ReportWire

Tag: Bytedance

  • TikTok’s fate in the U.S. could hinge on who controls its algorithm

    [ad_1]

    A deal in the works between the U.S. and China over the ownership of TikTok could include a licensing agreement for the closely guarded secret of the social media company’s algorithm, to which access has proved a major sticking point in negotiations between the countries. 

    The Chinese government once vowed to block the sale of TikTok’s algorithm, the technology that seems to intuit user preferences almost instantaneously and that has been a driving force for the video-sharing app’s explosive growth in recent years. 

    Previously, TikTok had also seemed unwilling to budge. In May, when the platform was challenging a 2024 law banning TikTok in the U.S., the company said in a legal filing that “divesting TikTok Inc.’s U.S. business and completely severing it from the globally integrated platform of which it is a part is not commercially, technologically, or legally feasible.”

    President Trump this week again pushed back enforcement of the TikTok law, which would require its parent company, Beijing-based ByteDance, to sell its stake in the app or be cut off from the U.S. market. In the meantime, an agreement between the U.S. and China appears to be moving forward. Mr. Trump on Friday said he and Chinese President Xi Jinping have “made progress” in talks over a potential deal to resolve the dispute over TikTok’s ownership.

    Although key elements of the framework deal remain unclear, when some details were released earlier this week, Wang Jingtao, deputy director of China’s Central Cyberspace Affairs Commission, told reporters in Madrid that the arrangement included agreement over “the use of intellectual property rights,” according the Associated Press.

    William Akoto, an assistant professor at American University, thinks ByteDance executives may be urging the Chinese government to strike a deal so the company can continue earning revenue from the algorithm, while maintaining a foothold in the U.S. 

    ByteDance and TikTok did not respond to requests for comment.

    How would a TikTok licensing deal work?

    Mr. Trump, asked Thursday about what will happen with TikTok’s algorithm, said, “TikTok has tremendous value. The United States has that value in its hand since we’re the ones that have to approve it.”

    Chinese law prohibits the export of TikTok’s proprietary algorithm, including to the U.S., without government approval, according to experts. So exactly how a licensing deal would work remains unclear, including whether ByteDance could maintain any sort of outside control over TikTok’s algorithm once ownership transfers to U.S. owners. 

    “What I understand is they would give a U.S. entity legal permission to use it under certain terms,” said Sarah Kreps, a nonresident senior fellow at the Brookings Institute, a nonpartisan policy research organization. “So it would be like they’re renting the algorithm rather than selling it.” 

    Kreps added that in retaining a measure of ownership over the algorithm, ByteDance could have the right to access internal TikTok metrics and influence how content is ranked in the U.S., akin to how a software vendor can patch or upgrade licensed software.

    The Wall Street Journal, citing people familiar with the matter, said this week that TikTok would create a new U.S. app and that the company’s engineers would re-create content-recommendation algorithms using technology licensed from ByteDance. 

    A White House spokesperson declined to comment on the contours of the U.S.-China framework deal over TikTok. “Any details of the TikTok framework are pure speculation unless they are announced by this administration,” the spokesperson said. 

    What makes TikTok’s algorithm special?

    Algorithms are complex data systems that act as recommendation engines, ranking the content users ultimately see in their feeds. They also help companies gather information about their customers in order to serve them targeted advertisements, a key source of revenue. 

    Like other social media players, TikTok’s algorithm delivers content to users based on their interests and interactions on the platform. Lauryn Williams, a deputy director and senior fellow focused on technology at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, described the algorithm as TikTok’s “secret sauce.”

    Kreps highlights the algorithm’s ability to quickly pick up on user behavior, interests and preferences. “There’s something about it that is so well-tailored to what they understand people to want that it gets them on the platform and keeps them there in ways that don’t seem to be the case with other platforms,” she said.

    In its own explanation of how it recommends videos, TikTok says it considers a range of factors, such as how long someone stays on a video and personal user information, such as someone’s language preference or country of origin. The algorithm then “selects from a large collection of eligible content and ranks them based on the system’s prediction of how likely you’ll be interested in each one.”

    A Supreme Court ruling from January upholding the TikTok ban notes that each interaction a user has on TikTok — whether watching a video, following an account or leaving a comment — enables the recommendation system to “further tailor a personalized content feed.” 

    National security concerns  

    In Madrid, U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said on Monday that “we want to ensure that the Chinese have a fair, invested environment in the United States, but always that U.S. national security comes first,” according to CNN.

    But while a deal between the U.S. and China could address the ownership dispute, it might not resolve all of the national security concerns that led Congress to pass the TikTok ban with bipartisan support in April of 2024, experts told CBS MoneyWatch.

    The Justice Department last year accused TikTok of collecting sensitive data about U.S. users, warning that the Chinese government could use the information to manipulate the content that people see. It also said TikTok employees were able to communicate directly with ByteDance engineers in China via an internal messaging system called Lark.

    In 2022, TikTok acknowledged in a letter to U.S. senators that China-based employees could have access to American users’ data in certain circumstances and said it was taking steps to strengthen data security. 

    In its decision to uphold the TikTok ban in January, the Supreme Court also noted that China can require TikTok’s parent company “to cooperate with [its] efforts to obtain personal data,” and that “there is little to stop all that information from ending up in the hands of a designated foreign adversary.”

    To minimize any national security concerns, Akoto, the American University assistant professor, said the new arrangement would have to ensure that the app’s China-based engineers are unable to access the U.S. version of Tiktok. If the algorithm sends user data back to China or if the algorithm can be updated outside of the U.S, that could leave American users’ data vulnerable, he said.

    When Jingtao, the deputy director of China’s Central Cyberspace Affairs Commission, spoke to the press earlier this week, he indicated the U.S. and China have agreed on entrusting a partner with handling U.S. user data and content security, although its unclear how exactly that would work. 

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Trump delays TikTok ban enforcement again ahead of expected China deal

    [ad_1]

    Washington — For a fourth time, President Trump has pushed back enforcing a bipartisan law that would effectively ban TikTok over the video-sharing app’s failure to cut ties with ByteDance, its China-based parent company. 

    The president signed an executive order Tuesday extending the pause on enforcing the law until at least Dec. 16.

    The move comes on the heels of Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent’s announcement Monday that U.S. and Chinese negotiators had agreed to “a framework” to resolve a dispute over TikTok’s ownership. Mr. Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping are planning to speak Friday “to firm everything up,” as Mr. Trump put it Tuesday morning.

    The law, which was upheld by the Supreme Court, took effect a day before Mr. Trump’s inauguration in January. Mr. Trump, however, has issued new orders every few months directing the Justice Department not to take action or impose penalties against companies like Apple and Google for failure to remove the widely popular app from their platforms. 

    Under the law, ByteDance must divest from TikTok or lose access to U.S. app stores and web-hosting services. 

    Members of Congress and national security officials have for years warned that TikTok could serve as a vehicle for China to spy on Americans, collect vast amounts of their data or serve them propaganda. During his first term, Mr. Trump tried unsuccessfully to ban the app, citing the potential security risks. 

    In his second term, Mr. Trump has praised TikTok for helping him win the support of young voters and dismissed concerns about the app as “highly overrated.” The White House recently launched its own TikTok account. 

    Mr. Trump has said for months that a deal to sell TikTok is on the verge, but the details of an official agreement, which would be subject to approval from the Chinese government, have yet to be made public. 

    “We have American buyers,” Mr. Trump told reporters last month, adding that he had yet to speak with Xi about a sale. 

    Mr. Trump also teased a deal in late June, telling Fox News in an interview that a group of wealthy individuals had agreed to buy TikTok and he would be sharing more in the coming weeks. Mr. Trump said he thought Xi “will probably do it.” 

    Discussions with China about a potential sale were happening “at the highest level,” White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said on June 30. 

    In late July, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said in an interview on CNBC that the “deal is over to them right now,” referring to China, and warned that TikTok “is going to go dark” if it’s not approved. 

    “We made the decision. We can’t have Chinese control and have something on 100 million American phones,” he said. 

    Lutnick said China or ByteDance “can have a little piece” but “Americans will have control” of the algorithm and “own the technology.” 

    TikTok was a topic of conversation during Bessent’s trade talks on Monday with Chinese officials in Spain. When asked by reporters later in the day whether China would have a stake in the company, Mr. Trump said, “We haven’t decided that.” 

    An apparent deal in April fell through after Mr. Trump announced new tariffs on China. The deal would have spun TikTok’s operations in the U.S. into a new company that was owned and operated by a majority of American investors, a source familiar with the plans said at the time. 

    Sources with knowledge of the negotiations told CBS News this week that the latest deal includes technology company Oracle and private equity firm Silver Lake. (David Ellison, the son of Oracle co-founder Larry Ellison, is the chairman and CEO of Paramount Skydance, which is the parent company of CBS. The Ellison family owns a controlling interest in Paramount Skydance.)

    The Chinese Embassy in Washington responded on Tuesday morning that China will “firmly defend its national interests, the legitimate rights and interests of Chinese companies, and will carry out technology export approvals according to relevant laws and regulations.” 

    The statement added that the Chinese government “also fully respects the will of enterprises and supports them in conducting business negotiations on an equal footing in accordance with market principles.” 

    Lawmakers have said that any deal that does not divest TikTok from ByteDance runs afoul of the law, including any arrangement that allows TikTok to continue operating in the U.S. while using ByteDance’s algorithm. 

    During arguments before the Supreme Court, TikTok’s lawyer said the app “would be a fundamentally different platform” if it was forced to completely cut ties with ByteDance because the new owner would have to rebuild the algorithm, which would take years. In legal filings, TikTok said the inability to share any data with ByteDance would mean that the app’s 170 million American users would not be able to access global content and vice versa. 

    Trump claims authority to not enforce law

    Alan Rozenshtein, a University of Minnesota law professor, said it’s not unusual for laws to go unenforced, but it’s typically because there are resource constraints or the law is ambiguous. The TikTok law is “completely unambiguous,” he said. 

    “There’s no room to argue that the law doesn’t say what it says and there’s also no resource constraint,” he said. “I don’t think that there is a sort of similar instance of this sort of flagrant attempt to let a company violate the law.”

    In letters to tech companies earlier this year, Attorney General Pam Bondi wrote that Mr. Trump “determined that an abrupt shutdown of the TikTok platform would interfere with the execution of the president’s constitutional duties to take care of the national security and foreign affairs of the United States.” 

    Bondi said the Justice Department is “irrevocably relinquishing” any legal claims against the companies, informing them that they can continue to make TikTok available in their app stores “without violating the act, and without incurring any legal liability.” 

    The letters were made public in early July as part of Freedom of Information Act lawsuits. 

    “Whatever your view of prosecutorial discretion, it does not give the president the power to say that something prohibited by statute is actually lawful,” said Zachary Price, a professor at the University of California College of the Law, San Francisco. “It would at most let you suspend enforcement. In other words, you might be able to never seek penalties under the law, but … you can’t tell them that they’re acting lawfully when they’re violating the statute.” 

    Anupam Chander, a law professor at Georgetown University, called the claims in Bondi’s letters an “excessive assertion of presidential power.” 

    But Chander said that by not enforcing the law instead of shutting it down, Mr. Trump may have a better chance at accomplishing what Congress insisted was the law’s intent: to force a sale. 

    “It’s a lot harder to sell a dead horse than a live horse,” Chander said. “If you force it to shut down and then hope in six months that you might engineer a sale — at that point, the value might have diminished so much that there’s very little reason, very little economic incentive for ByteDance to sell at all.” 

    Mr. Trump’s non-enforcement of the law has prompted some pushback from lawmakers, though the intensity has been relatively muted compared to the alarms Congress sounded over the app’s potential national security risks.

    “The courts have been really clear on this,” Sen. Josh Hawley, a Missouri Republican, told reporters in early June. “I think we ought to enforce the law.”  

    Republican Rep. Dan Newhouse of Washington said “the law is clear” and called for it to be “implemented as written.” 

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Trump expected to extend TikTok divestment deadline again: Report

    [ad_1]

    President Donald Trump‘s administration is expected to extend the September 17 deadline for China’s ByteDance to divest TikTok‘s U.S. assets or shut down the popular short-video app, according to a Reuters report citing a source familiar with the matter.

    This would mark the fourth extension granted by Trump since retaking office in January, following previous delays that moved the original congressional deadline to April, then May, June, and now potentially beyond September.

    Newsweek has reached out to the White House via email on Saturday for comment.

    Why It Matters

    The president’s stance on TikTok has evolved. During his first term, he signed executive orders to ban the app, which were later blocked by courts. His change in position followed meetings with American investors and public acknowledgment of TikTok’s role in his political outreach to young voters during last year’s election.

    Despite congressional mandates requiring ByteDance to sell its U.S. operations or face a ban, the continued delays signal the Trump administration’s reluctance to shut down an app used by approximately 170 million Americans.

    The administration’s August launch of an official White House TikTok account further underscores the platform’s strategic importance for political communication.

    What To Know

    TikTok’s uncertain status stems from longstanding concerns about Beijing’s potential ability to use the platform for surveillance, blackmail, or censorship of Americans. The app faces a federal sell-or-ban law enacted by Congress that originally required ByteDance to divest U.S. operations by January 2025.

    Any potential sale faces significant technical and political hurdles, particularly regarding TikTok’s proprietary algorithm, which would require Beijing’s approval to share with U.S. buyers.

    A previous deal framework would have created a new U.S.-based company majority-owned by American investors, but progress stalled after China indicated it would not approve the arrangement following Trump’s tariff announcements.

    The expected extension comes as U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Trade Representative Jamieson Greer engage in trade talks with Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng in Spain where TikTok has been included as an official agenda item for the first time in bilateral negotiations, Reuters reported. The meeting in Spain follows previous rounds in Geneva, London, and Stockholm where the app was not discussed.

    This development provides the Trump administration with political cover for another extension, sources told Reuters.

    The TikTok app logo is shown on an iPhone on January 17 in Houston.

    AP Photo/Ashley Landis, File

    What People Are Saying

    President Donald Trump wrote in June on Truth Social: “I’ve just signed the executive order extending the deadline for the TikTok closing by 90 days (September 17, 2025). Thank you for your attention to this matter!”

    White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said in an August statement: “The Trump administration is committed to communicating the historic successes President Trump has delivered to the American people with as many audiences and platforms as possible.”

    Trump’s then-national security adviser Mike Waltz said in January: “…President Trump has been very clear: Number one, TikTok is a great platform that many Americans use and has been great for his campaign and getting his message out. But number two, he’s going to protect their data.”

    What Happens Next?

    The administration faces mounting pressure to either finalize a divestment arrangement or provide a clear justification for indefinite delays.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Tesla upgrades EV voice assistant system with AI from DeepSeek and ByteDance

    [ad_1]

    Tesla is rolling out an upgraded voice assistant system for its electric vehicles (EVs) in mainland China, adopting artificial intelligence from DeepSeek and ByteDance to better engage with customers in the world’s largest automotive market.

    DeepSeek’s namesake chatbot would be used for “AI interaction”, which enables a Tesla EV’s driver to have casual conversations with the system, while also getting the latest news and weather information, according to the updated terms of use posted this month on the US carmaker’s mainland website.

    ByteDance’s Doubao large language model (LLM) would facilitate voice commands for navigation as well as in-vehicle media and amenities such as air conditioning, according to the updated terms.

    Do you have questions about the biggest topics and trends from around the world? Get the answers with SCMP Knowledge, our new platform of curated content with explainers, FAQs, analyses and infographics brought to you by our award-winning team.

    A user activates the upgraded voice assistant system by saying “Hey, Tesla” or another designated phrase, providing a more intuitive approach than clicking a button on either the EV’s steering wheel or multimedia terminal.

    Volcano Engine, the cloud computing services unit of ByteDance, is responsible for the AI systems integration using an encrypted application programming interface, a protocol that enables different software applications to communicate.

    Tesla did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Friday.

    Visitors check out a Tesla electric vehicle on display at the third China International Supply Chain Expo in Beijing on July 16, 2025. Photo: EPA alt=Visitors check out a Tesla electric vehicle on display at the third China International Supply Chain Expo in Beijing on July 16, 2025. Photo: EPA>

    Tesla’s latest initiative reflects the carmaker’s efforts to boost orders on the mainland’s highly competitive EV market, as the AI systems from DeepSeek and ByteDance would appeal to domestic buyers.

    Details on when Tesla’s upgraded voice assistant system would be available and on which models remain unknown. Tesla’s recently launched six-seat Model Y L SUV, which supports a voice wake-up feature, will start deliveries next month.

    Tesla’s updated terms, meanwhile, cautioned users that AI-generated content “may be incomplete, incorrect or contextually unsuitable”, adding that the technology should not be used to “endanger national security” or “disclose state secrets” as stipulated by China’s laws.

    Still, Tesla was nearly half a year late in adopting Chinese AI solutions. As of mid-February, more than a dozen domestic carmakers – including BYD, Geely and Stellantis-backed start-up Leapmotor – had already announced plans to release cars with DeepSeek-enabled AI features.

    Total EV deliveries – comprising passenger cars and commercial vehicles like buses – slid 5 per cent from a month earlier to 1.26 million units in July, according to data from the government-backed China Association of Automobile Manufacturers. It was the first month-on-month drop in the Chinese EV market since May.

    ByteDance has become a popular AI supplier for carmakers on the mainland. Last year, the TikTok and Douyin owner teamed up with Mercedes-Benz to integrate its LLM into the German carmaker’s in-car systems in China.

    The Beijing-based unicorn ByteDance had also formed an “automobile LLM ecosystem alliance” with more than 20 firms that included Geely and Great Wall Motor.

    This article originally appeared in the South China Morning Post (SCMP), the most authoritative voice reporting on China and Asia for more than a century. For more SCMP stories, please explore the SCMP app or visit the SCMP’s Facebook and Twitter pages. Copyright © 2025 South China Morning Post Publishers Ltd. All rights reserved.

    Copyright (c) 2025. South China Morning Post Publishers Ltd. All rights reserved.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • TikTok employees raised concerns that app could be addictive, unsealed edited video shows

    [ad_1]

    Newly unsealed and edited video shows TikTok employees and consultants expressing concern that potentially addictive features of the app could harm users’ mental health.

    The video compilation, which was shared with CBS News by the North Carolina Department of Justice, is part of the evidence in a 2024 lawsuit the state’s former attorney general filed against TikTok alleging the company misled the public about the safety of the social media platform. 

    North Carolina Special Superior Court Judge Adam Conrad on Tuesday ordered that the video and complaint be unsealed. In a separate ruling, he also denied a motion by TikTok’s parent company, China-based ByteDance, to dismiss the North Carolina lawsuit.

    “These clips clearly show that social media companies know they’re designing their apps to hook our children even at the expense of their health,” said North Carolina Attorney General Jeff Jackson in a statement to CBS News. “That’s why the company fought so hard to keep the video out of the public eye.”

    In a statement to CBS MoneyWatch, a TikTok spokesperson called the video a “shameful attempt to distort an open internal conversation about making the platform safer when TikTok was just beginning five years ago.”

    “This manipulation relies on conversations taken out of context with the sole purpose of misleading the public and grandstanding,” he added.

    The spokesperson also said TikTok has over 70 features and settings designed to support the safety and well-being of teens and other app users. Those features include a 60-minute daily screen time limit and another that automatically triggers a guided meditation exercise after 10 p.m. for teen users scrolling on TikTok.

    In a complaint issued in October 2024, former North Carolina Attorney General Joshua Stein alleged TikTok’s design fosters “excessive, compulsive and addictive use” and that the company knew about the harm it was causing. Stein also claimed TikTok ignored the addictive nature of the app “because their business model and desire for advertising revenue require keeping consumers on the app as much as possible.” 

    The lawsuit is part of broader litigation brought by 14 state attorneys general last year over allegations that TikTok harms children’s mental health. Minnesota’s attorney general joined the fight this week with a separate lawsuit.

    TikTok has denied the claims.

    “We strongly disagree with these claims, many of which we believe to be inaccurate and misleading,”  a TikTok spokesperson said in a statement to CBS MoneyWatch at the time. “We’re proud of and remain deeply committed to the work we’ve done to protect teens and we will continue to update and improve our product.”

    “Never want to leave”

    The 3 1/2-minute video released this week features a series of clips of internal company meetings, with speakers describing what they viewed as harmful features of the TikTok app, including some that promote “compulsive use.” 

    The meetings featured in the video took place a few years ago, according to a spokesperson for the North Carolina Department of Justice, who said they were unable to disclose the exact dates.

    “We obviously wanted people to spend as much time as possible on TikTok, which can be in contrast to what is best for your mental health,” said Ally Mann, whose LinkedIn profile lists her as a creator marketing and events lead at TikTok.

    In a separate clip, Ashlen Sepulveda, who is labeled in the video as working on trust and safety at the company, explains potential pitfalls of the TikTok algorithm that she said selects content based on users’ searches.

    “Let’s say for eating disorders, for example,” Sepulveda said in the video. “The more the user looks up things about fitness or diet, it turns into losing weight and then soon enough the entire ‘for you’ feed for this user is really soft disordered eating behavior that is being discussed by their peers with no opportunity to remove themselves from that bubble.”

    In another clip, Brett Peters, who according to his LinkedIn profile is global head of creator advocacy and reputation at TikTok, said TikTok’s goal is to produce such a diversity of content that “you never want to leave” the app. 

    Sixty-three percent of teens said they used TikTok in 2023, according to a Pew Research Center poll. 

    Meanwhile, TikTok continues to face an uncertain future as it stares down an approaching deadline, recently extended to Sept. 17 by President Trump, requiring the app to separate from its China-based parent company or be banned in the U.S. 

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • In lawsuit, Justice Department says TikTok collected data on children

    In lawsuit, Justice Department says TikTok collected data on children

    [ad_1]

    In lawsuit, Justice Department says TikTok collected data on children – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    The Justice Department on Friday filed a federal lawsuit against TikTok and its parent company ByteDance, saying that the social media giant collected data on users under the age of 13 without getting the permission of their parents. Scott MacFarlane has details.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • TikTok will still be a ‘gatekeeper’ under the Digital Markets Act, EU rules

    TikTok will still be a ‘gatekeeper’ under the Digital Markets Act, EU rules

    [ad_1]

    As far as the EU is concerned, TikTok requires strong, ongoing regulations. The EU’s General Court dismissed an action brought by TikTok’s parent company, ByteDance, which argued that the platform shouldn’t be considered a “gatekeeper” under the Digital Markets Act (DMA). The designation came in September 2023, and ByteDance filed to undo it just two months later.

    ByteDance had painted TikTok has an up and comer EU market, citing pushback through the development of Reels and Shorts — the General Court disagrees: “Although in 2018 TikTok was indeed a challenger seeking to contest the position of established operators such as Meta and Alphabet, it had rapidly consolidated its position, and even strengthened that position over the following years, despite the launch of competing services such as Reels and Shorts, to the point of reaching, in a short time, half the size, in terms of number of users within the European Union, of Facebook and of Instagram.”

    ByteDance had argued that TikTok was not dominant in the EU market, citing Instagram’s Reels and YouTube’s Shorts as meaningful competition. The General Court disagreed, writing that “although in 2018 TikTok was indeed a challenger seeking to contest the position of established operators such as Meta and Alphabet, it had rapidly consolidated its position … to the point of reaching, in a short time, half the size … of Facebook and of Instagram.”

    The General Court added that TikTok meets the qualifications set out to be a gatekeeper: a €75 million ($82 million) global market value, over 45 million monthly active end users and over 10,000 yearly active business users across the EU over the last three years.

    The DMA went into effect in March and prohibits gatekeepers — including Alphabet, Meta, Amazon and more — from favoring their own platforms or forcing users to stay inside their company’s ecosystem. ByteDance has just over two months to launch an appeal with the Court of Justice, the EU’s highest court.

    [ad_2]

    Sarah Fielding

    Source link

  • TikTok Is in Some Minority Report-Style Legal Trouble

    TikTok Is in Some Minority Report-Style Legal Trouble

    [ad_1]

    Image: QubixStudio (Shutterstock)

    Just months away from being banned in the U.S., the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) appears to be putting some salt in TikTok’s wound. The agency has issued a bizarre message about referring a complaint about the social media app to the Department of Justice (DOJ).

    The FTC issued a statement on Tuesday saying its investigations “uncovered reason to believe” that TikTok and its parent company ByteDance, are “violating or are about to violate the law.” The commission says the violations (or would-be violations) are of the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (“COPPA”) and the FTC Act but didn’t provide specifics. Also, the statement mentions how making this action public is something the FTC doesn’t normally do, but it determined that it was in the public’s interest to release the statement. So, we’re letting you know that they think you should know.

    A DOJ spokesperson says they can’t comment on the substance of the referral, but the department did consult with the FTC in advance and is considering the claim.

    In the statement, the FTC mentions how its investigation began in 2019 with Musical.ly, the predecessor of TikTok. Back then, the commission did find that the company was “aware that a significant percentage of users were younger than 13 and received thousands of complaints from parents” and issued a fine of $5.7 million. It’s unclear if this complaint against TikTok is related or if the investigation found other violations.

    TikTok says it has been working with the FTC for more than a year to address concerns it may have.

    “We’re disappointed the agency is pursuing litigation instead of continuing to work with us on a reasonable solution,” a TikTok spokesperson said in an emailed statement Tuesday. “We strongly disagree with the FTC’s allegations, many of which relate to past events and practices that are factually inaccurate or have been addressed. We’re proud of and remain deeply committed to the work we’ve done to protect children and we will continue to update and improve our product.”

    TikTok is not in the best spot right now, although it’s still incredibly popular. In April, President Joe Biden signed a bill requiring the divestment of TikTok or else face a U.S. ban. The social app is on the 270-day clock to figure out something, or it could wait for the upcoming presidential election and hope Trump wins as he’s suddenly come around to support TikTok. Maybe he found a dance that he liked watching on the app.

    [ad_2]

    Oscar Gonzalez

    Source link

  • Nebraska sues TikTok for allegedly targeting minors with

    Nebraska sues TikTok for allegedly targeting minors with

    [ad_1]

    Nebraska is suing social media giant TikTok and its parent company ByteDance, claiming the platform targets minors with “addictive design” and is “fueling a youth mental health crisis.”

    “TikTok has shown no regard for the wreckage its exploitative algorithm is leaving behind,” Attorney General Mike Hilgers said in a statement

    The lawsuit, filed in state court Wednesday, claims the platform engages in “deceptive and unfair trade practices” by claiming it is “family-friendly” and “safe for young users.” 

    The lawsuit alleges TikTok does not adhere to its own Community Guidelines, which states the platform does not allow “content that may put young people at risk.” The platform has also spent millions on advertising stating it’s suitable for young people, the complaint alleges, and representatives of TikTok have testified repeatedly the company monitors for harmful content and removes content that risks harm to minors or otherwise violates the Community Guidelines.

    But the lawsuit alleges the opposite is true and that teens and children are shown inappropriate content based on the platform’s algorithm and “addictive design.” 

    As part of its investigation, Nebraska created TikTok accounts for fictitious minor users registered as 13, 15, and 17 years old, the lawsuit said. Within minutes, the lawsuit claims, the teen users were directed to inappropriate content by the TikTok algorithm, including videos described in graphic detail in the lawsuit as simulating sexual acts and encouraging eating disorders. 

    Much of the content pushed to minors is encouraged by the “For You” feed, the lawsuit claims, which shows users the alleged inappropriate content without them searching for similar videos. Instead, the video just pops into minors’ feeds uninvited, the lawsuit claims. 

    Hilgers said kids are shown “inappropriate content, ranging from videos that encourage suicidal ideation and fuel depression, drive body image issues, and encourage eating disorders to those that encourage drug use and sexual content wildly inappropriate for young kids.”

    These interactions have fueled “a youth mental health crisis in Nebraska,” the lawsuit said. 

    TikTok refutes the allegations. 

    “TikTok has industry-leading safeguards to support teens’ well-being, including age-restricted features, parental controls, an automatic 60-minute time limit for people under 18, and more. We will continue working to address these industry-wide concerns,” a company spokesperson told CBS News in a statement.

    Nebraska’s lawsuit comes as TikTok battles the U.S. government over recent legislation requiring the platform to cut ties with its China-based owner within a year or be effectively banned from the United States. 

    TikTok said in a lawsuit filed earlier this month that banning the popular social media platform would violate the First Amendment rights of its users. Eight TikToker users — with millions of followers between them — filed a similar suit against the federal government last week. 

    More than 30 states and the federal government have banned the app on state- or government-issued devices. Montana became the first state to ban the app last May, a few months later a federal judge overturned the ruling, in part because the ban “infringes on the Constitutional rights of users and businesses.”

    — Melissa Quinn and C. Mandler contributed reporting.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • TikTok sues Biden administration to block new law that could lead to U.S. ban

    TikTok sues Biden administration to block new law that could lead to U.S. ban

    [ad_1]

    Washington — TikTok, the widely popular social media app, and its parent company ByteDance filed a lawsuit against the Justice Department on Tuesday over a new law that requires the platform to cut ties with its China-based owner within a year or be effectively banned from the United States.

    The petition filed in federal court in Washington, D.C., alleges that the measure signed into law by President Biden last month is unconstitutional in part because it violates the First Amendment rights of its users in the U.S. by effectively shutting down their access to the popular forum. Filed with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, the petition calls for the court to block Attorney General Merrick Garland from enforcing the measure.

    The suit names TikTok and Beijing-based ByteDance as plaintiffs and was filed against Garland.

    The foreign aid package passed by Congress last month included a provision that required ByteDance to sell its stake in TikTok within a year. If the company fails to meet that one-year deadline, TikTok would lose access to app stores and web-hosting providers, effectively cutting it off to the roughly 170 million users in the U.S. 

    But TikTok said in its filing that while lawmakers portrayed the measure as a choice between divesture or a ban, “there is no question: the Act will force a shutdown of TikTok by January 19, 2025, silencing the 170 million Americans who use the platform to communicate in ways that cannot be replicated elsewhere.”

    The company said that the divestiture required by the law within a 270-day timeline, subject to a 90-day extension by the president, is “simply not possible,” and pointed to the Chinese government’s opposition to selling the technology that has made TikTok so wildly popular in the U.S. — its recommendation engine.

    “For the first time in history, Congress has enacted a law that subjects a single, named speech platform to a permanent, nationwide ban, and bars every American from participating in a unique online community with more than 1 billion people worldwide,” TikTok wrote in its filing.

    TikTok came under scrutiny by Congress amid concerns about the app’s ties to China. U.S. officials have warned that the video-sharing platform is a threat to national security, in part because they say the Chinese government can use it to spy on Americans or weaponize the app to manipulate content and influence the public.

    FBI Director Christopher Wray told the House Intelligence Committee in March that the Chinese government could use TikTok’s software to gain access to Americans’ phones. Lawmakers in both chambers of Congress and across partisan lines have also expressed alarm about the app after participating in classified briefings.

    Rep. John Moolenaar, a Michigan Republican who chairs the House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party, said in a statement that Congress and the executive branch concluded that TikTok “poses a grave risk to national security and the American people.” 

    “It is telling that TikTok would rather spend its time, money, and effort fighting in court than solving the problem by breaking up with the CCP,” he said.

    TikTok’s legal effort was not unexpected, as the company had pledged to challenge the law’s constitutionality in court. The company has pointed to an initiative called “Project Texas,” launched in 2022, to demonstrate its efforts to safeguard U.S. user data and the integrity of its platform from foreign government influence. TikTok also said it was involved in a draft agreement through negotiations with an obscure federal agency, the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States, that included a “shut-down option” allowing the app to be suspended in the U.S. if it failed to meet certain obligations.

    The platform accused Congress in its petition of overlooking its investments “in favor of the politically expedient and punitive approach of targeting for disfavor one publisher and speaker (TikTok Inc.), one speech forum (TikTok), and that forum’s ultimate owner (ByteDance Ltd.)”

    Concerns about TikTok from policymakers have escalated in recent years, and more than 30 states and the federal government have banned the app on state-issued devices. Former President Donald Trump signed an executive order in 2020 that would’ve prohibited transactions with ByteDance, citing the data collection that “threatens to allow the Chinese Communist Party access to Americans’ personal and proprietary information.” But his attempts to ban the app were blocked by federal judges.

    Montana became the first state to prohibit the app last year, but a federal judge blocked the measure in part because of First Amendment concerns.

    But even amid those fears, several political figures have their own accounts, including Mr. Biden’s presidential campaign and members of Congress. TikTok pointed to the use of the app by supporters of the ban in its petition and said it “undermines the claim that the platform poses an actual threat to Americans.”

    Caitlin Yilek and Kaia Hubbard contributed to this report.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • U.S. Bans TikTok

    U.S. Bans TikTok

    [ad_1]

    President Biden signed a bill into law banning TikTok nationwide unless the Chinese company that owns it, ByteDance, sells its stake in the app within a year. What do you think?

    “And with that, Chinese influence over our economy comes to an end.”

    Rowena Marriott, Topiary Clipper

    “But I haven’t finished radicalizing!”

    Lochlan Robin, Tanning Bed Technician

    “Now the youth will return to the true center of taste and style: Paris, France.”

    Asma Harding, Weight Estimator

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Why U.S. officials want to ban TikTok

    Why U.S. officials want to ban TikTok

    [ad_1]

    Washington — A law that could lead to a national ban of TikTok cleared the Senate Tuesday night in a bipartisan vote of 79-18, representing one of the most serious threats to the immensely popular social media app’s U.S. operations. 

    Some lawmakers insist they don’t want to actually ban the platform used by roughly 170 million Americans, arguing the choice lies with TikTok’s China-based parent company, ByteDance. 

    To keep TikTok up and running in the U.S., ByteDance must sell its stake in TikTok, and it has up to a year to do so, according to the legislation, which was signed into law on Wednesday by President Biden. But the Chinese government, which would have to sign off on any sale, opposes a forced sale. Without a divestiture, the company would lose access to app stores and web-hosting providers, effectively banning it in the U.S. The timeline could be prolonged by an expected legal battle. 

    “This is not an effort to take your voice away. … This is not a ban of a service you appreciate,” Sen. Mark Warner, a Virginia Democrat and the chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee, said Tuesday in a floor speech, acknowledging that many Americans are skeptical of the legislation. “At the end of the day, they’ve not seen what Congress has seen.” 

    Why does Congress want to ban TikTok? 

    Lawmakers have suspicions about the video-sharing app’s ties to China and have tried to regulate it, though prior efforts to widely restrict it have been unsuccessful. U.S. officials have repeatedly warned that TikTok threatens national security because the Chinese government could use it to spy on Americans or weaponize it to covertly influence the U.S. public by amplifying or suppressing certain content. 

    The concern is warranted, U.S. officials say, because Chinese national security laws require organizations to cooperate with intelligence gathering. FBI Director Christopher Wray told House Intelligence Committee members in March that the Chinese government could compromise Americans’ devices through the software. 

    “This app is a spy balloon in Americans’ phones” that is “used to surveil and exploit Americans’ personal information,” Rep. Michael McCaul, a Texas Republican who chairs the House Foreign Affairs Committee, said Saturday before the lower chamber passed the bill as part of a broader foreign aid package. 

    In classified briefings, lawmakers have learned “how rivers of data are being collected and shared in ways that are not well-aligned with American security interests,” Sen. Chris Coons, a Democrat from Delaware, said Tuesday. 

    Sen. Marco Rubio of Florida, the top Republican on the Senate Intelligence Committee, said last month that the Chinese government has the ability to influence “a lot of young people” who use TikTok as their main news source. 

    “That’s a national security concern,” Rubio said. 

    Warner said Tuesday that the fact that Chinese diplomats are lobbying congressional staff against the legislation, which was first reported by Politico, shows “how dearly [Chinese President] Xi Jinping is invested in this product.” 

    Senate Minority Whip John Thune, a Republican from South Dakota, called the lobbying effort “a stunning confirmation of the value the Chinese government places on its ability to access Americans’ information and shape their TikTok experience.” 

    Arguments against banning TikTok 

    TikTok has denied that it’s beholden to the Chinese government and has accused lawmakers who want to restrict it of trampling on citizens’ free speech rights. TikTok has vowed to mount a legal challenge, calling the law “unconstitutional.” 

    “We’ll continue to fight, as this legislation is a clear violation of the First Amendment rights of the 170 million Americans on TikTok and would have devastating consequences for the 7 million small businesses that use TikTok to reach new customers, sell their products, and create new jobs. This is the beginning, not the end of this long process,” TikTok executive Michael Beckerman said in an internal company memo obtained by CBS News that was sent to TikTok staff on Saturday. 

    In a video on Wednesday, TikTok CEO Shou Zi Chew said “the facts and the Constitution are on our side and we expect to prevail again.” He said the company has invested billions of dollars to secure user data and “keep our platform free from outside manipulation.” 

    TikTok began an initiative known as “Project Texas” in 2022 to safeguard American users’ data on servers in the U.S. and ease lawmakers’ fears. But Warner argued Tuesday that the initiative was insufficient because it would still allow TikTok’s algorithm and source code to remain in China, making them “subject to Chinese government exploitation.” 

    Democratic Sen. Ed Markey of Massachusetts said Tuesday on the Senate floor that TikTok poses national security risks, but the legislation amounted to “censorship” because it could deny Americans access to a platform they rely on for news, business purposes, building a community and connecting with others. 

    “We should be very clear about the likely outcome of this law,” Markey said. “It’s really just a TikTok ban. And once we properly acknowledge that this bill is a TikTok ban, we can better see its impact on free expression.” 

    Sen. Rand Paul, a Republican from Kentucky, wrote in a recent opinion piece that the law could be a gateway to the government forcing the sale of other companies.

    “If the damage to one company weren’t enough, there is a very real danger this ham-fisted assault on TikTok may actually give the government the power to force the sale of other companies,” he wrote and predicted that  the Supreme Court will ultimately rule the law is unconstitutional. 

    Nikole Killion and Alan He contributed reporting. 

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • TikTok Divest-or-Ban Bill Passes in the Senate

    TikTok Divest-or-Ban Bill Passes in the Senate

    [ad_1]

    The U.S. Senate passed the TikTok bill on Tuesday evening in a vote of 79-18. The bill, which bans TikTok unless Bytedance sells it to a U.S. owner, flew through Congress this week as part of a broader package to provide $90 billion in foreign aid to Ukraine, Israel, and Taiwan. President Joe Biden said in a statement following the Senate vote that he would sign the package as soon as Wednesday, clearing the last hurdle before the TikTok divest-or-ban bill becomes law.

    “We’ve learned in recent years that democracy is a fragile and precious thing,” said Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer on the Senate floor Tuesday. “It will not survive the threats of this century – the new threats – if we aren’t willing to do what it takes to defend it.”

    TikTok is prepared to wage a legal battle against the U.S. government over the so-called ban, Bloomberg reported on Sunday. The social media company claims the so-called TikTok ban is “a clear violation” of the First Amendment rights of TikTok’s 170 million American users. A court case of this kind is unprecedented and could go up to the Supreme Court.

    TikTok did not immediately respond to Gizmodo’s request for comment.

    The “Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act,” also known as the TikTok bill, grants the White House new privileges to crack down on apps it determines to be a national security threat. The bill gives U.S. presidents the power to label apps as “foreign adversary-controlled applications” and force them to be sold to a U.S. owner within 270 days, though Biden can extend this to 360 days (a previous version only provided 180 days). If no sale occurs, the apps will be banned from app stores and blocked by internet service providers in the United States.

    TikTok has long denied that it shares any data with the Chinese government. However, Senators received classified briefings on TikTok from national security officials in March, which reportedly revealed the app’s “shocking” spy capabilities. Senators told Axios that TikTok could be used to tap the microphone on users’ devices, and even determine what users are doing on other apps. That said, none of this evidence has been made public

    A previous version of this bill swiftly passed through the House in March but stalled in the Senate for more than a month. By tying the TikTok bill to a crucial foreign aid package, lawmakers were able to nearly ensure it would be taken up by the Senate.

    One concern tech lawyers have raised about the TikTok bill is that it could ban apps other than TikTok. The bill features vague definitions of what constitutes “foreign adversary-controlled applications,” and gives the president a near unchecked power to make such a categorization.

    As President Biden seems poised to sign the TikTok bill into law, former President Donald Trump has flipped his stance on the social media app. Trump now supports TikTok’s existence, posting on Truth Social Monday that “Joe Biden is responsible for banning TikTok.” Trump was the first to attempt a TikTok ban in 2020 when he signed an executive order that was later rejected by a federal court.

    Trump’s reversal, which seems contradictory, is likely to curry favor with younger voters. Despite the overwhelming support in Congress, a U.S. TikTok ban is not popular with voters. Just 38% of U.S. adults say they would support a TikTok ban, according to the Pew Research Center. If Biden signs the TikTok bill, he’ll appear strong against China, but could potentially lose important swing voters.

    TikTok says this bill would “trample” free speech in America, an increasingly popular claim among social media apps. Elon Musk’s X and Trump’s Truth Social make similar First Amendment arguments for their app’s controversial content. Meanwhile, Mark Zuckerberg’s Meta is going in the other direction. Facebook, Threads, and Instagram how vowed not to prioritize news on their social media sites, making duller apps in exchange for less controversy.

    TikTok has fought tooth and nail to avoid a U.S. ban under Bytedance’s ownership. The app sent push notifications to millions of American users asking them to call their local congress member. Lawmakers’ offices were flooded with phone calls later that day. TikTok and Bytedance also reportedly spent over $7 million lobbying in Congress this year to fight the potential ban. Those attempts were unsuccessful, so now TikTok is poised to take this battle to court.

    [ad_2]

    Maxwell Zeff

    Source link

  • The TikTok ban was just passed by the House. Here’s what could happen next.

    The TikTok ban was just passed by the House. Here’s what could happen next.

    [ad_1]

    TikTok users could soon find that the popular social media service is either under new ownership or, although it wouldn’t happen immediately, outright banned in the U.S.

    On Saturday, the House passed legislation that would bar TikTok from operating in the U.S. if the popular platform’s China-based owner doesn’t sell its stake within a year. The bill will next head to the Senate, where it is expected to pass, buoyed by its attachment to a larger foreign aid package for Ukraine and Israel that has gained bipartisan support. 

    TikTok has attracted unwanted scrutiny not only for the addictiveness of its constantly scrolling videos, but also due to its Chinese owner, ByteDance. That has raised concerns among lawmakers and security experts that the Chinese government could tap TikTok’s trove of personal data about millions of U.S. users. 

    Meanwhile, TikTok has asked its users to contact their lawmakers to argue against the bill’s passage, an effort that appears to have failed to sway opinions in Washington, D.C., noted Eurasia Group director Clayton Allen. 

    TikTok has sent push alerts to users of the social media platform, urging them to contact their lawmakers about a congressional bill that would require its Chinese owner ByteDance to sell it or face a U.S. ban.

    Aimee Picchi


    As recently as last week, TikTok was sending push notifications to some of its users urging them to reach out to their lawmakers, saying that the bill could “take away YOUR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT to access TikTok.”

    “It’s a low-cost exercise if you have access to the user base,” Allen told CBS MoneyWatch. “But it seems like it has backfired.”

    Some lawmakers had argued that TikTok’s ability to send bulk push notifications to its users, many of them minors, underscored the risks of the app.

    In a statement, TikTok said it is “unfortunate” that lawmakers are “using the cover of important foreign and humanitarian assistance to once again jam through a ban bill that would trample the free speech rights of 170 million Americans, devastate 7 million businesses, and shutter a platform that contributes $24 billion to the U.S. economy, annually.”

    Here’s what to know about what could happen next to the TikTok bill. 

    When will the Senate vote on the TikTok bill?

    The Senate is expected to take up the bill as early as Tuesday, although the vote could come on Wednesday, said CBS News congressional correspondent Scott MacFarlane. 

    President Joe Biden has indicated he would sign the bill, which is primarily focused on providing foreign aid to Ukraine and Israel. 

    Why does Congress want to ban TikTok? 

    Actually, lawmakers want ByteDance to sell its stake in TikTok. Barring such a deal, the legislation would, in fact, ban the social media app in the U.S.

    Lawmakers are increasingly concerned about the company’s ties in China, with fears that ByteDance or TikTok could share data about U.S. users with China’s authoritarian government. 

    “The idea that we would give the Communist Party this much of a propaganda tool, as well as the ability to scrape 170 million Americans’ personal data, it is a national security risk,” Senator Mark Warner, a Virginia Democrat, said on CBS’ “Face the Nation,” on Sunday.

    What is the timeline for a possible TikTok sale or shutdown?

    If passed, the bill would give TikTok’s owner nine months to arrange a sale, with the potential for an additional three-month grace period, according to a copy of the bill released earlier this month. 

    But, Allen of Eurasia Group noted, that would put the nine-month mark in mid- to late January, which could also coincide with the U.S. presidential inauguration. If former President Donald Trump wins in November, he could very well take a different tack with TikTok, the analyst noted.

    “This might become a question for the next administration,” Allen said. “Looking at the language of the bill, I’m not sure Trump would be as bound to pursue what the Biden administration would want. He could use it as a point of leverage with China.”

    If TikTok is sold, who might buy it?

    Likely bidders include Microsoft, Oracle or private equity groups, according to Wedbush Securities analyst Dan Ives.

    However, Ives thinks ByteDance would be unlikely to sell TikTok with its core algorithms, the vital software that provides video recommendations to users based on their interests and viewing habits. 

    “The value of TikTok would dramatically change without the algorithms and makes the ultimate sale/divestiture of TikTok a very complex endeavor, with many potential strategic/financial bidders waiting anxiously for this process to kick off,” Ives said in a research note.

    Could other social media platforms benefit from the bill? 

    Rivals such as Meta could benefit from the bill if it becomes a law, Ives noted. 

    Wedbush estimates that roughly 60% of TikTok users would shift to Meta’s Instagram and Facebook if TikTok went dark in the U.S. Google would also benefit, he added. 

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • The EU opens an investigation into TikTok Lite, citing addiction concerns

    The EU opens an investigation into TikTok Lite, citing addiction concerns

    [ad_1]

    The European Union (EU) into TikTok and has accused the platform of running afoul of the region’s Digital Services Act (DSA), . The probe involves the addictive nature of TikTok Lite, which is a smaller version of the app that takes up less memory on a smartphone and was built to perform over slower internet connections.

    TikTok Lite launched earlier this month in France and Spain and includes a design aspect that allows users to earn points by watching and liking videos. These points can be exchanged for stuff like Amazon vouchers and TikTok’s proprietary digital currency, which is typically used to tip creators. The EU’s Commission has expressed concern that this type of “task and reward” design language could impact the mental health of young users by “stimulating addictive behavior.”

    The Commission hasn’t yet confirmed any breaches of the DSA, but has suggested that it might impose temporary measures to force parent company ByteDance to suspend TikTok Lite in the EU while it continues the investigation. The company has until April 24 to argue against these potential measures, so the app’s still available for EU residents. However, ByteDance failed to provide the EU with a risk assessment document regarding TikTok Lite after being asked last week.

    This failure to comply with the DSA could open the company up to steep penalties of up to one percent of its total annual income and periodic penalties of up to five percent of daily income. The Commission hasn’t indicated if it plans on issuing these fines as the investigation continues.

    “We suspect TikTok Lite could be as toxic and addictive as” light cigarettes, Thierry Breton, the commissioner for the EU Internal Market, wrote in a press release announcing the probe. “We will spare no effort to protect our children.”

    ByteDance has yet to respond to the investigation and the potential of TikTok Lite being banned in the EU. This latest inquiry follows a more comprehensive probe . That wide-ranging investigation focuses on addictive algorithms, age verification issues, default privacy settings and ad transparency.

    February’s probe is ongoing, but ByteDance was already forced to make concessions to allow TikTok to operate in the EU. The company had to give users the choice to the For You Page and instituted new harmful content reporting options. It also suspended personalized ads for EU users aged 13 to 17.

    As for America, the keeps inching closer to reality. The US House of Representatives tucked a revised version of the bill into this weekend’s foreign aid package. Under this new proposed legislation, ByteDance would have one year to sell off TikTok before it would be banned from app stores. It’s now heading to the Senate and will likely be voted on this week. However, it remains to be seen if the Senate will even keep the stuff about TikTok in the foreign aid package. President Biden has previously said if Congress passes it.

    [ad_2]

    Lawrence Bonk

    Source link

  • House votes in favor of bill that could ban TikTok, sending it onward to Senate

    House votes in favor of bill that could ban TikTok, sending it onward to Senate

    [ad_1]

    The US House of Representatives passed a bill on Saturday that could either see TikTok banned in the country or force its sale. A revised version of the bill, which previously passed the House in March but later stalled in Senate, was roped in with a foreign aid package this time around, likely meaning it will now be treated as a higher priority item. The bill originally gave TikTok’s Chinese parent company, ByteDance, six months to sell the app if it’s passed into law or TikTok would be banned from US app stores. Under the revised version, ByteDance would have up to a year to divest.

    The bill passed with a vote of 360-58 in the House, according to AP. It’ll now move on to the Senate, which could vote on it in just a matter of days. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer said today that the Senate is working to reach an agreement on when the next vote will be for the foreign aid package that the TikTok bill is attached to, but it is expected to happen this coming Tuesday. President Joe Biden has previously said he would support the bill if Congress passes it.

    The bill paints TikTok as a national security threat due to its ties to China. There are roughly 170 million US users on the app, at least according to TikTok, and ByteDance isn’t expected to let them go without a fight. In a statement posted on X earlier this week, the TikTok Policy account said such a law would “trample the free speech rights” of these users, “devastate 7 million businesses, and shutter a platform that contributes $24 billion to the U.S. economy, annually.” Critics of the bill have also argued that banning TikTok would do little in the way of actually protecting Americans’ data.

    [ad_2]

    Cheyenne MacDonald

    Source link

  • FCC Chair Jessica Rosenworcel Supports TikTok Ban, Calls Lack of Oversight ‘Stunning’

    FCC Chair Jessica Rosenworcel Supports TikTok Ban, Calls Lack of Oversight ‘Stunning’

    [ad_1]

    FCC chairman Jessica Rosenworcel (center) said President Joe Biden should sign the TikTok ban if he gets the opportunity. (L-R) Secretary of Health and Human Services Xavier Becerra, Representative Tony Cárdenas (DC-CA 29th District), Rosenworcel, Senator Alex Padilla (D-CA), Senator Thom Tillis (R-NC). Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

    Federal Communications Commission chairman Jessica Rosenworcel shared her clear stance on a potential TikTok ban during a luncheon at the Paley Center for Media on Tuesday (April 16), which was attended by media industry insiders from companies like Hearst, AARP and New York City Mayor Eric Adams’ communications team. In a Q&A session with Nick Thompson, CEO of The Atlantic, Rosenworcel said that if the House of Representatives passes the bill and makes it to President Joe Biden’s desk, “He should absolutely sign it.”

    “For decades, we’ve had policies in the Communications Act that would prevent, for instance, a Chinese national or a Chinese company from owning our nation’s broadcast television stations,” Rosenworcel said. “And yet here we have something arguably among the newer forms of media, and there’s zero oversight. I think that’s stunning.” 

    Other FCC leaders have been vocal about restricting access to TikTok. In 2022, Rosenworcel’s colleague Brendan Carr wrote an open letter asking Google and Apple to ban TikTok from their app stores.

    “TikTok is not just another video app,” Carr posted on X. “That’s the sheep’s clothing.”

    Millions of Americans are waiting to see if the U.S. government will follow through on banning the popular video-sharing app. The proposal is that TikTok must break away from its Chinese owner, BtyeDance, or become inaccessible in the United States. President Biden has already said that if a bill banning TikTok comes to him, he will sign it. This would also mean stopping the TikTok page his team created for Biden’s reelection campaign. At the moment, the bill appears to be stalled out in the House. 

    TikTok’s CEO, Shou Zi Chew, has begun his own campaign to keep TikTok in the U.S. The executive rarely makes public appeals, but he took to the app in March, asking for American TikTok users to speak out against the potential ban. 

    “I encourage you to keep sharing your stories,” Chew said in the TikTok video. “Share them with your friends, share them with your family. Share them with your senators. Protect your constitutional rights.” 

    Rosenworcel feels that the FCC regulations for data privacy are the “gold standard” for traditional telecommunications. However, she acknowledged a clear gap between the rapid development of digital media and other emerging technologies, like A.I., and the federal government’s capabilities. 

    “I think that those protections are really solid. We have to figure out how to extend them to a digital age where so much is unprotected,” Rosenworcel said. 

    TikTok’s fate is not in the hands of the FCC, but policies around net neutrality, data privacy and internet connectivity fall under Rosenworcel’s leadership. She is currently advocating for the Commission to reinstate net neutrality rules that bring back a national standard for private internet providers, including prohibiting them from making customers pay extra money to access high-speed internet. Former chairman Ajit Pai repealed those protections. The vote to bring the rules back is on April 25.

    FCC Chair Jessica Rosenworcel Supports TikTok Ban, Calls Lack of Oversight ‘Stunning’

    [ad_2]

    Nhari Djan

    Source link

  • When would a TikTok ban go into effect?

    When would a TikTok ban go into effect?

    [ad_1]

    Washington — Americans could lose access to TikTok within months if a bill that seeks to force its Beijing-based parent company ByteDance to sell its stake is signed into law. But the popular video-sharing app’s potentially swift demise depends on whether the bill can overcome a number of hurdles. 

    Lawmakers have long tried to regulate the platform because of its ties to China. They argue it threatens national security because the Chinese government could use TikTok to spy on Americans or weaponize it to covertly influence the U.S. public by amplifying or suppressing certain content. 

    TikTok has repeatedly stated that it would deny requests from the Chinese government for Americans’ data. It also points to “Project Texas,” an initiative that TikTok began in 2022 to safeguard American users’ data on servers in the U.S. and ease lawmakers’ fears. 

    The House overwhelmingly passed a measure Wednesday that gives ByteDance a choice: Sell TikTok within six months, or lose access to app stores and web-hosting services in the U.S. 

    It now heads to the Senate, where’s its future is uncertain

    When will the Senate vote on the TikTok bill? 

    It doesn’t appear that the Senate is in a hurry to send the bill to President Biden, who recently said he would sign it

    A number of senators have noted the upper chamber moves slower than its counterpart, which passed the measure just eight days after it was introduced. 

    “It’s hard for me to imagine that it’ll be real fast. We don’t do things fast. We’re designed not to do things fast, so I would think months,” Sen. Kevin Cramer, a Republican from North Dakota, said Wednesday when asked about the timeline. 

    On Thursday, Democratic Sen. Ron Wyden of Oregon said “lots of mistakes get made when you rush it without thinking through the implications.” 

    Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, a New York Democrat, has been noncommittal about bringing it up for a vote. But the House’s bipartisan support for it and the White House’s request to move “quickly” puts pressure on the Senate to act. 

    Sen. Mark Warner, a Virginia Democrat, said Thursday that “we’ve started conversations” with Schumer. Warner, who chairs the Senate Intelligence Committee, endorsed the bill after its passage in the House. He said he’s also had a “preliminary conversation” with Senate Commerce Committee Chair Maria Cantwell, whose panel would likely have to approve a measure restricting TikTok. 

    Cantwell has not backed the bill and suggested it may not survive legal scrutiny. 

    “I will be talking to my Senate and House colleagues to try to find a path forward that is constitutional and protects civil liberties,” the Washington Democrat said in a statement Wednesday. 

    Critics say the bill violates the First Amendment rights of the 170 million Americans on TikTok by taking away a platform they use to express themselves, get information and communicate. 

    Some senators have said they want to make changes to the House bill. An amended version would then have to back through the lower chamber if it passes the Senate. 

    Republican Sen. Josh Hawley of Missouri was doubtful it would get a floor vote. 

    What happens if the TikTok bill passes the Senate? 

    If the House bill becomes law, it would make it illegal to distribute apps developed by ByteDance, its subsidiaries and other firms “controlled by a foreign adversary,” unless the company offloads the app within 180 days. 

    A sale of TikTok faces its own challenges. The app is sure to have a multibillion-dollar price tag, which few companies or investors could afford. A deal with any tech giant that has the financial resources is likely to hit antitrust roadblocks. And, any sale would require China’s sign-off. The Chinese government has said it opposes a forced sale. 

    The six-month deadline to sell TikTok or be banned could also be extended amid a legal battle. TikTok CEO Shou Zi Chew, who was on Capitol Hill on Thursday meeting with lawmakers, has indicated the company will challenge it. 

    “It is not feasible to do whatever the bill thinks it does, within the parameters set out in the bill,” the chief executive said. “This will lead to the banning of the app in the country.” 

    Prior efforts to widely restrict TikTok in the U.S. have not been successful. The most recent case stemmed from Montana passing an outright ban last year. A federal judge temporarily blocked the law from taking effect in January, saying it was unconstitutional.

    Alan He and Cristina Corujo contributed reporting. 

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Is TikTok a threat to national security?

    Is TikTok a threat to national security?

    [ad_1]

    Is TikTok a threat to national security? – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    As U.S. lawmakers move forward with legislation that could potentially ban TikTok, China is warning of repercussions. Elizabeth Palmer, CBS News senior foreign correspondent, and Chris Krebs, former director of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, joins to unpack the larger national security threat TikTok could pose to the U.S.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • House to vote on TikTok ban

    House to vote on TikTok ban

    [ad_1]

    WashingtonLegislation that could ban TikTok in the U.S. if Beijing-based ByteDance doesn’t sell its stake in the social media platform is moving quickly in the House, with lawmakers expected to hold a vote Wednesday morning.  

    House Majority Leader Steve Scalise, a Louisiana Republican, was confident the bill would pass. 

    TikTok has repeatedly been targeted by lawmakers seeking to restrict the app over concerns that the Chinese government could force ByteDance to hand over the data of its 170 million American users. Lawmakers say the concern is warranted because Chinese national security laws require organizations to cooperate with intelligence gathering. TikTok has long denied it could be used by the Chinese government to spy on Americans. 

    The House fast-tracked the bill, known as the Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act, skipping the Rules Committee and bringing it up under a procedure that requires two-thirds support for passage, an indication that it has broad bipartisan support.

    President Biden has vowed to sign the legislation, which would require ByteDance to sell TikTok within six months or be banned from U.S. app stores and web-hosting services.

    “Americans need to ask themselves whether they want to give the Chinese government the ability to control access to their data, whether they want to give the Chinese government the ability to control the information they get through the recommendation algorithm,” FBI Director Christopher Wray told House Intelligence Committee members on Tuesday, adding that the Chinese government could compromise Americans’ devices through the software. 

    China’s Ministry of Commerce said last year it would “firmly oppose” the forced sale of TikTok. ByteDance did not return a request for comment. 

    Liu Pengyu, spokesperson for the Chinese Embassy in Washington accused the U.S. of running a disinformation campaign “for the purpose of bringing down the company.” 

    The U.S. “has not been able to give hard evidence to prove the so-called threats from TikTok to U.S. national security,” Liu said in a statement, calling on the U.S. to “provide an open, fair, equal and non-discriminatory business environment to companies of all countries operating in the U.S.” 

    But it’s unclear whether its passage in the House would mark the beginning of the end for TikTok in the U.S. Efforts to widely ban it have stalled amid disagreements about how to regulate the platform, free speech concerns and legal challenges. 

    In recent days, TikTok wielded its massive user base against lawmakers, inundating them with calls from constituents worried that they could lose access to the widely popular platform. A recent Pew Research Center survey found declining support among U.S. adults for a TikTok ban, even among those who were aware of ByteDance’s connection to China. 

    Former President Donald Trump’s opposition to the bill could also sway some Republicans to drop their support for it, just as it helped sink a bipartisan immigration deal earlier this year. Trump reversed his support for a TikTok ban, arguing that doing so would benefit Facebook, though at the same time, he also called TikTok a national security risk. Trump signed an executive order in 2020 that would have effectively barred it from operating in the U.S., but it faced a legal challenge from the company and was ultimately rescinded by the Biden administration. 

    The House bill is likely to face obstacles in the Senate, where a bipartisan effort last year to restrict TikTok petered out. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, a New York Democrat, has not yet committed to putting it on the floor and some senators are hesitant to focus on just one social media platform. 

    “I still have concerns about naming a specific company in legislation, but it feels like this House bill has momentum,” Sen. Mark Warner of Virginia, the Democratic chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, told reporters Monday. 

    Sen. John Cornyn, a Texas Republican, said he is “not sure that this is the answer.” Sen. Rand Paul, a Kentucky Republican, opposes the bill, calling it “inconsistent” with the First Amendment. 

    Rubio, however, said it was “a good sign” that the bill is quickly moving through the House.

    On Thursday, the House Energy and Commerce Committee unanimously advanced it after officials from the Justice Department and FBI gave members a classified briefing on TikTok. House members received another briefing on Tuesday from national security officials. 

    The Justice Department advised lawmakers that the legislation would be on more stable legal ground if it gave the government the authority to force ByteDance to divest from TikTok, rather than to impose an outright ban on the app if ByteDance doesn’t sell, according to a memo obtained by CBS News. The White House has also suggested it may not yet withstand legal scrutiny. 

    Rep. Mike Gallagher, a Wisconsin Republican who introduced the bill, said Tuesday that he thinks the legislation could withstand a legal challenge because “there’s no authority to go after any American company, and there’s no authority to go after content.” 

    “This is regulating conduct, not content,” Rep. Chip Roy, a Texas Republican, said after Tuesday’s classified briefing in defense of the bill. 

    Rep. Robert Garcia, a California Democrat, said the briefing failed to convince him that TikTok is an immediate national security threat. Appearing alongside TikTok creators outside the Capitol on Tuesday, Garcia said a ban would harm the economy and take away a platform that minority communities have used to connect. 

    Other House Democrats who opposed the bill criticized the lower chamber for rushing the bill to a floor vote, saying it lacked the necessary hearings. 

    Garcia said they would pressure their Senate colleagues to “ensure the Senate does not rush on this.” 

    “I’m more hopeful in the Senate doing the right thing right now than us in the House,” he said. 

    Gallagher, who leads the House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party, said an overwhelming vote in favor would send a message to the Senate. 

    “I just want a big vote on Wednesday so that the Senate is forced to take it up,” he said. 

    Jaala Brown, Cristina Corujo, Alan He and Robert Legare contributed reporting. 

    [ad_2]

    Source link