[ad_1]
Watch CBS News
Source link
[ad_1]
Watch CBS News
[ad_1]
BUSAN, South Korea—President Trump and Chinese leader Xi Jinping met face-to-face for the first time in six years in an attempt to find a truce in a bruising fight between the two superpowers over trade and technology.
The two leaders convened at the airport in this South Korean port city late Thursday morning local time. As they shook hands, Trump said it’s “good to see you again,” and added, “We’re going to have a very successful meeting, I have no doubt. But he’s a very tough negotiator, that’s not good.”
Copyright ©2025 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8
[ad_2] Josh Chin[ad_1]
President Donald Trump and Chinese leader Xi Jinping met in South Korea on Thursday, looking to cool an increasingly heated relationship between their two countries at their first meeting since Trump returned to office.
“We’re going to have a very successful meeting, I have no doubt,” Trump told reporters before the start of the sit-down in the port city of Busan.
He called Xi a longtime friend and “tough negotiator,” though he added that he wasn’t sure whether they would sign a deal at the end of it.
“Could be,” Trump said. “I think we’ll have a great understanding.”
For his part, Xi acknowledged “frictions” between the world’s two biggest economies, saying that “given our different national conditions, we do not always see eye to eye.”
The meeting between the two leaders, which took place at an air force base near Gimhae International Airport, lasted about an hour and 40 minutes, with Trump appearing to say something into Xi’s ear as they departed.
There were smiles among members of the U.S. delegation as they followed, and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick offered a thumbs up. Trump is now headed back to Washington after completing a three-country Asia tour.
The outcomes of the meeting were not immediately clear. Trump and Xi were expected to discuss moves on tariffs, combating fentanyl and access to rare-earth minerals, while leaving bigger targets for later.
With a Nov. 10 deadline to reach a tariff deal approaching, what began as Trump’s crackdown on the flow of fentanyl into the U.S. has broadened into a longer list of trade and security issues.
The working expectation was that Trump and Xi would agree on a pause in the fight rather than finalizing a sweeping deal, a person familiar with the planning said before their meeting. Beijing could ease export curbs on strategically crucial rare earths, Washington could hold off on broad tariff hikes, and both sides could reach for gestures, such as expanded purchases of U.S. farm goods by China.
Xi is also weighing steps on fentanyl chemicals, likely focused on choking off money-laundering networks tied to gangs, this person said. A rollout of a larger agreement could be staged around Trump’s planned visit to China next year.
The president had said he expected to lower tariffs on China that he imposed over its role in the illicit international flow of fentanyl components. He also said he hoped to finalize a deal on TikTok that would allow the social media app to continue operating in the U.S. despite a law, passed before he took office, that had been poised to ban it.
Both Trump and Xi wanted the optics and tactical aspect of this meeting to go well, the person familiar with the planning said.
Dan Caldwell, a former senior adviser to U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, said Trump deserved credit for pursuing a pragmatic China policy that maintained what he said was strategic ambiguity while taking steps to restore important military capabilities to deter Chinese aggression.
“A lot of folks wanted to assume that he was going to be reflexively hawkish on China,” Caldwell said of Trump. “That hasn’t been the case.”
But Caldwell cautioned against expecting a breakthrough in Busan. “I don’t think the overall push hinges on one meeting,” Caldwell said. “Ideally, these go well, but the whole thing does not hinge on just one set of talks.”
In other words, the goal is to make enough progress to get to the next date between the two leaders. Trump said earlier that he and Xi have agreed to meet again in China and in the United States, “in either Washington or at Mar-a-Lago.”
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told NBC News this week that Trump is likely to visit Xi in Beijing early next year, before the Lunar New Year in February.
Miles Yu, a former State Department adviser on China, said the U.S. and Beijing are “sizing each other out” with trade now a key battleground issue. Washington is pushing for concrete steps on fentanyl, market access and more, he said, while China “stonewalls and foot-drags” and offers only broad “frameworks.”
“This is the root cause of the five rounds of futile negotiations so far with China without a breakthrough,” Yu said, adding that the administration is trying to shift China’s approach by rallying its neighbors, a strategy that he said “may or may not work.”
After talks with Chinese counterparts in Malaysia last weekend, Bessent said negotiators had shaped a framework for the two leaders to consider that spanned tariffs, trade, fentanyl, rare earths and “substantial” purchases of U.S. agricultural products such as soybeans.
He credited Trump’s threat of an additional 100% tariff with creating leverage and said he believes that the framework would avoid that outcome and open space for tackling other issues.
Xi said Thursday that the framework agreed in Malaysia had “provided the necessary conditions for our meeting today.”
The meeting was the climax of Trump’s five-day trip to Malaysia, Japan and South Korea. During the trip he signed agreements with all three countries as well as Thailand and Cambodia; made new foreign investment announcements; and proclaimed that tariff leverage can drive warring parties to stand down.
Reflecting on his approach, Trump said going against the grain can sometimes deliver results.
“Oftentimes you’ll go the opposite way of almost everybody, and you’ll be the one that’s right, and the others will be the one that’s wrong,” he said in Gyeongju, South Korea, offering a peek into his thinking. “That’s where you have your greatest successes.”
Still, Trump is continuing a long-standing practice of meeting with allies before Beijing, which former Assistant Secretary of State Dave Stilwell said indicates that the U.S. is not going to trade its alliance commitments for a deal with China.
Some of the most sensitive terrain in the discussions involves critical minerals, said Stilwell, who also underscored the political guardrails around concerns for the Beijing-claimed island of Taiwan.
“Acknowledge the words, but look at the actions,” he said, citing Secretary of State Marco Rubio’s recent comments that the U.S. isn’t trading away Taiwan’s sovereignty for better deal terms with Beijing.
Some of Trump’s aides had worried that the president could shift the U.S. position on independence for Taiwan, walking away from long-standing U.S. policy, and had advised him against it, NBC News reported this week.
Trump seemed to downplay any discussions, saying before his meeting with Xi, “I don’t know that we’ll even speak about Taiwan.”
Analysts in the region, too, saw limited room for a sweeping agreement this week. It’s unlikely that Trump and Xi will reach a comprehensive deal that settles the long-term structural differences between the U.S. and China, said Zeng Jinghan, a professor of international relations at the City University of Hong Kong. “But
“Some sort of consensus and agreements are very possible,” said Zeng Jinghan, a professor of international relations at the City University of Hong Kong, given that both sides want “a little bit of de-escalation.”
But Trump and Xi were unlikely to reach a comprehensive deal that settles the long-term structural differences between their countries, he said.
The hope instead is for “less aggressive” rhetoric, Zeng said, with both Beijing and Washington likely to come back and declare the meeting a success.
Carol E. Lee, Peter Guo and Peter Alexander contributed.
[ad_2]
Katherine Doyle | NBC News
Source link
[ad_1]
Washington — President Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping will meet in Busan, South Korea, on Thursday (Wednesday night U.S. time) as the two leaders look to reach a trade deal they can both claim as a victory.
The meeting is set for 11 a.m. local time, or 10 p.m. ET Wednesday.
Mr. Trump’s threat to impose an additional 100% tariff rate on Chinese goods starting Nov. 1 is “effectively off the table” for now, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said Sunday on “Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan.” Mr. Trump threatened the additional 100% tariff on Chinese imports — which would bring tariffs on Chinese goods up to as high as 155% — in retaliation for China’s increased export controls on rare earth minerals and magnets. China has the vast majority of the world’s supply of those raw materials, critical for manufacturing in key technology areas like semiconductors and missiles.
The president on Wednesday said he hopes to walk away from the meeting with a deal.
“We’re going to be, I hope, making a deal,” Mr. Trump said. “I think we’re going to have a deal. I think it will be a good deal for both. The world is watching, and I think we’ll have something that’s very exciting for everybody.”
The public White House schedule allotted less than two hours for the meeting with Xi, although Mr. Trump said on a hot mic during a dinner hosted by South Korean President Lee Jae Myung that the Xi meeting would last “three to four hours.”
Aboard Air Force One on Wednesday, Mr. Trump said he believes he’ll lower tariffs imposed on Chinese imports earlier this year due to fentanyl trafficking after his meeting with Xi, noting China would be “working with me” on a compromise.
Bessent told “Face the Nation” that he expects the threat of 100% tariffs has “gone away, as has the threat of the immediate imposition of the Chinese initiating a worldwide export control regime.”
Bessent also said he expects Mr. Trump and Xi to sign a deal Thursday placing TikTok under majority U.S. ownership, although Chinese-owned ByteDance could still have a minority ownership stake of under 20%.
In August, Mr. Trump signed an executive action delaying the reinstatement of higher tariffs on Chinese goods for another 90 days, extending the pause until mid-November.
U.S. and Chinese officials have been holding trade talks for months leading up to Thursday’s Trump-Xi meeting.
Mr. Trump’s first secretary of state, Mike Pompeo, said Mr. Trump should commit to Taiwan’s independence.
“Xi Jinping is expected to press President Trump for clarity about America’s stance toward Taiwan at their meeting this week,” Pompeo wrote on social media. “America should oblige — and affirm our unequivocal commitment to Taiwan’s sovereignty and independence from Beijing.”
The last time Mr. Trump and Xi met in person was on the sidelines of the Group of 20 summit in Japan in 2019, during Mr. Trump’s first term in office, although the two leaders have spoken by phone. The last conversation the White House disclosed between the two men was on Sept. 19.
Busan, known as an educational and cultural center along Korea’s southeastern coast, is the second most populous city in South Korea behind its capital, Seoul. The Xi meeting is the final agenda item on Mr. Trump’s schedule of his five-day Asia tour, concluding a trip primarily intended to strengthen economic ties and cement trade deals in the South Pacific.
[ad_2]
[ad_1]
President Trump is expected to sit down with China’s Xi Jinping in South Korea for trade talks shortly as he wraps up his trip to Asia. Micah McCartney, a Taipei-based journalist with Newsweek, joins CBS News to preview the meeting.
[ad_2]
[ad_1]
NEW YORK (AP) — Almost everything in your 401(k) should be coming up a winner now. That makes it time for a gut check.
Not only is the U.S. stock market setting records, so are foreign stocks. Bond funds, which are supposed to be the boring and safe part of any portfolio, are also doing well this year, along with gold and cryptocurrencies.
But in the midst of all the fun, it can pay to remember how you felt during April. That’s when financial markets were tumbling because of worldwide tariffs that President Donald Trump announced on his “Liberation Day.”
Did all that fear push you to sell your stocks, lock in the losses and miss out on the stunning rebound that came afterward? Or did you hold tight, as many financial advisers suggested? Either way, it’s valuable information because another downturn could strike at any time.
To be sure, many professionals along Wall Street are forecasting that the U.S. stock market will keep rising. But the threat of a sharp drop remains, as it always does. That leaves investors with the luxury now, while prices are high, to reassess. Don’t get lulled into leaving your 401(k) on autopilot, unless you’re intentionally doing so, and make sure your portfolio isn’t stuffed with too much risk.
Here are some things to keep in mind:
It’s been another fabulous year for stocks. The S&P 500 has soared more than 35% from its low point in April, shortly after “Liberation Day.”
The market has had a few hiccups recently, as worries have popped up about everything from potentially bad loans at some banks to renewed talk about much higher tariffs on China. But stocks have come back from each stumble, only to push higher.
“The market continues to (hit) record highs on the back of strong earnings and easing U.S.–China trade tensions,” said Mark Hackett, chief market strategist at Nationwide, who calls the current state of “steady growth without irrational exuberance” a ”Goldilocks environment.”
You don’t need to worry at the moment, but remember that the stock market will fall eventually. It always does.
The S&P 500 index, which sits at the heart of many 401(k) accounts, has forced investors to swallow a 10% drop every couple of years or so, on average. That’s what Wall Street calls a “correction,” and professional investors see them as ways to clear out excessive optimism that may have built up and pushed prices too high. More serious drops of at least 20%, which Wall Street calls “bear markets,” are less common but can last for years.
Back in April, the S&P 500 index plunged nearly 20% from its record at the time. But the market came back, propelled by the big tech companies that have led the way the last few years.
“Fundamentally superior stocks recover quickly and bounce like fresh tennis balls, while fundamentally inferior stocks bounce like rocks.” said Louis Navellier, founder and chief investment officer of asset manager Navellier & Associates, who also brushed off worries that the stock market is in a bubble.
The stock market has charged to records because investors are expecting several important things to happen. If any fail to pan out, it would undercut the market.
Chief among those expectations is that big U.S. companies will continue to deliver big growth in profits. That’s one of the few ways they can justify the jumps for their stock prices and quiet criticism that they’ve become too expensive.
Critics point in particular to the frenzy going on in artificial-intelligence technology. There, they hear echoes of the dot-com bonanza that ultimately imploded in 2000 and sent stocks on a yearslong descent. One popular measure of valuing stocks, which looks at corporate profits over the preceding 10 years, showed the S&P 500 recently was near its most expensive level since the 2000 dot-com bubble.
Consider Nvidia, the chip company that’s become the poster child of the AI trade. If it fails to meet analysts’ high expectations for growth, its stock will look more expensive than it already does. It’s trading at 54 times its earnings per share over the last 12 months, much higher than the overall S&P 500’s price-earnings ratio of nearly 30.
Wednesday’s meeting of the Federal Reserve could be a key moment for the market.
Besides companies delivering bigger profits or stock prices falling, another way for the stock market to look less expensive is if interest rates ease.
The widespread expectation is that the Fed will cut its main interest rate to support the slowing job market and deliver more reductions through next year. But the Fed has also warned it may hold off on cuts if inflation accelerates beyond its still-high level. That’s because lower interest rates can make inflation worse, and Wednesday’s focus will be on whether the Fed gives any hints about the likelihood of more cuts in coming months.
Several of Wall Street’s most influential stocks will also be reporting their latest earnings results this week, including Microsoft and Apple. And Trump will be meeting with China’s leader, Xi Jinping on Thursday. The market has already run up on hopes that the two will ease rising trade tensions at some point.
A famous saying on Wall Street is that being too early is the same as being wrong.
Consider prescient investors who knew that stocks were too expensive when former Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan famously talked about the possibility of “irrational exuberance” in financial markets. That was in late 1996.
If they sold then, they would have missed out as the bubble inflated further and the S&P 500 more than doubled through late March 2000 before it popped.
Instead, the better way to think of it may be: Make sure your investments are set up the right way, so you can stomach the market whether it goes up or down.
It depends on your age and how much risk you’re willing to take.
If you did sell stocks this past April, you may have had too much of your portfolio in stocks for your risk tolerance. Or you may need to steel yourself more during the next drop.
Remember that anyone decades away from retirement has the luxury of waiting out any drops in the market. Bear markets are actually great in that case, because they put stocks on sale for anyone continuing to make regular contributions to their 401(k) account.
Workers closer to retirement still need stocks, though in smaller proportions, because they have historically provided the highest returns over the long term, and a retirement can last decades.
“They aren’t the most sexy, but companies with dependable dividends are a good bet, as are simple index funds designed to track the S&P 500 or a subset aimed at value or growth,” said John Kiernan, managing editor of personal finance site WalletHub.
“Young people need to grow their money over time, and they will have decades to make up for any losses,” Kiernan said. “Older people need to protect the money they have now, which might mean favoring bonds and high-yield savings accounts over risky investments.”
It’s easy to see how much stock retirement savers are recommended to hold at various ages. Mutual-fund companies have target-date retirement funds, which are built as autopilot products that will automatically move investors from lots of stocks when they’re young to fewer stocks when they’re closer to retirement.
The average target-date fund for workers just starting their careers had 92% of its portfolio invested in stocks at the end of last year, according to Morningstar. Target-date funds designed for people entering retirement have a bit under 50% invested in stocks, meanwhile.
Unfortunately, it’s the price you have to pay if you want the strong returns that the U.S. stock market has historically provided over the long term.
This is what the stock market does. It goes up and down, sometimes by shocking amounts, but it usually helps patient savers build their nest eggs over decades.
Ben Fulton, CEO of WEBs investments, recommends monitoring volatility by paying attention to the VIX, a volatility index, sometimes called the “fear index, which measures market expectations of future risk. The VIX is currently around 16, which Fulton said signals ”calm by historical standards.”
“When the VIX begins to hold consistently above 20, it often signals a time to gradually reduce market exposure,” he said. That happened during the tech bubble and more recently during the pandemic in 2020 and when inflation spiked in 2022.
“Until then, maintaining positions is critical, as markets that rise steadily can continue longer than logic might suggest, and stepping aside too early can mean missing valuable portfolio appreciation,” Fulton said.
“Markets rarely behave as we want, instead reflecting the collective sentiment of all investors.”
[ad_2]
[ad_1]
U.S. President Donald Trump is meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping on Thursday and Newsweek has rounded up five things Trump will be trying to get.
Trump will be pushing for a trade truce amid a fierce trade war between the world’s two largest economies that saw the American president threaten a 100 percent tariff hike on Chinese goods this month.
On Sunday, U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said he had come to a “very substantial framework” with Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng that would avoid the measure. He said on NBC’s Meet the Press that he had laid down the groundwork for Trump and Xi to discuss trade cooperation further.
The 100 percent tariff threat, which would begin on November 1, came over new Chinese export licensing rules being expanded to cover products containing even trace amounts of rare earth elements.
Bessent and U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer dubbed the move a “global supply chain power grab” and Washington has raced in recent months to secure supply deals with partners, including Australia and Canada, to reduce its dependency on Beijing.
Trump will likely want to reverse the decision as part of his discussions as China controls more than two-thirds of the world’s rare earths, a group of 17 minerals vital to producing technologies such as electric vehicles and missile guidance systems.
Trump will likely try push China to resume buying soybeans, America’s largest agricultural exports, as it bought none in September, according to Reuters, causing possible strain for American farmers, a group that forms a part of Trump’s political base.
Trump has already said he plans to lower American tariffs imposed on China over the fentanyl crisis.
“I expect to be lowering that because I believe they’re going to help us with the fentanyl situation,” Trump told reporters on Air Force One on Wednesday. “They’ll be doing what they can do,” he said, adding that “China is going to be working with me.”
Washington is considering reducing the tariff from 20 percent to 10 percent, The Wall Street Journal reported this week.
“China sympathizes with the American people for the suffering caused by the fentanyl crisis and has provided assistance in this regard and achieved positive results,” Chinese Foreign Affairs Ministry spokesperson Guo Jiakun said Wednesday.
Trump has previously said he would “like China to help us out with Russia” and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky is hopeful. He said on Monday that if Trump manages to “find an understanding with China about the reduction of Russian energy exports…it’ll help us all.”
It comes after Trump canceled his talks with Russian President Vladimir Putin and imposed sanctions on two Russian oil companies.
Trump said on Wednesday: “What I’ll really be talking to him [Xi] about is, how do we end the war with Russia and Ukraine, whether it’s through oil or energy or anything else.
“I think he’s going to be very receptive. He would now like to—I’m not sure that he did at the beginning—he would now like to see that war end. I think he can have a big influence on Putin.”
[ad_2]
[ad_1]
GYEONGJU, South Korea—Amid the pageantry and backslapping, President Trump’s weeklong Asian swing drew attention to a sour point for allies: The U.S. demand that they spend more to respond to a rising threat of Chinese aggression.
Washington first pressured Europeans to boost their military budgets shortly after Trump took office in January. That push ultimately proved successful, with many allies pledging to increase spending.
Copyright ©2025 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8
[ad_2] Alexander Ward[ad_1]
China’s Foreign Ministry has reiterated that the country remains committed to a self-defense-oriented nuclear policy, as Beijing certified two new nuclear test monitoring stations.
Robert Floyd, executive secretary of the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization (CTBTO) Preparatory Commission, visited China last week at Beijing’s invitation for the launch ceremony marking the certification of two auxiliary seismic facilities in Shanghai and Xi’an.
Next year will mark the 30th anniversary of the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty, which bans all nuclear explosions.
Both China and the United States are among those that have signed but not ratified the agreement. Still, both countries have adhered to its principles, with neither known to have conducted a full-scale nuclear weapons test since the CTBT’s signing in 1996. Each hosts at least a dozen CTBTO-certified monitoring facilities on their soil as part of the organization’s global verification network.
Newsweek reached out to the CTBTO by email with a request for comment.
“In recent years, China and the [CTBTO Provisional Technical Secretariat] have achieved significant cooperation outcomes in areas such as promoting the certification and acceptance of monitoring stations and enhancing capacity building for developing countries,” Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Guo Jiakun said on Monday during a regular press briefing.
“This demonstrates China’s consistent stance of earnestly fulfilling its international obligations and firmly supporting the Treaty,” he added.
Guo said China, as a “responsible nuclear-weapon state” and a permanent member of the United Nations Security Council, has maintained its long-standing nuclear test moratorium and upheld its no-first-use policy on nuclear strikes.
China is one of only two nuclear-armed nations—alongside India—to officially pledge not to use nuclear weapons first. New Delhi, however, allows for exceptions in the case of nuclear-armed adversaries or states aligned with them.
Beijing has proposed that all five recognized nuclear-weapon states—China, the United States, Russia, France, and the United Kingdom—enter negotiations on a “mutual no-first-use” treaty.
While China’s nuclear stockpile remains far smaller than those of Russia and the U.S., it has expanded rapidly in recent years, modernizing its missile forces and delivery systems to establish a “nuclear triad”—capabilities for land-, sea-, and air-based strategic deterrence.
China’s arsenal reached an estimated 600 warheads in 2024, a roughly 20 percent increase from the previous year, according to assessments by the U.S. Department of Defense and the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute.
A July report by the Washington-based Hudson Institute argued that Beijing’s nuclear buildup is less about preparing for a nuclear exchange and more about deterring the U.S. and its allies from threatening China’s strategic objectives in its region.
Floyd said in a video posted to X on Saturday: “The highlight of being in China this week has been the launch of the certification of two auxiliary seismic stations over the next short period of time. Seeing the Chinese government working together, powerfully […] The international monitoring system, for global good, for global peace and security. Multilateralism delivering.”
The CTBT is unlikely to enter into force anytime soon, as a number of key states—including those with nuclear weapons or the technical potential to develop them—have not signed or ratified it.
Meanwhile, the 2011 New START Treaty, the last remaining nuclear arms reduction pact between Washington and Moscow, is set to expire in February. Russian President Vladimir Putin, who suspended Moscow’s participation in the accord in 2023, has said he remains open to informally maintaining those limits beyond the treaty’s expiration. Washington has not yet responded to the proposal.
[ad_2]
[ad_1]
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
During the final leg of his Asia trip en route to South Korea, President Donald Trump spoke to reporters aboard Air Force One, expressing confidence in his relationship with Chinese President Xi Jinping ahead of their meeting at an economic summit.
Asked about U.S. efforts to curb fentanyl trafficking, Trump said the issue would be central to his discussions with Xi.
Ahead of his meeting with the Chinese leader, Trump said he hoped for progress on “a lot of problems,” including fentanyl trafficking, trade and tariffs.
“China is going to be working with me, okay,” Trump told reporters. “They’re going to be working with me, and we’re going to do something, I believe.”
U.S. President Donald Trump delivers remarks during the APEC CEOs Luncheon at the Gyeongju Arts Center on October 29, 2025 in Gyeongju, South Korea. (Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)
TRUMP PREDICTS ‘VERY HAPPY’ OUTCOME AHEAD OF FACE-TO-FACE WITH CHINA’S XI AFTER TARIFF THREATS
Trump said the issue would be a major topic of discussion in his upcoming meeting.
“We have to have the meeting — a meeting tomorrow. That’s a big meeting,” he said. “And fentanyl will be one of the things that we’re discussing. The farmers will be discussing a lot of things, but fentanyl will be one of the things we discuss.”
Trump stated that the fentanyl crisis and drug trafficking across the southern border are directly related, calling them “tremendous amounts of death.”
“We took in tremendous amounts of death. I call them the boats of death,” he said. “Under Biden and open borders, stuff was flowing. I think they killed 300,000 people last year — fentanyl drugs coming through the southern border. And now nobody gets through this. We’re very tough on the border.”

Border patrol agents and a special operations group member from the Texas Ranger Division seize 297 pounds of marijuana following a drug bust by the Mexico-U.S. border in the Rio Grande Valley sector, near McAllen, Texas, (Loren Elliott/Reuters)
Trump credited his policies with a sharp reduction in illegal drug trafficking by sea, saying it was “down about 80% by water.”
He also praised U.S. law enforcement and border officials for their efforts, saying, “Our border agents, our Border Patrol agents, they’ve been amazing. ICE — these people do such a great job with what they’re doing.”

Attendees applaud as U.S. President Donald Trump delivers remarks during the APEC CEOs Luncheon at the Gyeongju Arts Center on October 29, 2025 in Gyeongju, South Korea. (Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)
During his visit, Trump also commented on international security issues, including the Israel-Hamas conflict and North Korea’s recent missile launches. He said he expects his meeting with Xi to be productive, adding, “I think we’ll get a great meeting with President Xi of China. And a lot of problems are going to be solved.”
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
Trump’s comments underscored his push to link border security and international cooperation as key priorities ahead of his meeting with Xi.
[ad_2]
[ad_1]
President Trump blew up America’s decadeslong engagement with China during his first term. Now, he is poised to relaunch the kind of engagement with Beijing embraced by predecessors from Bill Clinton to Barack Obama—but on Trump’s terms.
Top trade negotiators for the U.S. and China, wrapping up two days of tense talks in Kuala Lumpur on Sunday, said they arrived at a framework agreement that sets the table for Trump and Chinese leader Xi Jinping to agree on a major deal when they meet Thursday in South Korea.
Copyright ©2025 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8
[ad_2] Lingling Wei[ad_1]
Fox News correspondent Lucas Tomlinson reports the latest on President Donald Trump’s trip to Asia. Gatestone Institute senior fellow Gordon Chang also joins ‘Fox News Live’ to discuss his take on the trip and the broader threat China poses.
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
A former Army sergeant who once held top-secret clearance at Joint Base Lewis-McChord in Washington state was sentenced Tuesday to four years in federal prison for attempting to provide national defense information to China.
Joseph Daniel Schmidt, 31, pleaded guilty in June to attempting to deliver and retain classified material, according to the Department of Justice (DOJ). U.S. District Judge John C. Coughenour also ordered three years of supervised release.
Schmidt’s sentencing comes as U.S. authorities warn of growing efforts by China to recruit or exploit former military personnel with access to sensitive information.
“As a retired Army officer, I find it unconscionable for a former soldier to put his colleagues and country at risk by peddling secret information and intelligence access to a hostile foreign power,” Acting U.S. Attorney Charles Neil Floyd said.
NAVY SAILOR FACES LIFE IN PRISON AFTER SELLING MILITARY SECRETS TO CHINA FOR $12K PAYMENT
Joseph Daniel Schmidt, 31, learned Mandarin and sought a Chinese visa while serving in the Army. (U.S. Army)
Schmidt enlisted in 2015, and served in the Army’s 109th Military Intelligence Battalion until 2020. Prosecutors said he had access to both secret and top secret systems and later contacted Chinese consular officials after leaving the Army.
Court records show Schmidt created multiple documents based on classified material and offered them to Chinese security services. He also kept a device capable of accessing secure Army networks, which prosecutors said he offered to Chinese officials.
After leaving the Army, Schmidt traveled to Hong Kong in March 2020 and continued corresponding with Chinese contacts. He lived there for more than three years before flying to San Francisco in October 2023, where he was arrested. He pleaded guilty in June 2025, and was sentenced Tuesday in Seattle.
CHINESE NATIONAL SENTENCED TO PRISON FOR SABOTAGING EMPLOYER’S SYSTEMS WITH ‘KILL SWITCH’

Schmidt attempted to sell U.S. state secrets to China through the consulate in Turkey before trying the Chinese security services, according to the DOJ. (Adek Berry)
Coughenour said he weighed “the seriousness of Schmidt’s crime and his mental health at the time.” A DOJ spokesperson confirmed to Fox News Digital the judge considered Schmidt’s mental health as a mitigating factor during sentencing.
The agency said Schmidt’s separation from the Army followed a mental health episode, and officials added that no classified material was believed to have reached China.
“The FBI and our partners will remain vigilant in our mission to safeguard our nation,” said W. Mike Herrington, special agent in charge of the Seattle field office.

Joseph Daniel Schmidt was stationed at Joint Base Lewis-McChord in Washington state while serving in the Army. (Facebook/Joint Base Lewis-McChord)
Assistant U.S. Attorney Todd Greenberg said Schmidt “created documents based on classified and national defense information. He used his training to provide sensitive information to the Chinese security service. He knew what he was doing was wrong – he was doing web searches for such things as ‘Can you be extradited for treason.’”
The FBI investigated the case, with valuable assistance provided by the U.S. Army Counterintelligence Command (USACC).
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
The case was investigated by the FBI’s Seattle Field Office with assistance from the USACC.
The Army did not immediately respond to Fox News Digital’s request for comment.
[ad_2]
[ad_1]
WASHINGTON — President Trump faces the most important international meeting of his second term so far on Thursday: face-to-face negotiations with Xi Jinping, who has made China a formidable economic and military challenger to the United States.
The two presidents face a vast agenda during their meeting in Seoul, beginning with the two countries’ escalating trade war over tariffs and high-tech exports. The list also includes U.S. demands for a Chinese crackdown on fentanyl, China’s aid to Russia in its war with Ukraine, the future of Taiwan and China’s growing nuclear arsenal.
Trump has already promised, characteristically, that the meeting will be a major success.
“It’s going to be fantastic for both countries, and it’s going to be fantastic for the entire world,” he said last week.
But it isn’t yet clear that the summit’s concrete results will measure up to that high standard.
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said Sunday that the two sides have agreed to a “framework” under which China would delay implementing tight controls on rare earth elements, minerals crucial for the production of high-tech products from smartphones and electric vehicles to military aircraft and missiles. He said China has also agreed to resume buying soybeans from U.S. farmers and to crack down on fentanyl components.
In return, Bessent said, the United States will back down from its stinging tariffs on Chinese goods.
Nicholas Burns, the U.S. ambassador in Beijing under then-President Biden, said that kind of deal would amount to “an uneasy trade truce rather than a comprehensive trade deal.”
“That may be the best we can expect,” he said in an interview Monday. Still, he added, “it will be a positive step to stabilize world markets and allow the continuation of U.S.-China trade for the time being.”
But U.S. and Chinese officials have been close-mouthed on what, if anything, has been agreed on regarding Xi’s other big trade demand: easier U.S. restrictions on high-tech exports to China, especially advanced semiconductor chips used for artificial intelligence.
Burns said the two superpowers’ technology competition is “the most sensitive … in terms of where this relationship will head, which country will emerge more powerful.”
Giving China easy access to advanced semiconductors “would only help [the Chinese army] in its competition with the U.S. military for power in the Indo-Pacific,” he warned.
Other former officials and China hawks outside the administration have said, even more pointedly, that they worry that Trump may be too willing to trade long-term technology assets for short-term trade deals.
In August, Trump eased export controls to allow Nvidia, the world leader in AI chips, to sell more semiconductors to China — in an unusual deal under which the U.S. company would pay 15% of its revenue from the sales to the U.S. Treasury.
Matthew Pottinger, Trump’s top China advisor in his first term, protested in a recent podcast interview that the deal risked trading a strategic technology advantage “for $20 billion and Nvidia’s bottom line.”
Underlying the controversy over technology, some China watchers warn, is a basic mismatch between the two presidents: Trump is focused almost entirely on trade and commercial deals, while Xi is focused on displacing the United States as the biggest economic and military power in Asia.
“I don’t think the administration has a strategy toward China,” said Bonnie Glaser, a China expert at the German Marshall Fund of the United States. “It has a trade strategy, not a China strategy.”
“The administration does not seem to be focused on competition with China,” said Jonathan Czin, a former CIA analyst now at Washington’s Brookings Institution. “It’s focused on deal making. … It’s tactics without strategy.”
“We’ve fallen into a kind of trade and technology myopia,” he added. “We’re not talking about issues like China’s coercion [of smaller countries] in the South China Sea. … China doesn’t want to have that bigger, broader conversation.”
It isn’t clear that Trump and Xi will have either the time or inclination to talk in detail about anything other than trade.
And even on the front-burner economic issues, this week’s ceasefire is unlikely to produce a permanent peace.
“As with all such agreements, the devil will be in the details,” Burns, the former ambassador, said. “The two countries will remain fierce trade rivals. Expect friction ahead and further trade duels well into 2026.”
“Buckle up,” Czin said. “There are likely more sudden moves from Beijing ahead.”
In the long run, Trump’s legacy in U.S.-China relations will rest not only on trade deals but on the larger competition for economic and military power in the Pacific Rim. No matter how this week’s meetings go, those challenges still lie ahead.
[ad_2]
Doyle McManus
Source link
[ad_1]
HONG KONG (AP) — China’s ambition to challenge Boeing and Airbus with its own homegrown passenger jet is running into turbulence, with deliveries of finished aircraft likely to fall far short of its target announced for this year.
The C919 jet — a single-aisle passenger plane aiming to rival Boeing’s 737 and Airbus’ A320 – is made by state-owned aircraft manufacturer COMAC. Beijing is showcasing it as evidence of China’s technological advancement and progress in self-reliance, though it uses many Western sourced components.
Trade friction with Washington threatens to prevent COMAC from securing core parts for the program that has been supported by huge Chinese government subsidies.
“COMAC faces significant risk from the volatile policy environment, with its supply chains vulnerable to export restrictions and tit-for-tat measures between the U.S. and China,” said Max J. Zenglein, Asia-Pacific senior economist at The Conference Board think tank.
The C919 has 48 major suppliers from the U.S. — including GE, Honeywell and Collins — 26 from Europe and 14 from China, according to analysts at the Bank of America. Trump threatened to impose new export controls on “critical” software to China after Beijing imposed stricter export controls on rare earths.
“Existing choke points are being exploited in the deal making process between governments,” Zenglein said. “This is likely to continue as critical dependencies have become political bargaining chips.”
Beijing has high hopes for the C919, which made its maiden commercial flight in 2023. The mid-sized jet is meant to help fill vast domestic demand for new aircraft over the next few decades. China hopes to expand sales beyond its borders and fly globally, including in Southeast Asia, Africa and Europe.
COMAC delivered 13 C919s to Chinese carriers last year and only seven as of October this year, despite plans to ramp up production and deliver 30 jets in 2025, according to the aviation consultancy Cirium.
China’s biggest state-owned airlines — Air China, China Eastern and China Southern — are the only commercial airlines currently flying a total of around 20 C919s.
Trade tensions between the U.S. and China have “directly affected” delivery schedules for the C919, said Dan Taylor, head of consulting at aviation consultancy IBA. For one, output plans were disrupted when the U.S. suspended export licenses for the jet’s LEAP-1C engines around May, resuming them in July, he said.
U.S.-controlled technology that needs export licensing for the LEAP-1C engines — jointly built by the U.S.’s GE Aerospace and France’s Safran -— means the C919’s engines require U.S. export clearance, Taylor said, making it “inherently sensitive to political shifts.”
“Engine and avionics dependence on Western suppliers continues to expose the program to policy decisions beyond COMAC’s control,” Taylor explained.
Geopolitical tensions alone are not the only cause for slower than expected production of the C919s. The program has been “marked by caution and prioritizing quality and safety, so there also may be some operational reasons for the slower production ramp up,” said Zenglein from The Conference Board.
While “it has always been the aim to reduce the reliance on foreign components as quickly as possible” for the C919, Zenglein said, many analysts say it is a challenging process. China’s own engine alternative — the CJ-1000A under development by state-owned Aero Engine Corporation of China (AECC) — is still under testing, according to IBA.
Several airlines outside of China, including AirAsia, have expressed interest in flying the C919, but a lack of international certification has so far prevented the C919 from flying beyond China. Certifications from the U.S. and the European Union’s aviation regulators could take years.
For the C919 to succeed, it “needs to have each one of three things: good economics, a prompt global product support network, and certification from safety agencies”, said Richard Aboulafia, managing director of AeroDynamic Advisory. “Any one of these three alone doesn’t mean much,” he said.
China will need 9,570 new passenger aircraft between 2025 and 2044, according to Airbus’ latest market forecast, more than 80% of them single-aisle jets like the C919.
COMAC’s faces a growing challenge from Airbus, which is expanding its manufacturing capacity in China. A second assembly line is due to begin operating in 2026, allowing Airbus to increase its production of A320 single-aisle jets in China – an aircraft model similar to the C919.
Analysts expect that it will take years for COMAC to break the Boeing-Airbus duopoly in global aircraft share. By the late 2020s, COMAC will likely grow within China and possibly establish regional exports, said IBA’s Taylor.
In the near term, a lack of international certification will be “delaying any meaningful Western-market entry” for the jet and export control volatility will likely continue to undermine its global expansion plans, Taylor added.
[ad_2]
[ad_1]
A Philippine general said on Friday that the United States Typhon missile system deployed in the country since April last year is capable of striking China.
The Chinese Foreign Ministry did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
The Typhon Mid-Range Capability system is a land-based missile system operated by the U.S. Army. It can launch two types of missiles—the Tomahawk and the Standard Missile-6—against aerial, surface and land targets, with respective ranges of about 1,000 and 290 miles.
The U.S. Army initially deployed the Typhon missile system in the Philippines for drills, but the U.S. and the Philippines, allies under a mutual defense treaty, later decided to keep it there indefinitely. Eastern and southern China and parts of the South China Sea—where Beijing and Manila have territorial disputes—fall within range of the system.
Armed Forces of the Philippines Chief General Romeo Brawner Jr. said in an interview that deploying the Typhon missile system is part of the military’s effort to strengthen its capability to defend the country against any invasion attempt, the Daily Tribune reported.
While acknowledging that mainland China and China’s artificial islands in the South China Sea are within range of the system, the general said the weapon’s range does “not matter to others” as the Philippines focuses on building defenses against “any threats.”
“It is not specifically targeting China, but these missile systems are here so we can train. Once we acquire these capabilities, we must be ready to use them,” the general said. Manila revealed its interest in buying the Typhon missile system last November.
The Philippine military chief said that even without hosting the U.S. missile system, the country is already a target because of its “very strategic” location, close to Taiwan and serving as a chokepoint between the South China Sea and the broader Pacific.
China’s communist government has claimed sovereignty over the self-governed island of Taiwan and has threatened to use force to achieve reunification. The Typhon missile system could strike Chinese invasion forces in the air and at sea from the Philippines.
The Philippines and Taiwan form part of a north-south defensive line known as the First Island Chain, along with Japan, under a U.S. containment strategy that aims to project military power to deter and defend against potential Chinese aggression.
The Chinese defense and foreign ministries have been urging the U.S. and the Philippines to withdraw the Typhon missile system from the Philippines, saying the deployment undermines China’s legitimate security interests and warning that it would take necessary countermeasures.
“This is a significant step in our partnership with the Philippines, our oldest treaty ally in the region,” the U.S. Army previously said of the “landmark” Typhon missile system deployment, saying it has enhanced interoperability, readiness and defense capabilities.
Armed Forces of the Philippines Chief General Romeo Brawner Jr. said in an interview on Friday: “These are medium-range missiles, meaning that if they are launched, they can reach mainland China and even their artificial islands. But for us, they do not matter to others; we are strengthening the [Armed Forces of the Philippines] to defend our country against any nation attempting to invade or seize our territory.”
Guo Jiakun, spokesperson for China’s Foreign Ministry, said at a press conference on February 12: “China will not sit idly by when its security interests are harmed or threatened … We call on the Philippines to change its course, and make a strategic choice that truly serves the fundamental interest of itself and its people, rather than staying on the wrong path and hurting the Philippines itself when it comes to issues like Typhon.”
China is likely to continue pressuring the Philippines over the Typhon missile system deployment, which could further increase tensions in the contested South China Sea.
[ad_2]
[ad_1]
After several years of losing money on cattle, Burleen and Pete Wobeter thought this would finally be the year things turned around. Their Iowa farm also grows corn and soybeans — crops that have been hit hard by the trade war with China — but cattle had been a bright spot so far in 2025.
“This year, it is the one thing that is going to make any money for us,” Burleen said.
That’s why they were astounded when President Trump announced he wanted to quadruple beef imports from Argentina, claiming it would “bring our beef prices down” and help “a very good ally.”
His words sent wholesale cattle prices plummeting.
“I thought the whole point of tariffs was to bring production back home, and now he is trying to do something to destroy that production,” Burleen said, adding, ” It feels like being a pawn in a game we’re not going to win.”
“We’re being used and abused as producers,” Pete added.
For farmers across the U.S., this harvest season brought a new kind of uncertainty. China, once the biggest buyer of U.S. soybeans, cut off purchases after tariffs escalated, leaving producers with full silos and falling prices.
The Wobeters were hoping stronger cattle prices could make up for those losses.
But while cattle ranchers are earning less, shoppers aren’t seeing any savings. Ground beef is up nearly 13% and steak is up 16% over the past year, according to federal data. Economists say the spike is tied to drought, high feed costs and a shrinking U.S. cattle herd — now at its lowest level in decades.
Bryan Whaley, CEO of the Iowa Cattlemen’s Association, said more imports from Argentina won’t fix that.
“You have to look at the total supply chain,” Whaley said. “It really only is gonna be about 2.5% of our total beef supply. So it’s really not going to make a substantial difference.”
To help farmers and ranchers weather the downturn, the Trump administration announced last week it would release about $3 billion in assistance by tapping a fund used in Mr. Trump’s first term to aid farmers, officials told CBS News.
The Trump administration has discussed offering upward of $10 billion in relief to farmers, CBS News reported earlier this month. That potential aid package is on the back burner due to the shutdown, and is separate from the $3 billion in new assistance, a senior administration official said.
At the same time, the administration recently hinted that new trade agreements could also help turn things around for soybean farmers. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said on “Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan” that new deals, including one with China, would be positive for U.S. agriculture.
“Soybean farmers are going to be extremely happy with this deal for this year and for the coming years,” he said.
During his Asia trip, Mr. Trump said he expected the new trade deal with China to be finalized in the coming days.
[ad_2]
[ad_1]
Key figures involved in the failed criminal case against two men accused of spying for China have given conflicting accounts to a parliamentary committee about why the case collapsed.
In September, prosecutors dropped charges against Christopher Cash and Christopher Berry, who had been charged under the Official Secrets Act. Both men deny wrongdoing.
The director of public prosecutions, Stephen Parkinson, had said the case could not progress because the government’s deputy national security adviser, Matt Collins, was unwilling to classify China as an active threat to national security.
However, Mr Collins told the committee he had been given legal advice that his evidence would be “enough”.
He said he always knew the case would be “a challenge” but that he had been “trying to ensure that we could support a successful prosecution”.
Mr Collins – who was set to be the government’s witness in the trial – added: “And so I was somewhat surprised when I was told on 3 September that the intention was to drop the case.”
In contrast Tom Little KC – who would have been the lead prosecuting barrister in the case – said he would be “surprised” if Mr Collins had not realised the prosecution would collapse unless he offered further evidence.
Earlier in the session, Mr Little had said Mr Collins had been clear he would not say that “China posed an active threat to national security at the material time”.
“That was in answer to what I regard as the million dollar question in the case, and once he had said that the current prosecution for those charges was effectively unsustainable,” he added.
He said the case was brought to “a crashing halt” when Mr Collins outlined the limits of what he would be wiling to say in court.
Asked by the National Security Strategy Committee about the evidence he provided to prosecutors, Mr Collins said: “What I was able to say is that China poses a range of threats to our national security.
“I was able to say that these include espionage threats, cyber threats, threats to our democratic institutions, threats to our economic security.
“I would be able to say that these threats are very real and persistent, and the operational partners are dealing with them on a daily basis.”
He added he believed the CPS was asking him to “use the generic term that China is a threat, or China is an active threat, which is not in line with government policy at the time”.
Members of the committee pressed Mr Parkinson and Mr Little on why they felt Mr Collins had not provided enough evidence that China could be considered a threat.
Labour peer Lord Paul Boateng noted that, in his evidence Mr Collins had said “China’s espionage operations threaten the UK’s economic prosperity and resilience, and the integrity of our democratic institutions”.
He argued the phrase would be enough to indicate “we are dealing with an enemy”.
Lord Mark Sedwill, a former national security adviser, suggested that if Mr Collins was only able to reflect the government view, the prosecution could have sought other witnesses who could have characterised China as a “threat to national security”.
However, Mr Little said the limits of Mr Collins’ evidence would have derailed the case, regardless of what others said.
Labour MP Dame Emily Thornberry asked why prosecutors could not have trusted a jury to conclude China could be deemed a threat.
Mr Parkinson argued that, without the key evidence from Mr Collins, a judge would not have let the case go to trial.
Mr Collins submitted his first witness statement in December 2023, after which prosecutors decided they had enough evidence to charge Mr Cash and Mr Berry under the Official Secrets Act 1911.
However, Mr Parkinson said a ruling in a separate court case in 2024 changed the requirements of what evidence would be needed and so prosecutors asked Mr Collins to provide further witness statements, in the hope he would label China a “threat to national security”.
In two further statements, Mr Collins detailed threats posed by China in cyberspace and to the UK’s democratic institutions but avoided labelling the country “a threat to national security”.
The collapse of the case triggered a political row over who was to blame. The Conservatives have accused the Labour government of allowing the case to fail because it wanted to foster better relations with Beijing.
However, the government said ministers had no role in providing evidence for the case and Mr Collins was giving evidence based on what Conservative government policy had been at the time.
On Wednesday, the committee will hear evidence from Attorney General Lord Hermer and senior minister Darren Jones.
[ad_2]