ReportWire

Tag: commodity

  • Traders brace for explosion of volatility Friday as $2.2 trillion in stock options expire

    Traders brace for explosion of volatility Friday as $2.2 trillion in stock options expire

    [ad_1]

    It’s that time again: monthly stock-market options for August are set to expire on Friday, potentially spurring more volatility in stocks after a bruising three-week run.

    U.S. stock option contracts with a notional value of $2.2 trillion are set to expire, according to Rocky Fishman, founder of newly formed strategy firm Asym 500 and a former head of index derivatives strategy at Goldman Sachs Group. Notional value measures the market value of the stocks, indexes and exchange-traded funds controlled by the options, although the premiums paid by holders of the options are worth much less.


    ASYM 500

    Fishman noted that the size of option-market open interest expiring on Friday is about average for an off-month expiration.

    Monthly options expire every month, but once a quarter — in March, June, September and December — an event known as “Triple Witching” takes place, causing notional value of expiring options to swell as quarterly and sometimes calendar-year options expire along with monthlies and weeklies.

    Sessions where monthly options expire often see higher-than-normal volatility, and options-market analysts warned that the same could happen on Friday.

    Charlie McElligott, a longtime derivatives strategist who publishes research on Nomura’s trading desk, warned clients that option dealers are “short gamma” heading into Friday’s expiration, increasing the potential for option dealers to exacerbate market volatility. McElligott illustrated this tendency in the chart below.


    NOMURA

    Why are dealers short gamma, and what does this mean? As stocks have stumbled, option traders have been buying put options and selling call options. As a result, dealers could be forced to hedge their positions by buying futures if stocks rise and their customers close out their short-call positions, or selling futures to hedge the risk of puts moving into the money.

    This would serve to exaggerate the market’s move in either direction, driving a rising market higher and a falling market lower, McElligott said.

    Dealers could hit “peak short gamma” if the S&P 500 falls to 4,320, sending a wave of puts into the money. If that happens, it’s possible dealers could slam stocks lower as they rush to avoid being on the hook for puts sold to customers. The S&P 500
    SPX
    finished Thursday at 4,370.36.


    NOMURA

    Gamma is used by options analysts to describe how quickly an option’s delta changes. Delta represents how sensitive the price of an option is to moves in the underlying asset. When options are about to expire, delta typically increases dramatically, since small moves that put it closer to being in or out of the money can have a dramatic impact on the option’s price.

    Brent Kochuba, founder of SpotGamma, also cited risks tied to dealers’ short-gamma position in research shared with clients. SpotGamma shares data and analytics about the option market.

    “We have been watching market gamma fall into negative gamma territory all month. Once it entered that range, price action became visibly choppier, as expected during these conditions,” he said in written commentary shared with MarketWatch and SpotGamma clients.

    Option contracts give traders the right, but not the obligation, to buy or sell the underlying asset or currency. Often, options tied to stock-market indexes like the S&P 500 are settled in futures or cash. Options tied to exchange-traded funds like the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust
    SPY,
    which tracks the S&P 500 index, are settled in shares of the ETF.

    A put option allows the buyer the right, but not the obligation, to sell shares at an agreed-upon price known as the “strike price.” A call option, conversely, gives the holder the right to buy shares. Put options tend to appreciate when the underlying stock or index falls, while the opposite is true for calls.

    U.S. stocks finished lower on Thursday, with the S&P 500 and Nasdaq Composite poised to record a third straight weekly decline, what would be the longest such streak for the S&P 500 since February.

    The S&P 500 was off by 0.8% on Thursday, while the Nasdaq Composite
    COMP
    fell by 1.2% to 13,316.93. The Dow Jones Industrial Average
    DJIA
    shed 290.91 points, or 0.8%, to 34,474.83.

    In addition to monthly options expiring Friday, weekly options known as “zero days until expiration” or “0DTE” options could further complicate the market’s reaction. A veteran Goldman Sachs Group strategist warned earlier this week that 0DTE traders have been limiting upswings in stocks while piling on the pressure when markets sink.

    See: ‘This is no longer a buy-the-dip market.’ Why this Goldman Sachs veteran is worried about the stock market.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Treasury market returns are negative again. Why this time for bonds looks different than 2022.

    Treasury market returns are negative again. Why this time for bonds looks different than 2022.

    [ad_1]

    Yearly returns in the Treasury market slipped into negative territory this week as the market sold off on signs that the Federal Reserve may need to keep rates high for a while to contain inflation.

    While negative returns might stir bad memories of last year’s shocking losses for bonds, stocks and nearly everything else, investors holding Treasury debt issued at 2023’s higher yields might want to sit back and take stock.

    “This is the top thing we hear,” said Ryan Murphy, director of fixed-income business development at Capital Group, of evaporating returns in what’s been a tough August. “You saw the worst bond market in 40 years last year. Investors, they are tired, and feel beaten up.”

    Murphy’s message to clients is this: “In bonds, you earn the money over time.” And those dwindling bond returns since January? “Approach it with a deep breath, and know this is going to work out in the end.”

    Capital Group’s laid-back style and lack of “a star CEO” earned it recognition by Institutional Investor in March as “a new bond leader” without a king, in large part because it attracted $100 billion in funds over the past five years, or twice the total of its peers.

    Recent volatility in interest rates again zapped yearly gains in many bond funds, as Fed officials continued to warn that a roaring labor market and robust spending could keep inflation from receding to the central bank’s 2% annual target.

    The spike in long-term bond yields makes older, lower-yielding securities look comparatively less attractive. That’s reflected in the yearly return on a key Bloomberg U.S. government bond and note index, which turned negative for the first time since March (see chart), when several regional banks failed, stoking fears of a broader banking crisis.

    Returns on U.S. government bonds turn negative for the year.


    FactSet

    However, a look back at August 2022 shows the 10-year Treasury yield starting around 2.6%, according to FactSet.

    By contrast, Treasury bill yields
    BX:TMUBMUSD06M
    neared 5.5% on Thursday, or “north of anything we’ve seen over the past 15 years,” Murphy said. And for investors looking to lock in longer-term yields, the 10-year Treasury rate
    BX:TMUBMUSD10Y
    touched 4.307% on Thursday, its highest level since November 2007, according to Dow Jones Market Data.

    See: How BlackRock’s Rick Rieder is steering his active fixed-income ETF as bond funds struggle

    “It’s becoming more expensive for the government and companies to finance debt because of the rapid climb in rates,” Murphy said of the drag of higher long-term interest rates.

    On the flip side, it’s also been one of the best stretches for lenders and bond investors in terms of getting paid to act as creditors since the 2007-2008 global financial crisis, but without a U.S. recession — or at least not yet.

    What’s also different from last year is that the Fed already jacked up interest rates to a 22-year high of 5.25%-5.5% in July, and has signaled it’s likely nearly finished with hikes in this cycle.

    Record cash on the sidelines

    Murphy pointed to a mountain of cash on the sidelines, in the form of assets in money-market funds, as another potential stabilizer for markets.

    Assets in money-market funds hit a record $5.57 trillion for the week ending Wednesday, according to data from the Investment Company Institute.

    “What’s really interesting is that there’s been two bursts of investors going into money-market funds. There was a big shift right at the onset of COVID, and another burst over the past 12-18 months since the beginning of the rate-hiking cycle,” Murphy said.

    Looking back to 2008, he pointed to a similar buildup in money-market assets, and a roughly $1.1 trillion wall of cash subsequently leaving the sector, as financial assets began to recover in the wake of the financial crisis.

    “What we did see, while not all of it, was a healthy amount went back into fixed-income in the following years,” Murphy said.

    Stocks closed lower Thursday and were headed for another week of losses, with the Dow Jones Industrial Average
    DJIA
    2.3% lower on the week so far, the S&P 500 index
    SPX
    down 2.1% and the Nasdaq Composite Index off 2.4%, according to FactSet.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Nasdaq falls to 6-week low as rising bond yields weigh on ‘Magnificent 7’ stocks

    Nasdaq falls to 6-week low as rising bond yields weigh on ‘Magnificent 7’ stocks

    [ad_1]

    U.S. stocks traded lower for a third straight day on Thursday as rising bond yields spurred weakness in some of the so-called Magnificent Seven megacap stocks, helping to drive the Nasdaq to a six-week low.

    How are stocks trading

    • The S&P 500
      SPX
      was down 2 points, or 0.1%, to 4,401.

    • The Dow Jones Industrial Average
      DJIA
      shed 42 points, or 0.1%, to 34,725.

    • The Nasdaq Composite
      COMP
      fell by 46 points, or 0.3%, to 13,428.

    The Dow and S&P 500 were on track to extend a losing streak to a third straight session as major indexes headed for another week in the red. The S&P 500 hasn’t fallen for three weeks in a row since February, FactSet data show.

    What’s driving markets

    Bonds have resumed command of the stock market of late as higher yields lash shares of megacap technology stocks, undermining their status as the undisputed market leaders.

    Long-dated Treasury yields continued to rise Thursday, with the 10-year yield
    BX:TMUBMUSD10Y
    touching its highest level since the 2008 financial crisis, rising north of 4.31%. Bond yields move inversely to prices.

    Rising yields helped heap more pressure on shares of some of this year’s highflying tech stocks, including Tesla Inc.
    TSLA,
    -0.34%
    ,
    Apple Inc.
    AAPL,
    -0.91%

    and Microsoft Corp.
    MSFT,
    -0.01%

    The elite group of megacap tech stocks which also includes Amazon.com Inc., Meta Platforms Corp.
    META,
    -0.24%

    and Alphabet Inc.’s Class A
    GOOGL,
    +2.42%

    and Class C
    GOOG,
    +2.48%

    shares has been credited with driving much of the Nasdaq Composite’s nearly 30% run-up year-to-date. But their market dominance has faded in recent weeks as investors have favored other cyclical sectors like energy and materials stocks. Those two sectors were the best performers on the S&P 500 on Thursday.

    “That’s a theme that’s been bubbling up here over the last three to four weeks, but there’s more of an exclamation point on it now,” said David Keller, chief market strategist at Stockcharts.com, during a phone interview with MarketWatch.

    “First you had Microsoft and Apple breaking down a few weeks ago, now you’re getting Meta breaking below its 50-day moving average.”

    Keller added that rising bond yields tend to have a bigger impact on growth stocks like technology names, while sectors like energy are more resilient.

    “Energy can do just fine in a rising rate environment. energy and materials should probably do better in a relative basis,” he said.

    Minutes from the Federal Reserve’s July meeting released Wednesday afternoon were being blamed for the latest leg higher in global bond yields. They showed that Fed policy makers could continue raising interest rates amid concerns that inflation could reaccelerate, potentially pushing bond yields even higher.

    “It’s really uncertain where terminal interest rates will land given the economy isn’t giving us a decisive picture of being too strong or too weak. It’s keeping the window open for more rate hikes potentially,” said Mohannad Aama, a portfolio manager at Beam Capital Management, during a phone interview with MarketWatch.

    Corporate earnings were also in focus as investors received results from Cisco Systems
    CSCO,
    +4.06%

    and retail giant Walmart Inc.
    WMT,
    -1.74%
    .
    Cisco reported strong quarterly results after Wednesday’s close. Walmart also reported stronger than expected earnings, helping to offset some concerns about the strength of the consumer spurred by Target Corp.’s
    TGT,
    +1.94%

    lackluster earnings and guidance from Wednesday.

    Shares of Cisco rose 2.6%, while Walmart shares turned lower, down 1.2%.

    Economic updates released Thursday helped support the notion that the U.S. economy is growing at a faster pace than economists had expected, potentially complicating the Fed’s efforts to tamp down inflation.

    First-time jobless-benefit claims fell by 11,000 to 239,000 last week, a sign that layoffs in the U.S. labor market remain low. The Philadelphia Fed factory index also shot higher to 12 in August, up from negative 13.5 during the prior month, a sign that manufacturers in the U.S. could be exiting a slump.

    Companies in focus

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • The S&P 500 is flashing a warning that U.S. stocks are likely headed lower after breaking below its 50-day moving average

    The S&P 500 is flashing a warning that U.S. stocks are likely headed lower after breaking below its 50-day moving average

    [ad_1]

    The S&P 500 on Tuesday closed below its 50-day moving average for the first time since March. It could portend more losses for the index, technical analysts said, suggesting that the summertime stock-market selloff isn’t over yet.

    After trending lower all session, the index SPX closed down 51.86 points, or 1.2%, to 4,437.86 on Tuesday, its lowest closing level since July 11, according to FactSet data.

    It…

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • J&J’s Kenvue Deal Could Be Too Popular. What Happens if It Is.

    J&J’s Kenvue Deal Could Be Too Popular. What Happens if It Is.

    [ad_1]



    Johnson and Johnson


    $40 billion exchange offer for shares in


    Kenvue


    is likely to generate strong interest from the healthcare company’s shareholders, resulting in participants being able to swap only a portion of their J&J stock. 

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Hawaiian Electric’s stock slides 26% as S&P downgrades credit to junk on risk from Maui wildfire lawsuits

    Hawaiian Electric’s stock slides 26% as S&P downgrades credit to junk on risk from Maui wildfire lawsuits

    [ad_1]

    Hawaiian Electric Industries Inc.’s stock added to losses Tuesday, tumbling 26% after S&P Global Ratings downgraded its rating on the utility company to junk.

    S&P Global Ratings cut its rating on the company HE to BB- and placed it on CreditWatch negative, meaning the rating agency could downgrade it again in the near term.

    The devastating…

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • ‘Good news really is bad news’: Stocks hit a roadblock as strong retail sales reinforce soft-landing view

    ‘Good news really is bad news’: Stocks hit a roadblock as strong retail sales reinforce soft-landing view

    [ad_1]

    Investors were jolted by a stronger-than-expected retail sales report on Tuesday, which underscores the dual-edged sword now facing markets.

    July’s 0.7% surge in retail sales is helping to bolster the view that a resilient U.S. economy can avoid a recession, despite more than a year of rate hikes by the Federal Reserve. However, the data also serves as another piece of information that some policy makers can use to support even more hikes in the final four months of this year, and left the benchmark 10-year Treasury yield…

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Builder confidence falls for the first time in 2023, despite strong U.S. home-buying demand

    Builder confidence falls for the first time in 2023, despite strong U.S. home-buying demand

    [ad_1]

    The numbers: Builder confidence waned in August as the 30-year mortgage rate surged, dampening U.S. home-buying interest.

    Despite a persistent shortage of homes on the market for resale, builders have lost confidence in the late summer amid declining customer traffic from higher mortgage rates, as well as challenges in the construction process.

    Mortgage…

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Import prices jump in July by largest amount in more than a year

    Import prices jump in July by largest amount in more than a year

    [ad_1]

    The numbers: The import price index rose 0.4% in July, the Labor Department said Tuesday. This is the biggest gain since May 2022.

    Economists surveyed by the Wall Street were expecting a 0.2% gain.

    Fuel import costs rose 3.6% in July. Higher prices for petroleum and natural gas contributed to the gain.

    Excluding…

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • ‘San Francisco is not dead’: Not everyone is shunning the city’s reeling office market

    ‘San Francisco is not dead’: Not everyone is shunning the city’s reeling office market

    [ad_1]

    Barry DiRaimondo, chief of SteelWave, a West Coast property developer that in the past half-century has partnering with many of the biggest names in commercial real estate, is looking for diamonds in the rough, distressed office properties located in the American city that many have given up on.

    Others may be shunning San Francisco while it’s down on its luck, but DiRaimondo sees better days ahead, despite the city’s threat of a growing deficit, its fentanyl crisis, homelessness and a reluctant return of office workers to its financial core.

    “Not much is coming up right now,” DiRaimondo said of buying opportunities, while speaking from his office in the heart of San Francisco’s financial district. But he was eager to point out several nearby buildings that could be candidates to buy, at the right price.

    “I think over the next 12 to 18 months, you’re going to see a tsunami,” of distressed office properties, DiRaimondo said.

    Like in many big cities, a wave of office buildings bought at peak prices before the pandemic now have a pile of debt coming due, at much higher rates. But San Francisco’s financial core only recently has begun to show flickers of hope in its weak recovery post-COVID.

    “Whether it’s San Francisco, Oakland or anywhere here, and your debt is rolling, you’re having a conversation with your lender,” DiRaimondo said. “There’s either a restructuring going on or a foreclosure going on.”

    A number of high-profile property owners this year surrendered local properties to lenders, including Westfield’s namesake shopping center downtown and a string of well-known hotels, a blow to the city’s comeback efforts.

    Still, DiRaimondo expects the bulk of property ownership transfers in this boom-and-bust cycle to take place quietly, behind the scenes, often through a building’s debt changing hands. It’s a familiar playbook for veteran real-estate developers like SteelWave and its partners, especially when San Francisco office property values tumble and new loans remains expensive and hard to come by.

    “Office is a nasty word, right now. Especially tech office,” he said. “We are doing something that’s a bit different.”

    Booms, busts

    San Francisco’s history as a boom-and-bust town perhaps is best suited for real-estate developers able to take a bunch of lemons and make lemonade.

    That has been SteelWave’s signature move in the notoriously rough-and-tumble commercial real-estate industry, through its ups and downs. It has bought over $17.5 billion in properties and developments in the past five decades, first under the Legacy Partners Commercial brand before it was renamed in 2015.

    It has partnered with some of the biggest names in commercial real estate, including with Angelo Gordon & Co. in 2021 on two Silicon Valley office buildings, but also distressed debt titans that include Rialto Capital, and with Chenco, one of the largest Chinese-owned U.S. real-estate investment firms.

    Its stronghold is the Bay Area and DiRaimondo is now looking to raise a $500 million fund to buy distressed buildings, including in downtown San Francisco, a place major Wall Street lenders have been backing away from for months.

    “It’s hard to raise equity to buy this stuff right now,” he said, but argues his strategy, which includes expanding its reach to potential investors in the U.A.E., Israel and parts of Europe, will pan out.

    SteelWave’s model of buying a property includes a final tally of costs often three to four times the initial purchase price, due to extensive overhauls.

    “Typically, what we do is buy something, tear it apart, put it back together, lease it, sell it,” DiRaimondo said.

    It’s niche in the distressed world that’s already produced overhauls of buildings from Seattle to Colorado to Los Angeles, places the tech industry wants to lease.

    In the southern California town of Costa Mesa, that meant partnering with Invesco to turn an old newsroom and printing press for the Los Angeles Times into a creative work campus. An opinion piece in 2022 from the newspaper described the revamp as turning, “the glum newspaper architecture into something inviting.”

    Forget being a ‘rent bandit’

    “In New York, people rushed back and refilled the apartments, streets, and subways. Restaurants and stores flooded with customers again,” a team from Moody’s analytics wrote in a recent “tale of two cities” report. “San Francisco, on the other end, battled safety concerns, homelessness, and population exodus which existed before but only became more obvious with barren neighborhoods.”

    SteelWave thinks the old days of landlords raking in top-dollar commercial rents in San Francisco, while adding little back to office buildings, are a thing of the past.

    “You have to have owners who want to create cool work environments to attract people back into the city,” DiRaimondo said of downtown San Francisco’s long slog back from the brink.

    That means buying properties at low prices, but also risking putting money down for major improvements. He isn’t a distressed investors looking to become a “rent bandit,” he says, because the strategy will fail to get quality tenants.

    Like the Moody’s team, DiRaimondo thinks San Francisco eventually will bounce back, but he thinks not before reality hits older office properties.

    Take a “commodity” building downtown, often older and midblock with generic features, that previously might have been worth $750 to $800 a square foot. It now looks worth less than $300 a square foot, he said.

    The early stages of fire-sales have begun already, with the 22-story tower at 350 California, nearby to DiRaimondo’s office, reportedly fetching $200 to $225 a square foot.

    “San Francisco is not dead,” DiRaimondo said. “I think there are opportunities in San Francisco.”

    See: San Francisco’s office market erases all gains since 2017 as prices sag nationally

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • ‘San Francisco is not dead’: Not everyone is shunning the city’s reeling office market

    ‘San Francisco is not dead’: Not everyone is shunning the city’s reeling office market

    [ad_1]

    Barry DiRaimondo, chief of SteelWave, a West Coast property developer that in the past half-century has partnering with many of the biggest names in commercial real estate, is looking for diamonds in the rough, distressed office properties located in the American city that many have given up on.

    Others may be shunning San Francisco while it’s down on its luck, but DiRaimondo sees better days ahead, despite the city’s threat of a growing deficit, its fentanyl crisis, homelessness and a reluctant return of office workers to its financial core.

    “Not much is coming up right now,” DiRaimondo said of buying opportunities, while speaking from his office in the heart of San Francisco’s financial district. But he was eager to point out several nearby buildings that could be candidates to buy, at the right price.

    “I think over the next 12 to 18 months, you’re going to see a tsunami,” of distressed office properties, DiRaimondo said.

    Like in many big cities, a wave of office buildings bought at peak prices before the pandemic now have a pile of debt coming due, at much higher rates. But San Francisco’s financial core only recently has begun to show flickers of hope in its weak recovery post-COVID.

    “Whether it’s San Francisco, Oakland or anywhere here, and your debt is rolling, you’re having a conversation with your lender,” DiRaimondo said. “There’s either a restructuring going on or a foreclosure going on.”

    A number of high-profile property owners this year surrendered local properties to lenders, including Westfield’s namesake shopping center downtown and a string of well-known hotels, a blow to the city’s comeback efforts.

    Still, DiRaimondo expects the bulk of property ownership transfers in this boom-and-bust cycle to take place quietly, behind the scenes, often through a building’s debt changing hands. It’s a familiar playbook for veteran real-estate developers like SteelWave and its partners, especially when San Francisco office property values tumble and new loans remains expensive and hard to come by.

    “Office is a nasty word, right now. Especially tech office,” he said. “We are doing something that’s a bit different.”

    Booms, busts

    San Francisco’s history as a boom-and-bust town perhaps is best suited for real-estate developers able to take a bunch of lemons and make lemonade.

    That has been SteelWave’s signature move in the notoriously rough-and-tumble commercial real-estate industry, through its ups and downs. It has bought over $17.5 billion in properties and developments in the past five decades, first under the Legacy Partners Commercial brand before it was renamed in 2015.

    It has partnered with some of the biggest names in commercial real estate, including with Angelo Gordon & Co. in 2021 on two Silicon Valley office buildings, but also distressed debt titans that include Rialto Capital, and with Chenco, one of the largest Chinese-owned U.S. real-estate investment firms.

    Its stronghold is the Bay Area and DiRaimondo is now looking to raise a $500 million fund to buy distressed buildings, including in downtown San Francisco, a place major Wall Street lenders have been backing away from for months.

    “It’s hard to raise equity to buy this stuff right now,” he said, but argues his strategy, which includes expanding its reach to potential investors in the U.A.E., Israel and parts of Europe, will pan out.

    SteelWave’s model of buying a property includes a final tally of costs often three to four times the initial purchase price, due to extensive overhauls.

    “Typically, what we do is buy something, tear it apart, put it back together, lease it, sell it,” DiRaimondo said.

    It’s niche in the distressed world that’s already produced overhauls of buildings from Seattle to Colorado to Los Angeles, places the tech industry wants to lease.

    In the southern California town of Costa Mesa, that meant partnering with Invesco to turn an old newsroom and printing press for the Los Angeles Times into a creative work campus. An opinion piece in 2022 from the newspaper described the revamp as turning, “the glum newspaper architecture into something inviting.”

    Forget being a ‘rent bandit’

    “In New York, people rushed back and refilled the apartments, streets, and subways. Restaurants and stores flooded with customers again,” a team from Moody’s analytics wrote in a recent “tale of two cities” report. “San Francisco, on the other end, battled safety concerns, homelessness, and population exodus which existed before but only became more obvious with barren neighborhoods.”

    SteelWave thinks the old days of landlords raking in top-dollar commercial rents in San Francisco, while adding little back to office buildings, are a thing of the past.

    “You have to have owners who want to create cool work environments to attract people back into the city,” DiRaimondo said of downtown San Francisco’s long slog back from the brink.

    That means buying properties at low prices, but also risking putting money down for major improvements. He isn’t a distressed investors looking to become a “rent bandit,” he says, because the strategy will fail to get quality tenants.

    Like the Moody’s team, DiRaimondo thinks San Francisco eventually will bounce back, but he thinks not before reality hits older office properties.

    Take a “commodity” building downtown, often older and midblock with generic features, that previously might have been worth $750 to $800 a square foot. It now looks worth less than $300 a square foot, he said.

    The early stages of fire-sales have begun already, with the 22-story tower at 350 California, nearby to DiRaimondo’s office, reportedly fetching $200 to $225 a square foot.

    “San Francisco is not dead,” DiRaimondo said. “I think there are opportunities in San Francisco.”

    See: San Francisco’s office market erases all gains since 2017 as prices sag nationally

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Russian ruble slides to 16-month low against U.S. dollar as capital flight, shrinking trade surplus bite

    Russian ruble slides to 16-month low against U.S. dollar as capital flight, shrinking trade surplus bite

    [ad_1]

    The Russian ruble plunged to its lowest level against the U.S. dollar in more than 16 months on Monday, as blowback related to President Vladimir Putin’s bloody invasion of Ukraine continued to weigh on the currency.

    The U.S. dollar
    USDRUB,
    +2.17%

    surged to 101.74 rubles on Monday, according to FactSet data. That’s the weakest level for the Russian currency since March 28, 2022. Since the start of the year, the dollar has gained more than 38% against the ruble, making the ruble one of the worst performing major emerging-market currencies of the year compared with the greenback.

    Weakness in the ruble has intensified over the past week weeks, and just a few days ago the Russian central bank announced it would halt buying of foreign currency on the open market through the end of the year. Instead, it will rely on Russia’s National Wealth Fund’s largess to supply them. The decision was enacted with the intention of “reducing volatility” in financial markets. The central bank has also said it’s launching a digital-ruble pilot program.

    Economists, including Konstantin Sonin, a political economist at the University of Chicago, have blamed capital flight and falling budget revenues (due to lower oil and gas income and tax revenue) for the ruble’s troubles.

    Data released by Russia’s central bank last week showed Russia’s current-account surplus has shrunk markedly during the first seven months of the year to an estimated $25.2 billion, compared with $165.4 billion during the same period in 2022. The central bank blamed the decline on a shrinking trade surplus caused by the drop in crude oil prices since the first half of 2022.

    The Bank of Russia, the country’s central bank, has attempted to shore up the ruble with little benefit. Last month, the central bank hiked interest rates by 100 basis points, the first increase since before Putin ordered the invasion of neighbor Ukraine in February 2022. It hinted that more hikes were possible.

    A weak ruble was one reason for the hike, as the weak currency has caused inflation to accelerate.

    While the ruble remains weak, it’s still holding above its lows around 130 to the dollar seen in March 2022, weeks after the West imposed a first round of sanctions on Moscow following the invasion of Ukraine, which has morphed into a bloody stalemate with no end in sight.

    The annual inflation rate rose to 4.5% in July from 3.25%, but economists at Goldman Sachs warned in a note earlier this month that inflation will likely head above the bank’s target again.

    “With continuing loose fiscal policy, we expect inflation to continue to rise throughout the year to +7.0% yoy [year-over-year] in December, above the CBR’s July inflation forecast range of +5.0% – +6.5%,” said a team of economists led by Kevin Daly.

    Russian officials have blamed the ruble’s latest bout of weakness on the central bank. Oreshkin Maxim, Putin’s economic aide, wrote in an editorial published in state media outlet Tass on Monday, that “loose monetary policy” was to blame for the weak ruble and urged action on that front.

    “The Central Bank has all the necessary tools to normalize the situation in the near future and ensure that lending rates are reduced to sustainable levels,” he wrote.

    Many economists and currency strategists expect the ruble’s slide to continue. However, a recent rebound in global crude-oil prices is leading to a modestly improved outlook.

    In the U.S., West Texas Intermediate crude for September settled at $84.40 a barrel on Wednesday, its highest level of 2023, according to FactSet data. That reflects a wider trend of rising energy prices globally. However, prices remain well below the peak of roughly $130 a barrel from March 2022, when prices spiked in the immediate aftermath of the invasion.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • A stumbling stock market faces a crucial summer test. Here’s what will decide the bull’s fate.

    A stumbling stock market faces a crucial summer test. Here’s what will decide the bull’s fate.

    [ad_1]

    Call it the end-of-summer blues.

    History shows that things can get ugly — and volatile — for the U.S. stock market in August and September. So a rocky start to the month shouldn’t be a big surprise. Indeed, even bulls might pine for some near-term consolidation after a torrid run that saw the S&P 500 index
    SPX
    rally nearly 20% over the first seven months of 2023. Through Friday’s close, the index is still up nearly 25% from its bear-market closing low of 3,577.03 hit on Oct. 12.

    But what would send the 2023 rally decisively off the rails?

    To answer that question, it helps to think about what has been driving the rally. Mark Hackett, chief of investment research at Nationwide, argues that the rally has largely been about fears that never materialized.

    “I would say about 90% of the move that we’ve seen over the last 10 months has really been a walking back from the ledge of fear,” Hackett told MarketWatch, in a phone interview.

    The October 2022 lows came as the Federal Reserve was hiking the fed-funds rate in outsize 75 basis point increments, inflation was just coming off its June peak last year above 9% and expectations for an imminent recession, or “hard landing,” were running hot.

    Tom Essaye, founder of Sevens Report Research, contends the rally has been built on three pillars: The Fed is now seen by many investors as likely finished, or nearly finished, raising interest rates; the economy appears set to possibly avert a recession altogether, and inflation has remained largely on a downward path.

    So trouble for the market would emerge if economic data were to falter and begin pointing to a hard landing, core inflation leveled off or bounced, or Fed Chair Jerome Powell signaled another rate hike is “definitely coming” and caused a further rise in Treasury yields.

    “This scenario would essentially undermine the three pillars of the rally, and as such investors should expect a substantial decline in stocks, even considering the recent pullback,” Essaye said in a note last week. “In fact, a decline of much more than 10% would be likely in this scenario, as it would undermine most of the rationale for the gains in stocks since June (and perhaps all of 2023).”

    That scenario has yet to materialize.

    The year-over-year rate of inflation as measured by the U.S. consumer price index rose to 3.2% in July from 3% in June, data showed last week. But the core rate, which strips out food and energy, slowed to 4.7% from 4.8%. The July producer price index, a measure of costs at the wholesale level, came in a touch stronger than expected, but didn’t change investor expectations for the Federal Reserve to leave rates unchanged when policy makers next meet in September.

    Policy makers will see another round of jobs data, including the August employment report, and inflation figures before that meeting.

    Meanwhile, a jump in Treasury yields, with the rate on the 10-year note pushing back above 4.15% after hitting a 2023 high near 4.2% earlier this month, is getting much of the blame for continued softness in the stock market. Rising yields can make Treasurys look more attractive than other assets and also raise the cost of financing for companies.

    The S&P 500 edged down 0.3% last week, suffering its first back-to-back weekly decline since May. The large-cap benchmark is down 2.7% so far in August, trimming its year-to-date gain to 16.3%. The Dow Jones Industrial Average
    DJIA
    rose 0.6%, while the Nasdaq Composite
    COMP
    shed 1.9%.

    A lack of obvious near-term catalysts could set the stage for the market to further struggle. A light week lies ahead for U.S. economic data, featuring July retail sales on Monday and the release of the minutes of the Fed’s July meeting on Wednesday.

    A slew of major retailers are set to deliver results as the second quarter earnings reporting season enters its final stretch.

    Nationwide’s Hackett said the market setup coming into August was nearly a mirror image of October’s gloomfest. Hedge funds and other large investors are no longer betting against the market, while longtime bears and pessimistic economists are throwing in the towel and issuing mea culpas.

    Stocks have rallied since late last year as fears priced into the market didn’t materialize, but now that dynamic is gone.

    Related: S&P 500 has a new record high 2023 price target. Here’s a look at Wall Street’s official stock-market outlook.

    Just as overwhelming pessimism set the stage for the market rally, widespread optimism over a “Goldilocks” scenario of falling inflation, a tame Fed and solid economic growth could eventually spell trouble for the bulls, Hackett said. Expectations don’t yet appear that extreme, but bear watching, he said.

    Meanwhile, investors also face seasonal concerns. August is historically a middling month for the S&P 500, producing an average gain of 0.67% based on data going back to 1928, according to Dow Jones Market Data. That makes August the fifth-worst performing month for the S&P 500. September is the worst performing month, producing an average downturn of 1.1%.

    For the Dow Jones Industrial Average, August has seen an average return of negative 0.8% since 1986, making it the worst performing month for the blue-chip gauge. In the decades before 1986, August was the blue-chip gauge’s best month.

    Mark Hulbert: August used to be the best month for the stock market. Then it became the worst.

    And then there’s volatility.

    Going back to 1990, the Cboe Volatility Index
    VX00,
    -4.91%
    ,
    known as the VIX, has seen its yearly peak most often in January (six times), followed by August and October at five times each, noted Jessica Rabe, co-founder of DataTrek Research, in a note last week.

    By that measure, investors are now in the middle of one of the most volatile months of the year with still another to come in October.

    “U.S. equities tend to outperform during calmer environments, so it makes sense that they rallied in July, but are struggling so far in August,” Rabe said. “The upshot: seasonal trends say U.S. equities could prove whippy through October until quieting down during the last two months of the year.”

    Hackett doesn’t expect the bull market to come off the rails, but sees scope for some near-term consolidation that will likely prove healthy over the long run.

    “It’s something that you don’t want to try to be too cute with because I don’t see the market as being really susceptible to a significant period of pain. I think it’s just a pretty natural, pretty healthy consolidation phase,” he said.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Hate to spoil the party but there’s a new risk in town — a ‘no landing’ economy

    Hate to spoil the party but there’s a new risk in town — a ‘no landing’ economy

    [ad_1]

    For the last 18 months, all you’ve heard from the markets is that the U.S. economy is three months away from a recession. Now, the popular analysis is that that inflation is on a smooth glidepath down and the economy will never have a downturn again.

    Worries about a recession have evaporated, and all the talk is about a “soft landing,” with the Federal Reserve not having to hike interest rates more than once more, at most.

    But behind the scenes, in some economic circles, there is growing concern about another risk for the economy, dubbed a “no landing” scenario.

    What does “no landing” mean? Essentially it’s marked by economic growth that’s too strong to allow inflation to fall all the way to 2%, where the Federal Reserve aims for it to be, and therefore an economy that will need more Fed rate hikes, according to Chris Low, chief economist at FHN Financial.

    So instead of the U.S. central bank starting to cut rates early next year, there may be more rate hikes in store.

    “There is still considerable work to do before the inflation beast is fully tamed,” Low said.

    Former Fed Vice Chair Richard Clarida described the risk in crystal-clear terms. “If the Fed finds itself  in March 2024 with an unemployment rate of 4% and an inflation rate of 4% with some of that temporary good news behind them, they are in a very tough spot,” Clarida said in a recent interview with Bloomberg News.

    “It is a risk. It is not the base case. But if I was still there [at the Fed], I would be assessing it,” he added.

    So why does this matter? Why would the Fed be in such a tough spot? Two words: presidential election.

    A Fed that is dedicated to bringing inflation down might have to slam the brakes on the economy forcefully to get the job done. That gets tough during an election year, especially one that already seems poised to be filled with acrimony.

    “The Fed does not play politics with monetary policy. The FOMC will do what is right for the economy, election year or not. Nevertheless, FOMC participants are already sensitive to triggering a recession. Doing it in an overt way when Congress, a third of the Senate, and the White House are up for grabs would be reckless,” Low said.

    Andrew Levin, professor of economics at Dartmouth College and a former top Fed staffer, said “raising interest rates sharply in the midst of an election cycle could be a delicate matter. Even the vaunted inflation fighter, Paul Volcker [the Fed’s chairman from 1979 to 1987], decided to ease off the brakes midway through the 1980 presidential campaign.”

    Ray Fair, a Yale economics professor, thinks that, whether or not the Fed successfully lowers consumer-price inflation to the vicinity of 2% will be what really matters for the 2024 presidential election. If inflation does not go gently and the Fed is still fighting next year, it would likely be negative for President Joe Biden and the Democratic Party, he said.

    See: Inflation could rebound later this year. And that might be a good thing.

    To avoid hiking rates next year, the Fed, in Low’s view, will raise interest rates to 6% by the end of this year. That is an out-of-consensus call. Financial markets think the Fed is done hiking with its benchmark policy interest rate in a range of 5.25% to 5.5%.

    Many economist and the financial markets are talking more about prospective Fed rate cuts in early 2024 than any more hikes.

    Asked during a recent radio interview if he thought a “no landing” scenario was taking shape, Philadelphia Fed President Patrick Harker replied: “I don’t think so.”

    Harker said the economy was likely on track to return to the low-interest-rate and low-inflation environment of 2012-19.

    “I think about this a lot, and I asked myself what’s different fundamentally about the U.S. economy now then the way it was before the pandemic,” Harker said. He concluded that there wasn’t much difference.

    The big trend Harker mentioned was demographics, with baby boomers still moving in large numbers into retirement. “I don’t think we have to stay in a high-inflation regime. I think we can get back to where we were,” he said.

    Steve Blitz, chief U.S. economist at research firm GlobalData.TSLombard, said he puts the probability of a “no landing” scenario at about 35%.

    Blitz added it was a common mistake for economists, policy makers, traders and journalists “to presume that the expansion to come is going to look like the expansion that was.”

    “At least in the United States, that was never the case,” he added.

    Blitz said that if the U.S. economy were growing at a rate below 2% with an inflation rate higher than 3%, the Fed would have to raise the policy rate to about 6.5%. But if the economy is humming along with 3% growth and inflation over 3%, that would be a trickier spot. “Does the Fed really want to slow that down?” he asked.

    See: The U.S. economy is aiming for a three-peat: 2% GDP growth

    The range of possible outcomes for the economy remains wide. Some economists still believe that a recession early next is the most likely outcome.

    Other economists, like Michelle Meyer, chief U.S. economist at Mastercard, think the economy will continue to grow, with inflation coming down. Meyer described that outcome as “a soft landing with bumps.”

    Stephen Stanley, chief economist at Santander U.S., said he thinks the U.S. economy will “muddle through” next year with subpar growth in the range of 1% for several quarters and inflation slowing gradually.

    “Obviously, that optimism melts away if we’re back to readings of 0.4% and 0.5% on core CPI in three months or six months,” Stanley said.

    Economic calendar: See what’s on the U.S. economic-data docket in the coming week

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Want companies to lower their prices? Stop buying stuff from them.

    Want companies to lower their prices? Stop buying stuff from them.

    [ad_1]

    The thing that will make companies lower prices is if consumers stop complaining about paying more for the things they need and want, and actually start refusing to buy them.

    As the U.S. corporate earnings-reporting season progresses, with earnings from major retailers Walmart Inc.
    WMT,
    +0.59%
    ,
    Target Corp.
    TGT,
    +0.10%

    and Home Depot Inc.
    HD,
    +0.52%

    on tap next week, investors can get a ground-floor view of how consumer demand may have been hurt, or not, by higher prices, and what the companies plan to do, or not do, about it.

    This dynamic of how consumers adjust their spending habits when prices change is referred to by economists as the price elasticity of demand.

    For companies to cut prices, ‘you have to have the consumer go on strike, and they’re not there yet.’


    — Jamie Cox, Harris Financial Group

    Those who trust companies will choose to ratchet down prices on their own, or at least not raise them because the rise in input costs has been slowing, haven’t been listening to what the many companies have told analysts on their post-earnings-report conference calls.

    Read: U.S. inflation eases again, PCE shows. Prices rise at slowest pace in almost two years.

    Kraft Heinz Co.
    KHC,
    +0.47%

    acknowledged after its second-quarter report that its relatively higher prices have hurt demand, but not by enough for the food and condiments company to consider cutting prices.

    Colgate-Palmolive Co.
    CL,
    +0.81%

    said it will continue to raise prices, even as inflation slows and selling volume declines, as the consumer-products company continues to be laser focused on boosting margins and profits.

    And while PepsiCo Inc.
    PEP,
    +0.16%

    was worried that elasticities would increase, given how its lower-income customers were being particularly pressured by inflation, the beverage and snack giant reported strong results as it witnessed “better elasticities” in most of the markets in which it operated.

    “Obviously, there is still carryover pricing, and I don’t think we’ll do anything different than our normal cycles on pricing in the balance of the year,” PepsiCo Chief Financial Officer Hugh Johnston told analysts, according to an AlphaSense transcript.

    Basically, as MarketWatch has reported, so-called greedflation is alive and well.

    Jamie Cox, managing partner for Harris Financial Group, said as long as the job market stays strong, as it is now, corporate greed will continue to pay off.

    “If something is more expensive, and you have a job, you’ll complain about it, but you won’t substitute it for something cheaper,” Cox said. For companies to cut prices, “you have to have the consumer go on strike, and they’re not there yet,” Cox added.

    ‘At some point, people are going to say, “All right — enough.” ’


    — Paul Nolte, Murphy & Sylvest Wealth Management

    The reason elasticity is so important in the current environment is that, as long as consumers continue to pay the higher prices companies are charging, inflation will remain stubbornly high, making it, in turn, more likely that the Federal Reserve will continue to raise interest rates or, at the very least, not lower them.

    But the longer interest rates stay high enough to crimp economic growth, the more likely the stock market will reverse lower as recession fears rise.

    “At some point, people are going to say, ‘All right — enough,’ ” said Paul Nolte, senior wealth manager and market strategist at Murphy & Sylvest Wealth Management. “But we just haven’t seen that yet.”

    What is elasticity?

    Economists use the term “price elasticity of demand” to refer to the way in which consumers adjust their spending habits when prices change.

    “Elasticity tries to measure how much more producers will want to produce if prices rise, and how much more consumers will want to buy if prices fall,” explained Bill Adams, chief economist at Comerica.

    Elasticity often depends on the type of product a company sells.

    For example, consumer-discretionary-goods companies that sell products and services that people want will often experience greater price elasticity than consumer-staples companies that sell things that people need, such as groceries and prescription drugs.

    But even for needs, consumers often still have a choice, as less expensive generic, or private-label, alternatives may be available.

    Andre Schulten, chief financial officer of consumer-staples maker Procter & Gamble Co.
    PG,
    +0.58%
    ,
    which recently beat earnings expectations as it continued to raise prices, telling analysts that, while there was “some trading into private label,” the overall market share of private-label products was unchanged for the year.

    As Harris Financial’s Cox said, consumers may be complaining about higher prices, but they aren’t yet desperate enough to stop buying.

    The Federal Reserve’s latest Beige Book economic survey stated that business contacts in some districts had observed a “reluctance” to raise prices as consumers appeared to have grown more sensitive to prices, but other districts reported “solid demand” allowed companies to maintain prices and profitability.

    That’s likely why companies and analysts have become less concerned about price elasticity. Based on a FactSet analysis, mentions of the word “elasticity” in press releases and conference calls of S&P 500 companies
    SPX
    increased as inflation and interest rates started surging in early 2022 through the end of the year.

    With inflation trends softening this year, the Fed took a brief pause in raising rates in June, helping fuel further stock-market gains, before raising rates again in July.

    Mentions of the word elasticity in earnings press releases and conference-call transcripts of S&P 500 companies.


    FactSet

    As the chart shows, “elasticity” popped up in more than 55% of earnings releases and conference calls in mid-2022, but with the second-quarter 2023 earnings-reporting season more than half over, mentions had dropped to about 20%.

    Perhaps that will pick up, as retailers, especially those catering to lower-income customers — recall the PepsiCo comment — assess the demand impact of continued price increases.

    Meanwhile, the branded-foods company Conagra Brands Inc.
    CAG,
    +0.71%
    ,
    whose wide-ranging food brands including Birds Eye, Duncan Hines, Hunt’s, Orville Redenbacher’s and Slim Jim, were starting to see the emergence of a different dynamic.

    Chief Executive Sean Connolly said consumers were shifting behavior in some categories as prices remained high. Rather than trade down to lower-priced alternatives, he noticed some consumers buying fewer items overall, “more of a hunkering down than a trading down.”

    That’s exactly the kind of consumer behavior that is needed, if companies are to stop feeding into the greedflation phenomenon and to start pulling back on prices.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Founder of failed crypto exchange FTX, Bankman-Fried, jailed in New York

    Founder of failed crypto exchange FTX, Bankman-Fried, jailed in New York

    [ad_1]

    FTX founder Sam Bankman-Fried was sent to jail Friday to await trial after a bail hearing for the fallen cryptocurrency wiz left a judge convinced that he had repeatedly tried to influence witnesses against him.

    U.S. District Judge Lewis A. Kaplan ordered Bankman-Fried’s bail revoked after prosecutors said he’d tried to harass a key witness in his fraud case last month when he showed a journalist her private writings and in January when he reached out to the general counsel for FTX with an encrypted communication.

    His lawyers insisted he shouldn’t be jailed for trying to protect his reputation against a barrage of unfavorable news stories.

    Kaplan said he had concluded there was probable cause to believe Bankman-Fried had tried to “tamper with witnesses at least twice” since his December arrest.

    A defense lawyer said an appeal of the incarceration order would be filed and asked for an immediate stay of the order.

    The 31-year-old has been under house arrest at his parents’ home in Palo Alto, California, since his December extradition from the Bahamas on charges that he defrauded investors in his businesses and illegally diverted millions of dollars’ worth of cryptocurrency from customers using his FTX exchange.

    Bankman-Fried’s $250 million bail package severely restricts his internet and phone usage.

    Two weeks ago, prosecutors surprised Bankman-Fried’s attorneys by demanding his incarceration, saying he violated those rules by giving The New York Times the private writings of Caroline Ellison, his former girlfriend and the ex-CEO of Alameda Research, a cryptocurrency trading hedge fund that was one of his businesses.

    Prosecutors maintained he was trying to sully her reputation and influence prospective jurors who might be summoned for his October trial.

    Ellison pleaded guilty in December to criminal charges carrying a potential penalty of 110 years in prison. She has agreed to testify against Bankman-Fried as part of a deal that could lead to a more lenient sentence.

    Bankman-Fried’s lawyers argued he probably failed in a quest to defend his reputation because the article cast Ellison in a sympathetic light. They also said prosecutors exaggerated the role Bankman-Fried had in the article.

    They said prosecutors were trying to get their client locked up by offering evidence consisting of “innuendo, speculation, and scant facts.”

    Since prosecutors made their detention request, Kaplan has imposed a gag order barring public comments by people participating in the trial, including Bankman-Fried.

    David McCraw, a lawyer for the Times, had written to the judge, noting the First Amendment implications of any blanket gag order, as well as public interest in Ellison and her cryptocurrency trading firm.

    Ellison confessed to a central role in a scheme defrauding investors of billions of dollars that went undetected, McGraw said.

    “It is not surprising that the public wants to know more about who she is and what she did and that news organizations would seek to provide to the public timely, pertinent, and fairly reported information about her, as The Times did in its story,” McGraw said.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Consumers seeing substantial improvement in U.S. economy over past 3 months: University of Michigan survey

    Consumers seeing substantial improvement in U.S. economy over past 3 months: University of Michigan survey

    [ad_1]

    The numbers: The University of Michigan’s gauge of consumer sentiment inched down to a preliminary August reading of 71.2 after hitting a 22-month high of 71.6 in the prior month.

    Economists polled by the Wall Street Journal had expected sentiment to inch up to a 71.7 reading in August.

    Another key part of the report is the U. of M. measure of inflation expectations.

    According to the report, Americans’ expectations for overall inflation over the next year slipped to 3.3% in August from 3.4% in the prior month, while expectations for inflation over the next 5 years inched down to 2.9% from 3%.

    Key details: According to the Michigan report, a gauge of U.S. consumers’ views on current conditions rose to to 77.4 in August from 76.6 in the prior month, while a barometer of their future expectations fell to 67.3 from 68.3.

    Big picture: Sentiment has been boosted by waning recession fears and disinflation in grocery store prices.

    What the University of Michigan said: “Consumer sentiment was essentially unchanged from July, with small offsetting increases and decreases within the index.  In general, consumers perceived few material differences in the economic environment from last month, but they saw substantial improvements relative to just three months ago,” said Joanne Hsu, the director of University of Michigan consumer surveys.

    Market reaction: Stocks
    DJIA

    SPX
    were mixed in early trading Friday while the yield on the 10-year Treasury note
    BX:TMUBMUSD10Y
    rose to 4.12%, the highest level since the spike last week after Fitch Ratings downgraded the U.S. credit rating.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • U.S. wholesale prices surprise to the upside in July, PPI shows

    U.S. wholesale prices surprise to the upside in July, PPI shows

    [ad_1]

    The numbers: The U.S. producer price index rose 0.3% in July, the Labor Department said Friday, up from a revised flat reading in June and the largest gain since January.

    Economists polled by The Wall Street Journal had forecast a 0.2% advance.

    The core producer price index, which excludes volatile food, energy prices, and trade services rose 0.2 in July, up from a 0.1% gain in the prior month. This is the largest increase since February.

    Key details: Over the past year, headline producer price inflation was running at a 0.8% rate in July, up from 0.2% in the prior month.

    Core prices are up 2.7% from a year earlier, matching the gain in June. Core PPI prices were running at a 5.8% rate in July 2022.

    A big part of the increase in producer prices was in the services sector.

    The cost of services rose 0.5% last month, up from a 0.1% drop in June. This is the largest increase in a year. The increase was led by a 7.6% gain for portfolio management.

    The cost of goods rose 0.1% in July after a flat reading in the prior month.

    Energy prices were flat in July, down sharply from a 0.7% gain in the prior month.

    Wholesale food prices jumped 0.5% after a 0.2% fall in the prior month.

    Further back on the production line, prices for intermediate goods fell 0.6%, the sixth straight monthly decline.

    Big picture: Price pressures have been diminishing at the producer level much faster than at the consumer level. Economists are watching the inflation data closely to see if the July interest rate hike by the Federal Reserve was the last hike of the cycle.

    What are they saying? “In short, PPI surprised to the upside in July. While we do not expect further rate hikes this year, if inflation surprises to the upside and the labor market and growth do not slow, another increase in interest rates cannot be ruled out in 2023,” said Rubeela Farooqi, chief U.S. economist at High Frequency Economics.

    Market reaction: U.S. stocks
    DJIA

    SPX
    were set to open lower on Friday after the stronger-than-expected PPI data. The yield on the 10-year Treasury note
    BX:TMUBMUSD10Y
    rose to 4.12%.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • IEA Raises Oil Supply Forecasts as U.S. Producers Counter OPEC+ Cuts

    IEA Raises Oil Supply Forecasts as U.S. Producers Counter OPEC+ Cuts

    [ad_1]

    By Will Horner

    The International Energy Agency raised its forecast for global oil supplies next year while moderating its demand expectations, pointing to a more balanced oil market that could cap oil prices.

    In its monthly market report, the IEA said it expects oil supplies to rise by 1.5 million barrels a day next year, 300,000 barrels a day more than it was expecting last month.

    That is as production increases in the U.S., Brazil and Guyana serve to counter production cuts by Russia and Saudi Arabia, undermining those nation’s efforts to support oil prices and boost their oil revenues.

    At the same time, the Paris-based intergovernmental organization said it expects oil demand to rise by 1 million barrels a day next year, roughly half the demand growth seen in 2023 and 100,000 barrels a day less than last month’s forecast.

    The changes mean that the IEA expects oil demand to exceed supply by a more modest 200,000 barrels a day next year, compared with a 700,000 barrel-a-day deficit in 2023. That could provide relief for economies still struggling with the lingering effects of inflation and prevent a repeat of the sharply higher oil prices that followed the outbreak of war in Ukraine.

    Oil producers not part of OPEC+, the alliance between the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries and a group of Russia-led oil producers, are set to dominate the increase in oil output, challenging the cartel’s control over the oil market and diminishing the ability of major producers such as Saudi Arabia to dictate global oil balances.

    “Non-OPEC+ oil supply, now at its highest level ever, nearly matches the OPEC+ alliance barrel-for-barrel and looks set to do so through next year,” the IEA said. “That’s a dramatic change from 2017, when OPEC+ was first established.”

    Non-OPEC+ oil producers will pump just under half of all barrels next year, the IEA expects. In 2017, they accounted for just 43% of all oil produced.

    The IEA’s forecasts are based on the current agreement of members of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries and its allies, known collectively as OPEC+, which could easily change in the coming months, the IEA acknowledged.

    OPEC+’s largest members and dominant decision makers, Saudi Arabia and Russia, have in recent months sharply slashed their output in an attempt to boost oil prices, cuts which have been periodically extended.

    Either nation could at any moment choose to reverse the cuts, though doing so would likely weigh on oil prices and with it their oil income. An oil price war between Moscow and Riyadh in 2020 threatened the end of the OPEC+ alliance and, in an unprecedented event, briefly sent oil prices into negative territory as the two countries raced to increase their output and capture a larger share of the market.

    Write to Will Horner at william.horner@wsj.com

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Nvidia’s stock drops below key uptrend tracker, snapping longest streak above it in 6 years

    Nvidia’s stock drops below key uptrend tracker, snapping longest streak above it in 6 years

    [ad_1]

    Nvidia Corp.’s stock chart now shows that the stunning uptrend investors in the semiconductor maker have enjoyed this year amid all the artificial-intelligence hype may have ended.

    But as history suggests, after a long uptrend, rather than a new downtrend, investors may have to endure some whipsaw action within a relatively static trading range over the next several months before the uptrend resumes.

    The stock
    NVDA,
    -0.72%

    slumped 4.7% on Wednesday to close at $425.54, which was 10.4% below the July 18 record close of $474.94, following a downbeat earnings report from Super Micro Computer Inc.
    SMCI,
    +3.47%
    ,
    which counts Nvidia as a key supplier.

    Many on Wall Street believe a correction is defined by a decline of at least 10% to up to 20% from a significant recent peak. A drop of 20% or more is thought of as a bear market.

    But perhaps more important for chart followers, the stock closed below the widely followed 50-day moving average for the first time since Jan. 6, 2023. The 50-DMA had extended to $429.03 on Wednesday.


    FactSet, MarketWatch

    On Thursday, the stock bounced 0.5% in morning trading but held below the 50-DMA, which extended to $429.68, according to FactSet. Despite the recent correction, the stock was still up 192.6% year to date, while the PHLX Semiconductor Index
    SOX
    has climbed 43.7% and the S&P 500
    SPX
    has advanced 17.2%.

    Read: Nvidia is ‘domination’ and could unlock $300 billion in AI revenue by 2027, analyst says.

    The 50-DMA is used by many chart watchers as a short-term trend tracker. If the stock is above that line, it is viewed as being in an uptrend. The most time spent above that line, the stronger the uptrend.

    Until Wednesday, Nvidia’s stock closed above the 50-DMA for 146 consecutive trading sessions, according to FactSet data, which is the second-longest stretch since it went public in January 1999.

    The record stretch above the 50-DMA was 255 sessions, a streak that ended on Feb. 23, 2017, while the second-longest stretch of 143 sessions ended on Oct. 28, 2020.

    After the stock snapped the super-50-DMA streak in 2020, it waffled around the line and was little changed for the next several months before resuming the uptrend with a big spike.

    As an uptrend takes a several-month pause after the 50-DMA breaks, the 200-DMA becomes strong support.


    FactSet, MarketWatch

    As the chart above shows, after the 50-DMA broke, investors set their sights on the 200-DMA, which many view as a dividing line between longer-term uptrends and downtrends. In this case, despite a one-day dip below the 200-DMA in mid-March 2021, the line acted as strong support.

    And after the record super-50-DMA streak, the stock seesawed around the line, while having a slightly negative bias for the next few months, before the uptrend resumed in force.

    After the 50-DMA break, the 200-DMA was never threatened.


    FactSet, MarketWatch

    This time, the stock never really threatened the 200-DMA.

    In the current technical situation, one of the downside levels to keep an eye on is the bear-market threshold of 20% below the July closing high, which comes in at $379.95. Another level to watch is the 200-DMA, which currently extends to $269.63 and has been rising by $1.65 a day over the past 10 days.

    [ad_2]

    Source link