ReportWire

Tag: Britney Spears

  • The Obsession With Marking Time Through Pop Culture

    The Obsession With Marking Time Through Pop Culture

    [ad_1]

    In the past several years, it’s become more and more common to “celebrate” (or mourn) the passing of milestone anniversaries for films and albums. This year, the sudden trend has evolved into also taking note of which songs were released, specifically, twenty-five years ago. A.k.a. singles that came out in 1998. Some of the more pronounced callouts in media have been Madonna’s “Ray of Light,” Britney Spears’ “…Baby One More Time,” Lauryn Hill’s “Doo Wop (That Thing),” Brandy and Monica’s “The Boy Is Mine,” Aaliyah’s “Are You That Somebody?,” Cher’s “Believe,” Christina Aguilera’s “Reflection” and Beastie Boys’ “Intergalactic.”

    In 1998’s defense, of course, it was a particularly momentous year for music. And, as usual, it has to be said, Madonna was the one to set the tone for mainstreaming the genre of the moment—electronica—by releasing Ray of Light in March. Cher would follow auditory suit (likely to Madonna’s eye roll) in October of that year with the release of “Believe” and the album of the same name. Where Madonna stopped at suffusing her music with William Orbit-helmed electronica sounds, Cher pushed further by being among the first to incorporate Auto-Tune in a manner antithetical to its original purpose (which was to disguise being off-key). With her unapologetically warped voice singing the “I Will Survive” of the 90s, Cher rang in a new era of musical manipulation.

    Elsewhere, Brandy and Monica relied on the tried-and-true duet method for their chart success (as did Mariah and Whitney with The Prince of Egypt’s “When You Believe,” for that matter—it was an animated movie soundtrack kind of year, what with Xtina’s “Reflection” being from the Mulan Soundtrack, to boot). But perhaps what stood out more than anything about “The Boy Is Mine” was its totally implausible video, wherein we’re supposed to believe The Boy (Mekhi Phifer) was able to carry off the logistical nightmare of fucking two women who lived next door to each other in the same building.

    “…Baby One More Time,” needless to say, stood out for its sound and visual, with Britney notoriously catering to every man’s Nabokovian fetish for schoolgirls by dressing in a Catholic school uniform throughout most of the Nigel Dick-directed video. It was this moment in pop culture history that perhaps signaled the biggest sea change of all from one decade into another. For, although Britney burst onto the scene (and caused men’s pants to burst in so doing) in the 90s, she was a decidedly 00s pop star. The leading example of what that entailed sonically and visually, with the likes of Jessica Simpson, Willa Ford, Mandy Moore, Hilary Duff and, later, even Taylor Swift emulating what Britney had perfected. That is to say, being a “pop tart.” Prancing around in sequined leotards with fishnets and singing “subtly” about sex. Because, in 1998, the United States was still in love with the idea of losing more of its innocence, a desire immediately established in January of that year, when the Clinton-Lewinsky scandal broke. For not since “Dick” Nixon had the nation been forced to see how little trust they should place in the “highest office in the world.” And all because, like most men, he couldn’t resist a blow J.

    So as America continued to deflower itself in a post-internet existence that was further punctuated by the release of The Matrix in 1999, the music and the videos that came with it seemed to reflect this period in American pop culture history more than any other. Even Next’s “Too Close” was a 1998 hit that talked exclusively about a man’s issues with concealing his boner because a woman dared to get “too close” to him. Therefore, “asking for it,” etc. (or, “You know I can’t help it,” as Next insists). This prompting Vee of Koffee Brown to demand, “Step back, you’re dancin’ kinda close/I feel a little poke comin’ through on you.” It’s a song that encapsulates many a junior high dance of the day, when “freaking” was all the rage among the preadolescent set.

    As mentioned, more than the songs that were about sexual awakenings/yearnings, the music of 1998 was dead-set on innovating. This included the aforementioned “Are You That Somebody?” and “Intergalactic,” as well as Fatboy Slim’s “The Rockafeller Skank,” all awash in sounds that would become a retrospective “time stamp” for the era. In general, that’s part of the reason why many people so love to mark time through pop culture. More than one’s own personal life (with memories triggered by certain songs), it is far likelier to offer a historical snapshot of a particular epoch lost to the quicksand of minutes and then years and then decades. The obsession to mark time as a whole, however, stems not from nostalgia, so much as being part of a capitalistic society in which time is literally money.

    If you look up, “Why do people keep track of time passing?” one of the top answers is extremely telling: “Time tracking is key to understanding how you spend your time, personally and in business. It is key to productivity, insight and a healthy workflow. This is equally important to everybody in an organization, or society.” In other words, if you aren’t productive within the capitalistic machine (complete with the purchasing power to support entertainment industries), then what good are you? Do you even exist? That pop culture is also a buttress for capitalism, thus, makes it inextricably linked to that system. Further solidified by how these anniversaries of album and song releases can provide the catalyst for re-releases that will prompt fans and even casual listeners alike to buy the same product again, whether digitally or as a result of being enticed by some “collector’s edition”-type presentation.

    Underlying capitalistic-driven motivations aside, maybe the reason why some are especially gung-ho about marking the passage of time this year by looking back on 1998 in music is because it was arguably the last time a pioneering shift occurred in said medium. With the dawning of the 2000s, hauntology would come to dominate the musical landscape more than anywhere else, complete with musicians like Amy Winehouse and Arctic Monkeys sounding as though they were pulled straight out of the 1960s rather than the twenty-first century. The same could also later be said of such acts as The Raveonettes, Duffy, Adele and Lana Del Rey.

    And when next year rolls around to mark the twenty-fifth anniversary of songs like Smash Mouth’s “All Star,” Ricky Martin’s “Livin’ La Vida Loca,” Bloodhound Gang’s “The Bad Touch,” Sugar Ray’s “Every Morning” and Crazy Town’s “Butterfly,” we’ll perhaps more fully understand the pinpointable instant when things started to take a dive (compounded by 1999 also being the year Napster was launched).

    [ad_2]

    Genna Rivieccio

    Source link

  • The “Difficult” Woman

    The “Difficult” Woman

    [ad_1]

    There is no shortage of examples of the “difficult” woman in history. Better known as “crazy.” For when a woman is deemed too difficult, the crazy label always comes in quite handily for those looking to silence her “psychotic” nature. Few ever stopping to consider that “psychotic” behavior is pretty much anything that doesn’t fit into the limiting box put forth by patriarchal society. And that limitation is very much by design. Hence, the rate at which far more women are diagnosed with “mental problems” than men. Because, shit, they straight-up invent mental disorders specifically for women (see: hysteria, Angry Woman Syndrome, Post-Abortion [Stress] Syndrome)—all created to hem in very natural reactions that would not be seen as “problematic” in men.

    People have continued to fool themselves into believing that “we’ve come so far” and that a level playing field has been formed. One on which women can thrive and “have it all.” That odious phrase that would never need to be applied to men because they’ve always had everything, no questions asked. Looking back on the women who have been branded with the “cuckoo” mark, it’s plain to see they were set up to fail. Frances Farmer, Zelda Fitzgerald (who was somehow viewed as “crazier” than F. Scott), Sylvia Plath, Princess Diana and, perhaps most illustriously of all, Britney Spears. Frances and Zelda were both relegated to mental institutions; Plath suffered her “madness” while only able to cast some of it out of her through her poetry and The Bell Jar; Diana was painted as the irrational, paranoid woman, whose paranoia was then preyed upon by the likes of Martin Bashir for profit.

    Britney, however, might have suffered the worst “consequence” of all: being betrayed by her own family. Who used the perception of her “insanity” (a.k.a. a normal reaction to living in a fishbowl and having every move she made interpreted as another sign of her incompetence) to their benefit. Specifically, Jamie and Lynne Spears colluding with Tri Star Sports & Entertainment’s Lou Taylor to entrap Britney in a conservatorship. Truly, the stuff of Hollywood horror story legend.

    As many remember, it was Britney snapping one night on February 16, 2007 (thus, the mocking t-shirt that reads: “I Feel Like 2007 Britney”) by shaving her head at a Tarzana salon that provided all the cannon fodder anyone needed to call her “crazy.” Frances Farmer endured a similar phenomenon on October 19, 1942, spurred from the instant she was stopped by a police officer for being parked on the side of the road with her high-beams on in a blackout zone (this being a wartime practice meant to prevent enemy aircrafts from detecting a target). Talking back to the officer (including telling him, “You bore me”), she was accused of being drunk (without any test actually given) and thrown into the clink for the night before she paid her bail.

    Other “drunk and disorderly” accusations were lobbied at Farmer in subsequent months that year as well. Namely, while in Mexico to shoot a movie version of John Steinbeck’s Murder at Laudice. Upon arriving, she found that the shooting script wasn’t even completed, so what the fuck else was she to do but entertain herself while she waited? Something any man in her position would have done as well—without the curse of being called “drunk and disorderly.” It was Mexico in the 1940s, what did anyone expect? Especially since the movie never even started filming.

    This led, soon enough, to “too much free time” on Farmer’s hands as she was additionally accused of disturbing the peace. She then endured something akin to the Spears family’s treatment of their star member upon trying to return to her Santa Monica abode after the botched film shoot, only to find that it had been cleared of all her possessions and another family was living in it. Farmer stated that her mother and sister-in-law were responsible for this abrupt ousting, after which she ended up staying at a room in the Knickerbocker Hotel. Of this bizarre turn of events, Farmer would later remark, “I suppose it seems peculiar that I never asked questions, or received an accounting, but I didn’t give a damn. At the time I neither knew nor cared.”

    Just before her “forced transference” to the Knickerbocker, studios were continuing to pass her around during this period. Mainly because Frances was declared to be a “difficult woman” for actually “deigning” to make suggestions about the character she was playing. Per Patrick Agan’s The Decline and Fall of the Love Goddesses, “She incurred studio wrath by demanding they rewrite the glamor out of [her] character [Calamity Jane in Badlands of Dakota] and give her back her original grittiness. Again she lost the battle and another mark was chalked up against her on Hollywood’s list of troublemakers.” That word “troublemaker” being reserved for any woman who doesn’t do as she’s told without “making a fuss” about it. The same went for women like Plath, Fitzgerald and Princess Diana, who were viewed as “problematic” and “threatening” because of their unwillingness to suffer in total silence. Plath spoke out in her venomous writing, and so did Zelda and Diana, for that matter (with the latter doing so secretly through biographer Andrew Morton).

    All these examples, of which there are so many more, prove solely that the “difficult” woman is often not so difficult at all. She merely expressed herself “out of nowhere” (as though she hadn’t been saying the same thing for some time while being ignored) when a man in the oppressor position expected her to go along as usual (e.g., Britney saying no to “one dance move” and then being admitted to a psychiatric facility by her father in 2019). And the same cycle of gaslighting a woman into thinking she’s “crazy” continues (for if she wasn’t to begin with, she certainly would be if forced to endure enough repetition of mantras like “you’re crazy,” “you’re imagining things,” et cetera).

    Just look at Britney being accused of insanity every day on her Instagram now that she’s free. For, no matter how many monuments or “holidays” we seem to generate (e.g., Women’s History Month and International Women’s Day) to tell us that women are important and deserve to be heard without the risk of seeming “difficult,” the actions of the world daily persist in emphasizing the contrary.

    [ad_2]

    Genna Rivieccio

    Source link

  • Celebrities You Didn’t Realize Always Pose the Exact Same Way

    Celebrities You Didn’t Realize Always Pose the Exact Same Way

    [ad_1]

    A celebrity can wear the most gorgeous outfit, designer jewelry, and eye-catching shoes on the red carpet—but it could all fall apart without the right power pose. Knowing your angles is truly an art form—one that these stars have perfected over the years. From Kim Kardashian to Zendaya to Beyoncé, we’ve compiled the signature stances of Hollywood’s biggest names.

    While some are more obvious (we’ve all seen Taylor Swift’s side glances), you’ve probably never noticed most of them. You might even pick up a few tips along the way, like how to do “The Beckham,” which is very different from “The Britney.” No matter which pose you find inspiration from, these stars are absolute pros, so you can’t go wrong. Without further ado, here are a bunch of celebrities who always pose the exact same way on the red carpet.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • 2023 Spring Fashion Trends Before TikTok Tells You

    2023 Spring Fashion Trends Before TikTok Tells You

    [ad_1]

    Spring is approaching! Next time you look up it’ll be all April showers bringing May flowers. As I type this article, it’s a balmy 60 degrees outside. Practically Bermuda-esque weather for New York.


    And while it may snow next week, this weather has me looking forward to those cute outfits I can debut in the spring. 2022 winter fashion brought us apres-ski chic and lace detailing, but I’m anticipating some big changes in the fashion world as the weather warms up. People are feeling risky…I can tell.

    The weather is getting warmer and jeans are getting tighter. Don’t panic, we aren’t diving into the deep end and bringing back skinny jeans or jeggings. It’s all about a straight leg or minimal bootcut flare.

    Multiple Fashion Weeks have come and gone, and I have a good picture of what retailers are about to push out in stores soon. 2023 spring fashion trends include heavy denim and satin-style cargo pants. With an emphasis on casual comfort and pants with lots of pockets, spring 2023 fashion will look very familiar.

    If you’re looking to catch the spring trends a little early this year, look no further. I’ve scoured every page of Vogue and every paparazzi shot of off-duty models like Hailey Bieber and Emily Ratajkowski. And I’ve most definitely kept up with the Kardashians, our ever-present trend dictators.

    An Excessive Amount Of Pockets

    Nina Agdal

    Shutterstock

    Whether it be a pair of cargo pants or a mini-skirt, anticipate the cargo-style pocket to be sewn on. We are focusing on Y2K style again, as always. All different types of cargo pants like satin will be on trend.

    Pair your cargo pants with a cropped baby tee for the ultimate Y2K resurgence. We want enough pockets that you could arguably fit multiple phones and wallets at once.

    90’s Style Strapless Tops

    Reformation Clothing

    We all know and love the strapless top, but the 90’s style involves a looser top. They pair well with the ever-so-highly debated low-rise jeans, which are still trending. It’s a bit more flowy and forgiving than a tight top, so I’m a fan.

    This type of top reminds me of the early 2000’s red carpet style. Tuck it into high waisted jeans for a tucked in look that’s perfect for spring weather.

    Full Denim Fits & Skinnier Jeans

    Britney Spears and Justin Timberlake may have been the founders of the full denim fit, but it looks like we’re bringing it back this spring. Denim strapless tops, denim accents, everything is all denim. You’ll also see less of the baggy style jeans and more fitted, straight leg styles.

    These Levi’s are perfect for this spring’s hottest pair of denim, and if you’re looking for a fun denim addition to your closet, try this top.

    Lingerie-Inspired Detailing

    Billie Eilish

    AFF-USA/Shutterstock

    We’re back to playing the “is-it-lingerie-or-is-it-acceptable-to-wear-in-public” game. Think all lace bodysuits and mesh everything. Slip dresses with lace applique and deep v cuts will be the star of the show.

    If you have to question whether you bought it in the underwear section of the store, you’re probably right on trend. Lingerie-inspired clothing is back and if you want a more understated look, throw on an oversized blazer and tailored menswear style pants.

    Quilted Jackets

    Street Style, Spring Summer 2021, Milan Fashion Week, Italy

    Cornel Cristian Petrus/Shutterstock

    Vogue says if you have one jacket this spring, make it a quilted one. And since our fashion Bible says a shell coat can be the perfect transitional weather piece, we must listen. The quilted jacket has been worn by Gigi Hadid, and can be layered on top of your favorite sweater.

    This quilted jacket by ASOS is my favorite piece in this article. As someone who was a big fan of the shacket, the quilted jacket is a more elevated approach on a spring favorite.

    Silks & Satins

    I’ve seen a bunch of silk cargo pants online when browsing, but that’s not all. We’re bringing back the low-rise silk maxi skirt that’s reminiscent of every beach commercial ever. It’s an essential piece for a brunch outfit or the transitional weather we’ll be experiencing.

    I like this
    satin mini for weekends out on the town with a moto jacket (also a spring favorite), and this silk maxi for a bottomless mimosa brunch with friends.

    [ad_2]

    Jai Phillips

    Source link

  • “Welcome to My Island, Bitch” Is the New “It’s Britney, Bitch”

    “Welcome to My Island, Bitch” Is the New “It’s Britney, Bitch”

    [ad_1]

    For those who didn’t think Caroline Polachek’s bop, “Welcome to My Island,” could get any better, Charli XCX has arrived to give her own take on it. One delivered in the “persona” of a decidedly creamy smooth pop icon goddess (as Madonna likes to call herself). In this regard, XCX continues to adopt the same braggadocious tone we’ve come to know and love on Crash, translating it into a “remix” that feels like a dripping-in-decadence song unto itself. Indeed, Polachek’s faint presence in the background of her own single is overshadowed by XCX with far more overtness than Taylor Swift doing the same to Lana Del Rey during “Snow on the Beach.” But that’s to be expected when Polachek trusts in XCX’s brilliance to remake a song based on their past collaborations together (including “New Shapes,” which also featured Christine and the Queens). And the brilliance XCX provides here is no exception to the rule.

    As someone who has transformed parodying pop stardom to the point where she can perhaps no longer blur the line between the parody and the real, the George Daniel and Charli XCX remix of “Welcome to My Island” fits right in with XCX’s simultaneous mockery and embracement of excess. In short, all the trappings of stardom and its according wealth. Among such trappings being island getaways at the drop of a custom-made hat. After all, there’s a reason so many celebrities buy private islands—it’s the ultimate milieu where no rules need apply to them (not that they really do elsewhere either). And yes, Richard Branson, who Charli name checks in the song with, “I guess I’m on my Richard Branson wave/No virgin, but I knew just how to behave,” is among the many “eccentric” (read: difficult because they can be) celebrities to own an island.

    What’s more, when Charli says she knows just how to behave, she means she knows just how to misbehave, regaling us with her double entendre-filled description, “You can drive me down to Florida and fuck me for days/Back at the start, think you knew that I was dangerous/I’ve done a couple bad things if you catch my drift/I told him, ‘Baby, you can pull up on the landing strip’/And if you do it right, welcome to my island, bitch.”

    It’s that last line that XCX has remade with the blunt addition of the word “bitch” that has rendered this version of “Welcome to My Island” arguably more iconic than Polachek’s original (which isn’t an easy feat considering how amazing it is already). And there’s no denying a touch of the Britney influence in “coming up with” that one-word addendum. XCX being a fan of Spears (like most of us), it’s certain that “Gimme More” has played a part in her pop music inspiration, perhaps finally manifesting at its most obvious with the straightforward declaration, “Welcome to my island, bitch.” For if Britney could make a similarly simple announcement so memorable by adding “bitch” (i.e., “It’s Britney, bitch”), then surely Charli could, too. And so she has, with an anthem that touts the glamor and indulgence of what being on an island connotes to those who don’t actually have to live on one full-time. For, as most who endure that fate know, it hardly feels like a 24/7 vacation, so much as a 24/7 nightmare.

    More than just the lyrical depictions, however, it is the sonic landscape—courtesy of Jim-E Stack, Dan Nigro, Danny L Harle, Caroline Polachek and George Daniel—that transports us into an environment so carefree and bacchanalian that it’s almost (almost) as good as actually being in, say, Ibiza (where this song should probably be playing on a loop throughout the summer). And for the landlocked plebes who will never make it to such exotic locations evoked by “Welcome to My Island,” the track alone will have to suffice, ingratiating itself among the Lavish Getaway Canon with other “rare breed” singles such as “La Isla Bonita.” And as for John Donne, who said, “No man is an island,” well, that’s probably just because he had never met a millionaire or billionaire with his own to prove otherwise.  

    [ad_2]

    Genna Rivieccio

    Source link

  • Super Bowl 2023: Britney Spears to Make an appearance Alongside Rihanna? Here’s what we know

    Super Bowl 2023: Britney Spears to Make an appearance Alongside Rihanna? Here’s what we know

    [ad_1]

    As the day approaches, fans have taken over the hype and made their best guesses after Rihanna decided to make an appearance after seven long years and deliver her greatest hits on the stage of the Super Bowl LVII halftime show. The “Queen of Pop-Song” is a queen for a reason, as she has taken over the internet by storm, where fans have suspected everything from how she will wrap up her 13-minute appearance to what she will be styled as. Others are curious about who Rihanna will collaborate with at her mega-live stage event, which will undoubtedly be a significant event for her given that she will step in after 7 long years for her son and take to the stage to celebrate her Caribbean heritage in order to support black women.

    Though Madonna performing “Party Rock” with the rap duo LMFAO or Missy Elliott at Katy Perry’s has not aged well or been forgotten by the audience for the halftime show, making it one of the most pressing issues to be addressed and putting all of our thoughts into it, how can we figure out who it could be?

    Of course, I’m not privy to any special information. But as someone who has followed RiRi since “Pon de Replay” premiered on TRL (RIP), I feel qualified to throw some strong contenders into the mix. Choosing the song for the set list was one of the biggest challenges the singer faced. So we can only speculate as to who will appear on stage with Rihanna. As collaborations with artists such as Jay-Z, Kanye West, Nicki Minaj, Shakira, Maroon 5, and Paul McCartney went on to be very successful events, having someone as a guest on her special day will definitely take the limelight away.

    To make it seamless, we have put our thinking cap on, and the arrow has hit the aim of:

    Can Britney Spears make an appearance with Rihanna at Super Bowl 2023?

    Britney Spears and Rihanna once teamed up on the remix of her classic song “S&M,” and they even played it live at the 2011 Billboard Music Awards. Spears is now officially free from conservatorship, and a performance on one of the greatest platforms would mark the occasion.

    However, there is currently no indication that Spears will appear alongside Rihanna. In reality, TMZ reported that Spears has been having mental health issues and may seek medical assistance after her family and friends believed she would require an “intervention,” according to people close to the singer.

    While there has been no official confirmation of the report, Britney’s husband shredded the evidence on her behalf, claiming that “no intervention” occurred because it was “unnecessary.” The outlet says that the insider told them, “Unfortunately, there is a lot of hysteria in the media right now, but Britney is fine, and much of this has been overblown and grossly distorted.”

    ALSO READ: Sam Asghari steps up for wife Britney Spears amidst health speculations, calls it “inappropriate”

    [ad_2]

    1136909

    Source link

  • If Only Britney Spears’ Sons Were As Protective and Supportive As Pamela Anderson’s

    If Only Britney Spears’ Sons Were As Protective and Supportive As Pamela Anderson’s

    [ad_1]

    It hasn’t taken many people long to notice an unfortunate comparison between how Pamela Anderson’s two sons treat their mother versus Britney Spears’ (with Spears herself even making the connection)—poisoned against their matriarch from an early age, thanks to spending most of their time with Kevin “Meat Pole” Federline. That Anderson’s body was and is the source of giving so many men (and women) orgasms around the world might make less evolved blokes related to her uncomfortable, and yet, it was her oldest son, Brandon Lee, who was determined to make a documentary that would “set the record straight” about his mother while candidly telling the story of their family, to boot. Called Pamela, A Love Story, the movie is co-produced by Lee and directed by Ryan White, with the former also appearing in it to weigh in on his upbringing and the perception surrounding his mother. Not to mention his younger brother, Dylan “Dilly” Lee, who is slightly more reserved in his discussions, but nonetheless supportive.

    The comparisons made to how Anderson and Spears were similarly (mal)treated by the media and the public at large also became a point of interest in the wake of the documentary’s release (and, let’s be real, it was far better than anything Framing Britney Spears could hope to achieve—if for no other reason than the subject was actually a willing participant). Not that it should come as any surprise that people (read: men) like to denigrate attractive blonde women for their viewing pleasure. And, speaking of viewing pleasure, the infamous Pam and Tommy sex tape is of course commented on in Pamela, A Love Story, with Anderson stating that, at this juncture, she’s made peace with the violation—even though it felt like another rape. Just as the release of an entire series (Pam & Tommy) about it did. But, as it’s been made evident over and over again, Anderson holds no grudges against anyone. Much to Brandon’s dismay…

    For it was on the red carpet during the premiere of the movie that Brandon was asked, “Do you feel this sense of responsibility to make sure, especially as a son—we’re protective of our moms—to make sure that she gets her due? And why is that so important to you?” He replied, “Well, I think it’s important for a lot of reasons, but you know, when I go back and I even look at, you know, past deals or residual checks that come in, I mean, people would be shocked to find out how people really took advantage of her, and took advantage of a young girl making a bad deal on a big show, and she was the biggest star in the world at the time and I think a lot of people made a lot of money off that and I think, you know, everybody’s gonna have to have their day where, you know, we come knockin’ and I—no, you know, I think so because, you know, for instance, when she makes, I don’t know, four thousand dollars a year off Baywatch, that’s a crime.” The ardency with which he says this is in direct opposition to the blasé attitude of Spears’ own little terrors, who easily turned against her when she was finally home free—literally. Released from the conservatorship and granted the ability to live how she wanted.

    This included many nude photos and videos that spoke psychologically to her newfound sense of freedom. Photos and videos that her sons were “embarrassed” by. And if that’s that case, Brandon and Dylan have far more to be “embarrassed” about. But they’re not. They’re accepting and embracing of their mother’s talent (and it is a talent to be able to strip and pose the way Anderson does, not to mention her comedic brilliance in the shows and movies she’s appeared in). Perhaps because they’re “older” (twenty-six and twenty-five, respectively), they have a better understanding of their mother’s “lifestyle.” But no, that’s not really it. The fact is, they were raised by Anderson, nurtured by her. And it was obvious that she consistently put them above everything else; her first priority was always aimed at being a good mother. That might not necessarily come in the cookie-cutter package the more conservative-minded would like to see, but Anderson’s love was undeniably there throughout their childhood.

    Indeed, Anderson was committed and protective enough of her sons to refuse tolerating Tommy Lee’s physical violence in early 1998, after he struck her while she was holding Dylan, then just several weeks old (born on December 29, 1997, the “incident” occurred in February of 1998). Of his domestic abuse charge, he said in an interview, “Tommy comes third now, instead of first. I don’t know how to deal with that.” Get the fuck outta here with that narcissistic bullshit of an excuse. And while other women might have given Lee a “second chance” after that—even Pamela, had she not just become a mother—she decided to bounce (Baywatch-style). For the Mama Bear instinct took hold and she realized it was time to leave, not wanting to stick around and find out if he might be capable of such effrontery again.

    And no, she didn’t hold a grudge against Lee either. As Brandon confirmed at the aforementioned premiere, “She doesn’t hold a grudge against anybody… and that’s wonderful, but I would love to see her get what’s right.” This in reference to her being fucked over on royalties for Baywatch… and the sex tape, for that matter. Which she never received a penny for. Yet from Dylan’s perspective, it’s what really proved her purity, her true commitment to motherhood over the “benefits” of fame as he noted in the documentary, “I think it would’ve been a different story if she did cash in on the tape. It just shows you, right? That thing guaranteed made people millions of dollars and she was like, ‘No.’ She one hundred percent cared about her family being okay and me being okay. Never cared about money.” Yet, as Brandon stated, “If it’s your work and it’s your face and it’s your image, you deserve something.” The same could be said for Spears, whose image was effectively pimped out by her own family for over a decade. Luckily, Spears, in contrast to Anderson, knows how to hold a grudge. And definitely should—even if it’s against her own spawns, Jayden and Sean. The ones who finally prompted her to lash out at their grotesque comportment (including berating her for her “behavior” on Instagram) with the sarcastically-tinged statement, “I understand your need to live with your father as I had to play the perfect role for fifteen years for absolutely nothing.”

    This referring to how everything she did—going along with the conservatorship and playing the part of the “good girl” by not trying harder to break out of it—was so her father wouldn’t take visiting access to her kids away from her. Visiting access that Federline ultimately posted about when he put up secretly-taped videos filmed by Jayden and Sean that showed Spears yelling at them. A.k.a. instructing them to wear lotion and put shoes on in public (yes, that’s rich coming from Spears, queen of walking barefoot at the gas station).

    Before the fallout was further cemented by such increasing betrayals that revealed her sons had been firmly brainwashed by Team Federline/Team Conservatorship, Spears had once posted a quote on her illustrious Instagram account that went, “There is nothing stronger than the love between a mother and son.” A little cringe-y and Oedipal, but hey, her heart was in the right place. And maybe that strength will never truly break Brit’s bond with the sons she stayed quiet for throughout the hellish ordeal of her imprisonment. The fierceness of the maternal instinct is, after all, difficult to sever. And yet, it’s more than slightly demeaning when a woman, who loves her children with such ferocity, is accused of and painted as being a bad mother.

    A scene in Pamela, A Love Story speaks to this issue when archival footage is shown of Anderson getting pepper sprayed outside of an L.A. club as a paparazzo tries to shame her with the question, “Where is your baby? Where is your baby?” “With my mother,” she hisses back. “You fuckin’ asshole!” This idea that a woman can’t “have her cake and eat it too” by going out and having fun because she’s a mother is deeply embedded in the warped thinking of our patriarchal society. Spears was similarly lambasted for her partying “antics” in the 00s (well-documented thanks to the field day that tabloids had with portraying her as an unfit mother), still young and eager to sow some wild oats despite having already birthed two children. Yet, because of this, she was expected to stay home, fold her hands and sit quietly while Federline got the male perk of going out freely without any judgment.

    At a certain moment in Pamela, A Love Story, Brandon remarks of his mother, “She’s never worried about if she’s okay. She always made sure everyone else is okay.” The same was true of Spears, even after she was so egregiously betrayed by everyone in her family—sons included. The ones who so blatantly show no support for her and all she’s been through (they couldn’t even be bothered to make an appearance at her wedding to Sam Asghari). Regardless of the disloyalty, it’s unlikely that she’s capable of ever genuinely turning her back on Jayden and Sean. Enduring the trauma of watching them grow further and further apart from her has prompted such statements on her Instagram as, “I’ve cried oceans for my boys and I’m not lying!!!!” In addition to her declaration of their lack of affinity with her, “There’s being rude then there’s being HATEFUL. They would visit me, walk in the door, go straight to their room and lock the door!!! The MONITOR would tell me that he just likes to be in his room. I’m like why come visit me if they don’t even visit me !!!” On the plus side, after ceasing to “pretend” they actually cared enough to come visit, Spears clapped back, “It’s been kinda nice not having to ask about which day the boys are coming this week and making me wait two or three days for a reply!!!”

    What’s more, in one of the above-referenced videos posted by Federline, Spears is shown announcing to her sons, “You all need to start treating me like a woman with worth. I am a woman, okay? Be nice to me. Do you understand?” But, clearly, they don’t. So perhaps they could use some instruction from Pamela Anderson’s sons on how to do that.

    [ad_2]

    Genna Rivieccio

    Source link

  • Britney Spears’ Instagram: Maybe “What U See (Is What U Get)”

    Britney Spears’ Instagram: Maybe “What U See (Is What U Get)”

    [ad_1]

    In some sense, it’s easier to believe the current conspiracy theories about Britney Spears. After all, it was “conspiracy theories” that led to her being freed from a needless thirteen-year conservatorship. But now that she is free (or “free,” as some people believe), it’s not quite what many were expecting. Complete with almost daily videos that are clearly not recent and captions that are “cryptic” at best. With most everyone (especially fans) wanting to interpret them as having some “arcane” meaning. But what if Britney actually is, in fact, just that simple? Talking incoherent-but-somehow-coherent shit about all the wrongs that have been done to her (of which there have been many) while embracing her “inbred swamp thing” Southern persona more than ever as she continues to say, “Holy shit balls” and flip off the camera. For, just as it was part of the reason for shaving her head in 2007, she wants to be effectively “unloved” by a public and a media that chewed her up and spit her out. In short, she is very firmly rebuffing any image of “America’s sweetheart” that might have ever been projected onto her. Or any attempt for that image to be re-projected now that she “owes” something to those who secured her unshackling.

    This perhaps includes, for those hoping to see warm and fuzzy images of her life now that it’s “unmanaged,” making it as messy and erratic as possible. Besides, it’s true that Britney once said (albeit during a period of far greater innocence in her life), “What you see/Is what you get/This is me, hey you/If you want me, don’t forget/You should take me as I am/‘Cause I can promise you/Baby, what you see is what you get.” Alas, no one can seem to believe that could possibly be true as they watch her jut out her sunburned-to-the-point-of-redness stomach in a midriff and continue to act as though she’s still dancing in the “…Baby One More Time” video—this often includes showcasing an “updated” version of the look via a green-and-blue plaid skirt with a white ruffle-collared shirt tied in a knot that is sure to expose plenty of belly. An outfit she chose to don for a January 21st post in which she performed her usual series of poses for the camera—exhibiting facial expressions that toe the line between awkward and sassy, though mostly the former. As though she can’t learn to deprogram from the idea that she’s constantly having to pose.

    To add to the eeriness of the display, Spears reverted to a commonly-played song in her Insta videos: Beyoncé’s “Haunted.” Those looking for hidden meaning would thusly be spooked by the lyrics she chose to highlight: “It’s what you do/It’s what you see/I know if I’m haunting you, you must be haunting me/It’s where we go/It’s where we’ll be/I know if I’m onto you, I’m onto you/Onto you, you must be onto me.” Such sentiments might spur the question: is she addressing that people, with their conspiracy theories, are “onto” the fact that she’s still not really in control? Least of all of her highly unhinged and consistently inconsistent Instagram account. Those descriptors were proven yet again on January 25th, after Spears went on yet another abstruse rant that many believe was pronounced shade at her husband’s infidelity before, once more, deleting the account.

    It was the expression of rage and its subsequent deletion that evidently prompted people to call the police to perform a “well check” on Spears at her home in Thousand Oaks. A.k.a. the home she was supposed to move out of in favor of a new one with Sam Asghari in Calabasas. But the latter residence is currently being “quietly” shopped around on the market as Spears has decided to return to the same home that should theoretically be filled with unpleasant associations… you know, because it was where she lived for a large bulk of her imprisoning conservatorship. But apparently, we all have a psychological glitch that allows us to find a slight bit of pleasure in the pain of revisiting old wounds.

    Upon the latest deletion of her account, the continued “concern” over Spears’ mental health—a polite way for people to excuse their fascination with watching “trainwrecks” and their drama—had also arisen when she changed her Instagram name from Channel 8 to River Red. Many could also read into that what they will—from making the correlation between Britney’s life and the 1998 movie of the same name about a boy who murders his abusive father to a commitment to never becoming menopausal (Britney has plenty of regressive tactics to stay in touch with the teen girl inside) to wanting the blood of those who wronged her to flow as gushingly as a river (in non-drought conditions). Like, say, Lou Taylor and Robin Greenhill of Tri Star Entertainment (not to be confused with TriStar Pictures).

    But then, such “outrage” over her “nonsensical” meanderings being drawn seems to invoke only giddy delight from Spears, who put up another post from the same day (January 21st) as the would-be neo-“…Baby One More Time” outfit. This one of a “collage” from @boipoppin with the caption, “I love being me. It pisses off all the right people.” That it truly does. In addition to all the wrong ones—like those who would seek to hem her in with a conservatorship (*cough cough* Lou Taylor and Robin Greenhill). And sell the idea to Spears’ father as the puppeteer. Two women who prompted a “red river” of shit on Britney’s Instagram in February of ’22, when she wrote (and later deleted, obviously), “The swanky suited up bitches … SO NICE with their ‘We are here to make you feel SPECIAL’ !!!! I had lunch with Lou Taylor and Robin Greenhill … they said ‘Britney, look at your picture on the wall!’ With a huge black and white framed picture in the hall of their office !!!!! Kate Beckinsale was there too !!!!! They sucked up to me and ‘made me feel special’ … RIGHT …. Ha those same bitches killed me a week later !!!!” Britney went on to say that her father/erstwhile conservator, Jamie Spears, “worshipped” Taylor and Greenhill and “would have done anything they asked of him.”

    Of her tenacity and endurance of such an unfathomable and incongruous situation, Spears asserted, “Nobody else would have lived through what they did to me !!! I lived through all of it and I remember all of it !!!! I will sue the shit out of Tri Star !!!! Psss they got away with all of it and I’m here to warn them every day of my precious life !!!!” Perhaps her warnings have persisted in the unrelenting posts that are drenched with the most enigmatic of shade as Britney dances and twirls or mimics one of the therapists she had to see while forced to be in a treatment facility. All of these freely put up for at least a day or two without Spears appearing to have any concern for how she’s “perceived.” Especially not now that her two narrow-minded sons have forsaken her in favor of the ultimate trashball that is Kevin Federline.

    But after a leaked video of her being “manic” at a restaurant in Thousand Oaks surfaced, Spears couldn’t ignore the ongoing scrutiny about her behavior. Thus, another dancing-in-the-studio post from Spears on January 23rd addressed her hyper-awareness of the public’s examination of her every move on social media—not to mention every (rare) move she makes in public. And yet, it’s an examination she slightly relishes and conjures by continuing to troll everyone with her captions. In this particular dancing video, she played some of her go-to favorite songs (e.g., Rihanna’s “Love on the Brain” and Chris Isaak’s “Baby Did A Bad Bad Thing”) with the “explanation,” “Howdy ho down … tipsy cattle balls !!! I have no idea what that means 🙈 … feeling kooky and silly but can’t act too kooky or silly like kids because they say ‘she’s CRAY CRAY’ … either way I gotta move … so I did !!! Sharing because I matter and if every person I call TAKES 9 RINGS TO ANSWER you can be certain I might get someone’s attention … all that LOVE !!! GOOD GOD RIGHT BACK AT YA !!! I bet after I post this my security answers after 2 RINGS … I be alive coming on my horse !!!” It sounds like a lot of word salad for the most part—at least to those who don’t know how to “look for the clues” and “allusions.” And, with regard to that security reference, it likely refers to Spears being literally policed with a “well check” every time she puts up a “cray cray” video.

    But as she once said in the aforementioned “What U See (Is What U Get),” “You should never try to change me/I can be nobody else/And I like the way I am.” Perhaps if so many people and “handlers” didn’t try to change her over the years, we might have some semblance of the girl we once knew in the era of Oops!…I Did It Again (on which this particular song appears).

    Uncannily enough, on the same track, Spears also sings the lyrics, “I know you watch me when I’m dancin’” and “I can feel your eyes on my back, baby/Uh na na/I can’t have no chains around me, baby can’t you see/I could be anything you dream of, but I gotta feel free.” Which she still clearly doesn’t/can’t because of how much weight is placed on the “strength” of her mental health each time she posts something snarky or silly or outright AI chatbot-sounding. As a “free” woman, however, doesn’t she have the right to? Maybe no one is controlling her—not even Sam. Maybe the harder truth to believe about Britney at this juncture is that what you see really is what you get. Complete with invectives like, “I generously serve you my shit … eat my shit!!! Psss !!! Keep coughing !!!” Whether aimed at Sam or not (as is the current speculation), Britney is right about one thing: “I could sit back and be like MOST and not give anyone anything to think about on Instagram.”

    Yet even when presenting her most blunt and honest thoughts (including, “Giving someone I love my everything only gives me the dagger in the heart !!!”), the majority wants to twist and turn them into something that isn’t rather straightforward. Because again, with Britney, “Baby, what you see is what you get.”

    [ad_2]

    Genna Rivieccio

    Source link

  • The Britney and Elvis Connection Further Solidifies With “Toxic Las Vegas”

    The Britney and Elvis Connection Further Solidifies With “Toxic Las Vegas”

    [ad_1]

    As though Elvis Presley and Britney Spears needed a further connection solidified between them (what with both being pimped out for profit), Baz Luhrmann decided to make it ultra-official by sanctioning the release of a deluxe edition of the Elvis Soundtrack featuring “Toxic Las Vegas.” As the title suggests, it’s a mashup of Spears’ “Toxic” and Presley’s “Viva Las Vegas” (which does, in fact, play during the movie). For those worried that Brit might be losing out on the profits yet again, however, there’s no need to fear: Luhrmann has assured that Brit approved of the sample being used. And why shouldn’t she? Clearly the chanteuse feels a certain kinship to the problematic icon (yes, Elvis conveniently glosses over his pedo tendencies in general and with Priscilla specifically). Not only because they both had to prop themselves up for a Vegas residency that started to feel more and more like a prison, but because each one was forced to perform against their will, when it was no longer a joy to do so. But rather, an infinite torture.

    Eerily enough, Britney would don the famous white jumpsuit for her Britney Spears Live from Las Vegas concert video, which showcased her performance at the MGM Grand for 2001’s Dream Within A Dream Tour. Because yes, back then, a Vegas residency would have been out of the question for a constantly rising star like her. Little did she know, Vegas would become her jail cell just thirteen years (also the amount of time she was stuck in a conservatorship) later with Piece of Me at Planet Hollywood. A jail sentence that wouldn’t turn out to be as long as Elvis’ at the International, but still long enough to break her spirit and cause her soul to drain out of her body. Elvis wasn’t really inside his body much either as the seven-year residency wore on. That’s right, seven years of being pumped full of downers and uppers just to keep the show going—just to keep “the Colonel” flush enough to pay his gambling debts.

    Of course, the Colonel wouldn’t see it that way, as Luhrmann posits in the biopic (co-written with Sam Bromell, Craig Pearce and Jeremy Doner—fittingly, there is no female perspective on such a “complicated” man). Played by Tom Hanks, the Colonel is sure to insist at the outset of the film (as Jamie Spears might), “Without me, there would be no Elvis Presley. And yet, there are some who would make me out to be the villain of this story.” In short, whatever he needs to tell himself amid the headlines that swirl after his death, including a newscaster announcing, “He worked Elvis like a mule to support his own gambling addiction.”

    And yet, Elvis was too young and naïve at the time of his ascent to avoid the con, it seemed. And what with being the first “pop star” of the kind, how was he to know how important and financially successful he would be? As Luhrmann said, “One minute he’s a truck driver, and the next minute he’s the most talked about, most provocative, most famous young man in the world.” Apart from the “truck driving man” description, it sounds like Britney to a tee—who was also constantly condemned for being too sexual. Because yes, women exposing their skin in a liberated manner warrants being treated like they’re still in the 1950s vis-à-vis the outrage and sexual repression front in America. Elvis’ pelvis, indeed, did break down many barriers with regard to repressed desire in the United States. Just not in a way that allowed women in entertainment (or any other arena) to relish the breaking down of those barriers. Hence, Britney being shamed at every turn for how she chose to dress and move… even in the twenty-first century and even by fellow women like Diane Sawyer.

    Born into a poor family like Britney, Elvis’ parents also saw an opportunity to monetize his talent. Of course, this was at a time when conservatorships weren’t quite so pervasive (unless, of course, you were a Native American being swindled by a white man), but it didn’t keep a man like the Colonel from capitalizing on his new “product.” Which is why, in Elvis, he boasts of his gift for the “snow job” (like Stanton Carlisle in Nightmare Alley), explaining what that means on the carny circuit: “emptying a rube’s wallet while leaving him with nothing but a smile on their face.” In this scenario, Elvis is the rube in addition to his public. Only he didn’t get the benefit of a smile on his face while being swindled and forced to perform in projects he found to be as hokey as everyone else did.

    Britney, at least, had more autonomy at the outset of her career. For a start, she was the one who suggested the Catholic schoolgirl uniforms of “…Baby One More Time.” Or, at least, planted the seed with comments like, “Wouldn’t I be wearing a schoolgirl’s outfit?” and “The outfits looked kind of dorky, so I was like, ‘Let’s tie up our shirts and be cute.’” Too “cute” for most pearl-clutching parents of the day. Just as it was for Elvis being deemed some sort of “instrument of the devil” for his hip-shaking maneuvers. As Austin Butler put it, “He had this animalistic fire.” As did (and does) Britney every time she performs, letting herself transcend to another plane free of judgment and accusations of being a ho (and, now that she’s older, “desperate”).

    As for Elvis and Britney’s Southern roots (both were born in Mississippi), it also extended into the eventual sound of their music. While each Southern singer was, on the surface, a “pop” musician, the icons grafted elements from the Black community to whitewash the sound for greater mass consumption (for Britney, that was especially noticeable on a record like 2001’s Britney or a song like “[I Got That] Boom Boom”).

    With “Toxic Las Vegas,” their separate remade-from-other-cultures sound fuses into one seamless party. Remixed by Jamieson Shaw, each pop star is given their time on the mic, with Elvis musing, “If I wind up broke, I’ll always remember that I had a swingin’ time.” Britney, unfortunately, had a far less “swingin’ time” in Las Vegas, as she’s sure to constantly repeat the story of how 1) she was never able to go out and enjoy the nightlife of the city at any point during her Piece of Me sentence and 2) all of her hometown “friends” were allowed to go to the spa while she was forced to keep “focusing on the show” and given no such outlet or release for the enjoyment of her own money.

    Upon the release of “Toxic Las Vegas,” Luhrmann would diplomatically say of the bond between Elvis and Britney, “She’s a gifted and talented artist, and all gifted and talented artists walk a high wire. What she’s been through—this is probably not the forum for me to comment on it, but others have said that there is a direct line between Elvis’ journey and Britney’s journey. They both had to contend with very, very complicated relationships. Let’s just leave it at that.” But let’s not. Let’s just say what happened: they were both fucked over by the people closest to them, carrying everyone else (in their inner circle) on their backs with the talent they had. The talent that should have ensured their wealth, not anyone else’s. And Las Vegas was a peak of the “toxicity” point for that harsh reality. So yes, a song and title like “Toxic Las Vegas” brings it all full-circle for both maltreated stars.

    [ad_2]

    Genna Rivieccio

    Source link

  • “They Talk About Me Like A Maniac”: Britney Spears and Sam Asghari on Recent Restaurant Incident

    “They Talk About Me Like A Maniac”: Britney Spears and Sam Asghari on Recent Restaurant Incident

    [ad_1]

    “HOLY SMOKES SHITBALLS,” Britney Spears wrote on Instagram late last night, in response to media coverage of her activity this weekend. This was part of a two-pronged response by Spears and her husband Sam Asghari after a few days of somewhat strange public and social media behavior. 

    To sum it up as briefly as possible: Spears and Asghari went out for a meal at the upscale chain restaurant JOEY (the Woodland Hills outpost, where the pork dumpling appetizers cost “14 1/4”) and were met with members of the public who felt it necessary to take cell phone videos of them. 

    From there it gets a little confusing. TMZ’s initial report said that Spears’s reaction “was manic” and she began talking in gibberish. Asghari was said to have stormed out in a huff, leaving the pop icon alone (with her bodyguard) for two minutes, and speaking “not another language, just unrecognizable speech.” There’s video of her alone at the table (covering her face with her menu) but considering just how loud it is at this place it is a little unclear who, if anyone, is babbling in an unknown tongue. You can watch for yourself.

    After this made news, and sparked discussion on social media, Spears made some curious posts on Instagram. One was of an illustration of a woman at a restaurant declaring “They told me I couldn’t/that’s why I did” and another was a dance routine replete with middle fingers to the tune of “I Touch Myself” by the Divinyls. As we wrote yesterday, these were, indeed, isolated moments that could come across as peculiar, but whether it was evidence of a larger “meltdown,” as described by outlets like the New York Post and the Daily Mail, is open to debate.

    On Sunday, Asghari told TMZ that this was a mountain out of a molehill. He explained that when going out sometimes “people are a little too excited to see my wife,” while miming a cell phone snap. “Fame comes with the territory,” he shrugged, adding that he simply went to get the car to get the hell out of there—he did not storm out or abandon Spears. “It is what it is, man,” he added, agreeing that being filmed while trying to have a meal is disrespectful, but “it comes with the territory and that’s it.”  

    He also wrote “Don’t believe what you read online people” on his Instagram Stories. (Alas, the ephemeral nature of that platform means this missive is now lost, like tears in the rain.)

    Late last night, Spears uploaded another unusual image to Instagram—this time an illustration from a Hong Kong-based artist with the handle carriedraw. Next to a picture of a very small person pouring syrup on pancakes, Spears had a lot to say about the recent developments.

    [ad_2]

    Jordan Hoffman

    Source link

  • SZA’s Stylist Shares What It Was Like Working on SOS

    SZA’s Stylist Shares What It Was Like Working on SOS

    [ad_1]

    Can you tell me a little bit about how you started out and eventually found your way into both parts of your fashion career?

    I grew up in L.A., and I always knew I wanted to be a fashion designer. When I was a kid, I didn’t know what being a stylist was. We had a family friend who was a costumer, and she was my childhood hero. Because that was the closest thing I knew to what I wanted to be.

    I always wanted to be a fashion designer, and my goal was to go to FIT in New York City right after high school, but September 11 happened, but that derailed my moving to New York City.

    I did a semester at SMC [Santa Monica City College], and then I went to FIDM. I went for fashion design. I had a teacher—I even remember her name; it was Mrs. Owens—and she was a designer. She actually had just gotten a job as head designer of Apple Bottom jeans.

    She was portfolio teacher, and I remember she told me that I would be a good stylist. She had previously worked at MTV as a stylist, and she introduced me to what that was because I didn’t really know what it was. I interned for her at Apple Bottom after I graduated. Then I interned at a few different denim companies. I eventually got a job with a small L.A. brand as women’s designer, and I was there for four years.

    There, I met stylists, and I started assisting. I did freelance design after I left, but I focused more on styling.

    [ad_2]

    Madeline Hill

    Source link

  • Hailey Bieber Claps Back at the Internet With a ‘Nepo Baby’ Tee

    Hailey Bieber Claps Back at the Internet With a ‘Nepo Baby’ Tee

    [ad_1]

    Barefaced and strutting in her usual chicness somewhere in Los Angeles, Hailey Bieber just debuted a fashion clapback to recent internet drama (with help from a nearby paparazzi, of course). Paired with her dusty blue low-rise jeans and Prada shoulder bag is a white t-shirt that reads, “Nepo Baby.”

    Taken from the word nepotism, “nepo baby” is a hot word in Hollywood and fashion right now, especially when discussing the recent phenomenon of celebrity children taking over modeling. As the latest group to catch a blaze from internet heat, nepo babies have been called out for the past several months as people point to privilege and power dynamics across industries, even earning New York Magazine cover story.

    [ad_2]

    Andrea Bossi

    Source link

  • An Animated Debate: Which Feature Will Bring Home the Oscar?

    An Animated Debate: Which Feature Will Bring Home the Oscar?

    [ad_1]

    This was such a good year for animation. Last year it truly boiled down to “Encanto vs. Mitchells”, but the field is wide open, so let’s run it down with the help of Vareity!

    With Disney/Pixar, we have Turning Red, a critical darling. Not commercial, because Disney didn’t give it a wide release….and Lightyear and Strange World, both of which did receive wide releases, flopped, and are non-entities in this race. Turning Red, which marks the first from Pixar to be solely directed by a woman, has received critical acclaim for Shi’s depictions of female friendships and the mother-daughter relationship.

    OP Note: TR is still probably my favorite film of the year.

    Netflix has quite a lot, including The Sea Beast, their most successful animated film to date. There’s also My Father’s Dragon, the latest from Cartoon Saloon, which hit the platform with a mild splash. Of course, there’s Guillermo del Toro’s Pinocchio, which is almost guaranteed to place in the nominations.

    The article does not, however, mention Henry Selick’s Wendell and Wild.

    OP Note: Sea Beast was fine enough, and GDT’s Pinocchio was really cool. Nice to see a multitude of stop motion available, sad W&W isn’t getting more attention.

    GKIDS missed a nomination last year with Belle (tip: the soundtrack is amazing), but with Inu-Oh already being nominated for a Golden Globe, maybe they can take it all the way (and give us a US release, y/y?).

    Did you, like most people, forget Dreamworks Animation had not one, but two films this year? The Bad Guys had a fairly slow rollout worldwide with it’s soft, almost Spider-verse-esque style for a bunch of criminals. It sadly seems to have sunk out of the public conciousness. Meanwhile, the sixth entry into the Shrek franchise, Puss In Boots: The Last Wish, may be 11 years too late, but it was worth the wait, with very positive reviews, and a bombastic artstyle and story that stops just short of saying memento mori.

    OP Note: Ok, maybe Puss in Boots is my favorite this year?

    Welcome to the animation side, A24, and welcome Marcel The Shell With Shoes On. I didn’t like it. But I’m glad another stop motion/live action hybrid is making the rounds, and is winning a lot of smaller circuits!

    src –> ft Apple and their John Lasseter film.

    [ad_2]

    sandstorm

    Source link

  • Jamie Spears Doesn’t Think Daughter Britney Spears Would Still ‘Be Alive’ If Not For Conservatorship

    Jamie Spears Doesn’t Think Daughter Britney Spears Would Still ‘Be Alive’ If Not For Conservatorship

    [ad_1]

    By Corey Atad.

    Jamie Spears is defending his daughter’s conservatorship.

    In a new interview with The Daily Mail, the father of pop superstar Britney Spears explained why he thinks placing his daughter under a conservatorship with the right thing.


    READ MORE:
    Britney Spears’ Lawyer Claims Jamie Spears Is ‘Running And Hiding’ From A Deposition

    “Not everybody’s going to agree with me. It’s been one hell of a time,” he said. “But I love my daughter with all my heart and soul. Where would Britney be right now without that conservatorship? And I don’t know if she’d be alive. I don’t… For protecting her, and also protecting [her two teenage sons], conservatorship was a great tool.”

    He continued, “My understanding of a conservatorship is to help someone regain their life and return back to society, and to be able to live normally. I want to say that I made a difference. There were a few people behind me that really helped bring it to a point where we could help her.”

    Britney was placed under the conservatorship in 2008 after a string of erratic behaviour which led to her being hospitalized in psychiatric care.

    The conservatorship was finally ended in 2021 after years of Britney’s attempts to have it her father removed as conservator and have the whole thing terminated.


    READ MORE:
    Kevin Federline Says Jamie Spears ‘Saved’ Daughter Britney’s Life

    The singer has alleged that during that time, her father controlled much of her life, including her finances, and that the conservatorship was “abusive.”

    Jamie claimed that when the conservatorship began in 2008, his daughter “had no money” and that the order “allowed the finances to be better.”

    He also said that Britney’s lawyer in the case “doesn’t have a clue what the truth is,” and that the same goes for the media who have reported on it for years.

    In January 2022, her lawyer filed documents claiming Jamie misused Britney’s funds and obtained her phone records and therapy notes in secret. Jamie has denied the allegations.

    The Daily Mail also recently reported that Jamie is working on a book with Britney’s ex Kevin Federline.

    [ad_2]

    Corey Atad

    Source link

  • “I Don’t Know If She’d Be Alive”: Jamie Spears Defends Conservatorship

    “I Don’t Know If She’d Be Alive”: Jamie Spears Defends Conservatorship

    [ad_1]

    Britney Spears’s father, Jamie Spears, spoke with Britain’s Daily Mail, going on the record for the first time in over a decade, and one year after the controversial conservatorship of his daughter ended. He defended the 13-year court decision, opposition to which led to the #FreeBritney movement on social media. 

    “Not everybody’s going to agree with me,” he said, adding, “I love my daughter with all my heart and soul. Where would Britney be right now without that conservatorship? And I don’t know if she’d be alive. I don’t.”

    He referred to the court order as “a great tool,” and said that it helped protect her and her kids. “Without it, I don’t think she would have got the kids back.”

    The conservatorship was set up in 2008, following erratic public displays by the performer. It put decisions about her estate and finances into her father’s hands, as well as many decisions about her personal life, including, she claimed, her reproductive rights. It is believed Jamie Spears earned $16,000 a month during this time, as well as taking a percentage of concert revenue. A Los Angeles court ended the arrangement in November 2021, after a 30-minute testimony from the performer in which she claimed the situation was abusive. 

    Jamie currently lives in rural Louisiana with his younger daughter, Jamie Lynn Spears, whose past feuding with her sister appears to be thawing if recent Instagram updates are to be believed. The Daily Mail describes a storage unit packed with Britney memorabilia, even if he and the 41-year-old performer and her father are not currently speaking. 

    He said he is wary of making public statements, lest he sends her “further down the hole,” though confessed he greatly misses having access to his two grandsons, the 17 and 16-year-old boys Britney had with Kevin Federline. “’I miss my two boys really, really bad,” he said. “We were very, very close. They were around that age where you could start having a good time with them. But they were developing a mind of their own. God makes things happen for a reason. I don’t know what that reason is, but it’s been a tough three years without them. The family’s a mess. All we can do is keep praying.”

    “My relationship with Kevin gave [the children] a sense of peace, and of protection,” he added. “Kevin will tell you this too—it was us who raised the kids. I just did what I was supposed to do, or felt like I needed to do.”

    Britney, who regularly updates Instagram posts, has not responded to the Daily Mail interview. 

    In June, the singer married Sam Asghari at their home. Neither of her parents nor her sister attended. The wedding was briefly disrupted by her former husband, Jason Alexander, who trespassed the event while live-streaming.  

    Britney’s highly anticipated book is expected to be released next month. Her deal with Simon & Schuster was estimated at $15 million, and there will reportedly be three different versions

    [ad_2]

    Jordan Hoffman

    Source link

  • Broadway writer of ‘& Juliet’ builds show with huge pop hits

    Broadway writer of ‘& Juliet’ builds show with huge pop hits

    [ad_1]

    NEW YORK — We first see Juliet in the Capulet tomb, devastated. She’s wakes up to see her Romeo dead. But before she plunges a dagger into her heart, she starts … singing. What comes out is, improbably, a Britney Spears hit.

    “Oh, baby, baby. How was I supposed to know? That something wasn’t right here? Oh, baby, baby. I shouldn’t have let you go,” she sings, the opening lines of “…Baby One More Time.”

    That such a pop song works perfectly in this august scene is a credit to playwright David West Read and the team behind the Broadway jukebox musical “& Juliet.”

    They’ve taken an original story using “Romeo and Juliet” as a launch pad and mixed in some of the biggest pop hits of the past few decades by Spears, Celine Dion, NSYNC, Ariana Grande, Katy Perry, Jon Bon Jovi, The Weeknd, Justin Timberlake, Pink and Backstreet Boys.

    “I really tried to let story and character drive it,” says Read, an Emmy-winning writer from “Schitt’s Creek.” “It’s a long process to make it seem effortless, but it’s a lot of effort.”

    The link between the songs is Swedish super-producer Max Martin, who has had a hand in writing such hits as “Since U Been Gone,” “Roar,” “Larger Than Life,” “That’s The Way It Is” and “Can’t Stop the Feeling,”

    The musical starts when William Shakespeare’s wife challenges him to rewrite “Romeo and Juliet” with a happier ending for Juliet, sparking a journey of self-discovery for the young woman and nearly everyone on stage. Inspired in part by “Mama Mia!” it has multiple couples of different generations.

    “I think the genius of David has just knocked all of us sideways,” says director Luke Sheppard. “I don’t think Max ever imagined that somebody would be able to find such a cohesive world for this.”

    Read had been handed a playlist of over 200 Martin songs in 2016 and whittled it down to about 30. He challenged himself to not change any of the lyrics, although he altered some pronouns. Some hits — like Perry’s “California Gurls” and Maroon 5’s “Moves Like Jagger” — were clearly never going to fit.

    “Instead of going for what are the most popular songs, I tried to prioritize what are songs that are going to tell this story in the best possible way,” says Read.

    Masterstrokes include turning Adam Lambert’s “Whataya Want From Me” into an duet between arguing lovers, giving Perry’s “Teenage Dream” to an older couple looking back on their young romance and handing Juliet “Oops!… I Did it Again” after she’s found herself in a second romantic conundrum.

    In one special move, Read gave Spear’s “I’m Not a Girl, Not Yet a Woman” to a new character, Juliet’s nonbinary friend, May, played by genderqueer Justin David Sullivan. It’s a landmark moment for Broadway, allowing a nonbinary main character to talk about being misgendered and what it’s like to date while trans.

    Read also turned Perry’s “I Kissed a Girl” into a duet between May and a male love interest. “I wanted it to be a queer love song sung by two unexpected characters that feel more representative of our current world,” he says. (Some audience members have walked out after that. “Clearly we still have a ways to go,” says Read.)

    There are also nods to musical theater conventions: “Stronger” works as a callback of “… Baby One More Time” (“My loneliness is killing me” in the first song reappears in the second as “My loneliness ain’t killing me no more”). And musical theater rules mean you need to have a song where a lead character makes clear they want something; the creators of “& Juliet” had one in plain sight — Backstreet Boys’ “I Want It That Way.”

    Read even made a connection between Martin and The Bard himself: “Shakespeare was the pop writer of his time. We think of him as very highbrow now, but he was creating an entertainment for the masses. That kind of overlap between Max and Shakespeare seems like it could be a fun way to give a brand to someone who doesn’t have his own brand.”

    The team got an early indication that the concept would work at the first workshop in which an audience was invited. Backstage, they waited for the reaction to “…Baby One More Time.”

    “The audience didn’t laugh. And that was amazing. I was like, ‘OK, passed that test,’” says Sheppard. ”I felt the audience just lean in that moment and connect with that song and with that artist.”

    Critics have been kind to the finished show, with Variety saying “& Juliet” “is exactly the musical Broadway needs right now: fun, exuberant, supremely joyful, hilarious and excellently performed by a talented and diverse cast.” Entertainment Weekly said Read’s work is “cleverly, sometimes ingeniously calibrated to sync with the songs.”

    “The ones that really mean a lot to me are the critics who clearly come in with a hatred for jukebox musicals and reluctantly admit that there is a lot of craft in this one,” says Read.

    He credits Martin for being open to outside-the-box ideas and allowing the show’s collaborators the flexibility to make what’s not another run-of-the-mill jukebox musical.

    “Sometimes it feels like someone slapped their name on something, and they show up on opening night and people are maybe making the show for the wrong reasons,” says Read. “To have the artist working with us and collaborating with us, I think also separates this from other jukebox musicals where the artist is either dead or not involved.”

    Read has since moved on — he is the creator and showrunner of the upcoming Apple TV+ series “The Big Door Prize” — but his experience with “& Juliet” has been so positive that he and Sheppard are working on another jukebox musical, this time with the catalog of Roy Orbison.

    “We’re trying to tell a new story with his existing music and challenging ourselves to do something completely different from what we would did with ‘& Juliet,’” he says.

    ———

    Online: https://andjulietbroadway.com

    ———

    Mark Kennedy is at http://twitter.com/KennedyTwits

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Discussion for The White Lotus S2 finale

    Discussion for The White Lotus S2 finale

    [ad_1]

    Discussion for The White Lotus S2 finale

    2×7: Arrivederci
    Albie asks Dominic for a karmic payment to help Lucia. Tanya grows wary of Quentin’s motives. Ethan confronts Cam.


    Meghann Fahy

    Mike White

    Haley Lu Richardson

    1 2 3 4

    ONTD, who did you hope were the murder victims (multiple choice so pick as many as you like)?

    Who do you hope is the returning character in S3?

    [ad_2]

    silverstarry

    Source link

  • Top TV ’22: The Slap, congressional docudrama and royal loss

    Top TV ’22: The Slap, congressional docudrama and royal loss

    [ad_1]

    NEW YORK (AP) — In a year marked by unexpected winners and losers, television was keeping tabs.

    A Hollywood star tarnished his image and that of the Oscars. A battered country stood up to an invader, again and again. The Jan. 6 insurrection became an unexpectedly watchable TV docudrama. A monarch was celebrated and mourned. Television entertainment had its usual highs and lows.

    Here are some of 2022′s defining TV moments from the perspective of The Associated Press’ television and media writers.

    THE SLAP

    The Oscars are Hollywood’s biggest platform and Will Smith, one of its biggest stars, was expected to reign with a best-actor award for the tennis dad biopic “King Richard.” But Smith lost while winning. Angered by a joke that presenter Chris Rock made at the expense of wife Jada Pinkett Smith, he strode onstage and slapped Rock, hard, drawing gasps from the TV and theater audience. A tearful Smith made excuses during his acceptance speech that March night and issued subsequent apologies. The film academy penalized him, but the Oscar prospects of his upcoming movie, “Emancipation,” are being debated.

    HUTCHINSON’S TESTIMONY

    Frankly, expectations were low when the House committee investigating the Jan. 6, 2021 Capitol insurrection scheduled public hearings. Congressional hearings tend to produce more heat than light, as preening politicians compete for sound bites to impress their supporters. But with only two Republicans on the committee — both of them appalled by what happened at the Capitol — the committee put on sharp, tightly-focused presentations, aided by a former ABC News producer. All made for compelling viewing, but none more than the live testimony of former White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson, who calmly described what was happening in the Trump administration

    DEPP vs HEARD

    Last year, Britney Spears’ bid to end her conservatorship was the mesmerizing celebrity legal battle. This year, the courtroom crossfire between Johnny Depp and Amber Heard — all playing out on TV — was the main attraction. Their defamation suits put the two actors in the kind of harsh, unflattering light barred from any Hollywood set. As the exes traded allegations of assault and substance abuse, the trial became increasingly sad, seamy and inescapable. The jury’s June verdict largely favored Depp. Heard might not be the only loser, experts warned: the spectacle and its outcome could have a chilling effect on women who might press abuse claims.

    UKRAINE BRAVERY

    The images of war are always awful, and Russia’s invasion of Ukraine produced many of them. Yet the many moments of bravery shown by the Ukrainian people and their leader, President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, changed the perception of a conflict many feared would be an ugly rout, and rallied the world to their side. Pick your moments — a woman who offered sunflower seeds to a Russian soldier so they can sprout from his pants pocket where his body falls, the defiantly profane response from Ukrainians stationed on a remote island when Russians told them to surrender, Zelenskyy’s media-savvy campaign for support. It was the stuff of heroes.

    KENOBI-VADER REMATCH

    Those who find Disney’s ever-expanding “Star Wars” universe is leaving them cold may have warmed up after the season finale of “Obi-Wan Kenobi.” The epic, roughly four-minute lightsaber battle between Obi-Wan (Ewan McGregor) and former apprentice Anakin Skywalker aka Darth Vadar (Hayden Christensen) was a fierce back-and-forth with, of course, good and evil hanging in the balance. But it was the unmasking of Vadar that sent Disney+ viewers into a stratospheric tizzy, his scarred face and psyche revealing a man beyond redemption.

    YELLOWSTONE

    When 12.1 million people tuned in on Nov. 13 to watch the season premiere of Kevin Costner’s “Yellowstone” on the otherwise invisible Paramount and some sister cable networks, it was the most-watched scripted show of the new television season. The Western is the definition of a broadly popular show, yet wasn’t on a broadcast network, which were conceived on the idea of reaching as many people as possible. You could call that a failure of imagination that typifies the decline of the networks, but the truth was they never really had a shot at “Yellowstone,” which was initially developed at HBO but went nowhere there. For every television success, there are people kicking themselves because they didn’t see it coming.

    REAL-LIFE CROWN

    Queen Elizabeth wasn’t America’s monarch, but her death in September at age 96 hit home and drew blanket coverage in the former British colony. Maybe it was “The Crown,” maybe it was her conspiratorial smile when she shared tea and secrets with Paddington Bear. Her dedication to service and a stately funeral procession with echoes of history certainly merited attention. But the catnip for TV came when brothers William and Harry and wives Kate and Meghan, any tensions publicly masked, joined to greet mourners. Princess Anne provided a memorable grace note: A deep curtsy as her mother’s coffin was carried by her.

    THE WALKING DEAD

    When “The Walking Dead” aired its final episode on Nov. 20, it was the end of an era for the quintessential punch-above-your-weight AMC cable network. How much that was the case became clear less than two weeks later, when company chairman James Dolan sent a memo to staff saying CEO Christina Spade was out after three months and large-scale layoffs were coming. AMC is hardly the only media company, or cable network, that is hurting. “We are primarily a content company and the mechanisms for the monetization of content are in disarray,” Dolan said. Shed a tear for the boutique network that gave us “Mad Men,” “Breaking Bad” and “Better Call Saul,” and cable networks in general.

    ELECTION CALM

    With memories of the 2020 election chaos fresh, news organizations prepared for a midterm election night where democracy itself could be in peril. Only… it wasn’t. Certainly, there were close elections and control of Congress wasn’t clear for several days. While there were a few exceptions, the election ran smoothly and most candidates accepted the results. And the story became those results: an unexpectedly strong showing for Democrats that defied history and expectations.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Ariana Grande Is Completely White Again?

    Ariana Grande Is Completely White Again?

    [ad_1]

    Ariana Grande Is Completely White Again?

    Gurl, your blackfishing was off the charts in the seven rings era and your recent plunge into “asian” was something else.

    Everyone knows you’re trying it because you’re playing Glinda in a two-movie attempt at a block-buster that I’m betting is gonna flopp-

    But, I’m not having it.

    SHE ACTUALLY HAS THE NERVE TO CALL THIS MAKE-UP RELEASE “MOD VANILLA”.

    For those of us that still remember and have eyes to see…

    SOURCE

    ONTD are you multi-racial?

    [ad_2]

    ichabod_crake

    Source link

  • Britney Spears Celebrates Birthday By Saluting Her Sister, Jamie Lynn

    Britney Spears Celebrates Birthday By Saluting Her Sister, Jamie Lynn

    [ad_1]

    Britney Spears celebrated her 41st birthday on Friday, but the biggest gift was the one she gave to her sister. She and Jamie Lynn Spears, ten years Britney’s junior, have recently had what can safely be called a frosty relationship, but it looks as if those days may be behind them.

    The international pop sensation took to Instagram (as is her métier) to share two photos of her younger sibling—one of which showed her holding a guitar. Deploying the flash camera emoji and the name jamielynnspears, Britney’s caption suggested that the pics came from her sister herself.

    Alongside the images, she wrote, “It’s my b-day but you’re my heart so I’m thinking about you … congratulations on being so brave, inspiring, and showing guts and glory in your show!!! You ain’t alone … if anybody knows what that feels like … I get it My baby sister !!! I love you !!!”

    Other emojis include a party hat and … someone blowing their nose? 

    Instagram content

    This content can also be viewed on the site it originates from.

    The show Britney referenced is Special Forces: World’s Toughest Test, a newly-launched reality series in which Spears and other celebs are challenged to survive a military boot camp. She is joined by the Spice Girls’s Mel B., Real Housewives of Atlanta‘s Kenya Moore, former baseball champ Mike Piazza, and [checks notes] one-time Trump goon Anthony Scaramucci.  

    For those who follow the Spears saga, Friday’s IG update is certainly an unexpected development. In January, the two were publicly at odds following the publication of the younger Spears’s book Things I Should Have Said. There was a social media-fought war of words that dug up past grievances, like Jamie Lynn’s use of Britney remixes at the 2017 Radio Disney Music Awards. Britney’s lawyers issued a cease-and-desist during the book tour, which sparked a response citing “intimidating and threatening social media posts.” The “Toxic” singer called her sister a “scum person,” and she was not invited to her June wedding to Sam Asghari.

    But this is all in the past! Let’s focus on a potentially beautiful future, okay? 

    Britney seems happy in marriage, and she also scored a hit recently with Elton John with the mashup collab “Hold Me Closer.” And on the horizon is the publication of her memoir, which was completed this summer. The book landed her a reported $15 million payday, a deal whose rivals include Barack and Michelle Obama, and Bill Clinton, and ahead of other notables like Bruce Springsteen and Pope John Paul II. 

    Content

    This content can also be viewed on the site it originates from.

    [ad_2]

    Jordan Hoffman

    Source link