ReportWire

Tag: Charlie Baker

  • Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine signed a law legalizing sports betting. He now says he’s opposed to it

    [ad_1]

    COLUMBUS, Ohio (AP) — If Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine could turn back time, he would not have signed the law that legalized sports betting in his state.

    With two Cleveland Guardians pitchers and an Ohio-born guard for the Miami Heat snared in separate betting-related criminal probes, the second-term Republican says he now “absolutely” regrets unleashing this unbridled new industry on Ohioans with his 2021 signature.

    “Look, we’ve always had gambling, we’re always going to have gambling,” DeWine told The Associated Press last week. “But just the power of these companies and the deep, deep, deep pockets they have to advertise and do everything they can to get someone to place that bet is really different once you have legalization of them.”

    His comments reflect a reckoning that’s unfolding across sports and politics as sports betting becomes more ingrained across much of the U.S. The wave of legalization in recent years unleashed a massive industry centered around betting and, more recently, a wave of investigations and arrests tied to allegations of rigged games. It’s a dynamic that DeWine says he doesn’t think lawmakers fully anticipated.

    “Ohio shouldn’t have done it,” he said.

    DeWine prompted a rare move to limit prop bets

    DeWine recently emerged as a key player in the negotiations between Major League Baseball and its authorized gaming operators that resulted in the capping of prop bets on individual pitches at $200 and excluding them from parlays. The deal was announced earlier this month, a day after Guardians pitchers Luis Ortiz and Emmanuel Clase were indicted and accused of rigging pitches at the behest of gamblers. Both have pleaded not guilty.

    “Gov. DeWine really did a huge service, I think — to us, certainly, I can’t speak for any of the other sports — in terms of kind of bringing forward the need to do something in this area,” MLB Commissioner Rob Manfred told reporters last week.

    And DeWine doesn’t plan to stop there. Shortly after Ortiz and Clase were first placed on paid leave this summer, he announced he’d be asking the commissioners and players’ unions of all the major U.S. sports leagues to ban prop bets — sometimes called micro-betting — like those implicated in the Guardians scandal. While that goal has not yet been achieved — micro-betting is critical to the business strategy in an industry with over $11 billion in revenue in the U.S. this year — DeWine said limits put in place for baseball are a good first step.

    “It needs to be holistic, it needs to be universal,” he told the AP. “They’re just playing with fire. I mean, they are just asking for more and more trouble, their failure to address this.”

    The gambling industry’s investments in Ohio politics

    DeWine’s recent sentiments mark a notable position shift after he pledged to — and then did — sign a legalization law that was sweeping in scope. The legislation allowed adults 21 and older to place sports bets online, at casinos, at racinos and at stand-alone betting kiosks in bars, restaurants and professional sports facilities. Wagering was permitted under the bill on professional sports teams, motor sports, Olympic events, golf, tennis and even major college sports, including Ohio State football.

    It was clear in the run-up to DeWine’s re-election in 2022 that the gambling industry was intensely interested in what was transpiring in the state.

    An AP investigation that year found that casino operators, slot machine makers, gaming technology companies, sports interests or their lobbyists donated nearly $1 million in 2021 and 2022 to the nonprofit Republican Governors Association, which supported pro-DeWine committees through its campaign arm. Entities and individuals with ties to the industry also donated more than $22,000 directly to DeWine’s campaign, according to campaign finance reports.

    A review of more recent campaign filings finds that industry largesse has continued to flow to Ohio politicians with sway over gaming’s future.

    Lobbyists and a PAC with ties to Jack Casino, DraftKings, FanDuel, MGM, Gamewise, Hard Rock, Underdog, Rush Street or Caesars have donated about $130,000 to Ohio state legislators in the past three years, records show — about a third of that directed to top House and Senate leaders. Then-Republican Lt. Gov. Jon Husted, who was positioning as DeWine’s likely gubernatorial successor, had received about $9,000 from industry-connected entities and individuals before being appointed to the U.S. Senate.

    At least one powerful state lawmaker, Republican House Finance Chairman Brian Stewart, had vowed to introduce legislation protecting prop bets prior to professional baseball’s crackdown.

    “I think that prop bets are a significant part of sports betting in the state of Ohio,” Stewart told cleveland.com in August. “It’s something that clearly a lot of Ohioans have taken part in and enjoy, and I don’t think there’s something that we should eliminate entirely.”

    Amid such pushback, DeWine and others now view voluntary buy-in from leagues, players’ unions and sportsbooks as a superior approach to pursuing gambling restrictions on a state-by-state basis, where the authority lies.

    Matt Schuler, executive director of the Ohio Casino Control Commission, said the baseball deal DeWine helped broker has shown it can be done.

    “He’s using the bully pulpit and he’s able to connect with the right people in that way,” Schuler said of DeWine. “No one thought that everyone could get on the same page, but now they did because everyone realizes the risk. The bets are small, but the risk is big, and so, having observed gaming and regulated it for about 14 years, this is impressive.”

    Harassment and scandal in Ohio changed DeWine’s mind

    DeWine said his concerns with sports gambling began almost as soon as Ohio’s law took effect in 2023. Very quickly, his office began receiving reports that gamblers were threatening members of the University of Dayton basketball team.

    So he contacted NCAA President Charlie Baker, whom he knew from Baker’s time as governor of Massachusetts, and learned that he shared DeWine’s concern. He got Baker to write a letter requesting the removal of collegiate prop bets from the list of legal wagers that sportsbooks operating in Ohio could place, which allowed DeWine to usher the change through the casino commission.

    After the Guardians case emerged this summer, DeWine approached Manfred with the same idea. They hadn’t both been governors, but DeWine did have one cache going in: his family’s long-time ownership of North Carolina’s Asheville Tourists. DeWine said Manfred asked him to hold off on pushing unilateral action in Ohio, in hopes of getting the parties to agree to a new national rule.

    “I would have preferred to have completely done away with the micro-prop bets, but this is the area that he was able to settle on with them, and I was pleased with that,” DeWine said. “And so, I think that’s progress.”

    DeWine, who faces term limits next year, said he would be happy to sign a repeal of Ohio’s sports betting law at this point, but he’s certain there’s not enough support for that at the Ohio Statehouse.

    “There’s not the votes for that. I can count,” he said. “I’m not always right, but I can pretty much guarantee you that they’re not ready to do this.”

    Instead, he’ll continue to make his case in other ways.

    DeWine, an avid baseball fan, particularly of his hometown Cincinnati Reds, said he believes “these sports are playing with dynamite here and the integrity of the sports is at stake.”

    “So, you try to do what you can do, and you try and warn people, and try to take action like we did with collegiate, and you try take action like what we’re doing with baseball,” he said. “But we’ve got to keep pushing these other sports to do it, too.”

    ___

    AP Baseball Writer Ronald Blum contributed to this report.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • NCAA College Student-Athletes Can Soon Bet on Pro Sports

    [ad_1]

    Posted on: October 23, 2025, 08:39h. 

    Last updated on: October 23, 2025, 08:39h.

    • NCAA student-athletes can be on professional sports beginning Nov. 1
    • College athletes remain barred from betting on all forms of collegiate athletics

    It’s official. Student-athletes participating in college sports sanctioned by the NCAA can bet on professional sports, so long as they use a legal, regulated sportsbook, beginning Nov. 1.

    NCAA college student-athletes sports betting
    The exterior of the NCAA National Office in Indianapolis is pictured in 2022. Beginning Nov. 1, 2025, college student-athletes governed by the NCAA can legally place bets on professional sports. (Image: Shutterstock)

    Earlier this month, Casino.org reported that the odds were good that college athletes participating in NCAA sports would soon be allowed to gamble on the outcome of professional sporting events. The news broke after the NCAA Division I Administrative Committee adopted a proposal to amend the ban on student-athletes betting on all sports to exclude pro games.

    The NCAA Division II and II management councils, as expected, ratified the proposal during their meetings this week. The adoption means that, effective Nov. 1, all college students of legal sports gambling age will be able to bet lawfully on professional sports.

    This change recognizes the realities of today’s sports environment without compromising our commitment to protecting the integrity of college competition or the well-being of student-athletes,” said Roberta Page, the director of athletics at Slippery Rock University in Pennsylvania and the Division II Management Council chair.

    The NCAA says its sports betting regulatory change “is not an endorsement of sports betting.” 

    NCAA Regulatory Responsibilities 

    The NCAA’s decision to allow its student-athletes to bet on pro sports is threefold. The lifting means college players who knowingly or unknowingly violate the rule will not be subject to harsh penalties, including the loss of eligibility.

    Perhaps more of a motive, however, is that monitoring every college athlete’s online gaming and betting activity, inclusive of college and professional sports, is a herculean task. The NCAA alone has more than 540K student-athletes competing at over 1,000 member schools across 24 sports.

    Allowing college athletes to bet on professional sports somewhat reduces the surveillance workload. The NCAA said the change allows the association and its conferences and member schools “to focus on protecting the integrity of college games … while encouraging healthy habits for student-athletes who choose to engage in betting activities on professional sports.”

    We run the largest sports betting integrity program in the world,” said NCAA President Charlie Baker. “Sadly, we discovered some student athletes involved with some problematic activity.”

    There’s also the thinking that ending the pro sports betting ban will bring some student-athletes gambling on the NFL and other pro sports via unregulated, offshore online sportsbooks, or through a local bookie, into the regulated market. Regulated sportsbooks come with consumer safeguards like responsible betting programs and financial account security.

    College Bets Remain Out of Bounds

    All NCAA student-athletes remain barred from betting on any outcome involving college sports, regardless of whether they compete in the associated sport, conference, or division.

    “NCAA rules ban participation in sports betting activities and prohibit providing information to individuals involved in or associated with any type of sports betting activities concerning intercollegiate or amateur athletics competition,” the NCAA rules read. “In other words, if you are a student-athlete, coach, or athletics staff member, regardless of sport or division, you are not allowed to bet or provide any useful information that can influence a bet in any sport the NCAA sponsors at any level.”

    [ad_2]

    Devin O’Connor

    Source link

  • Poll shows likely voters support Moulton over Markey in mock Senate race

    [ad_1]

    A new statewide poll of likely Massachusetts voters shows Congressman Seth Moulton could claim an early advantage over U.S. Sen. Ed Markey in a hypothetical 2026 U.S. Senate Democratic primary, while a solid majority of voters voiced support for cutting the state income tax rate to 4%.

    The poll, conducted Sept. 24–25 by Advantage, Inc. for the Fiscal Alliance Foundation, surveyed 750 likely voters and has a margin of error of plus or minus 3.6 percentage points.


    This page requires Javascript.

    Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

    kAmx? E96 9JA@E96E:42= &]$] $6?2E6 >2E49FA E92E E96 $2=6> r@?8C6DD>2? D2JD 96 92D ?@E >256 2 564:D:@? 23@FE[ |@F=E@? =625D |2C<6J cbT E@ a`T 2>@?8 2== G@E6CD[ H:E9 beT F?564:565] p>@?8 s6>@4C2E:4 G@E6CD H9@ H@F=5 36 2 3:8 A2CE @7 E96 AC:>2CJ 6=64E@C2E6[ |@F=E@? =625D bgT E@ |2C<6J’D b_T]k^Am

    kAm}62C=J EH@E9:C5D @7 2== C6DA@?56?ED — ebT — D2:5 E96 fhJ62C@=5 :?4F>36?E D9@F=5 ?@E D66< C66=64E:@? 😕 a_ae] p5G2?E286[ x?4] D2:5 E96J A@==65 86?6C2= 6=64E:@?=:<6=J G@E6CD[ ?@E AC:>2CJ G@E6CD[ 23@FE E96 A@DD:3=6 &]$] $6?2E6 >2E49FA]k^Am

    kAm~? 7:D42= A@=:4J[ eaT @7 G@E6CD D2:5 E96J DFAA@CE 4FEE:?8 E96 DE2E6 :?4@>6 E2I C2E6 7C@> dT E@ cT[ H:E9 ;FDE acT @AA@D65] $FAA@CE 7@C E96 4FE 4C@DD65 A2CEJ =:?6D[ 244@C5:?8 E@ E96 A@==’D DA@?D@CD] %96 >62DFC6 😀 2>@?8 E9@D6 AC@A@D65 7@C A@DD:3=6 :?4=FD:@? @? E96 a_ae 32==@E]k^Am

    kAmv@G] |2FC2 w62=6J =65 282:?DE #6AF3=:42? 492==6?86CD DE2E6H:56[ 3FE EC2:=65 2>@?8 :?56A6?56?E G@E6CD] pD<65 H9:49 42?5:52E6 C6DA@?56?ED H@F=5 DFAA@CE :7 E96 6=64E:@? H6C6 96=5 E@52J[ w62=6J 8@E E96 DFAA@CE @7 cdT @7 C6DA@?56?ED H96? >2E4965 282:?DE 7@C>6C w@FD:?8 2?5 t4@?@>:4 s6G6=@A>6?E $64C6E2CJ |:<6 z6??62=J WbcTX 2?5 E96 DFAA@CE @7 ceT @7 C6DA@?56?ED 282:?DE 7@C>6C |q%p 25>:?:DEC2E@C qC:2? $9@CED=66G6 Wb`TX]k^Am

    kAmp>@?8 :?56A6?56?E G@E6CD[ z6??62=J =65 w62=6J cbT E@ bbT[ 2?5 $9@CED=66G6 =65 96C c_T E@ bdT]k^Am

    kAm%96 A@== 5:5 ?@E E6DE z6??62=J 2?5 $9@CED=66G6 282:?DE @?6 2?@E96C]k^Am

    kAm“x7 x H2D H@C<:?8 7@C w62=6J[ x’5 36 2 =:EE=6 4@?46C?65 23@FE E9@D6 ?F>36CD[ 6DA64:2==J 4@?D:56C:?8 E92E E96J’C6 EC2:=:?8 96C ;@3 2AAC@G2= C2E:?8D[” D2:5 y:> t=EC:?892> @7 p5G2?E286[ x?4] 2E 2 AC6DD 4@?76C6?46 (65?6D52J]k^Am

    kAmp>@?8 DE2E6H:56 G@E6CD[ dgT D2:5 E96J 2AAC@G65 @7 E96 ;@3 w62=6J 😀 5@:?8 Wb_T DEC@?8=J 2AAC@G6[ 2?5 agT D@>6H92E 2AAC@G6]Xk^Am

    kAm“$96’D 366? E96C6 7@C[ J@F @H[ 4@>:?8 @? 7@FC J62CD] qFE C62==J[ :7 J@F E9:?< @7 E96 pv 324<8C@F?5[ E92E’D 2 `aJ62C :?4F>36?E DE2E6H:56[ 2?5 H96? J@F’C6 E9C@H? 282:?DE @?6 @7 E96 #6AF3=:42?D ]]] 2?5 J@F’C6 F?56C d_T[ x E9:?< H92E y:> ;FDE D2:5 😀 AC6EEJ ECF6[” D2:5 u:D42= p==:2?46 DA@<6DA6CD@? !2F= rC2?6J]k^Am

    kAmw62=6J’D 42>A2:8? A@:?E65 E96 }6HD $6CG:46 E@ E96 |2DD249FD6EED s6>@4C2E:4 !2CEJ H96? 2D<65 7@C 2 C6DA@?D6 E@ E96 A@==]k^Am

    kAm“%9:D 😀 2 A2CE:D2? @C82?:K2E:@? 2?5 2 566A=J A2CE:D2? A@==[ 2?5 6G6? H:E9 E92E |2DDu:D42= 92D |2FC2 w62=6J H:??:?8 3J 2 D:8?:7:42?E >2C8:?] %92E 92D E@ 9FCE E96 2?@?J>@FD #6AF3=:42? 5@?@CD H9@ 7F?5 E96>[” z6CC:82? D2:5]k^Am

    kAmp5G2?E286 x?4] 😀 2 A2CE:D2? @C82?:K2E:@? E92E @? :ED H63D:E6 567:?6D :ED6=7 2D 5C:G:?8 “8C2DDC@@ED G@E6C 4@?E24E 2?5 >@3:=:K2E:@?” E92E 32EE=6D 7@C #6AF3=:42?D “@? E96 =@42=[ DE2E6[ 2?5 ?2E:@?2= =6G6=D]” %96 u:D42= p==:2?46 56D4C:36D :ED6=7 2D ?@?A2CE:D2?[ 3FE 4C:E:4D DF886DE :ED 24E:G:E:6D 2=:8? H:E9 E96 #6AF3=:42? 2?5 4@?D6CG2E:G6 286?52]k^Am

    kAmx? 2 AC6DD C6=62D6[ z6??62=J D2:5[ “%9:D A@== AC@G6D H92E H6 2=C625J @H — |2FC2 w62=6J 😀 362E23=6] x 2> E96 @?=J #6AF3=:42? 42?5:52E6 H:E9 E96 6IA6C:6?46[ 6?6C8J[ A@=:4:6D[ 2?5 C6D@FC46D E@ H:? 😕 a_ae]”k^Am

    kAm%96 z6??62=J 42>A’D DE2E6>6?E 25565 E92E 9:D @AA@?6?E 😕 E96 #6AF3=:42? AC:>2CJ 😀 “F?6=64E23=6]”k^Am

    kAmp DA@<6DA6CD@? 7@C $9@CED=66G6 D2:5 E96 A@== D9@HD E96 C246 😀 72C 7C@> @G6C 2?5 9:89=:89E65 D9:7E:?8 G@E6C 4@?46C?D 2C@F?5 277@C523:=:EJ 2?5 =6256CD9:A]k^Am

    kAm%96 DFCG6J 2=D@ 82F865 AF3=:4 @A:?:@? @? D6G6C2= 9@E3FEE@? A@=:4J :DDF6D[ :?4=F5:?8 C6?E 4@?EC@= 2?5 6?6C8J A@=:4J] p >2;@C:EJ WdbTX @AA@D65 C6?E 4@?EC@= @FEC:89E[ 2?5 @AA@D:E:@? C@D6 E@ edT H96? C6DA@?56?ED H6C6 E@=5 :E 4@F=5 =625 E@ 9:896C AC@A6CEJ E2I6D 7@C 9@>6@H?6CD]k^Am

    kAm(96? 2D<65 23@FE E96 DE2E6’D ?6E K6C@ a_d_ >2?52E6[ dcT D2:5 E96J @AA@D65 E96 4=:>2E6 A@=:4J H96? :E H2D 56D4C:365 2D :?4C62D:?8 6?6C8J 4@DED 2?5 C65F4:?8 4@?DF>6C 49@:46] #@F89=J @?6E9:C5 DFAA@CE65 E96 A@=:4J 2D 56D4C:365]k^Am

    kAm~? 6?6C8J DFAA=J[ eaT @7 G@E6CD D2:5 E96J DFAA@CE 3F:=5:?8 ?6H ?2EFC2= 82D A:A6=:?6D 😕 }6H t?8=2?5] $FAA@CE 7@C ?F4=62C 6?6C8J H2D 2=D@ ?@E23=6[ H:E9 d`T 😕 72G@C @7 3F:=5:?8 ?6H ?F4=62C A=2?ED]k^Am

    kAmt=EC:?892> D2:5 E96 7:?5:?8D DF886DE 277@C523:=:EJ 😀 6>6C8:?8 2D 2 F?:7J:?8 4@?46C? 2>@?8 G@E6CD 24C@DD E96 A@=:E:42= DA64ECF>]k^Am

    kAm“(6 5@ D66 2 AC6EEJ 8@@5 A2EE6C? @7 A6@A=6 D2J:?8 E92E E96J’C6 4@?46C?65 23@FE 277@C523:=:EJ[ E92E E96J’C6 4@?46C?65 23@FE E96:C 6?6C8J 3:==D[ 2?5 E96J H2?E E@ D66 D@=FE:@?D E@ E92E[ 2?5 E96J’C6 =@@<:?8 7@C A=246D H96C6 E9@D6 D@=FE:@?D 42? 4@>6[” 96 D2:5]k^Am

    kAm%96 A@== 2=D@ :?4=F565 BF6DE:@?D @? E2IA2J6C C632E6D[ AF3=:4 C64@C5D 2446DD[ ?:4@E:?6 C6DEC:4E:@?D[ 2?5 @E96C A@=:4J :DDF6D]k^Am

    [ad_2]

    By Sam Drysdale | State House News Service

    Source link

  • Court sides with voodoo worshiper over religious exemption

    [ad_1]

    BOSTON — A state appeals court has sided with a medical worker and voodoo worshipper who was fired by University of Massachusetts Medical Health Care after her request for a religious exemption to the COVID-19 vaccine was rejected.

    The ruling, issued Monday by the state Court of Appeals, overturns a Superior Court ruling that rejected a lawsuit filed by Rachelle Jeune against UMass Medical over its denial of a religious exemption in October 2021 as part of her employment as a surgical technician.


    This page requires Javascript.

    Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

    kAm“(6 4@?4=F56 E92E E96 A=2:?E:77’D DE2E65 36=:67D E92E 96C 3@5J 😀 2 E6>A=6 @7 v@5 2?5 E92E D96 AC2J65 E@ v@5 2?5 C646:G65 2 >6DD286 ?@E E@ C646:G6 E96 r~’xs`h G244:?2E:@? H6C6 36=:67D E92E 2 EC:6C @7 724E 4@F=5 56E6C>:?6 H6C6 C6=:8:@FD 😕 ?2EFC6[” E96 7@FC;F586 A2?6= HC@E6 😕 E96 a`A286 CF=:?8]k^Am

    kAmy6F?6[ H9@ 😀 @C:8:?2==J 7C@> w2:E:[ D2:5 😕 4@FCE 7:=:?8D E92E D96 😀 2 56G@FE r9C:DE:2? 2?5 G@@5@@ AC24E:E:@?6C H9@ 92D “D:?46C6” C6=:8:@FD @3;64E:@?D E@ E96 r~’xs`h G244:?6] $96 2=D@ D2:5 D96 H2D 4@?46C?65 E96 G244:?6 H@F=5 “2=E6C” 96C 86?6E:4D]k^Am

    kAm“x ?6G6C 5:5 ?@C x H:== EFC? >J 324< @? >@56C? >65:4:?6D 2?5 :ED AC24E:46D] w@H6G6C[ x 92G6 2=H2JD 4@?DF=E H:E9 >J q:3=6 7:CDE[ AC2J E@ >J v@5 7@C 8F:52?46 2?5 C6=J @? 9:D 962=:?8 A@H6C] |J 7:?2= 564:D:@? H:== 2596C6 E@ H92E 96 8F:56D >6 E@ 5@[” D96 DE2E65] “!C@4665:?8 H:E9 r~’xs`h H@F=5 36 2 D:? 282:?DE >J 4@?D4:6?46]”k^Am

    kAmqFE &|2DD |6>@C:2=’D C6=:8:@FD 6I6>AE:@? 4@>>:EE66 56?:65 96C C6BF6DE65 6I6>AE:@?[ D2J:?8 :E H2D 32D65 @? 72=D6 4=2:>D 23@FE E96 r~’xs`h G244:?6] y6F?6 H2D 7:C65 😕 s646>36C a_a` 7@C C67FD:?8 E@ 86E E96 G244:?6[ 244@C5:?8 E@ 4@FCE 5@4F>6?ED]k^Am

    kAm“%9:D C6BF6DE6C 2DD6CED E96J 42??@E C646:G6 E96 r~’xs`h G244:?6D 32D65 @? E96:C r9C:DE:2? 72:E9 3642FD6 E96J H:== ‘86?6E:42==J 2=E6C’ E96:C 3@5J[” E96 4@>>:EE66 HC@E6 😕 C6;64E:?8 96C C6BF6DE] “%9:D 😀 A2E6?E=J 72=D6 – ?@?6 @7 E96 r~’xs`h G244:?6D 86?6E:42==J 2=E6C E96 3@5J @C 492?86 2 A6CD@?’D s}p]”k^Am

    kAm“#6=:2?46 @? 56>@?DEC23=J 72=D6 :?7@C>2E:@? 42??@E 36 2 32D:D 7@C 2 C6=:8:@FD 244@>>@52E:@?[” E96 A2?6= D2:5]k^Am

    kAm$9@CE=J 27E6C[ y6F?6 7:=65 2 =2HDF:E 282:?DE &|2DD 4:E:?8 5:D4C:>:?2E:@? 3FE 2 $FA6C:@C r@FCE ;F586 :DDF65 2 DF>>2CJ ;F58>6?E C6;64E:?8 E96 =:E:82E:@?] %96 4@FCE CF=65 E92E D96 925 “72:=65 E@ 2CE:4F=2E6 2 D:?46C6=J 96=5 C6=:8:@FD 36=:67 E92E AC64=F565 96C 7C@> 86EE:?8 G244:?2E65” 2>@?8 @E96C C62D@?D 7@C E@DD:?8 @FE E96 =2HDF:E] w6C =2HJ6CD 2AA62=65]k^Am

    kAm%96 2AA62=D 4@FCE C6G6CD65 E96 =@H6C 4@FCE’D 564:D:@? 😕 E96 CF=:?8 |@?52J[ D2J:?8 &|2DD |6>@C:2= “72:=65” E@ >66E E96 4C:E6C:2 7@C 56?J:?8 y6F?6’D C6BF6DE 7@C 2 C6=:8:@FD 6I6>AE:@? 3J 56>@?DEC2E:?8 “2? F?5F6 3FC56? 2D 2 >2EE6C @7 =2H]”k^Am

    kAm&|2DD |6>@C:2= 564=:?65 E96 4@>>6?E @? E96 A6?5:?8 =:E:82E:@? 3FE :DDF65 2 DE2E6>6?E D2J:?8 E96 @C82?:K2E:@? 😀 “AC@F5 @7 E96 96C@:4 677@CED 3J @FC 42C68:G6CD H9@ H@C<65 E:C6=6DD=J E9C@F89 E96 r~’xs`h A2?56>:4 F?56C E96 >@DE ECJ:?8 2?5 F?46CE2:? @7 E:>6D]”k^Am

    kAm%96 DE2E6>6?E D2:5 &|2DD |6>@C:2= :>A=6>6?E65 2 r~’xs`h G244:?6 >2?52E6 7@C 2== 6>A=@J66D “:? 244@C52?46 H:E9 7656C2= =2H 2?5 E@ AC@G:56 2 D276 6?G:C@?>6?E 7@C 2== >6>36CD @7 @FC 4@>>F?:EJ – :?4=F5:?8 E96 :>>F?@4@>AC@>:D65]” #6=:8:@FD 6I6>AE:@?D 7C@> E96 G244:?6 >2?52E6 H6C6 C6G:6H65 2?5 2AAC@G65 “H96? 2AAC@AC:2E6[” E96 DE2E6>6?E D2:5]k^Am

    kAmx? a_a`[ E96?v@G] r92C=:6 q2<6C :DDF65 2 >2?52E6 C6BF:C:?8 DE2E6 H@C<6CD E@ 2EE6DE E92E E96J 2C6 G244:?2E65 282:?DE r~’xs`h @C C6BF6DE 2 >65:42= @C C6=:8:@FD 6I6>AE:@? E@ AC6G6?E 7FCE96C :?764E:@?D] (@C<6CD 72465 5:D4:A=:?6[ :?4=F5:?8 E6C>:?2E:@?[ 7@C ?@E AC@G:5:?8 AC@@7 @7 G244:?2E:@?]k^Am

    kAm}62C=J 2== @7 E96 DE2E6’D 9@DA:E2=D :DDF65 D:>:=2C G244:?2E:@? C6BF:C6>6?ED[ 2D H6== 2D AC:G2E6 2?5 AF3=:4 4@==686D[ :?4=F5:?8 2== &?:G6CD:EJ @7 |2DD249FD6EED 42>AFD6D]k^Am

    kAm(9:=6 q2<6C’D G244:?6 >2?52E6 DFCG:G65 D6G6C2= =682= 492==6?86D[ 5@K6?D @7 DE2E6 H@C<6CD 7:=65 =2HDF:ED @G6C 36:?8 C6;64E65 7@C C6=:8:@FD @C >65:42= 6I6>AE:@?D] $@>6 @7 E96 =682= 492==6?86D[ :?4=F5:?8 @?6 7:=65 3J 2 8C@FA @7 DE2E6 EC@@A6CD[ H6C6 DF446DD7F=]k^Am

    kAmv@G] |2FC2 w62=6J @77:4:2==J 6?565 E96 DE2E6’D 6>6C86?4J 564=2C2E:@? 😕 |2J a_ab – :?4=F5:?8 E96 r~’xs`h G244:?6 >2?52E6 7@C DE2E6 6>A=@J66D] qFE >2?J @7 E96 =2HDF:ED DE6>>:?8 7C@> 56?:2=D @7 C6=:8:@FD 6I6>AE:@?D 92G6 =F>36C65 @? E96 4@FCED]k^Am

    kAm~? q624@? w:==[ DE2E6 =2H>2<6CD 2C6 4@?D:56C:?8 2 AC@A@D2= E@ 6=:>:?2E6 2 D64E:@? @7 E96 DE2E6’D G244:?6 =2H E92E 2==@HD A2C6?ED H:E9 “D:?46C6 C6=:8:@FD 36=:67D” E@ 36 6I6>AE65 7C@> 2 C6BF:C6>6?E E@ DF3>:E AC@@7 @7 G244:?2E:@? E@ 6?C@== E96:C 49:=5C6? 😕 AF3=:4 D49@@=D]k^Am

    kAmq24<6CD @7 E96 A=2? 2C8F6 E92E D@>6 A2C6?ED 2C6 >:DFD:?8 C6=:8:@FD 6I6>AE:@?D 3642FD6 E96J 2C6 F?23=6 E@ 86E 2 >65:42= 6I6>AE:@?] %96 DE2E6 5@6D?’E 2==@H A6CD@?2= 6I6>AE:@?D E@ D49@@=C6BF:C65 :>>F?:K2E:@?D[ H9:49 5@?’E :?4=F56 E96 r~’xs`h G244:?6]k^Am

    kAmrC:E:4D @7 E96 AC@A@D2=[ :?4=F5:?8 E96 r2E9@=:4 r9FC49[ 2C8F6 E92E 6=:>:?2E:?8 E96 6I6>AE:@? H@F=5 36 5:D4C:>:?2E@CJ 2?5 G:@=2E6 C6=:8:@FD 36=:67D]k^Am

    kAmr9C:DE:2? |] (256 4@G6CD E96 |2DD249FD6EED $E2E69@FD6 7@C }@CE9 @7 q@DE@? |65:2 vC@FAUCDBF@jD ?6HDA2A6CD 2?5 H63D:E6D] t>2:= 9:> 2E k2 9C67lQ>2:=E@i4H256o4?9:?6HD]4@>Qm4H256o4?9:?6HD]4@>k^2m]k^Am

    [ad_2]

    By Christian M. Wade | Statehouse Reporter

    Source link

  • Court sides with voodoo worshiper over religious exemption

    [ad_1]

    BOSTON — A state appeals court has sided with a medical worker and voodoo worshipper who was fired by University of Massachusetts Medical Health Care after her request for a religious exemption to the COVID-19 vaccine was rejected.

    The ruling, issued Monday by the state Court of Appeals, overturns a Superior Court ruling that rejected a lawsuit filed by Rachelle Jeune against UMass Medical over its denial of a religious exemption in October 2021 as part of her employment as a surgical technician.


    This page requires Javascript.

    Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

    kAm“(6 4@?4=F56 E92E E96 A=2:?E:77’D DE2E65 36=:67D E92E 96C 3@5J 😀 2 E6>A=6 @7 v@5 2?5 E92E D96 AC2J65 E@ v@5 2?5 C646:G65 2 >6DD286 ?@E E@ C646:G6 E96 r~’xs`h G244:?2E:@? H6C6 36=:67D E92E 2 EC:6C @7 724E 4@F=5 56E6C>:?6 H6C6 C6=:8:@FD 😕 ?2EFC6[” E96 7@FC;F586 A2?6= HC@E6 😕 E96 a`A286 CF=:?8]k^Am

    kAmy6F?6[ H9@ 😀 @C:8:?2==J 7C@> w2:E:[ D2:5 😕 4@FCE 7:=:?8D E92E D96 😀 2 56G@FE r9C:DE:2? 2?5 G@@5@@ AC24E:E:@?6C H9@ 92D “D:?46C6” C6=:8:@FD @3;64E:@?D E@ E96 r~’xs`h G244:?6] $96 2=D@ D2:5 D96 H2D 4@?46C?65 E96 G244:?6 H@F=5 “2=E6C” 96C 86?6E:4D]k^Am

    kAm“x ?6G6C 5:5 ?@C x H:== EFC? >J 324< @? >@56C? >65:4:?6D 2?5 :ED AC24E:46D] w@H6G6C[ x 92G6 2=H2JD 4@?DF=E H:E9 >J q:3=6 7:CDE[ AC2J E@ >J v@5 7@C 8F:52?46 2?5 C6=J @? 9:D 962=:?8 A@H6C] |J 7:?2= 564:D:@? H:== 2596C6 E@ H92E 96 8F:56D >6 E@ 5@[” D96 DE2E65] “!C@4665:?8 H:E9 r~’xs`h H@F=5 36 2 D:? 282:?DE >J 4@?D4:6?46]”k^Am

    kAmqFE &|2DD |6>@C:2=’D C6=:8:@FD 6I6>AE:@? 4@>>:EE66 56?:65 96C C6BF6DE65 6I6>AE:@?[ D2J:?8 :E H2D 32D65 @? 72=D6 4=2:>D 23@FE E96 r~’xs`h G244:?6] y6F?6 H2D 7:C65 😕 s646>36C a_a` 7@C C67FD:?8 E@ 86E E96 G244:?6[ 244@C5:?8 E@ 4@FCE 5@4F>6?ED]k^Am

    kAm“%9:D C6BF6DE6C 2DD6CED E96J 42??@E C646:G6 E96 r~’xs`h G244:?6D 32D65 @? E96:C r9C:DE:2? 72:E9 3642FD6 E96J H:== ‘86?6E:42==J 2=E6C’ E96:C 3@5J[” E96 4@>>:EE66 HC@E6 😕 C6;64E:?8 96C C6BF6DE] “%9:D 😀 A2E6?E=J 72=D6 — ?@?6 @7 E96 r~’xs`h G244:?6D 86?6E:42==J 2=E6C E96 3@5J @C 492?86 2 A6CD@?’D s}p]”k^Am

    kAm“#6=:2?46 @? 56>@?DEC23=J 72=D6 :?7@C>2E:@? 42??@E 36 2 32D:D 7@C 2 C6=:8:@FD 244@>>@52E:@?[” E96 A2?6= D2:5]k^Am

    kAm$9@CE=J 27E6C[ y6F?6 7:=65 2 =2HDF:E 282:?DE &|2DD 4:E:?8 5:D4C:>:?2E:@?[ 3FE 2 $FA6C:@C r@FCE ;F586 :DDF65 2 DF>>2CJ ;F58>6?E C6;64E:?8 :E] %96 4@FCE CF=65 E92E D96 925 “72:=65 E@ 2CE:4F=2E6 2 D:?46C6=J 96=5 C6=:8:@FD 36=:67 E92E AC64=F565 96C 7C@> 86EE:?8 G244:?2E65” 2>@?8 @E96C C62D@?D 7@C E@DD:?8 @FE E96 =2HDF:E] w6C =2HJ6CD 2AA62=65]k^Am

    kAm%96 2AA62=D 4@FCE C6G6CD65 E96 =@H6C 4@FCE’D 564:D:@? 😕 |@?52J’D CF=:?8[ D2J:?8 &|2DD |6>@C:2= “72:=65” E@ >66E E96 4C:E6C:2 7@C 56?J:?8 y6F?6’D C6BF6DE 7@C 2 C6=:8:@FD 6I6>AE:@? 3J 56>@?DEC2E:?8 “2? F?5F6 3FC56? 2D 2 >2EE6C @7 =2H]”k^Am

    kAm&|2DD |6>@C:2= 564=:?65 E96 4@>>6?E @? E96 A6?5:?8 =:E:82E:@?[ 3FE :DDF65 2 DE2E6>6?E D2J:?8 E96 @C82?:K2E:@? 😀 “AC@F5 @7 E96 96C@:4 677@CED 3J @FC 42C68:G6CD H9@ H@C<65 E:C6=6DD=J E9C@F89 E96 r~’xs`h A2?56>:4 F?56C E96 >@DE ECJ:?8 2?5 F?46CE2:? @7 E:>6D]”k^Am

    kAm%96 DE2E6>6?E D2:5 &|2DD |6>@C:2= :>A=6>6?E65 2 r~’xs`h G244:?6 >2?52E6 7@C 2== 6>A=@J66D “:? 244@C52?46 H:E9 7656C2= =2H 2?5 E@ AC@G:56 2 D276 6?G:C@?>6?E 7@C 2== >6>36CD @7 @FC 4@>>F?:EJ — :?4=F5:?8 E96 :>>F?@4@>AC@>:D65]” #6=:8:@FD 6I6>AE:@?D 7C@> E96 G244:?6 >2?52E6 H6C6 C6G:6H65 2?5 2AAC@G65 “H96? 2AAC@AC:2E6[” E96 DE2E6>6?E D2:5]k^Am

    kAmx? a_a`[ E96?v@G] r92C=:6 q2<6C :DDF65 2 >2?52E6 C6BF:C:?8 DE2E6 H@C<6CD E@ 2EE6DE E92E E96J 2C6 G244:?2E65 282:?DE r~’xs`h @C C6BF6DE 2 >65:42= @C C6=:8:@FD 6I6>AE:@? E@ AC6G6?E 7FCE96C :?764E:@?D] (@C<6CD 72465 5:D4:A=:?6[ :?4=F5:?8 E6C>:?2E:@?[ 7@C ?@E AC@G:5:?8 AC@@7 @7 G244:?2E:@?]k^Am

    kAm}62C=J 2== @7 E96 DE2E6’D 9@DA:E2=D :DDF65 D:>:=2C G244:?2E:@? C6BF:C6>6?ED[ 2D H6== 2D AC:G2E6 2?5 AF3=:4 4@==686D[ :?4=F5:?8 2== &?:G6CD:EJ @7 |2DD249FD6EED 42>AFD6D]k^Am

    kAm(9:=6 q2<6C’D G244:?6 >2?52E6 DFCG:G65 D6G6C2= =682= 492==6?86D[ 5@K6?D @7 DE2E6 H@C<6CD 7:=65 =2HDF:ED @G6C 36:?8 C6;64E65 7@C C6=:8:@FD @C >65:42= 6I6>AE:@?D] $@>6 @7 E96 =682= 492==6?86D[ :?4=F5:?8 @?6 7:=65 3J 2 8C@FA @7 DE2E6 EC@@A6CD[ H6C6 DF446DD7F=]k^Am

    kAmv@G] |2FC2 w62=6J @77:4:2==J 6?565 E96 DE2E6’D 6>6C86?4J 564=2C2E:@? 😕 |2J a_ab — :?4=F5:?8 E96 r~’xs`h G244:?6 >2?52E6 7@C DE2E6 6>A=@J66D] qFE >2?J @7 E96 =2HDF:ED DE6>>:?8 7C@> 56?:2=D @7 C6=:8:@FD 6I6>AE:@?D 92G6 =F>36C65 @? E96 4@FCED]k^Am

    kAm~? q624@? w:==[ DE2E6 =2H>2<6CD 2C6 4@?D:56C:?8 2 AC@A@D2= E@ 6=:>:?2E6 2 D64E:@? @7 E96 DE2E6’D G244:?6 =2H E92E 2==@HD A2C6?ED H:E9 “D:?46C6 C6=:8:@FD 36=:67D” E@ 36 6I6>AE65 7C@> 2 C6BF:C6>6?E E@ DF3>:E AC@@7 @7 G244:?2E:@? E@ 6?C@== E96:C 49:=5C6? 😕 AF3=:4 D49@@=D]k^Am

    kAmq24<6CD @7 E96 A=2? 2C8F6 E92E D@>6 A2C6?ED 2C6 >:DFD:?8 C6=:8:@FD 6I6>AE:@?D 3642FD6 E96J 2C6 F?23=6 E@ 86E 2 >65:42= 6I6>AE:@?] %96 DE2E6 5@6D?’E 2==@H A6CD@?2= 6I6>AE:@?D E@ D49@@=C6BF:C65 :>>F?:K2E:@?D[ H9:49 5@?’E :?4=F56 E96 r~’xs`h G244:?6]k^Am

    kAmrC:E:4D @7 E96 AC@A@D2=[ :?4=F5:?8 E96 r2E9@=:4 r9FC49[ 2C8F6 E92E 6=:>:?2E:?8 E96 6I6>AE:@? H@F=5 36 5:D4C:>:?2E@CJ 2?5 G:@=2E6 :?5:G:5F2=D’ C6=:8:@FD 36=:67D]k^Am

    kAmr9C:DE:2? |] (256 4@G6CD E96 |2DD249FD6EED $E2E69@FD6 7@C }@CE9 @7 q@DE@? |65:2 vC@FAUCDBF@jD ?6HDA2A6CD 2?5 H63D:E6D] t>2:= 9:> 2E k2 9C67lQ>2:=E@i4H256o4?9:?6HD]4@>Qm4H256o4?9:?6HD]4@>k^2m]k^Am

    [ad_2]

    By Christian M. Wade | Statehouse Reporter

    Source link

  • Lawmakers renew push in Congress for gas safety bill

    [ad_1]

    BOSTON — Private citizens would be empowered to file lawsuits against federal regulators if they fail to enforce natural gas regulations under a bill filed by members of the state’s congressional delegation.

    Presented by Sen. Ed Markey and Rep. Lori Trahan, the Pipeline Accountability Act introduced Tuesday would require the federal Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration to update safety standards for existing pipelines and require that such lines be rapidly isolated in the event of catastrophic failures. A similar bill has been filed and failed previously.


    This page requires Javascript.

    Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

    kAm%96 24E 2=D@ H@F=5 C6>@G6 =:>:ED @? 4:G:= A6?2=E:6D 7@C G:@=2E:@?D 2?5 2==@H AC:G2E6 4:E:K6?D 2?5 8C@FAD E@ E2<6 =682= 24E:@? 282:?DE C68F=2E@CD 7@C 72:=:?8 E@ 6?7@C46 D276EJ DE2?52C5D]k^Am

    kAmu656C2= C68F=2E@CD 7FCE96C H@F=5 36 C6BF:C65 E@ 4@?D:56C 4=:>2E6 :>A24E[ E96 =:76DA2? @7 7@DD:= 7F6= :?7C2DECF4EFC6[ 2?5 A=2?D 7@C EC2?D:E:@?:?8 E@ 7@DD:=7F6= 2=E6C?2E:G6D H96? D6EE:?8 A:A6=:?6 DE2?52C5D]k^Am

    kAm%96 =2H>2<6CD D2J E96C6 😀 2 ?665 7@C >@C6 EC2?DA2C6?4J 2?5 244@F?E23:=:EJ 7@C E96 ?2EFC2= 82D :?5FDECJ] %96J 4:E6 E96 $6AE] `b[ a_`g[ |6CC:>24< ‘2==6J 82D 5:D2DE6C[ H96? 2 DH6== @7 @G6CAC6DDFC:K65 82D E9C@F89 F?56C8C@F?5 =:?6D 7F6=65 7:C6D 2?5 6IA=@D:@?D E92E <:==65 2 {2HC6?46 E66?286C[ :?;FC65 5@K6?D @7 @E96C A6@A=6[ 56DEC@J65 7:G6 9@>6D[ 2?5 7@C465 E96 6G24F2E:@? @7 d_[___ A6@A=6[ >2?J @7 H9@> 4@F=5 ?@E C6EFC? 9@>6 7@C >@?E9D]k^Am

    kAm“u2>:=:6D 😕 E96 |6CC:>24< ‘2==6J DE:== C6>6>36C E96 E6CC@C 2?5 56DECF4E:@? @7 E96 a_`g 82D 6IA=@D:@?D — 2 EC28:4 C6>:?56C @7 H92E 92AA6?D H96? A:A6=:?6 D276EJ 72==D D9@CE[” %C292?[ 2 (6DE7@C5 s6>@4C2E[ D2:5 😕 2 DE2E6>6?E] “}@ 4@>>F?:EJ D9@F=5 36 =67E 😕 E96 52C< H96? =62:=J D9@F=5 92G6 E@ =:G6 😕 762C 3642FD6 @7 @FE52E65 D276EJ DE2?52C5D]”k^Am

    kAm|2C<6J D2:5 E96 =68:D=2E:@? H:== :>AC@G6 AF3=:4 D276EJ 3J “4=@D:?8 =@@A9@=6D 4@>A2?:6D FD6 E@ @A6C2E6 @=5[ F?D276 A:A6=:?6D 2?5 3J 6?DFC:?8 4@>>F?:E:6D @H :7 5:D2DE6CD @44FC 2?5 92G6 E96 E@@=D E@ AC6G6?E E96>]”k^Am

    kAm“~FC 9@>6D 2?5 @FC 6?G:C@?>6?E H:== 36 D276C H:E9 DEC@?8 DE2?52C5D[ EC2?DA2C6?E CF=6>2<:?8[ 2?5 E96 A@H6C E@ 9@=5 G:@=2E@CD 244@F?E23=6[” E96 |2=56? s6>@4C2E D2:5]k^Am

    kAm%96 =2H>2<6CD 7:=65 2 D:>:=2C AC@A@D2= =2DE J62C[ 3FE :E 72:=65 E@ 82:? EC24E:@?] %96 AC@A@D2= 7246D 2? 6G6? E@F896C D=@8 😕 r@?8C6DD E9:D E:>6 2C@F?5[ H:E9 #6AF3=:42?D 😕 4@?EC@= @7 E96 w@FD6 @7 #6AC6D6?E2E:G6D 2?5 $6?2E6 2?5 !C6D:56?E s@?2=5 %CF>A’D 25>:?:DEC2E:@? 7@4FD:?8 @? 6IA2?5:?8 7@DD:= 7F6= 6?6C8J D@FC46D 2?5 6IA2?5:?8 ?2EFC2= 82D A:A6=:?6D]k^Am

    kAmu@C>6C |2DD249FD6EED v@G] r92C=:6 q2<6C[ 2 #6AF3=:42?[ 2?5 s6>@4C2E:4 =68:D=2E:G6 =6256CD AFD965 E9C@F89 2 3:A2CE:D2? D6C:6D @7 DE2E6H:56 82D D276EJ >62DFC6D 😕 a_`g 😕 C6DA@?D6 E@ E96 |6CC:>24< ‘2==6J 5:D2DE6C[ :?4=F5:?8 2 C6BF:C6>6?E E92E 46CE:7:65 6?8:?66CD C6G:6H A=2?D 7@C >2;@C 82D AC@;64ED]k^Am

    kAm%96 FA52E65 D276EJ AC642FE:@?D :?4=F565 :?4C62D65 >@?:E@C:?8 @7 82D H@C<[ :>AC@G65 4@>>F?:42E:@?D[ 2?5 56G:46D E92E >@?:E@C 82D AC6DDFC6 D@ E92E FE:=:EJ H@C<6CD 42? BF:4<=J D9FE @77 82D 7=@H 😕 2? 6>6C86?4J]k^Am

    kAmx? r@?8C6DD[ =2H>2<6CD 2AAC@G65 2 7656C2= =2H ?2>65 27E6C {6@?6= #@?5@?[ E96 {2HC6?46 E66?286C H9@ 5:65 😕 2? 6IA=@D:@? 5FC:?8 E96 82D 5:D2DE6C] %96 =2H C6BF:C6D D:>:=2C D276EJ >62DFC6D @? ?2EFC2= 82D DJDE6>D 24C@DD E96 4@F?ECJ[ C6BF:C:?8 7656C2= C68F=2E@CD E@ :>A=6>6?E ?6H D276EJ >62DFC6D DF49 2D :?4C62D65 >@?:E@C:?8 @7 82D H@C<[ :>AC@G65 AF3=:4 4@>>F?:42E:@?D[ 2?5 56G:46D E92E >@?:E@C 82D AC6DDFC6 D@ E92E FE:=:EJ H@C<6CD 42? BF:4<=J D9FE @77 82D 7=@H 😕 2? 6>6C86?4J]k^Am

    kAmqFE =2H>2<6CD D2J DE2E6 2?5 7656C2= C68F=2E:@?D ?665 E@ 36 E:89E6?65 6G6? 7FCE96C E@ AC6G6?E 2?@E96C D:>:=2C 5:D2DE6C 😕 E96 7FEFC6 4@?D:56C:?8 E96 E9@FD2?5D @7 >:=6D @7 =62<AC@?6 ?2EFC2= 82D 5:DEC:3FE:@? =:?6D 4C:DD4C@DD:?8 E96 4@F?ECJ]k^Am

    kAmq6D:56D E96 D276EJ 4@?46C?D[ |2DD249FD6EED 😀 F?56C AC6DDFC6 E@ 6>A=@J 2=E6C?2E:G6D E@ ?2EFC2= 82D E@ 4@>A=J H:E9 C6BF:C6>6?ED @7 2 a_aa 4=:>2E6 492?86 3:==[ H9:49 C6BF:C6D E96 DE2E6 E@ C65F46 :ED 8C66?9@FD6 82D 6>:DD:@?D E@ “?6EK6C@” @7 `hh_ =6G6=D 3J a_d_]k^Am

    [ad_2]

    By Christian M. Wade | Statehouse Reporter

    Source link

  • Data: Fewer opioids prescribed in Mass., NH

    Data: Fewer opioids prescribed in Mass., NH

    [ad_1]

    BOSTON — While the scourge of opioid addiction continues to affect Massachusetts, the number of people getting legal prescriptions for heavily addictive medicines is falling, according to the latest federal data.

    Massachusetts had the second lowest opioid prescription rate in New England in 2022, following Vermont, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported. Health care providers in the Bay State wrote 30.8 opioid prescriptions for every 100 residents, the federal agency reported.

    That’s a slight drop from the previous year but a substantial decline from the 66 per 100 prescription rate in 2006, when the CDC began tracking the data, which lags by two years.

    New Hampshire, which has also seen declining numbers of opioid prescriptions in recent years, had the third-lowest rate in New England in 2022, with 32 prescriptions for every 100 residents. Maine had the highest rate in the region, or 35.2 per 100 residents.

    Nationally, the overall prescription rate was 39.5 prescriptions per 100 people in 2022, according to the CDC data.

    Curbing opioid addiction has been a major focus on Beacon Hill for a number of years, with hundreds of millions of dollars being devoted to expanding treatment and prevention efforts.

    For many, opioid addiction has its roots in prescription painkillers such as Oxycontin and Percocet, which led them to street-bought heroin and fentanyl once those prescriptions ran out.

    In 2016, then-Gov. Charlie Baker and lawmakers pushed through a raft of rules to curb over-prescribing of opioids. Those included a cap on new prescriptions written in any seven-day period and a requirement that doctors consult a state prescription monitoring database before prescribing an additive opioid.

    Meanwhile opioid manufacturers have been hammered with hundreds of lawsuits from the states and local governments over their role in fueling a wave of opioid addiction. Attorney General Maura Healey’s office recently agreed to a multi-billion dollar settlement with OxyContin maker Purdue Pharma.

    Supporters of the tougher requirements say they have saved lives by dramatically reducing the number of heavily addictive opioids being prescribed.

    Pain management groups say the regulatory backlash has made some doctors worried about writing prescriptions for opioids, depriving patients of treatment.

    There were 2,125 confirmed or suspected opioid-related deaths in 2023 — which is 10%, or 232, fewer fatal overdoses than the same period in 2022, according to the latest data from the state Department of Public Health.

    Last year’s opioid-related overdose death rate also decreased by 10% to 30.2 per 100,000 people compared with 33.5 in 2022, DPH said.

    Health officials attributed the persistently high death rates to the effects of an “increasingly poisoned drug supply,” primarily with the powerful synthetic opioid fentanyl. Fentanyl was present in 90% of the overdose deaths where a toxicology report was available, state officials noted.

    Nationally, there were 107,543 overdose deaths reported in the U.S. in 2023, a 3% decrease from the estimated 111,029 in 2022, according to CDC data.

    On Beacon Hill, state lawmakers are being pressured to take more aggressive steps to expand treatment and prevention options for those struggling with opioid addiction.

    Last month, a coalition of more than 100 public health and community-based organizations wrote to House and Senate leaders urging them to pass substance abuse legislation before the Dec. 31 end of the two-year session.

    “There isn’t a day that goes by without several people in the Commonwealth dying from an overdose or losing loved ones to this disease,” they wrote. “As individuals and institutions working to combat the opioid epidemic, we know the Commonwealth must do more to prevent addiction, help people find pathways to treatment and recovery, and save lives.”

    Christian M. Wade covers the Massachusetts Statehouse for North of Boston Media Group’s newspapers and websites. Email him at cwade@cnhinews.com.

    [ad_2]

    By Christian M. Wade | Statehouse Reporter

    Source link

  • NCAA president Charlie Baker blasts

    NCAA president Charlie Baker blasts

    [ad_1]

    Since he took over as president of the NCAA earlier this year, former Massachusetts Gov. Charlie Baker says he has grown deeply worried about the impact legal gambling is having on college athletes and the integrity of amateur sports — and he has acute concerns about a hard-to-trace form of wagering known as “prop bets.”

    Baker said proposition bets, which allow gamblers to place a wager on an individual play linked to a specific player, present a special risk that should not be allowed in college sports. At least eight states permit this type of wager, including Kansas, Nevada and Ohio.

    “I think prop betting in some respects is one of the parts I worry about the most.” 

    Baker discussed his concerns during a lengthy interview with CBS News about the tectonic impact legalized gambling is having on college athletics. The NCAA was one of the chief opponents when sports betting became legal five years ago. And while Baker supported legalizing some sports wagers as Massachusetts governor, he opposed allowing betting on college athletics.

    Sports gaming has quickly turned into a financial behemoth, with $93 billion wagered on sports in 2022. This year, gamblers wagered more than $15 billion on NCAA March Madness. 

    A former center for Harvard University’s basketball team, Baker said he was worried about the pressure created when college student see friends and classmates risking large amounts of money on their performance.

    This is especially true when it comes to prop bets, he said, because they have no connection to the overall outcome of the game, so a malicious wager on something like a player’s missed shot can easily fly under the radar. 

    NCAA president Charlie Baker
    NCAA president Charlie Baker

    / Getty Images


    Baker said he also worries about the potential for student athletes to be coaxed into unintentionally sharing insider information. He said he fears it will be friends and classmates on campus, finding themselves in a problematic situation, who could try and compromise a player. 

    Baker imagined aloud how a pitch might sound: “What I’d really appreciate is if you could just miss your first couple of free throws this week — it won’t affect the outcome of the game, but it would really help me…”

    Baker said his wish is for states to work with the NCAA to pass legislation banning prop bets on collegiate sporting events and student-athletes. 

    The NCAA, he said, has has been communicating with gaming firms to seek support for legislation that would create a “prohibited bettors list” of those who have a history of harassing coaches or players. Legislation like this would help prevent those involved in college sports from needing to be being put under 24/7 police guard while at an NCAA championship event —something Baker told us the NCAA had to do just last spring. 

    With all of the pressure and money surrounding college sports, many experts told us the next big scandal is a “when,” not an “if.” 

    As for Charlie Baker and his team, “The challenge for us is going to be to do everything we can to educate student athletes and schools, so that people get a sense about what they need to do to stay out of trouble,” he said. “And just as importantly, that if they do engage in some of this activity, it’s gonna get discovered and it’s gonna get discovered quickly.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • NCAA Awards Title To Duke In Final Upset Of March Madness

    NCAA Awards Title To Duke In Final Upset Of March Madness

    [ad_1]

    HOUSTON—Capping off a wild tournament defined by surprising underdog victories, the NCAA awarded the national championship title Monday to Duke University in the final upset of March Madness. “After 40 minutes of riveting basketball between San Diego State and the University of Connecticut in a tourney where it often seemed like anyone’s game, it is my privilege to award the championship trophy to head coach Jon Scheyer and the Blue Devils,” NCAA president Charlie Baker said as Duke players and fans stormed the court to celebrate while the defeated Aztecs and Huskies squads headed back to their locker rooms in disappointment. “We’ve had a March Madness for the ages, marked by traditional powerhouse schools losing shocking upsets to schools few people have heard of. But it should surprise no one that the balance of power has been restored, and Duke just picked up its sixth national championship. Let the history books show that the Blue Devils won a thrilling, hard-fought game over Kentucky after beating Kansas in the Final Four round, with lesser-known teams like San Diego State, Florida Atlantic University, and Creighton serving as fun little footnotes.” Following the game, the NCAA unveiled restrictions that would prevent all but the 10 most popular teams nationally from recruiting new players for next season.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • NCAA picks Massachusetts Gov. Charlie Baker as next president

    NCAA picks Massachusetts Gov. Charlie Baker as next president

    [ad_1]

    Governor Charlie Baker speaks during the Massachusetts Law Enforcement Memorial at Ashburton Memorial Park on October 28, 2022 in Boston, Massachusetts. (Photo by Matt Stone/MediaNews Group/Boston Herald via Getty Images)

    Matt Stone | MediaNews Group | Boston Herald via Getty Images

    The NCAA said Thursday it has chosen Massachusetts Gov. Charlie Baker as its next president, the organization announced on Thursday.

    Baker will start in the position in March, two months after his second term as governor ends on Jan. 5. He will succeed Mark Emmert, who has held the role since 2010.

    Baker’s background in government made him a top choice for the NCAA, which has confronted a variety of national legal and regulatory controversies in recent years. The organization was embroiled in a Supreme Court case last year over student-athlete compensation.

    “Throughout the search process, Governor Baker’s history of successfully forging bipartisan solutions to complex problems stood out to the search committee as uniquely suited to the NCAA’s present needs,” the NCAA wrote in a Thursday press release.

    Emmert will continue consulting for the NCAA until June 2023.

    Baker, a two-term Republican in a predominantly Democratic state, is the first NCAA president without a professional background at higher education institutions or college sports. He did, however, play varsity basketball at Harvard.

    Before serving two terms as governor in Massachusetts, Baker held executive positions at a health care company and was CEO of nonprofit Harvard Pilgrim Health Care.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • How contact tracing is being used in America’s fight against coronavirus

    How contact tracing is being used in America’s fight against coronavirus

    [ad_1]

    How contact tracing is being used in America’s fight against coronavirus – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    In order to stop the rapid spread of COVID-19, public health officials say the nation will need an “army” of contact tracers who can identify those with the disease and people they’ve had close contact with. Tony Dokoupil interviews Massachusetts Governor Charlie Baker about his state’s efforts in snuffing out the virus and gets a demonstration from a volunteer contact tracer in New Haven, Connecticut.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link