ReportWire

Tag: Border Patrol

  • US spent $40M to deport roughly 300 migrants to nations other than their own: Democratic report

    [ad_1]

    WASHINGTON — The Trump administration spent at least $40 million to deport roughly 300 migrants to countries other than their own as immigration officials expanded the practice over the last year to carry out President Donald Trump’s goals of quickly removing immigrants from the U.S., according to a report compiled by the Democratic staff of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.

    The Democrats on the Foreign Relations panel, led by Sen. Jeanne Shaheen, criticize the practice of third country deportations as “costly, wasteful and poorly monitored” in the report and call for “serious scrutiny of a policy that now operates largely in the dark.”

    The State Department, which oversees the negotiations to implement the programs, has stood behind the practice of third country deportations and defended it as a part of Trump’s campaign to end illegal immigration.

    “We’ve arrested people that are members of gangs and we’ve deported them. We don’t want gang members in our country,” Secretary of State Marco Rubio responded when asked about some of the third country deportations at a Senate hearing last month.

    The report, which is the first congressional review of the agreements, found lump sum payments ranging between $4.7 million and $7.5 million to five countries – Equatorial Guinea, Rwanda, El Salvador, Eswatini and Palau – to deport migrants to those nations. El Salvador has received about 250 Venezuelan nationals in March last year, while the other nations received far fewer deportees, ranging from 29 sent to Equatorial Guinea to none sent to Palau so far, according to the report.

    The nations examined in the report are just a fraction of the Trump administration’s overall work to deport migrants to third countries. According to internal administration documents reviewed by The Associated Press, there are 47 third-country agreements at various stages of negotiation. Of those, 15 have been concluded and 10 are at or near conclusion.

    The administration is also negotiating agreements with countries that will accept U.S. asylum seekers while their asylum claims are processed, according to the internal documents. There are 17 that are at various stages of negotiation, including 9 that have formally taken effect, although the administration claims that the agreements do not necessarily need to be concluded for people to be sent there.

    Immigration advocacy groups have criticized the “third country” policy as a reckless tactic that violates due process rights and can strand deportees in countries with long histories of human rights violations and corruption.

    During a visit to South Sudan, Democratic committee staff found a gated house with armed guards where deportees were held, including migrants from Vietnam and Mexico.

    The Democrats also largely take aim at how wasteful and ineffective the policy may be. It details several instances of migrants being deported to a third country, only for the U.S. to later pay for another flight to return the migrant to their home country.

    “In many cases, migrants could have been returned directly to their countries of origin, avoiding unnecessary flights and additional costs,” said Shaheen in a statement also signed by Democratic Sens. Chris Coons, Tammy Duckworth, Tim Kaine, Jack Rosen and Chris Van Hollen.

    It also remains unclear what benefits the countries may receive – or expect – in return for accepting third-country nationals.

    After an agreement was in place last year, South Sudan sent a list of requests to Washington that included American support for the prosecution of an opposition leader and sanctions relief for a senior official accused of diverting over a billion dollars in public funds, according to diplomatic communications made public by the State Department in January.

    Shaheen has also questioned a $7.5 million payment sent to Equatorial Guinea that came at the same time the Trump administration was developing ties with the country’s vice president, Teodoro “Teddy” Nguema Obiang. He is notorious among world leaders accused of corruption for a lavish lifestyle that has attracted the attention of prosecutors in several countries.

    Copyright © 2026 by The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.

    [ad_2]

    AP

    Source link

  • Judge expected to rule on texts, photos from fed agents in Brighton Park shooting

    [ad_1]

    CHICAGO (WLS) — The woman shot five times by federal agents in Chicago, during Operation Midway Blitz has asked a judge to release more evidence.

    She could get an answer at a hearing Friday.

    ABC7 Chicago is now streaming 24/7. Click here to watch

    Marimar Martinez was shot five times last year by CBP agents after her vehicle was involved in a collision with Border Patrol Agent, Charles Exum.

    This all happened on October 4, near 39th and Kedzie, on the city’s Southwest Side.

    RELATED: ‘My own government attempted to execute me,’ Chicago woman shot by Border Patrol testifies

    A judge could issue a ruling Friday to release more evidence from the shooting.

    Federal agents and the Department of Homeland Security say Martinez rammed the agents’ vehicle and continue to refer to her as a “domestic terrorist.” This after all charges against Martinez were later dropped.

    Martinez and her attorney said they want her name cleared by releasing evidence in the case.

    RELATED: DOJ drops charges against woman shot by CBP agent in Chicago after being accused of ramming car

    Prosecutors said they are OK with releasing body camera videos of the moments leading up to the shooting, but argue additional text messages from the agent involved should not be released.

    Martinez testified from Capitol Hill on Tuesday, saying that she believes her testimony highlights a pattern of lies told by the federal government.

    “I know that being a survivor, it’s my duty to be here today to let you elected officials know what is happening on the streets of our country because silence is no longer an option,” Martinez said.

    Martinez is set to be Congressman Chuy Garcia’s guest at President Donald Trump’s State of the Union address later this month, with Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem expected to attend.

    Martinez’ hearing this morning is set to begin at 9:30 a.m. at the Dirksen Federal Building.

    A court hearing scheduled for Wednesday shooting of Marimar Martinez back in October has been postponed until Friday.

    Martinez was hit five times and injured.

    ABC7 Chicago is now streaming 24/7. Click here to watch

    Federal prosecutors originally accused her and Anthony Santos of using their vehicles to strike agents who were doing immigration enforcement near 39th Street and Kedzie Avenue.

    Those charges were eventually dismissed.

    RELATED: ‘My own government attempted to execute me,’ Chicago woman shot by Border Patrol testifies

    Martinez seeks to release more evidence to combat what her lawyers said is harm to her reputation.

    Ahead of the hearing, Martinez was in Washington DC Tuesday testifying on Capitol Hill about her ordeal.

    “I know that being a survivor, it’s my duty to be here today to let you elected officials know what is happening on the streets of our country because silence is no longer an option,” Martinez said.

    She said what happened to her should serve as evidence of a pattern of lies told by the federal government.

    Illinois lawmakers joined her call for accountability

    “That’s why we made it clear that this negotiation to change the standards for ICE is critical for us to continue this agency,” Senator Dick Durbin said.

    Copyright © 2026 WLS-TV. All Rights Reserved.

    [ad_2]

    Christian Piekos

    Source link

  • Sen. Tillis pushes again for answers on Charlotte Border Patrol operation

    [ad_1]

    In a letter sent this week, Republican Sen. Thom Tillis pushed for more information about U.S. Border Patrol agents’ operation in Charlotte last year.

    “The operation resulted in the apprehension of several criminal illegal aliens with extensive criminal records, an outcome I applaud,” Tillis wrote to Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem. “At the same time, multiple public reports allege that U.S. citizens were detained, subject to force, and experienced damage to personal property.”

    The longtime Republican senator, set to retire at the end of his term, has been increasingly critical of Noem since masked federal agents shot and killed two American citizens in Minnesota last month.

    Tillis’ letter referenced an incident in which agents busted an American citizen’s window in Charlotte, and another in which a different citizen in Cary was arrested at his workplace before agents dumped him and his belongings in the woods.

    Senator Thom Tillis (R-NC) speaks during the Senate Judiciary Committee confirmation hearing for Supreme Court Associate Justice nominee Ketanji Brown Jackson on March 21, 2022 in Washington.
    Senator Thom Tillis (R-NC) speaks during the Senate Judiciary Committee confirmation hearing for Supreme Court Associate Justice nominee Ketanji Brown Jackson on March 21, 2022 in Washington. Jasper Colt USA TODAY

    “If these accounts are inaccurate, North Carolinians would welcome that clarification,” the senator wrote. “If they are accurate, then they represent a breakdown in safeguards that demands corrective action. Either way, the absence of clear, encounter-level data has made objective evaluation difficult and unnecessarily eroded public confidence.”

    For months, The Charlotte Observer has asked DHS for a full list of people arrested in the operation. DHS has not provided that information. The Department of Homeland Security has not released the names and information of most people arrested or taken by federal police in Charlotte, making it unknown to the public if they had criminal records or not.

    Tillis asked for Noem to produce information as well, including the total number of people arrested in Operation Charlotte’s Web and the total number of times agents used force on American citizens.

    Noem will testify before the Senate’s judiciary committee on March 3.

    Ryan Oehrli covers criminal justice in the Charlotte region for The Charlotte Observer. His work is produced with financial support from the nonprofit The Just Trust. The Observer maintains full editorial control of its journalism.

    This story was originally published February 4, 2026 at 3:34 PM.

    Ryan Oehrli

    The Charlotte Observer

    Ryan Oehrli writes about criminal justice for The Charlotte Observer. His reporting has delved into police misconduct, jail and prison deaths, the state’s pardon system and more. He was also part of a team of Pulitzer finalists who covered Hurricane Helene. A North Carolina native, he grew up in Beaufort County.

    [ad_2]

    Ryan Oehrli

    Source link

  • 2026 Government Shutdown: Latest News and Impact on ICE

    [ad_1]

    Photo: Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

    One of the most confusing federal-government shutdowns in living memory began at midnight on January 31 when the stopgap-spending authority that ended the last government shutdown in November ran out. The shutdown was triggered by Democratic fury (and Republican misgivings) over ICE and Border Patrol atrocities in Minneapolis. But Congress had to unravel and end the shutdown before it could begin serious negotiations on new guidelines for immigration enforcement.

    The Departments of Defense, Education, Labor, Health and Human Services, Transportation, and State — along with the department that supervises immigration enforcement, Homeland Security — shut down on Friday night. Other agencies remained open because spending bills affecting them passed both houses of Congress before the Minneapolis crisis began.

    But the partial shutdown will end later today after two close votes in the House approved a Senate bill to reopen all government departments other than DHS. That agency will receive stopgap spending authority until February 13 to allow for very difficult negotiations over immigration enforcement policies and tactics.

    Here’s how we got here and what we know about what will happen next:

    The current crisis began when the House combined six regular appropriations bills into one huge package after allowing a separate vote over DHS funding as protests against ICE were breaking out around the country (it passed narrowly with just seven Democratic votes). The House then adjourned, hoping to “jam” the Senate into approving the whole package and keeping the government fully open.

    But after Border Patrol agents killed Alex Pretti, Senate Democrats withheld the votes needed to clear the spending package, demanding reforms in immigration enforcement. As the January 30 deadline approached, the White House became engaged in the dispute and cut a deal with Chuck Schumer to provide a separate two-week stopgap-spending bill for DHS to allow for further negotiations and pass the rest of the appropriations. This arrangement cleared the Senate late on January 30, with most Republicans and about half the Democrats going along. Because the earlier House package was changed by the Senate, the Trump-Schumer deal went back to the House for its approval. In the meantime, the affected federal departments had to shut down.

    The House wasn’t privy to the Trump-Schumer deal, and there was grumbling over it in both party caucuses. House Democrats are sensitive to the explosion of grassroots anger at the Senate Democrats who failed to use their leverage to either force major ICE reforms in exchange for keeping the government open, or to defund ICE altogether. Hardcore conservative House Republicans are upset about a rumored White House “pivot” away from total support for aggressive ICE tactics. Some wanted to attach provocative anti-immigrant conditions to the Senate deal, like measures to defund “sanctuary cities” or a forced Senate vote on the SAVE Act, which would impose new citizenship-ID requirements for voting. Democrats made it clear such amendments would be unacceptable poison pills that would extend the shutdown indefinitely.

    House Speaker Mike Johnson had hoped to get around these grumbling factions with a quick vote right after the House reconvened on Monday to approve the Senate deal under a suspension of the rules, which requires a two-thirds vote. But in recognition of the divisions in his own ranks, and likely annoyed that he was left out of the Trump-Schumer negotiations, House Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries informed Johnson that he couldn’t promise the requisite number of votes to make the suspension of the rules feasible.

    So Johnson was forced to go through the laborious process of getting a vote set up via House passage of the “rule” for consideration of the Senate deal. By ancient tradition, the minority party won’t vote for the majority’s “rule,” so the Speaker was forced to obtain must virtually every Republican vote for it. By all accounts, Trump spent Monday twisting arms and quelling dissent. House Freedom Caucus types asked for and probably received assurances from Trump that he won’t back down too much on ICE or on mass deportation generally if and when negotiations on the DHS spending bill ever happen. The rule passed by one vote with just one Republican (Thomas Massie) dissenting.

    Passage of the rule brought the Senate deal to the House floor, where it passed by a 217-214 vote, with 21 Democrats voting for it (mostly outspoken “moderates” and some very senior members in safe seats) and 21 Republicans voting against it (mostly House Freedom Caucus members). It looks like Johnson figured out how many Democrats he could get to vote for the bill and gave an identical number of Republicans a “free vote” to oppose it. The outcome showed that nobody really wantsed the partial shutdown to continue, but everyone is aware that once everything other than the DHS bill is resolved, Democratic leverage to secure restraints on immigration-enforcement agents will be reduced significantly. Trump will sign the bill momentarily and the shutdown will officially end.

    Absolutely not. Negotiations haven’t begun, and there are signs of a deepening partisan rift on the subject. Senate Democrats announced a list of substantive demands prior to the Trump-Schumer procedural deal that included a requirement for judicial warrants before ICE–Border Patrol arrests; coordination with local law enforcement (and deference to their use-of-force rules); and an end to masking. Any or all of these demands could be deal-breakers with the White House, aside from whatever additional demands House Democrats insist upon.

    We’ll know soon enough: The Senate-passed CR for DHS expires on February 13. If no substantive deal is struck that can get through both Houses and and also secure Trump’s signature, the options are either another CR to allow more time for negotiations or a new shutdown of DHS (which includes, in addition to immigration enforcement, agencies like FEMA and the Coast Guard). The only good thing about these scenarios is that at least it will be clear to everyone what the fight’s about.

    This piece has been updated throughout.


    See All



    [ad_2]

    Ed Kilgore

    Source link

  • Judge says she won’t halt Minnesota immigration enforcement surge as a lawsuit proceeds

    [ad_1]

    Judge says she won’t halt Minnesota immigration enforcement surge as a lawsuit proceeds

    The lawsuit sought a quick order to halt the enforcement action or limit its scope

    This 13 page document lays out DHS policy for use of force. Now these rules apply to Customs and Border Protection, ICE, and Secret Service and make it clear what protocols agents should follow before any use of force is applied. And while it’s easy to look back and replay video over and over after the fact, experts we talked to told us agents need to rely on these policies and training, especially in critical moments. Unfortunately, It, it’s for me as *** field office director, this all of this is very um upsetting. Darius Reeves, *** former ICE field office director, spent nearly 20 years with ICE and Homeland Security, *** time when he says their operations were not drawing public attention. No one had any idea about ICE. We were very professional, we were very clean, and this is. There are far too many US citizens being involved. What troubles Reeves now isn’t just the outcome of recent encounters, but whether ICE and Border Patrol are following their own use of force and de-escalation policies. When is use of force an option? If it’s an immediate Imminent threat. The National Investigative Unit reviewed the Department of Homeland Security’s use of force policy alongside video from the two recent killings of Alex Preddy and Renee Good and talked with experts including Reeves. DHS policy is clear officers should attempt de-escalation, issue verbal commands, reassess when resistance stops, and discontinue force once an incident is under control. Video from the encounter involving 30 seven-year-old Alex Preddy shows in the minute before the shooting, Preddy is recording from *** distance. Agents push *** woman who grabs onto Preddy. He’s then pushed. An agent pushes another woman near Preddy, who then steps in with an open hand up, then turns away from the agent as he’s sprayed with *** chemical. They continually sprayed him even when his back was to them, and then everybody piles on. Based on the video we’ve seen, in your opinion. Was deadly force used correctly on Alex Peretti? Absolutely not. The second case involving Renee Good raises *** different policy question. DHS rules place strict limits on the use of deadly force in and around vehicles. Mark Brown used to train ICE agents and explains the strict rules. The general practice was that They went away from shooting in the moving vehicles. Reeves and Brown add that incidents need to be carefully examined afterward to prevent future violations. Are we debriefing every day after, you know, to see, OK, what are we doing for our own accountability? This is *** major travesty, um. And you, you’re going to have to stick to the policy. The DHS policy states that every agent must be trained in use of force and de-escalation policies at least once *** year, and every 2 years they must conduct less than lethal force training. The policy we reviewed was last updated in 2023. Reporting in Washington, I’m national investigative correspondent John Cardinelli.

    Judge says she won’t halt Minnesota immigration enforcement surge as a lawsuit proceeds

    The lawsuit sought a quick order to halt the enforcement action or limit its scope

    Updated: 10:27 AM PST Jan 31, 2026

    Editorial Standards

    A federal judge says she won’t halt the immigration enforcement surge in Minnesota and the Twin Cities as a lawsuit over it proceeds.Video above: Examining DHS use-of-force policiesA federal judge says she won’t halt the immigration enforcement surge in Minnesota and the Twin Cities as a lawsuit over it proceeds.Judge Katherine M. Menendez on Saturday denied a preliminary injunction sought in a lawsuit filed this month by state Attorney General Keith Ellison and the mayors of Minneapolis and St. Paul.It argued that the Department of Homeland Security is violating constitutional protections. The lawsuit sought a quick order to halt the enforcement action or limit its scope. Lawyers with the U.S. Department of Justice have called the lawsuit “legally frivolous.”The ruling on the injunction focused on the argument by Minnesota officials that the federal government is violating the Constitution’s 10th Amendment, which limits the federal government’s powers to infringe on the sovereignty of states. In her ruling, the judge relied heavily on whether that argument was likely to ultimately succeed in court.The federal government argued that the surge, dubbed Operation Metro Surge, is necessary in its effort to take criminal immigrants off the streets and because federal efforts have been hindered by state and local “sanctuary laws and policies.” State and local officials argued that the surge is retaliation after the federal government’s initial attempts to withhold federal funding to try to force immigration cooperation failed.”Because there is evidence supporting both sides’ arguments as to motivation and the relative merits of each side’s competing positions are unclear, the Court is reluctant to find that the likelihood-of-success factor weighs sufficiently in favor of granting a preliminary injunction,” the judge said in the ruling.U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi took to social media Saturday to laud the ruling, calling it “another HUGE” legal win for the Justice Department on X.Federal officers have fatally shot two people on the streets of Minneapolis: Renee Good on Jan. 7 and Alex Pretti on Jan. 24.

    A federal judge says she won’t halt the immigration enforcement surge in Minnesota and the Twin Cities as a lawsuit over it proceeds.

    Video above: Examining DHS use-of-force policies

    A federal judge says she won’t halt the immigration enforcement surge in Minnesota and the Twin Cities as a lawsuit over it proceeds.

    Judge Katherine M. Menendez on Saturday denied a preliminary injunction sought in a lawsuit filed this month by state Attorney General Keith Ellison and the mayors of Minneapolis and St. Paul.

    It argued that the Department of Homeland Security is violating constitutional protections. The lawsuit sought a quick order to halt the enforcement action or limit its scope. Lawyers with the U.S. Department of Justice have called the lawsuit “legally frivolous.”

    The ruling on the injunction focused on the argument by Minnesota officials that the federal government is violating the Constitution’s 10th Amendment, which limits the federal government’s powers to infringe on the sovereignty of states. In her ruling, the judge relied heavily on whether that argument was likely to ultimately succeed in court.

    The federal government argued that the surge, dubbed Operation Metro Surge, is necessary in its effort to take criminal immigrants off the streets and because federal efforts have been hindered by state and local “sanctuary laws and policies.” State and local officials argued that the surge is retaliation after the federal government’s initial attempts to withhold federal funding to try to force immigration cooperation failed.

    “Because there is evidence supporting both sides’ arguments as to motivation and the relative merits of each side’s competing positions are unclear, the Court is reluctant to find that the likelihood-of-success factor weighs sufficiently in favor of granting a preliminary injunction,” the judge said in the ruling.

    U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi took to social media Saturday to laud the ruling, calling it “another HUGE” legal win for the Justice Department on X.

    Federal officers have fatally shot two people on the streets of Minneapolis: Renee Good on Jan. 7 and Alex Pretti on Jan. 24.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Judge says she won’t halt Minnesota immigration enforcement surge as a lawsuit proceeds

    [ad_1]

    Judge says she won’t halt Minnesota immigration enforcement surge as a lawsuit proceeds

    The lawsuit sought a quick order to halt the enforcement action or limit its scope

    This 13 page document lays out DHS policy for use of force. Now these rules apply to Customs and Border Protection, ICE, and Secret Service and make it clear what protocols agents should follow before any use of force is applied. And while it’s easy to look back and replay video over and over after the fact, experts we talked to told us agents need to rely on these policies and training, especially in critical moments. Unfortunately, It, it’s for me as *** field office director, this all of this is very um upsetting. Darius Reeves, *** former ICE field office director, spent nearly 20 years with ICE and Homeland Security, *** time when he says their operations were not drawing public attention. No one had any idea about ICE. We were very professional, we were very clean, and this is. There are far too many US citizens being involved. What troubles Reeves now isn’t just the outcome of recent encounters, but whether ICE and Border Patrol are following their own use of force and de-escalation policies. When is use of force an option? If it’s an immediate Imminent threat. The National Investigative Unit reviewed the Department of Homeland Security’s use of force policy alongside video from the two recent killings of Alex Preddy and Renee Good and talked with experts including Reeves. DHS policy is clear officers should attempt de-escalation, issue verbal commands, reassess when resistance stops, and discontinue force once an incident is under control. Video from the encounter involving 30 seven-year-old Alex Preddy shows in the minute before the shooting, Preddy is recording from *** distance. Agents push *** woman who grabs onto Preddy. He’s then pushed. An agent pushes another woman near Preddy, who then steps in with an open hand up, then turns away from the agent as he’s sprayed with *** chemical. They continually sprayed him even when his back was to them, and then everybody piles on. Based on the video we’ve seen, in your opinion. Was deadly force used correctly on Alex Peretti? Absolutely not. The second case involving Renee Good raises *** different policy question. DHS rules place strict limits on the use of deadly force in and around vehicles. Mark Brown used to train ICE agents and explains the strict rules. The general practice was that They went away from shooting in the moving vehicles. Reeves and Brown add that incidents need to be carefully examined afterward to prevent future violations. Are we debriefing every day after, you know, to see, OK, what are we doing for our own accountability? This is *** major travesty, um. And you, you’re going to have to stick to the policy. The DHS policy states that every agent must be trained in use of force and de-escalation policies at least once *** year, and every 2 years they must conduct less than lethal force training. The policy we reviewed was last updated in 2023. Reporting in Washington, I’m national investigative correspondent John Cardinelli.

    Judge says she won’t halt Minnesota immigration enforcement surge as a lawsuit proceeds

    The lawsuit sought a quick order to halt the enforcement action or limit its scope

    Updated: 1:27 PM EST Jan 31, 2026

    Editorial Standards

    A federal judge says she won’t halt the immigration enforcement surge in Minnesota and the Twin Cities as a lawsuit over it proceeds.Video above: Examining DHS use-of-force policiesA federal judge says she won’t halt the immigration enforcement surge in Minnesota and the Twin Cities as a lawsuit over it proceeds.Judge Katherine M. Menendez on Saturday denied a preliminary injunction sought in a lawsuit filed this month by state Attorney General Keith Ellison and the mayors of Minneapolis and St. Paul.It argued that the Department of Homeland Security is violating constitutional protections. The lawsuit sought a quick order to halt the enforcement action or limit its scope. Lawyers with the U.S. Department of Justice have called the lawsuit “legally frivolous.”The ruling on the injunction focused on the argument by Minnesota officials that the federal government is violating the Constitution’s 10th Amendment, which limits the federal government’s powers to infringe on the sovereignty of states. In her ruling, the judge relied heavily on whether that argument was likely to ultimately succeed in court.The federal government argued that the surge, dubbed Operation Metro Surge, is necessary in its effort to take criminal immigrants off the streets and because federal efforts have been hindered by state and local “sanctuary laws and policies.” State and local officials argued that the surge is retaliation after the federal government’s initial attempts to withhold federal funding to try to force immigration cooperation failed.”Because there is evidence supporting both sides’ arguments as to motivation and the relative merits of each side’s competing positions are unclear, the Court is reluctant to find that the likelihood-of-success factor weighs sufficiently in favor of granting a preliminary injunction,” the judge said in the ruling.U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi took to social media Saturday to laud the ruling, calling it “another HUGE” legal win for the Justice Department on X.Federal officers have fatally shot two people on the streets of Minneapolis: Renee Good on Jan. 7 and Alex Pretti on Jan. 24.

    A federal judge says she won’t halt the immigration enforcement surge in Minnesota and the Twin Cities as a lawsuit over it proceeds.

    Video above: Examining DHS use-of-force policies

    A federal judge says she won’t halt the immigration enforcement surge in Minnesota and the Twin Cities as a lawsuit over it proceeds.

    Judge Katherine M. Menendez on Saturday denied a preliminary injunction sought in a lawsuit filed this month by state Attorney General Keith Ellison and the mayors of Minneapolis and St. Paul.

    It argued that the Department of Homeland Security is violating constitutional protections. The lawsuit sought a quick order to halt the enforcement action or limit its scope. Lawyers with the U.S. Department of Justice have called the lawsuit “legally frivolous.”

    The ruling on the injunction focused on the argument by Minnesota officials that the federal government is violating the Constitution’s 10th Amendment, which limits the federal government’s powers to infringe on the sovereignty of states. In her ruling, the judge relied heavily on whether that argument was likely to ultimately succeed in court.

    The federal government argued that the surge, dubbed Operation Metro Surge, is necessary in its effort to take criminal immigrants off the streets and because federal efforts have been hindered by state and local “sanctuary laws and policies.” State and local officials argued that the surge is retaliation after the federal government’s initial attempts to withhold federal funding to try to force immigration cooperation failed.

    “Because there is evidence supporting both sides’ arguments as to motivation and the relative merits of each side’s competing positions are unclear, the Court is reluctant to find that the likelihood-of-success factor weighs sufficiently in favor of granting a preliminary injunction,” the judge said in the ruling.

    U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi took to social media Saturday to laud the ruling, calling it “another HUGE” legal win for the Justice Department on X.

    Federal officers have fatally shot two people on the streets of Minneapolis: Renee Good on Jan. 7 and Alex Pretti on Jan. 24.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Johnson signs order directing CPD to investigate federal immigration agents’ alleged misconduct

    [ad_1]

    CHICAGO (WLS) — Mayor Brandon Johnson signed an executive order on Saturday morning, directing Chicago police to investigate any alleged illegal activity by federal immigration agents.

    During the signing, Johnson said the city must prepare for federal agents to potentially return to Chicago in the spring.

    ABC7 Chicago is now streaming 24/7. Click here to watch

    Under the “ICE On Notice” order, if CPD personnel observe or receive reports of alleged violations of state or local law by federal agents, they must:

    • Document federal enforcement activities in accordance with CPD policy;

    • Ensure that any body camera footage captured during the incident – including footage of any use of force, detentions, injuries, or other enforcement activity – is
      preserved;

    • Seek to identify the federal supervisory officer on scene, attempt to verify the supervisory officer’s name and badge number, and record the credential verification using body-cameras-including any refusal to comply;

    • Complete a report on any violation of state or local law by federal agents consistent with CPD policy;

    • Immediately summon emergency medical services and render aid to any injured person on the scene

    CPD must also provide any evidence of alleged felony violations to the Cook County State’s Attorney’s Office, the order states. Additionally, CPD must share data on federal immigration officers’ alleged legal violations with the pubic.

    Johnson’s office says his executive order makes Chicago “the first city in the nation to leverage local authority to pursue legal accountability for misconduct by federal immigration agents.”

    “Nobody is above the law. There is no such thing as ‘absolute immunity’ in America,” Johnson said in a statement. “The lawlessness of Trump’s militarized immigration agents puts the lives and well-being of every Chicagoan in immediate danger. With today’s order, we are putting ICE on notice in our city. Chicago will not sit idly by while Trump floods federal agents into our communities and terrorizes our residents.”

    Copyright © 2026 WLS-TV. All Rights Reserved.

    [ad_2]

    WLS

    Source link

  • Comparisons drawn between Alex Pretti, Kyle Rittenhouse in renewed Second Amendment debate

    [ad_1]

    Saturday’s fatal shooting of a man by a Border Patrol agent in Minneapolis has renewed a debate over the Second Amendment and concealed carry laws. But this time, the political roles are reversed.

    The right to bear arms has been a big Republican Party issue for decades. Conservative politicians have strongly defended the Second Amendment by successfully passing gun rights laws, such as concealed carry, in every state. Minneapolis shooting victim Alex Pretti was legally carrying a firearm. But top Trump administration officials say he did not have a right to do so.

    “You cannot bring a firearm loaded with multiple magazines to any sort of protest that you want. It is that simple,” said Director Kash Patel.

    However, President Donald Trump supported Kyle Rittenhouse after he shot and killed two men who tried grabbing his gun during protesters following a shooting involving police. Additionally, some Jan. 6 rioters were armed, and many Republicans supported a Missouri couple who pointed their firearms at protesters after George Floyd’s killing.

    Alex Pretti seen in bystander video Saturday morning in Minneapolis, left, and Kyle Rittenhouse at the Turning Point USA America Fest 2021 event Monday, Dec. 20, 2021, in Phoenix.

    (Bystander video)/(AP Photo/Ross D. Franklin)

    The killing spurred notable tension with the GOP’s long-standing support for gun rights. Officials say Pretti was armed, but no bystander videos that have surfaced so far appear to show him holding a weapon. The Minneapolis police chief said Pretti had a permit to carry a gun.

    Yet administration officials, including Noem and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, have questioned why he was armed. Speaking on ABC’s “This Week” Bessent said that when he has attended protests, “I didn’t bring a gun. I brought a billboard.”

    Such comments were notable for a party where support for the Second Amendment’s protection of gun ownership is foundational. Indeed, many in the GOP, including Trump, lifted Kyle Rittenhouse into prominence when the then-17-year-old former police youth cadet shot three men, killing two of them, during a 2020 protest in Wisconsin against police brutality. He was acquitted of all charges after testifying that he acted in self defense.

    In the wake of Pretti’s killing, gun rights advocates noted that it is legal to carry firearms during protests.

    “Every peaceable Minnesotan has the right to keep and bear arms – including while attending protests, acting as observers, or exercising their First Amendment rights,” the Minnesota Gun Owners Caucus said in a statement. “These rights do not disappear when someone is lawfully armed.”

    In a social media post, the National Rifle Association said “responsible public voices should be awaiting a full investigation, not making generalizations and demonizing law-abiding citizens.”

    Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., who is often critical of the White House, said “carrying a firearm is not a death sentence.”

    “It’s a Constitutionally protected God-given right,” he said, “and if you don’t understand this you have no business in law enforcement or government.

    The second-ranking Justice Department official said he was aware of reports that Pretti was lawfully armed.

    “There’s nothing wrong with anybody lawfully carrying firearms,” Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche said on “Meet the Press” on NBC. “But just make no mistake about it, this was an incredibly split-second decision that had to be made by ICE officers.”

    “The height of hypocrisy which continues out of the White House, scrambling to find some reason to show why these agents were justified,” said former Illinois House Republican Leader Jim Durkin.

    Durkin says the hypocrisy surrounding the Minneapolis case will continue to fracture the Republican Party. While it took over 20 years to pass a restricted concealed carry law in Illinois, residents have a right to carry a loaded firearm to a protest. Minnesota shares the same rights.

    “Mr. Pretti was not violating the law in terms of the Second Amendment. He had a protected right, and the law in Minnesota did not prohibit him from carrying a firearm,” said Rob Chadwick with the U.S. Concealed Carry Association.

    But Chadwick, a former FBI agent, says the law gets dicey if the armed person inserts themselves in a law enforcement operation. USCCA and a growing number of Republicans are calling for a full investigation into Pretti’s death.

    “When you take that step and get involved physically in a law enforcement action, it is incredibly dangerous and unintended consequences do happen,” Chadwick said.

    Meanwhile, White House Spokesperson Karoline Leavitt says Trump absolutely supports the Second Amendment for law-abiding Americans, but not for people who impede immigration enforcement operations.

    ABC Chicago Station WLS and The Associated Press contributed to this report.

    Copyright © 2026 KABC Television, LLC. All rights reserved.

    [ad_2]

    WTVD

    Source link

  • Do Federal Officials Really Have “Absolute Immunity”?

    [ad_1]

    On Saturday, agents with U.S. Border Patrol killed a man named Alex Jeffrey Pretti, the second person who has been shot dead by federal personnel in Minneapolis since President Donald Trump launched an immigration-enforcement operation in the city earlier this month. After the first killing, of a woman named Renee Good, who was shot behind the wheel of her car by an ICE agent, federal officials made clear that they had little interest in conducting an impartial investigation into the circumstances of her death. During a press conference, Vice-President J. D. Vance said that federal officials have “absolute immunity” in performing their duties. In the aftermath of Pretti’s death, which has prompted even some Republican officeholders to call for an investigation, state officials have accused the federal government of blocking access to the scene of the shooting. Multiple members of the Trump Administration have called Pretti a “domestic terrorist” and falsely described what occurred when he was gunned down, which was captured on video. On Saturday night, a federal judge ordered the government not to destroy or alter evidence after a lawsuit was filed by Minnesota authorities.

    To talk about what state officials can and cannot do to investigate and prosecute crimes allegedly committed by federal officials, I spoke by phone with Steve Vladeck, a law professor at Georgetown who writes a newsletter on legal issues called “One First.” During our conversation, which has been edited for length and clarity, we discussed why the law on these questions is so unsettled, how the Trump Administration could try to sabotage potential state actions, and how the Supreme Court might view future cases that feature a clash between executive power and states’ rights.

    Tell me if this is helpful—there are two different ways it can be difficult for states to investigate or prosecute federal officials. One of them has to do with the law itself as defined by the courts, and the second has to do with the Trump Administration trying to throw up every roadblock it can. Those seem like different things.

    I think that’s very helpful. There’s both the question of whether the law would allow a prosecution and whether as a matter of pure logistics, the prosecution is viable. We haven’t usually had to worry about the second one, but we certainly have to worry about it right now.

    So then let’s start with the first one, which relates to why it could be complicated for state officials to charge federal officers with crimes in a state such as Minnesota. What is the primary legal roadblock?

    The primary legal roadblock is the doctrine that’s become known as supremacy-clause immunity. This is a not-very-well-developed idea dating back to an 1890 Supreme Court decision, which basically says that federal officers are immune from the consequences of state law for actions they’re performing in the legitimate exercise of their federal duties. And the idea, which I think is actually relatively uncontroversial, is that federal officers who are lawfully acting within their federal duties are necessarily acting in a way that has to override contrary state laws. It’s analogous in that respect to the doctrine that’s generally known as preëmption—that valid federal laws will always displace valid state laws.

    So the idea here, in the best case, is that if federal officials are trying to enforce desegregation at a school in the South in the nineteen-fifties, for instance, then state and local officials cannot mess with them?

    That’s exactly right. You can’t prosecute federal officers for trespassing, for example, for enforcing a court order on a public school in the civil-rights era.

    Was the thinking behind the decision so high-minded, though, back in 1890?

    Actually, it was. So, the 1890 decision is this remarkably colorful case about the attempted assassination of Justice Stephen Field, and the question was whether his bodyguard, who was a deputy U.S. marshal, could be prosecuted by California for the murder of the Justice’s would-be assassin. And that was a context where I don’t think it’s especially surprising that the Supreme Court was of the view that the federal officer was immune from prosecution under state law for protecting one of their colleagues.

    What other decisions have come up about these questions since 1890?

    The biggest problem is that there really haven’t been that many cases, and virtually none that have gone back to the Supreme Court. Most of the development of the doctrine has actually been in lower courts. And one of the things I think is unhelpful is that, even when lower courts held in at least some of these cases that prosecutions could go forward, they were often dropped by the prosecutors before they produced a verdict. So we actually have a very, very tiny number of examples of successful state prosecutions of federal officers in American history. Of course, one might also say we don’t have that many examples in American history of what’s been happening in Minneapolis over the past three weeks.

    Has the Supreme Court ruled that Congress needs to provide authorization for states to go after federal officials? Am I understanding that correctly?

    The Supreme Court has never said that. There are other contexts in which the Supreme Court has said that Congress needs to specifically authorize, for example, [civil] damages suits before federal officers can be sued for violating the Constitution. But we’ve never quite had that ruling in the context of criminal prosecutions. And that’s because these cases have been so few and far between.

    The real development in case law has been trying to figure out exactly where the line is between the officer who was immunized because he was acting in good faith and the officer who went too far and should have known that he was going too far. There is a 2006 ruling in the federal appeals court in Denver, which was written by Michael McConnell, a very highly regarded and pretty right-of-center federal appeals judge. And McConnell says you can prosecute federal officers if it wasn’t necessary and reasonable for the officer, in the carrying out of their federal duties, to do what they did.

    And that ruling has held?

    I think the best that can be said is it’s the law of the Tenth Circuit right now. Minnesota is in the Eighth Circuit. So we’re in a place where there’s no obvious binding authority on this issue for state or local prosecutors.

    But let’s say that state or local prosecutors in Minnesota decide that that’s a good standard that you laid out from McConnell. Could you potentially have a situation where the question of whether what the federal officials were doing was “necessary and reasonable” would go to court?

    [ad_2]

    Isaac Chotiner

    Source link

  • Fact-check: Trump officials’ Alex Pretti claims vs. video

    [ad_1]

    Video footage of the fatal shooting of Minnesota resident Alex Pretti by a federal immigration officer contradicts Trump administration officials’ claims about the event.

    Since Pretti’s Jan. 24 killing in Minneapolis, the federal government has provided no evidence to substantiate early statements and shared no details about what happened before the confrontation and in the moments leading to a Border Patrol officer firing his gun.

    Pretti, 37, was a U.S. citizen who worked as an Intensive Care Unit nurse at the Minneapolis Veterans Affairs hospital.

    Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said Pretti was “brandishing” a handgun and “attacked” officers. Social media videos verified by multiple news organizations show Pretti, who had a concealed carry permit, holding a cell phone as he directed traffic and tried to help a woman pushed to the ground by an officer.

    White House senior adviser Stephen Miller called Pretti a “domestic terrorist,” the same term some Trump officials used to describe Renee Nicole Good, a Minneapolis woman killed Jan. 7 by an Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent.

    Noem, Miller and Border Patrol chief Greg Bovino said that because Pretti was carrying a handgun and ammunition, he planned to assassinate law enforcement — statements that incensed some Republicans who support Second Amendment rights. 

    “The suspect put himself in that situation,” Bovino said. “The victims are the Border Patrol agents there.”

    Pretti’s parents called their son a “kindhearted soul” and said Trump officials were not telling the truth. “The sickening lies told about our son by the administration are reprehensible and disgusting,” their Jan. 25 press statement said.

    With many questions remaining unanswered, here’s how Trump administration officials’ explanations conflict with available information.

    Video does not show Pretti approaching immigration agents with handgun

    Noem said Pretti “approached U.S. Border Patrol officers with a 9mm semi-automatic handgun.” 

    Bovino said, “This looks like a situation where an individual wanted to do maximum damage and massacre law enforcement.”

    News outlets’ analysis of videos of the incident from several angles do not show Pretti approaching immigration officials with a handgun. 

    Videos analyzed by The New York Times, CNN, NPR, ABC, Reuters and Bellingcat show Pretti holding a cellphone horizontally in his right hand. 

    In the footage, Pretti stands between an officer and two civilians. The officer disperses pepper spray at Pretti and the people standing behind him. A still image from bystander video shows Pretti holding up his left arm in reaction.

    Several agents tackle Pretti to the ground. One officer appears to remove a gun from Pretti’s hip and walk across the street away from the group. Quickly after another officer fires several shots at Pretti as he is restrained by agents.

    “What the videos depict is that this guy did not walk up to anybody from (Customs and Border Protection) in a threatening manner,” former acting DHS undersecretary for intelligence John Cohen told ABC News. “For (DHS) to construe that he arrived at that location with the intent to shoot those border patrol officers, there’s nothing in the video evidence that we’ve seen thus far that would support that.”

    CBS News correspondent Margaret Brennan asked Minneapolis Police Chief Brian O’Hara if he had seen any evidence that Pretti was “brandishing” a gun, as Noem said.

    “You have a Second Amendment right in the United States to possess a firearm. And there are some restrictions around that in Minnesota,” O’Hara said Jan. 25 on “Face the Nation.” “And everything that we see that we are aware of shows that he did not violate any of those restrictions.”

    Trump administration officials called Pretti a ‘domestic terrorist’

    Miller described Pretti as a “domestic terrorist” who “tried to assassinate federal law enforcement.”

    In a press conference after the shooting, Noem said Pretti “came with weapons and ammunition to stop a law enforcement operation of federal law enforcement officers.” She said Pretti “committed an act of domestic terrorism. That’s the facts.”

    “When you perpetuate violence against a government because of ideological reasons and for reasons to resist and perpetuate violence, that is the definition of domestic terrorism,” Noem said.

    It’s the second time in a month that Noem said a person shot and killed by immigration officers was a domestic terrorist, before any investigation had taken place.

    The FBI defines domestic terrorism as acts dangerous to human life that violate federal or state criminal laws and appear intended to intimidate or coerce civilians; influence government policy by intimidation or coercion; or affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination or kidnapping. 

    Legal experts questioned the characterization of Good as a domestic terrorist, telling PolitiFact the label was prejudicial and an attempt to malign her.

    Editor’s note: This story will be updated with additional statements and analysis. Check back later Jan. 26.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Judge set to hear arguments on Minnesota’s immigration crackdown after fatal shootings

    [ad_1]

    A federal judge will hear arguments Monday on whether she should at least temporarily halt the immigration crackdown in Minnesota that has led to the fatal shootings of two people by government officers.The state of Minnesota and the cities of Minneapolis and St. Paul sued the Department of Homeland Security earlier this month, five days after Renee Good was shot by an Immigration and Customs officer. Saturday’s shooting by a Border Patrol officer of Alex Pretti has only added urgency to the case.Since the original filing, the state and cities have substantially added to their original request. They’re trying to restore the state of affairs that existed before the Trump administration launched Operation Metro Surge on Dec. 1.The hearing is set for Monday morning in federal court in Minneapolis. Democratic Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison said he plans to personally attend.They’re asking that U.S. District Judge Kathleen Menendez order federal law enforcement agencies to reduce the numbers of officers and agents in Minnesota to levels before the surge, while allowing them to continue to enforce immigration laws within a long list of proposed limits.Justice Department attorneys have called the lawsuit “legally frivolous” and said “Minnesota wants a veto over federal law enforcement.” They asked the judge to reject the request or at least stay her order pending an anticipated appeal.Ellison said at a news conference Sunday that he and the cities filed their lawsuit because of “the unprecedented nature of this surge. It is a novel abuse of the Constitution that we’re looking at right now. No one can remember a time when we’ve seen something like this.”It wasn’t clear ahead of the hearing when the judge might rule.The case also has implications for other states that have been or could be targets of intensive federal immigration enforcement operations. Attorneys general from 19 states plus the District of Columbia, led by California, filed a friend-of-the-court brief supporting Minnesota.”If left unchecked, the federal government will no doubt be emboldened to continue its unlawful conduct in Minnesota and to repeat it elsewhere,” the attorneys general wrote.Menendez is the same judge who ruled in a separate case on Jan. 16 that federal officers in Minnesota can’t detain or tear gas peaceful protesters who aren’t obstructing authorities, including people who are following and observing agents.An appeals court temporarily suspended that ruling three days before Saturday’s shooting. But the plaintiffs in that case, represented by the American Civil Liberties Union of Minnesota, asked the appeals court late Saturday for an emergency order lifting the stay in light of Pretti’s killing. The Justice Department argued in a reply filed Sunday that the stay should remain in place, calling the injunction unworkable and overly broad.In yet another case, a different federal judge, Eric Tostrud, late Saturday issued an order blocking the Trump administration from “destroying or altering evidence” related to Saturday’s shooting. Ellison and Hennepin County Attorney Mary Moriarty asked for the order to try to preserve evidence collected by federal officials that state authorities have not yet been able to inspect. A hearing in that case is scheduled for Monday afternoon in federal court in St. Paul.“The fact that anyone would ever think that an agent of the federal government might even think about doing such a thing was completely unforeseeable only a few weeks ago,” Ellison told reporters. “But now, this is what we have to do.”

    A federal judge will hear arguments Monday on whether she should at least temporarily halt the immigration crackdown in Minnesota that has led to the fatal shootings of two people by government officers.

    The state of Minnesota and the cities of Minneapolis and St. Paul sued the Department of Homeland Security earlier this month, five days after Renee Good was shot by an Immigration and Customs officer. Saturday’s shooting by a Border Patrol officer of Alex Pretti has only added urgency to the case.

    Since the original filing, the state and cities have substantially added to their original request. They’re trying to restore the state of affairs that existed before the Trump administration launched Operation Metro Surge on Dec. 1.

    The hearing is set for Monday morning in federal court in Minneapolis. Democratic Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison said he plans to personally attend.

    They’re asking that U.S. District Judge Kathleen Menendez order federal law enforcement agencies to reduce the numbers of officers and agents in Minnesota to levels before the surge, while allowing them to continue to enforce immigration laws within a long list of proposed limits.

    Justice Department attorneys have called the lawsuit “legally frivolous” and said “Minnesota wants a veto over federal law enforcement.” They asked the judge to reject the request or at least stay her order pending an anticipated appeal.

    Ellison said at a news conference Sunday that he and the cities filed their lawsuit because of “the unprecedented nature of this surge. It is a novel abuse of the Constitution that we’re looking at right now. No one can remember a time when we’ve seen something like this.”

    It wasn’t clear ahead of the hearing when the judge might rule.

    The case also has implications for other states that have been or could be targets of intensive federal immigration enforcement operations. Attorneys general from 19 states plus the District of Columbia, led by California, filed a friend-of-the-court brief supporting Minnesota.

    “If left unchecked, the federal government will no doubt be emboldened to continue its unlawful conduct in Minnesota and to repeat it elsewhere,” the attorneys general wrote.

    Menendez is the same judge who ruled in a separate case on Jan. 16 that federal officers in Minnesota can’t detain or tear gas peaceful protesters who aren’t obstructing authorities, including people who are following and observing agents.

    An appeals court temporarily suspended that ruling three days before Saturday’s shooting. But the plaintiffs in that case, represented by the American Civil Liberties Union of Minnesota, asked the appeals court late Saturday for an emergency order lifting the stay in light of Pretti’s killing. The Justice Department argued in a reply filed Sunday that the stay should remain in place, calling the injunction unworkable and overly broad.

    In yet another case, a different federal judge, Eric Tostrud, late Saturday issued an order blocking the Trump administration from “destroying or altering evidence” related to Saturday’s shooting. Ellison and Hennepin County Attorney Mary Moriarty asked for the order to try to preserve evidence collected by federal officials that state authorities have not yet been able to inspect. A hearing in that case is scheduled for Monday afternoon in federal court in St. Paul.

    “The fact that anyone would ever think that an agent of the federal government might even think about doing such a thing was completely unforeseeable only a few weeks ago,” Ellison told reporters. “But now, this is what we have to do.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • The Trump administration is lying about gun rights and the death of Alex Pretti

    [ad_1]

    Customs and Border Protection (CBP) agents shot and killed a U.S. citizen in Minneapolis, Minnesota, outside a restaurant on Saturday. The victim, 37-year-old Alex Pretti, was licensed to carry a firearm, and he had one with him. The available footage does not show every detail of what happened, but Pretti was holding a cell phone rather than his gun when the officers initiated contact and began wrestling him to the ground.

    Trump administration officials, including Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem and Deputy White House Chief of Staff Stephen Miller, have already declared the killing completely justified, claiming that Pretti had intended to murder law enforcement agents. There is no evidence of this—none whatsoever—which makes it difficult to avoid the conclusion that the administration is prepared to brazenly lie about what happened.

    Other Republican officials, including Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and FBI Director Kash Patel, are taking the position that merely bringing a gun to a protest is a violation of the law or an indication of murderous intent. This is deeply wrong, and it is in conflict with the First and Second Amendments—two fundamental rights that Republicans typically profess to care about.

    As with the killing of Renee Good two weeks ago, the legal threshold at which lethal force can be justified is whether the officer who killed Pretti reasonably feared for his own safety. Only a careful, impartial investigation can determine that. The Justice Department has declined to conduct such an investigation into Good’s death, instead seeking to investigate the victim’s family.

    Video footage of Pretti’s death shows federal agents using pepper spray on protesters. Pretti appears to be recording the altercation with his cell phone. After an agent shoves one of the protesters to the ground, Pretti moves to assist her. Several CBP agents then decide to bring Pretti down.

    It’s conceivable that the agent who shot Pretti had the impression that he was reaching for his weapon—though the first shot clearly went off after another agent disarmed the protester. It’s also possible that the killer didn’t have even that much justification. Yet federal authorities have all but ruled out that possibility, and are making abjectly false statements in support of their mendacious posture.

    Noem has repeatedly claimed it as a fact that Pretti intended to harm officers. “This individual showed up to a law enforcement operation with a weapon and dozens of rounds of ammunition,” she told reporters. “He wasn’t there to peacefully protest. He was there to perpetuate violence.” Miller flatly asserted that Pretti was a “domestic terrorist” who “tried to assassinate federal law enforcement.”

    These are lies. They have no evidence that Pretti wanted to kill anyone. Even if evidence were unexpectedly to come out tomorrow that he was secretly a would-be assassin, it would still be wrong for officials to state as fact that Pretti intended to kill. There are no known facts that establish murder as his motivation. This is a man who was watching officers interact with protesters and recording it on his phone. Contrary to what the Department of Homeland Security wrote on X, he did not approach law enforcement, let alone with a gun drawn.

    These willful omissions and obvious lies do not inspire confidence that the federal government has any interest in discovering the truth of what happened. That is a glaring indictment of the Trump administration’s approach to immigration enforcement specifically and law enforcement in general.

    As if quietly conceding that none of the available facts were advancing their preferred narrative, several Republican officials are taking the ludicrous position that merely possessing a gun in the first place is evidence of an intent to cause harm. Bessent and Patel both sided with Noem on the Sunday morning shows, agreeing that Pretti should not have possessed the gun in the first place. Bessent said the protesters should carry billboards rather than guns. Patel said that bringing a gun to a protest was a violation of the law. That is simply untrue, as Minnesota is a concealed carry state, where it is lawful to carry a firearm in a public place. The notion that an individual cannot or should not exercise his First Amendment and Second Amendment rights at the same time is usually a misguided leftist talking point; in fact, the American Civil Liberties Union has taken criticism from conservatives and libertarians for becoming squishy on this and advocating against the gun rights of protesters after the January 6 riot.

    U.S. Attorney for the Central District of California Bill Essayli went even further in the wrong direction, writing on X: “If you approach law enforcement with a gun, there is a high likelihood they will be legally justified in shooting you.”

    Rep. Thomas Massie (R–Ky.) took that to task. “Carrying a firearm is not a death sentence, it’s a Constitutionally protected God-given right, and if you don’t understand this you have no business in law enforcement or government,” wrote Massie.

    Essayli’s comments also drew a rebuke from Gun Owners of America, a lobby that defends the Second Amendment.

    “Federal agents are not ‘highly likely’ to be ‘legally justified’ in ‘shooting’ concealed carry licensees who approach while lawfully carrying a firearm,” the group wrote on X. “The Second Amendment protects Americans’ right to bear arms while protesting—a right the federal government must not infringe upon.”

    More Republicans should take their cues from Massie and Gun Owners of America. The administration is eager to jettison cherished First and Second Amendment rights to forestall any possibility that a federal agent might be held responsible for an improper shooting. If they succeed, the GOP will cease to be a political party that even pretends to care about free speech and gun rights.

    [ad_2]

    Robby Soave

    Source link

  • Woman Shot By Border Patrol Officer In Portland Gets Probation For Illegal Entry – KXL

    [ad_1]

    PORTLAND, OR – The woman shot in the chest by a Border Patrol officer during a traffic stop in Portland earlier this month pleaded guilty Thursday to illegally entering the United States and was sentenced to a year of probation.

    Yorlenys Betzabeth Zambrano-Contreras, 32, appeared by video from an immigration detention center in Tacoma, Washington, for a hearing in federal court in Portland. Under a negotiated agreement, she will remain out of custody in Oregon while on probation.

    Zambrano-Contreras pleaded guilty to improper entry by an alien, a misdemeanor. The case was initially filed in Texas, but she waived her right to appear there for prosecution.

    Her defense attorney, Conor Huseby, said Zambrano-Contreras crossed the border in 2023 while seeking a better life for herself and her child amid long delays at ports of entry. Speaking through a Spanish-language interpreter, Zambrano-Contreras told the judge she had no place to live or work and crossed with a large group of people without inspection.

    Prosecutors said Zambrano-Contreras entered the U.S. from Mexico in September 2023 near the Paso Del Norte port of entry in Texas. She was detained by Border Patrol, then released due to lack of space and ordered to report to immigration authorities in Portland, which she did not do. Her immigration court hearing is scheduled for June 1, 2028.

    U.S. Magistrate Judge Stacie F. Beckerman ordered Zambrano-Contreras to undergo location monitoring during probation and comply with an initial nightly curfew. She was also barred from areas where prostitution occurs and warned she could be arrested if she violates probation conditions.

    Zambrano-Contreras was wounded Jan. 8 while sitting in the front passenger seat of a red Toyota Tacoma that was stopped by Border Patrol officers in a Southeast Portland medical office parking lot. Authorities say the driver, Luis David Niño-Moncada, rammed a federal vehicle and struck an officer with the truck. An officer then fired two shots into the vehicle, wounding both the driver and Zambrano-Contreras.

    Niño-Moncada, 33, later drove to an apartment complex and called 911. He has pleaded not guilty to aggravated assault of a federal officer and damaging federal property and remains in custody.

    Federal officials have alleged Zambrano-Contreras was the target of the stop and linked to a prostitution ring tied to the Venezuelan Tren de Aragua gang, but she has not been charged in connection with any prostitution activity or prior shooting. She is expected to be a witness in the case against Niño-Moncada.

    More about:

    [ad_2]

    Tim Lantz

    Source link

  • Judge restricts federal officers’ use of tear gas during protests in Minneapolis

    [ad_1]

    In a ruling on Friday, a judge restricted federal officers from detaining or using tear gas against peaceful protesters who are not obstructing authorities in Minneapolis, where demonstrations over President Donald Trump’s immigration crackdown are expected to continue this weekend. Tricia McLaughlin, a spokeswoman for the Department of Homeland Security, said in a statement responding to the preliminary injunction, “D.H.S. is taking appropriate and constitutional measures to uphold the rule of law and protect our officers and the public from dangerous rioters.”ICE’s tactics have faced criticism from Democratic leaders, like Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey.”What we’re seeing on our streets is unnecessary abuses of force. This is an invasion for the sake of creating chaos by our own federal government,” Frey said on Friday.Both Frey and Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz are reportedly under investigation. The Justice Department is looking into whether Frey and Walz impeded law enforcement through past public statements, according to the Associated Press. “Weaponizing the justice system against your opponents is an authoritarian tactic,” Walz said in a social media post on Friday.”A reminder to all those in Minnesota: No one is above the law,” Attorney General Pam Bondi wrote in a separate post, which didn’t explicitly mention the probe. The warning comes as Minneapolis braces for another weekend of demonstrations. Clashes with protesters have escalated following the fatal shooting of Renee Good by an ICE agent in a highly contested incident last week. “While peaceful expression is protected, any actions that harm people, destroy property, or jeopardize public safety will not be tolerated,” Minnesota Department of Public Safety Commissioner Bob Jacobson said Friday. Earlier this week, President Donald Trump warned that he could invoke the rarely used Insurrection Act to deploy troops to Minneapolis in response to protests. “If the corrupt politicians of Minnesota don’t obey the law and stop the professional agitators and insurrectionists from attacking the Patriots of I.C.E., who are only trying to do their job, I will institute the INSURRECTION ACT, which many Presidents have done before me, and quickly put an end to the travesty that is taking place in that once great State,” Trump wrote on social media Thursday.Trump appeared to walk back that threat, at least for now, while speaking to reporters Friday. “I don’t think there is any reason right now to use it, but if I needed it, I would use it,” Trump said.Minnesota’s Attorney General Keith Ellison has said that he would challenge the use of the 19th-century law in court if necessary. He’s already suing to try to stop the recent surge in immigration enforcement in the Twin Cities. DHS says officers have arrested more than 2,500 people as part of its “Metro Surge” operation to date.

    In a ruling on Friday, a judge restricted federal officers from detaining or using tear gas against peaceful protesters who are not obstructing authorities in Minneapolis, where demonstrations over President Donald Trump’s immigration crackdown are expected to continue this weekend.

    Tricia McLaughlin, a spokeswoman for the Department of Homeland Security, said in a statement responding to the preliminary injunction, “D.H.S. is taking appropriate and constitutional measures to uphold the rule of law and protect our officers and the public from dangerous rioters.”

    ICE’s tactics have faced criticism from Democratic leaders, like Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey.

    “What we’re seeing on our streets is unnecessary abuses of force. This is an invasion for the sake of creating chaos by our own federal government,” Frey said on Friday.

    Both Frey and Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz are reportedly under investigation. The Justice Department is looking into whether Frey and Walz impeded law enforcement through past public statements, according to the Associated Press.

    “Weaponizing the justice system against your opponents is an authoritarian tactic,” Walz said in a social media post on Friday.

    “A reminder to all those in Minnesota: No one is above the law,” Attorney General Pam Bondi wrote in a separate post, which didn’t explicitly mention the probe.

    The warning comes as Minneapolis braces for another weekend of demonstrations. Clashes with protesters have escalated following the fatal shooting of Renee Good by an ICE agent in a highly contested incident last week.

    “While peaceful expression is protected, any actions that harm people, destroy property, or jeopardize public safety will not be tolerated,” Minnesota Department of Public Safety Commissioner Bob Jacobson said Friday.

    Earlier this week, President Donald Trump warned that he could invoke the rarely used Insurrection Act to deploy troops to Minneapolis in response to protests.

    “If the corrupt politicians of Minnesota don’t obey the law and stop the professional agitators and insurrectionists from attacking the Patriots of I.C.E., who are only trying to do their job, I will institute the INSURRECTION ACT, which many Presidents have done before me, and quickly put an end to the travesty that is taking place in that once great State,” Trump wrote on social media Thursday.

    Trump appeared to walk back that threat, at least for now, while speaking to reporters Friday.

    “I don’t think there is any reason right now to use it, but if I needed it, I would use it,” Trump said.

    Minnesota’s Attorney General Keith Ellison has said that he would challenge the use of the 19th-century law in court if necessary. He’s already suing to try to stop the recent surge in immigration enforcement in the Twin Cities. DHS says officers have arrested more than 2,500 people as part of its “Metro Surge” operation to date.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Police Chief Confirms Pair Shot By Border Patrol Connected To Venezuelan Gang – KXL

    [ad_1]

    PORTLAND, OR – During a news conference on Friday, Portland Police Chief Bob Day told reporters that the two people shot by federal agents on Thursday are connected to the Venezuelan gang known at Tren de Aragua.  “What I can say is there is an association with the two folks yesterday and TDA,” he said.

    At the same time, Chief Day insisted that “this in no way draws a throughline to the actions and behaviors that occurred (on Thursday).”

    His comments came within hours of a social media post by the Department of Homeland Security which identified the man and woman shot as Luis David Nico Moncada and Yorlenys Betzabeth Zambrano-Contreras and referred to both as “suspected Tren de Aragua gang associates.”

    A federal investigation is underway, and Day said his officers are providing support to the FBI, but also said PPB is not conducting an investigation of its own.

    Portland Police say officers responded to the shooting outside of a medical clinic, and six minutes later, they got a call from a man who had been shot. Officers found a man and a woman in a car with gunshot wounds. Officers applied tourniquets until medics arrived and the two people were taken to a hospital. Homeland Security claims agents were making a traffic stop on the suspected gang members when the driver tried to run down an agent and shots were fired.

    In reaction to the shooting, Governor Tina Kotek said Homeland Security is destroying public trust in the federal government. The governor made the comment Thursday at news conference featuring Chief Day, Portland Mayor Keith Wilson, and other regional officials. Kotek insisted  when the President endorses actions that tear families apart it fosters an environment of lawlessness and recklessness. Kotek also said there must be a full and transparent investigation that involves Portland Police and the Multnomah County District Attorney’s Office.

    More about:

    [ad_2]

    Tim Lantz

    Source link

  • 12 detained in Florida Keys amid increasing immigration enforcement

    [ad_1]

    U.S. Border Patrol agents stage for an operation in the Winn Dixie parking lot in Key Largo Friday, Nov. 21, 2025.

    U.S. Border Patrol agents stage for an operation in the Winn Dixie parking lot in Key Largo Friday, Nov. 21, 2025.

    Federal agents detained 12 people during an immigration enforcement operation in the Florida Keys last week.

    U.S. Customs and Border Protection’s Air and Marine Operations issued a press release Friday saying its agents participated in the operation with the Border Patrol on Nov. 21. A CBP Blackhawk helicopter was also used in the operation, the agency said.

    Customs said the 12 people agents took into custody were illegally in the U.S. from countries including Nicaragua, Cuba, Venezuela, Colombia and Guatemala. The agency said the people were taken to the Border Patrol’s station in the Middle Keys city of Marathon to be processed for removal from the country.

    Agents were pulling cars over that morning in the southbound lanes of U.S. 1 at mile marker 105 in front of the Winn-Dixie supermarket in Key Largo, a witness told the Miami Herald.

    A U.S. Border Patrol agent approaches a car pulled over during an immigration operation in Key Largo Friday, Nov. 21, 2025.
    A U.S. Border Patrol agent approaches a car pulled over during an immigration operation in Key Largo Friday, Nov. 21, 2025. Photo by Nick Rodriguez

    Customs said all of them had “prior charges and convictions” for offenses including re-entry after deportation, driving under the influence, illegal concealed carry of a weapon, drug possession with a weapon, battery and domestic violence.

    As of Friday, none of the people’s cases have shown up in public federal court records.

    Increased immigration enforcement in the Florida Keys

    Since the Trump administration’s crackdown on undocumented immigrants, Border Patrol and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement have ramped up operations in the Keys, according to court records.

    Much of the enforcement effort appears to be happening around the Big Pine Key area in the Lower Keys.

    But, increased operations appear to be happening in the Upper Keys as well. The Florida Keys Weekly reported that on Nov. 17, a man and 16-year-old boy were pulled over on the way to drop the teen off at Coral Shores High School on Plantation Key, where he is a student.

    Both were detained, the newspaper reported. ICE could not immediately be reached for comment on where the boy is being held. Monroe County School District Deputy Superintendent Amber Acevedo told the Herald that she “did not have specific information” about the incident.

    On Sunday, Border Patrol agents pulled over a Ford pickup truck at mile marker 99 in Key Largo because “law enforcement databases indicated that the registered owner is an illegal alien residing in the United States,” a Border Patrol complaint filed Tuesday states.

    A handcuffed man sits in a U.S. Customs Air and Marine Operations boat off Rodriguez Key Tuesday, Nov. 25, 2025.
    A handcuffed man sits in a U.S. Customs Air and Marine Operations boat off Rodriguez Key Tuesday, Nov. 25, 2025. U.S. Customs and Border Protection

    According to the complaint, the driver, Lucas Jimenez-Ramos is a citizen of Guatemala illegally living in the U.S. The complaint states that he was previously deported in October 2019. He now faces a charge of “re-entry of a removed alien,” the complaint states.

    Also this week, a Customs Air and Marine Operations crew stopped a boat Tuesday off Rodriguez Key, a small uninhabited island just offshore of Key Largo, to conduct a “vessel document check,” the agency said in a statement.

    A man on the boat was a Venezuelan citizen “illegally present in the United States after deportation,” the statement said. He was also taken to the Border Patrol’s station in Marathon to be processed for removal.

    David Goodhue

    Miami Herald

    David Goodhue covers the Florida Keys and South Florida for FLKeysNews.com and the Miami Herald. Before joining the Herald, he covered Congress, the Environmental Protection Agency and the Department of Energy in Washington, D.C. He is a graduate of the University of Delaware.

    [ad_2]

    David Goodhue

    Source link

  • Charlotte church leads program to feed immigrant families after Border Patrol raids

    [ad_1]

    Kayla Neal, left, and Caris Malone organize food donations at Tabernaculo de Garcia in Charlotte, N.C., on Tuesday, November 25, 2025.

    Kayla Neal, left, and Caris Malone organize food donations at Tabernaculo de Garcia in Charlotte two days before Thanksgiving.

    Knikouyeh@charlotteobserver.com

    Pastor Adalberto Hernandez began receiving calls from his congregants shortly after Border Patrol arrived in Charlotte this month.

    At first, they’d tell him they were staying home from work and school out of fear they could be swept up in detentions. But as the days pressed on, a new threat emerged: hunger.

    Staying home cost Latino and immigrant families wages they need to pay bills. And many feared even a trip to the grocery store could put them in harm’s way, knowing that federal agents had targeted markets.

    People were running out of money, food and necessities, said Marleny Hernandez, whose husband is the pastor of Tabernaculo de Gracia in Archdale.

    Her church began offering grocery runs for its congregants. In just seven days, that gesture of kindness ballooned into a full-time, multi-organization effort to keep as many community members fed as possible.

    The church has assembled and delivered more than 300 boxes of food as of Wednesday, Marleny Hernandez said. Volunteers are calling it “Operación Esparanza” — translated “Operation Hope.”

    Southwest Charlotte community bands together to feed its own

    Anna Hernandez woke up to the sound of car horns blaring outside her Nations Ford home on Nov. 15. A minute went by. Two minutes. Five, 10.

    The unwelcome noise seemed to go on forever. She peeked outside to trace the source, to no avail.

    Then, she said, it hit her.

    “The feeling of guilt that I felt to realize that I woke up annoyed at the sound of the community alerting each other,” Anna Hernandez said. “People were making noise to alert each other that (Border Patrol members) were in the area.”

    Kayla Neal organizes food donations at Tabernaculo de Garcia in Charlotte, N.C., on Tuesday, November 25, 2025.
    Kayla Neal organizes food donations at Tabernaculo de Garcia. The church has assembled and delivered more than 300 boxes of food as of Wednesday. KHADEJEH NIKOUYEH Knikouyeh@charlotteobserver.com

    Anna Hernandez quickly mobilized support in any way she could.

    She’s a volunteer with Transforming Nations Ford, a community development nonprofit founded by Councilwoman-elect Joi Mayo. With Mayo’s approval, Anna Hernandez began a fundraising campaign through the nonprofit to help purchase essential items.

    Then, she connected with her friends at Tabernaculo de Gracia and other nonprofits to pool their resources. Anna Hernandez is a friend of the pastor’s daughters but has no blood relation to the family.

    Kayla Neal, one of roughly 100 volunteers, began calling around to hotels, grocery stores and retailers to see if they could spare any items for the cause. She’s collected pies, sandwiches and soaps from businesses wanting to help.

    It’s been tireless work, with some volunteers reporting 14-hour days of unpaid charity. Sara Hernandez, one of the pastor’s daughters, said the term “labor of love” has been floated to describe what they’re doing, but that doesn’t feel quite right.

    “This has really been a labor of grief,” Sara Hernandez said. “The grief that we feel for losing our community members. The fear and terror that our community experiences because of immigration’s presence. There’s still love present in that grief, love for our community and love for our brothers and sisters and the city of Charlotte.”

    The Department of Homeland Security said Border Patrol arrested more than 370 people in the Charlotte area between Nov. 15-20, when local officials said the operation had ended. Immigration and Customs Enforcement will continue working in the city.

    The family behind Tabernaculo de Gracia

    Marleny and Adalberto Hernandez are both first-generation immigrants who moved to the United States as teenagers.

    Marleny was the youngest of nine children in El Salvador. Her oldest siblings fled to the U.S. in the late ‘70s during the country’s civil war.

    Her mother was worried about her safety because children were being kidnapped from their homes, she recalled. Her mom moved her from town to town to protect her, but eventually decided it was best to send her out of the country when she was 13.

    Marleny Hernandez lived in the country as an undocumented refugee for decades, she said, until she became a legal permanent resident in 2001 after a long and difficult process. She became a citizen in 2021.

    “We understand when people are in need of basic things. And as a church, we are called to provide for the needs of people,” Marleny Hernandez said.

    Adalberto Hernandez began preaching in the Nations Ford and Archdale area 18 years ago. They were supposed to have an 18th anniversary celebration the same weekend the Border Patrol came to town.

    Their efforts in the past two weeks have touched lives across international lines, Sara Hernandez said.

    They’ve received voice memos from people in Central America who rely on their loved ones in Charlotte for support, thanking the church for providing milk to their grandchildren.

    “My parents’ faith is beyond just singing songs on a Sunday and preaching a sermon,” Sara Hernandez said. “It’s going out into the world and to our communities and serving people the best we can.”

    Kayla Neal, left, brings inside a box of food donations as Anna Hernandez holds the door at Tabernaculo de Garcia in Charlotte, N.C., on Tuesday, November 25, 2025. Volunteers delivered more than 300 boxes in one week to families in need.
    Kayla Neal brings a box of food donations inside to the Tabernaculo de Garcia church. KHADEJEH NIKOUYEH Knikouyeh@charlotteobserver.com

    How to give and receive help

    Individuals in need of help can text “apoyo,” which translates to “support,” to the church line at 704-312-2117. A volunteer will then reach out to collect information over a phone call. Delivery drivers are bilingual and can communicate with recipients.

    Those looking to support can donate items, time or money. Rice, beans, sugar, baby wipes, diapers, ramen and maseca are especially needed.

    Transforming Nations Ford is accepting physical donations as we as online monetary donations.

    Tabernaculo de Gracia and its volunteers took a two-day break following Wednesday’s deliveries to regroup and strategize for a sustainable operation moving forward, Sara Hernandez said. Many volunteers, including herself, took multiple days off of work to help out.

    “Amidst the anger, frustration and grief that we’re experiencing, there is hope that’s come through,” Sara Hernandez said.

    “This is us actively loving our neighbors.”

    This story was originally published November 27, 2025 at 6:00 AM.

    Related Stories from Charlotte Observer

    Nick Sullivan

    The Charlotte Observer

    Nick Sullivan covers the City of Charlotte for The Observer. He studied journalism at the University of South Carolina, and he previously covered education for The Arizona Republic and The Colorado Springs Gazette.

    [ad_2]

    Nick Sullivan

    Source link

  • Judge tosses one charge for Charlotte man who photographed Border Patrol

    [ad_1]

    Miguel Angel Garcia Martinez was arrested Sunday, Nov. 16, 2025, in Charlotte by the U.S. Border Patrol.

    Miguel Angel Garcia Martinez was arrested Sunday, Nov. 16, 2025, in Charlotte by the U.S. Border Patrol.

    Courtesy photo

    A federal judge on Wednesday partially dismissed charges the federal government brought against Miguel Martinez — a U.S. citizen who was arrested after documenting Border Patrol in Charlotte this month.

    Martinez, 24, took photos of agents at several locations on Nov. 16, the second day they roamed the city in paramilitary gear and questioned and stopped people in public places. Border Patrol agents tried to get Martinez to engage in a “voluntary stop,” but he fled after circling agents in a parking lot, according to court documents.

    A chase followed, and Martinez, who was previously convicted of resisting an officer, was charged with felony assaulting, resisting, opposing, impeding, intimidating or interfering with federal officers. That federal charge was enhanced when the government claimed he used a “deadly or dangerous weapon” — his car — in the alleged crime.

    But video played during Martinez’s three-hour preliminary hearing in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of North Carolina showed footage from inside a car carrying four ICE agents who said they planned to “smash” into Martinez. At one point an agent said “he’s gonna get shot.”

    After nearly a week of deliberating, U.S. Magistrate Judge David Keesler on Wednesday issued an order dismissing the enhancement charge of using a deadly weapon to impede officers. He found there was probable cause “to believe [Martinez] forcibly interfered with the CBP agents.”

    Miguel Martinez’s federal charges

    During the chase, both Martinez and agents drove over medians and on the wrong side of the road, video shows.

    Martinez’s federal public defender argued Martinez had every right to flee. When agents tried to stop Martinez, they were infringing on his First Amendment rights to engage in “citizen journalism” and document agents in public spaces, lawyer John Parke Davis said.

    Brayan Vicente Martinez, and his girlfriend Lienarani Bermudez stand outside the Home Depot on University City Boulevard where Martinez’s older brother, Miguel Angel Garcia Martinez, snapped photos of masked agents and sent them to warn others.
    Brayan Vicente Martinez, and his girlfriend Lienarani Bermudez stand outside the Home Depot on University City Boulevard where Martinez’s older brother, Miguel Angel Garcia Martinez, snapped photos of masked agents and sent them to warn others. Melissa Melvin-Rodriguez mrodriguez@charlotteobserver.com

    After the chase started, Martinez swerved to avoid the collision ICE agents wanted, Davis said. Federal officers eventually stopped Martinez after about two miles and charged him.

    Assistant U.S. Attorney Caryn Finley told Keesler “it’s lucky nobody got hurt” as Martinez continued to flee. He could’ve “just stopped” as agents in cars with lights and sirens followed him, she said.

    Keesler wrote that Martinez’s “circling of the CBP agents, the subsequent vehicular chase, and the danger posed by [his] driving” support a finding of probable cause that he interfered, but “considering … testimony and the video, the Court is not persuaded there is probable cause to support use of a deadly or dangerous weapon to interfere.”

    Keesler said he respectfully acknowledged the time Davis spent arguing on the “infringement of First Amendment rights and the alleged misconduct of ICE and CBP agents.”

    “At this stage, those matters are not properly before the Court; the question for the Court at this moment is probable cause. The Court makes no finding here regarding the basis for future litigation regarding Defendant’s First Amendment rights, or Defendant’s future motions practice in this criminal matter,” Keesler wrote.

    Martinez’s next court date has not been set.

    Martinez’s parents immigrated from Mexico, and he was “trying to protect immigrants,” so they knew where agents were, his family said of his actions.

    Follow More of Our Reporting on In the Spotlight

    Related Stories from Charlotte Observer

    Julia Coin

    The Charlotte Observer

    Julia Coin covers courts, legal issues, police and public safety around Charlotte and is part of the Pulitzer-finalist team that covered Tropical Storm Helene in North Carolina. As the Observer’s breaking news reporter, she unveiled how fentanyl infiltrated local schools. Michigan-born and Florida-raised, she studied journalism at the University of Florida, where she covered statewide legislation, sexual assault on campus and Hurricane Ian in her hometown of Sanibel Island.
    Support my work with a digital subscription

    [ad_2]

    Julia Coin

    Source link

  • Fact-checking claims about Border Patrol’s NC operation

    [ad_1]

    The Trump administration’s deployment of Border Patrol agents in North Carolina’s largest cities prompted a range of claims about the operation from all parts of the political spectrum.

    Some of the claims about “Operation Charlotte’s Web” were misleading.

    The Department of Homeland Security on Nov. 15 launched the operation in Charlotte and then expanded its efforts to Raleigh days later. The cities were the latest targets of the federal government’s stepped-up immigration enforcement, a campaign promise and top priority of President Donald Trump.

    The operation’s stated goal: to capture immigrants who are in the U.S. illegally and have been previously arrested for criminal offenses. By Friday, Border Patrol reported that it had arrested about 370 people.

    The operation is ongoing despite objections from local and state officials in Raleigh and Charlotte who worry about teams of agents disrupting their cities, which they claim are already safe. Gov. Josh Stein, a Democrat, criticized the operation as targeting everyday people for their skin color — a claim DHS has disputed

    “I call on federal agents to target violent criminals, not neighbors walking down the street, going to church, or putting up Christmas decorations,” Stein said Tuesday.

    Here is a roundup of claims we found to be inaccurate or disputed.

    Are North Carolina jails refusing to turn over arrestees to law enforcement ‘right now’?

    That’s what Tricia McLaughlin, assistant secretary for public affairs for the Department of Homeland Security, said in an interview with Fox News. However, there’s no evidence it’s true.

    “There’s about 1,400 criminal illegal aliens that, right now, are in North Carolina and Charlotte’s jails that they refuse to turn over to ICE law enforcement,” McLaughlin said in a video clip the department posted on X on Nov. 17. 

    It’s possible she misspoke. The department’s Nov. 15 press release about the operation says North Carolina officials ignored nearly 1,400 of the department’s requests — known as “detainers” — to hold immigrants in local jails so that federal immigration officials could pick them up. It’s unclear when those requests were made or if each one refers to a separate inmate. We asked the department about its numbers and McLaughlin’s claim. A department spokesperson said “CBP has no further information to provide.” 

    North Carolina sheriffs are legally required to notify ICE when they take someone into custody who they suspect is in the country illegally. They must also comply if ICE demands that the inmate be kept in custody for federal agents to pick up. North Carolina Republican lawmakers passed this law last year over the veto of then-Gov. Roy Cooper, a Democrat, who said it was unconstitutional and also infringed on the rights of sheriffs to run their jails how they see fit.

    Do North Carolina cities have sanctuary policies?

    The department’s Nov. 15 release said “sanctuary policies” prevented local officials from honoring immigration detainers. That needs clarification. 

    A decade ago, some North Carolina cities banned their law enforcement agencies from cooperating with federal immigration officials. Then in 2015, former Gov. Pat McCrory, a Republican, signed a law banning those types of policies. However, North Carolina sheriffs maintained the legal flexibility to ignore the detainers if they wanted. 

    Although most of North Carolina’s 100 sheriffs complied with detainer requests, some did not. Sheriffs in Wake and Mecklenburg counties, for instance, said honoring detainers would strain their relationships with people in their communities and potentially create legal issues. Some courts have said ICE detainers, which aren’t approved by any judge, violate the Constitution. 

    The GOP-controlled North Carolina General Assembly last year enacted the law requiring sheriffs to honor the detainers. A spokesperson for the North Carolina Sheriffs Association, which represents the state’s sheriffs and advocates on their behalf, said he believes all sheriffs are currently complying with the law.

    The Mecklenburg County Sheriff’s Office is not blocking immigration officials from any of the 85 people in its jail who are suspected of being in the country illegally, office spokesperson Sarah Mastouri said. The Wake County Sheriff’s Office is also complying with detainer requests, office spokesperson Rosalia Fedora said. Between Nov. 1 and Nov. 19, federal immigration officials took into custody 28 people who were in the Wake County jail, she said.

    Does the uptick in ICE raids harm broader public safety?

    Democratic state Supreme Court Justice Anita Earls believes so. In a lengthy statement criticizing the raids, she wrote that the large national immigration crackdown “is making the public less safe, in part because it has resulted in abandoning the effort to stop serious crimes. These agents are being pulled off cases investigating sex trafficking, child abuse and terrorism.”

    Earls is correct that ICE has taken thousands of federal agents off their work on other cases to help round people up in the raids in cities across the country. But does that make the country less safe? Not everyone agrees. 

    Trump personally ordered thousands of federal agents reassigned to ICE on his first day in office this year, writing in an executive order that he was doing so because “many of these aliens unlawfully within the United States present significant threats to national security and public safety, committing vile and heinous acts against innocent Americans.”

    According to data analysis by the Cato Institute, a libertarian think tank, roughly one-fifth of all FBI agents, as well as half of all DEA agents, have been reassigned to working on immigration raids like the ones in North Carolina due to Trump’s executive order.

    Ninety percent of the Department of Homeland Security Investigations staff has been reassigned to ICE, according to Cato. HSI is a unit of ICE but traditionally handles international criminal activity, rather than immigration enforcement. Those 6,198 HSI agents had previously been tasked with handling human trafficking, child exploitation, cybercrime, weapons export controls, intellectual property theft, drugs, and terrorism cases — the same issues Earls raised concerns over. 

    Trump wrote in his executive order that as long as he’s president, “the primary mission of [HSI] is the enforcement of … federal laws related to the illegal entry and unlawful presence of aliens in the United States.”

    Did Charlotte traffic plummet after Border Patrol started its operation?

    Some X posts claimed that traffic cleared around Charlotte after Border Patrol launched its operation. The Department of Homeland Security shared a post showing a map of Charlotte with clear roads, adding the caption: “You’re welcome.” And state data shows traffic dipped in some areas.

    The state Department of Transportation monitors traffic on the major thoroughfares around Charlotte, such as Interstate 77, Interstate 85, Interstate 485, and U.S. 21. We wanted to compare traffic on Nov. 17 with traffic on Nov. 10 — the Monday after Board Patrol arrived vs. the Monday before agents arrived. The number of vehicles dipped between 1% and 7.9% depending on the road, a DOT spokesperson told us. 

    In the Raleigh area, Border Patrol agents ramped up their operation Tuesday and Wednesday. Traffic volumes were down 0.5% to 4.8% on Wake County thoroughfares on those days compared to the previous week, DOT said. 

    Are nearly 15% of Mecklenburg County’s public school students here illegally?

    Stephen Miller, President Donald Trump’s deputy White House chief of staff, shared a news report on X that nearly 21,000 of the county’s students missed school on Nov. 17, adding: “So a conservative estimate is that one-seventh of a major southern public school district is here illegally.”

    The Charlotte-Mecklenburg School System’s average daily membership is about 140,000 students, according to 2023-24 data collected by the state Department of Public Instruction. The number of students who missed class that day — about 21,000 — does come out to about one-seventh of the district’s student population, or 15%. But that doesn’t mean that the students who were no-shows are in the U.S. illegally.

    The latest available data shows that nearly 8% of Charlotte-Mecklenburg students miss class on any given day. 

    Students often miss school because they are sick, have an appointment, or are on vacation. It’s also possible some students skipped school because they were afraid immigration agents would target them whether or not they are citizens. It’s difficult to know how many of the district’s students entered the U.S. illegally because the state doesn’t track its students’ citizenship statuses. 

    Did immigration agents shoot someone in Charlotte?

    That’s what a video on social media claimed, showing a man being wheeled away in a stretcher as masked, armed federal agents kept watch on the crowd gathered nearby and filming.

    McLaughlin said the social media post was false. The man in the stretcher was being taken into ICE custody, she said, but hadn’t been shot. She said he “had a panic attack and was taken to the hospital, where he attempted to escape by climbing into the ceiling tiles from the hospital bathroom. He was unsuccessful and was apprehended inside the ceiling by law enforcement.”

    Is Border Patrol done with North Carolina? 

    Democratic leaders in Charlotte on Nov. 20 celebrated what they said was the end of the operation. Charlotte Mayor Vi Lyles wrote on social media: “It appears that U.S. Border Patrol has ceased its operations in Charlotte. I’m relieved for our community and the residents, businesses, and all those who were targeted and impacted by this intrusion.”

    But, later that same day, federal officials said those announcements were far too premature. McLaughlin, the DHS spokeswoman, said “the operation is not over and is not ending anytime soon.”

    In the Triangle, ICE has a permanent presence, it maintains a detention center in Cary. Local police investigated a “suspicious vehicle” parked near there Friday, even calling in a bomb squad, which ultimately deemed the vehicle safe.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Charlotte man says Border Patrol agents injured him as he drove for groceries

    [ad_1]

    Cristobal Maltos said he was driving to a grocery store around 8:30 a.m. or 9 a.m. Nov. 17 when a hit-and-run driver came out of nowhere and sideswiped him.

    “I followed him and was on the phone with the police,” Maltos, 24, told The Charlotte Observer on Thursday. “I gave them the license plate number.”

    What happened next landed him in a hospital, he said, and the filing of wrongful charges against him by U.S. Customs and Border Protection.

    His encounter with a swarm of federal agents came during a five-day federal immigration enforcement operation dubbed “Charlotte’s Web” that officials say resulted in about 370 arrests in the Charlotte area. The Department of Homeland Security has not released most names of people taken.

    Agents accused Maltos of following them as they conducted stops and arrests Monday, according to a criminal complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of North Carolina. He reversed his car when U.S. Border Patrol agents first tried to make contact with him, officials said.

    Three Border Patrol cars and five agents surrounded Maltos when he later began following them, according to the complaint.

    The agents asked him for 30 seconds to roll down his window, court records show. An officer “leaned over the hood of the vehicle on the front drivers’ side.” Then Maltos’ car moved forward 30 feet, its side mirror hitting an officer, officials alleged. Then the car reversed slowly, and officers smashed the driver’s side window, opened the door and removed Maltos, according to court documents.

    Body camera shows the encounter, according to the complaint.

    Agents said they read Maltos his Miranda rights, which he waived, according to court documents. “Maltos eventually admitted he moved the vehicle forward in first gear” and “claimed he was in shock and was trying to get away, but did not admit striking the officer,” documents say.

    Maltos was jailed on charges of felony assault, resisting arrest and impeding a federal officer. He was released on a $25,000 unsecured bond.

    “Everybody’s saying I had run him over, assaulted a federal officer,” Maltos told the Observer in a phone interview. “That’s not true. I want everybody to know the truth of what happened.”

    Driver says federal narrative is false

    As the large hit-and-run vehicle made a U-turn, another unmarked SUV suddenly appeared and blocked both lanes. He soon realized it was ICE, he said.

    While he was still on the phone with police, describing what was happening, he said agents with weapons drawn approached his Honda Accord.

    He said he backed up to be safe, and the agents returned to their vehicles.

    At the next intersection, Arrowood Road and South Tryon Street, a third unmarked vehicle sped ahead to cut him off, he said.

    The vehicle stopped in the middle of the intersection and blocked both lanes, he said. A sedan was parked behind him.

    Within seconds, I was trapped between three unmarked ICE vehicles,” Maltos said on a GoFundMe page he said he started primarily to get the truth out about the incident.

    About 10 agents surrounded his car, he said. “I was terrified and in shock,” he said. “My car stalled when I accidentally released the clutch — I drive a manual vehicle — but before I could process anything, the agents rushed me.”

    Glass sprayed into his face and eyes when agents broke both front windows, he said. They shattered his mirror, dented his door and used a crowbar to pry it open.”

    Cristobal Maltos said glass sprayed into his face and eyes when agents broke the front windows of his car on Monday, Nov. 17, 2025. They shattered his mirror, dented his door and used a crowbar to pry it open, he said.
    Cristobal Maltos said glass sprayed into his face and eyes when agents broke the front windows of his car on Monday, Nov. 17, 2025. They shattered his mirror, dented his door and used a crowbar to pry it open, he said. Cristobal Maltos

    Cristobal Maltos said glass sprayed into his face and eyes when agents broke the front windows of his car on Monday, Nov. 17, 2025. They shattered his mirror, dented his door and used a crowbar to pry it open, he said.
    Cristobal Maltos said glass sprayed into his face and eyes when agents broke the front windows of his car on Monday, Nov. 17, 2025. They shattered his mirror, dented his door and used a crowbar to pry it open, he said. Cristobal Maltos

    Maltos said he was still strapped in his seatbelt.

    “When they finally unbuckled me, I told them I had recently undergone surgery and that I was a U.S. citizen,” he said. “One agent responded, ‘I don’t care.’”

    He said the agents threw him onto the asphalt, which was covered in broken glass, “causing even more injuries.” Then they dragged him into one of the SUVs, he said.

    Cristobal Maltos said he suffered injuries when federal agents pulled him from his car and threw him onto the glass-strewn ashpalt on South Tryon Street in Charlotte on Monday, Nov. 17, 2025.
    Cristobal Maltos said he suffered injuries when federal agents pulled him from his car and threw him onto the glass-strewn ashpalt on South Tryon Street in Charlotte on Monday, Nov. 17, 2025. Cristobal Maltos

    Cristobal Maltos said he suffered injuries when federal agents pulled him from his car and threw him onto the glass-strewn ashpalt on South Tryon Street in Charlotte on Monday, Nov. 17, 2025.
    Cristobal Maltos said he suffered injuries when federal agents pulled him from his car and threw him onto the glass-strewn ashpalt on South Tryon Street in Charlotte on Monday, Nov. 17, 2025. Cristobal Maltos

    “At one point, I was told they were ‘two seconds from shooting me,’” he said.

    Maltos said he was taken to the FBI office in Charlotte and then to the Gaston County jail. He said he is an American citizen born in Chicago and raised in Charlotte.

    “I never imagined I would experience what happened to me,” he said.

    He was injured and “emotionally traumatized,” he said, left “struggling to understand why this happened to me in my own country.”

    This story was originally published November 24, 2025 at 5:00 AM.

    Related Stories from Charlotte Observer

    Joe Marusak

    The Charlotte Observer

    Joe Marusak has been a reporter for The Charlotte Observer since 1989 covering the people, municipalities and major news events of the region, and was a news bureau editor for the paper. He currently reports on breaking news.
    Support my work with a digital subscription

    [ad_2]

    Joe Marusak

    Source link