ReportWire

Tag: Classical Theatre Company

  • Classical Theatre Company Sinks Its Teeth Into a Thrilling Dracula

    Classical Theatre Company Sinks Its Teeth Into a Thrilling Dracula

    “There are far worse things awaiting man than death…”

    Well, unless you’re Dracula. The world’s most famous vampire is more alive dead (or undead) and has been for more than a hundred years. He’s taking yet another bow, this time over at Classical Theatre Company, where they’re offering up Chris Iannacone’s adaptation of Bram Stoker’s Dracula just in time for Halloween.

    The year is 1897, and English solicitor Jonathan Harker embarks on a long journey, traveling quite the distance to Transylvania to meet with a mysterious man named Count Dracula. Harker has recently procured Dracula an estate in England, but the business reason for the trip quickly falls to the wayside as Harker starts to notice strange happenings at Dracula’s castle, as well as Dracula’s request that he stay for one month.

    Back home in England, Harker’s wife Mina anxiously awaits his return, in the meantime visiting with her dear friend Lucy, who’s about to wed a Mr. Arthur Holmwood. As time passes without word from her husband, Mina becomes more unsettled until one night, a mysterious ship crashes ashore during a violent storm. Not long after, Lucy begins to suffer from blood loss – cause unknown. They send for Dr. Seward, who calls on Professor Van Helsing for help deducing the cause of Lucy’s unexplained anemia. Van Helsing suspects there’s something more to Lucy’s illness—and the two puncture wounds on her neck—than meets the eye.

    Bram Stoker released his novel Dracula in 1897, and really, the gist of the story you know even if you never attempted slogging your way through Stoker’s epistolary snooze fest; its core has been filtered through the years in countless adaptations and parodies across multiple mediums with varying levels of fidelity to the source material.

    Though, to be fair, more so than Stoker’s novel, it’s Tod Browning’s 1931 Universal Pictures film starring Bela Lugosi that people know best – which in turn was based more on Hamilton Deane’s 1924 stage adaptation and John Balderston’s 1927 American revision. The point is, pretty much since its inception, Stoker’s novel has existed to be adapted into better versions of itself.

    click to enlarge

    Jonathan Robinson as Renfield in Classical Theatre Company’s Dracula.

    Photo by Pin Lim

    Iannacone’s broad-stroke swing at Stoker’s novel is decently paced and well-plotted, but the production is noticeably devoid of much substance. The focus is on the horror of the story, yes, but with the themes that underpin that horror – repressed sexuality and desire, anxiety around gender relations and otherness, etc. – tamped down, if not almost entirely stripped from the production, the show is little more than empty calories.

    By not leaning into the more common themes that usually come up in this story, director Blake Weir certainly created a challenge for himself and, somehow, it’s a challenge he overcame in terms of still mounting a thoroughly watchable show. It’s genuinely scary at times, funny in moments, and unsettling throughout – i.e., just what you want to see around Halloween. And despite a script that does a lot more telling than showing, the action scenes here are top-notch.

    One positive change to the story that deserves a mention is that Iannacone has added a much-appreciated agency into the character of Mina “I will not be the cause of our failure” Harker. Other hand, with only two women in the piece, it exacerbates the usual horror pattern that still rears its typical head here – the superficial one who discourteously calls a place “backwater country” is the one who is punished in the story while the loyal, responsible other one who thoughtfully considers the beauty of said “backwater country” is the one who survives. It’s more subtle than what’s in Stoker’s book (and in many works of horror in general), but it’s disappointing that it’s still there.

    Going back to the novel, Stoker didn’t exactly go all in on characterization, leaving Iannacone with a flat character problem that goes unsolved in his script. The actors are left to give us reason to care about these people, a chore they approach valiantly and overall successfully.

    There’s Kyle Clark as weary traveler and nervous talker Jonathan Harker. There’s the tight-laced skepticism of David Akinwande’s Seward. Jonathan Robinson, who brings a shuddering insanity and a hauntingly maniacal laugh to Renfield. Eva Olivia Catanzariti’s sympathetic Lucy and Patrick Fretwell’s steadfast Holmwood. And though their appearances are brief, the Weird Sisters, played with haunted house vibrance by Luke Fedell, Maggie Maxwell, and Jasmine Christyne, are the theatrical equivalent to statement pieces, uniquely designed by costume designer Leah Smith.

    click to enlarge

    Maggie Maxwell as a Weird Sister, Kyle Clark as Harker, and Jasmine Christyne as a Weird Sister in Classical Theatre Company’s Dracula.

    Photo by Pin Lim

    Elissa Cuellar’s Mina shines brightest in those moments where vampirism takes hold and flashes of an almost sinister nature appear. Greg Dean’s Van Helsing reads as knowledgeable and well-meaning if a bit scattered in appearance and mannerism, something unimpeded and maybe unintentionally aided by noticeable line flubs.

    Finally, there’s the man himself – Dracula, played by Spencer Plachy. In Plachy’s hands, Dracula is menacing. He’s not at all dandified or sexy like we often see; instead, Plachy’s Dracula comes off as a patronizing predator. (This choice right here, by the way, is the closest the production comes to making substantive meaning.) And not unlike the shark in Jaws, Plachy’s Dracula is used sparingly, which makes each time he appears, all hunched shoulders and harsh breath like he’s barely restraining himself, all the more enjoyable.

    Scenic Designer Afsaneh Aayani’s frightfully versatile set, with an assist from Properties Designer Charly Topper, serves the entire production with ease. The use of the windows as screens for essential projections by Weir, Edgar Guajardo, and Brenda Palestina, as well as photobooth-like framing for the characters, is particularly clever and reflective of the production’s great use of space. They also help with smooth transitions, with scenes blending into each other.

    Aayani’s set is lit by Guajardo’s hope-you’re-not-afraid-of-the-dark lighting schemes. Really, I can’t remember a show so happy to live in the shadows, which it does deftly. The playground is only better in the moments when smoky red light fills the theater and washes across the stage. And Jon Harvey’s eerie soundscape, from the buzzing of flies and barking of dogs to the non-diegetic, synth-y rhythms and jump-worthy musical cues were absolutely killer (no pun intended).

    The final verdict: If you’re looking for a little chill down your spine, Classical Theatre Company’s Dracula is just the lean, alluringly atmospheric production for you.

    Performances will continue at 7:30 p.m. Thursdays through Saturdays and Monday, October 21, and 2:30 p.m. Saturdays and Sundays through October 26 at The DeLUXE Theater, 3303 Lyons. For more information, call 713-963-9665 or visit classicaltheatre.org. $10-$30.

    Natalie de la Garza

    Source link

  • In its Own Sexist Way,  The Taming of the Shrew at Classical Theatre is Funny

    In its Own Sexist Way, The Taming of the Shrew at Classical Theatre is Funny


    “Why are we reading this?”

    The question resounds every year in English classes all across America, especially during the inevitable William Shakespeare unit. All teachers will preach of its perpetual relevance. The passion of young love in Romeo and Juliet. The corrosive effects of ambition and revenge in Hamlet. All of Macbeth.

    What about The Taming of the Shrew, his comedy about several men who conspire and act to break the headstrong and willful nature of a young woman so that her younger sister can be married? It’s one of his more obviously sexist plays; it’s, also, one of his wittiest.

    click to enlarge

    John Dunn as the Pedant, Patrick Fretwell as Tranio, and Marc Alba as Biondello

    Photo by Natasha Nivan Photography.

    The play is about a crass father, Baptista (Alan Hall), who has two daughters: the ladylike Bianca (Elisa Cuellar) and the abrasive, older sister Katherina (Laura Kaldis). Lucentio (Fritz Eagleton) comes to town with his servant Tranio (Patrick Fretwell) and is immediately taken by Bianca. Bianca has other suitors, Hortensio (Domonique Champion) and Gremio (Benito Vasquez), who wish to marry her. However, Baptista won’t marry off Bianca without Katherina first being married. Hortensio decides to enlist his friend, Petruchio (Kregg Dailey), to court the sister that no man wants to go near.

    In a battle of wit and will, Katharina and Petruchio go at each other until Petruchio is finally able to subdue the town Shrew. Petruchio has molded Katharina into an obedient wife, and Katharina is happy to obey and seeks great satisfaction in doing so.

    Now that feminism has become just as commonplace an idea of democracy, the plot of the play reads like Gloria Steinem’s worst nightmare. The whole battle-of-the-sexes dynamic seems like a regressive relic of a time no one should earnestly want.

    Yet in 2024, the desire for traditional gender roles has taken on new relevance. Trad wives and Alpha males have taken the internet by storm. Gender roles and sex-based stereotypes that used to be seen as limiting and confining have now been revamped as purpose-giving and innate. How outdated is The Taming of the Shrew really?

    click to enlarge

    Kregg Dailey as Petruchio and Laura Kaldis as Katherina

    Photo by Natasha Nivan Photography.

    Rather than downplay the problematic gender elements of the play, Dana Bowman, director of Classical Theatre Company’s production of The Taming of the Shrew, embraces the misogyny of trying to tame a woman. Bowman’s zany decision to frame the story as a 1950s sitcom unleashes the bawdy comedy with no reservations. There are no attempts to downplay the blatant misogyny, but the sound effects of the laugh track alongside other sound cues are enough to signal that there is a distinction to be made between humor and truth.

    What’s funny doesn’t have to be true. Is that the extent to Bowman’s perspective?

    The sitcom framework can only go so far. While a shrewd decision to adapt this classic this way, once the conceit loses its novelty, this production becomes just another Shakespeare play set in a new period. The laugh track becomes intermittently used. Lively ’50s inspired commercial breaks devolve into obvious breaks needed for set changes. At points, the momentum flounders. The scenes don’t transition well into each other, and the comedy loses its rhythm. Thankfully, it has actors who breathe vitality into this show when its ideas are running on fumes.

    From the moment Fretwell appears on stage with Eagleton, it’s clear that he has completely bought into the conventions of the sitcom. His physical comedy when he’s both Tranio and Tranio-playing-Lucentio is enjoyable to watch. The way he nimbly moves his body to evoke the confusion of a servant pretending to be upper class highlights reveals a playful use of his body. Tranio’s loyalty and resourcefulness comes through comprehensively.

    Cuellar is the coquettish ingénue. Every doe-eyed glance is both beguiling and endearing. Her smile is both inviting and perfunctory. Cuellar effectively weaponizes her charm as a tool to further her own desires. She’s the sister who marries exactly who she wants to marry while Katharina ends up with a lively brute. Cuellar’s stage presence evokes that of F. Scott Fitzgerald’s Daisy Buchanan — all the enchantment and allure with none of the shallowness.

    Kaldis plays the stubborn sister with zeal alongside Dailey’s boisterous and capricious Petruchio. Hall delivers the most insensitive and unkind words about his eldest daughter in such a naturally glib tone that his amusing disdain for her conveys a matter of fact acceptance of who she is. Ehrhardt’s Grumio a never ending source of comical misunderstandings and tongue-in-cheek innuendo.

    Domonique Champion stuns as Hortensio. His comedic timing and delivery of certain lines showcased not only his clear grasp of the language but also his ability to use his physicality to heighten a joke. At a certain point, his hat became just as much a part of his body as his arms and legs. He does not only excel at delivering multiple moments of laugh-at-loud laughter.

    His failed courtship of Bianca, while funny, finds balance in his earnest display of crushed hopes and rejection. His sadness for the courtship’s ending is palpable. That sadness is also felt when Benito Vasquez as Gremio is rejected. Despite his self-interested desires for wanting Bianca as his bride, Vasquez’s disappointment is real just as much as his desire for her wealth and beauty.

    What this production excels at is letting this Shakespearean comedy be a comedy. Even though the characters’ behaviors can be exaggerated, their intentions and desires are sincere and taken seriously. It’s this production’s commitment to performing the real intentions and real feelings of these characters that makes all the sexist underpinnings feel more like a bug rather than a feature.

    Performances continue through April 20 at 7:30 p.m. Thursdays and Fridays, 2:30 and 7:30 p.m. Saturdays and 2:30 p.m. Sundays at the DeLuxe Theater, 3303 Lyons. For more information call, 713-963-9665 or visit classicaltheatre.org $10-$30.

    Ada Alozie

    Source link