ReportWire

Tag: Bus Rapid Transit

  • Another Triangle community now considering bus rapid transit

    [ad_1]

    With dreams of commuter or light rail in the Triangle deferred, local governments are turning to a far cheaper and easier form of mass transit that uses buses.

    Durham County is the latest to consider bus rapid transit. The county’s plans get underway this fall with an online survey and a series of public workshops to determine how and where people might use BRT.

    The effort is a response to what the county heard as it developed the 2023 Durham Transit Plan, which guides how revenue from the county’s half-cent sales tax for transit should be spent.

    “Residents and our governing boards requested that we prioritize quick and reliable bus service,” Ellen Beckmann, the county’s transportation director, said in a written statement. “The BRT Vision Plan will identify the specific projects and corridors that we want to advance using our local sales tax to accomplish this goal.”

    BRT is a bus system with some similarities to rail. Passengers board from covered, elevated platforms, as on a train car, and electronic boards show when the next bus is due to arrive. The buses also get priority green lights at intersections and often travel in their own dedicated lanes, to avoid getting slowed by traffic.

    Both Raleigh and Chapel Hill have committed to bus rapid transit. Raleigh hopes to begin service on the state’s first BRT line along New Bern Avenue by the summer of 2030 and plans three more BRT lines radiating from downtown. Chapel Hill expects to begin building a line through the heart of town in 2027, connecting the Eubanks Road park-and-ride lot near Interstate 40 with Southern Village.

    Meanwhile, the city of Durham is planning what it calls Central Durham Bus Rapid Transit. It will run about 5 miles from Wellons Village through downtown to the Duke University and Veterans Administration medical centers.

    Compared to rail, bus rapid transit is much easier to develop and less expensive. GoRaleigh expects to spend $108 million to build the 5.4-mile New Bern Avenue line, or about $20 million per mile. In contrast, planners estimated several years ago that a proposed commuter rail line between Durham and Garner would cost $75 million to $80 million per mile.

    GoTriangle completed a feasibility study for the commuter rail line in early 2023, then shelved the project after it became clear the federal government would not help pay for it. An earlier effort to build commuter rail between Durham and Raleigh was also abandoned in 2006 after failing to win federal support or funding.

    Meanwhile, GoTriangle gave up on a proposed 18-mile light rail line between Durham and Chapel Hill in 2019, after the Federal Transit Administration said the project was unlikely to qualify for federal funding because of rising costs and uncertainty over acquiring the needed right-of-way.

    How to learn more and be heard

    To learn more about Durham County’s Bus Rapid Transit Vision Plan, including a link to the survey, go to durhambrtvision.com/. The survey will be live through Nov. 29.

    The county also plans three workshops — two in person and one online:

    • Thursday, Oct. 30, from 3 to 5 p.m. at the Durham County Main Library, 300 North Roxboro St.
    • Thursday, Nov. 6, from 5 to 7 p.m. at Durham Station, 515 West Pettigrew St. (Use Willard Street entrance to avoid construction.)
    • Tuesday, Nov. 18, from 11:30 a.m. to 12:30 p.m. online at kimley-horn.zoom.us/j/98587989690/.

    Related Stories from Raleigh News & Observer

    Richard Stradling

    The News & Observer

    Richard Stradling covers transportation for The News & Observer. Planes, trains and automobiles, plus ferries, bicycles, scooters and just plain walking. He’s been a reporter or editor for 38 years, including the last 26 at The N&O. 919-829-4739, rstradling@newsobserver.com.

    [ad_2]

    Richard Stradling

    Source link

  • A new vision for Speer Boulevard: Fewer cars, more pedestrians

    A new vision for Speer Boulevard: Fewer cars, more pedestrians

    [ad_1]

    Denver’s fast-moving, multi-lane Speer Boulevard is not the city’s most pedestrian-friendly street. 

    But what if it was? 

    The road, parts of which are among the city’s most dangerous corridors, could be radically changed if the city follows through on a new study that recommends an overhaul of Speer Boulevard between Colfax Avenue and Interstate 25 as it moves along the Auraria Campus, River Mile and Ball Arena area and much of Lower Downtown.

    The study’s authors — a group of architecture firms commissioned by the city — suggest reformatting 1.5 miles of Speer Boulevard. Right now, the boulevard includes a pair of busy one-way streets, one on each side of Cherry Creek. This new “vision” would reduce it to a single road, with two lanes in each direction, occupying just a single side of the creek.

    A rendering of the current layout of Speer Boulevard.
    Courtesy of the Denver Department of Transportation and Infrastructure
    A rendering of a road with green space and pedestrians alongside it.
    A rendering of the proposed changes to Speer Boulevard.
    Courtesy of the Denver Department of Transportation and Infrastructure

    This change would be a massive overhaul to one of the busiest streets running through the heart of downtown. With Speer relocated to only one side of the creek, the entire other side could be freed up and turned into a landscaped series of public parks and recreational space.

    The study also imagines the eventual addition of bus rapid transit — known as BRT — along Speer Boulevard, which could include a series of dedicated bus lanes and upgraded bus stops for faster public transit along the corridor.

    (Elsewhere, the city will break ground on Denver’s first BRT line, which will run along East Colfax Avenue, this fall.)

    The new Speer vision could turn what is essentially a highway through the heart of downtown into a pedestrian and transit paradise. 

    Making the change, however, would require hundreds of millions of dollars, years of planning and a significant change to how people navigate the corridor. Right now, it’s just a 54-page report and a grand vision. And there’s a long history of grand visions for Speer. Here’s what it might take to make this one happen.

    The study imagines a future Denver with better public transit and fewer cars.

    The new vision for Speer Boulevard comes as the city is reimagining much of downtown. Developers plan to transform 55 acres of parking lots around Ball Arena into housing, hotels, office space and entertainment venues.

    That means the area around Speer Boulevard could see a massive transformation in the next few years. 

    An overhead map view of Speer Boulevard with labels pointing out key city landmarks.
    A rendering of the proposed changes to Speer Boulevard.
    Courtesy of the Denver Department of Transportation and Infrastructure

    “Historically, Speer has been used by drivers and vehicles moving in and out of the city, often bypassing downtown,” the study’s authors wrote, adding that planned redevelopments would “reposition Speer from an arterial at the city’s edge to a street within the city’s center.” 

    Jill Locantore, executive director of the Denver Streets Partnership, has advocated for pedestrian upgrades to busy city streets for years. She wants Speer to be a part of the downtown transformation in the coming years.

    “It’s designed like a highway when what it needs to be is a people-friendly Main Street,” she said.

    Speer used to be more pedestrian-friendly. 

    Robert Speer, who was in office from 1904 to 1912, and again from 1916 to 1918, was a big proponent of the nationwide “City Beautiful” movement that sought to create, well, beautiful places to promote “social harmony and increased civic virtue” in what were otherwise drab, dirty industrial cities. 

    In Denver, Speer pushed for the creation of new parks and parkways. One of his most consequential road projects was the redesign of what was then Cherry Creek Drive, which at the time was lined with shanties and industrial ruins, into what is now Speer Boulevard.

    Famed city planner and landscape architect George Kessler and Denver’s own landscape architect S.R. DeBoer upgraded much of the road to a tree-lined drive with new parks, lampposts, and other amenities that enhanced the pedestrian experience, according to The Cultural Landscape Foundation. The creek was walled to keep it from flooding. 

    It was “the heart’s desire of the mayor that his name shall be perpetuated,” the Rocky Mountain News reported in 1908, so the city’s board of supervisors “railroaded through” a resolution renaming the road to Speer Boulevard in his honor. 

    This 1916 photo shows a much smaller and quieter Speer Boulevard, at right, where it intersects with E 7th Avenue.
    Courtesy Denver Public Library Special Collections, X-22674

    In the 1950s, as Denver fully embraced the automobile, city traffic engineers converted Speer Boulevard and what was formerly known as Forest Drive into two one-way thoroughfares designed to pump traffic along the creek as quickly as possible. 

    “This would also be a good street to try enforcing [minimum speed limits],” one approving Rocky columnist wrote in 1958. “After all, one slow poke can hold up a whole line of cars.” 

    Apart from the Cherry Creek bike and walking path, which was designed in the 1970s and built years later, Speer has remained dominated by speeding cars ever since, though drivers all too often end up crashing into the creek itself or the path next to it. 

    Some dreamers, however, had big ideas for how to dramatically reshape Speer over the years. 

    One out-there idea from the late 1960s would have added transit without infringing on car space. Noted railroad artist Otto Kuhler proposed an elevated monorail loop around Denver that would’ve straddled the creek. 

    That, of course, was never built.

    Denver is about to re-pedestrianize and cut car space on other key roadways.

    With the Colfax Avenue Bus Rapid Transit project breaking ground in October, the city is going all in on bus transit along that corridor. The nearly $300 million project, funded with a mix of federal and local money, will drop the infamous car-centric street down to just one lane in each direction between downtown and Aurora. 

    Plus, earlier this year, City Council rezoned large parts of that stretch to promote pedestrian-facing businesses over drive-thrus in anticipation of the BRT. Denver and state transportation officials are also studying a potential BRT along Federal Boulevard, one of the city’s most deadly streets. 

    In June, city officials also broke ground on a $15.5 million pedestrian improvement project along West Colfax that will add medians, signal crosswalks and landscaping along portions of the road.

    Denver City Council is also thinking about how to better use Denver’s downtown waterways. A new Council committee started in July is thinking about how to make the South Platte River, which intersects with Cherry Creek and Speer, more accessible and better integrated into the city.

    Reshaping Speer could be easier said than done.

    The Speer plan acknowledges that a traditional traffic study might conclude that eliminating half of Speer’s traffic lanes wouldn’t be feasible because it could cause traffic gridlock. 

    But the study’s authors say a metamorphosis of the corridor is indeed possible — if 40 to 50 percent of the more than 5,000 drivers per hour that use Speer at peak times can be convinced to switch to transit, bicycle, or some other form of transportation.

    Any bus service along this stretch would be starting from scratch, though. Unlike on Colfax, which holds the busiest RTD bus lines in its system, there is no local bus service along Speer north of Broadway. RTD cut its services significantly during the pandemic and has limited plans to restore them.

    Still, Locantore, who helped advocate for projects like the West Colfax upgrades, has pushed for city and state leaders to extend their BRT plans to include this stretch of Speer. She believes a transformed Speer could happen.

    “That’s exactly the kind of change that we need, but we’ll see how bold the city is willing to be in reimagining this particular corridor,” she said. “It would take community support, political will and funding.”

    The study’s authors estimate their proposal would cost nearly $600 million to build — about double the cost of the Colfax bus project. That money isn’t in the budget just yet, and the city hasn’t announced its next steps.

    What do you want the future of Speer Boulevard to look like? Drop us a line at [email protected].

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • CDOT wants to widen Federal Boulevard for new bus lanes. Some worry it’ll make the road even more dangerous

    CDOT wants to widen Federal Boulevard for new bus lanes. Some worry it’ll make the road even more dangerous

    [ad_1]

    Traffic moves along South Federal Boulevard in Denver on Monday, Aug. 12, 2024. The Colorado Department of Transportation intends to convert one of the three southbound lanes, seen here at right, to a bus lane, and widen the road to add a northbound bus lane, seen at left.

    Nathaniel Minor/CPR News

    The Colorado Department of Transportation wants to widen over two miles of South Federal Boulevard to make space for bus lanes. 

    Project leaders say the extra space will be needed to preserve two vehicle lanes in each direction on a busy stretch of Federal. Cutting the road down to one lane would send too many drivers onto side streets, they say.

    “There are places where traffic calming through road diets and otherwise is the best option,” said CDOT Executive Director Shoshana Lew, adding: “But that’s not always the answer.” 

    But some bus riders, advocates and at least one member of the Denver City Council worry the changes would make Federal Boulevard even more dangerous than it already is.

    The new bus lanes are a key part of a planned bus rapid transit line along nearly 18 miles of Federal.

    CDOT fast-tracked the project, which it has estimated at $300 million, after it overhauled its transportation agenda to comply with state mandates to lower climate emissions. 

    Several bus rapid transit lines are planned on arterial streets across the Denver metro that, like Federal, double as state highways.

    Unlike local buses, the rapid routes — known as BRT lines — are generally designed for speed and comfort. They typically stop at amenity-rich stations that are spaced further apart, buses are given priority at intersections, and passengers can board through any of the vehicle’s doors.

    In some cases, buses also get their own lanes. Bus lanes are often the most controversial part of a BRT project because they have the greatest potential to disrupt the status quo on busy, dangerous roads.

    Drivers cross 8th Avenue on Federal Boulevard. May 8, 2024.
    Kevin J. Beaty/Denverite

    But climate and road safety advocates say disruption is a welcome feature of BRT projects — not a bug. The state’s car-dominated transportation system has Colorado on track to miss upcoming climate goals and Denver officials have struggled to get a handle on growing traffic deaths in the last decade. 

    CDOT’s preferred plan for Federal, if it can find the money for it, would split the difference between a road diet that would surely make motorists fume and a full-bore expansion of the road. 

    Under a developing plan that CDOT officials stressed isn’t yet final, the agency would convert one of the three southbound vehicle lanes between Alameda and Jewell avenues to a bus lane. CDOT would use mostly existing right-of-way to widen the road just enough to accommodate a new northbound bus lane over roughly the same length. The road would be widened between Evans and Jewell avenues for bus lanes in each direction.

    That design is similar to the recommendation that came out of a city-led Federal BRT study in 2022.

    Bus riders worry a wider Federal will be more dangerous.

    A Denverite reporter roamed South Federal for a few hours on Monday morning and spoke with a handful of bus riders about the prospect of a wider road. 

    “I think it’d be a bad idea,” said Kelly Faison as she prepared to board an RTD bus on south Federal on Monday. “[It would] probably be more dangerous.”

    Many riders declined to be recorded and refused to give their names, but nearly all said safety was a top concern.

    “Wider lanes just means more time that it would take for a pedestrian to cross, and they’re already being run over,” said Carolyn, an elderly woman who declined to give her last name but said she walked across Federal often.

    Carolyn said she tries to look in “every direction the whole time that I’m crossing because somebody act like they want to run me down even as I have the light.”

    Denver planners have long identified South Federal as one of the most dangerous corridors in the city. Its recent Vision Zero action plan called for “immediate remedial safety work” on it, saying the stretch between Alameda and Yale saw eight traffic-related deaths between 2016 and 2021.

    Jamie Torres, the city councilor who represents some neighborhoods along Federal, said she is “totally against” widening the boulevard — even for the addition of bus lanes.

    “I think residents are exactly on point around how difficult it is already to cross a six-lane highway,” Torres said.

    Then-City Council president Jamie Torres attends council’s weekly working group meeting with Mayor Mike Johnston’ administration on homelessness and migrant arrivals. Dec. 12, 2023.
    Kevin J. Beaty/Denverite

    Ryan Noles, CDOT’s bus rapid transit program manager, said they are also considering new safety features for pedestrians — rebuilt sidewalks, signals timed to give walkers more time to cross, and mid-block crossings, for example.

    Jill Locantore, executive director of the Denver Streets Partnership, called such changes “helpful but marginal.” The root problem, she said, is Federal’s width.

    “Because that encourages drivers to go faster and just increases pedestrian exposure to traffic,” Locantore said.

    Locantore wants planners to go all-in on buses, like they are on Colfax.

    The Denver-led East Colfax BRT project will narrow the road to just one vehicle lane in each direction from Broadway to the Aurora border.

    “If it can work on Colfax, why can’t it work on Federal?” Locantore asked,

    A rendering of a possible bus rapid transit design on Colfax. (Denver Public Works)

    But there are significant differences between the two roads. Colfax is a denser, more walkable corridor that was originally built around streetcars. Large parking lots and low-slung commercial buildings are far more common on Federal. 

    State data says Colfax sees less traffic on its soon-to-be-slimmer stretch, peaking at 30,000 vehicles a day near East High School, than the segment of Federal in question which tops out at 40,000 vehicles daily. The federal government says road diets typically are implemented on roads with daily traffic of 25,000 vehicles or fewer.

    Mimi Luong, who owns Truong An Gifts in the Far East Center, said she’s supportive of better bus service on Federal — she’s suggested new Asian-themed bus stations too. She just visited South Korea and loved using the bus system there. 

    But she said Federal needs to stay at least two lanes across. 

    Mimi Luong stands in front of a Lunar New Year banner hanging on her family’s Truong An Gifts shop in the Far East Center as they prepare for the big holiday weekend. Feb. 8, 2024.
    Kevin J. Beaty/Denverite

    “Honestly, this is Colorado,” she said, adding: “You need a car for everywhere you go.”

    Torres said the idea of a one-lane Federal Boulevard seemed “pretty limited,” but said CDOT’s have-it-both-ways proposal makes it seem like they aren’t confident in BRT’s ability to shift drivers to transit riders.

    “It seems like we don’t quite know that BRT will work or not,” Torres said. 

    Lew, CDOT’s executive director, said her goal is to give travelers “as many safe sustainable choices as possible.” What CDOT eventually does with Federal will also be determined by how much money the federal government pitches in, Lew added.

    [ad_2]

    Nathaniel Minor

    Source link