ReportWire

Tag: commissioners

  • New rental, utility assistance program gives $45,000 in aid in first 2 weeks

    [ad_1]

    Tanisha Thomas plays with her son Kingston, 3, in one of the child care rooms following the grand opening ceremony of the new Riverside Campus of the Center for Transforming Lives in the Morningside neighborhood of Fort Worth on May 2. With the help of the organization, Thomas was able to find stability after experiencing homelessness and battling suicidal thoughts.

    Tanisha Thomas plays with her son Kingston, 3, in one of the child care rooms following the grand opening ceremony of the new Riverside Campus of the Center for Transforming Lives in the Morningside neighborhood of Fort Worth on May 2. With the help of the organization, Thomas was able to find stability after experiencing homelessness and battling suicidal thoughts.

    ctorres@star-telegram.com

    In the first two weeks of the program, Center for Transforming Lives has distributed $45,000 to Tarrant County residents in need of emergency rental and utility assistance.

    In August, Tarrant County Commissioners decided to outsource the assistance that the Human Services department had previously done because it was not being run efficiently. The Center for Transforming Lives subsequently won the $2.3 million contract to provide rental and utility assistance to residents beginning on Nov. 3.

    Carol Klocek, CEO of the Center for Transforming Lives, said people were already lined up at 7:30 a.m. on Nov. 3 waiting to apply for the program. In four hours, the center received 170 applications without ever having advertised the program. Thirty of the county’s in-process applicants were also transferred over that day.

    On Tuesday, Klocek said 23 households will receive the assistance they requested on Nov. 3. Once that is done, the portal will open back up for more applications to be submitted.

    Klocek said the center has been charged with getting the allotted $2 million of aid to the community as quickly as possible, but she’s not sure how long the funds will last. The county gave a grant of $2.3 million to the center with only $300,000 of that going toward administrative costs. The remainder is designated for aid.

    “Will that aid run out in six months? In seven months? And then, will there be a gap until the next year, or will there be, you know, additional funds?” Klocek said. “But what we want to do is stabilize as many households as we can and do that quickly, and that’s our primary charge.”

    Commissioner Roderick Miles, who hosted the public town hall at the center, said if the money is spent before the year-long contract ends, that will give the commissioners a strong case to say more investment is necessary.

    “How can you refute the evidence?” Miles said. “If we run through $2 million, then it’s incumbent upon us to say the need is greater than we anticipated, and we need to earmark, and we need to put more money into this program. It makes my colleagues and I reexamine how we’re doing our budget every year.”

    Before the county opted to outsource the utility and rental assistance programs, Human Services was only giving out about $1.5 million in aid. Budget director Helen Giese said the $4.5 million budget wasn’t being maximized to help residents in need.

    By spending over $2 million less of taxpayer money, the county is helping more members of the community through the partnership with Center for Transforming Lives.

    Rand Otten, acting director of Human Services, said at the October commissioners court meeting that in one month, the county’s department helped about 30 to 40 individuals pay rent in emergencies and about 100 people who needed help paying for utilities.

    According to the county staff report, Center for Transforming Lives proposed to assist approximately 2,200 households from Nov. 1 through Sept. 30, 2026.

    There is a great amount of need and a severe shortage of affordable housing in Tarrant County, Klocek said.

    “The problem is that for so many households, a flat tire, an illness, a gap in child care, all of those kinds of situations can cause people to destabilize,” Klocek said. “A lot of people are also having to take care of an older relative, and so maybe they have child care issues, but an older relative gets sick, so they have to take off work for that, and they work for an employer who doesn’t allow sick time, or doesn’t have flexibility. So all of those kinds of situations can mean they can’t make rent payments.”

    Under the Center for Transforming Lives, residents will no longer be able to receive long-term utility assistance as they could under Human Services. They will be allowed to apply for aid once a year and receive up to three months of help.

    “We’re really limiting this to an emergency assistance program,” Klocek said. “So with our goal of preventing homelessness and allowing people to really weather those things that come up, … but where people are going to be able to pay their rent.”

    Residents in need will be able to get connected with the other resources the center offers and other organizations who can help through the process of applying for emergency assistance at the Center for Transforming Lives.

    Miles said with the number of people ready to apply on Day 1, he saw that the center is a safe and trusted place for the community.

    “People know where it is, and they’re here waiting because they know, once the door is open, they’ll get what they need,” Miles said. “So I feel really good about how we’ve started.”

    Related Stories from Fort Worth Star-Telegram

    Rachel Royster

    Fort Worth Star-Telegram

    Rachel Royster is a news and government reporter for the Fort Worth Star-Telegram, specifically focused on Tarrant County. She joined the newsroom after interning at the Austin American-Statesman, the Waco Tribune-Herald and Capital Community News in DC. A Houston native and Baylor grad, Rachel enjoys traveling, reading and being outside. She welcomes any and all news tips to her email.

    [ad_2]

    Rachel Royster

    Source link

  • South Dakota utility regulators decide energy storage facility needs a state permit

    [ad_1]

    A sign displays the names of South Dakota’s three elected public utilities commissioners outside of their Pierre office in January 2023. (Joshua Haiar/South Dakota Searchlight)

    State utility regulators split Tuesday in Pierre over whether a proposed 120-megawatt energy storage facility in northeast South Dakota requires a state permit, voting 2-1 to deny a developer’s request for an exemption.

    Crowned Ridge Energy Storage petitioned the South Dakota Public Utilities Commission in August for a declaratory ruling that the project does not meet the legal definition of a facility subject to state permitting. The project is designed to store excess electricity from the electrical grid and from Crowned Ridge Wind’s turbines in the Watertown area. It would store enough electricity to power tens of thousands of homes. 

    Crowned Ridge is an affiliate of Florida-headquartered NextEra Energy Resources.

    Commissioner Chris Nelson moved to grant the company’s petition. He said regulating large-scale batteries would exceed the commission’s legal authority. 

    “Batteries don’t generate electricity,” Nelson said. “Secondly, if the Legislature had intended for these to be cited, they need to flat out say so, and not make us try to be electrochemical analysts to figure out whether it should or shouldn’t be.” 

    The energy storage facility, planned for commercial operation in December 2027, would be among the first large-scale energy storage projects in the state. Documents in the commission docket say the project would consist of rows of large lithium-ion batteries housed in white, semi-trailer-sized containers on about 15 acres.

    Examples of energy storage systems. (Courtesy of Public Utilities Commission)

    Mike Nadolski, a lawyer for the company, said the battery system does not generate new electricity and therefore falls outside the commission’s authority. He said the project simply stores and later injects that energy back into the power grid.

    The state’s three elected commissioners are assisted by staff. Staff attorney Amanda Reiss said their review centered on whether discharging stored power back into the grid could legally be considered “generation.” Staff wrote in their review that the project could qualify as an energy conversion facility, which would require a permit. Staff left the question to commissioners after noting the laws were open to interpretation.

    Commissioner Kristie Fiegen offered a substitute motion to deny the company’s petition and make it seek a permit.

    “Yes, energy is stored chemically, but when it comes out, electricity is generated,” Fiegen said. “I’d rather err on the side of customer protection.”

    Chairman Gary Hanson joined Fiegen, calling the matter “the beginning of a new era in electricity in South Dakota.” He said large-scale energy storage could reshape the grid and deserves regulation.

    The 2-1 vote means Crowned Ridge must pursue a state permit; however, commissioners said the Legislature could still clarify how battery storage projects should be treated under South Dakota law. The Legislature will begin its annual lawmaking session in January.

    SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • The Supreme Court will hear former FTC commissioner Rebecca Slaughter’s case

    [ad_1]

    The Supreme Court has voted 6-3 in favor of hearing a lawsuit brought by a former member of the US Federal Trade Commission, CNBC reports. Democrats Rebecca Kelly Slaughter and Alvaro Bedoya were fired from their posts as commissioners in the FTC by President Donald Trump in March. As has been the case with several of the Trump administration’s actions to remove possible critics from their roles in civil service, the pair said their dismissal was illegal.

    Commissioners’ terms may only be ended early for good cause under a law designed to protect the FTC as an independent agency. The FTC is also not allowed to have more than three commissioners from a single political party, meaning Slaughter and Bedoya could not both be replaced by additional Republican members.

    In July, US District Judge Loren AliKhan ruled in favor of Slaughter, who has moved ahead with a suit to contest her dismissal, and a federal appeals court reinstated her to the FTC in September. Today, however, the Supreme Court ruled that her firing may stand while it considers her case.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Santa Fe County commissioners approve high-profile solar energy project near Eldorado

    [ad_1]

    Santa Fe County commissioners have given the green light to a high-profile and controversial solar and battery energy storage facility that has divided opinion in the region and generated heated opposition in the Eldorado area.

    The commission’s 4-1 vote Tuesday to approve the Rancho Viejo Solar project is likely not the end of the story — opponents have said they plan to appeal the approval to state District Court.

    The project comes as New Mexico aims to make a shift to clean energy and away from coal and gas, and commissioners who voted to support the project cited the need to get renewable energy projects online to combat climate change.

    “I think that this project is much, much, much safer than the alternative — the alternative would be a 332-home development, with 332 potential fire hazards,” said Commissioner Hank Hughes, who is a resident of Eldorado and made the motion at Tuesday’s meeting to approve the proposal.

    He added, “I think this is the right decision. We are living in a climate crisis. … This is so much safer than fossil fuels.”

    The commission’s decision comes after a public hearing earlier this month that featured more than 20 hours of testimony. When the roll-call vote played out, at least one person in the audience cried out in frustration. Rancho Viejo Solar, proposed by Northern Virginia-based AES Corp., has drawn fierce opposition from residents concerned about impact on property values and the risk of fire from battery cells overheating.

    Company lauds vote

    Aiming to generate 96 megawatts of power and roughly 45 megawatts of battery storage, the project would cover 680 acres of a roughly 800-acre parcel and include a solar facility, a 1-acre collector substation, a 3-acre battery storage system and a 2.3-mile generation line about four miles east of La Cienega.

    Public Service Company of New Mexico is the intended client for the project.

    Joshua Mayer, senior development manager for AES, said in a statement the vote is “an essential step toward delivering safe, reliable, and affordable energy to the local grid as energy demand continues to rise, while directly advancing New Mexico’s clean energy goals.”

    081225_GC_]RanchoViejo02rgb.jpg (copy)

    Joshua Mayer, senior development manager for AES, listens to concerned citizens speak about on the Rancho Viejo Solar project during Day 2 of a hearing at the Santa Fe County Commission chamber earlier this month. The public hearing featured over 20 hours of testimony on the project before commissioners approved the site Tuesday.

    The county Planning Commission approved a conditional use permit for Rancho Viejo Solar earlier this year, a decision project opponents appealed to county commissioners. In an interview earlier this month, leaders with the Clean Energy Coalition of Santa Fe County, an organization that opposes the solar project and has about 2,000 members, said the group intended to appeal if the commissioners opted to uphold the Planning Commission’s decision.

    The vehement pushback has been a source of frustration for the project’s supporters, who say it could generate enough electricity to carry roughly the entire residential power load of Santa Fe and would mark a significant move in the state’s clean energy transition.

    Commissioners sound off

    Commissioner Lisa Cacari Stone was the lone member of the board to vote against Rancho Viejo Solar. In her comments ahead of the vote, she indicated she has concerns about safety, technology and about the application overall.

    Lisa Cacari Stone headshot

    Lisa Cacari Stone

    “There is the importance of the public health impact. The proximity of this large-scale project to neighborhoods and Rancho Viejo continues to create potential hazards and can be very detrimental to all those in the area,” Cacari Stone said.

    “My vote is not against solar energy,” she added. “It is against this particular proposal by AES because it does not meet — based on the evidence I’ve reviewed, written submissions and testimonies — the highest standards we owe all of our communities.”

    Commissioner Justin Greene, who is among the candidates running to be the next mayor of Santa Fe and who voted to support the project, noted some of the conditions with which AES will need to comply, including increasing the distance between battery containers in the interest of reducing fire risk.

    Justin Greene

    Justin Greene

    “We get calls for environmentalism and sustainability, and we are answering that call by creating a project and helping a project that will power Santa Fe and Santa Fe County,” Greene said.

    Some commissioners noted county officials as well as third-party technical experts recommended approval of the conditional use permit.

    “The environmental benefits of this are very important to me as an environmentalist myself and as someone with a 7-year-old child who will inherit our future,” Commissioner Adam Fulton Johnson said. “Projects like this are critical to meeting our renewable energy goals and replacing retired coal plants.”

    ‘It will go to District Court’

    Lee Zlotoff, who helms the Clean Energy Coalition of Santa Fe County, said in an interview earlier this month the organization has raised more than $50,000 and is prepared to go to court if the commissioners approve the land use permit. He noted his group is “in this for the long haul.”

    “The fight’s not over,” said Randy Coleman, the organization’s vice president, confirming Tuesday the group plans to file an appeal.

    081125_MS_AES Hearing Protest_003.JPG (copy)

    John Lee, left, and Pat Czeto stand outside with protest signs ahead of a public hearing on the Rancho Viejo Solar project in August 2025. The Clean Energy Coalition of Santa Fe County, an organization that opposes the solar project and has about 2,000 members, said the group intended to appeal if the commissioners opted to uphold the Planning Commission’s decision.

    Selma Eikelenboom, a resident of Ranchos San Marcos who lives near the project site, was unsurprised by the outcome Thursday, but said she is confident the matter will end up in court.

    An opponent of the project, she said she has spent three years studying AES’ proposal but, as a party with standing before the county commissioners, had only an hour to make her case.

    “It’s a shame, but it’s not over till the fat lady sings, as they say, and it means it will go to District Court,” Eikelenboom said.

    ‘A great precedent’

    After the meeting, Robert Cordingley, president of the nonprofit 350 Santa Fe, said the Rancho Viejo Solar hearing process can serve as a template moving forward for advocates who are pushing to get such projects approved.

    “We think this will set a great precedent and a template for future battery storage and solar farm projects, not just in Santa Fe County but in the state as a whole,” Cordingley said.

    Glenn Schiffbauer, executive director of the Santa Fe Green Chamber of Commerce, has also supported Rancho Viejo Solar through the lengthy process alongside groups like the Sierra Club’s Rio Grande Chapter.

    “It’s a good day,” Schiffbauer said. “For me and my organization, I think it was really good to see the county of Santa Fe take advantage of the opportunity that was presented to them to lead in renewable energy generation. … This was the first big one. Rather than doing nothing, which is usually the easier way, they did something, and now we have a template going forward.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Austin Pets Alive! | Hays County Commissioners Court Awards Contract…

    Austin Pets Alive! | Hays County Commissioners Court Awards Contract…

    [ad_1]


    To Continue Development of the Hays County Pet Resource Center

    [ad_2]

    Source link