ReportWire

Tag: California politics

  • Governor’s race: Sparks fly as San Jose mayor fends off rivals from left and right in first debate

    The first major televised debate among leading candidates for California governor Tuesday saw the race’s newest entrant — San Jose Mayor Matt Mahan — draw fire from both ends of the political spectrum.

    For most of the two-hour debate aired on KTVU in the Bay Area and KTTV in Los Angeles featuring a half dozen Democrats and one Republican, the candidates stuck to their campaign talking points with little acknowledgement of their rivals. Mahan was singled out by name by two of his rivals on the stage.

    But afterward, Melissa Michelson, a political science professor at Menlo College, told TV interviewers she felt “Matt Mahan did very well in the debate.”

    Steve Hilton, the Republican in the debate, said he was amazed that Mahan, who has often criticized current Gov. Gavin Newsom, gave him credit in recent remarks for his effort in dealing with homelessness.

    The mayor noted in response that Hilton had visited him in San Jose last month “to see what’s working” and said, “I don’t know what changed in the last week, but it seems (to be) the fact that I jumped into this race. Frankly, that’s exactly what’s wrong with our politics.”

    The mayor also fended off criticism from billionaire entrepreneur and Democratic environmental activist Tom Steyer who has been vocal about other billionaires and corporations needing to pay their fair share in taxes. Mahan, who comes from the tech sector, has been critical about a proposed tax on the state’s billionaires that he says would drive high-paying jobs out of California.

    “Right now the big tech CEOs are terrified about the idea of paying their fair share. Right now they’re supporting Matt, that’s where they are,” Steyer said. “Who have I got? I’ve got the nurses, I’ve got the bus drivers, I’ve got the cafeteria workers, I’ve got the custodians.”

    Mahan responded that he supports closing tax loopholes on the wealthy but that the proposed wealth tax would hurt the state and said “our politics has been oversimplified” by “populists on both sides and you deserve real answers not easy answers.”

    Some of the biggest names in the race weren’t on the debate stage: Republican Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco, Democratic former Rep. Katie Porter, and Democratic Rep. Eric Swalwell. Organizers said all three cited schedule conflicts. Swalwell’s campaign said he chose to stay in Washington, D.C. to vote against Immigration and Customs Enforcement funding.

    Hilton called Bianco a “RINO” — it stands for “Republican In Name Only” — and criticized him for not showing up to the debate “to face these Democrats or his record.”

    “Chad Bianco has more baggage than LAX,” Hilton said.

    Experts interviewed afterward by the moderators differed on how much the candidates who didn’t participate would be hurt by it. Jasmyne Cannick, a Democratic Party delegate in Los Angeles, said it would have some impact. Michelson however noted that those candidates all are leading in polls and could afford to skip.

    Democrats are heavily favored in California where they outnumber Republicans 2 to 1 in voter registration. But some of the six Democrats on stage struggled to separate themselves from the pack as they denounced the Trump administration and pledged to make California more affordable.

    “The assignment for all of them was to distinguish themselves,” Michelson said after the debate. “At the end they were trying to answer that question…and many of them talked about being ready to go on day one, this is no place for job training, you’ve got to be a fighter, but if you all say the same thing, you’re not distinguishing yourselves.”

    Other Democrats in the debate were former health secretary and Attorney General Xavier Becerra, former state Controller Betty Yee and former Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa.

    Michelson said that Mahan, who jumped into the race less than a week ago, had the most “unique vision” among Democrats, presenting a message that appeared to resonate with viewers.

    “He absolutely has a shot,” Michelson said of the mayor who will need to build his name recognition in a state where half of all voters live hundreds of miles from the city he leads.

    The debate came as the candidates reported their latest campaign fundraising hauls. Steyer, who spent $27 million in the race last year, aired several ads leading up to and during the televised debate.

    The debate remained civil throughout with little mud-slinging in a race that has seen few attack ads. Yee closed by calling herself “the adult in the room.” Villaraigosa said he’s “a proven problem solver.” Thurmond talked about his struggles with poverty in his youth. Becerra talked about his experience as attorney general taking on the Trump administration and saying the governor’s office is a “place where you have to fight.”

    Grace Hase

    Source link

  • California Republicans oppose mileage-based fee proposal

    INTERVIEW WITH MEHAN RIGHT NOW@KCRA.COM. AND THE KCRA 3 APP. REPUBLICAN LAWMAKERS AT THE STATE CAPITOL WANT TO PUT THE BRAKES ON EFFORTS TO REPLACE CALIFORNIA’S GAS TAX WITH A MILEAGE BASED FEE SYSTEM. AB 1421 PROPOSES TO EXTEND THE ROAD USAGE CHARGE TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE UNTIL JANUARY OF 2035. NOW, THE MAIN GOAL OF THAT COMMITTEE IS TO REPLACE THE CURRENT GAS TAX SYSTEM WITH A PER MILE USAGE FEE. YOU DRIVE MORE, YOU PAY MORE. THAT ROAD CHARGE WOULD THEN PAY FOR TRANSPORTATION, INFRASTRUCTURE AND REPAIRS. AS VEHICLES BECOME MORE FUEL EFFICIENT AND MORE EVS HIT THE ROAD, LESS GAS IS SOLD AND REVENUE DROPS. LAWMAKERS ARE LOOKING FOR WAYS TO PROTECT TRANSPORTATION FUNDING AS THEY SEE IT. WELL, TODAY, ASSEMBLY MEMBER FROM THE REPUBLICANS HEATH FLORA, RELEASED A STATEMENT SAYING, QUOTE, WE ALREADY PAY THE HIGHEST GAS TAXES IN THE NATION. NOW, SACRAMENTO IS TALKING ABOUT ADDING A NEW TAX FOR EVERY MILE PEOPLE DRIVE. PILING ON ANOTHER TAX RIGHT NOW SHOWS JUS

    Republican lawmakers at the California State Capitol are opposing a study weighing whether to replace the state’s gas tax with a mileage-based fee system, as proposed in Assembly Bill 1421.The bill aims to extend the “Road Usage Charge Technical Advisory Committee” until January 2035, with the goal of replacing the current gas tax system with a per-mile usage fee to fund transportation infrastructure and repairs. As vehicles become more fuel-efficient and more electric cars hit the road, less gas is sold, leading to a drop in revenue, prompting lawmakers to seek ways to protect transportation funding.”We already pay the highest gas taxes in the nation,” Assembly Republican Leader Heath Flora said in a statement. “Now Sacramento is talking about adding a new tax for every mile people drive. Piling on another tax right now shows just how out of touch politicians in Sacramento are with the reality working families face.” The study is due on Jan. 1, 2027. See more coverage of top California stories here | Download our app | Subscribe to our morning newsletter | Find us on YouTube here and subscribe to our channel

    Republican lawmakers at the California State Capitol are opposing a study weighing whether to replace the state’s gas tax with a mileage-based fee system, as proposed in Assembly Bill 1421.

    The bill aims to extend the “Road Usage Charge Technical Advisory Committee” until January 2035, with the goal of replacing the current gas tax system with a per-mile usage fee to fund transportation infrastructure and repairs.

    As vehicles become more fuel-efficient and more electric cars hit the road, less gas is sold, leading to a drop in revenue, prompting lawmakers to seek ways to protect transportation funding.

    “We already pay the highest gas taxes in the nation,” Assembly Republican Leader Heath Flora said in a statement. “Now Sacramento is talking about adding a new tax for every mile people drive. Piling on another tax right now shows just how out of touch politicians in Sacramento are with the reality working families face.”

    The study is due on Jan. 1, 2027.

    See more coverage of top California stories here | Download our app | Subscribe to our morning newsletter | Find us on YouTube here and subscribe to our channel


    Source link

  • ‘California can do better’: San Jose Mayor Matt Mahan enters crowded race for governor

    San Jose Mayor Matt Mahan announced Thursday that he is running for governor of California, jumping into an already crowded race less than six months before the June primary.

    The 43-year-old Democrat said he decided to run after growing frustrated with what he described as “business as usual” in Sacramento and a field of candidates he said has failed to offer a bold, solutions-driven vision for the state.

    “I know that California can do better,” Mahan said in an interview. “We’ve proven in San Jose that when we focus on the most important things and hold ourselves accountable for delivering results, we can really make progress for our residents. That’s the spirit we need in Sacramento.”

    Mahan’s announcement comes less than three weeks after he publicly signaled interest in joining the race, which remains wide open with no clear front-runner. He becomes the ninth Democrat to enter a contest that has already drawn a crowded and fractured field.

    Over the last two months, Mahan has hosted six of the candidates in San Jose, taking them on tours of the city’s interim housing communities as he looked for a candidate willing to prioritize faster, more pragmatic responses to homelessness. After those meetings, he said, he concluded that none were offering the approach he was seeking.

    Grace Hase

    Source link

  • Bay Area county committee passes ICE response plan for future enforcement operations, bans agency from county property

    Saying they were spurred by the shooting of Renee Good by an Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent in Minneapolis, an Alameda County Board of Supervisors committee has passed two proposals to establish a Bay Area regional response in the event that federal immigration agents launch a new operation locally.

    “We have to move very quickly,” Alameda County District 5 Supervisor Nikki Fortunato Bas told Bay Area News Group before the Board of Supervisors meeting on Thursday before the Together For All Committee vote. “Since the Minneapolis killing – more than ever – it is incredibly dangerous for people to enter the immigration system.”

    During a surge of immigration enforcement in Minneapolis, ICE agent Jonathan Ross shot Minneapolis resident Renee Good in the head while she was driving away. Good, a 37-year-old mother of three, was posthumously labeled as a “domestic terrorist” by Vice President JD Vance and Department of Homeland Security Sec. Kristi Noem, whose defense of Ross’ actions ignited furor among Minnesota residents who have taken to the streets in protest.

    The incident evoked memories of last October when Border Patrol agents launched an operation in the Bay Area that led to a protest at the entrance to Coast Guard Island. During the standoff, a U-Haul truck driven by Bella Thompson reversed and accelerated toward officers. Thompson was shot by federal officers before she could strike them and was charged with one count of assault of a federal officer. She was released on bail in November and remanded to her parents in Southern California while attending a mental health program pending trial.

    In the lead-up to the October incident, Bas said she had drafted a proposal to strengthen the county’s response to immigration enforcement operations. The first of these proposals calls for a coordinated regional response to federal immigration raids, following the example set by Santa Clara County, with public outreach plans and staff trainings on how to protect residents accessing the county’s social services, courts and health care facilities.

    Chase Hunter

    Source link

  • California’s moving van outflow slowed in 2025

     

    California van moves, average shares of 3 companies. (Graphic by Flourish) 

    One yardstick of California’s popularity as a place to live made a slight improvement last year.

    My trusty spreadsheet has collected annual migration data dating back to 2004 from three major moving van providers — Allied, Atlas and United. While having someone else move your stuff by van is usually an option for upper-crust Americans changing home states, this metric is worth following because it tends to parallel California’s competition for residents with other states.

    Jonathan Lansner

    Source link

  • Share the Spirit: Las Trampas helps those with developmental disabilities advocate for themselves

    LAFAYETTE — The campus at Las Trampas bustled as it usually does on the typical weekday, with dozens of intellectually and developmentally disabled individuals engaging with programs designed to stimulate and assist their independent living.

    This day, though, was busier than most.

    State Sen. Tim Grayson (D-CA9) would be visiting them, touring the grounds and meeting with some of the members, who Las Trampas empowers to advocate for themselves.

    The nonprofit, founded in 1938, currently serves 86 individuals ranging from 22 to 72 years old who live with moderate to profound cases of Down syndrome, cerebral palsy and autism. It has the capacity to help up to 120 people, but because of staffing shortages, a waiting list runs more than 50 deep with an average admittance time of two to three years.

    Recently, an even more dire issue has arisen: Around 35-45% of Las Trampas members are recipients of Medicaid, and through a waiver program, those funds amount to $3.5 million of the organization’s $10 million annual budget. That funding could be lost as the federal government implements its “One Big Beautiful Bill,” as it’s called by supporters, and makes planned cuts of nearly $1 trillion from Medicaid nationwide.

    Las Trampas lead direct service provider, Lindsay Brown, and participant Danny Robinson make cookies during the California Senator Tim Grayson's visit to Las Trampas in Lafayette, Calif., on Tuesday, Oct. 16, 2025. Las Trampas is a nonprofit organization that supports adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) through day programs, residential services, and supported living. (Ray Chavez/Bay Area News Group)
    Las Trampas lead direct service provider, Lindsay Brown, and participant Danny Robinson make cookies during the California Senator Tim Grayson’s visit to Las Trampas in Lafayette, Calif., on Tuesday, Oct. 16, 2025. Las Trampas is a nonprofit organization that supports adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) through day programs, residential services, and supported living. (Ray Chavez/Bay Area News Group) 

    “To get the senator here to see the critical work that we do on a regular basis is very important,” said Daniel Hogue, who has run the organization for the past 14 years. “It gives them a personal perspective of what their investments are and that removing any of those investments could really be damaging for people like Ariel, who’s now been living on her own for a very long time.”

    One of three self-advocates who helped prepare for and sat in on the meeting, 40-year-old Ariel Bellet lived with her parents until 2018, when she enrolled with Las Trampas. At first, she said she felt “nervous,” but now? “I love it.”

    A proud paycheck earner and owner of a 9-year-old Maltese Chihuahua, Ariel benefits from Las Trampas’ supportive living services, which allow her to live on her own in the community.

    “All of that could get taken away very quickly if things come to pass,” Hogue said.

    That was the topic at hand during an hour-long meeting with the state senator, who Hogue said has been a “very proactive” ally in Sacramento. Grayson lends not only a sympathetic ear but an empathetic one. His older sister, Shari, lives with an intellectual disability, “and I want to make sure those benefits don’t go away,” he said. “I want to make sure that Shari can age with dignity and be her own person and be very well accepted in the community she lives in.”

    California Senator Tim Grayson, second from right, greets Las Trampas participants during a visit at Las Trampas in Lafayette, Calif., on Tuesday, Oct. 16, 2025. Las Trampas is a nonprofit organization that supports adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) through day programs, residential services, and supported living. (Ray Chavez/Bay Area News Group)
    California Senator Tim Grayson, second from right, greets Las Trampas participants during a visit at Las Trampas in Lafayette, Calif., on Tuesday, Oct. 16, 2025. Las Trampas is a nonprofit organization that supports adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) through day programs, residential services, and supported living. (Ray Chavez/Bay Area News Group) 

    And that, in turn, is the mission of Las Trampas.

    Grayson was able to witness it firsthand, making stops in classrooms where program participants showed off their artwork, took a break from learning about indigenous music and prepared snacks in the recently renovated kitchen, where all the counters are at wheelchair height. At other times, there are life skills classes and outings into the community.

    Arie and Tevin Whack, who also participated in the meeting and helped guide the tour, are part of Las Trampas’ Vocational and Occupational Advocacy class. On other days, they can be found marching with signs on Mt. Diablo Boulevard, or even advocating for disability rights and inclusion in meetings with legislative aides at the Capitol.

    Las Trampas participant Tevin Whack cleans the windows at Las Trampas in Lafayette, Calif., on Tuesday, Oct. 16, 2025. Las Trampas is a nonprofit organization that supports adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) through day programs, residential services, and supported living. (Ray Chavez/Bay Area News Group)
    Las Trampas participant Tevin Whack cleans the windows at Las Trampas in Lafayette, Calif., on Tuesday, Oct. 16, 2025. Las Trampas is a nonprofit organization that supports adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) through day programs, residential services, and supported living. (Ray Chavez/Bay Area News Group) 

    Evan Webeck

    Source link

  • Exclusive: Gov. Gavin Newsom reacts to ex-aide’s arrest — ‘real surprise and shock’

    California Gov. Gavin Newsom, right, is seen with his then-chief of staff Dana Williamson in an undated photo released by the Governor’s Office. Williamson served as Newsom’s top aide during key moments of his first term, including the COVID-19 pandemic and the 2021 recall election.

    California Gov. Gavin Newsom, right, is seen with his then-chief of staff Dana Williamson in an undated photo released by the Governor’s Office. Williamson served as Newsom’s top aide during key moments of his first term, including the COVID-19 pandemic and the 2021 recall election.

    Governor’s Office via Politico

    The recent arrest of Capitol powerbroker Dana Williamson took Gov. Gavin Newsom completely by surprise, he said Wednesday in his first remarks since the U.S. Attorney’s Office indicted his former chief of staff on 23 counts of conspiracy to commit bank and wire fraud, lying to the FBI, falsifying tax returns and obstruction.

    FBI agents arrested Williamson, who served as Newsom’s chief of staff from December 2022 to November 2024, last Wednesday at her Carmichael home. Prosecutors accused her, lobbyist Greg Campbell and former Deputy State Attorney General Sean McCluskie of orchestrating a scheme to pad McCluskie’s salary by stealing $225,000 from dormant campaign accounts belonging to former Attorney General Xavier Becerra, who is now running for governor in 2026.

    In an exclusive interview with The Sacramento Bee, Newsom said his first reaction was “real surprise and shock,” as well as concern for Williamson’s four children when he learned about her arrest while in Brazil at a United Nations climate summit. Prosecutors also charged Williamson with claiming $1 million worth of private jet travel, furniture and luxury clothing as business deductions, in addition to the 18 bank and wire fraud counts. She pleaded not guilty, was released on bond and is awaiting a court appearance next month.

    Newsom said the office was first made aware of the FBI investigation a year ago, after agents first approached Williamson. His office then placed her on leave and she left the following month, in December 2024.

    “As soon as we found out about it (the FBI investigation), my legal folks came over and we moved to place her on leave,” the governor said. “My hope was, over the course (of) last year, that whatever this was, I wasn’t privy to the details, it would be worked out.”

    A spokesperson for the governor previously told The Bee that the office had also been informed that Williamson was working to resolve a civil matter related to a Paycheck Protection Program loan for her political consulting firm.

    Since Williamson’s arrest, lobbyists, consultants and current and former members of Newsom’s administration have received letters from the FBI informing them that their phones were intercepted as part of its investigation.

    Newsom said he did not receive any such letter, nor has the FBI interviewed him as part of its ongoing investigation. He said he does not believe he is the intended target of the FBI probe, as Williamson’s lawyer has alleged.

    “I don’t know anything about that..and whatever that assertion is,” he said. “That was certainly not reflected in the indictment itself. There’s nothing specific in that respect, or at least connects me.”

    Newsom’s office insinuated last week that the investigation may be political, as the DOJ has targeted Democratic politicians and opponents of Trump in recent months, including New York Attorney General Leticia James and former FBI Director James Comey.

    “There’s not an objective observer of this (federal) administration that can’t be concerned about that,” Newsom told The Bee. “I mean, just look at their actions on a consistent basis. Look at, you know, their actions over the course the last few months. So, I mean, I think that that’s the table stakes as it relates to the moment we’re living in.”

    The FBI investigation into Williamson appears to also be linked to a previous state sexual harassment lawsuit against gaming company Activision Blizzard, which Williamson, Campbell and lobbyist Alexis Podesta, an unindicted co-conspirator, all represented at one time. The Department of Fair Employment and Housing, now known as the Civil Rights Department, sued Activision Blizzard in 2021 for fomenting a “frat boy” culture that allowed unfettered sexual harassment and discrimination against female employees.

    Two state attorneys on the case were fired and resigned in protest in spring 2022, accusing the Governor’s Office of “interfering” in the case. Prosecutors said Williamson passed on information about the case to Podesta in January 2023 while she was chief of staff and the case was ongoing, claiming she could get another attorney on the case fired.

    “To the extent that there’s some allegations around her (Williamson’s) relationship with Activision, from my vantage point, from the vantage point of everyone around me, I’m not aware of anything,” Newsom said. “So that would, that would be of concern in that respect. But, look, no one’s naive about the moment we’re living in. And, as I say, this was really surprising to me in the first place.”

    Activision Blizzard, which is now part of Microsoft, eventually agreed to pay $54 million in a December 2023 settlement, but did not admit wrongdoing. Casey Wasserman, a member of its board of directors at the time, donated $100,000 to Newsom’s recall defense campaign in 2021.

    Newsom said Wasserman, whom he tapped in January to lead the philanthropic effort overseeing wildfire recovery in Los Angeles County, is a longtime friend of 30 years, from before he first entered politics in San Francisco in 1995. Wasserman, a sports executive, is also chair of the nonprofit LA28, which is overseeing the 2028 Olympics in Los Angeles. His company also employs sports agent Doug Hendrickson, Newsom’s longtime friend and co-host of the “Politickin’” podcast.

    Newsom pointed out that Bobby Kotick, Activision Blizzard’s chief executive, donated to efforts opposing Proposition 50, the governor’s successful bid to redistrict congressional districts: “He’s hardly been shy as an advocate for causes we’re not necessarily aligned with.”

    Wasserman, who is no longer on the Activision Blizzard board, did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

    Newsom, who has said he’s considering a presidential run after he’s termed out of office next year, has not taken a position in the governor’s race, which may now be shaken up by the scandal surrounding Becerra’s former aide. Newsom suggested Wednesday he would not issue any endorsements.

    “I try to avoid that topic, just on the basis of its uncomfortable … when you have a sell-by date,” Newsom said. “I used to be frustrated with Jerry Brown when he wasn’t returning my calls at this stage. Now, I’m deeply empathetic to Jerry, and actually want to apologize to him for being a pest … I think it’s more interesting who’s not running, you know, with Kamala (Harris) and (Alex) Padilla, than who is (running).”

    Before joining Newsom’s administration, Williamson was known as a sharp-elbowed political operative who brokered some of the governor’s most ambitious legislative deals. She is accused of helping McCluskie, a longtime Becerra aide, funnel money from Becerra’s accounts by disguising them as payments to his wife for a no-show job with Williamson’s consulting firm.

    McGregor Scott, Williamson’s attorney, last week accused the FBI of arresting his client as retaliation for not cooperating with an investigation into Newsom. Williamson initially retained Scott two years ago for help with a “discrete matter,” he said.

    Scott, the former U.S. Attorney in Sacramento, said federal prosecutors ignored his requests to meet and allow his client to voluntarily surrender herself. Instead, FBI agents stormed her home and temporarily handcuffed one of her adult children during her arrest last week.

    “We appreciate the governor’s concern for my client’s children,” Scott said Wednesday.

    This story was originally published November 19, 2025 at 8:57 PM.

    Related Stories from Miami Herald

    Lia Russell

    The Sacramento Bee

    Lia Russell covers California’s governor for The Sacramento Bee’s Capitol Bureau. Originally from San Francisco, Lia previously worked for The Baltimore Sun and the Bangor Daily News in Maine.

    Lia Russell

    Source link

  • AG Rob Bonta spent nearly $500K on lawyers while trying to be ‘helpful’ amid East Bay corruption probe, adviser says

    SACRAMENTO — California Attorney General Rob Bonta spent $468,000 of his campaign cash on lawyers while reportedly being interviewed by federal authorities investigating Oakland’s former mayor and others in a sprawling federal bribery and corruption inquiry.

    The longtime East Bay politician’s senior adviser, Dan Newman, told this news organization Wednesday that Bonta’s legal bills were for the sole purpose of “providing information that could be helpful to the investigation of those implicated” in the ongoing criminal probe.

    Bonta — who lives in Alameda and has worked his way from city councilman to the state’s top prosecutor — was never a target of the investigation, Newman said.

    “The AG’s involvement is over,” Newman added. “But this is an ongoing legal proceeding that we don’t want to hinder — with no relation to or involvement of the AG — so unable to provide further information.” He said the work required of those attorneys ended in 2024, the adviser said.

    Newman initially told the KCRA this week that the attorney general used the campaign funds “to help his law enforcement partners pursue justice” in the East Bay corruption probe. The Sacramento station was the first to report Bonta’s legal spending.

    Newman later changed that stance, claiming in a subsequent interview with KCRA that Bonta spent the money on attorneys for himself while being questioned by federal investigators. The adviser stressed Bonta was never a target of the investigation, and the funds were needed “because of the nature of the charges against the people implicated,” the station reported.

    The size of Bonta’s legal bills appear historically large, and they reflect the fact that Bonta retained one of the premier law firms in Silicon Valley — Wilson, Sonsini, Goodrich & Rosati — which routinely charges four figures an hour for its work, said David McCuan, a Sonoma State University political science professor. That also highlights the stakes Bonta faces as a politically ambitious state attorney general, particularly one who has taken a leading stand against the current White House administration by filing dozens of lawsuits against it, the professor said.

    “His problems are the appearance of impropriety when he is the poster child against Donald Trump and the administration,” McCuan said. “So if he has an image problem that is created by this expenditure, then that is a problem for him.”

    McCuan added that California campaign finance law is considered “murky” when it comes to when candidates can use campaign cash for legal help.

    In general, campaign funding can only be used “if the litigation is directly related to activities of the committee that are consistent with its primary objectives,” said Shery Yang, a spokesperson for the Fair Political Practices Commission, in an email. While she said she couldn’t speak specifically to this case, instances where that money can be used include defending against claims that a candidate violated election laws, or ensuring compliance with state campaign disclosure reports.

    The five payments to Wilson, Sonsini, Goodrich & Rosati were made two days before Bonta announced he would not run for governor and seek reelection as attorney general in February, the records show.

    It all casts a fresh spotlight on Bonta’s ties to many of the main players charged in the ongoing bribery and pay-to-play probe that has roiled the East Bay’s political scene, including former Oakland Mayor Sheng Thao and Andy Duong, who helps run a recycling company contracted by the city of Oakland.

    In charges unsealed in January, federal prosecutors accused former Thao of accepting bribes from Andy Duong and his father, David, in the form of political favors and a $95,000 no-show job for Thao’s romantic partner, Andre Jones. In return, prosecutors claimed Thao promised to secure lucrative city contracts for a fledgling housing company co-founded by David Duong, as well as for Duongs recycling business, California Waste Solutions.

    Thao, Jones and David and Andy Duong have all pleaded not guilty and could face trial by next year.

    Bonta has known Andy Duong for years, even becoming a frequent presence on his Instagram page before federal agents raided the businessman’s house in June 2024.

    In an August 2021 social media post, Bonta was seen standing alongside Andy Duong and the famed Filipino boxer and retired politician Manny Pacquiao, each of them giving a “thumbs up” to the camera. In another, Bonta appeared to be sitting in a limousine, smiling at the camera with one arm around Andy Duong and another around his wife, California Assemblymember Mia Bonta.

    “Cannot wait to see what else the future has to offer to you,” wrote Andy Duong, calling the state’s top prosecutor a “brother” while recounting his rise from “Vice Mayor to State Assembly and now CA Attorney General.” The post included no less than nine other photos of the two together over the years, often at campaign events or, in one instance, together at a Golden State Warriors game.

    Rob Bonta has since sought to distance himself from the Duongs. Shortly after the FBI and other federal authorities raided the family’s Oakland hills houses on June 20, 2024, Bonta said he planned to give back $155,000 in political contributions that he had previously received from the Duong family.

    The political fortunes of Thao and Mia Bonta also nearly collided several years ago. Before running for mayor, Thao briefly considered campaigning for the state assembly seat once held by Rob Bonta before he became the state’s attorney general. Instead, Thao opted to run for the mayor of Oakland, while Mia Bonta ran and filled her husband’s post in Sacramento.

    Bonta ties to people investigated in the corruption probe extend to an unnamed co-conspirator widely believed to be longtime Oakland political operative Mario Juarez. Bonta and Juarez enjoyed “close financial and political ties,” such as when Bonta helped secure a $3.4 million grant in 2017 from the California Energy Commission for a company that Juarez co-owned, according to a filing late last year by the Alameda County District Attorney’s Office.

    “They have publicly endorsed each other and have used the same office for their business dealings,” said the filing, adding that Juarez and the Bontas’ “extensive intertwined political and business dealings are widely known.”

    Jakob Rodgers is a senior breaking news reporter. Call, text or send him an encrypted message via Signal at 510-390-2351, or email him at jrodgers@bayareanewsgroup.com.

    Jakob Rodgers

    Source link

  • Nancy Pelosi expected to announce she won’t run for reelection in 2026

    Sources close to Nancy Pelosi expect the 85-year-old Democratic party stalwart to retire from politics next year.

    Pelosi will make a speech addressing her future after Californians vote on whether to redraw the state’s electoral map to create more Democrat-held seats in the U.S. House of Representatives, according to NBC News.

    RELATED: Election 2025: Everything Bay Area voters need to know before Nov. 4 election

    The state’s ballot measure Proposition 50 seeks to offset mid-decade redistricting efforts in red states including Texas intended to maintain a Republican majority in Congress.

    Pelosi has represented the majority of San Francisco since 1987. Multiple Democratic insiders reportedly said they don’t expect her to seek reelection in 2026.

“She’s going to go out with Prop 50 overwhelmingly passing, and what a crowning achievement for her to do that,” one of those sources told NBC News.

Pelosi hasn’t addressed primary challenges from younger Democrats bidding for her seat in the midterm election, though she appears to have the resources to go on the offensive. Her team hasn’t addressed speculation about her plans for 2026 and beyond. She filed a statement of candidacy with the Federal Elections Commission in November 2024.

The former Speaker of the House has long been among the most powerful figures in Democratic politics. Pressure from Pelosi is believed to have led to former President Joe Biden abandoning his 2024 reelection bid.

Months earlier, Biden awarded her the Presidential Medal of Freedom.

She’s also been an effective antagonist against President Trump, who won that election to serve a second term in office.

Trump has also had tough words for his Democratic rival whom he called “crazy” during a 2023 speech. In the same speech, Trump made fun of her husband, Paul Pelosi, who’d recently been attacked and seriously wounded by a hammer-wielding man who broke into the couple’s San Francisco home.

Brian Niemietz

Source link

  • Phillips 66, Kinder plan first-ever California-bound fuel pipeline

    By Nathan Risser, Bloomberg

    Phillips 66 and Kinder Morgan Inc. plan to build a new pipeline system and reverse the flow on some existing conduits to haul gasoline and other fuels to California, Arizona and Nevada.

    As California’s in-state refining capacity dwindles, the regional market is becoming increasingly reliant on imported fuels, especially gasoline. The pipeline project hatched by Phillips 66 and Kinder will carry fuels from as far away as the Midwest to augment supplies sent by refiners in Washington State and Asia.

    RELATED: California Legislature passes a swath of last-minute energy bills

    The project, slated for completion around 2029, would be the first pipeline system to deliver motor fuels into California, a state long considered an island disconnected from the major refining hubs of the Gulf Coast and Midwest.

    Bloomberg

    Source link

  • How long will Oakland be stuck with a security company linked to key figure in federal corruption case?

    OAKLAND — Despite multiple attempts, Oakland can’t seem to rid itself of a company that has for years provided security at city facilities, but which recently found itself linked to a corruption scandal that brought down former Mayor Sheng Thao.

    The city appeared to have reached the final stage of awarding a three-year, $27 million deal to a new security company on several occasions this year. But the deliberations have gone nowhere, and now Oakland is starting over from scratch.

    Shomik Mukherjee

    Source link

  • Trump floats San Francisco as next target for crime crackdown

    Lauren Dezenski

    (Bloomberg) — President Donald Trump said his administration would look to San Francisco as the next target of his federal crime crackdown, which has been mostly directed at Democrat-run cities.

    “I’m going to be strongly recommending at the request of government officials, which is always nice, that you start looking at San Francisco,” Trump said during a White House event on Wednesday, joined by FBI Director Kash Patel and Attorney General Pam Bondi. “I think we can make San Francisco — there’s one of our great cities 10 years ago, 15 years ago. Now it’s a mess, and we have great support in San Francisco.”

    Trump has moved to deploy US troops and federal law enforcement officials to major cities to target crime and counter demonstrations against his deportations of undocumented migrants even in the face of legal challenges. Trump has deployed National Guard personnel to Los Angeles, Washington, DC, Memphis, Chicago and Portland, claiming that Democratic state and local officials have failed to protect citizens and allowed violence to spiral out of control.

    Critics have accused Trump of exaggerating the threat and in Washington cast the deployments as a public relations exercise in a city where violent crime has fallen from post-pandemic highs. The Portland and Chicago deployments are currently facing legal challenges, but Trump has repeatedly floated expanding his efforts. The Los Angeles deployment was ruled unconstitutional earlier this year by a judge.

    Trump on Wednesday at the White House also announced the results of Operation Summer Heat, an effort he said was carried out in major cities to arrest violent criminals.

    “Over the past few months, FBI officers in all 50 states made crushing violent crime a top enforcement priority. That’s what they did, rounding up and arresting thousands of the most violent and dangerous criminals,” Trump said.

    The president said that the effort was carried out “in many cities that people didn’t know about. We kept it a little quiet, and it had a big impact.”

    According to Trump, the FBI arrested over 8,000 violent criminals during the operation in major cities, including 725 individuals wanted for violent crimes against children and murderers.

    –With assistance from Jennifer A. Dlouhy.

    More stories like this are available on bloomberg.com

    ©2025 Bloomberg L.P.

    Originally Published:

    Bloomberg

    Source link

  • Election 2025: Everything Bay Area voters need to know before Nov. 4 election

    Odd-numbered years usually bring an election respite for most Californians.

    That’s not the case in 2025.

    On Nov. 4, California voters will decide the fate of Proposition 50, the initiative pushed by Gov. Gavin Newsom that would redraw the state’s congressional districts. Newsom called the initiative a necessary response to partisan redistricting initiated first by Texas Republicans, while Republicans shot back that the plan was “illegal.”

    In addition to that, voters in Santa Clara County have two other races to weigh in on; in Alameda County, there’s one extra race.

    Here’s what voters should know before Nov. 4:

    Prop. 50

    On the ballot: Newsom signs Democratic gerrymandering law, sends plan to voters

    Which district is mine?: How your congressional district could change under California’s redistricting

    Pro or con?: How will California’s redistricting measure impact special elections in Santa Clara, Alameda counties? 

    Big money: Here’s how much the special election for California’s partisan redistricting measure will cost

    Dollars flowing in: Who’s winning the fundraising battle in California’s redistricting race?

    So many questions: What is redistricting? Your questions about maps, California’s feud with Texas and more, answered maps

    Bay Area measures

    Measure A: Santa Clara County will ask voters in November to approve new sales tax to cover cuts from Trump’s “Big, Beautiful Bill”

    Measure B: Parcel tax measure to fund East Bay hospital system goes before voters this fall

    Santa Clara County assessor: Four candidates look to replace Larry Stone in November

    Bay Area News Group

    Source link

  • Trump administration restores UCLA research grants following judge’s order

    By MIKHAIL ZINSHTEYN | CalMatters

    The Trump administration has restored almost all of the 500 National Institutes of Health grants it suspended at UCLA in July in response to a federal judge’s order last week.

    Attorneys in the U.S. Department of Justice submitted a court-mandated update on the status of the grant restorations Monday evening. They report that the National Institutes of Health, or NIH, has restored all but nine grants to UCLA health science researchers, though that figure may be even smaller.

    In response to a similar court order in August, the federal National Science Foundation restored 300 grants it had suspended in July.

    The restorations cap a remarkable turnaround for UCLA, which lost access to more than $500 million in research in July after the Trump administration froze 800 science grants to the esteemed public university. The National Science Foundation and National Institutes of Health accused UCLA of tolerating antisemitism as part of their justification for the grant funding freezes. Those claims followed months of efforts at the university to implement the recommendations of a task force on antisemitism that campus administrators appointed to examine bias at the school.

    The science grants pay for research into life-saving drugs, dementia, heart disease in rural areas, robotics education and a vast array of science inquiries across the country. They help propel the country’s research enterprise and are the top source of federal research grants at the University of California. The UC system has battled the Trump administration over various efforts to slash its funding since President Donald Trump’s second term began. Science funding is also a key source of income and training for graduate students, who are the next generation of publicly funded academics. Still, UCLA and the rest of the UC remain in the hot seat as the system contends with settlement demands from Trump that amount to $1.2 billion. Trump sought that settlement over a litany of accusations, including that the campus tolerates antisemitism.

    More than 600 Jewish faculty, students, staff and alumni of the University of California wrote in a public letter that stripping funding in response to those claims is “misguided and punitive.”

    Associated Press

    Source link

  • Elias: Lawsuit threatens California schools’ U.S. grants to help Latinos

    As students last month headed back to school at California’s more than 200 college and university campuses, some had more reason than usual to be nervous. That’s because a federal program that — for a change — is not currently threatened with defunding by President Trump appears to be in trouble from a completely different source.

    Thomas Elias

    Source link

  • Fighting intensifies over California bill that tries to ban immigration officers from wearing masks

    As California faces a deadline Friday to pass new laws for the year, police groups in the state are turning up pressure against a bill that attempts to ban law enforcement at nearly every level in California from wearing face coverings in most situations. The bill, SB 627, was filed by two Democratic state senators in response to images of federal immigration raids in which officers have been seen wearing masks. The state legislation attempts to enforce the ban against federal officers, which critics say is not legally possible. Police groups, including the Peace Officers Research Association of California and the California Police Chiefs Association, on Monday warned that the bill was recently changed to take away qualified immunity, or the legal protections provided to police under state law, from officers who “knowingly and willfully” violate the ban. In a letter sent to all state lawmakers and Gov. Newsom’s office on Monday, PORAC warned it could push officers to second-guess themselves and potentially put public safety at risk. “Without these protections, an officer would potentially be subject to civil suits against them personally for actions they took in good faith and based on information available at the time. For example, if an officer acting in good faith and based on current information arrests the wrong person, they are given immunity from being sued personally. Any erosion of existing immunity protections strikes at the core protections necessary for officers to operate safely and securely in California,” PORAC officials wrote. The bill was also recently changed to exempt the California Highway Patrol from the measure. Opponents said the legislation will end up solely punishing local law enforcement agencies for the actions of federal officers. “It’s not local law enforcement that’s engaging in those tactics,” said Jason Salazar, the President of the California Police Chiefs Association. “Our officers are following the law through good law enforcement and trying to provide public safety to our communities. This bill makes it harder to do that.” “As long as law enforcement are following the law and the policies set by their departments, they’ll have nothing to worry about under SB 627,” said State Sen. Scott Wiener, D-San Francisco, who wrote the proposal. “California has terrific law enforcement who are more than capable of following the policies set by their supervisors—all we’re asking is that they do so with regard to the extreme masking ICE and others have begun to deploy in recent months.” “They can pass all the laws they want. It’s more wishful thinking than an actual law,” U.S. Border Patrol’s El Centro Sector Chief, Gregory Bovino, told KCRA 3’s Ashley Zavala in a recent interview. Bovino said there has been a 1000% increase in federal officer assaults. “Whether they’re being doxxed or followed or whatever, I’m going to protect those agents, and face coverings make sense,” Bovino said. California’s U.S. Senator Alex Padilla has filed a proposal that would require federal immigration authorities to display legible identification during public-facing operations. It has been referred to the U.S. Senate’s Judiciary Committee but is not yet scheduled for a hearing. See more coverage of top California stories here | Download our app | Subscribe to our morning newsletter | Find us on YouTube here and subscribe to our channel

    As California faces a deadline Friday to pass new laws for the year, police groups in the state are turning up pressure against a bill that attempts to ban law enforcement at nearly every level in California from wearing face coverings in most situations.

    The bill, SB 627, was filed by two Democratic state senators in response to images of federal immigration raids in which officers have been seen wearing masks. The state legislation attempts to enforce the ban against federal officers, which critics say is not legally possible.

    Police groups, including the Peace Officers Research Association of California and the California Police Chiefs Association, on Monday warned that the bill was recently changed to take away qualified immunity, or the legal protections provided to police under state law, from officers who “knowingly and willfully” violate the ban.

    In a letter sent to all state lawmakers and Gov. Newsom’s office on Monday, PORAC warned it could push officers to second-guess themselves and potentially put public safety at risk.

    “Without these protections, an officer would potentially be subject to civil suits against them personally for actions they took in good faith and based on information available at the time. For example, if an officer acting in good faith and based on current information arrests the wrong person, they are given immunity from being sued personally. Any erosion of existing immunity protections strikes at the core protections necessary for officers to operate safely and securely in California,” PORAC officials wrote.

    The bill was also recently changed to exempt the California Highway Patrol from the measure. Opponents said the legislation will end up solely punishing local law enforcement agencies for the actions of federal officers.

    “It’s not local law enforcement that’s engaging in those tactics,” said Jason Salazar, the President of the California Police Chiefs Association. “Our officers are following the law through good law enforcement and trying to provide public safety to our communities. This bill makes it harder to do that.”

    “As long as law enforcement are following the law and the policies set by their departments, they’ll have nothing to worry about under SB 627,” said State Sen. Scott Wiener, D-San Francisco, who wrote the proposal. “California has terrific law enforcement who are more than capable of following the policies set by their supervisors—all we’re asking is that they do so with regard to the extreme masking ICE and others have begun to deploy in recent months.”

    “They can pass all the laws they want. It’s more wishful thinking than an actual law,” U.S. Border Patrol’s El Centro Sector Chief, Gregory Bovino, told KCRA 3’s Ashley Zavala in a recent interview. Bovino said there has been a 1000% increase in federal officer assaults.

    “Whether they’re being doxxed or followed or whatever, I’m going to protect those agents, and face coverings make sense,” Bovino said.

    California’s U.S. Senator Alex Padilla has filed a proposal that would require federal immigration authorities to display legible identification during public-facing operations. It has been referred to the U.S. Senate’s Judiciary Committee but is not yet scheduled for a hearing.

    See more coverage of top California stories here | Download our app | Subscribe to our morning newsletter | Find us on YouTube here and subscribe to our channel

    Source link

  • An Oakland mural depicting Native-American genocide was defaced. It led to a debate on the street.

    OAKLAND — For nearly 20 years, Diane Williams has seethed whenever she walked by a street mural depicting the genocide of Ohlone people by Spanish colonizers — artwork she finds demeaning because the Native American men are depicted as fully nude.

    Just this week, plans to remove the wall art were halted at the last minute, after tenants of the building’s apartments at 41st Street and Piedmont Avenue demanded that the history on display be left alone.

    But on Friday morning, Williams finally had a reason to smile as she gazed at the mural. Someone had defaced it overnight with paper cutouts and red paint.

    Now, the Franciscan missionaries oppressing the Native Americans in the painting had arrows piercing their heads and bodies. Blood spilled out of the white men. In the same red color, a declaration had been scrawled over the artwork: “THERE, I FIXED IT.”

    It was the latest twist in a saga that in recent weeks has divided the North Oakland community surrounding Piedmont Avenue. On Friday, the debate shifted from online circles into public view, engulfing the sidewalk facing the mural.

    These arguments mirror a broader discourse about artistic interpretations of history, with shared consensus about the horrors of Indigenous genocide, but more nuanced — and often fierce — disputes about how those stories are remembered, and who should be allowed to tell them.

    The mural, painted by artist Rocky Rische Baird, is titled “The Capture of the Solid. The Escape of the Soul.” Baird, who completed the work in 2006 with help from a $5,000 city grant, at the time described the 25-by-10-foot display as a testament that the “spirit of a person can’t be boxed.”

    At the center of the painting’s complex imagery are missionaries bringing traditional Western clothes — blue pants, brown boots and a belt with a buckle — to a naked Native man.

    Alex Brand, left, Hong Nguyen, and their six month-old baby, Walker Brand, who lived accross the street and recently moved to Hayward, take a selfie with the mural “The Capture of the Solid, Escape of the Soul,” by artist Rocky Rische-Baird, as seen on 41st Street near the corner of Piedmont Avenue in Oakland, Calif., on Monday, Sept. 1, 2025. (Ray Chavez/Bay Area News Group) 

    The man stands just beyond a vivid swirl of similarly unclothed American Indians with discolored bodies, a jarring imagining of the senseless violence and disease that ravaged the Ohlone people, who first settled in the coastal Northern California land that now comprises much of the Bay Area.

    Williams, a 77-year-old Alaskan Athabascan Indian who has lived in East Oakland since the early 1970s, finds plenty of reasons to despise the artwork, the most visceral being its nudity.

    “I saw this big old life-sized penis on this Native American, and I was appalled,” said Williams, who often passes the mural on the way to breast cancer treatment at the nearby Kaiser medical centers.

    “It’s just culturally inappropriate,” she said, “and historically inaccurate — those Indians weren’t frolicking around naked. Any man would take care to cover his penis.”

    Williams, who insists she is “no prude,” reveled Friday in the newfound defacement, saying it retained the Indians’ agency, though she took no credit for the graffiti. The mural has been vandalized before, and already the Native man’s genitals were barely visible because someone had previously tried to obscure the paint.

    "The Capture of the Solid, Escape of the Soul," mural by artist Rocky Rische-Baird, was vandalized with red paint and paper arrows made r on 41st Street near the corner of Piedmont Avenue in Oakland, Calif., on Friday, Sept. 5, 202. The mural, which was painted 20 years ago, depicts Spanish Franciscans clothing naked Ohlone Indians of the San Francisco Bay Area for work in the mission fields. The building's property manager plans to paint over the mural after receiving complaints from Ohlone native Diane Williams regarding its nudity. (Ray Chavez/Bay Area News Group)
    “The Capture of the Solid, Escape of the Soul,” mural by artist Rocky Rische-Baird, was vandalized with red paint and paper arrows made r on 41st Street near the corner of Piedmont Avenue in Oakland, Calif., on Friday, Sept. 5, 202. The mural, which was painted 20 years ago, depicts Spanish Franciscans clothing naked Ohlone Indians of the San Francisco Bay Area for work in the mission fields. The building’s property manager plans to paint over the mural after receiving complaints from Ohlone native Diane Williams regarding its nudity. (Ray Chavez/Bay Area News Group) 

    A woman strolling by on the sidewalk stopped to point a finger directly at Williams.

    “The damage that they did now is inexcusable,” the woman, Julia, who provided only her first name, said in reference to the defacement. “Someone had had the guts to put this (mural) here for everyone to see — it should be an honor to you, as a Native!”

    “I apologize that it upset you,” Williams responded, “but I’m the one who complained — and I wish we would have spoken when it was painted in 2006.”

    Julia declined to give her age but described herself as the building’s oldest tenant. Indeed, many of the residents here had urged the property manager to cancel a planned removal of the mural.

    Their anger carried over to the social media website Nextdoor, where in the heat of debate, Williams’ account was recently suspended.

    The owner of the building, Albert Sarshar, had earlier been lobbied by Williams to get rid of the artwork but called off the paint-over job this week to give himself “more time to investigate.” Days later, he remains confused about what to do.

    “I just want everyone to be happy,” he said.

    The owner even consulted with City Councilmember Zac Unger, who declined to weigh in on the debate, telling this news organization, “I don’t think it’s the role of government to dictate speech on private property.”

    Williams, meanwhile, insists that there were enough disgruntled Native Americans in the area to stage an upcoming boycott of the building’s primary tenant, a Japanese restaurant named Ebiko. But her earliest protest, in 2006, drew only a handful of people.

    Jacqueline Hackle, left, expresses with Ohlone native and activist Diane Williams on "The Capture of the Solid, Escape of the Soul," mural by artist Rocky Rische-Baird, which was vandalized with red paint and paper arrows on 41st Street near the corner of Piedmont Avenue in Oakland, Calif., on Friday, Sept. 5, 2025. The mural, which was painted 20 years ago, depicts Spanish Franciscans clothing naked Ohlone Indians of the San Francisco Bay Area for work in the mission fields. After complaints from Williams about the mural's nudity, the building's property manager plans to paint over it. (Ray Chavez/Bay Area News Group)
    Jacqueline Hackle, left, expresses with Ohlone native and activist Diane Williams on “The Capture of the Solid, Escape of the Soul,” mural by artist Rocky Rische-Baird, which was vandalized with red paint and paper arrows on 41st Street near the corner of Piedmont Avenue in Oakland, Calif., on Friday, Sept. 5, 2025. The mural, which was painted 20 years ago, depicts Spanish Franciscans clothing naked Ohlone Indians of the San Francisco Bay Area for work in the mission fields. After complaints from Williams about the mural’s nudity, the building’s property manager plans to paint over it. (Ray Chavez/Bay Area News Group) 

    Reached this week, several officials at the Muwekma Ohlone Tribe seemed unaware of the mural or the debate surrounding it, even after being provided the Piedmont Avenue address.

    “When art is offensive, it stimulates thinking, reflection and responses,” Alan Leventhal, the tribal archaeologist and ethnohistorian, said in an email.

    “Although some of the images are indeed provoking,” Leventhal added, “it still sends a message that the history on the genocide of California Indians has been swept under the rug and rendered invisible.”

    On the sidewalk, Williams found some allies Friday, including a woman passing by who called the artwork “problematic” and a man who said he had disliked the depiction of brutality since it was first painted two decades ago.

    “If this were a picture of slaves and slave owners, what’s really the purpose of that?” said the man, Nedar B., who is Black and gave only the first initial of his last name. “Why does a white person want to put that on display?”

    Baird, the original artist, did not respond to interview requests. While painting the mural, he consulted with Andrew Galvan, an Ohlone Indian and curator at the Old Mission Dolores Museum in San Francisco, who defends the advice he gave Baird originally.

    “Art provokes conversation,” Galvan said in a statement. “The mural needs proper context. It doesn’t need to be defaced and destroyed.”

    "The Capture of the Solid, Escape of the Soul," mural by artist Rocky Rische-Baird, was vandalized with red paint and paper arrows on 41st Street near the corner of Piedmont Avenue in Oakland, Calif., on Friday, Sept. 5, 202. The mural, which was painted 20 years ago, depicts Spanish Franciscans clothing naked Ohlone Indians of the San Francisco Bay Area for work in the mission fields. The building's property manager plans to paint over the mural after receiving complaints from Ohlone native Diane Williams regarding its nudity. (Ray Chavez/Bay Area News Group)
    “The Capture of the Solid, Escape of the Soul,” mural by artist Rocky Rische-Baird, was vandalized with red paint and paper arrows on 41st Street near the corner of Piedmont Avenue in Oakland, Calif., on Friday, Sept. 5, 202. The mural, which was painted 20 years ago, depicts Spanish Franciscans clothing naked Ohlone Indians of the San Francisco Bay Area for work in the mission fields. The building’s property manager plans to paint over the mural after receiving complaints from Ohlone native Diane Williams regarding its nudity. (Ray Chavez/Bay Area News Group) 

    Others who engaged Williams on Friday shared that view, including Jacqueline Hackle, who arrived to retrieve a pair of scissors stashed in a newspaper distribution box on the sidewalk.

    Earlier in the week, Hackle had cut and duct-taped a formal description of the mural to the wall below, where it identifies views held by Spanish soldiers that Native Americans “needed to be clothed and directed to work in the missions’ fields.”

    At one point, several people were simultaneously engaged with Williams in a fierce debate, including neighborhood resident, Valerie Winemiller, who took matters into her own hands — manually ripping off the paper arrowheads while angrily telling Williams to “find another wall and paint your own mural.”

    Winemiller had backup, calling to the scene Yano Rivera, a self-described “mural doctor,” who said he specializes in removing graffiti.

    “We’re going to very selectively and carefully reunify the painting visually,” Rivera explained. And then he got to work, using cotton balls and varnish to clean up all the blood.

    Shomik Mukherjee

    Source link

  • East Palo Alto housekeeper who fainted when arrested by ICE discharged from Stanford hospital

    The East Palo Alto housekeeper with a chronic health condition who fainted while being arrested by ICE agents early this week has been discharged from Stanford Medical Center to a federal detention facility in Bakersfield, U.S. Rep. Sam Liccardo said Saturday.

    U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents had been posted at her hospital room since she was arrested with an expired visa Monday, and prohibited her family from visiting most of the week, even forbidding flowers with a notecard from her father. The agency did not respond to a request for comment Saturday morning, or earlier inquiries during the week.

     

    Aleyda “Yeny” Rodriguez, in a photo from her family’s gofundme page, remains at Stanford Medical Center with ICE posted outside her door after being arrested in East Palo Alto with an expired visa. (Courtesy of Rodriguez family) 

    Aleyda “Yeny” Rodriguez, 47, has a blood disorder exacerbated by stress that causes her to faint, her family has said. They declined to comment Saturday.

    Stanford wouldn’t disclose Rodriguez’s health condition when she was discharged, but said in a statement that “throughout the patient’s stay at Stanford Health Care, our clinicians provided all necessary care.”

    Liccardo, a Democrat who represents much of Santa Clara and parts of San Mateo county and was participating in a Half Moon Bay beach cleanup Saturday, said he has been in touch with federal officials about her case. They told him that Rodriguez will have access to her phone Saturday to contact family.

    “Yeny’s arrest, which may have been perfectly legal under existing laws, exemplifies the devastation and trauma that this deeply misguided and cruel immigration policy is wreaking throughout our country,” Liccardo said in an interview Saturday. “We need to persuade more Americans and the other half of Congress of the extraordinarily important role that  millions of our neighbors like her play in our families and our communities.”

    Rodriguez was arrested Monday morning while dropping off her husband at her brother’s East Palo Alto house to start his day as a gardener. Her husband, Oscar Flores, managed to run to a neighbor’s house, where ICE agents stopped their pursuit because without a warrant they are prohibited from stepping onto private property, immigration lawyers say. Their nephew, Dario Jasso, had been arrested earlier that morning while getting into his vehicle to head to his construction job.

    Jasso, 29, had contacted his family earlier this week to say he was being held at the Mesa Verde ICE Processing Center, where his aunt now is being held. Flores videotaped the arrest of his wife, who was heard screaming while agents handcuffed her behind her back while on her knees. She fainted on the way to the ICE van, while her husband yelled in Spanish, “she’s sick! If she dies it’s your fault.”

    Flores is in hiding, but told the Mercury News earlier this week that he and his wife had 10-year tourist visas that expired two years ago. They had no other criminal record, he said, not even a speeding ticket.

    “I certainly heard that the target of her arrest was somebody else in the family,” Liccardo said, “and so we’re still trying to understand this and get more information.”

    Rodriguez’s father, Armando Rodriguez Garcia, had told the Mercury News that he traveled from Mexico to California on a tourist visa several weeks ago intending to take his daughter back to Mexico with him because she was “tired here.” He said he hoped he could take her home instead of having her experience the stresses of ICE custody, which were life threatening. The trauma of the arrest itself, he said, led to her weeklong hospital stay.

    The Trump Administration had once said its priority was arresting immigrants with criminal records, but has since expanded its operations over the past several months, hiring scores of agents to arrest those with expired visas. Federal agents only need probable cause to believe someone is in the U.S. illegally to make an arrest on public property.

    Liccardo said that he said he and fellow Democrats are working with organizations “to see how we can start to rally employers in red states and red districts as we start to see the impacts of these immigration policies on our agricultural industry, on health care, on elder care, on tech, construction and many industries where we know immigrants are critical to the substance of our economy.”

    He added that they are “working to essentially find allies who can communicate with Republicans who suffer from wobbly knees, if they can stiffen their spines.”

    Julia Prodis Sulek

    Source link

  • Interactive: How California is reshaping its congressional districts

    The Democrats, led by California Gov. Gavin Newsom, are hitting back at the Texas Republican lawmakers with a proposed redistricting map of California. The Proposed Congressional Map aims to add five Democratic seats in the upcoming elections.Redistricting, which typically happens every decade as the census updates, has created a new battleground between the Democrats and Republican-led states. President Donald Trump first prompted Republican district representatives in the GOP stronghold of Texas to redraw congressional lines to give the party an advantage in the upcoming elections. What followed was a two-week standoff in which Democratic Texas House representatives fled the state to stall the vote.Texas’ new congressional maps were eventually passed in an 88-52 vote, creating five new Republican-leaning seats.California’s Democratic leaders Thursday moved forward with an effort to change the congressional district maps. California currently has 52 seats in the U.S. House of Representatives; 43 of these seats went to the Democrats, while nine went to the Republicans in the 2024 election.The five California Republicans targeted by the redistricting plan include Reps. Doug LaMalfa in District 1, Kevin Kiley in District 3, David Valadao in District 22, Ken Calvert in District 41 and Darrell Issa in District 48.Each of these five districts is shown in the maps below. See if you can guess how these districts will be redrawn by trying our puzzle game below.

    The Democrats, led by California Gov. Gavin Newsom, are hitting back at the Texas Republican lawmakers with a proposed redistricting map of California. The Proposed Congressional Map aims to add five Democratic seats in the upcoming elections.

    Redistricting, which typically happens every decade as the census updates, has created a new battleground between the Democrats and Republican-led states.

    President Donald Trump first prompted Republican district representatives in the GOP stronghold of Texas to redraw congressional lines to give the party an advantage in the upcoming elections.

    What followed was a two-week standoff in which Democratic Texas House representatives fled the state to stall the vote.

    Texas’ new congressional maps were eventually passed in an 88-52 vote, creating five new Republican-leaning seats.

    California’s Democratic leaders Thursday moved forward with an effort to change the congressional district maps.

    California currently has 52 seats in the U.S. House of Representatives; 43 of these seats went to the Democrats, while nine went to the Republicans in the 2024 election.

    The five California Republicans targeted by the redistricting plan include Reps. Doug LaMalfa in District 1, Kevin Kiley in District 3, David Valadao in District 22, Ken Calvert in District 41 and Darrell Issa in District 48.

    Each of these five districts is shown in the maps below. See if you can guess how these districts will be redrawn by trying our puzzle game below.

    Source link

  • California Supreme Court rejects Republicans’ efforts to halt redistricting proposals

    California’s Supreme Court on Wednesday evening rejected Republicans’ efforts to stall work on Democrats’ redistricting proposals.

    Republican legislators earlier this week asked the state’s Supreme Court to intervene and hit the brakes on redistricting efforts underway in the statehouse.

    They argued, in their petition to the court, that the proposed redistricting legislation must be published for 30 days before the legislature can hear or act on it. The filing alleged that rule was “circumvented” by the legislature by replacing two unrelated bills with the redistricting proposal, a move called “gut and amend” by those in Sacramento.

    They asked the court to halt any work on the legislative package until mid-September.

    But the court said, in its order on Wednesday, Aug. 20, that the petitioners “failed to meet their burden of establishing a basis for relief at this time” under the state’s constitution.

    The full legislature is set to vote Thursday on the redistricting package, which includes newly redrawn congressional maps and a call for a special election on Nov. 4, when voters would decide whether to implement those partisan maps for the 2026, 2028 and 2030 elections.

    The effort has been touted by Gov. Gavin Newsom and Democrats as a way to counter plans in other, Republican-led states to enact mid-cycle gerrymandering ahead of the 2026 midterm elections.

    California would only have a special election to change its congressional districts if other states also went through with partisan, mid-cycle redistricting.

    The Texas House earlier Wednesday approved new congressional maps meant to give Republicans a boost in 2026, at the behest of President Donald Trump.

    The California Republicans’ lawsuit was led by Sens. Tony Strickland, R-Huntington Beach, and Suzette Martinez Valladares, R-Santa Clarita, as well as Assemblymembers Kate Sanchez, R-Rancho Santa Margarita, and Tri Ta, R-Westminster.

    “Today’s Supreme Court decision is not the end of this fight,” the Republican legislators said in a statement. “Although the Court denied our petition, it did not explain the reason for its ruling. This means Gov. Newsom and the Democrats’ plan to gut the voter-created Citizens Redistricting Commission, silence public input, and stick taxpayers with a $200+ million bill will proceed. Polls show most Democrats, Republicans, and independents want to keep the commission, not give politicians the power to rig maps. We will continue to challenge this unconstitutional power grab in the courts and at the ballot box.”

    Chief Justice Patricia Guerrero signed Wednesday’s order.

    Kaitlyn Schallhorn

    Source link