ReportWire

Tag: Breaking News: Politics

  • ‘Building up the middle class will be a defining goal,’ Harris says — here’s how she may make that happen

    ‘Building up the middle class will be a defining goal,’ Harris says — here’s how she may make that happen

    [ad_1]

    Vice President and 2024 Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris speaks at a campaign event in Atlanta, Georgia, on July 30, 2024.

    Elijah Nouvelage | Afp | Getty Images

    “Building up the middle class will be a defining goal of my presidency,” Vice President Kamala Harris said at a political event in Atlanta on Tuesday evening.

    “When our middle class is strong, America is strong,” the de facto Democratic presidential nominee said to the crowd of more than 10,000 supporters.

    “And to keep our middle class strong, families need relief from the high cost of living so that they have a chance, not to just to get by, but to get ahead,” she added.

    Here’s a look at how Harris may make that happen, based on the policies she advocated for during her first presidential bid in 2020 and as a senator.

    More from Personal Finance:
    What Kamala Harris’ latest financial disclosure reveals
    What a Kamala Harris administration could mean for you
    Where Kamala Harris could stand on tax policy, experts say

    One of Harris’ signature proposals as senator — the LIFT the Middle Class Act, or Livable Incomes for Families Today — would have provided an annual tax credit of up to $3,000 per person (or $6,000 per couple) for lower- and middle-income workers, on top of the benefits they already receive.

    The size of the credit would have amounted to “significant tax relief,” according to the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget.

    The Harris campaign did not immediately respond to CNBC’s request for comment. 

    How the LIFT Act could look today

    Since the LIFT Act was first proposed in 2018, the cost of living has only skyrocketed, hitting working-class Americans especially hard.

    For these households, “real incomes have declined or remained flat due to inflation,” Tomas Philipson, former chair of the White House Council of Economic Advisers, told CNBC. That makes many workers feel less confident about their financial standing — and less satisfied with President Joe Biden’s handling of the economy.

    At the same time, the rise of artificial intelligence has stoked fears about long-term job security.

    In that context, “there’s a good rationale” for refloating a tax credit for those making under a certain income threshold, according to Laura Veldkamp, a professor of finance and economics at Columbia University Business School.

    “A lot of people are asking the question, ‘Will AI take my job?’ There are people whose hard-earned skills could be obsolete,” she said. “One way to deal with that is to have more social insurance.”

    But a tax credit like LIFT would also be extremely costly, according to Tax Policy Center estimates from 2018 and 2019.

    To help cover the tab for the additional financial support, Harris at the time proposed repealing provisions of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act for taxpayers earning more than $100,000.

    However, funding such a tax credit now could be tough amid growing concerns over the federal budget deficit. Harris will also need to address trillions of expiring tax cuts enacted by former President Donald Trump before 2025.

    How the LIFT Act could support renters

    A present-day version of the LIFT Act may benefit renters the most, as many are part of the income category the tax credit is targeting, according to Francesco D’Acunto, an associate professor of finance at Georgetown University.

    D’Acunto and other experts suggest the LIFT Act might even be a better aid than the 5% rent cap proposal Biden unveiled on July 16. That proposal calls on Congress to cap rent increases from landlords with 50 existing units or more at 5% or risk losing federal tax breaks.

    Harris also supported the idea of rent caps at the campaign rally in Atlanta: “We will take on corporate landlords and cap unfair rent increases.”

    However economists have found that such policies inadvertently bring down the available supply of rental units. And rent-control policies could further affect an already, relatively short supply, according to a report by the Federal Reserve published in February.

    Rental vacancy rates, or the percentage of all units available for rent, measure the tightness of rental markets; the higher the vacancy rate, the easier it is to find housing, per the Fed.

    In 2021, the overall vacancy rate slid to 5.6%, the lowest level since 1984, the central bank found. Supply has since rebounded and plateaued at 6.6% in April, per census data via the Fed.

    While the rent cap may lead consumers to believe prices will not increase significantly, it could have negative side effects, such as landlords taking their properties off the rental market, said Karl Widerquist, an economist and professor of philosophy at Georgetown University.

    Plus, landlords who lose those federal tax breaks will still be able to raise rents, said Jacob Channel, a senior economist at LendingTree.

    The advantage of the LIFT tax credit, said D’Acunto, is that it doesn’t create the same market distortions the rent cap would ignite. “But instead now on the side of the renter, we are actually very directly helping them to defray the effects of rent inflation,” he said.

    Adds Widerquist: “We very often give tax benefits to all homeowners in the name of making it more affordable for people to become homeowners, and we don’t give a similar tax break to people who are paying rent. Those are the people who are struggling to become owners.”

    Child tax credit is a ‘huge priority’ for Democrats

    LIFT was first proposed years before Congress temporarily expanded the child tax credit during the Covid-19 pandemic, which could now be a bigger priority, experts say.

    The American Rescue Plan boosted the child tax credit to $3,000 from $2,000, with an extra $600 for children under age 6 for 2021, and families received up to half upfront via monthly payments. Harris described the child tax credit changes as one of the “most important” and “most impactful” parts of the legislation in a 2021 speech.

    The child poverty rate plunged to a historic low of 5.2% in 2021, largely due to the expansion, a Columbia University analysis found. Then in 2022, the rate more than doubled to 12.4% after pandemic relief expired, according to the U.S. Census Bureau.

    “Whereas the last administration gave tax cuts to billionaires, we gave tax cuts to families through the child tax credit, which cut child poverty in America by half,” Harris said at a political event in North Carolina in late July, before Biden left the race.

    Biden’s fiscal year 2025 budget aimed to restore the 2021 child tax credit increase and House lawmakers in January passed a bipartisan tax package, which included a child tax credit expansion. The Senate has scheduled a procedural vote for the bill on Thursday, which will force lawmakers to take a stand on the issue ahead of November.

    The enhanced tax break is “a huge priority for Democrats,” said Garrett Watson, senior policy analyst and modeling manager at the Tax Foundation. 

    Still, it’s unclear whether Harris, now the clear front-runner for the nomination, will renew calls for LIFT or focus on the child tax credit, which has a different design but a similar goal, he said.

    “It’s very hard to say whether they would revisit specific policy options from so long ago,” said Columbia Business School economics professor Brett House.

    For now, “there are other cultural and political issues that are going to dominate.”

    Don’t miss these insights from CNBC PRO

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Trump proposes strategic national crypto stockpile: ‘Never sell your bitcoin’

    Trump proposes strategic national crypto stockpile: ‘Never sell your bitcoin’

    [ad_1]

    Republican presidential nominee and former U.S. President Donald Trump walks off stage after speaking at a campaign rally at the Van Andel Arena in Grand Rapids, Michigan, on July 20, 2024.

    Anna Moneymaker | Getty Images

    NASHVILLE — Former President Donald Trump said that if he were returned to the White House, he would ensure that the federal government never sells off its bitcoin holdings. But he stopped short of proposing a formal federal reserve of digital currency.

    “For too long our government has violated the cardinal rule that every bitcoiner knows by heart: Never sell your bitcoin,” Trump said during his keynote speech at this year’s Bitcoin Conference in Nashville, the biggest bitcoin conference of the year.

    The former president’s remarks came as the race to capture the votes and the campaign cash of America’s frontline fintech adopters takes center stage in the 2024 presidential contest.

    “This afternoon I’m laying out my plan to ensure that the United States will be the crypto capital of the planet and the bitcoin superpower of the world and we’ll get it done,” Trump said.

    But Trump’s pledge to simply maintain the U.S. government’s current bitcoin holdings was a less radical pitch to the crypto crowd relative to other proposals at the conference.

    Third-party candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr., for instance, during his Friday Bitcoin Conference speech promised to launch a reserve of 4 million bitcoin, starting with the bitcoin holdings that the U.S. government already has stockpiled from criminal seizures. Kennedy said he would mandate the government purchase 550 bitcoin a day until the reserve reached 4 million.

    Shortly after Trump’s speech, Sen. Cynthia Lummis, R-Wy., read out her own legislative proposal to amass an official U.S. federal reserve of 1 million bitcoin over five years.

    “It will be held for a minimum of 20 years and can be used for one purpose: Reduce our debt,” Lummis said.

    The price of bitcoin briefly dipped during Trump’s speech, but recovered and was up slightly for the day, as of 5:15 p.m. E.T.

    Throughout his remarks, the former president worked to draw contrasts between the Republican Party’s growing embrace of crypto versus the hardline regulatory approach that has characterized the Biden administration.

    “The Biden-Harris administration’s repression of crypto and bitcoin is wrong and it’s very bad for our country,” Trump said. “Let me tell you if they win this election, every one of you will be gone. They will be vicious. They will be ruthless. They will do things that you wouldn’t believe.”

    Trump went on to list a series of crypto-friendly promises to a crowd of cheering bitcoin supporters, promising to dismantle what he called the “anti-crypto crusade” of President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris.

    “On day one, I will fire Gary Gensler,” Trump said, referencing the Biden-appointed chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission who has taken an aggressive approach to crypto regulation.

    The president does not have the power to fire appointed commissioners. Even if Trump were to appoint a new SEC chairman, Gensler would remain a commissioner on the independent agency.

    The former president also pledged to create a “bitcoin and crypto presidential advisory council.”

    “The rules will be written by people who love your industry, not hate your industry,” Trump said.

    The Republican presidential nominee also held an accompanying fundraiser in Nashville, with tickets topping out at $844,600. In June, BTC Inc. CEO David Bailey, who organized the conference, pledged to raise $100 million and turn out more than 5,000,000 voters for the Trump re-election effort, as the bitcoin sector increasingly turns to the Trump camp for support.

    Trump taking the main stage to directly address the bitcoin community is the latest in a months-long campaign to appeal to the crypto contingent, including accepting donations in virtual tokens, pledging to end President Joe Biden’s “war on crypto,” and advocating that all future bitcoin be made in America. It is also quite the about-face by the Republican presidential nominee.

    Trump very publicly dismissed bitcoin when he was in the White House. In July 2019, he said he was “not a fan” of bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies. He said that tokens aren’t money, that their value was “based on thin air,” and warned that unregulated crypto assets could help facilitate the drug trade, among “other illegal activity.”

    “Bitcoin just seems like a scam,” he told Fox in a phone interview in 2021. “I don’t like it because it’s another currency competing against the dollar.”

    “I want the dollar to be the currency of the world, that’s what I’ve always said,” continued Trump in his conversation with Fox.

    But five years, a lost presidential election, and millions of dollars from the crypto lobby later, the Republican presidential nominee sung the praises of the digital currency at the biggest bitcoin conference of the year in Nashville, which kicked off on Thursday.

    “Bitcoin stands for freedom, sovereignty and independence from government coercion and control,” Trump said during his keynote speech.

    Trump’s shift on bitcoin comes as the Republican Party pledges to lift the red tape of the Biden-Harris administration, working to turn crypto regulation into a voting issue for November, especially as inflation consistently ranks as a top voter priority in polls.

    As crypto lobbyists and supporters become more of a presence in Washington, it raises questions on whether the Democratic Party will dig into the hardline regulatory approach of the past several years or ease its position.

    “Every presidential candidate needs to understand, digital asset, pro-innovation voters are here to stay,” Democratic Rep. Wiley Nickel of North Carolina told CNBC in an interview, adding that crypto regulation should not become a “partisan political football.”

    “I want to keep this as a bipartisan issue. I don’t want Donald Trump to politicize this issue,” Rep. Nickel said.

    Rep. Ro Khanna, D-Ca., echoed Rep. Nickel’s sentiment, saying that crypto should not turn into a partisan talking point but will require regulation like any technology.

    “I don’t really see why it’s partisan. Being against bitcoin is like being against cell phones. It’s like being against AI. It’s like being against laptops,” Khanna told CNBC. “It’s a technology. Have thoughtful regulation on the technology, but it’s a technology that has appreciated from about $10,000 to $80,000.”

    Reps. Khanna and Nickel were two of the only Democrats to attend the Bitcoin Conference.

    Bitcoin 2024 conference organizers say they were briefly in talks to have Vice President Kamala Harris appear at the conference, though she ultimately declined. But billionaire businessman Mark Cuban posted on X that the Harris campaign had reached out with questions about crypto, so it appears the vice president is looking into this space and potentially figuring out where her policies, if elected president, could land.

    “I think we’re going to hear from Vice President Harris soon on this. And I’m very optimistic we’re gonna get a reset. And that I think, will matter in a major way,” Rep. Nickel said. “This issue isn’t going anywhere. And we’ve got to make sure we continue to embrace this in bipartisan way.”

    Harris’ team has already begun to reach out to people close to crypto companies to set up meetings, the Financial Times reported on Saturday.

    Bitcoin surges as namesake conference welcomes Donald Trump to Nashville

    Trump’s 180 on bitcoin

    The recent thaw in Trump’s sentiment for the digital asset space has coincided with a sudden influx of interest and cash from the country’s top tech talent.

    He has raised more than $4 million in a mix of cryptocurrencies, including bitcoin, ether, the U.S. dollar pegged stablecoin USDC, and various memecoins, with contributors hailing from 12 states, including a few battlegrounds. 

    Crypto billionaire twins and venture investors Tyler and Cameron Winklevoss led the charge, each contributing 15.57 bitcoin, or just over $1 million at the time of their donation, according to a filing with the Federal Election Commission — though they received a partial refund, because contributions surpassed the $844,600 limit.

    There are a number of other venture capitalists who are pro-crypto, and they’ve pledged millions to the Trump campaign, as well.

    Venture capitalists Marc Andreessen and Ben Horowitz told employees of Andreessen Horowitz (a16z) that they plan to make significant donations to political action committees supporting  Trump’s campaign. The partners of Sequoia Capital are backing Trump, as is venture investor David Sacks, who helped the former president raise $12 million at a fundraiser he hosted in his San Francisco home. The chief legal officers for centralized crypto exchange Coinbase and blockchain giant Ripple were both there.

    These members of the tech elite are also heavily contributing to pro-crypto super PACs like Fairshake, which has raised more than $200 million dollars to elect pro-crypto candidates up and down the ballot, and on both sides of the aisle.

    But reporting from NBC News finds that the vice president’s team is looking to win over support from some of big tech’s undecided donors, many of whom remained on the sidelines while President Joe Biden remained in the race. Their tune may be changing now that the vice president is the de facto nominee for the party.

    It helps that Harris has a long track record in California. 

    She has been fundraising in the tech community for years, including from those working at Amazon, Alphabet, Microsoft and Apple.

    “The pivot that has occurred in the last three days is dramatic,” Steve Westly, a venture capitalist and one-time gubernatorial candidate for California, told NBC News. “I don’t think I’ve ever seen such a surge of enthusiasm in any campaign I’ve been involved with.” 

    This comes as Trump’s running mate for vice president, JD Vance, is set to hold a fundraiser of his own in Palo Alto on Monday. 

    CNBC’s Rebecca Picciotto contributed to this report.

    Bitcoin 2024 conference underway: Here's what to know

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Building the middle class may be a ‘defining goal’ under a Harris presidency — how that may shape a key tax credit

    Building the middle class may be a ‘defining goal’ under a Harris presidency — how that may shape a key tax credit

    [ad_1]

    U.S. Vice President Kamala Harris delivers remarks during a campaign event at West Allis Central High School in West Allis, Wisconsin, on July 23, 2024.

    Kevin Mohatt | Reuters

    “Building up the middle class will be a defining goal of my presidency,” Vice President Kamala Harris said at a political event in West Allis, Wisconsin, on Tuesday — one of her first speeches since becoming the front-runner to replace President Joe Biden as the Democratic candidate for president.

    As the Harris campaign takes shape, tackling the wealth gap is already front and center.

    “When our middle class is strong, American is strong,” she said Tuesday.

    That sentiment revisits an idea she has advocated for previously.

    More from Personal Finance:
    What a Kamala Harris administration could mean for you
    Where Kamala Harris could stand on tax policy, experts say
    JD Vance once called on GOP to fight student loan forgiveness

    One of Harris’ signature proposals as senator — known as the LIFT the Middle Class Act, or Livable Incomes for Families Today — would have provided an annual tax credit of up to $3,000 per person (or $6,000 per couple) for lower- and middle-income workers, on top of the benefits they already receive.

    The size of the credit would have amounted to “significant tax relief,” according to the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget.

    The Harris campaign did not immediately respond to CNBC’s request for comment. 

    How LIFT can help renters

    While the rent cap may lead consumers to believe prices will not increase significantly, it could have negative side effects, such as landlords taking their properties off the rental market, said Karl Widerquist, an economist and professor of philosophy at Georgetown University.

    Plus, landlords who lose those federal tax breaks will still be able to raise rents, said Jacob Channel, a senior economist at LendingTree.

    The advantage of the LIFT tax credit, said D’Acunto, is that it doesn’t create the same market distortions the rent cap would ignite. “But instead now on the side of the renter, we are actually very directly helping them to defray the effects of rent inflation,” he said.

    Adds Widerquist: “We very often give tax benefits to all homeowners in the name of making it more affordable for people to become homeowners, and we don’t give a similar tax break to people who are paying rent. Those are the people who are struggling to become owners.”

    What the LIFT Act would mean today

    Since the LIFT Act was first proposed in 2018, the cost of living has only skyrocketed, hitting working-class Americans especially hard.

    For these households, “real incomes have declined or remained flat due to inflation,” said Tomas Philipson, former chair of the White House Council of Economic Advisers. That makes many workers feel less confident about their financial standing — and less satisfied with Biden’s handling of the economy.

    At the same time, the rise of artificial intelligence has stoked fears about long-term job security.

    In that context, “there’s a good rationale” for refloating a tax credit for those making under a certain income threshold, according to Laura Veldkamp, a professor of finance and economics at Columbia University Business School.

    “A lot of people are asking the question, ‘Will AI take my job?’ There are people whose hard-earned skills could be obsolete,” she said. “One way to deal with that is to have more social insurance.”

    But a tax credit like LIFT would also be extremely costly, according to Tax Policy Center estimates from 2018 and 2019.

    To help cover the tab for the additional financial support, Harris at the time proposed repealing provisions of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act for taxpayers earning more than $100,000.

    However, funding such a tax credit now could be tough amid growing concerns over the federal budget deficit. Harris will also need to address trillions of expiring tax cuts enacted by former President Donald Trump before 2025.

    Focus on the child tax credit

    LIFT was first proposed years before Congress temporarily expanded the child tax credit during the Covid-19 pandemic, which could now be a bigger priority, experts say.

    The American Rescue Plan boosted the child tax credit to $3,000 from $2,000, with an extra $600 for children under age 6 for 2021, and families received up to half upfront via monthly payments

    The child poverty rate plunged to a historic low of 5.2% in 2021, largely due to the expansion, a Columbia University analysis found. Then in 2022, the rate more than doubled to 12.4% after pandemic relief expired, according to the U.S. Census Bureau.

    The Biden economy: How Vice President Kamala Harris can reset the economic debate

    “Whereas the last administration gave tax cuts to billionaires, we gave tax cuts to families through the child tax credit, which cut child poverty in America by half,” Harris said at a political event in North Carolina last week before the president left the race.

    Biden’s fiscal year 2025 budget aimed to restore the 2021 child tax credit increase and House lawmakers in January passed a bipartisan tax package, which included a child tax credit expansion. However, the bill has been stuck in the Senate.  

    The enhanced tax break is “a huge priority for Democrats,” said Garrett Watson, senior policy analyst and modeling manager at the Tax Foundation. 

    Still, it’s unclear whether Harris will renew calls for LIFT or focus on the child tax credit, which has a different design but a similar goal, he said.

    “It’s very hard to say whether they would revisit specific policy options from so long ago,” said Columbia Business School economics professor Brett House.

    For now, “there are other cultural and political issues that are going to dominate.”

    Don’t miss these insights from CNBC PRO

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Kamala Harris has supported affordable housing in the past. This refloated policy might benefit renters

    Kamala Harris has supported affordable housing in the past. This refloated policy might benefit renters

    [ad_1]

    US Vice President Kamala Harris speaks on the South Lawn of the White House in Washington, DC, US, on Monday, July 22, 2024.

    Ting Shen | Bloomberg | Getty Images

    Harris’ record on housing issues

    As attorney general for California, Harris drafted and helped pass the California Homeowner Bill of Rights; it is a set of laws designed to protect homeowners from unfair practices. The California Homeowner Bill of Rights became law on January 1, 2013.

    Harris secured a $18 billion agreement as part of a national multistate settlement to benefit thousands of homeowners who lost their homes due to improper foreclosure or fraud in 2012.

    As senator, Harris introduced the Rent Relief Act in 2018, a bill that offers tax credits to renters who earn below $100,000 and spend over 30% of their income on rent and utilities.

    Harris resubmitted a second variation of the bill in 2019, which includes a mechanism from the Treasury to pay the tax credit on a monthly basis to eligible households. The latter version also caps the credit at 100% of small area fair market rents instead of 150% of FMR.

    Harris last month announced the recipients of an $85 million grant under the Pathways to Removing Obstacles for Housing, or PRO Housing, a first-of-its-kind project through the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development aimed to increase building activity and lower housing and rental costs for families in the U.S.

    That news came on the heels of a May announcement from Harris budgeting $5.5 billion through HUD to boost affordable housing, invest in economic growth, build wealth, and address homelessness in communities across America.

    Such policies come at a time when the country is facing rising homelessness rates and burdensome costs to buy or rent. In 2023, a record 653,100 people experienced homelessness in 2023, up from 256,600 the year prior, according to a report by the Harvard University Joint Center for Housing Studies.

    ‘There’s potential for a lot of good’

    The latest housing policies the Biden Administration has rolled out generally aim at increasing the supply of affordable housing and lowering costs for buyers and renters.

    Harris has been involved in Biden’s housing policy-making, and it’s likely that her campaign will carry on similar blueprints for housing, experts say.

    “Generally speaking, it does seem like affordable housing, zoning has been something that has been a talking point of hers for a while now,” said Jacob Channel, a senior economist at LendingTree. “If they keep on the same course that the Biden administration was on, I think there’s potential for a lot of good.”

    As a Harris candidacy begins to look more likely, people have been talking about a policy Harris originally floated in her 2020 Presidential campaign: the LIFT the Middle Class Act.

    The bill would give a refundable tax credit of up to $3,000 per person, or $6,000 per married couples who file joint tax returns, for qualifying middle- and working-class Americans.

    Some experts point out the LIFT Act might be better for renters than the 5% rent cap increase Biden proposed in mid-July.

    The proposal calls on Congress to cap rent increases from landlords with 50 existing units or more at 5% or risk losing federal tax breaks.

    “The concern with the rent cap is that the supply of housing would change,” said Francesco D’Acunto, an associate professor of finance at Georgetown University.

    While the rent cap may lead consumers to believe that prices will not increase more than a certain amount, it could lead to negative side effects, such as landlords taking their properties off of the rental market, said Karl Widerquist, an economist and professor of philosophy at Georgetown University.

    Landlords who lose access to tax breaks will still be able to raise rents and the plan would exclude new construction and buildings undergoing major renovations, Channel explained.

    The tax credit wouldn’t create the same distortions as the rent cap, and it also targets the negative effects of rent inflation, D’Acunto said.

    To be sure, Harris’ LIFT the Middle Class Act has received push back in the past. While it’s not a perfect policy, the LIFT Act is “essentially an expansion in the right direction,” Widerquist said.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • San Francisco downtown is a ‘ghost town’ that needs revival, mayoral candidate says

    San Francisco downtown is a ‘ghost town’ that needs revival, mayoral candidate says

    [ad_1]

    With San Francisco facing record high commercial vacancies, one mayoral candidate has a plan to reshape the city’s business district and surrounding areas.

    Democrat Mark Farrell, former interim mayor, is proposing a 20-year vision to revitalize San Francisco’s downtown in a bid to help the city bounce back from challenges exacerbated by the pandemic. His plan includes a new park at Embarcadero Plaza and mixed-use buildings that provide more housing options.

    He’s also proposing tax incentives for businesses that relocate to the area, and for those that mandate workers return to the office four days a week. The goal is to incentivize industries beyond technology.

    “As I’ve traveled around the world and in our own country over the past few years for work, other downtowns and other cities have recovered from Covid,” Farrell told CNBC in an interview. “Unfortunately, our city now ranks dead last in economic recovery post-Covid. And that, to me, is an embarrassment and it needs to change.”

    Commercial real estate vacancies in San Francisco hit a fresh high of 34.5% in the second quarter, according to a report last week from Cushman & Wakefield, up from 5% before the pandemic. Manhattan’s vacancy rate for the quarter was 23.6%. Farrell’s goal is to cut San Francisco’s vacancy rate in half by the end of a first term.

    A key piece of Farrell’s plan involves getting workers back into the city. Many of San Francisco’s top employers, including Salesforce, Uber and Visa, have embraced hybrid work, with staffers coming in, at best, three days a week. On top of that, the tech industry has been battered by layoffs over the past two years, removing thousands of people from payrolls.

    Salesforce CEO Marc Benioff goes one-on-one with Jim Cramer

    Under Farrell’s proposal, business that relocate downtown would receive a gross receipts tax incentive, as would companies that compel employees to come to the office four days a week. Such mandates have seen pushback in some cities, most recently in Philadelphia, where unionized city workers lost a bid to extend further an in-person work deadline.

    “Right now, if you come downtown, the issue is, is the lack of people; it’s a shell of what it used to be,” Farrell said. The incentives are designed to make sure “employees come back to work multiple days a week in the office to create that vibrancy that will really bring the future of downtown forward,” he said.

    Public safety is a major concern, as certain parts of downtown San Francisco are rife with drug use and homeless encampments. Farrell is calling for an increase in police staffing, adding that safety and street conditions impact every neighborhood, beyond San Francisco’s downtown core. 

    On Tuesday, Elon Musk said he’s moving the headquarters for X, formerly known as Twitter, to Austin, Texas, from San Francisco. X had already been looking to sublease most of its building in the city, and Musk posted on X on Tuesday, “Have had enough of dodging gangs of violent drug addicts just to get in and out of the building.”

    Conferences and tourism have also been slow to return to the city since the shutdowns that began in early 2020. The park at Embarcadero Plaza would be part of a plan to bring some of that back, Farrell said. He envisions a clean and open park outside of the Ferry Building to draw in workers, residents and tourists. He likened it to Mission Dolores Park, a San Francisco landmark.

    An image commissioned by Mayoral Candidate Mark Farrell’s campaign to show its plans for a new “world class” park on the Embarcadero in the future.

    Courtesy: Farrell for Mayor Commissioned from Gensler

    For housing, Farrell’s plan includes “aggressive tax-increment financing” and local incentives to drive faster housing development as well as conversion of commercial buildings to residential. Farrell is also seeking to increase height limits in neighborhoods including the Financial District, SoMA and Mission Bay to create “tens of thousands” of new units and residents, and encourage more housing in places like Union Square, which recently lost major tenants including Macy’s and Nordstrom.

    Farrell said the idea is akin to New York’s Hudson Yards, which opened before the pandemic. That project was criticized for its hefty price tag, but has since turned into a success story with lower office vacancies than other Manhattan neighborhoods. Farrell said his proposal promises to be a revenue generator for the city but that it needs anchor projects.

    “Right now the problem is downtown,” Farrell said. “We don’t have people working here. And it is a ghost town. And what that translates into is a loss of sales tax revenue, property tax revenue that is decreasing in major ways when buildings are selling for 10 or 20 cents on the dollar. At the end of the day, those resulting commercial property taxes are putting a massive hole in our budget here in San Francisco.”

    Farrell is just one of a number of well-known local candidates, including sitting Mayor London Breed, philanthropist Daniel Lurie and Board of Supervisors President Aaron Peskin. According to the city government’s website, 13 people have qualified for the November mayoral election.

    — CNBC’s Ari Levy and Jordan Novet contributed to this report.

    Don’t miss these insights from CNBC PRO

    San Francisco Fed President Mary Daly: PCE data shows us that monetary policy is working

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Elon Musk plans to give $45 million a month to pro-Trump super PAC, WSJ reports

    Elon Musk plans to give $45 million a month to pro-Trump super PAC, WSJ reports

    [ad_1]

    Elon Musk attends ‘Exploring the New Frontiers of Innovation: Mark Read in Conversation with Elon Musk’ session during the Cannes Lions International Festival Of Creativity 2024 – Day Three on June 19, 2024 in Cannes, France. 

    Marc Piasecki | Getty Images

    Elon Musk has said he is planning to pledge about $45 million a month to a newly formed super PAC backing former President Donald Trump‘s White House bid, the Wall Street Journal reported Monday, citing people familiar with the matter.

    Musk had not given any money to that group, called America PAC, as of the end of June, according to a quarterly financial filing submitted to the Federal Election Commission on Monday evening.

    It is unclear if he has donated in July. Emails to Musk’s associates were not immediately returned late Monday.

    But the super PAC, which was formed in late May, has received contributions from other high-profile entrepreneurs, including Palantir co-founder Joe Lonsdale and crypto billionaires Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss, the filing showed.

    Lonsdale donated $1 million to America PAC through Lonsdale Enterprises, an entity linked to the eponymous tech investor, multiple outlets reported.

    The Winklevoss twins each donated $250,000 to the super PAC, the FEC filing showed.

    Lonsdale could not immediately be reached for comment.

    America PAC brought in $8.8 million and spent $7.8 million between its inception and the end of June, leaving it with just under $1 million in cash on hand, according to the FEC filing.

    Musk, the CEO of Tesla and SpaceX and one of the world’s richest people, officially endorsed Trump on Saturday, minutes after the Republican presidential nominee survived an assassination attempt at a campaign rally.

    The report of Musk’s pledge to help Trump defeat President Joe Biden came on the first day of the Republican National Convention in Milwaukee, where Trump secured enough delegates to officially become the GOP nominee.

    Read the full report from The Wall Street Journal.

    CNBC’s Lora Kolodny contributed to this report.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • World leaders condemn assassination attempt on Trump: ‘Tragedy for democracy’

    World leaders condemn assassination attempt on Trump: ‘Tragedy for democracy’

    [ad_1]

    Republican candidate Donald Trump is seen with blood on his face surrounded by secret service agents as he is taken off the stage at a campaign event at Butler Farm Show Inc. in Butler, Pennsylvania, July 13, 2024. 

    Rebecca Droke | Afp | Getty Images

    World leaders have joined together to condemn the assassination attempt on former U.S. President Donald Trump over the weekend.

    Trump was hit in the ear at a campaign rally in Butler, Pennsylvania, on Saturday. The suspected shooter, identified by the FBI as 20-year Thomas Matthew Crooks, was swiftly killed by Secret Service agents at the scene.

    A bystander was also killed, while two other spectators were critically injured.

    Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said he was “sickened by the shooting” and sent his thoughts to Trump and his fellow Americans.

    European leaders from G-20 countries such as Germany, France, Italy, extended their concern and best wishes to Trump. The UK’s newly elected Prime Minister Keir Starmer said he was “appalled by the shocking scenes” at the rally, adding that “political violence in any form has no place in our societies.”

    French President Emmanuel Macron said on X that the assassination attempt was “a tragedy for our democracies” and his country “shares the indignation of the American people.”

    In Asia, China’s foreign ministry said in a statement that President Xi Jinping had expressed sympathies to Trump, while Japan’s Prime Minister Fumio Kishida emphasized on the importance of standing firm against violence that challenges democracy.

    India’s Prime Minister Narendra Modi — who referred to Trump as “my friend” — said he “strongly” condemned the incident and that “violence has no place in politics and democracies.”

    Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese reiterated the same, and said the campaign event in Pennsylvania was “concerning and confronting.”

    The Kremlin’s spokesman Dmitry Peskov said “Russia has always condemned all manifestations of violence,” according to Reuters, reportedly blaming the U.S. administration for creating an environment provoked the attack.

    In the U.S., both Republicans and Democrats alike came together to criticize the attack and expressed their well wishes to the former president.

    In an Oval Office address on Sunday evening, President Joe Biden emphasized the importance of lowering the temperature in U.S. politics and urged Americans to remember: “We are not enemies. We’re neighbors, we’re friends, co-workers, citizens and most importantly, we’re fellow Americans.”

    “The political record in this country has gotten very heated. It’s time to cool it down. We all have responsibility to do that,” Biden said in his address.

    “Disagreement is inevitable in American democracy. It’s part of human nature. Politics must never be a battlefield and God forbid, a killing field,” he said, adding that he had a call with Trump who is recovering well.

    Vice President Kamala Harris posted on X on Sunday, to say that violence such as this “has no place in our nation” and this “abhorrent act” must be condemned to ensure it does not continue to happen.

    Her words echoed those of former President Barack Obama who voiced that there is “absolutely no place for political violence in our democracy” as he wished Trump a speedy recovery.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • ‘It’s sick’: Biden condemns violence after Trump injured in shooting at campaign rally

    ‘It’s sick’: Biden condemns violence after Trump injured in shooting at campaign rally

    [ad_1]

    President Joe Biden delivered remarks on Saturday evening after former President Donald Trump was injured and rushed offstage when gunshots were fired at his political rally.

    “There’s no place in America for this kind of violence,” Biden said in Rehoboth Beach, Delaware.

    “It’s sick,” Biden said. “It’s sick.”

    “It’s one of the reasons we have to unite this country,” the president said. “We cannot allow for this to be happening. We cannot be like this. We cannot condone this.”

    Biden said he hoped to speak with Trump shortly, adding, “apparently he’s been doing well.”

    Political violence is “just unheard of, it’s just not appropriate, and everybody, everybody must condemn it,” he said.

    President Joe Biden speaks after his Republican opponent Donald Trump was injured following a shooting at an election rally in Pennsylvania, at the Rehoboth Beach Police Department, in Rehoboth Beach, Delaware, July 13, 2024.

    Samuel Corum | Afp | Getty Images

    Asked if he believed the shooting was an assassination attempt against Trump, Biden said he had “an opinion” but wanted to gather more facts before making additional comments.

    Trump’s campaign said shortly after the incident that he is “fine and is being checked out at a local medical facility.” Trump was seen with blood on his face and ear as he was evacuated by Secret Service.

    The U.S. Secret Service said, “the former President is safe,” and that there is an active investigation into the apparent shooting.

    In a written statement earlier Saturday evening, Biden, who is running for reelection against Trump, said that he was glad to hear Trump is “safe and doing well.”

    “I’m praying for him and his family and for all those who were at the rally, as we await further information,” Biden said in the statement.

    “There’s no place for this kind of violence in America. We must unite as one nation to condemn it,” the president said.

    Read more CNBC politics coverage

    The statement and Biden’s remarks followed an outpouring of support for Trump from his political allies and opponents alike, who roundly condemned political violence in all forms.

    Republican presidential candidate and former U.S. President Donald Trump gestures with a bloodied face as multiple shots rang out during a campaign rally at the Butler Farm Show in Butler, Pennsylvania, U.S., July 13, 2024. 

    Brendan Mcdermid | Reuters

    Both of Trump’s presidential predecessors, Barack Obama and George W. Bush, had already shared their relief that Trump appeared not to be seriously injured.

    “There is absolutely no place for political violence in our democracy,” Obama said in a statement on X. “Although we don’t yet know exactly what happened, we should all be relieved that former President Trump wasn’t seriously hurt, and use this moment to recommit ourselves to civility and respect in our politics.”

    Bush said that he and former first lady Laura Bush “are grateful that President Trump is safe following the cowardly attack on his life.”

    Former congresswoman Gabby Giffords, who was shot in the head in a 2011 assassination attempt and has since become a gun control activist, wrote, “Political violence is terrifying. I know.

    “I’m holding former president Trump, and all those affected by today’s indefensible act of violence in my heart. Political violence is un-American and is never acceptable—never,” Giffords wrote.

    Vice President Kamala Harris in a statement said that she and second gentleman Doug Emhoff “are relieved that [Trump] is not seriously injured.”

    “Violence such as this has no place in our nation. We must all condemn this abhorrent act and do our part to ensure that it does not lead to more violence,” Harris said.

    Not every reaction was nonpartisan.

    Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk, a vocal critic of Biden who reportedly recently donated to a pro-Trump super PAC, wrote on X within an hour of the shooting: “I fully endorse President Trump and hope for his rapid recovery.”

    This is developing news. Please check back for updates.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Alec Baldwin ‘Rust’ manslaughter case dismissed by judge

    Alec Baldwin ‘Rust’ manslaughter case dismissed by judge

    [ad_1]

    US actor Alec Baldwin participates in a pretrial hearing in Santa Fe, New Mexico, on July 8, 2024. 

    Ross D. Franklin | AFP | Getty Images

    A New Mexico judge on Friday dismissed the criminal involuntary manslaughter case against Alec Baldwin on the third day of the actor’s trial, after ruling that prosecutors improperly kept evidence about live ammunition potentially related to the case secret from defense lawyers.

    Judge Mary Marlowe Sommer tossed the case against Baldwin, which related to the October 2021 accidental shooting death of cinematographer Halyna Hutchins on the set of his movie “Rust,” with prejudice. That means prosecutors cannot retry the “30 Rock” actor.

    Baldwin wept as the decision was announced, on what was the third day of trial in the case in state court in Santa Fe. He soon after embraced his wife Hilaria.

    “There is no way for the court to right this wrong,” Sommers said, referring to the prosecution’s actions. “The sanction of dismissal is the only warranted remedy.”

    Under U.S. criminal law, prosecutors must turn over evidence to defense lawyers if that evidence is potentially helpful to a defendant.

    A defense lawyer for Hannah Gutierrez-Reed, who served as the armorer on the “Rust” production, in a statement said he will seek her immediate release from prison, where she is currently serving an 18-month prison sentence after being convicted in March of involuntary manslaughter in Hutchins’ death.

    Guitierrez-Reed’s lawyer, Jason Bowels, said the prosecution in Baldwin’s and his client’s case had engaged in an “absolutely shocking” pattern of misconduct.

    Baldwin in an Instagram post on Saturday morning wrote, “There are too many people who have supported me to thank just now.”

    “To all of you, you will never know how much I appreciate your kindness toward my family,” Baldwin wrote.

    Brian Parrish, a lawyer for Hutchins’ widower Matthew Hutchins, in a statement, said, “We respect the court’s decision,” but vowed to pursue civil claims against Baldwin.

    US actor Alec Baldwin and his wife Hilaria Baldwin embrace during his trial on involuntary manslaughter at Santa Fe County District Court in Santa Fe, New Mexico, on July 12, 2024. 

    Ramsay De Give | AFP | Getty Images

    Hours before she dismissed the case on Friday, Sommer sent jurors home for the weekend after receiving a motion from Baldwin’s attorneys asking her to toss the charges.

    The judge then conducted a hearing on the defense’s claims, which cited the ammunition in the possession of prosecutors, which had not been previously disclosed to Baldwin’s team by prosecutors.

    “We don’t know if it’s a live ammunition match or not,” Baldwin’s attorney Luke Nikas told Sommer, according to the Associated Press. “But we do know that the state had it, and it’s disclosable.”Prosecutors in turn claimed that the ammo was not related to the case.

    On Friday night, Erlinda Johnson Ocampo, who had been a special prosecutor on the team in Baldwin’s case, said she quit the team midday Friday after learning a day earlier that ammunition had been given to law enforcement on the heels of the shooting which had not been disclosed to defense lawyers.

    “We have an obligation as prosecutors, we have an obligation not only to the people, but to the defendant and our obligation is to make sure that all the evidence is turned over,” Ocampo told Chris Cuomon on NewsNation. “We don’t get to decide what the defense is going to be. Our job is to ensure transparency, and to ensure that the defendant has everything that the prosecution has gathered.”

    The dismissal comes 16 months after the charges against Baldwin were first tossed out by prosecutors after they said “new facts” had emerged that required further investigation.

    The case was refiled against him earlier this year.

    Judge Mary Marlowe Sommer speaks during a pretrial hearing in Santa Fe, New Mexico, on July 8, 2024. US actor Alec Baldwin is facing a single charge of involuntary manslaughter in the death of a cinematographer.

    Ross D. Franklin | ADP | Getty Images

    Baldwin was rehearsing a scene when a revolver he was handling fired, killing the 42-year-old Hutchins.

    Since the shooting, Baldwin has denied that he pulled the trigger of the weapon and said that he had been told the gun was unable to be fired when it was handed to him.

    He had faced the possibility of being sentenced to 18 months in prison if convicted in the case.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Taiwan on alert over ‘waves’ of missile tests in north China

    Taiwan on alert over ‘waves’ of missile tests in north China

    [ad_1]

    Military vehicles carrying DF-5B intercontinental ballistic missiles participate in a military parade at Tiananmen Square in Beijing on October 1, 2019, to mark the 70th anniversary of the founding of the Peoples Republic of China.

    Greg Baker | AFP | Getty Images

    Taiwan’s defense ministry said on Saturday it was monitoring “waves” of missile tests taking place in China’s far northern region of Inner Mongolia and that its air defense forces were on alert.

    Democratically governed Taiwan, which China views as its own territory, keeps a close watch on all Chinese military activities given Beijing’s regular activities around the island, but only rarely releases details of what it sees taking place inside China.

    The ministry said that from 4 a.m. (2000 GMT on Friday) it had detected “multiple waves of test launches” by China’s Rocket Force in Inner Mongolia, which lies some 2,000 km (1,200 miles) from Taiwan.

    Taiwan’s forces are continuously monitoring developments and the air defense forces are on alert, the ministry said, without giving details.

    China’s defense ministry did not answer calls seeking comment outside of office hours. The Rocket Force is in charge of China’s conventional and nuclear missile arsenal.

    In August 2022, China fired missiles into the waters around Taiwan during war games to express anger at a visit to Taipei by then-Speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives Nancy Pelosi.

    Taiwan operates powerful radar stations on some of the peaks of its central mountain range that can look far into China, according to security sources.

    China detests Taiwan President Lai Ching-te, who took office in May, calling him a “separatist”, and has increased its military pressure including war games since his inauguration.

    Lai has repeatedly offered talks with China but been rebuffed. He rejects Beijing’s sovereignty claims, saying only Taiwan’s people can decide their future.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Biden’s proposed rent caps ‘will work’ but can’t be ‘broad brushed’, says Fmr. Gov. Howard Dean

    Biden’s proposed rent caps ‘will work’ but can’t be ‘broad brushed’, says Fmr. Gov. Howard Dean

    [ad_1]

    Hosted by Brian Sullivan, “Last Call” is a fast-paced, entertaining business show that explores the intersection of money, culture and policy. Tune in Monday through Friday at 7 p.m. ET on CNBC.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • France’s Macron wanted to leave his mark on Europe — he may have just ruined his legacy

    France’s Macron wanted to leave his mark on Europe — he may have just ruined his legacy

    [ad_1]

    French President Emmanuel Macron on a campaign poster back in 2022.

    Sebastien Salom-gomis | Afp | Getty Images

    French President Emmanuel Macron’s failed snap election gamble is likely to take a large toll on his political ambitions and legacy, analysts say — and to weaken the power and influence he has sought to build in Europe in recent years.

    The final round of a snap parliamentary election in France last weekend — called by Macron after his center-right party was trounced in recent European Parliament elections — led to a surprise win for the left-wing New Popular Front alliance, thwarting an expected victory for the far-right National Rally party.

    Center-right Macron, who will remain in office until 2027, now faces the prospect of having to work with a coalition or technocratic government — and a prime minister — of a different political ilk, likely from the left-wing NFF. This is set to make governing France, the passing of legislation and reforms, potentially difficult.

    Not only did Macron’s high-stakes gamble with the snap poll not pay off, analysts note, but the French head of state has damaged his political standing and legacy in Europe, where he has sought a key leadership role.

    “In terms of his legacy, he will be in for a real political fight,” Tina Fordham, founder of Fordham Global Foresight, told CNBC on Monday.

    “Macron remains the towering figure and kingmaker. It will be him who chooses the prime minister, it’ll be Macron that travels to Washington for the 75th [anniversary] NATO summit this week, but those who are suggesting that his gamble paid off [are wrong],” Fordham said on CNBC’s “Squawk Box Europe.”

    “Yes, he was able to keep the far right from first place but they’ve increased their seat share — and now he has to deal with this unruly left and this unruly right,” she added.

    “I’m afraid it probably does [weaken him on a global stage] at a time which is unfortunate for the cohesion of the European Union,” she added.

    Macron looked to be the EU’s leader

    Since taking office in 2017 after the departure of his former boss, then-Socialist President Francois Hollande, Macron has tried to position himself at the center of Europe’s political decision-making — particularly since the departure of the European Union’s most central leader, former German Chancellor Angela Merkel, in 2021.

    Macron has pushed for closer political and economic integration in the EU, promoting the concept of European sovereignty, economic security and competitiveness, as well as pushing for a more integrated and autonomous European defense strategy that advocates for a “true, European army.”

    He’s credited with creating the European Political Community, bringing leaders from across 50 states in the region to discuss shared challenges and to coordinate joint responses. Macron has also been a staunch supporter of Ukraine, putting pressure on a seemingly more reluctant Germany — and on fellow NATO members — when it came to the supply of Western weapons to Kyiv for it to fight back against Russia.

    He even pitched the possibility of French troops helping on the ground, albeit controversially, going beyond other allies’ pledges.

    French President Emmanuel Macron and his Ukrainian counterpart Volodymyr Zelenskyy react after signing an agreement, February 16, 2024 at the Elysee Palace in Paris, France. 

    Pool | Via Reuters

    Only time will tell what France’s political makeup will be in the coming months, but the country is likely to experience weeks of political wrangling and potential deadlock as the left-wing faction angles itself to lead a new government, and to place one of its own politicians as prime minister.

    Although the decision lies in Macron’s hands, he is likely to come under pressure to select a PM from the left-wing bloc, given it won the largest number of seats in the vote. He might even come under pressure to select Hollande, who ran for the NFP and stands as a strong candidate.

    For now, Macron has rejected his current Prime Minister Gabriel Attal’s resignation and on Monday asked him to stay in the post “to ensure the country’s stability.”

    Political instability in France, the euro zone’s second-largest economy after Germany, does not come at a good time in the global political cycle, Ludovic Subran, chief economist at Allianz, told CNBC on Monday. Subran stressed that it was vital that Macron was aligned with the future prime minister.

    “France is not that weak now, but it is not very good because we are in a state-craft situation with the U.S. and China and imagine what could happen in November if [Republican presidential candidate Donald] Trump gets reelected — we’re going to be tested and tested again and again,” Subran told CNBC’s Charlotte Reed in Paris.

    “I think it’s going to be really important that Macron secures the alignment with his prime minister before he says anything in Brussels or Strasbourg, Subran said. “He’ll have to make sure there’s a paper-thin divide between he and his prime minister when it comes to international issues like Russia, trade, industrial policies and working toward more flexible fiscal policies for France and for the other member countries in Europe.”

    When it comes to Macron’s position in Europe, Subran said it would now “be hard for him to lecture and to sow the seeds of grand projects for Europe when he’s going to be weak domestically.”

    “If [National Rally figurehead Marine] Le Pen races to power in 2027, it’s going to be a very tainted legacy,” he added.

    Mixed legacy

    While Macron is likely to be praised in some quarters for his pro-European, pro-business and pro-trade approach in office, his legacy at home may be more mixed after this snap election — a decision seen by many as a strategic miscalculation, brought about by Macron’s perceived lack of understanding of voter sentiment and, some say, his perceived arrogance.

    It’s a criticism he’s often faced, as well as accusations of failing to understand the everyday concerns of many French citizens, particularly those living outside the main urban centers.

    Mass protest movements such as the “Yellow Vest” action that emerged in 2018 were largely fueled by anger among large sectors of the population at rising fuel and living costs and economic inequality, and what they perceived to be an out-of-touch, elitist political establishment.

    A police vehicle sprays water cannon at protesters during an anti-government demonstration in Paris on January 26, 2019.

    NurPhoto | NurPhoto | Getty Images

    The rise of the far-right National Rally party is also symptomatic of voter concerns, rightly or wrongly, over immigration and what many supporters see as the erosion of French identity and culture.

    His decision in June to call a snap election after his centrist Renaissance party was trounced in the European Parliament elections, was widely seen as a high-stakes gamble. It hasn’t paid off, and France’s uncertain political outlook will likely perturb France’s European partners, one French political scientist told CNBC.

    “Imagine the EU and international partners and allies of France. What must they think of that [decision to call a snap election]?” Philippe Marlière, professor of French and European politics at University College London, said ahead of the final round of the election on Sunday.

    “They must think, ‘what an amateur. What a mistake. What a mess.’ And it is a mess, which is now affecting us all. Because if France isn’t able to be a reliable partner in the EU when it comes to big issues of the world … people will not forget that it was Macron who created the situation in the first place.”

    French President Emmanuel Macron reviews troops that will take part in the Bastille Day parade, July 2, 2024 in Paris, France. 

    Aurelien Morissard | Via Reuters

    He told CNBC that, in France, most people believed that Macron had, in plain English, brought about a big political mess.

    “Everyone in France today, absolutely everyone — I’m yet to hear or meet someone who says it was a great idea — everyone says it’s a major cock-up. It was an unnecessary gamble which badly, very badly, backfired. He didn’t have an absolute majority before the dissolution [of parliament, the National Assembly] but his party was the main party in the National Assembly … so why did he have to dissolve parliament? Only he knows why he did that.”

    “On a scale of political blunders. I would probably give it a 10 out of 10,” Marlière said.

    Read more CNBC politics coverage

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Judge Aileen Cannon grants Trump’s request to pause some deadlines in classified documents case amid immunity questions

    Judge Aileen Cannon grants Trump’s request to pause some deadlines in classified documents case amid immunity questions

    [ad_1]

    Republican presidential candidate and former U.S. President Donald Trump attends the first presidential debate hosted by CNN in Atlanta, Georgia, U.S., June 27, 2024.

    Marco Bello | Reuters

    U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon on Saturday granted former President Donald Trump’s request for further briefing on the issue of presidential immunity in the Mar-a-Lago classified documents case and delayed certain deadlines.

    Cannon’s order marks the latest fallout from the Supreme Court’s presidential immunity decision on Monday, which ruled that Trump has immunity from prosecution for some conduct as president in the federal election interference case.

    In the order, Cannon afforded special counsel Jack Smith the right, but not the obligation, to file a submission on the use of classified information at trial. At the same time, she paused two upcoming deadlines for Trump and his co-defendants.

    Smith’s brief is now due on July 18, and a reply from Trump’s team is due on July 21.

    Neither Trump’s lawyers nor the Department of Justice immediately responded to a request for comment Saturday afternoon.

    There is no trial date in sight in the classified documents case. Trump has pleaded not guilty to all charges.

    The latest development comes after Trump’s attorneys on Friday asked Cannon to pause court proceedings and consider how the Supreme Court’s ruling affects the case. Trump’s team in February had also filed a motion to dismiss the indictment on immunity grounds.

    Saturday’s order also makes Trump’s team busier — at least in the short term — as it attempts to minimize or outright dismiss two of the three other criminal cases pending against him.

    Through an order earlier this week, Judge Juan Merchan, who presided over Trump’s criminal hush money trial earlier this year, stayed Trump’s July 11 sentencing hearing to allow for briefing on Trump’s motion to set aside the verdict in that trial.

    Trump’s brief, which is expected to focus on evidence involving his official acts admitted during the trial to prove his knowledge and intent, is due on July 11. Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s response is due on July 24.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Key housing focus for UK’s Labour Party will be on supply side, Investec analyst says

    Key housing focus for UK’s Labour Party will be on supply side, Investec analyst says

    [ad_1]

    Share

    Aynsley Lammin, equity analyst at Investec, says the U.K. Labour Party’s plan to restore mandatory housebuilding targets is a “quick win” for the sector that should boost planning and supply.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Who is Labour’s Keir Starmer, the likely new leader of Britain?

    Who is Labour’s Keir Starmer, the likely new leader of Britain?

    [ad_1]

    Labour leader Keir Starmer visits Burton and South Derbyshire College on June 27, 2024 in Burton upon Trent, United Kingdom. 

    Cameron Smith | Getty Images News | Getty Images

    LONDON — Britain looks likely to elect its first Labour prime minister in 14 years, with an expected landslide victory for the opposition party during the July 4 elections.

    Keir Starmer would take the country’s top job from Rishi Sunak with exit polls suggesting his left-of-center party could have a majority of around 170 seats.

    Starmer, 61, has had a rapid political ascent after entering U.K. parliament less than a decade ago. But many Britons still know little about the man who has positioned himself as the country’s change candidate.

    CNBC takes a look at the U.K.’s new prime minister and his platform.

    Human rights lawyer-turned-politician

    Starmer was born in 1962 in London, England, to a father who worked as a toolmaker and a mother who worked as a nurse.

    The 61-year-old has often referenced his modest beginnings as a point of connection with British voters and says his mother’s lifelong battle with a severe illness gave him a deep gratitude for the National Health Service (NHS).

    Starmer was the first in his family to go to university, studying law at the University of Leeds. After postgraduate studies at the University of Oxford, Starmer began working as a barrister — or British trial attorney — in 1987, taking on high-profile cases, including against Shell, McDonald’s and former Conservative Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher’s mine closures.

    Starmer also served as a human rights adviser during former Labour Prime Minister Tony Blair’s landmark Northern Ireland Good Friday Agreement.

    In 2008, a year after marrying his wife, Victoria, Starmer became director of public prosecutions, putting him at the head of the U.K.’s Crown Prosecution Service.

    Starmer was knighted in 2014 for his services to criminal justice and was elected to Parliament the following year, serving as immigration minister and Brexit minister for the opposition.

    In 2020, he was appointed Labour leader and instigated a major overhaul of the party after the resignation of Jeremy Corbyn, who led the faction to record loss in the 2019 election.

    Pro-business, pro-reforms, pro-EU

    In his 2024 election campaign, Starmer touted a “decade of national renewal” for the country following what Labour has described as years of spending cuts and falling living standards under the Tories.

    In the party’s election manifesto, published last month, Starmer outlined spending measures to create a new publicly owned energy company, reduce NHS waiting times, build new homes and renationalize rail services.

    Labour leader Keir Starmer gives a speech as he visits the Vale Inn on June 27, 2024 in Macclesfield, United Kingdom.

    Cameron Smith | Getty Images News | Getty Images

    But he also positioned himself as staunchly pro-business, continuing his years-long charm offensive on traditionally right-leaning voters with plans for “wealth creation” and a National Wealth Fund.

    “Economic growth and social justice must go hand in hand,” Starmer said at the launch event of the manifesto.

    Labour has outlined five long-term missions if it comes to power: drive economic growth, invest in green energy, overhaul the NHS, create safer streets, and deliver “opportunity” through a new skills agenda. To aid these goals, Starmer is planning a radical shake-up of government ministries, Labour officials told the FT.

    Starmer, who voted for the Remain campaign not the depart the EU in the U.K.’s 2016 EU referendum, has also pledged to improve the “botched” U.K.-EU deal, including in areas such as trade, research and security. However, he has insisted there is no case for Britain to rejoin the bloc.

    Public image problem?

    Despite his change agenda, Starmer is seen by many as an establishment figure, lacking the charisma of other politicians. A YouGov poll from earlier this year ranked him behind Reform’s Nigel Farage in terms of public popularity — and his rating fell further among younger voters.

    Keir Starmer ready to change the country, Labour's Ashworth says

    Critics have also questioned Starmer’s core values — for example, remaining in Corbyn’s top team even as the party leader faced accusations of antisemitism within Labour. Starmer later suspended Corbyn from the party. Others have accused him of betraying the left by courting business leaders and dropping pledges such as abolishing university fees.

    After a bumpy few years for British politics, though — with three different Conservative prime ministers in 2022 alone — Starmer’s supporters are championing him as a neutral figure of stability after a period of significant political upheaval.

    — CNBC’s Katrina Bishop contributed to this report.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • A key to Biden’s lagging wind energy goal will set sail after the election

    A key to Biden’s lagging wind energy goal will set sail after the election

    [ad_1]

    Wind turbines, solar panels and a coal-fired power station in China.

    Owngarden | Moment | Getty Images

    The United States is producing less than 1% of the wind power it wants to generate by 2030. But an enormous boat promising to change that is about 89% built, and when it’s done next year, the real race to catch up begins.

    The ship, named the Charybdis after a mythological Greek sea monster, won’t set sail until next year, potentially after one of the most pro-green energy administrations in history has left the White House. And as Eric Hines, the director of Tufts University’s offshore wind energy graduate program, puts it, “We’re going to need somewhere on the order of five of these installation vessels in just a few years.”

    The Biden administration wants the U.S. to generate 30,000 megawatts from wind power within the next five and a half years. As of last year, that figure stood at just 42 megawatts, putting the nation far behind Europe — which added 18,300 megawatts of new wind energy capacity in 2023 alone, according to WindEurope.

    In recent years, constructing massive offshore windmills has come with headwinds from supply chain snags to higher interest rates. But the U.S. faces an added logistical puzzle from a 100-year-old maritime law that, along with those other factors, has contributed to project delays and even cancellations.

    The outcome of November’s election isn’t likely to affect the Charybdis, whose operator plans to take advantage of green energy tax credits in the Inflation Reduction Act. But the prospect of a new administration much less keen on renewables could hamper additional projects.

    Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump claimed at a New Jersey rally in May that offshore wind installations harm whales, saying, “We are going to make sure that ends on day one. I am going to write it out in an executive order.” (“There are no known links between large whale deaths and ongoing offshore wind activities,” the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration has said.)

    The first major parts of the boat were laid down in 2020, kicking off a $625 million project between Dominion Energy and Seatrium AmFELS, which is building the massive vessel in its Brownsville, Texas, shipyard. At over 30,000 tons and with 58,000 square feet of deck space, the Charybdis will be able to transport 12 blades at a time, each measuring 357 feet and weighing 60 tons.

    We’re going to need somewhere on the order of five of these installation vessels in just a few years.

    Eric Hines

    Tufts University Professor

    Just as important as its technical specs, the boat will also be able to meet the requirements of the Jones Act, a 1920 merchant marine law that says cargo shipped from one point to another within the U.S. must be carried by an American vessel. And so far, there’s no American vessel capable of carrying wind turbine parts directly from shore to installation sites miles off the coast.

    The Charybdis’ first project will be Dominion’s offshore wind farm under development 24 miles east of Virginia Beach. Once completed, its 176 turbines are expected to deliver 2,600 megawatts of energy, enough to power over 900,000 homes. But to install its first two pilot turbines, it had to stage the parts in Canada to comply with the Jones Act, adding long travel times and related costs.

    “Obviously, you don’t want to install a large project like that,” said Mark Mitchell, the Dominion Energy senior vice president overseeing the Coastal Virginia Offshore Wind project — which, at $9.8 billion, is currently the largest and priciest in the country.

    Instead, the Charybdis will be able to pick up components on the coast, sail out to the wind farm site, and plant itself into the ocean floor using four 30-story legs that will transform the ship into a construction platform. Then, using a crane with a boom longer than 20 full-sized vehicles lined up bumper to bumper, it will begin assembling the turbines.

    After completing the Virginia project, the ship will be available for contract to other offshore wind projects along the nation’s coastline. Mitchell hopes the Charybdis can do more than complete wind farms already in the works, but inspire developers and planners to propose new ones too.

    “It’s a little bit of the chicken or the egg. As we start committing the projects, others can commit to infrastructure like this,” Mitchell said, adding that state and federal incentives will “pass right down to our customers.”

    But in other cases, federal subsidies have not been enough to overcome rising costs. One major reason: the Federal Reserve, which raised interest rates 11 times between March 2022 and July 2023, the fastest pace it has raised rates since the early 1980s.

    It’s a little bit of the chicken or the egg. As we start committing the projects, others can commit to infrastructure like this.

    Mark Mitchell

    Dominion Energy

    Higher interest rates make it more expensive to finance large construction projects like wind farms.

    “The cost of construction is very high,” Hines said. “If you imagine the time while one is constructing a project, you’re not making any money off the project. And so money that you borrow that time to construct the project, there’s a premium on that money, and the lower the interest rates, the better.”

    Last year, Danish company Orsted canceled two projects off the coast of New Jersey, citing “challenging” conditions.

    “Macroeconomic factors have changed dramatically over a short period of time, with high inflation, rising interest rates, and supply chain bottlenecks impacting our long-term capital investments,” Orsted said in October. The company paid the state $125 million to cease development.

    The Biden administration acknowledges the pressure from higher interest rates and points to tax credits in the IRA as a way to offset them.

    “We know that there are a number of different tools that will help us overcome some of those macroeconomic challenges,” said Jeff Marootian, principal deputy assistant secretary for the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.

    He acknowledged that the Biden administration’s goal of 30,000 megawatts of wind energy is “ambitious” but pointed to projects in the pipeline as a sign of things to come. The Energy Department has tallied nearly $6 billion of investments to develop offshore wind over the last few years, including in 17 manufacturing sites and at 15 ports.

    “Those are the kinds of investments that we need to continue to see in order to reach the president’s goals,” Marootian said.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Sen. Warren warns Powell against weakening banking regulations: ‘Do your job’

    Sen. Warren warns Powell against weakening banking regulations: ‘Do your job’

    [ad_1]

    Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., is accusing Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell of doing the financial industry’s bidding by considering changes to a sweeping set of regulations aimed at boosting the capital cushion that large American banks would be required to hold.

    In a June 17 letter first obtained by CNBC, Warren asked Powell for a response to reports that “you are advocating for slashing in half” the increase in capital required under the proposals, known as the Basel III Endgame.

    “I am disappointed by press reports indicating that you are personally intervening—after numerous meetings with big bank CEOs—to delay and water down the Basel III capital rules,” said Warren.

    Last year, three U.S. banking regulators including the Federal Reserve unveiled the proposed rules, a long-expected regime shift around bank capital and risky activities such as trading and lending. The regulations incorporate new international standards created as a response to the 2008 global financial crisis.

    “These rules are critical and long overdue, particularly in the wake of the Silicon Valley and Signature Bank failures, and as risks from the weak commercial real estate market and other economic threats ripple through the banking system,” Warren said.

    Bank CEOs and their lobbying groups have said the increases are unnecessarily aggressive and would force the industry to curtail lending.

    In March, Powell told lawmakers that he expected “broad and material changes” to the proposal in the wake of the industry’s campaign against the rules. JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon coordinated efforts to weaken the rules, urging CEOs to appeal directly to Powell, The Wall Street Journal reported last month.

    “It now appears that you are directly doing the bank industry’s bidding, rewarding them for their extensive personal lobbying of you,” Warren said in her letter. “Taking orders from the industry that caused the 2008 economic meltdown would sacrifice the financial security of middle-class and working families to line the pockets of wealthy investors and CEOs.”

    She further criticized Powell, saying “regulatory rollbacks” under the Fed chair allowed the regional banking crisis of 2023 to happen and “enriched Jamie Dimon and his Wall Street cronies.”

    Warren urged Powell to allow a Federal Reserve Board vote on the original, tougher Basel proposal by the end of this month. The window to finalize and approve the rules ahead of U.S. elections in November is closing, and analysts have said that the proposal could be delayed or killed if Donald Trump is reelected president.

    “Instead of doing Mr. Dimon’s bidding, you should do your job and allow the Board to convene for a vote on a 16% capital increase by June 30th, as global regulators determined was necessary to prevent another financial crisis,” Warren said.

    When asked for a response to Warren’s letter, a Fed spokesperson had this statement on Tuesday morning: “We have received the letter and plan to respond.”

    Don’t miss these exclusives from CNBC PRO

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Trump claims credit for Biden’s insulin price cap

    Trump claims credit for Biden’s insulin price cap

    [ad_1]

    President Joe Biden and former President Donald Trump 2024.

    Kevin Lamarque | Jay Paul | Reuters

    Former President Donald Trump on Saturday recognized that the price of insulin is lower under President Joe Biden, but he still wants voters to credit his own administration.

    “Low INSULIN PRICING was gotten for millions of Americans by me, and the Trump Administration, not by Crooked Joe Biden. He had NOTHING to do with it,” Trump wrote in a Truth Social post. “It was all done long before he so sadly entered office. All he does is try to take credit for things done by others, in this case, ME!”

    The comment comes as Trump lags Biden on the issue of health care, a top voter priority as the November election nears.

    For example, a May survey from KFF, a nonpartisan health policy research group, found Biden with an 11-point lead over Trump on the question of ensuring access to affordable health insurance.

    Biden led on several other health-care-related topics in the poll, though the candidates were relatively split on addressing high health-care costs. The poll surveyed 1,479 U.S. adults from April 23 to May 1 and the margin of error is +/- 3 percentage points.

    The two candidates are expected to have their first face-to-face presidential debate on June 27.

    Insulin price caps have become a central piece of evidence for Biden’s broader economic argument on the campaign trail against Trump.

    Under the Inflation Reduction Act, Biden issued a host of provisions aimed at bringing down the price of medicine for seniors, including capping the price of insulin at $35 per month for Medicare recipients. The president has continued to push for a more universal insulin cap that would cover younger people as well.

    “Instead of paying $400 a month for insulin, seniors with diabetes only have to pay $35 a month!” Biden said at his State of the Union address in March. “And now I want to cap the cost of insulin at $35 a month for every American who needs it!”

    The Democratic incumbent is trying to use lower insulin costs as proof that he has helped lower consumer costs despite the stubbornly high levels of inflation that have loomed over the U.S. economy’s post-pandemic recovery.

    For Trump’s part, the former president signed an executive order in the last year of his administration to issue his own $35 price cap on insulin. Biden later paused that policy when he took office as part of a larger freeze to allow his administration to review new regulations set to go into effect.

    But the memory of Trump-era health-care policies has still dimmed some voters’ views on the track record of the presumptive GOP presidential nominee. A CNBC All-America Economic survey issued in December found that Biden was ahead by 19 points against Trump on health care.

    Trump unsuccessfully spent most of his presidential term trying to repeal the Obama-era Affordable Care Act without offering a viable alternative health-care option. The ACA provides roughly 45 million Americans wit health insurance, according to a March estimate from the White House.

    Trump has doubled down on the promise to replace Obamacare on the 2024 campaign trail, though he has still not outlined what that replacement would look like.

    “I’m not running to terminate the ACA as Crooked Joe Biden says all over the place,” Trump said in a video posted to his Truth Social account in April. “We’re going to make the ACA much better than it is right now and much less expensive for you.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • U.S. ignored evidence major U.K. bank was helping fund sanctioned Iranian groups, whistleblower says

    U.S. ignored evidence major U.K. bank was helping fund sanctioned Iranian groups, whistleblower says

    [ad_1]

    Standard Chartered Plc bank branch in Hong Kong

    Bloomberg | Bloomberg | Getty Images

    Recent documents submitted to a U.S. federal court allege that major British bank Standard Chartered helped finance sanctioned Iranian entities and terrorist groups, and that relevant evidence was ignored by American authorities.

    London-based Standard Chartered, which primarily serves clients in emerging markets, was previously punished with more than a combined $1.7 billion in fines after admitting in 2012 and 2019 to violating sanctions on Iran and other blacklisted countries.

    The bank denies it ran transactions for any organizations designated as terrorists.

    The latest court filings, provided by former Standard Chartered Bank (SCB) employee turned whistleblower Julian Knight, claim that U.S. officials lied by denying that he provided them with evidence of far greater wrongdoing by the bank. The officials then applied to dismiss his whistleblower case against the bank as “meritless” in 2019 in order to shield it, Knight alleged. He has now asked a U.S. federal court in New York to reinstate the case.

    Knight, who led a Standard Chartered transaction services unit between 2009 and 2011, was one of two whistleblowers who gave U.S. investigators confidential bank statements in 2012 and 2013. The statements documenting transactions that he says contained proof of further sanctions breaches, including violations beyond 2007, when the bank said it had stopped any dealings with Iran.

    Knight’s court filing alleges that the U.S. government committed a “colossal fraud” against the legal system by denying he had presented “damning evidence” that Standard Chartered “facilitated many billions of dollars in banking transactions for Iran, numerous international terror groups, and the front companies for those groups,” according to a report by the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists.

    Some of that evidence, the court filing says, showed that the bank’s clients included front companies for Iran’s Revolutionary Guard, Palestinian militant group Hamas, Lebanon’s Hezbollah, and Iran-linked entities in the United Arab Emirates, Kuwait, Germany and other countries. 

    The two whistleblowers alleged that U.S. authorities who investigated Standard Chartered “made false statements to a court in order to have their [Knight’s and his colleague’s] claim for a whistleblower’s reward dismissed” in 2019, the BBC reported.

    The authorities in question, including an FBI agent, said that the whistleblowers’ claims “did not lead to the discovery of any new … violations.” The court then dismissed the case as “meritless.” CNBC has contacted the U.S. Department of Justice for comment.

    The ICIJ report says Knight’s latest claim alleges that the U.S. government “lied that it had conducted ‘a lengthy, costly, and substantial investigation’ into his claims or it was “fully aware” of the transactions he had provided “and simply lied to conceal them,” adding: “The Government’s own statements support the latter scenario.”

    In response to a CNBC request for comment, a Standard Chartered spokesperson described Knight’s court filing as “another attempt to use fabricated claims against the bank, following previous unsuccessful attempts” and said that the “false allegations underpinning it have been thoroughly discredited by the U.S. authorities who undertook a comprehensive investigation into the claims and said they were ‘meritless’ and did not show any violations of U.S. sanctions.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • The SBA is unveiling new credit lines of up to $5 million to fund small businesses

    The SBA is unveiling new credit lines of up to $5 million to fund small businesses

    [ad_1]

    Ira L. Black – Corbis | Corbis News | Getty Images

    The U.S. Small Business Administration plans to unveil new government-backed credit lines of up to $5 million for small businesses, SBA Administrator Isabel Casillas Guzman told CNBC.

    The SBA is launching a working capital pilot program in the coming months that is designed to be more attractive to both lenders and borrowers than the agency’s existing products, Guzman said in a phone interview.

    “An ongoing challenge for small businesses who are trying to go after that contract, perhaps to help us rebuild infrastructure … or a manufacturing facility that’s trying to expand its orders, is being able to have working capital to deliver against that,” Guzman said.

    The project is part of the SBA’s efforts to broaden its flagship lending program for American small businesses. Through its 7(a) loan program, the SBA provides guaranties to lenders to encourage them to extend loans to small business owners.

    The program backed more than 57,000 loans worth $27.5 billion last year, a 7% increase from 2022; most of those loans were for less than $350,000.

    Isabel Guzman, administrator of the U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) nominee for U.S. President Joe Biden, is sworn in during a Senate Small Business and Entrepreneurship Committee confirmation hearing in Washington, D.C., on Wednesday, Feb. 3, 2021.

    Bill Leary | Bloomberg | Getty Images

    But the SBA’s efforts to provide revolving lines of credit have had “less uptake” from lenders and business owners than the agency had hoped, Guzman said.

    The agency’s SBA Express loan, for instance, offers credit lines of up to $500,000, but with a 50% guaranty, which made it less appealing to lenders, she said. Another SBA product called CapLines had a complicated fee structure that wasn’t as affordable, Guzman said.

    “This product is our aim to increase access to a simpler working capital line,” Guzman said. “It basically takes the best of our various options to create a pilot program to see if we can get more borrowers an affordable working capital line, versus just a pure reliance on credit cards” or other capital sources,  she said.

    The SBA’s new working capital lines will have an annual fee and maximum interest rates based on the prime rate plus 3% to 6.5%, which would be roughly 12% to 15% today, according to the agency. They will allow small business owners to either fund specific projects or borrow against their assets.

    Loans larger than $150,000 will have a 75% guaranty by the SBA, limiting the losses that lenders face if customers can’t repay their debts. Loans smaller than $150,000 have an 85% guaranty, the agency said.

    “In an environment of higher interest rates, we want to make sure that the SBA is an option for more businesses,” Guzman said.

    Business owners interested in applying when the program goes live should head to the SBA’s website or its pre-screening lender platform, she said.

    Don’t miss these exclusives from CNBC PRO

    [ad_2]

    Source link