ReportWire

Tag: breakingNewsGlobal

  • These regional banks are at greatest risk of being taken over by rivals, according to KBW

    These regional banks are at greatest risk of being taken over by rivals, according to KBW

    [ad_1]

    A customer enters Comerica Inc. Bank headquarters in Dallas, Texas.

    Cooper Neill | Bloomberg | Getty Images

    A trio of regional banks face increasing pressure on returns and profitability that makes them potential targets for acquisition by a larger rival, according to KBW analysts.

    Banks with between $80 billion and $120 billion in assets are in a tough spot, says Christopher McGratty of KBW. That’s because this group has the lowest structural returns among banks with at least $10 billion in assets, putting them in the position of needing to grow larger to help pay for coming regulations — or struggling for years.

    Of eight banks in that zone, Comerica, Zions and First Horizon might ultimately be acquired by more profitable competitors, McGratty said in a Nov. 19 research note.

    Zions and First Horizon declined comment. Comerica didn’t immediately have a response to this article.

    While two others in the cohort, Western Alliance and Webster Financial, have “earned the right to remain independent” with above-peer returns, they could also consider selling themselves, the analyst said.

    The remaining lenders, including East West Bank, Popular Bank and New York Community Bank each have higher returns and could end up as acquirers rather than targets. KBW estimated banks’ long-term returns including the impact of coming regulations.

    “Our analysis leads us to these conclusions,” McGratty said in an interview last week. “Not every bank is as profitable as others and there are scale demands you have to keep in mind.”

    Banking regulators have proposed a sweeping set of changes after higher interest rates and deposit runs triggered the collapse of three midsized banks this year. The moves broadly take measures that applied to the biggest global banks down to the level of institutions with at least $100 billion in assets, increasing their compliance and funding costs.

    Stock Chart IconStock chart icon

    Invesco KBW Regional Bank ETF

    While shares of regional banks have dropped 21% this year, per the KBW Regional Banking Index, they have climbed in recent weeks as concerns around inflation have abated. The sector is still weighed down by concerns over the impact of new rules and the risk of a recession on loan losses, particularly in commercial real estate.

    Given the new rules, banks will eventually cluster in three groups to optimize their profitability, according to the KBW analysis: above $120 billion in assets, $50 to $80 billion in assets, and $20 to $50 billion in assets. Banks smaller than $10 billion in assets have advantages tied to debit card revenue, meaning that smaller institutions should grow to at least $20 billion in assets to offset their loss.

    The problem for banks with $80 billion to $90 billion in assets like Zions and Comerica is that the market assumes they will soon face the burdens of being $100 billion-asset banks, compressing their valuations, McGratty said.

    On the other hand, larger banks with strong returns including Huntington, Fifth Third, M&T and Regions Financial are positioned to grow through acquiring smaller lenders, McGratty said.

    While others were more bullish, KBW analysts downgraded the U.S. banking industry in late 2022, months before the regional banking crisis. KBW is also known for helping determine the composition of indexes that track the banking industry.

    Banks are waiting for clarity on regulations and interest rates before they will pursue deals, but consolidation has been a consistent theme for the industry, McGratty said.

    “We’ve seen it throughout banking history; when there’s lines in the sand around certain sizes of assets, banks figure out the rules,” he said. “There’s still too many banks and they can be more successful if they build scale.”

    The American banking landscape is on the cusp of a seismic shift

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Goldman Sachs paid pro golfer Patrick Cantlay more than $1 million annually, sources say

    Goldman Sachs paid pro golfer Patrick Cantlay more than $1 million annually, sources say

    [ad_1]

    Patrick Cantlay of the United States plays his shot from the 18th tee during the final round of the Workday Charity Open on July 12, 2020 at Muirfield Village Golf Club in Dublin, Ohio.

    Sam Greenwood | Getty Images

    Goldman Sachs paid professional golfer Patrick Cantlay more than $1 million annually in a sponsorship deal linked to the bank’s consumer-banking efforts, CNBC has learned.

    A three-year deal signed by Cantlay in 2020 included a minimum of $1.1 million annually, according to people with knowledge of the contract, with performance bonuses for PGA Tour and Major victories and hitting top rankings worth potentially far more.

    Goldman opted not to renew Cantlay’s sponsorship this year in the latest example of the bank’s retrenchment from its retail banking push. After CEO David Solomon capitulated to demands to end the money-losing effort, the bank shut down a personal loan unit, shelved a planned checking account and sold off businesses.

    Cantlay initially wore a cap emblazoned with the bank’s short-lived Marcus brand. That was replaced by the Goldman Sachs name after the bank’s president, John Waldron, said to be a fan of the sport, pushed for the change, said one of the people, who declined to be identified speaking about sponsorship deals.  

    The first Cantlay deal was considered a relatively modest sum for a Top-10 ranked PGA golfer, mostly because his brand was still rising when he was signed, according to one of the people.

    He got paid significantly more when Goldman renewed his sponsorship in a one year extension earlier in 2023, this person said. Cantlay has earned more than $42 million in official competitions since turning pro in 2012, according to the PGA Tour.

    Goldman spokesman Tony Fratto declined to comment on the financial aspects of the sponsorship, as did Cantlay’s representative Molly Levinson.

    “We constantly evaluate the firm’s partnerships, and at this time, our logo will no longer appear on his hat,” Fratto told The New York Times, which first reported that Goldman wasn’t renewing Cantlay.  

    Cantlay still appears on Goldman’s website as a brand ambassador, along with LGPA golfer Nelly Korda and McLaren’s Formula 1 racing team.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Citigroup considers deep job cuts for CEO Jane Fraser’s overhaul, called ‘Project Bora Bora’

    Citigroup considers deep job cuts for CEO Jane Fraser’s overhaul, called ‘Project Bora Bora’

    [ad_1]

    When Citigroup CEO Jane Fraser announced in September that her sweeping corporate overhaul would result in an undisclosed number of layoffs, a jolt of fear ran through many of the bank’s 240,000 souls.

    “We’ll be saying goodbye to some very talented and hard-working colleagues,” she warned in a memo.

    Employees’ concerns are justified. Managers and consultants working on Fraser’s reorganization — known internally by its code name, “Project Bora Bora” — have discussed job cuts of at least 10% in several major businesses, according to people with knowledge of the process. The talks are early and numbers may shift in coming weeks.

    Fraser is under mounting pressure to fix Citigroup, a global bank so difficult to manage that its challenges consumed three predecessors dating back to 2007. Already a laggard in every metric that matters to investors, the bank has fallen further behind rivals since Fraser took over in early 2021. It trades at a price-to-tangible book value ratio of 0.49, less than half the average of U.S. peers and one-third the valuation of top performers including JPMorgan Chase.

    “The only thing she can do at this point is a really substantial headcount reduction,” James Shanahan, an Edward Jones analyst, said in an interview. “She needs to do something big, and I think there’s a good chance it’ll be bigger and more painful for Citi employees than they expect.”

    Stock Chart IconStock chart icon

    hide content

    Citigroup’s stock has been mired in a slump under CEO Jane Fraser.

    If Fraser decides to part with 10% or more of her workforce, it would be one of Wall Street’s deepest rounds of dismissals in years.

    Burdened by regulatory demands that hastened the retirement of her predecessor Mike Corbat, Citigroup’s expenses and headcount have ballooned under Fraser. While competitors have been cutting jobs this year, Citigroup’s staff levels remained at 240,000. That leaves Citigroup with the biggest workforce of any American bank except the larger and far more profitable JPMorgan.

    An update on Fraser’s plan and its financial impact will come in January along with fourth-quarter earnings.

    Nagging doubts

    The stakes are high for America’s third-largest bank by assets. That’s because, after decades of stock underperformance, missed targets and shifting goal posts, Fraser is taking steps analysts have long called for. Failure could mean renewed calls to unlock value by taking even more drastic actions like dismantling the company.

    Fraser has vowed to boost Citigroup’s returns to at least 11% in the next few years, a critical goal that would help the bank’s stock recover. To get close, Citigroup needs to increase revenue, use its balance sheet more efficiently and cut costs. But revenue growth may be hard to achieve as the U.S. economy slows, leaving expense cuts the biggest lever to pull, according to analysts.

    “Not one investor I’ve spoken to thinks they’ll get to that return target in ’25 or ’26,” analyst Mike Mayo of Wells Fargo said in an interview. “If they can’t generate returns above their cost of capital, which is typically around 10%, they have no right to stay in business.”

    Fraser put Titi Cole, Citigroup’s head of legacy franchises, in charge of the reorganization, according to sources. Cole joined Citigroup in 2020 and is a veteran of Wells Fargo and Bank of America, institutions that have wrestled with expenses and headcount in the past.

    Boston Consulting Group has a key role as well. The consultants have been involved in mapping out the bank’s organization charts, tracking key performance metrics and making recommendations.

    Low morale, high anxiety

    Although the project’s code name evokes the turquoise waters of Tahiti, employees have been anything but calm since Fraser’s September announcement.

    “Morale is super, super low,” said one banker who left Citigroup recently and has been contacted by former colleagues. “They’re saying, ‘I don’t know if I’m getting hit, or if my manager is getting hit.’ People are bracing for the worst.”

    American residents eligible to travel to French Polynesia are charged less for on-island Covid tests if they are vaccinated ($50 versus $120).

    Dana Neibert | The Image Bank | Getty Images

    The ultimate number of layoffs will be determined in coming weeks as the massive project moves from management layers to rank-and-file workers. But some things are already clear, according to the people, who declined to be identified speaking about the confidential project.

    Executives will see cuts beyond 10% because of Fraser’s push to eliminate regional managers, co-heads and others with overlapping responsibilities, they said.

    For instance, chiefs of staff and chief administrative officers across Citigroup will be pruned this month, said one of the people with knowledge of the situation.

    Operations staff who supported businesses that have been divested or reorganized are also at higher risk of layoffs, said the people.

    Citi’s statement

    Even if Fraser announces a large reduction in workers, investors will probably need to see expenses drift lower before being convinced, said Pierre Buhler, a banking consultant with SSA & Co. That’s because of the industry’s track record of announcing expense plans only to see costs creep up.

    Still, it’s up to Fraser and her deputies to sign off on the overall plan, and they may opt to de-emphasize expense savings. The project is primarily about removing unnecessary layers to help Citigroup serve clients better, according to a current executive.

    Publicly, the bank has only said that costs would start to ease in the second half of 2024.

    Citigroup declined to comment beyond this statement:

    “As we’ve said previously, we are committed to delivering the full potential of the bank and meeting our commitments to our stakeholders,” a spokeswoman said. “We’ve acknowledged the actions we’re taking to reorganize the firm involve some difficult, consequential decisions, but they’re the right steps to align our structure to our strategy and deliver the plan we shared at our 2022 Investor Day.”

    Don’t miss these stories from CNBC PRO:

    How Citigroup is planning its comeback

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Amazon unveils buy now, pay later option from Affirm for small business owners

    Amazon unveils buy now, pay later option from Affirm for small business owners

    [ad_1]

    Amazon is unveiling its first buy now, pay later checkout option for the millions of small business owners who use its online store, CNBC learned exclusively.

    The tech giant confirmed Thursday that its partnership with Affirm is expanding to include Amazon Business, the e-commerce platform that caters to companies.

    Affirm shares jumped 19% on the news.

    The service, with loans ranging from $100 to $20,000, will be available to all eligible customers by Black Friday, or Nov. 24. It is specifically for sole proprietors, or small businesses owned by a single person, the most common form of business ownership in the U.S.

    It’s the latest sign of the widening adoption of a fintech feature that exploded in popularity early in the pandemic, along with the valuations of leading players Affirm and Klarna. When boom turned to bust in 2021, and valuations in the industry dropped steeply, skeptics pointed to rising interest rates and borrower defaults as hurdles for growth and profitability.

    But for users, the option is touted as being more transparent than credit cards because customers know how much interest they will owe up front. That’s made its appeal durable for households and businesses coming under increasing strain as excess cash from pandemic stimulus programs has dwindled.

    “We constantly hear from small businesses that say they need payment solutions to manage their cash flow,” Todd Heimes, director of Amazon Business Worldwide, said in an interview. “We offer the ability to use credit cards and to pay by invoice; this is another option available to small business customers to pay over time.”

    Amazon Business was launched in 2015 after the company realized businesses were using its popular retail website for office supplies and bulk purchases. The division reached $35 billion in sales this year and has more than 6 million customers globally.

    Amazon customer with access to a buy now, pay later option at checkout from Affirm.

    Courtesy: Amazon Inc.

    If approved, users can pay for Amazon purchases in equal installments over three to 48 months. They are charged an annualized interest rate between 10% and 36%, based on the perceived risk of the transaction, according to Affirm Chief Revenue Officer Wayne Pommen. There are no late or hidden fees, the companies said.

    “The financial industry is not great at providing credit to really small businesses,” Pommen said. “They can’t walk into a bank branch and get a loan until they reach a certain scale. So us being able to provide this for purchases” helps business grow and manage their cash flows, he said.

    The move is a boost in a crucial relationship for Affirm, which has had to search for revenue growth after demand for expensive Peloton bikes collapsed. Affirm first began offering installment loans to Amazon’s retail customers in 2021, launched on Amazon in Canada in 2022 and was then added to Amazon Pay earlier this year.

    Affirm, which uses its own models to underwrite loans for each transaction it facilitates, decided to target sole proprietors first because they make up most small businesses in the country, with 28 million registered in the U.S., according to Pommen.

    “We’ll see how the product performs and if it makes sense to expand it to a wider universe of businesses,” he said. “Our assessment is that we can underwrite this very successfully and have the strong performance that we need.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • JPMorgan Chase stock slips after bank says CEO Jamie Dimon is selling 1 million shares

    JPMorgan Chase stock slips after bank says CEO Jamie Dimon is selling 1 million shares

    [ad_1]

    JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon will begin to sell one million shares of the bank he runs next year, the company said Friday in a filing.

    The plan sparked concern that Dimon, 67, could be contemplating retirement. Dimon is arguably the country’s top banker. He has led JPMorgan since 2005, helping build it into the biggest and most profitable American bank. His stewardship included navigating JPMorgan through two banking crises, helping stabilize the industry by acquiring failed banks.

    Before now, Dimon has never sold shares of JPMorgan except for technical reasons such as exercising options. He has also spent his own money snapping up JPMorgan shares in the past.

    Shares of the bank slipped 3.6%, worse than the 2.3% decline of the KBW Bank Index.

    “This is a reminder that the CEO is getting closer to retirement,” Wells Fargo analyst Mike Mayo said in a note. Dimon may transition from his current role in about three and a half years, if prior statements prove accurate, Mayo added.

    A spokesperson for the New York-based bank said the move wasn’t related to succession planning, and that Dimon has “no current plans” for another sale, though his needs could change over time.

    Here is the bank’s statement:

    Chairman & CEO Jamie Dimon confirmed today that he and his family plan to sell a portion of their holdings of JPMorgan stock for financial diversification and tax-planning purposes. Starting in 2024 they currently intend to sell 1 million shares, subject to the terms of a stock trading plan. This is Mr. Dimon’s first such stock sale during his tenure at the company.

    Mr. Dimon continues to believe the company’s prospects are very strong and his stake in the company will remain very significant. He and his family currently hold approximately 8.6 million shares, and in addition he continues to have unvested Performance Share Units relating to 561,793 shares and Stock Appreciation Rights relating to 1,500,000 shares, subject to the terms and conditions of each grant.

    Mr. Dimon will use stock trading plans to sell his shares, in accordance with guidelines specified under Rule 10b5-1 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934.

    Read more CNBC finance news

    Don’t miss these CNBC PRO stories:

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Bank branches inside supermarkets are closing 7 times faster than other locations

    Bank branches inside supermarkets are closing 7 times faster than other locations

    [ad_1]

    Customers at a Safeway store in San Francisco.

    Getty Images

    American banks have been shuttering branches located within supermarket chains at a rate seven times faster than other locations amid the industry’s profit squeeze and customers’ migration to digital channels.

    Banks closed 10.7% of their in-store branches in the year ended June 30, according to Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. data. The closure rate for other branches was 1.4% in that period.

    Most branches within grocery stores are operated by regional banks, which have been under pressure since the March collapse of Silicon Valley Bank. PNC, Citizens Financial and U.S. Bank shut the most in-store locations during the 12-month period at chains including Safeway and Stop & Shop. Among retailers, Walmart houses the most bank branches with 1,179, according to an S&P Global report released this week.

    While the financial industry has been closing branches for years, the pace accelerated sharply in 2021 after the pandemic turbocharged the adoption of mobile and online banking. That year, banks closed nearly 18% of their in-store branches and 3.1% of other locations, S&P Global said.

    “In-store branches have fallen out of favor at many banks,” said Nathan Stovall, head of financial institutions research at S&P Global Market Intelligence. “We’ve seen banks look to shrink their branch networks, with a focus on cutting less-profitable branches that generate less customer traffic and fewer loans and high net worth accounts.”

    Banks began building branches inside supermarkets in the 1990s because the scaled-down locations were far cheaper to set up than regular locations. But the industry now views branches as a place to entice customers with wealth management accounts, credit cards and loans rather than just a place to withdraw money, and that favors full-sized branches.

    The pace of closures has slowed since the 2021 peak, but are still at an elevated level compared to before the pandemic. For instance, in 2019, banks shut 4.2% of in-store locations and 1.7% of other locations.

    The moves come as the industry is adjusting to higher funding costs as customers have moved balances into higher-yielding options like money market funds. U.S. banks registered a 15% decline in deposits from in-store branches, while deposits at other branches fell 4.7% in the year ended June 30, according to the FDIC.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Big banks are quietly cutting thousands of employees, and more layoffs are coming

    Big banks are quietly cutting thousands of employees, and more layoffs are coming

    [ad_1]

    Pedestrians walk along Wall Street near the New York Stock Exchange in New York.

    Michael Nagle | Bloomberg | Getty Images

    The largest American banks have been quietly laying off workers all year — and some of the deepest cuts are yet to come.

    Even as the economy has surprised forecasters with its resilience, lenders have cut headcount or announced plans to do so, with the key exception being JPMorgan Chase, the biggest and most profitable U.S. bank.

    Pressured by the impact of higher interest rates on the mortgage business, Wall Street deal-making and funding costs, the next five largest U.S. banks cut a combined 20,000 positions so far this year, according to company filings.

    The moves come after a two-year hiring boom during the pandemic, fueled by a surge in Wall Street activity. That subsided after the Federal Reserve began raising interest rates last year to cool an overheated economy, and banks found themselves suddenly overstaffed for an environment in which fewer consumers sought out mortgages and fewer corporations issued debt or bought competitors.

    “Banks are cutting costs where they can because things are really uncertain next year,” Chris Marinac, research director at Janney Montgomery Scott, said in a phone interview.

    Job losses in the financial industry could pressure the broader U.S. labor market in 2024. Faced with rising defaults on corporate and consumer loans, lenders are poised to make deeper cuts next year, said Marinac.

    “They need to find levers to keep earnings from falling further and to free up money for provisions as more loans go bad,” he said. “By the time we roll into January, you’ll hear a lot of companies talking about this.”

    Deepest cuts

    Banks disclose total headcount numbers every quarter. While the aggregate figures mask the hiring and firing going on beneath the surface, they are informative.

    The deepest cuts have been at Wells Fargo and Goldman Sachs, institutions that are wrestling with revenue declines in key businesses. They each have cut roughly 5% of their workforce so far this year.

    At Wells Fargo, job cuts came after the bank announced a strategic shift away from the mortgage business in January. And even though the bank cut 50,000 employees in the past three years as part of CEO Charlie Scharf‘s cost-cutting plan, the firm isn’t done shrinking headcount, executives said Friday.

    There are “very few parts of the company” that will be spared from cuts, said CFO Mike Santomassimo.

    “We still have additional opportunities to reduce head count,” he told analysts. “Attrition has remained low, which will likely result in additional severance expense for actions in 2024.”

    Goldman firings

    Meanwhile, after several rounds of cuts in the past year, Goldman executives said that they had “right-sized” the bank and don’t expect another mass layoff like the one enacted in January.

    But headcount is still headed down at the New York-based bank. Last year, Goldman brought back annual performance reviews where people deemed low performers are cut. In the coming weeks, the bank will terminate around 1% or 2% of its employees, according to a person with knowledge of the plans.

    Headcount will also drift lower because of Goldman’s pivot away from consumer finance; the firm agreed to sell two businesses in deals that will close in coming months, a wealth management unit and fintech lender GreenSky.

    A key factor driving the cuts is that job-hopping in finance slowed drastically from earlier years, leaving banks with more people than they expected.

    “Attrition has been remarkably low, and that’s something that we’ve just got to work through,” Morgan Stanley CEO James Gorman said Wednesday. The bank has cut about 2% of its workforce this year amid a protracted slowdown in investment banking activity.

    The aggregate figures obscure the hiring that banks are still doing. While headcount at Bank of America dipped 1.9% this year, the firm has hired 12,000 people so far, indicating that an even greater amount of people left their jobs.

    Citigroup’s cuts

    While Citigroup‘s staff figures have been stable at 240,000 this year, there are significant changes afoot, CFO Mark Mason told analysts last week. The bank has already identified 7,000 job cuts linked to $600 million in “repositioning charges” disclosed so far this year.

    CEO Jane Fraser’s latest plan to overhaul the bank’s corporate structure, as well as sales of overseas retail operations, will further lower headcount in coming quarters, executives said.

    “As we continue to progress in those divestitures … we’ll see those heads come down,” Mason said.

    Meanwhile, JPMorgan has been the industry’s outlier. The bank grew headcount by 5.1% this year as it expanded its branch network, invested aggressively in technology and acquired the failed regional lender First Republic, which added about 5,000 positions.

    Even after its hiring spree, JPMorgan has more than 10,000 open positions, the company said.

    But the bank appears to be the exception to the rule. Led by CEO Jamie Dimon since 2006, JPMorgan has best navigated the surging interest rate environment of the past year, managing to attract deposits and grow revenue while smaller rivals struggled. It’s the only one of the Big Six lenders whose shares have meaningfully climbed this year.  

    All these companies expanded year after year,” said Marinac. “You can easily see several more quarters where they go backwards, because there’s room to cut, and they have to find a way to survive.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Bank of America tops profit estimates on better-than-expected interest income

    Bank of America tops profit estimates on better-than-expected interest income

    [ad_1]

    Brian Moynihan, CEO of Bank of America

    Heidi Gutman | CNBC

    Bank of America topped estimates for third-quarter profit on Tuesday on stronger-than-expected interest income.

    Here’s what the company reported:

    • Earnings per share: 90 cents vs. expected 82 cent estimate from LSEG, formerly known as Refinitiv
    • Revenue: $25.32 billion, vs. expected $25.14 billion

    Profit rose 10% to $7.8 billion, or 90 cents per share, from $7.1 billion, or 81 cents a share, a year earlier, the Charlotte, North Carolina-based bank said in a release. Revenue climbed 2.9% to $25.32 billion, edging out the LSEG estimate.

    Bank of America said interest income rose 4% to $14.4 billion, roughly $300 million more than analysts had anticipated, fueled by higher rates and loan growth.

    CEO Brian Moynihan said the bank continued to add clients despite economic pressures. While consumer banking deposits were down 8% in the quarter, the segment posted a 6% increase in revenue to $10.5 billion, according to the company.

    “We did this in a healthy but slowing economy that saw U.S. consumer spending still ahead of last year but continuing to slow,” he said in an earnings release.

    Bank of America was supposed to be one of the biggest beneficiaries of higher interest rates this year. Instead, the company’s stock has been the worst performer among its big-bank peers in 2023. That’s because, under CEO Brian Moynihan, the lender piled into low-yielding, long-dated securities during the pandemic. Those securities lost value as interest rates climbed.

    That’s made Bank of America more sensitive to the recent surge in the 10-year Treasury yield than its peers — and more similar to some regional banks that are also nursing underwater bonds. Bank of America had more than $100 billion in paper losses on bonds at midyear.

    The situation has pressured the bank’s net interest income, or NII, which is a key metric that analysts will be watching this quarter. In July, the bank’s CFO, Alistair Borthwick, affirmed previous guidance that NII would be roughly $57 billion for 2023.  

    Bank of America shares were up about 1% in premarket trading Tuesday. The stock bad fallen 18% this year through Monday, trailing the 10% gain of rival JPMorgan Chase.

    Last week, JPMorgan, Wells Fargo and Citigroup each topped expectations for third-quarter profit, helped by better-than-expected credit costs. Morgan Stanley posts results Wednesday.  

    This story is developing. Please check back for updates.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Goldman Sachs is set to report third-quarter earnings — here’s what Wall Street expects

    Goldman Sachs is set to report third-quarter earnings — here’s what Wall Street expects

    [ad_1]

    David Solomon, chief executive officer of Goldman Sachs Group Inc., at the Goldman Sachs Financial Services Conference in New York, Dec. 6, 2022.

    Michael Nagle | Bloomberg | Getty Images

    Goldman Sachs is scheduled to report third-quarter earnings before the opening bell Tuesday.

    Here’s what Wall Street expects:

    • Earnings: $5.31 a share, according to LSEG, formerly known as Refinitiv
    • Revenue: $11.19 billion
    • Trading revenue: fixed income $2.8 billion, equities $2.73 billion, per StreetAccount
    • Investment banking revenue: $1.48 billion

    Is Wall Street deal-making on the mend?

    Among its big bank peers, Goldman Sachs is the most reliant on investment banking and trading revenue.

    While it’s made efforts under CEO David Solomon to diversify its revenue stream, first in an ill-fated retail banking push and later as it emphasized growth in asset and wealth management, it is Wall Street that powers the company. Last quarter, trading and advisory accounted for two-thirds of Goldman’s revenue.

    That’s been a headwind as mergers, initial public offerings and debt issuance all have been muted this year as the Federal Reserve boosted interest rates to slow the economy down. With signs that activity has picked up lately, analysts will be eager to hear about Goldman’s pipeline of deals.

    At the same time, Goldman has taken hits from two areas: Its strategic retrenchment away from retail banking has saddled the firm with losses as it finds buyers for unwanted operations, and its exposure to commercial real estate has resulted in write-downs as well.

    Last week, Goldman said that its sale of lending business GreenSky will result in a 19 cents per share hit to third-quarter results.

    Analysts will be keen to hear Solomon’s view on the investment banking outlook, as well as how the remaining parts of its consumer effort — mainly, its Apple Card business — fit in the latest iteration of Goldman Sachs.

    Goldman shares have dropped 8.4% this year through Monday, a better showing than the 21% decline of the KBW Bank Index.

    Last week, JPMorgan, Wells Fargo and Citigroup each topped expectations for third-quarter profit, helped by better-than-expected credit costs. Morgan Stanley posts results Wednesday.  

    This story is developing. Please check back for updates.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Bank earnings kick off with JPMorgan, Wells Fargo amid concerns about rising rates, bad loans

    Bank earnings kick off with JPMorgan, Wells Fargo amid concerns about rising rates, bad loans

    [ad_1]

    Jamie Dimon, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of JPMorgan Chase & Co., gestures as he speaks during an interview with Reuters in Miami, Florida, U.S., February 8, 2023. 

    Marco Bello | Reuters

    American banks are closing out another quarter in which interest rates surged, reviving concerns about shrinking margins and rising loan losses — though some analysts see a silver lining to the industry’s woes.

    Just as they did during the March regional banking crisis, higher rates are expected to lead to a jump in losses on banks’ bond portfolios and contribute to funding pressures as institutions are forced to pay higher rates for deposits.

    KBW analysts Christopher McGratty and David Konrad estimate banks’ per-share earnings fell 18% in the third quarter as lending margins compressed and loan demand sank on higher borrowing costs.

    “The fundamental outlook is hard near term; revenues are declining, margins are declining, growth is slowing,” McGratty said in a phone interview.

    Earnings season kicks off Friday with reports from JPMorgan Chase, Citigroup and Wells Fargo.

    Bank stocks have been intertwined closely with the path of borrowing costs this year. The S&P 500 Banks index sank 9.3% in September on concerns sparked by a surprising surge in longer-term interest rates, especially the 10-year yield, which jumped 74 basis points in the quarter.

    Rising yields mean the bonds owned by banks fall in value, creating unrealized losses that pressure capital levels. The dynamic caught midsized institutions including Silicon Valley Bank and First Republic off guard earlier this year, which — combined with deposit runs — led to government seizure of those banks.

    Big banks have largely dodged concerns tied to underwater bonds, with the notable exception of Bank of America. The bank piled into low-yielding securities during the pandemic and had more than $100 billion in paper losses on bonds at midyear. The issue constrains the bank’s interest revenue and has made the lender the worst stock performer this year among the top six U.S. institutions.

    Expectations on the impact of higher rates on banks’ balance sheets varied. Morgan Stanley analysts led by Betsy Graseck said in an October 2 note that the “estimated impact from the bond rout in 3Q is more than double” losses in the second quarter.

    Hardest-hit banks

    Bond losses will have the deepest impact on regional lenders including Comerica, Fifth Third Bank and KeyBank, the Morgan Stanley analysts said.

    Still, others including KBW and UBS analysts said that other factors could soften the capital hit from higher rates for most of the industry.

    “A lot will depend on the duration of their books,” Konrad said in an interview, referring to whether banks owned shorter or longer-term bonds. “I think the bond marks will look similar to last quarter, which is still a capital headwind, but that there’ll be a smaller group of banks that are hit more because of what they own.”

    There’s also concern that higher interest rates will result in ballooning losses in commercial real estate and industrial loans.

    “We expect loan loss provisions to increase materially compared to the third quarter of 2022 as we expect banks to build up loan loss reserves,” RBC analyst Gerard Cassidy wrote in a Oct. 2 note.

    Silver linings

    Still, bank stocks are primed for a short squeeze during earnings season because hedge funds placed bets on a return of the chaos from March, when regional banks saw an exodus of deposits, UBS analyst Erika Najarian wrote in an Oct. 9 note.

    “The combination of short interest above March 2023 levels and a short thesis from macro investors that higher rates will drive another liquidity crisis makes us think the sector is set up for a potentially volatile short squeeze,” Najarian wrote.

    Banks will probably show stability in deposit levels in the quarter, according to Goldman Sachs analysts led by Richard Ramsden. That, and guidance on net interest income in the fourth quarter and beyond, could support some banks, said the analysts, who are bullish on JPMorgan and Wells Fargo.

    Perhaps because bank stocks have been so beaten down and expectations are low, the industry is due for a relief rally, said McGratty.

    “People are looking ahead to, where is the trough in revenue?” McGratty said. “If you think about the last nine months, the first quarter was really hard. The second quarter was challenging, but not as bad, and the third will be still tough, but again, not getting worse.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Goldman Sachs warns of hit to third-quarter earnings on deal to offload GreenSky

    Goldman Sachs warns of hit to third-quarter earnings on deal to offload GreenSky

    [ad_1]

    David Solomon, CEO of Goldman Sachs, during a Bloomberg Television at the Goldman Sachs Financial Services Conference in New York on Dec. 6, 2022.

    Michael Nagle | Bloomberg | Getty Images

    Goldman Sachs said Wednesday that it agreed to sell its fintech lending platform GreenSky to a group of investors led by private equity firm Sixth Street.

    The deal, which includes a book of loans created by Goldman, will result in a 19 cents per share reduction to third-quarter earnings, Goldman said in the statement. The New York-based bank is scheduled to disclose results Tuesday.

    The move is the latest step CEO David Solomon has taken to retrench from his ill-fated push into retail banking. Under Solomon’s direction, Goldman acquired GreenSky last year for $1.7 billion, overruling deputies who felt the home improvement lender was a poor fit. Months later, Solomon decided to seek bids for the business amid his broader move away from consumer finance. Goldman also sold a wealth management business and was reportedly in talks to offload its Apple Card operations.

    “This transaction demonstrates our continued progress in narrowing the focus of our consumer business,” Solomon said in the release.

    The bank is now focused on its core strengths in investment banking and trading and its push to grow asset and wealth management fees, he added.

    Goldman will continue to operate GreenSky until the sale closes in the first quarter of 2024, the bank said.

    The expected hit to third-quarter earnings includes expenses tied to a write down of GreenSky intangibles, as well as marks on the loan portfolio and higher taxes, offset by the release of loan reserves tied to the transaction, Goldman said.

    It follows a $504 million second-quarter impairment on GreenSky disclosed in July.

    The Sixth Street group includes funds managed by KKR, Bayview Asset Management and CardWorks, according to the release.

    Private equity groups have played key roles in several of the banking industry’s asset divestitures since the start of the year, providing funding for the PacWest merger with Banc of California, for example.

    Read more: Goldman Sachs faces big write down on CEO David Solomon’s ill-fated GreenSky deal

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • These regional banks are at risk of being booted from the S&P 500

    These regional banks are at risk of being booted from the S&P 500

    [ad_1]

    A customer enters Comerica Inc. Bank headquarters in Dallas, Texas.

    Cooper Neill | Bloomberg | Getty Images

    The stock sell-off that hit regional banks this year has exposed lenders including Zions and Comerica to the risk of being delisted from the Standard & Poor’s 500 index.

    The banks, each with market capitalizations of around $5 billion, were the fourth- and sixth-smallest members of the 500 company listing as of this week, according to FactSet.

    That leaves the companies in a similar position to Lincoln National, which got shunted from the S&P 500 last month and placed into a small-cap index. Blackstone, the world’s largest alternative asset manager, took Lincoln National’s spot.

    This year’s regional banking crisis has already caused changes in the composition of the S&P 500, the most popular broad measure of large American companies in the investing world. Silicon Valley Bank and First Republic were removed from the benchmark after deposit runs led to their government seizure. More changes may be coming, especially if the industry faces a protracted slump, according to analysts.

    “It’s absolutely a risk,” Chris Marinac, research director at Janney Montgomery Scott, said in an interview. “If the market were to further change the valuation of these companies, especially if we have higher rates, I wouldn’t rule it out.”

    Banks begin disclosing third-quarter results Friday, led by JPMorgan Chase. Investors are keen to hear how rising interest rates affected bond holdings and deposits in the period.

    Companies that no longer qualify as large-cap stocks are at heightened risk of demotion from the S&P 500. There were seven members valued at $6 billion or less at the end of August. Two of them were removed the following month: insurer Lincoln National and consumer firm Newell Brands.

    Those that join the benchmark often celebrate the milestone. The popularity of mutual funds and ETFs based on the index means that new members typically see an immediate boost to their stock price. Those that get demoted can suffer declines as fewer money managers need to own shares in the companies.

    S&P guidelines

    To be considered for inclusion in the S&P 500, companies need to have a market capitalization of at least $14.5 billion and meet profitability and trading standards.

    Members that violate “one or more of the eligibility criteria for the S&P Composite 1500 may be deleted from the respective component index at the Index Committee’s discretion,” according to S&P Dow Jones Indices’ methodology.

    Still, that doesn’t mean Zions or Comerica are on the cusp of a delisting. The committee that decides the composition of the S&P 500 looks to minimize churn and accurately represent reference sectors, making changes only when “ongoing conditions warrant an index change,” according to S&P.

    Stock Chart IconStock chart icon

    Shares of regional banks ZIons and Comerica have tumbled this year.

    For instance, after the onset of the Covid pandemic in March 2020, many retail S&P 500 companies temporarily violated the profitability rule, but that didn’t result in widespread demotions, according to a person who has studied the S&P 500 index.

    S&P Dow Jones Indices declined to comment for this article, as did Comerica. Zion’s didn’t immediately return a message seeking comment.

    Besides Zions and Comerica, KeyCorp and Citizens Financial are the only other S&P 500 banks with market caps below the threshold for inclusion in the index, according to an Aug. 31 Piper Sandler note. KeyCorp and Citizens, however, each have market caps of greater than $10 billion, making them less likely to be impacted than smaller banks.

    After Blackstone became the first major alternative asset manager to join the S&P 500 last month, analysts said that peers including KKR and Apollo Global may be next, and they would likely replace other financial names. KKR and Apollo each have market capitalizations of greater than $50 billion.

    “Perhaps more demotions of low-market cap financials are to come,” Wells Fargo analyst Finian O’Shea said in a Sept. 5 research note.

    – CNBC’s Gabriel Cortes contributed to this article.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • This trade is where big investors are hiding out amid choppy markets, Goldman Sachs says

    This trade is where big investors are hiding out amid choppy markets, Goldman Sachs says

    [ad_1]

    A Goldman Sachs Group Inc. logo hangs on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange in New York, U.S., on Wednesday, May 19, 2010.

    Daniel Acker | Bloomberg | Getty Images

    Investors have piled into short-term U.S. government bonds in a bid to wait out the upheaval caused by a blowout in longer-term yields, according to a Goldman Sachs executive.

    An auction this week of 52-week Treasury bills at a 5.19% rate was 3.2 times oversubscribed, its highest demand of the year, said Lindsay Rosner, head of multi-sector investing at Goldman Sachs asset and wealth management.

    “They’re saying, ‘I’m now being afforded a lot more yield in the very front end of the curve in government paper’,” Rosner told CNBC in a phone interview, referring to 1-year T-bills. “That is really where you’re seeing investors flock.”

    The trade is a key way that institutions and wealthy investors are adjusting to the surge in long-term interest rates that have roiled markets lately. The 10-year Treasury yield has been climbing for weeks, reaching a 16-year high of 4.89% Friday after the September jobs report showed that employers were still hiring aggressively. Investors poured more than $1 trillion into new T-bills last quarter, according to Bloomberg.

    The playbook, according to Rosner, takes advantage of the presumption that interest rates will be higher for longer than markets had expected earlier this year. If that sentiment holds true, longer-duration Treasuries like the 10-year should offer better yields next year as the yield curve steepens, she said.

    “You get to collect a 5% coupon for the next year,” she said. “Then, in a year, you may have opportunities [in longer-duration Treasuries] at greater than 5% in government securities or potentially in [corporate bonds] that are now properly priced.

    “You could then get a double-digit yield, but be confident about valuation, unlike now,” she added.

    While 10-year Treasuries have crashed in recent weeks, other fixed income instruments including investment-grade and high-yield bonds haven’t fully reflected the change in rate assumptions, according to Rosner. That makes them a bad deal for the moment, but could create opportunities down the road.

    The upheaval that’s punished holders of longer-dated Treasuries in recent weeks has professional managers reducing the average duration of their portfolios, according to Ben Emons, head of fixed income at NewEdge Wealth. 

    “Treasury bills are in high demand,” he said. “Anyone out there who needs to manage duration in their portfolio, you do that with the 1-year T bill. That’s what BlackRock is doing, it’s what I’m doing.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Why borrowing costs for nearly everything are surging, and what it means for you

    Why borrowing costs for nearly everything are surging, and what it means for you

    [ad_1]

    Federal Reserve Board Chair Jerome Powell speaks during a news conference following a Federal Open Market Committee meeting at the Federal Reserve in Washington, D.C., on July 26, 2023.

    SAUL LOEB | Getty

    Violent moves in the bond market this week have hammered investors and renewed fears of a recession, as well as concerns about housing, banks and even the fiscal sustainability of the U.S. government.

    At the center of the storm is the 10-year Treasury yield, one of the most influential numbers in finance. The yield, which represents borrowing costs for issuers of bonds, has climbed steadily in recent weeks and reached 4.8% on Tuesday, a level last seen just before the 2008 financial crisis.

    The relentless rise in borrowing costs has blown past forecasters’ predictions and has Wall Street casting about for explanations. While the Federal Reserve has been raising its benchmark rate for 18 months, that hasn’t impacted longer-dated Treasurys like the 10-year until recently as investors believed rate cuts were likely coming in the near term.

    That began to change in July with signs of economic strength defying expectations for a slowdown. It gained speed in recent weeks as Fed officials remained steadfast that interest rates will remain elevated. Some on Wall Street believe that part of the move is technical in nature, sparked by selling from a country or large institutions. Others are fixated on the spiraling U.S. deficit and political dysfunction. Still others are convinced that the Fed has intentionally caused the surge in yields to slow down a too-hot U.S. economy.

    “The bond market is telling us that this higher cost of funding is going to be with us for a while,” Bob Michele, global head of fixed income for JPMorgan Chase‘s asset management division, said Tuesday in a Zoom interview. “It’s going to stay there because that’s where the Fed wants it. The Fed is slowing you, the consumer, down.”

    The ‘everything’ rate

    Investors are fixated on the 10-year Treasury yield because of its primacy in global finance.

    While shorter-duration Treasurys are more directly moved by Fed policy, the 10-year is influenced by the market and reflects expectations for growth and inflation. It’s the rate that matters most to consumers, corporations and governments, influencing trillions of dollars in home and auto loans, corporate and municipal bonds, commercial paper, and currencies.

    “When the 10-year moves, it affects everything; it’s the most watched benchmark for rates,” said Ben Emons, head of fixed income at NewEdge Wealth. “It impacts anything that’s financing for corporates or people.”

    The yield’s recent moves have the stock market on a razor’s edge as some of the expected correlations between asset classes have broken down.

    Stocks have sold off since yields began rising in July, giving up much of the year’s gains, but the typical safe haven of U.S. Treasurys has fared even worse. Longer-dated bonds have lost 46% since a March 2020 peak, according to Bloomberg, a precipitous decline for what’s supposed to be one of the safest investments available.

    “You have equities falling like it’s a recession, rates climbing like growth has no bounds, gold selling off like inflation is dead,” said Benjamin Dunn, a former hedge fund chief risk officer who now runs consultancy Alpha Theory Advisors. “None of it makes sense.”

    Borrowers squeezed

    Retailers, banks and real estate

    Beyond the consumer, that could be felt as employers pull back from what has been a strong economy. Companies that can only issue debt in the high-yield market, which includes many retail employers, will confront sharply higher borrowing costs. Higher rates squeeze the housing industry and push commercial real estate closer to default.

    “For anyone with debt coming due, this is a rate shock,” said Peter Boockvar of Bleakley Financial Group. “Any real estate person who has a loan coming due, any business whose floating rate loan is due, this is tough.”

    The spike in yields also adds pressure to regional banks holding bonds that have fallen in value, one of the key factors in the failures of Silicon Valley Bank and First Republic. While analysts don’t expect more banks to collapse, the industry has been seeking to offload assets and has already pulled back on lending.

    “We are now 100 basis points higher in yield” than in March, Rosner said. “So if banks haven’t fixed their issues since then, the problem is only worse, because rates are only higher.”

    5% and beyond?

    The rise in the 10-year has halted in the past two trading sessions this week. The rate was 4.71% on Thursday ahead of a key jobs report Friday. But after piercing through previous resistance levels, many expect that yields can climb higher, since the factors believed to be driving yields are still in place.

    That has raised fears that the U.S. could face a debt crisis where higher rates and spiraling deficits become entrenched, a concern boosted by the possibility of a government shutdown next month.

    “There are real concerns of ‘Are we operating at a debt-to-GDP level that is untenable?’” Rosner said.

    Since the Fed began raising rates last year, there have been two episodes of financial turmoil: the September 2022 collapse in the U.K.’s government bonds and the March U.S. regional banking crisis.

    Another move higher in the 10-year yield from here would heighten the chances something else breaks and makes recession much more likely, JPMorgan’s Michele said.   

    “If we get over 5% in the long end, this is legitimately another rate shock,” Michele said. “At that point, you have to keep your eyes open for what looks frail.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Citigroup CEO Jane Fraser sees ‘cracks’ emerging among some consumers as savings dry up

    Citigroup CEO Jane Fraser sees ‘cracks’ emerging among some consumers as savings dry up

    [ad_1]

    Lower-end consumers have shifted buying patterns to save money as their bank accounts dwindle in size, according to Citigroup CEO Jane Fraser.

    The third-largest U.S. bank by assets has been monitoring its credit card customers for signs of distress, Fraser told CNBC’s Sara Eisen on Friday in an interview.

    “We are paying attention to the lower FICO consumer, where there are cracks” forming, Fraser said, referring to the widely-used credit scoring system from Fair Isaac Corp. “I think some of the excess savings from the Covid years are getting close to depletion.”

    The U.S. government injected trillions of dollars into households and businesses during the Covid pandemic to avert disaster, money that has helped keep the economy humming for longer than many forecasters expected. At the same time, the Federal Reserve’s most aggressive interest rate hiking cycle in four decades has made credit card, mortgage and auto debt more expensive, and late payments and defaults have been climbing.

    When asked what other CEOs are telling her about the state of the economy, Fraser said that besides comments on AI and labor tightness, corporate leaders have told her that demand is softening, she said.

    “Particularly [for] the bottom end of the consumer, that’s the one that we’re starting to see cracks, you’re seeing some shift in the buying patterns to lower categories in the spend,” Fraser said. “It’s a resilient consumer but it’s a softer one.”

    Softening demand may help the Fed in its battle with inflation, the CEO noted. While employment and gross domestic product figures suggest the economy will achieve a “soft landing,” if it does tip into recession, it will likely be a “manageable” one, Fraser said.

    In the wide-ranging interview, Fraser also said that her latest overhaul of the bank was a move away from the “financial supermarket” model of the past into a more streamlined operation.

    The scope of job cuts and expense savings triggered by the reorganization will be disclosed with fourth quarter earnings, Fraser said.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Morgan Stanley kicks off generative AI era on Wall Street with assistant for financial advisors

    Morgan Stanley kicks off generative AI era on Wall Street with assistant for financial advisors

    [ad_1]

    Shannon Stapleton | Reuters

    Morgan Stanley has officially kicked off the generative AI era on Wall Street.

    The bank plans to announce Monday that the assistant it created with OpenAI‘s latest generative AI software is “fully live” for all financial advisors and their support staff, according to a memo obtained by CNBC.

    “Financial advisors will always be the center of Morgan Stanley wealth management’s universe,” Morgan Stanley co-President Andy Saperstein said in the memo. “We also believe that generative AI will revolutionize client interactions, bring new efficiencies to advisor practices, and ultimately help free up time to do what you do best: serve your clients.”

    Morgan Stanley, a top investment bank and wealth management juggernaut, made waves in March when it announced that it had been working on an assistant based on OpenAI’s GPT-4. Competitors including Goldman Sachs and JPMorgan Chase have announced projects based on generative AI technology. But Morgan Stanley is the first major Wall Street firm to put a bespoke solution based on GPT-4 in employees’ hands, according to Jeff McMillan, head of analytics, data and innovation at Morgan Stanley wealth management.

    Called the AI @ Morgan Stanley Assistant, the tool gives financial advisors speedy access to the bank’s “intellectual capital,” a database of about 100,000 research reports and documents, McMillan said in a recent interview.

    By saving advisors and customer service employees time when it comes to questions about markets, recommendations and internal processes, the assistant frees them to engage more with clients, he said.

    Human speech

    The tool, a simple window of text, belies the difficulty in making sure the program would produce quality responses, according to McMillan. The bank spent months curating documents and using human experts to test responses, he said.

    One adjustment for advisors is that they’ll need to phrase questions in full sentences as though they were speaking to a human, instead of leaning on keywords as they would with a search engine query, said McMillan.

    “No different than how I would ask you a question, that’s how you talk to this machine,” he said. “People are not accustomed to that.”

    It’s just the first in a series of solutions based on generative AI planned by the bank, according to McMillan. The firm is piloting a tool called Debrief that automatically summarizes the content of client meetings and generates follow-up emails.

    ‘Completely disruptive’

    Using OpenAI software required a fundamentally different approach than with previous technology efforts, he said. OpenAI’s ChatGPT uses large language models, or LLMs, to create human-sounding responses to questions.

    “The traditional way in which you would solve those things is you would write code,” McMillan said. “In the new world, you give examples of what ‘good’ looks like, and the system learns what good is. It’s actually able to ‘reason’ and apply logic that a human would apply.”

    Excitement over AI has bolstered the stock market this year and forced entire industries to contend with its implications, leading some experts to declare it the next foundational technology.

    “I’ve never seen anything like this in my career, and I’ve been doing artificial intelligence for 20 years,” McMillan said. “We saw a window of opportunity that was just completely disruptive, and I think as an organization, we didn’t want to get left behind.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • JPMorgan Chase to offer online payroll services as it steps up fight with Square, PayPal

    JPMorgan Chase to offer online payroll services as it steps up fight with Square, PayPal

    [ad_1]

    Co-founders Eddie Kim, Josh Reeves, and Tomer London of fintech startup Gusto, which handles payroll services for small businesses.

    Courtesy: Kelly Boynton | Gusto

    JPMorgan Chase is stepping up its appeal to small business customers by planning to offer digital payroll processing, CNBC has learned.

    The bank has picked San Francisco-based fintech player Gusto to provide the underlying technology for the feature, according to Gusto CEO Josh Reeves.

    “If you’re a customer of Chase payments solutions, you can go to payroll from the same exact place you do banking,” Reeves said. “It’s the same experience, with the same login and credentialing; all that stuff becomes easier when it’s in a one stop shop-type environment.”

    JPMorgan, the biggest U.S. bank by assets, has poured billions of dollars into technology in recent years. It’s part of a larger battle for the loyalty of American retail and business customers as fintech players including PayPal and Square morph into do-everything providers that threaten traditional banks. Both companies have their own payroll services.

    JPMorgan has previously rolled out fintech features, including a Square-like credit card reader for small businesses and early direct deposit for consumers.

    Everyone needs to get paid

    –CNBC’s Jon Fortt contributed to this article.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Goldman Sachs is in the spotlight as tech firms Arm and Instacart test IPO market

    Goldman Sachs is in the spotlight as tech firms Arm and Instacart test IPO market

    [ad_1]

    David Solomon, Goldman Sachs interview with David Faber, September 7, 2023.

    CNBC

    The return of large tech IPOs this week after a prolonged drought isn’t just a test of investors’ appetite for risky new offerings — it’s a key moment for Wall Street’s top advisor, Goldman Sachs.

    Chip designer Arm is expected to begin trading Thursday in the year’s biggest listing. Delivery firm Instacart and marketing automation platform Klaviyo are expected to list as soon as next week.

    While they each operate in vastly different parts of the tech universe, the companies have one important thing in common: Goldman is a key advisor.

    The stakes are high for everyone involved. Last year was the slowest for American IPOs in three decades, thanks to sharply higher interest rates, rising geopolitical tensions and the hangover from 2021 listings that fared poorly. Successful IPOs from Arm and others will boost confidence for CEOs waiting on the sidelines, and activity there would help revive other parts of finance including mergers and financing.

    That would be meaningful for Goldman, which is more dependent on investment banking than rivals JPMorgan Chase and Morgan Stanley. Amid the industry’s slump, Goldman has suffered the worst revenue decline this year among the six biggest U.S. banks, and CEO David Solomon has contended with internal dissent and departures tied to strategic errors and his leadership style.

    “This is the core of the core of what Goldman Sachs does,” Mike Mayo, Wells Fargo banking analyst, said in a phone interview. “Expectations are high, and they’re likely to meet those expectations. Should they fall short, there will be far more questions than anything we’ve seen so far.”

    Lead-left bank

    Goldman is lead-left advisor on Instacart and Klaviyo, meaning their bankers drive decisions, coordinate other banks and typically earn the biggest portion of fees. On Arm, Goldman shares top billing with JPMorgan, Barclays and Mizuho. Goldman also was named the deal’s allocation coordinator.

    But the sought-after title of lead advisor comes with added scrutiny if the deals flop.

    If shares of Arm or the other two IPOs fail to trade for a premium to the list price in coming weeks, dark clouds could form over the nascent market rebound. For Goldman, perceptions of a bungled process would feed doubts about the company under Solomon.

    Unlike the bank’s unfortunate foray into consumer finance, Goldman’s position atop Wall Street’s league tables hasn’t budged. The bank has actually gained share in advisory and trading since Solomon took over in 2018.

    But even in its traditional stronghold, there is room for cracks. Goldman is being investigated for its role advising Silicon Valley Bank in the days before its collapse.

    What’s Arm worth?

    Initial public offerings can be tricky transactions to navigate. Advisors need to properly gauge interest in shares and balance demands from clients while pricing shares so investors see upside.

    While Arm’s offering is reportedly seeing high demand, there are nagging doubts about the company’s valuation, its large exposure to China and its ability to ride the artificial intelligence wave. The SoftBank-owned company’s valuation has waxed and waned in recent weeks, from as high as $70 billion initially to the roughly $55 billion that represents the top end of a target share price of $47 to $51.

    “We believe investors should avoid this IPO, as we see very limited upside ahead,” David Trainer, CEO of research firm New Constructs, wrote Tuesday in a note. “SoftBank is wasting no time by offering Arm Holdings to the public markets, and at a valuation that is completely disconnected from the company’s fundamentals.”

    Further, Arm is selling an unusually small slice of its overall stock, about 9%, which helps drive scarcity. That small public float means new investors will have fewer rights related to voting power and corporate governance, Trainer noted.

    The IPO is expected to raise more than $5 billion for Arm and generate more than $100 million in fees for its bankers.

    There are more than 20 tech companies weighing whether to go public in the next year or so if conditions remain favorable, according to bankers with knowledge of the market. While some have begun taking steps to list in the first half of 2024, according to the bankers, the situation is fragile.

    “If those three don’t go well, it doesn’t bode well for the rest of the IPOs or M&A because people will lose confidence,” one of the bankers said.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Jamie Dimon says it’s a ‘huge mistake’ to think economy will boom with so many risks out there

    Jamie Dimon says it’s a ‘huge mistake’ to think economy will boom with so many risks out there

    [ad_1]

    Jamie Dimon, chairman and chief executive officer of JPMorgan Chase & Co., speaks during the Institute of International Finance (IIF) annual membership meeting in Washington, DC, US, on Thursday, Oct. 13, 2022.

    Ting Shen | Bloomberg | Getty Images

    JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon said Monday that while the U.S. economy is doing well, it would be a “huge mistake” to believe that it will last for years.

    Healthy consumer balance sheets and rising wages are supporting the economy for now, but there are risks ahead, said Dimon, who was speaking at a financial conference in New York. Topping his concerns include central banks reining in liquidity programs via “quantitative tightening,” the Ukraine war, and governments around the world “spending like drunken sailors,” the executive said.

    “To say the consumer is strong today, meaning you are going to have a booming environment for years, is a huge mistake,” he said.

    The world’s largest economy has defied expectations for a downturn for the past year, including from prognosticators like Dimon, head of the biggest U.S. bank by assets. Last year, he warned that a potential economic hurricane was on the way, citing the same concerns around central banks and the Ukraine conflict. But the U.S. economy has proven resilient, leading more economists to expect that a recession might be avoided.

    “Businesses feel pretty good because they look at their current results,” Dimon said. “But those things change, and we don’t know what the full effect of all this is going to be 12 or 18 months from now.”

    While JPMorgan and other banks have been “over-earning” on lending for years because of historically low default rates, strains were emerging in parts of real estate and subprime auto lending, Dimon said.

    “If and when you have a recession, which you’re eventually going to have, you’ll have a real normal credit cycle,” Dimon said. “In a normal credit cycle, something always does worse than” expected, he added.

    Dimon on regulations, markets, China

    Dimon struck a note of caution throughout the panel discussion. JPMorgan is repurchasing stock at a “lower level” than before, a pace which might last through 2024, he said, as the bank husbands capital to adhere to upcoming rules.

    He called the new regulatory mandates “hugely disappointing” and pushed for greater transparency from regulators, saying that JPMorgan would have to hold about 30% more capital than European banks.

    “Is that what they want? Is that good, long term?” Dimon asked. “What was the goddamn point of Basel in the first place?”

    When asked about whether the IPO and merger markets were picking up given the upcoming Arm listing, Dimon said he encouraged CEOs to take action rather than waiting too long.

    “I think the uncertainties out there ahead of us are still very large, and very dangerous,” Dimon said.

    Among those risks is the deterioration in relations with China, he said. Prospects for JPMorgan operations in China went from looking bright to only “just OK” because of the rising risks, he said.

    “I don’t expect war in Taiwan, but this can go south,” Dimon said.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Goldman Sachs CEO David Solomon sees Wall Street rebound if tech IPOs perform

    Goldman Sachs CEO David Solomon sees Wall Street rebound if tech IPOs perform

    [ad_1]

    The upcoming spate of tech IPOs could help kickstart muted capital markets, Goldman Sachs CEO David Solomon told CNBC’s David Faber.

    Firms including chip designer Arm and Instacart have filed to go public, and companies that are mulling listings will watch how those IPOs go, Solomon said Thursday during the interview.

    “Over the course of the next few months, especially if Arm and some of these other IPOs go well, I think you’re going to see a meaningful increase in activity,” Solomon said.

    A rebound in IPOs and mergers would be welcome for Goldman and the rest of Wall Street, which has dealt with a dearth of activity in the past year. After coming off a record year for revenue in 2021, Solomon has had to contend with internal dissent and criticism over his decisions and leadership style in a series of unflattering articles.

    Goldman Sachs CEO Solomon: I don't recognize this caricature that's been painted of me

    Solomon addressed the negative coverage, saying repeatedly that he didn’t recognize the “caricature’ of himself portrayed in the stories.

    “It’s not fun, you know, watching some of the personal attacks in the press,” Solomon said. “I don’t recognize the caricature that’s been painted of me. I have a lot of colleagues and clients I talked to, they don’t recognize that caricature either.”

    During the wide-ranging interview, Solomon addressed tougher bank regulation, the paring back of Goldman’s ambitions in consumer finance, and the mergers market. Acquisitions will likely pick up as CEOs regain confidence in the coming months, he said.

    “The sentiment that I’m hearing from CEOs globally is trying to get back at it,” Solomon said, though he cautioned that the mergers rebound would trail that of IPOs.

    Watch CNBC's full interview with Goldman Sachs CEO David Solomon

    [ad_2]

    Source link