Watch CBS News
Be the first to know
Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.

Watch CBS News
Be the first to know
Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.

CHARLOTTE, N.C. — A refugee who fled war-torn Cambodia decades ago and settled in Charlotte was stunned Monday when a barrage of gunfire erupted at the house next to his.
Saing Chheon still remembers having to escape war growing up in Cambodia
“The bomb dropped on the village; we lost my daddy and we just ran out,” he recalls.
Chheon was able to settle in Charlotte as a refugee in the 1980s. Now decades later, he never expected that kind of violence would show up right at his door again.
The deputy U.S. marshal who died in the shooting was 48-year-old Thomas M. Weeks.
“I can’t believe it’s right beside my house,” he said.
Chheon spent Tuesday placing flowers on the spot where he saw officers get shot in his own backyard.
He said he had to duck for cover as the suspect nextdoor opened fire on law enforcement serving a warrant on 39-year-old Terry Hughes, Jr. for illegal possession of firearms by a convicted felon.
Charlotte-Mecklenburg Police Department said Hughes opened fire shortly after officers arrived at the home.
In video Chheon recorded himself, you can hear multiple rounds of gunfire as officers take position behind parked cars in his garage.
Just beyond that he saw two officers go down.
When the dust settled, four law enforcement officers were dead — Sam Poloche, William Elliot, Joshua Eyer and U.S. Marshal Thomas Weeks Jr. — four more were injured, the suspect was dead and two other people were detained by investigators.
“We’re a resilient profession and a resilient city and we will certainly get through this, but it will take time and it will take support,” Charlotte-Mecklenburg Police Chief Johnny Jennings said.
Copyright © 2024 WTVD-TV. All Rights Reserved.
WTVD
Source link

CNN
—
Here’s a look at the Vietnam War.
1883-1945 – Cochin-China, southern Vietnam, and Annam and Tonkin, central and northern Vietnam, along with Cambodia and Laos make up colonial empire French Indochina.
1946 – Communists in the north begin fighting France for control of the country.
1949 – France establishes the State of Vietnam in the southern half of the country.
1951 – Ho Chi Minh becomes leader of Dang Lao Dong Vietnam, the Vietnam Worker’s Party, in the north.
North Vietnam was communist. South Vietnam was not. North Vietnamese Communists and South Vietnamese Communist rebels, known as the Viet Cong, wanted to overthrow the South Vietnamese government and reunite the country.
1954 – North Vietnamese begin helping South Vietnamese rebels fight South Vietnamese troops, thus BEGINS the Vietnam conflict.
April 30, 1975 – South Vietnam surrenders to North Vietnam as North Vietnamese troops enter Saigon, ENDING the Vietnam conflict.
The war was estimated to cost about $200 billion.
Anti-war opinion increased in the United States from the mid-1960s on, with rallies, teach-ins, and other forms of demonstration.
North Vietnamese guerrilla forces used the Ho Chi Minh Trail, a network of jungle paths and mountain trails, to send supplies and troops into South Vietnam.
The bombing of North Vietnam surpassed the total tonnage of bombs dropped on Germany, Italy and Japan in World War II.
Today, Vietnam is a communist state.
Source: Dept. of Defense
8,744,000 – Total number of US Troops that served worldwide during Vietnam
3,403,000 served in Southeast Asia
2,594,000 served in South Vietnam
The total of American servicemen listed as POW/MIA at the end of the war was 2,646. As of April 12, 2024, 1,577 soldiers remain unaccounted for.
Battle: 47,434
Non-Battle: 10,786
Total In-Theatre: 58,220
1.3 million – Total military deaths for all countries involved
1 million – Total civilian deaths
September 2, 1945 – Vietnam declares independence from France. Neither France nor the United States recognizes this claim. US President Harry S. Truman aids France with military equipment to fight the rebels known as Viet Minh.
May 1954 – The Battle of Dien Bien Phu results in serious defeat for the French and peace talks in Geneva. The Geneva Accords end the French Indochina War.
July 21, 1954 – Vietnam signs the Geneva Accords and divides into two countries at the 17th parallel, the Communist-led north and US-supported south.
1957-1963 – North Vietnam and the Viet Cong fight South Vietnamese troops. Hoping to stop the spread of communism in Southeast Asia, the United States sends more aid and military advisers to help the South Vietnamese government. The number of US military advisers in Vietnam grows from 900 in 1960 to 11,000 in 1962.
1964-1969 – By 1964, the Viet Cong, the Communist guerrilla force, has 35,000 troops in South Vietnam. The United States sends more and more troops to fight the Viet Cong and North Vietnamese, with the number of US troops in Vietnam peaking at 543,000 in April 1969. Anti-war sentiment in the United States grows stronger as the troop numbers increase.
August 2, 1964 – Gulf of Tonkin – The North Vietnamese fire on a US destroyer anchored in the Gulf of Tonkin. After US President Lyndon Johnson falsely claims that there had been a second attack on the destroyer, Congress passes the Gulf of Tonkin resolution, which authorizes full-scale US intervention in the Vietnam War. Johnson orders the bombing of North Vietnam in retaliation for the Tonkin attack.
August 5, 1964 – Johnson asks Congress for the power to go to war against the North Vietnamese and the Communists for violating the Geneva Accords against South Vietnam and Laos. The request is granted August 7, 1964, in a Congressional joint resolution.
January 30, 1968 – Tet Offensive – The North Vietnamese launch a massive surprise attack during the festival of the Vietnamese New Year, called Tet. The attack hits 36 major cities and towns in South Vietnam. Both sides suffer heavy casualties, but the offensive demonstrates that the war will not end soon or easily. American public opinion against the war increases, and the US begins to reduce the number of troops in Vietnam.
March 16, 1968 – My Lai Massacre – About 400 women, children and elderly men are massacred by US forces in the village of My Lai in South Vietnam. Lieutenant William L. Calley Jr. is later court-martialed for leading the raid and sentenced to life in prison for his role but is released in 1974 when a federal court overturns the conviction. Calley is the only soldier ever convicted in connection with the event.
April 1970 – Invasion of Cambodia – US President Richard Nixon orders US and South Vietnamese troops to invade border areas in Cambodia and destroy supply centers set up by the North Vietnamese. The invasion sparks more anti-war protests, and on June 3, 1970, Nixon announces the completion of troop withdrawal.
May 4, 1970 – National Guard units fire into a group of demonstrators at Kent State University in Ohio. The shots kill four students and wound nine others. Anti-war demonstrations and riots occur on hundreds of other campuses throughout May.
February 8, 1971 – Invasion of Laos – Under orders from Nixon, US and South Vietnamese ground troops, with the support of B-52 bombers, invade southern Laos in an effort to stop the North Vietnamese supply routes through Laos into South Vietnam. This action is done without consent of Congress and causes more anti-war protests in the United States.
January 27, 1973 – A cease-fire is arranged after peace talks.
March 29, 1973 – The last American ground troops leave. Fighting begins again between North and South Vietnam, but the United States does not return.
April 30, 1975 – South Vietnam surrenders to North Vietnam as North Vietnamese troops enter Saigon, now called Ho Chi Minh City.
May 25, 2012 – US President Barack Obama signs a proclamation that puts into effect the “Commemoration of the 50th Anniversary of the Vietnam War” that will continue until November 11, 2025. Over the next 13 years, the program will “honor and give thanks to a generation of proud Americans who saw our country through one of the most challenging missions we have ever faced.”

Watch CBS News
Be the first to know
Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.

Watch CBS News
Be the first to know
Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.

The theft of Cambodia’s cultural treasures — thousands of sacred stone, bronze and gold artifacts from religious sites across the country — might just be the greatest art heist in history. It began nearly a century ago when Cambodia was colonized by France, but in the 1970s, 80s and 90s — amidst genocide, civil war, and political turmoil – the looting became a global business, much of it run by a British man named Douglas Latchford. He kept some of it for himself, but much of what his gang of thieves stole, Latchford then sold to wealthy private collectors and some of the most important museums around the world. Cambodia’s government has spent the last 10 years trying to track it all down… and now they want their history and heritage brought home.
Angkor Wat, with its towering spires, is the glory of Cambodia. Nearly a thousand years old, it’s one of the biggest and most extraordinary religious temples in the world — sprawling across 400 acres. Originally built to honor the Hindu god Vishnu, it then became a Buddhist temple, and remains a place of worship today. You can wander here for weeks, lost in a labyrinth of ancient stone corridors and sacred chambers. But the scars of plunder run deep: looters have hacked off the heads of many statues… they’ve stolen bodies as well… empty pedestals mark where gods and deities once stood… on some, only the feet remain.
It’s worse in the rest of Cambodia’s 4,000 temples. Nearly all have been looted. This one is a hundred miles northeast of Angkor Wat… on a remote mountain… called Sandak.
Brad Gordon: This was hit very heavily by the looting gangs.
Brad Gordon: They found gold, they found statues, they found many, many things.
60 Minutes
That’s Brad Gordon, an American lawyer, who’s been working for the Cambodian government for 10 years, tracking down its stolen treasures… he brought us to Sandak with his team of investigators, archeologists and art scholars.
Anderson Cooper: This is so cool.
In the temple’s crumbling courtyard, little remains… mostly empty pedestals scattered among the Sralao trees.
Anderson Cooper: It’s remarkable to me just how much stuff is just scattered on the ground.
Brad Gordon: Yes.
Brad Gordon: It’s like a pedestal graveyard.
Anderson Cooper: We’ve all seen in museums these statues with no feet on them, and I don’t think people realize the feet were hacked off. Because in order to steal them, that’s the easiest way to– to get them off the pedestal.
Brad Gordon: And we know when the looters came to sites like this, the first thing they took was the heads. That was the easiest to grab. And then later on maybe they come back and get the torso. But they were not very careful, so they left behind pieces.
For Cambodians, these statues are not just works of art… they are sacred deities that hold the souls of their ancestors to whom they ask for guidance and pray…
Anderson Cooper: This is incredible. Th– these were all looted.
Phoeurng Sackona: Yes, all looted.
Anderson Cooper: All of these heads, like, cut off–
Phoeurng Sackona: And the head was cut off, yes.
60 Minutes
Phoeurng Sackona, Cambodia’s minister of culture, is in charge of the government’s efforts to track down their stolen gods. We met her in a closely guarded warehouse not far from Angkor Wat… where more than 6,000 pieces from temples across the country are stored for safekeeping… each one sculpted by an artisan from an ancient Khmer Empire… that lasted for more than five centuries and spanned Cambodia, Laos, Thailand and Vietnam.
Anderson Cooper: So the statues have a soul? The statues are– are they living?
Phoeurng Sackona: For us, yes.
Phoeurng Sackona: And we believe that we can talk with them. They will hear. They will see. What do you want? What do you see? What do you do in your life, in your house, outside in the society, also? So that–
Anderson Cooper: They’re watching.
Phoeurng Sackona: They’re watching, everywhere…
Phoeurng Sackona’s entire family was killed in the genocide that began in 1975 when the Khmer Rouge, a radical communist group took over, forcing millions of Cambodians into labor camps. Some 2 million people, nearly a quarter of the population, were slaughtered or starved to death. The Khmer Rouge lost power in 1979, but fighting and instability continued for decades, leaving Cambodia’s temples unprotected and vulnerable… easy targets for unscrupulous antiquities dealers like Douglas Latchford.
Anderson Cooper: Who was Douglas Latchford?
Brad Gordon: I would say that he was, in many ways, the mastermind behind the greatest art heist in history.
Anderson Cooper: The greatest art heist in history?
Brad Gordon: Yes, in terms of scope and multitude of crime sites and the enormous amount of statues that were taken out.
Latchford lived in Thailand… an enigmatic British businessman… he began collecting in the 1960s. He had, it seems, two great loves: Cambodian antiquities and… Thai bodybuilders… He sponsored Bangkok’s biggest bodybuilding competition, the Latchford Classic.
Anderson Cooper: How would you describe him?
Brad Gordon: He was extremely deceptive, I think in many ways, was ruthless. But he hid that behind this incredible façade of charm.
Latchford portrayed himself as a scholar and protector of Cambodia’s culture, a reputation he burnished by donating sculptures to the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York and other prestigious institutions. He also published three books filled with the finest examples of Cambodian antiquities… many of them, it turns out, Latchford had stolen.
Brad Gordon: He was using the books as sales catalogs. You know, he was handing them out. He was using them to sell pieces. And– and he understood a certain psychology of collectors out there that if they see something in a beautiful book, they think it’s legitimate.
Those books have been an invaluable guide for Brad Gordon and his team, helping them compile a database of thousands of missing artifacts. Many of which they didn’t know existed until Latchford published photos of them.
Gordon’s team got their big break when they met this man in 2012. He was a former Khmer Rouge child soldier and leader of a gang of looters. His name was Toek Tik.
Brad Gordon: That first meeting, I– I didn’t really know who we had met. You know, I knew– I knew that he was important. I knew that many people were telling me he was the best. And I knew that he was feared.
Anderson Cooper: Why were people afraid of him?
Brad Gordon: You know, over the years, he had killed many people.
It turned out Toek Tik had worked for decades supplying Douglas Latchford with thousands of treasures… and he was amazed to see them again in Latchford’s books.
Brad Gordon: He kept opening the book and going back to the front cover and– and going through and tapping and saying, “I know this one. I know this one. I know this one.”
Anderson Cooper: And when he says he knew this one, mean he– he helped loot the– those ones.
Brad Gordon: That’s what we learned later, yeah.
Toek Tik became a key confidential source for Gordon’s team. They gave him a code name, Lion, to protect his identity. And followed him to dozens of temples where he confessed what he’d found, and how he’d stolen it.
Brad Gordon: He would say to us, “I’m gonna transfer everything in my head to you. I’m gonna tell you everything. Every secret.”
Anderson Cooper: You felt like his memory was very good. It was accurate.
Brad Gordon: Oh it was unbelievable. He remembered the size of everything. Measured against his body. He would use his arm to show us how long a statue was
Anderson Cooper: Why do you think he wanted to cooperate?
Brad Gordon: You know, he felt tremendously guilty about many things he had done in his life, about the killing, about the looting. And we offered him a road of redemption– a way to do something really good at the end of his life.
60 Minutes
They recorded hundreds of hours of Lion’s testimony… he explained how gangs of looters would spend weeks at remote temples… using shovels, chisels, metal detectors… even dynamite… to find and dig out treasures. Dozens of men would hoist heavy stone statues onto oxcarts before transporting them across the border… into Thailand… and into the hands of Douglas Latchford. Lion never met Latchford, but he’d send him photographs of artifacts he could choose from.
Brad Gordon: We hear about them saying, “Oh we had to go to this temple and take a photo. And then sending it back.” You know, my sense is he was shopping. He had a list. The looters knew his priorities.
Like these… which came from a temple complex called Koh Ker. The statues from there had a distinctive style that Latchford loved.
It was, however, a dangerous business. Most looters only made enough to buy food for their families. And fighting between rival gangs was common.
Anderson Cooper: People were killed over these– these antiquities. Do you look at these as blood statues?
Brad Gordon: For sure. They’re blood antiquities. Whenever I see a statue I think about, you know, who died to– to get this out of the ground or get it out of a temple and to– to move it here? So, so much of this looting was done in the shadow of the war, shadow of the genocide.
It was this 500-pound sandstone warrior from Koh Ker that appeared in a Sotheby’s auction catalog in 2011 that put Douglas Latchford on the radar of U.S. law enforcement. Its feet were missing. And the price tag? An estimated $2-3 million.
J.P. Labbat: When it appeared in the market– there were a number of archaeologists, a number of people who immediately recognized the– the source of the statue as being a specific temple in Cambodia.
Anderson Cooper: It c– came from Koh Ker?
J.P. Labbat: That’s right.
Until he retired last September, J.P. Labbat was a special agent on the cultural property, art and antiquities unit with Homeland Security.
J.P. Labbat: A team from the U.S. Attorney’s Office at the Southern District of New York traveled to Cambodia– to inspect the site where the statue had been removed.
J.P. Labbat: And so the base– was still there with it with the feet still in the ground. And so– they were able to match that base and feet to the statue.
60 Minutes
Anderson Cooper: And that was enough evidence to get the statue pulled off the market?
J.P. Labbat: That’s right.
After years of legal wrangling, Sotheby’s finally agreed to send this stolen warrior back to Cambodia…
A ceremony was held welcoming it home… and investigators were able to trace its original sale back to Douglas Latchford… who was asked about its repatriation in a German documentary in 2014.
Wolfgang Luck: Is it a good day for Cambodia, or is it a bad day for the art market if these things are coming back?
Douglas Latchford: It’s a good day for Cambodia, it’s a bad day for the art market.
Law enforcement in New York was closing in on Latchford, but he claimed prosecutors had him all wrong.
Douglas Latchford: Their imagination has gone wild. They’ve seen too many Indiana Jones films. As far as I know there is no such thing as a smuggling network and I certainly don’t belong to any smuggling network.
Anderson Cooper: The attempted sale of this statue in 2011, was that a turning point in the unraveling of Douglas Latchford?
J.P. Labbat: I would say yes. That case put more of a– focus and a spotlight on him. And then efforts were– were then doubled to, like, really peel back the onion and look into Latchford’s activities.
The testimony of former looters found by Brad Gordon and his team was critical for the U.S. attorney’s case against Latchford.
Anderson Cooper: How rare is it to actually have access to the looters? To people who actually stole these things 10, 20, 30 years ago.
J.P. Labbat: I know of no other case where– where that’s happened. And– it– it’s quite remarkable to have looters actively assisting a team of investigators to recover artifacts that they had a firsthand in helping remove from the country.
Douglas Latchford was finally indicted by U.S. authorities in 2019 for smuggling, conspiracy, wire fraud and other charges, but he died before he could be put on trial. Brad Gordon eventually convinced Latchford’s family to return his personal collection of stolen treasures… Among the first pieces to come home in 2021 was this statue from Koh Ker. Lion, weakened by cancer, came to inspect it in Cambodia’s National Museum to verify it was the same one he’d dug out of the ground.
Brad Gordon: And then he turned to me and he said, “It’s the real statue you know it was a remarkable thing to watch. And just his– his relationship, it– it was living to him.
Anderson Cooper: Do you think he was happy it was back?
Brad Gordon: Thrilled. So happy, he knew that he had done something good.
Lion died a few months later… but the secrets he revealed continue to bring statues back to Cambodia’s National Museum… masterpieces that left the country long before these school children were born.
Anderson Cooper: Does the return of these statues, of these Gods, help some to heal
Phoeurng Sackona: Yes. To get back the soul of the nation.
Anderson Cooper: The soul of the nation.
Phoeurng Sackona: It’s not only for me– but all of my family who was died during the war, and for– for all Cambodian people.
There are still many more stolen Cambodian statues and artifacts in museums and private collections around the world.
It’s taken a team of Cambodian investigators led by Brad Gordon, an American lawyer, more than 10 years to document the theft of thousands of ancient statues and relics by a British collector named Douglas Latchford. They’ve managed to get some of what he stole back, but many of Cambodia’s greatest treasures are still out there… hidden away in the mansions of millionaires and billionaires… and hiding in plain sight, on display in some of the most prestigious museums around the world.
The Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York has one of the most important collections of Cambodian antiquities in the world. But many of the finest pieces on display here in the Southeast Asian art wing… are stolen. Like this one. And this one… This as well – all passed through the hands of Douglas Latchford.
Latchford sold this one to the Met in the early 1990s… This one he donated.
Anderson Cooper: Do you think people visiting the Met, know that these were looted?
Brad Gordon: I think most people walk through the Met, they have no idea those are blood antiquities. They have no idea what– what the history is behind those pieces. They don’t know– the temples they came from. They don’t know the people who were killed to get them here.
Anderson Cooper: The dirt has been brushed off. There’s a little note that says where it came from. Should people believe what’s on that little note?
Brad Gordon: No. Absolutely not.
Last March, we went with Brad Gordon to see where in Cambodia the Met and other museums’ collections really did come from.
Anderson Cooper: This is incredible.
This seven-story pyramid is more than 1,000 years old… and rises out of the jungle in Koh Ker in northeast Cambodia… It’s one of dozens of temples in what was once the capital of an ancient Khmer empire.
Anderson Cooper: –looters have been all over this site for– for decades.
Brad Gordon: Correct.
Anderson Cooper: Douglas Latchford loved the statuary…
Brad Gordon: In love with the beauty, in love with the artistic–
Anderson Cooper: The statues from here are–
Anderson Cooper: –have a distinctive style that he particularly loved?
Brad Gordon: Correct.
And perhaps the most famous statues in that distinctive style that Latchford stole from Koh Ker were nine stone warriors once arranged together in a battle scene. Today, seven have been returned to the National Museum in Phnom Penh, including this 500-pound sandstone sculpture — it’s the one Sotheby’s tried to sell in 2011. They’re back on their original pedestals, their ankles reunited with their feet, hacked off by looters.
Anderson Cooper: This was at Sotheby’s. This is at Christie’s.
Hab Touch: Norton Simon’s.
Anderson Cooper: Norton Simon Museum–
Hab Touch is the secretary of state in Cambodia’s Ministry of Culture. He is working with Brad Gordon to bring back the two Koh Ker statues who’s empty pedestals sit in the museum.
Anderson Cooper: So do you know what are supposed to be on–
Hab Touch: We know.
60 Minutes
Anderson Cooper: You know what are supposed to be here, and you know what’s–
Hab Touch: We know–
Anderson Cooper: –supposed to be here?
Hab Touch: Among nine sculpture, we have seven already. Only two missing.
One of those missing sculptures was discovered in the glossy pages of Architectural Digest in 2008… this mythical army commander and a stunning number of other stolen works… were all together in the Palm Beach mansion of the late billionaire George Lindemann and his wife Frayda.
Anderson Cooper: The ancient treasures of Cambodia were sitting in the living room of an incredibly wealthy family in America, in Florida, on display, while people were having cocktails and–
Brad Gordon: The one thing that I’m always struck by is how many people witnessed it and have been silent and continue to be silent today.
The Lindemann’s spent an estimated $20 million building the collection with the help of Douglas Latchford… Frayda Lindemann didn’t respond to our request for an interview.
But in Koh Ker… we showed her home to two former looters.
Anderson Cooper: What do you think of this house?
It’s a beautiful house, he said, it looks like it belongs to a king.
The former looters pointed out another statue in the Lindemann’s living room they said they helped steal… this reclining figure of the Hindu God Vishnu. They said it was dug out of the ground from this exact spot in late 1995.
Anderson Cooper: You’re 100% sure this was taken from here by you and others in 1995?
Lida (translated): Yeah, I’m sure.
They also identified a number of other statues they say they stole that appear in books published by Douglas Latchford. They say they found this copper statue using a metal detector.
Anderson Cooper: This is Bodhisattva at Ease?
Brad Gordon: Yeah.
They dug it out of the ground here in 1990. J.P. Labbat, former special agent with Homeland Security, found photos of the statue covered in dirt on Douglas Latchford’s computer. Latchford sold it to the Met in 1992. And here it is, still on display.
Anderson Cooper: You were able to get access to some of Latchford’s– emails?
J.P. Labatt: Yes. And in there– there are d– detailed– stories about the manner in which he obtained pieces, the fact that he was having them reassembled– and repaired, that dirt and– and crustaceans were being– cleaned off of them.
Anderson Cooper: They were freshly dug out of the ground?
J.P. Labatt: Fresh. The– these were fresh pieces that he would describe in his emails that needed a level of restoration before he could even attempt to sell them.
Douglas Latchford was indicted in 2019 but died before he could be put on trial. Federal prosecutors in New York however continued tracing his looted artifacts… they believe at least 18 of them have landed up at the Met.
Andrea Bayer: I am very involved in our work on provenance.
Andrea Bayer is deputy director for Collections and Administration at The Met.
Anderson Cooper: The Met has said that they will return objects based upon rigorous evidentiary review. What rigorous evidentiary review was done before acquiring these pieces?
Andrea Bayer: Not enough.
Anderson Cooper: It seems like the Met had a don’t ask, don’t tell policy. They wanted to build up their collection. And nobody was really asking questions where it came from.
60 Minutes
Andrea Bayer: For people, many people in the art world, there was a sense of protecting great objects that stood a chance of being destroyed. We no longer feel about it that way.
Under pressure 10 years ago, the Met did return two statues called Kneeling Attendants, which had been donated to them by Douglas Latchford.
Anderson Cooper: In 2013, when you returned the kneeling attendants, did you investigate the other items that Douglas Latchford had brought to this museum?
Andrea Bayer: I don’t know the answer to that question. I can only pick up the story several years later, when Doug– Douglas Latchford was indicted in 2019, when we immediately and proactively went to the U.S. Attorney’s Office and offered our full cooperation.
Anderson Cooper: Well, I can pick up the story actually in 2013, because a spokesman for the Met, said that “No special effort was gonna be made to check the provenances of any other Douglas Latchford donated work.” Why wouldn’t the Met want to look into everything else that Douglas Latchford had brought to this museum?
Andrea Bayer: I can’t speculate about why that didn’t happen.
Anderson Cooper: But no one investigated all the other items that Douglas Latchford gave?
Andrea Bayer: Not to my knowledge.
The Met is not the only major museum with looted Cambodian artifacts… but its collection is one of the largest in the world. In May, the museum announced it would create a research team to examine the provenance… or acquisition history of all its collections.
Anderson Cooper: It’s taken 10 years since Douglas Latchford was shown to have given stolen property to the Met, for the Met to set up this provenance team. Why has it taken 10 years?
Andrea Bayer: It was a slow process, I’ll grant you that. It was a slow process, but– I think that the fact that we are– fully engaged now, fully cooperative now is– is our only answer to this really. it’s a moment of reckoning, and we’re ready to do what it takes now– to right whatever the wrong is.
Anderson Cooper: Four years ago, when Douglas Latchford was indicted by prosecutors, did you set up a team to check the provenance of every Latchford work–
Andrea Bayer: Yes. We started, absolutely we started to dig in right then and there. It’s not easy. I mean the fact that we don’t have much information has to do with the fact that it’s very hard to find the information–
Anderson Cooper: But there’s enough information for federal prosecutors- to charge Douglas Latchford with stealing and looting and trafficking in smuggled items. How much more evidence do you need? You haven’t–
Andrea Bayer: We need–
Anderson Cooper: –returned any of the– any Douglas Latchford-related items since he’s been indicted, and that was four years ago.
Andrea Bayer: But we are on the verge of– of– of returning a number of them.
Anderson Cooper: All of them?
Andrea Bayer: That I can’t say.
That interview took place in September… two days ago, federal prosecutors announced the Met would return 13 antiquities that came through Douglas Latchford.
But the Met is not returning this statue… which was specifically cited in the indictment of Latchford… or this one which Latchford sold to the Met in 1992.
Cambodia’s culture minister called the Met’s announcement a “first step” and says she looks “forward to the return of many more of our treasures.”
60 Minutes
Anderson Cooper: Shouldn’t museums have thought twice about buying things that were coming out of Cambodia in– during the genocide and civil war and decades of strife?
J.P. Labatt: And this question that you raise is really– the– the crux of– of what we’re wrestling with.
J.P. Labatt: You– acquired pieces from a known smuggler who– used a team of looters that the government has interviewed and taken statements from. They have emails which refute the information in your own provenance at the museum. You have items in the museum which were named in the indictment of Latchford that are still there. And so these pieces should go back.
Anderson Cooper: There’s no question.
J.P. Labatt: It’s the right thing to do.
This past September, the Lindemann family, whose collection was showcased in Architectural Digest, struck a deal with federal authorities… voluntarily agreeing to return 33 stolen treasures. In a statement to the New York Times, the Lindemann’s said: “Having purchased these items from dealers that we assumed were reputable, we were saddened to learn how they made their way to the market in the United States.”
Anderson Cooper: Why did the Lindemanns agree to return their collection to Cambodia?
J.P. Labatt: The pieces were dirty. I– I think they finally came around to the– the fact that– Latchford was dirty their collection was– was all looted pieces. it was obvious. And– and so they– they– decided to surrender them.
We got a peek at what was the Lindemann collection shortly after the deal was done. It was sitting in a warehouse in upstate New York. A nation’s living gods and ancestors waiting for a ride home.
Brad Gordon: This is like a whole wing of a museum.
A wing of a museum that only the Lindemann’s and their friends had access to.
Anderson Cooper: If the Lindemann’s hadn’t published these in Architectural Digest back in 2008?
Brad Gordon: I think there’s a good chance we maybe never would have found it.
Brad Gordon: We always say, the gods want to come home. We feel like the gods have spoken today. They want to come home.
As one of the biggest crates was being opened… waiting eagerly was Muikong Taing and Thyda Long… two members of Brad Gordon’s investigative team. This would be their first look at the mythical army commander taken from Koh Ker… they were likely the first Cambodians to set eyes on it since Douglas Latchford stole it more than 50 years ago.
Thyda Long: He’s here.
Anderson Cooper: There’s a look in his eyes and on his face.
Thyda Long: It’s much bigger than I expected it to be.
Anderson Cooper: His presence is extraordinary.
Thyda Long: I did not expect to feel this way.
Even the commander seemed to be smiling.
Then it was time to see the rarest piece in the Lindemann’s collection. The Cambodian team knelt in reverence as the Hindu god Vishnu was uncrated. Despite all the fuss, he appeared unperturbed… reclining in a cosmic slumber. When this statue arrives in Cambodia, it will be welcomed as one of the most important ever returned.
Produced by Michael H. Gavshon and Nadim Roberts. Associate producer, Eliza Costas. Broadcast associate, Grace Conley. Edited by Patrick Lee.

Watch CBS News
Be the first to know
Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.

The late chef’s comments about the war criminal in a 2001 book recirculated online soon after news emerged of the former secretary of state’s death.

Watch CBS News
Be the first to know
Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.

Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Sen, one of the world’s longest-serving leaders, said Wednesday he will resign and hand power to his eldest son after almost four decades of hardline rule.
The former Khmer Rouge cadre has run the kingdom since 1985, eliminating all opposition to his power, with rival parties banned, challengers forced to flee and freedom of expression stifled.
His Cambodian People’s Party (CPP) won a landslide victory in an election on Sunday with no meaningful opposition, taking 82 percent of the vote, paving the way for a dynastic succession to his son that some critics have compared with North Korea.
“I would like to ask for understanding from the people as I announce that I will not continue as prime minister,” the 70-year-old said in a special broadcast on state television.
TANG CHHIN SOTHY/AFP via Getty Images
Election authorities disqualified the only serious challenger, the Candlelight Party, on a technicality in advance of the election, and the CPP is expected to win all but five lower house seats.
The government hailed the 84.6 percent voter turnout as evidence of the country’s “democratic maturity” but Western powers, including the United States and the European Union, condemned the election as neither free nor fair.
The UN’s human rights chief, Volker Turk, added his criticism on Wednesday, saying opposition parties and media had faced “restrictions and reprisals” aimed at hindering free elections.
Hun Sen’s son, Hun Manet, a 45-year-old four-star general, will take over as prime minister at the head of a new government on the evening of August 22.
“I ask people to support Hun Manet who will be the new prime minister,” Hun Sen said, adding that he was stepping down now to ensure a smooth handover of power.
Sam Rainsy, an opposition leader who lives in exile to avoid charges he says are politically motivated, condemned the handover.
“It is Hun Sen’s game… which is the murder of democracy in Cambodia,” he said in a Facebook video. “We must absolutely oppose it.”
Hun Sen has trailed the handover to his son for a year and a half, and the 45-year-old played a leading role in campaigning for Sunday’s vote.
But the outgoing leader has made it clear that he still intends to wield influence, even after he steps down, scotching the notion the country could change direction.
While insisting he would not interfere with his son’s rule, Hun Sen said he would help him to “control security, order and take part in the further development of the country”.
After stepping down as PM, he will become president of the senate and act as head of state when the king is overseas, he said.
Sebastian Strangio, author of “Hun Sen’s Cambodia”, told AFP the father “will undoubtedly exercise a huge influence over the direction of his son’s administration”.
“Lacking his father’s power and authority, Manet will have limited freedom of maneuver, and his actions as leader will most likely be dictated by the requirements of the political system, rather than the other way around,” he said.
MANDEL NGAN/AFP via Getty Images
Under Hun Sen, Cambodia has tacked close to Beijing, benefiting from huge Chinese investment and infrastructure projects, including the redevelopment of a naval base that has alarmed Washington.
China welcomed Sunday’s election, with President Xi Jinping sending Hun Sen a personal message of congratulations.
But the flood of Chinese money has brought problems, including a rash of casinos and online scam operations staffed by foreign workers, many trafficked and toiling in appalling conditions.
Critics say his rule has also been marked by environmental destruction and entrenched graft.
Cambodia ranks 150th out of 180 in Transparency International’s corruption perception index. In Asia, only Myanmar and North Korea rank lower.
Rights groups accuse Hun Sen of using the legal system to crush any opposition to his rule, including critical activists and troublesome union leaders, as well as politicians.
Scores of opposition politicians have been convicted and jailed during his time in power and the law was changed ahead of Sunday’s election to make it illegal to call for voters to spoil ballots.
Five days before polling day, authorities banned Sam Rainsy from running for office for 25 years for urging people to void their ballot papers.
Opposition leader Kem Sokha was convicted of treason in March and sentenced to 27 years in prison over an alleged plot to topple Hun Sen’s government. He is currently serving his sentence under house arrest.

It was Hollywood that turned the temple complex around Angkor Wat into an ultra-famous location, but the Cambodian site is so much more than a movie set. For nine hundred years, it has been a wonder of history, religion and art.
It’s also the site of an epic theft. Thousands of people visit the temple every day, but look closely at some of the lesser-known parts of the complex, and you’ll notice vital statues of Hindu gods and Buddhas are missing.
In the decades of lawlessness following Cambodia’s civil war, which raged from 1967 to 1975 and left hundreds of thousands of people dead, looters raided these sites and made off with the priceless artifacts. Many have ended up in private collections and museums.
American lawyer Brad Gordon said he is on a mission to track down these irreplacable items.
“Many of these statues have spiritual qualities, and the Cambodians regard them as their ancestors,” Gordon said.”They believe that they’re living.”
Dmitry Rukhlenko/iStock
In one case, a man named Toek Tik, code-named Lion, revealed to Gordon and a team of archaeologists that he had stolen a statue from a temple. Lion died in 2021, but first, he led Gordon and the archaeology team to the temple he’d robbed in 1997. There, Gordon and his team found a pedestal and the fragment of a foot, which led the experts to confirm that Lion had stolen the statue “Standing Female Deity.”
Now, that statue lives in the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York City.
“We have his confirmation, and then we have a French archaeologist who uses 3D imaging. And he’s been able to match the body at the Met to the foot that’s here,” Gordon said. The museum returned two Cambodian sculptures, known as the Kneeling Attendants, in 2013, but Gordon said they’re not budging on the matter of “Standing Female Deity.”
“The Met has been very difficult,” Gordon said. The museum did not respond to a request for comment from CBS News.
Gordon said that he isn’t giving up on bringing the statue home.
“At the moment we have been working with the U.S. Government – providing them information on the collection,” Gordon explained. “And the U.S. Government has their own investigation going on. If it doesn’t work out to our satisfaction, we are confident we can bring civil action.”
Other museums and collectors have cooperated, Gordon said, and so the looted pieces have been trickling back to Cambodia. As recently as March, a trove of pieces were returned by a collector in the United Kingdom who’d inherited the pieces and decided giving them back was the only ethical choice.
“Some museums are actually contacting us now and saying, ‘Hey, we don’t want to have stolen objects. Would you review our collection… If you want any of them back, please just tell us,'” Gordon said.

About 40 crocodiles killed a Cambodian man on Friday after he fell into their enclosure on his family’s reptile farm, police said.
Luan Nam, 72, was trying to move a crocodile out of a cage where it had laid eggs when it grabbed the stick he was using as a goad and pulled him in.
The main group of reptiles then set about him, tearing his body to pieces and leaving the concrete enclosure at the farm in Siem Reap awash with blood.
“While he was chasing a crocodile out of an egg-laying cage, the crocodile attacked the stick, causing him to fall into the enclosure,” Mey Savry, police chief of Siem Reap commune, told AFP.
“Then other crocodiles pounced, attacking him until he was dead,” he said, adding that the remains of Luan Nam’s body were covered with bite marks.
One of the man’s arms was bitten off and swallowed by the crocodiles, he said.
Luan Nam was the president of the local crocodile farmers’ association but his family may now sell his stock, after urging him for years to stop raising the reptiles, commune chief May Sameth told AFP.
Local media reported that the victim was from Po Banteay Chey village.
A two-year-old girl was killed and eaten by crocodiles in 2019 when she wandered into her family’s reptile farm in the same village, the police chief said.
There are a number of crocodile farms around Siem Reap, the gateway city to the famed ruins of Angkor Wat.
The reptiles are kept for their eggs, skins and meat as well as the trade in their young.
The incident marks at least the second person killed by a crocodile this month. In early May, the remains of a missing 65-year-old fisherman in Australia were found inside two crocodiles.
Last year, two American tourists were injured by a crocodile at a resort in Mexico when one went swimming in the ocean at night and the other went in the water to help him.

A venomous snake named after a mythological goddess, an orchid that looks like a Muppet, a tree frog with skin that looks like moss and a tree-climbing lizard that changes colors are among hundreds of new species that were recently discovered across Asia. But according to a new report by the World Wildlife Fund, many of the 380 new species are already at risk of going extinct.
Henrik Bringsoe
All of the species were found across southeast Asia’s Greater Mekong region – which includes Cambodia, Laos, Myanmar, Thailand and Vietnam – in 2021 and 2022. That area is known for being home to some of the world’s “most biologically diverse habitats,” according to the WWF, with thousands of species of plants and animals.
A new report from the group published on Monday details the discovery of new species of 290 plants, 19 fishes, 24 amphibians, 46 reptiles and one mammal across the area. But while the new species found were described as “remarkable” by the WWF, the group also offered a warning for many.
Tylototriton thaiorum, otherwise known as the Thai crocodile newt, for example, is only known to live in one area in Vietnam and is already considered to be an endangered species. The WWF says that the area in which the newt is known to live is suffering from habitat loss because of expanding agriculture and logging, as well as communities collecting the creature to treat abdominal pain and parasitic infections.
Nguyen Thien/TAO via World Wildlife Fund
Vietnam is also home to the newly identified Theloderma Khoii, a frog whose color and patterns make it look as though it’s covered in moss as a form of camouflage. But the report says that road construction and illegal logging threaten the forests in which it lives, leading researchers to believe it should also be considered endangered.
And it’s not just animals that are under threat. Nepenthes bracteosa and Nepenthes hirtella, two new species of pitcher plants, “have immediately been classified as Critically Endangered,” the WWF said in its report. Both plants are found only on “a single hilltop” in southern Thailand, meaning that “any significant disturbance or deteriorating in their habitat could put them at risk of extinction.”
Keooudone Souvannakhoummane/World Wildlife Fund
Cambodia’s Dendrobium fuscifaucium — a miniature orchid that resembles the Muppets who sing the song “Mah Na Mah Na” — is not specifically said to be endangered in the report, but the organization describes it as an “unusual discovery” that researchers are struggling to find in the wild. They stumbled upon the species from a nursery collection, whose owner said they bought it from a local wild plant vendor who said they found it in the wild.
“The discovery of this new species only underlines the importance of protecting these delicate plants,” the report says.
Truong Nguyen of the Vietnam Academy of Science said that the status of these newly dubbed species shows the “tremendous pressures” the region is facing, both from economic development and human population growth. These issues, he said in a foreword in the report, “drive deforestation, pollution and overexploitation of natural resources, compounded by the effects of climate change.”
“More concerted, science-based and urgent efforts need to be made to reverse the rapid biodiversity loss in the region,” he wrote. “Using the critical evidence base that is laid by scientists, we all need to urgently invest time and resources into the best ways to conserve the known and yet unknown species.”

Watch CBS News
Be the first to know
Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.

PHNOM PENH, Cambodia (AP) — An 11-year-old girl in Cambodia has died from bird flu in the country’s first known human H5N1 infection since 2014, health officials said.
Bird flu, also known as avian influenza, normally spreads in poultry and wasn’t deemed a threat to people until a 1997 outbreak among visitors to live poultry markets in Hong Kong. Most human cases worldwide have involved direct contact with infected poultry, but concerns have arisen recently about infections in a variety of mammals and the possibility the virus could evolve to spread more easily between people.
The girl from the rural southeastern province of Prey Veng became ill Feb. 16 and was sent to be treated at hospital in the capital, Phnom Penh. She was diagnosed Wednesday after suffering a fever up to 39 Celsius (102 Fahrenheit) with coughing and throat pain and died shortly afterward, the Health Ministry said in a statement Wednesday night.
Health officials have taken samples from a dead wild bird at a conservation area near the girl’s home, the ministry said in another statement Thursday. It said teams in the area would also warn residents about touching dead and sick birds.
Cambodian Health Minister Mam Bunheng warned that bird flu poses an especially high risk to children who may be feeding or collecting eggs from domesticated poultry, playing with the birds or cleaning their cages.
Symptoms of H5N1 infection are similar to that of other flus, including cough, aches and fever, and in serious cases, patients can develop life-threatening pneumonia.
Cambodia had 56 human cases of H5N1 from 2003 through 2014 and 37 of them were fatal, according to the World Health Organization.
Globally, about 870 human infections and 457 deaths have been reported to the WHO in 21 countries. But the pace has slowed, and there have been about 170 infections and 50 deaths in the last seven years.
WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus earlier this month expressed concern about avian influenza infections in mammals including minks, otters, foxes and sea lions.
“H5N1 has spread widely in wild birds and poultry for 25 years, but the recent spillover to mammals needs to be monitored closely,” he warned.
In January, a 9-year-old girl in Ecuador became the first reported case of human infection in Latin America and the Caribbean. She was treated with antiviral medicine.
Tedros said earlier this month that the WHO still assesses the risk from bird flu to humans as low.
“But we cannot assume that will remain the case, and we must prepare for any change in the status quo,” he said. He advised for people not to touch dead or sick wild animals and for countries to strengthen their surveillance of settings where people and animals interact.

Cambodia’s longtime ruler Hun Sen has ‘overseen a systematic assault on fundamental freedoms’, report states.
Cambodia has experienced a worrying decline in basic freedoms as authorities use the legal system to restrict and criminalise human rights work, youth activism, trade unions, independent journalism, opposition politicians and other voices critical of Prime Minister Hun Sen’s government, a leading rights group has warned.
To further strengthen his almost 40-year iron grip on power, Hun Sen recently used the COVID-19 pandemic to implement a state of emergency law that further restricted the fundamental freedoms of Cambodian citizens, said CIVICUS – a global alliance of civil society organisations tracking fundamental freedoms worldwide.
“The misuse of the criminal justice system to harass and prosecute human rights defenders, unionists and journalists and the shutting down of media outlets highlights the democratic regression in Cambodia,” CIVICUS said in a Cambodia country report released on Thursday.
Hun Sen, the organisation said, had “overseen a systematic assault on fundamental freedoms in Cambodia over the past decade” and the country was now on a watch list of “repressive” countries joining, among others, Iran, Sudan, Zimbabwe, and Peru.
“Cambodian human rights defenders and activists continue to face repression,” said CIVICUS, which tracks civic freedoms across 197 countries and territories, and “press freedom continues to be at risk in Cambodia with radio stations and newspapers silenced, newsrooms purged and journalists prosecuted, leaving the independent media sector devastated”.
On Monday, Hun Sen ordered the closure of one of the country’s last remaining independent news outlets, Voice of Democracy (VOD), after it reported on a story involving his son and heir apparent Hun Manet. Hun Sen said the story on the provision of aid to earthquake-hit Turkey was misreported and had demanded an apology. Despite receiving an apology, he ordered VOD shut down anyway.
European Union embassies in Cambodia expressed their concern at Hun Sen’s closure of VOD, as did Australia, Canada, the United Kingdom and United States.
We are deeply concerned by the closure
of VOD @VOD_English and @VODKhmer – independent and professional media. We respectfully urge a reassessment of the decision since a free and independent press allows for many voices in a democratic Cambodia 🇰🇭— Canada in Cambodia (@CanadaCambodia) February 14, 2023
The decision to close the news organisation was “particularly troubling due to the chilling impact it will have on freedom of expression and on access to information ahead of the national elections in July”, US State Department spokesperson Ned Price said on Monday.
Responding to international criticism of his closure of VOD, Hun Sen on Tuesday warned foreigners to not interfere in Cambodia’s internal affairs.
Cambodia’s foreign ministry weighed in, saying the closure of a “rule-breaking” news organisation did “not merit any worry at all” and accused foreign diplomats who had expressed concern as “politically-driven, prejudiced and biased”.
Josef Benedict, Asia-Pacific researcher for CIVICUS, said the misuse of the criminal justice system and the “systematic attack on civic space in the country” contravened Cambodia’s international human rights obligations.
With more than 50 political prisoners in jail, and more than 150 opposition party leaders and supporters the target of politically-motivated prosecutions, CIVICUS said there are “serious concerns around the escalating climate of repression against the opposition” ahead of Cambodia’s national elections in July.
In a list of recommendations accompanying the report, the organisation called on the Cambodian government to drop all charges against those exercising their constitutional rights to freedom of assembly, association and expression, and to end the mass trials, arbitrary arrest, violence, harassment and intimidation directed at the country’s political opposition.
Journalists also needed to be protected from intimidation and be allowed to “work freely without fear of retaliation for expressing critical opinions or exposing government abuses”, CIVICUS said.
CIVICUS also called on the international community – through diplomatic missions and representatives in Cambodia – to press the Cambodian government to protect the fundamental freedoms of its citizens and to make public international concerns regarding the deteriorating situation in Cambodia – including raising concerns at the United Nations Human Rights Council and “initiate stronger Council action as required”.

Phnom Penh, Cambodia – Cambodian rapper Kea Sokun was once jailed for his hard-hitting lyrics, but that did not stop him from forging ahead with his latest release, Workers Blood, set to scenes of striking garment workers beaten by military police. At least four workers died in the protests.
“They fought for their rights, for freedom, the search for justice full of obstacles,” Sokun raps in Khmer. “I would like to commemorate the heroism of the workers who sacrificed their lives.”
Within days of the song’s release on January 3 — the ninth anniversary of the government’s deadly response to a vast garment workers’ strike — the Ministry of Culture warned the music video was “inciting content that may cause insecurity and social disorder”.
The leaders of the human rights organisations that commissioned the song were soon hauled in for questioning. Police threatened legal action unless the video was removed from the websites and Facebook pages of the Cambodian League for the Promotion and Defence of Human Rights (LICADHO) and the Center for Alliance of Labor and Human Rights (CENTRAL), representatives for the rights groups say.
“Every year we post [about the anniversary of the protests] and we have no problem, so why now when we only used old images with a song about a real event, why is it incitement?” Am Sam Ath, LICADHO’s operations director, told Al Jazeera. “We regard the order to remove the video as a violation of LICADHO’s right of expression.”
National police spokesperson Chhay Kimkoeurn claimed no threats were involved and said police merely sought to “educate” the rights groups.
“We didn’t threaten them with legal action, but if they don’t obey the law we will enforce the law,” he told Al Jazeera, referring to “incitement” to commit a crime, a vague charge commonly wielded against those perceived to have criticised the government.
The censorship of Workers Blood is part of an ongoing crackdown on freedom of expression in Cambodia that is gathering pace ahead of national elections in July. Nearing his fourth decade in power, Prime Minister Hun Sen outlawed the main opposition party ahead of the last elections five years ago, and is now preparing to hand control of the ruling Cambodian People’s Party (CPP) to his son Hun Manet.
Civil society organisations, opposition politicians and rappers alike are being forcefully reminded of the limits of what can and cannot be said in an increasingly restrictive society.
“I think the government is trying to legitimise itself and this is a transition period of power, so they are looking at civil society as threats,” Khun Tharo, program manager for CENTRAL, told Al Jazeera. “The government feels this song has really discredited [them].”
While Cambodia’s music industry has exploded in recent years, few rappers besides Sokun have dared bring direct social commentary into their songs. Other rappers who have spoken out against the government’s actions faced death threats or were forced to issue public apologies.
“I always want to use songs as mirrors to reflect the reality in society,” Sokun told VOD, an online media outlet in Cambodia, last year. “I just want to speak the truth.”
Growing up in a poor household down the road from the World Heritage site of Angkor Wat and dropping out of school in his early teens, Sokun was arrested and sentenced to one year in prison in 2020 for a series of nationalist songs touching on topics like Cambodia’s borders, and filled with unsparing takedowns of the rich and powerful.
A judge offered to release Sokun if he apologised for his lyrics, but the rapper refused and served the time, boosting his popularity across Cambodia.
The 24-year-old now has more than a quarter of a million subscribers on his YouTube channel and continues to target political issues and injustice, producing a song describing his incarceration and another about the filling in of Phnom Penh’s lakes for development.
But it was Workers Blood that hit a nerve with the government because it was a reminder of the scale of garment workers’ protests that began in late 2013, says Sabina Lawreniuk, a University of Nottingham research fellow who studies Cambodia’s garment industry.
Tens of thousands of workers took to Veng Sreng Boulevard in Phnom Penh to demand higher wages and the government was eventually forced to double the minimum wage to $160 per month. It has since increased wages annually, even as aggressive new laws on trade unions have also been introduced that rights groups say are intended to stifle independent union organising.
“Labour politics in Cambodia are explicitly entangled with electoral politics in a way that some other human rights issues and struggles in Cambodia are not,” Lawreniuk told Al Jazeera. “That huge mobilization of people really unsettled the government.”
The protests came in the aftermath of the closely contested elections of 2013 when the Cambodia National Rescue Party spooked the CPP by capturing a large share of the votes on a platform calling for wage increases for garment workers and civil servants.

The Veng Sreng protests only ended after police and military forces began firing at the crowds, injuring dozens and killing at least four people on January 3, 2014. One protester, 15-year-old Khem Sophat, remains missing to this day.
“I don’t have hope that he will be found, his friend said he was shot and lay down on the street,” Sophat’s father, Khem Soeun, told Al Jazeera. “My child was very gentle, he was always helping the family.”
Sophat had lied about his age to get a job at a garment factory and sent money to his parents every month, his father said. He last saw his son nine months before the protests when he visited for the Khmer New Year holidays.
“After he went back to work, he never came back again,” Soeun said. “His mum, when she heard the song [Workers Blood], she cried all day, it reminded her of Veng Sreng street.”
The deaths were the result of “indiscriminate firing and excessive use of force by the military police,” according to a fact-finding report produced shortly after the protest by the labour rights group Asia Monitor Resource Center. No one has ever been held accountable for the workers’ deaths.
“Waiting for justice for nine years, a long time passed and nobody responsible, longing for a solution,” Sokun raps. “The eyes saw the truth, unforgettable, stuck in the minds of those who live.”
Vorn Pov, president of the Independent Democratic Informal Economy Association (IDEA), was beaten bloody by government security forces at the protest. As a prominent labour activist associated with Veng Sreng, Pov was questioned by police about Sokun’s song and later forced to remove it from his organisation’s Facebook page, even though IDEA had not sponsored the song.
“When listening to Sokun’s song, it is shocking, like it’s still new and fresh and so unjust for the victims,” Pov told Al Jazeera. “I feel this society cannot be relied upon to find the truth when injustice happens.”
Ministry of Culture spokesperson Long Bunna Siriwadh would not elaborate on what specifically about Workers Blood triggered the allegation of incitement.
“I don’t analyse the meaning, I only speak to the principle of law and social order,” Siriwadh told Al Jazeera, claiming Sokun could keep making songs. “He can continue to do whatever he wants. But don’t cause turmoil to society, respect the law — it is easy like that.”
Hun Sen laid down a clear red line in a recent speech, warning the opposition party and other potential detractors that criticism of the ruling CPP would be met with legal action or violence. The CPP has already sued one of the opposition Candlelight Party’s vice presidents for $1m in defamation damages after he claimed there were issues with the electoral process, and this week police arrested another Candlelight leader for allegedly issuing a bad cheque.
In the run-up to Cambodian elections, freedom of expression is usually constricted, and while curbs might later be relaxed, the situation never returns to how it was before, according to Nottingham University researcher Lawreniuk.
“Although it feels like authoritarian control tightens around election time, and then it’s released, actually the government’s power has always been consolidating over time,” Lawreniuk said. “That’s what has enabled this slide toward de facto one-party rule.”

Sokun, who has stayed mostly silent since the crackdown, declined to comment for Al Jazeera, saying he was now experiencing “a lot of problems in his life”. But he has denied the song ran afoul of the law.
“Nothing is wrong with the song, there’s no incitement to cause turmoil,” he told Voice of America shortly after the video was censored. “We want the authorities to find justice for the victims, but instead they take action against the one who posts [the song], I feel regret about this.”
The original posts may have been removed, but Sokun’s song continues to be shared widely across social media on other pages and platforms. If the government’s aim was to stop the music video from being seen, it has not worked, CENTRAL’s Tharo said.
“Now it has gone viral,” he said. “I think our target has been reached, because the whole idea was to create a public sentiment of remembrance [about Veng Sreng].”