ReportWire

Tag: bryan cranston

  • Bryan Cranston Was Bothered by Sora 2, But Now He’s Praising OpenAI

    If you were following the Sora 2 news closely when the limited public release of OpenAI’s new video generator started on September 30, you may have noticed some unsettling videos featuring the likeness and voice of iconic TV actor Bryan Cranston—typically in character as Breaking Bad protagonist Walter White. Cranston evidently saw those too, and he found them so unsettling he reportedly contacted his union, SAG-AFTRA, about it.

    But good news: OpenAI has apparently addressed Cranston’s misgivings, and he’s praising the company publicly now.

    In a statement released Monday by SAG-AFTRA (via Deadline), Cranston stated that initially he was “deeply concerned not just for myself, but for all performers whose work and identity can be misused in this way.”

    To be specific, he might have been concerned about this video set in a strip mall parking lot in which Cranston (appearing as Walter White) and deceased pop musician Michael Jackson announce to Jackson’s vlog viewers that they’ve been hanging out.

    Perhaps he also saw this more elaborate work of fan fiction in which Cranston and the rest of the core Breaking Bad cast are in what appears to be the Vietnam War:

    On October 8, Cranston’s agency, released an indignant statement about Sora 2, asking in part:

    The question is, does OpenAI and its partner companies believe that humans, writers, artists, actors, directors, producers, musicians, and athletes deserve to be compensated and credited for the work they create? Or does OpenAI believe they can just steal it, disregarding global copyright principles and blatantly dismissing creators’ rights, as well as the many people and companies who fund the production, creation, and publication of these humans’ work?

    On Monday, however, Cranston had seen something he liked, and was no longer upset. He announced that he was “grateful to OpenAI for its policy and for improving its guardrails.”

    Additionally, Deadline says SAG-AFTRA, OpenAI, the Association of Talent Agents, United Talent Agency, and Creative Artists Agency all released a related joint statement including the following: “While from the start it was OpenAI’s policy to require opt-in for the use of voice and likeness, OpenAI expressed regret for these unintentional generations. OpenAI has strengthened guardrails around replication of voice and likeness when individuals do not opt-in.”

    On October 3, well before CAA’s angry statement about Sora 2, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman painted a slightly different picture in regards to OpenAI’s copyright policy upon the release of Sora 2. He wrote in a blog post that in light of how the product was being used, OpenAI “will give rightsholders more granular control over generation of characters, similar to the opt-in model for likeness but with additional controls,” and added, “We are going to try sharing some of this revenue with rightsholders who want their characters generated by users.”

    We asked OpenAI to clarify the timeline of the Sora 2 copyright policy, and will update if we hear back.

    Altman wrote in that same post that OpenAI is “going to have to somehow make money for video generation.”

    Mike Pearl

    Source link

  • ‘Malcolm in the Middle’ Star Frankie Muniz Says Fans Will Be ‘Surprised’ to See ‘Where Everybody Is’ in Series Reboot: ‘Hard to Fit 20 Years of Stuff into Four 30-Minute Episodes’

    Frankie Muniz says the “Malcolm in the Middle” reboot may not be what fans are expecting.

    During a recent appearance on the “Lightweights” podcast, Muniz said long-time fans may be “surprised” after they see what the Wilkerson family has been up to during their 20-year absence.

    “I think people will be surprised, in a sense, where everybody is and the story,” Muniz said. “It’s hard to fit in 20 years of stuff into four 30-minute episodes, right? But I think people are going to be very happy with what they came up with.”

    Muniz beamed when discussing his return to the early-aughts family sitcom, describing his experience shooting the reboot as “the best time of my entire life.”

    “I’m not exaggerating when I say filming this reboot, like I loved it so much, way more than I ever thought I could have,” he said. “We ended in May, and I haven’t talked to anybody since, you know what I mean? I’ve been gone. I’ve only been home, I think, for 12 days since the beginning of the year. I’m just always crazy, and I think next week, I’m going to have time. I’m going to reach out [to the rest of the cast].”

    The original “Malcolm in the Middle” ran for 151 episodes across seven seasons from 2000 to 2006. The four-part reboot sees Muniz reunited with original cast members Bryan Cranston, Jane Kaczmarek, Christopher Masterson and Justin Berfield.

    Erik Per Sullivan, who played the youngest Wilkerson child, Dewy, did not return for the new episodes. The role was instead played by Caleb Ellsworth-Clark. Other new cast members include Kiana Madeira, Anthony Timpano, Vaughan Murrae and Keeley Karsten.

    In an interview with People, Cranston said he “missed” playing Hal Wilkerson and loved returning to the world of “Malcolm in the Middle.”

    “It’s been almost 20 years since we said goodbye,” he said. “And he’s a sweet, lovable man. He’s a lovable guy, and it was fun to see my whole family back together. It was great.”

    The official logline for the reboot reads, “Malcolm and his daughter are drawn into the family’s chaos when Hal and Lois demand his presence for their 40th wedding anniversary party.”

    Jack Dunn

    Source link

  • Argylle, Matthew Vaughn’s “Layer Cake” of a Movie Still Not Ultimately as Layered as The Lost City

    Argylle, Matthew Vaughn’s “Layer Cake” of a Movie Still Not Ultimately as Layered as The Lost City


    Upon watching the first thirty-five seconds of the trailer for Argylle, it doesn’t take fans of 2022’s The Lost City very long to immediately spot a certain glaring correlation between the latter and the former. Right down to Argylle’s, spy novel author, Elly Conway (Bryce Dallas Howard, not to be confused with Jessica Chastain, who once starred in a Matthew Vaughn-written movie called The Debt), being extremely introverted and “married to her work.” While The Lost City’s Loretta Sage (Sandra Bullock) might not have a cat she’s devoted to the way Elly is (another extremely gimmicky element of the movie), she embodies, for all intents and purposes, the same “lonely cat lady” trope. Where Loretta has a pushy manager, Beth Hatten (Da’Vine Joy Randolph), hounding her to finish the book so she can start her tour of it, Elly has her pushy mother, Ruth Conway (Catherine O’Hara), to make her write a different ending to the final installment in the Argylle series. 

    After reading the finale to the book, Ruth insists that Elly owes her readers more than that. Just like Dash McMahon a.k.a. Alan (Channing Tatum), the cover model for Loretta’s books, insists that she owes it to her readers to keep the Lovemore series—steeped in the erotic romance-adventure genre—going, even though she announces her plans to end it. Like Elly, she’s run out of things to say…and she also just thinks the books are generally schlocky, and not representative in the least of her true intelligence. The same ultimately goes for Elly, after Argylle’s screenwriter, Jason Fuchs, throws in an amnesia plotline that will eventually reveal Elly is an untapped reserve of far more intelligence than she lets on. An “alter ego” that will inevitably lead to her wearing an atrocious sequined gold dress that she doesn’t quite rock with the same panache as Loretta with her fuchsia sequined jumpsuit (on loan, of course). 

    Loretta’s own intelligence, too, has been suppressed in favor of using her archaeology degree to make the main character in her series seem more “believable.” Even though there is nothing believable about an archaeologist named Dr. Lovemore. An archaeologist named Dr. Sage, on the other hand, slightly more so. Alas, Loretta no longer pursues her archaeological ambitions “legitimately.” And that’s been making her feel like enough of a sham lately to call it quits on the erotic novel front. Stuck on the last chapter, just as Elly is with her own final installment in the Argylle series, Loretta decides to slap together an ending, much to Alan’s dismay. Not just because it puts him out of a job, but because he has a long-time crush on Loretta and losing proximity/access to her, however rare, is a bitter pill to swallow. Loretta, of course, couldn’t be more oblivious to his affections…in the same mousy, bookish manner that Elly is oblivious to the fondness Aidan Wilde (Sam Rockwell) has for her when he initially approaches her on a train under the guise of being a “regular Joe.” 

    Turns out, he’s there to save her from the bevy of fellow spies on the train (a concept that itself reeks of the banal Brad Pitt movie, Bullet Train) out to kidnap her for, what else, her savvy spy mind. As displayed with unexpected perspicacity and foresight in the books she’s written. Foresight that is so accurate, as a matter of fact, that the top/most dangerous spy organization in the world, the Division, truly believes she’s the only one who can find what (or rather, who) they’re looking for. In the same fashion, Abigail Fairfax (Daniel Radcliffe), the man who kidnaps Loretta in The Lost City, does so because, as he reminds her, “Your fictional archaeologist was making real translations of a dead language. Something no one else has been able to do.” He then reminds her that she was once a young college student doing her dissertation on the lost language that will lead Abigail to the Crown of Fire, a valuable yet priceless treasure that has thus far only been the stuff of lore. Until Loretta gave Abigail hope that she could crack the code to finding it. 

    Aidan, too, hopes that Elly can use her unique writer’s brain to tap into some arcane spy knowledge that will lead them to the British hacker who holds the Masterkey (better known as a USB drive) with all the damning evidence against the Division and its corrupt members. And, naturally, because Vaughn expects us to believe that Elly is just that shrewd (along with a lot of other things we’re supposed to “just believe”), she effortlessly figures out how to find him as she and Aidan embark on an increasingly dangerous, unexpected and all-over-the-map (literally and figuratively) journey. Which, yes, is precisely what happens in The Lost City. Except the hijinks that ensue once Loretta is kidnapped (also forced to take a plane she doesn’t want to get on, as is the case with Elly) are at least far more humorous and endearing to watch unfold (not to mention much less filled with so much expository dialogue).

    Maybe this is because one knows that The Lost City isn’t trying to be everything to everyone. Doesn’t seek to extend beyond the confines of its rom-com adventure genre. One that mimics the spirit of 80s classics like Romancing the Stone and the various Indiana Jones movies of that decade. This being what The Lost City does as well, and yet with just a dash more credibility and a tone that is far less “look how clever we, the writer and director, are.” Goddamn, they’re acting like they’re capable of the kind of artful meta plotline that was present in Scream. Unfortunately, that’s not the scenario.

    In any event, even The Lost City couldn’t fully melt the hearts of critics like Manohla Dargis, who wrote at the time of the film’s release: “The Lost City remains a copy of a copy.” One supposes that makes Argylle a copy of a copy of a copy. And not a very well-executed one at that. Not half as well-made as The Lost City anyway, a film that has apparently stoked a rash of imitators in the genre, including the J. Lo atrocity that was Shotgun Wedding

    Perhaps the sudden increased interest in spy and/or action-adventure rom-coms is a sign of the times, what with a reboot of Mr. and Mrs. Smith in TV series format also occurring this year. Whatever that sign is, it doesn’t exactly bode well for the “new Cold War”…or the hooey content of movies like Argylle.



    Genna Rivieccio

    Source link

  • Argylle’s Twists and Post-Credits Scene, Explained

    Argylle’s Twists and Post-Credits Scene, Explained


    This post contains spoilers for Argylle.

    Update, February 2, 12:30 p.m. ET: The actual writers of Argylle, the book, have been revealed: Terry Hayes, an Australian author and screenwriter best known for 2013’s I Am Pilgrim, and Tammy Cohen, a British writer of psychological thrillers. The pair went public in an interview with The Telegraph. Both Hayes and Cohen were previously floated by Vanity Fair as prime suspects for authorship of Argylle.

    “God, I hope all the people that pre-ordered on the basis that Taylor wrote it aren’t disappointed,” Cohen told the publication in reference to the popular theory that Taylor Swift was behind the book.

    “I hope they are!” Hayes quipped. “If that’s why they buy a book, they deserve every punishment they get.”

    The hardest part of keeping their involvement with the project a secret for the last three years was “not being able to tell my support group of writer friends who I ring up every time I get into a mess,” Cohen said. “And also trying to account for a large amount of time when I apparently haven’t produced a book.” Hayes, who took a decade to complete his second novel, 2023’s The Year of the Locust, joked, “That was no problem for me.”

    The original post continues below.

    In the lead-up to Argylle, a new spy thriller from director Matthew Vaughn, Swifties and civilians alike attempted to decipher who wrote the novel that supposedly inspired the film. But in the words of Jodie Foster in True Detective, the world has been asking the wrong question. The issue isn’t who wrote Argylle, it’s why that author’s identity has been kept under wraps when the film’s biggest twist and post-credits scene motives have already been revealed.

    First, a refresher: The film stars Bryce Dallas Howard as Elly Conway, author of a series of novels about a spy named Argylle. There is also an actual Argylle novel allegedly written by a real Elly Conway, who has a verified social media presence. Onlookers have speculated that the book was written by everyone from an under-the-radar real novelist to Taylor Swift. The Argylle team waited a while to extinguish that last bit of gossip, though Vanity Fair’s sources confirmed back in October that Swift is not the author. As John Cena, who plays henchman Wyatt in the film, recently told Today: “I can’t think of a better way for people to get to know Argylle—a movie where the tagline is, ‘The greater the spy, the bigger the lie’—than with some misdirection, some spy-type deception,” adding, “I got to debunk the rumor, but I’m grateful for Taylor and her fans to be so engaged, and it really fits in with our theme.”

    The film version of Argylle contains details that can also be found in the real Conway’s digital footprint. The character mentions working as a small-town waitress before she was in an ice skating accident; Conway’s actual author bio on the Penguin Random House website mentions that “she wrote her first novel about Agent Argylle while working as a waitress in a late-night diner.” An author’s note in the book states that Conway conceived of the plot in a “febrile dream” that occurred after a “terrible accident.”

    In the film, a fan of Conway’s points out the author’s talent for predicting real-life geopolitical events in the pages of her novels. “The secret is research, research, research,” Howard’s character replies. “Although that is what I would say as a real spy, so…” This is apparently what catches the attention of The Division, a cartoonishly evil group that begins to hunt Conway. In turn, the CIA sends Sam Rockwell’s spy, Aidan Wilde, to protect Elly.

    Conway doesn’t know who to trust—an anxiety that is vindicated when she discovers that the people who purport to be her parents (played by Bryan Cranston and Catherine O’Hara) are actually Division baddies posing as mom and dad.

    And then the film takes another twist. We learn that Elly Conway is not a real person, but a new identity that the evil duo gave Howard’s character after she began suffering from amnesia. Elly Conway is actually Agent R. (as in Rachel) Kylle, Samuel L. Jackson’s former CIA director, Alfred Solomon, tells her. Kylle was a top agency operative who fell into a coma and was then brainwashed by the opposition. The Division tricked her into becoming a reclusive author in hopes that her novels, based on Kylle’s actual repressed memories, would lead them to an all-important missing data file. As Alfie summarizes it: “The books are not predictions. They are memories of who you are.”

    Of course, the real-life novel nods to this reveal. Conway dedicates the book to “Mom and Dad, who have been beside me every step of the way.”

    Rachel’s amnesia begins to fade as her combat skills return. By the end of the film, just call her Zach Bryan, because she remembers everything and can thus save the day in outlandish fashion.

    (from left) Elly Conway (Bryce Dallas Howard) and Alfred Solomon (Samuel L. Jackson) in Argylle, directed by Matthew Vaughn.Peter Mountain/Universal Pictures,Apple Original Films,and MARV





    Savannah Walsh

    Source link

  • “Long-Term Damage”? Bob Iger, Ted Sarandos, and David Zaslav’s Bad-PR Summer

    “Long-Term Damage”? Bob Iger, Ted Sarandos, and David Zaslav’s Bad-PR Summer

    In the largest screening room on the MGM lot in 1933, Louis B. Mayer completed his transformation into a Marvel-worthy villain. As the Great Depression raged, he solemnly shared with top executives and stars that the studio was at risk of going belly up. Americans weren’t going to the movies, and MGM’s rivals were in a panic about a complete production shutdown. To save MGM—and really all of Hollywood—employees would need to take a 50% pay cut. “I, Louis B. Mayer, will work to see that you get back every penny when this terrible emergency is over,” the Scott Eyman biography Lion of Hollywood quotes him as saying.

    Spoiler alert: They never got their money back. Mayer—on his way to becoming the highest-paid executive in America—received a bonus that year after MGM posted profits, and as Eyman writes, the actors and writers unions were born out of workers’ discontent over the industry-wide cuts.

    Ninety years later, amid the first double strike in over 60 years, the titans of Hollywood are fighting a narrative that relatively little has changed, particularly as they have collected paychecks of eight figures or more. Though the struggle to establish new contracts with both the writers and actors is ongoing, the major studios may have already lost the optics war. “It’s been amazing to me how lopsided the PR battle has been,” says Stephen Galloway, dean of Chapman University’s Dodge College of Film and Media Arts. “The actors and writers are sending in the Spartan hordes while Rome is crumbling, and you’ve got Bob Iger doing one of the biggest foot-in-mouth cases of any executive ever.”

    Bloomberg/Getty Images.

    In case you somehow missed it, he’s referring to the Disney CEO’s unfortunately timed July 13 interview with CNBC’s David Faber, right before the actors strike began, during Allen & Company’s annual Sun Valley conference. There, at a luxurious retreat widely referred to as summer camp for billionaires, Iger called the unions’ demands “just not realistic.” It was a shot across the bow in the ongoing labor negotiations that only further incensed picketers. The following day, SAG-AFTRA president Fran Drescher called Iger’s comments on the strike “terribly repugnant and out of touch,” adding that, if she were Disney, she would “lock him behind doors” and forbid him from commenting publicly on the strike again. Executives at Iger’s level regularly make headlines, but during the strikes the criticisms have become more personal than usual.

    It was always going to be difficult for the studios to win the hearts and minds of the public during their contract talks with SAG-AFTRA and the WGA, something more than one studio-side source concedes to Vanity Fair. “Optics are important here,” says an exec who stresses that Hollywood itself isn’t in a good place, the studios having collectively laid off thousands of employees over the last year as they face pressure from Wall Street to extract profits from their streaming businesses. “I don’t know how we position ourselves.” The Alliance of Motion Picture and Television Producers, which bargains on behalf of the studios, has not commented much publicly about the negotiations, but their members have of course been called out from the picket lines. “We’ve got a message for Mr. Iger,” actor Bryan Cranston said during a speech at a recent rally. “I know, sir, that you look at things through a different lens. We don’t expect you to understand who we are. But…we will not be having our jobs taken away and given to robots. We will not have you take away our right to work and earn a decent living. And lastly, and most importantly, we will not allow you to take away our dignity!”

    Before Iger picked up a lightning rod and held it over his head, it was David Zaslav who’d been cast as a villain in Hollywood’s saga of the summer. On May 20, as the writers strike dragged on into its third week, Zaslav was met with boos and picket-style chants during a commencement speech at Boston University, which was conferring an honorary degree upon the 63-year-old ​​Warner Bros. Discovery boss. The hostile reception caught WBD off guard. Zaslav’s speech had been booked two years in advance, and it was a meaningful appearance for the suddenly embattled mogul, who earned his law degree from BU in 1985. (The university’s president publicly scolded “students who were appallingly coarse and deliberately abusive to Mr. Zaslav.”)

    Zaslav and his lieutenants were less surprised when, days later, he came in for backlash after cohosting a star-studded soiree at the French Riviera’s Hotel du Cap-Eden-Roc during the Cannes Film Festival, a fête which signified, as The New York Times suggested, “the A-listification of Hollywood’s newest mogul.” Some in Zaslav’s orbit thought that going through with the bash was a bad idea given the position that he and the company were in. But it had been in the works for the better part of a year and was seen as an important symbolic event, a celebration of film and the 100th anniversary of Warner Bros. So WBD made what was described to VF as a “clear-eyed” call to proceed, fully aware that it would probably be used against them. (Hollywood stars, from Robert De Niro and Martin Scorsese to Leonardo DiCaprio, Scarlett Johansson, and numerous others, apparently had few, if any, qualms about showing up.)

    A scathing Zaslav critique in July by a freelancer for GQ (one of VF’s sister publications) turned into its own public relations mess, further fueling the Zaslav news cycle. Since the Cannes soiree, Zaslav has kept his head down for the most part; unlike Iger, he didn’t chat with CNBC during Sun Valley as he typically would. That doesn’t mean the scrutiny has cooled off. On the contrary, WBD is bracing for big Zaslav pieces that are said to be in the works at two major-league publications, one of which is a long-simmering magazine feature with three prominent bylines attached. (We’ll leave that as a blind item for now.)

    Iger softened his public stance on the strike in the company’s early-August earnings call, declaring his “deep respect and appreciation” for Hollywood’s creative community, and saying he is personally committed to finding a solution to the ongoing dispute. The feeling is that it would have been best if both he and Zaslav had followed the lead of, say, Netflix co-CEO Ted Sarandos and taken a step away from the spotlight. “Silence and careful movements would have really been the key to weathering this,” says an executive at a major media company. “Instead, they both very much stepped right in it, and I think created long-term damage from a PR perspective. Iger had more reputational damage, because he’s seen as the king of Hollywood.”

    That’s not to say Sarandos hasn’t weathered his share of criticism since the strikes began. You could reason, after all, that Netflix set the stage for this whole mess by supercharging the streaming wars, and many writers argued just that during the earliest days of the strike. As picketers flocked to the Netflix offices in Los Angeles and New York, Sarandos backed out of the PEN America Literary Gala “given the threat to disrupt this wonderful evening.” The company also canceled plans for its first-ever Upfront Week advertising showcase. “It is head-scratching to many of us that Sarandos has not become more of a target,” says a plugged-in Hollywood insider. “Behind closed doors, everyone on both sides is like, ‘He got us into this. Now he needs to get us out of it.’”

    From what we hear, Sarandos—who in his first strike-era earnings call announced expected savings related to the production shutdown, while also positioning himself as a pro-labor son of a union electrician—has been getting more involved in the negotiations of late. Sources familiar with the talks say Iger has also become more hands-on, particularly as the AMPTP and WGA resume their talks. Other engaged leaders who we hear have pushed for more face-to-face meetings are Zaslav and Sony boss Tony Vinciquerra. Meanwhile veteran entertainment executive Peter Chernin, who was an instrumental figure in resolving the last writers strike, has stepped in recently to lend a hand.

    It might be too late for any one executive to come out of this conflict looking like a winner, but that didn’t stop one communications veteran from quipping recently, “They should hire publicists.” After all, the writers and the actors have more than a little experience crafting messages and winning people over to their side. In contrast to a Deadline story published on the eve of the SAG-AFTRA strike, the studio party line has been that they don’t regard the contract talks as a battle. Encouragingly, WGA negotiating committee cochair Chris Keyser recently said much the same: “This isn’t a war we’re in, it’s a negotiation. It’s just a negotiation. There is no face-saving here for either side because there is no winner or loser.”

    A few months of intensely scrutinized faux pas and agita-inducing press will, of course, fade in many, if not all, memories. These guys are still going to be in charge after the strikes come to a close and the Town eventually gets back to business. Iger recently re-upped his contract through 2026 and has successfully reduced streaming losses. Zaz is chipping away at WBD’s debt load and riding high on Barbie’s success at the box office. Sarandos has the dark horse hit of the summer with (presumably inexpensive) reruns of the legal drama Suits, and Netflix is back to adding subscribers at a solid clip.

    As one of our sources notes, “If your shareholders love you and the strike is settled, things can look a lot different for you in six months.”

    Still, Chapman University’s Galloway has an idea that might have helped these CEOs along the way: to avoid the comparisons to Mayer and his ilk, they could have reserved some of their multimillion-dollar compensation packages for a fund to help workers struggling as a result of the production stoppage and industry-wide layoffs. “Even then, they would probably be criticized,” he says, “but at least people would see that they’re willing to have some skin in the game.”

    This story has been updated. 

    Natalie Jarvey, Joe Pompeo

    Source link

  • Asteroid City: Wes Anderson’s “Sci-Fi” Movie Is About A Collective and Resigned Sense of Doom More Than It Is 50s Americana

    Asteroid City: Wes Anderson’s “Sci-Fi” Movie Is About A Collective and Resigned Sense of Doom More Than It Is 50s Americana

    A palpable shift has occurred in Wes Anderson’s style and tone since the release of 2021’s The French Dispatch. One doesn’t want to use a cliché like “mature” to describe what’s been happening since that perceptible tonal pivot in his filmography, so perhaps the better way to “define” what’s happening to Anderson and his storytelling is that it’s gotten, as Cher Horowitz would note, “Way existential.” Not to say there wasn’t that element to some degree in previous films, but now, it’s amplified—ratcheted up to a maximum that was never there before. Some might proffer it’s because Anderson has transitioned to a new era of his life, therefore possesses a greater concern with mortality; others could posit that our world and society has become so fragile in the years since 2020, that even privileged white men have been rattled by it enough to let it color their work. Whatever the case, the increased focus on mortality and “the meaning of life” in Anderson’s oeuvre is no surprise considering one of his greatest directorial influences is Woody Allen. Yes, he might be cancelled, but that doesn’t change the effect he’s had on Anderson.

    Of course, Anderson has managed to take the puerility of Allen’s lead characters and render them “quirky,” “oddball” and “postmodern” instead. What’s more, Anderson has the “marketing sense” not to make his characters come across as “too Jewy,” lest it “scandalize” the often white bread audiences he tends to attract. Some might argue that Asteroid City is his whitest offering yet—which is really saying something. And yes, like Allen, Anderson has begun to favor the “screenwriting technique” of setting his movies in the past, so as not to have to deal with the “vexing” and “unpleasant” complications of trying to address post-woke culture in his casting and narrative decisions. Defenders of Anderson would bite back by remarking that the director creates alternate worlds in general, and should be left to do his own thing without being subjected to the “moral” and “ethical” issues presented by “modern filmmaking requirements.” For the most part, that’s remained the case, even as occasional hemming-and-hawing about his “movies so white” shtick crops up when he releases a new film. But to those who will follow Anderson anywhere, the trip to Asteroid City does prove to be worth it. If for no other reason than to show us the evolution of an auteur when he’s left alone, permitted to be creative without letting the outside voices and noise fuck with his head.

    In many regards, the “town” (or rather, desert patch with a population of eighty-seven) is a representation of the same bubble Anderson exists in whenever he writes and directs something. To the point of writing, Anderson returns to the meta exploration of what it means to create on the page (as he did for The French Dispatch), anchored by the playwright Conrad Earp (Edward Norton). Although he’s not one of the more heavily featured characters, without him, none of the characters we’re seeing perform a televised production of Asteroid City would exist. If that sounds too meta already, it probably is. With the host (Bryan Cranston) of an anthology TV series serving as our guide, the movie commences in black and white as he stares into the camera and proceeds to do his best impersonation of Rod Serling at the beginning of The Twilight Zone. Indeed, it’s clear Anderson wants to allude to these types of TV anthology series that were so popular in the post-war Golden Age of Television. And even on the radio, as Orson Welles showcased in 1938, with his adaptation of The War of the Worlds. A broadcast that caused many listeners to panic about an alien invasion, unaware that it wasn’t real. In fact, Cranston as the host is sure to forewarn his viewers, “Asteroid City does not exist. It is an imaginary drama created expressly for this broadcast.” That warning comes with good reason, for people in the 50s were easily susceptible to being bamboozled by whatever was presented to them on the then-new medium of TV. Because, “If it’s on TV, it must be true.” And the last thing anyone wanted to believe—then as much as now—is that there could be life on other planets. Sure, it sounds “neato” in theory, but, in reality, Earthlings are major narcissists who want to remain the lone “stars” of the interplanetary show.

    Set in September of 1955, Asteroid City centers its narrative on a Junior Stargazer convention, where five students will be honored for their excellence in astronomy and astronomy-related innovations. Among those five are Woodrow (Jake Ryan), Shelly (Sophia Lillis), Ricky (Ethan Josh Lee), Dinah (Grace Edwards) and Clifford (Aristou Meehan). It’s Woodrow who arrives to town first, courtesy of his war photographer father, Augie Steenbeck (Jason Schwartzman). Although they’ve arrived to their destination, Augie still has to take the broken-down car to the mechanic (Matt Dillon). After much fanfare and tinkering, The Mechanic concludes that the car is kaput. Augie decides to phone his father-in-law, Stanley Zak (Tom Hanks), to come pick up Woodrow and Augie’s three daughters, Andromeda (Ella Faris), Pandora (Gracie Faris) and Cassiopeia (Willan Faris). Stanley doesn’t immediately agree, instead opting to remind Augie that he was never good enough for his daughter (played briefly, in a way, by Margot Robbie) and that he ought to tell his children that their mother died. Three weeks ago, to be exact. But withholding this information is just one of many ways in which Augie parades his emotional stuntedness. Something that ultimately enchants Hollywood actress Midge Campbell (Scarlett Johansson), who also happens to be the mother of another Junior Stargazer, Dinah.

    All the while, the vibrant, almost fake-looking set seems there solely to reiterate that all vibrancy is belied by something darker beneath it. That was never truer than in postwar America. And talking of vibrant cinematography and explosions, if Barbie’s color palette had a baby with Oppenheimer’s explosive content, you’d get Asteroid City (which, again, features Margot “Barbie” Robbie herself). With regard to explosions, it bears noting that the intro to the movie includes a train plugging along, bound for Asteroid City carrying all manner of bounty: avocados, pecans and, oh yes, a ten-megaton nuclear warhead with the disclaimer: “Caution: DO NOT DETONATE without Presidential Approval.” So much about that wide array of “transported goods” speaks to the very dichotomy of American culture. Priding itself on being a land of plenty while also doing everything in its power to self-destruct all that natural wealth. What’s more, the presence of hazardous material on trains is only too relevant considering the recent tragedy that befell East Palestine, Ohio. And yet, these are the sorts of environmentally-damaging behaviors that were set in motion in the postwar economic boom of America. Complete with the “miracle” of Teflon.

    Accordingly, it’s no coincidence that as the “progress” associated with modern life accelerated at a rate not seen since the first Industrial Revolution, some were concerned about the potential fallout of such “development.” After all, with technological advancement could arise as many inconveniences as conveniences (see also: AI). For those who came of age after the so-called war to end all wars, a natural skepticism vis-à-vis “advancement” was also to be expected. Perhaps the fear of modern existence, with all the implications of war and invasion being “leveled up” due to “better” technology (i.e., the atomic bomb), planted the seed of suddenly seeing flying saucers all the time starting in the 40s and 50s. A phenomenon that many government officials were keen to write off as being somehow related to atomic testing (this being why the Atomic Age is so wrapped up in the alien sightings craze of the 50s). The sudden collective sightings might also have been a manifestation of the inherent fear of what all this “progress” could do. Especially when it came to increasing the potential for interplanetary contact. For it was also in the 50s that the great “space race” began—spurred by nothing more than the competitive, dick-swinging nature of the Cold War between the U.S. and USSR. That was all it took to propel a “they’re among us” and “hiding in plain sight” mentality, one that was frequently preyed upon by the U.S. government via the Red Scare. Such intense fear- and paranoia-mongering does fuck with the mind, you know. Enough to make it see things that may or may not really be there (literally and figuratively). The term “alien,” therefore, meaning “foreigner” or “other” as much as extraterrestrial as the 50s wore on.

    So it was that Americans did what they always do best with fear: monetize it! To be sure, Asteroid City itself only exists to commodify the terror of an asteroid hitting Earth and leaving such a great impact thousands of years ago. Then, when news of an alien infiltrating the Junior Stargazer convention leaks, a fun fair materializes to sell merch (“Alien Gifts Sold Here”) related to commemorating the “event.” As such, the train that goes to Asteroid City suddenly becomes the “Alien Special” and there’s now “Alien Parking,” as well as signs declaring, “Asteroid City U.F.O.” and “Spacecraft Sighting.” With this American zeal for exploitation in mind, plus the alien element, there’s even a certain Nope vibe at play throughout Asteroid City as well. And a dash of Don’t Worry Darling, to boot. Mainly because of the unexplained sonic booms that go on in the background while the housewives are trying to kiki.

    Anderson extracts the paranoia element that might have been present in films of the day (like Flying Saucers Attack!) and instead relates the discovery of an alien life form to the added feeling of being insignificant as a human in this universe. To highlight that point, J.J. Kellogg (Liev Schreiber), father to Junior Stargazer Clifford, demands of his son’s escalating antics related to performing unasked dares, “Why do you always have to dare something?” He replies meekly, “I don’t know. Maybe it’s because I’m afraid otherwise nobody’ll notice my existence in the universe.” To be sure, the reason most people behave obnoxiously is to get the kind of attention that will convince themselves they matter. They mean something in this grand abyss.

    Even Midge, a movie star, feels mostly unseen. So when Augie takes her picture in such an intimate way, she can’t help but feel allured by him. Seen by him. That, in the end, is what everyone wants. In the spirit of alluding to 50s Americana, Midge herself seems to be a loose representation of Marilyn Monroe, also prone to pills and alcohol, and constantly referred to as a brilliant comedienne despite flying under the radar as such. Then there’s another six degrees of Marilyn separation when Willem Dafoe appears as Saltzburg Keitel, an overt homage to Elia Kazan and his Actors Studio—a version of which we see when Earp shows up to a class to try to get insight on how to convey a certain scene. And yes, the concern with whether or not the acting in the play is being done “right” keeps coming up, reaching a crest as a metaphor for what Asteroid City is all about: what is anyone’s place in the universe? Does any of it mean anything? So yeah, again with the Woody Allen influence.

    Toward the end of the play/movie, Jones Hall, the actor playing Augie, asks Schubert Green (Adrien Brody), the director, “Do I just keep doing it?” He could be asking about his performance as much as his very existence itself. Schubert assures, “Yes.” Jones continues, “Without knowing anything? Isn’t there supposed to be some kind of answer out there in the cosmic wilderness?” When Jones then admits, “I still don’t understand the play,” that phrase “the play” doubles just as easily for “life.” Schubert insists, “Doesn’t matter. Just keep telling the story.” In other words, just keep rolling the dice and living as though any of it means anything at all.

    And maybe nihilism, for some people, is part of compartmentalizing that meaninglessness. This much appears to be the case for Midge, who tells Augie stoically, “I think I know now what I realize we are… Two catastrophically wounded people who don’t express the depths of their pain because…we don’t want to. That’s our connection.” But a connection is a connection—and that’s all anyone on Earth is really looking—starving—for…no matter how many decades fly by and how many according “advancements” are made. It’s likely the convention-interrupting alien could sense and see that desperation among the humans during his brief landing.

    So it is that Augie tells Midge afterward, “I don’t like the way that guy looked at us, the alien.” Midge inquires, “How did he look?”  “Like we’re doomed.” Midge shrugs, “Maybe we are.” “Maybe” being a polite euphemism for “definitely.” But even though we are, maybe the art will make sense of it all in the end. Even if only to “just keep telling the story.” For posterity. For whoever—or whatever—might come across the ruins and relics in the future. Hopefully, they’ll learn from the mistakes that we ourselves didn’t.

    Genna Rivieccio

    Source link

  • Bryan Cranston says he will soon take a break from acting

    Bryan Cranston says he will soon take a break from acting

    Actor Bryan Cranston announced that he plans to take a break from acting in the next few years to spend more time with his wife of three decades.

    In an interview with British GQ, the 67-year-old “Breaking Bad” star said he planned to take the break in 2026, and maybe move to France with his wife Robin Dearden. 

    “I want to have that experience,” he said. “I want to go for day trips and have the fire in the fireplace and drink wine with new friends and not read scripts.”

    “It’s not going to be like, ‘Oh, I’ll read and see what I’m going to do.’ No, it’s a pause. It’s a stop,” he added. 

    The actor told the magazine that he wanted to put his wife of 34 years first after she has supported him throughout his acting career. 

    “Cranston is planning to shut down his production company, sell his half of Dos Hombres, and abscond with Dearden,” the article says.

    “I want to change the paradigm once again,” he tells GQ. “For the last 24 years, Robin has led her life holding onto my tail. She’s been the plus one, she’s been the wife of a celebrity. She’s had to pivot and adjust her life based on mine. She has tremendous benefits from it, but we’re uneven. I want to level that out. She deserves it.” 

    Cranston said he wanted to live in a small village, learn French and how to cook and pick up gardening. He said he was excited at the prospect of reading books with his wife and “finding new things to talk about over dinner.”

    “It’s about taking a chance. I’m used to that feeling — of not knowing,” he said. 

    In March, Cranston appeared on “CBS Mornings” to discuss the second season of his show “Your Honor,” his first series since the smash hit “Breaking Bad.”

    Cranston said he was drawn to do the show because of its compelling premise. 

    “The thing that got me was the conceit of the first season which was, ‘What would you do to save the life of your child?’ and the follow-up question is, ‘Would you willingly become a criminal if you thought it would save your child’s life?’ and the answer again is ‘yes,’” he said.

    Source link

  • Actor Bryan Cranston talks Season 2 of

    Actor Bryan Cranston talks Season 2 of

    Actor Bryan Cranston talks Season 2 of “Your Honor” on Showtime – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    Bryan Cranston is a multiple Emmy Award-winning actor, most known for his role as Walter White in the critically acclaimed series, “Breaking Bad.” Cranston’s latest project, “Your Honor,” has been a hit for Showtime. He joins “CBS Mornings” for a closer look at Season 2 and what projects he hopes to do in the future.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    Source link

  • Bryan Cranston Working on ‘Malcolm in the Middle’ Revival

    Bryan Cranston Working on ‘Malcolm in the Middle’ Revival

    Bryan Cranston is apparently working on a Malcolm In The Middle reboot, and we’re here for it. Despite playing one of the greatest TV villains of our generation, it seems that Cranston wants to return to his roots. He’s an incredibly versatile actor, and it doesn’t seem like it should be much of a problem for him to shift back into sitcom dad mode.

    For those who didn’t grow up with the series, Malcolm In The Middle was a sitcom staple of the early 2000s about a working-class family. It wasn’t exactly like how you might imagine a sitcom from that era. It was quirky and kinda cynical, but most of all, it felt real. It reflected everyday life for a family living in poverty, and that made it all the more captivating.

    The show starred Frankie Muniz as the titular Malcolm. and that remains one of his most recognizable roles. In fact, it was Muniz who spilled the beans on the potential reboot during a recent interview. Muniz is set to be a star on VH1’s The Surreal Life, which follows a number of celebrities who have fallen away from the spotlight. They’ll be cooped up together all under one roof, in a Big Brotherstyle reality TV scenario.

    During the interview with Fox News Digital, he said:

    I know Bryan Cranston is really into the idea and he’s kind of heading writing the script and getting everything rolling, so, there might be something. I would be down 100 percent. When I was filming the show, I obviously was a kid. We did seven seasons, 151 episodes. I didn’t really watch the show when it was on, but I’ve now since watched the show with my wife. We [watched] all 151 episodes… I realized, ‘Wow, that’s what we were making.’… I can separate myself from being on it and watching it as a fan. I would love to know what the family’s up to.

    Of course, just because Bryan Cranston’s really enthusiastic about the idea and potentially working out the specifics… The show isn’t guaranteed. Hopefully, we hear more soon.

    13 Actors Who Returned To Iconic Roles Decades Later

    Cody Mcintosh

    Source link