[ad_1]
Watch CBS News
Be the first to know
Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.
[ad_2]
Source link

[ad_1]
Watch CBS News
Be the first to know
Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.
[ad_2]
Source link

[ad_1]
Watch CBS News
Be the first to know
Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.
[ad_2]

[ad_1]
Two-time Oscar-nominated actor Tom Wilkinson, who starred in “The Full Monty” about a group of unemployed steel workers who launched new careers as strippers died “suddenly” on Saturday, his publicist said in a statement.
“His wife and family were with him,” the statement said, and that his “family asks for privacy at this time.”
Wilkinson was nominated for Academy Awards for actor in a leading role for “In The Bedroom” in 2001 and for a supporting role in “Michael Clayton” in 2007.
He most recently reunited with his Full Monty co-stars, Robert Carlyle and Mark Addy, in a Disney+ series of the same name.
The original 1997 smash hit about an unlikely group of men stripping won an Oscar for best original musical or comedy score and was nominated for three others, including best picture and best director.
Wilkinson’s character played ex-foreman Gerald Cooper who was recruited to help the unemployed men dance.
The actor also took a home best supporting actor Bafta for the role.
Wilkinson acted in more than 130 film and TV credits in total, the BBC reported, including many U.S. political figures. He played President Lyndon B Johnson in 2014’s Selma, and he earned an Emmy for playing US political figure Benjamin Franklin in 2008 mini-series John Adams.
He was also known for his roles in a BBC adaptation of Charles Dickens novel “Martin Chuzzlewit”, the 1995 adaptation of Jane Austen’s “Sense and Sensibility”, the 2014 Wes Anderson comedy drama “The Grand Budapest Hotel” and 2011 ensemble comedy “The Best Exotic Marigold Hotel”.
Thanks for reading CBS NEWS.
Create your free account or log in
for more features.
[ad_2]

[ad_1]
Princess Diana’s life, of course, has always been the stuff that soap opera fodder is made of. But usually, that “fodder” has been given the “prestige drama” treatment. Most recently, in a movie format with Kristen Stewart playing the part of Diana in Pablo Larraín’s 2021 film, Spencer. But at least Larraín had the good sense to commence his movie with the warning, “A fable from a true tragedy.” Because, in effect, that’s what any attempt to make a film or show about Diana’s life (particularly her “later years”) is. That has become increasingly true with products like The Crown, which seem to enjoy an especial emphasis on who/“what” she was during the brief period when she was officially divorced from Prince Charles. Sadly, Diana scarcely got to experience a full year as a free woman before the car crash that would take her life.
The first part of The Crown’s sixth season (because, unfortunately, they want to drag it out in two parts) wastes no time in commencing with the tragedy right away, for viewers are made to understand that it’s August 31, 1997 with the opening shot trained on the Eiffel Tower—this after panning upward from a man leaving his apartment to walk his dog. It is this man who will serve as the anchor for the crash scene, with his literal “man on the street” perspective serving to highlight that, even if Diana were an “ordinary mortal” (which she technically was after being stripped of her royal title), this “incident” would have been regarded with shock and outrage. Which is precisely how the dog-walking man views it when he calls emergency services to report the crash. Though the audience already knows how it all built up to this senseless moment, writer and show creator Peter Morgan wants to take us through the usual structural rigmarole that goes hand in hand with Diana: starting with her death and then “taking us back” to the moments before it all went so horribly awry.
Having already written about this death with a better angle in 2006, when he received acclaim for The Queen’s screenplay (complete with an Academy Award nomination for Best Original Screenplay), Morgan is beating a dead horse in more ways than one with this rehashing. And perhaps trying to make season six as “different” as possible from the way he told the story of her death in The Queen. Well, that it certainly is…most notably in using the ultra-cheesy trope of wielding “Diana’s ghost” (though Morgan insists, “I never imagined it as Diana’s ‘ghost’ in the traditional sense. It was her continuing to live vividly in the minds of those she has left behind…”) to help give closure to the ones who were the biggest assholes to her: Elizabeth and Charles. Obviously, in the former’s case, Morgan wants to show respect for a dead royal, and, in the latter’s case, doesn’t want to ruffle the feathers of a king by presenting him as having blood on his hands. Instead, Diana consistently comes across as the trainwreck, the one who “did it to herself” in the end. This much is underscored at every turn throughout all four episodes of season six’s “part one.” Even in little details where Morgan can take more creative license with dialogue that paints Diana as “addicted to drama.”
In fact, there’s a scene of her on the horn with her therapist, Susie Orbach (the name of Diana’s real-life shrink), just so we can witness Morgan-as-Orbach chastising her with the lines, “Let’s face it, this [relationship with Dodi] is just drama again. Drama is adrenaline. Addictive. And in many ways, the opposite of adult behavior.” Referring to her latest “boyfriend,” a still-engaged (as far as his fiancée, Kelly Fisher, was concerned) Dodi Fayed (Khalid Abdalla), Orbach wants, like so many others in the Royal Family, for Diana to stop being, well, “so dramatic.” Not only that, but to stop courting the drama that already surrounds her without her “trying” to cultivate more. It’s a take on the People’s Princess that isn’t exactly new (in addition to billing her as someone with persecutory delusions). But it is one that feels increasingly in poor taste amid a more theoretically “modern” climate. One in which it’s no longer acceptable to paint women as the villains who “asked for it.” And that is often how Diana comes across in this final season.
Which is why something about Morgan’s representation of Diana and the circumstances leading up to her death feel more than somewhat fishy. As though The Crown itself paid him off to keep the narrative of Diana’s inevitable self-destruction going. And with Charles as the current monarch, his “dashing” portrayal is suspiciously over-the-top. This includes Diana’s specter informing him on his private plane, “Thank you for how you were in the hospital. So raw, broken…and handsome.” Cue vomiting here (no allusion to Diana’s bulimia intended). And yeah, what about that scene in the hospital of Charles? The one where he’s wailing over her body so that everyone else in the building can hear it. As if. Not only because Charles himself simply wasn’t that way, but because of the old British adage about always maintaining a “stiff upper lip,” most especially in public. Therefore, Morgan’s additional very “creative” (read: ass-kissing) license with this scene seems to indicate his further not-so-coincidental affection for the new king of late. For, as Morgan himself commented in an interview with Variety about season six, “I probably am a monarchist, but out of appreciation for what they do when they do it well. I think if we’re all adults, we would say that the system makes no sense and is unjust in the modern democracy. But I’m not sure Britain would be Britain without a monarchy.” Ah, one of those. A man who would sooner imagine the end of Britain than the end of its monarchy. We’ll see where that takes the country in the years to come…
And so, as a self-proclaimed royalist (where once he claimed not to be), that sentiment of Morgan’s has been rather apparent throughout The Crown, as the show mutated into an evermore royal puff piece, particularly toward Charles in the episodes that aired leading up to his real-life coronation. This extended in casting someone much better-looking (Dominic West) in season five and season six to play him, as well as portraying him as someone with viable breakdancing moves in “The Way Ahead.” In the actual footage, Charles looks far less at home on the dance floor among what The Crown title card calls “disadvantaged youths” (that’s polite Queen’s English for “Black people”). Indeed, where Charles’ charity work is made to appear dignified in the series, Diana’s is eventually made to appear as yet another manifestation of her attention-seeking love for spectacle. This angle, spun by Morgan, is apparent when her relationship with Fayed becomes more central to her press conference in Bosnia about landmines than the victims of the landmines themselves (this, by the way, is another fictionalization on Morgan’s part, as the photo of “the kiss” between her and Fayed wasn’t printed until after that conference). As though, again, it’s somehow Diana’s doing that this is the reaction to her. As though, in the end, she “sought it out” with her behavior. Her “recklessness”—not just in general, but in matters of love. Yet it was clear there wasn’t any real “love” between her and Fayed. Or at least, that’s how The Crown paints it, with Fayed’s interest in her largely driven by his father’s pressure to “acquire” her like another British asset for their portfolio.
As we all know without watching The Crown, that “acquisition” didn’t happen. Nor did the proposal Dodi botched in a room at The Ritz-Carlton, with all signs pointing to the fact that Dodi would not have proposed in the hotel before they headed back to his place on the night of their death. In truth, the only “accuracy” about their relationship appears to be the idea that they were both “using each other” for various reasons. And yes, in all likelihood, things probably wouldn’t have lasted romantically between them. If one can even call what they had a “true romance” as opposed to just a “bad” one (if for no other reason than being perpetually hounded by paparazzi, as Fayed was painted in the press as an “ill-advised choice” [to put it as non-racistly as possible on behalf of the Brits] for Diana).
With part two of the season set to refocus more on Elizabeth and Charles (yawn), there are also reports that the fallout from Diana’s death in terms of how it affects William and Harry will be a factor as well. Whatever the case, it’s surely got to beat seeing, once again, the reductive bastardization of Diana’s final years. Something that has never quite been “warmly received” by those who revere the princess (one such other example being 2013’s simply-titled Diana starring Naomi Watts in the titular role). Least of all when she’s presented as some kind of ghost with predilections for blowing smoke up the Royal Family’s ass…which, of course, was never her style.
[ad_2]
Genna Rivieccio
Source link

[ad_1]
Nairobi, Kenya — King Charles III is in Kenya for his first state visit to a Commonwealth country as monarch. He will acknowledge the “painful aspects” of the countries’ shared history while underscoring his commitment to an organization that’s been central to Britain’s global power since World War II.
The four-day visit is full of symbolism. Charles’ mother, the late Queen Elizabeth II, learned that she had become the U.K. monarch while visiting a game preserve in the East African nation, at the time a British colony, in 1952.
The king and Queen Camilla touched down in the capital, Nairobi, late Monday and were given a ceremonial welcome Tuesday by Kenyan President William Ruto at State House. Charles later planted an African fern tree seedling in its lawn.
Tim Rooke/Pool/Samir Hussein/WireImage
The royal couple also visited the Tomb of the Unknown Warrior at gardens named Uhuru, which is Swahili for freedom. The king and Ruto laid wreaths, then proceeded to the site of the declaration of Kenya’s independence in 1963.
Comments by the king and Kenya’s president were not immediately made available.
Kenya is celebrating the 60th anniversary of its independence this year. It and Britain have enjoyed a close and sometimes challenging relationship after the prolonged struggle against colonial rule, sometimes known as the Mau Mau Rebellion, in which thousands of Kenyans died.
Colonial authorities resorted to executions and detention without trial as they tried to put down the insurrection, and thousands of Kenyans said they were beaten and sexually assaulted by agents of the administration.
The British High Commission said Charles would “meet veterans and give his blessing to efforts by the Commonwealth War Graves Commission to ensure Kenyans and Africans who supported British efforts in the World Wars are properly commemorated.”
Salim David Nganga, 64, speaking in Jevanjee Gardens in Nairobi, where colonial statues were brought down in 2020, said the king ought to apologize to Kenyans first.
“The king should never have been allowed to step in this country, considering the dark history of British colonialists,” he said.
The king’s visit reignited some tensions over land in parts of Kenya.
Joel Kimutai Kimetto, 74, said his grandfather and father were kicked out of their ancestral home by the British.
“What is most painful is that years after the brutalities and the stealing of our land, British companies are still in possession of our ancestral homes, earning millions from their comfortable headquarters in the U.K., while our people remain squatters,” he told the AP in a phone interview. “We ask President William Ruto and our leaders to use this golden opportunity to address our plight with the king.”
Elsewhere, a planned protest and press conference by victims of a fire at a conservancy in central Kenya that was allegedly started by British soldiers in training was cancelled ahead of the king’s visit.
The king also plans to visit Nairobi National Park and meet with environmental activist Wanjira Mathai, the daughter of late Nobel laureate Wangari Maathai, as he emphasizes his commitment to environmental protection.
The royal family has long ties to Africa. In 1947, the future queen pledged lifelong service to Britain and the Commonwealth during a speech from South Africa on her 21st birthday. Five years later, she and her late husband Prince Philip were visiting Aberdare National Park in Kenya when they learned that her father had died and she had become queen.
[ad_2]

[ad_1]
In August 1939, a young woman named Clare Hollingworth got her first journalism assignment. “You must go to Warsaw tonight,” her editor said. Days later, after Hollingworth spotted “hundreds of tanks, armored cars and field guns” near the Polish border with Czechoslovakia, the 27-year-old cub reporter kicked off her career with a once-in-a-lifetime dispatch heralding the outbreak of World War II: “1,000 TANKS MASSED ON POLISH FRONTIER. TEN DIVISIONS REPORTED READY FOR SWIFT STROKE.”
The news organization behind this historic scoop wasn’t one of the newswires, or The New York Times, or the BBC. Rather, the glory belongs to The Daily Telegraph, a conservative London broadsheet that recently went on the block for the first time in nearly two decades. It’s a paper with an illustrious past, whose owners have ranged from Conrad Black and Sir Edward Levy-Lawson to the Berry and Barclay families. And though it doesn’t have the same global cachet as other enduring publications with roots in the 19th century, it is, as the BBC once described it, “an ornament to Britain and one of the world’s great titles…. At its best, the daily and Sunday papers channel the kind of sceptical conservatism that speaks to and for a patriotic and provincial England.”
The Telegraph’s story begins in 1855 when it rolled off the presses and boldly declared itself “the largest, best, and cheapest newspaper in the world.” One hundred sixty-eight years later, The Telegraph holds none of those distinctions. But it might as well, judging by the murderers’ row of media barons that have been identified as prospective suitors. There’s Rupert Murdoch, perhaps keen on one last conquest, whose interest has been reported as if he isn’t imminently stepping down as the executive chairman of News Corp. There’s Lord Rothermere, scion of the legendary Harmsworth dynasty, who has been consolidating influence since taking Daily Mail and General Trust private two years ago. There’s Mathias Döpfner, the charismatic Axel Springer boss, who now has a second chance at acquiring a landmark English-language newspaper after losing out on The Financial Times in 2015.
Others include a group led by GB News co-owner Sir Paul Marshall, who is teaming up with Republican megadonor and fellow hedge-funder Ken Griffin; a group led by the recently knighted former Telegraph editor in chief and erstwhile Dow Jones CEO Will Lewis, who is also reportedly one of two final candidates that Jeff Bezos is considering to run The Washington Post; and a group led by the Northern Irish media proprietor and British tabloid veteran David Montgomery, who now serves as executive chairman of the UK media company National World. The Barclay family, meanwhile, is fighting to wrest their beloved Telegraph Media Group back from Lloyds Bank, which took control of the entity in June after talks over unpaid debt broke down, thus setting the present auction in motion.
That’s a lot of rich and powerful men salivating over a newspaper that’s not exactly massive, unlike, say, The Guardian or the Daily Mail, both of which have exported their brands throughout the English-speaking world.
Why all the fuss?
“Upscale heritage brands have been successful around the world, and they’re the only ones who’ve really made the transition to digital, while many of the startups have turned out to be commercial disasters,” says Kelvin MacKenzie, the former longtime Murdoch lieutenant best known for his ferocious editorship of The Sun. “If you look around, The Financial Times, The New York Times, The Washington Post, The Times [of London], they’ve all been successful. So The Telegraph is viewed as an opportunity to be in the digital age with a heritage brand that has unfilled potential. The bet is that they can turn this into a successful subscription-based product. And also, these big heritage brands give you a calling card at the top table, certainly in the UK.”
[ad_2]
Joe Pompeo
Source link

[ad_1]
England’s oldest homes, built on a problematic past, are finding restorative purpose through progressive heirs and supportive communities.
[ad_2]
James Reginato
Source link

[ad_1]
London — Thousands of travelers faced flight delays and uncertainty Monday after the United Kingdom’s air traffic control system was hit by technical problems that resulted in the cancellation of at least 500 flights in and out of British airports.
Britain’s National Air Traffic Service (NATS) said in a statement to CBS News that a technical issue had forced restrictions to the flow of aircraft in and out of the U.K. on Monday, the end of a long weekend and one of the busiest holidays of the year for travel, amid reports of widespread flight delays into London from popular vacation destinations.
Hours later, NATS said it had “identified and remedied” the technical issue and was “now working closely with airlines and airports to manage the flights affected as efficiently as possible.” The agency did not say when normal service might be resumed.
BBC News said more than 230 flights departing the U.K. were cancelled Monday, as well as at least 271 that had been scheduled to arrive in the U.K.
Dan Kitwood / Getty Images
Scottish airline Loganair said earlier on social media that there had been a network-wide failure of U.K. air traffic control computer systems and warned that international flights could be impacted.
CBS News producer Emmet Lyons said he was stuck on a runway in the Spanish island of Majorca and the pilot on his flight back to the U.K. told all the passengers they were being held for an indeterminate period due to a major issue with air traffic control in the U.K.
Speaking to the BBC, Alistair Rosenschein, an aviation consultant and former Boeing 747 pilot for British Airways, said it appeared that the entire air traffic control system had gone down across the U.K. He said the equivalent situation for vehicular traffic would be if every road was closed in the country.
“The disruptions are huge and customers around the world [will] have to be put up in hotels if the delay is particularly too long,” he added. “It’s a bit of a nightmare scenario, really.”
More than 6,000 flights were due in and out of the U.K. on Monday, according to the BBC.
Michele Robson, a former air traffic control worker, said technical issues like this usually “only last a couple of hours,” making Monday’s shutdown “unusual.”
“Nobody really knows at this point how long it’s going to take,” she told BBC News.
“There was a flight planning system failure this morning which affected both centers in the U.K.,” Robson said as she waited for a flight from the small British island of Jersey to London.
“It looks like there’s been what they would call a ‘zero rate’ put on, where it means that no aircraft can take off inbound to the U.K., or probably outbound. It would generally be them trying to land things that were already in the air.”
[ad_2]

[ad_1]
An overloaded boat carrying migrants capsized before dawn Saturday in the English Channel, killing at least six people and leaving more than 50 others to be rescued, according to French authorities.
About 65 people were estimated to have boarded the boat and two people may still be lost at sea, the Maritime Prefecture of the Channel and the North Sea said.
When rescuers plucked people from the waters, six were initially in critical condition. One of those, who was flown by helicopter to a Calais hospital, was pronounced dead and the other five later perished and were ferried to shore.
“This morning, a migrant boat capsized off Calais,” French Prime Minister Elisabeth Borne said on social media. “My thoughts are with the victims.”
The deaths come as Britain’s ruling Conservative party has sought to stop crossings of small, often unseaworthy, boats with a variety of policies that have come under fire for failing to stem the flow of migrants.
French authorities noted a marked increase in attempted crossings from the coast since Thursday during the onset of milder weather. British authorities said 755 people crossed the channel in small boats Thursday, the highest daily number this year.
Small boat arrivals are down 15% from the number at this point last year. As of Thursday, 15,826 had been detected in the year to date, compared to 18,600 at this time last year.
Last year, five migrants died and four were reported missing while attempting to cross from the northern coast of France. In November 2021, a boat carrying migrants sank, resulting in the deaths of 27 individuals.
U.K. Home Secretary Suella Braverman, who said on the platform X, formerly known as Twitter, that there had been a “tragic loss of life,” met Saturday with Border Force officials.
“This incident is sadly another reminder of the extreme dangers of crossing the Channel in small boats and how vital it is that we break the people smugglers’ business model and stop the boats,” a spokesperson for Braverman said in a statement.
Prime Minister Rishi Sunak has made “stop the boats” a rallying cry and a focus of his political platform but his efforts have faced setbacks.
The centerpiece of policies designed to deter people from risking their lives at sea is legislation that would deport refugees who arrive illegally back to their home country or a safe third country. But plans to fly people to Rwanda have been shot down by an appeals court and are now being appealed by the Supreme Court.
As Conservatives kicked off what they were calling “small boats week,” they hailed the first arrivals Monday of asylum seekers to be housed in what essentially was a floating dormitory moored off England’s south coast.
The barge Bibby Stockholm, which had been used to house oil rig workers, was leased to save the 6 million pounds ($7.6 million) spent on hotels each day for some 51,000 asylum seekers.
It was outfitted to house 500 men, but on Friday, the initial 39 on board had to be evacuated when the deadly bacteria that causes legionnaires’ disease was found in the water. The Home Office said no one onboard had become ill.
Charity groups for refugees and members of the opposition Labour Party have strongly criticized Sunak’s policies, but even his fellow Tories have heaped criticism for the barge fiasco.
Member of Parliament David Davis said that even if the barge worked properly it would only house a day’s worth of new arrivals and pointed to the need for processing asylum claims more quickly.
“The primary thing that’s been revealed has been the startling incompetence of the Home Office itself,” Davis told BBC Radio 4. “It’s really, really hard to understand how, at all layers, this could not be caught early.”
Steve Smith, chief executive of refugee charity Care4Calais, called the deaths an appalling tragedy that could have been prevented if the U.K. allowed people to apply for asylum in France and travel safely to Britain.
“This terrible loss of life demonstrates yet again the need for a system of safe passage to the UK for refugees,” Smith said. “It would put the people smugglers out of business overnight.”
A report from a patrol boat about a migrant vessel in distress near Sangatte in France triggered a search and rescue operation Saturday that involved British and French vessels. Three French ships, a helicopter and a plane canvassed the area and two British ships participated in the search.
Three dozen people were taken to the port of Calais on a French boat and at least 22 were taken to Dover by U.K. rescuers.
The incident is under investigation by the Boulogne prosecutor’s office.
[ad_2]

[ad_1]
London — In the heart of the English countryside, a multimillion-dollar set of the mythical land of Oz — complete with the thatched roof houses of Munchkinland, and a yellow brick road to boot — lies empty.
Production on the set of “Wicked” — a film adaptation of the hit Broadway musical, and starring Ariana Grande — has shut down in the U.K. for the foreseeable future, as the effects of the Hollywood actors’ and writers’ strikes are being felt far beyond Hollywood.
London is the third largest center for movie production in the world. Major productions being shot in England’s capital, like “Wicked” and the Walt Disney-produced “Deadpool 3,” have paused all production until further notice.
While U.K. labor laws prevent Equity — the British performing arts and entertainment trade union — from striking with Screen Actors Guild-American Federation of Television and Radio Artists and the Writers Guild of America, actors and writers in the U.K. have been marching in solidarity with their U.S. colleagues.
Comedian Rob Delaney, a SAG-AFTRA member and one of the stars of “Deadpool 3,” told CBS News at a solidarity march in Leicester Square last week that the strikes are necessary to make large Hollywood studios care about “quality and quantity.”
“They’re like toddlers,” Delaney said of the studios. “They say ‘look at all the money’ and then we ask for a nickel…and they’re like, ‘No we don’t have it.’”
Krisztian Elek/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images
“I’d rather be on set today, but today’s job is to be here making sure that people less fortunate than me get paid properly,” he added.
“Succession” star Brian Cox, also in attendance at the London rally, told CBS News that writers are the lifeblood of the industry.
“You couldn’t have a show like ‘Succession,’ with as many Emmy nominations as we’ve had, without great writing,” he said. “It’s nonsense to think that you can circumvent writers, you can’t. They’re the basis of what we do.”
Many film and television workers in Britain say that the best outcome for the industry globally is for SAG- AFTRA and the WGA to get the terms that they want.
“The idea of being like the Hollywood film industry, or a Hollywood stunt person, is kind of almost like an outdated kind of myth now,” British stuntman James Cox told CBS News earlier this week. “Because now, such a large chunk of the work is here in the U.K.”
Cox warned that the economic impact in the short term will be severe for peers in his profession.
“It’s the unknown element, which is probably the most distressing for most of the performers,” he said. “To say, ‘Now you guys are unemployed, we don’t know how long for,’ there’s going to be kind of stresses and strains across the whole hierarchy of the film industry.”
Among the sticking points for writers and actors in the U.S. is the decline in residuals from film and television work due to the growing market dominance of streaming platforms such as Netflix. Another major issue has been the use of artificial intelligence, which British performers say also poses a threat to the livelihoods of film crews globally.
“AI as a creative tool, is worrying because…it can’t really create anything,” actor Simon Pegg told CBS News at Equity’s SAG-AFTRA solidarity rally last week.
“Only we can do that,” he added. “So to rely on it is to rely on mediocrity, and we can’t do that.”
For James Cox, AI threatens the fundamental value of movie making. He says audiences could lose the magic of cinema.
“That’s ultimately, probably, the question at the crux of the AI issue,” Cox said. “What do the people want to see? Do they want to see something human, or something distinctly unhuman?”
The approximately 11,000 members of the WGA have been on strike since early May, while SAG-AFTRA joined them on the picket lines in mid-July. Of SAG-AFTRA’s 160,000 total members, about 65,000 film and television actors are on strike.
The two unions are negotiating with the Alliance of Motion Picture and Television Producers, the group that represents all major Hollywood studios, including Paramount Pictures, which along with CBS News is part of Paramount Global.
[ad_2]

[ad_1]
LONDON (AP) — Senior British politicians on Sunday called on the BBC to rapidly investigate claims that a leading presenter paid a teenager for explicit photos.
Culture Secretary Lucy Frazer held crisis talks with the broadcaster’s director-general, and said the “deeply concerning” allegations must be looked into “swiftly and sensitively.”
The publicly funded national broadcaster is under pressure after The Sun newspaper reported allegations that the male presenter gave a youth 35,000 pounds ($45,000) starting in 2020 when the young person was 17.
Neither the star nor the youth was identified. Amid speculation on social media about the identity of the presenter, several of the BBC’s best-known stars spoke up to say it wasn’t them.
Though the age of sexual consent in Britain is 16, it’s a crime to make or possess indecent images of anyone under 18.
The Sun said the young person’s mother had complained to the BBC in May. It was unclear what if any action the broadcaster had taken.
In a statement, the BBC said “we treat any allegations very seriously and we have processes in place to proactively deal with them.”
“If, at any point, new information comes to light or is provided — including via newspapers — this will be acted upon appropriately, in line with internal processes,” the broadcaster said.
U.K. media reported that the presenter was not due to be on the air in the near future, but it was unclear whether he had been suspended.
Frazer said Director General Tim Davie had assured her the BBC was “investigating swiftly and sensitively.”
“Given the nature of the allegations, it is important that the BBC is now given the space to conduct its investigation, establish the facts and take appropriate action. I will be kept updated,” she wrote on social media.
Rachel Reeves, economy spokeswoman for the opposition Labour Party, said the BBC needed to “speed up their processes” and “get their house in order.”
Commercial U.K. broadcaster ITV recently faced its own scandal after Phillip Schofield, a long-time host on the channel’s popular morning show, quit in May, admitting he had lied about an affair with a much younger colleague.
ITV executives were summoned to Parliament to answer questions about whether the broadcaster had a “toxic” work culture and had covered up misconduct by stars.
The BBC faces greater scrutiny than other broadcasters because it is taxpayer-funded and committed to remaining impartial in its news coverage. It was engulfed in a storm over free speech and political bias in March when its leading sports presenter, former England soccer player Gary Lineker, criticized the government’s immigration policy on social media.
Lineker was suspended — and then restored after other sports presenters, analysts and Premier League players boycotted the BBC airwaves in solidarity.
[ad_2]

[ad_1]
Watch CBS News
Be the first to know
Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.
[ad_2]

[ad_1]
London — Prince Harry has lost a bid to bring a legal challenge against the U.K. government over its refusal to allow him to pay privately for personal police protection for himself and his family when the estranged royals visit Britain.
Harry and his wife Meghan, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex, gave up their roles as senior “working” members of the royal family in 2020, soon after which they settled in California. That year, the Executive Committee for the Protection of Royalty and Public Figures (RAVEC), made up of officials from the government, London’s Metropolitan Police Service and the royal household, decided the Sussexes no longer qualified for special police protection in the U.K.
Harry had argued through his lawyers at Britain’s High Court that a formal judicial review process should assess the government’s decision to refuse his offer to have the personal protection order restored at his expense.
“RAVEC has exceeded its authority, its power, because it doesn’t have the power to make this decision in the first place,” Harry’s lawyers told the court, according to CBS News’ partner network BBC News.
In a written judgment on Tuesday, however, High Court Justice Martin Chamberlain denied Harry permission to bring a judicial review over RAVEC’s decision, describing the committee’s actions as “narrowly confined to the protective security services that fall within its remit.”
Harry’s legal team had argued in court that there were provisions in U.K. law that allowed for private payment for “special police services,” and as such, “payment for policing is not inconsistent with the public interest or public confidence in the Metropolitan Police Service,” according to the BBC.
In his ruling, Chamberlain also rejected that argument, saying the security services Harry was seeking were “different in kind from the police services provided at (for example) sporting or entertainment events, because they involve the deployment of highly trained specialist officers, of whom there are a limited number, and who are required to put themselves in harm’s way to protect their principals.”
“RAVEC’s reasoning was that there are policy reasons why those services should not be made available for payment, even though others are. I can detect nothing that is arguably irrational in that reasoning,” Chamberlain wrote.
The battle over his personal protection when he visits Britain is just one of several legal cases Prince Harry is currently involved in.
The duke is also part of a small group of celebrities alleging unlawful information gathering by Britain’s tabloid press. Harry and Meghan have filed at least seven lawsuits against U.S. and U.K. media outlets since 2019, according to the U.K.’s Sky News.
[ad_2]

[ad_1]
Watch CBS News
Be the first to know
Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.
[ad_2]

[ad_1]
Watch CBS News
Be the first to know
Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.
[ad_2]

[ad_1]
Watch CBS News
Be the first to know
Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.
[ad_2]

[ad_1]
London — Prince William and his wife Kate visited a London pub Thursday, and the Prince of Wales stepped behind the bar to pull a pint of “Kingmaker” ale two days before his father King Charles III’s coronation ceremony. The Prince and Princess of Wales dropped into the Dog and Duck in central London’s Soho entertainment district to chat to representatives from the hospitality industry, which is set for a bumper weekend thanks to the coronation on Saturday.
William, the heir to the throne, pulled the first-ever pint of Kingmaker, a pale ale brewed to celebrate the coronation.
Jamie Lorriman/AP
“You always have the best conversations in pubs you never know who you are going to meet,” he said.
The 40-year-old prince was handed a full cider glass, joking that he would have to mind how much he drank and “get back into work mode.”
Jamie Lorriman/AP
Kate, meanwhile, said excitement for the coronation was “already starting to build,” and that their eldest child Prince George was “excited” about the ceremony after taking part in rehearsals.
George, aged nine, is second in line to the throne. On Saturday he will be one of eight Pages of Honor during the service, joining a procession through the nave of Westminster Abbey and assisting with holding the king’s ornate Coronation Vestments, or ceremonial robes.
William and Kate chatted with well-wishers outside the pub, shaking hands with members of the crowd.
Jamie Lorriman – WPA Pool/Getty
The Dog and Duck, originally built in 1734, is one of the oldest pubs in Soho.
To get there, the couple took their first ride on the Elizabeth Line, the new rail line running beneath the British capital that was named after William’s grandmother Queen Elizabeth II, who died in September last year after a record 70 years on the throne.
Jordan Pettitt/AP
They rode three stops, chatting to transport workers about plans for the weekend, when tens of thousands of people are expected to descend on the city. Some hardy souls were camped out along The Mall, on the coronation procession route directly in front of Buckingham Palace, days ahead of the event.
When asked about the coronation preparations, Kate replied: “Yes, it’s going to be a busy time. We’re getting there. I still feel like we’re trying to get ducks in a row.”
William, like his son George, will have an active role in the coronation ceremony at Westminster Abbey. The heir will help his father to don the Golden Imperial Mantle — a floor-length cloak made of cloth of gold that dates back to 1821.
[ad_2]

[ad_1]
London — With days to go until King Charles III’ coronation, some royal superfans have already camped out in central London to secure a front row spot for the historic day. That includes Donna Werner, who came all the way from New Fairfield, Connecticut, to camp next to St. James’ Park, just outside Buckingham Palace on The Mall, a full five days ahead of the big event.
“There’s nothing like this in the states,” Werner told CBS News on Tuesday, her second day camped out. “One of the biggest parades I have ever been to was probably a ticker-tape parade for when the Yankees won the World Series … and this is a thousand times better!”
CBS News
Werner joined a handful of the most hardcore royal superfans enduring Britain’s cold nights and unpredictable weather to guarantee a clear view of the processions carrying King Charles and Camilla on May 6. Some of them will have spent nine nights in their tents by the time the big day arrives.
For them, the climax of coronation day will be seeing the king roll past in the gilded Diamond Jubilee State Coach on his way to Westminster Abbey, and then return to Buckingham Palace several hours later in the Gold State Coach.
U.K. Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport/Handout
“Unless you’re here, you can’t even imagine the feeling in the air of excitement and the love,” Werner said. “It’s definitely worth it, even if it rains.”
Werner decorated her camping spot with a U.S. flag and a sign that reads: “U.S. Loves King Charles,” which she’s hoping the king will spot during the procession. “We have a great view here,” she said. “If I’m going to come all this way, I want to be front-and-center.”
CBS News
The Connecticut resident is no stranger to roughing it to catch a glimpse of royalty. Werner has secured a spot at the front of the crowds since Prince Andrew and Sarah Ferguson’s wedding in 1986. She said she has been “in love” with Britain since her first visit as a teenager.
Early Wednesday morning, Werner’s was one of only about half a dozen tents along that section of the procession route as uniformed soldiers paraded past for a rehearsal. A brass band on horseback led the practice procession.
CBS News
“I just love all the pomp and circumstance,” Werner told CBS News. “It’s just so joyful and it’s just, everybody’s so happy. … Nobody does it like the Brits.”
Thanks for reading CBS NEWS.
Create your free account or log in
for more features.
[ad_2]