ReportWire

Tag: Charli XCX Brat

  • Taylor Swift Increasingly Loses Touch with “The Commoner” on The Life of a Showgirl

    Although Taylor Swift has been famous for most of her life, one of the biggest keys to her success has always been “relatability.” Or at least the illusion of it. This has been done, more often than not, with lovelorn lyrics about being some “dowdy” girl who can’t ever quite get the guy/find love (most famously on “You Belong With Me”). With her twelfth album, The Life of a Showgirl, Swift loses some of that already dwindling “everywoman” cachet for the sake of a concept that’s centered on, essentially, living in a gilded cage. But it isn’t just the “poor me, I’m so rich” aura that makes The Life of a Showgirl frequently eye-rolling, it’s also the bathetic displays toward, unmistakably, Travis Kelce—whose podcast, New Heights, she appeared on to announce the album in the first place. Never mind that said podcast is aimed at discussing sports, not pop music.

    And yet, such “flouting of the rules” has been going on a lot during the “crossover potential” of Taylor and Travis’ (or “Traylor,” if you must) relationship. One that has even prompted the commissioner of the NFL, Roger Goodell, to gush about how she’s responsible for bringing in a younger audience to the games/generally drumming up interest in the sport ever since she started dating the Kansas City Chiefs quarterback.

    The very quarterback she does her best to wield within a Shakespearean context with The Life of a Showgirl’s first track, “The Fate of Ophelia,” with an effect that could very well have Shakespeare turning in his grave as Swift rewrites, you guessed it, the fate of Ophelia, by making it a “happy ending” for the erstwhile suicidal wreck. And who else should save her but the Hamlet stand-in of the song, “Prince” Travis? A man that Swift has the gall to sing of, “Late one night, you dug me out of my grave and/Saved my heart from the fate of Ophelia/Keep it one hundrеd on the land, the sea, thе sky/Pledge allegiance to your hands, your team, your vibes/Don’t care where the hell you been, ‘cause now you’re mine.”

    Cornball songwriting aside, “The Fate of Ophelia” is an insult to hallowed literature itself in that Swift would dare to touch Shakespearean scripture for the sake “Hollywoodizing” the ending—this further manifest in the lyrics, “No longer drowning and deceived/All because you came for me.” Mixing metaphors a bit, Taylor also talks of being rescued from a tower (hardly the first time she’s used that image in a song, with The Tortured Poets Department also mentioning it on “The Albatross” and “Cassandra”), in addition to the water in which Ophelia drowned. So clearly, she’s confusing Big O with Rapunzel, but no matter, Swift simply has a penchant for referencing other famous women.

    As she does on the second track, “Elizabeth Taylor.” And no, it’s not the first time Swift has mentioned this “fellow Taylor” in a song. She also name-checked the icon during 2017’s “…Ready For It?” (“He can be my jailer, Burton to this Taylor”), co-produced by Max Martin, Shellback and Ali Payami. It’s the former two that Swift reteams with for the entirety of The Life of a Showgirl, further distinguishing it from Reputation, which incorporated other producers apart from Martin and Shellback into the mix, including Jack Antonoff. The reteaming of Swift with just Martin and Shellback is, in fact, a primary gimmick of this album, and perhaps a subtle way to make amends for never getting around to Reputation (Taylor’s Version) after engaging fans in one of the biggest trolls in recent music history.

    Perhaps one of the peak examples on the record of “losing touch” with “the commoner,” Swift does her best to embody Elizabeth T. when she sings, “That view of Portofino was on my mind when you called me at the Plaza Athénée [said in a very non-French way]/Ooh, oftentimes it doesn’t feel so glamorous to be me/All the right guys/Promised they’d stay/Under bright lights/They withered away/But you bloom.” For a start, most of the football fans on “Team Travis” in this relationship would have no idea what the fuck she’s talking about, their limited sense of geography extending, at best, to what lies just beyond Kansas. What’s more, most Midwesterners are well over the constant favoritism given to New York and Los Angeles, yet Swift appears to have her own limited sense of geography when she says, “Be my NY whеn Hollywood hates me.” This statement feeling less like a nod to E. Taylor and more like one to Marilyn Monroe, who famously fled Hollywood for New York after getting into a contract dispute with Darryl F. Zanuck, the head of 20th Century Fox, at the end of 1954. No matter, Swift, like Lindsay Lohan before her, can be attracted to both legends’ stories—their tragic tales and love lives, intermixed with glitz and glamor.

    And, as if to highlight the cliches of “how lonely it is at the top,” Swift adds, “Hey, what could you possibly get for the girl who has everything and nothing all at once?” In many regards, this track is a “sequel,” of sorts,” to the question posed on 2019’s “The Archer”: “Who could ever leave me, darling?/But who could stay?” The answer, for the moment, is Kelce, who at least knows something about the pressure behind a sentiment like, “You’re only as hot as your last hit, baby.” If that’s the case, Swift might be in trouble with a song like “Opalite,” which trots out the same old color-related tropes she’s already overused in the past (though probably not nearly as much as Lana Del Rey mentions “blue”). In this case, the “onyx night” represents the darkness before the arrival of Kelce into her life, who provides the “opalite sky” in the wake of “the lightning strikes”—presumably a metaphor for Swift’s previous botched relationships and media scrutiny.

    Commencing the song with the verse, “I had a bad habit/Of missing lovers past/My brother used to call it/‘Eating out of the trash,’ it’s never gonna last/I thought my house was haunted/I used to live with ghosts/And all the perfect couples/Said, ‘When you know, you know and when you don’t, you don’t,’” it’s evident Swift is alluding to Jack Antonoff, Margaret Qualley and Lana Del Rey. The latter of whom wrote a song about Antonoff and Qualley’s relationship called, what else, “Margaret,” during which she sings, “When you know, you know” of the kind of true love that Antonoff found with Qualley. Later in the song, however, she does Swift one better by saying, “‘Cause when you know, you know/And when you’re old, you’re old/Like Hollywood and me.” Swift, of course, isn’t quite ready to refer to herself in such a way. For being an “aging showgirl,” as The Last Showgirl recently reminded, doesn’t generally bode well for one’s career.

    Even though Swift has made amply certain that she has plenty of other parachutes, as it were, should she need a graceful “out” from pop stardom. For she has her hands in numerous pies (many of which people probably won’t know about for years), as she’s keen to circuitously boast about via the mafioso theme of “Father Figure,” which dares to sample from George Michael, a big risk for anyone, but especially Swift. This because, when compared to the great pop musicians that came before her, particularly in the 80s, the ways in which Swift falls short become even more glaringly obvious. In other words, she has never “ate” the way that, say, Madonna, Prince, George Michael, Grace Jones or David Bowie have.

    Regardless, Swift does what she can with the interpolation of Michael’s 1987 hit (and, let’s just say that it works better than the interpolation of Right Said Fred’s “I’m Too Sexy” on “Look What You Made Me Do”), wielding it to throw shade at all of the male executives who thought they could manipulate and control her over the years. Indeed, in a sense, it acts as The Life of a Showgirl’s “The Man,” with Swift getting into the persona of a big dick-swinging executive (or mafia boss) herself, with many speculating that Scott Borchetta is the source of inspiration. After all, he signed her as his first artist on his then new label, Big Machine Records, when she was just fourteen years old. So it is that Swift sardonically flexes, as though channeling Borchetta, “When I found you, you were young, wayward, lost in the cold/Pulled up to you in the Jag, turned your rags into gold/The winding road leads to the chateau/‘You remind me of a younger me’/I saw potential.”

    The chorus then goes for the jugular with, “I’ll be your father figure/I drink that brown liquor/I can make deals with the devil because my dick’s bigger/This love is pure profit/Just step into my office.” The mafia motif is also peppered in throughout (as if The Godfather needs any more play in terms of fortifying a grotesque Italian stereotype), with Swift asserting, “Leave it with me/I protect the family” and “I got the place surrounded/You’ll be sleeping with the fishes before you know you’re drowning.” Elsewhere, another light Del Rey nod is made with, “Mistake my kindness for weakness and find your card canceled” (on 2019’s “Mariners Apartment Complex,” Del Rey sings, “They mistook my kindness for weakness”). As for another “unintentional” nod, it bears noting that Michael’s “Father Figure” has been having a moment this past year, with Harris Dickinson as Samuel offering a kinky dance in a hotel room to said track in Babygirl while Nicole Kidman as Romy watches before joining in (side note: Swift was sure to mention that she wrote this song before this movie came out).

    A title like “Father Figure” leads naturally into “Eldest Daughter” (which, yes, Swift is, with only one younger brother, Austin). A track that, incidentally, has a lot in common with Lorde’s “Favourite Daughter” from Virgin. Except that, unlike the catchiness of “Favourite Daughter,” which is something of a millennial anthem in terms of how said generation was conditioned to always achieve and strive for more, “Eldest Daughter” is a cheesy ballad that few Gen Z listeners could handle. After all, Swift is a millennial through and through (in case “as the 50 Cent song played…” didn’t also give it away on “Ruin the Friendship”) in part because of being fearless when it comes to being cringe. So it is that she addresses the current chicness of being callous and aloof in the first verse, “Everybody’s so punk on the internet/Everyone’s unbothered ‘til they’re not/Every joke’s just trolling and memes/Sad as it seems, apathy is hot/Everybody’s cutthroat in the comments/Every single hot take is cold as ice.” Apart from referencing some of her lyrics in “You Need to Calm Down” (e.g., “You are somebody that I don’t know/But you’re taking shots at me like it’s Patrón/And I’m just like, ‘Damn, it’s seven a.m.’/Say it in the street, that’s a knockout/But you say it in a tweet, that’s a copout”), the “hot take” line also seems to allude to that time she felt obliged to tell Damon Albarn off.

    The incident occurred in early 2022, when a written interview between The Los Angeles Times and Albarn went as follows:

    LAT: “She may not be to your taste, but Taylor Swift is an excellent songwriter.

    DA: “She doesn’t write her own songs.”

    LAT: “Of course she does. Co-writes some of them.”

    DA: “That doesn’t count. I know what co-writing is. Co-writing is very different to writing. I’m not hating on anybody, I’m just saying there’s a big difference between a songwriter and a songwriter who co-writes. Doesn’t mean that the outcome can’t be really great.”

    Swift was very quick to respond via Twitter, slamming Albarn about his “hot take” with the reply: “I was such a big fan of yours until I saw this. I write ALL of my own songs. Your hot take is completely false and SO damaging. You don’t have to like my songs but it’s really fucked up to try and discredit my writing. WOW.” But, to be fair, Albarn isn’t wrong. Swift does co-write most of her songs, with The Life of a Showgirl being no exception in that Martin and Shellback are her fellow collaborators. But it’s apparent that she is in total control of all themes, as unrelatable as they are. Granted, Swift pulls what Olivia Rodrigo and Addison Rae did with “vampire” and “Fame Is a Gun” respectively in that she insists everyone can relate to having a “public life” now thanks to the advent of the online persona. This being her inspiration behind “Eldest Daughter,” of which she commented,

    “[It’s] about kind of the roles that we play in our public life, because nowadays everyone has a public life. You have a life that you portray to other people or what you portray on social media, and then you have the you that everyone gets to know who has earned the right to be closest to you. And it’s really hard to be sincere publicly because that’s not really what our culture rewards. People reward you for being like tough and unbothered and like too busy to care. And you may be that about some things, but everyone has things that matter to them and people that matter to them.”

    For Swift, it’s always been apparent that being “the best” is what matters to her. This in addition to finding and securing her Prince Charming. It’s a variation on the latter theme that occurs in “Ruin the Friendship.” Yet another track that proves she’s sort of scraping the bottom of the barrel for “relatable material” in that she once again feels obliged to speak as though she’s still in high school. To be sure, Swift appears mentally stuck in that “era” in many ways, often writing from the perspective of an ostracized and/or lovestruck teenager (as she also does on TTPD’s “So High School”). And while that might have been her “core audience” once upon a time, many have been forced to leave such “childish things” behind.

    Nonetheless, Swift takes listeners back to a moment in time when she was friends with someone in high school (reportedly Jeff Lang, a man that died in his early twenties) who she had more than “just friendly” feelings for. Filled with regret over having never made a move, especially since that person later died (“When I left school, I lost track of you/Abigail called me with the bad news/Goodbye, and we’ll never know why”—apart from the “why” being, you know, drugs), Swift advocates for “ruining the friendship.” Or, more to the point, ruining a male/female friendship by breaking the “cardinal rule” and turning it romantic. For, as Vickie Miner (Janeane Garofalo) from Reality Bites once said, “Sex is the quickest way to ruin a friendship.” Looking back on her cautiousness now, however, Swift would have been only too willing to ruin it. Though probably not with sex. In fact, she is more inclined to mention a “kiss.” That’s the “sex act” she’s most willing to get on board with as she sings, “My advice is to always ruin the friendship/Better that than regret it for all time/Should’ve kissed you anyway.” Perhaps Joey Potter and Pacey Witter would tend to agree. Though Dawson Leery, not so much.

    Apart from discussing being “the best,” finding “Prince Charming” and dissecting “love lost,” Swift’s indisputable other favorite songwriting topic is her haters. Of which, of course, she has many. Though not nearly as many as she does lovers—that is, of her work. Even so, for Swift, it’s as Gaga (loosely quoting Madonna with, “If there are a hundred people in a room and ninety-nine say they liked it, I only remember the one person who didn’t”) once said: “There can be a hundred people in a room and ninety-nine don’t believe in you, but all it takes is one and it just changes your whole life.” For Swift, that person who “changes her whole life” by not believing in her is usually her hater (hear also: “Bad Blood,” one of her biggest hits inspired by none other than erstwhile “enemy” Katy Perry). If the “Easter eggs” of “Actually Romantic” are anything to go by, the latest hater that Swift is “taking down by taking to task” is Charli XCX. The shade is in the song title alone, which features “romantic” in it the way Charli’s “Everything is romantic” does. One of the many beloved songs that appeared on Brat last year. Along with “Sympathy is a knife,” which was speculated to be about Swift when Charli mentioned, among other things, “Don’t wanna see her backstage at my boyfriend’s show/Fingers crossed behind my back, I hope they break up quick.”

    If Charli was, in fact, referring to Swift, she definitely got her wish about Matty Healy and Swift breaking up quick. As for the boyfriend Charli refers to, George Daniel, he’s since become her husband. A fellow “365 party girl,” though probably not nearly at Charli’s level. Something Swift shades when she opens the track with, “I heard you call me ‘Boring Barbie’ when the coke’s got you brave/High-fived my ex [Matty Healy] and then you said you’re glad he ghosted me/Wrote me a song [“Everything is romantic”] sayin’ it makes you sick to see my face/Some people might be offended.” Swift, though, not so much. Or so she claims in the chorus, “But it’s actually sweet/All the time you’ve spent on me/It’s honestly wild/All the effort you’ve put in/It’s actually romantic/I really gotta hand it to you/No man has ever loved me like you do.” In effect, Swift speaks on the fine line between love and hate, and how Charli (or any other chanteuse, really) might technically be showing her the former by fixating on her so much. So it is that Swift keeps ribbing, “Hadn’t thought of you in a long time [this channeling Lover’s “I Forgot That You Existed”]/But you keep sending me funny valentines [the song, one supposes?]/And I know you think it comes off vicious/But it’s precious, adorable/Like a toy chihuahua barking at me from a tiny purse/That’s how much it hurts.”

    Of course, Swift is lying to herself when she says it doesn’t hurt, otherwise she wouldn’t have written a song about it, digging the (unsympathetic) knife in as much as she can with other lyrics like, “How many times has your boyfriend said/‘Why are we always talkin’ ‘bout her?’” And yes, XCX does mention talking about “her” in “Sympathy is a knife” when she says, “George says I’m just paranoid/Says he just don’t see it, he’s so naïve.”

    What George—and just about everyone else—might see, however, is that The Life of a Showgirl is less about a girl who “puts on a show” and more about a girl who is obsessed with her boyfriend in the same way that she has been with every boyfriend before (as each album has evidenced). And when that meme of one of Taylor and Travis’ first dates came out with the caption, “Taylor taking her new album for a walk,” it was entirely accurate. For while the intent behind it was to emphasize that Swift always explores her breakups on her records (with Red and TTPD being a primary example), it turns out that the meme was right in a different way, because Kelce is the crux of her new album far more than being a performer is.

    “Wi$h Li$t” (which bears a similarity to Midnights’ “Glitch” in terms of Swift’s intonation and the sound of the track itself) is just such a beacon of that. During it, Swift details the different kinds of wishes that people have for themselves, many of them materially-oriented (e.g., “They want that yacht life, under chopper blades/They want those bright lights and Balenci shades/And a fat ass with a baby face [this somehow sounding like a jibe being made at one of Swift’s longtime nemeses, Kim Kardashian]).” Swift, on the other hand, claims, “I just want you/Have a couple kids, got the whole block lookin’ like you/We tell the world to leave us the fuck alone, and they do, wow/Got me dreamin’ ‘bout a driveway with a basketball hoop/Boss up, settle down, got a wish list.” A wish list, evidently, that not only one-ups Swift’s usual cringe factor, but also proves XCX “or whoever” right in calling her Boring Barbie.

    Try as she might to mitigate that nickname with the song that follows, “Wood.” An innuendo-laden ditty that makes all previous songs on The Life of a Showgirl come across as far less uncomfortable. And it’s not just because this marks the first time that Swift tries her hand at something like being “raunchy” (“Girls, I don’t need to catch the bouquet/To know a hard rock is on the way”), but because, well, she’s quite bad at it. Though, at the very least, she spared listeners from not being euphemistic (“The curse on me was broken by your magic wand”—oof). Because to hear her try her hand at something as sexually explicit as “WAP” would be so much worse.

    Nay, it might even get her “CANCELLED!” (spelled the British way, perhaps a residual side effect of being with Alwyn). A phenomenon that Swift insists she’s no stranger to, telling Time in 2023 that she was “canceled within an inch of my life and sanity” because of the “fully manufactured frame job, in an illegally recorded phone call, which Kim Kardashian edited and then put out to say to everyone that I was a liar.” Histrionic recounting aside, Swift was so affected by the backlash of that leaked phone call she didn’t bother releasing an album in 2016, let alone commenting on the election that year, even when her input would have been potentially invaluable, what with her influence on mass culture, right down to voting predilections. And, although she was never really at risk of “being put out to pasture” because of the incident, Swift commented that the experience made her have a new empathy for others who went through the same thing after her. As she stated via Amazon Track by Track, “I don’t naturally just cast people aside just because other people decide they don’t like them. I make my own decisions about people based on how they treat me within my life and their actions. And so, this is a song about all those themes.” Of course, such a comment leads one to wonder what her “hot take” on Woody Allen might be (especially since her bestie, Selena Gomez, once worked with him on the atrocious A Rainy Day in New York). And if there are others who have been “canceled” that she might side with sans publicly having the courage to say so.

    For the time being, however, she’ll have to leave listeners guessing on which canceled celebrities she’s still friends with (certainly not Blake Lively) by way of the generic chorus, “Good thing I like my friends cancelled/I like ‘em cloaked in Gucci [so much designer brand name-checking on this record] and in scandal/Like my whiskey sour/And poison thorny flowers/Welcome to my underworld [yes, it feels very deliberately Reputation]/It’ll break your heart/At least you know exactly who your friends are/They’re the ones with matching scars.”

    As are those who have been called “terms of endearment” in a condescending manner before. In this regard, “Honey,” the second to last song on the record (and not to be confused with Mariah’s iconic single of the same name), is probably the most “relatable” song on The Life of a Showgirl. Mainly because Swift, once again, taps into her rage against the patriarchy by recalling the times when people would call her “honey” or “sweetheart” in a derogatory sort of way. But, ever since she met her “Prince Charming,” the word has taken on a more positive connotation, prompting her to urge, “You can call me ‘honey’ if you want/Because I’m the one you want/I’m the one you want/You give it different meaning/‘Cause you mean it when you talk/Sweetie, it’s yours, kicking in doors, take it to the floor, gimme more/Buy the paint in the color of your eyes/And graffiti my whole damn life.”

    Unfortunately, that’s not even as saccharine as it gets on “Honey,” with Swift also singing, “Honey, I’m home, we could play house/We can bed down, pick me up, who’s the baddest in the land? What’s the plan?/You could be my forever-night stand/Honey.” This bearing certain correlations to Swift’s well-documented “nesting phase” on “Lover,” during which she also saw fit to make listeners nearly retch with the lines, “We could leave the Christmas lights up ‘til January/And this is our place, we make the rules [a.k.a. “playing house”],” along with, “All’s well that ends well to end up with you/Swear to be overdramatic and true to my lover.” These lyrics now no longer applying to Joe Alwyn, but to Kelce. Easily repurposed “in a pinch.” Not just in general, but when such sentiments are refunneled into other songs with similar “gushings” aimed at Kelce, with this particular one serving as something like the “Sweet Nothing” (one of many Midnights tracks directed at Alwyn) of the album.

    And for the grand, “show-stopping” finale, Swift pivots away from romantic love in favor of the love she has for performance (though, needless to say, her expression of this love comes nowhere near what JADE achieves on “Angel of My Dreams”—and, honestly, to gain insight into the life of a real-ass showgirl, it’s That’s Showbiz Baby for the win). Thus, she concludes with the eponymous “The Life of a Showgirl” featuring Sabrina Carpenter. And yes, tapping Carpenter to collaborate has a “full-circle” meaning in that Carpenter was one of the opening acts during The Eras Tour. In the time since, obviously, Carpenter has blown up to a level that might very nearly match Swift’s in due time—in fact, she now almost has as many albums, with Man’s Best Friend marking her seventh one (and arguably more listenable as “pop perfection” than The Life of a Showgirl).

    While the album is primarily a love letter to Kelce (whereas TTPD was a vinegar valentine to Matty Healy), there’s a telling line in “The Life of a Showgirl” wherein Swift declares herself to be “married to the hustle” (even if through a “character”). All while warning others aspiring to the life of a showgirl, through the lens of this famous broad named “Kitty,” “Hеy, thank you for the lovely bouquet/You’re sweeter than a peach/But you don’t know the life of a showgirl, babe/And you’re never, ever gonna/Wait, the more you play, the more that you pay/You’re softer than a kitten, so/You don’t know the life of a showgirl, babe/And you’re never gonna wanna.” But naturally, in both Swift and Carpenter’s case, they definitely wanna. And probably will “till the end of time” (as a more reluctant showgirl, Lana Del Rey, would put it). But while Carpenter is in an “era” that allows for more creative inspiration to flow, Swift seems to be indicating that her own “muse” is in the midst of some kind of “last gasp.” At least when it comes to being relatable to anyone other than tradwives.

    To that end, like the also Max Martin-infused Reputation before it, The Life of a Showgirl arrives at a time when things have never been more politically fraught. And yet, Swift has chosen to release one of her “fluffiest” records yet. For never has “glitz and glam” been more of an “in poor taste” sell than it is now (which is why Doja Cat had to feign going back to the 80s with Vie in order to do it). Further indicating that Swift seems to be more out of touch with reality/the common person than ever before.

    At the bare minimum, though, she seems to understand that she needed to keep this record breezy (read: short). Way more pared down than The Tortured Poets Department. This perhaps being a testament both to the critical feedback she encountered about that album’s length and the fact that, ultimately, she knows that froth isn’t something that can be explored too in-depth without really annoying people. And yes, if The Life of a Showgirl, as “superfluous” as it is, is an indication of where Swift is at now, it doesn’t bode well for where she’s going to be “artistically” once she’s actually married. If she gets divorced, however, well, that’s another story…

    Genna Rivieccio

    Source link

  • The Return of Smoking Aligns With the Return of Retro Practices in General

    It’s a “trend” (read: way of life) many have been noticing for the past couple of years: smoking. Its steady rise back into mainstream culture arguably reaching a crescendo with Brat summer, the Charli XCX-fueled phenomenon-by-way-of-an-album that laid out what constitutes a “brat,” at least aesthetically: “pack of cigs, a Bic lighter and a strappy white top with no bra.” Note that pack of cigs was placed at the top of the list, even if XCX was largely just bullshitting/trolling the press…as is the wont of a true brat.

    And yet, it was as though she “manifested” the full-fledged opening of the floodgates when it came to “social smoking” being back in a big way. Unapologetically so. For, where once there was a stigma about it, the summer of 2024 seemed to confirm something that had been brewing for a while: if the “culture” was going to be subjected to the retro practices being consistently touted and implemented by a certain administration helmed by a certain orange creature, then it wanted to at least get back one “good” retro practice out of it: the joy of smoking. No matter that everyone, by now, is well-aware of the bodily harm it guarantees. 

    Here, too, another factor is at play with regard to the “why” of cigarettes a.k.a. “cancer sticks” taking off so much in recent times: it’s apparent that more and more people aren’t seeing much of a viable future for the world, so why not really find (a.k.a. buy, for an extremely exorbitant price) the thing you love and let it kill you? It’s not like there’s going to be an assured tomorrow anyway, n’est-ce pas? So “let it rip.” Or, in this case, let it burn. Put another way by Jared Oviatt a.k.a. “@cigfluencers” (now the go-to person for articles about why cigarettes are “back”), “The dream of stability, owning a home, financial security feels increasingly out of reach. So the question becomes: why not do what you want? Why not smoke? Nothing matters!”

    However, speaking to that aforementioned point about the exorbitant price, the people smoking are actually the ones who can own a home, do have financial security. To be sure, there seems to be something to the idea that “only” celebrities are smoking again (ergo, in some enraged people’s opinions, trying to make it “cool” again)—perhaps because the cost of a pack of cigarettes, to them, amounts to pennies. Which is why Rosalía brought an entire “cigarette bouquet” to Charli XCX for her 32nd birthday on August 2, 2024. Because, while roughly fifteen dollars a pack (when bought from a metropolitan city like L.A.) is alms to the richies, it makes far more of a dent in the average person’s so-called salary. Hence, the popularity of cigarettes among celebrities not necessarily causing a major uptick in smoking among “the commoners.” Who tend to prefer vaping anyway, a much more déclassé form of smoking, with only slightly less harmful health effects. Even so, Lana Del Rey remains committed to it, despite previously being one of the earlier known celebrities of the twenty-first century to parade her cig habit (once an indelible part of her visuals). 

    But then, that’s because Del Rey was always touting twentieth century views and “ideals” in the first place. It’s only now that “everyone else” has “caught up” to her (as she herself presently chooses vaping instead—to which her recent opening act, Addison Rae, would say, “Ew, I hate vaping”) by allowing themselves to fall behind. And why shouldn’t they, when everything around them reflects a society that has entered a time machine, reinvoking the worst of what “hippies” and “crusaders” fought against in the mid-twentieth century: racism, sexism and an overtly patriarchal society.

    Alas, since all of that has bubbled up to the surface again with a vengeance, many seem to think that, at the bare minimum, that should include the erstwhile “glamor” of cigarettes. Before the myth of their “doctor recommended” cachet was debunked with an early 1960s study that definitively concluded cigarettes cause lung cancer. It was in 1964, with the publication of Smoking and Health: Report of the Advisory Committee to the Surgeon General of the Public Health Service, that things for the tobacco industry started to get really dicey. Because that’s when the PSAs, both in print and on TV, started coming out, making increasingly indelible impressions on people as the decades wore on. 

    The 90s were an especially “anti-smoking” time, in terms of campaigns going hard against tobacco. One ad, seeking to satirize the supposed glamor of smoking now mostly associated with Old Hollywood films, depicted a man and woman with “movie star vibes” as the former asks, “Mind if I smoke?” Her reply: “Care if I die?” The message was out: smoking was decidedly gross, selfish and, worst of all (for men and women alike), caused impotence. And yes, it’s almost certain that’s a problem for “cigfluencer” Matty Healy, who went from dating the “wholesome” Taylor Swift to the “brat-adjacent” Gabbriette, a fellow smoker. Because, despite the 90s being always on-trend with the likes of those in the “Brat orbit,” anti-smoking isn’t something that took hold from that hallowed decade. Besides, even the it girls of the day (e.g., Kate Moss, Chloë Sevigny, Winona Ryder) clearly never paid much attention to such ads. Or the influence their unabashed smoking had on those who wanted to be like them.

    Even so, that didn’t stop the effects of the anti-smoking movement at the government level, with California in particular being ahead of the curve on banning smoking in restaurants, workplaces and bars starting in 1995 (though Beverly Hills specifically started banning smoking in certain public places in 1987). Rather ironic considering that Hollywood was the place that started selling cigarettes as “glamorous” in the first place. The dive that the reputation of the cigarette took by the mid-2000s was so noticeable that it can best be summed up by Aaron Eckhart’s character, Nick Naylor, in 2006’s Thank You For Smoking, when he laments that the only people you see smoking in movies anymore are “RAVs”: Russians, Arabs and villains (the former two often neatly fitting into the latter category for Americans anyway). 

    Enter Mary-Kate Olsen, who, despite her twin also being a smoker, was arguably the first to really bring back cigarettes as a mark of “class” and “wealth.” This while also embodying the brat definition of wielding them as an accessory long before Charli XCX herself crystallized what brat even meant. MK’s cigarette-smoking advocacy reached an apex at her 2015 wedding to Olivier Sarkozy, an event that prompted Page Six to famously describe the reception as having “bowls and bowls filled with cigarettes, and everyone smoked the whole night.” It was a phrase—and scene—that pop culture enthusiasts couldn’t stop obsessing over. And maybe it took XCX’s Brat to “inspire” a new generation glom on to what Mary-Kate had already done for cigs anyway. Well, her and a few other 00s-era “bad girls,” including Lindsay Lohan and Britney Spears (as a certain infamous 2008 Rolling Stone article phrased it, “She is an inbred swamp thing who chain-smokes”).

    All of which is to say that, sure, the “coolness” of smoking has survived numerous threats to its clout in the years since the truth about its dangers was made public. But it—smoking—has always been there, just waiting in the wings to reemerge again as a viable thing to do for securing one’s “effortless” chicness. However, the fact that the confluence of retro political policies and stances on gender (de facto, gender roles) has aligned with smoking’s latest renaissance doesn’t seem like a coincidence at all. So much as an additional way to “mirror the past.”  And to further undo all the human progress that was made since.

    Genna Rivieccio

    Source link

  • Dionysus Beware: Party Girl Gods Charli XCX and Kesha Finally Join Forces

    Dionysus Beware: Party Girl Gods Charli XCX and Kesha Finally Join Forces

    Perhaps saving the best for last in terms of who she wanted to unveil as a collaborator on her Brat remix album, Charli XCX has at last given fans an overdue Kesha feature. Really, it should have happened long ago, but perhaps Kesha wouldn’t have been “at home” in the Number 1 Angel or Pop 2 universe (even if, somehow, Lizzo managed to fit into the latter). On Brat and it’s completely different but also still brat, however, any style—anything goes. And Kesha is undoubtedly one of the OG brats (along with Blackout-era Britney Spears)…embodying the definition long before Charli fully crystallized what it meant.

    After all, Kesha was the one singing solely about partying and waking up hungover only to do it all over again on her early albums, Animal, the Cannibal EP and Warrior. Hell, she even had a song called “Sleazy” (on Cannibal) that spoke to the core of what “being brat” is all about. And yes, she was also all about glitter (this was before that particular party girl accoutrement started to get more flak for its anti-environmental properties). And Kesha, too, understood the value of a remix album, releasing a successful one in 2011 via I Am the Dance Commander + I Command You to Dance: The Remix Album (which rolls off the tongue about as easily as Brat and it’s completely different but also still brat).

    This early period of back-to-back albums for Kesha (from 2010 to 2012) would have still been at a time when Charli had yet to even release her first studio album, True Romance, in 2013. However, that didn’t mean that she wasn’t still plenty busy making and putting out music, including her first two mixtapes, Heartbreaks and Earthquakes and Super Ultra, both released in 2012. Music that, in some way or other, was informed by pop songs of that moment as much as Charli’s own predilection for the “underground sound.” And, of course, Britney Spears.

    In fact, some listeners might not be able to avoid pointing out that the most perfect choice for a collaboration on this particular song would have been Spears (snatches of Britney crooning the word “everytime” from her 2003 song of the same name are, after all, prominently featured throughout and she was referenced multiple times in Spring Breakers, including with use of that single). Even so, Kesha is undeniably the second-most perfect choice (besides, Spears only exits her semi-permanent retirement for Elton John remixes). She being just as associated with “party girl antics” as Charli.

    This even in spite of all the trauma and sadness she also became associated with amid her endless Kesha v. Dr. Luke legal battle. Indeed, because the case was only recently settled (in June of 2023) after being tied up in court for nearly ten years since the time when Kesha first filed a lawsuit against her erstwhile producer in 2014, most of her career has been underscored by this legal battle. That said, her newfound sense of liberty from a man whose shadow loomed over her for years is apparent in the first single she released, “Joy Ride,” on her own independent label, Kesha Records.

    That jubilant aura of freedom is also present on her contribution to “Spring Breakers.” A movie which came out at the height of her party girl image in 2012. Which also marked the same year Icona Pop and XCX’s “I Love It” reached number one on the Billboard charts (and entered the top ten on the Billboard Hot 100), launching the latter into the spotlight as a key player in the music industry. And as XCX’s party girl image began to rise, Kesha’s party girl image started to wane. Not just because she was effectively blocked from making new music, but because her next album after a five-year hiatus was Rainbow, a more contemplative record compared to the party bops of her past.

    When she pivoted back to dancier music with the release of High Road in January 2020, her attempts at connecting with her audience again on tour were foiled by the pandemic. Gag Order then served up a mix of styles in 2023, bringing us to the present, with Kesha seeming to get fully back into the dance/pop genre she started out in, albeit with far more experimental flair. Something Charli XCX knows all about. Hence, the lyrics, “Every time, I make it so outrageous/Always gonna lose to people playin’ safer.” But, in the present, playing it safe no longer guarantees the success it once did (just look at Katy Perry), with XCX noting that “the niche” is being rewarded more than ever.

    As for Kesha’s own “unsafe” added verse, she sings, “Ooh, these bitches, we tied/Art is not a competition/Rating go up when the clothes come off/But a real bitch come when the dick goes up, like/Ooh, these bitches rip off/Wish they could be OG, but they not/We going psycho, we going off/Yeah, me and Charli, we the party girl gods.” So it is that Dionysus has been duly informed. And while insisting that art is not a competition while also noting that the new bitches on the scene will never be OG (ergo, truly “legitimate”) sounds like a dichotomy, well, it just speaks to the Brat manifesto of a song like “Girl, so confusing.” You can have occasional contempt for another girl while also respecting them. Again, dichotomies. That’s what Brat is all about—apart from “a pack of cigs, a Bic lighter and a strappy white top with no bra.” Accoutrements Kesha has presumably gotten on board with in lieu of glitter.

    Elsewhere, Kesha braggadociously adds, “Oh baby, you mad watchin’ me win/Do it again ’cause I’m Kesha, bitch/Makin’ me sick, nominated/All the motherfuckers better be prayin’/Singin’ my song, singin’ along/TikTok [the song, not the app] bitch ’til the kingdom come/Give ’em a hit, they can eat shit/Choke on my name when you suck on my dick.” A fine sentiment, to be sure…especially when directed at Dr. Luke or anyone else trying to stop Kesha’s party. Or Charli’s Brat autumn.

    Genna Rivieccio

    Source link

  • Charli XCX’s Most Ambitious “Mixtape” Yet: Brat and it’s completely different but also still brat

    Charli XCX’s Most Ambitious “Mixtape” Yet: Brat and it’s completely different but also still brat

    Being that the intention of Brat was always to get back to Charli XCX’s musical roots (especially after her intentionally hyper-commercial album, Crash), it seemed inevitable that what amounts to a “mixtape” version of it would come out. Of course, it’s instead being referred to as a “remix album.” A genre that can be a notoriously hard sell unless you’re Madonna with You Can Dance or Dua Lipa with Club Future Nostalgia. But, in Charli’s case, there are two things in her favor: 1) the unstoppable nature of Brat summer that has turned into Brat autumn and 2) XCX long ago established herself as a mixtape queen with Number 1 Angel and Pop 2 (hell, even 14, Heartbreaks and Earthquakes and Super Ultra). And Brat and it’s completely different but also still brat (a riff on the title of Brat’s deluxe edition, Brat and it’s the same but there’s three more songs so it’s not) still has that “at the cutting edge” feel. Except, this time around, her roster of guest musicians is even more A-list, including Ariana Grande, Lorde, Julian Casablancas and Billie Eilish.

    Regardless, Charli hasn’t gone full-tilt diva by totally ignoring lesser-known artists (at least within the mainstream circuit) on the record. For example, BB Trickz, Bladee and The Japanese House. Perhaps all part of XCX’s bid to prove that, while she might have effectively “gone corporate,” she hasn’t forgotten the importance of the underground. Not just in terms of how it helped her come up in the world, but also to its ongoing influence on her creativity (in that sense, XCX is very Madonna-esque indeed).

    To kick off the album, XCX opts for Robyn and Yung Lean to accompany her on “360,” one of the earliest remixes to show up (though “von dutch” featuring Addison Rae was the true OG of the Brat remixes) before anyone knew for certain that Brat and it’s completely different but also still brat was going to be a reality. Combining the “old” and the “new” in terms of selecting these two specific collaborators seems to be a pointed choice on Charli’s part, a “hat tip” to the idea that there is no new without recognizing those who came before to blaze a trail. And there’s no better epitome of that in the dance world than Robyn. Besides, as Charli once said, “When I listen to a Robyn pop song, I don’t feel like she’s just kind of saying something and not thinking; I feel like it’s really emotional.”

    Plus, Robyn was an early supporter of Charli, with the latter having once told her idol during an interview, “I’ll never forget when we were on tour in Australia together years ago… You came over to me at some party where I was feeling really nervous and you said, ‘Don’t worry about what anyone else thinks of you. We’ll have fun together, being ourselves.’” And that’s just what they continue to do on the “360” remix (which retains its musical core, unlike most of the other remixes on Brat and it’s completely different but also still brat), with Robyn boasting, “Your favorite pop star [Charli] is into me” (smacking of Chappell Roan bragging, “I’m your favorite artist’s favorite artist” [oui, a Sasha Colby homage]).

    It’s with “Club Classics” featuring BB Trickz that the listener finally notices the true essence of a remix album, for the song sounds entirely different. Even if producers George Daniel (a.k.a. Charli’s fiancé) and TimFromTheHouse are sure to incorporate the now signature refrain of “365,” present in the lyrics, “When I’m in the club, yeah, I’m (bumpin’ that)/When I’m at the house, yeah, I’m (bumpin’ that)/365, party girl (bumpin’ that)/Should we do a little key? Should we have a little line?/When I, club, yeah I’m (bumpin’ that)/When I’m at the housе, yeah, I’m (bumpin’ that)/365, party girl (bumpin’ that).”

    BB Trickz’ Tokischa-like inflection later shines through in her Spanish portion of the song that translates to, “Bb xcx is an automatic classic/Brr-brr, fashion killa even if the outfit is basic/I’m a brat even if I don’t have any plastic/Bounce like that, your boyfriend is a fanatic/I’m still a princess even if I walk around the hood/I’d give you a date, but I’m not in the mood/Baddie in the club, brat in the club/In the club, huh, I’m playing on loop/In the club (club, club), in the club.” Just as Charli has been…and not only during Brat summer, but for the majority of her career. So, yes, it’s only natural that she’d want to “dance to [herself],” what with such an impressive oeuvre of danceable ditties.

    Ones that are even danceable when the subject matter of the lyrics happens to be more serious. As is the case on both the original and remix versions of “Sympathy is a knife.” And while many speculated that the song was about Taylor Swift (as they alternated between guessing if “Girl, so confusing” was about Lorde or Marina), therefore that Swift might pull a Lorde and “work it out on the remix,” the presence of Ariana Grande instead makes it seem all the more possible that the song is about Taylor. And that she didn’t actually “shake it off” the way she led the public to believe by praising Charli’s brilliance post-Brat. However, perhaps to take attention away from the whole “Taylor theory,” the new iteration of “Sympathy is a knife” centers on the altered perspective on fame Charli has gotten since her “overnight” success with Brat. So it is that she opens the song with, “It’s a knife when you know they’re waiting for you to choke/It’s a knife when a journalist does a misquote/It’s a knife when a friend is suddenly steppin’ on your throat/It’s a knife when they say that you’ve been doing things you don’t.” Suddenly understanding that she doesn’t exist in the same niche bubble anymore, XCX has had the same rude wake-up call about fame this year as Chappell Roan (who has been around for far less time). Addressing the complications of this newfound popularity, XCX adds, “It’s a knife when your old friends hate your new friends/When somebody says, ‘Charli, I think you’ve totally changed’/It’s a knife when somebody says they like the old me and not the new me/And I’m like, ‘Who the fuck is she?’” This question also seems to be a foil to her asking, “Who the fuck are you?/I’m a brat when I’m bumpin’ that” on “365.”

    Dissecting the pains (sharp as a knife) that have come with the pleasures of fame, Charli expresses the rightful fear, “‘Cause it’s a knife when you’re finally on top/‘Cause logically the next step is they wanna see you fall to the bottom.” Perhaps that’s part of why XCX already announced her intention to take a break from music for a while during The Brat Interview with Zane Lowe, citing her desire to focus on acting now (indeed, she has starring roles lined up in Faces of Death and I Want Your Sex). And yes, she also discussed her hyper-awareness of the fact that everything she does musically in the future will now be compared to this. Her blessing, thus, also being her curse.

    As for Grande, she has her own unique set of knife digs to explore via the lyrics, “It’s a knife when you know they’re counting on your mistakes/It’s a knife when you’re so pretty, they think you must be fake/It’s a knife when they dissect your body on the front page/It’s a knife when they won’t believe you, why should you explain?/It’s a knife when the mean fans hate the nice fans/When somebody says, ‘Ari, I think you’ve totally changed’ (no shit)/It’s a knife when somebody says they like the old me and not the new me/And I’m like, ‘Who the fuck is she?’” Because, needless to say, there is this constant pressure that musicians—particularly female ones—undergo to reinvent yet also “stay the same” a.k.a. appeal to their audience in the same way. Which makes for a double-edged sword more than a mere knife.

    In typical Brat fashion, the track starts to sound like an entirely different song by the end, with Grande layering on her “uhs” and “mms” as Charli admits, “All this expectation is a knife.” In other words, when it comes to success, be careful what you wish for. A theme also present on “I might say something stupid.” Because, yes, to add further “insult” to Taylor’s “injury,” “Sympathy is a knife” is followed up by a song featuring her The Tortured Poets Department muse, Matty Healy. Billed, of course, as The 1975 (along with production from Jon Hopkins, credited as part of the feature). Indeed, it feels as though Charli has “gifted” this entire song to him as a space to explore some of the emotional and reputational fallout that occurred after his dalliance with Taylor Swift—during which he was picked apart for being far too skeevy for such a “nice girl.” Now engaged to Gabbriette (name-checked in the “cool/mean girl” anthem that is “360”—likely first and foremost for her A-plus resting bitch face), it’s obvious that in the divide between Healy and Swift, Charli has far more allegiance to those in the Healy camp (including her own fiancé, who serves as The 1975’s drummer). So it is that she gives him the opportunity to reflect on his post-Swift feelings as she, too, joins in on the verse, “Rot in my house in L.A./Thinkin’ of givin’ up everything/Now I’m watchin’ what I say/These interviews are so serious/My friends went through this before, yeah/It happens to lots of guys/Medicine makеs him a problem/‘I’m famous, but I’m not quite.’” After each musician’s tumultuous past year, the latter sentiment no longer applies.

    To lighten the mood of existential dread on the previous two tracks, Charli brings in her go-to, Troye Sivan, for a feature on “Talk Talk.” Like Healy, he’s given plenty of vocal time to paint the picture, “Are we getting too close?/You’re leaving things in my head/I’ll be honest, you scare me/My life’s supposed to be a party (do you ever think about me?)/‘Cause we talk that talk, yeah we talk all night/And the more I know you, the more I like you/Can you stick with me, maybe just for life?/And say what’s on your mind?” Considering the song is an homage to Charli’s feelings of shyness around George Daniel before they started dating, it holds a special place in her heart. Maybe that’s why she secured Dua Lipa to contribute her own Spanish and French vocals to the track. As a matter of fact, Lipa was generous enough to do so without even wanting to be credited as a feature on the song. Because what’s more Brat than being aware that everybody is going to know it’s your voice anyway? No attribution required.

    For “von dutch,” however, all the credit goes to Addison Rae for remaking it into something entirely new—while still maintaining the braggadocious vibe of the original. So it is that she flexes, with Lily Allen-esque brattiness (think: “URL Badman”), “I’m just living that life/While you’re sittin’ in your dad’s basement/Bet you’re disappointed that I’m shinin’/I’m just living that life/Von Dutch, cult classic, but I still pop.” Charli then brings the conversational meta tone present on many of these remixes by describing, “Linked with Addison on Melrose [a phrase that has since been immortalized in t-shirt form]/Bought some cute clothes and wrote this in the studio.” The two then speak to the overarching theme of the song—that you can “hate” someone and still be obsessed with them, ergo, “If you don’t like me and still watch everything I do, bitch, you’re a fan”—by concluding with the verse, “All these girls are like, ‘Ah, can I get a picture?’/And then they go online like, ‘Just kidding, I hate you’ (Von Dutch, cult classic, but I still pop)/‘Cause we’re just living that life.”

    A romantic life, in addition to a glamorous one. But lately, the romantic aspect for Charli has been tinged with a bit of taint thanks to the whole global fame thing. To that point, as mentioned, it is with this remix album/mixtape that Charli also had a chance to speak on how her perspective has changed since her post-Brat existence. Something also particularly explored on the new version of “Everything is romantic” with Caroline Polachek (paying back the favor of Charli remixing “Welcome to My Island” back in 2023). Among the most standout remixes, Polachek’s ethereal voice delivers instantly classic lines like, “Late nights in black silk in East London (everything is)/Church bells in the distance/Free bleeding in the autumn rain/Fall in love again and again.” Obviously, that line about free bleeding is super witchy just in time for “spooky season.” For yes, the “spooky aesthetic” is also very Brat.

    Compared to the unabashed romantic portraits Charli gave in the original (inspired by a trip to, where else, Italy), there is a more bittersweet, macabre tone to the “romantic” imagery in this version (e.g., “Walk to the studio soaking wet/ACAB tag on a bus stop sign”). And that gets played up by a dialogue exchange between Charli and Caroline (not unlike the conversational tone in “Girl, so confusing” with Lorde) that starts, “Charli calls from a hotel bed/Hungover on Tokyo time [Billie Eilish will also refer to Charli’s Tokyo predilections on “Guess”]/‘Hey, girl, what’s up, how you been?’/‘I think I need your advice’/‘That’s crazy, I was just thinking of you, what’s on your mind?’/‘I’m trying to shut off my brain/I’m thinking ‘bout work all the time/‘It’s like you’re living the dream/But you’rе not living your life.’” Polachek’s wise aphorism cuts Charli like a knife (comme sympathie) as she replies, “I knew that you would relatе/I feel smothered by logistics/Need my fingerprints on everything/Trying to feed my relationship/Am I in a slump?/Am I playing back time?/Did I lose my perspective?/Everything’s still romantic, right?”

    Suddenly questioning, in many ways, her own “street cred” now that she’s gone full-tilt mainstream (unintentional or not), Charli acknowledges being consumed by the competitiveness and vacuity that comes with being an international pop phenomenon. Complete with the Skims and H&M campaigns. At the end of the song, all Polachek can offer is: “All things change in the blink of an eye/Charli calls from a photo set/Living that life is romantic, right?” Alas, probably not with a million cameras on everything you do.

    The sense of regret and wistfulness on “Everything is romantic” also appears on “Rewind” featuring Bladee (another Swedish rapper à la Yung Lean). And while XCX might have excised her body image issues out of this version (e.g., “Nowadays, I only eat at the good restaurants/But honestly, I’m always thinkin’ ‘bout my weight”), she still has plenty to say about the fresh slew of inadequacies she feels with her elevated fame status. So it is that she admits, “Maybe I need a reality check/Sometimes now I just gotta say less [the curse of being far more scrutinized than ever before]/Wanna see my face all up in the press/When I don’t, sometimes I get a little bit depressed.” Ah, such a Leo sentiment, to boot. As for her honorary home, Charli remarks, “L.A. makes me so competitive/Sometimes I wanna wake up dead.” As one can hear, the lyrics are even more candid (and slightly Lana Del Rey-esque) than on the original Brat.

    Charli then even throws in a nod to Britney Spears and Cher with the lines, “I must confess, I’m under stress/Turn back the time again.” For added elegiac effect (not just for the way her life used to be, but the person she was at that time), the two woefully chant, “Requiem for everything/Rewind, remind me” to close out the song. In many regards, as a matter of fact, this remix album feels like Charli ringing the knell for the period of her life that came before Brat. One she’ll never be able to recreate now that “being fringe” isn’t something she lay can claim to any longer.

    Another reason to want to rewind to that time when it was all much less complicated? SOPHIE was still alive. As the core subject on “So I,” the remix version with A.G. Cook is possibly even more bittersweet as Charli reflects on some of their best times together. For while the original’s lyrical focus was on the absence of SOPHIE, the remix wishes to replicate the experience of her presence by remembering the formative experiences they shared. Thus, Charli sings, “Now I wanna think about all the good times/Me and A.G. on Mulholland/Crazy Uber, straight from a video shoot/Got birthday cake on the way.” The birthday cake was for SOPHIE and the video shoot was for “After the Afterparty.” As Charli told Lowe during The Brat Interview, the cake was shaped and styled like a burger and was one of those “gross” grocery store kinds (even if Gelson’s isn’t exactly a cheapo grocery store). But surely, to SOPHIE, it was the thought that counted. And she undoubtedly would have been touched by the numerous ways in which XCX still continues to carry on her musical legacy in her own music (with the “So I” remix sounding decidedly SOPHIE-esque from a sonic standpoint).

    As for the the next song, a remix of “Girl, so confusing” with Lorde, the internet already “went crazy” for it. But hearing it within the framework of the entire remix album revitalizes its potency and further cements it as a truly standout moment in the Brat universe (rounded out by Lorde joining XCX onstage to perform it during the Sweat Tour at Madison Square Garden). As is “Apple” thanks to its viral TikTok moment that had people of all ages imitating the choreography. Alas, the entire tone and motif of “Apple” is altered with the presence of The Japanese House (who, incidentally, got her start with some help from Matty Healy). For, rather than continuing to be a song about generational trauma, it becomes a song about relationship trauma, with Charli and The Japanese House lamenting, “When you made me (I’ve been looking at you so long, now I only see me)/You made me so sad, so sad.” The idea that someone can “make” you in a relationship—as though you never really existed before—is not uncommon among women, who so often can’t help but think that “another half” will be the solution to the inherent emptiness they feel.

    Hence, when that half is lost, one winds up with sentiments such as, “Sometimes when I go home/It doesn’t feel like home/Don’t know if you can hear me/Inside this conversation/Sometimes when I go home/It doesn’t feel like home/Silently pack my things, get in the car/I just wanna drive, drive, drive, drive, drive, drive.” So even if “I think the apple’s rotten right to the core/From all the things passed down/From all the apples coming before” didn’t make the cut—despite being a key part of the original—at least “I just wanna drive, drive, drive” did. The Japanese House also further, that’s right, drives home the failed relationship point with the verse, “Somebody asked me how you’re doing/And I make excuses and I say you’re fine/I keep trying not to think about you, but I/Seem to think about you all the time.” So it is that “Apple” is no longer really “Apple” at all.

    Less jarring in terms of its musical (though not lyrical) transformation is “B2b” featuring Tinashe—herself coming off a year when she was finally given more credit and recognition thanks to the viral success of “Nasty.” Charli refers to each of their “sudden blowups” in the lyrics, “‘Hey, Tinashe, wanna do this song?’ [Brat always has to keep it text-level conversational]/Two days later, got the vocals cut/Oh my god, we really blew the fuck up/Now everybody wants what we got.” Of course, Britney Spears fans would argue that Tinashe already blew up long ago by being a feature on 2016’s “Slumber Party.” And yes, her debut album was all the way back in 2014, yet the masses only seemed to catch on with Quantum Baby’s “Nasty” this year—much the same as they did with Brat. Charli and Tinashe have made six and seven albums, respectively, but it took all the way until this moment to be celebrated on such a scale. This is why Tinashe has a perfect right to boast, “Look at me now, better than before…/Didn’t come out of nowhere, they been sleeping on me, I’m bored.”

    While the term “back to back” had a different connotation in the original (including the allusion to B2B DJs—a.k.a. two DJs “spinning” at the same time), here it refers to the endless slog of work it takes to get to the career high Charli and Tinashe are currently experiencing, with Charli declaring, “All the way from Los Angeles to France/Dix ans plus tard et toujours en place/Yeah, we work hard, yeah, we work hard (back to back), in addition to, “I travel ‘round the world to fifteen countries in four days and/After I get off stage, I’m on set shooting ‘til the a.m./I’m fuckin’ tired, but I love it and I’m not complainin’/Oh, shit, I kinda made it (yeah, we work hard, yeah).” All of this is to say, of course, that Charli is a believer in the inherent tenets of capitalism.

    As for the next track, Charli got the rightful notion that Julian Casablancas would be the ideal collaborator for it. After all, in the original version of “Mean girls,” Charli alludes to a New York scene queen via the depiction, “Yeah, she’s in her mid-twenties, real intelligent/And you hate the fact she’s New York City’s darling.” Just as Casablancas and his fellow band members in The Strokes were for a good portion of the 00s. Something Charli alludes to during The Brat Interview when she says, “It was fun on the remix album to bring all of these people in, some of whom aren’t particularly connected to the club world…when you would think about it on the surface, but actually, Julian Casablancas, for example… When I think about Julian, [he] has this sort of history with Daft Punk and also…you talk about New York downtown, it’s like, people were, like, partying then.” That is, in the 2000s. Before the obscene digital documentation wrought by social media took over everything and scared people out of being full-tilt debauched (lest the evidence showed up later on the internet).

    “Mean girls,” suffice it to say, sounds like the perfect soundtrack for one of the antagonists in a 2000s movie (Regina George being the leader of the pack, duh). As for the remix, it brings the middle part breakdown of the song (the one that sounds like Mr. G from Summer Heights High composed it) to the beginning, thus taking on a new life and meaning with Casablancas in the driver’s seat. Naturally, when one utters the name “Julian Casablancas,” the automatic meaning is “The Strokes” (and vice versa)—just as it is the case with “Matty Healy” and “The 1975.” That said, there is, of course, an undeniable The Strokes tincture to the song. At a certain moment, both Charli and Casablancas seem to be channeling their inner empathetic mean girl energy by announcing in the bridge, “I won’t break down, I won’t/Not I, oh no/It is my fault I know it now, oh no/I gave you everything/Too much, it’s true/Then took it all away/In front of you.” And yet, in another verse, Casablancas seems to be the one who was slighted by a mean girl when he recounts, “I don’t understand/What you’re gonna do/I followed the rules/I took the abuse/I don’t understand/Where you’re coming from/I downed all my pills/I love you the most/Be with, with me/Thought you could talk.” The last sentence bearing a faint hint of the same earnestness of wanting to communicate with the object of one’s desire/affection in “Talk Talk.”

    The nebulous, arcane nature of the lyrics are almost inscrutable as a mean girl herself—not to mention the origins of how she became so mean. That said, Casablancas seems to taunt, “Kept it vague so you could guess.” Alas, “Guess” doesn’t appear for two more tracks, with the emotional “I think about it all the time” following “Mean girls.” And who better to exude the kind of emotionalism necessary for this particular song than Bon Iver?—even though it’s a bit of an odd choice to feature a man on a song about one’s biological clock ticking. Though maybe it’s a subtle way of showing Taylor she’s not the only one who can get Bon Iver featured on a song. What’s more, Iver once covered the Bonnie Raitt’s “Nick of Time,” itself a song that speaks to women’s fear of it being “too late” vis-à-vis having a baby. With the Raitt reference in mind, it doesn’t feel like a coincidence that the song has undertones of an 80s power ballad. And in contrast to other remixes, one of the more recognizable verses were kept: “So, we had a conversation on the way home, ‘Should I stop my birth control?’/‘Cause my career still feels small in the existential scheme of it all.”

    Despite that, Charli can’t help but get caught up in the vicious circle of her increasingly successful career, adding in the new verse, “First off, you’re bound to the album/Then you’re locked into the promo/Next thing, three years have gonе by (scared to run out of time)/Me and Gеorge sit down and try to plan for our future/But there’s so much guilt involved when we stop working/‘Cause you’re not supposed to stop when things start working, no.” More candidly still: “I’m so scared to run out of time.” Then putting none too fine a point on the Raitt tribute, XCX concludes, “I think about it all the time (time, time, t-time, t-time, time)/I found love, baby (time, time, t-time, t-time, time)/‘Cause our love ran out of time (time, time, t-time, t-time, time)/Love in the nick of time (time, time, t-time, t-time, time)/I found love (time, time, t-time, t-time, time).” So did Rihanna, albeit in a hopeless place. And she managed to have two children, so surely Charli can do the same (even if Rihanna appears to have given up music altogether as part of focusing on this new era in her life…granted, she had stopped putting out albums long before the kids came along).

    The closer on the original Brat, “365,” now benefits from Shygirl’s presence on Brat and it’s completely different but also still brat. And yes, the pair already showcased the track all over the U.S. during the Sweat Tour (with Shygirl serving as Charli and Troye’s “special guest”). This remix is also among the few that preserves a large portion of its original self, with Shygirl contributing just one new verse: “Too hot, when I sweat, just lick me/Touch and squeeze when the bassline hits me/Are you gonna ride me?/Harder than a BPM, beat match me (yeah, I’m lovin’ that)/Can’t see straight, yeah, I love it when the pill hits/Back of the booth, bitch, guest list, VIP/Party don’t start ‘til a bitch come find me/Party girl, party girl (yeah, I’m lovin’ that).”

    That “Guess” featuring Billie Eilish should now serve as the coda for this edition of Brat is part and parcel of the album being Brat’s “Bizarro World” flipside (complete with the font on the cover literally being flipped). The Black Lodge to Brat’s White Lodge (now that Kyle MacLachlan has been deemed “Mr. Brat” by the Brat herself). With Charli perhaps figuring that going even more niche again might get her back to “herself”—who the fuck is she?, to quote the new “Sympathy is a knife”—after all this accelerated fame.

    By the same token, Charli remarked during The Brat Interview, “From before I made Brat I knew, I was, like, ‘We’re gonna do a remix album.’ Because we’re gonna make so many edits that it’s gonna just…we’re gonna want to do it because they’ll be so much music and it will be really cool to have, like, kind of a channel to put it all out there.” “Cool” it is. And also perhaps even cooler and more ambitious than any of her previous mixtapes.

    Genna Rivieccio

    Source link

  • Chappell Roan’s “Unwitting” Charli XCX Shade

    Chappell Roan’s “Unwitting” Charli XCX Shade

    Move over, Billie Eilish, there’s a new environmentally-conscious Gen Z pop star in the mix, and it’s none other than Chappell Roan. Despite her classification as a “geriatric Gen Zer” (born near the very beginning of the generation’s “hatching” in 1998), there’s no denying Roan as being, these days, perhaps even more influential on her age group than “zygote” Gen Z pop stars like Eilish and Olivia Rodrigo. The latter two, although often vocal about various “do-gooding” endeavors (for Rodrigo, it’s less about the environment than her Fund 4 Good, which aims to “support community based non-profits and girls’ education, support reproductive rights and prevent gender-based violence”), have never been quite as upfront and vehement as Roan is in the October issue of Rolling Stone for which she serves as the cover star (complete with the title, “A Star Is Born”—the Lady Gaga allusion being rather over-the-top, but hey, no one ever said that subtlety sells).

    Among other quotable chestnuts found in the article, Roan announces, “All the money [I make] goes to the world-building [oy, that phrase]. That’s why I am saying no to every fucking brand deal right now, because I’m like ‘Does it fit in this world?’ No, H&M does not fit in this world. Also, fuck H&M.” While Roan could have simply stopped at “every fucking brand deal,” she opted to call out H&M in particular. A pointed choice considering Charli XCX’s highly-publicized, fresh collaboration with the fast-fashion juggernaut. A collab that has many declaring that Brat summer is effortlessly poised to become Brat autumn (with a remix edition of the album coming out in October to further emphasize the seamless transition). And why not? When there’s still so much more money to be made off of this particular “femininomenon” for Charli? Indeed, like Chappell, she’s been frequently mentioned as one of the three most celebrated pop stars of the year—and all of whom have been slogging at it for roughly a decade only to finally be met with insane, Taylor Swift-level obsession in 2024 (though one wonders if any fans can truly be as obsessed [and willing to spend as much money to prove it] as a Swiftie). Charli, of course, has actually been in the spotlight since at least 2012, when Icona Pop’s “I Love It” (which Charli wrote, but didn’t feel was right for herself as a “solo” effort). Well over ten years. It’s just that, as with everything, Gen Z isn’t aware of shit prior to their own “era” until and unless it becomes a trend.

    Which, one supposes is why it’s good that Roan is trying to use her own “trending” nature to make a big, politically and environmentally-conscious statement while she can. Apart from already insisting that fame can be repurposed from toxic to tolerable, Roan is focusing in on a cause that’s supposedly near and dear to Gen Z, despite their greater addiction to fast fashion than any previous generation. Particularly with ultra-cheap online outlets like AliExpress, Temu, Shein and Romwe (and, quelle surprise, Shein owns Romwe, hence the very similar prices and products) “tempting” them with their shitty but attainable wares. Compared to those entities, H&M seems almost “saintly” (though its latest offense is continuing to operate its many store locations in Israel amid the ongoing Palestinian genocide).  

    Thus, Roan’s open vitriol toward a fast fashion player that is hardly all that influential to Gen Z compared to the abovementioned ilk comes across more like shade. Which is also odd when considering that, per Roan’s gushing account, Charli XCX was the first of the “pop girls” to reach out to her after she went on that previously mentioned tirade about fame and posted it to TikTok. It was during a soundcheck in Dublin that she stated, “I love Charli so much. She was like the first girl to reach out and check on me. She was like ‘Hi, this is about to get really hard and if you need a friend, I’ll be here for you’. So it’s just so sick to see her just ruling the fucking world and doing it her way.” But if being a spokesperson for H&M—even allowing the company to adopt her signature Brat green backdrop for its logo—is “doing it her way,” maybe Roan isn’t entirely convinced of XCX’s artistic genius.

    Then again, perhaps Roan really doesn’t have that much room to talk/get on a soapbox. For, even though she might make a big production about being seen with her own reusable water bottle at an awards ceremony or bringing her own carpet to the red carpet for that same awards ceremony (the VMAs), she’s also the same “artist” willing to allow her hit, “Hot To Go!,” to appear in a Target commercial for the “Cuddle Collab.” (Perhaps she thought that because the commercial centered on dogs and cats, it could eke by the proverbial “watchdogs” [no pun intended] of environmental causes.) And it probably will, for there is little that Roan can do wrong at the moment, whereas Charli has already started to lose cachet for being “too corporate,” what with the H&M collab and Kamala Harris’ campaign using Brat for its own “marketing” purposes, ergo a much older, wider range of demographics becoming aware of her.

    And while Roan might not have been cognizant that Charli was doing the campaign when she made those anti-H&M comments for the Rolling Stone feature, it seems as though her comments underlyingly constitute more Gen Z knife-digging aimed into the backs of millennials like Charli, who was at least spared from Roan name-checking Skims, too (otherwise known as: XCX’s other sellout collab of the moment). That would have been really pointed. But also, a necessary pushback against the inexplicable reign of Kim Kardashian as some kind of “high-minded businesswoman.”

    In any case, it’s not as though Eilish is much for really backing up her sentiments either, what with participating in XCX’s underwear-laden “Guess” video. Because, regardless of insisting that all those mountains upon mountains of “unused” panties would be donated to an organization that supports survivors of domestic violence, the “fast fashion-chic” look of the video’s key backdrop is enough to bury that message—literally. Meanwhile, Roan wants to resurrect it in a manner, “unwittingly” or not, that puts a glaring spotlight on how “anti-Gen Z” in sentiment XCX ultimately is despite her newfound resonance with the generation that supposedly finds most millennials to be inherently cringe. And not just for their environmental practices (that actually aren’t worse than what Gen Z does with its own China-based fast fashion obsession).

    Genna Rivieccio

    Source link

  • “Talk Talk” Gets A Sexier, Less Desperate Makeover With Troye Sivan and, More Importantly, Dua Lipa on the Remix

    “Talk Talk” Gets A Sexier, Less Desperate Makeover With Troye Sivan and, More Importantly, Dua Lipa on the Remix

    Just in time to mark the beginning of the Sweat Tour, which kicks off on September 14th in Detroit, Charli XCX has released yet another remix of one of her songs from Brat: “Talk Talk.” A song that will also be featured on her forthcoming remix edition of Brat called Brat and it’s completely different but also still brat. And the remix of “Talk Talk” now features, of course, Troye Sivan—her co-headliner on the abovementioned tour, which is designed to look and feel like a rave (a vibe that perfectly suits each musician’s respective fanbases).

    Although (to those who aren’t kidding themselves) it comes across as one of the most generic/throwaway tracks on the record, the song’s current makeover allows “Talk Talk” a greater aura of sexiness as opposed to “earnestness.” And that sexiness is probably mostly thanks to Dua Lipa’s contributions, minimal though they may be.

    After all, it’s Lipa who kicks off the house-ified track with the Spanish declaration and entreaty, “Hay una fiesta en mi casa, vengan/Será muy divertido” (“There’s a party at my house, come. It will be a lot of fun”). Perhaps XCX herself fed Lipa these lines, considering how well-known she is (or was) for throwing the best parties—particularly at her illustrious Beachwood Canyon mansion in Hollywood (which she’s moved out of now that she’s more “adult”). A place she quickly made infamous for being a party spot, telling Seth Meyers in an interview from earlier this year that she would often find herself being asked by party guests if they knew who the host was…having no idea that it was the very person they were asking.

    In 2019, she also told Architectural Digest of her Beachwood Canyon abode, “We throw a lot of parties here… I just like the house to feel busy; I like that this house has just seen a lot of stories and fun things happen.” Of course, this was pre-George Daniel. Pre-being practically wifed up. And pre-spending her quarantine time there with Huck Kwong, her long-time (even if on-again, off-again) boyfriend before XCX fell for The 1975’s drummer. Who is also fast becoming known as one of her go-to producers apart from A. G. Cook (with the two first collaborating together on the Crash album for the title track).

    Before meeting in even a professional capacity, however, the two were only talking via text (or “online,” if you will), with XCX first encountering him in the flesh at the 2020 NME Awards (which still went on because the world hadn’t yet gone into lockdown mode as it was only early February of that pandemic year). At said event, while XCX was nominated for Best British Solo Act, Best Solo Act in the World and Best Collaboration, The 1975 was nominated for Best British Song, Best Song in the World, Best Festival Headliner, Best Band in the World and Best British Band (which they won), in addition to also receiving the special honors of the Innovation Award and Band of the Decade (all of which seems far too excessive, especially considering the band’s current post-Taylor Swift-dating-Matty-Healy standing).

    In effect, all that The 1975 “prowess” made it even more difficult for XCX to feel comfortable approaching her crush. And yes, she also admitted their “talking” via text was decidedly flirtatious despite still being attached to Kwong (with whom she would subsequently spend the lockdown year with while recording How I’m Feeling Now). Of being at the NME Awardswith Daniel in her midst, Charli recalled, “…we were both sat on different tables, and we were like texting each other, but we weren’t hanging out. But we were both looking over at each other—it was very like, one of us would look, and the other one would look away, and then just vice versa. You know, when you just feel like someone is watching you, you can feel a hole burning in the back of your head or something like that. It was very much that moment.”

    Which is exactly why the original version of the song paints that exact portrait with the opening verse, “I’ve been lookin’ at you/Puttin’ holes in your head/We’ve been talking for months/But never in the same room/And now I wanna approach ya/But we’ve been keeping this a secret/When you’re surrounded by friends/And I’m just wondering what they know.” To accommodate Sivan’s presence on the remix, however, XCX dispenses with that image in favor of giving him the time to provide a less “desperate,” “needy” vibe with the new chorus, “‘Kay, here’s the plan/I wanna fly you out to Amsterdam/I got a good hotel to fuck you in, I wanna/Boy, come see me.” Okay, maybe it still sounds desperate and needy, but somehow, his delivery (paired with the “Daddy” move of getting a “good hotel”) makes it come across as far more “endlessly cool” than XCX’s shameless admission, “I think you’re getting closer/‘Cause I’ve been getting nervous/I wish you’d talk, talk/Wish you’d talk, talk/Wish you’d talk, talk/Wish you’d just talk to me/Talk to me, talk to me/Are you thinking ’bout me?/I’m kind of thinking you are/I followed you to the bathroom/But then I felt crazy.” That last part, too, was based on XCX’s real-life experience at the NME Awards.

    But with Sivan at her side to lighten the “stalker-y mood” of the scenario, and Dua Lipa to deliver her occasional foreign language interjections (concluding with, “J’ai perdu mon téléphone mais tu sais quoi? Ça valait la peine parce que c’était une soirée de fou” a.k.a. “I lost my phone but you know what? It was worth it because it was a crazy night”), the tone of “Talk Talk” becomes more filled with levity on the lyrical front. What’s more, the music itself also has a more innovative sound. In truth, with additional production credits by Styalz Fuego, NOVODOR and Zhone (who build on what A. G. Cook and Hudson Mohawke did on the original), the beat transcends into something far more unique (and house music-oriented) than what’s provided on the OG “Talk Talk.”

    Thus, when Charli and Sivan seductively (and, at the same time, jubilantly) sing the refrain, “Shall we go back to my—/Talk to me in French, French, French, French/Talk-talk-talk-talk-talk-talk to me in Spanish, Spanish, Spanish, Spanish,” listeners who don’t even speak those languages might just be inclined to miraculously oblige. Even though that doesn’t mean this collaboration in any way surpasses what the two accomplished together on “1999” (but it definitely does when pitted against “2099”).  

    Genna Rivieccio

    Source link

  • Charli XCX Doing A Skims Ad Campaign Is More Crash Than Brat

    Charli XCX Doing A Skims Ad Campaign Is More Crash Than Brat

    During one of her many interviews about Brat, Charli XCX mentioned being committed to whatever “character”/“persona” she’s trying on for her album of the moment. (Though it bears mentioning that no one could ever be as committed as Marina and the Diamonds playing Electra Heart for the album of the same name back in 2012.) Admitting that, to her, this aspect of it is more interesting that the music itself. But it seems that, in capitulating to becoming a “Skims model” (a term that somehow feels and sounds derisive probably because it inherently is), she’s having a bit of whiplash in terms of recalling just who, exactly, she’s supposed to be embodying for the (brat) summer of 2024, instead reverting more freely to her Crash persona from 2022. The one that “took every advertising deal” (including, most glaringly, the one with Samsung) without the slightest bit of shame or hesitation because, hey, this was her “sellout” era. Whoring herself out for [insert company name here] and gleefully taking the money in return was, accordingly, completely “on-brand.”

    Kim Kardashian, needless to say, has been in the “whoring herself out” era ever since the days of sticking her head up Paris Hilton’s asshole and keeping it in there until she could come out with a slightly more famous face than before. Funnily enough, Kardashian herself does exemplify a brat in the more conventional sense of the word (along with the children she’s “raising”). That is, minus the part where she’s not a little girl anymore—though it’s no secret that most millennial women, particularly those in the limelight, still can’t help but act that way (see also: Paris Hilton and Lana Del Rey). And yes, what was brattier than Kim screaming, “My diamond earring!” after losing a stud reportedly worth seventy-five thousand dollars while swimming in Bora Bora circa 2011? Her melodramatic delivery and traditional brat reaction was, thus, the polar opposite of being “very demure, very mindful.”

    As is XCX choosing to pose for Skims’ cotton “underthings.” Regardless of trying to make it more “Brat coded” by having Petra Collins do the photoshoot and “tongue-in-cheekly” captioning it “#ad” (in keeping with the dry, straightforward labeling of things in the Brat world). A caption that essentially “Brat-ifies” Crash behavior. In any case, maybe some part of Kardashian (aside from the part that jumps on every bandwagon to capitalize as much as possible for both more money and clout) tapped XCX for the campaign because she saw a “kindred” in the literal meaning of “brat” as opposed to XCX’s modern twist on the concept, which essentially means being messy (e.g., wearing the same makeup for days at a time), not trying too hard and being, in effect, too cool to care.

    Thus, posing for a Skims ad, however “no frills,” feels very much the opposite of Brat. As though XCX can’t help but return, ever so slightly, to the girl she was on Crash. The unapologetic sellout that could collect the cash without judgment because that’s simply the name of the game when you’re an Ultra-Famous Pop Star. Such an unapologetic sellout could also effortlessly get into bed with Kim Kardashian and her odious Skims brand without thinking twice about it. In point of fact, Crash’s last song (on the standard edition) is called “Twice,” a track featuring the lyrics, “Don’t, don’t, don’t think twice/Don’t think about it.” Although she might have been referring to the end of the world/mortality (it was sort of like her more upbeat version of Billie Eilish’s “Everybody Dies”), in this instance, it can easily apply to the idea of not thinking twice about becoming one of Kardashian’s growing list of shills. Much to Taylor Swift’s increasing dismay, as she seems to be losing all the “cool” girls to the former Mrs. West and her flesh-toned shapewear. Even her own “good friend,” Lana Del Rey, who also blithely donned the coquette look in time for Skims’ Valentine’s Day 2024 ad campaign. Resultantly, there were rumors of a fallout between Swift and Del Rey after the latter showed up to the Met Gala with a cinched-waist-to-the-max Kardashian.

    As for Charli XCX, despite knowing she “couldn’t even be her if she tried” (a lyric from Brat’s “Sympathy is a knife,” which features some heavy allusions to Swift), the Crash album was her biggest attempt at being “that pop star bitch.” You know, the kind with Swiftian-level juggernaut powers. While, at the same time, also being her biggest troll of the music industry. The entire concept, after all, was centered on the “Faustian pact” nature of becoming a star (Maxxxine also comes to mind on that front). And, if anyone knows all about such Faustian pacts, it’s surely Kim Kardashian. So perhaps this “deal with the devil” connection also played a role in XCX’s “attraction” to the “girl with no talent.”

    Or maybe XCX simply wanted to look “hot in it” (to quote one of her songs), donning a see-through white cotton bra that miraculously shows no sign of any nipples (let alone hard ones) and matching white cotton boxers while flashing what has become her signature “dead-eyed” look. Though one has to wonder if that expression is “ironic” anymore, so much as a sign that she played the part of Crash corporate sellout for so long that it’s now bled into the Brat era. XCX even had the audacity to declare, “SKIMS empowers people to feel confident in their own skin, which is the essence of Brat. I am excited to be working with a brand that understands that comfort and style don’t need to be compromised.” Aside from Charli sounding like a marketing robot/recently converted cult member, it has to be said that what obviously does need to be compromised, at this juncture, in order to be “brat” is artistic integrity.

    After Crash came out, XCX declared, “I needed to switch after Crash—I wasn’t born to do radio liners. That’s not who I am at all.” But if Brat is (or was) meant to be something of its polar opposite/a return to her “fringe club days,” an ad with Skims certainly doesn’t align with that narrative. But, then again, perhaps the corporate-ification of Brat (complete with Kamala Harris joining in on the meme trend for her presidential campaign) is causing a rightfully schizophrenic reaction on Charli’s part.

    Genna Rivieccio

    Source link

  • The ultimate guide to the Brat summer in Phoenix

    The ultimate guide to the Brat summer in Phoenix

    On June 7, English pop artist Charli XCX released her sixth studio album, “Brat.” Immediately recognizable by its lime-green backdrop and simple sans-serif inscription, it’s since become a pop culture phenomenon, making its way to worldwide charts, trending TikTok audios and dances and even endorsement by the Kamala Harris campaign, which has incorporated the Brat aesthetic in multiple social media campaigns. What it means to be Brat
    While the concept of Brat is loose and meant to be one defined on a personal basis, Charli XCX told BBC that Brat is a concept that represents a person who might have “a pack of cigs, a Bic lighter and a strappy white top with no bra.”…

    Shi Bradley

    Source link

  • ‘Guess’ The Charli xcx And Billie Eilish Song Equivalents Of These Iconic Pop Culture Bras 

    ‘Guess’ The Charli xcx And Billie Eilish Song Equivalents Of These Iconic Pop Culture Bras 

    Three million, not just the rolling hits of growing viewers that have phoned up Charli xcx at the familiar hunting ground of the ‘360’ music video, laced with It girls and sprawling dark grey walls. But also, the number of flinging bras sprung into a girl power mountain (false, it was 10,000 per Charli’s tweet, but c’mon, it’s a lot). One that takes silkily murmured Billie Eilish—of which, this is her first feature with another artist ever— to whiz through on the upgrade of her vehicle collection: a bulldozer! Toss in a couple of cheeky, pick-up lyrics, “Charli likes boys, but she knows I’d hit it,” another callback to ‘360’ through a visual description of the single cover and a whole lot of fun. And the girls are serving up the ‘Guess’ remix produced by The Dare in a tiny bow.

    What’s also cool about their flirtatious team-up is that the undergarments seen in the music video are all being donated to I Support The Girls. It started up in neither Bra City nor Tokoyo, a fondness by Charli that Billie picked up. In this case, we wouldn’t mind that luxury souvenir either. But a basement in Maryland, ISTG. The charity looks to support women and girls experiencing homelessness, domestic violence, and other ill-fitting scenarios. Now, they’re not just in the States but also have affiliates around the globe, making a significant impact!

    A Bra Feature

    We’ve decided to have an iconic battle-off between Charli and Billie vs. bras in pop culture. Playing true to the selected tune for the techno-spliced neon lights club mix, we’re getting you to ‘Guess’ the song from either artist that goes with the bra. We’ll give you some facts about the unmentionables. Then, by using the toggle, you can either throw a spicy garment in your online cart to get it right or have to clean it out for getting it wrong. 

    Madonna’s Cone Bra

    A spectacle of pink and ring-tight curls, Madonna’s Blond Ambition tour was one of her most expensive—the stage featuring Catholic stained glass murals and dozens of flaming candles came to $2 million—and deliciously stylish. A lush pink conical bra was underneath a pinstripe blazer. It was crafted by Jean Paul Gaultier, who was designated as the head costume designer. Until now, corsets were known primarily in the coquette world as soft against luscious curves. This garment was gender-forming, tucked over the top of trousers. It has since shaped what other performers wear, dabbling into the sexiness we see in various cuts and fabrics today. 

    Of course, it’s ‘LUNCH,’ the main course of Billie’s HIT ME HARD AND SOFT era. With a wicked synth and a surrounding baseline, Billie appears in her usual oversized sports jerseys and chunky jewelry, providing that masculine touch while juxtaposed with feminine seduction, dangling cherries, and impish lyrics. The combination of the two sparks the androgynous fashion in Madonna’s conical bra. 

    Mean Girl’s Bra

    The mention of Mean Girls’ ring leader, Regina George, serves up the biggest clue. Everyone remembers joining the rank of spokesperson upon flipping through our own wardrobe and cutting out an old tank top come Halloween 2004. Then, the resurgence after Reneé Rapp not only crossed out Broadway iteration but also film musicals. Anyway, in a hilariously savage skit done by Cady Heron, Regina turns the snip in her favor by strutting out of the changing rooms in seeable purple nips. 

    Duh, our numbered track title goes to Charli’s ‘360.’ Everyone and their cool mom know Regina would’ve joined the other Internet It girls in the music video! 

    Little Mermaid’s Seashells

    You never wanted something to be more ‘Part Of Your World’ than Ariel’s purple shell bra. Interestingly, in the Hans Christian Andersen iteration, she was nude or clothed in sea foam. Since the audience is children, Disney decided to go with something a bit more modest. 

    Ariel’s quest to find her voice (literally through breaking the shell around Ursula’s neck and figuratively by discovering freedom in becoming a human) is quite similar to Billie’s identity questioning sprawlings on ‘What Was I Made For?’ Made for Margot Robbie’s Barbie, Billie relates to the character upon seeing shrunk replicas of her various getups throughout the years. 

    How many bras did you rack up in your online cart? We’ll excuse you if you restart at various times to have it at its brim. Donating your winning collection to I Support The Girls would be even more cute! You can also stream BRAT and rave about the remix on our various social media platforms, Twitter, Instagram, and Facebook. Hence, others are not only entertained by these upcoming receivers of the Grammy’s Best Pop Duo/Group Performance bracket but also gain familiarity with the charity. 

    TO LEARN MORE ABOUT CHARLI XCX:
    FACEBOOK | INSTAGRAM | TWITTER | YOUTUBE

    TO LEARN MORE ABOUT BILLIE EILISH:
    FACEBOOK | INSTAGRAM | TIKTOK | TWITTER | WEBSITE | YOUTUBE

    Rachel Finucane

    Source link

  • A Panty-Dropping, Project X Affair: Charli XCX and Billie Eilish’s “Guess” Video

    A Panty-Dropping, Project X Affair: Charli XCX and Billie Eilish’s “Guess” Video

    When Charli first, er, teased the album artwork for the “Guess” remix featuring Billie Eilish, she dared her fans to, that’s right, guess who it was joining her on the cover for this revamped edition. Despite the retroactive dead giveaway that it was Billie Eilish (you know, the butch, 90s boy aesthetic), perhaps no one, in their wildest fantasies, could have imagined that such an iconic collaboration would come on the heels of Charli working with Lorde on the “Girl, so confusing” remix. And, like Lorde, Eilish has plenty to offer when it comes to contributing a new verse to this track. One that is on-brand for the sex-drenched nature of the song.

    Funnily enough, it seems to have taken a millennial to help Gen Z remember that life doesn’t have to be sexless. It can be raunchy, promiscuous and, yes, even panty-dropping. In short, it can recapture all the key visuals of Project X. And if Charli and Billie comprised the collaboration people had only dreamed about, it would be in keeping with the premise of that movie, with its tagline: “The party you’ve only dreamed about.” This is the effect Charli is going for in the Aidan Zamiri-directed video for “Guess,” which also seems to recreate the garbage-filled aesthetic of the Atacama Desert in Chile, where fast fashion goes to die, creating massive piles within the landfill. It’s a similar pile that Charli and Billie mount toward the middle of the video, only to roll back down it with glee as they meet one another at the bottom in a shot that positions them lying side by side as though they just banged (metaphorically, they kind of have).

    To that end, perhaps Charli has learned her lesson (somewhat) about promoting environment-destroying behavior (hear: any of her songs that serve as love letters to driving) by including a disclaimer at the end of the video that reads, “All unworn garments will be donated to survivors of domestic violence through I Support the Girls.” Of course, all the “garments” in question are lingerie-related, which is a bit of an odd donation to make to victims of domestic abuse, but anyway

    Zamiri, who also photographed Eilish for her Rolling Stone cover earlier this year, opens the video on a close-up of Charli’s sunglasses-covered face (the ultimate symbol of her Brat era) as she asks, “Billie, you there?” The answer to that question is: not just yet. Billie’s big entrance will be made once the party is already well underway. A party that takes place in a more 90s-ified version of the apartment style Charli showed us in the “Baby” video. After the close-up on her face, she introduces herself by cuntily walking across the trash-filled carpet. The timeline of whether the party already happened or is about to happen or she’s simply having another one without cleaning up from the night before isn’t important. What is, however, is the fact that Project X has so obviously remained a tried-and-true inspiration for XCX’s work. It was back in 2020 that she declared, “I think I’ve officially decided that Project X is my favorite movie of all time.” No matter how retrospectively uncomfortable the R. Kelly mention gets. And while others might see the 2012 high school comedy as “nothing special,” it makes sense that XCX would continue to idealize it. After all, she’s a big believer in party alchemy. The “power of the party,” as it were.

    Case in point, back in 2019, when she did an interview for Nowness, Charli said, “I’m very inspired by parties. Lots of emotional things happen at parties, like, maybe you fall in love with someone, or you, like, spend a really amazing night with your friends, or you break up with someone. It’s, like, there’s a lot of emotions that go on at parties…” Hence, her attachment to them as more than something that’s merely “frivolous.” It’s a microcosm, a hotbed of unmitigated feelings (mainly thanks to las drogas). And the primary ones at this “Guess” party are, in two words, “let’s fuck.” The writhing, gyrating and general “every guy, grab a girl” vibe is practically a constant of the narrative.

    In promoting this concept, Charli also proves that, theoretically, the “clean girl aesthetic” is over and that, accordingly, it’s “safe” to promote the messy lifestyle that goes hand in hand with drinking and drugging yet again (not that Charli ever really ceased doing that). Hence, the constant flash to partygoers smoking (actual cigarettes, none of this vape bullshit) and drinking throughout “Guess.”

    Indeed, it can be argued that the last time partying in this manner was so acceptable was, in fact, back in 2012, when Project X was released. It was also the year of Kesha’s sophomore album, Warrior, which continued the “grimy girl” motif of her debut, Animal. Her vehement “party or die” (or “party and die,” depending on the person) mantra endured with a song like “Die Young,” during which Kesha declared, “Let’s make the most of the night like we’re gonna die young/Young hearts, out our minds/Runnin’ till we outta time/Wild childs, lookin’ good/Livin’ hard just like we should/Don’t care who’s watching when we tearing it up (you know)/That magic that we got nobody can touch.” This is the sentiment that permeates the “Guess” video, even if the lyrics themselves are far less wholesome, and much more in keeping with the gratuitously salacious tone of Charli’s other film favorite, Spring Breakers (though Camila Cabello tried her best to co-opt that “mood board” for C,XOXO).

    This includes Eilish’s sexually-charged verse, “Don’t have to guess the color of your underwear/Already know what you’ve got goin’ on down there/It’s that lacy black pair with the little bows/The ones I picked out for you in Tokyo/I saw them when you sat down, they were peekin’ out/I’m gonna tell you right now, they’re all I’m thinkin’ about.” She delivers these lines after literally crashing the party in a bulldozer (it kind of reminds one of the way the party in Weird Science was crashed by the mutant bikers, riding right through the walls/glass doors to get in).

    Charli eventually leaves the party with Billie (perhaps taking the latter up on her offer, “Charli likes boys, but she knows I’d hit it/Charli, call me if you’re with it”), riding on the side of the bulldozer/tractor as she bounces in a similar way to how she did in the video for “360” while pouring a glass of wine. Zamiri then rapidly intercuts scenes between the original party and the two-woman rager that Charli and Billie have continued together outside in the “wilds” of a concrete jungle somewhere in L.A. (for both singers favor that city, like anyone with consummate taste).

    To conclude the even more sexed-up remix, the duo goads, “You wanna guess the address of the party we’re at (you really are not invited)/You wanna guess if we’re serious about this song.” That last line smacks of Justin Timberlake assuring at the end of “Rock Your Body,” “Gonna have you naked by the end of this song.” And sure, while he might be permanently “cancelled,” there’s no denying XCX was influenced by NSYNC, de facto Timberlake, at some point in the late 90s/early 00s.

    As for boasting about the “hoi polloi” not being invited to the party, not only is it typical Brat behavior, it’s also in keeping with the necessary exclusivity of celebrities like XCX and Eilish, who have both dealt with their fair share of creepy civilian behavior. So one supposes that’s why the party of Project X was patently more epic in scope and aftermath—it didn’t discriminate about the guest list.

    Genna Rivieccio

    Source link

  • The Week of Laying to Rest a Feud Remixes: “The Boy Is Mine” and “Girl, so confusing”

    The Week of Laying to Rest a Feud Remixes: “The Boy Is Mine” and “Girl, so confusing”

    In what is perhaps a “sign o’ the times” for the world of pop, the week in music has offered an overarching theme that centers on “laying to rest feuds.” Or, as Junior LaBeija would put it, “Category is: ‘laying to rest feuds.’” Ariana Grande and Charli XCX are weirdly in sync about this topic, for both pop stars have seen fit to put out remixes that are decidedly “bury the hatchet”-chic. In Grande’s case, the “burial” comes in the form of a remix of her latest single, “the boy is mine,” and in Charli’s, it’s another arbitrary remix (like “360” featuring Robyn and Yung Lean) from Brat: “Girl, so confusing.” The latter features Lorde, one of the public figures that Charli was speculated to be singing about on the track (the other was MARINA). 

    Indeed, Brat is an album all about trying to tame the green-eyed monster (hence Charli coming up with the shade that will henceforth be called “Brat green”)…or at least subdue it slightly into submission. And even Taylor Swift appears to be a source of inspiration for Charli’s insecurity flare-ups, as evidenced by another song on the record, “Sympathy is a knife.” On this particular track, XCX confesses, “I don’t wanna share the space/I don’t wanna force a smile/This one girl taps my insecurities/Don’t know if it’s real or if I’m spiraling.” Or if the media is a key force in fueling these types of anxieties. After all, Brandy and Monica represented one of the earliest modern examples (following Madonna and Cyndi Lauper—though there wasn’t ultimately much of a comparison there) of how various outlets relish reporting on so-called rivalries between two “similar” female artists. In the wake of Brandy and Monica, there would be Britney Spears and Christina Aguilera, Jennifer Lopez and Mariah Carey (though that’s still a pretty real feud…for Mariah), Lily Allen and Amy Winehouse, Taylor Swift and Katy Perry (fueled by Taylor herself), Olivia Rodrigo and Sabrina Carpenter—and many others in between. Including, of course, Charli XCX and Lorde. 

    While the two have never shared an outright feud in the same way as Brandy and Monica, who were more openly pitted against one another during a time when there was hardly as much space for Black female musicians to thrive (not that there’s all that much now either), there was always a little bit of resentment there. More openly on Charli’s part perhaps…particularly as she was the one who had to deal with being mistaken for Lorde during the Pure Heroine era despite having been in the music game long before the New Zealander traipsed into town (so to speak) with the automatic hit that was 2013’s “Royals.” So it is that Charli pulls no punches when she admits on the song, “Yeah, I don’t know if you like me/Sometimes I think you might hate me/Sometimes I think I might hate you/Maybe you just wanna be me/You always say, ‘Let’s go out’/So we go eat at a restaurant/Sometimes it feels a bit awkward/‘Cause we don’t have much in common.” Save for the crippling sense of self-doubt that even the most successful of women can’t seem to shake. 

    In the revamped version of the song, Lorde responds to these specific lyrics with, “You’d always say, ‘Let’s go out’/But then I’d cancel last minute/I was so lost in my head/And scared to be in your pictures/‘Cause for the last couple years I’ve been at war in my body/I tried to starve myself thinner/And then I gained all the weight back/I was trapped in the hatred/And your life seemed so awesome/I never thought for a second/My voice was in your head.”

    This deeply personal addition to the song layers it with the exact message Charli was talking about when she told The Guardian, “Relationships between women are super-complex… You can like someone and dislike them at the same time; you can have the best time of your life on a night out with someone but not be that close to them at all.” Lorde has fallen into the former category for XCX, mainly as a result of the Brat green-eyed monster affecting her feelings toward the fellow acclaimed singer. Ironically enough, though, in the same interview, Charli insists that female rivalry in the entertainment industry has died down compared to previous decades, remarking, “We’ve got past the point of the media always pitting women against one another. In the mid to late 00s, it literally sold magazines and papers: ‘Britney versus Christina,’ ‘Paris versus Lindsay.’ Then feminism became a popular marketing tool. In the music industry, it was distilled into this idea that if you support women, and you like other women, then you’re a good feminist. The reverse of that is, if you don’t like all other women who exist and breathe on this Earth then you’re a bad feminist. If you’re not a girl’s girl then you’re a bad woman.” And, speaking of that phrase, “girl’s girl,” it was weaponized against Ariana Grande in the aftermath of her “homewrecker” scandal. Specifically, when Ethan Slater’s ex-wife, Lilly Jay, called out Grande for not being a “girl’s girl.” Because “girl’s girls” don’t allow themselves to fall into the trap of being “the other woman.” They instead choose to “walk away”—or simply get the dude in question to actually leave his wife.

    Maybe that’s why Grande is quite deliberate in having Monica tout the line, “Well, he better sort out his business, ‘cause I’ll never be nobody’s mistress.” A lyric that also shows how far Brandy and Monica have come since their teen years when they were singing this song. This declaration is also one that “absolves” Grande of being a homewrecker in the rawer sense of the word. Instead, she falls more into the category of the scenario described by Olivia Rodrigo on “traitor” when ripping into the bloke that left her, “It took you two weeks/To go off and date her/Guess you didn’t cheat/But you’re still a traitor.”

    This sense of feeling stabbed in the back by the woman who “took” her man (in lieu of blaming the man himself for his shady actions) only adding to the overall sense of competitiveness between women. Rightfully convinced of the scarcity of men to “possess” (that is, in terms of the somewhat straight ones who are non-bald and non-short…Grande didn’t quite care about the latter description when it came to pursuing Slater). So on the one hand, there is this remix that addresses a common trope for why women feud—because of a guy—and on the other there’s Charli and Lorde’s remix that addresses another all-too-familiar trope: women being jealous of each other’s looks and success—even their “aura.” But both tropes, more often than not, relate to competing for a man because “being better” is how they’re able to catch and hold his attention. Because, yes, unfortunately, much of what women do is still latently rooted in attracting the male gaze. Worse still, male approval. 

    At the same time, women are just as concerned with gaining the favor of other women. As Charli was when she had to deal with the public shaming from MARINA in 2016 after the “that FROOT looks familiar” debacle. Which is what makes it so momentous that MARINA was actually moved enough by the “Girl, so confusing” remix to publicly comment (yet again), “THIS IS BEAUTIFUL. Just cried listening to it. It’s so courageous and human to make work about this topic and it’s so healing to listen to it. Congratulations on an iconic album @charlixcx.” And yes, she was probably just glad to learn that Charli didn’t end up admitting the song was about her instead of Lorde. Though both Lorde and MARINA can be accused of having “the same hair” as Charli at one point or another… 

    Signs of Lorde’s involvement with the record were already noticeable when she declared on social media, “The only album I’ve ever pre-saved is out today… Charli just cooked this one different. So much grit, grace & skin in the game. I speak for all of us when I say it’s an honor to be moved, changed and gagged by her work. There is NO ONE like this bitch.” That statement feels like a retroactive “Easter egg” about the lyrical contributions she would provide for this particular song. 

    As for Brandy and Monica, their feud might be laid to rest in their personal lives, but for the sake of the song, they can still bring the catty, possessive vibe necessary for a theme of this nature, presently singing, “How could you still be so disillusioned after all of this time, time?/I told you once before, I’ll tell you once more, the boy is still mine, mine.” In his mind, of course, he’s both of theirs, thinks there’s “plenty” of him to go around. And such casual, cavalier thinking on many a man’s part is what helps keep stoking the fires of female competitiveness. Also manifest in Charli allegedly referring to Taylor Swift on “Sympathy is a knife” when she laments, “‘Cause I couldn’t even be her if I tried/I’m opposite, I’m on the other side/I feel all these feelings I can’t control/Oh no, don’t know why…/Why I wanna buy a gun?/Why I wanna shoot myself?/Volatilе at war with my dialogue.” 

    Perhaps the only way to mitigate some of that negative dialogue is by hashing it out with the other woman in question. The one who’s causing all this envy—yet who might actually be envious as well. For no woman, no matter how seemingly self-confident, is immune to the trap of low self-esteem/self-regard that tends to be a more pervasive affliction among this particular gender.

    Genna Rivieccio

    Source link

  • Girl, so confusing (To Some) That Charli XCX and Lorde Have Joined Forces

    Girl, so confusing (To Some) That Charli XCX and Lorde Have Joined Forces

    While some may be convinced that a Lorde-featuring remix of “Girl, so confusing” is just a red herring to distract from the fact that it’s still ultimately referring to MARINA (#thatfrootlooksfamiliar), Charli XCX seems to want to put fan theories about a feud between her and the other big-haired singer to rest. It actually appears to be a week of “laying to rest feud” songs, with Ariana Grande also achieving the impossible and getting Brandy and Monica to come together on her own remix of “the boy is mine.” But with Charli and Lorde, the signs of the “feud” were subtler, even though they arose from the same place: women feeling jealous of one another’s success thanks to the assumption that there isn’t “enough room” for “everyone” (read: just women) in the entertainment industry. Even though Britney Spears, angel that she is (or at least that’s how Spring Breakers bills her), did once declare, “There’s room for all of us” at one of the many press conferences of her early career. 

    If only that were true. Alas, in the present landscape, the competition between women in music has only seemed to become more fierce as they vie for the ever-diminishing attention spans of listeners who can barely focus on a song that’s longer than two minutes, let alone multiple artists that keep cropping up like a game of whack-a-mole. That Lorde herself “cropped up” in 2013 was a bit of a bane for Charli XCX. For this similar-looking girl (a.k.a. they both had dark, curly, big hair) came along right before XCX was finally about to break through ever so slightly into the mainstream with 2014’s “Boom Clap.” And since people apparently can’t differentiate women who have the same hair color (see also: Lady Gaga dyeing her hair blonde early in her career to avoid being confused with Amy Winehouse), it was going to be a problem. So much that she was actually mistaken for Lorde during a now illustrious TV interview. Rather than correcting the interviewer (a fellow female, to boot), however, Charli decided to just run with it.

    Two years prior to 2014, her name was becoming more prominent thanks to her feature on Icona Pop’s “I Love It,” but it wasn’t her own solo effort. “Boom Clap” would mark her full-on breakthrough on the charts, but only after she was featured on yet another hit that same year: Iggy Azalea’s “Fancy.” Alas, in Charli’s mind, a lot of that success was mitigated by how easy it seemed for Lorde to get “all the flowers” right away. Whereas Charli had already been around since 2008, creating her version of Lana Del Ray a.k.a. Lizzy Grant in the form of an unreleased album called 14 (technically before Adele thought to start naming her own records after her age, as Charli was recording some of these tracks as early as 2006). 

    It was in the booklet of said album, distributed to a very select few, that Charli wrote, “The songs I write are about my mates and experiences.” Not much has really changed on that front, with the entire Brat album being a reflection of those two preferred topics. Except that Lorde falls somewhere in between. Not necessarily a full-on “mate” (though maybe more of an “experience”), Lorde has been, at the very least, something of a “driving force” in XCX’s professional life, with the latter at one point commenting, “When ‘Royals’ came out, I was super jealous of the success that that song got, and that Ella got. You piece all this stuff together in your brain, like: ‘She was into my music. She had big hair; I had big hair. She wore black lipstick; I once wore black lipstick.’ You create these parallels and think, ‘Well, that could have been me.’” 

    Instead, Charli was destined to take a much more circuitous path toward becoming a respected, applauded pop star of her own kind. Nonetheless, “Girl, so confusing” sets out to address many of those early insecurities that have lingered on even after XCX’s irrefutable success. But it’s been hard-won in comparison to Lorde’s, a singer who was instantaneously embraced and praised for her brilliance. Deemed a musical prodigy (like Charli, Lorde also has the benefit of synesthesia to help her compose songs) from the outset, it’s easy to understand why XCX would home in on Lorde as a source of envy. That XCX’s debut album, True Romance, was released five months before Lorde’s in 2013 also set a competitive precedent in that, technically, the two were “launched” the same year. To add insult to Charli’s injury, Lorde was also garnering more praise and sales at an even younger age than Charli (the two are four years apart). 

    The difference in their paths, personalities and general “vibes” couldn’t have been more apparent than in the only photos of the two of them together that exist (apart from that rando snap of them with Carly Rae Jepsen)—taken at the 2014 VMAs. In one of them, Charli holds up two peace signs while sticking her tongue out in typical bombastic Leo fashion while Lorde, ever-staid, cool, calm and collected (such a Scorpio), stands next to her with a close-mouthed half-smile. Her aura of disinterested ennui being something that Charli only managed to cultivate much later, having perfected it in the Crash era. 

    In the meantime, Lorde’s own lack of confidence seems to have shined through more openly in recent years—and perhaps most openly of all in the lengthy verse she contributes to the “Girl, so confusing” remix (marking her second release of the year after a cover of “Take Me to the River” for Everyone’s Getting Involved: A Tribute to Talking Heads’ Stop Making Sense). For there is a portion where she gets extremely candid about her body image issues via the lines, “You’d always say, ‘Let’s go out’/But then I’d cancel last minute/I was so lost in my head/And scared to be in your pictures/‘Cause for the last couple years/I’ve been at war with my body/I tried to starve myself thinner/And then I gained all the weight back.”

    Considering that women in the public eye are deemed “fair game” for the media on all matters body critical, it’s no wonder Lorde would be paranoid about having her photo taken in a state of anything less than “perfection” (by warped societal standards). Knowing full well it could be dissected and analyzed for all of eternity on the internet. XCX knows all about this heightened fear too, commenting on her own struggles with body dysmorphia on “Rewind” as she admits, “Nowadays, I only eat at the good restaurants/But, honestly, I’m always thinking ’bout my weight.” 

    The power in joining together—especially in the wake of so much speculation as to whether or not they had “beef” (though, again, it’s nothing compared to the speculation about XCX and MARINA’s beef)—comes at a time when patriarchal forces still seek to keep women pitted against one another. Some recent examples include Olivia Rodrigo and Sabrina Carpenter (which spawned the latter’s “because i like a boy”), or Olivia Rodrigo and Taylor Swift (surprisingly, though, not Olivia Rodrigo and Billie Eilish), or Taylor Swift and Charli herself, or Taylor Swift and Billie Eilish—or, shit, Taylor Swift and every other female artist. Thus, for two women in the music business to team up like this does not go unnoticed. Nor does its powerful message. 

    Lorde’s candor about female competitiveness only adds to the remix’s power as she sings, “I was trapped in the hatred/And your life seemed so awesome/I never thought for a second/My voice was in your head/‘Girl, you walk like a bitch’/When I was ten, someone said that/And it’s just self-defense/Until you’re building a weapon.” In other words, protecting yourself, as a woman, can end up turning dangerous for other women who are just as insecure. Take, for example, Lily Allen stating of her early twenties propensity to openly criticize other women (including the fellow singer she was pitted against at the time, Amy Winehouse) that she was extremely dissatisfied with her own self during this period (Paris Hilton would make a similar assessment of her rampant racist and homophobic comments in the 00s). 

    Putting forth a “tough as nails” facade, women convince both genders that they’re impervious to what anyone thinks when, in fact, they’re crumpling over in fear of others’ opinions on the inside. Thus, Lorde adds to her verse, “She believed my projection/And now I totally get it/Forgot that inside the icon/There’s still a young girl from Essex.” In short, even Lorde can forget, thanks to her own deft ability to project a false persona and confidence, that Charli has probably been doing the same. That she’s still, in spite of the steely exterior, that unformed rave scene girl at heart.

    The two singers eventually join one another to sing a version of the chorus that goes, “People say we’re alike/They say we’ve got the same hair/It’s you and me on the coin/The industry loves to spend/And when we put this to bed/The internet will go crazy/I’m glad I know how you feel.” It’s after this line that Lorde goes back to singing solo so she can say, once and for all: “‘Cause I ride for you, Charli.” Only during the outro can Charli finally return the sentiment with the declaration, “You know I ride for you too.” It only took about ten years to get to that point, but hey, some feuds between women never end at all (here’s looking at you, Bette and Joan).

    And yet, XCX still leaves the feud potentially open for further fodder when the song concludes with: “It’s so confusing-ing” (which plays in the same pitch as Grimes). Perhaps confusing enough to make Charli and Lorde fall into old competitive habits once more. Though hopefully it’s nothing but “love you, mean its” and musical collabs from here on out. Because the two do pair (un)surprisingly well together.

    Genna Rivieccio

    Source link

  • “360” Featuring Robyn and Yung Lean Continues to Showcase Charli XCX’s Commitment to the Art of the Remix

    “360” Featuring Robyn and Yung Lean Continues to Showcase Charli XCX’s Commitment to the Art of the Remix

    A collaboration between Charli XCX and Robyn and Charli XCX and Yung Lean, respectively, has seemed like a long time coming. That said, perhaps Charli XCX saw fit to kill two birds with one stone by offering a remix of “360” that features both artists on it. Charli’s nods to Robyn have been steadfast in recent years, showing her love (song allusion intended) most recently by sampling “Cobrastyle” (from Robyn’s 2005 self-titled album) for “Speed Drive” on the Barbie Soundtrack

    As for her connection to Yung Lean, it should be fairly obvious that the two share certain similar “Tumblrcore” sensibilities. Put these three together in the blender that is the “360” remix and the result is actually more disjointed than one would expect. Yet, somehow, it works. And maybe part of the discordant cohesion stems from both Robyn and Yung Lean being Swedes. After all, it’s no secret that solid gold pop/dance music just naturally courses through the veins of the Swedish. So no wonder Yung Lean flexes, “We put this shit together so carelessly.” While other musicians might not want to make that assertion based on how it might open their song up to more than just light criticism for being “sloppy,” here the braggadocio works in favor of the song’s overall “charmingly arrogant” aura. 

    Besides, if anyone can back up the right to be arrogant about their music, it’s Robyn. Which is exactly why she self-referentially touts, “​​Killin’ this shit since 1994/Got everybody in the club dancing on their own.” Charli, too, has been in the music game long enough to have earned some of her bratty hauteur, which commences in the very first line of the remix with, “They-they-they all wanna sound like me.” And yes, based on the recent shade thrown at Camila Cabello for effectively imitating Charli’s “hyperpop” sound for her C,XOXO “era,” it would seem the internet is well-aware of XCX’s influence and saturation into the mainstream that once kept her boxed out (that is, until she decided to do a parody of being mainstream with Crash). At the very least, though, Camila seems to know better than to release C,XOXO before Brat, with the former coming out three weeks after the latter. 

    Not that it would faze Charli either way, whose confidence level reaches another peak in “360” when she sings, “Me and Lean and Robyn, we don’t even have to practice/We got many hits, get you feeling nostalgic.” To be sure, Charli hits like “Boom Clap,” “I Love It, “Fancy” and “1999” (the most nostalgic of all) always get the crowds in a frenzy. Needless to say, if Robyn and/or Yung Lean ever did join her onstage for the version of “360,” it would cause all-out mayhem in the audience. Even more than if Addison Rae decided to cameo for the remix version of “Von Dutch.” Both remixes, by the way, are made to sound like altogether entirely different songs (with “360” remaining faithful only to the original backing music). 

    While remixes of the past might have only added in an extra verse from the new person appearing on it (e.g., the Left Eye version of “No Scrubs” [which should have been the “normal” version to begin with] or Ariana Grande’s ill-advised decision to include Mariah Carey on the remix for “yes, and?”), Charli has set a gold-standard precedent for making entirely new tracks through her remixes (hear also: “Welcome to My Island”). While others might be content to provide a few barely noticeable tweaks, Charli treats the remix with the same reverence that Madonna’s remixers usually do (including the likes of William Orbit, Victor Calderone, Tracy Young, Stuart Price, Junior Vasquez, Paul Oakenfold, etc.). And that is the mark of someone who truly cares about dance music. 

    Not that there was ever any doubt in the minds of Charli fans that she wasn’t hopelessly devoted to the genre. A genre she single-handedly helped reinvent at the dawn of the 2010s and continues to perfect as the 2020s forge ahead, filled with plenty of events that would make it otherwise difficult to even conceive of dancing without a bit of encouragement to do so from her music. 

    Genna Rivieccio

    Source link

  • An Ode to It Girls and Sociopathy: Charli XCX’s “360”

    An Ode to It Girls and Sociopathy: Charli XCX’s “360”

    In Madonna’s seminal 1990 hit, “Vogue,” she talks about how Rita Hayworth “gave good face.” That’s at least eighty percent of the “job” description of being an it girl (or “internet girl,” the apparent updated version of that term). The other twenty percent seems to be a mixture of wearing over-the-top couture and being photographed at all the right parties. As a self-appointed party girl/internet obsession, Charli XCX knows all about combining the analog and digital elements of what it means to be “it.” And she pays homage to that at the beginning of her latest video, “360” (yet another single that will appear on Brat).

    Directed by ​​Aidan Zamiri, the scene opens on Charli walking down a hallway as she texts back and forth with fellow it girl Gabbriette, who chastises her for being (five hours) late to a place called Skyferrori’s (is that supposed to be a Sky Ferreira reference?) Trattoria. Traipsing into the restaurant, she’s met with the eyes of Rachel Sennott (who technically “collaborated” with Charli on Bottoms) and Chloe Cherry. It’s Rachel who tells her she can’t sing her song just yet, with Gabriette further explaining, “We have to fulfill the prophecy of finding a new, hot internet girl. That’s literally why we’re at dinner.” A little expository, but sure. Chloe Cherry then adds, “Or else our kind will cease to exist…forever.” Annoyed, Charli tries to speed up the process by suggesting, “What about…her?” as she points to the girl at the end of the table—who happens to be Julia Fox. Obviously, that’s a no go as it girls who are already it girls can’t be chosen. Charli then lands on the waitress (if that word is still permissible) and the others at the table aren’t opposed to it. 

    “What do you guys need me to do?” she asks gamely, even if nervously. Fox explains, “See, you actually need to have this, like, je ne sais quoi.” Charli affirms, “Yeah it’s, like, definitely a je ne sais quoi kind of situation.” In other words, no one wants to admit that it’s pure luck and, often, a little bit of nepo baby clout (as Paris Hilton knows from her late 90s/early 00s it girl days). Or, as Gabbriette describes it, “I would say it’s about being really hot in, like, a scary way.” Fox approves vehemently of that definition. With that “sorted,” Charli declares, “I’m gonna do my song now.” So it is that the A. G. Cook-produced notes begin and Charli delivers the manifesto, “I went my own way and I made it/I’m your favorite reference, baby/Call me Gabbriette, you’re so inspired/Ah, ah I’m tectonic, moves, I make ’em/Shock you like defibrillators/No style, I can’t relate.” Just as Sabrina Carpenter can’t relate to “desperation.” She, too, is something of an it girl at this moment, and her song, “espresso,” exudes the same kind of sociopathy that Charli and co. champion in “360.” Complete with the first proper visual from it outside of the “holding court” restaurant setting being Charli atop an elderly man on a gurney in a hospital. 

    Mounting him with her legs spread apart so that his midsection is between her thighs, other it girls soon gather around her (with Gabbriette blowing cigarette smoke right in his face) in between scenes of Charli in the gym jiggling about with a glass of red wine in hand as Sennott and Fox stand on either side of her (the former texting on her phone and the latter vaping while disinterestedly lifting a dumbbell). 

    In another cut back to the restaurant setting, Charli struts toward the table and gets on top of it so she can walk it like a runway. When she runs out of table, the waiters in the restaurant quickly scramble to provide her with more (a maneuver that smacks of this particular 1990 performance) so that she never has to worry about falling or looking foolish for not being able to continue her strut. Not that she ever would worry—because worry is a sentiment that is entirely out of the it girl’s vocabulary. She knows everything she wants will fall right into her lap not just because she’s “hot,” but because it always has before. For anything else to occur would signal some kind of cataclysm in the universe…at least in the it girl’s internet-speak-fueled mind. And when Charli wants to keep walking once the room itself ends, a waiter knocks out the wall for her so that she can. It’s just, like, the rules of what “little people” are expected to do for beautiful and rich ones. 

    The knocked-out wall leads into a room where an ordinary family sits on the couch as the likes of Richie Shazam (in a cone bra corset) and Chloe Cherry pose in the background while Charli keeps singing her song, declaring, “That city sewer slut’s the vibe/Internationally recognized/I set the tone, it’s my design/And it’s stuck in your mind/Legacy is undebated/You gon’ jump if A. G. made it/If you love it, if you hate it/I don’t fucking care what you think.” Ah, that old chestnut that only sounds authentic when Joan Jett says it via the chorus, “I don’t give a damn ‘bout my bad reputation.” 

    Charli continues to cement her own “bad reputation” as she stands before a pair of crashed cars (she is, after all, the creator of an album called Crash) in the middle of an L.A. street where who should eventually appear but none other than L.A.’s number one hater, Chloe Sevigny. A woman that some might call the original it girl if they’re not aware of Edie Sedgwick’s existence before hers (and yes, it’s almost surprising that Edie wasn’t AI-generated at some point within the context of this video—but maybe Charli decided to limit her poor taste to gyrating atop a hospitalized old man). 

    Charli and Chloe then strut down the road together as a random dumpster on fire shows up in the background. Joining their fellow it girls up ahead, the nine women stand together and throw various poses for a nonexistent camera as the fire keeps raging behind them. Perhaps an ultimate metaphor for the fact that, no matter what kind of chaos or tragedy is happening in the world, you can always count on an it girl’s vanity to totally ignore or disregard it. What’s eternally most important is how fierce she looks.

    Genna Rivieccio

    Source link

  • The “Toxic” Video for a New, Less Glamorous Era: Charli XCX’s “Von Dutch”

    The “Toxic” Video for a New, Less Glamorous Era: Charli XCX’s “Von Dutch”

    Although Charli XCX’s first album, True Romance, wasn’t released until 2013, she has always exuded the sonic and visual aura of being a daughter of the 00s. And there was no more significant “mother” in that decade than Britney Spears, who kicked off the aughts with her iconic “Oops!…I Did It Again” video and album. By 2004, however, Spears seemed determined to one-up herself with the video for “Toxic,” arguably among her most well-known visuals after “…Baby One More Time,”  “Oops!…I Did It Again”  and “I’m A Slave 4 U.” In it, Spears channels Pan Am-era chic in a flight attendant uniform that one would have never seen in the “friendly” skies of the 00s, let alone now. 

    But even more than her 60s-inspired flight attendant ensemble, it was her literal nude look that stood out in the eyes of viewers. As Spears confirmed in an interview (something she seems to have thrown a peace sign up on altogether since the conservatorship ended) from 2016 with Jonathan Ross, it was simply crystals/mini diamonds (or “hand diamonds,” as she called them) glued onto her body and paired with a white G-string. And voilà, immortal look achieved. 

    With the video released at the beginning of 2004, it would eventually serve as a reminder of 00s “polish” and decadence in the years before the 2008 financial crisis. In the months just leading up to it, Spears would release the less polished (visual-wise) video for “Gimme More,” the lead single from 2007’s Blackout. After that, she would unleash the moody, clapback-at-the-critics song, “Piece of Me”—which would become such a signature that she named her Vegas residency in its honor. It is the theme of that particular song which Charli XCX seeks to repurpose on “Von Dutch” (a title in keeping with her 00s reverence). Accordingly, the Torso-directed video commences with XCX being stalked by paparazzi at the airport (Charles de Gaulle, to be exact—because Charli is just so Euro).

    As she walks past the proverbial vultures with her aloofness and sunglasses as a shield, she then whips her shades off, along with her skirt (so she can sport just her underwear and tights underneath), and gets right into the first verse: “It’s okay to just admit that you’re jealous of me/Yeah I heard you talk about me, that’s the word on the street/You’re obsessin’ [that accusation lending the song un certain Mariah flair], just confess it/Put your hands up/It’s obvious I’m your number one.” (This also channeling, incidentally, a lyric Goldfrapp sings on 2005’s, what else, “Number 1”.) 

    From the start, it’s apparent that XCX is much less apologetic than Spears was on “Piece of Me” as she sang with more than a slightly sardonic tinge, “I’m Miss Bad Media Karma/Another day, another drama/Guess I can’t see no harm in workin’ and bein’ a mama.” Charli, rather than inserting semi-apologetic caveats in her lyrics, declares full-stop, “​​I’m just living that life Von Dutch, cult classic, but I still pop/I get money, you get mad because the bank’s shut/Yeah, I know your little secret, put your hands up/It’s so obvious I’m your number one.” In the spirit of another 00s piece of pop culture that has inspired of late, Mean Girls, there are many aspects of “Von Dutch” that mirror the content of Renée Rapp and Megan Thee Stallion’s “Not My Fault.” Wherein the former boasts, “It’s not my fault/You gotta pay what I get for free/It’s not my fault/You’re like, you’re like, you’re like in love with me.” According to Charli, nor is it her fault either. She’s “just livin’ that life, Von dutch, cult classic, but I still pop.” 

    Even when forced to mingle among the hoi polloi at the airport. Because, again, these are not the glamorous days of Britney’s “Toxic” video, during which she plays an international spy who also happens to be on a mission to poison her ex-boyfriend. For Charli, it’s less about the destination and more about the journey as she treats the entire airport and, subsequently, the airplane like her runway. Or, more to the point, as any “TikToker” would if CDG had agreed to shut down the terminal for them so they could dance and mug for the camera to their heart’s content without judgment (not that such a worry has ever stopped an “influencer” from annoying people in the public space before). Not to mention providing an empty plane to “bop around” on before making one’s way out onto the wing to do a jig there as well. And, as though to highlight the differences between 2004 Britney on an airplane and 2024 Charli on one, the latter takes the drink cart she’s pushing and violently shoves it down on the floor without a second thought. A stark contrast to Spears sexily pushing her own champagne-filled cart down the aisle on her airplane to “serve with a smile” that hides her ulterior motives.

    But back to the TikTok video flavor, funnily enough, XCX seems to shade that ilk with the line, “Do that littlе dance, without it, you’d be namelеss.” Something in the tone of the lyrics also giving Amy Winehouse on “Fuck Me Pumps” when she jibes, “Don’t be mad at me, ‘cause you’re pushing thirty/And your old tricks no longer work” (how ahead of her time she was on Gen Z-level ageism…along with Lily Allen on “22”). This all further speaking to how XCX is ready to drench herself in the 00s…much as the rest of the pop culture-obsessed set has done of late. But XCX is additionally bringing more than a dash of her “Tumblr sleaze” into the equation, hence breaking the fourth wall by slamming her head against the camera to mimic the effect of beating the shit out of someone—whoever her collective nemesis is, in this case. 

    She then grabs onto an automatic floor-cleaning machine and holds on for a bit before jumping the turnstile at a boarding gate like it’s merely a subway stop. On the empty plane (an Airbus A380), XCX continues her visceral, “anti-‘Toxic’” performance, pursued by the invisible antagonist she keeps fighting back with bratty (her next album is titled Brat, after all) panache. Or perhaps “anti” isn’t the word so much as “antithesis of.” Because there is nothing rehearsed-feeling or, as mentioned, polished about this the way there was in “Toxic.” This, to reemphasize, echoing the fact that all sense of glamor and being able to put up a veneer of elegance and sophistication has dissipated in our post-Empire world. Indeed, XCX is effectively putting a spotlight on the motif of how fucking shitty it is to travel now compared to 2004 (easier and less dehumanizing that year than now, despite the world coming fresh off 9/11). 

    Elsewhere in the lyrics of the song, XCX takes a page from Olivia Rodrigo branding her ex as a “fame fucker” on “vampire” (since fame, after all, is supposedly accessible to everyone now). Thus, Charli jabs at her haters, “Why you lying? You won’t fuck unless he’s famous.” It’s a long way from Britney touting, “I’m Mrs. Lifestyles of the Rich and Famous (you want a piece of me)/I’m Mrs. Oh My God That Britney’s Shameless (you want a piece of me).” Where Spears was forced to give up those pieces of herself to the public mostly against her will, Charli is of an era wherein everyone is willing and ready to whore it all out for the sake of fame (and hopefully, the added and often correlative bonus of money). Doing it for the hallowed “benefit” of being able to say you’re “famous”—or rather, “viral.” That word so evocative of a disease…which is precisely what fame has become. A bug that everyone wants to catch like corona at a party in 2020 Tuscaloosa. Because if you’re not trying to get famous while the world burns around you, you might not have a chance to enjoy the perks before it’s burned entirely. Thanks, in part, to jumbo jets like the one so prominently featured in XCX’s video (and yes, Charli is no stranger to promoting fossil fuels in her songs [including “Vroom Vroom” and “Speed Drive”] and visuals [e.g., “2999”]).

    It’s hard to put much “Toxic”-level varnish on this bleak human condition of the next generation. Maybe that’s why, by the end, XCX is as triumphant as she is run ragged, coasting along the conveyor belt of the baggage claim with the rest of the damaged, overly jostled goods.

    Genna Rivieccio

    Source link