ReportWire

Tag: Capitol Hill

  • Judge expected to rule on texts, photos from fed agents in Brighton Park shooting

    CHICAGO (WLS) — The woman shot five times by federal agents in Chicago, during Operation Midway Blitz has asked a judge to release more evidence.

    She could get an answer at a hearing Friday.

    ABC7 Chicago is now streaming 24/7. Click here to watch

    Marimar Martinez was shot five times last year by CBP agents after her vehicle was involved in a collision with Border Patrol Agent, Charles Exum.

    This all happened on October 4, near 39th and Kedzie, on the city’s Southwest Side.

    RELATED: ‘My own government attempted to execute me,’ Chicago woman shot by Border Patrol testifies

    A judge could issue a ruling Friday to release more evidence from the shooting.

    Federal agents and the Department of Homeland Security say Martinez rammed the agents’ vehicle and continue to refer to her as a “domestic terrorist.” This after all charges against Martinez were later dropped.

    Martinez and her attorney said they want her name cleared by releasing evidence in the case.

    RELATED: DOJ drops charges against woman shot by CBP agent in Chicago after being accused of ramming car

    Prosecutors said they are OK with releasing body camera videos of the moments leading up to the shooting, but argue additional text messages from the agent involved should not be released.

    Martinez testified from Capitol Hill on Tuesday, saying that she believes her testimony highlights a pattern of lies told by the federal government.

    “I know that being a survivor, it’s my duty to be here today to let you elected officials know what is happening on the streets of our country because silence is no longer an option,” Martinez said.

    Martinez is set to be Congressman Chuy Garcia’s guest at President Donald Trump’s State of the Union address later this month, with Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem expected to attend.

    Martinez’ hearing this morning is set to begin at 9:30 a.m. at the Dirksen Federal Building.

    A court hearing scheduled for Wednesday shooting of Marimar Martinez back in October has been postponed until Friday.

    Martinez was hit five times and injured.

    ABC7 Chicago is now streaming 24/7. Click here to watch

    Federal prosecutors originally accused her and Anthony Santos of using their vehicles to strike agents who were doing immigration enforcement near 39th Street and Kedzie Avenue.

    Those charges were eventually dismissed.

    RELATED: ‘My own government attempted to execute me,’ Chicago woman shot by Border Patrol testifies

    Martinez seeks to release more evidence to combat what her lawyers said is harm to her reputation.

    Ahead of the hearing, Martinez was in Washington DC Tuesday testifying on Capitol Hill about her ordeal.

    “I know that being a survivor, it’s my duty to be here today to let you elected officials know what is happening on the streets of our country because silence is no longer an option,” Martinez said.

    She said what happened to her should serve as evidence of a pattern of lies told by the federal government.

    Illinois lawmakers joined her call for accountability

    “That’s why we made it clear that this negotiation to change the standards for ICE is critical for us to continue this agency,” Senator Dick Durbin said.

    Copyright © 2026 WLS-TV. All Rights Reserved.

    Christian Piekos

    Source link

  • Minnesota Gov. Walz, AG Ellison to testify at House Oversight Committee hearing on fraud in March

    Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz and Attorney General Keith Ellison will testify at a House Oversight Committee hearing on fraud and the “misuse” of federal funds in the state in March, Chairman James Comer, R-Kentucky, said on Friday.

    Republicans on the committee launched an investigation into Walz’s handling of a series of multimillion-dollar fraud schemes in Minnesota last December. Members, at the time, asked in letters the governor and Ellison for “documents and communications showing what your administration knew about this fraud and whether you took action to limit or halt the investigation into this widespread fraud.”

    “Americans deserve answers about the rampant misuse of taxpayer dollars in Minnesota’s social services programs that occurred on Governor Walz’s and Attorney General Ellison’s watch,” Comer said in a news release on Friday.

    The hearing is scheduled for March 4. WCCO has reached out to Walz and Ellison for comment.

    Republican Minnesota state Reps. Kristin Robbins, Walter Hudson and Marion Rarick, along with Brendan Ballou, a former prosecutor for the Justice Department who is appearing as the Democrats’ witness, testified in front of the committee earlier this month.

    Robbins said, as chair of a fraud prevention committee in the Minnesota House, she’s been “working to uncover the massive fraud under Tim Walz, propose solutions and hold state agencies accountable.”

    She also testified that her committee has evidence that, as far back as 2012, money has been sent back to al Shabaab, a U.S.-designated foreign terrorist organization and al Qaeda affiliate based in Somalia. The Treasury Department said last month that it would investigate whether tax dollars from Minnesota’s public assistance programs made their way to al Shabaab.

    Democrats on the committee acknowledged concerns about fraud during the Jan. 7 hearing, but said the response should not punish communities unjustly, while pointing to what they said was hypocrisy among their GOP colleagues in taking fraud allegations seriously.   

    Walz has defended his handling of the crisis, saying his administration has “spent years cracking down on fraudsters” and has accused President Trump of “politicizing the issue to defund programs that help Minnesotans.”

    On Dec. 31, A spokesperson for Walz said in response to the Jan. 7 hearing, without expanding, “We’re always happy to work with Congress, though this committee has a track record of holding circus hearings that have nothing to do with the issue at hand.”

    Ellison’s office said on Dec. 31, without evidence, that the attorney general and the state’s Medicaid Fraud Control Unit have “prosecuted over 300 Medicaid fraud cases and won over $80 million in recoveries and restitution for the people of Minnesota.”

    Former U.S. Assistant U.S. Attorney Joe Thompson in December said the total amount of fraud in Minnesota’s Medicaid programs could be $9 billion or more. Walz called Thompson’s statement “sensationalism” and said that it doesn’t “help” the state tackle the problem that he vowed to fix.

    Nick Lentz

    Source link

  • Anti-ICE protests erupt across the country after shootings

    Protests against the Trump administration’s immigration crackdown erupted across the United States this weekend, including outside the White House, following two recent shootings involving immigration officers.A border officer wounded two people in Portland, Oregon, on Thursday. In a separate event on Wednesday, an ICE agent fatally shot a woman in Minneapolis, where thousands marched on Saturday. Minnesota leaders urged demonstrators to remain peaceful after several protesters were arrested on Friday. The Trump administration insists that federal officers acted in self-defense in both shootings. The Department of Homeland Security is not backing down from what it has called its biggest-ever immigration enforcement operation in the Twin Cities. The agency highlighted the arrest of “criminal illegal aliens” in social media posts on Saturday. Meanwhile, the administration faces pushback from Democrats and certain Republicans on Capitol Hill. Critics are calling for a full, objective investigation into the Minneapolis shooting after state officials were left out of the probe.Some Democrats are calling to impeach DHS Secretary Kristi Noem, while others want to restrict funding for her department and add further restrictions on federal agents.Cellphone video below from the ICE agent who shot Renee Good shows the moments before and during the shooting. Viewer discretion is advised.

    Protests against the Trump administration’s immigration crackdown erupted across the United States this weekend, including outside the White House, following two recent shootings involving immigration officers.

    A border officer wounded two people in Portland, Oregon, on Thursday. In a separate event on Wednesday, an ICE agent fatally shot a woman in Minneapolis, where thousands marched on Saturday.

    Minnesota leaders urged demonstrators to remain peaceful after several protesters were arrested on Friday.

    The Trump administration insists that federal officers acted in self-defense in both shootings.

    The Department of Homeland Security is not backing down from what it has called its biggest-ever immigration enforcement operation in the Twin Cities. The agency highlighted the arrest of “criminal illegal aliens” in social media posts on Saturday.

    Meanwhile, the administration faces pushback from Democrats and certain Republicans on Capitol Hill. Critics are calling for a full, objective investigation into the Minneapolis shooting after state officials were left out of the probe.

    Some Democrats are calling to impeach DHS Secretary Kristi Noem, while others want to restrict funding for her department and add further restrictions on federal agents.

    Cellphone video below from the ICE agent who shot Renee Good shows the moments before and during the shooting. Viewer discretion is advised.

    Source link

  • Sandwich shop owed more than $40,000 in taxes before seizure, city says

    Long-running Denver lunch spot Mr. Lucky’s Sandwiches, which closed in December after Denver’s Department of Finance seized its two locations, owes more than $40,000 in unpaid taxes, according to the city agency. Galen Juracek, who owns the shops in Capitol Hill and the Highland neighborhood, specifically owes $40,556.11.

    Multiple notices posted to the door of Mr. Lucky’s Capitol Hill location showed that the city demanded payment for the back taxes starting in July. But the city’s “distraint warrant” — a legal notice that a business owner owes a specific amount, and that the business could be seized if they don’t pay it — notes the shops, at 711 E. 6th Ave. and 3326 Tejon St., were forced to close on Tuesday, Dec. 23.

    Mr. Lucky’s had already decided it would close its two locations by the end of 2025, said Laura Swartz, communications director for the Department of Finance. But the city’s seizure of the business shows that it had not been keeping up on basic requirements, with a $39,956 bill for unpaid sales taxes and $600.11 in “occupational privilege” taxes, which fund local services and allow a business to operate within a specific area.

    “When businesses charge customers sales tax but then do not submit that sales tax to the city, the city is responsible for becoming involved,” she said in an email to The Denver Post

    Juracek did not respond to multiple phone calls from The Denver Post requesting comment. His business, which is described on its website as a “go-to spot for handcrafted sandwiches since 1999, roasting our meats in-house and making every bite unforgettable,” is listed on the documents as G&J Concepts.

    John Wenzel

    Source link

  • PHOTOS: US Capitol Christmas tree arrives – WTOP News

    Get breaking news and daily headlines delivered to your email inbox by signing up here.

    © 2025 WTOP. All Rights Reserved. This website is not intended for users located within the European Economic Area.

    Abigail Constantino

    Source link

  • House expected to vote on bill forcing release of Jeffrey Epstein case files

    The House is expected to vote Tuesday on legislation to force the Justice Department to publicly release its files on the late financier Jeffrey Epstein, the culmination of a monthslong effort that has overcome opposition from President Donald Trump and Republican leadership.When a small bipartisan group of House lawmakers introduced a petition in July to maneuver around House Speaker Mike Johnson’s control of which bills see the House floor, it appeared a long-shot effort, especially as Trump urged his supporters to dismiss the matter as a “hoax.” But both Trump and Johnson failed in their efforts to prevent the vote.Now the president has bowed to the growing momentum behind the bill and even said Republicans should vote for it. His blessing all but ensures that the House will pass the bill with an overwhelming margin, putting further pressure on the Senate to take it up.Trump on Monday said he would sign the bill if it passes both chambers of Congress, adding, “Let the Senate look at it.”Tuesday’s vote also provides a further boost to the demands that the Justice Department release its case files on Epstein, a well-connected financier who killed himself in a Manhattan jail while awaiting trial in 2019 on charges he sexually abused and trafficked underage girls.A separate investigation conducted by the House Oversight Committee has released thousands of pages of emails and other documents from Epstein’s estate, showing his connections to global leaders, Wall Street powerbrokers, influential political figures and Trump himself.Trump’s reversal on the Epstein filesTrump has said he cut ties with Epstein years ago, but tried for months to move past the demands for disclosure. On Monday, he told reporters that Epstein was connected to more Democrats and that he didn’t want the Epstein files to “detract from the great success of the Republican Party.”Still, many in the Republican base have continued to demand the release of the files. Adding to that pressure, several survivors of Epstein’s abuse will appear on Capitol Hill Tuesday morning to push for release of the files. They also met with Johnson and rallied outside the Capitol in September, but have had to wait two months for the vote.That’s because Johnson kept the House closed for legislative business for nearly two months and also refused to swear-in Democratic Rep. Adelita Grijalva of Arizona during the government shutdown. After winning a special election on Sept. 23, Grijalva had pledged to provide the crucial 218th vote to the petition for the Epstein files bill. But only after she was sworn into office last week could she sign her name to the discharge petition to give it majority support in the 435-member House.It quickly became apparent the bill would pass, and both Johnson and Trump began to fold. Trump on Sunday said Republicans should vote for the bill.Rep. Thomas Massie, the Kentucky Republican who sponsored the bill alongside Democratic Rep. Ro Khanna, said Trump “got tired of me winning. He wanted to join.”How Johnson is handling the billRather than waiting until next week for the discharge position to officially take effect, Johnson is moving to hold the vote this week. He indicated the legislation will be brought to the House floor under a procedure that requires a two-thirds majority.“I think it’s going to be an important vote to continue to show the transparency that we’ve delivered,” House Republican leader Steve Scalise, R-La., said Monday night.House Democrats celebrated the vote as a rare win for the minority.“It’s a complete and total surrender, because as Democrats we made clear from the very beginning, the survivors and the American people deserve full and complete transparency as it relates to the lives that were ruined by Jeffrey Epstein,” said House Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries.What will the Senate do?Still, it’s not clear how the Senate will handle the bill.Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., has previously been circumspect when asked about the legislation and instead said he trusted the Justice Department to release information on the Epstein investigation.But what the Justice Department has released so far under Trump was mostly already public. The bill would go further, forcing the release within 30 days of all files and communications related to Epstein, as well as any information about the investigation into his death in federal prison. Information about Epstein’s victims or continuing federal investigations would be allowed to be redacted, but not information due to “embarrassment, reputational harm, or political sensitivity, including to any government official, public figure, or foreign dignitary.”Johnson also suggested that he would like to see the Senate amend the bill to protect the information of “victims and whistleblowers.”But Massie said the Senate should take into account the public clamor that forced both Trump and Johnson to back down.“If it’s anything but a genuine effort to make it better and stronger, it’ll backfire on the senators if they muck it up,” Massie said.___Associated Press writers Kevin Freking and Matt Brown contributed to this report.

    The House is expected to vote Tuesday on legislation to force the Justice Department to publicly release its files on the late financier Jeffrey Epstein, the culmination of a monthslong effort that has overcome opposition from President Donald Trump and Republican leadership.

    When a small bipartisan group of House lawmakers introduced a petition in July to maneuver around House Speaker Mike Johnson’s control of which bills see the House floor, it appeared a long-shot effort, especially as Trump urged his supporters to dismiss the matter as a “hoax.” But both Trump and Johnson failed in their efforts to prevent the vote.

    Now the president has bowed to the growing momentum behind the bill and even said Republicans should vote for it. His blessing all but ensures that the House will pass the bill with an overwhelming margin, putting further pressure on the Senate to take it up.

    Trump on Monday said he would sign the bill if it passes both chambers of Congress, adding, “Let the Senate look at it.”

    Tuesday’s vote also provides a further boost to the demands that the Justice Department release its case files on Epstein, a well-connected financier who killed himself in a Manhattan jail while awaiting trial in 2019 on charges he sexually abused and trafficked underage girls.

    A separate investigation conducted by the House Oversight Committee has released thousands of pages of emails and other documents from Epstein’s estate, showing his connections to global leaders, Wall Street powerbrokers, influential political figures and Trump himself.

    Trump’s reversal on the Epstein files

    Trump has said he cut ties with Epstein years ago, but tried for months to move past the demands for disclosure. On Monday, he told reporters that Epstein was connected to more Democrats and that he didn’t want the Epstein files to “detract from the great success of the Republican Party.”

    Still, many in the Republican base have continued to demand the release of the files. Adding to that pressure, several survivors of Epstein’s abuse will appear on Capitol Hill Tuesday morning to push for release of the files. They also met with Johnson and rallied outside the Capitol in September, but have had to wait two months for the vote.

    That’s because Johnson kept the House closed for legislative business for nearly two months and also refused to swear-in Democratic Rep. Adelita Grijalva of Arizona during the government shutdown. After winning a special election on Sept. 23, Grijalva had pledged to provide the crucial 218th vote to the petition for the Epstein files bill. But only after she was sworn into office last week could she sign her name to the discharge petition to give it majority support in the 435-member House.

    It quickly became apparent the bill would pass, and both Johnson and Trump began to fold. Trump on Sunday said Republicans should vote for the bill.

    Rep. Thomas Massie, the Kentucky Republican who sponsored the bill alongside Democratic Rep. Ro Khanna, said Trump “got tired of me winning. He wanted to join.”

    How Johnson is handling the bill

    Rather than waiting until next week for the discharge position to officially take effect, Johnson is moving to hold the vote this week. He indicated the legislation will be brought to the House floor under a procedure that requires a two-thirds majority.

    “I think it’s going to be an important vote to continue to show the transparency that we’ve delivered,” House Republican leader Steve Scalise, R-La., said Monday night.

    House Democrats celebrated the vote as a rare win for the minority.

    “It’s a complete and total surrender, because as Democrats we made clear from the very beginning, the survivors and the American people deserve full and complete transparency as it relates to the lives that were ruined by Jeffrey Epstein,” said House Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries.

    What will the Senate do?

    Still, it’s not clear how the Senate will handle the bill.

    Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., has previously been circumspect when asked about the legislation and instead said he trusted the Justice Department to release information on the Epstein investigation.

    But what the Justice Department has released so far under Trump was mostly already public. The bill would go further, forcing the release within 30 days of all files and communications related to Epstein, as well as any information about the investigation into his death in federal prison. Information about Epstein’s victims or continuing federal investigations would be allowed to be redacted, but not information due to “embarrassment, reputational harm, or political sensitivity, including to any government official, public figure, or foreign dignitary.”

    Johnson also suggested that he would like to see the Senate amend the bill to protect the information of “victims and whistleblowers.”

    But Massie said the Senate should take into account the public clamor that forced both Trump and Johnson to back down.

    “If it’s anything but a genuine effort to make it better and stronger, it’ll backfire on the senators if they muck it up,” Massie said.

    ___

    Associated Press writers Kevin Freking and Matt Brown contributed to this report.

    Source link

  • Seattle Theatre Group opens Kerry Hall on Capitol Hill

    On Saturday, the Seattle Theatre Group (STG) held a grand opening for Kerry Hall, revitalizing historic space for the arts community up on the city’s famed cultural hub of Capitol Hill. The opening comes after an impressive push from students to preserve the building after Cornish College of the Arts announced it would sell the property.

    Kerry Hall will host dance and movement workshops, live music, community showcases and other family-friendly activities at its century-long location on East Roy Street.

    On Nov. 15, public officials, including Seattle City Councilmembers, kicked off the day of festivities with a ribbon cutting around 11 a.m. Then, community organizers gathered for an art market, dance performances, and more.

    Seattle’s historic Kerry Hall over the years (Seattle Theatre Group)

    Kerry Hall grand opening by the Seattle Theatre Group

    What they’re saying:

    “STG celebrates a vibrant new chapter with Kerry Hall, a space that centers creativity, connection, and community,” representatives for the group said in a letter to press on Saturday.

    Seattle’s historic Kerry Hall over the years (Seattle Theatre Group)

    Seattle’s historic Kerry Hall over the years (Seattle Theatre Group)

    MORE NEWS FROM FOX 13 SEATTLE

    Bruce Harrell concedes to Katie Wilson in race for Seattle mayor

    Seattle Mariners catcher Cal Raleigh finishes runner-up to Aaron Judge for AL MVP

    Christmas music is on Warm 106.9 24/7, like it or not

    Health officials report possible first human avian flu case in WA for 2025

    Seattle’s popular Thai restaurant Bangrak Market rebounds after fire

    To get the best local news, weather and sports in Seattle for free, sign up for the daily FOX Seattle Newsletter.

    Download the free FOX LOCAL app for mobile in the Apple App Store or Google Play Store for live Seattle news, top stories, weather updates and more local and national news.

    Things To DoCapitol HillNews

    Ramsey.Pfeffinger@fox.com (Ramsey Pfeffinger)

    Source link

  • House returns, set to end record-breaking government shutdown

    Right now the process is underway to reach that final vote in the House to end this longest government shutdown ever. We also wanted to lay out how it’s currently set to work. Over the last 2 days, House lawmakers have been flying in from across the country as they’ve been on recess during the entire shutdown. Some potentially face shutdown-related flight delays, but they are on their way back to the Capitol. The House agenda today was very specific, swearing in *** new congresswoman from Arizona when the House resumed this. Afternoon then debate and an initial procedural vote scheduled for around 5 p.m. Eastern today. If that passes, the House would debate again and is currently scheduled to hold *** final vote around 7 p.m. Eastern. That vote does not include healthcare subsidies, which started the whole shutdown in the first place. Of course we want to reopen the government. But that we need to decisively address the Republican healthcare crisis, and that begins with extending the Affordable Care Act tax credits. We believe the long national nightmare will be over tonight. It was completely and utterly foolish and pointless in the end, as we said all along. Democrats are largely expected to vote no on this. Republicans who hold *** majority in the House can only afford to lose 2 votes in order to pass this bill. And if that happens, the bill then heads over to President Donald Trump for his signature before the very likely long process of getting the government back up and running again. Reporting on Capitol Hill, I’m Amy Lou.

    House returns, set to end record-breaking government shutdown

    House lawmakers reconvened in Washington on Wednesday to vote on a bill that would end the longest government shutdown in U.S. history.

    Updated: 2:05 PM PST Nov 12, 2025

    Editorial Standards

    House lawmakers raced back to Washington on Wednesday to vote on a bill that could end the 43-day government shutdown, making it the longest in U.S. history. Over the last two days, lawmakers have been flying in from across the country, some facing their own potential shutdown-related delays, to get to Wednesday’s expected final vote. The House’s agenda included swearing in a new congresswoman from Arizona, followed by debate and an initial procedural vote scheduled for early evening. If that passes, the House debates again before holding a final vote on the bill, expected around 7 p.m. ET. The bill currently does not include Affordable Care Act subsidies, which started the shutdown in the first place.Democrats, who are largely expected to vote “no” on the bill, expressed disappointment.”Of course, we want to reopen the government, but we need to decisively address the Republican health care crisis,” House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., said. “That begins with extending the Affordable Care Act tax credits.”House Republicans, who hold a majority in the chamber, were largely expected to pass the measure despite Democrats’ objections, but can only afford to lose two votes for the bill to pass. “We believe the long national nightmare will be over tonight,” House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., said. “It was completely and utterly foolish and pointless in the end, as we said all along.”If the bill clears the House, it will require President Donald Trump’s signature before beginning the likely lengthy process of getting the government back up and running again.However, full Republican support is not clear-cut ahead of the final vote. The bill includes a controversial provision that would ban most hemp products in the U.S. Supporters say it would close a dangerous loophole on unregulated products, but others argue it would destroy the hemp industry for many farmers. In the Senate, Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., for example, voted against the bill. Similar action in the House on Wednesday could hold up its passage.Watch the latest coverage on the government shutdown:

    House lawmakers raced back to Washington on Wednesday to vote on a bill that could end the 43-day government shutdown, making it the longest in U.S. history.

    Over the last two days, lawmakers have been flying in from across the country, some facing their own potential shutdown-related delays, to get to Wednesday’s expected final vote.

    The House’s agenda included swearing in a new congresswoman from Arizona, followed by debate and an initial procedural vote scheduled for early evening. If that passes, the House debates again before holding a final vote on the bill, expected around 7 p.m. ET. The bill currently does not include Affordable Care Act subsidies, which started the shutdown in the first place.

    Democrats, who are largely expected to vote “no” on the bill, expressed disappointment.

    “Of course, we want to reopen the government, but we need to decisively address the Republican health care crisis,” House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., said. “That begins with extending the Affordable Care Act tax credits.”

    House Republicans, who hold a majority in the chamber, were largely expected to pass the measure despite Democrats’ objections, but can only afford to lose two votes for the bill to pass.

    “We believe the long national nightmare will be over tonight,” House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., said. “It was completely and utterly foolish and pointless in the end, as we said all along.”

    If the bill clears the House, it will require President Donald Trump’s signature before beginning the likely lengthy process of getting the government back up and running again.

    However, full Republican support is not clear-cut ahead of the final vote. The bill includes a controversial provision that would ban most hemp products in the U.S.

    Supporters say it would close a dangerous loophole on unregulated products, but others argue it would destroy the hemp industry for many farmers.

    In the Senate, Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., for example, voted against the bill. Similar action in the House on Wednesday could hold up its passage.

    Watch the latest coverage on the government shutdown:

    Source link

  • Lumbee Tribe of NC makes the case for recognition, again, at Senate hearing

    Members of North Carolina’s congressional delegation stand with the Lumbee Tribe of North Carolina as the seek federal recognition from Congress.

    Members of North Carolina’s congressional delegation stand with the Lumbee Tribe of North Carolina as the seek federal recognition from Congress.

    Danielle Battaglia

    Race and money.

    Those were the keywords in the Lumbee Tribe of North Carolina’s latest push for federal recognition at a Capitol Hill hearing Wednesday.

    The Senate Committee on Tribal Affairs met to determine whether Congress should take up the Lumbee Fairness Act and provide the tribe with full federal recognition, which has been sought since 1888.

    In 1956, Congress passed The Lumbee Act designating them as a tribe but not offering members federal benefits.

    This was the ninth time Lumbee leaders have sat before the committee. Lumbee Chairman John Lowery said he hopes he would be the final leader to do so.

    “I’m confident that this year Congress will finally amend this law, this flawed law, and extend the full service and benefits that we deserve,” Lowery said. “A tribe’s legal status should be clear, concise and unambiguous, and the Lumbee Fairness Act ensures that for our tribe.”

    Sen. Thom Tillis, a Republican from Huntersville, led a news conference prior to the hearing with North Carolina legislators Sen. Ted Budd and Reps. Mark Harris, David Rouzer, Richard Hudson and Tim Moore in support of the tribe. All but two of North Carolina’s 16-member congressional delegation have supported the bill’s passage.

    Tillis also testified before the committee, saying the fight was “personal” to him because “it’s an injustice that needs to be righted.”

    “The Lumbee people have waited long enough,” Tillis said. “They don’t ask for special treatment, only fair treatment they’ve earned and deserve full federal recognition.”

    The Lumbee Tribe has 60,000 members in Robeson, Hoke, Scotland and Cumberland counties, making up the largest tribe east of the Mississippi River and the ninth largest in the country.

    It’s unusual for the committee to get as much attention as it did Wednesday. The hearing was moved into a larger hearing room to accommodate additional members of the public in attendance.

    The Lumbee Tribe of North Carolina visit Congress on Wednesday, Nov. 5, 2025, to seek full federal recognition.
    The Lumbee Tribe of North Carolina visit Congress on Wednesday, Nov. 5, 2025, to seek full federal recognition. Danielle Battaglia Danielle Battaglia

    Lumbee faces opposition from other tribes

    Lowery was joined at the witness table by Tribal Attorney Arlinda Locklear. They testified for more than an hour on why Congress should grant full federal recognition, instead of the tribe applying through the Bureau of Indian Affairs for recognition.

    To their right sat their staunch opponents, Eastern Band of Cherokee Chief Michell Hicks and Shawnee Chief Ben Barnes testifying in opposition of Congressional action.

    “I want to express my deep appreciation of your willingness to examine the fact,” Hicks said. “A careful evidence-based review of this matter is long overdue. Your commitment to that standard honors every federally-recognized tribe and the integrity of this committee’s work.”

    Hicks told the committee that he wasn’t there to question anyone’s personal identity or heritage. But he said he questions the evidence of the Lumbee’s history as a tribe. He criticized the Lumbees for claiming connections to various other tribes, not having their own language or historical documents.

    “Their claims rest on theories, speculation and invented narratives,” Hicks said. “Only after the Civil War, when North Carolina rewrote its constitution and imposed new racial restrictions on non-white citizens, did these families suddenly adopt an Indian identity, calling themselves Croatan to access a separate Indian School and government resources and history.”

    He also argued that the cost of full federal recognition for the Lumbee Tribe far exceeds the Congressional Budget Office’s estimate of $350 million. Instead, he said, “Independent analysis shows the real price is in the billions.”

    “We do not fear another tribe,” Hicks said. “I want to make that clear. We fear falsehoods becoming federal law. If there is evidence, let it be presented. If there is a tribal origin, let the OFA confirm, and if they meet the same standard every other tribe meets, we will welcome them to the group of federally recognized tribes, but Congress must not legislate identity by replacing evidence with assertion.”

    Sen. Thom Tillis speaks at a news conference calling for full federal recognition for the Lumbee Tribe of North Carolina.
    Sen. Thom Tillis speaks at a news conference calling for full federal recognition for the Lumbee Tribe of North Carolina. Danielle Battaglia Danielle Battaglia

    Cherokee response to Lumbee effort

    At the dais, Sen. Markwayne Mullin, a Republican from Oklahoma, who is Cherokee, began questions to the chiefs, setting his focus on Hicks and asking whether he believes the Lumbees are native.

    “I do believe they’re native,” Mullin said. “I’ve been accused of being not being native and I would laugh. I can’t control who my ancestors love, but I still live on the same lot of land where my family stopped walking because I am Cherokee and I’m proud to be Cherokee.”

    He recognized that to some, he may not look like a member of the tribe.

    “I have a problem when someone starts saying that,” Mullin said. “Things get a little personal.”

    He then pointed out that there’s a difference between Cherokee Nation and the Eastern Band, because, he said, the Eastern Band stayed back while the Cherokee Nation kept walking.

    “But you were fairly recognized,” Mullin said to Hicks. “Shouldn’t you be recognized as Cherokee Nation at that point? Because we’re all descendants of Cherokee Nation.”

    Mullin caused a slight fracas in the crowd when he said to Hicks, “you can’t look over there and say they’re not native. You’re telling me they’re not native faces.” He then told Hicks to turn around and look at the tribe.

    Members of the Eastern Band were heard muttering that he was racially profiling.

    Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto, a Democrat from Nevada, who was friendlier to the opposition, said she understands there are two approaches to recognition, and one is through Congress.

    “There’s also an evidence-based approach,” she said. “I’m not in a position to look out in the audience, unlike some of my colleagues, to say who is a member and who isn’t. It’s like I’m not in a position, I don’t think, I should be looking out in my community saying just because you have brown skin, you’re undocumented. There has to be an evidence-based approach and that’s why it wasn’t created in Congress.”

    But she added that if something isn’t working with the Office of Indian Affairs, that’s another conversation they need to discuss.

    The Lumbee leaders argued that the process is lengthy and costly. They’re confident it would end with a lawsuit by the Eastern Band saying that it should have gone through Congress.

    The hearing ended without any action.

    Lumbee recognition was included in the House’s version of the National Defense Authorization Act passed in September. The Senate ran its own version of the bill that didn’t include Tillis’ amendment for federal recognition.

    President Donald Trump made Lumbee recognition one of the first executive orders he signed in his second term instructing the Department of Interior to find a path forward to legal recognition. DOI has not responded to request for comments about their findings or released their report through a Freedom of Information Act request.

    Related Stories from Raleigh News & Observer

    Danielle Battaglia

    McClatchy DC

    Danielle Battaglia is the D.C. correspondent for The News & Observer and The Charlotte Observer, leading coverage of North Carolina’s congressional delegation and elections. She also covers the White House. Her career has spanned three North Carolina newsrooms where she has covered crime, courts and local, state and national politics. She has won two McClatchy President’s awards and numerous national and state awards for her work.
    Support my work with a digital subscription

    Danielle Battaglia

    Source link

  • President Trump urges Republicans to reopen government as shutdown marks longest in US history

    The government shutdown has reached its 36th day, the longest in U.S. history, as President Donald Trump pressures Republicans to end the Senate filibuster in order to reopen the government.”It’s time for Republicans to do what they have to do, and that’s terminate the filibuster. It’s the only way you can do it,” Trump told senators Wednesday at the White House.The filibuster is a Senate rule that requires 60 votes to advance most legislation. Ending the filibuster would allow Republicans to pass a bill with a simple majority, but several Republicans warn that when Democrats are in power, they’d be able to do the same thing. Senate Majority Leader John Thune said after breakfast at the White House, “It’s just not happening.”The president also said the shutdown was a “big factor, negative” in Tuesday’s election results.”Countless public servants are now not being paid and the air traffic control system is under increasing strain. We must get the government back open soon and really immediately,” Trump said.The shutdown is hitting home for many Americans, with lines stretching at food banks across the country as SNAP benefits are delayed and reduced for more than 40 million Americans. After-school programs that depend on federal dollars are closing. The Transportation Secretary said, starting Friday, there will be a 10% reduction in flights at 40 airports across the country.Republicans have pushed to reopen the government with a short-term spending bill. Democrats have rejected those bills, arguing that Republicans are leaving out a key provision: restoring expiring Affordable Care Act subsidies that help millions of Americans lower their health-insurance costs. Democrats say passing a short-term bill without those subsidies would leave families facing sudden premium spikes.”The election results ought to send a much needed bolt of lightning to Donald Trump that he should meet with us to end this crisis,” said Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer of New York. “The American people have spoken last night. End the shutdown, end the healthcare crisis, sit down and talk with us.”Republicans have said they’re willing to negotiate ACA subsidies, but only after the shutdown is over.See more government shutdown coverage from the Washington News Bureau:

    The government shutdown has reached its 36th day, the longest in U.S. history, as President Donald Trump pressures Republicans to end the Senate filibuster in order to reopen the government.

    “It’s time for Republicans to do what they have to do, and that’s terminate the filibuster. It’s the only way you can do it,” Trump told senators Wednesday at the White House.

    The filibuster is a Senate rule that requires 60 votes to advance most legislation. Ending the filibuster would allow Republicans to pass a bill with a simple majority, but several Republicans warn that when Democrats are in power, they’d be able to do the same thing.

    Senate Majority Leader John Thune said after breakfast at the White House, “It’s just not happening.”

    The president also said the shutdown was a “big factor, negative” in Tuesday’s election results.

    “Countless public servants are now not being paid and the air traffic control system is under increasing strain. We must get the government back open soon and really immediately,” Trump said.

    The shutdown is hitting home for many Americans, with lines stretching at food banks across the country as SNAP benefits are delayed and reduced for more than 40 million Americans. After-school programs that depend on federal dollars are closing.

    The Transportation Secretary said, starting Friday, there will be a 10% reduction in flights at 40 airports across the country.

    Republicans have pushed to reopen the government with a short-term spending bill. Democrats have rejected those bills, arguing that Republicans are leaving out a key provision: restoring expiring Affordable Care Act subsidies that help millions of Americans lower their health-insurance costs. Democrats say passing a short-term bill without those subsidies would leave families facing sudden premium spikes.

    “The election results ought to send a much needed bolt of lightning to Donald Trump that he should meet with us to end this crisis,” said Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer of New York. “The American people have spoken last night. End the shutdown, end the healthcare crisis, sit down and talk with us.”

    Republicans have said they’re willing to negotiate ACA subsidies, but only after the shutdown is over.

    See more government shutdown coverage from the Washington News Bureau:

    Source link

  • Mom seeks justice after son was killed in Seattle’s Capitol Hill neighborhood

    Standing near the intersection of 10th and Pike, where Michelle Reese lost her son Robert Fleeks Jr. more than a month ago, she told FOX 13 that she could still feel his presence.

    “Last week I came up here and I prayed,” Reese said.

    The backstory:

    On Sept. 17, the 26-year-old was shot in the Capitol Hill neighborhood, then later died at the hospital, according to Seattle Police. Reese said her son was in the area getting pizza when that happened.

    “I’m emotional, I’m upset, I’m also grateful to God but at the same time, I’m definitely grieving and hurt,” Reese said.

    Michelle Reese and her son

    She added, there are four people suspected of being involved in her son’s murder, but more than a month later, she says there are still no arrests.

    “It’s very unsettling, and it doesn’t make me feel safe, it doesn’t make my family feel safe,” Reese said.

    As she waits for answers, Reese remembers the happier times. “He had a smile that would really light up the room,” Reese said.

    Robert and his unborn child

    She’s also looking toward the future, as her son was expecting a child. It will be a moment that he sadly will miss.

    “He’s full of love, very much a leader,” Reese said. In the meantime, all she wants is justice for her first-born son.

    “My son, he is a human, he is a person, he belongs to a whole bunch of family, he is connected, no one deserves to lose their life for no reason at all,” Reese said.

    What you can do:

    If anyone has information about this, you can call Seattle Police Department’s Violent Crimes Tip Line at 206-233-5000. The family also has an email set up; you can reach out at justicerobertfleeksjr@gmail.com.

    MORE NEWS FROM FOX 13 SEATTLE

    Massive WA drug, gun trafficking group busted, 10 arrested

    4 pm sunsets to return to Seattle. Here’s when

    ID killer Bryan Kohberger gets money while claiming he can’t pay victims: prosecutors

    On a hot streak: FOX 13’s Aaron Levine wins 3rd straight Jeopardy episode

    Family files lawsuit against Seattle following teen’s death at Gas Works Park

    To get the best local news, weather and sports in Seattle for free, sign up for the daily FOX Seattle Newsletter.

    Download the free FOX LOCAL app for mobile in the Apple App Store or Google Play Store for live Seattle news, top stories, weather updates and more local and national news.

    Crime and Public SafetyCapitol HillNews

    Shirah.Matsuzawa@fox.com (Shirah Matsuzawa)

    Source link

  • Some lawmakers call for ‘nuclear option’ to end government shutdown. What is it?

    Some lawmakers have called for using the “nuclear option” to override the Senate filibuster and end the government shutdown.

    Some lawmakers have called for using the “nuclear option” to override the Senate filibuster and end the government shutdown.

    Sonder Bridge Photography, UnSplash

    As the government shutdown drags on, a small group of lawmakers is embracing the “nuclear option.”

    In recent days, several Republicans and one Democrat have spoken out in favor of the controversial legislative maneuver, which could help break the deadlock on Capitol Hill. However, congressional leaders remain opposed to the idea.

    The so-called nuclear option entails overriding the Senate filibuster — a long-standing procedural tactic — which allows any senator to delay or block a vote by extending the window of debate indefinitely.

    Under current Senate rules, a 60-vote supermajority is needed to invoke cloture and end debate. If the filibuster were eliminated — which could be done by a simple majority vote — just 51 senators would be sufficient to advance legislation, paving the way for the narrow GOP majority to pass a spending bill.

    The nuclear option has already been used several times in the past, allowing a simple majority to advance nominations. But, the filibuster remains in place for passing legislation.

    The option was first employed in 2013 by Senate Democrats, led by Majority Leader Harry Reid, to confirm lower court judicial nominees. Then, in 2017, Senate Republicans used the last resort method to confirm Supreme Court nominee Neil Gorsuch.

    Calls for the nuclear option

    “I think Republicans ought to take a long, hard look at the 60 vote threshold, because I think we’re just being beholden to a broken system right now,” Rep. Chip Roy, a Texas Republican, told reporters on Oct. 20.

    “At a minimum, why don’t we take a look at it for (continuing resolutions),” he added. “Why shouldn’t we have a 50-vote threshold to be able to fund the government if the majority of the people want to do that.”

    Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene — a Georgia Republican and frequent critic of House GOP leadership — was less equivocal.

    “As I have been saying for weeks now, Republicans in the Senate can reopen the government, without Democrats, by using the nuclear option,” Greene wrote on X on Oct. 21. “All of this political drama would end if Republicans would use the power we have. Democrats will do it when they regain power. Like it or not.”

    Sen. Susan Collins, a long-serving Maine Republican, said she is wary of nuking the filibuster, but didn’t write it off entirely.

    “I am a strong supporter of the filibuster, but obviously I’ll look at any plan that anyone puts out in order to reopen the government,” she told NOTUS, a nonprofit news outlet, on Oct. 20.

    Additionally, at least one Democrat, Sen. John Fetterman of Pennsylvania, signaled his desire to do away with the filibuster.

    Speaking to reporters on Oct. 21, he said he would support a carve-out in the filibuster to allow legislation to fund the government to move forward with a simple majority.

    “Carve it out so we can move on,” Fetterman said, according to The Hill. “I support it because it makes it more difficult to shut the government down in the future, and that’s where it’s entirely appropriate … I don’t want to hear any Democrat clutching their pearls about the filibuster. We all ran on it.”

    In 2022, Senate Democrats made a high-profile attempt to override the filibuster to pass voting rights legislation, though it ultimately failed due to opposition from Sens. Kyrsten Sinema and Joe Manchin.

    Pushback from leadership

    However, other lawmakers, including GOP leadership, have dismissed attempts to override the legislative tactic, pointing to concerns that it could come back to hurt them in the long-run.

    “There’s always a lot of swirl out there, as you know, from social media, et cetera, but no, I have not had that conversation,” Senate Majority Leader John Thune told reporters in early October when asked about ending the filibuster, according to Politico.

    House Speaker Mike Johnson signaled the move would be risky.

    “Is it possible? Yes,” he said, according to the outlet. “Is it wise? A lot of people would tell you it’s not. I mean, on the Republican side, I would be deeply concerned if the Democrats had a bare majority in the Senate right now.”

    Brendan Rascius

    McClatchy DC

    Brendan Rascius is a McClatchy national real-time reporter covering politics and international news. He has a master’s in journalism from Columbia University and a bachelor’s in political science from Southern Connecticut State University.

    Brendan Rascius

    Source link

  • RTD ridership still falling as state pushes transit-oriented development: ‘We’re not moving the needle’

    ENGLEWOOD — Metro Denver budtender Quentin Ferguson needs Regional Transportation District bus and trains to reach work at an Arvada dispensary from his house, a trip that takes 90 minutes each way “on a good day.”

    “It is pretty inconvenient,” Ferguson, 22, said on a recent rainy evening, waiting for a nearly empty train that was eight minutes late.

    He’s not complaining, however, because his relatively low income and Medicaid status qualify him for a discounted RTD monthly pass. That lets him save money for a car or an electric bicycle, he said, either of them offering a faster commute.

    Then he would no longer have to ride RTD.

    His plight reflects a core problem of lagging ridership that RTD directors increasingly run up against as they try to position the transit agency as the smartest way to navigate Denver. Most other U.S. public transit agencies, too, are grappling with a version of this problem.

    In Colorado, state-government-driven efforts to concentrate the growing population in high-density, transit-oriented development around bus and train stations — a priority for legislators and Gov. Jared Polis — hinge on having a swift public system that residents ride.

    But transit ridership has failed to rebound a year after RTD’s havoc in 2024, when operators disrupted service downtown for a $152 million rail reconstruction followed by a systemwide emergency maintenance blitz to smooth deteriorating tracks that led to trains crawling through 10-mph “slow zones.”

    The latest ridership numbers show an overall decline this year, by at least 3.9%, with 40 million fewer riders per year compared with six years ago. And RTD executives’ newly proposed, record $1.3 billion budget for 2026 doesn’t include funds for boosting bus and train frequency to win back riders.

    Frustrations intensified last week.

    “What is the point of transit-oriented development if it is just development?” said state Rep. Meg Froelich, a Democrat representing Englewood who chairs the House Transportation, Housing and Local Government Committee. “We need reliable transit to have transit-oriented development. We have cities that have invested significant resources into their transit-oriented communities. RTD is not holding up its end of the bargain.”

    At a retreat this past summer, a majority of the RTD’s 15 elected board members agreed that boosting ridership is their top priority. Some who reviewed the proposed budget last week questioned the lack of spending on service improvements for riders.

    “We’re not moving the needle. Ridership is not going up. It should be going up,” director Karen Benker said in an interview.

    “Over the past few years, there’s been a tremendous amount of population growth. There are so many apartment complexes, so much new housing put up all over,” Benker said. “Transit has to be relied on. You just cannot keep building more roads. We’re going to have to find ways to get people to ride public transit.”

    Commuting trends blamed

    RTD Chief Executive and General Manager Debra Johnson, in emailed responses to questions from The Denver Post, emphasized that “RTD is not unique” among U.S. transit agencies struggling to regain ridership lost during the COVID-19 pandemic. Johnson blamed societal shifts.

    “Commuting trends have significantly changed over the last five years,” she said. “Return-to-work numbers in the Denver metro area, which accounted for a significant percentage of RTD’s ridership prior to March 2020, remain low as companies and businesses continue to provide flexible in-office schedules for their employees.”

    In the future, RTD will be “changing its focus from primarily providing commuter services,” she said, toward “enhancing its bus and services and connections to high-volume events, activity centers, concerts and festivals.”

    A recent survey commissioned by the agency found exceptional customer satisfaction.

    But agency directors are looking for a more aggressive approach to reversing the decline in ridership. And some are mulling a radical restructuring of routes.

    Funded mostly by taxpayers across a 2,345 square-mile area spanning eight counties and 40 municipalities — one of the biggest in the nation — RTD operates 10 rail lines covering 114 miles with 84 stations and 102 bus routes with 9,720 stops.

    “We should start from scratch,” said RTD director Chris Nicholson, advocating an overhaul of the “geometry” of all bus routes to align transit better with metro Denver residents’ current mobility patterns.

    The key will be increasing frequency.

    “We should design the routes how we think would best serve people today, and then we could take that and modify it where absolutely necessary to avoid disruptive differences with our current route map,” he said.

    Then, in 2030, directors should appeal to voters for increased funding to improve service — funds that would be substantially controlled by municipalties “to pick where they want the service to go,” he said.

    Reversing the RTD ridership decline may take a couple of years, Nicholson said, comparing the decreases this year to customers shunning a restaurant. “If you’re a restaurant and you poison some guests accidentally, you’re gonna lose customers even after you fix the problem.”

    The RTD ridership numbers show an overall public transit ridership decrease by 5% when measured over the 12-month period from August 2024 through July 2025, the last month for which staffers have made numbers available, compared with the same period a year ago.

    Bus ridership decreased by 2% and light rail by 18% over that period. In a typical month, RTD officials record around 5 million boardings — around 247,000 on weekdays.

    The emergency maintenance blitz began in June 2024 when RTD officials revealed that inspectors had found widespread “rail burn” deterioration of tracks, compelling thousands of riders to seek other transportation.

    The precautionary rail “slow zones” persisted for months as contractors worked on tracks, delaying and diverting trains, leaving transit-dependent workers in a lurch. RTD driver workforce shortages limited deployment of emergency bus shuttles.

    This year, RTD ridership systemwide decreased by 3.9% when measured from January through July, compared with that period in 2024. The bus ridership this year has decreased by 2.4%.

    On rail lines, the ridership on the relatively popular A Line that runs from Union Station downtown to Denver International Airport was down by 9.7%. The E Line light rail that runs from downtown to the southeastern edge of metro Denver was down by 24%. Rail ridership on the W Line decreased by 18% and on R Line by 15%, agency records show.

    The annual RTD ridership has decreased by 38% since 2019, from 105.8 million to 65.2 million in 2024.

    A Regional Transportation District light rail train moves through downtown Denver on Friday, June 27, 2025. (AP Photo/David Zalubowski)

    Light rail ‘sickness’ spreading

    “The sickness on RTD light rail is spreading to other parts of the RTD system,” said James Flattum, a co-founder of the Greater Denver Transit grassroots rider advocacy group, who also serves on the state’s RTD Accountability Committee. “We’re seeing permanent demand destruction as a consequence of having an unreliable system. This comes from a loss of trust in RTD to get you where you need to go.”

    RTD officials have countered critics by pointing out that the light rail’s on-time performance recovered this year to 91% or better. Bus on-time performance still lagged at 83% in July, agency records show.

    The officials also pointed to decreased security reports made using an RTD smartphone app after deploying more police officers on buses and trains. The number of reported assaults has decreased — to four in September, compared with 16 in September 2024, records show.

    Greater Denver Transit members acknowledged that safety has improved, but question the agency’s assertions based on app usage. “It may be true that the number of security calls went down,” Flattum said, “but maybe the people who otherwise would have made more safety calls are no longer riding RTD.”

    RTD staffers developing the 2026 budget have focused on managing debt and maintaining operations spending at current levels. They’ve received forecasts that revenues from taxpayers will increase slightly. It’s unclear whether state and federal funds will be available.

    Looking ahead, they’re also planning to take on $539 million of debt over the next five years to buy new diesel buses, instead of shifting to electric hybrid buses as planned for the future.

    RTD directors and leaders of the Southwest Energy Efficiency Project, an environmental group, are opposing the rollback of RTD’s planned shift to the cleaner, quieter electric hybrid buses and taking on new debt for that purpose.

    Colorado lawmakers will “push on a bunch of different fronts” to prioritize better service to boost ridership, Froelich said.

    The legislature in recent years directed funds to help RTD provide free transit for riders under age 20. Buses and trains running at least every 15 minutes would improve both ridership and safety, she said, because more riders would discourage bad behavior and riders wouldn’t have to wait alone at night on often-empty platforms for up to an hour.

    “We’re trying to do what we can to get people back onto the transit system,” Froelich said. “They do it in other places, and people here do ride the Bustang (intercity bus system). RTD just seems to lack the nimbleness required to meet the moment.”

    Denver Center for the Performing Arts stage hand Chris Grossman walks home after work in downtown Denver on Thursday, Oct. 16, 2025. (Photo by Andy Cross/The Denver Post)
    Denver Center for the Performing Arts stage hand Chris Grossman walks home after work in downtown Denver on Thursday, Oct. 16, 2025. (Photo by Andy Cross/The Denver Post)

    Riders switch modes

    Meanwhile, riders continue to abandon public transit when it doesn’t meet their needs.

    For Denver Center for the Performing Arts theater technician Chris Grossman, 35, ditching RTD led to a better quality of life. He had to move from the Virginia Village neighborhood he loved.

    Back in 2016, Grossman sold his ailing blue 2003 VW Golf when he moved there in the belief that “RTD light rail was more or less reliable.” He rode nearly every day between the Colorado Station and downtown.

    But trains became erratic as maintenance of walls along tracks caused delays. “It just got so bad. I was burning so much money on rideshares that I probably could have bought a car.” Shortly before RTD announced the “slow zones” last summer, he moved to an apartment closer to downtown on Capitol Hill.

    He walks or rides scooters to work, faster than taking the bus, he said.

    Similarly, Honor Morgan, 25, who came to Denver from the rural Midwest, “grateful for any public transit,” said she had to move from her place east of downtown to be closer to her workplace due to RTD transit trouble.

    Buses were late, and one blew by her as she waited. She had to adjust her attire when riding her Colfax Avenue route to Union Station to manage harassment. She faced regular dramas of riders with substance-use problems erupting.

    Morgan moved to an apartment near Union Station in March, allowing her to walk to work.

    Bruce Finley

    Source link

  • Government shutdown enters fourth week, affecting federal workers, services, economy

    The government shutdown is entering a fourth week as Democrats and Republicans blame each other for holding the country “hostage.” Caught in the middle, federal workers, government services, and the economy are all feeling the impact. Previous shutdowns have seen reduced overall economic growth, disproportionately affecting certain industries. National parks and museums remain closed, flight delays are mounting, and backlogs for new small business loans and flood insurance renewals are growing.Republicans continue to accuse Democrats of blocking paychecks by refusing to reopen the government, while Democrats argue that Republicans are unwilling to negotiate over the core issue of health care funding. “Congressional Democrats seem to want to keep the government shut down even though it would mean that a lot of you would not get your paycheck,” Vice President JD Vance said in remarks to an audience of Marines celebrating the 250th anniversary Saturday.Democrats pushed back in “No Kings” protests across the country.”They’re the ones acting like children refusing to negotiate with Democrats in the Senate who they know have to vote for a budget in order for it to become law,” Sen. Chris Murphy said in an interview Saturday.The shutdown has had a sizable impact as uncertainty weighs on the federal workforce. Under the Trump administration’s direction, federal agencies have been planning not just furloughs but also permanent layoffs. However, a federal judge has temporarily blocked the firings, deeming them potentially illegal.Public perception of who is to blame has been roughly evenly split. A new Associated Press poll finds that a majority, about 6 in 10 Americans, blame President Donald Trump and Republicans for the shutdown. An even larger majority, three-quarters of Americans, believe both sides deserve at least a “moderate” share of the blame, suggesting that no one has truly escaped responsibility for the shutdown.Watch the latest coverage on the federal government shutdown:

    The government shutdown is entering a fourth week as Democrats and Republicans blame each other for holding the country “hostage.” Caught in the middle, federal workers, government services, and the economy are all feeling the impact.

    Previous shutdowns have seen reduced overall economic growth, disproportionately affecting certain industries.

    National parks and museums remain closed, flight delays are mounting, and backlogs for new small business loans and flood insurance renewals are growing.

    Republicans continue to accuse Democrats of blocking paychecks by refusing to reopen the government, while Democrats argue that Republicans are unwilling to negotiate over the core issue of health care funding.

    “Congressional Democrats seem to want to keep the government shut down even though it would mean that a lot of you would not get your paycheck,” Vice President JD Vance said in remarks to an audience of Marines celebrating the 250th anniversary Saturday.

    Democrats pushed back in “No Kings” protests across the country.

    “They’re the ones acting like children refusing to negotiate with Democrats in the Senate who they know have to vote for a budget in order for it to become law,” Sen. Chris Murphy said in an interview Saturday.

    The shutdown has had a sizable impact as uncertainty weighs on the federal workforce. Under the Trump administration’s direction, federal agencies have been planning not just furloughs but also permanent layoffs. However, a federal judge has temporarily blocked the firings, deeming them potentially illegal.

    Public perception of who is to blame has been roughly evenly split. A new Associated Press poll finds that a majority, about 6 in 10 Americans, blame President Donald Trump and Republicans for the shutdown. An even larger majority, three-quarters of Americans, believe both sides deserve at least a “moderate” share of the blame, suggesting that no one has truly escaped responsibility for the shutdown.

    Watch the latest coverage on the federal government shutdown:

    Source link

  • Black Lives Matter mural vandalized in Seattle’s Capitol Hill neighborhood

    A Black Lives Matter mural in Seattle’s Capitol Hill neighborhood was vandalized just over a week ago, with white paint now defacing the art.

    The backstory:

    It happened between Sep. 27 and 30, according to the Seattle Department of Transportation.

    The mural was originally painted back in 2020 and is now upkept by artists with the Vivid Matter Collective. The damage comes just weeks after the collective did some paint touch-ups to the mural.

    What they’re saying:

    Some say it’s disappointing to see, especially with the vandal still on the loose.

    “Police cruisers came right there and two of them drove through the middle and skirted up faster,” said Remington Michel Stone.

    Stone didn’t see who covered it in paint, but says they’ve seen cars drive over the mural recently, which bothers them.

    “I think it’s very obvious that that area is not to be driven on by anyone as much as possible,” Stone said. “Not just because there is a mural there but because there are yellow posts that go all around there.”

    Many say it comes down to respect.

    “I think in this park, the thing we care about is respecting one another.”

    The Seattle Department of Transportation says it is working with the Vivid Matter Collective to restore the painting, issuing the following statement:

    “Artists were onsite today to assess the damage, and our crews are coordinating cleanup efforts that will include hydro-blasting and pressure washing to remove the paint.

    “SDOT remains committed to preserving this important piece of public art and ensuring it continues to be a space of pride and reflection for the community.”

    The Source: Information in this story came from Converge Media, the Seattle Department of Transportation and the Vivid Matter Collective.

    MORE NEWS FROM FOX 13 SEATTLE

    Seattle mayor announces National Guard defense plan, issues executive orders

    Man charged in WA State Capitol break-in, vandalism

    Major delays expected on I-5, I-405 during busy Seattle sports weekend

    Man shot in the face in South Seattle

    Docs: Everett, WA man accused of setting fire to adult stores

    To get the best local news, weather and sports in Seattle for free, sign up for the daily FOX Seattle Newsletter.

    Download the free FOX LOCAL app for mobile in the Apple App Store or Google Play Store for live Seattle news, top stories, weather updates and more local and national news.

    Capitol HillSeattleNews

    Jennifer.Dowling@fox.com (Jennifer Dowling)

    Source link

  • 1 killed, 1 injured in Capitol Hill shooting

    Seattle police are searching for a suspect after one person died and a bystander was injured in a shooting in the Capitol Hill neighborhood Thursday night.

    What we know:

    The shooting happened near the Chipotle at East Pike Street and Broadway around 8:15 p.m.

    Seattle Capitol Hill shooting investigation

    Police say they located a victim on scene who was shot. They were treated on scene by paramedics before being transported to Harborview Medical Center, where they later died from their injuries.

    Later, police learned a second victim showed up to Harborview with a gunshot wound. SPD said they were a bystander.

    At this time, Seattle police do not have any suspects in custody.

    The public is asked to avoid the area as officers investigate the scene.

    This is a developing story. Check back for updates.

    MORE NEWS FROM FOX 13 SEATTLE

    Seattle mayor announces National Guard defense plan, issues executive orders

    Man charged in WA State Capitol break-in, vandalism

    Major delays expected on I-5, I-405 during busy Seattle sports weekend

    Man shot in the face in South Seattle

    Docs: Everett, WA man accused of setting fire to adult stores

    To get the best local news, weather and sports in Seattle for free, sign up for the daily FOX Seattle Newsletter.

    Download the free FOX LOCAL app for mobile in the Apple App Store or Google Play Store for live Seattle news, top stories, weather updates and more local and national news.

    The Source: Information in this story came from the Seattle Police Department.

    Crime and Public SafetyCapitol HillSeattleNews

    Will.Wixey@fox.com (Will Wixey)

    Source link

  • Seattle police arrest armed felon smoking fentanyl outside Capitol Hill grocery store

    Police arrested an armed felon after he was caught smoking fentanyl in front of a grocery store in Seattle’s Capitol Hill neighborhood overnight. 

    Seattle police officers recovered a firearm, 0.2g of Fentanyl, and narcotic paraphernalia during an arrest. (Seattle Police Department)

    What they’re saying:

    According to the Seattle Police Department (SPD), patrol officers saw a man smoking narcotics with a pipe in front of the QFC grocery store near Broadway and East Pike Street just after midnight.

    Officers arrested the 27-year-old man without incident. 

    While interviewing him, police recovered a loaded handgun. When asked where he got it, he told officers he “found it.”

    According to SPD, the suspect was recently released from prison. He has previous convictions for multiple felonies, including unlawful possession of a firearm, theft of a motor vehicle, attempting to elude police and unlawful possession of a motor vehicle. He is prohibited from carrying firearms.

    The suspect also had a $4,000 arrest warrant for fighting in public, issued by the Centralia Municipal Court. 

    Officers booked him into the King County Jail for investigation of unlawful possession of a firearm and possession of narcotics. 

    The Source: Information in this story comes from a press release by the Seattle Police Department.

    MORE NEWS FROM FOX 13 SEATTLE

    Gov. Ferguson: Intruder breaks into WA Capitol Building

    Nobel Prize in medicine goes to 3 scientists, including one from Seattle

    Mariners, Seahawks, Sounders draw nearly 200,000 fans in Seattle

    Daylight saving time 2025: When will we ‘fall back?’

    ‘Maybe they’re hungry’: Seattle mayor’s public safety comments spark online debate

    To get the best local news, weather and sports in Seattle for free, sign up for the daily FOX Seattle Newsletter.

    Download the free FOX LOCAL app for mobile in the Apple App Store or Google Play Store for live Seattle news, top stories, weather updates and more local and national news.

    Capitol HillCrime and Public SafetySeattleNewsOpioid Epidemic

    Jim.Jensen@fox.com (Jim Jensen)

    Source link

  • Woman shot, several pepper sprayed during fight in Seattle’s Capitol Hill

    Seattle police are investigating after a woman was shot and several others were pepper sprayed during a fight in Capitol Hill Sunday afternoon.

    What we know:

    It happened near Broadway East and East Harrison Street around 4 p.m.

    Officers arrived on scene and located a woman with a gunshot wound to her knee. She was treated at the scene and later taken to Harborview Medical Center in serious, but stable condition.

    The shooting stemmed from a fight between a group of people, where several people were pepper sprayed and gunshots rang out, Seattle Police said.

    Surveillance video reportedly showed a female suspect firing several shots into the crowd before taking off in a black SUV.

    Police didn’t locate the suspect, who police say fled before officers got there. 

    Anyone with information about the suspect or shooting is asked to call the SPD Violent Crimes Tip Line at 206-233-5000.

    MORE NEWS FROM FOX 13 SEATTLE

    Seattle, Portland leaders join state officials in rejecting Trump’s PNW troop deployment

    Family calls for ‘justice for Sunshine’ as plea deal is discussed in graphic Queen Anne assault case

    Tolls now in effect for WA’s SR-509 Expressway. Here’s what to know

    Doja Cat announces Seattle tour stop at Climate Pledge Arena

    Seattle Mariners, Seahawks, Sounders all home this weekend: Traffic, parking, transit tips

    To get the best local news, weather and sports in Seattle for free, sign up for the daily FOX Seattle Newsletter.

    Download the free FOX LOCAL app for mobile in the Apple App Store or Google Play Store for live Seattle news, top stories, weather updates and more local and national news.

    The Source: Information in this story came from the Seattle Police Department.

    Crime and Public SafetyCapitol HillNewsSeattle

    Will.Wixey@fox.com (Will Wixey)

    Source link

  • Inside Congress’ warring factions over how to fund the government

    Battle lines are emerging on Capitol Hill in the fight to avert a government shutdown in three weeks — and it’s not just Republicans vs. Democrats.

    On one side, fiscal hawks are joining with the White House to keep federal agencies running on static funding levels, ideally into January or longer. On the other, Democrats and some top Republicans want to punt no further than November to buy congressional negotiators more time to cut a cross-party compromise on fresh funding totals for federal programs.

    In the end, the standoff could hinge on Speaker Mike Johnson’s appetite for trying to pass a funding package backed by President Donald Trump but not Democrats, as he did in the spring — and whether Senate Democrats once again capitulate rather than see government operations grind to a halt on Oct. 1.

    “They jammed us last time,” Sen. Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii), a top appropriator, said in an interview. “And I am encouraging my Republican friends who want to do appropriations to understand that that won’t work this time.”

    Even more irate after Trump’s latest move to unilaterally cancel almost $5 billion in foreign aid through a so-called pocket rescission, Democrats are warning there will be a funding lapse if Republicans don’t negotiate with them. And while they’re being cautious not to box themselves in with ultimatums on funding totals or specific policy demands, they’re starting to flex their muscles by floating concessions Republicans could make in exchange for support across the aisle.

    That includes making a deal by the end of the year to head off the expiration of enhanced health insurance subsidies that would result in premium hikes come January for millions of Americans.

    There are glimmers of bipartisan talks happening behind the scenes: Johnson and Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries recently discussed passing a short-term spending patch until November or December, though no decisions were made.

    And top House and Senate appropriators are gelling behind a hybrid approach: attempting a bill with a full year of updated funding levels for the USDA, the Department of Veterans Affairs and congressional operations, tied to a short-term extension for other agencies, to allow for more negotiations.

    But there are plenty of reasons to be skeptical about a bipartisan funding deal coming together, with Sen. John Kennedy (R-La.), a senior appropriator, putting the odds of a shutdown at “50-50, perhaps higher.”

    As of late last week, the top Senate leaders — Republican John Thune and Democrat Chuck Schumer — haven’t yet spoken about the upcoming funding deadline, in a further sign that cross-party talks are still nascent.

    Meanwhile, House hard-liners, backed by some of their conservative Senate counterparts, appear to be digging in to demand a lengthy stopgap bill, rather than a short-term patch meant to facilitate a more comprehensive bipartisan funding measure down the road. One Republican, granted anonymity to share the conservative strategy, said fiscal hawks want a funding patch “to 2026” or for the entirety of the coming fiscal year “if we can get it.”

    Continually running the government on stopgaps is part of White House budget director Russ Vought’s strategy to shrink federal spending as he roots for the government funding process to be “less bipartisan.”

    Those kick-the-can funding bills give the White House more leeway to shift cash while depriving Democrats of any increases in non-defense funding and GOP defense hawks the military budget increases they seek. Then, using party-line measures like the domestic-policy megabill and the $9 billion clawbacks package Congress cleared this summer, Republicans can add or subtract funding without needing to rely on the votes of Senate Democrats.

    The White House predicts that Trump’s more recent, unilateral cancellation of $4.9 billion will only help build support among GOP fiscal hawks for a “clean” continuing resolution, or CR, that simply drags out current funding levels for weeks or months more. In this scenario, Democrats will have to fall in line, a White House official told reporters late last month after Trump nixed the foreign aid funding.

    It’s very hard for me to believe that they’re going to oppose a clean CR that would cause them to be responsible for a government shutdown,” said the official, granted anonymity to speak candidly.

    The Senate’s top Democratic appropriator, Patty Murray of Washington, warned it won’t work for Republicans to blame Democrats: If the GOP goes it alone, she said last week, “well, then, that is a Republican shutdown.”

    Democrats are also still grappling with how the pocket rescission will factor into their government funding demands. Schatz called it a “point of friction” but added, “I’m not prepared to articulate any red lines to you.”

    Notwithstanding the administration’s latest attempt to revoke funding, setting static spending levels through next September would be a nonstarter for many members of both parties. For Democrats, going into next year with a stopgap bill would force them to give up their biggest point of leverage — another end-of-the-year government funding deadline — to try to get a deal on extending the enhanced Affordable Care Act tax credits that will expire Dec. 31.

    On the GOP side, some conservatives view a full-year stopgap bill as locking in spending levels set under President Joe Biden, while defense hawks warn that it undermines the military. Those GOP divisions would make it harder, if not impossible, for Johnson and the White House to try to repeat their go-it-alone playbook from the spring.

    Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) said he didn’t think a full-year, flat-funded spending bill would come to fruition: “We can talk about it all we want, we always do. Same plot, different actors.”

    Passage of a lengthy funding patch would especially sting for Republicans appropriators, who are quietly trying to retain relevance amid Trump’s escalating assault on Congress’ power through tactics to shift, freeze and cancel funding that lawmakers previously approved.

    House Appropriations Chair Tom Cole, who consistently refrains from criticizing the president, told his underlings last week that the best way for lawmakers to protect Congress’ power of the purse is to negotiate a bipartisan funding agreement now, rather than fall back on a continuing resolution.

    “The way to be successful is, get a deal done. That’s what we need to do,” the Oklahoma Republican told fellow appropriators during a recent markup. “But please don’t have any illusions that we’re cavalierly surrendering our power.”

    Still, Cole hasn’t received the blessing of his leadership to begin cross-party negotiations.

    “We are in discussions now with the administration, with the Senate, about how to proceed,” he said. “We don’t have any final goal or deadline. But I would prefer to get this done sooner rather than later, and I don’t want another CR.”

    Meredith Lee Hill contributed to this report.

    Source link

  • In a week of stumbles, Trump faces setbacks in court and abroad

    Facing viral rumors of his imminent death, President Trump emerged in the Oval Office on Tuesday alive and scowling. Core tenets of his economic policies were under strain. Flashy diplomatic overtures to Moscow appeared to be backfiring. And a scandal over a notorious sexual abuser that has fixated his base was roaring back to life in Washington.

    It was a challenging week for the president, whose aggressive approach to his second term has begun to hit significant roadblocks with the public and the courts, and overseas, with longstanding U.S. adversaries Trump once hoped to coax to his will.

    The president called for an expedited Supreme Court review of an appellate court ruling that he had exceeded his authority by issuing sweeping global tariffs last spring — a decision that, if left standing, could upend the foundation of his economic agenda. On Friday, the Bureau of Labor Statistics issued jobs numbers showing a contraction of the labor market in July, a first since the depths of the pandemic in 2020.

    New art lining a hallway in the West Wing features photographs of Trump’s summit with Vladimir Putin in Alaska, where Trump said the Russian president had agreed to meet with Ukraine’s president, Volodymyr Zelensky, to discuss an end to the war. Yet, three weeks on, Russia had launched its most intense bombardment of Kyiv in years, and Putin traveled to Beijing for a military parade hosted by Xi Jinping, which Russian state media used to mock the U.S. president.

    During an appearance in the Oval Office on Friday afternoon, Trump said reaching a deal to end the war between Russia and Ukraine has turned out to be “a little bit more difficult” than he initially thought.

    And a rare spree of bipartisanship broke out on Capitol Hill — in opposition to Trump’s causes.

    A tense hearing at the Senate Finance Committee with Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. laid bare concern over the direction of federal vaccination policy and public health recommendations under his leadership across party lines.

    Trump declined to stand behind him wholeheartedly after the hearing. “He’s got some little different ideas,” Trump told reporters, adding: “It’s not your standard talk.”

    On Wednesday, moments after a group of more than 100 women pleaded for Trump’s help from the steps of the Capitol seeking transparency over the investigation of their alleged abuser, Jeffrey Epstein, Trump dismissed the matter as a “hoax” perpetrated by Democrats.

    “The Department of Justice has done its job, they have given everything requested of them,” Trump repeated on Truth Social on Friday. “It’s time to end the Democrat Epstein Hoax.”

    Trump was close friends with Epstein for more than a decade. But his base has repeatedly called for the release of thousands of files in his case — and some of Trump’s staunchest allies in Congress are set to vote against his wishes for a discharge petition directing the Justice Department to do so in the coming days.

    A far-right political activist released hidden camera footage this week of a Justice Department official claiming the agency would redact the names of Republicans, but not Democrats, identified in the files. In the video, the DOJ official also suggested that Epstein associate Ghislaine Maxwell was recently moved to a lower-security prison as part of a deal to keep her quiet.

    Public support for Trump has appeared stable since July, with roughly 42% of Americans approving of his job performance across a series of high quality polls. But the end of the August recess in Washington — and the oncoming flu and COVID-19 season — could return public attention to subjects that have proved politically perilous for the president this week.

    Polls show that a majority of the president’s Republican voters support vaccines. They oppose Putin and increasingly support Ukraine. And across the political spectrum, Americans want the Epstein files released, unredacted and in full.

    A string of court losses

    The president’s agenda suffered several setbacks this week, as federal judges across the country ruled his administration had broken the law in various instances.

    In San Francisco, a federal judge ruled that Trump’s deployment of military troops in Los Angeles was illegal and barred soldiers from aiding immigration arrests in California in an order set to take effect next week.

    In Boston, a federal judge said the Trump administration broke the law when it froze billions of dollars in research funds awarded to Harvard University. In another court ruling, a judge temporarily blocked the Trump administration from deporting dozens of unaccompanied migrant children to Guatemala.

    And on Friday afternoon, a federal judge stopped the Trump administration from taking away the deportation protections under Temporary Protected Status for hundreds of thousands of Venezuelans and Haitians living in the United States.

    While the court decisions represent a snag for key portions of the administration’s agenda, the cases continue to play out in court — and could ultimately turn in favor of Trump.

    Legal experts are closely watching those decisions. In the case of the military troop deployments, for instance, some fear a reversal on appeal could ultimately hand the president broader power to send troops to American cities.

    Trump has floated additional federal deployments — to Chicago, Baltimore and New Orleans — in recent days.

    Trump reacts to a bad week

    Trump greeted the waves of bad news with a characteristic mix of deflection, finger-pointing and anger.

    He warned that losing his appeal on tariff policy at the Supreme Court would render the United States a “third world country,” telling reporters, “if we don’t win that case, our country is going to suffer so greatly.” And he said he was “very disappointed” in Putin.

    After the parade in Beijing — which was also attended by Prime Minister Narendra Modi of India, a longstanding U.S. ally now ostracized by Trump’s tariffs — drew widespread media attention, Trump wrote on social media that the countries were conspiring together against the United States.

    “We’ve lost India and Russia to deepest, darkest, China,” he wrote.

    In another lengthy social media post on Friday, Trump accused Democrats of fueling the Epstein “hoax” as a means to “distract from the great success of a Republican President.”

    Days earlier, survivors of Epstein’s sexual abuse publicly pressured lawmakers to back a legislative measure to force the release of the sex trafficking investigation into the late financier.

    “This is about ending secrecy wherever abuse of power takes root,” said Anouska De Georgiou, who was among the Epstein victims who held a news conference on Capitol Hill.

    A few high-profile Republicans also broke with Trump on the Epstein issue, calling for more transparency on the investigation. Trump ally Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia said she is willing to expose those who are tied to Epstein’s sex trafficking case.

    On a phone call with Trump on Wednesday morning, Greene suggested he meet with Epstein’s victims at the White House while they were gathered in town. He was noncommittal, the congresswoman told reporters.

    The survivors left town without a meeting. At the direction of the White House, Republican leadership continues to press Republican members to oppose efforts to release the files.

    Michael Wilner, Ana Ceballos

    Source link