ReportWire

Tag: Chris Smith

  • Employees, insiders speak of toxic culture within Cherry Creek School District

    The relationship between the superintendent and the director of human resources is impacting the culture at one of Colorado’s most prominent school districts, according to multiple insiders and employees.

    Several current and former employees of the Cherry Creek School District told Denver7 Investigates that the district has a toxic culture stemming from Superintendent Chris Smith and his wife, Chief Human Resource Officer Brenda Smith.

    Insiders, who have come forward over the past three months, say that the relationship leaves employees with nowhere to go if they have complaints.

    Three sources spoke to Denver7 Investigates in silhouette with their voices disguised because they feared retaliation. Roughly a dozen others decided not to go on camera out of fear of retaliation against them and their families, but they independently reinforced the comments of those who went on camera.

    Cherry Creek is one of the largest districts in the state, boasting 53,000 students and more than 9,000 employees with a history of success in the classroom and on the athletic fields. Many of the schools have some of the highest ratings in the state on websites such as GreatSchools.org.

    “I think people don’t feel safe. You can’t question the superintendent because his wife is head of HR,” one of the sources said during their on-camera interview. “I think it’s a huge problem and I think it hurts our students.”

    Through open records requests and from inside sources, Denver7 Investigates has obtained nearly a dozen complaint letters circulating inside of the school district, including several sent directly to the elected school board. Some were signed while others were anonymously written. Sources said the anonymous letters are evidence of the fear of retaliation in the district.

    Denver7

    One eight-page letter from two district principals — sent more than a year ago — accuses Chris Smith of unprofessional conduct, retaliation against employees and misallocation of budgetary items, including expenses and salaries.

    “I saw a lot of fear tactics, intimidation tactics. A lot of ‘my way or no way,’” the second source said in their silhouette interview.

    After that letter sparked an investigation, district employees raised concerns regarding a potential conflict of interest created by the superintendent and his wife.

    “People need to know what the leadership in Cherry Creek looks like and how people who push back or give feedback or disagree are pushed out,” the first silhouette source said. “I think the superintendent is leveraging his relationship with his wife as head of HR to make staffing and personnel decisions that benefit him.”

    That letter from the principals also stated that “The Human Resources Department operates with the intent that people are guilty prior to an investigation. They refer to the conference room in their office as ‘the cry room.’”

    “They have a room that they meet with employees that’s called the crying room. It’s nicknamed the crying room,” the second silhouette source said, adding that in her opinion, it’s the district’s goal to make people cry when called into that room. Others independently shared that opinion.

    The district hired a law firm to investigate the accusations in the letter. It concluded that Chris Smith did not clearly violate district policy and was less definitive on claims of retaliation and misappropriation.

    But the report did state that “Smith has exhibited unprofessional behavior,” and recommended “executive leadership training/coaching.”

    “I think the only thing that can fix it is getting past the dirty little secret and making sure it’s not a secret anymore,” the first source said.

    Regarding the husband-wife power structure in the district, the investigation concluded, “Even if there is not an actual conflict of interest, there is certainly a perceived one across the district that stems from the Smiths’ relationship, their high-level district positions and reporting structure.”

    But it fell short of calling for a change. Instead, it states that “there is no direct evidence their relationship has impacted their actions or inactions.”

    Expert weighs in 

    Michael Nalick, a management professor at the University of Denver and an expert on corporate structure, said he believes this relationship to be “a big problem.”

    “The point is there is perceived impropriety just because of their positions,” Nalick said. “Whether or not they’re valid, it’s that perceived impropriety. Even if it doesn’t occur, it still negatively affects the organization.”

    Nalick reviewed documents obtained by Denver7 Investigates and some testimonials from current and former employees.

    One of those documents was a letter from the school board approving superintendent Smith’s hiring while his wife remained as head of HR.

    That school board changed over in November after the most recent election.

    Nalick said the board is complicit in the culture as they created a policy permitting this dynamic, and he suggested that change needs to happen.

    “I would naturally say one of them has to go. You can’t continue to have both of them employed with that relationship,” Nalick said.

    A third source who spoke to Denver7 Investigates in silhouette also laid blame on the school board for allowing this dynamic.

    “The school board is very much aware of this controversy. For whatever reason it has made the decision to not take any action,” they said, referring to the district’s leadership dynamic.

    Superintendent avoids questions

    Denver7 Investigates made multiple attempts via email and text message to speak with Chris Smith to get his side of the controversy. Through the district’s media relations office, he denied all requests. He also did not acknowledge questions from Denver7 Investigates at a December school board meeting where multiple security guards were present, blocking Denver7 Investigates’ access to Smith and the school board.

    At the end of the meeting, Chief Investigative Reporter Tony Kovaleski asked superintendent Smith if he would promise to answer his questions. Smith did not acknowledge the question and walked out a back door of the meeting room.

    Tony at board meeting.png

    Denver7

    Denver7 Chief Investigative Reporter Tony Kovaleski attempts to ask Cherry Creek School District Superintendent Chris Smith, far right, a question after a December School Board meeting while Smith exits through a side door.

    The lack of comment did not come as a surprise to the first silhouette source who spoke to Denver7 Investigates.

    “I don’t know that he has the courage to answer your questions honestly,” they said of Smith.

    Denver7 Investigates also waited outside a scheduled meeting with district principals and managers last month. Chris Smith declined to come out and answer questions. An inside source provided a recording of part of that meeting that included Chris Smith saying that a news story would be coming out about him and that it was “probably not going to be the best story” about him.

    The district did provide a three-paragraph response to interview requests, stating:

    “Complaints against the district have been made by a small handful of employees who are resistant to Superintendent Smith’s leadership as it is moving the district in new and different ways. Consistently ranked as one of the top workplaces in the state, CCSD welcomes all opinions and all signed complaints are taken seriously. Each of the signed complaints provided were investigated thoroughly by independent counsel and all allegations were found to be baseless and unfounded.

    The Board of Education has directed Superintendent Smith to share CCSD initiatives as well as learn from other innovative school districts and partner with forward-thinking organizations as we continue to pursue excellence for every student. This has led to the nationally-renowned Cherry Creek Innovation Campus, the opening of the nation’s first mental health facility for students, and the creation of the Aspiring Educator Pathway, Colorado’s first teacher apprenticeship program.

    Brenda Smith was hired for her current role in early 2019 by a previous Superintendent, therefore was in her current position when the CCSD Board of Education made the decision to hire Superintendent Smith in April 2021. The Board of Education recognized that Brenda Smith should have the ability to continue her role and pursue her professional goals while Superintendent Smith is afforded the same opportunity. It was not seen as a conflict of interest then nor is it one today.” 

    In a follow-up exchange via email, a district spokesperson also noted, “There is no statute requiring public officials to agree to on-camera interviews with journalists.”

    One of the sources said the fact that so many were speaking anonymously spoke of the concerns and issues in the district as well as the leadership in the organization.

    “You have always told us if we had questions,if we had concerns, if we needed to talk, your door is open,” the source said of Chris Smith. “We have had to take to sending anonymous communications, doing secret interviews. What is it about your leadership that has gotten us to this point?”


    investigates-banner.png

    Denver7

    Got a tip? Send it to the Denver7 Investigates team

    Use the form below to send us a comment or story idea you’d like the Denver7 Investigates team to check out. You can also email investigates@Denver7.com or call our newsroom at 303-832-0200.

    Tony Kovaleski

    Source link

  • Detroit Lions Announce Plethora of Roster Moves Prior to SNF Matchup vs. Chiefs

    The Detroit Lions are making sure they’re prepared for anything ahead of their Sunday Night Football showdown against the Kansas City Chiefs. And after a week loaded with injury news, it’s safe to say the front office and coaching staff have been busy.

    With multiple players ruled out, including key starters, Detroit made a flurry of roster moves on Saturday designed to patch up depth and keep things steady heading into a primetime battle against the defending Super Bowl champs.

    Lions Lose Two Linemen, Add Reinforcements Up Front

    The most significant blow came when the Lions officially placed rookie offensive tackle Giovanni Manu on injured reserve due to a lingering knee injury. Manu had filled in admirably in recent weeks but will now miss at least the next four games.

    Detroit also waived offensive lineman Kingsley Eguakun and defensive tackle Chris Smith, two players who had spent most of the season inactive on game days.

    To fill those gaps, general manager Brad Holmes and head coach Dan Campbell turned to the practice squad for reinforcements. The team promoted three players to the active roster:

    • DL Quinton Jefferson – a veteran presence who adds experience and versatility to the defensive line rotation.
    • CB Nick Whiteside – provides depth at corner with both Terrion Arnold and Avonte Maddox banged up.
    • DB Erick Hallett – a flexible defensive back capable of playing both corner and safety, giving Kelvin Sheppard’s defense some much-needed coverage options.

    The Lions didn’t stop there. With the offensive line taking a beating, Detroit elevated OT Devin Cochran from the practice squad for the second straight week. Cochran, a former Bengals tackle, has experience protecting the edge and will be on standby with Taylor Decker and Giovanni Manu sidelined.

    In the secondary, the team elevated cornerback Arthur Maulet, who was signed earlier this week. Maulet brings veteran savvy and toughness, traits that Dan Campbell values deeply, and they’ll be needed against Patrick Mahomes and the Chiefs’ passing attack.

    If there’s one thing fans know by now, it’s that Dan Campbell’s group won’t back down. The Lions may be shorthanded, but they’re still gritty, still dangerous, and still ready to fight.

    Don Drysdale

    Source link

  • AI is being used to send some households impacted by Helene and Milton $1,000 cash relief payments

    AI is being used to send some households impacted by Helene and Milton $1,000 cash relief payments

    Nearly 1,000 hurricane-impacted households in North Carolina and Florida will benefit this week from a new disaster aid program that employs a model not commonly used by philanthropy in the United States: Giving people rapid, direct cash payments.

    The nonprofit GiveDirectly plans to send payments of $1,000 on Friday to some households impacted by Hurricanes Helene and Milton. The organization harnesses a Google-developed artificial intelligence tool to pinpoint areas with high concentrations of poverty and storm damage. On Tuesday, it invited people in those areas to enroll in the program through a smartphone app used to manage SNAP and other government benefits. Donations will then be deposited through the app’s debit card.

    The approach is meant to deliver aid “in as streamlined and dignified a way as possible,” said Laura Keen, a senior program manager at GiveDirectly. It removes much of the burden of applying, and is intended to empower people to decide for themselves what their most pressing needs are.

    It won’t capture everyone who needs help — but GiveDirectly hopes the program can be a model that makes disaster aid faster and more effective. “We’re always trying to grow the share of disaster response that is delivered as cash, whether that is by FEMA or private actors,” said Keen.

    The influx of clothing, blankets, and food that typically arrive after a disaster can fill real needs, but in-kind donations can’t cover getting a hotel room during an evacuation, or childcare while schools are closed.

    “There is an elegance to cash that allows individuals in these types of circumstances to resolve their unique needs, which are sure to be very different from the needs of their neighbors,” said Keen. She added that getting money into people’s hands fast can protect them from predatory lending and curb credit card debt.

    The organization employs direct payments for poverty relief around the world, but it first experimented with cash disaster payments in the U.S. in 2017, when it gave money to households impacted by Hurricane Harvey in Texas and Hurricane Maria in Puerto Rico. Back then, GiveDirectly enrolled people in person and handed out debit cards activated later. The process took a few weeks.

    Now that work is done in days — remotely. A Google team uses its SKAI machine-based learning tool to narrow down the worst-hit areas by comparing pre- and post-disaster aerial imagery. GiveDirectly uses another Google-developed tool to compare those findings with poverty data. It sends the target areas to Propel, an electronic benefits transfers app, which invites users in those places to enroll.

    “They don’t have to find a bunch of documentation that proves their eligibility,” Keen said. “We already know they’re eligible.”

    Still, focusing on areas with lots of damaged buildings won’t pick up all low-income households devastated by a disaster. Nor will reaching out to those already signed up for government benefits, as not all poor people enroll in them, and undocumented residents aren’t eligible for them. People without smartphones can’t access the app. Propel serves only 5 million of the 22 million households enrolled in SNAP benefits.

    In North Carolina, where electricity in some communities has still not been restored after Hurricane Helene, having a smartphone makes no difference without a way to power it and a signal to connect to.

    Keen said GiveDirectly is aware of this model’s shortcomings. She said some can be alleviated with a hybrid model that uses both remote and in-person enrollment. But the limitations also come down to funding. So far, GiveDirectly has raised $1.2 million for this campaign, including a $300,000 donation from the Conrad N. Hilton Foundation.

    Despite the pitfalls, GiveDirectly hopes its model sparks ideas for other direct payment programs.

    FEMA overhauled its own cash relief program, called Serious Needs Assistance, in January. The agency increased the payments from $500 to $750 ($770 with the start of the new fiscal year on Oct. 1) and eliminated the requirement that states request the aid first.

    Across all Helene- and Milton-impacted states, more than 693,000 households have received Serious Needs Assistance as of Oct. 24 for a total spend of more than $522 million, according to a FEMA spokesperson.

    But the program still requires households to apply, which proved problematic when misinformation about the program ran rampant in the weeks after Helene. In places with high costs of living, the $750 might not go very far.

    Technology could help FEMA improve its system, said Chris Smith, who managed FEMA’s Individual Assistance program from 2015 to 2022 and is now director of individual assistance and disaster housing at the consulting firm IEM. “I think that we have to open up our imaginations that maybe there are other ways to quickly identify need and quickly identify eligibility.”

    But Smith cautions that a publicly funded program doesn’t enjoy the same license to experiment as a philanthropic one. “There has to be ultimately an accountability of how any level of government is providing assistance to individuals. People are going to want to know that, and to have that degree of certainty is very important.”

    The government has experimented with other types of unconditional cash assistance, such as when it expanded the child tax credit into a monthly direct deposit payment in 2021. That program briefly cut the child poverty rate almost by half before it expired.

    Research on guaranteed income programs shows recipients spend the money on their needs, said Stacia West, founding director at the University of Pennsylvania’s Center for Guaranteed Income Research. “There is no one who can budget better than a person in poverty,” she said.

    In a study tracking spending across 9,000 participants in more than 30 guaranteed income programs in the U.S., the Center for Guaranteed Income Research has found that the majority of the money is spent on retail goods, food and groceries, and transportation.

    West said one-time cash payments can be a huge help to families recovering from a disaster, but the money can make a more profound difference if it’s given for a sustained time.

    That has happened in two U.S. disasters. In 2016, Dolly Parton funded a program that gave $1,000 per month for six months to people in Tennessee who lost their homes in the Great Smoky Mountains wildfires. The People’s Fund of Maui, a program sponsored by Oprah and Dwayne Johnson, gave 8,100 adults affected by the 2023 Maui wildfires $1,200 month for six months.

    Keen said GiveDirectly would love to implement such a program if it had the funding, especially because long-term assistance could help people build future resilience. “So you’re not only repairing your home, but also fortifying it to a level that is more protected against the next time.”

    ——

    Associated Press coverage of philanthropy and nonprofits receives support through the AP’s collaboration with The Conversation US, with funding from Lilly Endowment Inc. The AP is solely responsible for this content. For all of AP’s philanthropy coverage, visit https://apnews.com/hub/philanthropy.

    Source link

  • Wham!—The Music Duo and the Documentary—Reminds That Pop Music Was Never Frivolous

    Wham!—The Music Duo and the Documentary—Reminds That Pop Music Was Never Frivolous

    It’s easy to write Wham! off, even to this day, as another “embarrassing” 80s pop group. Their preppy, often neon attire, combined with Hair As Personality stylings also add to the present-day listener’s inability to take them seriously. And yet, even in their time and place—when they “made sense”—they were still regarded by critics as froth. Or, worse still, chaff. But that didn’t stop fans and casual radio listeners alike from turning up the volume whenever one of the duo’s songs came on. As they frequently did once the band finally “made it big.” And, compared to other British bands (The Beatles included), Wham! had a relatively “seamless” transition from high school boys to twenty-something megastars.

    Maybe part of what made it feel so “natural” was that George Michael—born Georgios Panayiotou—and Andrew Ridgeley were friends for such a long time and shared the same dream of becoming musicians for equally as long, that it became unfathomable to think that life could turn out any other way. Director Chris Smith (known for other standout documentaries including Jim & Andy: The Great Beyond and Fyre) homes in on that friendship throughout Wham!, and how there would never have been a Wham! without that boyhood bond. Indeed, Michael himself is featured in the documentary stating, “I genuinely believe that there’s something predestined about it. I mean, the path might have been totally different had I sat down next to someone else that day.” That day being when George, age eleven, met Andrew, age twelve at Bushey Meads School in 1975. It became quickly apparent that their bond would be forged by music, with the voice of Ridgeley (for Smith goes the Asif Kapadia route in opting for voices and archival footage in lieu of talking heads for the documentary) remarking, “Essentially, Yog [Ridgeley’s affectionate nickname for George] and I saw things exactly the same way. Musically, we were joined at the hip.” A hip-joining that led them to start a ska band called The Executive that eventually “imploded,” leaving George and Andrew in the ruins—thus, demarcating them as the only two who were genuinely serious about “doing music” “as a career.”

    By 1981, the formation of that career was taking shape in the form of going to Beat Route (get it?—a play on beetroot) in London’s West End. It was there that nightclub culture informed the sound and lyrical content of Wham!’s work. As Ridgeley notes, “The songwriting was dictated by our circumstances, the environment around us.” Not just one dominated by escaping onto the dance floor, but one dominated by recession, unemployment and the unshakeable onset of Thatcherism. So yes, even a band as “light” as Wham! was expressing the pain of life as a young man in Britain. A life that seemed to offer no future other than the factory line or the dole line. That, too, was the uniqueness of Wham!—it was so distinctly laddish. So geared toward ruffians and a “neo” kind of Teddy Boy. The very prototype that John Lennon imitated when he was first starting to navigate his musical identity. Like The Beatles, Wham!, for all its “male motifs” appeal, would end up attracting primarily women as fans. With Michael in particular becoming a “pinup,” despite his resistance toward such a label as it meant having to further bury his sexuality in the sand. This occurring early on in Wham!’s career, after Michael decided to come out to Shirlie Kemp (one of the “backup girls” in the band/Ridgeley’s girlfriend-turned-ex) and Ridgeley while staying a few extra days in Ibiza after shooting the video for “Club Tropicana.” Because of course Ibiza would facilitate that epiphany, that sense of freeness to finally admit to others who you are. Alas, Shirlie and Ridgeley advised Michael against coming out publicly because they were both more concerned about his oppressive father’s horrifying reaction than anyone or anything else. It was with that bum advice that Michael sealed off a key part of himself for decades to come.

    For those who might have thought “Careless Whisper” was accordingly about some secret, forbidden love gone wrong, Wham! clears it up as being, quite simply, one of the first songs the duo recorded as Wham! As a matter of fact, the mention of “Careless Whisper” is interwoven throughout Wham!, almost like a recurring talisman…the way it has been in so many people’s lives. It was one of those songs that, just as A. B. Quintanilla writing Selena’s “Como La Flor,” kept building up over years of thinking about it. Michael confirms as much in Wham!, recounting, “We put it together very slowly, at home or on the bus, just add a little day by day.” Nonetheless, it wasn’t “really ready” until 1984, though Michael was struck with inspiration for the lyrics at just seventeen years old, while riding the bus to his job as an usher at a movie theater (thus, the verse, “Something in your eyes/Calls to mind a silver screen/And all its sad goodbyes”). Again, he was only seventeen when he wrote it. A song of such power and maturity. A song that would make all saxophone solos after it pale in comparison. A song that would set Ridgeley up for life as a result of receiving half the royalties.

    But for all the flak Ridgeley gets about “riding coattails,” it has to be said that he was the main reason Wham! existed at all (or George Michael The Performer, for that matter). Were it not for his persistent harassment of a label cofounder for Innervision Records called Mark Dean, Wham! probably never would have gotten a record deal (even if it turned out to be a really shitty one, in terms of any sort of financial gain for the band’s success). Dean lived down the street from Ridgeley’s parents, and Ridgeley would phone Dean’s mom asking if her son had listened to the demo tape he put in their letterbox yet. When he finally did, Dean was impressed enough despite the lo-fi quality of it to sign the group to the label.

    It’s here that Ridgeley stating, “There was only one thing that I ever wanted to do: be in a band with Yog” comes to mind. Because perhaps that’s why, once Ridgeley’s dream was fulfilled, it was all downhill from there (for his music career, at least). Complete with his raucous, party animal reputation that resulted in the tabloid nicknames “Animal Andy” and Randy Andy.” But it was a tabloid frenzy that suited Michael well, for it meant no one could call attention to his own seemingly total lack of a sexual appetite…for women, that is. Even if the telltale clues were always there, plain as day. Just look at a double entendre-y lyric such as, “I choose to cruise.” Not to mention the entire contents of “Nothing Looks the Same in the Light,” a song Michael wrote about the first time he realized he wanted to stay in bed with a man for the night.

    Not being able to be honest about who he was caused an undeniable depression. It was likely for this reason that Michael retreated further into the protection of Wham!’s “effervescent” and “exuberant” aura. Fun and “escapism” being the core tenets of what Wham! was all about. It’s possible Michael was afraid to lose a protective shield like that (even though many probably thought Ridgeley needed Wham! more than Michael). For, unlike most bands that start out at a certain age, therefore represent/are forever associated with that certain age, Wham! knew from the outset that it was ultimately a finite project. That there was, inevitably, an expiration date on what they represented—fun, froth and frivolity—once they aged out of the very demographic they were appealing to. The same thing technically happened to The Beatles after 1965 (once Beatlemania had crested), but they chose to reanimate into a “Part Deux” of themselves, replete with psychedelia and Eastern-influenced lyrics and rhythms.

    Wham! was never going to bother with a Part Deux of themselves, which is why it was so important to them to “make it big” in their teens/early twenties. “Youth” was their brand. And, in contrast to The Beatles, they weren’t shy about their affinity for pop (The Beatles, instead, wanted to be categorically “rock n’ roll”). As both Michael and Ridgeley exhibited, pop was never froth, not fundamentally. In that sense, one might say they were doing “purposeful pop” long before Katy Perry decided to on Witness. Because, in defiance of most Brits, Michael and Ridgeley weren’t snobbish about the genre. Indeed, willfully chose it (they “chose life,” if you will) over something like the ska and punk genres that dominated their sound when they were in The Executive.

    A pop song could say so much more than any treatise or political speech. And “Wham Rap!” did just that, with an opening that goes, “Wham! bam!/I am! a man!/Job or no job,/You can’t tell me that I’m not./Do! you!/Enjoy what you do?/If not, just stop!/Don’t stay there and rot!” It was advice, in the end, that would apply to the dissolution of Wham! But that doesn’t come until the end of the documentary. In the meantime, the criticism they endure for shifting from “socially aware” content to something like “Club Tropicana”—which marked the true essence of the band—is addressed. Reviews from the British press were merciless, including assessments such as, “The work is futile, the thought is shallow…” Yet there was nothing futile, shallow or thoughtless about Michael and Ridgeley catering to what their own peers wanted. Knowing full well what would make hearts and pulses alike flutter. As Michael explained to one interviewer back in the day, “I think what’s happening in England is that there’s a large escapist element creeping back into music now. Three or four years ago with the punk thing, people were shouting. Now, they’re not ashamed of being young, unemployed. They’d rather just go to a disco or a club and forget about it.” Wham!, in that regard, was anything but frivolous, even if they were catering to those who wanted to be frivolous.

    Having a keen social awareness of their time and place, Wham! embodied the 80s not just for their vibrantly-colored sportswear and hairstyles that required a blow dryer, but because they knew beneath the so-called froth of it all was a dark, unpleasant reality—neoliberalism held up as a god, racism, AIDS, war, famine. So why not just escape for the four-minute length of a pop song? Why not just have a good time while you could, whenever you could grab it? Something only a pop song is capable of furnishing on a socialistic level. Nothing about that is frivolous, yet pop music continues to be lambasted for having no value when, in truth, it remains one of the few pure modern comforts we have in a world of cold, hard reality.

    To many, Wham! will never be a band “of substance.” Or, if it is, then only if the duo is being sardonically pontificated upon by yuppies like Patrick Bateman (indeed, how did Bret Easton Ellis choose not to include a discourse on Make It Big from Bateman at some point in American Psycho?). But to those who understand that the presence of pop music in our culture is the best way to check its pulse (and if it even still has one), Wham! was a symbol of one of the most vital times in music, reflecting the youth back to itself before it was forced into the kind of situation “Wham Rap!” and “Young Guns” warned about.

    With a run time of about one hour and thirty minutes, the Wham! documentary feels as short-lived as the band’s five-ish years of recording together. And likewise, it’s just as impactful despite its shortness.

    Genna Rivieccio

    Source link

  • Chris Smith, Former NFL Defensive End For Cleveland Browns, Dead At 31

    Chris Smith, Former NFL Defensive End For Cleveland Browns, Dead At 31

    CLEVELAND (AP) — Former NFL defensive end Chris Smith, who was touched by tragedy while he played for the Cleveland Browns, has died.

    Smith’s agent, Drew Rosenhaus, and the Browns confirmed his passing on Tuesday. The cause of death was not immediately known.

    “Rest in Peace Chris,” Rosenhaus wrote on Twitter. “Condolences to all his family, friends and loved ones. We will miss you.”

    Smith played for the XFL’s Seattle Sea Dragons this season.

    He previously spent eight seasons in the NFL with Jacksonville, Cincinnati, Cleveland, Las Vegas and Houston.

    While Smith was with the Browns in 2019, his girlfriend, Petara Cordero, was killed when she was hit by a car after she exited the vehicle he was driving.

    Cordero was standing on the road’s shoulder when the vehicle driven by a 47-year-old woman smashed into the passenger side of Smith’s car.

    “Chris was one of the kindest players and people that I’ve ever met,” Browns All-Pro defensive end Myles Garrett said. “He was willing to give you the shirt off his back for you. It’s hard just knowing people like that can go at any time.”

    Smith and Cordero had a daughter shortly before Cordero’s death.

    After playing at Arkansas, Smith was drafted by the Jaguars in the fifth round in 2014. He finished with 11 career sacks in 72 games.

    Former Browns quarterback Baker Mayfield also expressed his sympathy for Smith.

    “To know him was to love him,” Mayfield posted on Twitter along with a photo of Smith leading a huddle of Browns. “Heaven got a good one. We’ll never forget you and we’ll always miss you. RIP Chris.”

    Source link