ReportWire

Tag: cognition

  • The Link Between Milk and Parkinson’s Disease | NutritionFacts.org

    [ad_1]

    Is the brain damage associated with milk consumption due to the banned pesticide heptachlor or the milk sugar galactose?

    Parkinson’s disease is a neurodegenerative brain disorder that affects millions of people. What causes it? Well, if you look at lifestyle factors associated with Parkinson’s disease, dairy consumption is the strongest dietary factor associated with an increased risk of Parkinson’s disease. In fact, dairy products are the only food group consistently linked with a high risk of developing Parkinson’s. Five large prospective studies have confirmed the link. This includes the two Harvard cohorts, the Nurses’ Health Study and the Health Professionals Follow-up Study, which followed more than 100,000 people combined for decades in “the largest analysis of dairy and PD [Parkinson’s disease] to date,” analyzing more than 1,000 newly diagnosed cases. All the studies found a link between dairy and Parkinson’s, with most finding a significant link—about a 50% increase in risk overall in those drinking the most milk compared to those drinking the least, at a p-value below 0.00001, meaning there’s less than a 1 in 100,000 chance you’d randomly get a finding that extreme. You can see this in the chart below and at 1:13 in my video, The Role Milk May Play in Triggering Parkinson’s Disease.

    Okay, but why is there a link at all? “Despite clear-cut associations between milk intake and” incidence of Parkinson’s, “there is no rational explanation,” concluded one review. A year later, though, we got a clue: “Midlife milk consumption and substantia nigra neuron density at death.” What does that mean? Parkinson’s is caused primarily by the loss of a certain type of nerve cells in a critical part of the brain, with symptoms first appearing once most of these neurons have died. So one study looked at how much milk people drank when they were in their 40s, 50s, and 60s, and then examined their brains at autopsy and counted how many of those critical neurons they had left. In every single quadrant, neuron density was highest “in those who consumed no milk and lowest in those who consumed the most milk.” Even after removing the Parkinson’s cases, those drinking two cups (473 mL) of milk a day had up to 40% fewer nerve cells in most quadrants of that critical brain region. What’s in milk that could be wiping out brain cells? Among the people who drank the most milk, residues of the pesticide “heptachlor epoxide were found in 9 out of 10 brains.” So, maybe the finding of pesticide residues more commonly in the brains of those who drank the most milk could explain how milk could be cause-and-effect related to Parkinson’s disease risk.

    Now, that’s not the only potential explanation. In one of my videos, I talked about how meat contains that clumpy neurotoxic protein alpha-synuclein. Well, dairy products may contain trace amounts as well, but we don’t have confirmation of that. Could the milk sugar “galactose be the missing link?” Galactose is what the lactose in milk breaks down into once it’s in the body. It’s also what’s used to induce aging—to experimentally cause aging—in the brain. When you drink it, the galactose is picked up by your brain within a few hours, and for doses above 100 mg/kg, it appears that galactose can cause pathological alterations in brain cells, similar to those observed in Parkinson’s disease. This amount “can be reached and surpassed” by simply drinking two glasses (473 mL) of milk (the main dietary source of galactose) each day. And of all your brain cells, those dopaminergic neurons—the ones that you need to retain to prevent Parkinson’s—may be more vulnerable to galactose-induced damage because they are more vulnerable to oxidative stress.

    Galactose may also explain the findings linking milk drinking with higher death rates. You may be thinking, “Well, duh—the saturated butterfat is just cutting people’s lives short,” but higher mortality with high milk consumption has been observed regardless of the milk fat content. Skim milk might be fat-free, but it’s not lactose-free.

    Can’t you just drink lactose-free milk, like Lactaid? That has the lactase enzyme added to make lactose-free milk. But it just breaks down lactose into galactose in the carton rather than in your gut, so you’re still ingesting the same amount of galactose. Perhaps it’s no wonder that more milk intake at midlife may be linked to a greater rate of cognitive decline. Remember, researchers use galactose to create brain aging in the laboratory. D-galactose, a metabolic derivative of lactose, has been extensively used in animal models “to mimic cognitive aging” through oxidative stress. Compared to those who said they “almost never” drink milk, those drinking more than one glass (237 mL) a day appear more likely to suffer a decline in global cognitive function.

    Doctor’s Note

    Here’s the meat video I mentioned: The Role Meat May Play in Triggering Parkinson’s Disease.

    You may remember that I’ve explored this before in Could Lactose Explain the Milk and Parkinson’s Disease Link?. Uric acid may also be a contender—see Parkinson’s Disease and the Uric Acid Sweet Spot.

    For more on Parkinson’s disease, check out related posts below.

    [ad_2]

    Michael Greger M.D. FACLM

    Source link

  • State to use AI to improve government

    [ad_1]

    BOSTON — Artificial intelligence is being used for everything from guiding self-powered cars and developing life-saving medicines to powering online search engines that help you find a plumber or pick holiday gifts for your family.

    And the machine learning platform could soon be employed by the state government to speed up the processes of getting a state permit, renewing a vehicle registration or detecting fraud in public benefits programs.

    This page requires Javascript.

    Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

    kAm%96 w62=6J 25>:?:DEC2E:@? 2??@F?465 uC:52J E92E :E A=2?D E@ 56A=@J r92Ev!%’D 2CE:7:4:2= :?E6==:86?46 2DD:DE2?E A=2E7@C> 😕 6I64FE:G6 3C2?49 286?4:6D H:E9 E96 8@2= @7 >2<:?8 DE2E6 8@G6C?>6?E H@C< “36EE6C 2?5 72DE6C” 7@C C6D:56?ED]k^Am

    kAm“%9:D 😀 23@FE >2<:?8 8@G6C?>6?E 72DE6C[ >@C6 677:4:6?E[ 2?5 >@C6 67764E:G6 7@C E96 A6@A=6 H6 D6CG6[” v@G] |2FC2 w62=6J D2:5 😕 2 AC6A2C65 DE2E6>6?E]k^Am

    kAmw6C 25>:?:DEC2E:@? D2:5 E96 px C@==@FE H:== 36 :>A=6>6?E65 2D 2 A92D65 2AAC@249 24C@DD E96 6I64FE:G6 3C2?49 “2?5 H:== AC@G:56 2 D276 2?5 D64FC6 6?G:C@?>6?E E92E AC@E64ED DE2E6 52E2]” %96 4@?EC24E H:E9 r92Ev!% H2D ?68@E:2E65 E9C@F89 2 4@>A6E:E:G6 AC@4FC6>6?E AC@46DD[ @77:4:2=D D2:5]k^Am

    kAm~?46 56A=@J65[ |2DD249FD6EED H:== 36 E96 7:CDE DE2E6 E@ 25@AE E96 E649?@=@8J 7@C E96 6?E:C6 c_[___6>A=@J66 6I64FE:G6 3C2?49[ 244@C5:?8 E@ E96 w62=6J 25>:?:DEC2E:@?]k^Am

    kAm%96 C@==@FE @7 E96 ?6H A@=:4J 4@>6D 2D DE2E6 =2H>2<6CD 2C6 4@?D:56C:?8 2 >JC:25 @7 AC@A@D2=D 2:>65 2E 255:?8 8F2C5C2:=D 2C@F?5 FD6 @7 E96 ?6H E649?@=@8J]k^Am

    kAm~?6 AC@A@D2= H@F=5 C6BF:C6 =2C86 2CE:7:4:2= :?E6==:86?46 E649?@=@8J 4@>A2?:6D DF49 2D E96 @?=:?6 492E3@E r92Ev!% E@ C68:DE6C H:E9 E96 DE2E6 pEE@C?6J v6?6C2=’D ~77:46 2?5 5:D4=@D6 :?7@C>2E:@? 23@FE E96:C 2=8@C:E9>D]k^Am

    kAmp?@E96C 3:== 42==D 7@C 32??:?8 “566A72<6D” @C 4@>AFE6C86?6C2E65 >2?:AF=2E:@?D @7 2 A6CD@?’D G@:46 @C =:<6?6DD FD:?8 >249:?6 =62C?:?8 E@ 4C62E6 G:DF2= 2?5 2F5:@ 4@?E6?E E92E 2AA62CD E@ 36 C62=] %96 E649?@=@8J 😀 36:?8 FD65 E@ 86?6C2E6 72<6 :>286CJ 7@C 2?JE9:?8 7C@> “C6G6?86 A@C?” E@ A@=:E:42= >F5D=:?8:?8]k^Am

    kAmx? a_ac[ pEE@C?6J v6?6C2= p?5C62 r2>A36== D@F89E E@ E:89E6? E96 C6:?D @? 2CE:7:4:2= :?E6==:86?46 56G6=@A6CD[ DFAA=:6CD 2?5 FD6CD[ :DDF:?8 ?6H 8F:52?46 E92E H2C?65 E96> ?@E E@ CF? 27@F= @7 E96 DE2E6’D =2HD @? 4@?DF>6C AC@E64E:@?[ 2?E:5:D4C:>:?2E:@? 2?5 52E2 D64FC:EJ]k^Am

    kAm{2DE H66<[ E96 DE2E6 w@FD6 @7 #6AC6D6?E2E:G6D 2AAC@G65 2 A2:C @7 3:A2CE:D2? 3:==D D6EE:?8 ?6H C6DEC:4E:@?D @? E96 FD6 @7 2CE:7:4:2= :?E6==:86?46 😕 A@=:E:42= 42>A2:8?:?8] %96 AC@A@D2=D H@F=5 C6BF:C6 42>A2:8?D E@ 5:D4=@D6 E96 FD6 @7 px 😕 A@=:E:42= 25D 2?5 32? “5646AE:G6” 4@>>F?:42E:@?D 😕 42>A2:8? 25D h_ 52JD 367@C6 2? 6=64E:@?]k^Am

    kAmr92Ev!%[ H9:49 H2D 4C62E65 3J $2? uC2?4:D4@32D65 ~A6?px[ 2? 2CE:7:4:2= :?E6==:86?46 C6D62C49 7:C> 4@7@F?565 3J t=@? |FD<[ 2==@HD FD6CD E@ 6?E6C E96>6D[ AC@>AED 2?5 8F:56=:?6D :?E@ E96 px DJDE6> E92E 4@>6D FA H:E9 2 C6DA@?D6 2D :7 2 9F>2? HC@E6 :E]k^Am

    kAm~? :ED H63D:E6[ E96 4@>A2?J D2JD E96 r92Ev!% 3@E 😀 2 “D276 2?5 FD67F=” px DJDE6> E92E :?E6C24ED 😕 2 “4@?G6CD2E:@?2= H2J” H:E9 FD6CD[ >2<:?8 :E A@DD:3=6 E@ “2?DH6C 7@==@HFA BF6DE:@?D[ 25>:E :ED >:DE2<6D[ 492==6?86 :?4@CC64E AC6>:D6D[ 2?5 C6;64E :?2AAC@AC:2E6 C6BF6DED]”k^Am

    kAmqFE E96 6>6C86?46 @7 px E649?@=@8J 92D 366? DE66A65 😕 4@?EC@G6CDJ[ H:E9 4C:E:4D H2C?:?8 E92E r@?8C6DD 2?5 DE2E6 8@G6C?>6?ED ?665 E@ >@G6 BF:4<=J E@ D6E C68F=2E:@?D 8@G6C?:?8 :ED FD6]k^Am

    kAmw62=6J 25>:?:DEC2E:@? @77:4:2=D D2J E96 C@==@FE @7 r92Ev!% H:== 36 5@?6 H:E9:? 2 “H2==65@77[ D64FC6 6?G:C@?>6?E E92E AC@E64ED DE2E6 52E2 2?5 6?DFC6D E92E 6>A=@J66 492E :?AFED 5@ ?@E EC2:? AF3=:4 px >@56=D]” %96J D2:5 FD6 @7 E96 E649?@=@8J H:== 36 8@G6C?65 3J 4FCC6?E DE2E6 C68F=2E:@?D 2?5 A@=:4:6D[ H9:49 H:== 36 “C68F=2C=J” FA52E65[ @77:4:2=D D2J]k^Am

    kAm“qJ >2<:?8 r92Ev!% 2G2:=23=6 E@ E96 DE2E6 H@C<7@C46[ H6 2C6 6>A@H6C:?8 @FC 6>A=@J66D H:E9 2 D64FC6[ 8@G6C?65 E@@= E92E 42? 6?92?46 D6CG:46 56=:G6CJ H9:=6 >2:?E2:?:?8 E96 9:896DE DE2?52C5D 7@C 52E2 AC:G24J[ D64FC:EJ[ 2?5 E9@F89E7F=[ EC2?DA2C6?E FD286 @7 px[” y2D@? $?J56C[ D64C6E2CJ @7 E96 tI64FE:G6 ~77:46 @7 %649?@=@8J $6CG:46D 2?5 $64FC:EJ[ D2:5 😕 2 DE2E6>6?E]k^Am

    kAm“~FC 7@4FD 😀 ?@E ;FDE 25@AE:?8 px[ 3FE 5@:?8 D@ 😕 2 H2J E92E C67=64ED @FC G2=F6D[ 2?5 DEC6?8E96?D ECFDE H:E9 E96 C6D:56?ED H6 D6CG6]”k^Am

    kAmr9C:DE:2? |] (256 4@G6CD E96 |2DD249FD6EED $E2E69@FD6 7@C }@CE9 @7 q@DE@? |65:2 vC@FAUCDBF@jD ?6HDA2A6CD 2?5 H63D:E6D] t>2:= 9:> 2E k2 9C67lQ>2:=E@i4H256o4?9:?6HD]4@>Qm4H256o4?9:?6HD]4@>k^2m]k^Am

    [ad_2]

    By Christian M. Wade | Statehouse Reporter

    Source link

  • Can Vegan Fecal Transplants Lower TMAO Levels? | NutritionFacts.org

    [ad_1]

    If the microbiome of those eating plant-based diets protects against the toxic effects of TMAO, what about swapping gut flora?

    “Almost 2,500 years ago, Hippocrates stated that ‘All disease begins in the gut.’” When we feed our gut bacteria right with whole plant foods, they feed us right back with beneficial compounds like butyrate, which our gut bugs make from fiber. On the other hand, if we feed them wrong, they can produce detrimental compounds like TMAO, which they make from cheese, eggs, seafood, and other meat.

    We used to think that TMAO only contributed to cardiovascular diseases, like heart disease and stroke, but, more recently, it has been linked to psoriatic arthritis, associated with polycystic ovary syndrome, and everything in between. I’m most concerned about our leading killers, though. Of the top ten causes of death in the United States, we’ve known about its association with increased risk of heart disease and stroke, killers number one and five, but recently, an association has also been found between blood levels of TMAO and the risks of various cancers, which are our killer number two. The link between TMAO and cancer could be attributed to the inflammation caused by TMAO, but it could also be oxidative stress (free radicals), DNA damage, or a disruption in protein folding.

    What about our fourth leading killer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), like emphysema? TMAO is associated with premature death in patients with exacerbated COPD, though it’s suspected that it’s due to them dying from more cardiovascular disease.

    The link to stroke is a no-brainer—no pun intended. It is due to the higher blood pressure associated with higher TMAO levels, as well as the greater likelihood of clots forming in those with atrial fibrillation. Those with higher TMAO levels also appear to have worse strokes and four times the odds of death.

    Killer number six is Alzheimer’s disease. Can TMAO even get up into our brains? Yes, TMAO is present in human cerebrospinal fluid, which bathes the brain, and TMAO levels are higher in those with mild cognitive dysfunction and those with Alzheimer’s disease dementia. “In the brain, TMAO has been shown to induce neuronal senescence [meaning, deterioration with age], increase oxidative stress, impair mitochondrial function, and inhibit mTOR signaling, all of which contribute to brain aging and cognitive impairment.”

    Killer number seven is diabetes, and people with higher TMAO levels are about 50% more likely to have diabetes. Killer number eight is pneumonia, and TMAO predicts fatal outcomes in pneumonia patients even without evident heart disease. Kidney disease is killer number nine, and TMAO is strongly related to kidney function and predicts fatal outcomes there as well. Over a period of five years, more than half of chronic kidney disease patients who started out with average or higher TMAO levels were dead, whereas among those in the lowest third of levels, nearly 90% remained alive.

    How can we lower the TMAO levels in our blood? Because TMAO originates from dietary sources, we could limit our intake of choline- and carnitine-rich foods. They’re so widespread in foods,” though we’re talking about meat, eggs, and dairy. “Therefore, restriction of foods rich in TMA-containing nutrients may not be practical.” Can we just get a vegan fecal transplant? “Vegan donors provided the investigators with a fresh morning fecal sample…”

    If you remember, if you give a vegan a steak, despite all that carnitine, they make almost no TMAO compared to a meat-eater, presumably because the vegan hasn’t been fostering steak-eating bugs in their gut. See below and at 3:40 in my video Can Vegan Fecal Transplants Lower TMAO Levels?.

    Remarkably, even if you give plant-based eaters the equivalent of a 20-ounce steak every day for two months, only about half start ramping up production of TMAO, showing just how far their gut flora has to change. The capacity of veggie feces to churn out TMAO is almost nonexistent. Instead of eating healthier, what about getting some vegan poop?

    In a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial, research subjects either got vegan poop or their own poop back through a hose snaked down their nose, and it didn’t work.

    First of all, the vegans recruited for the study started out making TMAO themselves, in contrast to the other study, where they didn’t make any at all. This may be because the earlier study required the vegans to have been vegan for at least a year, and this study didn’t. So, there wasn’t much of a change in TMAO running through their bodies two weeks after getting the vegan poop, but the vegan poop they got seemed to start out with some capacity to produce TMAO in the first place.

    So, the failure to improve after the vegan fecal transplant “could be related to limited baseline microbiome differences and continuation of an omnivorous diet” after the vegan-donor transplant. What’s the point of trying to reset your microbiome if you’re just going to eat meat? Well, the researchers didn’t want to switch people to a plant-based diet since they knew that alone can change our microbiome, and they didn’t want to introduce any extra factors. The bottom line is that it seems there may not be any shortcuts. We may just have to eat a healthier diet.

    Doctor’s Note

    Want to become a donor? Find out How to Become a Fecal Transplant Super Donor.

    For more on TMAO, check out related posts below. 

    See the microbiome topic page for even more.

    [ad_2]

    Michael Greger M.D. FACLM

    Source link

  • Healthy Life: Ending the day on a positive note: How news can support mental health

    [ad_1]

    In Finland, some parents have adopted a bedtime routine that seems almost too simple to matter. Each night, they ask their children one question: “What was the last good moment of your day?” No screens, no lectures, no moralizing, just a moment to pause and reflect.

    Psychologists who followed families practicing this ritual for 10 years found remarkable results. Children who answered the question daily were up to 80 percent less anxious by the time they reached their teenage years. Ending the day on a calm note helps the brain wrap up its stress cycle, allowing children to sleep more peacefully and recover emotionally from the day’s challenges.

    The story recently became popular on social media, but it also makes us think about something bigger: why don’t the media talk more about such easy and helpful ways to take care of our mental health? In a news world focused on major crises and troubling stories, reporters don’t often highlight positive developments happening around the world.

    The hidden cost of daily news

    Newsrooms have long followed the mantra: “If it bleeds, it leads.” Stories about crime, disasters, or conflict grab attention – and clicks. But reading it can really affect people’s feelings. The research has shown that many adults experience stress or discomfort when following the news, and some even limit their news consumption because they find it stressful (American Psychological Association 2023). Meanwhile, the Reuters Institute notes that “news avoidance” is rising globally, as people deliberately turn away from stories that make them feel overwhelmed.

    The paradox is clear: journalism aims to inform and empower the public, yet relentless coverage of negative events can leave readers anxious, helpless, or disengaged. Ignoring these effects undercuts the basic mission of the press.

    Learning from Finland: A different approach

    The Finnish bedtime ritual offers a useful metaphor for journalism. Just like children think about their day before going to sleep, readers can better understand the news if stories include background information, ideas for fixing problems, and messages of hope.

    This is the philosophy behind solutions journalism, promoted by groups like the Solutions Journalism Network. It doesn’t mean sugar-coating problems or avoiding hard truths. Instead, it means telling the full story, highlighting not just the problem but also credible responses and examples of success.

    For instance, when reporting on youth anxiety, a journalist could explore programs in schools, community initiatives, or national policies that help children build resilience. Research from the University of Texas at Austin’s Engaging News Project found that readers of solutions-focused articles felt more optimistic about the issue and more confident that there were effective ways to address it, compared with readers who only saw problem-focused news. Engaging audiences this way also strengthens trust in media, an important advantage at a time when many people doubt the news.

    Small shifts, big impact

    In many ways, journalism can borrow inspiration from the Finnish habit of ending the day with a moment of reflection. It’s a simple cultural practice, not a rule, but it shows how small habits can shape how people process the world around them and be less anxious.

    Similarly, there are a few modest adjustments journalists can consider when thinking about how audiences absorb the news:

    Language: choosing clear, calm wording instead of dramatic phrasing when covering difficult subjects.

    Balance: showing not only the problem, but also what people or communities are trying in response.

    Context: helping readers understand why something is happening, not only that it happened.

    Follow-up: returning to stories so people see what changed over time.

    They are reflections on how reporting might support a clearer and more grounded understanding of events. And just as the Finnish ritual helps families end the day with perspective, these small journalistic choices can help audiences navigate the news with a better coherence.

    Real-world examples

    Some news outlets are already using solutions journalism. The Guardian’s Upside series, BBC’s People Fixing the World, and CBC’s What On Earth? spotlight serious issues, like climate, health, and inequality, while focusing on real-world innovations and responses. These programs illustrate that news can inform without overwhelming, by highlighting constructive change.

    Closing the cycle

    In a world where headlines bombard us with crisis after crisis, journalism can offer closure. Just as the Finnish ritual encourages children to reflect on a positive moment before sleep, journalists can help audiences finish the news cycle feeling informed rather than exhausted. The goal isn’t “feel-good news” – it’s resilience and understanding in an age of constant noise.

    Journalism has always been about sharing information. Today, it can also help improve our mental well-being, one calming story at a time.

    American Psychological Association (2023). Stress in America: The State of Our Nation.

    Reuters Institute (2024). Digital News Report: Trends in News Consumption and Avoidance.

    University of Texas at Austin (2021). The Effects of Solutions Journalism on Audience Trust and Engagement.

    [ad_2]

    By: Valentine Delort

    Source link

  • Scientific Studies Find Additional Pet Health Benefits of Ashwagandha | Animal Wellness Magazine

    [ad_1]

    Explore the newly proven pet health benefits of ashwagandha, as confirmed by three scientific studies featuring KSM-66 Ashwagandha.

    Ashwagandha is a millennia-old staple in traditional Ayurvedic medicine, celebrated for its powerful adaptogenic and healing properties. Today, modern science is confirming additional human and pet health benefits of ashwagandha. Past studies have demonstrated its efficacy at managing stress and anxiety in dogs, cats, and horses, and new research shows it also has benefits for brain, skin, and coat health. Let’s examine what the research says about the additional ways ashwagandha, specifically KSM-66 Ashwagandha, supports pet health.

    New Study Demonstrates Ashwagandha’s Benefits for Brain Health

    A recent canine study has shown promising results for the benefits ashwagandha can have for canine brain health, cognition, and the ability to reduce symptoms of canine dementia. Dogs supplemented with KSM-66 Ashwagandha experienced significant improvements in:

    • Serotonin and dopamine levels
    • Nerve growth factor
    • Canine dementia scale scores for sleep, anxiety, and disorientation

    Separate Studies Confirm Ashwagandha’s Skin Health Benefits for Dogs and Cats

    Two additional studies explored the impact of KSM-66 Ashwagandha on skin and coat health in both dogs and cats. They found it can help pets struggling with dry skin, shedding, or lackluster coats. Researchers found significant increases in:

    • Skin hydration and elasticity
    • Moisture retention
    • Fur thickness and growth

    KSM-66 Ashwagandha: Driving the Science that Explores the Pet Health Benefits of Ashwagandha

    KSM-66 Ashwagandha is a premium, root-only extract known for its quality, purity, and efficacy. Backed by 46 safety and quality certifications, KSM-66 Ashwagandha is the most clinically studied ashwagandha available. It’s also the safest and the only one clinically proven for pets. Along with the three recent studies, five more published studies have demonstrated the pet health benefits of ashwagandha from KSM-66, which include:

    • Reducing stress and anxiety
    • Improving gut and immune health
    • Supporting cognitive function and longevity

    “The scientific research being done using KSM-66 Ashwagandha proves what healers have known for thousands of years” says Kartikeya Baldwa, CEO of Ixoreal Biomed, manufacturer of KSM-66 Ashwagandha. “Ashwagandha is a natural adaptogenic herb that supports health in humans, and now we’re seeing it does the same for dogs, cats, and horses. It’s important for pet parents to know there is efficacy behind this root-only extract when they’re buying it for their animals. There’s a reason it’s known as the “king of herbs!”

    KSM-66 Ashwagandha is also great for pets because of its neutral taste, which makes it an ideal addition to pet food, treats, and supplements.

    Learn more about KSM-66 Ashwagandha.


    Post Views: 32


    Animal Wellness is North America’s top natural health and lifestyle magazine for dogs and cats, with a readership of over one million every year. AW features articles by some of the most renowned experts in the pet industry, with topics ranging from diet and health related issues, to articles on training, fitness and emotional well being.

    [ad_2]

    Animal Wellness

    Source link

  • Cognitive Science Says This Is the Best Way to Learn Faster, Increase Recall, and Improve Your Memory

    [ad_1]

    How does learning work? Encode, store, retrieve: take it in, find a place for it, pull it out when you need it. If you can’t retrieve information, you haven’t really learned it.

    So since we all learn best by doing, it only makes sense that testing yourself — as long as you do it the right way — is the best way to learn faster and retain more.

    Granted, taking a test kind of sucks. Tests assess, measure, and judge, and who enjoys being judged? Taking a test can feel high pressure, high stakes.

    But what if there is no pressure? What if there are no stakes? What if a test isn’t used to evaluate your knowledge, but help you learn faster and better?

    A meta-review of a number of studies published in the Journal of Experimental Psychology found that self-testing — which is inherently low-stakes, since testing yourself means you’re the only person who knows the results — is the most effective way to speed up the learning process. A massive study published in Psychological Science in the Public Interest backs up that finding, showing that self-testing is the most effective learning technique, edging out distributed practice and interleaving.

    Why? Partly because of the additional context self-testing naturally creates. Quiz yourself and answer incorrectly, and not only will you be more likely to remember the right answer after you look it up, you’ll also remember the fact you didn’t remember.

    Getting something wrong is a great way to remember it the next time, especially if you tend to be hard on yourself. In a weird way, when it comes to memory, what you got wrong can be stickier than what you got right.

    For example, I sat in the parking lot looking up the answer to a question I thought I had gotten wrong on the Class A contractor’s license exam; I feel sure I’ll never forget that bolts must be placed within 12 inches of all sill plate joints. You could argue that was a high-pressure situation, but it really wasn’t. Instead of studying a lot to prepare, I took the test to see what I needed to learn since you can retake the test as often as necessary within a one-year period.

    I truly saw it as practice test, so the stakes felt low. (As it turned out out I passed the first time, but I still remember the answers to questions I thought I had gotten wrong, and looked up afterwards.)

    The same approach works when you’re teaching new employees. Say you’re training new technicians to perform a process. Stop halfway and give them a pop quiz, and the stakes — since the quiz feels like an assessment, not a learning tool — and they’ll feel the stakes are high. (If nothing else, no one likes to be wrong in front of other people.)

    But what if you pass out a quick quiz, let them take it, go over the answers, and tell them to throw away their papers when you’re done? Take makes it a low-stakes test that fosters learning.

    And provide a number of other positive outcomes. According to a study published in Psychology of Learning and Motivation, low-stakes self-testing provides a number of benefits:

    • Self-testing (and retrieving) aids retention. Learning a presentation? Quiz yourself on what comes after your intro. Quiz yourself by listing the four main points you want to make. Quiz yourself on sales estimates, key initiatives, or results from competitive analysis. That will force you to practice retrieving the information you want to remember, which will make it stickier.
    • Self-testing identifies knowledge gaps. Test yourself, and you’ll quickly discover what you don’t know. Then you can focus on learning that. (And you’ll be more likely to remember that information since you didn’t know it the first time.)
    • Self-testing helps you learn more the next time you study. Studies show that people who took a test before they studied retained information better than those who did not. (Think of it as priming your study pump.)
    • Self-testing organizes knowledge. Reading is fairly passive. Testing forces you to make connections, or recognizes gaps in your ability to make connections. Testing helps you realize, “Ah — this goes with that,” or “This causes that,” and makes you cluster information so it makes better sense.
    • Self-testing helps transfer knowledge to new situations. People who are repeatedly tested are better able to apply what they know to new situations. Think of it as the, “Hmm, this is a lot like that, but with one little twist” effect. 
    • Self-testing helps retrieve information not tested. Granted, this one seems odd. Still: take a test, and you’ll better remember information that was studied but not tested. (I’m guessing that’s the result of the overall memory boost frequent low-stakes testing provides.) 
    • Self-testing prevents interference from prior material. Try to learn a lot at once, and it all tends to run together. Or, more likely, you’ll remember what you learned early in the session, but after a while the rest is just a blur. Toss in a few quizzes along the way, though, and that doesn’t tend to happen. If you need to learn a lot of material, break the session into chunks by inserting a few quizzes. (And if you’re teaching new employees a lot of material, definitely throw in a few low-stakes quizzes.)

    ​Best of all, testing tends to encourage more learning. While self-testing certainly reveals what you don’t know — at least not yet — it also helps you feel good about how much you have learned.

    The result is a virtuous cycle. You feel good about improving, which motivates you to keep trying to improve, self-testing reveals you’ve continued to improve.

    That’s another benefit of frequent, low-stakes testing.

    Not only do you learn more, you also want to learn more.

    The opinions expressed here by Inc.com columnists are their own, not those of Inc.com.

    [ad_2]

    Jeff Haden

    Source link

  • Educators get new guidance for age of AI

    [ad_1]

    STATE HOUSE, BOSTON — Artificial intelligence in classrooms is no longer a distant prospect, and Massachusetts education officials on Monday released statewide guidance urging schools to use the technology thoughtfully, with an emphasis on equity, transparency, academic integrity and human oversight.

    “AI already surrounds young people. It is baked into the devices and apps they use, and is increasingly used in nearly every system they will encounter in their lives, from health care to banking,” the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education’s new AI Literacy Module for Educators says.


    This page requires Javascript.

    Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

    kAm“z?@H=6586 @7 9@H E96D6 DJDE6>D @A6C2E6—2?5 9@H E96J >2J D6CG6 @C F?56C>:?6 :?5:G:5F2=D’ 2?5 D@4:6EJ’D 8@2=D—96=AD 3C:586 4=2DDC@@> =62C?:?8 H:E9 E96 564:D:@?D E96J H:== 7246 @FED:56 D49@@=]”k^Am

    kAm%96 s6A2CE>6?E @7 t=6>6?E2CJ 2?5 $64@?52CJ t5F42E:@? C6=62D65 E96 =62C?:?8 >@5F=6 7@C 65F42E@CD[ 2D H6== 2D 2 ?6H v6?6C2E:G6 px !@=:46 vF:52?46 5@4F>6?E @? |@?52J 29625 @7 E96 a_ada_ae D49@@= J62C[ 2 7@C>2= 2EE6>AE E@ D6E A2C2>6E6CD 2C@F?5 E96 E649?@=@8J E92E 92D :?7:=EC2E65 65F42E:@?]k^Am

    kAmq@E9 H6C6 56G6=@A65 😕 C6DA@?D6 E@ C64@>>6?52E:@?D 7C@> 2 DE2E6H:56 px %2D< u@C46 2?5 2C6 >62?E E@ 8:G6 D49@@=D 2 4@?D:DE6?E 7C2>6H@C< 7@C 564:5:?8 H96?[ 9@H 2?5 H9J E@ FD6 px 😕 H2JD E92E 2C6 D276[ 6E9:42= 2?5 :?DECF4E:@?2==J >62?:?87F=[ 244@C5:?8 E@ 2 st$t DA@<6DA6CD@?]k^Am

    kAm%96 56A2CE>6?E DEC6DD65 E92E E96 8F:52?46 😀 “?@E E@ AC@>@E6 @C 5:D4@FC286 E96 FD6 @7 px] x?DE625[ :E @776CD 6DD6?E:2= 8F:52?46 E@ 96=A 65F42E@CD E9:?< 4C:E:42==J 23@FE px — 2?5 E@ 564:56 :7[ H96?[ 2?5 9@H :E >:89E 7:E :?E@ E96:C AC@76DD:@?2= AC24E:46]”k^Am

    kAm%96 =62C?:?8 >@5F=6 7@C 65F42E@CD :ED6=7 ?@E6D E92E :E H2D HC:EE6? H:E9 E96 96=A @7 86?6C2E:G6 px]k^Am

    kAm%96 7:CDE 5C27E H2D :?E6?E:@?2==J HC:EE6? H:E9@FE px] p 5:D4=@DFC6 D2JD “E96 2FE9@CD H2?E65 E9:D C6D@FC46 E@ C67=64E E96 36DE E9:?<:?8 @7 6IA6CED 7C@> st$t’D px E2D< 7@C46[ 7C@> st$t[ 2?5 7C@> @E96C 65F42E@CD H9@ DFAA@CE65 E9:D H@C<] (96? px >@56=D 4C62E6 7:CDE 5C27ED[ H6 >2J F?4@?D4:@FD=J ‘2?49@C’ @? px’D @FEAFED 2?5 =:>:E @FC @H? 4C:E:42= E9:?<:?8 2?5 4C62E:G:EJj 7@C E9:D C6D@FC46 23@FE px[ E92E H2D 2 A@DD:3:=:EJ E96 2FE9@CD H2?E65 E@ 2G@:5]”k^Am

    kAmw@H6G6C[ E96 4=@D6E@7:?2= 5C27E H2D 6?E6C65 :?E@ 2 =2C86 =2?8F286 >@56= =:<6 r92Ev!%c@ @C r=2F56 $@??6E c “E@ 4964< E92E E96 E6IE H2D 2446DD:3=6 2?5 ;2C8@?7C66[” :E D2JD]k^Am

    kAmx? |2DD249FD6EED 4=2DDC@@>D[ px FD6 92D 2=C625J DE2CE65 E@ DAC625] %62496CD 2C6 6IA6C:>6?E:?8 H:E9 r92Ev!% 2?5 @E96C E@@=D E@ 86?6C2E6 CF3C:4D[ =6DD@? A=2?D[ 2?5 :?DECF4E:@?2= >2E6C:2=D[ 2?5 DEF56?ED 2C6 FD:?8 :E E@ 5C27E 6DD2JD[ 3C2:?DE@C> :562D[ @C EC2?D=2E6 E6IE 7@C >F=E:=:?8F2= =62C?6CD] q6J@?5 E6249:?8[ 5:DEC:4ED 2C6 2=D@ FD:?8 px 7@C D4965F=:?8[ C6D@FC46 2==@42E:@? 2?5 252AE:G6 2DD6DD>6?ED]k^Am

    kAmqFE E96 DE2E6’D ?6H C6D@FC46D 42FE:@? E92E px 😀 72C 7C@> 2 ?6FEC2= E@@=[ 2?5 BF6DE:@?D DH:C= 2C@F?5 H96E96C px 42? 36 FD65 E@ 6?92?46 =62C?:?8[ @C D9@CE4FE :E]k^Am

    kAm“q642FD6 px 😀 56D:8?65 E@ >:>:4 A2EE6C?D[ ?@E E@ ‘E6== E96 ECFE9[’ :E 42? AC@5F46 C6DA@?D6D E92E 2C6 8C2>>2E:42==J 4@CC64E 2?5 E92E D@F?5 4@?G:?4:?8[ 3FE 2C6 724EF2==J HC@?8 @C 4@?EC2CJ E@ 9F>2?D’ F?56CDE2?5:?8 @7 C62=:EJ[” E96 8F:52?46 D2JD]k^Am

    kAmx? H92E :E 42==D “px 7:4E:@?D[” E96 56A2CE>6?E H2C?D 282:?DE @G6CC6=:2?46 @? DJDE6>D E92E 42? 723C:42E6 :?7@C>2E:@?[ C6:?7@C46 FD6C 2DDF>AE:@?D E9C@F89 “DJ4@A92?4J[” 2?5 4C62E6 H92E |x% C6D62C496CD 92G6 56D4C:365 2D “4@8?:E:G6 563E[” H96C6 A6@A=6 364@>6 2?49@C65 E@ >249:?686?6C2E65 5C27ED 2?5 =@D6 E96 23:=:EJ E@ 56G6=@A E96:C @H? :562D]k^Am

    kAm%96 8F:52?46 FC86D D49@@=D E@ AC:@C:E:K6 7:G6 8F:5:?8 G2=F6D H96? 25@AE:?8 px E@@=Di 52E2 AC:G24J 2?5 D64FC:EJ[ EC2?DA2C6?4J 2?5 244@F?E23:=:EJ[ 3:2D 2H2C6?6DD 2?5 >:E:82E:@?[ 9F>2? @G6CD:89E 2?5 65F42E@C ;F58>6?E[ 2?5 24256>:4 :?E68C:EJ]k^Am

    kAm~? AC:G24J[ E96 56A2CE>6?E C64@>>6?5D E92E 5:DEC:4ED @?=J 2AAC@G6 px E@@=D G6EE65 E9C@F89 2 7@C>2= 52E2 AC:G24J 28C66>6?E AC@46DD 2?5 E6249 DEF56?ED 9@H E96:C 52E2 😀 FD65 H96? E96J :?E6C24E H:E9 DF49 DJDE6>D] u@C EC2?DA2C6?4J[ D49@@=D 2C6 6?4@FC2865 E@ :?7@C> A2C6?ED 23@FE 4=2DDC@@> px FD6[ >2:?E2:? AF3=:4 =:DED @7 2AAC@G65 E@@=D[ 2?5 56D4C:36 9@H 6249 😀 FD65]k^Am

    kAmq:2D 😀 2?@E96C 46?EC2= 4@?46C?] %96 8F:52?46 DF886DED 86?6C2E:G6 px E@@=D 92G6 3F:=E:? 92C>7F= 3:2D6D[ 2D E96J 2C6 EC2:?65 @? 9F>2? 52E2[ 2?5 E92E E62496CD 2?5 DEF56?ED D9@F=5 6I2>:?6 9@H px C6DA@?D6D >2J G2CJ]k^Am

    kAm“(96? px DJDE6>D 8@ F?6I2>:?65[ E96J 42? :?25G6CE6?E=J C6:?7@C46 9:DE@C:42= A2EE6C?D @7 6I4=FD:@?[ >:DC6AC6D6?E2E:@?[ @C :?;FDE:46[” E96 56A2CE>6?E HC@E6]k^Am

    kAm~77:4:2=D H2C? E92E AC65:4E:G6 2?2=JE:4D 7@C642DE:?8 2 DEF56?E’D 7FEFC6 @FE4@>6 4@F=5 :?4@CC64E=J 7=28 E96> 7@C 24256>:4 :?E6CG6?E:@?[ 32D65 @? 3:2D65 px :?E6CAC6E2E:@? @7 52E2]k^Am

    kAm“pFE@>2E65 8C25:?8 E@@=D >2J A6?2=:K6 =:?8F:DE:4 5:776C6?46D] w:C:?8 A=2E7@C>D >:89E 5@H?C2?< 42?5:52E6D H9@D6 6IA6C:6?46D @C 6G6? ?2>6D 5:776C 7C@> 5@>:?2?E ?@C>D] pE E96 D2>6 E:>6[ DEF56?ED 24C@DD E96 r@>>@?H62=E9 7246 C62= 5:DA2C:E:6D 😕 2446DD E@ 9:89DA665 :?E6C?6E[ FAE@52E6 56G:46D[ 2?5 :?4=FD:G6 =62C?:?8 6?G:C@?>6?ED[” E96 8F:52?46 D2JD]k^Am

    kAm%96 5@4F>6?E 2=D@ A=246D C6DA@?D:3:=:EJ @? 65F42E@CD E@ @G6CD66 2?5 25;FDE px @FEAFED] u@C 6I2>A=6[ E62496CD >:89E FD6 px E@ 5C27E 2 A6CD@?2=:K65 C625:?8 A=2? 3FE DE:== 252AE :E E@ C67=64E 2 DEF56?E’D :?5:G:5F2= :?E6C6DED[ DF49 2D DA@CED @C 8C2A9:4 ?@G6=D]k^Am

    kAmu@C DEF56?ED[ E96 DE2E6 😀 >@G:?8 2H2J 7C@> 2 E@?6 @7 @FEC:89E AC@9:3:E:@? @7 px[ 2?5 E@H2C5D @?6 @7 5:D4=@DFC6 7@C E96 D2<6 @7 24256>:4 :?E68C:EJ]k^Am

    kAm%96 5@4F>6?ED DF886DE E92E D49@@=D 4@F=5 4@>6 FA H:E9 A@=:4:6D 7@C DEF56?ED E@ :?4=F56 2? “px &D65” D64E:@? 😕 E96:C A2A6CD[ 4=2C:7J:?8 9@H 2?5 H96? E96J FD65 E@@=D[ H9:=6 E62496CD E6249 E96 5:DE:?4E:@? 36EH66? px2DD:DE65 3C2:?DE@C>:?8 2?5 pxHC:EE6? 4@?E6?E]k^Am

    kAm“$49@@=D E6249 2?5 6?4@FC286 E9@F89E7F= :?E68C2E:@? @7 px C2E96C E92? A6?2=:K:?8 FD6 @FEC:89E]]] px 😀 FD65 😕 H2JD E92E C6:?7@C46 =62C?:?8[ ?@E D9@CE4:C4F:E :E] r=62C 6IA64E2E:@?D 8F:56 H96? 2?5 9@H DEF56?ED FD6 px E@@=D[ H:E9 2? 6>A92D:D @? @C:8:?2=:EJ[ EC2?DA2C6?4J[ 2?5 C67=64E:@?[” :E D2JD]k^Am

    kAmq6J@?5 4=2DDC@@> CF=6D[ :E 6>A92D:K6D E92E “px =:E6C24J” — ?@E @?=J E96 E649?:42= @H=6586[ 3FE F?56CDE2?5:?8 2?5 6G2=F2E:?8 E96 C6DA@?D:3=6 FD6 @7 E96D6 E@@=D — 2D 2? :>A@CE2?E ;@3 2?5 4:G:4 D<:==]k^Am

    kAm“$EF56?ED ?665 E@ 36 6>A@H6C65 ?@E ;FDE 2D FD6CD[ 3FE 2D :?7@C>65[ 4C:E:42= E9:?<6CD H9@ F?56CDE2?5 9@H px H@C:D=625[ 2?5 9@H E@ 2DD6DD :ED :>A24ED[” E96 8F:52?46 D2JD]k^Am

    kAm%92E =:E6C24J 6IE6?5D E@ E96 A6CD@?2= 2?5 6?G:C@?>6?E2= 4@DED @7 E649?@=@8J] $EF56?ED[ E96 56A2CE>6?E DF886DED[ D9@F=5 C67=64E @? E96:C 5:8:E2= 7@@EAC:?ED 2?5 52E2 A6C>2?6?46 H9:=6 2=D@ 4@?D:56C:?8 6?G:C@?>6?E2= :>A24ED @7 px =:<6 6?6C8J FD6 2?5 6H2DE6]k^Am

    kAm%96 ?6H C6D@FC46D 6>A92D:K6 E92E “E6249:?8 H:E9 px 😀 ?@E 23@FE C6A=24:?8 65F42E@CD—:E’D 23@FE 6>A@H6C:?8 E96> E@ 724:=:E2E6 C:49[ 9F>2?46?E6C65 =62C?:?8 6IA6C:6?46D 😕 px6?92?465 6?G:C@?>6?ED]”k^Am

    kAm%96 4=2DDC@@> 8F:52?46 2CC:G6D 2D v@G] |2FC2 w62=6J 92D E2<6? 2 AC@>:?6?E C@=6 😕 D92A:?8 |2DD249FD6EED’ px =2?5D42A6] {2DE J62C D96 =2F?4965 E96 DE2E6’D px wF3[ 42==:?8 :E 2 3:5 E@ >2<6 |2DD249FD6EED 2 =6256C 😕 3@E9 56G6=@A:?8 2?5 C68F=2E:?8 2CE:7:4:2= :?E6==:86?46] w62=6J 92D AC@>@E65 2? 2==:? 2AAC@249 E@ :?E68C2E:?8 px 24C@DD D64E@CD[ 9:89=:89E:?8 :ED A@E6?E:2= 7@C 64@?@>:4 56G6=@A>6?E]k^Am

    kAmt5F42E:@? @77:4:2=D A@D:E:@?65 E96:C ?6H C6D@FC46D 2D A2CE @7 E92E 3C@256C DE2E6H:56 DEC2E68J]k^Am

    kAm“~G6C E96 4@>:?8 J62CD[ D49@@=D H:== A=2J 2 4C:E:42= C@=6 😕 DFAA@CE:?8 DEF56?ED H9@ H:== 36 8C25F2E:?8 :?E@ E9:D 64@DJDE6> 3J AC@G:5:?8 6BF:E23=6 @AA@CEF?:E:6D 7@C E96> E@ =62C? 23@FE E96 D276 2?5 67764E:G6 FD6 @7 px[” :E D2JD]k^Am

    kAm%96 5@4F>6?ED 24@H=6586 E92E px 😀 2=C625J 6>365565 😕 >2?J @7 E96 E@@=D DEF56?ED 2?5 E62496CD FD6 52:=J] %96 492==6?86[ E96J DF886DE[ 😀 ?@E H96E96C D49@@=D H:== FD6 px 3FE 9@H E96J H:== D92A6 :ED C@=6]k^Am

    kAm%96 C6=62D6 2=D@ 4@>6D 282:?DE E96 324<5C@A @7 2 AFD9 @? q624@? w:== E@ =:>:E E649?@=@8J 😕 4=2DDC@@>D]k^Am

    kAm%96 $6?2E6 E9:D DF>>6C 2AAC@G65 2 3:== E92E H@F=5 AC@9:3:E DEF56?E 46==A9@?6 FD6 😕 D49@@=D DE2CE:?8 😕 E96 a_aea_af 24256>:4 J62C[ C67=64E:?8 8C@H:?8 4@?46C? E92E 4@?DE2?E 56G:46 2446DD 92>A6CD 7@4FD 2?5 =62C?:?8] {2H>2<6CD 324<:?8 E96 >62DFC6 92G6 =:<6?65 46==A9@?6D 😕 4=2DDC@@>D E@ “6=64EC@?:4 4@42:?6” 2?5 “2 J@FE9 3692G:@C2= 962=E9 4C:D:D @? DE6C@:5D]”k^Am

    kAm%96 w@FD6 92D ?@E D2:5 H96? :E A=2?D E@ E2<6 FA E96 >62DFC6[ @C 6G6? H96? C6AC6D6?E2E:G6D H:== C6EFC? 7@C D6C:@FD =2H>2<:?8[ 2 E:>6E23=6 E92E ?@H 2AA62CD =:<6=J E@ 72== 27E6C E96 ?6H D49@@= J62C 368:?D]k^Am

    kAm%92E F?46CE2:?EJ =62G6D D49@@=D 😕 2 A6C:@5 @7 7=FI[ H6:89:?8 9@H E@ :?E68C2E6 6>6C8:?8 px E@@=D 6G6? 2D =2H>2<6CD 4@?D:56C AF==:?8 324< @? @E96C 7@C>D @7 DEF56?E E649?@=@8J FD6]k^Am

    [ad_2]

    By Sam Drysdale | State House News Service

    Source link

  • Boosting BDNF Levels in Our Brain to Treat Depression  | NutritionFacts.org

    [ad_1]

    We can raise BDNF levels in our brain by fasting and exercising, as well as by eating and avoiding certain foods.

    There is accumulating evidence that brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) may be playing a role in human depression. BDNF controls the growth of new nerve cells. “So, low levels of this peptide could lead to an atrophy of specific brain areas such as the amygdala and the hippocampus, as it has been observed among depressed patients.” That may be one of the reasons that exercise is so good for our brains. Start an hour-a-day exercise regimen, and, within three months, there can be a quadrupling of BDNF release from our brain, as seen below and at 0:35 in my video How to Boost Brain BDNF Levels for Depression Treatment.

    This makes sense. Any time we were desperate to catch prey (or desperate not to become prey ourselves), we needed to be cognitively sharp. So, when we’re fasting, exercising, or in a negative calorie balance, our brain starts churning out BDNF to make sure we’re firing on all cylinders. Of course, Big Pharma is eager to create drugs to mimic this effect, but is there any way to boost BDNF naturally? Yes, I just said it: fasting and exercising. Is there anything we can add to our diet to boost BDNF?

    Higher intakes of dietary flavonoids appear to be protectively associated with symptoms of depression. The Harvard Nurses’ Health Study followed tens of thousands of women for years and found that those who were consuming the most flavonoids appeared to reduce their risk of becoming depressed. Flavonoids occur naturally in plants, so there’s a substantial amount in a variety of healthy foods. But how do we know the benefits are from the flavonoids and not just from eating more healthfully in general? We put it to the test.

    Some fruits and vegetables have more flavonoids than others. As shown below and at 1:51 in my video, apples have more than apricots, plums more than peaches, red cabbage more than white, and kale more than cucumbers. Researchers randomized people into one of three groups: more high-flavonoid fruits and vegetables, more low-flavonoid fruits and vegetables, or no extra fruits and vegetables at all. After 18 weeks, only the high-flavonoid group got a significant boost in BDNF levels, which corresponded with an improvement in cognitive performance. The BDNF boost may help explain why each additional daily serving of fruits or vegetables is associated with a 3 percent decrease in the risk of depression. 

    What’s more, as seen here and at 2:27 in my video, a teaspoon a day of the spice turmeric may boost BNDF levels by more than 50 percent within a month. This is consistent with the other randomized controlled trials that have so far been done. 

    Nuts may help, too. In the PREDIMED study, where people were randomized to receive weekly batches of nuts or extra-virgin olive oil, the nut group lowered their risk of having low BDNF levels by 78 percent, as shown below and at 2:46.

    And BDNF is not implicated only in depression, but schizophrenia. When individuals with schizophrenia underwent a 12-week exercise program, they got a significant boost in their BDNF levels, which led the researchers to “suggest that exercise-induced modulation of BDNF may play an important role in developing non-pharmacological treatment for chronic schizophrenic patients.”

    What about schizophrenia symptoms? Thirty individuals with schizophrenia were randomized to ramp up to 40 minutes of aerobic exercise three times a week or not, and there did appear to be an improvement in psychiatric symptoms, such as hallucinations, as well as an increase in their quality of life, with exercise. In fact, researchers could actually visualize what happened in their brains. Loss of brain volume in a certain region appears to be a feature of schizophrenia, but 30 minutes of exercise, three times a week, resulted in an increase of up to 20 percent in the size of that region within three months, as seen here and at 3:46 in my video

    Caloric restriction may also increase BDNF levels in people with schizophrenia. So, researchers didn’t just have study participants eat less, but more healthfully, too—less saturated fat and sugar, and more fruits and veggies. The study was like the Soviet fasting trials for schizophrenia that reported truly unbelievable results, supposedly restoring people to function, and described fasting as “an unparalleled achievement in the treatment of schizophrenia”—but part of the problem is that the diagnostic system the Soviets used is completely different than ours, making any results hard to interpret. There was a subgroup that seemed to correspond to the Western definition, but they still reported 40 to 60 percent improvement rates from fasting, but fasting wasn’t all they did. After the participants fasted for up to a month, they were put on a meat- and egg-free diet. So, when the researchers reported these remarkable effects even years later, they were for those individuals who stuck with the meat- and egg-free diet. Evidently, the closer the diet was followed, the better the effect, and those who broke the diet relapsed. The researchers noted: “Not all patients can remain vegetarian, but they must not take meat for at least six months, and then in very small portions.” We know from randomized controlled trials that simply eschewing meat and eggs can improve mental states within just two weeks, so it’s hard to know what role fasting itself played in the reported improvements.

    A single high-fat meal can drop BDNF levels within hours of consumption, and we can prove it’s the fat itself by seeing the same result after injecting fat straight into our veins. Perhaps that helps explain why increased consumption of saturated fats in a high-fat diet may contribute to brain dysfunction—that is, neurodegenerative diseases, long-term memory loss, and cognitive impairment. It may also help explain why the standard American diet has been linked to a higher risk of depression, as dietary factors modulate the levels of brain-derived neurotrophic factor.

    [ad_2]

    Michael Greger M.D. FACLM

    Source link

  • Parenting 101: 4 Money rules to raise millionaires

    [ad_1]

    According to a recent Bankrate study, children who were raised with a strong financial education are significantly more likely to build healthy money habits and negotiate higher salaries as adults.

    No wonder parents today aren’t willing to leave financial success up to chance. Gamblizard reports that Google searches for “how to teach kids about money” have skyrocketed 92% in the past month alone.

    With Teach Children to Save Day coming up on April 27, personal finance strategist Jamie Wall has four essential money skills every parent should teach early.

    Teach kids to negotiate early

    Helping children learn to negotiate teaches them confidence and critical thinking. This skill doesn’t just help with salaries, it also builds resilience and self-advocacy across various life situations. Start small by encouraging your kids to explain their reasoning during decisions or budget trade-offs. Let them make their case for a new toy by suggesting ways to save for it or what they’d be willing to give up. Role-play common scenarios, like asking for a later bedtime or a larger allowance, so they get comfortable presenting their viewpoint and backing it up with logic.

    Introduce investing concepts early

    Investing might seem like an “adult” topic, but kids as young as 10 can grasp basic ideas like risk, growth, and diversification. Start simple: offer 1 toy now or 3 if they wait a week. It’s an easy way to introduce patience and the idea of long-term rewards. With older kids, try playing a stock market game or tracking shares of a brand they like to make investing fun and relatable. Encourage them to follow the performance of their chosen stocks over time and discuss how the value goes up and down. This hands-on approach teaches patience, the importance of long-term growth, and the power of small, consistent investments.

    Encourage budgeting with allowances

    Giving kids a regular allowance tied to specific responsibilities helps them learn to manage money hands-on. According to the AICPA, the average allowance is $30 per week, and children earn around $6.11 per hour for completing chores. That’s a real income they can learn to manage. Encourage them to split their money into categories: save, spend, and give. This introduces budgeting in a way that’s personal and meaningful, building a habit that can last into adulthood.

    Encourage entrepreneurial ventures

    Letting your child run a mini business, like selling handmade crafts, mowing lawns, or even creating digital content, can teach practical lessons about money, time, and value creation. In a national survey by Junior Achievement USA, 60% of teens said they would prefer to start their own business rather than work a traditional job. This shows a strong interest in entrepreneurship among youth, and early practice gives them a head start. They learn budgeting, setting prices, marketing, and even coping with failure — all within a safe, supportive environment.

    – JC

    [ad_2]

    By: Jennifer Cox The Suburban

    Source link

  • AI Will Understand Humans Better Than Humans Do

    AI Will Understand Humans Better Than Humans Do

    [ad_1]

    Michal Kosinski is a Stanford research psychologist with a nose for timely subjects. He sees his work as not only advancing knowledge, but alerting the world to potential dangers ignited by the consequences of computer systems. His best-known projects involved analyzing the ways in which Facebook (now Meta) gained a shockingly deep understanding of its users from all the times they clicked “like” on the platform. Now he’s shifted to the study of surprising things that AI can do. He’s conducted experiments, for example, that indicate that computers could predict a person’s sexuality by analyzing a digital photo of their face.

    I’ve gotten to know Kosinski through my writing about Meta, and I reconnected with him to discuss his latest paper, published this week in the peer-reviewed Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. His conclusion is startling. Large language models like OpenAI’s, he claims, have crossed a border and are using techniques analogous to actual thought, once considered solely the realm of flesh-and-blood people (or at least mammals). Specifically, he tested OpenAI’s GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 to see if they had mastered what is known as “theory of mind.” This is the ability of humans, developed in the childhood years, to understand the thought processes of other humans. It’s an important skill. If a computer system can’t correctly interpret what people think, its world understanding will be impoverished and it will get lots of things wrong. If models do have theory of mind, they are one step closer to matching and exceeding human capabilities. Kosinski put LLMs to the test and now says his experiments show that in GPT-4 in particular, a theory of mind-like ability “may have emerged as an unintended by-product of LLMs’ improving language skills … They signify the advent of more powerful and socially skilled AI.”

    Kosinski sees his work in AI as a natural outgrowth of his earlier dive into Facebook Likes. “I was not really studying social networks, I was studying humans,” he says. When OpenAI and Google started building their latest generative AI models, he says, they thought they were training them to primarily handle language. “But they actually trained a human mind model, because you cannot predict what word I’m going to say next without modeling my mind.”

    Kosinski is careful not to claim that LLMs have utterly mastered theory of mind—yet. In his experiments he presented a few classic problems to the chatbots, some of which they handled very well. But even the most sophisticated model, GPT-4, failed a quarter of the time. The successes, he writes, put GPT-4 on a level with 6-year-old children. Not bad, given the early state of the field. “Observing AI’s rapid progress, many wonder whether and when AI could achieve ToM or consciousness,” he writes. Putting aside that radioactive c-word, that’s a lot to chew on.

    “If theory of mind emerged spontaneously in those models, it also suggests that other abilities can emerge next,” he tells me. “They can be better at educating, influencing, and manipulating us thanks to those abilities.” He’s concerned that we’re not really prepared for LLMs that understand the way humans think. Especially if they get to the point where they understand humans better than humans do.

    “We humans do not simulate personality—we have personality,” he says. “So I’m kind of stuck with my personality. These things model personality. There’s an advantage in that they can have any personality they want at any point of time.” When I mention to Kosinski that it sounds like he’s describing a sociopath, he lights up. “I use that in my talks!” he says. “A sociopath can put on a mask—they’re not really sad, but they can play a sad person.” This chameleon-like power could make AI a superior scammer. With zero remorse.

    [ad_2]

    Steven Levy

    Source link

  • From Danvers to Ghana: Local teacher travels for global learning experience

    From Danvers to Ghana: Local teacher travels for global learning experience

    [ad_1]

    For Danvers teacher John Hodsdon, summer break was by no means a vacation from learning.

    Hodsdon, a sixth-grade science teacher at Holten Richmond Middle School, spent more than two weeks in Ghana through the Fulbright Teachers for Global Classrooms Program.

    The fully funded program is a yearlong professional learning opportunity and short-term exchange for elementary, middle and high school educators from the U.S. to develop skills to prepare students for a competitive global economy. The program equips educators to bring an international perspective to their schools through targeted training, experience abroad and global collaboration.

    “One of the goals is to help prepare kids for a global world,” said Hodsdon. “How do we communicate with different cultures? How do we show empathy? How do we create a sustainable future by working together?”

    Hodsdon is in his 30th year in Danvers. As a science teacher, he enjoys helping students learn about the environment and feel empowered to effect change. When he found out about the Fulbright opportunity, he was immediately interested, and applied.

    “Danvers is becoming a more diverse community of students,” he said. “I wanted to increase my own cultural understanding and my knowledge of global education.”

    Prior to the trip abroad, participants completed a semester-long online course focused on best practices in global education and gathered for an in-person professional development workshop in Washington, D.C. Finally, they traveled to immerse themselves in another country’s culture and education system. Participating countries and territories included Brazil, Colombia, Ghana, India, Indonesia, Morocco, Peru, Philippines, Senegal and Uruguay.

    Hodsdon was in Ghana from July 13 to July 29 with 17 other participants in the program. Ghana, the second-most populous country in West Africa, is dominated by agriculture. Hodsdon and his group spent the first few days in the capital city of Accra for an orientation period.

    “We met with government officials, and they’re going through education reform right now, so it was interesting to see that process,” he said.

    Next, they went to Yendi, a small town in northern Ghana, and visited Yendi Senior High School. Hodsdon had a chance to observe, co-teach some lessons and put on presentations.

    “We shared ideas about making curriculum student-centered,” he said. “There are some really great teachers over there, so we learned a lot as well. And in working with the kids, they had so much joy in learning, in spite of the fact that they don’t have a lot of the conveniences that we have here.”

    Hodsdon said it was interesting to see how connected the students in Ghana were to their own environment and natural resources.

    “There’s more of a disconnect to the environment here, like if you were to ask, ‘where does your water come from?’” said Hodsdon. “In Ghana, they’re gathering their own water from a well.”

    Hodsdon said he and his host teacher in Yendi will continue to work together and hopefully collaborate on some projects throughout the year. At the start of the school year, Holten Richmond seventh-graders wrote to students in Yendi and sent them school supplies. Next, Hodsdon’s students are raising money to help the students there buy trees to plant, to help with climate change.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Unbelievable facts

    Unbelievable facts

    [ad_1]

    While great apes can learn hundreds of sign language words, they have never been observed asking…

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Cassella new assistant principal at Collins Middle School

    Cassella new assistant principal at Collins Middle School

    [ad_1]

    SALEM — Eliza Cassella was recently named the assistant principal for Collins Middle School in Salem.

    Cassella served the last two years as the Director of Social and Emotional Learning, Culture and Climate at Collins. She has served in educational leadership for more than a decade and has two masters degrees from UMass Boston and Harvard and several certifications in leadership.

    “We are so excited to have Eliza join our leadership team this school year,” said school principal Gavin Softic in an announcement. “Her experience integrating social emotional learning into the everyday learning environment for staff and students makes her a unique talent that we are very fortunate to have in our community.”

    Among other duties, Cassella will oversee grade 7 and help support the implementation of the new Student Success Advisor model, the integration of restorative practices across the school, and CREW 2.0, a space for Connection, Reflection, Excellence, and making real world connections.

    “I feel an overwhelming sense of joy, gratitude, and excitement to be transitioning into the assistant principal role at Collins Middle School,” said Cassella. “Collins…is cultivating something very special for students and educators, and you can feel and sense that when you walk through the doors. It’s electric.”

    She graduated from Assumption College in 2010 and spent five years at City Year, a Boston-based nonprofit that assists schools in the U.S. and other countries in developing young leaders. She began at City Year as an Americorps member serving in a resource classroom delivering targeted interventions in English language arts and math. She also co-led the extended day program before moving on as the Team Leader at the Dearborn Middle School STEM Academy.

    She held several leadership positions, including National Literary Lead, for which she worked with a team to implement evidence-based literacy interventions for corps members across the country. She was also named City Year’s Team Leader of the Year.

    Her tenure in Boston Public Schools included as a classroom teacher and in leadership positions at the Edwards Middle School in Charlestown and East Boston High School. She was also the girls’ junior varsity basketball coach and an assistant varsity basketball coach for the Jets.

    Cassella is currently a part-time adjunct professor at Assumption, a role she accepted last year, and lives in East Boston.

    [ad_2]

    By News Staff

    Source link

  • Night owls exhibit better cognition, research suggests

    Night owls exhibit better cognition, research suggests

    [ad_1]

    Night owls exhibit better cognition, new research suggests. The study found that people who prefer to stay and wake up late tended to perform better on cognitive tests than early birds. Getting a decent amount of sleep was also associated with better cognition. 

    The research, conducted by scientists from Imperial College London in the UK, aimed to explore the relationship between different aspects of sleep and mental performance, including a person’s preferred sleep time, or chronotype. Our chronotype runs along a spectrum, with early birds preferring to sleep and wake up early and night owls preferring a late night and late morning rise.

    Examining sleep and cognition

    The research team analyzed data from the UK Biobank, a longstanding research project that has followed UK residents’ health for many years. As part of the project, researchers asked volunteers to undergo various tests and fill out questionnaires about their daily habits, including sleep. The researchers split the analysis into two parts: they examined data from volunteers who had completed all four cognitive tests included in the project and those who completed two specific tests that assessed their memory and reaction time.

    All told, the team examined data from over 26,000 participants ages 53 to 86, finding several links between sleep and better cognitive functioning. Those who reported sleeping the typical amount recommended, around seven to nine hours a night, tended to do better on cognitive tests than those who didn’t, for instance. But the researchers also found that self-reported night owls exhibit better cognition compared to early birds, as did people somewhere in the middle. 

    “Our study found that adults who are naturally more active in the evening (what we called ‘eveningness’) tended to perform better on cognitive tests than those who are ‘morning people,’” said lead author Raha West, a researcher at ICL’s Department of Surgery and Cancer, in a statement from the university. “Rather than just being personal preferences, these chronotypes could impact our cognitive function.”

    Correlation doesn’t imply causation

    The team’s findings, published this week in the journal BMJ Public Health, can show only a correlation between being a night owl and better mental sharpness, not definitively prove it. And even if this was the case, there are other potential disadvantages to being an evening person. Night owls who work or go to school early are more likely to experience social jetlag, for instance, meaning they can’t often get the amount or kind of sleep they prefer—a discrepancy that can cause subtle but noticeable long-term harm to a person’s metabolism and overall health. Night owls in general may also be at higher risk for health issues like diabetes.

    The researchers say their work demonstrates that the relationship between our brain and sleep is nuanced and complicated. But at the very least, it seems that trying to ensure that we get as much sleep as we need, ideally when we prefer it, is key to keeping our minds sharp. 

     “While understanding and working with your natural sleep tendencies is essential, it’s equally important to remember to get just enough sleep, not too long or too short,” said West. “This is crucial for keeping your brain healthy and functioning at its best.”

    [ad_2]

    Ed Cara

    Source link

  • Deathbed Motivation: The Top 5 Regrets of the Dying

    Deathbed Motivation: The Top 5 Regrets of the Dying

    [ad_1]

    If you were on your deathbed right now, what would your biggest regrets be? The answer can change the way you decide to live the rest of your life.


    Thinking about death can change how we live our lives. Our time on Earth is limited, and this realization can completely shift our perspective. It puts our real values and priorities into sharp focus, causing us to step back and re-evaluate if we are living our current lives in the best way possible.

    When I was going through a period of depression in college, I would take the bus to the local cemetery by myself with nothing but my camera. I’ve always been comfortable with solitude and doing things alone, but these cemetery walks were an especially meaningful and humbling experience for me. Walking among the graves and reading the names of people I’d never know showed me that life is much bigger than my ego. The realization that death is a necessary part of life sparked me to reevaluate and see the bigger picture behind my choices and actions.

    These cemetery walks were a powerful reminder that I would be dead one day too – but not yet – and that filled me with a sense of power and responsibility so long as I’m still breathing.

    How people think about death can have a profound effect on their psychology. Some people face the prospect of mortality by ignoring it and engaging in escapist behaviors driven by materialism (“buy more things”) or hedonism (“seek more pleasure”). Others embrace the prospect of death and recognize that it means they need to make the most of their time here before it’s too late.

    In the popular book The Top Five Regrets of the Dying: A Life Transformed by the Dearly Departing, Bronnie Ware documents her experiences in palliative care, working closely with those who had terminal illnesses or were approaching the end-of-life. She identified five main regrets of the dying based on conversations and confessions with those on their deathbeds.

    This article will outline her main findings along with my personal thoughts on each one.

    Deathbed Motivation: Top 5 Regrets of the Dying

    According to Bronnie Ware, the five most common regrets shared by people nearing death were:

    “I wish I’d had the courage to live a life true to myself, not the life others expected of me.”

    It’s cliché but true: you only have one life to live.

    Many people cave to social pressures to choose paths in life that are expected of them, such as what school to attend, or what career to pursue, or what types of relationships to cultivate. However, what brings one person happiness isn’t necessarily what brings another person happiness. If we only try to make others happy, we often end up neglecting our own needs, wants, passions, and ideals.

    Understanding your core values is one of the most important steps you can take in life. Knowing what you really want will help you make choices that are harmonious with what you really care about, not just what you think you “should do” or “ought to do.” One interesting study published in the journal Emotions found that our most enduring and long-lasting regrets are usually “ideal-related,” such as personal goals and aspirations.

    Our biggest regrets are often the things we didn’t do but always wanted to, like starting a rock band, or writing a book, or traveling to a place we always wanted to visit.

    “I wish I hadn’t worked so hard.”

    Most people don’t lay on their deathbeds thinking, “I wish I spent more time at my job.”

    Work is important and it can be fulfilling, but many people in today’s world become myopically focused on advancing in their jobs/careers or making more money by any means necessary (sometimes even in unhealthy, destructive, or unethical ways).

    We wrongly believe that wealth is the only real measure of value in life, and thus we get distracted from other important things like spending more time with family, taking care of our health, giving back to our community, or pursuing personal passions.

    In our materialistic and consumerist culture, nothing seems more important than “working hard” and “making money,” but as the saying goes, “You can’t take it with you when you die.”

    “I wish I’d had the courage to express my feelings.”

    We often have trouble expressing our true feelings toward people because we see emotions as weakness or we don’t want to risk being vulnerable.

    This is especially true when it comes to feelings of love, gratitude, and appreciation. There are some families, cultures, and couples where it’s rare to hear the words, “I love you,” or “I appreciate you.” The feelings are taken for granted, but they are never explicitly said.

    It’s important that we learn to express love and appreciation toward others while we still can (including toward family, friends, loved ones, or mentors), because we will often regret it if we miss our chance.

    Recently I wrote my mom a thank you letter for her birthday. It helped me communicate a lot of feelings that I’ve always had but were difficult to say out-loud. It felt like an emotional weight was lifted off my shoulders once I finally expressed my tremendous gratitude for her and everything she’s done for me.

    There are also people I’ve lost in life whom I was never able to tell that I appreciated them. Those are regrets I’ll have to live with – the crucial lesson is don’t miss the opportunity to tell people you love them while you still can.

    “I wish I had stayed in touch with my friends.”

    One common theme in life is that relationships come and go.

    Our circle of friends often changes dramatically throughout high school, college, and into adulthood, especially when we move to new places or leave our hometowns. We tend to lose touch with people over time. Those who were once “best friends” we now go years without even speaking to.

    In theory, it’s easier to stay in touch with people now more than ever; old friends and family are just a call, text, or email away, yet we rarely take advantage of these opportunities.

    It’s never too late to check in on past connections. It can seem awkward at first to reach out to those we haven’t seen in years, but often they will appreciate the gesture and you both will enjoy reconnecting and reminiscing about your shared past.

    The simple act of checking in on people on a regular basis (such as holidays, birthdays, reunions, etc.) can preserve our social connections over time and remind us all the positive relationships and social support we have. Each person you stay in touch with is another layer of meaning in your life.

    “I wish that I had let myself be happier.”

    People are too busy these days to be happy.

    We get easily trapped in the hustle and bustle of daily life with work, school, chores, family, and other responsibilities and obligations. In the midst of all this, many forget the simple art of stepping back and finding happiness in the moment.

    You don’t need to wait for something life-changing to be happy. Many people don’t realize that happiness is in their control and you can start finding it in little things, like savoring positive experiences, counting your blessings, having things to look forward to, and prioritizing positive activities. These are habits that are available to anyone no matter what their current situation is in life. You don’t need to be rich or famous; in fact, sometimes those people are the most distracted and least happy.

    If happiness is a skill, then it’s something that’s worth learning. It isn’t magic, it’s a direct result of how you think, act, and view your world.

    The Time That Remains

    If you are reading this right now, then you still have power over how you live the rest of your life. Every new breath is a symbol of this power.

    Which of the big five regrets do you relate to the most? Living too much by other people’s expectations, focusing too much on work, not communicating your true feelings, losing touch with old friends and family, or simply not finding time for more happiness?

    These are important questions worth reflecting on. Take a moment to imagine yourself on your deathbed, which regrets would hurt the most? What can you still do about it?


    Enter your email to stay updated on new articles in self improvement:

    [ad_2]

    Steven Handel

    Source link

  • Irregular Meals, Night Shifts, and Metabolic Harms  | NutritionFacts.org

    Irregular Meals, Night Shifts, and Metabolic Harms  | NutritionFacts.org

    [ad_1]

    What can shift workers do to moderate the adverse effects of circadian rhythm disruption?

    Shift workers may have higher rates of death from heart disease, stroke, diabetes, dementia, and cardiovascular disease, as well as higher rates of death from cancer. Graveyard shift, indeed! But, is it just because they’re eating out of vending machines or not getting enough sleep? Highly controlled studies have recently attempted to tease out these other factors by putting people on the same diets with the same sleep—but at the wrong time of day. Redistributing eating to the nighttime resulted in elevated cholesterol and increases in blood pressure and inflammation. No wonder shift workers are at higher risk. Shifting meals to the night in a simulated night-shift protocol effectively turned about one-third of the subjects prediabetic in just ten days. Our bodies just weren’t designed to handle food at night, as I discuss in my video The Metabolic Harms of Night Shifts and Irregular Meals.

    Just as avoiding bright light at night can prevent circadian misalignment, so can avoiding night eating. We may have no control over the lighting at our workplace, but we can try to minimize overnight food intake, which has been shown to help limit the negative metabolic consequences of shift work. When we finally do get home in the morning, though, we may disproportionately crave unhealthy foods. In one experiment, 81 percent of participants in a night-shift scenario chose high-fat foods, such as croissants, out of a breakfast buffet, compared to just 43 percent of the same subjects during a control period on a normal schedule.

    Shiftwork may also leave people too fatigued to exercise. But, even at the same physical activity levels, chronodisruption can affect energy expenditure. Researchers found that we burn 12 to 16 percent fewer calories while sleeping during the daytime compared to nighttime. Just a single improperly-timed snack can affect how much fat we burn every day. Study subjects eating a specified snack at 10:00 am burned about 6 more grams of fat from their body than on the days they ate the same snack at 11:00 pm. That’s only about a pat and a half of butter’s worth of fat, but it was the identical snack, just given at a different time. The late snack group also suffered about a 9 percent bump in their LDL cholesterol within just two weeks.

    Even just sleeping in on the weekends may mess up our metabolism. “Social jetlag is a measure of the discrepancy in sleep timing between our work days and free days.” From a circadian rhythm standpoint, if we go to bed late and sleep in on the weekends, it’s as if we flew a few time zones west on Friday evening, then flew back Monday morning. Travel-induced jet lag goes away in a few days, but what might the consequences be of constantly shifting our sleep schedule every week over our entire working career? Interventional studies have yet put it to the test, but population studies suggest that those who have at least an hour of social jet lag a week (which may describe more than two-thirds of people) have twice the odds of being overweight. 

    If sleep regularity is important, what about meal regularity? “The importance of eating regularly was highlighted early by Hippocrates (460–377 BC) and later by Florence Nightingale,” but it wasn’t put to the test until the 21st century. A few population studies had suggested that those eating meals irregularly were at a metabolic disadvantage, but the first interventional studies weren’t published until 2004. Subjects were randomized to eat their regular diets divided into six regular eating occasions a day or three to nine daily occasions in an irregular manner. Researchers found that an irregular eating pattern can cause a drop in insulin sensitivity and a rise in cholesterol levels, as well as reduce the calorie burn immediately after meals in both lean and obese individuals. The study participants ended up eating more, though, on the irregular meals, so it’s difficult to disentangle the circadian effects. The fact that overweight individuals may overeat on an irregular pattern may be telling in and of itself, but it would be nice to see such a study repeated using identical diets to see if irregularity itself has metabolic effects.

    Just such a study was published in 2016: During two periods, people were randomized to eat identical foods in a regular or irregular meal pattern. As you can see in the graph below and at 4:47 in my video, during the irregular period, people had impaired glucose tolerance, meaning higher blood sugar responses to the same food.

    They also had lower diet-induced thermogenesis, meaning the burning of fewer calories to process each meal, as seen in the graph below and at 4:55 in my video.

    The difference in thermogenesis only came out to be about ten calories per meal, though, and there was no difference in weight changes over the two-week periods. However, diet-induced thermogenesis can act as “a satiety signal.” The extra work put into processing a meal can help slake one’s appetite. And, indeed, “lower hunger and higher fullness ratings” during the regular meal period could potentially translate into better weight control over the long term. 

    The series on chronobiology is winding down with just two videos left in this series: Shedding Light on Shedding Weight and Friday Favorites: Why People Gain Weight in the Fall.

    If you missed any of the other videos, see the related posts below. 
     

    [ad_2]

    Michael Greger M.D. FACLM

    Source link

  • Study: ‘Little Evidence’ That Cannabis Harmfully Impacts Cognition in People with HIV | High Times

    Study: ‘Little Evidence’ That Cannabis Harmfully Impacts Cognition in People with HIV | High Times

    [ad_1]

    Cannabis is widely used to help mitigate the symptoms of a variety of conditions and diseases. Specifically, a number of state medical cannabis programs list HIV/AIDS as a qualifying condition, as cannabis can help to eliminate a variety of symptoms associated with HIV/AIDS treatment.

    Though, some clinicians have expressed concern how regular cannabis treatments in this regard may impact patient cognition. 

    Researchers affiliated with the University of California at San Diego sought to investigate the cognitive impacts of cannabis use in people with HIV through a newly published meta-analysis in the journal Current HIV/AIDS Reports

    Ultimately, they conclude that neither the use of whole-plant cannabis or cannabis-based medicines are associated with significant cognitive changes in those with HIV.

    Cannabis Use Among People with HIV

    In the study abstract, researchers note the potential benefits that cannabis use can offer patients with HIV while recognizing this population’s “high burden of persisting neurocognitive impairment” and physician concerns with adding cannabis into the mix, specifically its potential cognitive effects.

    Cannabis use among those with HIV is far from a new trend. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration first approved synthetic oral THC capsules (dronabinol) to treat HIV-induced cachexia, or loss of appetite, in 1985.

    Additionally, surveys have consistently affirmed that cannabis use is common among people with HIV, with one 2007 study predating the bulk of medical reform measures in the U.S. still finding that more than 60% of HIV/AIDS patients self-identified as medical cannabis users. 

    Another more recent 2022 study noted that 77% and 34% of people with HIV reported lifetime and past-year cannabis use, respectively.

    While some of these patients report recreational use as one reason, research over the years has found that cannabis is largely used among people with HIV to stimulate appetite, reduce pain, relax and ease anxiety and help with sleep.

    ‘Little Evidence’ of Harmful Cognitive Cannabis Impacts

    With plenty of existing data to pull from, researchers reviewed data from 34 clinical studies to determine the extent that cannabis impacts cognition among patients with HIV. The results, according to the study, revealed that there is “little evidence” to support that cannabis has a harmful impact on cognition among those with HIV.

    “Overall, the number of reported adverse effects were largely outnumbered by beneficial or null findings, providing insufficient support for the detrimental impact of CU [cannabis use] on cognition in PWH [people with HIV],” researchers reported, adding that the results suggest both cannabis and cannabis-based medications can be prescribed to people with HIV “while posing little threat to cognitive function.”

    The topic of cannabis use and cognition has seen a recent uptick in popularity, especially given recent conversations surrounding cannabis-induced psychosis (which has largely been linked to pre-existing conditions and vulnerabilities and is not a widespread issue among cannabis consumers, with some advocates arguing that the focus on this topic is a repackaged version of “Reefer Madness” propaganda from decades past).

    Of course, it’s important to look at the full picture and recognize how cannabis use and abuse may impact a variety of populations, and myriad studies attempt to look a bit more broadly at the topic.

    Recent research shows that cannabis users may actually have a lower chance of cognitive decline overall.  Previous studies have also noted links between heavy cannabis use and cognitive performance, though researchers noted that particular products used, methods of consumption and the reasons for use can also impact cognitive effects associated with cannabis use.

    Another recent study similarly found that adolescents who occasionally use cannabis do not see cognitive differences compared to those who abstain, once again highlighting a distinction surrounding frequency of use among other variables.

    [ad_2]

    Keegan Williams

    Source link

  • Brain-Boosting Grapes  | NutritionFacts.org

    Brain-Boosting Grapes  | NutritionFacts.org

    [ad_1]

    Grape juice and whole grapes are put to the test for brain function, including cognitive decline in early Alzheimer’s.

    In 2010, the first controlled trial was published that examined how the brain responds to grape juice. It helped aged rats, but what about people? “Concord grape juice supplementation improves memory function in older adults with mild cognitive impairment”—or so says the title. The problem is that the study was funded by Welch’s, and, though the authors claim they have no financial interest in the outcome, that seems disingenuous. I mean, do they think Welch’s would ever fund them again if they found grape juice wasn’t good for you? And, indeed, that title is a bit of industry spin. I’m sure that’s what they wanted to find.

    Older adults with memory decline (but not dementia) were randomized into a placebo-controlled, double-blind trial with Concord grape juice versus a similarly looking and tasting Kool-Aid type of drink with the same calories and same sugars. That’s a solid study design. And, berries have those wonderful polyphenol phytonutrients, which have anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties, so it certainly could help brain function and it did seem to help with verbal learning, as you can see in the graph below and at 1:21 in my video Friday Favorites: Benefits of Grapes for Brain Health.

    The odds you’d get such notable results just by chance are like 1 in 25, whereas the higher recall scores are not considered to be statistically significant, since even if there wasn’t an effect, you might get those kinds of results by chance 1 in every 8 or 10 times you’d run the experiment, as shown in the graph below and at 1:38 in my video. And, by convention, we like at least 1 in 20—a p-value of 0.05 or less—especially if we’re looking at multiple outcomes, which increases the likelihood that something will pop up as a fluke. The bottom line is that we’re less confident in these memory outcomes. If this study hadn’t had industry funding, I imagine it would be titled more accurately. Perhaps “Concord grape juice supplementation improves verbal learning in older adults with mild cognitive impairment”—which is still an important finding, and we have the Welch’s corporation to thank for it. Without industry funding, a study like this might never get done. 

    The findings suggest that drinking grape juice is superior to drinking a grape Kool-Aid type of beverage, not necessarily for helping memory, but maybe for helping with learning. When the study was repeated, though, it did seem to help one measure of memory, but no benefit was found for verbal learning, even when using the same test as before, which calls the previous results into question. So, we’re left uncertain about what effects, if any, grape juice has on the aging brain. 

    What about the brains of middle-aged mothers? The Welch’s-funded researchers noted significant improvements in one measure of memory and driving performance as measured in a fancy driving simulator, suggesting you might be able to stop a dozen yards earlier on the highway after drinking grape juice than if you had instead had a grape Kool-Aid type of drink. I do like how they tried to translate the cognitive effects into more meaningful metrics, but it’s important to acknowledge, as they did, that no effects were found for the majority of cognitive consequences. And, when you study 20 different outcomes, the odds are pretty good that you’d just get a statistically significant result or two by chance, as you can see below and at 3:33 in my video

    The latest study involved giving a single dose of a cup of purple grape juice or white grape juice (to which flavor and color had been added to disguise it) to young adults with an average age of 21. In this way, researchers could see if there’s something special about those deep purple polyphenol pigments in Concord grape juice. Their findings? They got the same kind of results: two cognitive measures just reaching statistical significance, but that’s out of seven different outcomes, as you can see below and at 4:12 in my video. So, instead of a p-value of 0.05 as the cut-off for significance, we’d really like to see closer to 0.007, and none hit that. Maybe it’s because they didn’t use whole food like in that blueberry study I profiled before. 

    There was a study that looked at actual grape consumption by utilizing freeze-dried grape powder to capture the whole food (instead of just the juice) versus a sugar-matched placebo. The researchers used PET scans to track changes in brain metabolism associated with early Alzheimer’s in a group of older adults already suffering from mild cognitive decline. Although the changes couldn’t be picked up on neuropsychological testing, in those early-stage Alzheimer’s regions, the placebo group continued to worsen, but the grape group “was spared such decline,” suggesting a protective effect of grapes. You can see these points illustrated in a graph and brain mapping pictures below and from 5:11 in my video. You can see locations where brain metabolism declined after eating six months of placebo grapes (colored red in the video), compared to the level of decline in a brain after six months of eating actual grapes. 

    When commercial entities fund studies, it’s more for marketing purposes than science. That doesn’t necessarily mean the findings are invalid, but you do have to pay special attention to things like the framing of the research question, the experimental methods, statistical analysis, biased interpretation of results, or spin.

    The blueberry video I mentioned is Flashback Friday: Benefits of Blueberries for the Brain. You may also be interested in the Benefits of Blueberries for Mood and Mobility.

    What else might help protect brain function? Check out related posts below.

    [ad_2]

    Michael Greger M.D. FACLM

    Source link

  • Rumination vs. Savoring: The Neural Dynamics Between Positive and Negative Thinking – The Emotion Machine

    Rumination vs. Savoring: The Neural Dynamics Between Positive and Negative Thinking – The Emotion Machine

    [ad_1]

    Rumination is the cornerstone of depression and anxiety. It’s characterized by an excessive replaying of negative thoughts and memories. A new study finds rumination activates the same brain regions as savoring, or the replaying of positive thoughts. Can depressed people learn to use their brains’ natural abilities in a more constructive way?


    This content is for Monthly, Yearly, and Lifetime members only.
    Join Here Login

    [ad_2]

    Steven Handel

    Source link

  • Study Finds Cannabis Users Have Lower Chance of Cognitive Decline | High Times

    Study Finds Cannabis Users Have Lower Chance of Cognitive Decline | High Times

    [ad_1]

    The use of cannabis was associated with lower rates of subjective cognitive decline (SCD), according to the findings of a new study from researchers affiliated with the State University of New York (SUNY). The research found that participants who use marijuana for recreational or medicinal purposes reported less confusion and memory loss compared to those who do not use weed. 

    The new study, which was published online last month by the journal Current Alzheimer Research, found that recreational cannabis use had the most significant impact on cognitive decline.

    “Compared to non-users,” the authors wrote, “non-medical cannabis use was significantly associated with 96% decreased odds of SCD,” according to a report from Filter.

    People who used cannabis for medicinal reasons or for both recreational and medical purposes also showed “decreased odds of SCD.” However, the differences did not rise to the level of statistical significance.

    The authors of the study note that previous research has found a link between heavy cannabis use and cognitive performance. Past studies have shown that frequent or heavy marijuana use was associated with lower verbal recall performance, subjective memory complaints and lower cognitive function, among other signs of mental decline.

    “However, the cognitive implications of cannabis are not only determined by the frequency of cannabis consumption,” the researchers wrote, adding that other factors including the particular product used, method of consumption, and reason for use could also “impact the cognitive effects associated with cannabis use.”

    “Our study addresses these knowledge gaps by comprehensively examining how reason, frequency, and method of cannabis use are associated with SCD among US middle-aged and older adults,” the authors of the study added.

    To conduct the study, researchers at SUNY Upstate Medical University in Syracuse, New York analyzed health survey data from the 2021 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS). The researchers note that the system’s cognitive decline model “was restricted to respondents aged 45 years and older in Washington DC and 14 US states (GA, HI, MS, OR, PA, TN, TX, WI, CO, MD, MI, OH, OK, and NY).”

    The total sample included 4,744 observations with valid SCD responses.

    Survey Asked About Memory Lapses And Confusion

    The survey asked respondents, “During the past 12 months, have you experienced confusion or memory loss that is happening more often or is getting worse?” Respondents were given the option to reply yes, no, don’t know/not sure, or to refuse the question.

    The researchers analyzed the survey data based on three cannabis variables including frequency of use over the past month, ranging from zero to 30 days; reason for cannabis use, which included non-user, medical, non-medical or both; and the method of cannabis consumption, such as non-user, smoke, eat, drink, vaporize, dab or other.

    “We found that non-medical cannabis use was significantly associated with reduced odds of SCD in comparison to non-users,” the researchers wrote, adding that there are several possible reasons for the study’s findings.

    The researchers offered several possible reasons that could explain why cannabis use was associated with reduced rates of self-reported cognitive decline. They note that many people use cannabis to help them sleep, citing a recent study that found that “more frequent sleep disturbances were associated with higher dementia risk in a national US older adult sample.”

    “Several studies have found that cannabis use might enhance sleep quality, expedite sleep onset, and reduce sleep disturbances. Non-medical cannabis use could have contributed to the observed decrease in SCD due to its potential benefit on sleep quality,” the discussion section of the new paper said.

    The results of the study were not consistent for some variables, however. Researchers found an association between the method of cannabis consumption, including a higher prevalence of SCD among cannabis smokers. The research also found an association between the frequency of use and cognitive decline.

    “Although increased frequency and different methods of cannabis use showed positive associations with SCD, these relationships were not statistically significant.”

    The researchers stressed that the study does not refute previous research that has shown frequent or heavy marijuana use was associated with cognitive decline. Instead, they said that the mixed findings indicate the need for further research on the subjects.

    “Our findings underscore the importance of considering multiple factors, such as the reasons for cannabis use, when examining the relationship between cannabis and SCD,” the authors wrote in their conclusion. “Further research is needed to explore the underlying mechanisms contributing to these associations.”

    The authors noted several limitations to the study, including a reliance on self-reported data. They also reported possible bias in responses from participants in states that have not legalized medical cannabis, noting that “individuals in such states may be more likely to underreport or misreport their cannabis use.”

    The study was published as an “article in press,” indicating that it has been accepted by the journal and copyedited and formatted for publication. Further corrections or proofreading changes could come before the article’s final version is published.

    [ad_2]

    A.J. Herrington

    Source link