ReportWire

Tag: capital punishment

  • Suspect in Charlie Kirk assassination case faces court hearing

    [ad_1]

    PROVO, Utah — The 22-year-old man charged with killing Charlie Kirk will have a court hearing Monday where he and his newly appointed legal counsel will decide whether they want a preliminary hearing where the judge will determine if there is enough evidence against him to go forward with a trial.

    Prosecutors have charged Tyler Robinson with aggravated murder and plan to seek the death penalty.

    The Utah state court system gives people accused of crimes an option to waive their legal right to a preliminary hearing and instead schedule an arraignment where they can enter a plea.

    Kathryn Nester, the lead attorney appointed to represent Robinson, declined to comment on the case ahead of Monday’s hearing. Prosecutors at the Utah County Attorney’s Office did not respond to email and phone messages seeking comment.

    The hearing in Provo is open to the public, just a few miles from the Utah Valley University campus in Orem where many students are still processing trauma from the Sept. 10 shooting and the day-and-a-half search for the suspect.

    Authorities arrested Robinson when he showed up with his parents at his hometown sheriff’s office in southwest Utah, more than a three-hour drive from the site of the shooting, to turn himself in. Prosecutors have since revealed incriminating text messages and DNA evidence that they say connect Robinson to the killing.

    A note that Robinson had left for his romantic partner before the shooting said he had the opportunity to kill one of the nation’s leading conservative voices, “and I’m going to take it,” Utah County Attorney Jeff Gray told reporters before the first hearing. Gray also said that Robinson wrote in a text about Kirk to his partner: “I had enough of his hatred.”

    The assassination of Kirk, a close ally of President Donald Trump who worked to steer young voters toward conservatism, has galvanized Republicans who have vowed to carry on Kirk’s mission of moving American politics further to the right.

    Trump has declared Kirk a “martyr” for freedom and threatened to crack down on what he called the “radical left.”

    Workers across the country have been punished or fired for speaking out about Kirk after his death, including teachers, public and private employees and media personalities — most notably Jimmy Kimmel, who had his late-night show suspended then quickly reinstated by ABC.

    Kirk’s political organization, Arizona-based Turning Point USA, brought young, evangelical Christians into politics through his podcast, social media and campus events. Many prominent Republicans are filling in at the upcoming campus events Kirk was meant to attend, including Utah Gov. Spencer Cox and Sen. Mike Lee at Utah State University on Tuesday.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Florida sets execution date for man who killed neighbor in 1998

    [ad_1]

    FT. LAUDERDALE, Fla. — Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis has set an execution date for a 65-year-old man who sexually battered and killed his next-door neighbor in 1998.

    Norman Mearle Grim Jr. was convicted in the death of Cynthia Campbell. She was reported missing, and her body was later found off the Pensacola Bay Bridge by a fisherman.

    Grim is set to die by lethal injection on Oct. 28.

    Prosecutors said Campbell suffered multiple blunt-force injuries to her face and head that were consistent with being struck by a hammer, as well has 11 stab wounds in the chest. An autopsy revealed seven of the stab wounds penetrated her heart.

    Physical evidence including DNA tied Grim to her death, and he was convicted of sexual battery and first-degree murder in December 2000.

    Florida leads the nation in the number of executions in 2025. On Sept. 17, the state carried out its 12th execution of the year when David Pittman died by lethal injection.

    Two other Florida executions are also scheduled for this fall. Victor Tony Jones is set to die on Sept. 30 for the 1990 killings of two people during a robbery, and Samuel Lee Smithers is scheduled to be executed on Oct. 14 for the murders of two women in 1996.

    The highest previous annual total of recent Florida executions is eight in 2014, since the death penalty was restored in 1976 by the U.S. Supreme Court. A total of 33 people have been executed in the U.S. this year, exceeding the 25 executions carried out last year. The most recent year with more executions for the entire U.S. was 2014, when 35 people were put to death.

    Alabama and Texas each carried out executions on Sept. 25.

    Appeals will likely be filed in the Florida Supreme Court and the U.S. Supreme Court.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Texas man facing execution for fatally beating 13-month-old girl during ‘exorcism’

    [ad_1]

    A Texas man faces execution Thursday for killing his girlfriend’s 13-month-old daughter during a torturous ordeal the couple said was part of an “exorcism” to expel a demon from the child’s body.Blaine Milam, 35, was condemned for the December 2008 murder of Amora Carson at his trailer in Rusk County in East Texas.Milam was scheduled to receive a lethal injection Thursday evening at the state penitentiary in Huntsville. At around the same time Milam was to be put to death, authorities in Alabama were planning to execute Geoffrey West for fatally shooting a gas station employee during a 1997 robbery.Milam has claimed he is innocent, blaming then-girlfriend Jesseca Carson for the killing and alleging she was the one who claimed the girl was possessed by a demon. She was tried separately from Milam and sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole after being convicted of capital murder for helping Milam. Both were 18 at the time.Prosecutors said Milam savagely beat the girl with a hammer and also bit, strangled, and mutilated her over a period of 30 hours.A forensic pathologist who performed an autopsy found the child had multiple skull fractures along with broken arms, legs, ribs and numerous bite marks. The pathologist testified at trial that he could not determine a specific cause of death because the girl had so many potentially fatal injuries.Milam’s attorneys have asked the U.S. Supreme Court to stop his execution, arguing his conviction was based in part on “now-discredited” bite mark evidence as well as other unreliable DNA evidence. Milam’s attorneys also argued he is intellectually disabled and therefore ineligible for execution.In their petition to the Supreme Court, Milam’s lawyers alleged Carson had experienced religious delusions and suffered from a neurological visual-perception disorder that caused her to see malevolent-seeming distortions in her daughter’s face, causing her to attack the child.“It was Carson who caused her daughter’s death. There is no credible evidence that Milam played any role in it,” Milam’s lawyers said.State and federal appeals courts have previously turned down efforts by Milam’s attorneys to stay his execution. The Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles on Tuesday denied Milam’s request to commute his death sentence to a lesser penalty. Milam previously had executions dates in 2019 and 2021 that were stayed.The Texas Attorney General’s Office has said Milam’s claims that he is intellectually disabled have been rejected in previous court rulings and a recent review of DNA evidence used at his trial “continues to forensically tie him to Amora’s body.”The attorney general’s office also said in court documents that even if bitemark and DNA evidence were excluded, there was other evidence pointing to his guilt, including his efforts to hide evidence and a confession he made to a nurse after his arrest.Rusk County District Attorney Michael Jimerson, who tried the case along with the Texas Attorney General’s Office, told The Associated Press in 2019 that authorities initially treated Milam and Carson as grieving parents.But Carson later told investigators Milam told her Amora was “possessed by a demon” because “God was tired of her lying to Milam,” according to court records.The use of bite mark evidence has been called into question in recent years, with a 2016 report by the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology saying bitemark analysis “is clearly scientifically unreliable at present.”Jimerson said he still couldn’t pinpoint a motive, believing the exorcism claim was just a way for Milam and Carson to cover up their crime.“It’s … very hard to confront the idea that someone would derive their gratification from the torture of a baby. That is really something that diminishes all of us and it’s just a very, very hard thing to face,” Jimerson had said.If the execution is carried out, Milam would be the fifth person put to death this year in Texas, historically the nation’s busiest capital punishment state. If both of Thursdays executions take place, that would bring this year’s total to 33 death sentences carried out nationwide. Florida leads the nation this year with a record 12 executions conducted so far in 2025 with two more scheduled in the state by mid-October.

    A Texas man faces execution Thursday for killing his girlfriend’s 13-month-old daughter during a torturous ordeal the couple said was part of an “exorcism” to expel a demon from the child’s body.

    Blaine Milam, 35, was condemned for the December 2008 murder of Amora Carson at his trailer in Rusk County in East Texas.

    Milam was scheduled to receive a lethal injection Thursday evening at the state penitentiary in Huntsville. At around the same time Milam was to be put to death, authorities in Alabama were planning to execute Geoffrey West for fatally shooting a gas station employee during a 1997 robbery.

    Milam has claimed he is innocent, blaming then-girlfriend Jesseca Carson for the killing and alleging she was the one who claimed the girl was possessed by a demon. She was tried separately from Milam and sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole after being convicted of capital murder for helping Milam. Both were 18 at the time.

    Prosecutors said Milam savagely beat the girl with a hammer and also bit, strangled, and mutilated her over a period of 30 hours.

    Texas Department of Criminal Justice via AP

    This undated booking photo provided by the Texas Department of Criminal Justice shows Texas death row inmate Blaine Milam.

    A forensic pathologist who performed an autopsy found the child had multiple skull fractures along with broken arms, legs, ribs and numerous bite marks. The pathologist testified at trial that he could not determine a specific cause of death because the girl had so many potentially fatal injuries.

    Milam’s attorneys have asked the U.S. Supreme Court to stop his execution, arguing his conviction was based in part on “now-discredited” bite mark evidence as well as other unreliable DNA evidence. Milam’s attorneys also argued he is intellectually disabled and therefore ineligible for execution.

    In their petition to the Supreme Court, Milam’s lawyers alleged Carson had experienced religious delusions and suffered from a neurological visual-perception disorder that caused her to see malevolent-seeming distortions in her daughter’s face, causing her to attack the child.

    “It was Carson who caused her daughter’s death. There is no credible evidence that Milam played any role in it,” Milam’s lawyers said.

    State and federal appeals courts have previously turned down efforts by Milam’s attorneys to stay his execution. The Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles on Tuesday denied Milam’s request to commute his death sentence to a lesser penalty. Milam previously had executions dates in 2019 and 2021 that were stayed.

    The Texas Attorney General’s Office has said Milam’s claims that he is intellectually disabled have been rejected in previous court rulings and a recent review of DNA evidence used at his trial “continues to forensically tie him to Amora’s body.”

    The attorney general’s office also said in court documents that even if bitemark and DNA evidence were excluded, there was other evidence pointing to his guilt, including his efforts to hide evidence and a confession he made to a nurse after his arrest.

    Rusk County District Attorney Michael Jimerson, who tried the case along with the Texas Attorney General’s Office, told The Associated Press in 2019 that authorities initially treated Milam and Carson as grieving parents.

    But Carson later told investigators Milam told her Amora was “possessed by a demon” because “God was tired of her lying to Milam,” according to court records.

    The use of bite mark evidence has been called into question in recent years, with a 2016 report by the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology saying bitemark analysis “is clearly scientifically unreliable at present.”

    Jimerson said he still couldn’t pinpoint a motive, believing the exorcism claim was just a way for Milam and Carson to cover up their crime.

    “It’s … very hard to confront the idea that someone would derive their gratification from the torture of a baby. That is really something that diminishes all of us and it’s just a very, very hard thing to face,” Jimerson had said.

    If the execution is carried out, Milam would be the fifth person put to death this year in Texas, historically the nation’s busiest capital punishment state. If both of Thursdays executions take place, that would bring this year’s total to 33 death sentences carried out nationwide. Florida leads the nation this year with a record 12 executions conducted so far in 2025 with two more scheduled in the state by mid-October.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Texas man facing execution for fatally beating 13-month-old girl during ‘exorcism’

    [ad_1]

    HOUSTON — A Texas man faces execution Thursday for killing his girlfriend’s 13-month-old daughter during a torturous ordeal the couple said was part of an “exorcism” to expel a demon from the child’s body.

    Blaine Milam, 35, was condemned for the December 2008 murder of Amora Carson at his trailer in Rusk County in East Texas.

    Milam was scheduled to receive a lethal injection Thursday evening at the state penitentiary in Huntsville. At around the same time Milam was to be put to death, authorities in Alabama were planning to execute Geoffrey West for fatally shooting a gas station employee during a 1997 robbery.

    Milam has claimed he is innocent, blaming then-girlfriend Jesseca Carson for the killing and alleging she was the one who claimed the girl was possessed by a demon. She was tried separately from Milam and sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole after being convicted of capital murder for helping Milam. Both were 18 at the time.

    Prosecutors said Milam savagely beat the girl with a hammer and also bit, strangled, and mutilated her over a period of 30 hours.

    A forensic pathologist who performed an autopsy found the child had multiple skull fractures along with broken arms, legs, ribs and numerous bite marks. The pathologist testified at trial that he could not determine a specific cause of death because the girl had so many potentially fatal injuries.

    Milam’s attorneys have asked the U.S. Supreme Court to stop his execution, arguing his conviction was based in part on “now-discredited” bite mark evidence as well as other unreliable DNA evidence. Milam’s attorneys also argued he is intellectually disabled and therefore ineligible for execution.

    In their petition to the Supreme Court, Milam’s lawyers alleged Carson had experienced religious delusions and suffered from a neurological visual-perception disorder that caused her to see malevolent-seeming distortions in her daughter’s face, causing her to attack the child.

    “It was Carson who caused her daughter’s death. There is no credible evidence that Milam played any role in it.,” Milam’s lawyers said.

    State and federal appeals courts have previously turned down efforts by Milam’s attorneys to stay his execution. The Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles on Tuesday denied Milam’s request to commute his death sentence to a lesser penalty. Milam’s previously had executions dates in 2019 and 2021 that were stayed.

    The Texas Attorney General’s Office has said Milam’s claims that he is intellectually disabled have been rejected in previous court rulings and a recent review of DNA evidence used at his trial “continues to forensically tie him to Amora’s body.”

    The attorney general’s office also said in court documents that even if bitemark and DNA evidence were excluded, there was other evidence pointing to his guilt, including his efforts to hide evidence and a confession he made to a nurse after his arrest.

    Rusk County District Attorney Micheal Jimerson, who tried the case along with the Texas Attorney General’s Office, told The Associated Press in 2019 that authorities initially treated Milam and Carson as grieving parents.

    But Carson later told investigators Milam told her Amora was “possessed by a demon” because “God was tired of her lying to Milam,” according to court records.

    The use of bite mark evidence has been called into question in recent years, with a 2016 report by the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology saying bitemark analysis “is clearly scientifically unreliable at present.”

    Jimerson said he still couldn’t pinpoint a motive, believing the exorcism claim was just a way for Milam and Carson to cover up their crime.

    “It’s … very hard to confront the idea that someone would derive their gratification from the torture of a baby. That is really something that diminishes all of us and it’s just a very, very hard thing to face,” Jimerson had said.

    If the execution is carried out, Milam would be the fifth person put to death this year in Texas, historically the nation’s busiest capital punishment state. If both of Thursdays executions take place, that would bring this year’s total to 33 death sentences carried out nationwide. Florida leads the nation this year with a record 12 executions conducted so far in 2025 with two more scheduled in the state by mid-October.

    ___

    Follow Juan A. Lozano: https://x.com/juanlozano70

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Alabama to execute man for 1997 shooting death of store clerk

    [ad_1]

    Alabama is preparing to execute a man convicted of killing a woman during a 1997 gas station robbery in what will be the nation’s latest execution carried out with nitrogen gas.

    Geoffrey Todd West, 50, is scheduled to be executed Thursday night at the William C. Holman Correctional Facility in south Alabama. West was convicted of capital murder for the 1997 shooting death of Margaret Parrish Berry, 33. Berry’s son is among those who urged Alabama’s governor to commute West’s sentence to life in prison.

    It is one of two executions scheduled Thursday in the United States. Texas plans to carry out a lethal injection on the same evening.

    Berry, the mother of two sons, was shot while lying on the floor behind the counter at Harold’s Chevron in Etowah County on March 28, 1997.

    Prosecutors said the store clerk was killed to ensure there was no witness left behind. Court records state that $250 was taken from a cookie can that held the store’s money. West’s girlfriend agreed to testify against him in exchange for a 35-year sentence for her role in the robbery and slaying.

    A jury convicted West of capital murder during a robbery and voted 10-2 to recommend a death sentence — a recommendation accepted by the judge. Etowah County Circuit Judge William Cardwell said at the 1999 sentencing that he found it difficult to order the execution of a young man but said the killing was “intentional, carried out execution-style.”

    West doesn’t deny he killed Margaret Berry. He said at 50 that he struggles to understand what he did at 21. He and his girlfriend were desperate for cash and went to the store where he once worked to rob it.

    “There’s not a day that goes by that I don’t regret it and wish that I could take that back,” West told The Associated Press.

    He said he wants to apologize to Berry’s family.

    “I’m so very sorry for the hurt that I’ve caused you all. I’m so very sorry for what I’ve taken away from you, and I hope and pray you forgive me,” West said of what he wants to tell Berry’s family.

    One of Berry’s sons urged Alabama Gov. Kay Ivey to halt the execution and let West serve the rest of his life in prison.

    Will Berry said he has forgiven West. He said that he believes forgiveness is what his mother would want.

    “I don’t want this man to die. Vengeance isn’t for the state. It’s for the Lord,” Will Berry said.

    Berry on Tuesday joined death penalty opponents at a vigil outside the Alabama Capitol. He helped delivered a petition to Ivey’s office asking that the execution be halted.

    Ivey replied in a Sept. 11 letter to Berry that she appreciated his belief, but she said Alabama law “imposes death as punishment for the most egregious forms of murder.”

    “As governor, it is my solemn duty to carry out these laws,” Ivey wrote.

    Ivey has commuted one death sentence during her eight years in office. The Republican governor wrote in the letter that she did so only because of questions about the person’s guilt.

    West and Will Berry exchanged letters. The two men had asked to be able to meet ahead of the Thursday night execution. But the state denied the request for security reasons.

    West will be executed by nitrogen gas. The method involves strapping a gas mask to the face and forcing the inmate to breathe pure nitrogen gas, thus depriving the person of the oxygen needed to stay alive. Nitrogen is an inert gas that makes up 78% of the Earth’s atmosphere and is harmless when mixed with adequate oxygen.

    After Alabama lawmakers in 2018 authorized nitrogen gas as an execution method, the Alabama Department of Corrections gave death row prisoners a brief window to name their preferred execution method. West was one several dozen inmates in 2018 who picked nitrogen. However, at the time the state had not developed procedures for using it, and it was unclear when that would happen.

    Alabama carried out the nation’s first nitrogen gas execution in 2024. Nationally, six people have now been executed using nitrogen gas — five in Alabama and one in Louisiana.

    Lethal injection remains Alabama’s primary execution method.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • As officials searched for Charlie Kirk’s shooter, suspect confessed to his partner, prosecutor says

    [ad_1]

    PROVO, Utah — As authorities worked feverishly to find the person who assassinated Charlie Kirk at Utah Valley University last week, the 22-year-old man now charged with the crime was texting with his romantic partner and acknowledging he was the shooter, court documents revealed.

    Tyler Robinson fired a single fatal shot from the rooftop of a building overlooking the outdoor venue where Kirk was speaking to about 3,000 people on Sept. 10, investigators say. Afterward, prosecutors say he texted with the partner, who he lived with near St. George, Utah, about 240 miles (387 kilometers) southwest of the campus.

    He said to look under his keyboard at their home. There was a note that said, “I had the opportunity to take out Charlie Kirk and I’m going to take it.”

    After expressing shock, his partner asked Robinson if he was the shooter. Robinson responded, “I am, I’m sorry.”

    The partner apparently never went to law enforcement with the information. Robinson remained on the run until the next night, when his parents recognized he was the person in a photo released by authorities as they searched for the shooter. They helped organize Robinson’s peaceful surrender.

    The partner was not named in the charging documents that contained the narrative of the shooting and were made public Tuesday when authorities charged Robinson with capital murder and other counts. He could face the death penalty.

    Law enforcement officials say they are looking at whether others knew about or aided Robinson in the assassination. They have not said if the partner is among those being investigated but have publicly expressed appreciation for the partner sharing information.

    Prosecutors allege Robinson used a bolt-action rifle to shoot Kirk in the neck on the campus in Orem, about 40 miles (64 kilometers) south of Salt Lake City. DNA on the trigger of the rifle matched Robinson, according to Utah County Attorney Jeff Gray. The rifle had been Robinson’s grandfather’s.

    Robinson appeared briefly Tuesday before a judge by video from jail. He nodded slightly at times but mostly stared ahead as the judge read the charges and said he would appoint an attorney to represent him. Robinson’s family has declined to comment to The Associated Press since his arrest.

    Kirk, a 31-year-old father of two, was a prominent force in politics credited with energizing the Republican youth movement and helping Donald Trump win back the White House in 2024. He gained a large following through social media, his podcast and campus events that featured him responding to a line of questioners who could query and debate him on any topic.

    Authorities have not revealed a clear motive in the shooting, but Gray said that Robinson wrote in a text about Kirk to his partner: “I had enough of his hatred. Some hate can’t be negotiated out.”

    The prosecutor said Robinson also wrote in one text that he spent more than a week planning the attack on Kirk. Authorities have not said what they believe the planning entailed.

    Gray declined to answer whether Robinson targeted Kirk for his anti-transgender views. Kirk was shot while taking a question that touched on mass shootings, gun violence and transgender people.

    “That is for a jury to decide,” Gray said.

    Robinson was involved in a romantic relationship with his roommate, who investigators say is transgender.

    While authorities say Robinson hasn’t been cooperating with investigators, they say his family and friends have been sharing information.

    Robinson’s mother told investigators that their son had turned hard left politically in the last year and became more supportive of gay and transgender rights, Gray said.

    Those decisions prompted several conversations in the household, especially between Robinson and his father. They had different political views and Robinson told his partner in a text that his dad had become a “diehard MAGA” since Trump was elected.

    Robinson’s mother recognized him when authorities released a picture of the suspect and his parents confronted him, at which time Robinson said he wanted to kill himself, Gray said.

    The family persuaded him to meet with a family friend who is a retired sheriff’s deputy. That person was able to get Robinson to turn himself in, the prosecutor said.

    Robinson was arrested late Thursday near St. George, where he grew up.

    In a text exchange with his partner released by authorities, Robinson wrote about planning to get his rifle from his “drop point,” but that the area was “locked down.”

    Later he sent: “I can get close to it but there is a squad car parked right by it. I think they already swept that spot, but I don’t wanna chance it.” The texts cited in court documents did not include timestamps and it was unclear how long after the shooting Robinson was texting.

    “To be honest I had hoped to keep this secret till I died of old age. I am sorry to involve you,” Robinson wrote in another text to his partner.

    Robinson discarded the rifle and clothing and asked his roommate to conceal evidence, Gray said.

    Robinson also was charged with felony discharge of a firearm, punishable by up to life in prison, and obstructing justice, punishable by up to 15 years in prison.

    He also was charged with witness tampering because he had directed his partner to delete their text messages and told his partner to stay silent if questioned by police, Gray said.

    FBI Director Kash Patel said Tuesday that agents are looking at “anyone and everyone” who was involved in a gaming chatroom on the social media platform Discord with Robinson. The chatroom involved “a lot more” than 20 people, he said during a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing in Washington.

    The charges filed Tuesday carry two enhancements, including committing several of the crimes in front of or close to children and carrying out violence based on the subject’s political beliefs.

    Kirk, a dominant figure in conservative politics, became a confidant of President Donald Trump after founding Arizona-based Turning Point USA, one of the nation’s largest political organizations. He brought young, conservative evangelical Christians into politics.

    In the days since Kirk’s assassination, Americans have found themselves facing questions about rising political violence, the deep divisions that brought the nation here and whether anything can change.

    Despite calls for greater civility, some who opposed Kirk’s provocative statements about gender, race and politics criticized him after his death. Many Republicans have led the push to punish anyone they believe dishonored him, causing both public and private workers to lose their jobs or face other consequences at work.

    ___

    Seewer reported from Toledo, Ohio.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Record 12th execution set in Florida this year for man convicted of killing family

    [ad_1]

    STARKE, Fla. — A Florida man convicted of killing his estranged wife’s sister and parents and setting their house on fire is scheduled to put to death Wednesday, which would be a record 12th execution in the state in 2025.

    David Pittman, 63, is set to receive a lethal injection starting at 6 p.m. at Florida State Prison near Starke under a death warrant signed by Gov. Ron DeSantis. The Republican governor has signed more death warrants this year than any of his predecessors.

    Pittman’s final appeal was rejected Tuesday by the U.S. Supreme Court.

    So far, two more Florida executions are scheduled for this fall. Victor Tony Jones is set to die on Sept. 30 for the 1990 killings of two people during a robbery and Samuel Lee Smithers is scheduled for execution on Oct. 14 for the murders of two women in 1996.

    Pittman was convicted and sentenced to death in 1991 on three counts of first-degree murder, according to court records. Jurors also found him guilty of arson and grand theft.

    Pittman and his wife, Marie, were going through a contentious divorce in May 1990, when the killings occurred, and investigators say he had threatened to harm her family several times.

    Trial testimony showed Pittman cut a phone line at the Mulberry, Florida home of his wife’s parents, Clarence Knowles, 60, and his wife, 50-year-old Barbara Knowles. Pittman stabbed the couple to death as well as their other daughter, 21-year-old Bonnie Knowles. Pittman then set their house on fire and stole Bonnie Knowles’ car, which he also set ablaze. The family was found dead on May 15 of that year.

    A witness during his 1991 trial identified Pittman as the person running away from the burning car. A jailhouse informant also testified that Pittman had admitted to the killings. Jurors recommended the death penalty on a 9-3 vote.

    Pittman’s most recent appeals focused on recent evidence indicating he suffers from intellectual disabilities, including an IQ in the low 70s, that was apparent at the time of the killings. His lawyers say his execution would violate the Constitution’s protection against putting to death a person with severe mental problems.

    Lawyers for the state disagreed, contending it is now too late for Pittman to claim mental impairment from years earlier. The Florida Supreme Court, reversing a previous decision, ruled in 2020 that such claims cannot apply retroactively.

    “Pittman’s underlying intellectual disability claim is meritless. He was not intellectually disabled when he murdered the three victims in 1990 or when he went to trial in 1991,” the state attorneys told the U.S. Supreme Court.

    Before Pittman, 30 people have been executed in the U.S. in 2025, with Florida leading the way behind the flurry of death warrants signed by DeSantis. The last execution in Florida was the Aug. 28 lethal injection of 59-year-old Curtis Windom, convicted of the 1992 murders of his girlfriend, her mother and another man.

    Florida executions are carried out via a three-drug injection — a sedative, a paralytic and a drug that stops the heart, according to the state Department of Corrections.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Prosecutor: Suspect left note saying he would kill Kirk

    [ad_1]

    PROVO, Utah — Prosecutors brought a murder charge Tuesday against the man accused of assassinating Charlie Kirk and outlined evidence, including a text message confession to his partner and a note left beforehand saying he had the opportunity to kill one of the nation’s leading conservative voices “and I’m going to take it.”

    DNA on the trigger of the rifle that killed Kirk also matched that of Tyler Robinson, Utah County Attorney Jeff Gray said while outlining the evidence and announcing charges that could result in the death penalty if Robinson is convicted.


    This page requires Javascript.

    Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

    kAm%96 AC@D64FE@C D2:5 #@3:?D@?[ aa[ HC@E6 😕 @?6 E6IE E92E 96 DA6?E >@C6 E92? 2 H66< A=2??:?8 E96 2EE24< @? z:C<[ 2 AC@>:?6?E 7@C46 😕 A@=:E:4D 4C65:E65 H:E9 k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^492C=:6<:C<EFC?:?8A@:?EECF>A47a2eg6cb_b4deagahh776bgb5_h4`6hQm6?6C8:K:?8 E96 #6AF3=:42? J@FE9 >@G6>6?Ek^2m 2?5 96=A:?8 s@?2=5 %CF>A H:? 324< E96 (9:E6 w@FD6 😕 a_ac]k^Am

    kAm“%96 >FC56C @7 r92C=:6 z:C< 😀 2? p>6C:42? EC2865J[” vC2J D2:5]k^Am

    kAmz:C< H2D k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^492C=:6<:C<D9@@E:?8DFDA64EE9:?8DE@@H5456b7fha7c5eebe5cc73h7c72dbdeh4Qm8F??65 5@H?k^2m $6AE] `_ H9:=6 DA62<:?8 H:E9 DEF56?ED 2E &E29 ‘2==6J &?:G6CD:EJ] !C@D64FE@CD 2==686 #@3:?D@? D9@E z:C< 😕 E96 ?64< H:E9 2 3@=E24E:@? C:7=6 7C@> E96 C@@7 @7 2 ?62C3J 3F:=5:?8 @? E96 42>AFD 😕 ~C6>[ 23@FE c_ >:=6D D@FE9 @7 $2=E {2<6 r:EJ]k^Am

    kAm#@3:?D@? 2AA62C65 3C:67=J %F6D52J 367@C6 2 ;F586 3J G:56@ 7C@> ;2:=] w6 ?@5565 D=:89E=J 2E E:>6D 3FE >@DE=J DE2C65 DEC2:89E 29625 2D E96 ;F586 C625 E96 492C86D 282:?DE 9:> 2?5 D2:5 96 H@F=5 2AA@:?E 2? 2EE@C?6J E@ C6AC6D6?E 9:>] #@3:?D@?’D 72>:=J 92D 564=:?65 E@ 4@>>6?E E@ %96 pDD@4:2E65 !C6DD D:?46 9:D 2CC6DE]k^Am

    kAmpFE9@C:E:6D 92G6 ?@E C6G62=65 2 4=62C >@E:G6 😕 E96 D9@@E:?8[ 3FE vC2J D2:5 E92E #@3:?D@? HC@E6 😕 2 E6IE 23@FE z:C< E@ 9:D A2CE?6Ci “x 925 6?@F89 @7 9:D 92EC65] $@>6 92E6 42?’E 36 ?68@E:2E65 @FE]”k^Am

    kAm#@3:?D@? 2=D@ =67E 2 ?@E6 7@C 9:D A2CE?6C 9:556? F?56C 2 <6J3@2C5 E92E D2:5[ “x 925 E96 @AA@CEF?:EJ E@ E2<6 @FE r92C=:6 z:C< 2?5 x’> 8@:?8 E@ E2<6 :E[” 244@C5:?8 E@ vC2J]k^Am

    kAm%96 AC@D64FE@C 564=:?65 E@ 2?DH6C H96E96C #@3:?D@? E2C86E65 z:C< 7@C 9:D 2?E:EC2?D86?56C G:6HD] z:C< H2D D9@E H9:=6 E2<:?8 2 BF6DE:@? E92E E@F4965 @? >2DD D9@@E:?8D[ 8F? G:@=6?46 2?5 EC2?D86?56C A6@A=6]k^Am

    kAm“%92E 😀 7@C 2 ;FCJ E@ 564:56[” vC2J D2:5]k^Am

    kAm#@3:?D@? H2D :?G@=G65 😕 2 C@>2?E:4 C6=2E:@?D9:A H:E9 9:D C@@>>2E6[ H9@ :?G6DE:82E@CD D2J H2D EC2?D86?56C[ H9:49 92D?’E 366? 4@?7:C>65] vC2J D2:5 E96 A2CE?6C 92D 366? 4@@A6C2E:?8 H:E9 :?G6DE:82E@CD]k^Am

    kAm#@3:?D@?’D A2CE?6C 2AA62C65 D9@4<65 😕 E96 E6IE 6I492?86 27E6C E96 D9@@E:?8[ 244@C5:?8 E@ 4@FCE 5@4F>6?ED[ 2D<:?8 #@3:?D@? “H9J 96 5:5 :E 2?5 9@H =@?8 96’5 366? A=2??:?8 :E]”k^Am

    kAm(9:=6 2FE9@C:E:6D D2J #@3:?D@? 92D?’E 366? 4@@A6C2E:?8 H:E9 :?G6DE:82E@CD[ E96J D2J 9:D 72>:=J 2?5 7C:6?5D 92G6 366? E2=<:?8]k^Am

    kAm#@3:?D@?’D >@E96C E@=5 :?G6DE:82E@CD E92E E96:C D@? 925 EFC?65 =67E A@=:E:42==J 😕 E96 =2DE J62C 2?5 3642>6 >@C6 DFAA@CE:G6 @7 82J 2?5 EC2?D86?56C C:89ED 27E6C 52E:?8 D@>6@?6 H9@ 😀 EC2?D86?56C[ vC2J D2:5]k^Am

    kAm%9@D6 564:D:@?D AC@>AE65 D6G6C2= 4@?G6CD2E:@?D 😕 E96 9@FD69@=5[ 6DA64:2==J 36EH66? #@3:?D@? 2?5 9:D 72E96C] %96J 925 5:776C6?E A@=:E:42= G:6HD 2?5 #@3:?D@? E@=5 9:D A2CE?6C 😕 2 E6IE E92E 9:D 525 925 364@>6 2 “5:692C5 |pvp” D:?46 %CF>A H2D 6=64E65]k^Am

    kAm#@3:?D@?’D >@E96C C64@8?:K65 9:> H96? 2FE9@C:E:6D C6=62D65 2 A:4EFC6 @7 E96 DFDA64E 2?5 9:D A2C6?ED 4@?7C@?E65 9:>[ 2E H9:49 E:>6 #@3:?D@? D2:5 96 H2?E65 E@ <:== 9:>D6=7[ vC2J D2:5]k^Am

    kAm%96 72>:=J A6CDF2565 9:> E@ >66E H:E9 2 72>:=J 7C:6?5 H9@ 😀 2 C6E:C65 D96C:77’D 56AFEJ[ H9@ A6CDF2565 #@3:?D@? E@ EFC? 9:>D6=7 :?[ E96 AC@D64FE@C D2:5]k^Am

    kAmk2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^492C=:6<:C<D9@@E:?8EJ=6CC@3:?D@?DFDA64E5ghb44`e73_hbf5d_fagb4f`_4dd`67_Qm#@3:?D@? H2D 2CC6DE65k^2m =2E6 %9FCD52J ?62C $E] v6@C86[ E96 D@FE96C? &E29 4@>>F?:EJ H96C6 96 8C6H FA[ 23@FE ac_ >:=6D D@FE9H6DE @7 H96C6 E96 D9@@E:?8 92AA6?65]k^Am

    kAmx? 2 E6IE 6I492?86 H:E9 9:D A2CE?6C C6=62D65 3J 2FE9@C:E:6D[ #@3:?D@? HC@E6i “x 925 A=2??65 E@ 8C23 >J C:7=6 7C@> >J 5C@A A@:?E D9@CE=J 27E6C[ 3FE >@DE @7 E92E D:56 @7 E@H? 8@E =@4<65 5@H?] xED BF:6E[ 2=>@DE 6?@F89 E@ 86E @FE[ 3FE E96C6D @?6 G69:4=6 =:?86C:?8]”k^Am

    kAm%96? 96 HC@E6i “v@:?8 E@ 2EE6>AE E@ C6EC:6G6 :E 282:?[ 9@A67F==J E96J 92G6 >@G65 @?] x 92G6?’E D66? 2?JE9:?8 23@FE E96> 7:?5:?8 :E]” p7E6C E92E[ 96 D6?Ei “x 42? 86E 4=@D6 E@ :E 3FE E96C6 😀 2 DBF25 42C A2C<65 C:89E 3J :E] x E9:?< E96J 2=C625J DH6AE E92E DA@E[ 3FE x 5@?’E H2??2 492?46 :E]”k^Am

    kAmw6 2=D@ H2D H@CC:65 23@FE =@D:?8 9:D 8C2?572E96C’D C:7=6 2?5 >6?E:@?65 D6G6C2= E:>6D 😕 E96 E6IED E92E 96 H:D965 96 925 A:4<65 :E FA[ 244@C5:?8 E@ E96 E6IED D92C65 😕 4@FCE 5@4F>6?ED[ H9:49 5:5 ?@E 92G6 E:>6DE2>AD] xE H2D F?4=62C 9@H =@?8 27E6C E96 D9@@E:?8 #@3:?D@? H2D E6IE:?8]k^Am

    kAm“%@ 36 9@?6DE x 925 9@A65 E@ <66A E9:D D64C6E E:== x 5:65 @7 @=5 286] x 2> D@CCJ E@ :?G@=G6 J@F[” #@3:?D@? HC@E6 😕 2?@E96C E6IE E@ 9:D A2CE?6C]k^Am

    kAm#@3:?D@? 5:D42C565 E96 C:7=6 2?5 4=@E9:?8 2?5 2D<65 9:D C@@>>2E6 E@ 4@?462= 6G:56?46[ vC2J D2:5]k^Am

    kAm#@3:?D@? H2D 492C865 H:E9 76=@?J 5:D492C86 @7 2 7:C62C>[ AF?:D923=6 3J FA E@ =:76 😕 AC:D@?[ 2?5 @3DECF4E:?8 ;FDE:46[ AF?:D923=6 3J FA E@ `d J62CD 😕 AC:D@?]k^Am

    kAmw6 2=D@ H2D 492C865 H:E9 H:E?6DD E2>A6C:?8 3642FD6 96 925 5:C64E65 9:D A2CE?6C E@ 56=6E6 E96:C E6IE >6DD286D 2?5 E@=5 9:D A2CE?6C E@ DE2J D:=6?E :7 BF6DE:@?65 3J A@=:46[ vC2J D2:5]k^Am

    kAmuqx s:C64E@C k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^73:A2E6=CFDD:26ADE6:?4b6f_ebb36767ec3e_e`bf_h4hh`h3_4Qmz2D9 !2E6=k^2m D2:5 %F6D52J E92E 286?ED 2C6 =@@<:?8 2E “2?J@?6 2?5 6G6CJ@?6” H9@ H2D :?G@=G65 😕 2 82>:?8 492EC@@> @? E96 D@4:2= >65:2 A=2E7@C> s:D4@C5 H:E9 #@3:?D@?] %96 492EC@@> :?G@=G65 “2 =@E >@C6” E92? a_ A6@A=6[ 96 D2:5 5FC:?8 k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^A2E6=73:492C=:6<:C<D6?2E6962C:?8_cg4f2f4dfdcfa3g2`2f5c65e73ba3ehQm2 $6?2E6 yF5:4:2CJ r@>>:EE66 962C:?8k^2m 😕 (2D9:?8E@?]k^Am

    kAm“(6 2C6 :?G6DE:82E:?8 r92C=:6’D 2DD2DD:?2E:@? 7F==J 2?5 4@>A=6E6=J 2?5 CF??:?8 @FE 6G6CJ =625 C6=2E65 E@ 2?J 2==682E:@? @7 3C@256C G:@=6?46[” !2E6= D2:5 😕 C6DA@?D6 E@ 2 BF6DE:@? 23@FE H96E96C E96 z:C< D9@@E:?8 H2D 36:?8 EC62E65 2D A2CE @7 2 3C@256C EC6?5 @7 G:@=6?46 282:?DE C6=:8:@FD 8C@FAD]k^Am

    kAm%96 492C86D 7:=65 %F6D52J 42CCJ EH@ 6?92?46>6?ED[ :?4=F5:?8 4@>>:EE:?8 D6G6C2= @7 E96 4C:>6D 😕 7C@?E @7 @C 4=@D6 E@ 49:=5C6? 2?5 42CCJ:?8 @FE G:@=6?46 32D65 @? E96 DF3;64E’D A@=:E:42= 36=:67D]k^Am

    kAmvC2J 564=:?65 E@ D2J H96E96C #@3:?D@?’D A2CE?6C 4@F=5 7246 492C86D @C H96E96C 2?J@?6 6=D6 >:89E 7246 492C86D]k^Am

    kAmz:C<[ 2 5@>:?2?E 7:8FC6 😕 4@?D6CG2E:G6 A@=:E:4D[ 3642>6 k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^492C=:6<:C<D9@@E:?8FE29F?:G6CD:EJC6AF3=:42?Dgbdf4b5`_a56_h6bba_756fe`adg`b`2Qm2 4@?7:52?E @7 !C6D:56?E s@?2=5 %CF>Ak^2m 27E6C 7@F?5:?8 pC:K@?232D65 %FC?:?8 !@:?E &$p[ @?6 @7 E96 ?2E:@?’D k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^492C=:6<:C<EFC?:?8A@:?EECF>A47a2eg6cb_b4deagahh776bgb5_h4`6hQm=2C86DE A@=:E:42= @C82?:K2E:@?Dk^2m] w6 3C@F89E J@F?8[ 4@?D6CG2E:G6 6G2?86=:42= r9C:DE:2?D :?E@ A@=:E:4D]k^Am

    kAmx? E96 52JD D:?46 z:C<’D 2DD2DD:?2E:@?[ p>6C:42?D 92G6 7@F?5 E96>D6=G6D k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^492C=:6<:C<<:==:?82>6C:425:G:565G:@=6?46A@=:E:4Dh3fd4_db_`eeg72_bb7h3c44hg3_ce4hQm724:?8 BF6DE:@?Dk^2m 23@FE C:D:?8 k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^A@=:E:42=G:@=6?462DD2DD:?2E:@?>:??6D@E2ECF>Ab4fd_477_fchebbgfa23e`_`372ab3abQmA@=:E:42= G:@=6?46k^2m[ E96 566A 5:G:D:@?D E92E 3C@F89E E96 ?2E:@? 96C6 2?5 H96E96C 2?JE9:?8 42? 492?86]k^Am

    Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.

    [ad_2]

    By JESSE BEDAYN, HANNAH SCHOENBAUM and JOHN SEEWER – Associated Press

    Source link

  • New Hampshire Supreme Court to hear death row inmate’s appeal for life sentence

    [ad_1]

    New Hampshire’s only inmate on death row has been granted a rare opportunity to plead his case for a life sentence before the state’s highest court.

    In a brief single-page order handed down Monday, New Hampshire’s Supreme Court agreed to hear the appeal of Michael Addison, 45, who killed Manchester Officer Michael Briggs in 2006.

    The decision is a surprising development in a case where the court had repeatedly denied reconsidering Addison’s death sentence, and upheld that execution was an appropriate punishment a decade prior.

    But in 2019, New Hampshire lawmakers narrowly abolished the death penalty despite fears from Briggs’ family and others that doing so would result in Addison’s sentence being commuted. At the time, supporters stressed that the repeal wouldn’t apply retroactively to Addison, but others warned that courts could interpret it differently — something that Addison’s attorneys are hoping for as well.

    Gov. Kelly Ayotte, a Republican and former state attorney general who advocated for Addison’s death sentence, has previously described Addison as a “cold-blood­ed, cold­heart­ed, remorse­less killer.”

    Part of her successful gubernatorial campaign last year included TV ads that touted she “put a cop killer on death row.”

    Briggs was killed on Oct. 16, 2006, while responding to a domestic disturbance call in Manchester, New Hampshire, involving Addison, who was then 26 years old. After arriving at the scene, Briggs told Addison to stop walking away. Addison fatally shot Briggs and then fled to his grandmother’s house in Massachusetts. He was arrested later that day and eventually convicted of capital murder in 2008 and sentenced to die.

    Currently, 23 states have abolished or overturned the death penalty, according to the Death Penalty Information Center. Among the 27 states that allow capital punishment, governors have issued moratoriums on the death penalty in four of them.

    New Hampshire hasn’t executed anyone since 1939.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Judge clears way for execution of South Carolina inmate

    [ad_1]

    COLUMBIA, S.C. — A judge in South Carolina has ruled a death row inmate’s beliefs that most laws are unconstitutional and citizens have an absolute right to defend their property to the death are not proof he is mentally incompetent and should be executed.

    The ruling clears the way for now for Steven Bixby to be put to death for the 2003 killings of two police officers who came to his family’s Abbeville home to discuss a dispute between them and a construction crew that had come to widen the road. Bixby’s lawyers can ask to appeal the ruling.

    The state Supreme Court had stopped Bixby’s execution weeks before it could be scheduled and asked a lower court to decide if his beliefs about the legal system kept him from helping his lawyers as they appeal his death sentence.

    Judge R. Scott Sprouse noted in his ruling, dated late last week, that Bixby cooperates with his lawyers and the psychiatrists treating and questioning him.

    While Bixby “has often disagreed with counsel and expresses distrust regarding their strategy in this proceeding, the evidence demonstrates that he understands their role, the rationale for why they are engaging in this competency proceeding, and that he can choose whether or not to cooperate with them,” Sprouse wrote.

    Bixby, 58, shot Abbeville County deputy Danny Wilson as the officer knocked on the front door of his parents’ home in December 2003, a day after they threatened the road crew, authorities said.

    They dragged Wilson’s dying body inside and restrained him with his own handcuffs. Then they killed state Constable Donnie Ouzts as he and other officers rushed to the home after realizing Wilson had been missing for about an hour. That led to a 12-hour standoff as officers and the Bixbys fired hundreds of bullets at each other, investigators said.

    Bixby’s parents were also charged with murder but died behind bars.

    The judge held a hearing last month to determine if Bixby was competent. Both sides had experts testify. One called by Bixby’s lawyers said the isolation of prison has only made his beliefs worse and that Bixby is stuck in a mindset that never grew.

    But the judge put more weight with the ones called by the state noting two of them have been dealing with Bixby since shortly after the killings and while Bixby has been angry with their testimony about his mental state before he understands they have a job to do.

    Those experts testified Bixby isn’t going to give up his beliefs about the law and the Constitution and he is ready to die as a martyr if his appeals fail. They said Bixby thinks he will be reunited with his parents in heaven.

    The psychiatrist who sees and treats death row inmates in South Carolina said Bixby summed up his mental state to him as ““I’m not crazy. I’m not a mental health case. I may be an (expletive), but I’m not crazy.”

    After the hearing, Bibxy sent his own handwritten motion to the judge. He reiterated his long held belief that his family was justified killing Wilson because the deputy was trying to help take their land. He also suggested the judge would commit treason if he does not stop his execution and set him free.

    “I am an innocent man!! Let freedom ring & let those committing treason swing!!!” Bixby wrote. “Like Thomas Jefferson: I am standing on principle even if I stand alone.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Florida man who killed 2 women set for lethal injection next month, extending execution record

    [ad_1]

    ST. PETERSBURG, Fla. — A Florida man convicted of killing two women whose bodies were found in a rural pond in 1996 is scheduled to be put to death in October under a death warrant signed by Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis, who continues to set a record pace for executions.

    Samuel Lee Smithers, 72, is scheduled to die by lethal injection Oct. 14 at Florida State Prison. Smithers would be the 14th person set for execution in Florida in 2025, with DeSantis overseeing more executions in a single year than any other Florida governor since the death penalty was reinstated in 1976.

    DeSantis signed the death warrant Friday night, just a few days before the scheduled execution Wednesday of David Joseph Pittman. Another convicted killer, Victor Tony Jones, is set to die on Sept. 30.

    In the Smithers case, court records show he met his two victims — Christy Cowan and Denise Roach — on different dates at a Tampa motel to pay them for sex. At the time, he was doing landscape maintenance on a 27-acre property that included three ponds in rural Plant City, Florida.

    On May 28, 1996, property owner Marion Whitehurst — who had met Smithers in church where he was a Baptist deacon — stopped by to find Smithers cleaning an axe in the carport, which he claimed to be using to trim tree limbs.

    “Whitehurst noticed a pool of blood in the carport,” the records state. “Smithers told her someone must have come by and killed a small animal.”

    Whitehurst contacted law enforcement and a sheriff’s deputy met her later that day at the property. The blood had been cleaned up, court records say, but the deputy noticed drag marks leading to one of the ponds. That’s where they found the bodies of Cowan and Roach.

    Both Cowan and Roach were severely beaten, strangled and left in the pond to die. Smithers confessed to the murders and was handed two death sentences after his trial in 1999. His convictions and sentences have been upheld by the Florida Supreme Court.

    So far 30 people have been executed in the U.S. in 2025, with Florida leading the way behind a flurry of death warrants signed by DeSantis. The last execution in Florida was the Aug. 28 lethal injection of 59-year-old Curtis Windom, convicted in the 1992 murders of his girlfriend, her mother and another man.

    The previous record for executions in one year in Florida was eight, most recently in 2014.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Zizians group member to be arraigned on murder charge in Vermont border agent’s death

    [ad_1]

    BURLINGTON, Vt. — A member of the cultlike Zizians group accused of killing a U.S. Border Patrol agent is set to make her first court appearance since prosecutors said they will seek the death penalty against her.

    Teresa Youngblut, 21, of Seattle, is among a group of radical computer scientists focused on veganism, gender identity and artificial intelligence who have been linked to six killings in three states. She’s accused of fatally shooting agent David Maland in Vermont on Jan. 20, the same day President Donald Trump was inaugurated and signed a sweeping executive order lifting the moratorium on federal executions.

    Youngblut initially was charged with using a deadly weapon against law enforcement and discharging a firearm during an assault with a deadly weapon, crimes that were not punishable by the death penalty. But the Trump administration signaled early on that more serious charges were coming as part of its push for more federal executions, and a new indictment released last month charged her with murder of a federal law enforcement agent, assaulting other agents with a deadly weapon and related firearms offenses.

    Youngblut is scheduled to be arraigned on the new charges Friday afternoon.

    At the time of the shooting, authorities had been watching Youngblut and her companion, Felix Bauckholt, for several days after a Vermont hotel employee reported seeing them carrying guns and wearing black tactical gear. She’s accused of opening fire on border agents who pulled the car over on Interstate 91. An agent fired back, killing Bauckholt and wounding Youngblut.

    The pair were among the followers of Jack LaSota, a transgender woman also known as Ziz whose online writing attracted young, highly intelligent computer scientists who shared anarchist beliefs. Members of the group have been tied to the death of one of their own during an attack on a California landlord in 2022, the landlord’s subsequent killing earlier this year, and the deaths of one of the members’ parents in Pennsylvania.

    LaSota and two others face weapons and drug charges in Maryland, where they were arrested in February, while LaSota faces additional federal charges of being an armed fugitive. Another member of the group who is charged with killing the landlord in California had applied for a marriage license with Youngblut. Michelle Zajko, whose parents were killed in Pennsylvania, was arrested with LaSota in Maryland, and has been charged with providing weapons to Youngblut in Vermont.

    Vermont abolished its state death penalty in 1972. The last person sentenced to death in the state on federal charges was Donald Fell, who was convicted in 2005 of abducting and killing a supermarket worker five years earlier. But the conviction and sentence were later thrown out because of juror misconduct, and in 2018, he pleaded guilty and was sentenced to life in prison.

    ___

    Ramer reported from Concord, New Hampshire.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Judge orders new trial for Alabama man who has been on death row for 31 years

    [ad_1]

    MONTGOMERY, Ala. — A federal judge has ordered a new trial for an Alabama death row inmate after tests showed it was another man’s DNA on the victim’s body.

    Chief U.S. District Judge Emily C. Marks last week ruled that Christopher Barbour must get a new trial.

    Barbour, now 56, was convicted of the 1992 stabbing death of Thelma Bishop Roberts in Montgomery. Barbour initially confessed that he killed Roberts after helping another man rape her, but he later recanted and said his confession was coerced by police. He has maintained that he is innocent.

    New DNA testing done in 2021 revealed that semen on the victim’s body didn’t belong to either man. It belonged to Roberts’ neighbor who is now incarcerated for an unrelated murder.

    His attorneys argued in an earlier court filing that “Mr. Barbour’s innocence is patently clear.”

    Marks said that Barbour’s conviction was tainted because prosecutors did not turn over bench notes from the initial forensics report that excluded Barbour, as well as the man he said raped the victim, as the source of the DNA. That information, Marks said, could have used to cast doubt on Barbour’s confession, which was the primary evidence against him at trial.

    “Barbour has shown that the prosecution’s knowing use of false evidence may have had an effect on the outcome of the trial,” Marks wrote.

    The state had argued that the DNA results do not exonerate Barbour. A spokesman for Alabama Attorney General Steve Marshall said the state plans to appeal the decision.

    The ruling came in a civil case that Barbour filed challenging his conviction on the grounds that his rights were violated. Marks gave the state 90 days to begin preparations for a new trial.

    Marks did not rule on Barbour’s innocence claim but wrote that he can now “argue as much to a jury.” Marks wrote in a ruling last year that the new DNA information “is powerful evidence that Barbour’s confession is false, and that Mrs. Roberts’ murder did not occur as the prosecution presented it at trial.”

    Barbour has been on Alabama’s death row since 1994.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • U.S. declines to pursue death penalty against trio of accused Mexican cartel kingpins

    [ad_1]

    Federal authorities in the United States revealed Tuesday that they will not seek the death penalty against three reputed Mexican drug cartel leaders, including an alleged former partner of the infamous “El Chapo” and the man accused of orchestrating the killing of a Drug Enforcement Administration agent.

    Court filings showed decisions handed down in the trio of prosecutions, all being held in Brooklyn, N.Y.

    The cases involve drug and conspiracy charges against Ismael “El Mayo” Zambada, 75, charged with running a powerful faction of Mexico’s Sinaloa cartel; Rafael Caro Quintero, 72, who allegedly masterminded the DEA agent’s torture and murder in 1985; and Vicente Carrillo Fuentes, 62, also known as El Viceroy, who is under indictment as the ex-boss of the Juárez cartel.

    Prosecutors from the Eastern District of New York filed a letter in each case “to inform the Court and the defense that the Attorney General has authorized and directed this Office not to seek the death penalty.”

    The decision comes despite calls by President Trump use capital punishment against drug traffickers and the U.S. government ratcheting up pressure against Mexico to dismantle organized crime groups and to stanch the flow of fentanyl and other illicit drugs across the border.

    A White House spokesperson did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

    It’s rare for the death penalty to be in play against high-level Mexican cartel figures. Mexico long ago abolished capital punishment and typically extradites its citizens on the condition that they are spared death.

    In Zambada’s case, the standard restrictions did not apply because he was not extradited. Zambada was brought to the U.S. in July 2024 by a son of his longtime associate, Joaquín “El Chapo” Guzmán. Zambada alleges he was ambushed and kidnapped in Sinaloa by Joaquín Guzmán López, who forced him onto an airplane bound for a small airport outside El Paso.

    Zambada has pleaded not guilty to the charges against him and remains jailed in Brooklyn while his case proceeds. A court filing in June said prosecutors and the defense had “discussed the potential for a resolution short of trial,” suggesting plea negotiations are underway.

    We’re going to be asking [that] everyone who sells drugs, gets caught selling drugs, to receive the death penalty for their heinous acts

    — President Trump in 2022

    Frank Perez, the lawyer representing Zambada, issued a statement Tuesday to The Times that said: “We welcome the government’s decision not to pursue the death penalty against our client. This marks an important step toward achieving a fair and just resolution.”

    Federal authorities announced in May that Guzmán López, 39, an accused leader of the Sinaloa cartel faction known as “Los Chapitos,” would also not face the death penalty. He faces an array of drug smuggling and conspiracy charges in a case pending before the federal court in Chicago.

    Another son of El Chapo, Ovidio Guzmán López, 35, pleaded guilty to drug trafficking, money laundering and firearms charges last month in Chicago. Court filings show he has agreed to cooperate with U.S. authorities in other investigations.

    Caro Quintero and Carrillo Fuentes were two of the biggest names among a group of 29 men handed over by Mexico to the U.S. in February. The unusual mass transfer was conducted outside the typical extradition process, which left open the possibility of the death penalty.

    Reputed to be a founding member of Mexico’s powerful Guadalajara cartel in the 1980s, Caro Quintero is allegedly responsible for the brutal slaying of DEA agent Enrique “Kiki” Camarena 40 years ago.

    The killing, portrayed on the Netflix show “Narcos: Mexico” and recounted in many books and documentaries, led to a fierce response by U.S. authorities, but Caro Quintero managed to elude justice for decades. Getting him on U.S. soil was portrayed as a major victory by Trump administration officials.

    Derek Maltz, the DEA chief in February, said in a statement that Caro Quintero had “unleashed violence, destruction, and death across the United States and Mexico, has spent four decades atop DEA’s most wanted fugitives list.”

    Carrillo Fuentes is perhaps best known as the younger brother of another Mexican drug trafficker, Amado Carrillo Fuentes, the legendary “Lord of the Skies,” who died in 1997. Once close to El Chapo, El Mayo and other Sinaloa cartel leaders, the younger Carrillo Funtes split off to form his own cartel in the city of Juárez, triggering years of bloody cartel warfare.

    Kenneth J. Montgomery, the lawyer for Carrillo Fuentes, said Tuesday that his client was “extremely grateful” for the government’s decision to not seek the death penalty. “I thought it was the right decision,” he said. “In a civilized society, I don’t think the death penalty should ever be an option.”

    Trump has been an ardent supporter of capital punishment. In January, he signed an order that directs the attorney general to “take all necessary and lawful action” to ensure that states have enough lethal injection drugs to carry out executions.

    The executive order directed the attorney general to pursue the death penalty in cases that involve the killing of law enforcement officers, among other factors. For years, Trump has loudly called for executing convicted drug traffickers. He reiterated the call for executions again in 2022 when announcing his intent to run again for president.

    “We’re going to be asking [for] everyone who sells drugs, gets caught selling drugs, to receive the death penalty for their heinous acts,” Trump said.

    Atty. Gen. Pam Bondi lifted a moratorium on federal executions in February, reversing a policy that began under the Biden administration. In April, Bondi announced intentions to seek the death penalty against Luigi Mangione, the man charged with assassinating a UnitedHealthcare executive in New York City.

    Bonnie Klapper, a former federal narcotics prosecutor in the Eastern District of New York, reacted with surprise upon learning that the Trump administration had decided to not pursue capital cases against the accused kingpins, particularly Caro Quintero.

    Klapper, who is now a defense attorney, speculated that Mexico is strongly opposed to executions of its citizens and officials may have exerted diplomatic pressure to spare the lives of the three men, perhaps offering to send more kingpins in the future.

    “While my initial reaction is one of shock given this administration’s embrace of the death penalty, perhaps there’s conversations taking place behind the scenes in which Mexico has said, ‘If you want more of these, you can’t ask to kill any of our citizens.’”

    [ad_2]

    Keegan Hamilton

    Source link

  • Germany recalls ambassador from Iran as it protests the execution of an Iranian German prisoner

    Germany recalls ambassador from Iran as it protests the execution of an Iranian German prisoner

    [ad_1]

    BERLIN — Germany protested to Iran on Tuesday over the execution of Iranian German prisoner Jamshid Sharmahd, who lived in the U.S. and was kidnapped in Dubai in 2020 by Iranian security forces, and recalled its ambassador to Berlin for consultations.

    The Foreign Ministry wrote on the social network X that Iran’s charge d’affaires in Berlin was summoned to hear “our sharp protest” against Tehran’s action and added that it reserves the right to take “further measures.” It didn’t elaborate.

    At the same time, German Ambassador Markus Potzel “protested in the strongest terms against the murder of Jamshid Sharmahd” to the Iranian foreign minister, it said. German Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock then recalled him to Berlin for consultations.

    Sharmahd, 69, was put to death in Iran on Monday on terrorism charges, the country’s judiciary said. That followed a 2023 trial that Germany, the U.S. and international rights groups dismissed as a sham.

    He was one of several Iranian dissidents abroad in recent years either tricked or kidnapped back to Iran as Tehran began lashing out after the collapse of its 2015 nuclear deal with world powers including Germany.

    Iran accused Sharmahd, who lived in Glendora, California, of planning a 2008 attack on a mosque that killed 14 people — including five women and a child — and wounded over 200 others, as well as plotting other assaults through the little-known Kingdom Assembly of Iran and its Tondar militant wing.

    Iran also accused Sharmahd of “disclosing classified information” on missile sites of Iran’s paramilitary Revolutionary Guard during a television program in 2017.

    His family disputed the allegations and had worked for years to see him freed.

    Sharmahd had been in Dubai in 2020, trying to travel to India for a business deal involving his software company. He hoped to get a connecting flight despite the coronavirus pandemic disrupting global travel.

    Sharmahd’s family received their last message from him on July 28, 2020. It’s unclear how the abduction happened. But tracking data showed that Sharmahd’s mobile phone traveled south from Dubai to the city of Al Ain on July 29, crossing the border into Oman. On July 30, tracking data showed the mobile phone traveled to the Omani port city of Sohar, where the signal stopped.

    Two days later, Iran announced it had captured Sharmahd in a “complex operation.” The Intelligence Ministry published a photograph of him blindfolded.

    Germany expelled two Iranian diplomats in 2023 over Sharmahd’s death sentence.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Japan prosecutors will not appeal acquittal of world’s longest death-row inmate in retrial

    Japan prosecutors will not appeal acquittal of world’s longest death-row inmate in retrial

    [ad_1]

    TOKYO — Japanese prosecutors said Tuesday they will not appeal the acquittal of the world’s longest-serving death-row inmate in a retrial last month, bringing closure to the 1966 murder case after more than a half-century of legal battles.

    Prosecutor-general Naomi Unemoto said the prosecution decided not to appeal the Shizuoka District Court decision that found Iwao Hakamada not guilty in a retrial 58 years after his arrest, saying: “We feel sorry for putting him in a legally unstable situation for an extremely long time.”

    Hakamada, an 88-year-old former boxer, was found not guilty on Oct. 26 by the Shizuoka court, which concluded that police and prosecutors collaborated in fabricating and planting evidence against him. The court said he was forced into confession by violent, hourslong interrogations.

    The top prosecutors’ decision to not appeal two days before the Oct. 10 deadline finalizes Hakamada’s acquittal by the district court.

    ”I’m delighted that we finally resolved this. Case closed,” his 91-year-old sister Hideko Hakamada told reporters after getting a phone call from her lawyer about the prosecutors’ decision.

    “I kind of knew this was going to happen,” Hakamada said, with a laugh.

    Unemoto, in a statement on the Supreme Public Prosecutors Office website, also apologized for Hakamada’s decades-long unstable legal situation amid a lengthy court process and pledged to investigate why the retrial took so long.

    Hakamada was convicted of murder in the 1966 killing of an executive and three of his family members and setting fire to their home in central Japan. He was sentenced to death in 1968 but was not executed, due to the lengthy appeal and retrial process in Japan’s notoriously slow-paced justice system.

    Hakamada became the fifth death row inmate to be found not guilty in a retrial in postwar Japan, where prosecutors have a more than 99% conviction rate and retrials are extremely rare.

    He spent more than 45 years on death row, making him the world’s longest-serving death-row inmate, according to Amnesty International.

    With Tuesday’s settlement of the retrial ruling, Hakamada is now entitled to receive government compensation of up to about 200 million yen ($1.4 million).

    His lawyer Hideyo Ogawa has said his defense team is considering filing a damage suit against the government and the Shizuoka prefecture over the collaboration of prosecutors and police in fabricating evidence, despite knowing it could send Hakamada to the gallows.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Supreme Court allows Missouri to proceed with the execution of death row inmate Marcellus Williams

    Supreme Court allows Missouri to proceed with the execution of death row inmate Marcellus Williams

    [ad_1]

    BONNE TERRE, Mo. — A Missouri man is scheduled to be executed by lethal injection Tuesday evening after the U.S. Supreme Court allowed the state to proceed with its plan to execute him, rejecting a last-ditch request to intervene on his behalf.

    The justices rejected two separate appeals to spare Marcellus Williams’ life, over the objection of Liberal Justices Ketanji Brown Jackson, Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor, a day after the Missouri Supreme Court and Republican Gov. Mike Parson declined to step in on Williams’ behalf.

    Williams, 55, has long maintained innocence in the 1998 death of Lisha Gayle, a social worker and former newspaper reporter who was repeatedly stabbed during a burglary of her suburban St. Louis home. The execution is opposed both by Gayle’s family and the prosecutor’s office that put Williams on death row — an unprecedented combination.

    “The family defines closure as Marcellus being allowed to live,” the clemency petition stated. “Marcellus’ execution is not necessary.”

    Williams is among inmates in five states who are scheduled to be executed in the span of a week — an unusually high number that defies a yearslong decline in the use and support of the death penalty in the U.S. The first was carried out Friday in South Carolina. The others are scheduled to take place in Texas on Tuesday, and in Oklahoma and Alabama on Thursday.

    Williams’ hopes of having his sentence commuted to life in prison suffered dual setbacks Monday when, almost simultaneously, Parson denied clemency and the Missouri Supreme Court declined to grant a stay of execution.

    Attorneys working on Williams’ behalf filed motions late Monday challenging the state Supreme Court’s decision.

    “We have asked the U.S. Supreme Court to stay Marcellus Williams’ execution on Tuesday based on a revelation by the trial prosecutor that he removed at least one Black juror before trial based on his race,” Tricia Bushnell, an attorney for Mr. Williams, said in a statement.

    The prosecutor in the 2001 murder case, Keith Larner, testified at an August hearing that he struck one potential Black juror partly because he looked too much like Williams — a statement which Williams’ attorneys asserted showed improper racial bias.

    Bushnell said Larner removed six of seven Black prospective jurors. The jury ultimately had 11 white members and one Black member. Larner contended that the jury selection process was fair.

    The Missouri attorney general’s office filed a response Tuesday saying the only effect of a stay of execution would be another delay in a case “that has already been delayed many years through Williams’ litigation of meritless claims.”

    The state Supreme Court, in a unanimous decision Monday afternoon, affirmed a lower court ruling rejecting Williams’ arguments.

    Parson accused Williams’ attorneys of trying to “muddy the waters about DNA evidence” with claims that courts have repeatedly rejected.

    “Nothing from the real facts of this case have led me to believe in Mr. Williams’ innocence,” Parson said in a statement.

    Parson, a former sheriff, has never granted clemency in a death penalty case. Williams’ execution would be the third in Missouri this year and the 100th since the state resumed executions in 1989.

    St. Louis County Prosecuting Attorney Wesley Bell has sought to set aside Williams’ sentence, citing questions about his guilt. His office joined lawyers from the Midwest Innocence Project in asking the U.S. Supreme Court to grant a stay.

    “Even for those who disagree on the death penalty, when there is a shadow of a doubt of any defendant’s guilt, the irreversible punishment of execution should not be an option,” Bell said in a statement.

    This marks the third time Williams has faced execution. He was less than a week away from lethal injection in January 2015 when the state Supreme Court called it off, allowing time for his attorneys to pursue additional DNA testing.

    He was hours away from being executed in August 2017 when then-Gov. Eric Greitens, a Republican, granted a stay and appointed a panel of retired judges to examine the case. But that panel never reached a conclusion.

    Questions about DNA evidence also led Bell to request a hearing challenging Williams’ guilt. But days before the Aug. 21 hearing, new testing showed that DNA on the knife belonged to members of the prosecutor’s office who handled it without gloves after the original crime lab tests.

    Without DNA evidence pointing to any alternative suspect, Midwest Innocence Project attorneys reached a compromise with the prosecutor’s office: Williams would enter a new, no-contest plea to first-degree murder in exchange for a new sentence of life in prison without parole.

    Judge Bruce Hilton signed off on the agreement, as did Gayle’s family. But at the urging of Missouri’s Republican attorney general, Andrew Bailey, the state Supreme Court blocked the agreement and ordered Hilton to proceed with an evidentiary hearing, which took place Aug. 28.

    Hilton ruled on Sept. 12 that the first-degree murder conviction and death sentence would stand, noting that Williams’ arguments all had been previously rejected. That decision was upheld Monday by the state Supreme Court.

    Prosecutors at Williams’ original trial said he broke into Gayle’s home on Aug. 11, 1998, heard water running in the shower, and found a large butcher knife. Gayle, a former reporter for the St. Louis Post-Dispatch, was stabbed 43 times when she came downstairs. Her purse and her husband’s laptop computer were stolen.

    Authorities said Williams stole a jacket to conceal blood on his shirt. Williams’ girlfriend asked him why he would wear a jacket on a hot day. The girlfriend said she later saw the purse and laptop in his car and that Williams sold the computer a day or two later.

    Prosecutors also cited testimony from Henry Cole, who shared a cell with Williams in 1999 while Williams was jailed on unrelated charges. Cole told prosecutors Williams confessed to the killing and offered details about it.

    Attorneys for Williams said that fingerprints, a bloody shoeprint, hair and other evidence at the crime scene didn’t match Williams.

    ___

    AP writer Mark Sherman contributed from Washington. Salter reported from O’Fallon, Missouri.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • A Texas man is set to be executed for killing his infant son

    A Texas man is set to be executed for killing his infant son

    [ad_1]

    HOUSTON — A Texas man with a long history of mental illness who has repeatedly sought to waive his right to appeal his death sentence faced execution Tuesday evening for killing his 3-month-old son more than 16 years ago, one of five executions set to take place within a week’s time in the U.S.

    Travis Mullis, 38, was condemned for stomping his son Alijah to death in January 2008. His execution by lethal injection was set to take place at the state penitentiary in Huntsville.

    Mullis would be the fourth inmate put to death this year in Texas, the nation’s busiest capital punishment state, and the 15th in the U.S. An execution in Missouri was also set for Tuesday, and on Thursday, executions were scheduled to take place in Oklahoma and Alabama.

    Authorities say Mullis, then 21 and living in Brazoria County, drove to nearby Galveston with his son after fighting with his girlfriend. Mullis parked his car and sexually assaulted his son. After the infant began to cry uncontrollably, Mullis began strangling his son before taking him out of the car and stomping on his head, according to authorities.

    The infant’s body was later found on the side of the road. Mullis fled Texas but was later arrested after turning himself in to police in Philadelphia.

    Mullis’ execution was expected to proceed as his attorneys did not plan to file any final appeals to try and stay his lethal injection. His lawyers also did not file a clemency petition with the Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles.

    In a letter submitted to U.S. District Judge George Hanks in Houston, Mullis wrote in February that he had no desire to challenge his case any further. Mullis has previously taken responsibility for his son’s death and has said “his punishment fit the crime.”

    In the letter, Mullis said, “he seeks the same finality and justice the state seeks.”

    Galveston County District Attorney Jack Roady, whose office prosecuted Mullis, declined to comment ahead of Tuesday’s scheduled execution.

    At Mullis’ trial, prosecutors said Mullis was a “monster” who manipulated people, was deceitful and refused the medical and psychiatric help he had been offered.

    Since his conviction in 2011, Mullis has long been at odds with his various attorneys over whether to appeal his case. At times, Mullis had asked that his appeals be waived, only to later change his mind.

    Shawn Nolan, one of Mullis’ attorneys, told the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals during a June 2023 hearing that state courts in Texas had erred in ruling that Mullis had been mentally competent when he had waived his right to appeal his case about a decade earlier.

    Nolan told the appeals court that Mullis has been treated for “profound mental illness” since he was 3 years old, was sexually abused as a child and is “severely bipolar,” leading him to change his mind about appealing his case.

    “The only hope that Mr. Mullis had of avoiding execution, of surviving was to have competent counsel to help the court in its determination of whether he was giving up his rights knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily and that did not happen,” Nolan said.

    Natalie Thompson, who at the time was with the Texas Attorney General’s Office, told the appeals court that Mullis understood what he was doing and could go against his lawyers’ advice “even if he’s suffering from mental illness.”

    The appeals court upheld Hank’s ruling from 2021 that found Mullis “repeatedly competently chose to waive review” of his death sentence.

    The U.S. Supreme Court has prohibited the application of the death penalty for the intellectually disabled, but not for people with serious mental illness.

    If carried out as planned, the executions in Texas, Missouri, Alabama and Oklahoma will mark the first time in more than 20 years — since July 2003 — that five were held in seven days, according to the nonprofit Death Penalty Information Center, which takes no position on capital punishment but has criticized the way states carry out executions. The first took place Friday when South Carolina put inmate Freddie Owens to death.

    ___

    Follow Juan A. Lozano: https://twitter.com/juanlozano70

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Missouri death row inmate gets another chance at a hearing that could spare his life

    Missouri death row inmate gets another chance at a hearing that could spare his life

    [ad_1]

    ST. LOUIS — ST. LOUIS (AP) — Marcellus Williams thought the DNA evidence was enough to remove him from Missouri’s death row, perhaps even him from prison. A decades-old mistake by a prosecutor’s office has kept his life hanging in the balance.

    Williams, 55, is scheduled to be executed on Sept. 24 for the 1998 stabbing death of Lisha Gayle in the St. Louis suburb of University City. St. Louis County Circuit Judge Bruce Hilton on Wednesday will preside over an evidentiary hearing challenging Williams’ guilt. But the key piece of evidence to support Williams is DNA testing that is no longer viable.

    A 2021 Missouri law allows prosecutors to file a motion seeking to vacate a conviction they believe was unjust. St. Louis County Prosecuting Attorney Wesley Bell filed such a request in January after reviewing DNA testing that wasn’t available when Williams was convicted in 2001. Those tests indicated that Williams’ DNA was not on the murder weapon. A hearing was scheduled for Aug. 21.

    Instead of a hearing, lawyers met behind closed doors for hours before Matthew Jacober, a special prosecutor for Bell’s office, announced that the DNA evidence was contaminated, making it impossible to show that someone else may have been the killer.

    New testing released last week determined that DNA from Edward Magee, an investigator for the prosecutor’s office when Williams was tried, was on the knife. Testing also couldn’t exclude the original prosecutor who handled the case, Keith Larner.

    “Additional investigating and testing demonstrated that the evidence was not handled properly at the time of (Williams’) conviction,” Jacober told the judge. “As a result, DNA was likely removed and added between 1998 and 2001.”

    That prompted lawyers for Williams and the prosecutor’s office to reach a compromise: Williams would enter a new, no-contest plea to first-degree murder in exchange for a new sentence of life in prison without parole. Hilton signed off on the agreement. So did Gayle’s family.

    Lawyers for the Missouri Attorney General’s Office did not.

    At Republican Attorney General Andrew Bailey’s urging, the Missouri Supreme Court blocked the agreement and ordered Hilton to proceed with the evidentiary hearing.

    The execution, now less than four weeks away, is still on. Hilton is expected to rule by mid-September.

    Williams has been close to execution before. In August 2017, just hours before his scheduled lethal injection, then-Gov. Eric Greitens, a Republican, granted a stay after testing showed that DNA on the knife matched an unknown person.

    That evidence prompted Bell to reexamine the case. A rising star in Missouri Democratic politics, Bell defeated incumbent U.S. Rep. Cori Bush in a primary this month and is heavily favored in the November general election.

    Three other men — Christopher Dunn last month, Lamar Johnson and Kevin Strickland — have been freed after decades in prison after prosecutors successfully challenged their convictions under the 2021 law.

    Prosecutors at Williams’ trial said he broke into Gayle’s home on Aug. 11, 1998, heard water running in the shower, and found a large butcher knife. When Gayle came downstairs, she was stabbed 43 times. Her purse and her husband’s laptop were stolen. Gayle was a social worker who previously worked as a reporter for the St. Louis Post-Dispatch.

    Authorities said Williams stole a jacket to conceal blood on his shirt. Williams’ girlfriend asked him why he would wear a jacket on a hot day. The girlfriend said she later saw the laptop in the car and that Williams sold it a day or two later.

    Prosecutors also cited testimony from Henry Cole, who shared a cell with Williams in 1999 while Williams was jailed on unrelated charges. Cole told prosecutors Williams confessed to the killing and offered details about it.

    Williams’ attorneys responded that the girlfriend and Cole were both convicted felons out for a $10,000 reward.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Alabama Supreme Court authorizes third nitrogen gas execution

    Alabama Supreme Court authorizes third nitrogen gas execution

    [ad_1]

    MONTGOMERY, Ala. — A third person is set to be executed by nitrogen gas, Alabama authorized Wednesday, months after becoming the first state to put a person to death with the previously untested method.

    The Alabama Supreme Court granted the state attorney general’s request to authorize the execution of Carey Dale Grayson, one of four teenagers convicted in the 1994 killing of Vickie Deblieux in Jefferson County. Alabama Gov. Kay Ivey will set Grayson’s execution date.

    In January, the state put Kenneth Smith to death in the nation’s first nitrogen gas execution. A second execution using the protocol is set for Sept. 26 for Alan Eugene Miller. Miller recently reached a lawsuit settlement with the state over the execution method.

    Alabama and attorneys for people in prison continue to present opposing views of what happened during the first execution using nitrogen gas. Smith shook for several minutes on the death chamber gurney as he was put to death Jan. 25. While Alabama Attorney General Steve Marshall described the execution as “textbook,” lawyers for inmates said it was the antithesis of the state’s prediction that nitrogen would provide a quick and humane death.

    Grayson has an ongoing lawsuit seeking to block the state from using the same protocol that was used to execute Smith. His attorneys argued the method causes unconstitutional levels of pain and that Smith showed signs of “conscious suffocation.”

    “We are disappointed that the Alabama Supreme Court has authorized the setting of an execution date before the federal courts have had a chance to review Mr. Grayson’s challenge to the constitutionality of Alabama’s current nitrogen protocol, and before Mr. Grayson has had an opportunity to review any changes to the protocol brought about by the recent Alan Miller settlement,” Matt Schulz, an assistant federal defender who is representing Grayson, wrote in an email.

    Earlier this month, Miller reached a “confidential settlement agreement” with the state to end his lawsuit over the specifics of the state’s nitrogen gas protocol. A spokesperson for the Alabama Department of Corrections declined to comment on whether the state is making procedural changes for Miller.

    The state has asked a judge to dismiss Grayson’s lawsuit, arguing that the execution method is constitutional and that his claims are speculative.

    Marshall’s office did not immediately comment on the court setting the execution date.

    Grayson was charged with torturing and killing Deblieux, 37, on Feb. 21, 1994. Prosecutors said Deblieux was hitchhiking from Tennessee to her mother’s home in Louisiana when four teenagers, including Grayson, offered her a ride. Prosecutors said they took her to a wooded area, attacked and beat her and threw her off a cliff. The teens later mutilated her body, prosecutors said.

    Grayson, Kenny Loggins and Trace Duncan were all convicted and sentenced to death. However, Loggins and Duncan, who were under 18 at the time of the crime, had their death sentences set aside after the U.S. Supreme Court in 2005 banned the execution of offenders who were younger than 18 at the time of the crime. Grayson was 19.

    The fourth teenager was sentenced to life imprisonment.

    Schulz noted that Alabama, in a 2004 Supreme Court brief opposing an age cutoff for the death penalty, wrote that it would be nonsensical to allow Grayson to be executed but not the codefendants whom the state described as “plainly are every bit as culpable — if not more so — in Vickie’s death and mutilation.” The state was seeking to allow all the teens to be executed.

    Lethal injection remains Alabama’s primary execution method but gives inmates the option to choose the electric chair or nitrogen gas. Grayson had previously selected nitrogen gas as his preferred execution method, but that was before the state had developed a process to use it.

    [ad_2]

    Source link