ReportWire

Tag: cameras

  • How tech is being used in Nancy Guthrie disappearance investigation

    [ad_1]

    NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

    Nancy Guthrie, the 84-year-old mother of “Today” show co-anchor Savannah Guthrie, was reported missing from her home in the Catalina Foothills area near Tucson after she failed to appear for church and could not be reached by family. When deputies arrived, several things stood out. Her phone, wallet and car keys were inside the home. The daily medication she relies on was left behind. Given her age and mobility challenges, investigators said she would not have left voluntarily.

    The Pima County Sheriff’s Department has since stated publicly that the case is being treated as a suspected abduction, and the home was processed as a crime scene. As the search continues, investigators are piecing together not only physical evidence and witness tips, but also the digital trail left behind by everyday technology.

    Sign up for my FREE CyberGuy Report
    Get my best tech tips, urgent security alerts and exclusive deals delivered straight to your inbox. Plus, you’ll get instant access to my Ultimate Scam Survival Guide – free when you join my CYBERGUY.COM newsletter.

    149 MILLION PASSWORDS EXPOSED IN MASSIVE CREDENTIAL LEAK

    Investigators are examining digital clues from phones, cameras and networks to help narrow the timeline in the Nancy Guthrie missing person investigation. (Courtesy of NBC)

    Why technology matters in missing person investigations

    In cases like this, technology rarely delivers a single smoking gun. Instead, it helps investigators answer quieter but critical questions that shape a timeline. Investigators ask when everything still looked normal. They look for the moment when devices stopped communicating. They try to pinpoint when something changed. Phones, medical devices, cellular networks and cameras generate timestamps. Those records help narrow the window when events may have taken a dangerous turn.

    YOUR PHONE SHARES DATA AT NIGHT: HERE’S HOW TO STOP IT

    Nancy Guthrie and Savannah Guthrie posing together for a photo.

    Smart cameras and neighborhood footage can provide crucial time markers, even when images are unclear or partially obscured. (Courtesy of NBC)

    How investigators connect data across agencies

    Behind the scenes, investigators rely on advanced analytical systems to connect information from multiple sources and jurisdictions. In Tucson and across Pima County, law enforcement agencies use artificial intelligence-assisted crime analysis platforms such as COPLINK, which allows data sharing with at least 19 other police departments across Arizona. These systems help investigators cross-reference tips, reports, vehicle data and digital evidence more quickly than manual searches.

    The Pima County Sheriff’s Department, Tucson Police Department and the FBI also work through real-time analytical crime centers, including Tucson’s Real-Time Analytical Crime Center (TRACC). These centers allow analysts to review large volumes of data together, from phone records and license plate reads to surveillance timestamps.

    This type of analysis does not replace traditional police work. It helps narrow timelines, rule out possibilities and prioritize leads as new information comes in.

    Bluetooth data and Apple’s potential role

    iOS may retain low-level Bluetooth artifacts outside the pacemaker app. Access to this data typically requires:

    • Legal process
    • Apple cooperation
    • Device forensic extraction

    Bluetooth artifacts cannot determine distance. They cannot show that two devices were a few feet apart. What they can sometimes provide is timestamp correlation, confirming that a Bluetooth interaction occurred. That correlation can help align pacemaker activity with phone movement or inactivity. It is not publicly known whether Apple has been formally contacted in this case. An inquiry has been made. Apple typically does not comment on specific investigations but may confirm what categories of data could be available.

    What the iPhone itself may reveal

    Even without medical data, the iPhone left behind may provide valuable corroboration. With proper legal access, investigators may examine:

    • Motion sensor activity
    • Cellular network connections
    • Wi-Fi associations
    • Camera metadata
    • Power and usage patterns

    This data can help establish whether the phone moved unexpectedly or stopped being used at a specific time. Again, the value lies in confirming timelines, not speculating motives.

    Cell tower data and coverage around the home

    Public mapping databases show dense cellular coverage in the area surrounding the Guthrie residence. There are 41 cell towers within a three-mile radius. The closest carrier towers are approximately:

    • AT&T at 1.0 mile
    • Verizon at 1.4 miles
    • T-Mobile at 3.0 miles

    Carrier records can be analyzed to identify device connections, sector handoffs and anomalous activity during the critical window between Saturday evening and Sunday morning. This analysis is complex, but it can help confirm whether a device moved or disconnected unexpectedly.

    Cameras, license plate readers and neighborhood footage

    Investigators are also reviewing surveillance systems. Tucson primarily uses Verkada cameras integrated with the Fusus platform. Flock Safety cameras are used in other parts of the region, including South Tucson.

    More than 200 automatic license plate readers are deployed in the broader area, allowing investigators to review historical vehicle movements during the critical time window. These systems can capture license plates, vehicle make and color, vehicle type and alerts tied to suspect vehicles.

    Private sources may matter just as much. Neighbor doorbell cameras and home systems can provide important timeline markers, even if the footage is grainy. Some modern vehicles also record motion near parked cars if settings are enabled.

    SUPER BOWL SCAMS SURGE IN FEBRUARY AND TARGET YOUR DATA

    Nancy Guthrie and Savannah Guthrie posing together for a photo.

    Everyday devices quietly record timestamps that may help investigators understand when something has changed and where to look next. (Courtesy of NBC)

    Ways to keep your loved ones safe

    Technology can help protect older or vulnerable relatives, but it works best when combined with everyday habits that reduce risk.

    1) Use connected cameras

    Install smart doorbell cameras and outdoor security cameras that notify family members when someone unfamiliar appears. Alerts can matter just as much as recorded footage. Many newer systems allow AI-based person detection, which can alert you when an unknown person is seen at certain times of day or night. These alerts can be customized, so family members know when activity breaks a normal pattern, not just when motion is detected.

    2) Wear an emergency pendant or medical alert device

    Emergency pendants and wearable SOS devices let someone call for help with a single press. Many newer models work outside the home and can alert caregivers if a fall is detected. Some devices also include GPS, which helps when someone becomes disoriented or leaves home unexpectedly. This remains one of the most overlooked safety tools for older adults.

    3) Enable device sharing and safety features

    If your loved one agrees, enable location sharing, emergency contacts and built-in safety features on their phone or wearable.

    On smartphones, this can include:

    • Emergency SOS
    • Medical ID access from the lock screen
    • Trusted location sharing through apps like Find My

    These features work quietly in the background, allowing help to reach the right people quickly without requiring daily interaction.

    4) Create simple check-in routines

    Use apps, text reminders or calendar alerts that prompt regular check-ins. If a message goes unanswered, it creates a reason to follow up quickly instead of assuming everything is fine. Consistency matters more than complexity.

    5) Use devices with passive safety monitoring

    Some phones, wearables and home systems can detect changes in normal daily activity without requiring a button press. For example, smartphones and smartwatches can notice when movement patterns suddenly stop or change. If a device that usually moves every morning stays still for hours, that shift can trigger alerts or prompt a check-in from a caregiver. Smart home systems can also flag unusual inactivity. Motion sensors that normally register movement throughout the day may show a long gap, which can signal that something is wrong. Passive monitoring works in the background. It reduces the need for constant interaction while still creating early warning signs when routines break.

    6) Know emergency contacts and escalation steps

    Enable smart alerts from home security systems so that family members know when doors open late at night, remain open longer than normal or when systems are armed or disarmed. Fire and smoke listener alerts and bedside panic buttons add another layer of protection, especially overnight. Car apps can also share safety signals, such as when a vehicle is unlocked, a door or window is left open or when location sharing is enabled with trusted family members.

    “No single device can protect someone on its own,” a law enforcement expert told CyberGuy. “What helps most is layering. A camera paired with a wearable. A phone paired with check-ins. Technology paired with human attention. Each layer adds context and reduces blind spots. Together, they create earlier warnings and faster responses when something goes wrong.”

    Kurt’s key takeaways

    The disappearance of Nancy Guthrie is heartbreaking. It also highlights how deeply modern technology is woven into everyday life. Digital data from phones, cellular networks, and cameras can offer valuable insights, but only when used responsibly and in compliance with privacy laws. As this investigation continues, technology may help law enforcement narrow timelines and test theories, even if it cannot answer every question. In cases like this, every detail matters.

    As digital footprints grow more detailed, should tech companies give law enforcement broader access when someone goes missing? Let us know by writing to us at Cyberguy.com.

    Sign up for my FREE CyberGuy Report
    Get my best tech tips, urgent security alerts and exclusive deals delivered straight to your inbox. Plus, you’ll get instant access to my Ultimate Scam Survival Guide – free when you join my CYBERGUY.COM newsletter. 

    CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

    Copyright 2026 CyberGuy.com. All rights reserved.  

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • RTD agrees to share camera feeds with Aurora police

    [ad_1]

    AURORA, Colo. — The Aurora City Council on Monday night approved an agreement between the Regional Transportation District (RTD) and Aurora police, which will allow APD access to RTD’s camera feeds in the city.

    Those cameras are placed on RTD property, including dozens of bus and rail stations.

    “We’ve never had to clear any hurdles with them providing that footage to us,” Aurora Sgt. Matthew Longshore told Denver7. “This is just one of those elements now that we actually have footage readily available to our investigators or our officers, in that real time… We would be able to view it live. We’d be able to go back 12, 24 hours to kind of view what happened previously.”

    Longshore called the agreement an expansion of the agencies’ already strong partnership.”

    “This is about public safety,” he said. “The more eyes we have in the community, the better.”

    Denver7

    A passenger moves across an RTD light rail platform.

    This is the latest example of Aurora police promoting technology as a potential solution to fight crime. In the fall, the department gained approval to use artificial intelligence facial recognition technology.

    But that move and others, including the use of drones and automated license plate cameras known as Flock cameras, have sparked privacy and transparency concerns in Aurora and around the Denver metro.

    PREVIOUS COVERAGE:

    A public commenter from the Denver Aurora Community Action Committee spoke out against the AI facial technology and increased surveillance in general during Monday’s Aurora City Council meeting.

    “You cannot impose surveillance technology on a community that does not trust you, and that distrust is earned,” she said. “How can we possibly trust APD with this tool when there is a non-zero chance they will share our faces and data with agencies like ICE?”

    “You ask us to trust a pipeline of surveillance that leads directly to deportation and death.”

    APD says the cameras are only meant to respond to 911 calls or to address broader crime trends.

    “If you know, we have an increase in crime, or if there’s something suspicious happening in the area,” Longshore said. “There’s typically an audit log that’s available on all of our cameras, so we can see who’s viewing it and when. There are certain things in place to be able to make sure that officers are doing things specifically for certain reasons.

    Denver7 reached out to RTD for comment on the agreement and is waiting to hear back.

    RTD agrees to share camera feeds with Aurora Police

    ryan image bar.jpg

    Denver7 | Your Voice: Get in touch with Ryan Fish

    Denver7’s Ryan Fish covers stories that have an impact in all of Colorado’s communities, but specializes in covering artificial intelligence, technology, aviation and space. If you’d like to get in touch with Ryan, fill out the form below to send him an email.

    [ad_2]

    Ryan Fish

    Source link

  • The Best GoPro and Camera Deals for Black Friday

    [ad_1]

    If you’re in the market for a new camera, this holiday season is the time to buy. There are some great Black Friday camera deals available right now, including one on our favorite GoPro, the GoPro Hero 13 Black. There are plenty of other GoPro camera deals, along with some good buys on cameras from Insta360, DJI, Fujifilm, and more.

    For more info about action cams, check out our complete guide. Also, be sure to read our guide to the Best GoPros, Best 360 Cameras, Best Instax Cameras, Best Travel Cameras, and Best Mirrorless Cameras. Head to our full roundup for more Black Friday deals.

    Updated November 28: We’ve added a new section of mirrorless camera deals, along with a deal on Polaroid’s latest Now camera.

    Do You Need a New Camera?

    Probably not. Probably what you need to do is spend a lot more time with the one you have, but if buying a new camera makes you feel like maybe you’re getting better at photography, far be it for me to stop you. Hitting too close to home? I feel you. I mean I want a new camera. I want the Sony A7C R, which is an amazing camera. The autofocus is light year’s ahead of my A7R II, the sensor is bigger, the dynamic range is better, and it’s smaller and lighter. What’s not to love? But it isn’t going to instantly make me take better pictures.

    To make better images you have to spend time at it. It takes practice, shooting everyday, even if you only have 10 minutes. Walk around the neighborhood and play with different compositions, try shooting in ways you normally don’t. Experiment with different light at different times of the day. Just get out an shoot more. Most of it will be garbage, but you’ll be learning.

    If you need a new camera to get you to do that, then carry on, there are some truly great deals to be had right now.

    The Best Action Camera Deal

    • Photograph: Scott Gilbertson

    • Photograph: Scott Gilbertson

    • Photograph: Scott Gilbertson

    • Photograph: Scott Gilbertson

    GoPro did not release a new model of its Hero action camera this year. Last year’s Hero 13 is still the latest, but it’s on sale for Black Friday anyway. Last year’s GoPro Hero 13 was the first significant change for GoPro’s flagship action camera in many years. The company added an interchangeable lens system, along with Macro, Ultra Wide, and Anamorphic lenses, plus a set of four neutral density filters. The new interchangeable lens system opens up shooting possibilities that simply don’t exist with other action cameras. For some reason, this camera often gets overlooked. It’s just fun to shoot with.

    I think the slickest part of the Hero 13’s new lens and filter system is that the Hero 13 Black autodetects which lens is attached and changes the Hero 13’s settings accordingly. This is especially nice for those who don’t want to fiddle with fine-tuning their camera settings every time they change lenses or pop on a neutral density filter. I’ve been using all three lenses for over a year now, and they’re all nice, but the Ultra Wide is my favorite. I mainly use my GoPro to shoot from the handlebars of my bike, so the wider the shot, the better and more immersive the footage becomes, hence my love of the Ultra Wide. The Hero Black ultrawide edition is also on sale.

    Everything that made GoPro a household name is here as well, with industry-leading hypersmooth stabilization, all kinds of helpful shooting modes, and support for GoPro’s Quik app. Also note that if you buy through gopro.com, the company includes a year’s worth of GoPro Premium, the company’s subscription cloud storage service. If the GoPro has a shortcoming, it’s the battery life. It’s OK, but not great. I suggest grabbing an extra battery.

    So, given that there was no Hero 14 this year, how future-proof is the Hero 13? I would say very future-proof. I will admit, the newly announced DJI Action 6, which has a variable aperture lens, is very interesting, but it’s still an automated aperture rather than giving you a full aperture priority mode. I’m also a little leery of DJI products, given the ban on imports that starts December 23, 2025. The Insta360 Ace Pro 2 below is also on sale, and I do love that camera as well, especially with the new accessories that turn it into something more like a point-and-shoot. But in the end, when I head out the door for a ride, or a paddle, or, right now, some snowshoeing, the action camera I reach for remains the GoPro Hero 13 Black.

    Other Great Action Camera Deals

    DJI

    Osmo Action 5 Pro

    Our top pick action camera for most people, the Action 5 is a great option. It has better battery life than the Hero 13, and better low light performance, though do keep in mind that support in the US will be limited after December 23, 2025.

    Insta360

    Ace Pro 2

    If you’re going to turn your action camera on yourself, the Ace Pro 2 is our top pick for vlogging. It has a great lens and sensor co-engineered with Leica, capable of recording 8K video at up to 30 fps. My only gripe is the lack of 10-bit color, but unless you’re doing your color in post, you won’t miss it.

    Deals on Action Camera Accessories

    The Best 360 Camera Deal

    • Photograph: Scott Gilbertson

    • Photograph: Scott Gilbertson

    The GoPro Max 2 is the best 360 camera you can buy, and it’s currently $100 off. The dual 14 mm (35 mm equivalent) lenses of the Max 2 each record to a 1/2.3-inch chip, the largest available in a 360 camera. This gives what GoPro calls “True 8K” video, by which the company means that the actual recorded area of the sensor is 8K, whereas other 360 cameras have an 8K sensor, but only record about 6K or 7K worth of that sensor as the actual image. The short story is that the Max 2’s video is sharper and clearer. Couple this with support for 10-bit color in Log files, and you have footage that the competition just can’t match.

    Other 360 Camera Deals

    Insta360

    X5 360 Camera

    Our former top pick, the Insta360 X5 is still an excellent 360 camera. It uses twin 1/1.28″ sensors to capture very near 8K video. The dynamic range is impressive, and the color science here is very good though it does tend toward the oversaturated.

    Insta360

    X4 360 Camera

    This is the best price you’re going to see on a 360 camera. The Insta360 X4 has been superseded by the X5, but it’s still a great camera. The video quality is the same resolution as the X5 (8K), but it lacks the X5’s updated sensors, processor, and improved color options.

    A Fun, Screen-Free Digital Camera

    A hand holding up a pink Camp Snap Digital Camera

    Photograph: Nena Farrell

    What if there were a film camera that captured digital images? That’s what the Camp Snap camera is, the screen-free aspect means that, like film, you don’t know how your images look until later— you can keep photographing without getting pulled out of the moment as much. The Camp Snap can hold up to 2,000 photos on the preinstalled memory card, and it comes with a USB-C cable to download the photos onto your computer. This one is a fun gift to give too.

    The Best Deals on Instant Cameras

    Front view of black instant film camera with the lens extended

    Photograph: B&H Photo

    Fujifilm’s Instax Mini 99 is the best Instax camera for those who love manual controls and creative effects. The Mini 99 offers some manual focus and exposure controls, as well as some fun color effects, like the ability to simulate light leaks just like those thrift store cameras collecting dust on your shelf. There are two dials on top of the Mini 99. One acts like an exposure compensation dial, allowing you to adjust exposure value (EV) two stops brighter and two stops darker. I found the L (Lighten) and L+ useful when shooting against snow, which has a tendency to overwhelm small sensors like this one. It’s also good for strongly backlit scenes, though those are still not Instax’s strong suit. The Mini 99 has a 60-mm lens made of plastic. It works out to roughly the same field of view as a 35-mm lens in 35-mm format (or if you prefer, somewhere between 1x and 2x on your iPhone). The shutter is fixed at f/12.7, which means you’ll be relying on the flash in all but bright, sunny, outdoor shots. That said, unlike quite a few other Instax models, with the Mini 99 you can turn off the flash for those well-lit shots, and that means far fewer washed-out images.

    Image may contain: Camera, Digital Camera, and Electronics

    Courtesy of Polaroid

    Polaroid’s standard Now camera is close enough to the classic Polaroid that you probably won’t notice the difference. The Gen 3 version is an incremental update of the Gen 2, bringing better auto focus and improved flash. Otherwise, it’s the same basic design we love, with a nice chunky body and easy-to-find buttons.

    Other Instant Camera Deals

    Fujifilm

    Instax Mini 12

    This one is nearly always on sale for Black Friday. It’s our pick for best budget Instax as it manages to be a capable, but easy-to-use camera wrapped in a colorful, bubbly design aimed at beginners.

    Fujifilm

    Instax Mini 41

    The Mini 41 is essentially the Mini 12 in a different body. Same capabilities, but looking more like a “camera” should.

    Deals on Mirrorless Cameras

    Front of the Nikon ZF camera

    Photograph: Scott Gilbertson

    Nikon

    Zf Mirrorless Camera

    The Nikon Zf is the camera I would buy if I were in the market for a new camera. It’s all about the knobs and dials. Every setting you need to make an image is accessible on a dial or knob: ISO, aperture, shutter speed, and exposure compensation. There’s also a switch to change shooting modes and another to change to black-and-white mode or video mode. Pair that with a great 24-MP sensor and reasonably fast autofocus speeds, and you have a fantastic, reasonably priced camera. The best deal of the bunch here is Adorama’s lens bundle, which comes with a charger, memory card, lens filters, and cleaning kit.

    Other Mirrorless Camera Deals

    Sony

    A7RV

    This deal is so good at has its own full write up. This is Sony’s top-of-the-line mirrorless camera at the lowest price it’s ever been. If you’ve been wanting to upgrade, now is the time.

    Sony

    A7 IV Camera

    This is also a great deal on a more hybrid camera, with some video-extras, like 4K/30 fps video oversampled from a 7K sensor region. Be aware that the rumor mill says this one is due for an update, but it’s still a great camera, especially at this price.

    The Best Deals on Our Favorite Photo Printing Services

    A photograph isn’t a photograph until you print it. Strong words, but I’ll stand by them. Luckily, there are some great deals right now that will let you print your images without spending a fortune.

    Person's hand holding printed photographs

    Photograph: Mpix

    Our favorite place to print photos is holding a 30 percent off sale on its print services. Mpix makes high-quality prints at a reasonable price, even when it’s full price, which makes this a great deal. Mpix prints on Kodak Endura paper and offers a variety of paper options. I tested the E-surface, which renders rich, deep blacks and true-to-life colors. It holds up well over time; the images we printed in 2013 look exactly like they did when we got them. We also like Mpix’s books and calendars.

    If you need to print gifts for your family, Shutterfly is having a sitewide 50 percent off sale. We’re fans of Shutterfly’s book printing service, which had the best results so far in our testing of photo printing services. We also like the calendars. The printing is good enough, especially for the price, and shipping is generally speedy.

    The highest-quality prints in our testing came from Adorama’s Printique service. It would be the top pick in our print services guide if it were a bit cheaper, which, with this deal, it is. You can choose from a range of papers, and they’re listed by their actual names, like Kodak Endura or Fujifilm Matte. I also like the option to print the date and file name on the back of each image.


    Power up with unlimited access to WIRED. Get best-in-class reporting and exclusive subscriber content that’s too important to ignore. Subscribe Today.

    [ad_2]

    Scott Gilbertson

    Source link

  • Save $900 on Sony’s Best Mirrorless Camera With This Early Black Friday Deal

    [ad_1]

    It’s Too Early for the lame turkey and family jokes that always start Black Friday deals posts, so I’ll just cut to the chase. Sony’s top-of-the-line mirrorless camera, the A7R V, is on sale at the lowest price we’ve ever seen. If you’ve been thinking of updating, now is the time to buy.

    The A7R V isn’t our top-pick mirrorless camera, but that’s mainly because at full price it’s expensive relative to the rest of the market. At this price, though, it’s a steal, and while there is no truly best camera for everyone, the A7R V is unquestionably the highest-resolution camera you can buy. And I know, megapixels aren’t everything, but I have never taken an image with this camera and thought, darn, that’s just too many megapixels.

    Courtesy of Sony

    The massive 61-megapixel, full-frame sensor in the A7R V is the largest sensor you can get without moving up to a bigger, bulkier medium-format camera. If you want to go totally nuts, get this, landscape photographers: The A7R V can combine 16 shots into a single 240-MP image. It only works with static subjects, but if you ever worried if your images are hi-res enough to cover the side of a building in Times Square, well, you can rest easy with the A7R V.

    Yes, the megapixel race is silly and mostly over, but I will say that I’ve shot quite a bit with the A7R C—which uses the same sensor—and images from this 60-MP sensor are noticeable sharper, and the dynamic range is visibly better than what I get from the A7R II (which has a 40-MP sensor). This is obviously the case onscreen, when pixel peeping, but I also notice the difference when I print images.

    That the A7R V is $900 off does make you wonder if perhaps the A7R VI is on the horizon? Anything is possible, but I kind of doubt it’s coming imminently. The A7C R, which as noted above, is nearly identical in features, is still not on sale. Furthermore, rumor has it the A7 V (no R) is due before the end of the year, and Sony rarely announces cameras back to back.

    What if you don’t want all those megapixels? They do make for huge files, after all (80-120 MB per image in my experience). The Sony A7 IV (9/10, WIRED Recommends, which uses a 33-MP sensor, is on sale for $700 less than usual.

    Sony A7IV Camera Body

    Photograph: Sony

    While the sensor has only about half the resolution of the A7R V, it’s plenty sharp and boasts a few video-oriented features you won’t find in the higher-resolution model. It has very nearly the same excellent dynamic range and one of the best autofocus system on the market.

    Without getting too deep in the weeds of video technicalities, the A7 IV can record 4K/30p video by oversampling from a 7K sensor region. On the other hand, the A7R V employs what’s known as line-skipping to achieve the same 4K/30p recording. This method of recording results in reduced sharpness and sometimes causes aliasing issues.

    [ad_2]

    Scott Gilbertson

    Source link

  • Google Nest Doorbell Cam (2025) Review: I’m So Tired of Subscriptions

    [ad_1]

    Google is betting that AI can justify the high price of its smart home security camera subscriptions. The idea is that with AI, your notifications would read more like a human looked outside and told you what they saw. And instead of you scrolling through endless video footage to see what happened, AI can summarize the day for you. Sounds good, right? Sounds great to me.

    If you already read my Nest Cam Outdoor (wired, 2nd gen) review, you’ll know the reality, as I experienced it, is underwhelming. Notifications, generated by Google’s Gemini AI chatbot, constantly misidentified my pets and gave weird and wrong descriptions of events taking place in triggered recordings. Daily summaries of my family’s comings and goings made it sound like my house was being mobbed with people and animals. None of it helped justify the pricey cloud storage service that the Google Home Premium (formerly Nest Aware) subscriptions otherwise are. And without those subscriptions, the Nest Cam Outdoor just doesn’t do enough to make it worth buying over some of the more capable, less cloud-reliant alternatives out there.

    Does the Google Nest Doorbell (wired, 3rd gen) fare any better? Well, the AI features are still broken the same way, but it may still be a better purchase, depending on how deep your roots are within the walled garden of the Google Home ecosystem. If you’re not a big Google Home user, though, it’s best to look elsewhere.


    Google Nest Doorbell (wired, 3rd gen)

    Janky AI summaries and spendy subscription aside, the Nest Doorbell is good enough if you’re deep in the Google Home ecosystem.

    • Clear, wide field of view
    • Nice integration with Google Home speakers and displays
    • Attractive design
    • Quick notifications
    • Inconsistent AI notifications
    • AI summaries are useless
    • Expensive hardware and subscriptions
    • No local storage

    The Nest Doorbell might be the nicest-looking video doorbell on the market. Its slender, bar-shaped housing is rounded on both ends, curving tightly around the camera and the LED ring-lit doorbell button. The whole thing has the same gentle, pleasingly symmetrical vibe that characterizes the other Google Nest cameras. It’s a lot nicer to look at than chunky, blocky video doorbells from the likes of Ring or Eufy.

    Beyond the pretty design, Google’s third-gen wired doorbell has solid specs like a 2K resolution camera sensor with a generous 166-degree diagonal field of view that spreads out over a square aspect ratio. It captures HDR video at 30 frames per second; clips come in vibrant color during the day and, using infrared LEDs, black and white at night. The Nest Doorbell also has a microphone and speaker that enables two-way audio. Connectivity-wise, the camera uses both 2.4GHz and 5GHz Wi-Fi and Bluetooth Low Energy. Thanks to that fast Wi-Fi and its always-on nature, its live feed loads almost instantly in the Google Home app.

    Installation is straightforward, assuming you’ve got the requisite doorbell wiring by your door. The Nest Doorbell comes with a mounting plate and a second angled adapter that you can use if you want to have the camera pointing more toward people at your door. Google includes wire extenders if you need them, and the Google Home app, which you use for setup, guides you through installation.

    © Wes Davis / Gizmodo

    It’s easy to connect the Nest Doorbell to the Google Home app—the only place you’ll ever use it, since this is exclusively a Google Home-compatible product—but a word of advice: Setup requires a QR code included in the box. Lose it and you’ll have to undo all of your physical installation work to get at the same QR code on the back of the doorbell itself.

    Once set up, it works like most other video doorbells. You’ll get notifications when someone presses its button, or when the Nest Doorbell detects the sorts of objects—people, pets, and vehicles—you’ve set it to notify you about. Unfortunately, you’ll need a subscription if you want those notifications to feature a zoomed-in preview of whatever triggered the recording, as well as for package detection. Seems stingy, but I guess thumbnail images and machine-learning cardboard box recognition don’t grow on trees?

    See Nest Doorbell (wired, 3rd gen) at Amazon

    Despite those omissions, Google is more generous with free features for the Nest Doorbell than the Nest Cam Outdoor. It works with existing mechanical and digital chimes, for instance, and if you don’t have a functioning chime (like me) then you’ve also got the option to use Google’s smart speakers or displays. They can be configured to announce when someone has rang your doorbell and—in the case of the Google Nest Hub or Hub Max—start streaming the camera’s live feed. Through the display you can also chat with the person who rang your doorbell or, if you’re not into chatting, pick an automated response such as one telling a delivery person to leave the payload there.

    In testing, my second-generation Nest Hub was fairly quick to announce that someone had pressed the button, and chatting back and forth with them was easy enough. The only problem was that I had to deal with the Nest Hub itself, which has an interface that’s absolutely sluggish in 2025. Still, it’s a cool integration. Now, if only I could get it to do this on the Google TV-equipped OLED TV in my basement.

    And that’s it for the Nest Doorbell, sans subscription. There’s no local recording, although Google did bump the amount of time it’ll keep a recorded event on its servers from a scant three hours in the previous Nest Doorbell to a still-meager six hours. Either way, it’s paltry compared to the free local storage offered for video doorbells from the likes of Eufy, Reolink, Blink, and Aqara.

    AI works better on the doorbell camera

    Nest Doorbell In Google Home App
    © Screenshots by Wes Davis / Gizmodo

    If you want more out of the Nest Doorbell, you’ll have to pay for a $10 or $20 per month Google Home Premium subscription. That’ll give you more cloud video storage history—to the tune of 30 days or 60 days, respectively, with the latter also adding 10 days of 24/7 recording that you can search using Gemini.

    The lower Standard tier also gets you facial recognition, package detection, and alerts if one of your Google Home devices hears glass breaking or smoke alarms. Those features, as well as local storage, are all things the Reolink Elite I recently reviewed offers for free. In fact, the only thing this subscription nets you that you can’t get with a lot of other cameras is a feature called “Help me create,” which lets you create automations by describing them in a text box in the Google Home app. It worked well for creating simple automations, although one thing that bothers me is that if you ask it to do something that Google Home’s automations aren’t capable of, Gemini won’t tell you that. It’ll just deliver a non-functioning automation.

    Eventually, the Standard plan will also include a wide rollout of Gemini to smart speakers. That includes features like Gemini Live, Google’s LLM-powered assistant’s back-and-forth voice chatting feature. As of this review, it’s best to hold off on the subscription if you want access to Gemini on your speakers, as that’s only available to some in early access.

    You have to subscribe to the $20/month Google Home Premium Advanced plan to get the headlining AI camera features like daily summaries and AI-created notifications for events. You can read a lot more about my issues with these features over in my review of the Nest Cam Outdoor, but to summarize: Google’s AI system has a tendency to misinterpret what’s happening in front of it, confidently misidentifies animals, and its summaries often describe a person coming and going in a way that makes it seem like I’m having a house party every day.

    That said, the system seems more accurate in the context of a video doorbell, perhaps because the camera is closer to the ground and can see what’s in front of it more clearly. Or maybe it’s just because what happens in front of my house is a lot more routine than in the backyard—it’s not trying to make sense of dogs going in and out or people doing yardwork or taking out the trash. Gemini still called my cat a dog sometimes, but it accurately called out when most packages were delivered and even noted that one was from Amazon.

    These features are slick when they work, and—again—like I said in my Nest Cam Outdoor review, they’re a clear technological leap forward for home security cameras. But Google’s AI descriptions are still wrong often enough that it’s like paying $20 a month to beta test, and that just doesn’t feel good to me. Heck, even when they aren’t flat wrong, they’re not much more useful than the generic, non-AI descriptors of “Person,” “Person with Package,” or “Activity or animal” of the subscription-free experience. Also, AI video search might be very cool, but as the Reolink Elite shows, you can get similar AI search from an on-device AI model. Like with local video storage, it feels like Google could make a camera with on-device AI search for free, and just didn’t do it because, well, more money via subscriptions is better than less money without them.

    Good buy if you’re all-in on Google Home

    Google Nest Doorbell Wired 3rdgen Review 2
    © Wes Davis / Gizmodo

    The Google Nest Doorbell (wired, 3rd gen) serves a pretty specific niche—people heavily invested in the Google Home ecosystem—very well. If you have a home full of Google Nest speakers and smart displays and you love using Google Gemini for things, you’ll probably like the Nest Doorbell. And if you’re already paying for a spendy Google Home Premium plan and don’t have a Nest Doorbell or you’ve only got the first-generation model, it’s a no-brainer.

    But for anyone else, the Nest Doorbell isn’t meaningfully useful on its own, and the Google Home Premium subscription is a raw deal at a time when your weary dollar won’t go as far as it used to. It’s hard to feel good about paying $20 a month for useless AI summaries, or for AI-written notifications that can be slightly more helpful than generic “person spotted” alerts when I’m canceling streaming services to save money. I’d much rather buy one of the many cheaper alternative video doorbells that offer local video storage and reactivate my Netflix account for a couple more months with the money I saved.

    See Nest Doorbell (wired, 3rd gen) at Amazon

    [ad_2]

    Wes Davis

    Source link

  • Washington court says Flock camera images are public records

    [ad_1]

    NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

    A Skagit County Superior Court judge ruled that images from Flock Safety automated license plate reader cameras in Stanwood and Sedro-Woolley qualify as public records under Washington’s Public Records Act.

    Judge Elizabeth Yost Neidzwski said the images are “not exempt from disclosure” and explained that an agency does not need to physically hold a record for it to fall under the law.

    The request that led to the ruling

    The case began when Washington resident Jose Rodriguez asked Stanwood for one hour of Flock camera images. That request prompted Stanwood and neighboring Sedro-Woolley to ask the court to declare that vendor-stored data did not count as public records.

    Sign up for my FREE CyberGuy Report
    Get my best tech tips, urgent security alerts and exclusive deals delivered straight to your inbox. Plus, you’ll get instant access to my Ultimate Scam Survival Guide — free when you join my CYBERGUY.COM newsletter.

    Judge Neidzwski rejected that argument. She said the cities’ ALPR images support a government purpose and meet the definition of a public record.

    SEATTLE ELECTS DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST KATIE WILSON AS MAYOR

    Flock Safety cameras use AI to capture license plate images in real time, tracking vehicles as they move through neighborhoods. (Flock Safety)

    However, Rodriguez will not receive the specific images he sought. The city had already allowed the footage to auto-delete after 30 days, and it expired before the ruling.

    We reached out to Flock Safety, and a spokesperson provided CyberGuy with the following statement:

    “The Court merely declined to exempt these records from disclosure under Washington’s extremely broad public records law. Nothing changed in the status quo in Washington as a result of this ruling — these records were covered by the law before the ruling, and remain so following the ruling. Unfortunately, some individuals in Washington have abused the breadth of the public records law to extort significant settlements from Washington communities for technical violations of the disclosure requirements, which we cannot believe is the intent of the law. We are supporting efforts to enact a legislative fix to this situation, which is costing Washington communities tens of thousands of dollars to stave off frivolous lawsuits.”

    A license plate camera

    The Washington court ruling marks a major step toward transparency in how police collect and store surveillance data. (Flock Safety)

    Why the decision matters for transparency

    Flock’s automated license plate reader cameras capture multiple still images of passing vehicles along with time, location and license plate information. Cities use the system to assist law enforcement with investigations, relying on stored images to identify vehicles connected to crimes or alerts.

    The court’s ruling raises broader questions about how local agencies manage these images once they’re created. By finding that the images qualify as public records, the decision forces cities to examine how long they retain this data, how it is stored and who may request access under state law. 

    Privacy advocates say the ruling highlights the need for clear policies around retention and transparency, while law enforcement groups argue that access rules must still protect ongoing investigations.

    AI DASHCAMS ENHANCE TRUCKER SAFETY WHILE RAISING PRIVACY CONCERNS

    License plate reader

    The debate continues as communities weigh the balance between public safety, privacy and the right to know what’s being recorded. (Flock Safety)

    How this ruling impacts privacy and surveillance

    For years, cities and police agencies have argued that data stored by third-party vendors falls outside public records laws. They often make this claim even when the data documents activity on public roads. The Washington ruling did not settle broader questions about surveillance, but it rejected the idea that Flock camera images are exempt simply because a vendor stores them. This decision exposes a growing tension between how agencies use surveillance tools and what the public can access under state law.

    Beryl Lipton of the Electronic Frontier Foundation, a nonprofit dedicated to defending digital privacy, free expression and transparency in technology, told Cyberguy, “The use of third-party vendors for surveillance and data storage is widespread and growing across the country, and allowing this to undermine the public’s right to know is very dangerous. The government’s primary obligation should be to its constituents, which includes protecting their rights under public records laws, not to the private vendors that they choose to employ while conducting mass surveillance. Whether an agency stores images and information on their own devices or on the private server of a vendor should not affect the appropriate disclosure of these records under public records laws. If the use of these devices makes it too difficult for a city to comply with the law, then the response should not be to circumvent the laws they find inconvenient, but rather it should be to only use vendors that won’t get in the way of a city’s ability to fulfill its responsibilities to their citizenry. Otherwise, they should not use these tools at all.”

    What this means for you

    If your town uses Flock or other automated license plate readers, this ruling shows how Washington courts may handle future records requests. It confirms that ALPR images can count as public records, even when a vendor stores the data.

    The debate over privacy and safety continues. Supporters say public access builds trust and oversight. Critics worry that releasing vehicle data could expose sensitive details without strong safeguards or redactions.

    CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

    Take my quiz: How safe is your online security?

    Think your devices and data are truly protected? Take this quick quiz to see where your digital habits stand. From passwords to Wi-Fi settings, you’ll get a personalized breakdown of what you’re doing right and what needs improvement. Take my Quiz here: Cyberguy.com.

    Kurt’s key takeaways

    This ruling shows how courts may handle data from automated license plate readers. It also reveals how much vehicle information cities collect. As a result, it raises new questions about who should access these records. In addition, the decision may guide future transparency debates in Washington. However, it will also spark fresh conversations about how surveillance tools fit within state records laws.

    Do you think public access to AI camera footage improves accountability or puts privacy at risk? Let us know by writing to us at Cyberguy.com.

    Sign up for my FREE CyberGuy Report
    Get my best tech tips, urgent security alerts and exclusive deals delivered straight to your inbox. Plus, you’ll get instant access to my Ultimate Scam Survival Guide — free when you join my CYBERGUY.COM newsletter.

    Copyright 2025 CyberGuy.com.  All rights reserved.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Capturing the northern lights: How to take the best photos of auroras

    [ad_1]

    Multiple parts of the United States were treated to mesmerizing colors from the aurora borealis, or northern lights, in the sky Tuesday night. This is because of a severe geomagnetic storm triggered by solar flares. Related video above: Weather Talk — How do I know if we can see the Northern Lights?The lights can appear faint when looked at with the naked eye, but with the right camera settings, the different colors and waves can be seen in photos.Forecasters say there is still a chance that some regions would get to catch the lights on Wednesday night. Here’s how to take the best photos of them:Using nighttime picture-taking settingsMost newer versions of iPhone and Android phones have a setting for taking pictures in low light. This slows the shutter speed, allowing more light in and taking a clearer picture. Here’s how to adjust settings on iPhone and Android devices like Samsung phones or Google Pixel phones. It’s important to hold your phone steady or use a tripod so your image does not end up blurry.Video below: Check out these dazzling photos of Tuesday night’s northern lights in IowaThere’s an app for that, tooThere are also apps available that are specifically designed to help you take pictures of the northern lights. Check the app stores on your iPhones or Android devices.Be in the right place at the right timeArtificial light pollution can decrease your chances of catching the best colors, so it is best to get away from cities and into rural areas for picture-taking. There will be more visibility the farther north you can get. Any time after it gets dark outside and before midnight will be the best opportunity. Related video below: What causes the colors you see with the northern lights?

    Multiple parts of the United States were treated to mesmerizing colors from the aurora borealis, or northern lights, in the sky Tuesday night. This is because of a severe geomagnetic storm triggered by solar flares.

    Related video above: Weather Talk — How do I know if we can see the Northern Lights?

    The lights can appear faint when looked at with the naked eye, but with the right camera settings, the different colors and waves can be seen in photos.

    Forecasters say there is still a chance that some regions would get to catch the lights on Wednesday night. Here’s how to take the best photos of them:

    Using nighttime picture-taking settings

    Most newer versions of iPhone and Android phones have a setting for taking pictures in low light. This slows the shutter speed, allowing more light in and taking a clearer picture. Here’s how to adjust settings on iPhone and Android devices like Samsung phones or Google Pixel phones.

    It’s important to hold your phone steady or use a tripod so your image does not end up blurry.

    Video below: Check out these dazzling photos of Tuesday night’s northern lights in Iowa

    There’s an app for that, too

    There are also apps available that are specifically designed to help you take pictures of the northern lights. Check the app stores on your iPhones or Android devices.

    Be in the right place at the right time

    Artificial light pollution can decrease your chances of catching the best colors, so it is best to get away from cities and into rural areas for picture-taking.

    There will be more visibility the farther north you can get. Any time after it gets dark outside and before midnight will be the best opportunity.

    Related video below: What causes the colors you see with the northern lights?

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Capturing the northern lights: How to take the best photos of auroras

    [ad_1]

    Multiple parts of the United States were treated to mesmerizing colors from the aurora borealis, or northern lights, in the sky Tuesday night. This is because of a severe geomagnetic storm triggered by solar flares. Related video above: Weather Talk — How do I know if we can see the Northern Lights?The lights can appear faint when looked at with the naked eye, but with the right camera settings, the different colors and waves can be seen in photos.Forecasters say there is still a chance that some regions would get to catch the lights on Wednesday night. Here’s how to take the best photos of them:Using nighttime picture-taking settingsMost newer versions of iPhone and Android phones have a setting for taking pictures in low light. This slows the shutter speed, allowing more light in and taking a clearer picture. Here’s how to adjust settings on iPhone and Android devices like Samsung phones or Google Pixel phones. It’s important to hold your phone steady or use a tripod so your image does not end up blurry.Video below: Check out these dazzling photos of Tuesday night’s northern lights in IowaThere’s an app for that, tooThere are also apps available that are specifically designed to help you take pictures of the northern lights. Check the app stores on your iPhones or Android devices.Be in the right place at the right timeArtificial light pollution can decrease your chances of catching the best colors, so it is best to get away from cities and into rural areas for picture-taking. There will be more visibility the farther north you can get. Any time after it gets dark outside and before midnight will be the best opportunity. Related video below: What causes the colors you see with the northern lights?

    Multiple parts of the United States were treated to mesmerizing colors from the aurora borealis, or northern lights, in the sky Tuesday night. This is because of a severe geomagnetic storm triggered by solar flares.

    Related video above: Weather Talk — How do I know if we can see the Northern Lights?

    The lights can appear faint when looked at with the naked eye, but with the right camera settings, the different colors and waves can be seen in photos.

    Forecasters say there is still a chance that some regions would get to catch the lights on Wednesday night. Here’s how to take the best photos of them:

    Using nighttime picture-taking settings

    Most newer versions of iPhone and Android phones have a setting for taking pictures in low light. This slows the shutter speed, allowing more light in and taking a clearer picture. Here’s how to adjust settings on iPhone and Android devices like Samsung phones or Google Pixel phones.

    It’s important to hold your phone steady or use a tripod so your image does not end up blurry.

    Video below: Check out these dazzling photos of Tuesday night’s northern lights in Iowa

    There’s an app for that, too

    There are also apps available that are specifically designed to help you take pictures of the northern lights. Check the app stores on your iPhones or Android devices.

    Be in the right place at the right time

    Artificial light pollution can decrease your chances of catching the best colors, so it is best to get away from cities and into rural areas for picture-taking.

    There will be more visibility the farther north you can get. Any time after it gets dark outside and before midnight will be the best opportunity.

    Related video below: What causes the colors you see with the northern lights?

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Gear News of the Week: Withings Launches Its Pee Scanner, and Samsung Shows Off a Trifold Phone

    [ad_1]

    A few weeks ago, bathroom and plumbing company Kohler debuted the Dekoda, a health and wellness sensor that lives on your toilet bowl and records signs of your gut health and hydration. Now, Withings has launched the U-Scan. First shown at CES in 2023, the U-Scan also sits inside the toilet bowl. A thermal sensor detects when a fresh, er, sample is being deposited. The U-Scan takes a small sample and analyzes it on-site with miniature biochemical sensors inside an interchangeable cartridge.

    There are two separate U-Scans. U-Scan Nutrio analyzes your diet, checking for biomarkers like bio-acidity, hydration status, and ketone levels, which shows that you’ve started burning body fat instead of sugar. U-Scan Calci also checks for calcium, which is a sign that you might have kidney stones. Results are then transmitted via Wi-Fi to the Withings app.

    The cartridges are replaceable, and the sensor comes with a docking station to clean and recharge the sensor. Purchasing the U-Scan comes with a complimentary subscription to Withings+, the company’s upgraded app, which also includes a free consultation with a nutritionist.

    The U-Scan packages start at $380, which comes with one U-Scan, either Nutrio or Calci, one cartridge, and two to four scans weekly (each cartridge lasts about 2.5 months). For more intensive monitoring, the Intensive package includes two cartridges for five to seven weekly measurements. Replacement cartridges are $100 for one cartridge or $180 for two, and Withings sends you the cartridge automatically depending on which package you select. The U-Scan is now available at Withings.com. We’ll be testing it soon. —Adrienne So

    Samsung Brings Its Browser to Windows, and Teases a Trifold Phone

    Samsung has long offered its own browser on its smartphones—Samsung Internet—but now the app is finally available on another platform: Windows. Considering Samsung makes Windows laptops and Android phones, this move allows folks who use the company’s browser to share their browsing history and bookmarks between phone and laptop, and if you have saved passwords with Samsung Pass, you can use it to autofill passwords on websites.

    The company is taking this opportunity to bring some Galaxy AI features over as well, including Browsing Assist, which lets you instantly summarize webpages or translate them to another language. Samsung says its browser also blocks third-party web trackers, and there’s a Privacy Dashboard that lets you see what has been blocked.

    Samsung Internet for PC is only available as a beta right now, but anyone in the US or South Korea on Windows 11 or Windows 10 (version 1809 and above) can download it now.

    [ad_2]

    Julian Chokkattu

    Source link

  • Zoom Uncomfortably Close With Oppo’s Crazy New Telephoto Lens

    [ad_1]

    For several years, the top Chinese smartphone brands have been duking it out for photography dominance. Even though year-over-year changes are often minuscule, these companies try to one-up one another. Take Oppo’s latest flagship, the Find X9 Pro, as an example.

    It boasts a 200-megapixel telephoto lens developed with camera manufacturer Hasselblad, so you can zoom in on a subject from afar. If that wasn’t enough, Oppo sells a bonkers Hasselblad Teleconverter Kit, a proper 3.28X telephoto lens that slots onto a special case providing more optical zoom than I’ve ever seen in a smartphone.

    The Find X9 Pro, launching alongside the slightly more modest Find X9, already launched in China, but will soon be landing in the UK and Europe (not the US). As you might expect, it is an absolute unit in terms of specs. Alongside the versatile camera system with pro software tools, there’s a lovely 6.78-inch screen, and a truly enormous 7,500 mAh silicon-carbon battery.

    Close Up

    Photograph: Simon Hill

    I love a telephoto lens in my phone. While I rarely bother with the ultrawide, the option to zoom in from a distance often proves useful. You can get close-ups at gigs and other stage-based events, pick up on cool architectural details, and sometimes figure out what the hell that distant thing is. Aptly-named zoomers don’t realize how good they’ve got it; you used to need a DSLR with a huge lens to get as close as your average phone can now.

    The Oppo Find X9 Pro has a 200-megapixel telephoto lens that supports 3X optical zoom, and it can take excellent shots at 6X zoom by cropping 200-megapixel images down to 50 megapixels. Oppo claims it’s capable of 13.2X lossless zoom using computational photography; I’m not sure about that number, but the Find X9 Pro certainly takes great photos of any distant subject. Technically, the digital zoom goes up to 120X, but anything beyond 30X starts to look like an oil painting.

    Impressive as it is, there have been other phones with 200-megapixel telephoto lenses, so Oppo kicked things up a notch with the optional Hasselblad Teleconverter Kit. Used in conjunction with its Magnetic Photographer Case, there’s a sliding attachment that slots over the camera module, then the lens twists and clicks securely into place over the telephoto lens, adding another 3.28X zoom.

    [ad_2]

    Simon Hill

    Source link

  • Who Needs a Regular GoPro When Insta360’s Affordable X4 Air Exists?

    [ad_1]

    All of us leering at the large, evil eye of 360 cameras these past few years have wondered what it would take to finally see one at the same price as a typical GoPro. Well, we may finally have that option with Insta360’s X4 Air. It’s essentially the company’s last-gen 360 camera repackaged as the budget option. But when Insta360’s leading X5 costs $550, grabbing 8K, all-around footage for less is starting to sound way more appealing than a traditional action camera.

    If you stare long enough into the iris of the stick-shaped X4 Air, you may struggle to find what’s different between it and last year’s X4 and the latest X5. The X4 Air contains dual 1/1.8-inch sensors in the typical fisheye compartment. That’s larger than the original X4’s 1/2-inch sensors, though slightly more petite compared to the 1/1.28-inch on the X5. It will film the typical 8K resolution at 30 fps—which is the basics of what you need for 360 footage. If you drop the resolution to 4K, you can get up to 60 fps compared to the X5’s 100 fps at the same resolution. However, 8K is more important for 360 footage considering the pixels are spread across the entire spherical image. The 100 fps maximum on both the X4 and X5 was built for slow-mo footage, though it will sacrifice some image quality. The X4 Air can only hit 120 fps at 1080p in single-lens mode.

    Insta360 promises the 360 camera has enough battery for 88 minutes of continuous recording at its max resolution and frame rate. The new X4 Air also won’t take the best-quality still photos, maxing out at 29 megapixels compared to 72 megapixels. However, unlike the Insta360 X4, the Air allows for replaceable lens protectors and fully swappable lenses, first introduced with the X5. This has become one of the most-requested features for 360 cameras. Insta360 redesigned its upcoming Antigravity X1 360 camera drone to include swappable lenses after receiving early feedback.

    And to top it off, the X4 Air isn’t that much thinner or lighter than the previous X4 or the current X5. It weighs 165g (0.36 pounds), which is 35g less than the 200g (0.44 pounds) X5, which doesn’t make it that much more portable in the grand scheme of things. You’ll still be sticking these cameras onto the end of telescoping poles to capture your all-around antics. As is always the issue with 360 cameras, the nature of 360 footage means you’ll need to spend a little more time in the editing room before you can throw your footage up on Instagram.

    The competition has spent 2025 trying to knock Insta360 off its 360 footage throne. DJI started things out with its $550 Osmo 360(which you’ll still struggle to buy in the U.S.). GoPro decided it didn’t need a sudden sequel to its Hero action camera series this year and instead tried to undercut Insta360 with its $500 GoPro Max2. The X4 Air’s $400 starting price point is still steep, but it’s essentially the same cost as a new GoPro Hero13 Black. At this point, we can expect 360 cameras to start meeting or beating the cost of single-lens devices.

    If you were already about to do the whole “shut up and take my money” song and dance, you may need to hold off for a little while. While the camera is supposed to be available immediately, Insta360 has not revealed when it may be available in either the U.S. or Canada. We reached out to the company to learn if this is due to the lack of U.S.

    [ad_2]

    Kyle Barr

    Source link

  • Our Favorite High Resolution Mirrorless Camera Is $900 Off Right Now

    [ad_1]

    If you want to step up your photography game, and graduate from your phone, why not go all the way to the highest-resolution camera on the market? Normally, we suggest that a more affordable camera might be the best pick for most people in our guide to mirrorless cameras, but at this price—why not go big?

    Courtesy of Sony

    The massive 61-megapixel, full-frame sensor in the A7R V is the largest sensor you can get without jumping into medium format (which is significantly more expensive and bulkier). If that’s not enough, there’s actually an even higher-resolution possibility that combines 16 shots into a single 240-MP image (so long as your subject is static, e.g., a landscape). That should print billboard-size without issue.

    Yes, the megapixel race is silly and mostly over, but I will say that I’ve shot quite a bit with the A7R C (which uses the same sensor). The images from this 60-MP sensor are noticeable sharper, and the dynamic range is visibly better than what I get from the A7R II (which has a 40-MP sensor). This is obviously the case onscreen, when pixel peeping, but I also notice the difference when I print images.

    If you don’t need all those megapixels, and you still want to save some money, I have good news, our top pick for most people, the Sony A7 IV (9/10, WIRED Recommends), is on sale as well for $700 less than usual.

    Sony A7IV Camera Body

    Photograph: Sony

    This is a 33-megapixel, full-frame camera that, while only half the resolution of the A7R V, is plenty sharp and boasts a few video-oriented features you won’t find in the higher-resolution model. It has very nearly the same excellent dynamic range and one of the best autofocus system on the market.

    Without getting too deep in the weeds of video technicalities, the A7 IV can record 4K/30p video by oversampling from a 7K sensor region. On the other hand, the A7R V employs what’s known as line-skipping to achieve the same 4K/30p recording. This method of recording results in reduced sharpness and sometimes causes aliasing issues.

    The short story: If you want to record video at full sensor size, the A7 IV is the way to go. In fact, while there are better still cameras like the Sony A7R V, and better video cameras, nothing combines the two quite as well as the A7 IV. If you’re looking to do a mix of still and video work, this is one of the best buys on the market, especially at this price.

    [ad_2]

    Scott Gilbertson

    Source link

  • Google Wants You to Talk to Your Nest Cameras and Doorbell to Find Out What They Recorded

    [ad_1]

    Hot on the heels of Amazon’s own Ring and Blink security camera blitz, Google is announcing new Nest cameras with its Gemini AI chatbot as the main selling point in addition to improved image quality. Thankfully, there are only three new Nest products, and they’re relatively easy to understand, unlike Amazon’s entire lineup, which may require a PhD to figure out the differences between each model.

    New Nest Outdoor, Indoor, and Doorbell cameras

    © Adriano Contreras / Gizmodo

    The three new Nest cameras are the $150 Nest Outdoor Camera (wired, 2nd-gen), $100 Nest Indoor Camera (wired, 3rd-gen), and $180 Nest Doorbell (wired, 2nd-gen). You have some neutral colors like Snow (white) and Hazel, but the most striking color is the “berry” red model for the Indoor Camera. I prefer my security cameras to blend into the walls and ceilings, but if you’ve ever wanted a bright, berry-colored camera watching you from above, now you can live out your wildest dreams.

    On the hardware front, all three Nest cameras boast 2K-resolution image sensors with HDR. Google says the sensors greatly improve recorded video footage quality, especially for low-light and night video. Equally important is the new wider and taller field of view (152 degrees on the Indoor Camera and Outdoor Camera and 166 degrees on the Nest Doorbell)—essential for capturing more in video so that Gemini can have more information to process and understand. With older Nest cameras and the doorbell, they could only send notifications alerting you to motion or sound, but with Gemini, Google says users will be able to get more specific notifications that describe what’s happening.

    Google Nest Product Launch 19
    © Adriano Contreras / Gizmodo

    For example, if a delivery person comes by your door to drop off a package, Gemini should send a notification describing their clothing and might even get as specific as telling you which delivery service they may be from if it can see a uniform logo or truck in the background. At home, with the Nest Indoor Camera and Outdoor Camera, Gemini could send a notification telling you that your cat knocked over a glass vase or perhaps your child named John (you need to allow face recognition) was playing in the backyard at 4 p.m. instead of doing his homework like you asked him to.

    Gemini also has a feature called “Ask Home,” which combines computer vision from the cameras and natural language processing to find specific clips instead of you having to scrub frame by frame, through hours of footage. Google says you’ll be able to simply ask Gemini to find something from footage. “What happened to the vase in the living room?” is one example, the company shared.

    There are some additional quality-of-life improvements for springing for the new cameras, including “Home Brief” (summary of hours of footage), the ability to zoom in a crop the field of view to focus on only one area for monitoring, and six hours of free event video history (up from three hours).

    All of these features are accessible in the redesigned Google Home app that’s simpler, faster, and more stable. You can still use the Nest app, but Google tells Gizmodo that the Home app will be the primary smart home app for Nest devices moving forward. It’s only a matter of time before the Nest app is phased out sometime in the future, so don’t get too attached. The good news is, the new Google Home app has reached feature parity and stability with the Nest app. So, if the smart home app has left a bad taste in your mouth, like it has with me, I think we should give it another shot and then judge it.

    I’ve not seen any of the new Nest Cameras in action, so I can’t say with what degree of accuracy Gemini is able to recognize people, vehicles, animals, packages, and other objects within footage in and around the home. But I’m hella interested in seeing how well the Ask Home feature works. I’d love to know which one of my two cats knocked over certain things in my apartment while I was at the office.

    For the budget-conscious

    Google Nest Product Launch 03
    © Adriano Contreras / Gizmodo

    The new Nest smart home products are feature-packed, but if you have a tighter budget—like a lot tighter—you may want to consider some of Walmart’s new Onn-branded devices like the $23 Indoor Camera Wired and the $50 Video Doorbell Wired. These aren’t comparable to the Nest Indoor Camera and Nest Doorbell—they only record 1080p, and the field of view isn’t as wide—but it does provide a more basic security camera system that integrates nicely with the new Google Home app. If you want the Gemini features like intelligent alerts and event history, you’ll need to pony up for a Google Home Premium subscription, which is split into Standard ($10) and Advanced ($20) plans.

    [ad_2]

    Raymond Wong

    Source link

  • The best instant cameras for 2025

    [ad_1]

    Instant cameras are popular for one simple reason: they’re fun. You can bring one to a party or event and capture a spontaneous moment, then after a couple of minutes, everyone can enjoy a physical photo instead of staring at a phone screen. The quality isn’t perfect, but those snaps have a nostalgic quality that people love.

    Buying one can be tricky though — you need to consider factors like price, film size, photo quality and more. Plus, there are a lot of models to choose from. This guide will help you choose the best Instant camera for your needs so you can wring the most fun possible out of it.

    What to consider before buying an instant camera

    The main factor for most people is the size of the film. When most people think of retro instant cameras, they think of a square image size. That’s why Instagram, which used to have a Polaroid-like app icon, only supported square images for years. If that’s what you want, then Fuji’s Square or either of Polaroid’s formats are best.

    However, if you want as large an image as possible, Fujifilm’s Instax wide is the way to go. For those who prefer a smaller size to pin on their fridge or slip in an envelope (or the cheaper film), Fujifilim’s Instax Mini or Polaroid’s Go format are best.

    With that in mind, here are the choices. Fujifilm’s Instax alone offers three formats: Mini, Square and Wide, with film sizes of 3.4 x 2.1 inches, 3.4 x 2.8 inches and 3.4 x 4.3 inches. The corresponding image sizes are 2.44 x 1.81 inches, 2.44 x 2.44 inches and 2.44 x 3.9 inches.

    Leica’s Sofort 2 and Lomography models also uses Fujifilm’s Mini format, while Polaroid’s smaller Go format is 2.64 x 2.13 inches (1.81 x 1.83-inch image) and its i-Type size is 3.46 x 4.21 inches, with a square image size of 3.11 x 3.11 inches.

    As for prices, Fujifilm’s Instax films are generally around $1 – $1.20 per shot for square or wide color film and $.60 – $.75 for mini color film. Those prices go up a bit if you choose custom models with colorful or patterned borders, and down if you buy in bulk. Polaroid’s i-Type film is a bit more at about $2.00 per shot or $1.00 – $1.35 per shot for Go color film.

    Image quality isn’t really the point with instant cameras of course, as they’re always going to be fuzzy compared to digital photos. However, some models (notably Fujifilm and Polaroid models) are a bit better than others.

    And in terms of pricing for the cameras themselves, models with larger film are generally more expensive. It also increases if you add hybrid features like USB-C connectivity, smartphone sharing, the ability to print out photos and more, along with niceties like a selfie mirror. The best, most feature-laden cameras can cost upwards of $200 and basic versions can be well under $100.

    Best instant cameras for 2025

    Fujifilm

    Wireless connectivity: Bluetooth | Camera weight: 436g (without batteries, strap, and film)

    The best instant camera is the Fujifilm Instax Square SQ40. It looks great thanks to the leatherette details and retro design, while offering minimal controls for ease of use. It takes 3.39 x 2.83-inch Instax Square prints that fully deliver on the retro vibes. You also get a flash, selfie mirror, front shutter release and hand strap, plus it’s relatively light and easy to carry around. The camera alone is priced at $150, but you’ll need to budget for film as well.

    $150 at Amazon

    Image for the large product module

    Fujifilm

    Wireless connectivity: Bluetooth | Camera weight: 306g (without batteries, strap, and film)

    If you’d rather spend less on both camera and film, take a look at Fujifilm’s Instax Mini 12. It’s a basic instant camera ideal for newbies that lets you get started shooting in just a couple of minutes. The controls couldn’t be simpler as well, as you just need to twist the lens into the “on” or “off” position. It’s also small and thin, so can be slipped into a pocket and fits nicely into the small hands of fledgeling young photographers.

    $93 at Amazon

    Image for the large product module

    Fujifilm

    Wireless connectivity: Bluetooth | Camera weight: 12 ounces (without batteries, strap, and film)

    Where the Instax Mini 12 is cheap and cheerful, the Instax Mini 99 offers far more control and features. The best feature is the four-colored LEDs inside the camera that can be enabled to produce in-camera “looks,” like “Faded Green” and “Light Leak,” that produces a glow simulating a broken camera. At the same time, unlike other models, you can turn the flash off completely for a more natural look. Other nice features are a rear display and sports mode, with the one downside being the lack of a selfie mirror.

    $199 at Amazon

    Image for the large product module

    Polaroid

    Wireless connectivity: Bluetooth | Camera weight: 240g (without batteries and film)

    The Polaroid Go might be basic and relatively cheap, but it offers a lot. You get a self-timer and double-exposure modes, along with Polaroid’s square Go format film that delivers that nostalgic feel. It’s also pretty small and light, so it’s an easy choice to bring it along to any occasion. The main drawback is the autofocus, which delivers spotty results unless you’re a good way from the subject.

    $110 at Amazon

    Image for the large product module

    Polaroid

    Wireless connectivity: Bluetooth | Camera weight: 451.5g (without film)

    Polaroid is a name synonymous with instant cameras, and its Now+ model is the best choice for larger film. Though the prints are slightly smaller than those produced by Fujifilm’s Instax Wide 400, I prefer the square format that evokes old school Polaroid photos. It also offers a host of features like an updated app with creative shooting modes including manual modes, a self-timer, double exposure, light painting and an aperture priority option for depth of field.

    Though the 2nd-generation model suffered from occasional exposure issues, the new model has largely corrected that and added a tripod mount to boot, along with some new colors. The main downside is the relatively high price of Polaroid’s i-Type film.

    $129 at Amazon

    Image for the large product module

    Fujifilm

    Wireless connectivity: Bluetooth | Camera weight: 616g (without battery, strap, film cartridge, and close-up lens)

    For the biggest prints possible (as long as you don’t mind the rectangular format), Fujifilm’s new Instax Wide 400 is your best bet. It offers simple operation with one-button, fully-automatic shooting along with a new close focus option to add tight shots to your repertoire. The main downside is a lack of hybrid options, but the fact that it’s relatively basic helps keep the price down. Film is also considerably cheaper than Polaroid’s i-Type.

    $150 at B&H Photo

    Image for the large product module

    Fujifilm

    Wireless connectivity: Bluetooth | Camera weight: 285g

    For the next most fully-featured instant camera, look no further than Fujifilm’s Instax Mini Evo. It marries the vintage charm of instant photography with digital shooting, giving you the ability to preview shots on the three-inch rear display and only print out the ones you want. Another great trick is that it can function as a printer for your smartphone photos.

    Design-wise, it matches the aesthetic of Fujifilm’s charming digital cameras like the X100 VI, and is considerably more compact than other Instax models. And much like the X-series cameras, you have the ability to apply numerous simulations and effects to prints. The downside is that it’s more complex to operate than other instant cameras, but that versatility will appeal to many buyers.

    $235 at Amazon

    Image for the large product module

    Lomography

    Wireless connectivity: None | Camera weight: 725.7g

    If you’re very particular about your instant photography, Lomography’s Lomo’Instant Wide Glass is the model to get. It has perhaps the best lens of any instant camera with a 90 mm multi-coated glass model that delivers very sharp photos. It also comes with a host of advanced features, including exposure compensation control, a built-in flash, multiple exposure capability, a manual focus lens, a sync socket for an external flash, selfie mirror and the ability to add optional wide-angle and macro conversion lenses. The main disadvantages are its large size and relatively high price.

    $169 at Lomography

    Image for the large product module

    Leica

    Wireless connectivity: Bluetooth | Camera weight: 320g (without batteries and film)

    If the canape table at your typical gathering has caviar blinis and quail egg tartines, your instant camera of choice may be Leica’s Sofort 2. It’s a point-and-shoot model with a 28mm equivalent f/2.0 lens that shoots mini-sized Sofort film (or Fuji’s Instax film). While the specs aren’t too impressive for a $400 instant camera, Leica did nail the social aspect with the ability to capture digital images to a microSD card, view them on the three-inch LCD display and then share them with friends using Leica’s FOTOS app. It doesn’t take the best photos of any instant camera, though it does offer great battery life and nice portability. However, the main reason to get this model is the Leica brand and red dot. That lets others know that you may be taking lighthearted pictures, but you definitely know what you’re doing.

    $399 at B&H Photo

    Image for the small product module

    Fujifilm

    If you have an instant camera that can save images to a memory card, an instant printer lets you share favorite photos with friends and family. The best of those is Fujifilm’s Instax Link Wide Printer. It’s portable and prints quickly with true to life colors, plus the photos last forever. It’s also very affordable.

    $150 at Amazon

    Image for the small product module

    Canon

    Canon has a fun take on photo printers with the Ivy 2 printer. It uses special photo paper (that’s also a sticker!) so it never needs ink and allows you to print photos with graphics and funky borders. At the same time, it’s easy to set up, reliable, very portable and affordable.

    $100 at Amazon

    [ad_2]

    Steve Dent

    Source link

  • You’ll Want to Slap DJI’s Pin-Sized Action Camera Everywhere

    [ad_1]

    Finally, action cameras are getting small enough that we can actually carry them around on our bodies without entangling ourselves in a jury-rigged mount shaped like a straightjacket. DJI copied Insta360’s homework and then went wild with its new Osmo Nano magnetic wearable camera. There are a few features that could make it your next spy cam, though, as always with DJI, you won’t see it available in the U.S.

    DJI is mostly known for drones, but its GoPro-like action cameras, such as the Osmo Action 5 Pro, have kept me coming back. As earlier leaks suggested, this bug-sized Osmo Nano camera attaches to a small screen body called the Multifunctional Vision Dock via magnets. This means you can position it forward or backward for selfie or point-of-view footage. The real benefit of the magnetic camera is that you can rig up a surprising variety of mounts, so long as you have another magnet or ferromagnetic metal handy. Sure, you can strap it to your head, but we all know you’re going to try and stick it on your cat’s collar.

    You can see where DJI drew its inspiration from, but the Osmo Nano offers something slightly different from the Insta360 Go Ultra. © Kyle Barr / Gizmodo

    While you could argue the Osmo Nano is a continuation of the old DJI Action 2 miniature camera, the drone maker is taking more cues Insta360’s Go Ultra. The Osmo Nano includes a 1/1.3-inch sensor, slightly larger than the 1/1.28-inch sensor on the Go Ultra. It will shoot up to 4K resolution and 120 fps at a max 143-degree wide angle to capture all your antics without any handling. It supports 13.5 stops of dynamic range as well as 10-bit color and D-Log M for color accuracy.

    I went hands-on with the Osmo Nano at IFA 2025, though I didn’t get to capture any footage. The pod weighs 52g, so it’s surprisingly light despite its 55mm size. While the DJI Osmo Nano is slightly larger than the Action Pod for the Insta360 Go Ultra, it makes up for that in several key ways. The Go Ultra is limited to a max 60 fps shooting at 4K. For one, the device includes built-in storage, plus access to a microSD card. It can also connect with any of DJI’s popular mics, like its recent Mic 3, without a receiver. The device also supports gesture controls that will start recording if you nod your head. Otherwise, you can pat the top of the pod or hit the small recording button.

    Dji Magnetic Camera 1
    You can stick the Osmo Nano’s pod on any ferromagnetic surface, though you’ll want a true magnetic connection if you’re planning on running around with it. © Kyle Barr / Gizmodo

    The Osmo Nano promises to record for 200 minutes at 1080p and 24 fps, but face it, you’ll want to record everything in 4K for the sake of better image quality. The pod should get between 55 and 60 minutes at 4K and 30 fps. With those specs, you’ll end up needing to charge it up more often than you think. At least it supports fast charging that promises to get to 80% in 20 minutes.

    The only problem is that DJI still isn’t shipping the Osmo Nano to the U.S. at launch. The company has repeatedly said it is “committed to the U.S. market,” though the federal government has soft-banned its products from entering the States. That’s a shame, since the modular action camera is starting at $300 with 64GB of built-in storage on Amazon. The rest of the world can play around with DJI’s tiny camera, while we in the U.S. have to rely on competitors.

    [ad_2]

    Kyle Barr

    Source link

  • Meta’s New Wraparound Smart Glasses Are the Most Oakley Oakleys You Can Buy

    [ad_1]

    Ray-Ban wasn’t the only collaboration that got some shine at Meta Connect. The company also took the wraps (no pun intended) off a pair of wraparound shades designed by Oakley and, like its recently released HSTN smart glasses, designed more with sporty types in mind.

    Outside of the differing glasses shape, the $499 Meta Oakley Meta Vanguard (yes, that’s the official name in that order) specs also have a centered camera that’s meant to be better suited for capturing footage during “action” sports like snowboarding or cycling. Similar to Oakley’s HSTN glasses, the Vanguard have upgraded camera specs and are capable of capturing video in up to 3K resolution with its 12-megapixel camera that has a 122-degree field of view.

    © Meta

    There are some new fitness integrations, specifically with Garmin and Strava, that allow you to use the smart glasses as a sort of augment for health wearables. For instance, you can ask Meta AI how you’re doing on your fitness goals, or you can get updates on other fitness metrics in real time.

    While the tech inside the Vanguard is significant, equally as important is the form factor. Wraparound shades, while they’re probably not the style most normies would spring for, are ideal for skiing and snowboarding because of the superior wind blockage. Having used Meta’s HSTN smart glasses a little myself, I think Vanguard will appeal to more people interested in the action sports side of things since the former double more as just regular specs.

    One of the biggest upgrades that I got to hear for myself is the speakers. According to Meta, the Vanguard are 6 decibels louder than the HSTN glasses, which is clutch if you’re tearing down a hill at 30 mph on a snowboard. Meta also tried to optimize the design for sports in a number of ways, including an IP67 water rating, which makes them very durable when it comes to water and dust. I don’t know any professional water skiers, but if I did, I’d probably recommend these smart glasses.

    Battery-wise, the Vanguard have decent longevity on paper. According to Meta, they have 9 hours of battery life with “mixed usage” or as much as 6 hours if you’re playing music continuously. With the charging case, Meta says its smart glasses get 36 hours and they can go from 0 to 50% in 20 minutes. There are all sorts of lens variations this go-around too, including black, sapphire, 24K (which is gold), and something called “Road.” Those lenses can be swapped around or replaced, but it’ll cost you a whole $85.

    I haven’t had a chance to really test out the Vanguards in depth, but I can see how these would be appealing to someone who wants a sturdy pair of action-sports-oriented smart glasses. They’re available on Oct. 21 if that’s your thing, or you can preorder now.

    [ad_2]

    James Pero

    Source link

  • Insta360 Go Ultra Review: This Tiny Action Camera Got Swacked by a Sword, and Survived

    [ad_1]

    My brother punched his rapier toward my head. The blade missed me by inches, but the clever duelist swiped down and chopped at my crown, sending the $450 action camera attached to my fencing mask spinning away. The magnetic pod for Insta360’s Go Ultra tumbled to the floor, the light still blinking red, still recording. His sword left a gash along the side of the lens and a scuff on plastic. The camera still works, so if you were wondering how durable the Go Ultra is, know that it passed the “getting hit by a sword” test.

    Insta360 Go Ultra

    You won’t find a smaller action cam that’s this portable with video quality to stand up to your favorite GoPro.

    Pros

    • So light and portable
    • Records at 4K/60 fps
    • Magnetic mount with wide variety of uses
    • Durable against sword blows
    • Fast charging

    Cons

    • Battery doesn’t last too long
    • Overheating issues
    • No internal storage

    I had been looking for a camera light enough to stick on my fencing mask without rigging up a mount for a much larger recording device, and I think I found it with the Insta360 Go Ultra. The pricey action camera looks like your average GoPro when both of its main parts—the “Standalone Camera” case with the flip-up display and “Action Pod” with the image sensor and lens—are connected. But its detachable design means you can stick the smaller practically anywhere, so long as you rig up the right mount for the appropriate situation.

    The Go Ultra doesn’t have all the capabilities of its contemporaries. It’s not the best for slow-motion footage or shooting at the highest possible resolution and frame rate. But because of its light and idiot-proof design, the Go Ultra is now my favorite little device to take on adventures or whenever I next enter the dueling pit.

    An action camera for ants?

    The Standalone Camera and Action Pod serve as the two pieces to the Go Ultra’s whole. © Raymond Wong / Gizmodo

    The Action Pod can communicate with the Standalone Camera up to about 30 feet away, which helps you compose a shot when you can’t physically see the camera’s orientation. Whereas the average rugged action camera, such as the GoPro Hero 13 Black or DJI Osmo Action 5 Pro, can take a hit and keep on filming, the Go Ultra is still durable and can adhere to any magnetic strip or ferromagnetic metal (though you still want the strongest mount to keep it from going astray). However, if you’re planning to attach the Go Ultra’s Action Pod to any moving object, you’ll want a strong magnetic attachment to keep it secure. Compared to the Insta360 Go 3S from 2024, the Go Ultra’s Action Pod is much larger with longer battery life and a bigger sensor that makes it better for low-light shooting.

    The Insta360 Go Ultra contains a 14.27mm focal length lens with an f/2.85 aperture and the ability to shoot up to 50-megapixel still photos. With those specs, the lens fits somewhere in between higher-end action cameras and a simple point-and-shoot video camera for recording your family’s antics. It can shoot in a max 180Mbps bitrate with a variety of preset video modes, though most of the time you’ll stick with either “Video” in daylight or “PureVideo” for low-light environments. With a wide-angle lens, you’re more likely to get the shot without having a death grip on a selfie stick.

    The Go Ultra comes packed with a magnetic clip and a necklace you can wear under your shirt. The necklace will sit center-mass on your chest, which I found good for doing point-of-view shots when I was reporting on the ground from IFA 2025 in Berlin. The clip can help your lens hitch a ride on a hat or helmet and still feel light enough you may forget it’s there. I clipped the Go Ultra Action Pod on a thin tree branch and managed to get a shot without needing a tripod. The Action Pod is light enough I never had to worry about it weighing down anything it was attached to.

    The older Insta360 Go 3S may be lighter, but it’s to such a small degree that the trade off is worth it. Speaking of changes from the older Go-series action cameras, the Go Ultra doesn’t come with any internal storage, unlike the Go 3S. Instead, it records to a microSD card that slots into the Action Pod. I would have appreciated some buffer of internal capacity in case I ran out of storage on the memory card while shooting, but I vastly prefer SD cards to being stuck with limited built-in storage.

    Depending on what kind of bundle you buy, you may end up with more attachment points. The Standalone Camera housing can attach to a Quick Release Mount with your traditional GoPro two-pronged threads, a tripod, and a Pivot Stand with a suction cap. There’s even a $17 “Toddler Titan Hat Clip,” which Insta360 implies parents will hang from a child’s cap facing toward the body to take extra-close shots of the tyke’s wide-eyed expressions. I would not blame any toddler who takes that camera and chucks it across the room. Inevitably, it will be up to innovative camera aficionados to create their own magnetic mounts for their needs. To that end, the Action Pod allows for more creativity in how and where you set up your camera.

    Better than most for low-light shooting

    Insta360 Go Ultra Action Camera 10
    Insta360 sells several magnetic and non-magnetic mounts, such as its Pivot Stand, but you can DIY your own mounting rig with a little ingenuity. © Raymond Wong / Gizmodo

    We all want to believe our action cams can take footage as beautiful as those slickly-produced GoPro promotional videos. The true footage you can get from such a small lens will inevitably disspaoint. The Insta360 Go Ultra shoots at 4K resolution at a max of 60 fps, though the camera will default to 30 fps in most scenarios. If you want to shoot with HDR—aka high-dynamic range for better contrast—you’re also limited to 30 fps. For my amateur hour fencing video that I published straight to Instagram, that’s perfectly acceptable. For those hoping for video footage requiring minimal editing, just know you’ll never get the quality you’ll see in all the promotional video that Insta360 shares to its social feeds. You’ll find that your phone may present better-quality footage for quick and dirty POV feeds.

    Still, I would put the Go Ultra’s quality up there with the expensive action cameras I’ve used. Small sensors often struggle with low-light scenarios, a problem that has plagued action cameras since the beginning. The Go Ultra’s “PureView” mode does a fair job brightening up images to make them more visible. I could spot a little bit of noise from the video once I brought it to my PC, but for my purpose the footage was good enough to flip over to my socials. As for the shots I took in the dim halls of IFA, the quality was a mixed bag. Some clips still appeared dark without great contrast. Overall, there’s only so much you can expect from a small sensor.

    The Go Ultra may not be your first go-to choice for extreme sports, especially if you were planning to shoot in slow motion. You can choose to film in 60 fps, but if you want automated slow-mo video, 4x slow-mo at 120 fps is limited to 1080p recording. Like Insta360’s 360-degree cameras and its upcoming Antigravity A1 drone, the Go Ultra also includes options for automatic dewarping to correct the fisheye effect of the rounded lens, but you may end up going for “Ultra” setting to capture as much of the scenery in one go. The video above used the standard “Ultra” wide field of view, which felt on the money for hands-on shots. With any of these modes, the camera’s automatic FlowState stabilization did a good job even as I was whipping a sword at my fencing partners.

    The action camera can shoot in both vertical and horizontal just by changing the orientation of the lens. The default 16:9 shots are when the camera lens is positioned in the top right. When rotated 90 degrees counterclockwise and the lens is on the top left, it will shoot in 9:16. There’s nothing on the Action Pod to mark when it’s vertical or horizontal, and there were times I would lose the Action Pod, reattach it, only to realize I was now shooting in the wrong orientation. This wasn’t a problem on older Go models with the oval-shaped pod compared to the square on the Go Ultra. A small indicator arrow on the Action Pod itself may have resolved this small headache.

    Not the longest battery, but it charges up real quick

    Insta360 Go Ultra Action Camera 08
    The Insta360 Go Ultra is about the same size as a GoPro Hero camera, though the detachable Action Pod is much smaller and lighter. © Raymond Wong / Gizmodo

    The Go Ultra can’t last you an entire afternoon’s worth of continuous shooting. Filming in 4K at 60 fps, I found it would last a little over 40 minutes before I needed to shove the Action Pod back in its case to let it recharge. In those cases, the Standalone Camera housing essentially acts as a way to give the Action Pod a little extra juice. But after depleting the Action Pod, the Standalone Camera and its limited 500mAh capacity battery won’t be enough for more than 1.5 hours, especially if you’re shooting in low-light or higher frame rate modes.

    Though the battery isn’t the best, the more concerning hurdle you’ll run up against is heat management. The Go Ultra alerts users as soon as they choose the 4K 60 fps mode that this could cause overheating, which would also hinder battery life. Outdoors, in the shade, the Action Pod didn’t feel hot to the touch, but it still alerted me about overheating after an extended shoot. A few minutes set aside in its Standalone Camera case eventually let continue recording.

    The latest GoPro Hero 13 Black lasts a little more than 2 hours of continuous recording at higher resolutions. The Go Ultra Action Pod should last longer—closer to 2 hours if you drop the frame rate down to 30 fps and only shoot at 1080p. I wouldn’t suggest you limit resolution for the sake of battery life unless it becomes absolutely necessary. To make up for the limited battery, Insta360’s small action camera supports fast charging. I could recharge up to 80% from empty in around 15 minutes. A full charge takes about 40 minutes for both the Standalone Camera and Action Pod.

    Most amateurs looking to post their snowboarding tricks to their TikTok won’t have any complaints with image quality. Those with more professional setups could find extra use for a small-form camera. Since the Go Ultra’s Action Pod is so compact, it becomes another arrow in the quiver when you need to get POV footage. It won’t have all the enhanced zoom, resolution, and frame rate options as other action cameras, but in my time using the Go Ultra, I didn’t miss 5.3K resolution or any of the other features, especially when the Action Pod is so damn light. It’s so small I don’t need to duck into a full head or chest mount to get quality shots.

    Those imagining all the action shots they can take with the $450 Insta360 Go Ultra need to remember what they may be sacrificing for the sake of portability. The Hero 13 Black’s costs $430 while Insta360’s Ace Pro 2 demands $400. At the very least, the move to smaller magnetic cameras is pushing the industry forward. Multiple leaks have implied DJI is planning to launch its own pod-based action camera. Until somebody comes along and does it better, the Go Ultra has just the right balance of camera quality and portability.

    [ad_2]

    Kyle Barr

    Source link

  • We Found the Best Travel Cameras You’ll Actually Use on Vacation

    [ad_1]

    If I were buying a camera today, this is the body I would get, travel or otherwise. The A7C R is one of the smallest full-frame, interchangeable-lens cameras on the market. This is why it’s our top pick for travelers in our guide to the Best Mirrorless Cameras. The 61-MP sensor offers amazing detail and very good dynamic range (14.7 EV). The autofocus is among the best you’ll find in mirrorless cameras, and there’s great subject tracking as well, making it perfect for shooting fast-moving scenes on the go.

    The video specs here are top-notch as well, with support for 4K/60 fps video in full-frame mode (1.2X crop) or oversampled 4K/30 fps video. Both support 10-bit 4:2 color depth, various Log formats, and even 16-bit RAW output to an external recorder. My main gripe about the A7C R is the same as it was in my initial review. The viewfinder is cramped and low-resolution (2.36 million dots). It’s not a deal breaker for me, but it’s something to keep in mind and good reason to rent a camera before you invest.

    The big question with this camera is, which lens do you pair it with for travel? There’s a compelling argument to be made for the Sony FE 24-105-mm f/4 G ($1,300), which gives you everything from wide to portrait with a little bit of extra reach as well. Another great option if you like primes is the Sony 40-mm f2.5 G ($748), which makes for a compact kit, and 40-mm is a surprisingly great focal length for travel in my experience.

    ★ Alternatives: At $2,198, Sony’s A7C II (note, no R) is a bit cheaper. It uses Sony’s smaller 33-MP sensor but is otherwise very close in size and capabilities.

    [ad_2]

    Scott Gilbertson

    Source link

  • Now summer’s over, here’s what to do with all those photos on your camera roll

    [ad_1]

    LONDON — The summer holidays are over, and all those great times you had on vacation have been memorialized in hundreds of smartphone photos. Now what?

    Some highlights — the prettiest sunset, the best group shots — have been posted on Instagram or shared in the family chat group. But many more will likely languish in your camera roll.

    Because smartphones come with increasingly large amounts of file storage, it’s too easy to take photos just because we can. But it’s also real work to go through them all later, so it’s too easy to forget about them.

    Here are some quick and easy methods to help deal with the pictures (and videos) overwhelming your phone.

    There will some shots that will be the most important — standout photos that you want to share with others, or know that you’ll look back on years later, or just keep for reference. Star or heart any photos that fall into this category, which puts them into a folder or album for favorites.

    After a recent extended family trip to Turkey, I ended up with quite a few photos of restaurant and cafe menus. They were shared in the family WhatsApp group to decide where or what to eat. But we’ll probably never visit those establishments again.

    It’s always good practice cull photos that you just don’t need anymore, which could also include screenshots, pictures of receipts or duplicate images. But going through hundreds of trip photos could be a little tedious without some help. Fortunately, there are dozens of photo deletion and cleanup apps available that aim to speed the job up.

    Many of them resemble dating apps like Tinder, because they let you swipe left to delete and swipe right to save a photo. Some are free, others need a subscription.

    It starts getting more challenging when you have images that are similar but not identical. Which one should you keep? Some apps have a comparison feature to help you decide.

    I tried a few of these apps and found that Clever Cleaner’s Similars function works well, helping me whittle down, for example, many of the various nearly identical shots I took of Istanbul’s skyline while crossing the Bosphorus Strait by ferry at dusk. The free app grouped similar pictures together and then suggested the best shot to keep. I found that I generally agreed with its suggestions.

    Even if you’ve managed to sort through your camera roll, it will probably still be a jumble of images stretching back in an unbroken stream.

    So group photos into albums organized by themes. Android and iPhone users can do this on the Photos apps on their respective operating systems. Select all the photos from a trip and add them to a new album.

    Planning ahead will make this process easier. Create an album when you start your trip, then save the photos there as you take them.

    You can also create a shared album on Android or iPhone, which lets other people view or comment on photos or add their own.

    If you don’t want to set up a shared album, Android and Google Photos lets users create links so others can just view an album or individual photo. It’s not so easy on iOS, which only lets users export the album’s photos. You can share individual photos with an iCloud link but it expires after 30 days.

    Now that you’ve edited and curated your holiday pictures, consider taking an analog approach to showing them off.

    Print them out and put them in an album that people can flip — not scroll — through. Or blow up the most eye-catching shot to frame and hang it as wall art.

    Google Photos offers a photo book printing service that uses artificial intelligence to curate photos into generic themes, like Spring 2025, Memories, or They Grow Up So Fast, and generate basic no-frills layouts.

    Other services like Mixbook and Shutterstock offer services that automatically generate more elaborately designed photobooks. Mixbook can even provide AI-generated photo captions, though the results might be, well, mixed.

    ____

    AP Technology Writer Barbara Ortutay in San Francisco contributed to this report.

    ____

    Is there a tech topic that you think needs explaining? Write to us at onetechtip@ap.org with your suggestions for future editions of One Tech Tip.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Reolink’s New Floodlight Camera Uses Sensors and AI to Detect Where It Can’t See

    [ad_1]

    Reolink rolled out a new smart home security camera at IFA 2025 that the company says can see beyond its dual camera lenses. It’s called the TrackFlex Floodlight WiFi, and it looks kind of like the Reolink Elite Floodlight WiFi, a camera I recently reviewed, but with a ball-shaped camera housing that rotates to see things that three sensors above them have detected.

    This sensor-based approach gives the camera a 270-degree detection range at any given time, according to a press release that Reolink emailed to Gizmodo. The three motion sensors wrap around the front and sides of the unit. A representative I spoke with at Reolink’s IFA booth suggested installing the camera on the corner of your home, surveying a driveway that stretches from the street to a garage farther back, a scene impossible for one fixed-view camera to cover—the TrackFlex could detect that a car is entering the driveway, swivel to face it, then watch it as it drives to the garage.

    © Wes Davis / Gizmodo

    Like other Reolink cameras, this one stores recordings locally, either with microSD cards (up to 512GB) or Reolink’s NVR and Home Hub devices. Saving videos to a network-attached storage (NAS) device via FTP is also an option. This is Reolink, so expect to be assaulted with options in the company’s app.

    As for the TrackFlex’s dual cameras, they’re not recording one broad field of view like the Elite Floodlight WiFi. Instead, one is a standard wide view while the other is a 6x zoom, capable of capturing a lot more zoomed-in detail than the wide lens can. The two floodlights looked exactly like those of the Elite, and can articulate to point up or down, or to bathe a wider area in light. They also offer the same brightness and temperature adjustment as the Elite.

    The camera uses the company’s new local AI system called ReoNeura Core, which enables the TrackFlex to do the same sorts of natural language video search that we’re seeing with a lot of other connected-camera AI systems. (See SwitchBot’s new AI Hub.) So, if you want to search your locally stored video for a moment, like when a person with a brown shirt walked into your garage last, you can do that. The Reolink rep I spoke with took me to a pair of displays that showed me what was happening behind the scenes.

    Relink Trackflex Ai Summaries
    © Wes Davis / Gizmodo

    On the left, it was a view of what a user might see while using the event notifications screen; you see the camera’s live feed. While on the right, a list of events with descriptions that were mostly pretty accurate—there were people interacting at a convention, and others were walking around in the background—but it got some details wrong. We weren’t at an outdoor event, for example (although it was quite bright in there).

    Reolink Ai Categorization
    © Wes Davis / Gizmodo

    Meanwhile, on the right, the screen showed individual characteristics of the things the model was identifying. Seeing everyone broken down by their attributes had a very police-station-surveillance vibe. ReoNeuro identified one person as a middle-aged male wearing a green, short-sleeve shirt, along with a hat and a bag. In the bottom panel, another middle-aged male—although that person definitely looked younger than me, and I’m still in my prime, I swear—is identified as wearing a long-sleeve shirt with pants, both blue, and as having short hair. All of that detail is effectively keywords for your searches later, and they all seem like things you’d type if you’re looking for specific events that you know the TrackFlex recorded.

    But woof, it’s more than a little unnerving to see this in action, and it felt a little off-key to have a Reolink rep so proudly showing it to me. It’s great that this is all happening on device, as I’d rather that than have it happening in a cloud server over which I have no control. It’s convenient and there’s no doubt that I want the convenience of casually searching my footage, but that sure didn’t stop seeing how the sausage is made from giving me the willies.

    [ad_2]

    Wes Davis

    Source link