ReportWire

Tag: california love

  • The “California Dreamin’” and “I Left My Heart in San Francisco” Connection

    The “California Dreamin’” and “I Left My Heart in San Francisco” Connection

    [ad_1]

    Perhaps more than any other state, California gets a lot of shit talked about it (well…maybe Florida actually wins on that one). This was even before the constant reports about a mass exodus because of how expensive and overtaxed it is as a place to live rather than visit. The long-standing “issue” many seem to take with it (hence, the river of ridicule) stems mostly from the idea that Los Angeles represents everything about it, therefore it must be a “nation” of superficial, self-obsessed twats. Even though the bulk of that demographic actually resides in New York City. But anyway, just because the state invokes the ire of a lot of jealous bitches (cue Don DeLillo writing, “California deserves whatever it gets. Californians invented the concept of life-style. This alone warrants their doom”), there are those who have no trouble understanding the majesty and appeal of the Golden State. 

    This, of course, might prompt the Janis Ian in Mean Girls-inspired response, “That’s the thing with you plastics. You think everybody is in love with you when actually, everybody hates you!” But that wasn’t the case with songwriter Douglass Cross and composer George Cory or The Mamas and the Papas’ John and Michelle Phillips. The former two being the brainchildren behind “I Left My Heart in San Francisco” and the latter being the ones behind “California Dreamin’” (ranked by Rolling Stone as one of the five hundred greatest songs of all time). In both instances surrounding the creation of the songs, the writers felt the call of California after moving to New York. In John and Michelle’s case, they were trapped in a dreary New York setting during the winter (thus, “California dreamin’/On such a winter’s day”), and yearning to return to the golden sunshine of California. 

    Cross and Cory, on the other hand, can acknowledge that San Francisco is not without its own form of coldness and grayness (“The morning fog may chill the air, I don’t care”), but that it is of the singular “California variety” (a.k.a. not nearly as bleak and biting). They, too, address a certain unavoidable loneliness that permeates New York, resulting in the lyrics, “I’ve been terribly alone and forgotten in Manhattan/I’m going home to my city by the Bay/I left my heart in San Francisco/High on a hill, it calls to me/To be where little cable cars climb halfway to the stars.” Cross and Cory also can’t help but mention the sunshine (“When I come home to you, San Francisco/Your golden sun will shine for me”) as a major factor for wanting to return to California, de facto a major reason why New York blows chunks. Ergo, in both songs, California’s weather is touted as its superpower, not its downfall (as is the trend of the moment when discussing the ravaging effects of climate change on the state…while, for some reason, no one seems to be talking half as much about the flood that is coming for NYC). 

    Created just three years apart, with “I Left My Heart in San Francisco” being released in 1962 and “California Dreamin’” in 1965, the affection for the state was starting to become a palpable trend. Perhaps most notably begun by the cast of I Love Lucy in 1955, in an episode titled “California, Here We Come!” Repurposed from Al Jolson’s 1924 rendition (“California, Here I Come”)—during which, unfortunately, he’s wearing blackface—the quartet is featured driving over the George Washington Bridge as they sing bombastically in their brand-new Pontiac Star Chief convertible. The image of Lucy, Ricky, Fred and Ethel gleefully abandoning the oppressive, cold confines of NYC in this boat of a vehicle signals their ready and willing conversion to California culture (a phrase Woody Allen, back when his name could be said, would likely call an oxymoron). And established the idea that, when given a choice between “intellectual” and anti-luxurious New York versus warm, spacious California, a person would opt for the latter every time. 

    Even the man “born and bred” in New York who would become synonymous with San Francisco, Tony Bennett, chose California when presented with a song like “I Left My Heart in San Francisco.” Although Tennessee Ernie Ford (another I Love Lucy connection for you) was the original choice to sing it, Bennett ended up getting his eyes on it and performing it in the Fairmount Hotel’s Venetian Room in Nob Hill (where he would continue to do so in subsequent decades, making the single his signature every time he performed there). At that first December 1961 performance, Mayor George Christopher (the last example of SF ever having a Republican mayor) was in attendance, as well as Joseph Alioto, who would serve as San Francisco’s mayor in the years soon after. Thus, from the start, the song was historic, becoming an instantaneous piece of San Francisco’s identity. Just as “California Dreamin’” would for the entire state as a whole. With John and Michelle Phillips of The Mamas and the Papas having no clue that their ire for New York winters would result in such a phenomenon.

    Although Michelle was the California-born one between the two of them, John would prove his undying devotion to the state yet again in 1967, when he wrote “San Francisco (Be Sure to Wear Flowers in Your Hair)” for Scott McKenzie. Because to know California (rather than know its stereotype) is to love it. Whereas to know New York (especially during the winter) is to fathom that there is wisdom in the advice, “Go west.” As a matter of fact, it was a New York newspaper editor (Horace Greeley, allegedly) who immortalized that line.

    [ad_2]

    Genna Rivieccio

    Source link

  • Column: Voices from Nevada on a prospective Newsom presidential bid. In a word, no

    Column: Voices from Nevada on a prospective Newsom presidential bid. In a word, no

    [ad_1]

    Nevada will play a key role in the 2024 presidential race, as a major battleground and one of the first states to vote when Democrats choose their presidential nominee.

    Despite his repeated objections, California Gov. Gavin Newsom is often mentioned as a possible alternative to President Biden.

    But a series of interviews in and around Las Vegas, where most Nevada voters live, found no support for a Newsom candidacy and not a lot of California love.

    Here are some of those voters discussing the governor, why they oppose him replacing Biden as Democrats’ 2024 nominee and thoughts on the state next door.

    [ad_2]

    Mark Z. Barabak

    Source link

  • Column: Newsom gets no California love for his political ambitions. Maybe he should try elsewhere

    Column: Newsom gets no California love for his political ambitions. Maybe he should try elsewhere

    [ad_1]

    Bill Clinton was a man of large appetite and no small ambition when he served as Arkansas governor, a job he assumed at the age of 32.

    So it was hardly a surprise when, 14 years later, Clinton launched a bid for president.

    There was skepticism at the time and some carping of the too-big-for-his-britches variety. But that soon faded with the growing excitement of the 1992 election and the opening of Clinton’s Little Rock campaign headquarters, as Skip Rutherford, an old confidant, recalled.

    Gavin Newsom can only sigh with envy.

    California’s governor is not running for president. Take him at his word.

    Filing deadlines have passed in the key early-voting states of Nevada and New Hampshire, and Newsom must know that a run against President Biden — his fellow Democrat — would almost surely fail, destroying Newsom’s political future in the process.

    Still, the gallivanting governor has acted very much like a presidential candidate, striding the global stage and trolling the GOP’s White House contestants whenever he has the chance. Maybe he’s positioning himself for a run after his term ends in January 2027.

    Either way, California voters are not pleased.

    A Los Angeles Times/UC Berkeley poll released this week found Newsom’s approval rating sinking to the lowest point of his nearly five years in office, with 44% of respondents having a favorable view of his job performance and 49% disapproving.

    There may be several explanations; like barnacles on a ship, negatives tend to accumulate the longer a politician stays in office.

    Some on the left are disappointed with Newsom’s approach to the state’s homelessness and mental health crises. Some environmentalists are unhappy with the governor’s water policy. (Republicans never could stand Newsom.)

    But probably the biggest reason for voter discontent is the governor’s political wandering eye.

    “A lot of people don’t think California is doing well,” said Mark DiCamillo, who oversaw the poll for The Times and Berkeley’s Institute of Governmental Studies.

    “There’s homelessness and now the budget deficit,” DiCamillo went on. “There’s a lot of issues that need attention and they seem to be getting worse — or at least not better — and he’s off doing his own thing.”

    The ill will is nothing new. Govs. Jerry Brown and Pete Wilson both sagged in the polls when they stinted on their day job to run off and seek the presidency.

    Maybe it’s a California thing.

    Nationwide, two sitting governors have been elected president in the last 90-plus years: Clinton and Texas’ George W. Bush. Both ran with the blessing of the folks back home.

    Rutherford, who oversaw the planning of Clinton’s presidential library, said Arkansas voters were captivated as they watched “all the people who came in to work” for the campaign, “all the national press coming in and out,” and “it became a source of, ‘Wow, we got a guy who now has a shot to win this thing.’”

    Bush, whose father had been president, was coy even as he used his 1998 gubernatorial reelection campaign to position himself for a White House bid. He won his second term in a landslide and soon enough was traveling the country in pursuit of the presidency.

    Texans didn’t seem to mind.

    A November 1999 poll, conducted by the Scripps Howard news service, found 72% of those surveyed approved of Bush’s performance as governor. The state’s most powerful Democrat, Lt. Gov. Bob Bullock, even endorsed Bush for president in 2000, burnishing the Republican’s bipartisan credentials in a way that’s unimaginable in today’s age of impermeable partisanship.

    “He was just a chatty, friendly character,” said Bruce Buchanan, a longtime Bush watcher and presidential scholar at the University of Texas at Austin. “Everybody who got close to him came away feeling that way, whether they happened to agree with his politics or not.”

    Maybe Californians aren’t all that excited about installing one of their own in the Oval Office.

    After yielding two presidents in the last half-century, Richard Nixon and Ronald Reagan, and two House speakers of recent vintage, Nancy Pelosi and Kevin McCarthy, perhaps national political celebrity isn’t what it used to be.

    Things may be different in Florida, which has never produced a president.

    Even though Ron DeSantis is struggling there — a recent poll put him a whopping 39 percentage points behind former President Trump in Florida’s Republican primary — voters haven’t necessarily soured on their governor, now in his second and final term.

    In a recent trial heat for the 2026 gubernatorial race, DeSantis’ wife, Casey, had more than twice the support of any other potential candidate tested, said Mike Binder, a political science professor and pollster at the University of North Florida in Jacksonville.

    “Clearly, the DeSantis name brand still has a lot of value to it,” Binder said.

    Maybe Newsom can ask Florida’s governor for pointers on running for president without alienating his home state when the two archrivals — one seeking the presidency, the other kinda-sorta but not really — debate at the end of the month.

    Either that or Newsom could start over someplace else like, say, Democratic-leaning Rhode Island. There has never been a president elected from the Ocean State.

    [ad_2]

    Mark Z. Barabak

    Source link