ReportWire

Tag: books

  • The Right-Wing Nonprofit Serving A.I. Slop for America’s Birthday

    [ad_1]

    PragerU is also supplying the multimedia content for the Freedom Truck Mobile Museums, a travelling exhibition of touch-screen displays, Revolutionary War artifacts, and A.I. slop that will chug across the country on tractor-trailers throughout 2026, in celebration of the two-hundred-and-fiftieth anniversary of the Declaration of Independence. It seems that the battle over who defines good and evil—or, at least, over who defines American history—will be waged, in part, from the helm of an eighteen-wheeler.

    Prager, who is seventy-seven, is an observant Jew who sees evangelical Christians as natural allies in his pursuit of “transforming America into a faith-based nation,” as he once wrote. (He has also lamented what he termed Jewish “bigotry” toward evangelical Christians, whose “support, and often even love, of the Jewish people and Israel is the most unrequited love I have ever seen on a large scale.”) In 2009, decades into a successful career in conservative talk radio, he co-founded PragerU, in order to provide what he called a “free alternative to the dominant left-wing ideology in culture, media, and education.” PragerU has received major funding from hard-right benefactors, including Betsy DeVos’s family foundation and the billionaire fracking brothers Dan and Farris Wilks. According to its most recent tax filing—which describes PragerU’s purpose as “marketing and producing educational content for all ages, 4-104, with a focus on a pro-American, Judeo-Christian message”—it received more than sixty-six million dollars in donations in 2024. (In November of that year, Prager sustained a severe spinal-cord injury in a fall that left him paralyzed below the shoulders; he has since resumed making video content for the PragerU website, and composed part of “If There Is No God” by dictation.)

    Prager’s nonprofit is just one of dozens of conservative organizations, many of them Christian, that are named as “partners” in the America 250 Civics Education Coalition, which is overseen by Linda McMahon, the Education Secretary. The coalition has the secular task of developing programming for America’s birthday, such as PragerU’s Founders Museum and the Freedom Trucks, the latter of which received a fourteen-million-dollar grant from the federal Institute of Museum and Library Services. (In March, President Trump signed executive orders to dismantle both the I.M.L.S. and the D.O.E.; they remain alive, albeit in shrunken, ideologized versions of their former selves.) Other America 250 partners include both of the major pro-Trump think tanks (the America First Policy Institute and the Heritage Foundation), a Christian liberal-arts school (Hillsdale College), the Supreme Court’s favorite conservative-Christian legal-advocacy group (the Alliance Defending Freedom), the Christian-right-aligned church of Charlie Kirk (Turning Point USA), and something called Priests for Life.

    According to a D.O.E. press release, the America 250 coalition is “dedicated to renewing patriotism, strengthening civic knowledge, and advancing a shared understanding of America’s founding principles in schools across the nation.” Of course, one of America’s founding principles, taught in every civics class, is the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment, which might seem to frown on the knitting together of so many religious organizations and public funds intended to advance civic education.

    “Real patriotic education,” McMahon said, at the opening of the Founders Museum last year, “means that, just as our founders loved and honored America, so we should honor them, while deeply learning and earnestly debating, still, their ideas.” One way to take McMahon up on this challenge is to deeply learn what James Madison wrote, in 1785, after a bill arose in Virginia’s General Assembly to establish a taxpayer provision for “Teachers of the Christian Religion.” In a petition to his colleagues in the Assembly, Madison asked, “Who does not see that the same authority which can establish Christianity, in exclusion of all other Religions, may establish with the same ease any particular sect of Christians, in exclusion of all other Sects?” He abhorred the proposal as “a melancholy mark” of “sudden degeneracy.” “Instead of holding forth an Asylum to the persecuted,” he wrote, “it is itself a signal of persecution.” A governing body that would permit such an incursion on the free exercise of religion was one that “may sweep away all our fundamental rights,” Madison warned. The bill died.

    Although PragerU has won fans at the highest levels of federal and state government, its educational content and short-form videos are reviled across many chambers of the internet, where the Prager name—attached to videos with titles such as “DEI Must Die,” “Preferred Pronouns or Prison,” “Multiculturalism: A Bad Idea,” and “Is Fascism Right or Left?”—has become synonymous with MAGA-brand disinformation. (PragerU claims that its videos receive tens of millions of views per quarter, but these metrics have not been independently verified.) A PragerU Kids video called “How to Think Objectively,” which was reportedly shown in Houston public schools, provides the thinnest façade for a lesson in climate-change denial. Democratic socialism and, especially, immigration are scourges of the Prager-verse, which has attempted to undermine the constitutional provision of birthright citizenship and cranked out endless pro-ICE videos since the Department of Homeland Security began its violent occupations of Minneapolis and other major U.S. cities.

    [ad_2]

    Jessica Winter

    Source link

  • Oregon Reaches Major Milestone Through Dolly Parton’s Imagination Library – KXL

    [ad_1]

    SALEM, OR – Dolly Parton’s Imagination Library of Oregon has mailed its four-millionth book to a child in Oregon, marking a major milestone for early literacy in the state.

    The program provides free, age-appropriate books each month to children from birth to age 5. It first launched in Oregon in 2007.

    State leaders expanded the program statewide in 2024, offering matching funds to boost local enrollment and access. By April 2025, the Imagination Library reached full statewide coverage. Since that expansion, more than 1.39 million books — over one-third of the total mailed — have been sent to Oregon children.

    Currently, about 35% of Oregon children under age 5 are enrolled. In some communities, participation tops 50%.

    Oregon First Lady Aimee Kotek Wilson, who has hosted read-aloud events across the state, called the program an investment in Oregon’s future.

    The Imagination Library was founded in 1995 by Dolly Parton and was inspired by her father’s inability to read. The goal: put books directly into children’s hands and help families build daily reading habits before kindergarten.

    More about:

    [ad_2]

    Tim Lantz

    Source link

  • Prince William thought former Prince Andrew was an ‘ignoramus’ before King Charles took action: author

    [ad_1]

    NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

    Prince William had a few choice words about his disgraced uncle before his father, King Charles III, took action.

    The claim comes from Russell Myers, royal editor of the Daily Mirror and author of the new book “William and Catherine,” which examines how the Prince and Princess of Wales have weathered the storms that have rocked the House of Windsor. 

    Myers told Fox News Digital that palace aides had sounded the alarm about former Prince Andrew’s behavior before his relationship with late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein came to light.

    From left: The former Prince Andrew, King Charles III and Prince William attend Katharine, Duchess of Kent’s Requiem Mass service at Westminster Cathedral on Sept. 16, 2025, in London. Andrew was arrested on Feb. 19, 2026. Thames Valley Police confirmed to Fox News Digital he was released hours later. (Max Mumby/Indigo/Getty Images)

    “It was very clear to me, made by several people I’d spoken to for the book, how William thought his uncle was always a bit of an ignoramus,” said Myers.

    “He had a real issue with the way that Andrew treated his staff,” he shared. “He didn’t like his attitude of entitlement and privilege. This is very alien to both William and Catherine. 

    Former Prince Andrew

    Princess Diana’s former butler Paul Burrell previously claimed to Fox News Digital that Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor would tell palace aides to “f off.” (Max Mumby/Indigo/Getty Images)

    “They are very centered on producing really sound and enjoyable working environments for the people who are employed by them. They’re very respectful of the people that they work with. You just have to look at the amount of time that people stayed and worked within their household.”

    WATCH: PRINCE WILLIAM SAW FORMER PRINCE ANDREW AS ENTITLED, URGED EXILE: AUTHOR

    Myers noted that tensions between William and Charles intensified after Andrew gave a bombshell interview to the BBC in 2019, where he attempted to explain his friendship with Epstein.

    “After that disastrous 2019 interview Andrew gave to the BBC’s ‘Newsnight,’ in which he failed to apologize for his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, … William had the foresight to say, ‘This man must not have any place within the institution, any place within the family. He must be banished because he got himself into this mess, and he must be banished before the rot sets in.’”

    Prince Andrew in a suit and top hat looking at a woman wearing a light pink suit and floral hat as Jeffrey Epstein looks on.

    This undated photo shows Prince Andrew and Jeffrey Epstein at Ascot in the U.K. (Tim Graham Photo Library via Getty Images)

    “That’s what he told the late queen and his father at the time,” Myers claimed. “… [Andrew] failed to apologize for his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. He failed to acknowledge the real impact on Jeffrey Epstein’s victims and really gave a very bad account of himself. … I think it was six years later before King Charles finally took that action of stripping his title, stripping his honors and exiling him from public life.”

    "William and Catherine" book cover.

    “William and Catherine: The Monarchy’s New Era: The Inside Story,” by Russell Myers, will be published on March 10, 2026, in the U.S.  (Pegasus Books)

    Charles ascended to the throne following the death of his mother, Queen Elizabeth II, in 2022. Myers noted the monarch faced mounting pressure from the public and William to address “the Andrew problem” swiftly.

    “You’re also seeing investigators building cases from a catalog of allegations that have followed Andrew,” said Myers.

    Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor looking at the camera as he kneels next to an unidentified woman.

    Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor was featured in three new photos from the recent Epstein files drop. (Department of Justice)

    “And even though he’s denied all the allegations that have been put in front of him, we only have to look at what is happening now. Multiple police forces are investigating a catalog of claims and allegations relating to his misconduct.”

    CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR THE ENTERTAINMENT NEWSLETTER

    Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor smiling outside a church at Prince William while the prince looks annoyed in a dark suit.

    Prince William and his wife Catherine have been “deeply concerned” by the latest revelations linking Andrew to late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, Kensington Palace said on Feb. 9, 2026. (Max Mumby/Indigo/Getty Images)

    “I think if William had had his way, then certainly the royal family would’ve been able to be on the front foot many years ago,” Myers added.

    Fox News Digital reached out to Kensington Palace for comment. A spokesperson for Buckingham Palace previously told Fox News Digital, “We don’t comment on such books.”

    A photo of Prince Andrew and Ghislaine Maxwell found in the Justice Department's latest release of Epstein files.

    A photo of Prince Andrew and Ghislaine Maxwell was found in the Justice Department’s release of Epstein files. (Department of Justice)

    Royal commentator Meredith Constant told Fox News Digital that before Andrew’s scandals, Charles and his heir didn’t always see eye-to-eye on how the monarchy should be managed.

    A close-up of King Charles in uniform walking ahead of Prince Andrew in a suit.

    Former Prince Andrew and King Charles are seen attending the funeral of their mother, Queen Elizabeth II, on Sept. 19, 2022, in London. (Samir Hussein/WireImage/Getty Images)

    “When the queen died, there were people in the palace afraid of how the public would receive Charles,” Constant explained. “There have been calls since William was a child for Charles to step out of the way in favor of King William’s reign sooner. The idea, after the queen’s death, that Charles and William were in ‘lockstep’ was largely invented.”

    “Charles wants to bring the monarchy into the 21st century, while still respecting the pomp that comes with the job,” said Constant.

    Prince William walks red carpet at BAFTAs with Kate Middleton

    Prince William and Catherine, Princess of Wales attend the 2026 EE BAFTA Film Awards at The Royal Festival Hall on Feb. 22, 2026, in London. (Samir Hussein/Getty Images)

    “Despite battling cancer, King Charles led the pack in the number of royal engagements for 2025, with 533, versus William with 202. Prince William envisions a monarchy where he takes on fewer causes but does more behind the scenes for maximum impact. 

    LIKE WHAT YOU’RE READING? CLICK HERE FOR MORE ENTERTAINMENT NEWS

    Prince William sitting and listening to scientists while surrounded by computer hardware and monitors.

    Prince William, Prince of Wales listens to scientists during a visit to Isambard-AI, the U.K.’s most powerful supercomputer at the University of Bristol on Jan. 22, 2026, in Bristol, England.  (Chris Jackson/Getty Images)

    “Like a politician running for office, William has the advantage of saying, primarily through sources, what his reign will look like and what he would do differently. The difference is, he’s not running for office. He was predestined for the role.”

    Royal experts told Fox News Digital that tensions between father and son reportedly led to disagreements over how to address Andrew and the fallout from his scandals.

    King Charles in a gold royal carriage.

    King Charles III was crowned in 2023. (Max Mumby/Indigo/Getty Images)

    “William and Charles differ on the handling of Andrew,” said Constant. “Charles has always felt some responsibility for his brother, especially after his mother died. William is a lot less forgiving of his uncle and thought Andrew should be cut out much earlier, ‘before the rot sets in.’ 

    Prince William, Kate Middleton and Prince Andrew looking serious and stern outside a church.

    Prince William, Kate Middleton and Prince Andrew depart after the requiem mass service for the Duchess of Kent at Westminster Cathedral on Sept. 16, 2025, in London. (Karwai Tang/WireImage/Getty Images)

    “Right now, the Andrew situation is with the police and the U.K. government, so father and son will want to stay out of the way while presenting a united front. It doesn’t help either one of their interests to appear fractured at the moment.”

    “The reality is, we don’t know what William would have done if he were already king,” she noted. “Perhaps he would have diverged from his father, but we’ve also seen areas where William has followed suit despite promising a different strategy, like his relationship with the British media.”

    Prince Andrew in April 2025

    Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor attends the traditional Easter Sunday service at St. George’s Chapel, Windsor Castle on April 20, 2025, in Windsor, England. (Max Mumby/Indigo/Getty Images)

    “The image presented of William as a global statesman, charting a new path, modernizing the monarchy, is a bit at odds with some of what we’ve seen,” she pointed out. “That doesn’t mean he can’t be that changemaker king.”

    CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

    Prince William stands next to King Charles wearing a blue suit.

    Prince William and King Charles III reportedly didn’t always see eye-to-eye about “the Andrew problem.” (Max Mumby/Getty Images)

    According to Myers’ book, William challenged his father directly about Andrew following the queen’s death. However, the Prince of Wales was “very much put in his place,” said a source. While William didn’t agree that Andrew’s exile should be limited, he didn’t provoke his father any further.

    Myers also noted that, for years, William questioned Andrew’s worth in the royal household, asking, “What does he actually do?” Myers claimed that while William has a close relationship with his cousins, Princess Beatrice and Princess Eugenie, William was horrified by how Andrew behaved in front of staff, “ordering people out, the aggressive or dismissive manner.”

    Jeffrey Epstein embracing a smiling Ghislaine Maxwell

    Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell were both indicted on federal sex trafficking charges stemming from Epstein’s years of abuse of underage girls.  (Joe Schildhorn/Patrick McMullan via Getty Images)

    Whenever Andrew faced new allegations involving Epstein, William would “implore the king to act,” urging for his uncle’s title to be stripped and to finally banish him for good.

    King Charles looking away from his worried brother Prince Andrew.

    “Let me state clearly: the law must take its course,” said King Charles III in a statement following Andrew’s arrest. (Adrian Dennis/AFP via Getty Images)

    “The Prince of Wales was adamant the whole episode would never go away and, despite how others may have felt, that there was absolutely no upside in Andrew being protected,” a palace source close to William told Myers.

    “His view was crystal clear: Andrew shouldn’t be anywhere near the family under any circumstances, not by association, not at family functions, anywhere. Every single time there was a new revelation, which no one knew when it was coming or what the next one would be, it was a stain on all of the family.”

    Police officers walking near the entrance to the former residence of Andrew Mountbatten Windsor.

    Police officers walk near the entrance to the Royal Lodge, a property on the estate surrounding Windsor Castle and a former residence of Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, younger brother of Britain’s King Charles. (Jaimi Joy/Reuters)

    Myers wrote that when Charles attempted to coax his brother out of his 30-room mansion, where he lived with his ex-wife, Andrew was “in no mood to move” and told the king he was “going nowhere.”

    FORMER PRINCE ANDREW’S DAUGHTERS TORN BETWEEN LOYALTY AND LEGACY AFTER FATHER’S BIRTHDAY ARREST: EXPERTS

    Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor in the back of a car after release

    Andrew Mountbatten Windsor, formerly known as Prince Andrew, leaves Aylsham Police Station in a vehicle, on the day he was arrested on suspicion of misconduct in public office. (Reuters/Phil Noble TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY)

    On Oct. 30, the king stripped his younger brother of the right to be called prince, forced him to move out of the royal estate he occupied for more than 20 years and issued a public statement supporting the women and girls abused by Epstein.

    Sarah Ferguson and Prince Andrew arrive at Westminster Cathedral for a memorial service, dressed in dark formal attire.

    Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor and his ex-wife Sarah Ferguson were evicted from Royal Lodge. (Max Mumby/Indigo/Getty)

    Then, on Feb. 19 — Andrew’s birthday — the 66-year-old was arrested on suspicion of misconduct in public office during an inquiry linked to his ties with Epstein. He is accused of sharing confidential trade information with the late American financier.

    Former Prince Andrew being driven after he was released following his arrest.

    Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor is seen returning home after leaving police custody, following his arrest on Feb. 19, 2026, in Sandringham, Norfolk.  (Peter Nicholls/Getty Images)

    The late queen’s favorite son is the first senior British royal to be arrested since King Charles I nearly 400 years ago. After being held for about 11 hours, Thames Valley Police confirmed to Fox News Digital that Andrew was released. The investigation is ongoing.

    The Associated Press contributed to this report.

    Related Article

    Former Prince Andrew charged taxpayers for massages while splurging on lavish trips as trade envoy: report

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • The Judy Blume Book That Scandalized a Nation

    [ad_1]

    Living with Tom in New Mexico, Judy had not found the freedom, sexual or otherwise, that she had been after when she left John; to the contrary, she had quickly found herself in another bad marriage. Frustrated, she poured her liberatory aspirations into the book; despite her failure of nerve at the end, Sandy Pressman takes herself for a wilder ride than Judy ever had — flying away to a secret assignation with one lover, sleeping with her brother-in-law at a party (a pool party, where the women ended up drunk and topless), dating the husband of a friend in an open marriage.

    “I was wild,” Judy said. “My fantasies were wild.” She remembered having dinner with her agent, Claire Smith, and Smith’s husband in Brooklyn, after both the Smiths had read a draft of Wifey. “Everyone was so scandalized by it. But [Claire] was not so scandalized so that she wouldn’t sell it. A lot of people wanted me to change my name, warning me I would ruin my lovely career if I published this under my own name.” Before publication, she sent a draft to John. “I said, ‘If there is anything in this book that you don’t want, let me know.’ And he said to me, ‘I don’t care … It’s okay with me.’” Judy wasn’t sure that John ever read it — “I don’t think John ever read any of my books” — but at least she had his blessing.

    While she refused to publish under a pseudonym, she did make one concession to the dictates of decency. In an early draft, Judy had written a scene in which Sandy uses her dog to pleasure herself. “The dog did a little licking of Sandy, and that was very satisfying,” she said. “A little oral sex.” The scene was pure fiction — as an adult, Judy never even owned a dog — but it felt true to Sandy’s character. “It seemed like a good thing to do, [for] somebody who was unfulfilled.” Judy couldn’t remember who asked her to remove the scene; it might have been Claire Smith, or her editor, Phyllis Grann, or Helen Honig Meyer, the publisher of Dell, which oversaw Laurel, Judy’s paperback publisher. Judy heard, second- or thirdhand, that when the book went to Meyer, “she was absolutely scandalized — something to do with [how] her granddaughter liked my books.” Whatever the case, the dog had to go.

    When Wifey was published in September 1978, critics mostly agreed that it was not a good book. The Los Angeles Times critic liked Wifey, calling it “a voyage into reality that is somehow funny in spite of its frustrations and disappointments.” But that was a minority point of view. The Minneapolis Tribune critic said she “didn’t feel much of anything except that there was a lot to wade through on the way to the occasionally risqué,” while the Roanoke Times said the book “meets no needs and offers little fun” and “is a collection of stereotypes performing redundant sexual activities amidst much melodrama and shallow perceptions.”

    It’s hard to credit the assertion that the book “offers little fun,” for, if anything, the book offers too much fun, at the expense of characterization. It’s easy to see how Sandy steps out on her marriage but much harder to make sense of her bizarre internal monologue (using a vinegar douche, Sandy imagines that she is concocting “cunt vinaigrette”), or her willingness to go to bed with any man who comes on to her, including her friend’s husband, whose foreplay involves calling her animal names (“my mountain goat, my baby burro”). The problem, for the novel, is not that Sandy is experimental, adventuresome, or even obscene, but rather that she seems to change from page to page. Judy would later stress her own instability during that period (“I was wild”); it’s hardly surprising that the character onto whom she projected her inner life, the character who conceivably would let a dog go down on her, did not entirely cohere on the page.

    Yet the novel has its strengths, ignored by its critics and, presumably, by its millions of readers, who flocked to the sexy stuff, the inferior pastiche of Erica Jong, Jacqueline Susann, or Anne Roiphe. Sneaking around in the bushes, the old Judy Blume is still there. For one thing, she is still a funny writer, unparalleled at depicting a turtle-swallowing toddler or, it turns out, a predictable husband. “Rules and Regulations for a Norman Pressman Fuck,” one section begins. “The room must be dark so they do not have to look at each other. There will be one kiss, with tongue, to get things going. His fingers will pass lightly over her breasts, travel down her belly to her cunt, and stop. He will attempt to find her clitoris.” And so on, unsparingly.
    Wifey also has, nestled in all the moist valleys between breasts and ass cheeks, insightful writing about racial injustice (there is a subplot about whether the Pressmans should sell their house to a Black family), class tensions (between the Pressmans and their friends, between Norman and his employees), and, as ever, the indignities of being young and female. There is a genuine pathos to the story of Sandy’s twin nieces, agreed by all to be unattractive, thanks to their weight and their noses. When it’s time for the twins’ joint nose jobs, long planned by their mother, Sandy drives her mother into New York City to visit the girls in the hospital. The scene offers a pitiless view of the sexism, and materialism, of the culture in which the girls were being raised.

    “It’s a shame they got the Lefferts’ noses instead of ours,” the twins’ grandmother Mona says to Sandy, their aunt. (Sandy feels the same way; earlier in the book, we read of her surprise that her sister “had produced such unattractive children.”) Mona has it on good authority that although a nose job typically costs $1,800, because they are twins and because of professional courtesy (their father, whom Sandy has slept with, is a gynecologist), “they’re getting a break — two thousand dollars for both.”
    Whatever its merits — and it had some — Wifey was treated by readers and critics as less important than its author. Judy Blume had become one of those celebrities — like Barbra Streisand, say, or Elizabeth Taylor — who was bigger than her body of work. A magazine story about Judy, while occasioned by a new book, could ignore the book and focus on the personal life of the woman who had created it, because that was what readers really wanted to know about. Shortly after the publication of Wifey, two of the country’s most widely read magazines ran long stories about Judy. Neither one could have enhanced her reputation as a serious writer.

    In October 1978, People ran a 2,000-word profile by John Neary, which, with its numerous photographs by his wife, Joan Neary, stretched over five pages. The spread opens with a full-page photograph of Judy looking straight at the camera, in a lacy teddy, leaning back against some sort of comforter or pillow. And it’s all downhill from there. The text of the article is a reasonable summation of her career, beginning with the present (Wifey is a smash, in its third printing, paperback rights sold for $350,000) and looking back at her beginnings (the NYU writing class, early rejection letters). But it is, alas, punctuated by the Blume-ian clichés about her weight (100 pounds, “103 on a fat day,” Judy says) and her youthful appearance. “Judy is always mistaken for a daughter when she answers the door of her sprawling, $140,000 adobe home,” the article says, referring to the house in Santa Fe that she had bought after two years in Los Alamos (the article doesn’t say so, but Kitchens did not contribute to the purchase of their houses). Discussing the impact of Margaret on her career, Judy makes herself sound uncharacteristically naïve: “That was the first time I felt, ‘My God, I really can do this! These people are taking me seriously! This is not just pretend, not just something to keep me out of Saks!’” The quotation may have been Judy’s — a mordant allusion to John Blume, who had made the Saks joke about her writing — but the exclamation points, which drive home the false impression that she is a giddy child or a recovering shopaholic, were People’s added touch.

    Photo: © Joan Neary

    Still, Judy colluded with this lightweight approach, this portrait of the artist as a sex kitten. According to Judy, photographer Joan Neary came up with the idea of posing her in a teddy, and Judy just went along with it. But Neary said that wasn’t so. “As a photographer I never posed anyone for a picture — just hung around long enough for people to relax and forget about me,” Neary said. As for the teddy, Neary said it couldn’t have been her idea: “How would I have known she had that garment?” On the second page of the article, Judy is shown fully dressed but with her arms around Tom’s neck and her legs wrapped around his waist; he is holding her in the air, as if he has just spun her around and they have come to a dizzy stop. The caption reads: “In a playful moment, Judy tells husband Tom, ‘I let you live out your fantasies. This is position No. 32.’”

    On the final page of the article, the photograph at the top shows Judy lying barefoot on a bed, on her stomach, her head propped on one hand, while the other hand holds a pen, scribbling something on a pad of paper. Just as the opening photograph of the piece shows her in bed, wearing skimpy nightclothes, the final photograph implies that she scarcely leaves the bed, save for a change of clothes. Sex, writing — it’s all in the bedroom. The caption under the final photograph reads, “‘I do not see myself as a great novelist,’ she says, ‘but it brings people pleasure, and me pleasure. So why not?’”

    Judy always regretted collaborating with the Nearys. “They knew what People wanted, and they delivered.” The article prompted a disappointed letter from novelist Norma Klein, a friend and frequent correspondent. “When I saw that terrible photo of you in People, dressed in the nightgown with that shy, frightened smile on your face, I practically wanted to cry,” Klein wrote. “It was so pathetic and unnecessary. Don’t play into that.” If the People article manages to erase Judy’s career as a pioneering writer for children, painting her instead as a semi-talented dilettante of adult literature, holed up in the bedroom writing about the pleasure principle, with breaks to give Tom “position No. 32,” the New York Times Magazine article that ran two months later does her the disservice — or was it meant to be a favor? — of overlooking the adult novel altogether. The Times Magazine piece, which mentions Wifey only twice, is by Joyce Maynard, who at 25 was already a literary star herself. Maynard had become precociously famous with the 1972 publication, in the Times Magazine, of “An 18-Year-Old Looks Back on Life,” an essay that she expanded the next year into a full-length memoir. By the time she wrote the Blume profile, Maynard had dropped out of Yale, moved in with the writer J.D. Salinger (he had sent her a fan letter after reading her essay in the Times Magazine), left Salinger, gotten married, and had a baby. She brought the baby to her interview with Judy in Manhattan.

    By assigning the profile to a 20-something memoirist celebrated for writing about her own adolescence, the Times Magazine was in effect overdetermining the piece that they would get: an appraisal of Judy the children’s writer. “When Judy Blume visits bookstores to autograph copies of ‘Wifey,’ it is the kids who besiege her,” Maynard wrote. “Every week more than 200 of them write her letters — requesting bust-development exercises and asking for more details on how you get a baby. ‘How can I tell my mother that I know some things about sex?’ Or, simply, ‘I am desperate.’” Maynard effectively sidesteps the occasion for the profile — Judy’s new, bestselling, sexy adult novel — to offer an evaluation of her outsize role in youth culture. Maynard is saying to adults, You may have heard about this sensation called Wifey, but are you aware of what the author means to your daughters?

    “Coming of Age with Judy Blume” is a long piece — it was the longest profile of Judy to date — and, with her ample word limit, Maynard limns the basics of Judy’s life. She inserts in the middle, in the heart of the piece, a trip to Bath, Ohio, where she interviews girls and their mothers about the appeal of Judy’s work and explains the twisty road a Blume hardcover can travel: “Then Beth Rice went on a shopping trip with Christiane Boustani and told Christiane’s mother it was O.K. to buy the book. Christiane got the book from Beth after Beth had read it. Heather Benson, age 13, borrowed Forever on a choir trip. Possibly it was Beth Rice’s copy, now covered in brown paper, since one belonging to another girl was confiscated by a teacher at the Bath Middle School. Heather’s mother, Pat, found the copy Heather had, picked it up and was so shocked she couldn’t put it down.”

    Maynard’s Times profile is the rare piece that quotes actual young people about what Judy means to them, and it’s one of the first to connect her popularity with the rising number of parents challenging her books, asking that the books be removed from schools or libraries — a good sign, it’s implied, since it’s the kind of thing that happens to authors only once they get popular. The accompanying photographs are of Judy talking to teenagers and of daughters and mothers quoted in the piece. In short, Maynard takes Judy — and her readership — seriously.

    Nevertheless, certain clichés follow Judy from article to article. Her youthful mien, for example, remains irresistible to the journalist, even the shrewd Maynard: daughter Randy is “often taken for Judy’s sister”; Judy “still has a girlish voice, and in figure she could be about 12 years old”; she “could fit right in as a guest at a seventh-grade slumber party.” More interesting, Judy herself is far too self-deprecating; she’s unwilling or unable to own her talent. “I can’t entirely explain why they [sell], myself,” Judy tells Maynard about her books’ success. “I know I’m no great literary figure.”

    [ad_2]

    Mark Oppenheimer

    Source link

  • Inside the Heartbreakingly Brief Life of Patrick Bouvier Kennedy, JFK and Jackie’s Youngest Son

    [ad_1]

    Shortly after 10 p.m., press secretary Pierre Salinger stepped before reporters in a makeshift pressroom at the Statler Hotel. For the first time he acknowledged that Patrick had a breathing ailment, identifying it the way doctors did, as “idiopathic respiratory distress syndrome.” Playing down the seriousness, he explained that the condition was not uncommon in premature infants. But he acknowledged it was “a cause for concern.” He told reporters it would be four days before doctors could “make a final diagnosis.”

    A reporter pressed Salinger on the outlook for the baby: “Is it on the danger list?”

    “I would not say that,” Salinger replied.

    “Would anybody else?” the reporter ventured.

    “Well,” Salinger snapped, “nobody that I talked to has.”

    He then revealed that Patrick was baptized soon after birth, prompting a reporter to ask why so quickly.

    “I would rather not comment on that,” Salinger answered.

    In his suite at the Ritz-Carlton, Jack called Jackie twice around midnight. Wishing to keep her spirits up, he tilted his words toward the positive. “The President assured Mrs. Kennedy,” the United Press International reported, “that everything was all right.”

    His calls had the intended effect. Jackie’s mother, Janet Auchincloss, arrived at the hospital late in the evening and visited Jackie around midnight. She told a reporter that her daughter was in “remarkably good condition” and “awfully happy that everything was going well.”

    During the night, an enterprising photographer with a telephoto lens sneaked upstairs in a building opposite Children’s and found a window in line with Patrick’s room. While chief resident James Hughes hovered over the incubator, the photographer clicked off a series of shots.

    Days later a grainy black-and-white image dominated the cover of Life magazine under the headline: “Hospital Vigil over the Kennedy Baby.” The photograph through the cross panes of Patrick’s window showed an unnamed doctor—Hughes—in scrubs and a white mask, head bowed, looking down at what was the baby’s incubator, though all that was visible on the cover was a fuzzy black smear in the lower-right corner. Standing beside Hughes was a nurse, her starched white cap perched high on her head, her face an indistinct blur.

    A four-photo spread inside the magazine was blurrier than the image on the front: doctors and nurses moving about, their heads dark splotches against a gray-lighted background.

    The magazine’s report featured one more image, a particularly intrusive one. A Life photographer had managed to shove his way into a Children’s Hospital elevator with President Kennedy for a candid, closeup shot that filled a full page. In the photo the beleaguered president is pinned against the elevator’s back wall, shoulders hunched, arms crossed, eyes staring downward. The headline read “. . . A Worried Father Visits His Stricken Son.”

    Neither Hughes nor the nurse had any idea they were under press surveillance while looking after Patrick. Hughes learned of his anonymous fame only after the edition hit newsstands: “Somebody called us and said you’re on the cover of Life magazine.” Hughes embraced his anonymity. He had no wish to go public. “There was nothing magical about the moment,” he explained. “It isn’t as if I held up a newborn baby for the world to see. I was there attending as best we could as this kid struggled for breath.”

    [ad_2]

    Steven Levingston

    Source link

  • ‘Oh My God, They’re Ruining the Show’

    [ad_1]

    From the day it premiered, Twin Peaks had a problem. Audiences wanted to know who killed Laura Palmer; David Lynch and Mark Frost weren’t interested in telling them who killed Laura Palmer. When they agreed to reveal the killer, the network was apparently vindicated. Some 17 million viewers tuned in — the highest ratings the show had achieved since the season-two premiere.

    But now that the murder mystery had been resolved, the show had a new, even more vexing problem: If it wasn’t about solving the murder of Laura Palmer, what was Twin Peaks about? Even Bob Iger concedes he may have been too hasty. “Looking back on it now, I’m not convinced I was right,” he said. “Deep down, I felt David was frustrating the audience, but it may well be that my demands for an answer to the question of who killed Laura Palmer threw the show into another kind of narrative disarray.” Mark Frost agrees. “We paid a big price for it. You know, that was something that contributed as much as anything to the momentum falling apart.” David Lynch was even blunter. “That killed Twin Peaks,” he said. “Totally dead. Over. Finished.”

    The problem, of course, was that Twin Peaks wasn’t finished. It was in the middle of its second season, and the story would continue, one way or another, for at least 13 more episodes. “Especially network television— when you’re dealing with 22 episodes, and the production monster’s chasing you, you don’t really have any other choice,” says Mark Frost. “I don’t think it had been fully figured out,” says Scott Frost. “Production is like jumping out of a plane. And you have a parachute, but it’s actually not attached to you yet.”

    The resolution of Laura Palmer’s murder isn’t so much a period at the end of a sentence as it is an ellipsis: Leland may be dead, but BOB is still out there, hunting for another host. Or, to put it another way: With the central mystery resolved, the show’s writers had unprecedented freedom to redefine what Twin Peaks could be. “I don’t know if there was a master plan there at all. We got so good at resolving things we thought up that we were kind of fearless about what we put in,” says writer Robert Engels. “That was one of the things that was fun about the show — that we had the sense that we could pretty much do or try anything,” says writer Harley Peyton. “There were times when that took us down weird avenues, but there were times when it took us in absolutely the right direction. I think we took some wrong turns along the way, but that, to me, is part of the process, and part of making something under sort of insane circumstances.”

    There’s a palpable sense of desperation as Twin Peaks — just one episode removed from Leland’s death — manufactures another, flimsier reason for Cooper to stick around town. Targeted (correctly) by the FBI’s internal affairs division for his extralegal undercover mission at One Eyed Jack’s and (incorrectly) for stealing a large amount of cocaine, Cooper is suspended from the FBI and forced to hand over his badge and gun. Twin Peaks had already flirted with turning Cooper, a consummate outsider, into a Twin Peaks insider. (At the very least, it was hard to imagine him saying good-bye, forever, to the Double R’s coffee and cherry pie.) But Cooper’s dismissal from the FBI, even temporarily, altered the show’s fundamental building blocks in a way that proved challenging to reverse. So much care had been put into crafting the show’s look and feel: What happened when you upended it? “We were doomed the day that Agent Cooper turned in his black suit for lumberjack flannel,” says editor-director Duwayne Dunham.

    Twin Peaks had always managed to juggle its darkest moments with its silliest, but the show’s unique tone was becoming harder and harder to balance. “If we made mistakes along the way, one of them was maybe falling in love with comedy a little too much,” says Peyton. “This is the thing you always have to be careful of as a writer: Are you entertaining yourself, or are you entertaining the audience? We were certainly entertaining ourselves, and the hope was that we would entertain the audience as well.”

    No sustained analysis of season two would be complete without a brief survey of some of the show’s wackier story lines. Nadine Hurley waking from a coma with the strength of a superhero and the mind of a teenager? “I was a big comic book fan, so I brought in Nadine’s superpowers, which I thought was hilarious. That’s on me,” says Peyton. The emergence of Lana Milford (Robyn Lively), a black widow who seduces both of the elderly Milford brothers while turning every other man in Twin Peaks — even, uncharacteristically, Cooper — into a drooling idiot? “That was meant to have a supernatural aspect, but that supernatural aspect never actually comes in, so it’s just unresolved,” says Peyton. Ben Horne, trying to reverse the Civil War while delusionally believing himself to be Robert E. Lee? “That idea came about at the same time Ken Burns’s [The] Civil War miniseries happened. Had that miniseries not come out, I doubt that story ever would have gone into the series,” says writer Scott Frost.

    And then there’s what Peyton acknowledges as “the most grievous thing I ever did in the Twin Peaks universe”: James Hurley’s brief, stand-alone detour into a film noir after he crosses paths with a femme fatale named Evelyn Marsh. “James is just such a wonderful actor, and he had this wonderful vibe that sort of made him a perfect fit for that kind of story, which is why we wanted to do it in the first place,” says Peyton.

    At this point in the story, James’s love life has gone full Peyton Place. “The only thing I really, really wish they would have done is kept James with Donna,” says actor James Marshall. “When Laura died, the reality of their attraction came around. And when they got together, they should’ve stayed together. They could help each other through their grief, and you actually see two people heal while everything else is going crazy. Instead: Evelyn Marsh.”

    “The most grievous thing I ever did in the Twin Peaks universe.”
    Photo: ABC

    In a rare subplot that takes place entirely outside Twin Peaks, James — on a sullen solo motorcycle trip after Maddy is murdered — suddenly wanders into a James M. Cain novel. Twin Peaks had nodded at classic noir tropes before; Neff, the insurance agent who alerted Catherine Martell to a shady policy in the show’s first season, was named in tribute to the protagonist of Cain’s 1943 crime classic Double Indemnity. This particular subplot owes Cain an obvious debt and stretches across five episodes, as the married Marsh picks up James at a bar, hires him as a mechanic, sleeps with him, and frames him for killing her husband before having a change of heart and letting him go.

    It is as paint-by-numbers as a noir story can get, and those responsible for translating it to the small screen were just as dubious of the story line as the audience. “You hadn’t seen a character like Evelyn in Twin Peaks. She felt like she came from, I don’t know, Dynasty or something,” says Dunham, who directed one of the episodes in which the Evelyn Marsh subplot unfolds. “I regret that I didn’t do a better job with it. But it just didn’t fit. It was completely wrong, and it was wrong for James. James — that character — would not be attracted to that. James was one of the Bookhouse Boys.” Marshall agrees. “I think there were a lot of actors on the show who were reputable, seasoned actors — who’ve been around a long time — doing exactly what I was scared to do: going to production and fighting for their parts,” he says.

    “So much happened on the show where I didn’t know if my character was coming or going,” said Lara Flynn Boyle. “I called [David Lynch] every day, like, ‘Oh my God, they’re ruining the show.’ He got sick of hearing from me,” says Sherilyn Fenn. “This costumer, in the second season, said, ‘Oh, I’ve got 20 hula skirts.’ And I was like … ‘Do you think Twin Peaks is just this random, let’s-be-weird-to-be-weird? Because it isn’t. It never was.’”

    “It just was getting weird for weird’s sake,” agrees Dunham. “My thing is: That’s not an accurate understanding of David’s work. It’s not just weird for weird’s sake. There’s a purpose and a reason. That’s why, in David’s hands, he can make that stuff work.”

    The problem reached its nadir in “Episode 21,” the first (and only) episode directed by Uli Edel. As the director of the acclaimed, noirish drama Last Exit to Brooklyn, Edel had earned a reputation as a talent to watch. But his abrasive style clashed with the cast, who were justifiably confident, by then, that they knew what they were doing. During the filming of one scene, “Uli said, ‘You’re just furniture to me, man. Just go where I tell you,’” says Michael Horse. “So I go to the crew and said, ‘This guy, Uli, is he good?’ And they said, ‘Yeah, he’s really good.’ And I went to Uli and said, ‘Hey, man, you can say that to me. But if this isn’t Emmy-quality shit, I’ll come to your house and kick your ass.’”

    Horse’s conflict with Edel was a representative example of the cast’s larger sense that Twin Peaks had been handed to some unfit caretakers while Frost and Lynch were busy elsewhere. “I hope I’m not making anybody mad, but they claimed David and Mark were totally on top of the Twin Peaks stuff — that they were giving yeses and noes and overseeing everything in every detail. But I know that, working with David, it was a way different show. So I just don’t believe that,” says Marshall. “I do think that it had an effect on the show. How could it not? You could be the most talented person on earth. You’re not going to be able to imitate David Lynch.”

    It’s true that the Leland reveal in “Episode 14” was Lynch’s last directing credit until the season-two finale. But while there are Twin Peaks fans who believe season two’s missteps were due to Lynch’s absence, it was Mark Frost who spent some time away from the show during its perceived dip in quality. Just as Lynch spent a chunk of Twin Peaks’s first season directing Wild at Heart, Frost took a leave of absence from season two to direct Storyville, a moody, James Spader–starring political thriller. “His absence made things complicated. Certainly for my relationship with David,” says Peyton.

    By this point, Peyton and Engels — long established as two of Twin Peaks’s most reliable writers — had been given producer credits and taken on some duties that, today, would fall under the umbrella of “showrunning.” When Frost went to New Orleans to shoot Storyville, he left Peyton in charge. “It’s not like I had to somehow convene a writers’ room and figure out what we’re going to do next. We know what every episode is going to be, and Mark was talking to me every day,” says Peyton. “But one night — at, like, almost midnight — my phone rings, and it’s Todd Holland. And Todd is freaking out because he just got off the phone with David Lynch, who gave him a raft of script notes that were going to impact his shooting the following morning. Now, I’m already a little irritated, so I say, ‘Look. Ignore David’s notes. He has no business calling you up at 11 o’clock at night with script notes. Just shoot your day and let it be.’ He’s very thankful, and I feel I’ve done my job.”

    “My phone rings the next day. And David yelled at me for ten minutes. And I’m telling you: Ten minutes is a long time to have someone yell at you. His temper … you didn’t see it very often, but I saw it, and he was fucking furious, yelling at the top of his lungs: How dare I? What the fuck am I doing? Who the fuck do I think I am? The phone call, obviously, did not end well. And my relationship with David — whatever relationship I had — that was the end of our relationship.”

    The disagreements among creatives at the top of the show were further complicated by the actors, who continued to use their own power to try to shape the stories written for their characters. “There were some political things that were starting to happen, and I just got out of the way for the whole thing,” says Marshall. “There were several other actors on the show who were vying for different things, and it was like … I didn’t want to be involved in that.”

    Most significant was the scrapping of a plotline that had been simmering since the beginning of season one: the flirtation between Cooper and Audrey Horne. “As far as I remember, we all believed that they were a couple or going to be a couple,” said Tina Rathborne, who directed one of season one’s many sexually charged scenes between Audrey and Cooper. “Audrey’s seduction of Coop seems part of the dual lesson that Coop is learning. He’s learning about his more innocent side, and he’s learning about his darker side, that he’s willing to be seduced by this young girl. This young, somewhat raunchy girl. But he’s also willing to defend his higher side.”

    In season one, Cooper’s so-called “higher side” seemed to win out. When he found Audrey waiting for him, naked, in his bed at the Great Northern, he let her down by gently explaining that what she really needed was a friend. But owing to Kyle MacLachlan and Fenn’s undeniable onscreen chemistry, the writers kept looping Cooper and Audrey back together. Audrey goes undercover at One Eyed Jack’s to help the man she calls “my special agent”; Cooper risks his career to rescue her. When Audrey meets Denise Bryson and feels threatened by the presence of Cooper’s female FBI peer, she marks her territory by planting a kiss on his lips.

    If the writers didn’t want the audience to be invested in a romance between Cooper and Audrey, they were doing a very, very bad job backing away from the story. That’s because they had every intention of doubling down on what had obviously emerged as the show’s most potent will they/won’t they. “David took me to dinner and basically asked me if I was in love with Kyle,” says Fenn. “And I burst out laughing. Not even slightly! He’s a great guy, he’s a nice person, but that’s it. I didn’t have any feelings that way. At all. The truth is that as human beings, he and I didn’t have that kind of chemistry. But those characters, for some really weird reason, did.” Peyton adds, “We were going to do a — ‘romance’ may be the wrong word, but certainly an exploration of the relationship between Audrey and Cooper. That didn’t happen, and it didn’t happen because Kyle refused.”

    For years, the official story has been that MacLachlan rejected the plotline because he didn’t believe Cooper would get involved with a high-schooler. There’s a solid plot justification for that argument; Cooper did, after all, gently reject Audrey for the same reason back in season one. But whatever the merits of that argument, there’s no question that offscreen dynamics were also in play. At the time, MacLachlan was dating Lara Flynn Boyle, whose push for Donna’s unconvincing bad-girl makeover in season two was judged, by some, to have been a response to Fenn getting more attention for her coquettish performance.

    “I still remember talking with Mark [Frost],” says Peyton. “Mark was saying, ‘No, we’re going to draw a line in the sand. We can’t do this. We planned this pretty carefully, and it’s going to upend our second season.’ Then Kyle went into Mark’s office with David. I remember waiting and waiting and waiting. And then he came out and said, ‘No, we’re not doing it.’ And that was because David was the one who was basically saying, ‘We’re going to go with what the actors prefer.’ The thing about David that I learned over time is that he will sort of do anything for the actors. And because he’ll do anything for them, they will do anything for him.”

    Whatever the underlying reasons for it, even those who were frustrated by MacLachlan’s justification now concede it was better that the Cooper-Audrey plotline didn’t move forward. “It’s hard to say, because nowadays, I would say, ‘No, we can’t do that, because he’s in a position of power and she’s much younger.’ All the things Kyle was saying. It’s easy to say he did it because of Lara Flynn Boyle. But who knows why?” says Peyton. “I mean … he did end up with a love interest who was the same age [as Audrey]. And she was from a convent, for crying out loud.”

    Cooper’s formerly cloistered paramour was Annie Blackburn (Heather Graham), a half-sister of Norma Jennings whose sudden arrival in Twin Peaks was written to fill in the gap where the Cooper-Audrey romance would have been, and actor Heather Graham knew what she was walking into. Prior to being cast, Graham had already made her way into the outskirts of Lynchland by co-starring, opposite Benicio del Toro, in a Calvin Klein commercial Lynch directed. But playing a woman capable of instantly bewitching Dale Cooper would be an entirely different challenge, and Graham met Lynch at his home to discuss the character — after he showed off another ongoing project. “He was doing some kind of experiment where he was putting meat into this kind of art piece and letting ants crawl on it,” says Graham.

    Graham recalls Lynch describing Annie as “a finely tuned machine. Like a Ferrari or a sports car that’s very amazing — but that it can be easily thrown off-balance, if something goes wrong.” Peyton had a blunter appraisal: “Sad to say, Annie was — at least when the character was initially conceived — a damsel in distress. And not a great deal more than that,” he says.

    “When we said, ‘Okay, well, who’s going to sweep Audrey off her feet?’ [Harley Peyton] said, ‘Well, it should be a singing cowboy.’”
    Photo: ABC

    Audrey, for her part, got a new love interest of her own — though not before the show teased a flirtation between Audrey and Bobby, who was briefly positioned as Ben Horne’s new right-hand man. “I don’t know if they were definitely going to go with it. I thought they were definitely going to go with it, and we had those moments,” said Dana Ashbrook. “I think it was either a MacGuffin, or a change of someone’s mind, or I don’t know. It was so on the fly, always, the story.” In the end, Bobby stayed true to Shelly — though not before Gordon Cole planted a kiss on her — and Audrey got her own new love interest in John Justice Wheeler, a dashing young businessman-pilot played by Billy Zane. “It was Harley who came up with [John Justice Wheeler],” says Mark Frost. “When we said, ‘Okay, well, who’s going to sweep Audrey off her feet?’ he said, ‘Well, it should be a singing cowboy.’”

    Wheeler does, in fact, throw on a cowboy hat, take Audrey on a picnic, and serenade her with a rendition of the cowboy folk standard “Bury Me Not on the Lone Prairie.” Fenn herself was unconvinced. “He’s a really nice guy. But the first time I met him was at 6 in the morning. And he goes, ‘What would you do if I leaned over the table and kissed you?’ And I go, ‘I’d have a problem with that.’” Still, Wheeler’s routine is enough, apparently, to knock Audrey’s crush on Cooper out of her brain entirely; the episode’s script describes her as “warm and certain” as she reassures Wheeler that she doesn’t have feelings for anyone else.

    With Cooper and Audrey splintering off into their own separate love stories — and much of the other main cast engaged in their own semi-stand-alone arcs — Twin Peaks needed both a villain and an event to justify weaving everything back together. If there was anything that bound Twin Peaks’s many threads in the back half of the second season, it was the simmering threat of Cooper’s insane former partner Windom Earle, revealed early in season two as having escaped custody hell-bent on revenge. Though it wasn’t clear at the time, Earle’s clash with Cooper would become Twin Peaks’s most significant arc following the resolution of Laura’s murder. “That was supposed to be short-lived,” says Engels. “I talked those guys into hiring [Kenneth Welsh]. He was a friend of mine, and they just loved him, so that character became bigger.”

    After escaping a mental institution and stalking Cooper to Twin Peaks, Earle engages Cooper in a grotesque version of the daily chess game they played when they were partners. Whenever Earle takes a piece, he commits an equivalent murder; the loss of a pawn, for example, leads to the murder of a drifter with no direct connection to the larger narrative.

    Once Cooper realizes the game Earle is playing, he’s savvy enough to build a strategy not aimed at winning the game, but at protecting the pieces remaining on his side of the board. Still: You’d think he’d be smart enough to realize that protecting his queen is paramount — especially since he’s simultaneously falling in love with Annie, whose innocence and lack of worldliness makes her an especially ripe target. And you’d definitely think he’d be smart enough to recognize the danger when the Giant literally appears in front of him, waving his arms and mouthing the word no, after Annie suggests she’ll enter the Miss Twin Peaks pageant. But when Cooper falls in love, it seems, his deductive powers vanish; just a few episodes earlier, he flirts with Annie at the Double R, then walks right by the not-especially-well-disguised Windom Earle.

    If there was anything that bound Twin Peaks’s many threads in the back half of the second season, it was the simmering threat of Cooper’s insane former partner Windom Earle, played by Kenneth Welsh.
    Photo: ABC

    All these plotlines converge in the penultimate episode of Twin Peaks, which also turns out to be the last gasp of the comedy-focused storytelling that had come to the forefront of the first season. The Miss Twin Peaks pageant was designed, among other things, to bring the increasingly scattered group of characters back together: Donna Hayward, Shelly Johnson, Lucy Moran, Nadine Hurley, Lana Milford, and Annie Blackburn all compete, and Norma Jennings, Doc Hayward, Pete Martell, and Dick Tremayne all play a role in judging the pageant. Though she had been targeted by Windom Earle alongside Donna and Shelly just a few episodes earlier, Audrey is noticeably absent for much of the competition. “I called David right away and said, ‘I’m not doing it,’” says Fenn. “No fucking way. Audrey was there, but I didn’t, like, parade up and down a fucking catwalk in a bathing suit.”

    Goofy as it is, the levity feels welcome before Twin Peaks takes its final plunge into the darkness. Lana Milford does something called “contortionistic jazz exotica,” and Lucy Moran does a dance that ends in the splits, which led to actress Kimmy Robertson needing to reassure people that there was no damage to the baby. (Robertson, for the record, was not actually pregnant.) But when Annie Blackburn is crowned Miss Twin Peaks — after a speech that leans heavily on the words of Chief Seattle, a leader of Washington’s Suquamish and Duwamish tribes — Earle, who has infiltrated the Miss Twin Peaks pageant disguised as the Log Lady, makes his move. A queen has been crowned; he’s ready to claim her.

    It’s a strong cliffhanger for the season finale, but that’s not how it originally aired. By this point, ABC’s scheduling of Twin Peaks had become erratic, with lengthy hiatuses in December and January — a problem further exacerbated when the show was preempted by coverage of the Gulf War. After the memorably bizarre cliffhanger of “Episode 23” — which concluded with Josie Packard, revealed as the mysterious shooter who shot Cooper in the season-one finale, somehow trapped in a drawer pull in a Great Northern Hotel room — ABC put the show on hiatus. That troubling sign prompted a fan campaign called COOP, or Citizens Opposed to the Offing of Peaks, to place hundreds of phone calls and send thousands of letters and packages, some containing logs or doughnuts, to ABC. David Lynch goosed the campaign further in a February appearance on Late Night With David Letterman, where the host gamely posted Bob Iger’s mailing address. (“I love annoying these network weasels,” said Letterman.)

    ABC relented, and Twin Peaks returned on Thursday, March 28 — an escape, at last, from the wasteland of Saturday night. But the reprieve was short-lived. Less than a month later, on April 18, 1991, “Episode 27” aired — a return to form that ended, promisingly, with BOB reemerging from the Black Lodge. But anyone intrigued by that cliffhanger was forced to wait nearly two months, to June 10, when the network unceremoniously dumped the final two episodes as a double feature. Though Twin Peaks hadn’t been formally canceled, everyone involved knew the writing was on the wall. “As a phenomenon,” Mark Frost conceded a month before the season-two finale aired, “the show is over.”

    [ad_2]

    Scott Meslow

    Source link

  • Inside Bunny Mellon’s New York Home, Immortalized in Watercolor

    [ad_1]

    Over the next six years, Snowy served as the Mellon family’s live-in artist at their residences in Upperville, Virginia, Washington, DC, and New York City, as well as on Cape Cod and Antigua. In her watercolors, Campbell captured the colors, light, and ambiance of the very rarefied rooms therein.

    Dream job that it was, Snowy nonetheless eventually gave her notice to Bunny when marriage and motherhood claimed her. Over the last half-century, the artist’s luminous paintings remained in the archives of the Oak Spring Garden Foundation, on the Mellon estate in Virginia. This month, with the release of The Enchanting Interiors of Bunny Mellon: Paintings by Snowy Campbell (Rizzoli), they are published for the first time.

    Being the Mellons’ New York City redoubt, their home at 125 East 70th Street was arguably more opulent than the couple’s other residences. Yet there was nothing showy about the eight-bedroom, 11,000-square-foot mansion, because it followed the template Mrs. Mellon had created. As Mr. Mellon once explained: “One of the most engaging features of all our houses is their friendliness. Major works of art live side-by-side with small objects of art, children’s drawings, and bronzes of favorite horses. Bunny’s quest for comfort and informality has been nurtured with care; a little natural shabbiness in an old chair cover is sometimes purposely overlooked.”

    Truman Capote, Lee Radziwell and Rachel “Bunny” Lambert Lloyd arrive at an event at the Asia House hosted by Jacqueline Kennedy for John K. Galbraith in New York, 1965

    WWD/Getty Images

    Bunny’s aversion to anything looking too new was duly noted by Truman Capote. In a 1978 interview with Time magazine, he reported that Mrs. Mellon always carried a small pair of scissors in her purse: “When things are looking a little too neat, she takes a little snip out of a chair or something so it will have that lived-in look.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Spencer Pratt faces harsh family opposition in LA mayoral bid despite growing community support

    [ad_1]

    NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

    Spencer Pratt’s quest to positively impact Los Angeles was lost on his sister’s ears. 

    Stephanie Pratt voiced her concerns about her brother’s mayoral campaign and claimed his intentions aren’t so pure.

    In a series of posts shared on X, Stephanie noted that Spencer was a vital asset to the community more than one year after the devastating LA wildfires. However, she assured her followers that “The Hills” star was simply trying to stay relevant.

    SPENCER PRATT SAYS A-LISTERS PRIVATELY CHEER HIS CRITICISM OF CALIFORNIA LEADERSHIP, FEAR CAREER FALLOUT

    Spencer Pratt’s sister Stephanie encouraged followers to not support her brother’s campaign for LA mayor. (Michael Tran)

    Pratt and his wife, Heidi Montag, lost their Pacific Palisades home in January 2025 during the deadly LA wildfires. Pratt said his parents also lost their home in the fires.

    “Spencer has done great work for the palisades,” Stephanie wrote. “But LA does not need another unqualified and inexperienced mayor. A vote for him is a vote for stupidity.”

    She continued, “He’s just trying to stay famous and sell his memoir don’t be fooled.”

    Stephanie mused over an “ideal world” where the Palisades received their own “mayor and police department,” but was more concerned with the current issues plaguing Los Angeles.

    SPENCER PRATT VOWS TO WORK WITH FEDERAL GOVERNMENT ON ICE ENFORCEMENT AS LA MAYOR CANDIDATE

    “I’m worried about LA. I have no problem playing government but our city needs help,” Stephanie wrote. 

    LA mayoral candidate Spencer Pratt

    Spencer Pratt declared his intent to run for Mayor of Los Angeles on the one year anniversary of the Palisades fire. (MEGA/GC Images)

    “Everyone saying I should support him no matter what. Sorry he beat me up when I was 18 & put me in the hospital. So no he doesn’t belong in the government. Run the palisades all you want not LA.”

    She added, “Leopards never change their spots. Stay in the palisades Spencer.”

    A vocal opponent to current Mayor Karen Bass, “The Guy You Loved to Hate” author launched his Los Angeles mayoral campaign last month. He told Fox News Digital that while he often finds himself standing alone in public, the support he receives behind closed doors tells a very different story.

    LIKE WHAT YOU’RE READING? CLICK HERE FOR MORE ENTERTAINMENT NEWS

    “I know actual A-list stars support what I do, because I’ve been at restaurants, and they sit down at the table, and they quiz me about everything that I know for 20 minutes and thank me,” Pratt said. “But these people know if they do that publicly, they risk losing their careers that some of them have been working for 30 years to have.”

    Pratt said he understands the risks that come with speaking publicly and doesn’t fault those who choose to stay quiet.

    CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR THE ENTERTAINMENT NEWSLETTER

    “So, I don’t judge them,” he added. “It’s just the same with firefighters that don’t come forward with the truth because of retaliation. There’s no difference between public employees who know what’s going on and celebrities. Everyone sees what’s happening, but everyone’s scared to talk.”

    The reality star said the release of his memoir and his decision to run for mayor unfolded simultaneously in a way that felt beyond his control.

    “The timing of the mayor and the book — that’s God’s timing because the book actually came together right after the fires over a year ago,” he told Fox News Digital. “So, the writing’s been happening all year.”

    WATCH: SPENCER PRATT SAYS A-LISTERS PRIVATELY SUPPORT HIS LA MAYOR CAMPAIGN

    As the manuscript took shape, Pratt said he was watching the political landscape closely and growing increasingly frustrated.

    “And then when I saw that nobody was stepping up to run against Mayor Karen Bass in the last month or so, I had to do it,” he said. “Again, it’s God’s timing.”

    CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

    Fox News Digital’s Danielle Minnetian contributed to this report.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Wuthering Heights: 7 Major Changes From Book to Screen

    [ad_1]

    When Heathcliff returns to Yorkshire a rich man after a three-year absence and finds Cathy married to Edgar, the roles reverse. Now it’s his turn to inflict pain. He marries Isabella, “an abject thing,” whom he tells Cathy he’d only live with in “a very ghoulish fashion,” turning “the blue eyes black, every day, or two.”

    Brontë’s Isabella (who is Edgar’s sister in the novel but his ward in the movie) doesn’t enthusiastically consent to her own degradation—but Fennell’s Isabella does. And although she naïvely crushes on Heathcliff because she thinks he’s sexily moody—rather than a lunatic set on the ruination of her and her entire family—the novel’s version is not a simpleton infatuated with dolls, as portrayed in the film.

    That said, in the novel, Heathcliff is able to trick Isabella into eloping, putting himself in position to inherit the Grange, which he wants to spite Edgar. Once they’re married, Heathcliff reveals his true nature and begins terrorizing her, prompting Isabella to ask Nelly in a letter, “Is he a devil?” If readers are at all uncertain of his sociopathic tendencies, Heathcliff then hangs his wife’s dog. Jacob Elordi would never.

    Instead, Elordi’s Heathcliff collars and chains Oliver’s Isabella herself, instructing her to bark like a dog. Importantly, this only occurs after he tells her he’ll “never love her,” will “treat her abominably,” and asks her no less than four times, “Do you want me to stop?” This is a sadist who is surprisingly committed to consent. Isabella becomes his willing submissive, a plot line that provides the film’s comic relief. When she calls Heathcliff “diabolical,” she means in the way he savages her body. Though momentarily amusing, it’s a total 180 from the book, in which Isabella demonstrates the most agency of any character: Horrified by Heathcliff, she escapes to London, where she raises their son, Linton, until she dies.

    And that’s not the only sub/dom addition Fennell has made to Wuthering Heights. In the novel, the servant Joseph is a self-righteous zealot who’s always banging on about the Bible. His character is an avatar for the austere religion that threatens to impinge on the wildness that reigns at the Heights. That is to say, he doesn’t use farm equipment to have bondage sex with a housemaid in the stables—as he does in the film. (Joseph is played by actor Ewan Mitchell.) Believe it or not, there is zero bondage sex in Brontë’s classic.

    If the book is psychosexual, the emphasis is on the “psycho.” In this buttoned-up Victorian milieu, all erotic desire is shoved under the surface, and Heathcliff and Cathy’s thwarted love, though all-consuming, is never consummated. Robbie and Elordi’s Catherine and Heathcliff, on the other hand, have a months-long affair in which they have explicit sex in a montage whose settings include her powder-pink bedroom, inside her carriage, on the moors, and atop a table.

    In the novel, the closest the two come to sex is when Heathcliff digs up Catherine’s grave—not once but twice. The second time, he knocks out the side of her coffin and plans to do the same to his own, so that when he’s buried next to her, their decaying corpses will merge. Recalling the story, Brontë’s Heathcliff tells Nelly he slept well that night for the first time in 18 years, dreaming of himself dead with his “cheek frozen against [Cathy]”—a scene that for many implies a necrophilic embrace. In contrast, “Wuthering Heights” ends with Heathcliff cradling Catherine’s expired body on her deathbed. The poignant image is juxtaposed with flashbacks of them as children lying sweetly next to one another. (Can’t wait for Fennell’s reimaging of “A Rose for Emily.”)

    The Lost Generation: Cathy II, Linton, and Hareton

    As is tradition in adaptations of Wuthering Heights, Fennell’s film narrows its scope to Heathcliff and Cathy’s relationship and ends with her death. When the credits rolled, the woman next to me turned to her friend and exclaimed, “Wait, what? There must be a part two!” There is not. But her confusion was understandable, since Cathy dies just halfway through the novel—which is, in fact, split into two parts.

    [ad_2]

    Natasha O’Neill

    Source link

  • 1/19: The Takeout: Author and historian H.W. Brands

    [ad_1]

    Author and historian H.W. Brands joins “The Takeout” to talk about the spread of propaganda during World War II to gain support for American intervention, the anti-intervention movement led by Charles Lindbergh, and how FDR and Winston Churchill used the global media to influence each other and the world.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • A celebration of fake books

    [ad_1]

    A first-of-its-kind exhibit in New York City is drawing crowds of book enthusiasts. Ironically, none of the books featured are real. People who judge these so-called “Blooks” by their covers will have a surprise in store when they discover what’s inside these rare, novelty items. Lee Cowan reports.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Soap opera star Susan Lucci opens up about grief and resilience

    [ad_1]

    For decades, Susan Lucci starred in “All My Children.” She speaks to “CBS Mornings” about her second memoir, which dives into her life after the soap opera series, the death of her husband and the resilience she found along the way.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • The Book Pages: Your 2026 reading plan, plus 10 new books out this week

    [ad_1]

    What’s the plan – you do have one, right?

    No, not one for your estate or your budget or your life choices – sure, fine, do those too – but considering the purview of this newsletter, I’m asking about your reading plan in 2026.

    At a time when many have already abandoned their New Year’s resolutions, regular readers of this newsletter, I know, remain serious about their reading goals and tracking them. You’ve told me so when I’ve written about wanting to read more while being resistant to keeping a log of what I’ve read. (I’m complicated, OK?)

    SEE ALSOLike books? Get our free Book Pages newsletter about bestsellers, authors and more

    Last year, realizing that resistance was futile, I did try harder to document my reading and – wouldn’t you know it? – I ended up reading more last year than ever before. So … you guys were right, thank you. (Another benefit of keeping tabs? Looking at my list from the first weeks of 2026, I realize I’d already completely forgotten about a book I’d enjoyed just two weeks ago.)

    Back to the present, what’s the plan for 2026? Will you be reading more fiction or books in translation or poetry – or taking part in more community-based reading activities? Like, say, heading out to a real-world “Heated Rivalry”-inspired event or two? (Yes, the hockey romance was a book first, and the author loves the adaptation, so we’re counting it.)

    The covers for “So You Want to Own Greenland: Lessons From the Vikings to Trump” and “Challenger: A True Story of Heroism and Disaster on the Edge of Space.” (Covers courtesy of Melville House/ Avid Reader Press/Simon & Schuster)

    Are you going to wade into the fast-moving swirl of current events? If so, you might pick up Elizabeth Buchanan’s “So You Want to Own Greenland? Lessons from the Vikings to Trump,” which offers a brisk, informative look at the island’s long history and interactions with outsiders, from Erik the Red’s lost settlements to the current administration’s interest there.

    Buchanan, a “polar geopolitics expert who co-founded the polar warfare program at West Point” and was head of research for the Royal Australian Navy, manages to balance a deep understanding of the island with a penchant for pop culture references, including “Sex and the City,” Andre the Giant and James Blunt.

    Possibly, as the 40th anniversary of the Challenger disaster is Jan. 28, you might want to get a copy of the award-winning “Challenger: A True Story of Heroism and Disaster on the Edge of Space” by Adam Higginbotham (who also wrote the excellent “Midnight in Chernobyl”).

    I’m working my way through this one in between other reading and am stunned at its deep research and compelling narrative, especially as I wasn’t entirely sure I wanted to revisit the devastating moment when the world watched on TV as the space shuttle’s seven crew members, including schoolteacher Christa McAuliffe, died as Challenger came apart less than two minutes into the flight.

    Books hitting store shelves on Jan. 27, 2026. (Covers courtesy of the publishers)
    Books hitting store shelves on Jan. 27, 2026. (Covers courtesy of the publishers)

    If you’re going to be reading more new fiction, this is a good time to start. There are some intriguing reads hitting stores this week.

    New books from George Saunders (“Vigil”), Poppy Kuroki (“Passage to Tokyo”), Thrity Umrigar (“Missing Sam“), Nikesha Elise Williams (“The Seven Daughters of Dupree”), Lynn Cullen (“When We Were Brilliant”) and Don Winslow (“The Final Score ”) are among new ones in stores next week.

    (Courtesy of the publishers)
    (Courtesy of the publishers)

    A selection of new nonfiction releases includes Mike Pitt’s “Island at the Edge of the World: The Forgotten History of Easter Island,” Austin McCoy’s “Living in a D.A.I.S.Y. Age: The Music, Culture, and World De La Soul Made” and Brooke N. Newman’s “The Crown’s Silence: The Hidden History of the British Monarchy and Slavery in the Americas.”

    And I just got a copy of “Nicola Griffith: She Is Here,” which collects essays, poems and short stories by the author. The slim volume is from PM Press, which got its start in California before relocating to New York in 2022. I’ve already mentioned how much I like her recently reissued Aud Torvingen crime thrillers, and Liz Ohanesian interviewed her about her novel “Menewood,” so I’m looking forward to checking out this collection.

    So what’s the plan? To keep hitting the books, that’s what.

    Thanks, as always, for reading.

    [ad_2]

    Erik Pedersen

    Source link

  • Wilder’s book dinners bring customers face to face with local authors

    [ad_1]

    Ticket prices are usually around $125 and include a copy of the book, a five-course meal and tax and gratuity for the staff. Additional proceeds are donated to a local charity of the author’s choosing — which have included the William Way LGBT Community Center, Savage Sisters Recovery and Mighty Writers.

    For the first time, February’s book dinner will be broadcasted by WURD Radio’s Sara Lomax-Reese, who will be moderating the event. Cook hopes this will give more people the opportunity to be a part of the discussion.

    “I’m looking forward to seeing [the discussion] move beyond the four walls and further into the community,” Cook said. “[Reese] is a profound Philly icon and such a powerful human to be in conversation with, especially during this season.”

    Proceeds will go toward Cook’s nonprofit organization, Harriet’s BookClub, which funds programs that send local students on educational field trips to Paris.

    “With Jeannine, we’re really excited that she’s not only an author but also owns a bookstore in Philly,” Kleppinger said. “With Wilder being an independent restaurant itself, Jeannine was a great collaborator for us and aligned with the values that we also have as a business.”

    The next book dinner will be a discussion with Philadelphia-based author M.L Rio about “Hot Wax,” on Tuesday, March 24. While there are no more events on the schedule, Wilder staff says says more are on the way.

    “The book dinners … give people a fun event, but it’s also fun for our team to have that creative outlet,” Kleppinger said. “It gets us thinking outside the box. … Everyone who’s involved in it loves doing it.”

    [ad_2]

    Molly McVety

    Source link

  • Book excerpt:

    [ad_1]

    Harper


    We may receive an affiliate commission from anything you buy from this article.

    In his new memoir, “Where We Keep the Light” (to be published Tuesday by HarperCollins), Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro writes of his lifetime of public service, as well as the aftermath of the April 2025 arson attack on his home, and of the character of ordinary Americans – determined to build and strengthen community – who represent “the bonds that lead to a more perfect union.”

    Read an excerpt below, and don’t miss Norah O’Donnell’s interview with Josh Shapiro on “CBS Sunday Morning” January 25!


    “Where We Keep the Light” by Josh Shapiro

    Prefer to listen? Audible has a 30-day free trial available right now.


    Five months later, in the weeks following the arson attack on the Residence, as I sat in a pew at Salem Baptist Church, I felt a tap on my arm. It was a woman from the congregation who had been sitting in the pew across from me. She was in a baby-pink T-shirt and sweatpants and a matching baseball cap, suited up to join the other church ladies on a fitness walk after the service. She was in her seventies, at least, and greeted me with a smile. “Governor, I’ve been praying for you,” she said. I was touched, of course. “We will take care of you like you took care of me all those years ago and lifted me up.”

    She had tears in her eyes as she told me that seventeen years ago, when I’d served this district in the state House, we had met at a local event. Her husband had been sick, and she’d been having a hard time. They’d needed help with their medical benefits. I’d heard her, she said. I could see how down and out they had been. I’d told my team that they needed to figure out a way to get them what they needed, and we had. And now, here she was, in this church, at a difficult point in my life and for my family. She was here praying for me, lifting me up. I could feel the power of her prayers. The sense of connectedness to someone I hadn’t really seen in many years.

    Those days after the attack on the Governor’s Residence felt, at times, heavy and unrelenting, like we were wandering through the dark. And yet, as we navigated the challenges and shouldered the weight, what we remember most is not the hardness and the weight. What we carry forward are the moments like this. Because this light, it was all around us. We were overwhelmed by the outpouring from people all across this country whose shared humanity, shared sense of decency, shared agreement of what is right and what is wrong and of what our country should be and who Americans are at our core, overrides all of that.

    In days like that morning at Salem, or when I am in a synagogue or any place of worship, which is often in the course of my work, I find myself thinking more and more about William Penn. That he arrived on our shores in October 1682 aboard a ship named Welcome. His Pennsylvania would be a place that would be open to all people, grounded in free expression, freedom of religion, free elections, and respect for others. I think about my responsibility to carry this forward—to go a few more miles in the journey Penn began, to build a place that remains warm and welcoming for everyone—no matter what you look like, where you come from, who you love, or who you pray to.

    Now, I assume Penn could have never imagined a Governor who prays like me or a Lieutenant Governor who looks like Austin [Davius] in the land he once led. Or that he ever would have envisioned a world in which a Jewish Governor would host a giant iftar during Ramadan, obsess about needing more and bigger Christmas trees at the Governor’s Residence in December, or host his son’s bar mitzvah in the same spot where both of those expressions of other people’s faiths took place. Though I do bet he’d be proud of how far we’ve come.

    His ideas of faith and his acceptance of others set in motion something that we need to find our way back to today. It’s a foundational principle of this great nation. A band of patriots gathered at Independence Hall in 1776 to declare our independence from a king and set ourselves on a path of self-determination. Those patriots plotted, planned, and organized in taverns and town squares and decided that they wanted to live in a place grounded in the notion of real freedom and self-determination. And over the last two and half centuries, our American story has been defined by people from all walks of life who have followed that lead and done their part. Ordinary Americans rising up, demanding more, seeking justice, and working to build a better life for their children. The story of our nation has not been written just by people with titles next to their names or by people in government offices but by everyday folks believing in each other, standing up, raising their voices, and using their power.

    I’ve been privileged in my life to know those people—the ones who will be in the history books and the ones I’ve written about in this book. The ones I feel blessed to know because they taught me something and helped me grow as a public servant, as a father, a husband, and a person, and brought me closer to my own faith.

    That is the American way. Those are the bonds that lead to a more perfect union. Those people, those bonds, that deeper connection to my faith are how I have learned to fish differently. To show up, to listen, to leave this place better than we found it. That’s the cornerstone of my faith—of all faiths, really. It’s elemental, even as it is sometimes hard to see and feel today.

    This has been true at all the most significant moments in American history—the commitment to doing the hard work required to have faith in these ideals and the people to perfect them. That is our shared story. It was true for our Founders at Independence Hall. It offered courage to the brave souls who wore our uniform and landed on foreign beaches to protect our freedoms here at home and defeat fascism abroad. It was on display when our neighbors, who sought a more perfect union, sat down at the lunch counter so the next generation could stand taller.

    I’ve witnessed this in the many millions of quieter moments of goodness, too. The way my father showed faith that new moms could tell him what they needed for their babies, not the other way around. The way my mother taught me to care about the world around me. In how the survivors of abuse found the courage to expose the truth. I’ve seen this with the dedication and bravery of the Hawbaker workers who were unafraid of corporate power. And with the law enforcement officers who care so deeply about their neighbors that they’re willing to give their lives for the rest of us. I witnessed the fortitude of moms who lost their kids to fentanyl, who turn their pain into help for others; the craftsmen who wouldn’t let an arsonist’s crimes keep the people’s home closed; the brave couples who pushed for marriage equality and moved the needle; the lady at Sheetz who got her husband the care he needed, along with thousands of others in dire straits; a community ravaged by an attack on their neighbors determined to show a capacity to love rather than succumb to hate.

    All those people and their actions and their belief in common good have propelled us forward, just like our Founders intended, and helped us find our faith in a brighter, better day. Ordinary folks doing extraordinary things each day to build a more just and connected nation. To not be consumed by darkness or chaos.

    Now more than ever, we yearn for and need a world defined by faith. It’s universal, this belief in others to help us through what feels unsettled, uncivil, un-American. It’s a guidepost, a path through the woods. When the dark feels like it could consume us whole and churn us up and lose us, it is where we keep the light.

         
    Reprinted with permission from the book “Where We Keep the Light.” Copyright © 2026 by Josh Shapiro. Published by Harper, an imprint of HarperCollins Publishers. 


    Get the book here:

    “Where We Keep the Light” by Josh Shapiro

    Buy locally from Bookshop.org


    For more info:

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Netflix’s Virgin River Show vs. Robyn Carr’s Book: Biggest Differences

    [ad_1]

    Virgin River won over Netflix viewers about small town life — but how does the TV adaptation compare to the original book?

    Based on the book series written by Robyn Carr, Virgin River centers around the lives of residents living in a small town in Northern California, including Mel (Alexandra Breckenridge) and her love interest, Jack (Martin Henderson). The series also stars Colin Lawrence, Annette O’Toole, Tim Matheson, Benjamin Hollingsworth, Sarah Dugdale, Zibby Allen, Marco Grazzini, Mark Ghanimé and Kai Bradbury.

    After many ups and downs — including a miscarriage in season 5 — Jack and Mel finally ended season 6 as husband and wife. Elsewhere, exes Brie (Allen) and Brady (Hollingsworth) slept together before Brie told her boyfriend, Mike (Grazzini), about her affair with Brady, which made him propose to her.

    The drama at the center of the show has taken on a world of its own. Keep scrolling for the main differences that took place on the show compared to Carr’s version:


    Related: Which ‘Virgin River’ Stars Are — And Aren’t — Returning for Season 7?

    Between a cast exit, love triangle complications and several open-ended story lines, Virgin River has a lot of questions that need answering in season 7 — but is every cast member returning for more episodes? Virgin River, which premiered in 2019, is based on Robyn Carr’s book series and follows the lives of residents living […]

    Adapting the Characters — and Relationships — Differently

    Mel-and-Jack-Virgin_River_n_S6_E10_00_14_10_18R_Crop

    Alexandra Breckenridge and Martin Henderson in ‘Virgin River’ season 6.
    Courtesy of Netflix

    From Preacher and Paige’s romance to Hope and Doc, the TV show explored the same dynamics with new additions. Book fans will likely notice that the characters aren’t exactly the way they were written on the page.

    The Focus on Mel and Jack

    With over a dozen books, Mel and Jack couldn’t always be at the center of the book series. The show, however, had more freedom to focus the show around one main couple.

    Missing Characters

    Which 'Virgin River' Stars Are — And Aren't — Returning for Season 7?
    Netflix / Courtesy Everett Collection

    21 books in the series means more characters, which isn’t the case for the show. Some examples include Vanessa, who played a role on the page — unlike the Netflix series. Side note: crucial details have also been changed as a way to accommodate storytelling.

    Everything to Know About Virgin River Prequel


    Related: Will Mel and Jack Have a Baby? What to Know About ‘Virgin River’ Season 7

    Mel and Jack finally made it to the altar on Virgin River ahead of season 7 — but what comes next? Virgin River, which premiered in 2019, follows the lives of residents living in a small town in Northern California, including Mel (Alexandra Breckenridge) and her love interest, Jack (Martin Henderson). The series also stars […]

    The Speed of Certain Events

    As viewers know, Virgin River on our screens has only covered a year while the book series has the ability to check in on a larger timeframe.

    The Rating

    Virgin River
    Netflix / Courtesy Everett Collection

    Certain situations are much more PG on the show while the books didn’t shy away from romance — in all sense of the word.

    Mel’s Backstory — and Future

    In addition to the show changing details about Mel’s husband, her love story with Jack is still going on. A big portion that the show hasn’t touched on is the idea of kids, which they have on the page but not on screen yet.

    [ad_2]

    Yana Grebenyuk

    Source link

  • 10 Uplifting Reads to Banish the Winter Blues

    [ad_1]

    ‘Fried Green Tomatoes at the Whistle Stop Café’ by Fannie Flagg

    This 1987 classic is a must-read for anyone seeking a lift. The novel follows the burgeoning friendship between Evelyn Couch, a housewife in her 50s, and Ninny Threadgoode, an elderly woman living in a care home. As their bond grows, Ninny begins to recount the story of her younger days in Whistle Stop, Alabama—focusing on her sister-in-law Idgie and Idgie’s close friend Ruth, who together run the Whistle Stop Café. The narrative seamlessly moves between past and present, inviting readers into a world that’s tender, humorous and rich in Southern atmosphere. While the novel is uplifting and full of warmth, it also confronts serious themes, including racism, aging, sexuality and prejudice, with sensitivity and nuance. And since so much of the story unfolds in the café, it’s no surprise that food plays a central role, with moments bound to make your mouth water—including, of course, the now-iconic fried green tomatoes. More than 40 years after its publication, the book’s themes still resonate, and its humor, heart and unforgettable characters remain as vibrant and engaging as ever.

    [ad_2]

    Gillian Harvey

    Source link

  • Cocktail history as a comic: Author talks about his new graphic nonfiction book

    [ad_1]

    New York-based cocktail historian David Wondrich had most recently finished editing an 860-plus-page compendium of knowledge about cocktail history when the opportunity arose to share cocktail history through a different medium: as a graphic nonfiction book.

    The author took on the challenge, teaming up with illustrator Dean Kotz to take readers on a journey around the world, following the world’s drinking preferences from Colonial-era punches to Prohibition, from the rise of the 1930s tiki trend to the modern-day craft cocktail movement and beyond — plus much more along the way, including an array of cocktail recipes. We recently caught up with Wondrich to learn more.

    “The Comic Book History of the Cocktail: Five Centuries of Mixing Drinks and Carrying On” by David Wondrich, illustrated by Dean Kotz (Ten Speed Graphic, $30) covers the evolution of the cocktail from the rise of distillation to the craft cocktail movement and beyond. (Photo courtesy of Ten Speed Graphic) 

    Responses have been edited for length and clarity.

    Q: What inspired you to tell the history of cocktails through a comic book?

    [ad_2]

    Kate Bradshaw

    Source link

  • This week’s bestsellers at Southern California’s independent bookstores

    [ad_1]

    The SoCal Indie Bestsellers List for the sales week ended Jan. 11 is based on reporting from the independent booksellers of Southern California, the California Independent Booksellers Alliance and IndieBound. For an independent bookstore near you, visit IndieBound.org.

    HARDCOVER FICTION

    1. What We Can Know: Ian McEwan

    2. Heart the Lover: Lily King

    3. The Correspondent: Virginia Evans

    4. James: Percival Everett

    5. The First Time I Saw Him: Laura Dave

    6. Wild Dark Shore: Charlotte McConaghy

    7. Flesh: David Szalay

    8. Buckeye: Patrick Ryan

    9. Audition: Katie Kitamura

    10. Mona’s Eyes: Thomas Schlesser

    HARDCOVER NONFICTION

    1. A Marriage at Sea: A True Story of Love, Obsession, and Shipwreck: Sophie Elmhirst

    2. Bread of Angels: A Memoir: Patti Smith

    3. One Day, Everyone Will Have Always Been Against This: Omar El Akkad

    4. Firestorm: The Great Los Angeles Fires and America’s New Age of Disaster: Jacob Soboroff

    5. The Let Them Theory: A Life-Changing Tool That Millions of People Can’t Stop Talking About: Mel Robbins, Sawyer Robbins

    6. Hush: How to Radiate Power and Confidence Without Saying a Word: Linda Clemons

    7. The Creative Act: A Way of Being: Rick Rubin

    8. Good Things: Recipes and Rituals to Share with People You Love: Samin Nosrat

    9. Mother Mary Comes to Me: Arundhati Roy

    10. The Little Frog’s Guide to Life: Love, Advice and Inspiration for Every Day from the Internet’s Beloved Mushroom Frog: Maybell Eequay

    TRADE PAPERBACK FICTION

    1. Heated Rivalry: Rachel Reid

    2. Dungeon Crawler Carl: Matt Dinniman

    3. Hamnet: Maggie O’Farrell

    4. Project Hail Mary: Andy Weir

    5. Game Changer: Rachel Reid

    6. The Long Game: Rachel Reid

    7. Remarkably Bright Creatures: Shelby Van Pelt

    8. Martyr!: Kaveh Akbar

    9. The Frozen River: Ariel Lawhon

    10. I Who Have Never Known Men: Jacqueline Harpman

    TRADE PAPERBACK NONFICTION

    1. The Age of Magical Overthinking: Notes on Modern Irrationality: Amanda Montell

    2. I’m Glad My Mom Died: Jennette McCurdy

    3. Fight Oligarchy: Senator Bernie Sanders

    4. On Tyranny: Twenty Lessons from the Twentieth Century: Timothy Snyder

    5. How to Know a Person: The Art of Seeing Others Deeply and Being Deeply Seen: David Brooks

    6. Reimagining Government: Achieving the Promise of AI: Faisal Hoque, Erik Nelson, Thomas H. Davenport

    7. Braiding Sweetgrass: Indigenous Wisdom, Scientific Knowledge, and the Teachings of Plants: Robin Wall Kimmerer

    8. The Wager: A Tale of Shipwreck, Mutiny and Murder: David Grann

    9. Just Kids: Patti Smith

    10. The Body Keeps the Score: Brain, Mind, and Body in the Healing of Trauma: Bessel van der Kolk, M.D.

    [ad_2]

    Staff report

    Source link

  • Book excerpt:

    [ad_1]

    Avid Reader Press


    We may receive an affiliate commission from anything you buy from this article.

    Broadcasting superstar Oprah Winfrey, who has struggled with weight for much of her life, and Dr. Ania Jastreboff, of the Yale School of Medicine, have teamed up to examine the biology of obesity, offering a new way forward.

    Their new book is “Enough: Your Health, Your Weight, and What It’s Like To Be Free” (‎to be published Jan. 13 by Avid Reader Press).

    Read an excerpt below, and don’t miss Jane Pauley’s interview with Winfrey and Jastreboff on “CBS Sunday Morning” January 11!


    “Enough: Your Health, Your Weight, and What It’s Like To Be Free”

    Prefer to listen? Audible has a 30-day free trial available right now.


    Enough Shame and Blame

    My patient Alice began experiencing self-blame in childhood. Her well-intentioned mom put her on diets when she was in her early teens. Even before that, she had started to develop what she eventually called the “self-hatred voice.” She vividly remembers when she was ten years old, sitting in the front yard with her legs bent, seeing the inside curvature of her leg and wanting it to be smaller. “This is the line where your muscle is, and on the inside is a curve. That’s the fat and the extra skin. I thought, ‘Oh, if I could just cut that off, then my leg would be perfect.’ I had a pen, and I drew the line where I thought my legs should be and where the fat should be cut off. I just knew that I was larger than I wanted to be.” Alice lived in Vermont at the time, and her mother had a garden where she grew all sorts of vegetables—lettuce, carrots, cucumbers. “I just remember eating salad, so much salad!” Alice recalls. At thirteen, she sat at the table, thinking, “Here’s a plate with three pieces of lettuce and a carrot,” and wondering how she was going to get through basketball practice or soccer without passing out or blowing the game for her teammates.

    A few years later, her mother put herself and Alice on a no-carb diet. “Atkins was kinda big,” Alice says. Her father and two younger brothers were exempt; it was only for the girls of the family. Which basically meant Alice and her mother were still eating everything from the garden, except no turnips, because turnips had “too many carbs.”

    After three days, Alice revolted. She reached for some crackers in the cupboard: “Mom, I just ate an entire sleeve of saltines!” Hearing this, her mother was not upset with her. Alice shared, “She was desperate for carbs, too, and ate three saltines herself. And then dutifully returned to her no-carb diet.”

    At sixteen, Alice started tracking her weight for sports. The self-hatred voice in her mind began to be very specific and explicit. “The cupcake you just ate—what is the number of calories in it? What is the number of carbs?” She described that it wouldn’t let up, not even for just one tiny-teeny bite. It was unrelenting.

    Fast-forward more than thirty years, and by the time Alice was nearly fifty, she had tried every diet and workout program under the sun: forty-seven of them, to be exact. Atkins, keto, South Beach, the Zone, low carb, no carb, ultra-low fat, liquid only, Jillian Michaels, Jane Fonda, Suzanne Somers, full-body HIIT workouts, gym memberships, a YMCA weight coach, DietBet, StepBet, a Mediterranean diet, a vegetarian diet, the raw food diet, intermittent fasting. She’d even tried hypnosis. She had three teenagers, a fulfilling job in communications, and a loving boyfriend. She struggled with obesity despite spending much of her adult life tracking every morsel of food, eating mostly healthful meals, and exercising every day. She had successfully lost weight countless times. That wasn’t the issue. The problem was that she always gained it back. She always blamed herself for having obesity. She did not know about the biology of obesity, yet.

    From “Enough: Your Health, Your Weight, and What It’s Like To Be Free” by Ania M. Jastreboff, M.D., Ph.D., and Oprah Winfrey. Copyright © 2025. Reprinted by permission of Simon & Schuster, Inc. All Rights Reserved.


    Get the book here:

    “Enough: Your Health, Your Weight, and What It’s Like To Be Free”

    Buy locally from Bookshop.org


    For more info:

    [ad_2]

    Source link