ReportWire

Tag: brian stelter

  • Brian Stelter Returns to CNN as Chief Media Analyst, Revives ‘Reliable Sources’ Newsletter

    Brian Stelter Returns to CNN as Chief Media Analyst, Revives ‘Reliable Sources’ Newsletter

    [ad_1]

    Brian Stelter, the former host of CNN’s “Reliable Sources,” announced his return to the network as chief media analyst, including resuming his role as the lead writer for the “Reliable Sources” newsletter. Stelter, who departed from CNN in August 2022 after the cancellation of his show under former network head Chris Licht, has spent the past two years writing and freelancing.

    Stelter’s return follows the recent departure of Oliver Darcy, who had taken over the newsletter and is now starting his own independent venture. Stelter emphasized that while the newsletter will relaunch on September 9, his role will involve new challenges and contributions beyond the familiar format. He reflected on his time away from CNN, noting how it allowed him to gain new insights into the media industry from a different perspective.


    Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.

    MBFC Ad-Free 

    or

    MBFC Donation

    or

    Crypto Donation


    Follow Media Bias Fact Check: 

    BlueSky: https://bsky.app/profile/mediabiasfactcheck.bsky.social

    Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/Media_Bias_Fact_Check/

    Threads: https://www.threads.net/@mediabiasfactcheck

    Twitter: https://twitter.com/MBFC_News

    Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/mediabiasfactcheck

    Mastodon: https://mastodon.social/@mediabiasfactcheck

    Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/mediabiasfactcheck/

    Pinterest: https://www.pinterest.com/mbfcnews/

     

    Found this insightful? Please consider sharing on your Social Media:

    [ad_2]

    Media Bias Fact Check

    Source link

  • Why Tucker Carlson’s Exit From Fox News Looks Like an Execution

    Why Tucker Carlson’s Exit From Fox News Looks Like an Execution

    [ad_1]

    The last time Tucker Carlson texted me, it was about a Twitter rumor that new management at CNN might toss me overboard. Carlson clearly wanted an excuse to turn a random tweet into national news for his millions of devotees. “Do you have comment?” he asked. “Thanks.” By that point, in April of 2022, I had sworn off any contact with Carlson. I’d had enough of the swearing and trolling. But Monday presented an astonishing reason to reach back out to Carlson. I texted: “Any comment on your departure from Fox?”

    It’s been a few hours, and he has not replied yet. Carlson has chosen silence at one of the most consequential moments in his life: his firing from Fox News. Officially, Carlson and Fox “agreed to part ways.” That’s what the terse press release from Fox said. “We thank him for his service to the network as a host and prior to that as a contributor.”

    The real “tell” about the terms of Carlson’s departure came in the second and last paragraph, where Fox revealed that “Mr. Carlson’s last program was Friday April 21st.” Carlson is not signing off. To put it more bluntly: He’s not being given a chance to say goodbye. It is technically possible, I suppose, that Carlson turned down a chance to sign off on his own terms. But my 20 years of experience covering cable news suggests otherwise.

    Four months after Carlson texted about the rumor of my departure, CNN CEO Chris Licht told me he was canceling Reliable Sources, the Sunday morning program I had led for nearly nine years. Notice that I didn’t call it “my show”—it’s a crucial distinction. News anchors don’t own their time slots, they rent. Anchors who let their egos delude them into thinking they own their time slots, well, they don’t last very long.

    But Carlson, more than anyone else in cable news, might have been able to credibly call the 8 p.m. hour on Fox News “my show.” I spent oodles of time on Reliable Sources analyzing the rise of Tucker Carlson Tonight as a force in both television and politics. Carlson became, for a couple of years, even bigger than his network. He was said to have a chummy relationship with Fox Corporation CEO Lachlan Murdoch. He was also said to be sharply critical of the women who ran Fox News for Murdoch. Fox staffers believed that Carlson could get away with anything for two main reasons: his friendship with Murdoch and his reliably high ratings.

    But virtually every show gets canceled eventually. Which brings me back to my departure from CNN. Licht showed me grace while ending Reliable Sources: He offered me a final show. One final episode to dissect the media, including CNN, and to say thanks to the viewing public. I could interview whomever I wanted, bring up any topic I wanted, and say whatever I wanted. No one in management read my sign-off monologue in advance. This was the result of mutual respect—and it was mutually beneficial. I had a chance to say my piece, and CNN was credited with being courteous to a departing anchorman.

    Sign-offs mean the world to the hosts who are allowed to give them. I could see it in Sean Spicer’s eyes when he said farewell to his fans on the Fox-wannabe channel Newsmax earlier this month. The former Trump White House press secretary tried to use his sign-off to turn Newsmax viewers into his own subscribers: He read aloud the URL for his personal website and plugged his Twitter handle and YouTube account. “Stay in touch,” he said, either eagerly or desperately, depending on your point of view.

    For a TV host like Spicer, those last few minutes of airtime are close to priceless. (After I signed off on CNN, multiple people told me that I should have plugged a Substack or something, but I was eager to take several months off.) I’m telling you all of this to emphasize that Carlson is not saying goodbye. The takeaway, at least for some TV insiders, is that Carlson was shoved— hard—by Fox management. As Vanity Fair’s Gabriel Sherman reported Monday, Carlson was blindsided by his own cancellation. Not being given a chance to sign off is the television equivalent of an execution.

    “Damn,” a former Fox producer said to me right after it happened. “It had to be O’Reilly-level bad for him to not even get a goodbye show.” You’ll recall that Bill O’Reilly, the longtime renter of the 8 p.m. time slot at Fox, was booted in 2017 in the wake of sexual misconduct allegations and revelations about secret settlements. That’s not why Carlson is out—in fact, a well-placed network source says Carlson was not the subject of any misconduct investigation. Carlson has many, many flaws, but they’re distinct from O’Reilly’s flaws.

    [ad_2]

    Brian Stelter

    Source link

  • What Happened to The New York Times’ Media Column?

    What Happened to The New York Times’ Media Column?

    [ad_1]

    It was this time last year that New York Times media columnist Ben Smith announced he’d be giving up one of the most coveted jobs in journalism. The former BuzzFeed editor’s abrupt departure quickly sparked a guessing game among media-watchers and members of the newsroom as to who would take his place. While Smith went on to build and launch Semafor, his new media start-up with cofounder Justin Smith, the Times has yet to fill his old slot. 

    I’m told people involved with hiring have solicited beat memos from journalists both inside and outside the paper, though it’s unclear what, if anything, has come of them. A few names outside have emerged as contenders, including the Washington Post media writer (and former Vanity Fair special correspondent) Sarah Ellison, former CNN anchor Brian Stelter, and Puck media columnist Dylan Byers; all three had conversations with newsroom leaders, according to sources. (Semafor’s Max Tani reported earlier on potential candidates in Smith’s new media newsletter, which is now blasted out on Sunday nights around the same time his old Times column used to appear online.) I’m told that Byers was in talks with management about the job but took himself out of the running late last year. Stelter, meanwhile, has had additional meetings with the Times in recent weeks. 

    It’s surprising for such a high-profile perch—one that Smith made a weekly destination for media junkies not seen since the David Carr era—to be dormant for this long. A Times insider last year told me that Smith’s departure presented an opportunity “for rethinking the focus” of its signature column. And yet, one person who talked to the Times for the gig told me they got the impression that the Times was still trying to figure out what they were doing with the column—and looking for a columnist to come to them with a clear vision for it. “We continue to seek to fill the position,” a Times spokesperson told me, “but don’t have anything further to share on our personnel processes.”

    Meanwhile, the paper’s media coverage is without a permanent media editor ever since editor Jim Windolf moved to a new role in Styles about a year ago. Joe Plambeck, an editor on the Business desk, has been editing a lot of the section’s copy in the interim. The Times approached Financial Times US business editor Andrew Edgecliffe-Johnson about the media editor job, according to a source familiar with the information. (Edgecliffe-Johnson declined to comment.)

    Perhaps, one contributing factor to the delay is the number of cooks in the kitchen—among those involved in the columnist hiring process is business editor Ellen Pollock, deputy managing editor Sam Dolnick, and, of course, executive editor Joe Kahn—and the fact that the Times doesn’t seem to know what it even wants the column to be. That’s in stark contrast to Smith’s appointment, which famously came together after then executive editor Dean Baquet, knowing exactly what he wanted, took Smith out to a midwinter Lambs Club lunch. 

    [ad_2]

    Charlotte Klein

    Source link