[ad_1]
This article is only available to subscribers
Offer valid for non-subscribers only
[ad_2]
Nathan Canilao, Christian Babcock
Source link
[ad_1]
This article is only available to subscribers
Offer valid for non-subscribers only
[ad_2]
Nathan Canilao, Christian Babcock
Source link
[ad_1]
Hundreds of South Bay protesters took to the streets Saturday to show their disdain toward President Donald Trump’s military actions in Venezuela and the killing of a Minnesota woman by a federal agent earlier this week.
Rallies began Saturday morning in Los Gatos and Mountain View, with more planned later into the day in Sunnyvale, Palo Alto, San Jose, Richmond and San Francisco. Many were organized by a coalition of groups including May Day Strong, Indivisible and others.
In a statement, May Day Strong called for unity against U.S. occupation of Venezuela and the removal of “reckless untrained ICE agents from our communities.” They argued overseas wars and increased immigration enforcement enriched billionaires at a human cost, and that tax money should be used for “good jobs, better schools, access to health care and (getting) our basic needs met.”
At Los Gatos, David Bowie’s “Under Pressure” blared to over 100 people as passing cars honked in support of the demonstration.
George Hoffman, a 49-year-old Los Gatos resident, said he’s been protesting regularly at the town’s Tesla dealership since April 2025, in an effort to push back against Elon Musk’s support of Trump.
Hoffman said he started attending protests because he was tired of keeping quiet on the Trump administration’s actions and “feeling like everything was broken.”
“It was killing me,” he said. “I was in a hole of despair and loneliness.”
One week ago, a U.S. strike in Venezuela killed about 80 people and ended with the capture of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro and his wife Cilia Flores, who are now in New York City awaiting trial on federal drug charges. Trump and others in his administration have said the U.S. would “run” the country, taking millions of barrels of oil with the blessing of the South American nation’s acting leadership.
Many within the U.S. and internationally criticized the attack as a flagrant violation of international law that ignores Venezuela’s sovereignty. However, Venezuelan expatriates in Florida and elsewhere were supportive of Maduro’s removal after years of reported human rights violations and economic troubles in the country.
In Mountain View, a couple dozen people went to a Chevron gas station to protest. Cindy Ferguson, a 73-year-old Mountain View resident, has been going to several demonstrations, including the No Kings protests in June. She specifically wanted everyone to rally around Chevron due to the president’s actions in Venezuela to gain control of their oil reserves. Ferguson was formerly in the Army between 1973 and 1976. She criticized the similarities she saw between the U.S.’s intervention in Iraq and Iran and the attacks in Venezuela, saying “none of it worked, then or now.”
“They stand to profit really big, so he’s just paying off his billionaire buddies, and all the money and spending is for that,” Ferguson said. “Why aren’t we feeding kids? Why aren’t we giving health care? We could do a lot with that money, too. Let’s care for everyone.”
On Wednesday, a Minnesota woman named Renee Good was fatally shot by a federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent in Minneapolis, a killing caught on video that quickly sparked outrage and, from the Trump administration, unsupported claims that Good was a “domestic terrorist.” A day later, two people were wounded in Portland, Oregon, when federal immigration officers shot them in their car outside of a hospital. Both of the shootings inspired vigils and demonstrations against crackdowns authorized by Trump.
Many people that were protesting in the South Bay were enraged over the Good’s death. John Elliott, a 77-year-old Los Gatos resident, said that he had seen the video footage of Good’s shooting and thought it was “striking” that there were people who could justify it. Similarly, 20-year-old Campbell resident Michael Zambon felt that Good’s death was an extrajudicial killing.
“This is really not just about the murder of Renee Nicole Good. It’s also about the rule of law,” Zambon said. “This is a regime of lawlessness. And I believe we need to push back as best we can in order to ensure that the rule of law can endure in the consciousness of the country.”
Lisa Guevara, a 58-year-old resident of Menlo Park, is affiliated with Showing Up for Racial Justice, an organization to help white people organize against racial discrimination. Guevara connected the ICE-involved shootings with the attack on Venezuela as examples of Trump’s government trying to convince Americans that they have a right to enter Venezuela or American cities to strong-arm them.
“I think all of it is connected; It’s all this fascist, patriarchal, white supremacy situation,” Guevara said. “It’s this idea of being able to to determine other people’s lives for them, whether it’s in foreign countries or whether it’s in our own neighborhoods.”
Hoffman said Good’s death was another example of the Trump administration lying to people about what has been happening in the nation.
“We need to stop seeing this as a single issue,” Hoffman said. “It’s all the same fight.”
This is a developing report. Check back for updates.
[ad_2]
Nollyanne Delacruz
Source link
[ad_1]
Tijuana, Mexico — After a month away, Catherine Vermillion came home to her San Diego apartment and an empty parking space.
“I looked up and realized my car was gone,” Vermillion told CBS News. “I remembered that I had an AirTag in the car, so I checked my phone, and the AirTag showed that my car was in Tijuana, Mexico.”
When she saw where the AirTag popped up, she said she was in “shock and disbelief.”
Disbelief turned into frustration after she said local police couldn’t help.
“They just said that because it’s across the border, they’re not able to go and get it even though I could show them it was only 45 minutes away,” Vermillion said.
It’s a frustration shared by the California Highway Patrol.
“When it comes to country borders, we cannot cross that line,” CHP Lt. David Navarro said.
Navarro warned that organized theft rings are going after high-end SUVs, pickups and performance cars, stealing them in the U.S., then smuggling them into Mexico. He said it’s lucrative, hard to track and often impossible to recover those cars once they cross the border.
In just the last four years, CHP data shows the number of stolen vehicles tracked crossing the border from California, Arizona and Texas jumped 79%.
“If a vehicle’s stolen in the middle of the night, and the victim does not wake up till 7 in the morning, well if it’s stolen at 2, you have roughly five hours to transport that vehicle,” Navarro said. “If that vehicle’s not reported in the system, and it passes through that camera, then no, it’s not going to be alerted at all.”
That’s exactly what happened to Vermillion’s Jeep. The difference was she knew exactly where it ended up — 46 miles away, over the border in Tijuana.
CBS News
Enter Phil Mohr, a repo man who has spent the last 20 years as a stolen car bounty hunter in Mexico.
Mohr said a lot of stolen cars end up next to the airport in Tijuana, a few hundred yards from the U.S.-Mexico border.
“This is a organized drop-off point,” Mohr said.
Organized in many cases by cartels, who federal agents told CBS News drive the cars into Mexico and use them to traffic drugs and weapons.
Mohr worked with local law enforcement in Mexico to repossess Vermillion’s car and bring it back to San Diego.
“It feels like a win,” Mohr said. “It feels like you made it right, that you righted a wrong in the world.”
A neighbor of Vermillion’s took a picture to capture the moment when Mohr brought her car back.
“I just have my hands up, like, whoa,” Vermillion said. “It was like the best day ever.”
For Vermillion, it was the best day ever, but for most, that day never comes.
[ad_2]
[ad_1]
FREMONT — A bison rancher is appealing the city’s order demanding he remove a gate that blocks public access to a regional park, with a hearing over the matter expected to take place soon.
Rancher Chris George is fighting tooth-and-nail to keep the gate on Morrison Canyon Road in rural Fremont, despite city officials determining it was illegally constructed and blocks a city right-of-way.
A hearing date has not been set but could happen as early as this month. He could face a minimum fine of $100 per day that the fence remains up, according to a notice the city served to the George family in November shortly after the gate’s construction.
The city’s removal order came after the Alameda County Board of Supervisor late last year voted to hand responsibility of the 0.2-mile stretch over to the George family. Within two weeks, the rancher erected a gate, escalating a yearslong fight over the 1,000 feet of road that provides access to Vargas Plateau Regional Park, a popular park for hiking, biking and horseback riding.
According to a notice signed by Israel Vazquez–Comonfort, a city code enforcement officer, George had until Nov. 26 to “immediately” remove the gate “that obstructs the use of the public street,” or face penalties. But George, who did not respond to a request for comment, has refused to dismantle it.
In an earlier letter, Fremont City Attorney Rafael Alvarado Jr. told George and his attorney that the city legally took ownership of the road when it incorporated into Alameda County about seven decades ago.
“For the past seventy years, the public has used and enjoyed the roadway as a public right of way, and said public use of the roadway has been open, notorious, continuous, and adverse to any purported private interest of your client,” Alvarado wrote. He also added that George has “no legal authority” that would allow “a private party to construct a private gate over public land.”
In response, George’s attorney, Clark Morrison, wrote to the city appealing their order, claiming that it was issued “without evidence” that the roadway is a public street.
“The gate and fence are constructed entirely on private property,” Morrison wrote, adding “it is not legally possible” for his clients to have violated any municipal code. He demanded the city rescind the order, which he also claims has “invited and encouraged trespass by certain third parties on the Georges’ private property, and harassment of the Georges by those same third parties.”
The Georges have long battled environmental and public access advocates over the stretch of Morrison Canyon Road.
In 2008, George and a neighbor filed a lawsuit over traffic and roadway conditions, leading to a settlement in 2012 that delayed the opening of Vargas Plateau Regional Park while the East Bay Regional Park District and the city of Fremont spent hundreds of thousands of dollars to improve the road and reduce the number of parking spaces there.
Jason Bezis, an attorney who represents the anti-gate crowd, told this news organization on Friday that George’s claim to the land is “really outrageous.”
“They’re very much like the Donald Trump ethos, or Donald Trump mindset, of making false statements and hoping that no one questions them,” Bezis said.
He said that the roadway is proven to be “a public road until the City Council says it’s vacated.”
Bezis likened the land fight to one at Martins Beach in San Mateo County. In that case, a judge ruled that a Silicon Valley billionaire was illegally restricting public access to the popular beach by gating off his own driveway and blocking the only road to the ocean. But Bezis’ said the situation in Fremont is more egregious.
“This is just absolutely brazen and not supported by any facts,” he said.
[ad_2]
Kyle Martin
Source link
[ad_1]
Some people think a proposed tax on California’s billionaires to make up for cuts in federal funding to hospitals and healthcare programs will drive money out of the state.
To Seema Kanani, a medical social worker for a major hospital system in Northern California, it is time to sound the alarm about the future of healthcare in the state.
“We need to do this now. We can’t wait 5-10 years,” she said. “We are at risk in the near future, actually, of having hospitals, ERs, and community clinics close down.”
She’s been a member of the healthcare justice union, the Service Employees International Union – United Healthcare Workers West (SEIU-UHW), for 19 years.
Her union is proposing a billionaire wealth tax to make up for massive federal healthcare spending cuts that are set to take place over the next decade, which will largely impact middle- and lower-income Californians.
“A lot of my patients will choose to kind of ration their diabetes medication or other medications they cannot afford because they have to choose between paying their electricity bill or getting their medication,” Kanani said.
The idea is to levy a one-time, 5% tax on the wealth, not income, of billionaires that live in California.
“There are over 200 billionaires just in California. So, it’s time for them to step up and do their part for the state that has given them so much,” she said. “This is not meant to be a long-term fix. That’s why it’s an emergency, one-time tax. It’s not a long-term tax.”
A December analysis from California’s non-partisan Legislative Analyst’s Office revealed the proposed billionaire tax would likely generate tens of billions of dollars for the state over several years. It also notes that state income tax revenues would likely decrease by hundreds of millions of dollars per year on an ongoing basis if the ultra-wealthy were to leave the state.
The latter is what San Jose Mayor Matt Mahan fears will happen if the idea comes to fruition.
“We will actually increasingly have to rely on middle-class and working families to fill that gap. That’s who will lose here. People who will benefit are the taxpayers of Texas and Arizona and Florida, who will now have more billionaires relocating to their state and sharing in the burden of paying for their public services and infrastructure,” Mahan said.
Mahan believes the concept would do more harm than good in the long-run for California.
“It’s an incredible risk. We are talking about putting at risk the driver of our economy, the job creation engine of California, for a one-time tax, to subsidize a system that is ripe with waste, fraud, and abuse,” he said. “Let’s get serious about tackling economic inequality by closing loopholes, not pushing capital out of state.”
He acknowledges there are bigger-picture solutions needed for addressing wealth inequality in the Bay Area, California, and the nation.
“Wealth inequality is a very real issue. It deserves serious solutions. I think there are a number of them out there that we ought to pursue. We make it far too easy for very wealthy individuals to avoid paying taxes on their accumulated assets. I’ve heard from folks who are quite wealthy who acknowledge that they can borrow against their assets and never pay taxes on them – they can pass them on, tax-free, to their heirs,” Mahan said. “There are very real ways that are pragmatic that we could, at a national level, close massive loopholes related to wealth accumulation that would level the playing field, generate additional public revenues, and really, create a more fair economy for everyone.”
From Kanani’s standpoint, this step is needed to help save California’s healthcare system, and it is not meant to be a silver bullet for solving wealth inequality.
“The life and the American Dream that California is known for is not going to exist if the healthcare collapse happens,” she said. “I would welcome anyone that has other ways to tackle this to suggest so.”
She’s hopeful the proposition will receive enough petition signatures and will be put to voters in November. It will need 874,641 signatures by June 24 to qualify for the November ballot, according to Ballotpedia.
[ad_2]
Max Darrow
Source link
[ad_1]
SAN FRANCISCO – Warriors coach Steve Kerr ripped the federal government for its response to the death of Minnesota woman Renee Nicole Good.
Immigration and Customs Enforcement personnel shot and killed Good while she was in her vehicle on Wednesday.
On Thursday night, the Minnesota Timberwolves held a moment of silence in honor of Good before tipoff against the Cavaliers.
“I’m glad that the Timberwolves recognized her life and the tragic nature of her death,” Kerr said during his pregame press conference on Friday. “It’s shameful, really, that in our country, we can have law enforcement officers who commit murder and seemingly get away with it.”
Good was shot in her SUV in a neighborhood south of downtown Minneapolis.
Video from multiple bystanders showed officers surrounding the vehicle and attempting to open the driver’s side door, and then an officer shooting Good as she began to drive forward.
Whether any officers were hit by the vehicle is open to interpretation.
The federal government, led by President Donald Trump, has taken the side of ICE and characterized Good’s shooting as self-defense.
“It’s shameful that the government can come out and lie about what happened when there’s video and witnesses who have all come out and disputed what the government is saying,” Kerr said. “So very demoralizing, devastating to lose anybody’s life, especially in that manner. Terribly sad for her family, and for her and that city, and I’m glad the Timberwolves came out and expressed that sadness.”
This is far from the first time the Warriors coach has commented on current events and social justice matters.
Kerr has consistently voiced political opinions during his 11-year career in charge of the Warriors, including an appearance as a speaker at the 2024 Democratic National Convention, and has already made headlines multiple times over the past year for sharing thoughts about hot-button issues.
In May, he wore a shirt in support of Harvard when the university was under pressure by the Trump administration.
During the preseason this past fall, Kerr attended a “No Kings” protest to voice his opposition to actions taken by the federal government.
In October, Kerr praised San Francisco mayor Daniel Lurie for helping the Bay Area avoid a “surge” of federal law enforcement into the region’s biggest city.
In November, Kerr spoke about the need for gun reform after legendary Oakland coach John Beam was murdered at Laney College and a high school student was shot at Skyline High in Oakland.
In December, Kerr again called for change after a mass shooting at Brown left several dead and more wounded.
“It’s human nature to just not want to deal with this stuff, and it’s human nature to just think this is so horrible, let’s not think about it,” Kerr told reporters in Portland. “We have to think about it.”
The Associated Press contributed to this report
[ad_2]
Joseph Dycus
Source link
[ad_1]
California is suing the Trump administration over its “baseless and cruel” decision to freeze $10 billion in federal funding for child care and family assistance allocated to California and four other Democratic-led states, Atty. Gen. Rob Bonta announced Thursday.
The lawsuit was filed jointly by the five states targeted by the freeze — California, New York, Minnesota, Illinois and Colorado — over the Trump administration’s allegations of widespread fraud within their welfare systems. California alone is facing a loss of about $5 billion in funding, including $1.4 billion for child-care programs.
The lawsuit alleges that the freeze is based on unfounded claims of fraud and infringes on Congress’ spending power as enshrined in the U.S. Constitution. The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
“This is just the latest example of Trump’s willingness to throw vulnerable children, vulnerable families and seniors under the bus if he thinks it will advance his vendetta against California and Democratic-led states,” Bonta said at a Thursday evening news conference.
The $10-billion funding freeze follows the administration’s decision to freeze $185 million in child-care funds to Minnesota, where federal officials allege that as much as half of the roughly $18 billion paid to 14 state-run programs since 2018 may have been fraudulent. Amid the fallout, Gov. Tim Walz has ordered a third-party audit and announced that he will not seek a third term.
Bonta said that letters sent by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services announcing the freeze Tuesday provided no evidence to back up claims of widespread fraud and misuse of taxpayer dollars in California. The freeze applies to the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families program, the Social Services Block Grant program and the Child Care and Development Fund.
“This is funding that California parents count on to get the safe and reliable child care they need so that they can go to work and provide for their families,” he said. “It’s funding that helps families on the brink of homelessness keep roofs over their heads.”
Bonta also raised concerns regarding Health and Human Services’ request that California turn over all documents associated with the state’s implementation of the three programs. This requires the state to share personally identifiable information about program participants, a move Bonta called “deeply concerning and also deeply questionable.”
“The administration doesn’t have the authority to override the established, lawful process our states have already gone through to submit plans and receive approval for these funds,” Bonta said. “It doesn’t have the authority to override the U.S. Constitution and trample Congress’ power of the purse.”
The lawsuit was filed in federal court in Manhattan and marked the 53rd suit California had filed against the Trump administration since the president’s inauguration last January. It asks the court to block the funding freeze and the administration’s sweeping demands for documents and data.
[ad_2]
Clara Harter
Source link
[ad_1]
West Sacramento’s mayor is the latest person to announce plans to campaign for one of California’s congressional districts in the 2026 midterm election since the passing of Proposition 50.The voter-approved measure aims to send more Democrats to Congress by redrawing five Republican-heavy districts to include more Democratic voters. While District 6 is not one of those five targeted districts, the current officeholder — Democrat Ami Bera — has since announced plans to run for District 3, which is targeted.As a result, several people have announced campaigns for District 6, which now includes Martha Guerrero running as a Democrat.“I am running for Congress because our communities deserve a representative who has been in the trenches for working families,” Guerrero said in a release. “They deserve someone laser-focused on lowering costs and protecting their rights.”Guerrero in the release also touted her achievements in serving West Sacramento, citing public safety, flood protection, supporting small business and job growth, government transparency and homelessness.The mayor is in her third term as West Sacramento mayor after serving in the city council.Other candidates for District 6 include former State Sen. Dr. Richard Pan, Sacramento County District Attorney Thien Ho and Republican Christine Bish.See more coverage of top California stories here | Download our app | Subscribe to our morning newsletter | Find us on YouTube here and subscribe to our channel
West Sacramento’s mayor is the latest person to announce plans to campaign for one of California’s congressional districts in the 2026 midterm election since the passing of Proposition 50.
The voter-approved measure aims to send more Democrats to Congress by redrawing five Republican-heavy districts to include more Democratic voters. While District 6 is not one of those five targeted districts, the current officeholder — Democrat Ami Bera — has since announced plans to run for District 3, which is targeted.
As a result, several people have announced campaigns for District 6, which now includes Martha Guerrero running as a Democrat.
“I am running for Congress because our communities deserve a representative who has been in the trenches for working families,” Guerrero said in a release. “They deserve someone laser-focused on lowering costs and protecting their rights.”
Guerrero in the release also touted her achievements in serving West Sacramento, citing public safety, flood protection, supporting small business and job growth, government transparency and homelessness.
The mayor is in her third term as West Sacramento mayor after serving in the city council.
Other candidates for District 6 include former State Sen. Dr. Richard Pan, Sacramento County District Attorney Thien Ho and Republican Christine Bish.
See more coverage of top California stories here | Download our app | Subscribe to our morning newsletter | Find us on YouTube here and subscribe to our channel
[ad_2]
[ad_1]
SAN FRANCISCO – Draymond Green did not have to look very far – in both a space or time sense – to recall the last time his mother was disappointed in the way he had acted during a game.
Holding his phone in his right hand during Wednesday’s press conference after a 120-113 Warriors win over the Milwaukee Bucks, Green read off, rapid-fire, a number of recent texts from his mother, Mary Babers.
“Remember what you love, and stop abusing it,” one text read, while another, written after a recent ejection, was simply: “What happened?”
Basketball is an emotional game, with its players and coaches sometimes prone to losing their cool. And if there was one thing to be learned from the press conference before and after Golden State’s victory, it was this:
Age and basketball accomplishments cannot diminish a man’s fear or respect for his mother.
A few days earlier, Steve Kerr, 60, had drawn the ire of official Brian Forte when the Warriors coach had to be restrained while directing a stream of profanities in his direction after the Warriors were on the wrong end of several controversial calls.
Kerr, who was ejected in the loss to the Clippers, was not worried about how the league or his players would react to his outburst. Instead, his biggest critic after the ejection was his mother, Ann Kerr, who lives in Southern California and made the short trip to Inglewood.
Ms. Kerr was not pleased with her son’s behavior.
“She looked horrified afterwards, and she asked me if I was going to hit the referee,” Kerr said. “I said, ‘Mom, I’ve never hit anybody in my life …. She said, ‘Why were all of those men holding you back?’ Well, that’s all part of the theatrics.”
Theatrics got superstar Steph Curry in trouble with his mother, Sonya, during a 2018 playoff series with Houston.
“I did the ‘This is my (expletive) house,’ and right into the camera, too,” Curry said, sheepishly adding. “No plausible deniability.”
Even the opposing team got in on the action. Bucks coach Doc Rivers, an accomplished point guard back in the 1980s and 1990s, once disappointed his mother by using foul language in the heat of the action.
“Oh yeah, my mom, she is a churchgoing lady, and I wasn’t using the right language one game, she called and let me have it,” Rivers said. “It’s interesting ’cause you say ‘I’m sorry,’ but you do know the next day you’re gonna do it again. It’s a tough one.”
[ad_2]
Joseph Dycus
Source link
[ad_1]
After several years of providing legislators with a pre-recorded video link for his annual State of the State address, Gov. Gavin Newsom will deliver his final address live and in-person inside the California State Capitol on Thursday.
The governor’s State of the State has been required in writing since California became a state in 1850. All those years of speeches are housed in one place, across the street from the Capitol, in the State Library and court building.
The very first State of the State address in 1850 shows the status of California’s statehood then, written by Gov. Peter Burnett, with the first sentence reading: “Gentlemen of the Senate and Assembly, the circumstances under which you have assembled are most new interesting and extraordinary.”
Alex Vassar, spokesperson for the California State Library, said that 176 years later, the annual address offers a snapshot of California’s triumphs and tragedies and everyday troubles.
“The requirement has always been that it’s important for the governor as the first person who oversees the operation of the state, the head of the executive branch, that he notified the legislature of what his concerns are, how things are running,” Vassar said.
Newsom seemed to be carrying on the traditional speech when he took office in 2019. However, since the COVID-19 pandemic, he has not delivered his State of the State speech in the Capitol building. Instead, he delivered his 2021 remarks from an empty Dodger Stadium and resorted to pre-recorded video in the final week of the legislative session in 2025.
State Senator Tony Strickland (R-Huntington Beach) said he is looking for the governor to address the state’s $18 billion budget deficit, unemployment, and affordability problems.
“We’ve got serious problems in California. We need serious leadership,” Strickland said. “His record is abysmal in California.”
Assemblymember Alex Lee (D-Milpitas) is calling for a crackdown on tax breaks.
“I’m looking for the governor, hopefully, closing tax loopholes on corporations and billionaires,” Lee said. “And I hope he paints a strong picture that yes, we have problems, but here’s how we get to the next stage of California.”
Gov. Earl Warren began delivering the State of the State in the form of a speech to the legislature in the 1960s.
Now, in his final year in office, Newsom is expected to return to that tradition.
Newsom will deliver his final State of the State address inside the California State Capitol on Thursday.
The address is expected to begin at 10:30 a.m. PT and will stream live on CBS News Sacramento.
[ad_2]
Steve Large
Source link
[ad_1]
It isn’t just billionaires leaving California.
Anecdotal data suggest there is also an exodus of regular people who load their belongings into rental trucks and lug them to another state.
U-Haul’s survey of the more than 2.5 million one-way trips using its vehicles in the U.S. last year showed that the gap between the number of people leaving and the number arriving was higher in California than in any other state.
While the Golden State also attracts a large number of newcomers, it has had the biggest net outflow for six years in a row.
Generally, the defectors don’t go far. The top five destinations for the diaspora using U-Haul’s trucks, trailers and boxes last year were Arizona, Nevada, Oregon, Washington and Texas.
California experienced a net outflow of U-Haul users with an in-migration of 49.4%, and those leaving of 50.6%. Massachusetts, New York, New Jersey and Illinois also rank among the bottom five on the index.
U-Haul didn’t speculate on the reasons California continues to top the ranking.
“We continue to find that life circumstances — marriage, children, a death in the family, college, jobs and other events — dictate the need for most moves,” John Taylor, U-Haul International president, said in a press statement.
While California’s exodus was greater than any other state, the silver lining was that the state lost fewer residents to out-of-state migration in 2025 than in 2024.
U-Haul said that broadly the hotly debated issue of blue-to-red state migration, which became more pronounced after the pandemic of 2020, continues to be a discernible trend.
Though U-Haul did not specify the reasons for the exodus, California demographers tracking the trend point to the cost of living and housing affordability as the top reasons for leaving.
“Over the last dozen years or so, on a net basis, the flow out of the state because of housing [affordability] far exceeds other reasons people cite [including] jobs or family,” said Hans Johnson, senior fellow at the Public Policy Institute of California.
“This net out migration from California is a more than two-decade-long trend. And again, we’re a big state, so the net out numbers are big,” he said.
U-Haul data showed that there was a pretty even split between arrivals and departures. While the company declined to share absolute numbers, it said that 50.6% of its one-way customers in California were leaving, while 49.4% were arriving.
U-Haul’s network of 24,000 rental locations across the U.S. provides a near-real-time view of domestic migration dynamics, while official data on population movements often lags.
California’s population grew by a marginal 0.05% in the year ending July 2025, reaching 39.5 million people, according to the California Department of Finance.
After two consecutive years of population decline following the 2020 pandemic, California recorded its third year of population growth in 2025. While international migration has rebounded, the number of California residents moving out increased to 216,000, consistent with levels in 2018 and 2019.
Eric McGhee, senior fellow at the Public Policy Institute of California, who researches the challenges facing California, said there’s growing evidence of political leanings shaping the state’s migration patterns, with those moving out of state more likely to be Republican and those moving in likely to be Democratic.
“Partisanship probably is not the most significant of these considerations, but it may be just the last straw that broke the camel’s back, on top of the other things that are more traditional drivers of migration … cost of living and family and friends and jobs,” McGhee said.
Living in California costs 12.6% more than the national average, according to the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis. One of the biggest pain points in the state is housing, which is 57.8% more expensive than what the average American pays.
The U-Haul study across all 50 states found that 7 of the top 10 growth states where people moved to have Republican governors. Nine of the states with the biggest net outflows had Democrat governors.
Texas, Florida and North Carolina were the top three growth states for U-Haul customers, with Dallas, Houston and Austin bagging the top spots for growth in metro regions.
A notable exception in California was San Diego and San Francisco, which were the only California cities in the top 25 metros with a net inflow of one-way U-Haul customers.
[ad_2]
Nilesh Christopher
Source link
[ad_1]
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
Spencer Pratt announced on the one-year anniversary of the start of the Palisades Fire that he plans to run for mayor of Los Angeles.
Pratt, whose home burned down during the fires last year, made the announcement during a “They Let Us Burn!” protest in the Pacific Palisades near the remains of his home Wednesday.
“On Jan. 7, 2025, [his wife] Heidi [Montag] and I lost our home. We lost every material possession we own. My parents lost their home too and, with it, decades of memories lost inside those walls,” Pratt emotionally told the crowd on Wednesday, calling it the “worst day of my life.”
The 42-year-old noted he grew up in the Palisades, “thinking that my two boys would grow up here just like I did with that same hometown feeling. Then, right before my eyes, that future that I envisioned burned to the ground.”
LA MAYOR BASS POINTS FINGERS WHEN GRILLED ON AFRICA TRIP AMID BOTCHED WILDFIRE RESPONSE
Spencer Pratt announced on the one-year anniversary of the start of the Palisades Fire that he plans to run for mayor of Los Angeles. (Spencer Pratt/Instagram; MEGA/GC Images)
Pratt, a frequent critic of Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass and Gov. Gavin Newsom, said the most “heartbreaking” part of the last year was the “realization that all of this was preventable.”
The former “The Hills” reality star accused the state of letting “brush grow wild” in Topanga State Park for 50 years without wildfire maintenance and creating a “hostile” insurance environment that prompted carriers to drop them before the fires.

Spencer Pratt announces he’s running for mayor of Los Angeles on Wednesday, Jan. 7, 2026, on the first anniversary of the Palisades Fire. (Backgrid)
“I have realized that the city I love is being managed into the ground by people who don’t have the courage to actually lead,” he said. “Business as usual is a death sentence for Los Angeles, and I’m done waiting for someone to take real action. That’s why I am running for mayor. And let me be clear, this just isn’t a campaign. This is a mission.”
LA MAYOR BASS CONCEDES AFRICA TRIP WAS ‘ABSOLUTELY’ A MISTAKE AMID BOTCHED WILDFIRE RESPONSE
After making his announcement, Pratt posted a photo of himself with his signed paperwork to run for mayor, writing, “Yes, it’s official. Papers are filed and campaign is open: mayorpratt.com.”
Since losing his home, Pratt has been vocal on social media, accusing city and state leaders of mismanagement, corruption and “criminal negligence” in their response to the fires.
CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR THE ENTERTAINMENT NEWSLETTER

Former reality television star Spencer Pratt, who lost his home in the Palisades fire, has been an outspoken critic of California leaders over their management of the wildfire recovery efforts. (MEGA/GC Images)
In January 2025, Pratt and Montag sued the city of Los Angeles and the Department of Water and Power over the destruction of their home.
The “Hills” alums filed the suit Jan. 21, 2025, along with 20 other property owners, blaming the city and the utility company for the damage.
LIKE WHAT YOU’RE READING? CLICK HERE FOR MORE ENTERTAINMENT NEWS

Spencer Pratt and Heidi Montag at a “They Let Us Burn!” rally in the Pacific Palisades on Jan. 7, 2026. (Backgrid)
Republicans have also launched a congressional investigation into the fire response.
“When people are like, ‘How do you feel about Republican senators opening a congressional investigation into the Palisades?’ I’m just happy anyone is investigating why the people who paid almost $700,000,000 in taxes, to these people who are employees, aren’t being questioned in front of every judge, jury, investigator, cop, sheriff, detective,” Pratt said last year.

Spencer Pratt surveying his property after his home was destroyed. (Spencer Pratt Instagram)
He was also joined in the Palisades by U.S. Small Business Administration Administrator Kelly Loeffler, who toured the damage amid delayed rebuild permits.
Fox News Digital has reached out to Pratt, Newsom and Bass for comment.
“It’s no shock that in advance of his imminent book release, a reality TV ‘villain’ who once staged a fake divorce to boost ratings and spent the last summer spewing post-fire misinformation and disinformation to pump up his social media following, would now announce he’s running for Mayor,” Douglas Herman, Bass’ campaign strategist, told Fox News Digital.
A spokesperson from Newsom’s office told Fox News Digital in part, “Topanga State Park is within LA city limits. By law, the fire response is the responsibility of the Los Angeles City Fire Department (LAFD), not the state. Parks is not a firefighting agency and does not direct fire response.”
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
The governor’s office said, “With respect to the origin of the fire, the U.S. Department of Justice has determined that it was intentionally set by an out-of-state arsonist who was arrested in Florida. The governor expects the suspect to be held fully accountable under the law.
“Gov. Newsom has been focused on stabilizing and modernizing California’s home insurance market, especially as climate change drives more severe wildfire risk.”
The spokesperson added that California insurance rates “remain below the national average and significantly less than some other states.”
[ad_2]
[ad_1]
The 2025-2030 U.S. Dietary Guidelines for Americans, which updates recommendations for a healthy diet, was released by Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins on Wednesday.
The document is above; a full Associated Press report examines the changes and includes reaction from experts.
Among the changes from the previous version, issued in 2020:
“Highly processed foods”: It urges avoiding “packaged, prepared, ready-to-eat or other foods that are salty or sweet, such as chips, cookies and candy.”
Saturated fats: Butter and beef tallow are included as recommended whole-food sources of saturated fats.
Protein: The previous recommendations called for 0.8 grams of protein per kilogram of body weight (0.36 grams per pound of body weight) — about 54 grams daily for a 150-pound person. The new recommendation is 1.2 to 1.6 grams of protein per kilogram of body weight. An average American man consumes about 100 grams of protein per day.
Added sugar: Previous guidelines recommended limiting added sugars to 10% of daily calories, but to aim for less. That’s about 12 teaspoons a day in a 2,000-calorie daily diet. The new document says no one meal should contain more than 10 grams of added sugars, or about 2 teaspoons.
Alcohol: The new guidelines roll back previous recommendations to limit alcohol to 1 drink or less per day for women and 2 drinks or less per day for men. Instead, the recommendation is to “consume less alcohol for better health.”
[ad_2]
Bay Area News Group
Source link
[ad_1]
Valero on Tuesday said it will continue to provide the Bay Area with gasoline even after it completely idles its Benicia Refinery later this year.
It will begin to idle its processing units in February as part of a phased approach and expects to have most of its refining processing units idled by April 2026.
Valero is Benicia’s largest employer as well as the city’s single largest source of tax revenue, and in its announcement, the company said it is preparing to submit a Worker Readjustment and Retraining Notification, as required by law. WARNS are required when a company with 75 or more employees lays off 50 or more employees in a 30-day period.
As for the impact on Bay Area drivers, Valero announced the company will import fuel into the region and use existing inventory to keep drivers supplied.
“Valero remains committed to fulfilling its contractual supply obligations in the California market and anticipates importing additional gasoline volumes to the Bay Area in the near term,” the company said.
Gov. Gavin Newsom’s office touted the plan as one that will “help maintain steady supply and stable prices as discussions continue on a path forward for the refinery.”
“We’re in ongoing discussions with Valero to evaluate options for continued operations at the Benicia refinery and I appreciate the company planning responsibly, including planning for imports of refined products to supply the market in the meantime,” Newsom said.
How long Valero will import fuel into the region was not stated, and California and the California Energy Commission are still working on the refinery’s future.
“We want to express our appreciation to Valero for continuing to work with us collaboratively to evaluate options for the Valero Benicia refinery and for maintaining fuel supply to Northern California,” said Siva Gunda, CEC Vice Chair.
Ashwini Rao has lived in Benicia for about a year. During that time, the future of the refinery has been a big question. Now that they know the answers, they say a lot of people will feel the impact, good and bad.
“It does affect people, the local jobs, so definitely it’s a loss for people here,” said Rao. “But I do see a lot of pollution here happening, so that’s kind of better.”
Severin Borenstein is a professor at UC Berkeley and the faculty director of their energy institute. He said he saw the move coming.
“The demand for Californian gasoline is declining, and refineries have been talking for a long time about their financial viability as California uses less and less gasoline,” Borenstein said.
[ad_2]
Jose Fabian
Source link