ReportWire

Tag: capital

  • Here’s why UBS’s deal to buy Credit Suisse matters to U.S. investors

    Here’s why UBS’s deal to buy Credit Suisse matters to U.S. investors

    [ad_1]

    Thousands of miles away from U.S. shores last Wednesday, a headline began working its way across Europe, then Wall Street, sparking fresh panic as it dawned on investors that they may be facing yet another banking crisis.

    Shares of Credit Suisse
    CS,
    -6.94%

    CSGN,
    -8.01%

    would eventually sink 25% last week to a fresh record low, unable to find footing days after the head of top shareholder Saudi National Bank said they won’t invest any more in the bank. By Sunday, the struggling Swiss bank had a new owner, leaving investors to wonder if at least one chapter in a current roller coaster of global banking stress can be closed.

    Swiss authorities steered rival UBS AG
    UBS,
    -5.50%

    to an all-stock deal worth 3 billion francs ($3.25 billion), or 0.76 francs per share, a not-so-slight discount to the 1.86 franc close on Friday of Credit Suisse. So important was the agreement, it was announced by Switzerland’s President Alain Berset, with both banks and the chairman of the Swiss National Bank on either side of him.

    “With the takeover of Credit Suisse by UBS, a solution has been found to secure financial stability and protect the Swiss economy in this exceptional situation,” the SNB said in a statement.

    The Swiss National Bank said either Swiss bank can borrow up to 100 billion francs in a liquidity assistance loan, and Credit Suisse will get a liquidity assistance loan of up to 100 billion francs, backed by a federal default guarantee. The U.S. Federal Reserve had worked with its Swiss counterpart on the deal as well.

    “We welcome the announcements by the Swiss authorities today to support financial stability. The capital and liquidity positions of the U.S. banking system are strong, and the U.S. financial system is resilient,” said a statement Sunday by Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen and Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell.

    European Central Bank President Christine Lagarde also praised Swiss authorities for “restoring orderly market conditions and ensuring financial stability,” while reiterating the “resilience” of the euro-area banking sector. She said the ECB stands ready to provide liquidity if needed.

    Her comment comes days after the the ECB pulled the trigger Thursday on a 50-basis-point rate hike, as it warned “inflation is projected to remain too high for too long.”

    The deal for Credit Suisse comes in the wake of stress on the U.S. banking sector, triggered by the collapse of Silvergate Bank, Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank, all within the space of a week.

    “Virtually everyone at this high-level Swiss press conference — government officials, regulator, central bank governor, and executives of the two banks — blamed the US banking sector turmoil for being the catalyst for the financial turmoil in #Switzerland,” tweeted Mohamed A. El-Erian, chief economic adviser at Allianz, of the press conference Sunday with Swiss authorities to announce the deal.

    And for U.S. investors who have had quite enough anxiety lately, a logical question would be to ask if the deal that brings together the two Swiss banking giants will now remove one layer of stress from global markets, and hence Wall Street.

    For that reason, many will be watching how Asian and U.S. equity futures trade later on Sunday, as well as Europe’s opening reaction on Monday.

    The Credit Suisse news may only go so far to assuage investors, with some raising an eyebrow over Powell and Yellen’s Sunday statement about the Swiss deal. “Seriously, if everyone truly believed the ‘The capital and liquidity positions of the U.S. banking system are strong, and the U.S. financial system is resilient’ … Would they have to tell us? Are these words enough?” said Jim Bianco, president of Bianco Research, on Twitter. “Or do investors want to see Warren Buffett writing checks to regional banks in the next two hours (before Asia opens)?”

    Fox News and other media outlets reported over the weekend that the Berkshire Hathaway
    BRK.A,
    -2.76%

    BRK.B,
    -2.81%

    chairman and CEO had been talking to President Joe Biden’s administration in recent days over possible investments in the battered regional bank sector, and offering his advice.

    The billionaire investor was responsible for a capital injection to Bank of America
    BAC,
    -3.97%

    in 2011 as its shares tumbled due to subprime mortgages, as well as $5 billion to Goldman Sachs
    GS,
    -3.67%

    amid the 2008 financial crisis.

    Some had said ahead of the deal last week that global-market stability depended on the Swiss first getting their house in order.

    “I don’t think there are any direct consequences for U.S. investors, but it’s extremely negative for sentiment if a major Swiss bank fails, hot on the heels of SVB/SBNY,” Simon Ree, the founder of Tao of Trading options academy school and author of the book by the same name, told MarketWatch last week.

    “The market will be (temporarily) wondering who’s next. It could start to have the optics of a global banking crisis, rather than an idiosyncratic failure of a niche U.S. regional bank,” said Ree.

    Credit Suisse’s troubles came amid a revamp and five straight money-losing quarters, following a painful legacy that included billions worth of exposure to the collapsed Archegos family office and $10 billion worth of funds tied to Greensil Capital it had to freeze.

    Read: In its delayed annual report, Credit Suisse admitted to financial control weaknesses

    “The SNB and the Swiss government are fully aware that the failure of Credit Suisse or even any losses by deposit holders would destroy Switzerland’s reputation as a financial center,” said Otavio Marenzi, CEO of Opimas, a management consulting firm focused on global capital markets, in a note to clients last week.

    The bank’s plummeting stock price and soaring bond yields was “mimicking Silicon Valley Bank’s recent collapse in a frightening way. In terms of the outflow of deposits, Credit Suisse’s position looks even worse,” said Marenzi.

    Over there?

    As far as some are concerned, the market may have more stress ahead of it.

    “The SVB failure highlights the potential for other skeletons to be hidden in closets and the market will spend the next few weeks/months hunting them out. Even just the extreme volatility we’ve seen on bond markets the last five days renders any attempt to ascribe a value to other asset classes redundant,” said Ree.

    Plus: Here’s what’s really protecting your bank deposits

    His view is shared by many analysts, who in part point to increasing uncertainty around how the Federal Reserve will react going forward as it tries to balance market and economic risks. Some now see full percentage rate cuts by year-end, amid banking stress.

    Samantha LaDuc, the founder of LaDucTrading.com who specializes in timing major market inflections, said she stands by her advice (that she shared with MarketWatch in February) that investors are being “paid to wait,” by staying in cash.

    Read: Looking for a place for your cash? Grab these 5% CDs while you still can.

    “I have been literally recommending and tweeting to clients that we are PAID TO WAIT in T-bills at 5% until [the] bond market can figure out if we have recession or not. All that happened last week pulled forward recession risk,” she told MarketWatch.

    Prior to the SVB crisis, she had been recommending clients short reflation trades, such as banks
    XLF,
    -3.22%

    KRE,
    -5.99%
    ,
    energy
    XLE,
    -1.57%

    and metals and mining
    XME,
    -0.78%

    COPX,
    +0.63%

    SLX,
    -1.96%
    ,
    and has been saying she sees “unattractive risk-reward for either stocks or bonds.”

    Opimas’ Marenzi said the threat to Wall Street from Credit Suisse was simple:

    “You mean what do American investors who do not own any non-American stocks and do not own a passport and could not find Switzerland on a map and who think that anyone who speaks any language other than English is a bit weird have to worry about? Not a lot, other than the contagion spreading back into the US banking system and causing a meltdown,” he told MarketWatch.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • The Dow’s 4 financial stocks are cutting about 170 points off the Dow’s price

    The Dow’s 4 financial stocks are cutting about 170 points off the Dow’s price

    [ad_1]

    Financial stocks continued to drag stock stock market down Friday, as the Dow Jones Industrial Average’s
    DJIA,
    -1.19%

    four financial components contributed about 40% of the index’s selloff. Shares of JPMorgan Chase & Co.
    JPM,
    -3.78%

    gave up 3.7%, insurer Travelers Companies Inc.
    TRV,
    -4.17%

    dropped 3.6%, American Express Co.
    AXP,
    -2.62%

    fell 3.2% and Goldman Sachs Group Inc.
    GS,
    -3.67%

    slid 3.0%. The combined price declines of those stocks reduced the Dow’s price by 170 points, while the Dow fell 439 points, or 1.4%. SVB Financial Group’s
    SIVB,
    -60.41%

    bankruptcy filing on Friday showed that the $30 billion infusion into First Republic Bank
    FRC,
    -32.80%

    didn’t mean the crisis in investor confidence was over.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • First Republic stock’s soars a record 58%, but recovers only about one-fifth what it lost the past 3 days

    First Republic stock’s soars a record 58%, but recovers only about one-fifth what it lost the past 3 days

    [ad_1]

    While some of the hardest-hit regional bank stocks are posting record one-day rallies, the gains look a bit less impressive when compared with the beating they took over the previous three sessions. Shares of First Republic Bank FRC rocketed $18.05, or 57.8%, in morning trading Tuesday, which was more than quadruple the percentage of their previous record one-day rally of 12.9% on March 17, 2020. But considering the stock had plummeted $83,79, or 72.9%, over the previous three sessions in the wake of recent bank failures, Tuesday’s bounce has retraced just 21.5% of that selloff. Among other big bouncers, shares of Western…

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • SVB’s failure proves the U.S. needs tighter banking regulations so that all customers’ money is safe

    SVB’s failure proves the U.S. needs tighter banking regulations so that all customers’ money is safe

    [ad_1]

    The run on Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) SIVB— on which nearly half of all venture-backed tech start-ups in the United States depend — is in part a rerun of a familiar story, but it’s more than that. Once again, economic policy and financial regulation has proven inadequate.

    The news about the second-biggest bank failure in U.S. history came just days after Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell assured Congress that the financial condition of America’s banks was sound. But the timing should not be surprising. Given the large and…

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • SVB Financial stock tumbles 22% after hours on reports of funds advising clients to pull money from bank

    SVB Financial stock tumbles 22% after hours on reports of funds advising clients to pull money from bank

    [ad_1]

    SVB Financial Group
    SIVB,
    -60.41%

    fell more than 22% in the extended session Thursday as reports surfaced that several funds are advising clients to pull their money from Silicon Valley Bank.

    Bloomberg News late Thursday reported that Founders Fund, the San Francisco-based venture-capital fund co-founded by Peter Thiel, has advised companies to do just so. The report cited people familiar with the matter.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • GM’s stock slips 2% as auto maker announces buyouts

    GM’s stock slips 2% as auto maker announces buyouts

    [ad_1]

    General Motors Co. on Thursday announced employee buyouts that are expected to lead to charges of $1.5 billion as the auto maker seeks to be “nimble in an increasingly competitive market.”

    GM’s
    GM,
    -3.16%

    stock slipped 2% after the news. The announcement comes a little over a week after the Detroit News reported that GM was cutting about 500 jobs, which came roughly a month after the company said it wasn’t planning layoffs.

    “By permanently bringing down structured costs, we can improve vehicle profitability and remain nimble in an increasingly competitive market,” a GM spokesperson said.

    The buyouts, which the company is calling a voluntary separation program, are being offered to U.S. salaried employees with at least five years of service and to global executives with at least two years of service, GM said.

    The program offers employees “an opportunity to make a career change or retire earlier,” the company said. “Employees are strongly encouraged to consider the program.”

    GM said in late January that it planned to implement a program aimed at cutting costs by $2 billion per year by 2024.

    The buyouts are part of that effort, which also includes reducing vehicle complexity and cutting discretionary spending, GM said.

    U.S. employees taking the buyout would receive 1 month of pay for every year of service, up to 12 months, as well as COBRA benefits, a prorated performance bonus and help finding a new job.

    GM said it expects to record the bulk of the separation charges in the first half of 2023.

    The Wall Street Journal reported Wednesday that GM’s crucial pivot to electric vehicles had “stalled.”

    GM has not followed competitors Ford Motor Co.
    F,
    -2.20%

    and Tesla Inc.
    TSLA,
    -2.02%

    in announcing price cuts, with Chief Executive Mary Barra saying in January she believed “we’re priced where we need to be.”

    GM in January reported fourth-quarter earnings that beat Wall Street expectations and issued guidance that was also well above forecast.

    The company said it had led the U.S. auto industry in sales and had the largest year-over-year increase in market share among auto makers, thanks to “strong demand for our products and improved supply chain conditions.”

    GM’s stock has run up 18.2% year to date through Wednesday, while the S&P 500
    SPX,
    -0.22%

    has gained 4%.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Financing a startup: Breaking through current cost barriers | Bank Automation News

    Financing a startup: Breaking through current cost barriers | Bank Automation News

    [ad_1]

    It’s a tough time to finance a startup.   Startups looking to secure capital to underwrite consumer auto loans this year face roadblocks as investors tighten their purse strings, driving up the cost of funds and stymieing the plentiful flow of capital fintechs tapped into two years ago.  Fintechs looking to secure warehouse lines of credit […]

    [ad_2]

    Amanda Harris

    Source link

  • Look for stocks to lose 30% from here, says strategist David Rosenberg. And don’t even think about turning bullish until 2024.

    Look for stocks to lose 30% from here, says strategist David Rosenberg. And don’t even think about turning bullish until 2024.

    [ad_1]

    David Rosenberg, the former chief North American economist at Merrill Lynch, has been saying for almost a year that the Fed means business and investors should take the U.S. central bank’s effort to fight inflation both seriously and literally.

    Rosenberg, now president of Toronto-based Rosenberg Research & Associates Inc., expects investors will face more pain in financial markets in the months to come.

    “The recession’s just starting,” Rosenberg said in an interview with MarketWatch. “The market bottoms typically in the sixth or seventh inning of the recession, deep into the Fed easing cycle.” Investors can expect to endure more uncertainty leading up to the time — and it will come — when the Fed first pauses its current run of interest rate hikes and then begins to cut.

    Fortunately for investors, the Fed’s pause and perhaps even cuts will come in 2023, Rosenberg predicts. Unfortunately, he added, the S&P 500
    SPX,
    -0.61%

    could drop 30% from its current level before that happens. Said Rosenberg: “You’re left with the S&P 500 bottoming out somewhere close to 2,900.”

    At that point, Rosenberg added, stocks will look attractive again. But that’s a story for 2024.

    In this recent interview, which has been edited for length and clarity, Rosenberg offered a playbook for investors to follow this year and to prepare for a more bullish 2024. Meanwhile, he said, as they wait for the much-anticipated Fed pivot, investors should make their own pivot to defensive sectors of the financial markets — including bonds, gold and dividend-paying stocks.

    MarketWatch: So many people out there are expecting a recession. But stocks have performed well to start the year. Are investors and Wall Street out of touch?

    Rosenberg: Investor sentiment is out of line; the household sector is still enormously overweight equities. There is a disconnect between how investors feel about the outlook and how they’re actually positioned. They feel bearish but they’re still positioned bullishly, and that is a classic case of cognitive dissonance. We also have a situation where there is a lot of talk about recession and about how this is the most widely expected recession of all time, and yet the analyst community is still expecting corporate earnings growth to be positive in 2023.

    In a plain-vanilla recession, earnings go down 20%. We’ve never had a recession where earnings were up at all. The consensus is that we are going to see corporate earnings expand in 2023. So there’s another glaring anomaly. We are being told this is a widely expected recession, and yet it’s not reflected in earnings estimates – at least not yet.

    There’s nothing right now in my collection of metrics telling me that we’re anywhere close to a bottom. 2022 was the year where the Fed tightened policy aggressively and that showed up in the marketplace in a compression in the price-earnings multiple from roughly 22 to around 17. The story in 2022 was about what the rate hikes did to the market multiple; 2023 will be about what those rate hikes do to corporate earnings.

    You’re left with the S&P 500 bottoming out somewhere close to 2,900.

    When you’re attempting to be reasonable and come up with a sensible multiple for this market, given where the risk-free interest rate is now, and we can generously assume a roughly 15 price-earnings multiple. Then you slap that on a recession earning environment, and you’re left with the S&P 500 bottoming out somewhere close to 2900.

    The closer we get to that, the more I will be recommending allocations to the stock market. If I was saying 3200 before, there is a reasonable outcome that can lead you to something below 3000. At 3200 to tell you the truth I would plan on getting a little more positive.

    This is just pure mathematics. All the stock market is at any point is earnings multiplied by the multiple you want to apply to that earnings stream. That multiple is sensitive to interest rates. All we’ve seen is Act I — multiple compression. We haven’t yet seen the market multiple dip below the long-run mean, which is closer to 16. You’ve never had a bear market bottom with the multiple above the long-run average. That just doesn’t happen.

    David Rosenberg: ‘You want to be in defensive areas with strong balance sheets, earnings visibility, solid dividend yields and dividend payout ratios.’


    Rosenberg Research

    MarketWatch: The market wants a “Powell put” to rescue stocks, but may have to settle for a “Powell pause.” When the Fed finally pauses its rate hikes, is that a signal to turn bullish?

    Rosenberg: The stock market bottoms 70% of the way into a recession and 70% of the way into the easing cycle. What’s more important is that the Fed will pause, and then will pivot. That is going to be a 2023 story.

    The Fed will shift its views as circumstances change. The S&P 500 low will be south of 3000 and then it’s a matter of time. The Fed will pause, the markets will have a knee-jerk positive reaction you can trade. Then the Fed will start to cut interest rates, and that usually takes place six months after the pause. Then there will be a lot of giddiness in the market for a short time. When the market bottoms, it’s the mirror image of when it peaks. The market peaks when it starts to see the recession coming. The next bull market will start once investors begin to see the recovery.

    But the recession’s just starting. The market bottoms typically in the sixth or seventh inning of the recession, deep into the Fed easing cycle when the central bank has cut interest rates enough to push the yield curve back to a positive slope. That is many months away. We have to wait for the pause, the pivot, and for rate cuts to steepen the yield curve. That will be a late 2023, early 2024 story.

    MarketWatch: How concerned are you about corporate and household debt? Are there echoes of the 2008-09 Great Recession?

    Rosenberg: There’s not going to be a replay of 2008-09. It doesn’t mean there won’t be a major financial spasm. That always happens after a Fed tightening cycle. The excesses are exposed, and expunged. I look at it more as it could be a replay of what happened with nonbank financials in the 1980s, early 1990s, that engulfed the savings and loan industry. I am concerned about the banks in the sense that they have a tremendous amount of commercial real estate exposure on their balance sheets. I do think the banks will be compelled to bolster their loan-loss reserves, and that will come out of their earnings performance. That’s not the same as incurring capitalization problems, so I don’t see any major banks defaulting or being at risk of default.

    But I’m concerned about other pockets of the financial sector. The banks are actually less important to the overall credit market than they’ve been in the past. This is not a repeat of 2008-09 but we do have to focus on where the extreme leverage is centered.

    Read: The stock market is wishing and hoping the Fed will pivot — but the pain won’t end until investors panic

    It’s not necessarily in the banks this time; it is in other sources such as private equity, private debt, and they have yet to fully mark-to-market their assets. That’s an area of concern. The parts of the market that cater directly to the consumer, like credit cards, we’re already starting to see signs of stress in terms of the rise in 30-day late-payment rates. Early stage arrears are surfacing in credit cards, auto loans and even some elements of the mortgage market. The big risk to me is not so much the banks, but the nonbank financials that cater to credit cards, auto loans, and private equity and private debt.

    MarketWatch: Why should individuals care about trouble in private equity and private debt? That’s for the wealthy and the big institutions.

    Rosenberg: Unless private investment firms gate their assets, you’re going to end up getting a flood of redemptions and asset sales, and that affects all markets. Markets are intertwined. Redemptions and forced asset sales will affect market valuations in general. We’re seeing deflation in the equity market and now in a much more important market for individuals, which is residential real estate. One of the reasons why so many people have delayed their return to the labor market is they looked at their wealth, principally equities and real estate, and thought they could retire early based on this massive wealth creation that took place through 2020 and 2021.

    Now people are having to recalculate their ability to retire early and fund a comfortable retirement lifestyle. They will be forced back into the labor market. And the problem with a recession of course is that there are going to be fewer job openings, which means the unemployment rate is going to rise. The Fed is already telling us we’re going to 4.6%, which itself is a recession call; we’re going to blow through that number. All this plays out in the labor market not necessarily through job loss, but it’s going to force people to go back and look for a job. The unemployment rate goes up — that has a lag impact on nominal wages and that is going to be another factor that will curtail consumer spending, which is 70% of the economy.

    My strongest conviction is the 30-year Treasury bond.

    At some point, we’re going to have to have some sort of positive shock that will arrest the decline. The cycle is the cycle and what dominates the cycle are interest rates. At some point we get the recessionary pressures, inflation melts, the Fed will have successfully reset asset values to more normal levels, and we will be in a different monetary policy cycle by the second half of 2024 that will breathe life into the economy and we’ll be off to a recovery phase, which the market will start to discount later in 2023. Nothing here is permanent. It’s about interest rates, liquidity and the yield curve that has played out before.

    MarketWatch: Where do you advise investors to put their money now, and why?

    Rosenberg: My strongest conviction is the 30-year Treasury bond
    TMUBMUSD30Y,
    3.674%
    .
    The Fed will cut rates and you’ll get the biggest decline in yields at the short end. But in terms of bond prices and the total return potential, it’s at the long end of the curve. Bond yields always go down in a recession. Inflation is going to fall more quickly than is generally anticipated. Recession and disinflation are powerful forces for the long end of the Treasury curve.

    As the Fed pauses and then pivots — and this Volcker-like tightening is not permanent — other central banks around the world are going to play catch up, and that is going to undercut the U.S. dollar
    DXY,
    +0.70%
    .
    There are few better hedges against a U.S. dollar reversal than gold. On top of that, cryptocurrency has been exposed as being far too volatile to be part of any asset mix. It’s fun to trade, but crypto is not an investment. The crypto craze — fund flows directed to bitcoin
    BTCUSD,
    +0.35%

    and the like — drained the gold price by more than $200 an ounce.

    Buy companies that provide the goods and services that people need – not what they want.

    I’m bullish on gold
    GC00,
    +0.22%

    – physical gold — bullish on bonds, and within the stock market, under the proviso that we have a recession, you want to ensure you are invested in sectors with the lowest possible correlation to GDP growth.

    Invest in 2023 the same way you’re going to be living life — in a period of frugality. Buy companies that provide the goods and services that people need – not what they want. Consumer staples, not consumer cyclicals. Utilities. Health care. I look at Apple as a cyclical consumer products company, but Microsoft is a defensive growth technology company.

    You want to be buying essentials, staples, things you need. When I look at Microsoft
    MSFT,
    -0.61%
    ,
    Alphabet
    GOOGL,
    -1.79%
    ,
    Amazon
    AMZN,
    -1.17%
    ,
    they are what I would consider to be defensive growth stocks and at some point this year, they will deserve to be garnering a very strong look for the next cycle.

    You also want to invest in areas with a secular growth tailwind. For example, military budgets are rising in every part of the world and that plays right into defense/aerospace stocks. Food security, whether it’s food producers, anything related to agriculture, is an area you ought to be invested in.

    You want to be in defensive areas with strong balance sheets, earnings visibility, solid dividend yields and dividend payout ratios. If you follow that you’ll do just fine. I just think you’ll do far better if you have a healthy allocation to long-term bonds and gold. Gold finished 2022 unchanged, in a year when flat was the new up.

    In terms of the relative weighting, that’s a personal choice but I would say to focus on defensive sectors with zero or low correlation to GDP, a laddered bond portfolio if you want to play it safe, or just the long bond, and physical gold. Also, the Dogs of the Dow fits the screening for strong balance sheets, strong dividend payout ratios and a nice starting yield. The Dogs outperformed in 2022, and 2023 will be much the same. That’s the strategy for 2023.

    More: ‘It’s payback time.’ U.S. stocks have been a no-brainer moneymaker for years — but those days are over.

    Plus: ‘The Nasdaq is our favorite short.’ This market strategist sees recession and a credit crunch slamming stocks in 2023.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Chevron stock falls after profit misses expectations, while revenue beats

    Chevron stock falls after profit misses expectations, while revenue beats

    [ad_1]

    Shares of Chevron Corp.
    CVX,
    +4.86%

    fell 0.7% in premarket trading Friday after the oil and gas giant missed fourth-quarter profit expectations, while revenue rose above forecasts. Net income rose to $6.35 billion, or $3.33 a share, from $5.06 billion, or $2.63 a share, in the year-ago period. Excluding nonrecurring items, adjusted earnings per share of $4.09 was below the FactSet consensus of $4.33. Sales grew 17.3% to $56.47 billion, beating the FactSet consensus of $52.68 billion. Net oil-equivalent production fell 3% to 3.01 million barrels per day, as U.S. production rose 4% but international production dropped 7% due primarily to the end of concessions in Thailand and Indonesia. For Chevron’s upstream business, which includes exploration and production, U.S. earnings declined 11.9% to $2.62 billion while international earnings jumped 31.2% to $2.87 billion. “We delivered record earnings and cash flow in 2022, while increasing investments and growing U.S. production to a company record,” said Chief Executive Mike Wirth. The stock has gained 5.6% over the past three months through Thursday, while the Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF
    XLE,
    +3.16%

    has tacked on 4.7% and the Dow Jones Industrial Average
    DJIA,
    +0.61%

    advanced 6.0%.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Dow to cut 2,000 jobs, to record charges of up to $725 million primarily for severance and benefits costs

    Dow to cut 2,000 jobs, to record charges of up to $725 million primarily for severance and benefits costs

    [ad_1]

    Dow Inc. DOW followed up its downbeat fourth-quarter earnings report with another release saying it would cut 2,000 jobs as part of its $1 billion cost-cutting plan. The cuts represent about 5.6% of the chemicals and specialty materials company’s workforce, according to FactSet data. Dow said it will also shut down select assets as it evaluates its global asset base, particularly in Europe. The company said it will record a charge of $550 million to $725 million in the first quarter of 2023 for costs resulting from its cost-cutting actions, which primarily include severance and benefit costs. Earlier, the company reported…

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Tesla stock wipes out three-day bounce, falls to lowest price in more than 2 years

    Tesla stock wipes out three-day bounce, falls to lowest price in more than 2 years

    [ad_1]

    It has taken just one day for Tesla Inc.’s stock to erase the entire bounce it enjoyed over the last three days trading sessions of 2022, as disappointing deliveries data helped trigger the biggest selloff in more than two years.

    The stock’s
    TSLA,
    -12.24%

    Tuesday drop knocked the electric vehicle maker’s market capitalization to 15th on the list of most valuation S&P 500 index companies.

    On Tuesday, Tesla’s market cap fell below that of consumer products company Procter & Gamble Co.
    PG,
    +0.01%
    ,
    with a current market cap of $359.18 billion, and was just below Nvidia Corp.
    NVDA,
    -2.05%

    at $352.15 billion, according to FactSet data. Tesla sat just above Chevron Corp.
    CVX,
    -3.06%
    ,
    which was at $336.43 billion. (See list of S&P 500’s 20 most valuable companies as of Tuesday’s closing prices below.)

    Tesla’s stock took a $15.08, or 12.2% dive, to $108.10 on Tuesday, to lead the S&P 500’s
    SPX,
    -0.40%

    decliners, after the company reported over the weekend that fourth-quarter deliveries that came up short of expectations for the third quarter in a row. It suffered the biggest one-day decline since it plummeted 21.1% on Sept. 8, 2020, and closed at the lowest price since Aug. 13, 2020.

    Don’t miss: Tesla delivery-target miss shows ‘demand cracks clearly happening’ that mean ‘numbers could be materially reset’ for coming years, analysts write.

    With about 3.16 billion shares outstanding as of Oct. 18, the stock’s decline shaved about $47.62 billion off Tesla’s market cap, to bring it down to $341.35 billion. That’s a far cry from the peak market cap of $1.24 trillion reached exactly one-year ago.

    After the stock hit the deepest oversold reading in its history based on the widely followed Relative Strength Index momentum indicator on Dec. 27, following the longest losing streak in more than four years, it ran up $14.08, or 12.9%, over the past three days.

    If there’s a bright side to Tuesday’s stock selloff, it’s that even though the price fell below the Dec. 27 closing price, the RSI ended the day at 24.86, which is up from the Dec. 27 record low of 16.56.

    That could be a preliminary sign of what chart watchers call “bullish technical divergence,” which is when prices make lower lows while the RSI makes a higher low. It’s still rather early to make that determination, however, as the stock needs to start bouncing again to see if RSI bottoms above the previous low.

    Market caps of the Top 20 most valuable S&P 500 companies:

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Blue Apron receives delisting notice, just as stock bounces back above $1

    Blue Apron receives delisting notice, just as stock bounces back above $1

    [ad_1]

    Shares of Blue Apron Holdings Inc.
    APRN,
    +1.46%

    shot up 9.9% in morning trading Friday, to trade back above the $1 level for the first time in more than two weeks, after the meal-kit company said it received a delisting notice from the New York Stock Exchange. The notice said the company was not in compliance with the listing requirement of a minimum average stock closing price of at least $1 over a consecutive 30-day period and an average market capitalization of at least $50.0 million, also over a consecutive 30-day period. The company said it plans to notify the NYSE on Jan. 6 that it received the delisting notice, and intends to submit a plan to “cure” the minimum stock price and market capitalization deficiencies. The stock has closed below the $1 mark since Dec. 6, and closed at a record low of 64 cents on Dec. 13. It has bounced since then after the company said it received funding from a major investor; it has rocketing 56.7% amid a four-day winning streak. Meanwhile, the company’s market capitalization was $41.6 million at current stock prices, and has been below $50 million since Nov. 11, according to FactSet data. The stock has plummeted 84.4% year to date, while the S&P 500
    SPX,
    +0.59%

    has shed 20.1%.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Saudi crown prince set to invest in Credit Suisse’s new investment bank

    Saudi crown prince set to invest in Credit Suisse’s new investment bank

    [ad_1]

    Saudi Arabia’s crown prince and a U.S. private-equity firm run by Barclays PLC’s former chief executive are among investors preparing to invest $1 billion or more into Credit Suisse’s
    CSGN,
    +6.61%

    CS,
    +9.39%

    new investment bank, people familiar with the matter said. 

    Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman is considering an investment of around $500 million to back the new unit, CS First Boston, and its CEO-designate, Michael Klein, some of the people said. Additional financial backing could come from U.S. investors including veteran banker Bob Diamond‘s Atlas Merchant Capital, people familiar with that potential investment said. Credit Suisse previously said it had $500 million committed from an additional investor it hasn’t named.  

    Credit Suisse has received a number of proposals from investors interested in CS First Boston. Credit Suisse Chairman Axel Lehmann at a conference on Thursday said it has other firm commitments in addition to the $500 million from the unnamed investor. The bank hasn’t received a formal proposal from any Saudi entity, some of the people familiar with the matter said. 

    Credit Suisse is spinning off the New York-based investment bank as part of a fresh start after being buffeted by scandals, regulatory scrutiny and steep losses. It is raising $4.2 billion in new stock that separately will make Saudi National Bank its largest shareholder. It isn’t clear if Prince Mohammed would make the investment through that bank, or another investment vehicle. He is chairman of the country’s sovereign-wealth fund, Public Investment Fund, which along with another government fund is Saudi National Bank’s main owner. 

    An expanded version of this report appears on WSJ.com.

    Also popular on WSJ.com:

    Apple makes plans to move production out of China.

    FTX founder Sam Bankman-Fried says he can’t account for billions sent to Alameda.

    [ad_2]

    Source link