ReportWire

Tag: CDC Guidelines

  • CDC warns travelers to Mexico’s Baja California of exposure to deadly Rocky Mountain spotted fever

    CDC warns travelers to Mexico’s Baja California of exposure to deadly Rocky Mountain spotted fever

    [ad_1]

    The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is warning travelers to Baja California, Mexico, about Rocky Mountain spotted fever, a potentially fatal bacterial disease that spreads through the bite of an infected brown dog tick, which can be carried by pets. 

    The warning comes after a San Diego, California, resident who traveled to Baja California died last month after contracting the disease, San Diego County Public Health Services reported

    In addition to Baja California, RMSF has been found in the Mexican states of Sonora, Chihuahua, Coahuila and Nuevo León.

    In the level 1 travel advisory issued Friday, the CDC urged travelers who develop symptoms of RMSF during travel, or within two weeks of returning to the U.S., to seek medical attention.

    Symptoms of RMSF include fever, headache, and rash, which can develop two to four days after the onset of symptoms, according to the CDC. 

    The disease can progress quickly in infected patients and can become deadly if not treated early with the antibiotic doxycycline. Children under 10 years of age are five times more likely to die from RMSF, the CDC said.

    San Diego County public health officials said the last time someone from San Diego died from RMSF was in 2014.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • What to know about the widening cantaloupe recall over deadly salmonella risks

    What to know about the widening cantaloupe recall over deadly salmonella risks

    [ad_1]

    Consumers who eat cantaloupe are advised to be on high alert following a spate of government warnings over a deadly salmonella outbreak linked to the fruit. 

    U.S. health officials have ordered sweeping recalls of potentially contaminated whole and pre-sliced cantaloupes over the past few weeks, in addition to urging consumers on Thursday to toss out any products containing the melon, recall notices from officials show. The flurry of warnings has prompted major grocery sellers such as Kroger, Trader Joe’s and Walmart to continue removing products containing the melon from store shelves. 

    Bacteria-harboring cantaloupes have been linked to at least 117 illnesses, including 61 hospitalizations and two deaths across 34 U.S. states, and those numbers could grow, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said Thursday in a statement. 

    Here’s what to know about the latest rash of cantaloupe recalls, and how to know if you should save or toss that fruit in your fridge. 

    What is happening? 

    Following an outbreak of severe bacterial infections linked to the fruits, the CDC is warning consumers to steer clear of pre-cut cantaloupe if they are unsure of whether it is from a distributor whose product has been recalled.

    The guidance follows previous orders by U.S. health officials to recall whole cantaloupes from several brands, including Malichita and Rudy, which prompted several nationwide grocery chains to recall their own products containing pre-cut cantaloupes. Most recently, Sprouts Farmers Market and Trader Joe’s on Wednesday pulled select fresh-cut products made from whole cantaloupes off their shelves, according to an FDA notice.

    Cut Fruit Express of Inver Grove Heights, Minnesota, on Wednesday recalled products containing cantaloupe, including Caribou Coffee Fruit Mix CHPG 6.5oz; Cut Fruit Express Brand 6.5oz, 15oz, 16oz, 32oz packages of fruit mix; and food service packages of 5lb-tray, 10lb-bag, 25lb-Pail, all of which could be contaminated with salmonella.

    Which products are affected? 

    Whole fresh cantaloupes with Malichita, Rudy, “4050” and “Product of Mexico/produit du Mexique” labels are not safe to consume and should be thrown away, the FDA said

    In addition, products containing pre-cut cantaloupe such as fruit salads may pose a salmonella risk to consumers, according to the agency. Since November, there have been at least three waves of recalls issued over pre-cut cantaloupe by major grocery stores, including Kroger, Trader Joe’s, Sprouts Farmer Market, Aldi, and Walmart, according to the FDA. 

    What should I do if I don’t know my cantaloupe’s brand? 

    The FDA is advising consumers to toss out any cantaloupe that cannot be identified by brand. 

    “If you cannot tell if your cantaloupe, including pre-cut cantaloupe or products containing pre-cut cantaloupe is part of the recall, do not eat or use it and throw it away,” the agency said Thursday in a statement. 

    In addition to throwing out the melon, that FDA advises people to wash any surfaces that may have come into contact with the cantaloupe, using hot, soapy water or a dishwasher, the agency said. 

    What is Salmonella? 

    Salmonella, or salmonellosis, is a bacterial infection that affects the intestinal tract, according to the Mayo Clinic, a nonprofit medical research center. Symptoms include diarrhea, fever and stomach cramps, which usually begin between eight and 72 hours after exposure to the bacteria.

    Not everyone who contracts salmonella experiences symptoms, according to the Mayo Clinic. Children under age five, the elderly and those with weakened immune systems are more at risk of developing severe illnesses that require medical care or hospitalization. 

    People who get salmonella should rest and drink plenty of fluids to avoid dehydration, according to the Cleveland Clinic. The infection usually resolves on its own in a few days.  

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • FDA approves new COVID boosters

    FDA approves new COVID boosters

    [ad_1]

    FDA approves new COVID boosters – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    The FDA has approved new COVID-19 boosters designed to target the current dominant variant. The new shots could roll out as early as this week if the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention also approves them.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Man dies after eating raw oysters from seafood stand near St. Louis

    Man dies after eating raw oysters from seafood stand near St. Louis

    [ad_1]

    Flesh-eating bacteria seen in Delaware Bay


    Rise in flesh-eating bacteria linked to climate change

    00:29

    A man died after eating raw oysters from a seafood stand in the St. Louis suburb of Manchester, health officials announced Friday. Officials are urging the public to dispose of any oysters purchased recently from the business after the 54-year-old’s death.

    The culprit in Thursday’s death is the Vibrio vulnificus bacteria, which doesn’t make an oyster look, smell, or taste any different. The oysters were probably already contaminated when they arrived at the stand, St. Louis County Public Health said in a news release. The man had eaten them sometime in the past week.

    The release said the business, the Fruit Stand & Seafood, is cooperating with the investigation and that there is no evidence that the business did anything to contaminate them. Health officials are trying to determine their source.

    In March, a study found that Vibrio vulnificus cases could increase and occur in more places due warming waters caused by climate change.

    How to reduce your risk of vibriosis 

    The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention says about 80,000 people get vibriosis in the U.S. each year, and about 100 people die from it.

    According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, you can reduce your risk of vibriosis by following these tips:

    • Don’t eat raw or undercooked oysters or other shellfish. Cook them before eating.
    • Always wash your hands with soap and water after handing raw shellfish.
    • Avoid contaminating cooked shellfish with raw shellfish and its juices.
    • Stay out of salt water or brackish water if you have a wound (including from a recent surgery, piercing, or tattoo), or cover your wound with a waterproof bandage if there’s a possibility it could come into contact with salt water or brackish water, raw seafood, or raw seafood juices. Brackish water is a mixture of fresh and salt water. It is often found where rivers meet the sea.
    • Wash wounds and cuts thoroughly with soap and water if they have been exposed to seawater or raw seafood or its juices.
    • If you develop a skin infection, tell your medical provider if your skin has come into contact with salt water or brackish water, raw seafood, or raw seafood juices.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • A quarter of Americans distrust CDC recommendations, survey finds

    A quarter of Americans distrust CDC recommendations, survey finds

    [ad_1]

    About one-quarter of Americans say they trust the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s health recommendations “not very much” or “not at all,” according to a new survey co-authored by the agency’s researchers, four times worse than for doctors and nurses.

    Of those surveyed, 37% said they have a “great deal” of trust in the CDC’s health recommendations, and an additional 37% “somewhat” trust the agency. 16% have “not very much” trust in the CDC’s recommendations, and 10% trust them “not at all.”

    The findings, published this week in the journal Health Affairs, are from a survey conducted in February 2022 examining the nation’s trust in public health agencies in the wake of COVID-19.

    Asked how much they trusted “recommendations made to improve health in general” from various sources, doctors scored the highest, with 54% saying they trust doctors’ recommendations “a great deal,” and 39% saying they “somewhat” trust them.

    State and local elected officials scored worst on the survey, with only about one in 10 Americans saying they trusted their health recommendations “a great deal,” and about a third saying they trusted them “somewhat.”

    The CDC garnered slightly higher trust than their counterparts in state and local public health departments. Reported trust also climbed when the survey asked more narrowly about providing information about the COVID-19 outbreak.

    42% of Americans said they trusted the CDC “a great deal” to provide accurate COVID-19 information and an additional 29% said they “somewhat” trusted the agency. Only around a third of Americans have “a great deal” of trust in COVID-19 information from their state and local health departments.

    The survey is not the first to find most Americans stating they have at least some trust in the CDC’s recommendations.

    A Morning Consult poll commissioned by the de Beaumont Foundation last year found one-third of Americans saying they trusted public health information and news from the CDC either “not much” or “not at all.” 

    In 2021, a similar survey from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation found that around 20% of Americans surveyed said they trusted the CDC’s health recommendations “not very much” or “not at all.” 

    Compared to those 2021 findings, the results from the CDC poll mark a significant drop in trust in the CDC’s recommendations. Back in 2021, 52% of respondents told the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation that they trusted the CDC a “great deal” or “quite a lot.”

    “[M]ost U.S. adults maintain at least some trust in public health agencies far into the COVID-19 pandemic. This may leave room for agencies to gain trust among those who are somewhat or not very trusting, particularly by working with more trusted partners,” the study’s authors wrote in Health Affairs. 

    Among Americans who said they lacked trust in the CDC’s information about COVID-19, the Health Affairs survey found that concerns over political influence and conflicting recommendations were cited by more than 70% of those who distrusted the agency. 

    Those were also the top reasons for lower trust in state and local public health departments about their COVID-19 information.

    The new survey results come as the CDC has been in the midst of a sweeping set of reforms ordered by its director.

    “Obviously, much of some of the challenges this administration inherited. They’ve been longstanding challenges at the CDC, and we’ve taken this opportunity to learn from the challenges of the current COVID 19 pandemic,” CDC Director Dr. Rochelle Walensky told a congressional hearing last month. 

    “That includes sharing our scientific data faster, enhancing our laboratory quality, translating that science into clear, concise communications,” she added.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • No One Really Knows How Much COVID Is Silently Spreading … Again

    No One Really Knows How Much COVID Is Silently Spreading … Again

    [ad_1]

    In the early days of the pandemic, one of the scariest and most surprising features of SARS-CoV-2 was its stealth. Initially assumed to transmit only from people who were actively sick—as its predecessor SARS-CoV did—the new coronavirus turned out to be a silent spreader, also spewing from the airways of people who were feeling just fine. After months of insisting that only the symptomatic had to mask, test, and isolate, officials scrambled to retool their guidance; singing, talking, laughing, even breathing in tight quarters were abruptly categorized as threats.

    Three years later, the coronavirus is still silently spreading—but the fear of its covertness again seems gone. Enthusiasm for masking and testing has plummeted; isolation recommendations have been pared down, and may soon entirely disappear. “We’re just not communicating about asymptomatic transmission anymore,” says Saskia Popescu, an infectious-disease epidemiologist and infection-prevention expert at George Mason University. “People think, What’s the point? I feel fine.

    Although the concern over asymptomatic spread has dissipated, the threat itself has not. And even as our worries over the virus continue to shrink and be shunted aside, the virus—and the way it moves between us—is continuing to change. Which means that our best ideas for stopping its spread aren’t just getting forgotten; they’re going obsolete.

    When SARS-CoV-2 was new to the world and hardly anyone had immunity, symptomless spread probably accounted for most of the virus’s spread—at least 50 percent or so, says Meagan Fitzpatrick, an infectious-disease transmission modeler at the University of Maryland’s School of Medicine. People wouldn’t start feeling sick until four, five, or six days, on average, after being infected. In the interim, the virus would be xeroxing itself at high speed in their airway, reaching potentially infectious levels a day or two before symptoms started. Silently infected people weren’t sneezing and coughing—symptoms that propel the virus more forcefully outward, increasing transmission efficiency. But at a time when tests were still scarce and slow to deliver results, not knowing they had the virus made them dangerous all the same. Precautionary tests were still scarce, or very slow to deliver results. So symptomless transmission became a norm, as did epic superspreading events.

    Now, though, tests are more abundant, presymptomatic spread is a better-known danger, and repeated rounds of vaccination and infection have left behind layers of immunity. That protection, in particular, has slashed the severity and duration of acute symptoms, lowering the risk that people will end up in hospitals or morgues; it may even be chipping away at long COVID. At the same time, though, the addition of immunity has made the dynamics of symptomless transmission much more complex.

    On an individual basis, at least, silent spread could be happening less often than it did before. One possible reason is that symptoms are now igniting sooner in people’s bodies, just three or so days, on average, after infection—a shift that roughly coincided with the rise of the first Omicron variant and could be a quirk of the virus itself. But Aubree Gordon, an infectious-disease epidemiologist at the University of Michigan, told me that faster-arriving sicknesses are probably being driven in part by speedier immune responses, primed by past exposures. That means that illness might now coincide with or even precede the peak of contagiousness, shortening the average period in which people spread the virus before they feel sick. In that one very specific sense, COVID could now be a touch more flulike. Presymptomatic transmission of the flu does seem to happen on occasion, says Seema Lakdawala, a virologist at Emory University. But in general, “people tend not to hit their highest viral levels until after they develop symptoms,” Gordon told me.

    Coupled with more population-level immunity, this arrangement could be working in our favor. People might be less likely to pass the virus unwittingly to others. And thanks to the defenses we’ve collectively built up, the pathogen itself is also having more trouble exiting infected bodies and infiltrating new ones. That’s almost certainly part of the reason that this winter hasn’t been quite as bad as past ones have, COVID-wise, says Maia Majumder, an infectious-disease modeler at Harvard Medical School and Boston Children’s Hospital.

    That said, a lot of people are still undoubtedly catching the coronavirus from people who aren’t feeling sick. Infection per infection, the risk of superspreading events might now be lower, but at the same time people have gotten chiller about socializing without masks and testing before gathering in groups—a behavioral change that’s bound to counteract at least some of the forward shift in symptoms. Presymptomatic spread might be less likely nowadays, but it’s nowhere near gone. Multiply a small amount of presymptomatic spread by a large number of cases, and that can still seed … another large number of cases.

    There could be some newcomers to the pool of silent spreaders, too—those who are now transmitting the virus without ever developing symptoms at all. With people’s defenses higher than they were even a year and a half ago, infections that might have once been severe are now moderate or mild; ones that might have once been mild are now unnoticeable, says Seyed Moghadas, a computational epidemiologist at York University. At the same time, though, immunity has probably transformed some symptomless-yet-contagious infections into non-transmissible cases, or kept some people from getting infected at all. Milder cases are of course welcome, Fitzpatrick told me, but no one knows exactly what these changes add up to: Depending on the rate and degree of each of those shifts, totally asymptomatic transmission might now be more common, less common, or sort of a wash.

    Better studies on transmission patterns would help cut through the muck; they’re just not really happening anymore. “To get this data, you need to have pretty good testing for surveillance purposes, and that basically has stopped,” says Yonatan Grad, an infectious-disease epidemiologist at Harvard’s School of Public Health.

    Meanwhile, people are just straight-up testing less, and rarely reporting any of the results they get at home. For many months now, even some people who are testing have been seeing strings of negative results days into bona-fide cases of COVID—sometimes a week or more past when their symptoms start. That’s troubling on two counts: First, some legit COVID cases are probably getting missed, and keeping people from accessing test-dependent treatments such as Paxlovid. Second, the disparity muddles the start and end of isolation. Per CDC guidelines, people who don’t test positive until a few days into their illness should still count their first day of symptoms as Day 0 of isolation. But if symptoms might sometimes outpace contagiousness, “I think those positive tests should restart the isolation clock,” Popescu told me, or risk releasing people back into society too soon.

    American testing guidelines, however, haven’t undergone a major overhaul in more than a year—right after Omicron blew across the nation, says Jessica Malaty Rivera, an infectious-disease epidemiologist at Boston Children’s Hospital. And even if the rules were to undergo a revamp, they wouldn’t necessarily guarantee more or better testing, which requires access and will. Testing programs have been winding down for many months; free diagnostics are once again growing scarce.

    Through all of this, scientists and nonscientists alike are still wrestling with how to define silent infection in the first place. What counts as symptomless depends not just on biology, but behavior—and our vigilance. As worries over transmission continue to falter and fade, even mild infections may be mistaken for quiet ones, Grad told me, brushed off as allergies or stress. Biologically, the virus and the disease may not need to become that much more muted to spread with ease: Forgetting about silent spread may grease the wheels all on its own.

    [ad_2]

    Katherine J. Wu

    Source link

  • Millions of children left susceptible to measles as vaccination rates drop, new report finds

    Millions of children left susceptible to measles as vaccination rates drop, new report finds

    [ad_1]

    The threat of a measles outbreak is growing due to a significant decline in vaccination rates among children worldwide, according to joint report released Wednesday by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and the World Health Organization. 

    For the last few decades, measles has remained relatively contained due to the double-dose vaccination that is 97% effective. The measles vaccination rates have steadily dropped since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, the report found, with nearly 40 million children missing one or both of the doses in 2021, a record high according to the CDC and WHO. 

    Because of the pandemic, 61 million measles vaccine doses were postponed or missed in 18 countries in 2021, the report found.

    “This decline is a significant setback in global progress towards achieving and maintaining measles elimination and leaves millions of children susceptible to infection,” the two agencies said in a news release.   

    In 2021, there were about 9 million measles cases and 128,000 measles deaths worldwide, according to the CDC and WHO. Twenty-two countries experienced “large and disruptive outbreaks” — a trend that has continued into 2022, according to the report. 

    The report found that, based on the latest data, only 81% of children worldwide are receiving a first dose, and only 71% are receiving a second dose. This marks the “lowest global coverage rates” since 2008, the CDC and WHO found.    

    “The paradox of the pandemic is that while vaccines against COVID-19 were developed in record time and deployed in the largest vaccination campaign in history, routine immunization programs were badly disrupted,” WHO Director-General Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said in a statement.

    Now, the two agencies are advising officials across the world to get their immunization systems back on track to prevent more missed vaccinations.

    “Measles outbreaks illustrate weaknesses in immunization programs,” CDC Director Dr. Rochelle P. Walensky said in a statement. “Public health officials can use outbreak response to identify communities at risk, understand causes of under-vaccination, and help deliver locally tailored solutions to ensure vaccinations are available to all.”

    The best way to contain the deadly virus is for all stakeholders to put their resources into immunization surveillance systems, the report stressed.

    Through the Immunization Agenda 2030 global strategy — which aims to give vaccine access to everyone worldwide — the WHO and CDC hope all children can be immunized, and outbreaks can be detected and responded to quickly.

    “We have a short window of opportunity to urgently make up for lost ground in measles vaccination and protect every child,” said Ephrem Tekle Lemango, immunization chief for UNICEF, said in a statement. “The time for decisive action is now.” 

    Last week, health officials in central Ohio reported they were investigating a measles outbreak at several childcare facilities. 18 cases were under investigation, officials said at the time. All of the cases were in unvaccinated children, and 17 of the 18 infected children are under the age of five. 

    [ad_2]

    Source link