ReportWire

Tag: city charter

  • Special election for vacant Providence City Council seat is Dec. 2

    [ad_1]

    The façade of Providence City Hall is seen from Kennedy Plaza on Sept. 9, 2025. (Photo by Alexander Castro/Rhode Island Current)

    A special election to fill the Providence City Council’s vacant Ward 2 seat — which represents the Blackstone, College Hill, and Wayland neighborhoods — is set for Tuesday, Dec. 2. A primary date is scheduled for Tuesday, Nov. 4. 

    The contest already has three contenders. The latest hopeful is Democratic pollster Matt McDermott, who announced his intent to enter the race Wednesday morning.

    McDermott has served as national co-chair of the LGBTQ+ Victory Fund Campaign Board and worked with candidates like U.S. Rep. Sarah McBride, a Delaware Democrat who was elected in 2024 to become the first openly transgender person in Congress. 

    David Caldwell Jr., president of the Audubon Society of RI, and Jeff Levy of the law firm Levy & Blackman LLP previously announced their candidacy. Both candidates are Democrats.

    City charter rules triggered a special election for Ward 2 to fill the seat left by Helen Anthony, who resigned Sept. 1. Anthony’s resignation was OK’d by the Providence City Council at its Sept. 4 meeting, the first after the Council broke for its summer recess. 

    Candidates must declare their intent to run by filing forms with the city’s Board of Canvassers between Sept. 25 and 4 p.m. on Sept. 26. Nomination papers go out on Oct. 2, and need to be returned by Oct. 7 with at least 50 signatures from eligible voters in Ward 2.

    McDermott, who lives with his husband, a grade school teacher, in Wayland Square, calls for expanding affordable housing and returning schools to local control, after being under state control since 2019.

    “Providence stands at a pivotal moment — a time when bold action can shape our future,” McDermott said in a Wednesday statement. “We need leaders who defend our values, build real collaboration, and deliver transparent, community-led governance.”

    Caldwell’s website indicates that he shares the goals of returning schools to local control and creating more affordable housing. The Marine Corps veteran also wants to prioritize meeting Rhode Island’s Act on Climate goals and protecting the environment — a commitment he traces back to his deployment during the Iraq invasion.

    “My most vivid memory during that deployment was standing on the Kuwaiti border as Saddam Hussein set the Rumaila oil fields ablaze, turning day into near-darkness,” Caldwell wrote. “Missiles occasionally flew overhead, intercepted by our Patriot batteries. In that moment, wearing a chemical weapons suit on the other side of the world, I made a promise: my children would never have to fight oil wars abroad.”

    Caldwell moved with his wife from California to Rhode Island in 2008, then to the East Side in 2017 so his daughters could attend the Lincoln School, an all-girls college preparatory school. 

    Levy’s website promises that he will “fight to protect our city from Trump.” Levy wrote that he wants to keep the capital city “welcoming, safe, and affordable,” and cited his pro bono work against election theft and volunteer work with the American Civil Liberties Union as proof he’ll bring “relentless advocacy” to City Hall.

    “That means putting in the hard work to find fair and equitable solutions to the budget, schools, and housing — and being ready to fight back against the looming MAGA assault on our city,” Levy wrote. “I am ready to do both.”

    Levy has lived with his family in Providence for 27 years and has coached the Fox Point East Side Little League.

    Anthony announced her resignation Aug. 1, citing her continued recovery from severe injuries she sustained in a 2023 accident in a California state park while on vacation. Anthony was in a crosswalk when she was hit by an 82-year-old motorist who mistakenly hit the gas on the large ATV she was driving. She had served on the council since 2019.

    Anthony chaired the council’s Finance Committee, which is directly responsible for forging the capital city’s budget each year in concert with the mayor’s office. The committee on Tuesday night elected Councilor Jo-Ann Ryan, who represents Ward 5 and first took office in 2014, as the its chair. Ryan previously chaired the committee from 2019 to 2023.

    “City Council has no greater responsibility than to be effective stewards of taxpayer dollars,” Ryan said in a statement Tuesday. “I intend to lead this committee with transparency and diligence as we work together to build a city that serves the best interests of all of its residents.”

    During her first stint as chair, Ryan oversaw city budgets which were shaped by the allocation of more than $100 million in American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funding.

    SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Police Commission forwards three LAPD chief finalists’ names for mayor’s consideration

    Police Commission forwards three LAPD chief finalists’ names for mayor’s consideration

    [ad_1]

    The Los Angeles Police Commission has forwarded the names of three finalists for LAPD chief to Mayor Karen Bass — but like much else about the search process, the identities of the front-runners have been kept a secret.

    The announcement came as the commission returned from closed session at the end of a special meeting Wednesday. Commission President Erroll Southers said the board had “discharged its duties as set forth in the city charter…and will be forwarding a list of recommended candidates to the mayor,” according to a recording of the meeting.

    He then made a motion to adjourn the meeting, without further comment. The brief announcement went largely unnoticed outside the commission, which did not issue a news release or otherwise publicly announce the decision.

    The move brings the city one step closer to ending what has been a months-long search for what is widely considered one of the most high-profile and challenging jobs in law enforcement. The post has been vacant since February, when former Chief Michel Moore retired.

    Under the city charter, the commission — a five-member civilian body that acts like a board of directors for the LAPD — is required to select three finalists for Bass to consider. But if the mayor is unsatisfied with the choices, she can ask commissioners to send additional names or continue the search. Whomever she picks will then need to be confirmed by the full City Council.

    Bass has declined through a spokesman numerous requests for comment from The Times about her priorities for chief, and she did not reschedule an earlier interview about the topic that she had canceled.

    Zach Seidl, a spokesman for the mayor’s office, said in a text message there was “[n]othing to share about the search at this time other than the Mayor is continuing to work with urgency on this search and her work to make LA safer.” He did not respond to a follow-up question about whether the mayor had started considering the finalists.

    Wednesday’s announcement squares with a previous timeline given by commissioners, who said they hope to finish evaluating what could be dozens of candidates and offer Bass their top three suggestions by the end of August.

    That hasn’t stopped fevered speculation among LAPD rank-and-file and command staff about who their next leader will be.

    There were at least 25 applicants for the job.

    Among the outside executives who received second interviews, according to sources, were Jim McDonnell, a one-time LAPD assistant chief and former Los Angeles County sheriff; former Houston and Miami chief Art Acevedo; and Robert Arcos, a former LAPD assistant chief who works for the L.A. County district attorney’s office. A high-profile former chief from a West Coast department was also said to have applied, but that name has never been confirmed.

    Those entries, confirmed by multiple sources, add another dynamic to what many consider a wide-open race to be the city’s next top cop.

    The department veterans who received second interviews, sources said, are: Assistant Chief Blake Chow, who oversees LAPD special operations; Deputy Chief Emada Tingirides, commanding officer of the department’s South Bureau; Deputy Chief Donald Graham, who heads the Transit Services Bureau; Deputy Chief Alan Hamilton, head of the Detective Bureau; and Cmdr. Lillian Carranza of the Central Bureau.

    Finding the city’s next police chief is one of the most closely watched decisions made by any mayor.

    Bass and commissioners have in recent months embarked on a citywide listening tour to canvass residents, officers and business owners about what they want to see in the next chief. The mayor has also made regular visits to police roll calls across the city.

    During the community forums, many attendees pushed for the selection of an insider who is attuned to policing in a city as vast and diverse as L.A.

    Others talked about the importance of picking someone who understands the complicated history between the department and the communities it policies. And yet, unlike in other recent chief searches, a growing number of people within the LAPD are pushing for an outside candidate to breathe new life into the organization.

    The process has been shrouded in an unusual level of secrecy.

    Although the names of candidates have occasionally been withheld to protect the identities of those working in other cities, officials this time have also declined to reveal how many people applied for the position, only saying that the number was “more than 25.” Sources have since told The Times that the number was more than 30.

    In the absence of information, the search has been the subject of almost daily rumors inside the department. A LinkedIn post by a former LAPD sergeant-turned-policing consultant went viral after it claimed to reveal a list of semi-finalists. Among those named in the post was Anne Kirkpatrick, the current police commissioner in New Orleans, who quickly issued denials of any interest in the LAPD job.

    At stake is the chance to lead the country’s third-largest local police force at a crucial time in its history. Whoever gets the job will be inheriting a wary department eager for clear leadership and a city worried about crime and the use of force.

    One of the key questions facing Bass is whether an outsider would be better at introducing reforms in the organization, rather than someone who has come up through the ranks here and already understands the political and labor landscape.

    The Los Angeles Police Protective League, the powerful bargaining body for the city’s rank-and-file officers, has not publicly staked out its position on the insider-outsider debate.

    One of Moore’s former assistant chiefs, Dominic Choi, was picked as interim leader. Moore has stayed on as a consultant on the chief search, and Choi has said he will not seek the job permanently.

    More risk management than crime-fighting, the job of running the LAPD — a vast, multibillion-dollar organization with more than 10,000 employees that operates under an intense microscope — involves balancing demands that are often at odds:

    Even though violent crime numbers have started to level out, with the exception of robberies, anxiety over public safety remains high among many Angelenos; the number of police shootings has also increased, raising concerns from the Police Commission. Meanwhile, any new leader, particularly one from the outside, will be expected to be a quick study and hit the ground running.

    Prognosticators have said Bass’ selection will indicate a lot about what direction she thinks the department is headed. Picking someone from within the organization to follow in Moore’s footsteps would signal that the mayor is looking to continue some of the reforms he started but would stop short of the wholesale changes that some have called for.

    Choosing an outside candidate would signal that the mayor is seeking a new direction for the department, some observers say. The city has hired only two outside chiefs in the past 75 years: Willie L. Williams and William J. Bratton. Both selections followed seismic scandals: the Los Angeles uprising in 1992 and the Rampart scandal of the late 1990s that saw more than 70 police officers implicated in unprovoked shootings, assaults and evidence-planting.

    Experts say the LAPD job is one of the toughest in law enforcement.

    Any serious candidate will have to have a proven track record as an experienced leader. The chief must be comfortable speaking extemporaneously — and often in front of cameras — about the work of the police department through the progressive lens of the city’s elected leaders, including the mayor and City Council.

    Whoever gets the job will need to navigate through many challenges at once, while dealing with the myriad issues confronting the city, including homelessness and the fentanyl crisis.

    The next chief will also have to recruit and inspire a new generation of officers, some of whom weren’t even born when the department was forced to undergo sweeping changes in the wake of the Rampart scandal and who grew of age in the Black Lives Matter era.

    The Olympics and the World Cup also loom as security challenges in coming years. Others are keen to see how the next chief will tackle a much-maligned discipline system that, depending on whom one asks, either lets too many bad cops off or has been weaponized to favor the well-connected.

    In March, the city hired the Northern California-based headhunter Bob Murray & Associates to conduct the nationwide chief search — the same firm that helped pick Bratton more than two decades ago.

    Joel Bryden, a vice president for the firm, said he could not discuss the search, referring questions to city officials.

    “It’s our hard and fast rule,” said Bryden, one of the two main recruiters on the chief search. “We at least have kept everything confidential even though leaks have occurred, some accurate, and some not.”

    [ad_2]

    Libor Jany

    Source link

  • Expand the L.A. City Council? A citizens commission will explore that and other ideas

    Expand the L.A. City Council? A citizens commission will explore that and other ideas

    [ad_1]

    The Los Angeles City Council voted Tuesday to create a new citizen’s commission to look at expanding the size of the council, reducing the number of council meetings and other potential changes to city operations.

    The 13-member commission will be charged with developing proposals for the November 2026 ballot that would revise the city charter, which spells out the powers and duties of city departments, offices and elected officials.

    The idea of expanding the 15-member council has been circulating for a few years, with several council members signing on to the idea. Council President Paul Krekorian had hoped to send a council expansion measure to L.A. voters in November.

    Although a council committee studied the concept over several months, its members never coalesced around a single strategy, leaving the question to the new commission.

    Council expansion had drawn support from a number of civic groups, which argued that it would improve community representation at City Hall and diversify the membership of the council.

    Godfrey Plata, deputy director of the nonprofit group L.A. Forward, said his organization and others were disappointed by the council’s failure to act.

    “We thought it was procrastination to punt it over to a charter commission,” said Plata, whose group argued last year in favor of growing the council to 29 members. “But we’re certainly eager to continue a public conversation around it.”

    Krekorian, who faces term limits at the end of the year, has continued to argue in favor of expansion, pointing out that the city of nearly 4 million has the same number of districts as nearly a century ago, when its population was much smaller.

    Reducing the size of each district would make the council more responsive to residents, he said, while also reducing the influence of “institutional organized money” in elections.

    “I think it even reduces the risk of corruption,” Krekorian said last week during an appearance at the Los Angeles Current Affairs Forum.

    Krekorian said the new charter reform commission will also look at other issues, including the city’s handling of real estate development, the process of filling vacant council seats and the procedure for censuring or suspending elected officials who have engaged in wrongdoing.

    Michael Feinstein, speaking on behalf of the Los Angeles County Green Party, called on the council to make sure the commission also looks at major changes to city elections, including a move to “ranked-choice” voting, which allows voters to rank candidates in order of preference instead of choosing just one.

    The last major overhaul of the city charter was in 1999. That year, voters established a system of neighborhood councils and gave more authority to the mayor, among other things. On that same ballot, voters rejected efforts to expand the council.

    This time around, it’s not clear how wide-ranging the commission’s work will be. Although the council can forward topics for study, the commission will also collect input from a wide range of individuals and community groups.

    Under the plan approved on Tuesday, Mayor Karen Bass will have the power to appoint four of the commission’s 13 members. Krekorian will select two, as will council President-elect Marqueece Harris-Dawson.

    Those eight would be appointed in August and September, according to a timeline created for the commission. Once they convene, they would then spend three months developing a work plan and selecting five additional commissioners.

    The commission’s schedule calls for it to spend much of 2025 deliberating and collecting public input. In January 2026, its proposals would be submitted to the council, which would then decide which ones would appear on the November 2026 ballot.

    Feinstein, a former mayor of Santa Monica, criticized that arrangement, warning that the council will have the power to reject any of the commission’s proposals. He also faulted the council for allowing the commission to be populated by political appointees.

    “This [process] embeds a direct City Council conflict of interest around deciding the future size and powers of the council,” he said in an email to The Times.

    The charter reform commission is also expected to look at whether to shrink the number of council meetings — a topic that has exasperated some council members in recent months.

    The city charter requires that the council meet at least three days each week. Councilmembers Katy Yaroslasvky, Tim McOsker and Eunisses Hernandez recently backed a ballot proposal to reduce that number to one day per week. But others on the council resisted the idea, saying it needed vetting from the soon-to-be-formed commission.

    Separately, the council voted on Tuesday to approve language for two city charter amendments on the Nov. 5 ballot. One would establish an independent redistricting process for the Los Angeles Unified School District, which takes in 26 cities and is governed by a seven-member board.

    The other ballot proposal is aimed at strengthening the city Ethics Commission, which enforces laws dealing with campaign fundraising, lobbying and other political activities. Under the proposal, the agency would receive a minimum of $7 million per year for its operations.

    Backers say this would prevent elected officials from retaliating against the agency by cutting its budget. The proposal would also triple the fines for ethics violations and give the Ethics Commission the ability to hire its own lawyer in some cases.

    [ad_2]

    David Zahniser

    Source link