ReportWire

Tag: Congress

  • Starmer calls on ex-Prince Andrew to testify before Congress after latest Epstein release

    [ad_1]

    NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

    U.K. Prime Minister Kier Starmer called on the former Prince Andrew to testify before Congress after the latest Epstein files release.

    The trove of documents includes photos of the former prince, now known as Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, kneeling over an unidentified woman. Two of the photos, released on Jan. 30, show Mountbatten-Windsor crouched on the ground with his hand resting on her stomach as he looked down at her. A third shows him on his knees with his hands resting on either side of her body as he looks at the camera.

    Starmer confirmed his support for Mountbatten-Windsor to testify in the U.S. in comments to reporters on Saturday.

    “In terms of testifying, I have always said anybody who has got information should be prepared to share that information,” Starmer said.

    ANDREW’S ALLEGED EMAILS TO GHISLAINE MAXWELL IN JEFFREY EPSTEIN FILES REQUESTED ‘INAPPROPRIATE FRIENDS’

    Prince Andrew was officially stripped of his royal titles and honors by King Charles III on Oct. 30, 2025. (Steve Parsons – WPA Pool/Getty Images)

    “You can’t be victim-centered if you’re not prepared to do that,” he continued. “Epstein’s victims have to be the first priority.”

    Mountbatten-Windsor announced in mid-October he was giving up his royal titles, and the palace announced later that month that King Charles “initiated a formal process to remove the Style, Titles and Honours of Prince Andrew.”

    Democrats on the House Oversight Committee released the newest photos last week. They previously called on Mountbatten-Windsor to testify in November, when his titles were removed.

    NEW GHISLAINE MAXWELL MUGSHOT INCLUDED IN DOJ’S LATEST EPSTEIN FILES RELEASE

    Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor was featured in three new photos from the recent Epstein files drop.

    Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor was featured in three new photos from the recent Epstein files drop. (Department of Justice)

    In another drop of photos, released on Dec. 19, Mountbatten-Windsor can be seen lying down on the laps of five people, whose faces have all been blacked out, while Maxwell and a sixth unknown person with their faces blacked out stand behind them.

    While none of the photographs showed Mountbatten-Windsor with Epstein, People magazine reported at the time that the evidence also included a screenshot of an email Epstein sent in March 2011 to someone listed as “The Duke,” believed to be Andrew, who was then the Duke of York.

    Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor knelt over an unidentified woman while resting his hand on her stomach.

    Andrew knelt over an unidentified woman while resting his hand on her stomach. (Department of Justice)

    Aside from his relationship with Epstein, Andrew was also accused of sexual assault by Epstein accuser Virginia Giuffre. Giuffre filed a lawsuit against Andrew, claiming she was forced to have sex with him three times, including when she was 17 years old.

    CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

    The case was settled out of court in 2022 without Andrew acknowledging any wrongdoing.

    Fox News’ Lori A Bashian contributed to this report.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Man tackled to ground after spraying unknown substance at Rep. Ilhan Omar

    [ad_1]

    A man sprayed an unknown substance on Democratic U.S. Rep. Ilhan Omar and was tackled to the ground Tuesday during a town hall she was hosting in Minneapolis, where tensions over federal immigration enforcement have come to a head after agents fatally shot an intensive care nurse and a mother of three this month.

    The audience cheered as the man was pinned down and his arms were tied behind his back. In video of the incident, someone in the crowd can be heard saying, “Oh my god, he sprayed something on her.”

    Just before that Omar had called for the abolishment of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and for Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem to resign or face impeachment. Calls are mounting on Capitol Hill for Noem to step down after the shooting deaths in Minneapolis of two people who protested deportations. Few Republicans have risen to her defense.

    “ICE cannot be reformed,” Omar said, seconds before the attack.

    Minneapolis police said officers saw the man use a syringe to spray an unknown liquid at Omar. They immediately arrested him and booked him at the county jail for third-degree assault, spokesperson Trevor Folke said. Forensic scientists responded to the scene.

    Police identified the man as 55-year-old Anthony Kazmierczak. It was not immediately clear if Kazmierczak had an attorney. The county public defenders’ office could not immediately be reached.

    Anthony James Kazmierczak (Hennepin County Jail )

    Omar continued the town hall for about 25 more minutes after the man was ushered out by security, saying she would not be intimidated.

    There was a strong, vinegarlike smell after the man pushed on the syringe, according to an Associated Press journalist who was there. Photos of the device, which fell to the ground when he was tackled, showed what appeared to be a light-brown liquid inside. There was no immediate word from officials on what it was.

    Minneapolis Council Member LaTrisha Vetaw said some of the substance came into contact with her and State Sen. Bobby Joe Champion as well. She called it a deeply unsettling experience.

    No one in the crowd of about 100 people had a noticeable physical reaction to the substance.

    ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA - JANUARY 27: The syringe an individual used in an attempted attack on Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN) during a town hall meeting at the Urban League Twin Cities facility is seen on January 27, 2026 in Minneapolis, Minnesota. A person holding a syringe charged Omar's podium while she spoke to community members. Protests and demonstrations continue around Minneapolis in the aftermath of the killings of Alex Pretti and Renee Nicole Good by federal law enforcement.  (Photo by Brandon Bell/Getty Images)

    The syringe an individual used to spray an unknown substance at Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN) during a town hall meeting at the Urban League Twin Cities facility on Jan. 27, 2026, in Minneapolis, Minnesota. (Photo by Brandon Bell/Getty Images)

    Omar says she is OK and ‘a survivor’

    Walking out afterward, Omar said she felt a little flustered but was not hurt. She was going to be screened by a medical team.

    She later posted on the social platform X: “I’m ok. I’m a survivor so this small agitator isn’t going to intimidate me from doing my work. I don’t let bullies win. Grateful to my incredible constituents who rallied behind me. Minnesota strong.”

    The White House did not immediately respond to a message seeking comment Tuesday night.

    President Donald Trump has frequently criticized the congresswoman and has stepped up verbal attacks on her in recent months as he turned his focus on Minneapolis.

    During a Cabinet meeting in December, he called her “garbage” and added that “her friends are garbage.”

    Hours earlier on Tuesday, the president criticized Omar as he spoke to a crowd in Iowa, saying his administration would only let in immigrants who “can show that they love our country.”

    “They have to be proud, not like Ilhan Omar,” he said, drawing loud boos at the mention of her name.

    He added: “She comes from a country that’s a disaster. So probably, it’s considered, I think — it’s not even a country.”

    Omar is a U.S. citizen who fled her birthplace, Somalia, with her family at age 8 as a civil war tore apart the country.

    The Minneapolis-St. Paul area is home to about 84,000 people of Somali descent — nearly a third of Somalis living in the U.S.

    Officials condemn the attack

    Democratic Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz expressed gratitude that Omar was safe, adding in a post on X: “Our state has been shattered by political violence in the last year. The cruel, inflammatory, dehumanizing rhetoric by our nation’s leaders needs to stop immediately.”

    U.S. Rep. Nancy Mace, a South Carolina Republican, also denounced the assault.

    “I am deeply disturbed to learn that Rep. Ilhan Omar was attacked at a town hall today” Mace said via X. “Regardless of how vehemently I disagree with her rhetoric — and I do — no elected official should face physical attacks. This is not who we are.”

    Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey, a Democrat, called the attack “unacceptable.” He said he was relieved that Omar “is OK” and thanked police for their quick response, concluding: “This kind of behavior will not be tolerated in our city.”

    The city has been reeling from the fatal shootings of two residents by federal immigration agents this month during Trump’s massive immigration enforcement surge. Intensive care unit nurse Alex Pretti was killed Saturday, less than three weeks after Renee Good was fatally shot behind the wheel of her vehicle.

    Lawmakers face rising threats

    The attack came days after a man was arrested in Utah for allegedly punching U.S. Rep. Maxwell Frost, a Democrat from Florida, in the face during the Sundance Film Festival and saying Trump was going to deport him.

    Threats against members of Congress have increased in recent years, peaking in 2021 and the aftermath of that year’s Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol, before dipping slightly only to climb again, according to the most recent figures from the U.S. Capitol Police.

    Lawmakers have discussed the chill the threats bring on their ability to hold town halls and public events, with some even citing the threat environment in their decisions not to seek reelection.

    Omar has faced the most particular concern, long targeted with harsh language and personal attacks by Trump and other Republicans.

    Following the assault on Omar, U.S. Capitol Police said in a statement that the agency was “working with our federal partners to see this man faces the most serious charges possible to deter this kind of violence in our society.”

    It also released updated numbers detailing threats to members of Congress: 14,938 “concerning statements, behaviors, and communications directed against lawmakers, their families, staff and the Capitol Complex.”

    That is a sharp increase from 2024, when the number of cases was 9,474, according to USCP. It is the third year in a row that the number of threats has increased.

    Capitol Police have beefed up security measures across all fronts since the attack on the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, and the department has seen increased reporting after a new center was launched two years ago to receive and process reports of threats.


    Schoenbaum reported from Salt Lake City. Associated Press writers Audrey McAvoy in Honolulu, Mike Balsamo, Lisa Mascaro and Michelle Price in Washington, and Farnoush Amiri in New York contributed.

    [ad_2]

    Laura Bargfeld and Hannah Schoenbaum | The Associated Press

    Source link

  • Latest deadly shooting by federal agents pushes government closer to shutdown as Trump claims Minnesota officials are ‘inciting insurrection’ | Fortune

    [ad_1]

    Another deadly shooting in Minnesota at the hands of federal agents carrying out President Donald Trump’s immigration crackdown heaped pressure on Senate Democrats to shut down the federal government again.

    Meanwhile, Trump appeared to inch closer to deploying active-duty troops to the state after accusing local officials of “inciting insurrection.”

    A series of appropriations bills passed the House of Representatives earlier in the week, including one to fund the Department of Homeland Security, which includes agencies like Immigration and Customs Enforcement and the Border Patrol.

    The Senate must pass those bills in a so-called minibus or else the government will run out of funding on Friday. That’s after lawmakers agreed to end the previous shutdown in November with short-term funding.

    The shooting death of Renee Good by an ICE agent in Minneapolis earlier this month had already prompted Democrats to seek reforms from DHS in exchange for votes on funding.

    Another non-fatal shooting by immigration officers followed, but the latest death on Saturday stirred fresh demands from House Democrats that counterparts in the Senate must reject DHS funding.

    Senate Dems should block ICE funding this week. Activate the National Guard. We can and must stop this,” Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez said on social media.

    So far, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer as well as Minnesota’s two Democratic senators have called on ICE to get out of the state without saying anything about the appropriations bill.

    But Sen. Chris Murphy, the ranking Democrat on the subcommittee that oversees the DHS budget, reiterated his earlier push to linking reforms and funding.

    “1. ICE must leave Minneapolis. 2. Congress should not fund this version of ICE – that is seeking confirmation, chaos and dystopia,” he posted.

    Murphy added later: “The Senate should not vote to keep funding this rampage. We are not powerless. We do not need to accept this.”

    Other Democrats, including senators Elizabeth Warren, Mark Warner, Brian Schatz, Mark Kelly, Catherine Cortez Masto, and Jacky Rosen have also signaled they will block DHS funding.

    The shooting also followed days of reports about immigration officers in Minnesota detaining young children, arresting U.S. citizens, and forcibly entering homes without judicial warrants.

    But on Saturday, Trump blamed Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz and Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey for demanding that immigration agents leave the city.

    “The Mayor and the Governor are inciting Insurrection, with their pompous, dangerous, and arrogant rhetoric!” he wrote.

    That suggests Trump may invoke the Insurrection Act to deploy the military to Minnesota. Last week, two infantry battalions of the Army’s 11th Airborne Division, which is based in Alaska and specializes in arctic operations, were given prepare-to-deploy orders.

    If he does that, the political fight over his immigration policies would likely escalate from a budgetary standoff to a constitutional battle.

    Earlier this month, Trump said he would invoke the 1807 law “if the corrupt politicians of Minnesota don’t obey the law and stop the professional agitators and insurrectionists from attacking the Patriots of I.C.E., who are only trying to do their job.”

    A day later, he told reporters there wasn’t a reason to use it “right now,” but added “If I needed it, I’d use it.”

    [ad_2]

    Jason Ma

    Source link

  • Does keeping the US Capitol clear of snow for Congress add pressure? – WTOP News

    [ad_1]

    The Senate is scheduled to return into session Monday and lawmakers won’t have much time to act on final legislation to avoid a partial government shutdown Jan. 30.

    For all the latest developments in Congress, follow WTOP Capitol Hill correspondent Mitchell Miller at Today on the Hill.

    Crews across the D.C. region are working around the clock to prepare for the snow, and that includes a busy team at the U.S. Capitol.

    The Senate is scheduled to return into session Monday and lawmakers won’t have much time to act on final legislation to avoid a partial government shutdown Jan. 30.

    “We have 80 people that have been working for days — for the past week — on making sure that we’re prepared for this,” said Jim Kaufmann, executive director for the U.S Capitol Grounds and Arboretum at the Architect of the Capitol.

    He has what one employee calls an “arsenal” of equipment to clear snow around the Capitol.
    That includes some 50 pieces of equipment, with trucks that can quickly be converted with plows for snow removal.

    A single truck can have five different attachments, including a salt spreader. But Kaufmann said his biggest resources are the employees who are gearing up for a winter weather marathon.

    “They’re dedicated,” he said. “And they’re making great sacrifices. They’re prepared to be camping out here from Saturday night until Monday or Tuesday.”

    Sensors provide real-time weather conditions

    In addition to heavy equipment and crew, Kaufmann’s team utilizes the latest technology to help determine how to deploy resources.

    “We gather information from weather stations that are throughout the Capitol campus, and they’re feeding in live weather data,” he said.

    While driving in a pickup truck near the Capitol, Kaufmann pointed to a screen on a mounted phone that showed a wide range of conditions, including the temperature of the road.

    His team uses MARWIS — Mobile Advanced Road Weather Information Sensor — technology that’s also used to monitor airport runways.

    As a truck moves around the campus, all kinds of weather-related data can be monitored live.

    “And then, of course, we have all the commercial and news outlets, including WTOP,” he said. “When I’m in the truck, I’m listening live on the weather, what’s coming down.”

    Kauffman said as the snow piles up, his staff will be checking on priority routes and D.C.’s evacuation routes, making sure they stay on top of everything.

    Does keeping it clear for Congress add pressure?

    “We have to make sure that a snowstorm doesn’t stop Congress,” Kaufmann said.

    Even though lawmakers aren’t in session this weekend, senators will be struggling with weather-related travel challenges to get back to D.C. this coming week.

    The Capitol grounds will need to be clear for them and their staff. But Kaufmann said the added pressure comes with the job.

    He said one year, a presidential motorcade was on the East Plaza and there were 6 inches of snow.

    “The hills were getting covered fast, and that’s our main priority, making sure that we can get a presidential motorcade in and out safely,” he said.

    The area on the East Side of the Capitol can be tricky, he said, since it has a different surface than roads and can quickly get covered in ice.

    “There’s always a bit of pressure, but the saving grace is our team, and that takes the pressure away,” he said. “I can meet with our senior leadership and give them the information they need to make key decisions, and they’re 100% confident in our team to get the job done.”

    Get breaking news and daily headlines delivered to your email inbox by signing up here.

    © 2026 WTOP. All Rights Reserved. This website is not intended for users located within the European Economic Area.

    [ad_2]

    Mitchell Miller

    Source link

  • House committee votes to hold Bill and Hillary Clinton in contempt of Congress | Fortune

    [ad_1]

    A House committee advanced resolutions Wednesday to hold former President Bill Clinton and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton in contempt of Congress over the Jeffrey Epstein investigation, opening the prospect of the House using one of its most powerful punishments against a former president for the first time.

    In bipartisan votes, the Republican-controlled House Oversight Committee approved the contempt of Congress charges, setting up potential votes in the House early next month. In a rare departure from party lines, some Democrats supported the contempt measures against the Clintons, with several progressive lawmakers emphasizing the need for full transparency in the Epstein investigation.

    The votes were the latest turn in the Epstein saga as Congress investigates how the late financier was able to sexually abuse dozens of teenage girls for years.

    “No witness, not a former president or a private citizen, may willfully defy a congressional subpoena without consequence. But that is what the Clintons did and that is why we are here,” Rep. James Comer, the chairman, said at the session on Wednesday.

    The repercussions of contempt charges loomed large, given the possibility of a substantial fine and even incarceration. Still, there were signs of a potential thaw as the Clintons appeared to be searching for an off-ramp to testify. In addition, passage of contempt charges through the full House was far from guaranteed, requiring a majority vote — something Republicans increasingly struggle to achieve.

    The Clintons have said they had nothing to do with Epstein for decades and are seeking a resolution to the dispute. This week, they offered to have the committee leadership and staff interview Bill Clinton in New York.

    Comer rejected that offer Tuesday, insisting that any interview also have an official transcript.

    What do lawmakers want to know from the Clintons?

    The push in Washington for a reckoning over Epstein has shown details of the connections between the wealthy financier and both Bill Clinton and Trump, among many other high-powered men. Epstein killed himself in 2019 in a New York jail cell while awaiting trial.

    Bill Clinton, President Donald Trump and many others connected to Epstein have not been accused of wrongdoing. Yet lawmakers are wrestling over who receives the most scrutiny.

    A spokesman for the Clintons, Angel Ureña, said on social media that the Clintons are trying to help the Epstein investigation but that “both Clintons have been out of office for over a decade. Neither had anything to do with him for more than 20 years.”

    Behind the scenes, longtime Clinton lawyer David Kendall has tried to negotiate an agreement with Comer for months. Kendall raised the prospect of having the Clintons testify on Christmas and Christmas Eve, according to the committee’s account of the negotiations.

    The Clintons, who contend the subpoenas are invalid because they do not serve any legislative purpose, have also offered the committee written declarations about their interactions with Epstein.

    How Democrats are approaching the issue

    Democrats have largely been focused on advancing the investigation into Epstein rather than mounting a defense of the Clintons, who led their party for decades. They agreed that Bill Clinton should inform the committee if he has any pertinent information about Epstein’s abuses.

    A wealthy financier, Epstein donated to Bill Clinton’s 1992 presidential campaign and Hillary Clinton’s joint fundraising committee ahead of her 2000 Senate campaign in New York.

    “No president or former president is above the law,” the top Democrat on the House Oversight Committee, Rep. Robert Garcia, said at the hearing.

    On Wednesday, Democrats tried to advance several changes to the contempt of Congress charges. Several argued that Hillary Clinton should be exempted because she has said she had very little personal interaction with Epstein. Democratic lawmakers also tried to downgrade the contempt of Congress resolution to a civil rather than criminal offense.

    Democrats spent the hearing criticizing Comer for focusing on the Clintons when the Justice Department is running a month late on a congressionally-mandated deadline to publicly release its case files on Epstein. Comer has also allowed several former attorneys general to provide the committee with written statements attesting to their limited knowledge of the case.

    The committee had also subpoenaed Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein’s longtime confidant, who is serving a lengthy prison sentence for a conviction on sex trafficking charges. But Comer declined to press for the interview after Maxwell’s attorney indicated she would invoke Fifth Amendment rights in any deposition.

    “It’s interesting that it’s this subpoena only that Republicans and the chairman have been obsessed about putting all their energy behind,” Garcia said.

    Comer said the committee will interview Maxwell next month. Attorney General Pam Bondi will also appear before the House Judiciary Committee in February.

    In the end, nine Democrats voted with all Republicans on the committee to advance contempt against Bill Clinton, and three Democrats — Reps. Summer Lee of Pennsylvania, Melanie Stansbury of New Mexico and Rashida Tlaib of Michigan — joined in the vote to advance the contempt resolution for Hillary Clinton.

    Democrats embraced the call for full transparency on Epstein after Trump’s return to the White House, particularly after Bondi stumbled on her promise to release the entirety of the unredacted Epstein files to the public. The backlash scrambled traditional ideological lines, leading Republicans to side with Democrats demanding further investigation.

    The pressure eventually resulted in a bipartisan subpoena from the committee that ordered the Justice Department and Epstein’s estate to release files related to Epstein. Republicans quickly moved to include the Clintons in the subpoena.

    Comer has indicated that he will insist that the subpoena be fulfilled by nothing less than a transcribed deposition of Bill Clinton.

    “They’re going to have two weeks until this bill is on the floor,” he said Wednesday

    How contempt proceedings have been used

    Contempt of Congress proceedings are rare, used historically as a last resort when lawmakers are trying to force testimony for high-profile investigations, such as the infamous inquiry during the 1940s into alleged Communist sympathizers in Hollywood or the impeachment proceedings of President Richard Nixon.

    Most recently, Trump’s advisers Peter Navarro and Steve Bannon were convicted of contempt charges for defying subpoenas from a House panel investigating the Jan. 6, 2021, riot by a mob of the Republican president’s supporters at the Capitol. Both Navarro and Bannon spent months in prison.

    The Jan. 6 committee also subpoenaed Trump in its inquiry. Trump’s lawyers resisted the subpoena, citing decades of legal precedent they said shielded ex-presidents from being ordered to appear before Congress. The committee ultimately withdrew its subpoena.

    No former president has ever been successfully forced to appear before Congress, although some have voluntarily appeared.

    But some Republicans said they should face the same consequences for refusing to testify as Bannon and Navarro.

    Rep. Andy Biggs, an Arizona Republican, said on social media that if the Clintons “aren’t perp walked, we will have failed the American people.”

    [ad_2]

    Stephen Groves, Matt Brown, The Associated Press

    Source link

  • State GOP seeks Supreme Court injunction to block California’s new, voter-approved congressional districts

    [ad_1]

    The state Republican Party on Tuesday filed an emergency application asking the U.S. Supreme Court to issue an injunction to stop the congressional districts California voters approved last year from going into effect.

    Arguing that the districts created by Proposition 50 violate federal law because the race of voters was considered when they were configured, the filing urges the court to act by Feb. 9 because of ensuing deadlines for candidates to file to run for office.

    “Our emergency application asks the Supreme Court to put the brakes on Prop. 50 now, before the Democrats try to run out the clock and force candidates and voters to live with unconstitutional congressional districts,” state GOP Chairwoman Corrin Rankin said in a statement. “Californians deserve fair districts and clean elections, not a backroom redraw that picks winners and losers based on race.”

    A spokesperson for Gov. Gavin Newsom, who led the rare middecade redistricting effort and is one of the respondents in the lawsuit, did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

    The redrawing of congressional districts typically occurs once a decade, after the U.S. census, to account for population shifts. In California, the boundaries are drawn by a voter-approved independent commission to stop partisan gerrymandering and incumbent protection.

    After President Trump urged leaders in Texas and other GOP-led states to redraw their delegation’s districts to boost the number of Republicans elected to Congress in the November midterm election, Newsom and other Democratic leaders responded by crafting a plan to increase the number of their party’s members in the California delegation to the U.S. House of Representatives. Republicans currently have a razor-thin majority, and the party that controls Congress after the November election will determine whether Trump is able to continue enacting his agenda during his final two years in office.

    California voters handily passed Proposition 50, one of the most expensive ballot measure campaigns in state history. The state GOP and others immediately challenged the new districts, but earlier this month, two members of a three-judge federal panel rejected their claim that the district boundaries were drawn to illegally favor Latino voters.

    [ad_2]

    Seema Mehta

    Source link

  • Congressman Ami Bera says Republicans privately concerned about President Trump

    [ad_1]

    As Congress returns from recess this week, Sacramento Congressman Ami Bera says Republican lawmakers have privately expressed growing concern over President Donald Trump’s recent decisions.“I think they are very worried about what they’re seeing coming out of the President,” Bera said. “Even the actions with Venezuela — they weren’t consulted about any of this.”Bera, a Democrat who serves on the House Foreign Affairs and Intelligence Committees, returned Sunday from South America, where he met with Peru’s foreign minister. He said it was too dangerous for him to travel to Venezuela, describing the country as fragile following U.S. military action that led to the capture of President Nicolás Maduro.“They’re happy Maduro is gone,” Bera said of Peruvian officials. “They want to see a stable Venezuela, but they’re cautious because you still have the Maduro regime in place, and a lot could go wrong.”He added that while Peru welcomes Maduro’s removal, leaders there are concerned that ongoing instability could lead to increased migration into neighboring countries.Back in Washington, Congress faces a potential government shutdown at the end of the month. Bera said lawmakers must address unresolved issues, including healthcare subsidies and immigration policy, after the action in Minneapolis. He also pointed to President Trump’s recent remarks about taking control of Greenland, which Trump has said is necessary for national security.“President Trump is not listening to anyone,” Bera said. “Now he’s talking about invading Greenland, and our closest allies in Europe are pissed off with us. He’s alienating everyone. I hope when I get back there tomorrow, Republicans will say enough is enough — let’s go around the president and get some of this stuff done.”Despite the challenges, Bera said he remains optimistic that a shutdown can be avoided.“I do not think the government will shut down because we saw how it hurt Americans,” he said. “We should negotiate. There’s going to be give and take. As Democrats, we’re not going to get everything we want. That’s how we’ve passed the appropriations bills so far, and I hope we get it done this week.”Bera also highlighted bipartisan support for extending health care subsidies, noting that 17 Republicans joined Democrats to back the measure, despite opposition from President Trump.See more coverage of top California stories here | Download our app | Subscribe to our morning newsletter | Find us on YouTube here and subscribe to our channel

    As Congress returns from recess this week, Sacramento Congressman Ami Bera says Republican lawmakers have privately expressed growing concern over President Donald Trump’s recent decisions.

    “I think they are very worried about what they’re seeing coming out of the President,” Bera said. “Even the actions with Venezuela — they weren’t consulted about any of this.”

    Bera, a Democrat who serves on the House Foreign Affairs and Intelligence Committees, returned Sunday from South America, where he met with Peru’s foreign minister. He said it was too dangerous for him to travel to Venezuela, describing the country as fragile following U.S. military action that led to the capture of President Nicolás Maduro.

    “They’re happy Maduro is gone,” Bera said of Peruvian officials. “They want to see a stable Venezuela, but they’re cautious because you still have the Maduro regime in place, and a lot could go wrong.”

    He added that while Peru welcomes Maduro’s removal, leaders there are concerned that ongoing instability could lead to increased migration into neighboring countries.

    Back in Washington, Congress faces a potential government shutdown at the end of the month. Bera said lawmakers must address unresolved issues, including healthcare subsidies and immigration policy, after the action in Minneapolis. He also pointed to President Trump’s recent remarks about taking control of Greenland, which Trump has said is necessary for national security.

    “President Trump is not listening to anyone,” Bera said. “Now he’s talking about invading Greenland, and our closest allies in Europe are pissed off with us. He’s alienating everyone. I hope when I get back there tomorrow, Republicans will say enough is enough — let’s go around the president and get some of this stuff done.”

    Despite the challenges, Bera said he remains optimistic that a shutdown can be avoided.

    “I do not think the government will shut down because we saw how it hurt Americans,” he said. “We should negotiate. There’s going to be give and take. As Democrats, we’re not going to get everything we want. That’s how we’ve passed the appropriations bills so far, and I hope we get it done this week.”

    Bera also highlighted bipartisan support for extending health care subsidies, noting that 17 Republicans joined Democrats to back the measure, despite opposition from President Trump.

    See more coverage of top California stories here | Download our app | Subscribe to our morning newsletter | Find us on YouTube here and subscribe to our channel

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Epstein files fight in court heats up as congressmen accuse DOJ of ‘serious misconduct’ | Fortune

    [ad_1]

    Manhattan’s top federal prosecutor said Friday that a judge lacks the authority to appoint a neutral expert to oversee the public release of documents in the sex trafficking probe of financier Jeffrey Epstein and British socialite Ghislaine Maxwell.

    Judge Paul A. Engelmayer was told in a letter signed by U.S. Attorney Jay Clayton that he must reject a request this week by the congressional cosponsors of the Epstein Files Transparency Act to appoint a neutral expert.

    U.S. Rep. Ro Khanna, a California Democrat, and Rep. Thomas Massie, a Kentucky Republican, say they have “urgent and grave concerns” about the slow release of only a small number of millions of documents that began last month.

    In a filing to the judge they said they believed “criminal violations have taken place” in the release process.

    Clayton, though, said Khanna and Massie do not have standing with the court that would allow them to seek the “extraordinary” relief of the appointment of a special master and independent monitor.

    Engelmayer “lacks the authority” to grant such a request, he said, particularly because the congressional representatives who made the request are not parties to the criminal case that led to Maxwell’s December 2021 sex trafficking conviction and subsequent 20-year prison sentence for recruiting girls and women for Epstein to abuse and aiding the abuse.

    Khanna said Clayton’s response “misconstrued” the intent of their request.

    “We are informing the Court of serious misconduct by the Department of Justice that requires a remedy, one we believe this Court has the authority to provide, and which victims themselves have requested,” Khanna said in a statement.

    “Our purpose is to ensure that DOJ complies with its representations to the Court and with its legal obligations under our law,” he added.

    Epstein died in a federal jail in New York City in August 2019 as he awaited trial on sex trafficking charges. The death was ruled a suicide.

    The Justice Department expects to update the court “again shortly” regarding its progress in turning over documents from the Epstein and Maxwell investigative files, Clayton said in the letter.

    The Justice Department has said the files’ release was slowed by redactions required to protect the identities of abuse victims.

    In their letter, Khanna and Massie wrote that the Department of Justice’s release of only 12,000 documents out of more than 2 million documents being reviewed was a “flagrant violation” of the law’s release requirements and had caused “ serious trauma to survivors.”

    “Put simply, the DOJ cannot be trusted with making mandatory disclosures under the Act,” the congressmen said as they asked for the appointment of an independent monitor to ensure all documents and electronically stored information are immediately made public.

    They also recommended that a court-appointed monitor be given authority to prepare reports about the true nature and extent of the document production and whether improper redactions or conduct have taken place.

    [ad_2]

    Michael R. Sisak, Larry Neumeister, The Associated Press

    Source link

  • What The Polymarket Says About Cannabis Rescheduling And More

    [ad_1]

    Markets reveal expectations on weed policy, Greenland, Bond, and beyond in what the polymarket says about cannabis rescheduling and more.

    Prediction markets have quietly become one of the most closely watched indicators of public expectations, and few platforms illustrate this better than Polymarket. Built on blockchain technology, Polymarket allows users to wager on real-world outcomes ranging from elections and public policy to pop culture and geopolitics. The resulting prices act as a constantly updating forecast, reflecting how traders collectively assess the likelihood of major events. Here is what the polymarket says about cannabis rescheduling and more.

    RELATED: Why Is Yawning Contagious

    One of the most closely followed policy questions on the platform has been whether the United States will reschedule cannabis under federal law. Markets asking whether marijuana would be moved out of Schedule I during 2025 collapsed to near zero by year’s end. Even contracts extending into early 2026 show limited optimism, with implied probabilities remaining in the single digits. Despite growing bipartisan rhetoric and widespread state-level legalization, traders appear unconvinced federal agencies will act quickly. The market suggests skepticism administrative or political hurdles will be resolved in the near term.

    Another surprising area of activity involves Greenland. Polymarket users have actively traded contracts speculating on whether the United States will acquire Greenland before the end of the decade. While the odds remain well below 50 percent, they have at times climbed into the low-to-mid teens, driven by renewed media attention on Arctic security, rare-earth minerals, and strategic shipping routes. The presence of meaningful trading volume indicates many participants see Greenland as more than a fringe geopolitical thought experiment.

    Beyond policy and geopolitics, Polymarket has become a venue for cultural forecasting. One of its most popular entertainment markets centers on who will be cast as the next James Bond. Following the conclusion of Daniel Craig’s run as 007, traders have assigned varying odds to a shortlist of actors rumored to be under consideration. While no single candidate commands overwhelming confidence, the market fluctuates rapidly with casting rumors, studio comments, and betting activity tied to press speculation surrounding the James Bond franchise and its future direction.

    Financial markets are also a major focus. Bitcoin price targets routinely attract large pools of liquidity, with traders betting on whether the cryptocurrency will reach specific milestones by set dates. These markets often respond instantly to macroeconomic news, regulatory announcements, and shifts in institutional sentiment. Observers note that Polymarket’s Bitcoin odds frequently move faster than traditional analyst forecasts, offering a real-time snapshot of market psychology.

    RELATED: The Rebel Heart Of The South Includes Cannabis And Rock

    Taken together, these bets highlight how Polymarket has evolved into a broader forecasting tool rather than a novelty platform. Unlike opinion polls or expert panels, prediction markets force participants to quantify their beliefs with capital at risk. While they are not guarantees of future outcomes, they provide a useful signal of how informed traders interpret available information.

    From cannabis reform and Arctic geopolitics to the future of James Bond and cryptocurrency prices, Polymarket’s odds offer a revealing glimpse into what people truly think will happen next — not just what they say publicly, but what they are willing to bet on.

    [ad_2]

    Anthony Washington

    Source link

  • Congress Rides To The Rescue Of Your Favorite Hemp Drink

    [ad_1]

    Congress rides to the rescue of your favorite hemp drink, delaying bans, sparking debates, and keeping America’s buzzy beverages flowing.

    For a brief, buzzy moment, it looked like America’s favorite chill-in-a-can was about to get iced out by Washington. But it now seems Congress rides to the rescue of your favorite hemp drink.

    Tucked deep inside the sprawling, ironically nicknamed “big beautiful bill,” Congress quietly slammed the brakes on hemp-derived drinks. The low-dose THC seltzers and mocktail alternatives have exploded in popularity from Austin patios to suburban dinner parties. With a few lines of legislative fine print, lawmakers effectively banned products derived from federally legal hemp, sending shockwaves through the beverage industry and confusing consumers who had no idea their sparkling lemon-lime was suddenly controversial.

    RELATED: The Best Cocktails For Holiday Day Drinking

    And yet, just as quickly as the ban arrived, Congress appears to be backing off—at least for now.

    Hemp drinks didn’t become popular by accident. As Americans continue drifting away from alcohol, these beverages hit a cultural sweet spot: social, functional, low-dose, and hangover-free. They offer a gentle buzz without the baggage, making them especially appealing to health-conscious consumers, professionals, and anyone tired of next-day regrets.

    Nowhere has this trend been louder—or more ironic—than Texas. Despite the state’s famously strict cannabis laws, hemp-derived THC drinks have flourished thanks to federal loopholes allowing products made from legal hemp. From Houston to Dallas to Austin, these drinks line bar menus, brewery fridges, and convenience store shelves. Texans, it turns out, like their rebellion cold and carbonated.

    Photo by GeorgePeters/Getty Images

    So who pulled the plug? The opposition to hemp drinks largely comes from a coalition of alcohol interests, prohibition-minded lawmakers, and regulators uneasy about how quickly the category has grown. Their argument: hemp drinks exploit a loophole, blur regulatory lines, and lack oversight. Critics warn of inconsistent dosing, youth access, and a marketplace moving faster than the rules designed to govern it.

    Supporters counter that this “loophole” is simply the law as written—and that hemp drinks are often more transparent, responsibly dosed, and safer than alcohol.

    Now comes the unexpected plot twist.

    Facing backlash from small businesses, farmers, distributors, and consumers—not to mention states suddenly staring at enforcement chaos—Congress has opted to delay the ban. Rather than pulling hemp drinks off shelves overnight, lawmakers are pressing pause, buying time to reassess how (or whether) these products should be regulated.

    RELATED: Upgrade Your Gift Game and Avoid the Lame

    For fans of hemp drinks, this is a temporary stay of execution—and possibly a sign of something bigger.

    The delay doesn’t mean the issue is settled. It means Congress has recognized banning a fast-growing, wildly popular category without a clear alternative may create more problems than it solves. Regulation, not eradication, is now back on the table.

    For now, your favorite hemp drink survives—still fizzy, still legal, still very much part of America’s evolving relationship with alcohol alternatives. Whether Congress ultimately becomes the hero of this story or just buys time for another showdown remains to be seen.

    But one thing is clear: hemp drinks aren’t going quietly.

    And Congress just learned banning America’s buzz—especially in Texas—isn’t as easy as it sounds.

    [ad_2]

    Anthony Washington

    Source link

  • Contributor: A Senate war powers resolution on Venezuela actually could curb Trump

    [ad_1]

    President Trump seemed angry after the Senate voted last Thursday to pass a war powers resolution to the next stage, where lawmakers could approve the measure and seek to curb the president’s ability to wage war in Venezuela without congressional authorization.

    Trump said that day that five Republican senators who supported bringing the measure to a vote — Susan Collins (Maine), Lisa Murkowski (Alaska), Rand Paul (Ky.), Josh Hawley (Mo.) and Todd Young (Ind.) — “should never be elected to office again.”

    Why should he get so riled up about this, to the point where he could put his own party’s control of the Senate at risk in November? Even if this resolution were to pass both houses of Congress, he could veto it and ultimately be unrestrained. He did this in 2019, when a war powers resolution mandating that the U.S. military cease its participation in the war in Yemen was passed in both the Senate and the House. Many people think that such legislation therefore can’t make a difference.

    But the president’s ire is telling. These political moves on the Hill can get results even before the resolution has a final vote, or if it is vetoed by the president.

    The Trump administration made significant concessions before the 2019 resolution was approved by Congress, in an attempt to prevent it from passing. For instance, months before it was approved, the U.S. military stopped refueling Saudi warplanes in midair. These concessions de-escalated the war and saved tens of thousands of lives.

    A war powers resolution is an act of Congress that is based on a 1973 law of the same name. That law spells out and reinforces the power that our Constitution has allocated to Congress, to decide when the U.S. military can be involved in hostilities.

    The U.S. military raid in Caracas that seized Venezuela’s President Nicolás Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores, is illegal according to international law, the charters of the Organization of American States and the United Nations, as well as other treaties to which the United States is a signatory. According to our own Constitution, the government violates U.S. law when it violates treaties that our government has signed.

    None of that restrained the Trump administration, which has not demonstrated much respect for the rule of law. But the White House does care about the political power of Congress. If there is an expanded war in Venezuela or anywhere else that Trump has threatened to use the military, the fact that Congress took steps to oppose it will increase the political cost to the president.

    This is likely one of the main reasons that the Trump administration has at least promised to make concessions regarding military action in Latin America — and who knows, possibly he did make some compromises compared with what had been planned.

    On Nov. 5, the day before the Senate was to vote on a war powers resolution to halt and prevent hostilities within or against Venezuela by U.S. armed forces, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth and White House counsel had a private briefing with senators.

    They assured lawmakers that they were not going to have a land war or airstrikes in Venezuela. According to news reports, the White House counsel stated that they did not have a legal justification for such a war. It is clear that blocking the resolution was very important to these top officials. The day after that meeting, the war powers resolution was blocked by two votes. Two Republicans had joined the Democrats and independents in support of the resolution: Murkowski and Paul. That added up to 49 votes — not quite the needed majority.

    But on Thursday, there were three additional Republicans who voted for the new resolution, so it will proceed to a final vote.

    The war powers resolution is not just a political fight, but a matter of life and death. The blockade involved in the seizure of oil tankers is, according to experts, an unlawful use of military force. This means that the blockade would be included as a participation in hostilities that would require authorization from Congress.

    Since 2015, the United States has imposed unilateral economic sanctions that destroyed Venezuela’s economy. From 2012 to 2020, Venezuela suffered the worst peacetime depression in world history. Real (inflation-adjusted) GDP, or income, fell by 74%. Think of the economic destruction of the U.S. Great Depression, multiplied by three times. Most of this was the result of the sanctions.

    This unprecedented devastation is generally attributed to Maduro in public discussion. But U.S. sanctions deliberately cut Venezuela off from international finance, as well as blocking most of its oil sales, which accounted for more than 90% of foreign exchange (mostly dollar) earnings. This devastated the economy.

    In the first year of Trump sanctions from 2017-18, Venezuela’s deaths increased by tens of thousands of people, at a time when oil prices were increasing. Sanctions were expanded even more the following year. About a quarter of the population, more than 7 million people, emigrated after 2015 — 750,000 of them to the United States.

    We know that the deadly impact of sanctions that target the civilian population is real. Research published in July by the Lancet Global Health, by my colleagues Francisco Rodriguez, Silvio Rendon and myself, estimated the global death toll from unilateral economic sanctions, as these are, at 564,000 per year over the past decade. This is comparable to the worldwide deaths from armed conflict. A majority of the victims over the 1970-2021 period were children.

    The Trump administration has, in the last few days, been moving in the direction of lifting some sanctions to allow for oil exports, according to the president’s stated plan to “run Venezuela.” This is ironic because Venezuela has for many years wanted more investment and trade, including in oil, with the United States, and it was U.S. sanctions that prohibited it.

    Such lifting of sanctions would be a big step forward, in terms of saving lives of people who are deprived of food, medicine and other necessities in Venezuela, as a result of these sanctions and the economic destruction that they cause.

    But to create the stability that Venezuela needs to recover, we will have to take the military and economic violence out of this campaign. There are members of Congress moving toward that goal, and they need all the help that they can get, before it’s too late.

    Mark Weisbrot is co-director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research and author of “Failed: What the ‘Experts’ Got Wrong About the Global Economy.”

    [ad_2]

    Mark Weisbrot

    Source link

  • Elizabeth Warren says Trump called her after speech criticizing his record on costs

    [ad_1]

    NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

    Democratic Sen. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts said that President Donald Trump called her on Monday following a speech in which she sharply criticized his record on costs and governance. 

    “This morning, I gave a speech noting how Donald Trump is driving up costs for families, sowing terror and chaos in our communities, and abusing his power to prosecute anyone who criticizes him. I also laid out an argument for how Democrats should fight back and win,” Warren said in her statement.

    The left-wing lawmaker delivered a speech at a National Press Club event on Monday and then offered further remarks while responding to questions after the speech. 

    DEMOCRATS ‘DOOMED TO FAIL’ WITHOUT POPULIST ECONOMIC MESSAGE, WARREN WARNS

    Senator Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., holds a discussion at the National Press Building on Jan. 12, 2026 in Washington, D.C.  (Heather Diehl/Getty Images)

    “In my remarks, I made it clear that despite promising to lower costs On Day One, Trump has done nothing but raise costs for families,” she said in the statement

    She said Trump called her after her remarks at the event on Monday.

    “I told him that Congress can pass legislation to cap credit card rates if he will actually fight for it. I also urged him to get House Republicans to pass the bipartisan ROAD to Housing Act,” that “would build more housing and lower costs,” she said in the statement.

    Fox News Digital reached out to the White House for comment on Tuesday.

    “President Trump and Sen. Warren had a productive call about credit card interest rates and housing affordability for the American people,” a White House official noted.

    MAMDANI ADVISER, WARREN IN THE HOT SEAT AS COLLAPSE OF ROOMBA MAKER SHIFTS DATA TO CHINA

    In a post on Truth Social last week, President Trump called for capping credit card interest rates at 10% for one year.

    “Effective January 20, 2026, I, as President of the United States, am calling for a one year cap on Credit Card Interest Rates of 10%. Coincidentally, the January 20th date will coincide with the one year anniversary of the historic and very successful Trump Administration,” he declared in the post.

    ELIZABETH WARREN CALLS ON DEMOCRATS TO REJECT BILLIONAIRE DONORS AHEAD OF 2026 AND 2028 ELECTIONS

    CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

    During comments at the National Press Club event, Warren said the president has a “credibility problem,” saying he has not done “one damn thing to actually lower the cost of housing for the American people.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • House Democrats challenge new Homeland Security order limiting lawmaker visits to immigration facilities

    [ad_1]

    Twelve House Democrats who last year sued the Trump administration over a policy limiting congressional oversight of immigrant detention facilities returned to federal court Monday to challenge a second, new policy imposing further limits on such unannounced visits.

    In December, those members of Congress won their lawsuit challenging a Department of Homeland Security policy from June that required a week’s notice from lawmakers before an oversight visit. Now they’re accusing Homeland Security of having “secretly reimposed” the requirement last week.

    In a Jan. 8 memorandum, Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem wrote that “Facility visit requests must be made a minimum of seven (7) calendar days in advance. Any requests to shorten that time must be approved by me.”

    The lawmakers who challenged the policies are led by Rep. Joe Neguse (D-Colo.) and include five members from California: Reps. Robert Garcia (D-Long Beach), Lou Correa (D-Santa Ana), Jimmy Gomez (D-Los Angeles), Raul Ruiz (D-Indio) and Norma Torres (D-Pomona).

    Last summer, as immigration raids spread through Los Angeles and other parts of Southern California, many Democrats including those named in the lawsuit were denied entry to local detention facilities. Before then, unannounced inspections had been a common, long-standing practice under congressional oversight powers.

    “The duplicate notice policy is a transparent attempt by DHS to again subvert Congress’s will…and this Court’s stay of DHS’s oversight visit policy,” the plaintiffs wrote in a federal court motion Monday requesting an emergency hearing.

    On Saturday, three days after Renee Nicole Good was shot and killed by an Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent, three members of Congress from Minnesota attempted to conduct an oversight visit of an ICE facility near Minneapolis. They were denied access.

    Afterward, lawyers for Homeland Security notified the lawmakers and the court of the new policy, according to the court filing.

    In a joint statement, the plaintiffs wrote that “rather than complying with the law, the Department of Homeland Security is attempting to get around this order by re-imposing the same unlawful policy.”

    “This is unacceptable,” they said. “Oversight is a core responsibility of Members of Congress, and a constitutional duty we do not take lightly. It is not something the executive branch can turn on or off at will.”

    Congress has stipulated in yearly appropriations packages since 2020 that funds may not be used to prevent a member of Congress “from entering, for the purpose of conducting oversight, any facility operated by or for the Department of Homeland Security used to detain or otherwise house aliens.”

    That language formed the basis of the decision last month by U.S. District Court Judge Jia Cobb in Washington, who found that lawmakers cannot be denied entry for visits “unless and until” the government could show that no appropriations money was being used to operate detention facilities.

    In her policy memorandum, Noem wrote that funds from the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which supplied roughly $170 billion toward immigration and border enforcement, are not subject to the limitations of the yearly appropriations law.

    “ICE must ensure that this policy is implemented and enforced exclusively with money appropriated by OBBBA,” Noem said.

    Noem said the new policy is justified because unannounced visits pull ICE officers away from their normal duties. “Moreover, there is an increasing trend of replacing legitimate oversight activities with circus-like publicity stunts, all of which creates a chaotic environment with heightened emotions,” she wrote.

    The lawmakers, in the court filing, argued it’s clear that the new policy violates the law.

    “It is practically impossible that the development, promulgation, communication, and implementation of this policy has been, and will be, accomplished — as required — without using a single dollar of annually appropriated funds,” they wrote.

    [ad_2]

    Andrea Castillo

    Source link

  • ‘People do feel betrayed’: Trahan talks tumultuous 2025, hopes for 2026

    [ad_1]

    LOWELL — For U.S. Rep. Lori Trahan, 2025 went about as she expected with the return of the Trump administration, which she thinks has been much like the first term, but with things moving much faster than before.

    That expectation was set, she said, by documents like Project 2025, a 900-page document compiled by the Heritage Foundation outlining a blueprint for a dramatic shakeup of the U.S. government under the next conservative president, which ended up again being President Donald Trump.

    “I think we were all sort of ready for a different cadence in this term, but it certainly started before the inauguration. We had a bipartisan package of health care bills, of all this legislation on its way to passage at the end of the year,” Trahan told The Sun Tuesday.

    “Elon Musk basically in a tweet said ‘it’s way too complicated, legislation shouldn’t be this long,’ and he killed it.”

    Despite the tumultuousness that followed in the federal government for the rest of 2025, Trahan once again closed out the year with a report from her office on what she sees as her biggest accomplishments of the year, even within a Congress she said took on “irrelevance” rather quickly.

    Those highlights included the more than $200 million in federal funding for the long-awaited Rourke Bridge project in Lowell, her support for online privacy protections through the reintroduction of the DELETE Act and the fight to restore Affordable Care Act premiums that expired at the end of the year.

    On Tuesday, Trahan sat down with The Sun to talk about her hopes for 2026, the upcoming midterm elections and what ways Democrats can counter President Trump with a slim minority in Congress.

    Trahan remarked that she was shocked how quickly Congress was pushed to the side in 2025 as Trump issued a record number of executive orders, but expressed confidence Democrats can reassert that authority in the coming midterms in November.

    “I think people want a check and balance on this administration, especially after living through this year, (having) Republicans in charge has really just meant chaos, it has meant higher prices, no checks on tariff policy, no checks on changes to children’s vaccine schedules, no checks on a potential war with Venezuela,” said Trahan. “The president has bombed seven countries since he has been in office and he ran on ending forever-wars (and not) getting the United States involved in foreign wars. People are tired, they are exhausted. They are really trying to make ends meet, trying to establish a better life for their families and themselves, and they are facing higher prices everywhere.”

    Trahan noted her support for a war powers resolution which had yet to be taken up by the Senate and would prohibit the president from waging war in Venezuela. The bill has since been passed in the Senate 53-47, and has yet to be taken up in the House of Representatives. The Senate margin would not be enough to overcome a veto by Trump, which would require a two-thirds majority in both chambers.

    Given the challenges her party faces in getting legislation through without control of any branch of government, Trahan said her aims in 2026 are centered around things like the stabilization of our local health care system after the Nashoba Valley Medical Center closure in 2024.

    “No Plan B until the governor stepped in, working with UMass to come up with a path forward there, but there is anxiety in that region around not having a full community hospital operation,” said Trahan. “What the Big Beautiful Bill did … was really undermine and destabilize our entire hospital system. Without those Medicaid payments, we are absolutely going to see a loss of vital hospital services. We have already seen some of the less profitable services close … that is going to continue.”

    On top of that, Trahan said, the Affordable Care Act premiums expired on Jan. 1, and her office has heard from constituents whose health insurance premiums have since risen to as high as an extra $11,000 a year.

    “It is just incredible to see how beneficial those tax credits were for people, and how unaffordable it is without them,” said Trahan.

    “When you have young, healthy people … who say ‘this is unaffordable for me, I am going to roll the dice,’ one: something catastrophic can happen to them and they are not even going to be able to afford the ambulance bill, never mind what it will take to treat them in the hospital,” said Trahan. “But two: it increases everybody’s premiums because then the insurance pool is older and sicker, people who can’t not have insurance.”

    Trahan and the rest of the House Democrats got the support of nine Republicans to sign a discharge petition to force a vote on a clean three-year extension of the ACA tax credits. The subsequent vote passed the House 230-196 with 17 Republicans joining all Democrats to vote in favor. That bill faces a questionable future in the Senate as of Friday.

    Trahan currently does not have an opponent for this year’s midterm elections, which would be the second straight election she goes uncontested if that remains true. While Trahan could have little to worry about her own seat, Democrats are currently facing a historic popularity crisis according to a number of polls over the past year.

    “We have to reconcile a lot of polls. The institution that has the lowest approval rating is Congress, but there is a difference when you ask how people feel about their own congressperson,” said Trahan. “I have a lot of humility around the state of favorability for the Democrats.”

    Despite the polling challenge, after the off-year 2025 elections across the country showed promising signs for Democrats, the party has expressed confidence it will take back seats from what is currently a very narrow Republican majority. Trahan said that can happen by the Democrats “making the case for a check and balance on this administration.”

    “On any administration, but this administration in particular. Congress has to reassert their authority so the questions people have back home we are actually asking in the halls of Congress and committee rooms,” said Trahan.

    Points of contention for voters who subscribe to Trump’s “America First” messaging might be the military’s intervention in foreign countries, Trahan said, or things like the $40 billion bailout given to Argentina.

    “I think that is why you are seeing some disruption and questions in the Republican Party … My hope is that pressure people feel at home will start to come to Congress with them, and people will start surfacing those questions and having hearings, and forcing the president to not bypass Congress, but instead to work with us,” said Trahan.

    Despite the division, Trahan said she has still been able to find common ground with her Republican colleagues on certain issues. She pointed to two bills, the reauthorization of the Creating Hope for Kids Act  and there is the Accelerating Care for Kids Act, on which she has worked for four years with Republicans in the House and she feels confident will pass this year.

    Just a bit into 2026, and closing in on one year since a new administration and new session of Congress, Trahan said the midterms come down to how “people don’t feel like they are better off right now.”

    “People do feel betrayed … they thought [Trump] was going to make a concerted effort to bring their prices down. That is not happening. That is where Democrats know people expect the government to do something,” said Trahan.

    Trahan and all but one member of the House voted in November in favor of the Epstein Files Transparency Act, a bill to compel the Department of Justice to release all documents related to the investigation into deceased sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein and his clients. The DOJ had a Dec. 19 deadline to release the trove of documents, but those that were released by that time were heavily redacted, and the DOJ said there are millions more documents that needed to be processed for release.

    Trahan said with the DOJ missing deadlines compelled by the law, the House Judiciary and Oversight Committees are “spending a lion’s share of their time just watching the DOJ and making sure they are following the letter of the law.”

    “This was incredibly bipartisan, it was the result of victims coming to Washington and demanding that these files be released, which by the way, this president promised he would make transparent. It shouldn’t have even gotten to the point where that was forced upon his Department of Justice,” said Trahan.

    One of the biggest changes of 2025, which is poised to continue to be a flashpoint in 2026, has been the federal policies surround immigration and its enforcement. Trahan’s office has been tracking 15 cases within her district where immigration enforcement agents have arrested immigrants who in some cases had legal status.

    “We work with legal services … we work with [U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services] on where they are if they are in Burlington or if they have already gone to Maine, or in horrible cases to Louisiana or somewhere else,” said Trahan.

    Another way her office helps is by advising all immigrants facing these issues to sign a privacy consent release form.

    “It is just one of those things people would never know to ask for, but we can’t be helpful until that piece of paper has been signed, and there has been a lot of obstruction of a detainee getting that piece of paper, getting it signed and getting that communication to us, but once we have all that in place we can work on someone’s behalf in a myriad of ways,” said Trahan.

    Growing up, Trahan said, her family only wanted was to know “that if we worked hard we could get ahead.”

    “Right now that is not the reality,” said Trahan, calling health care and the high cost of living the biggest challenges facing Americans right now. “Families like the one I grew up in are really struggling … they are not seeing their government acknowledge they cannot afford health care coverage.”

    Seven years into her congressional tenure, Trahan said she still sees the job similarly to what she expected going into her first term, which she credits to her decade of experience as a congressional staffer.

    “I started in the second half of Trump’s first term. I am now going to serve, hopefully if I win my reelection, through another Trump term, and I think what has changed has been the abdication by the Republican majority’s authority to the president,” said Trahan. “In 2018 we were part of this blue wave that was part of the backlash of the first two years of President Trump being in office. I got to see a Congress that exerted its authority on a rogue presidency. I have also lived through this first year where we did not have that check and balance. That is really dangerous for our country.”

    [ad_2]

    Peter Currier

    Source link

  • Crowded primary expected in Maryland’s 5th District, as candidates aim to replace Hoyer – WTOP News

    [ad_1]

    Only hours after Maryland congressman Steny Hoyer announced he wasn’t running again, Democrats in Prince George’s County were being surveyed about who they might support to replace him.

    Only hours after Maryland Rep. Steny Hoyer announced he would not be running again, Democrats in Prince George’s County were being surveyed about who they might support to replace him.

    For months, there had been whispers that Hoyer was ready to give up his seat, and politicians in lower offices have been planning and organizing behind the scenes so they would be ready if it happened.

    The Board of Elections already shows a handful of Democrats and Republicans who have filed, and while some of them are former federal employees, none of them have a lot of experience in the local elected landscape. That will change between now and Feb. 24, the deadline to run.

    “I think it is likely that you wind up with someone more progressive than Hoyer, and because this is not a particularly competitive district, it’s not like voters will be thinking strategically,” St. Mary’s College political science professor Todd Eberly said.

    “‘Who can we find that might appeal to independents or maybe some moderate Republicans?’ This is a safe Democratic seat, which means they don’t have to worry so much, the way that you might have to in a more competitive district,” Eberly added.

    The 5th District includes all of Southern Maryland, southern Prince George’s and Anne Arundel counties, and parts of central Prince George’s and western Anne Arundel counties.

    “Just because of numbers, the politics of Prince George’s County and Charles County are more likely to have an influence on who ultimately wins the Democratic nomination and claims the seat,” Eberly said.

    While some of those areas are represented by conservative Republicans at the state and county level, the amount of Democrats who live in the more populated areas of the counties overwhelm them when it comes to the race for Congress.

    “It is interesting that St. Mary’s is the county (Hoyer) calls home, but it’s probably, politically speaking, the place where he’s least at home,” he said.

    Who would run?

    At least one poll that’s already circulating asks voters their thoughts about Rushern Baker, Quincy Bareebe, Wala Blegay, State Del. Adrian Boafo, Harry Dunn, Harry Jarin and Nicole Williams.

    Bareebe and Jarin have already filed to run. Boafo is a state delegate from Bowie. Williams is a state delegate from Hyattsville and the chair of the county’s delegation this year. Dunn is a former U.S. Capitol Police officer who grew up in the county but also ran in the adjacent 4th District in 2024. Blegay is an at-large member of the Prince George’s County Council, and Baker is the former county executive in Prince George’s County.

    Boafo and Blegay have made clear that they’re considering a run, and Williams’ name has been mentioned several times by others who are connected to politics.

    A source with ties to Baker told WTOP he’s also looking to run for the seat, though that hasn’t been officially confirmed.

    Other names are also being mentioned, and Maryland Del. C.T. Wilson told WTOP he’s considering a run.

    “It is a safe Democratic seat, so whoever wins that Democratic primary knows that they’ll probably be able to hold on to that seat as long as they wish. And I think that’s going to make it hard for a lot of people to pass up,” Eberly said.

    But he added that anyone who currently serves in Annapolis or at the county level will have to weigh a run for the congressional seat at the expense of not being able to return to the seat they have now.

    “In order to run in the primary for that seat, you’re not going to be able to run in the primary for what may be a seat that you currently hold,” Eberly said. “Do you want to give that up for the chance at winning this?”

    Which means it’s possible the list of names mentioned above will see some subtractions, as well as additions, in the weeks ahead.

    [ad_2]

    John Domen

    Source link

  • Is the War Powers Act unconstitutional, as Trump says?

    [ad_1]

    After President Donald Trump’s unilateral decision to use the U.S. military to capture Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro, some lawmakers criticized Trump for ordering it without any authorization from Congress. 

    Trump, in a Jan. 8 Truth Social post, said he has the power to do that, and questioned the constitutionality of a related law.

    “The War Powers Act is Unconstitutional, totally violating Article II of the Constitution, as all Presidents, and their Departments of Justice, have determined before me,” Trump wrote.

    But Trump went too far by calling the 1973 War Powers Resolution unconstitutional. Courts have repeatedly declined to rule on its constitutionality.

    Within days of the Venezuela operation, the Senate advanced a resolution to limit further military operations in Venezuela without congressional backing, with five Republicans joining Democrats in supporting it. But this measure has little chance of being enacted, since it would need Trump’s signature if the Republican-controlled House passes it, which is uncertain.

    For decades, presidents and Congress have battled over who has the institutional power to declare war.

    The U.S. Constitution assigns Congress the right to declare war. The last time Congress did that was at the beginning of World War II.

    Since then, presidents have generally initiated military action using their constitutionally granted powers as commander in chief without an official declaration of war.

    In August 1964, President Lyndon B. Johnson asked Congress to back his effort to widen the United States’ role in Vietnam. He received approval with enactment of the Tonkin Gulf Resolution, which easily passed both chambers of Congress.

    As public sentiment turned against the Vietnam War, lawmakers became increasingly frustrated about their secondary role in sending U.S. troops abroad. So in 1973, Congress passed the War Powers Resolution, which was enacted over President Richard Nixon’s veto. 

    The resolution required the president to report to Congress within 48 hours of introducing armed forces into hostilities and to terminate the use of U.S. armed forces within 60 days unless Congress approves. If approval is not granted and the president deems it an emergency, an additional 30 days are allowed to end operations.

    Presidents have often, but not always, followed the act’s requirements, usually framing any entreaties to Congress as a voluntary bid to secure “support” for military action rather than “permission.” This has sometimes taken the form of an “authorization for the use of military force” — legislation that amounts to a modern version of a declaration of war.

    Trump has a point that presidents from both political parties have sought to assert power and limit lawmakers’ interference, including in court. But these arguments were never backed by court rulings.

    Between 1973 and 2012, Congress’ nonpartisan Congressional Research Service found eight judicial decisions involving the War Powers Resolution, and “in each and every case” the ruling declined to offer a binding opinion, always finding a reason, such as a lack of standing to sue, to avoid taking a side.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Rep. Julia Brownley announces she will not seek reelection

    [ad_1]

    Rep. Julia Brownley, a Democrat who has represented swaths of Ventura and Los Angeles counties for more than a decade, announced Thursday that she would not seek reelection.

    “Serving our community and our country has been the honor of my lifetime. Every step of this journey has been shaped by the people I represent, by their resilience, their determination, and their belief that government can and should work for the common good,” Brownley said, touting her efforts to expand access to healthcare, support veterans, fight climate change and other policy priorities, as well as constituent services. “We … never lost sight of the simple truth that public service is about showing up for people when they need help the most.”

    Brownley, 73, did not say why she was choosing not to seek reelection, but she joins more than 40 other members of the U.S. House of Representatives who have announced they are not to running for their seats again in November. Other Californians not seeking reelection are Reps. Nancy Pelosi (D-San Francisco) and Eric Swalwell (D-Dublin), who is running for governor.

    Brownley served on the Santa Monica-Malibu Unified School District board of education and in the state Assembly before successfully running for Congress in 2012. At the time, the district was nearly evenly divided between Democratic and Republican voters. But in years since, the district has grown more liberal.

    In 2024, when the 26th Congressional District included Agoura Hills, Calabasas, Camarillo, Fillmore, Moorpark, Port Hueneme, Santa Paula, Simi Valley, Thousand Oaks, Oxnard, Westlake Village and a portion of San Buenaventura, the congresswoman won reelection with 56.6% of the vote over GOP businessman Michael Koslow, who received 43.4% of the ballots cast. At the time, the voter registration in the district was 42.5% Democratic, 29.6% Republican and 20.4% independent.

    The district grew more Democratic after the passage of Proposition 50, the redrawing of congressional maps California voters approved in November to counter President Trump’s efforts to boost the number of Republicans elected to Congress from GOP-led states. Simi Valley was excised from the district, while Hidden Hills, parts of Palmdale, Lancaster and nearby high-desert areas were added to the district.

    For Republican candidates had already announced plans to challenge Brownley this year, including Koslow, who called Brownley “out of touch” with the district’s voters.

    “The voters of the 26th Congressional District need a representative who isn’t afraid to vote his conscience in Washington,” Koslow said in a statement. “They can count on me to bring common sense to Washington.”

    On Thursday, Assemblywoman Jacqui Irwin (D-Thousand Oaks) filed paperwork with the Federal Election Commission to run for Brownley’s seat hours after the congresswoman announced she would not seek reelection.

    [ad_2]

    Seema Mehta

    Source link

  • Maryland leaders applaud Hoyer’s ‘immeasurable’ impact after retirement announcement – WTOP News

    [ad_1]

    In the hours after Rep. Steny Hoyer announced his retirement, the praise coming from elected leaders at all levels in the state of Maryland was like a tidal wave.

    In the hours after Rep. Steny Hoyer announced his retirement, the praise coming from elected leaders at all levels in the state of Maryland was like a tidal wave.

    Democrats, and especially the ones from Prince George’s County, couldn’t stop gushing over the impact Hoyer had as a lawmaker and as a person.

    “Steny Hoyer’s impact is immeasurable on the state of Maryland, on the United States of America, to all of us personally,” Gov. Wes Moore said.

    He then told a story about his first interaction with Hoyer, which came well before the governor entered politics.

    “I remember when I was deployed to Afghanistan,” Moore said. “I received a care package … one of the things in the care package was a flag, a Maryland flag, that was sent to me from Steny Hoyer. I did not know Steny Hoyer at that point. He just knew that a Marylander was protecting the country overseas. So he asked for a flag to be sent to that Marylander, who happened to be me.”

    “He’s someone who has shown us what public service looks like,” Moore added, joking that Hoyer will get some “very well deserved time off. And frankly, knowing Steny Hoyer, I have no idea what retirement actually looks like. I’ll believe it when I see it.”

    Sen. Angela Alsobrooks, a longtime friend of Hoyer’s, credited him with changing her life.

    “He said to me years ago, ‘no matter what you run for, I am always going to be basically the first to support you. I will support any endeavor you undertake,’” Alsobrooks said in an interview with WTOP. “And that’s the penultimate of trust and belief is he felt that I was talented enough, and that I offered the kind of service that he felt he could support.”

    She also noted how strong his support was among African American voters in Prince George’s County, and how much he treasured that trust Black voters put into him.

    “Steny Hoyer is popular all around the state and the country, but he is beloved among African Americans,” she said. “You can see it in his annual Bull Roast that, routinely and without effort, calls out over 1,000 people, and many of them are African American families from Prince George’s County who have supported him in all 20 plus of his elections. And he noted that, and he thanked specifically the African American community for their solid support. And I think that was classy.”

    She said because of that support, Maryland could count on Hoyer to deliver for the state.

    “We always knew that in Steny, we had a staunch advocate,” Alsobrooks told WTOP. “We knew we had a person who would not only appear on our behalf, but would be prepared for whatever the issue was, that he would build whatever relationships were necessary for us to be successful.”

    In a statement, Sen. Chris Van Hollen praised Hoyer.

    “He never wavered in his focus on delivering results for his district and our state,” Van Hollen wrote. “From his efforts to secure federal support for important military bases like Naval Air Station Patuxent River to our institutions of higher learning, like the University of Maryland, to so much more — Steny is Team Maryland through and through.”

    Rep. Glenn Ivey, whose district is adjacent to Hoyer’s, called Hoyer one of the “greats of all time” during an interview with WTOP.

    “He’s had a huge impact, certainly on Prince George’s County in Maryland, but really the nation,” Ivey said. “There’s a lot to show for it within the congressional district. The federal courthouse, for example, was something that he put in place, helped to build out the University of Maryland. There’s a lot of activity that he’s done with respect to WMATA, building out the Metro system. The list goes on and on. So it’s a huge loss for not just Maryland, but for the nation.”

    Ivey also noted the depth that Hoyer’s roots extend through the region.

    “Three of my kids went to Judy P. Hoyer Elementary School,” Ivey said. “When they first met him, they called him Mr. Judy P. Hoyer, because his family’s had that kind of an impact across the board too.”

    Maryland Third District Rep. Sarah Elfreth said her career in politics began with an internship in Hoyer’s office.

    “From millions of dollars of investment in Prince George’s County and Southern Maryland to his work to uphold democratic values around the globe, you would be hard-pressed to find an issue he hasn’t led on,” she said.

    Hoyer was born and raised in Prince George’s County and graduated from Suitland High School.

    “He’s just been amazing with the resources that he’s been able to bring back to Prince George’s County and to the state of Maryland,” said Del. Nicole Williams, who chairs the Prince George’s County delegation in Annapolis. “We are really going to miss his leadership, but we’re also very happy for him in his retirement and wish him a lot of rest for all of his years of service.”

    Prince George’s County Council member Wala Blegay, who may be interested in succeeding Hoyer in Washington, credited him with helping her make the contacts needed to get her political career off the ground, too.

    “He just showed me what true constituent services (looked like) and how you how you actually go and meet people’s needs,” she said.

    [ad_2]

    John Domen

    Source link

  • West Sacramento mayor announces campaign for California US House District 6

    [ad_1]

    West Sacramento’s mayor is the latest person to announce plans to campaign for one of California’s congressional districts in the 2026 midterm election since the passing of Proposition 50.The voter-approved measure aims to send more Democrats to Congress by redrawing five Republican-heavy districts to include more Democratic voters. While District 6 is not one of those five targeted districts, the current officeholder — Democrat Ami Bera — has since announced plans to run for District 3, which is targeted.As a result, several people have announced campaigns for District 6, which now includes Martha Guerrero running as a Democrat.“I am running for Congress because our communities deserve a representative who has been in the trenches for working families,” Guerrero said in a release. “They deserve someone laser-focused on lowering costs and protecting their rights.”Guerrero in the release also touted her achievements in serving West Sacramento, citing public safety, flood protection, supporting small business and job growth, government transparency and homelessness.The mayor is in her third term as West Sacramento mayor after serving in the city council.Other candidates for District 6 include former State Sen. Dr. Richard Pan, Sacramento County District Attorney Thien Ho and Republican Christine Bish.See more coverage of top California stories here | Download our app | Subscribe to our morning newsletter | Find us on YouTube here and subscribe to our channel

    West Sacramento’s mayor is the latest person to announce plans to campaign for one of California’s congressional districts in the 2026 midterm election since the passing of Proposition 50.

    The voter-approved measure aims to send more Democrats to Congress by redrawing five Republican-heavy districts to include more Democratic voters. While District 6 is not one of those five targeted districts, the current officeholder — Democrat Ami Bera — has since announced plans to run for District 3, which is targeted.

    As a result, several people have announced campaigns for District 6, which now includes Martha Guerrero running as a Democrat.

    “I am running for Congress because our communities deserve a representative who has been in the trenches for working families,” Guerrero said in a release. “They deserve someone laser-focused on lowering costs and protecting their rights.”

    Guerrero in the release also touted her achievements in serving West Sacramento, citing public safety, flood protection, supporting small business and job growth, government transparency and homelessness.

    The mayor is in her third term as West Sacramento mayor after serving in the city council.

    Other candidates for District 6 include former State Sen. Dr. Richard Pan, Sacramento County District Attorney Thien Ho and Republican Christine Bish.

    See more coverage of top California stories here | Download our app | Subscribe to our morning newsletter | Find us on YouTube here and subscribe to our channel

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Maryland Rep. Steny Hoyer will retire after 60 years in elected office – WTOP News

    [ad_1]

    Hoyer will not seek reelection and will retire at the end of his current term. After nearly 60 years in public office, the 86-year-old congressman stated he wanted to “pass the baton” while still in good health.

    Multiple sources reported Wednesday evening that Maryland 5th District Rep. Steny Hoyer will be retiring from the House.

    The Washington Post first reported that in a sit-down interview, 86-year-old Hoyer said he reached the decision over the holidays with his family. He stated that he wanted to pass “the baton” while still in good health.

    Washington Post reporter Paul Kane told WTOP’s Nick Iannelli that Hoyer is still “pretty darn sharp,” though the longtime Maryland Democrat suffered a stoke in August 2024.

    “He didn’t want to be one of those people who stuck around and ended up being pushed around in a wheelchair or getting too forgetful. There’s been a lot of those in recent years, Democrats and Republicans alike in Congress,” Kane said.

    Hoyer is the third-longest serving member of the House of Representatives, having held his seat since 1982.

    “I think that Steny Hoyer has basically come to a peaceful point in his life where he has decided he accomplished everything he possibly could have, and that now is the time to finally step away from politics after close to 60 years,” WTOP Capitol Hill Correspondent Mitchell Miller said.

    Hoyer and former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi both worked together for the same lawmaker when they first got to Congress decades ago. The two rose through the ranks together, with Hoyer serving as the No. 2 leader among House Democrats for many years.

    He served as House Majority Leader when Pelosi became the first woman to serve as Speaker of the House. While they had a longtime rivalry, they also had a healthy respect for each other.

    Hoyer has acknowledged that he would have liked to have become House Speaker, but it was not meant to be.

    He stepped down from his role as House Majority Leader in 2022, endorsing Hakeem Jeffries as his successor. Hoyer continued his role as a Maryland representative and member of the House Appropriations Committee.

    The veteran lawmaker has still had a major impact on Maryland politics in recent years. He provided an early endorsement to Wes Moore, who now serves as governor and is seen as a rising star within the Democratic Party. He also endorsed Angela Alsobrooks, who is now Maryland’s junior U.S. senator.

    Hoyer’s departure could lead to a shake-up on the Prince George’s County Council, setting off a contested primary. In Prince George’s County, at least one member of the county council and one state delegate were waiting to see what Hoyer decides to do, with the intention of jumping in if the longtime incumbent decides to retire.

    “It’s going to cause a ripple effect,” Kane said. “You’ll probably end up with people in small city councils who end up getting seats for the first time in their life in politics because of the ripple effect that this creates throughout the region.”

    In terms of the 5th District race, Miller said it will very likely be a competitive race with many candidates vying for the seat.

    “I think it’s just going to be a very, very difficult position to fill. Obviously, you have a change in the generations moving forward, but Steny Hoyer has just had a profound impact on Maryland politics,” Miller said.

    While he’s leaving Congress after a storied political career, Hoyer seems content with all he has accomplished.

    A spokeswoman for Hoyer only told WTOP that he will speak on the House floor at 10 a.m. on Thursday.

    WTOP’s Mitchell Miller contributed to this report.

    [ad_2]

    Ciara Wells

    Source link