ReportWire

Tag: Brad Raffensperger

  • Georgia Gubernatorial Ad Bashes ‘Judas’ Who Betrayed Trump

    [ad_1]

    Georgia’s Republican secretary of State Brad Raffensperger is eternally a MAGA target.
    Photo: Alex Wong/Getty Images

    We’re all used to negative campaign ads, but this inaugural offering from Georgia Republican gubernatorial candidate Rick Jackson is quite the doozy:

    Yes, that’s right. The decidedly un-mom-like mom in this ad sneeringly tells her innocent-looking son that in order to lower expectations for his life, he was named “Brad” after Georgia secretary of State and Jackson gubernatorial-primary rival Brad Raffensperger, who “turned on his own kind” (Republicans? White people?) and consorted with the likes of Stacey Abrams. Mom’s backup name for him, she tells the traumatized child, was “Judas.” In case you missed the connection, the ad ends with the words “Brad ‘Judas’ Raffensperger” across the screen.

    All Raffensperger did to earn this most hateful of epithets (in deeply Christian Georgia, anyway) was to certify Joe Biden’s 2020 presidential win in the state and refuse Donald Trump’s wildly corrupt and inappropriate demand that he “find” enough new votes to change the outcome. Trump tried to purge Raffensperger (along with his co-certifier of the Biden win, Governor Brian Kemp) in a 2022 primary but failed. Now Raffensperger is running for governor (Kemp is term-limited) precisely at the time Trump is reviving his conspiracy-theory-laden take on the 2020 election in Georgia. Just this week, FBI agents and Trump’s director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, were in Atlanta hauling off boxes of 2020 voter files. So Jackson’s toxic ad is designed to arouse fresh MAGA resentment of the public official who “turned on his own kind.”

    Jackson isn’t just a random jerk. A former health-care executive, he’s pledged to spend up to $50 million of his own money in the 2026 race, where he is posing (as you might tell from his ad) as a defender of the president. Trouble is there is already a wacky rich MAGA dude in the race: state lieutenant governor Burt Jones, who was a fake Trump elector in 2020. Indeed, Jones has already been endorsed by the Boss. But Jackson made it clear right away he was as much of a target as “Judas” Raffensperger, as the Atlanta Journal-Constitution reported:

    Jackson, 71, wasted no time at his Wednesday rally at Jackson Healthcare’s opulent Alpharetta campus, calling Jones “a so-called front-runner who was weak as can be and as lazy as the day is long. He wants the title of governor, but not the job.”

    If Jones were to win the nomination, he added to a crowd of hundreds of employees, “we would be risking losing his seat to a radical Democrat — or a Republican who acts like one. I wasn’t willing to sit and let that happen to our president or our great state.”

    Jackson’s surprise entry into the race wasn’t the first unwelcome surprise for Burt Jones in recent months. During the Christmas holidays, TV viewers in Georgia were treated to a $5 million barrage of ads accusing the lieutenant governor of corruption. They were bought by a shadowy PAC, and all of Jones’s gubernatorial rivals denied having anything to do with it. Is it possible Rick Jackson was the mystery donor for these nasty-grams aimed at softening up Jones? Nobody knows, but the plot has thickened. And we do know Jackson doesn’t have a problem with running negative ads.

    The irony is that Jackson may help Raffensperger win by splitting the MAGA vote and battling with Jones in a way that distracts attention from the secretary of State’s perfidious behavior in refusing to steal an election for Trump. There’s also a fourth major candidate, Attorney General Chris Carr, who agreed with Raffensperger and Kemp about the 2020 results but has gone out of his way to be lovey-dovey with the 45th and 47th president ever since he trounced his own Trump-endorsed primary opponent in 2022. There are all kinds of murder-suicide scenarios on the table for this fractious Republican field.

    And victory-minded Republicans are aware this could be a good year for Democrats in Georgia as elsewhere. Yet another survivor of the Republican civil war Trump set off in Georgia in 2022, then–Republican lieutenant governor Geoff Duncan, is now running for governor as a Democrat, though former Atlanta mayor Keisha Lance Bottoms and former Labor commissioner Mike Thurmond lead him in the polls.

    It could be a wild ride to November in the state Trump just can’t leave alone.

    [ad_2]

    Ed Kilgore

    Source link

  • ‘I want to turn chaos into conversations’: Geoff Duncan wants to be Georgia’s Next Governor

    [ad_1]

    “On day one as governor, I’ll sign an executive order that allows doctors to practice medicine with pregnant women without the fear of prosecution. Secondly, I’ll introduce legislation that repeals the six-week ban and returns us to Roe v Wade. That’s my promise and I’m sticking to it,” said Duncan (left) during his interview at The Atlanta Voice on Monday, Sept. 22, 2025.
    Photo by Tabius McCoy/The Atlanta Voice

    Former Georgia Lt. Governor Geoff Duncan came to The Atlanta Voice for the first time on Monday, Sept. 21, to discuss his campaign for governor. Duncan is one of nearly a dozen candidates who have launched campaigns this year. Last week, Duncan visited a Black-owned small business in what looked like a concerted effort to speak directly to Black voters. A former Republican, Duncan, is running as a Democrat and believes there’s a place for a governor who appeals to both sides.

    “I do have a track record of working across the aisle,” he said. “I want to turn chaos into conversations.” 

    The Atlanta Voice: Good morning, Mr. Duncan, and welcome to WAREHOUSE Studios on the campus of The Atlanta Voice. Let’s get right to it. Why did you decide to run for governor?

    Geoff Duncan: I really feel like Georgia’s best days are in front of us and I want to lead all Georgians to those better days. In my role as Lieutenant Governor I saw how important the job as governor can be. I really feel there’s an opportunity to prioritize folks in the state that need it the most.

    Duncan listed affordable child care, unemployment, and housing cost, and healthcare as issues he plans to tackle during his campaign.

    AV: Any other issues taking place in Georgia that you believe should be addressed on the campaign trail going forward?

    GD: Quite honestly, we have a Donald Trump crisis, too. This guy has leaned into our state in such a negative way. Not only trying to steal the 2020 [presidential election], but now he’s essentially putting rural hospitals in a crisis. We have a Donald Trump crisis, and I am willing to stand up and push back.

    Photo By Tabius McCoy/The Atlanta Voice

    AV: Does your experience as Lt. Governor give you an advantage over your opponents in this race?

    GD: Absolutely. I learned a lot as Lt. Governor. In the four years that I was in office, we went through a pandemic, which was unbelievable for everybody ….I don’t even know what to refer to the pandemic as. We woke up one day, and there was 10 percent unemployment. We also had to navigate the difficult realities of civil unrest and the horrific murder of Ahmaud Arbery, amongst others. And we had to deal with the 2020 election trying to be stolen by a sitting President. I learned a lot about leadership. I learned a lot about myself. I learned a lot about Georgians, and that’s really what’s led me on this journey. I think most Georgians just want somebody to lead their state that stays focused on the issues that matter most.

    AV: What are some of those issues?  

    GD: Being able to allow folks to raise their kids in safe communities, being able to have access to quality education and quality healthcare, the ability to find a high-paying quality job. Those are the things we want to stay focused on. Too often in politics, folks are staying focused on the fringe issues because it’s a hyper-partisan environment.

    If Georgians want to elect somebody who’s going to be hyper-partisan and call names, then they are not going to vote for me. If they want a consistent leader who shows up to work every day focused on the issues that matter, I think we have a good shot to win this.

    Duncan was clear that he believes current Georgia Governor Brian Kemp has been good for the state.  “He is doing a good job of leading our state forward. Our economy continues to grow. I think he handled COVID extremely well, and I was glad to work alongside him and the Legislature on a number of the COVID relief actions. But there’s more work to be done in the state.” 

    AV: What do you believe you can bring to the governor’s office that the other candidates cannot? 

    GD: I have been behind the curtain, and I realize how important the job of governor is. You get to write the first draft of the budget. You get to prioritize what is going to be nearly $40 billion, understanding how those agencies work, and understanding what dollars are effective and what dollars don’t seem to be effective. You get to prioritize what’s going on in the Legislature as the chief negotiator between constituencies. 

    And it’s not just Democrats versus Republicans at the Legislature. There are a lot of constituencies, rural and urban, and others, where you have to broker deals. The governor has to play a significant role. You put all that together, and the job of governor is important, and I feel like I have got a really good head start on understanding how that operates. 

    AV: Former Atlanta Mayor Keisha Lance Bottoms, State Rep. Jason Esteves, and former DeKalb County CEO Michael Thurmond are also running to represent the Democratic Party in this race. All have high levels of name recognition with Democratic voters in two of Georgia’s largest counties, Fulton and DeKalb counties, respectively. Do you believe your level of name recognition will help you as well?

    GD: I think more important than name recognition is my platform. I think my platform meets the needs, meets those individuals, meets those counties where they are. 

    AV: Please explain.

    GD: I know I keep talking about affordability, but it’s a reality folks are facing. There are folks who are going to read this who are scared about just paying rent next month. They are worried about being able to afford groceries when they go to the store. My platform is laser-focused on meeting folks where they are at.  

    I think amongst Democrats, my name ID is high because I have been willing to stand up to Donald Trump, even when it wasn’t politically popular.  

    Former Georgia Lieutenant Governor Geoff Duncan (above, left, at The Black Coffee Co. on Wednesday, Sept. 17, 2025) and current Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger have joined the long list of Democrats and Republicans running for the state’s top spot. Photo by Julia Beverly/The Atlanta Voice

    AV: Was the visit to The Black Coffee Company an attempt to begin reaching out to the Black voter base in Atlanta?

    GD: One of my areas of focus has been on the Black community, for sure. Such an important part of the election, but more importantly, part of the state. The importance is to learn perspective, to understand what people need, where people’s hearts are at, and where their concerns are at.

    On Sunday, Duncan and his wife attended service at Allen Temple AME Church, one of the city’s oldest Black church communities.

    AV: Why do you believe Democratic voters should trust you? Why should they believe you have similar Democratic values now?

    GD: Those are great questions. Two parts: One is that I do have a track record of working across the aisle on an overwhelming majority of the issues. Two, some Republicans want to point fingers and call me names, saying ‘Geoff Duncan has lost his mind’. I haven’t lost my mind, I found my heart. I want to love my neighbor, that’s my mission each and every day. I want to look for ways to use the state of Georgia as that vehicle for us to love our neighbors.

    Duncan, 50, married and a father of three, admitted that he “got guns and abortion wrong” as a “young Republican legislator.”

    “I fell into that trap of thinking the NRA and other groups had people’s best interests at heart. They don’t,” he said. 

    He added, “I was wrong to think a room full of legislators knew better than millions of women in this state. I have taken the time to talk to them, hear their horrific stories, and tough circumstances in situations. I believe they deserve the right to choose and day one as governor, “I’ll sign an executive order that allows doctors to practice medicine with pregnant women without the fear of prosecution. Secondly, I’ll introduce legislation that repeals the six-week ban and returns us to Roe v Wade.

    That’s my promise and I’m sticking to it.”

    [ad_2]

    Donnell Suggs

    Source link

  • Duncan, Raffensperger add names to the Governor’s race 

    [ad_1]

    Former Georgia Lt. Governor Geoff Duncan (above, right) spoke to customers inside The Black Coffee Co. on Wednesday, Sept. 17, 2025. Duncan announced his intentions to run for governor in 2026. Photo by Donnell Suggs/The Atlanta Voice

    Former Georgia Lieutenant Governor Geoff Duncan and current Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger have joined the long list of Democrats and Republicans running for the state’s top spot. 

    Duncan will run for governor as a Democrat after years of being a highly vocal and supportive Republican. On Wednesday morning, he dropped by The Black Coffee Company, a small business on Jonesboro Road on the city’s southwest side, to discuss the importance of supporting small businesses. Upon his arrival, Duncan, wearing a blue striped polo, matching khakis, and sneakers, was greeted by one of the shop’s co-owners and proceeded to walk in and talk shop with him and other small business owners. 

    After learning the backstory of how The Black Coffee Company got started, Duncan said the business, which now has multiple locations, including in the Atlanta University Center, had an amazing story.

    “To go from a dream to a business, that’s an amazing story,” Duncan said. “I think the customers that are in here feed off of this story.”

    The Black Coffee Company is a popular spot for small business owners and work-from-home folks, and on Wednesday, the shop was packed with people tapping on laptops and sipping coffee and tea.

    It could not have been a better time or place for a candidate looking to switch political allegiances to show his face. To do it at a Black-owned business feels more strategic than anything else. Duncan ordered a small plain black coffee and complimented the mural on the wall near the entrance. Among the famous faces in the mural are Georgia Senator Jon Ossoff and one of Duncan’s Democratic primary candidates, former Atlanta Mayor Keisha Lance Bottoms.   

    Duncan (above) took questions from the media after visiting with the owners of The Black Coffee Company on Wednesday, Sept. 17, 2025. Photo by Donnell Suggs/The Atlanta Voice

    In a statement to the media announcing his candidacy, Duncan said in part:  

    “As Georgia’s first Democratic governor in 28 years, I will stand up to Trump and his yes men in our state while bringing down the costs of childcare, health care, and housing so every Georgia family is in the best position possible. That’s what Georgia deserves,” Duncan said in a statement announcing his campaign that was sent to The Atlanta Voice.

    A falling out with the MAGA set led Duncan, 50, to change his political tune. On the Democratic ticket, he will join Georgia State Senator Jason Esteves, Georgia State Representative Derrick Jackson, former DeKalb County CEO and Georgia Labor Secretary Michael Thurmond, and Olu Brown. The latter, a preacher and educator, has no previous political experience.

    The four men of color on the list each participated in a gubernatorial forum in Warner Robins last month. Republican candidate Ken Yasger, a former United States Marine who has been vocal about his struggles with alcohol abuse, was also in attendance. Like Brown, Yasger is a political neophyte. Former Atlanta Mayor Keisha Lance Bottoms is also campaigning to lead the Democratic ticket next year. Bottoms was not in Warner Robins on August 20, but neither were the Republican gubernatorial candidates, Georgia Attorney General Chris Carr, and Georgia Lt. Governor Burt Jones. Current Georgia Governor Brian Kemp has publicly endorsed registered Republican Derek Dooley.

    Duncan is not new to campaigning in front of Democratic voters. During former United States President Kamala Harris’s historic presidential campaign, Duncan made multiple public endorsements and appearances for her campaign.

    “Georgians deserve leaders with the courage to take on Donald Trump and do what’s right,” said Duncan in that statement.

    Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger (above, center) made an appearance in Clayton County on Monday, August 18, 2025. On Wednesday, Sept. 17, 2025, he announced his intentions to run for Georgia governor. Photo by Donnell Suggs/The Atlanta Voice

    Raffensperger might not make too many public appearances at Black-owned small businesses, after all, he is not switching parties, and remains a staunch Republican. The Secretary of State was, however, a small business owner and spoke about the importance of making small business dreams a reality during a visit to Clayton County and the Riverdale Towne Center last month. Clayton County has a majority Democratic voting block, and Raffensperger might have been tipping his hand when he visited there to discuss small business ownership with the Clayton County Chamber of Commerce. 

    In a statement to the media announcing his candidacy, Raffensperger said in part:  

    “Hardworking Georgians are struggling to put food on the table. Parents worry about their kids being indoctrinated in the classroom. Too many families live in fear of gangs, cartels, and violent criminals,” said Raffensperger.

    “Our future is in peril, yet cowardly politicians cave to well-funded special interests and political elites—sacrificing the well-being of our families to advance their own agenda.”

    [ad_2]

    Donnell Suggs

    Source link

  • Talking small business success on the Southside: Raffensperger speaks with business owners in Clayton County

    [ad_1]

    Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger (seated, left) was introduced to a room full of Clayton County business owners and local government officials on Monday morning. Photo by Donnell Suggs/The Atlanta Voice

    RIVERDALE, GA. – On Monday morning, the Clayton County Chamber of Commerce and City of Riverdale hosted a conversation between Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger and local business owners. The event took place in a conference room inside the Riverdale Town Center. The roundtable was the first of similar conversations scheduled to take place as part of a small business information series.

    Raffensperger was one of a small handful of white people in the room. Of the nearly 300,000 Clayton County residents, almost 70% are Black, according to data from the United States Census. The large majority of small business in Clayton County, the seventh largest county in the state, are Black-owned and operated.

    There will be several high-profile elected offices up for grabs in 2026, including the officer of governor, so an appearance from Raffensperger in Clayton County is less typical than it would be during an election year.

    Sitting beside Raffensperger at a table in the front of the room was Riverdale Mayor Dr. Evelyn Wynn-Dixon.

    Raffensperger (center) speaking with local elected officials before the start of the roundtable in Riverdale on Monday, August 18, 2025. Photo by Donnell Suggs/The Atlanta Voice

    “I know you from the television and I want to make one thing clear, he’s an honest man,” Wynn-Dixon said of Raffensperger. “I want to let the people know he’s working for us.”

    Riverdale City Manager Dr. Natasha Hampton introduced Raffensperger, and listed a number of his personal and professional accomplishments

    Raffensperger said his office is taking part in similar local events in order to hear from voters and business owners. He spoke about free and fair elections

    “One of the reasons we hold these roundtables is to give people hope,” Raffensperger said. “Did you know that Apple started with two guys in a garage.”

    He said he is noticing a big push on a national level to bring manufacturing jobs back to the United States. He believes this is important in order for people to not only survive, but thrive.

    “We need to make sure much of that comes back to Georgia,” he said.

    The room inside the Riverdale Town Center was packed for Raffensperger’s appearance. Photo by Donnell Suggs/The Atlanta Voice

    Raffensperger shared stories of meeting his wife Trisha as a junior in high school, getting married in college, growing his small business, and the untimely death of one of their three sons to a Fentanyl overdose.

    During his speech, Raffensperger mentioned programs created by his office and other state agencies to help small businesses. He used “She Leads”, a program for women-owned businesses, that are available for residents. Raffensperger also mentioned financial literacy programs for high school students, seniors, and military families.

    The Secretary asked the crowd a question before taking questions.

    “What could we do in Georgia to really help you power your business further?”

    He took questions from Mayor Wynn-Dixon, local officials, and local business owners, including an owner of a child care consulting firm. A question on how artificial intelligence is affecting the workforce in Georgia.

    “As a business owner I would encourage you to join your local chamber,” Raffensperger said. “As it relates to A.I., it’s going to affect some careers, for the good and the not so good.

    The audience asked Raffensperger about how he made it from being in the construction business to local politics to statewide politics. He explained the timeline, and joked that his father didn’t like politicians, “But maybe he would forgive me since I was his son,” he joked.

    “You can run for school board, you can run for city council,” Raffensperger said. “I highly recommend everyone to get a mentor. I think finding a mentor is invaluable.”

    The topic of tariffs was also mentioned during Raffensperger’s speech. He was sure to mention that he was talking about back in 2003 under the George H.W. Bush administration and steel manufacturers as the businesses which were affected.

    Raffensperger did not mention the tariffs being out in place under the current presidential administration, nor was he asked about it.

    [ad_2]

    Donnell Suggs

    Source link

  • Georgia secretary of state’s office says it repelled cyberattack

    Georgia secretary of state’s office says it repelled cyberattack

    [ad_1]

    The secretary of state’s office was the target of an unsuccessful cyberattack earlier this month, the agency confirmed to CBS News on Wednesday. 

    An official with the secretary of state’s office said the attack was an attempt to crash the absentee voting website, and it was discovered when the agency noticed a spike in attempts to access the site nine days ago, on Oct. 14. There were over 420,000 attempts made from around the world, which the official said was a coordinated attempt to make the website crash.

    Security experts were ultimately able to thwart the attack. The secretary of state’s office said it still does not know who was behind the attack but suggested it may have been a foreign country. 

    Gabriel Sterling, chief operating officer for the office, wrote Thursday evening in a social media post that “this was a big win for our cyber security team and our partners. We work everyday to protect Georgia voters and our systems.” In a separate post, he said, “The attack was detected and mitigated quickly.” CNN first reported the cyberattack attempt.

    The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency is aware of the cyberattack and worked with the Georgia secretary of state’s office in the aftermath of the incident, sources confirmed to CBS News. The FBI declined to comment.

    Georgia voters have also been showing up for early voting, which began on Oct. 15. Early voters shattered records this year for the presidential election, the secretary of state’s office said, more than doubling early voting figures from 2020 on the first day, with 310,000 ballots cast, compared with 136,739 on the first day of early voting in 2020.

    Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger predicted there would be record turnout in Georgia this year, telling CBS News’ Margaret Brennan on “Face the Nation” Sunday, “You look at the turnout — we’re almost pushing 1.4 million who’ve already voted early or who we’ve accepted their absentee ballots.”

    and

    contributed to this report.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Trump-backed Georgia State Election Board mandates ALL paper ballots be hand-counted in 2024 Elections

    Trump-backed Georgia State Election Board mandates ALL paper ballots be hand-counted in 2024 Elections

    [ad_1]

    The Georgia State Election Board approved a rule that forces poll workers to count paper ballots by hand. The measure passed 3-2 Friday. Despite the new rule flying against the advice of the Attorney General’s office, the Secretary of State’s office and a group of county election officials. 

    Here is how the new rules would work: three poll workers hand count ballots, sorting them into stacks of fifty ballots until all have been counted. The three workers must arrive at the same total. If that number doesn’t match those recorded on the voter check-in system, the electronic voting machines and the scanner recap forms, the poll manager is to determine the reasons for inconsistency. If possible, the workers and the poll manager must correct the errors.

    Attorney General Chris Carr warned of possible illegal condct. In his letter, he says:

    “The Board has no authority to promulgate rules regarding the classification or retention of documents,”and promulgation of the rule would very likely go beyond the scope of the Board’s authority and be subject to challenge as invalid.

    Full Chris Carr letter to State Election Board

    The fallout from 2020 continues to persist

    In August, former President Donald Trump praised the three officials that would eventually affirm the measure. 

    “They’re on fire. They’re doing a great job.” “Janice Johnston, Rick Jeffares and Janelle King, three people are all pit bulls fighting for honesty, transparency and victory,” Trump said.

    Janelle King, a member voting in favor of the new rule, argued that the board was “creating more stability in our election process”. She believes they are providing election officials the room to ensure that the final results are accurate.

    On August 15th, Georgia Secretary of State (and the previous administrator of Georgia’s elections) Brad Raffensperger lampooned the proposed rules.

    “Activists seeking to impose last-minute changes in election procedures outside of the legislative process undermine voter confidence and burden election workers,” Raffensperger said in a news release.

    These actions are a result of a series of actions taken by Trump allies over the past three years. Their goal since Trump lost in 2020 has been to fundamentally reshape election administration in Georgia. After Raffensperger refused to ‘find 11,780 votes’, the Georgia Legislature stripped him of his powers. In August 2024, the Georgia State Election Board voted for Attorney General Carr to investigate the Fulton County government. This request has been long on the minds of MAGA Republicans and Donald Trump alike. 

    Democrats and some Republicans are fighting back

    Democrats said during an August press conference that these moves could sow chaos and uncertainty following the elections. 

    “What is unfolding in Georgia is nothing less than an effort to subvert democracy and move us backward,” U.S. Rep. Lucy McBath, D-Marietta, said Monday during a news conference at the state Capitol. “We must not allow our State Election Board to be taken over by Donald Trump.”

    Two Georgia Republicans and a non-profit organization filed a lawsuit challenging anti-democratic rules passed by the MAGA members of the State Election Board (SEB).

    “These misguided, last-minute changes from unelected bureaucrats who have never run an election and seem to reject the advice of anyone who ever has could cause serious problems in an election that otherwise will be secure and accurate,” Raffensperger said in a statement released on August 15.

    Also, the Democratic National Committee and the Democratic Party of Georgia Sued the State Election Board for taking similar stances.

    The final day to register to vote in the 2024 Presidential Election in Georgia is Monday, October 7th. Early voting in Georgia begins on October 15.  The earliest possible date new rules could take effect if passed is October 14, which is just 22 days before the General Election. 

    [ad_2]

    Itoro N. Umontuen

    Source link

  • 21 Donald Trump election lies listed in his new indictment | CNN Politics

    21 Donald Trump election lies listed in his new indictment | CNN Politics

    [ad_1]


    Washington
    CNN
     — 

    Special counsel Jack Smith said Tuesday that the January 6, 2021 attack on the US Capitol was “fueled by lies” told by former President Donald Trump. The indictment of Trump on four new federal criminal charges, all related to the former president’s effort to overturn his defeat in the 2020 election, lays out some of those lies one by one.

    Even in listing 21 lies, the 45-page indictment does not come close to capturing the entirety of Trump’s massive catalogue of false claims about the election. But the list is illustrative nonetheless – highlighting the breadth of election-related topics Trump was dishonest about, the large number of states his election dishonesty spanned, and, critically, his willingness to persist in privately and publicly making dishonest assertions even after they had been debunked to him directly.

    Here is the list of 21.

    1. The lie that fraud changed the outcome of the 2020 election, that Trump “had actually won,” and that the election was “stolen.” (Pages 1 and 40-41 of the indictment)

    Trump’s claim of a stolen election whose winner was determined by massive fraud was (and continues to be) his overarching lie about the election. The indictment asserts that Trump knew as early as 2020 that his narrative was false – and had been told as such by numerous senior officials in his administration and allies outside the federal government – but persisted in deploying it anyway, including on January 6 itself.

    2. The lie that fake pro-Trump Electoral College electors in seven states were legitimate electors. (Pages 5 and 26)

    The indictment alleges that Trump and his alleged co-conspirators “organized” the phony slates of electors and then “caused” the slates to be transmitted to Vice President Mike Pence and other government officials to try to get them counted on January 6, the day Congress met to count the electoral votes.

    3. The lie that the Justice Department had identified significant concerns that may have affected the outcome of the election. (Pages 6 and 27)

    Attorney General William Barr and other top Justice Department officials had told Trump that his claims of major fraud had proved to be untrue. But the indictment alleges that Trump still sought to have the Justice Department “make knowingly false claims of election fraud to officials in the targeted states through a formal letter under the Acting Attorney General’s signature, thus giving the Defendant’s lies the backing of the federal government and attempting to improperly influence the targeted states to replace legitimate Biden electors with the Defendant’s.”

    4. The lie that Pence had the power to reject Biden’s electoral votes. (Pages 6, 32-38)

    Pence had repeatedly and correctly told Trump that he did not have the constitutional or legal right to send electoral votes back to the states as Trump wanted. The indictment notes that Trump nonetheless repeatedly declared that Pence could do so – first in private conversations and White House meetings, then in tweets on January 5 and January 6, then in Trump’s January 6 speech in Washington at a rally before the riot – in which Trump, angry at Pence, allegedly inserted the false claim into his prepared text even after advisors had managed to temporarily get it removed.

    5. The lie that “the Vice President and I are in total agreement that the Vice President has the power to act.” (Page 36)

    The indictment alleges that the day before the riot, Trump “approved and caused” his campaign to issue a false statement saying Pence agreed with him about having the power to reject electoral votes – even though Trump knew, from a one-on-one meeting with Pence hours prior, that Pence continued to firmly disagree.

    6. The lie that Georgia had thousands of ballots cast in the names of dead people. (Pages 8 and 16)

    The indictment notes that Georgia’s top elections official – Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger – a republican – explained to Trump in a phone call on January 2, 2021 that this claim was false, but that Trump repeated it in his January 6 rally speech anyway. Raffensperger said in the phone call and then in a January 6 letter to Congress that just two potential dead-voter cases had been discovered in the state; Raffensperger said in late 2021 that the total had been updated and stood at four.

    7. The lie that Pennsylvania had 205,000 more votes than voters. (Pages 8 and 20)

    The indictment notes that Trump’s acting attorney general Jeffrey Rosen and acting deputy attorney general Richard Donoghue had both told him that this claim was false, but he kept making it anyway – including in the January 6 rally speech.

    8. The lie that there had been a suspicious “dump” of votes in Detroit, Michigan. (Pages 9 and 17)

    The indictment notes that Barr, the attorney general, told Trump on December 1, 2020 that this was false – as CNN and others had noted, supposedly nefarious “dumps” Trump kept talking about were merely ballots being counted and added to the public totals as normal – but that Trump still repeated the false claim in public remarks the next day. And Barr wasn’t the only one to try to dissuade Trump from this claim. The indictment also notes that Michigan’s Republican Senate majority leader, Mike Shirkey, had told Trump in an Oval Office meeting on November 20, 2020 that Trump had lost the state “not because of fraud” but because Trump had “underperformed with certain voter populations.”

    9. The lie that Nevada had tens of thousands of double votes and other fraud. (Page 9)

    The indictment notes that Nevada’s top elections official – Secretary of State Barbara Cegavske, also a Republican – had publicly posted a “Facts vs. Myths” document explaining that Nevada judges had rejected such claims.

    10. The lie that more than 30,000 non-citizens had voted in Arizona. (Pages 9 and 11)

    The indictment notes that Trump put the number at “over 36,000” in his January 6 speech – even though, the indictment says, his own campaign manager “had explained to him that such claims were false” and Arizona House Speaker Rusty Bowers, a Republican who had supported Trump in the election, “had issued a public statement that there was no evidence of substantial fraud in Arizona.”

    11. The lie that voting machines in swing states had switched votes from Trump to Biden. (Page 9)

    This is a reference to false conspiracy theories about Dominion Voting Systems machines, which Trump kept repeating long after it was thoroughly debunked by his own administration’s election cybersecurity security arm and many others. The indictment says, “The Defendant’s Attorney General, Acting Attorney General, and Acting Deputy Attorney General all had explained to him that this was false, and numerous recounts and audits had confirmed the accuracy of voting machines.”

    12. The lie that Dominion machines had been involved in “massive election fraud.” (Page 12)

    The indictment notes that Trump, on Twitter, promoted a lawsuit filed by an alleged co-conspirator, whom CNN has identified as lawyer Sidney Powell, that alleged “massive election fraud” involving Dominion – even though, the indictment says, Trump privately acknowledged to advisors that the claims were “unsupported” and told them Powell sounded “crazy.”

    13. The lie that “a substantial number of non-citizens, non-residents, and dead people had voted fraudulently in Arizona.” (Page 10)

    The indictment alleges that Trump and an alleged co-conspirator, whom CNN has identified as former Trump lawyer Rudy Giuliani, made these baseless claims on a November 22, 2020 phone call with Bowers; the indictment says Giuliani never provided evidence and eventually said, at a December 1, 2020 meeting with Bowers, “words to the effect of, ‘We don’t have the evidence, but we have lots of theories.”

    14. The lie that Fulton County, Georgia elections workers had engaged in “ballot stuffing.” (Pages 13 and 14)

    This is the long-debunked lie – which Trump has continued to repeat in 2023 – that a video had caught two elections workers in Atlanta breaking the law. The workers were simply doing their jobs, and, as the indictment notes, they were cleared of wrongdoing by state officials in 2020 – but Trump continued to make the claims even after Raffensperger and Justice Department officials directly and repeatedly told him they were unfounded.

    15. The lie that thousands of out-of-state voters cast ballots in Georgia. (Page 16)

    The indictment notes that Trump made this claim on his infamous January 2, 2021 call with Raffensperger, whose staff responded that the claim was inaccurate. An official in Raffensberger’s office explained to Trump that the voters in question had authentically moved back to Georgia and legitimately cast ballots.

    16. The lie that Raffensperger “was unwilling, or unable,” to address Trump’s claims about a “‘ballots under table’ scam, ballot destruction, out of state ‘voters’, dead voters, and more.” (Page 16)

    In fact, contrary to this Trump tweet the day after the call, Raffensperger and his staff had addressed and debunked all of these false Trump claims.

    17. The lie that there was substantial fraud in Wisconsin and that the state had tens of thousands of unlawful votes. (Page 21)

    False and false. But the indictment notes that Trump made the vague fraud claim in a tweet on December 21, 2020, after the state Supreme Court upheld Biden’s win, and repeated the more specific claim about tens of thousands of unlawful votes in the January 6 speech.

    18. The lie that Wisconsin had more votes counted than it had actual voters. (Page 21)

    This, like Trump’s similar claim about Pennsylvania, is not true. But the indictment alleges that Trump raised the claim in a December 27, 2020 conversation with acting attorney general Rosen and acting deputy attorney general Donoghue, who informed him that it was false.

    19. The lie that the election was “corrupt.” (Page 28)

    The indictment alleges that when acting attorney general Rosen told Trump on the December 27, 2020 call that the Justice Department couldn’t and wouldn’t change the outcome of the election, Trump responded, “Just say that the election was corrupt and leave the rest to me and the Republican congressmen.” (Deputy attorney general Donoghue memorialized the reported Trump remark in his handwritten notes, which CNN reported on in 2021 and which were subsequently published by the House committee that investigated the Capitol riot.)

    20. The lie that Trump won every state by hundreds of thousands of votes. (Page 34)

    The indictment says that, at a January 4, 2021 meeting intended to convince Pence to unlawfully reject Biden’s electoral votes and send them back to swing-state legislatures, Pence took notes describing Trump as saying, “Bottom line-won every state by 100,000s of votes.” This was, obviously, false even if Trump was specifically talking about swing states won by Biden rather than every state in the nation.

    21. The lie that Pennsylvania “want[s] to recertify.” (Page 38)

    Trump made this false claim in his January 6 speech. In reality, some Republican state legislators in Pennsylvania had expressed a desire to at least delay the congressional affirmation of Biden’s victory – but the state’s Democratic governor and top elections official, who actually had election certification power in the state, had no desire to recertify Biden’s legitimate win.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • The Fulton County charges against Donald Trump face a major test Monday. Here’s what to watch for | CNN Politics

    The Fulton County charges against Donald Trump face a major test Monday. Here’s what to watch for | CNN Politics

    [ad_1]



    CNN
     — 

    Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis will lay out the first details of her sprawling anti-racketeering case against former President Donald Trump, his White House chief of staff Mark Meadows and 17 other co-defendants at a federal court hearing on Monday morning.

    This will be the first time that substantive arguments will be made in court about the four criminal cases brought against Trump this year.

    The subject of the hearing, set to begin at 10 a.m., is Meadows’ motion to move his case to federal court and possibly have it thrown out, but it’s much more than that – it could end up acting as a mini-trial that determines the future of Fulton County’s case against the former president.

    Willis is expected to preview the case that she is planning to bring against the 19 co-defendants, getting on the public record some of her evidence and legal arguments for why Trump and his allies broke the law when pressuring Georgia election officials to meddle with the 2020 results.

    Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, who received the January 2021 call from Trump to “find” the votes that would reverse his loss, has been subpoenaed to testify, along with an investigator in his office and two other lawyers who were present on the call.

    Here’s what to watch for:

    Meadows is one of several defendants who have filed to move their cases from Georgia state court to federal court, and Trump is expected to file a similar motion.

    Several defendants who have filed similar removal notices, including ex-Georgia Republican Party chair David Shafer and Cathy Latham, who served as a fake elector, have argued they were acting at Trump’s direction.

    Meadows is arguing that the charges against him in Georgia should be dismissed under a federal immunity claim extended, in certain contexts, to individuals who are prosecuted or sued for alleged conduct that was done on behalf of the US government or was tied to their federal position.

    While he may still face an uphill battle to move his case, Meadows is “uniquely situated” in Willis’ case, said Steve Vladeck, a CNN analyst and professor at the University of Texas School of Law.

    “Folks should be wary of this being a bellwether,” Vladeck said, describing the dispute instead as an “opening salvo in what is going to be a long and complicated series of procedural fights.”

    If US District Judge Steve Jones grants Meadows’ or another defendant’s request to move the prosecution to federal court, it does not ultimately doom Willis’ case.

    For one, it is not clear whether Meadows’ co-defendants would join him in the federal forum, and even if the judge accepts Meadows’ claim that his case should play out in federal court, it does not mean that Jones will buy Meadows’ arguments that the charges against him should be dismissed.

    For instance, in Trump’s New York case, in which he was charged by the Manhattan district attorney with 34 counts of falsifying business records, a federal judge rejected the former president’s bid to move the case to federal court.

    US law allows defendants in state civil suits or criminal cases to seek to move those proceedings to federal court if those defendants face charges based on conduct they carried out “under color” of the federal government.

    While such proceedings are not uncommon in civil lawsuits against current and former federal officials, they are extremely rare in criminal cases, legal experts told CNN, meaning Jones will be navigating in uncertain legal territory.

    “This is just that rare case where there is just not a lot of law,” Vladeck said.

    Meadows is arguing that under the Constitution’s Supremacy Clause, the federal court should dismiss the charges against him, because the conduct underlying the charges was conducted as part of his duties as a close White House adviser to Trump.

    “If Mr. Meadows had absented himself from Oval Office meetings or refused to arrange meetings or calls between the President and governmental leaders, that would have affected his ability to provide the close and confidential advice that a Chief of Staff is supposed to provide,” Meadows’ lawyers wrote in a court filing.

    Beyond Meadows’ participation on the Raffensperger call, Willis has also highlighted as alleged acts in the racketeering conspiracy his surprise visit to an Atlanta election audit and a request Meadows and Trump are said to have made to a White House official to compile a memo on how to disrupt the January 6, 2021, election certification vote in Congress.

    “In order to prevail, Meadows has to convince the court that when he was banging on the audit door he wasn’t representing the private interests of Donald Trump,” said Lee Kovarsky, a University of Texas law professor and expert in the removal statute.

    Willis, in her response to Meadows’ filings, is leaning on a federal law known as the Hatch Act, which prohibits government officials from using their federal office to engage in political activity, including campaign-oriented conduct. She argues Meadows’ involvement in the pressure campaign on Georgia election officials is clearly conduct he was not allowed to engage in as a federal officer, and therefore he is not entitled to the federal immunity defense.

    The Hatch Act framing is a “nice way of illustrating that he was acting outside the scope of his official duties,” Kovarsky said, adding that Willis will not have to prove that Meadows violated the federal statute to be successful in the argument.

    Willis’ filings in the dispute also appear to be a shot across the bow at Trump and any attempt he could make with similar claims.

    “An evaluation of the actions named in the indictment makes clear that all of them were intended to ‘interfere with or affect’ the presidential election in Georgia and elsewhere in order to somehow transform Mr. Trump from an unsuccessful candidate into a successful one,” the district attorney’s office said. “The activities are precisely the type which other courts have already determined to be ‘unofficial’ and therefore beyond the color of the defendant’s office.”

    Key witnesses potentially taking the stand

    Jones, a Barack Obama appointee, has shown that he would like to avoid a circus while also not giving short shrift to Meadows’ arguments, Vladeck said. The orders the judge has already issued have hewed tightly to the relevant statutes and case law, and he has moved the proceedings along efficiently.

    The judge is “by the book, which includes quickly and quietly,” Vladeck said.

    Still, the hearing could feature some revelatory moments, as Willis appears to be preparing to put on the stand several witnesses to the pressure campaign Trump and Meadows are accused of applying to Georgia election officials.

    In addition to Raffensperger, Willis subpoenaed Frances Watson, who was chief investigator in the Georgia secretary of state’s office. According to the grand jury indictment, Meadows arranged a call between Trump and Watson, and texted Watson himself to offer Trump campaign funding toward speeding up a ballot review in Fulton County.

    Willis also subpoenaed two lawyers who were on the Trump-Raffensperger phone call on Trump’s behalf: Kurt Hilbert and Alex Kaufman.

    “The central question is: Were Meadows and Trump acting in the context of … their federal positions, or were they just candidates for office or campaign staff acting in the state of Georgia?” said Elliot Williams, a CNN legal analyst and former Justice Department official. “Raffensperger will come to testify as to, ‘Maybe I actually think these guys were acting on behalf of the campaign, not the presidency.’”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Judge rejects Mark Meadows’ bid to move Georgia election interference case to federal court | CNN Politics

    Judge rejects Mark Meadows’ bid to move Georgia election interference case to federal court | CNN Politics

    [ad_1]



    CNN
     — 

    A federal judge on Friday rejected former White House chief of staff Mark Meadows’ bid to move his Georgia criminal case to federal court, a significant setback for Meadows and a troubling sign for former President Donald Trump.

    US District Judge Steve Jones found that the allegations against Meadows contained in the Fulton County district attorney’s indictment on election subversion charges were largely “related to political activities” and not to Meadows’ role as White House chief of staff.

    “The evidence before the Court overwhelmingly suggests that Meadows was not acting in his scope of executive branch duties during most of the Overt Acts alleged,” wrote Jones, a Barack Obama appointee.

    The Friday ruling has significant implications for the former president and his 18 co-defendants in the Fulton County district attorney’s sprawling racketeering case, though the judge said the ruling did not apply to the other defendants. Meadows was the first of five defendants who already filed motions to move the case to federal court – and Trump is expected to do so, too.

    Meadows unsuccessfully argued that his case, now playing out in Georgia state court, should be moved because the allegations in the indictment were connected to his official duties as White House chief of staff. His lawyers wanted the case in federal court so they could try to get it dismissed altogether, invoking federal immunity extended to certain individuals who are prosecuted or sued for conduct tied to their US government roles.

    The judge’s decision could set the tone for the other defendants also trying to move their cases. It’s an ominous sign for the defendants who are hoping to invoke the same federal immunity protections.

    The judge explicitly stated in his ruling that he is not offering any opinion about Fulton County’s underlying criminal case against Meadows, who has pleaded not guilty.

    Jones wrote in the decision that Meadows had not met even the “‘quite low’ threshold for removal” to federal court, because his activities for the Trump campaign were outside the scope of his federal role as White House chief of staff.

    “The Court finds that the color of the Office of the White House Chief of Staff did not include working with or working for the Trump campaign, except for simply coordinating the President’s schedule, traveling with the President to his campaign events, and redirecting communications to the campaign,” Jones wrote. “Thus, consistent with his testimony and the federal statutes and regulations, engaging in political activities is exceeds the outer limits of the Office of the White House Chief of Staff.”

    The Hatch Act, which prohibits federal officials from engaging in political activity as part of their official duties, was “helpful in defining the outer limits of the scope the White House Chief of Staff’s authority,” the judge said.

    “These prohibitions on executive branch employees (including the White House Chief of Staff) reinforce the Court’s conclusion that Meadows has not shown how his actions relate to the scope of his federal executive branch office. Federal officer removal is thereby inapposite,” the judge wrote in the decision.

    Meadows on Friday swiftly appealed the ruling to the US 11th Circuit Court of Appeals.

    The indictment identifies eight overt acts Meadows allegedly took in furtherance of the scheme to overturn the 2020 election results. Meadows argued that these actions were part of his federal duties – and thus, the case should be moved to federal court – but Jones disagreed.

    “The Court finds insufficient evidence to establish that the gravamen, or a heavy majority of overt acts alleged against Meadows relate to his role as White House Chief of Staff,” Jones wrote, adding that “Meadows failed to provide sufficient evidence that these actions related to any legitimate purpose of the executive branch.”

    One of Meadows’ most critical actions was his participation in Trump’s phone call with Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger in early January 2021, when Trump infamously prodded Raffensperger to “find” enough votes for him to overcome Joe Biden’s margin of victory.

    Jones ruled that this phone call “was made regarding private litigation brought by President and his campaign” and was “therefore outside Meadows’ federal role as an executive branch officer.”

    Meadows other actions in late 2020, including contacts with state lawmakers that Trump hoped would help him undermine the election results, also weren’t tied to his government role, Jones concluded.

    “The Court finds that the underlying substance of those meetings and calls were related to political activities and not to the scope of Meadows’s federal office,” the judge wrote.

    The ruling is also a personal blow to Meadows, who took a significant risk by testifying about the removal bid at a recent hearing, where he was questioned under oath by Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis’ team. Prosecutors could potentially use his testimony against him in future proceedings.

    After the charges against Trump and his 18 co-defendants were filed, the former president’s lawyers signaled they intended to try to move Trump’s case to federal court, just as Trump had unsuccessfully sought to do in his New York criminal case. Trump’s lawyers told the judge overseeing the state case on Thursday that he may seek to move the case to federal court, but they haven’t filed the legal motions yet.

    Trump has 30 days from the time he entered his not-guilty plea to file to move his case.

    CNN has reached out to lawyers for Meadows and Trump for comment.

    In addition to Meadows, Jeffrey Clark, the former Trump administration DOJ official, and three Georgia GOP officials who served as Trump’s fake electors have also filed to move their cases to federal court. Former Georgia Republican Party Chairman David Shafer and former GOP Coffee County Chairwoman Cathy Latham have a joint hearing scheduled on September 20, while the third fake elector seeking federal removal – Shawn Still, a Georgia state senator – has a hearing on September 18.

    While Meadows’ motion was rejected, Shafer, Still and Latham have made a slightly different argument: They say they acted as fake electors at Trump’s direction. But unlike Meadows, who worked in the White House in 2020, the fake electors have a more tenuous link to the federal government, as nominees to serve as real electors for Trump if he won Georgia, who would’ve participated in the federally mandated Electoral College process.

    In his decision Friday, Jones noted that his ruling regarding Meadows “does not, at this time, have any effect on” the other defendants who are also trying to move their case to federal court. Those motions are still pending before Jones, and evidentiary hearings are scheduled for later this month.

    “The Court will assess these Defendants’ arguments and evidence following the forthcoming hearings…. independent of its conclusion” in the Meadows case, Jones wrote.

    There are several reasons why it would be advantageous for Meadows and the other defendants to move their cases to federal court. In addition to making immunity claims under the Constitution’s Supremacy Clause, a federal trial would likely have a jury pool more sympathetic to Trump and his co-defendants.

    While the state courthouse for this case is based in deep-blue Fulton County, the federal court district that includes Fulton also contains the more-Republican northern part of the state.

    At his hearing last month, Meadows surprisingly took the stand trying to help move his case to federal court, testifying for more than three hours about what happened in the White House after the 2020 election.

    Meadows tried to argue that all of his work as the president’s top adviser fit into his role as chief of staff – even when it spilled into politics.

    “It’s still part of my job to make sure that the president is safe and secure and able to perform his job. And that’s what I was doing,” Meadows said, later adding, “serving the president of the United States and … it takes on all kinds of forms.”

    But the Fulton County prosecutors peppered Meadows with questions about how his official job involved things like setting up phone calls involving campaign lawyers, such as Trump’s infamous January 2021 phone call Raffensperger.

    Jones concluded that some of Meadows’ high-stakes testimony on the witness stand was lacking – and even used some of it against him in the ruling.

    “When questioned about the scope of his authority, Meadows was unable to explain the limits of his authority, other than his inability to stump for the President or work on behalf of the campaign,” Jones wrote, saying he would give Meadows’ testimony on that topic “less weight” than the other evidence.

    Jones also cited Meadows’ acknowledgment that the lawyers he included in the phone call with Georgia’s secretary of state were working for Trump or his campaign – not the government.

    Fulton County prosecutors also subpoenaed Raffensperger to testify at Meadows’ hearing, where Raffensperger said plainly there was no role for the federal government in certifying Georgia’s elections.

    “It was a campaign call,” Raffensperger testified.

    This story has been updated with additional details.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Conservative Voting Group Sued Over Refusal To Produce Ballot-Harvesting Evidence

    Conservative Voting Group Sued Over Refusal To Produce Ballot-Harvesting Evidence

    [ad_1]

    ATLANTA (AP) — The Georgia State Election Board is asking a judge to order a conservative voting organization to produce information to help investigate its claims of ballot trafficking in the state.

    The Texas-based True the Vote group filed complaints with Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger in November 2021, including one saying it had received “a detailed account of coordinated efforts to collect and deposit ballots in drop boxes across metro Atlanta” during the 2020 general election and in a runoff election in January 2021.

    True the Vote’s assertions were relied upon heavily for the film “2000 Mules,” a widely debunked film by conservative pundit and filmmaker Dinesh D’Souza. The film featured surveillance video from drop boxes in Atlanta’s suburbs showing people depositing multiple ballots. A State Election Board investigation found that those people were submitting ballots for themselves and family members who lived with them, which is allowed under Georgia law.

    In the court filing Tuesday, the state attorney general’s office asked a Fulton County Superior Court judge to order True the Vote to comply with its subpoena.

    “After multiple good faith efforts by the SEB (State Election Board) and its counsel to obtain the requested information and documents, True the Vote continues to indifferently vacillate between statements of assured compliance and blanket refusals,” leaving the election board with no choice but to turn to the courts, the filing says.

    Two attorneys who have represented True the Vote in the matter did not immediately respond to emails seeking comment Wednesday.

    True the Vote’s complaint said its investigators “spoke with several individuals regarding personal knowledge, methods, and organizations involved in ballot trafficking in Georgia.” One of those people, referred to in the complaint only as John Doe, “admitted to personally participating and provided specific information about the ballot trafficking process.” Doe is alleged to have outlined a “network of non-governmental organizations” that paid people to collect and deliver absentee ballots.

    The group said it was able to confirm patterns of activity to support the allegations using surveillance video and geospatial mobile device information. In a September 2021 letter, Vic Reynolds, who was director of the Georgia Bureau of Investigation at the time, said the evidence produced did not amount to proof of ballot harvesting.

    After receiving the group’s complaints two months later, Raffensperger’s office opened an investigation. Investigators in April 2022 issued subpoenas to True the Vote for relevant documents and information, including the identity and contact information for people who True the Vote said provided details about the alleged ballot trafficking.

    A lawyer for True the Vote in May 2023 wrote a letter to a state attorney saying that a complete response to the subpoenas would require the organization to identify people to whom it had promised confidentiality and that it could not do that. The lawyer wrote that True the Vote was withdrawing its complaints.

    State Election Board Chair William Duffey responded in a letter two weeks later, saying that the board’s investigation into True the Vote’s “serious allegations” was ongoing. Therefore, he wrote, he would not allow the complaints to be withdrawn and asked the state attorney general’s office to seek enforcement of the subpoenas.

    A lawyer for True the Vote in June wrote in a letter that True the Vote had already provided some of the information requested to the Georgia Bureau of Investigation but declined to provide the identities and contact information for people described in its complaints “because doing so may put those persons in physical or personal jeopardy.”

    One man falsely accused in the film of committing ballot fraud has filed a still-pending federal lawsuit against True the Vote, D’Souza and others. Surveillance video in the film shows Mark Andrews, his face blurred, depositing five ballots in a drop box in downtown Lawrenceville, a suburb northeast of Atlanta, ahead of the 2020 election. A voiceover by conservative pundit and filmmaker Dinesh D’Souza says: “What you are seeing is a crime. These are fraudulent votes.”

    A state investigation found that Andrews was dropping off ballots for himself and his three adult children.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Rudy Giuliani, Brad Raffensperger speak with Jan. 6 investigators

    Rudy Giuliani, Brad Raffensperger speak with Jan. 6 investigators

    [ad_1]

    Rudy Giuliani, Brad Raffensperger speak with Jan. 6 investigators – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger spoke with federal prosecutors Wednesday as part of an investigation into efforts to overturn the 2020 election. The meeting likely focused on a 2021 phone call between Raffensperger and then-President Trump, where Trump was recorded telling Raffensperger to “find” the votes to reverse Joe Biden’s win in Georgia. CBS News chief election and campaign correspondent Robert Costa joins “Prime Time” to discuss the significance of the interview.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Report finds widespread misconduct in Women’s Soccer League: CBS News Flash Dec. 15, 2022

    Report finds widespread misconduct in Women’s Soccer League: CBS News Flash Dec. 15, 2022

    [ad_1]

    Report finds widespread misconduct in Women’s Soccer League: CBS News Flash Dec. 15, 2022 – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    A new report from the National Women’s Soccer League and players union finds ongoing and widespread misconduct at more than half the clubs, going back a decade, including instances of sexual abuse and manipulation coming from those in power. Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger is calling for an end to runoff elections. And Part Two of the Harry and Meghan docu-series is out on Netflix today.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Strong midterm turnout in Georgia sparks new debate about a controversial election law | CNN Politics

    Strong midterm turnout in Georgia sparks new debate about a controversial election law | CNN Politics

    [ad_1]



    CNN
     — 

    The strong turnout in Georgia’s runoff election that cemented Democrats’ control of the US Senate is sparking fresh debate about the impact of the state’s controversial 2021 election law and could trigger a new round of election rule changes next year in the Republican-led state legislature.

    Voters showed up in droves for the midterms, with more than 3.5 million casting ballots in the December 6 runoff – or some 90% of the general election turnout, a far higher rate than typical runoffs. And top Republicans in Georgia, including Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, argued those numbers refute claims that the 2021 law was designed to suppress votes in this increasingly competitive state.

    “There’s no truth to voter suppression,” Raffensperger said in an interview this week with CNN’s Kaitlan Collins, a day after Democratic Sen. Raphael Warnock secured reelection in the first federal election cycle since Georgia voting law took effect.

    Georgia Democrats and voting rights groups, however, continue to criticize the 2021 law – enacted in the wake of Democratic gains two years ago – as erecting multiple barriers to voting. And the surging turnout, they said, masked extraordinary efforts by voters and activists to overcome both new and longstanding obstacles to the franchise in this once deep-red state.

    “Just because people endured long lines that wrapped around buildings, some blocks long … doesn’t mean that voter suppression does not exist,” Warnock said during his victory speech Tuesday – echoing a theme he made repeatedly on the campaign trail. “It simply means that you, the people, have decided that your voices will not be silenced.”

    Warnock’s victory Tuesday solidified Georgia’s standing as a battleground state and comes after Warnock and fellow Democratic Sen. Jon Ossoff won runoffs in the 2020 election cycle. In that election, President Joe Biden became the first Democratic presidential nominee to win the Peach State in nearly three decades.

    Voting rights activists said the 2021 law made it harder to cast a ballot in myriad ways: It limited the number and location of ballot drop boxes, instituted new ID requirements to vote by mail and shortened the window for a runoff from the nine weeks in the 2020 election to four weeks, contributing to long lines during the early voting period.

    Additionally, the voter registration deadline fell on November 7 – the day before the general election and before Georgians knew for certain that the contest would advance to a runoff because neither Warnock nor his Republican challenger Herschel Walker had surpassed the 50% threshold to win outright in the general election.

    In the 2020 election cycle, at least 23,000 people who registered after Election Day went on to vote in the Senate runoff in January 2021, according to an analysis of Georgia’s Secretary of State data by Catalist, a company that provides data, analytics and other services to Democrats, academics and nonprofit issue-advocacy organizations.

    And only an 11th hour court victory for Warnock and Democrats paved the way for counties to hold early in-person voting on the Saturday after Thanksgiving. State election officials had opposed casting ballots on that date, saying Georgia law prohibited voting on a Saturday if there is a state holiday on the Thursday or Friday before.

    “It’s death by a thousand cuts,” Kendra Cotton, CEO of the voting rights group New Georgia Project Action Fund, said of the new restrictions. “They are not trying to hit the jugular, so you bleed out at once. It’s these little nicks, so you slowly become anemic before you pass out.”

    “It’s a margins game,” she added. “I wish folks would stop acting like the purpose of SB202 was to disenfranchise the masses. Joe Biden won this state by a little less than 12,000 votes. I can guarantee you that there are more than 12,000 people across this state who were eligible to vote in this election and they could not.”

    Even Cotton’s 21-year-old daughter, Jarah Cotton, became ensnared.

    The younger Cotton, a Harvard University senior, said she had planned to vote absentee in November’s general election – but misunderstood a new requirement of Georgia’s law: that she print out her online application for absentee ballot, sign it “with a pen and ink” and then upload it.

    In the runoff, Jarah Cotton said she successfully completed her application for an absentee ballot but did not receive it before she returned home to Powder Springs, Georgia, for the Thanksgiving holiday.

    The court ruling permitting voting the Saturday after Thanksgiving allowed her to cast an in-person ballot in the runoff – but only after her family paid $180 to delay her return flight to Boston by a day.

    “I don’t think it should be this hard,” Jarah Cotton said of her experience. “It should be more straightforward, but I think that’s reflective of the voting process in Georgia.”

    Gabriel Sterling, the chief operating officer in the secretary of state’s office, said too many critics of the state’s voting process are comparing the 2022 election with the ease of voting during the height of the pandemic in the 2020 election cycle when election officials across the state “moved heaven and earth” to guarantee the franchise.

    That so many people voted in a four-week runoff shows “the system works really well,” he told CNN in an interview Friday. “The problem now is that it that is has become so politicized. I’ve been saying now, for 24 months, that both sides have to stop weaponizing election administration.”

    Voting rights activists say the state’s runoff system, first enacted in 1964, itself is a vestige of voter-suppression efforts from the state’s dark past. Its original sponsor sought to guarantee that candidates backed by Black Georgians could not win outright with a plurality of the vote.

    Most states decide general election winners based on which candidate gets the most votes, unlike Georgia, where candidates must win more than 50% of the votes cast to avoid a runoff.

    Runoffs also are costly affairs.

    A recent study by researchers at Kennesaw State University estimated that the Senate runoffs in the 2020 election cycle had a $75 million price tag for taxpayers.

    In the CNN interview earlier this week, Raffensperger suggested that the Republican-controlled General Assembly might revisit some of the state’s election rules, including potentially lowering to 45% the threshold needed to win a general election outright.

    He also said he wanted to work with counties to guarantee more polling places are available to ease the long lines voters endured during the early voting window in the runoff.

    And Raffensperger said lawmakers might weigh a ranked-choice instant runoff system. In so-called instant runoffs, voters rank candidates by order of preference. If one candidate doesn’t receive more than 50% of the vote, voters’ second choices would be used to determine the winner, without the need to hold a second election.

    Given the shortened runoff schedule in Georgia, state lawmakers instituted the instant runoff for a narrow slice of voters – those in the military and overseas – in this year’s midterms.

    “There will be a push for this in the upcoming legislative session,” said Daniel Baggerman, president of Better Ballot Georgia, a group advocating for the instant runoff.

    “It’s asking a lot from voters” to show up again for a runoff “when there’s a simple way that achieves the same outcome,” he said.

    Sterling agreed that there “needs to be a discussion about general election runoffs,” but he said he worries that moving to an instant runoff system risks disenfranchising a wide swath of Georgians who might not understand the process without “a tremendous amount of voter education.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Michigan and Georgia Secretaries of State on

    Michigan and Georgia Secretaries of State on

    [ad_1]

    Michigan and Georgia Secretaries of State on “The Takeout” – 12/2/2022 – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson and Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger join Major Garrett on “The Takeout” to discuss the 2020 and 2022 elections. Raffensperger says “serious times require serious candidates.” Benson says she still faces threats over the 2020 election.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link