ReportWire

Tag: colorado budget

  • Gov. Polis presents budget to lawmakers, focuses on proposal that would cut Medicaid programs

    [ad_1]

    DENVER — For the second year in a row, Colorado is staring down a daunting budget deficit — and the governor believes cuts to Medicaid are one solution to balancing the budget.

    The solution, however, feels more like a problem for many Colorado families worried about what it may mean for the future.

    Every year, the Joint Budget Committee (JBC) is tasked with preparing budget recommendations for the General Assembly. The group of Colorado lawmakers are provided with budget requests from all executive and judicial departments by November 1.

    Governor Jared Polis presented his budget proposal to the JBC on Wednesday morning.

    The presentation began by setting the stage for the situation, where Gov. Polis cited the federal government shutdown, tariffs, and H.R. 1 (One Big Beautiful Bill Act) as factors that hurt Colorado’s budget.

    “These actions, combined with large increases in Medicaid costs, are straining the General Fund. Difficult choices are needed to address these impacts and protect the progress we have made,” Gov. Polis said in his presentation.

    A special session was held in August to address the state’s $1.2 billion budget hole, which was created by tax changes made in President Donald Trump’s One Big Beautiful Act (H.R.1). As a result, Colorado will collect less revenue than expected when lawmakers approved the state budget in May.

    Some of that $1.2 billion revenue loss was absorbed by the state education fund and the affordable housing fund. Around $300 million that the state had in surplus, which would have been refunded to taxpayers, will now be used to help fill the gap. That left lawmakers with a budget gap estimated to be around $783 million.

    Democratic legislative leaders and Polis had a three-pronged approach to address the budget gap:

    • Cut special corporate tax breaks
    • Dip into the state’s reserves
    • Make spending cuts

    During the special session, lawmakers cut corporate tax breaks by about $250 million. They left it to Polis to make the spending cuts and to determine how much to borrow from state reserves.

    Just after the special session concluded, Polis announced a total of $250 million in cuts and redirected spending in order to balance the state budget.

    The Department of Health Care Policy and Financing (HCPF), which administers Colorado’s Medicaid program, makes up roughly one third of the total General Fund appropriations for the next Fiscal Year.

    As a result, in part, HCPF will see more than $79 million in cuts. About $38 million of that will come from freezing an increase in provider reimbursement rates that kicked in on July 1.

    Then, an executive order from the end of October “initiated an additional $537 million in budget reductions to HCPF, most of which will begin this fiscal year to quickly realize savings to address the state’s current and future budget challenges,” according to the department.

    HCPF has proposed several changes within budget requests targeted at saving money and the sustainability of programs. Their proposal was guided by a certain framework created by the department that aims to “avoid draconian cuts.”

    As part of that framework, data analytics were employed to find trends in cost increases and examine why those increases were occurring.

    “Medicaid is the fastest growing part of this budget that we present, considerably faster than education spending, the other big element,” Polis told the JBC on Wednesday. “You have to dig deeper within Medicaid. There are some costs that are not increasing more than others, and there are some that are… There’s some elements of Medicaid that have remained static and are sustainable. There’s other aspects that are not. We can’t just paint Medicaid with one broad stroke.”

    Jim Waltz

    Governor Jared Polis presented his budget proposal to the Joint Budget Committee on Wednesday morning.

    According to Polis, his proposal would protect the 1.2 million eligible Coloradans who are covered by Medicaid, as well as those who qualify in the future.

    The overview of the budget requests for Fiscal Year 2026-27 reports that caseload costs within Medicaid are “growing faster than revenues will allow without crowding out other uses of the General Fund.” It continues to say that since Fiscal Year 2018-19, the General Fund appropriations for Medicaid have “grown far faster than inflation.”

    Members of the JBC had concerns about Polis’ proposal following the presentation.

    “My concern about the cuts that have already been made, and about what we’re looking at going forward, is that we are impacting our most vulnerable populations in the state,” said State Senator Judy Amabile, a Boulder Democrat. “Some of the people who have been reaching out to me have been talking about how they have a person that they care for that requires 24/7 care. They will literally not be able to survive… I just wonder what the long-term consequences are of the decisions that we’re making today that will restrict the kind of care that our most vulnerable populations are getting. And whether we are going to be driving more people into institutional settings, which are a lot more expensive than having people receive care in a less restrictive setting.”

    State Senator Barbara Kirkmeyer, a Republican who represents Larimer and Weld counties, said she did not have many questions for Polis. Instead, she had comments she wanted the committee to consider.

    “Last year, I asked you why I should think your budget was serious. This year, I definitely don’t think this budget is serious,” Kirkmeyer said. “We know where you used to balance the budget on the backs of students. Now you’re balancing the budget on the backs of people who rely on Medicaid, and you’re jeopardizing health care for everybody.”

    Kirkmeyer called on the JBC to “do the right thing” and “build a budget that works for the people of this state.”

    Denver7 asked Polis for a response to Kirkmeyer’s comments. His team sent Denver7 the statement below:

    Gov. Polis is doing everything he can to lower the cost of healthcare. Senator Kirkmeyer can’t have it both ways and has generally voted to expand the size of government — pushing the state to make unsustainable spending decisions, and ignoring the impacts of H.R. 1 and the disastrous effects it will have on Coloradans’ access to healthcare. Governor Polis submitted a responsible, balanced budget proposal that fully funds schools, funds public safety improvement and increases funding for Medicaid to ensure our most vulnerable Coloradans continue to have access to the care they need and deserve, now and in the future.

    Ally Sullivan, spokesperson for Governor Jared Polis’ Office

    Meanwhile, 3-year-old Jackson Roberts was preparing for his weekly physical therapy appointment.

    “Jackson, he cannot independently walk on his own, and so this is just kind of building that stability and the muscles that he needs in his legs to build up the endurance,” said his mother, Ciara Stewart. “Jackson has two extremely rare genetic mutations, and that has caused a multitude of brain deformities, severe developmental delays. “He is nonverbal. He is nonambulatory. But outside of all of the craziness that we endure, you know, Jackson is a smart, happy and joyful kid who’s full of potential.”

    This year alone, Stewart said her son had spinal and eye surgery.

    “It’s hard because I’m doing everything I can to give him every single opportunity to thrive and to grow and stand up, to be included in everyday activities,” Stewart said. “Being a first-time mom, this is not exactly what you dreamt of life to be, and you just have to like mold to the new reality and become the better version of the parent that your special needs child needs you to be.”

    Stewart told Denver7 Medicaid has been their lifeline.

    “If it wasn’t for Medicaid and these programs, we wouldn’t be able to afford these things for him,” Stewart said.

    Stewart fears for the future of Medicaid in Colorado, specifically when it comes to Community Connector Services, a program that supports children learning how to safely and independently access their communities.

    “What affects my son the most is Community Connector cuts that allows us to engage in the community in a safe way, and it gives us those resources that we need to be successful in an environment that’s not entirely sculpted for children like my son,” Stewart said.

    Jackson Roberts

    Jim Waltz

    Three-year-old Jackson Roberts relies on Medicaid.

    According to a funding request from the HCPF for Fiscal Year 2026-27, a solution to the budget deficit would be removing access to those Community Connector services for members who are under 6 years old.

    “This will ensure that parental responsibilities are taken into account with this service, while allowing age-appropriate members to make meaningful connections within their communities,” the document states.

    Stewart disagrees.

    “Community Connector doesn’t replace a parent responsibility. It empowers it, at the end of the day,” she said. “It is a blessing and a half to see my son be able to navigate our home and communities and his school more independently.”

    Ultimately, Stewart believes cuts to Medicaid would be felt throughout the entire Colorado community.

    “I understand that budget cuts have to happen, and I just hope that they just don’t end up being as drastic as what it’s looking like. Because it’s not just my family, it’s thousands of families, thousands of disabled children, thousands of disabled adults,” said Stewart. “It’s not just an effect on families. It ripples through the economies and our communities as well.”

    What exactly the future holds for Colorado health care programs is still uncertain, since the budget process is far from over.

    In January, state departments can request adjustments to their appropriations from the JBC for the fiscal year ahead. Such requests are called supplementals, which are bills that can be introduced into the legislative session in early February.

    Once the JBC has settled on their recommendations, the result is the Long Bill — the legislation that details the state budget. That is typically introduced into the session by late March or early April.

    Related coverage:

    COLETTE CALL TO ACTION.jpg

    Denver7 | Your Voice: Get in touch with Colette Bordelon

    Denver7’s Colette Bordelon covers stories that have an impact in all of Colorado’s communities, but specializes in reporting on crime, justice and issues impacting our climate and environment. If you’d like to get in touch with Colette, fill out the form below to send her an email.

    [ad_2]

    Colette Bordelon

    Source link

  • State lawmakers return to Colorado Capitol for special session to address massive budget gap

    [ad_1]

    DENVER — State lawmakers returned to the Colorado Capitol on Thursday to begin a special session to address a massive budget shortfall.

    Governor Jared Polis blames the budget deficit on the tax changes made in President Donald Trump’s One Big Beautiful Act (H.R.1). According to the governor and fellow Colorado Democrats, Colorado is set to collect less revenue than expected when lawmakers approved the state budget in May.

    Across the aisle, Colorado Republicans say the federal government’s spending bill isn’t to blame.

    Lawmakers will also attempt to tackle other issues during the special session, including a proposal to provide financial support to Planned Parenthood, which was targeted by the OBBA.

    Politics

    Denver7 presses lawmakers on how they plan to address the state’s $1B budget gap

    What caused Colorado’s budget shortfall?

    Despite misinformation on social media, the state’s current budget shortfall was not caused by excessive spending on undocumented immigrants or the state’s spending over the past several years.

    State Rep. Bob Marshall, D-Highlands Ranch, said he’s tired of hearing misinformed arguments about the budget deficit.

    “Well, it’s really irritating,” Marshall said. “I mean, the reason we’re here is because we have a $1.2 billion hole blasted in the middle of our budget.”

    While the federal government can spend more money than it collects, Colorado’s constitution requires state lawmakers to pass a balanced budget each year. Indeed, that’s what lawmakers did earlier this year.

    But that wasn’t the end of the story.

    Colorado is one of a handful of states with “rolling” conformity, meaning that it automatically adopts changes to the federal tax code. So, if Congress passes legislation that cuts or raises federal taxes, Colorado automatically mirrors it.

    Budget analysts say this automatic mirroring has benefits, such as making filing taxes easier for Coloradans. It can also create problems.

    Trump’s bill made a lot of changes to the federal tax code and cut taxes. Because of its automatic mirroring, Colorado adopted those changes. Many provisions from the OBBA will take effect in 2026 and 2027, but several took effect immediately, resulting in less revenue for the state to collect.

    Colorado approved its state budget in May. State lawmakers approved the budget, anticipating no major changes to the federal tax code. But in July, Congress gave approval to the OBBA, and the president signed it into law on July 4.

    “The impacts on Colorado are particularly immediate,” Polis said. “The impact on taxpayers depends on your tax situation. You may benefit; you may not. But there is a significant loss in revenue, largely from the corporate tax changes that are in this bill.”

    Polis called a special session to address the sudden budget shortfall.

    • Political reporter Brandon Richard recaps Day 1 of the special legislative session in the video player below

    Colorado lawmakers conclude first day of special legislative session

    How much is the shortfall?

    According to Mark Ferrandino, Colorado’s budget director, the OBBA created a $1.2 billion budget gap for the current budget.

    Some of that revenue loss was absorbed by the state education fund and the affordable housing fund. Around $300 million that the state had in surplus, which would have been refunded to taxpayers, will now be used to help fill the gap.

    That still leaves lawmakers with a budget gap estimated to be around $783 million.

    How do lawmakers plan to fill the budget gap?

    Democrats, who are in charge of both chambers of the legislature, have proposed a three-pronged approach: end corporate tax breaks, dip into the state’s rainy-day savings, and cut some spending.

    House Speaker Julie McCluskie said on Tuesday that she anticipates closing the corporate tax loopholes would provide $300 to $400 million. She estimates lawmakers will need to take $200 to $300 million from the state’s reserves, which would leave about $300 million in cuts that would need to be made.

    McCluskie said Democrats would make cuts “responsibly.” However, Democrats want the governor to make those cuts for them.

    Democrats have introduced SB25B-001, which would establish procedures for the Joint Budget Committee (JBC) to hold hearings with the governor’s office when the state doesn’t have enough money to provide state services.

    Under current law, the governor can end or pause functions of state agencies for up to three months if the state doesn’t have enough money for state services. The bill will give the legislature, through the JBC, more involvement in those decisions.

    “To come in in the middle of August, and cut the hundreds of millions of dollars that need to be cut, that’s just not something that the budget committee is equipped to do,” said State Sen. Jeff Bridges, the chairman of the JBC.

    2025 special session bills authorized by sponsor for pre-release

    House Bills

    • Artificial Intelligence Systems (25B-0004)
    • Sale of Tax Credits (25B-0005)
    • Insurance Premium Tax Rate for Home Offices (25B-0006)
    • Eliminate State Sales Tax Vendor Fee (25B-0007)
    • Corporate Income Tax Foreign Jurisdictions (25B-0008)
    • Qualified Bus Income Deduction Add-Back (25B-0009)
    • Prescription Drug Benefit Information Transparency (25B-0011)
    • Consumer Protections for AI Interactions (25B-0013)
    • Continuity of Care for Impacted Communities (25B-0018)
    • Improve Affordability Private Health Insurance (25B-0021)
    • Health Ins Affordability Enter Board Appointment (25B-0023)
    • Voter Approval for State Vendor Fee Reductions (25B-0024)
    • Prohibit Certain Cash Fund Use Against Fed Action (25B-0025)
    • Additions to Definition Federal Taxable Income (25B-0028)
    • Health Insurance Affordability Fund Allocation (25B-0033)
    • Spending Reduction Procedures (25B-0034)
    • Transfer of Money in Refinance Discretionary Account (25B-0036)
    • Health Providers Practice Scope Preventive Care (25B-0037)
    • Limit Subsidies Health Ins Affordability Enterprise (25B-0042)
    • Retention of Vendors Fees for Collecting Sales Tax (25B-0043)

    Senate Bills

    • State-Only Funding for Certain Entities (25B-0001)
    • Healthy School Meals For All (25B-0002)
    • Processes to Reduce Spending During Shortfall (25B-0003)
    • Reallocate DNR Wolf Funding to Health Ins Enterprise (25B-0010)
    • Tech-Neutral Anti-Discrimination Clarification Act (25B-0012)
    • Increase Transparency for Algorithmic Systems (25B-0017)
    • Voter Approval Additions to Federal Taxable Income (25B-0031)
    • Tax Credit for Health Savings Accounts (25B-0032)

    Courtesy of Colorado General Assembly website

    Republicans call special session ‘premature’

    While Polis and Democratic lawmakers say the special session is necessary, Republicans aren’t so sure about the timing.

    “I think the special session is very premature,” said Colorado House Minority Leader Rose Pugliese. “I think that the impacts of the bill really should have gone through the Joint Budget Committee process, and then once the Joint Budget Committee can understand what the implications of the budget are, then we can come in for a special session or during a regular session to get this budget issue dealt with.”

    Republicans said the special session fails to address the state’s structural budget challenges and believe Democrats plan to raise taxes.

    “For years, Democrats at the Capitol have spent beyond their means and ignored Republican solutions. Now, they want taxpayers to bail them out,” Pugliese said. “Republicans will protect your right to vote on tax increases, defend your refunds, and not give Democrats a blank check. Our bills repeal hidden tax hikes, protect small retailers, and preserve Medicaid for the most vulnerable. These are real solutions for Colorado families.”

    Republicans have introduced bills that they say would provide “common-sense solutions,” but the proposals are not expected to pass the Democratic majority.

    Politics

    How common are special sessions in Colorado? Here are all 52 that’ve been called

    Lawmakers will address other issues

    The OBBA made reproductive clinics like Planned Parenthood ineligible for federal reimbursements. Colorado Democrats have introduced a bill, SB25B-002, which would authorize state funding for those clinics until they become eligible for federal reimbursements again.

    “We are irreplaceable,” said Jack Teter, the vice president of government affairs for Planned Parenthood. “And I’m very grateful that the legislature and the governor’s office recognize that and that they’re acting during special session to preserve access for our patients.”
     
    Lawmakers will also consider SB25B-003, a bill to ask voters to provide more money for the SNAP food assistance program.

    “Republicans in Congress made unprecedented cuts to SNAP in their federal budget, which slashed millions from nutrition programs that helped Coloradans feed their families,” said State Sen. Dafna Michaelson Jenet, D-Commerce City.

    Lawmakers will also consider changes to Colorado’s artificial intelligence law.

    The special session is expected to last into the first part of next week.

    Denver7

    Denver7 | Your Voice: Get in touch with Brandon Richard

    Denver7 politics reporter Brandon Richard closely follows developments at the State Capitol and in Washington, and digs deeper to find how legislation affects Coloradans in every community. If you’d like to get in touch with Brandon, fill out the form below to send him an email.

    [ad_2]

    Brandon Richard

    Source link