ReportWire

Tag: bond

  • Newsom’s signature water tunnel is set back by California court ruling

    [ad_1]

    In a decision that could complicate Gov. Gavin Newsom’s push to build a giant water tunnel and remake California’s water system, a state appeals court has rejected the state’s plan for financing the project.

    The 3rd District Court of Appeal ruled against the state Department of Water Resources’ plan to issue billions of dollars in bonds to build the 45-mile tunnel beneath the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta.

    The decision is a win for California ratepayers and taxpayers, said Roger Moore, a lawyer representing six counties in Northern California and two water agencies in the Delta region.

    He said it underlines that state agencies “have to take real steps to make sure that there is transparency and accountability.”

    Upholding a 2024 decision by a Sacramento County Superior Court judge, the court ruled the water agency does not have the authority under a 1959 law to issue bonds for a new “unit” of the State Water Project, which delivers water from the Delta to farms and cities, and “exceeded its delegated authority” in planning to finance the tunnel through bonds.

    Kirsten Macintyre, a spokesperson for the department, said the court didn’t say the Department of Water Resources lacks the authority to build the project or borrow funds to pay for it, but rather that the description the state presented in the case was “overly broad.”

    “While DWR respectfully disagrees with that conclusion, we have taken additional steps to resolve the issue,” she said in an email.

    Last year, the agency opened a second court case in an effort to confirm its bond-issuing authority, a step that Macintyre said was taken to “address the court’s concerns.”

    If the appeals court decision stands and the ongoing case doesn’t bring a different conclusion, it might lead the Newsom administration to revise its plan for financing the project. Officials could also petition for the California Supreme Court to hear the case.

    The state estimated in 2024 that the tunnel would cost $20.1 billion, while opponents say it could cost three to five times more than that.

    State officials have said that the tunnel, called the Delta Conveyance Project, ultimately would be paid for by participating water agencies that agree to repay the bonds.

    The tunnel would create a second route to transport water from new intakes on the Sacramento River to the south side of the Delta, where pumps send water into the aqueducts of the State Water Project.

    The system of aqueducts and pipelines transports water from the Delta to 27 million people in cities from the Bay Area to San Diego, and to 750,000 acres of farmland.

    In 1960, California voters approved bonds for the construction of the State Water Project. Legislation in 1959 had given DWR the authority to build the Feather River Project, an initial component of the State Water Project.

    But in the ruling last week, the court said DWR officials were wrong to rely on that provision. The three judges said it doesn’t allow the agency to issue bonds “under the guise of a ‘further modification’” of that original water system.

    Newsom has said the project is essential for the state’s future and has made it a central priority of his administration.

    State officials and supporters of the project have said the tunnel would modernize the state’s water system for more severe droughts and deluges with climate change, and would withstand sea level rise and the risks of a major earthquake in the region.

    Opponents, including environmental advocates, fishing groups and tribal leaders, argue the project would harm the Delta’s communities and ecosystem, and further threaten native fish that are already in decline.

    [ad_2]

    Ian James

    Source link

  • How Do I Emotionally Connect With My Partner?

    [ad_1]

    Building a strong emotional connection with your partner is crucial for a fulfilling relationship, but it’s not always easy to know where to start. In this article, we’ll explore the importance of building a strong emotional connection, the key elements of a strong bond and how to know if you have them, common signs of emotional distance, and ways you can strengthen your love.

    Why It’s Important to Emotionally Connect With Your Partner

    Research shows that understanding and nurturing your connection can help you better navigate challenges, build trust, and foster intimacy. Engaging in healthy communication patterns, shared activities, and gratitude can also significantly enhance emotional ties. In short, working on your emotional connection will bolster your connection and build goodwill, so even during tough times your connection stays strong. 

    Understanding Emotional Connection

    Your emotional connection is the foundation of your relationship. It’s more than just being together, it’s about shared experiences and a bond that reaches below surface level. Emotional intimacy happens when partners can trust each other with their innermost thoughts and feelings. They know they can rely on each other, even during difficult times, and they choose each other every day. 

    Emotional intelligence plays a role in establishing this bond. It requires recognizing and managing your own emotions while being attuned to your partner’s.

    Creating a safe space where each partner can share their thoughts, dreams, and fears is also essential. Knowing that your partner supports you and really cares about your inner world is crucial to a healthy emotional connection. 

    Key Elements of a Strong Emotional Connection and How to Know if You Have Them

    Trust

    The foundation of every lasting relationship, trust is what everything else is built upon. Trust is built through consistency and reliability, through showing up for each other in both calm and difficult times. When trust is strong, both partners feel secure enough to grow and take emotional risks together.

    How you know you have trust in your relationship? You can be open and honest without fear. You don’t have to filter your thoughts or hide your emotions. You know your partner has your back. You have a sense of safety in your relationship.

    Respect

    Having respect for your partner means valuing their individuality and feelings while honoring differences that make each of you unique. It’s about seeing your partner as a whole person, not someone to change or manage. When couples treat each other with respect, they create an environment where both people feel seen, heard, and appreciated. That kind of mutual care creates the space where real emotional closeness can develop.

    How you know you have respect in your relationship? You value each other’s differences and opinions. You treat one another with kindness, even if you disagree. Your relationship feels balanced and secure. You both matter equally.

    Empathy

    Having empathy means understanding and being attuned to what your partner is feeling. It begins with listening—not to fix or correct—but to understand. When you validate each other’s emotions, even when you don’t agree, you build emotional attunement, that sense of “you get me” that keeps love close and secure. Empathy transforms tension into understanding and turns conflict into connection.

    How you know you have empathy in your relationship? You truly understand and care about what one another feels. You listen to each other with compassion. You respond to each other with warmth. You are sensitive to each other’s moods and feelings. 

    Communication

    It’s not just about talking; it’s about listening with awareness and responding with care. Open, honest conversations paired with regular emotional check-ins help prevent misunderstandings and build trust. When couples communicate well, they stay connected even through stress and change, continually reinforcing their emotional bond.

    How you know you have good communication in your relationship? Communication flows easily. Conversations feel natural and honest, whether you’re sharing dreams or talking through challenges. You have regular check-ins with each other. You practice active listening, and avoid blame or criticism. 

    Friendship

    It lies at the heart of lasting love. The laughter, shared memories, and mutual enjoyment that make being together feel easy and joyful. Strong friendships within relationships create a sense of “us”, a partnership grounded in appreciation and affection. When friendship thrives, love feels lighter, safer, and more resilient against life’s challenges.

    How you know you have friendship in your relationship? You laugh together, share experiences, and genuinely enjoy each other’s company. You make time for fun and connection, even in small ways. You play together and you have adventures together. You seek each other out in a crowded room. 

    [ad_2]

    The Gottman Institute

    Source link

  • Judge revokes bond for man accused of trying to sexually assault woman on Orange County trail

    [ad_1]

    A judge has agreed to revoke bond for a man accused of trying to rape a woman on an Orange County trail.The man, 23-year-old Jacoby Tillman, was out on a $9,500 bond after he was accused of attacking a woman from behind and attempting to rape her on July 25. Tillman was arrested on Oct. 10 and charged with attempted sexual battery, battery by strangulation and false imprisonment.The incident happened on a running trail near Econ Park. Tillman’s bond release sparked outrage from Orange County Sheriff John Mina.Prosecutors said they wanted him locked up until his trial, and they filed a new motion for it to happen. They also upped his charge to attempted first-degree murder. After being released on bond, prosecutors said Tillman posted a TikTok and made comments directed at the witness and used a text message that the witness had sent him in the past.The state argues that this violated the judge’s no-contact order with the victim and witnesses, which is a condition for his release.The judge agreed that Tillman violated court orders. At that time, he was charged with attempted sexual battery. In a new court filing, prosecutors said they want Tillman to be sentenced as a “habitual violent felony offender.”Tillman’s criminal record includes convictions for aggravated battery and misdemeanor battery in Orange County.His girlfriend at the time also reported abusive behavior, including an incident where he choked her until she lost consciousness, according to the OCSO.Related content

    A judge has agreed to revoke bond for a man accused of trying to rape a woman on an Orange County trail.

    The man, 23-year-old Jacoby Tillman, was out on a $9,500 bond after he was accused of attacking a woman from behind and attempting to rape her on July 25.

    Tillman was arrested on Oct. 10 and charged with attempted sexual battery, battery by strangulation and false imprisonment.

    The incident happened on a running trail near Econ Park.

    Tillman’s bond release sparked outrage from Orange County Sheriff John Mina.

    Prosecutors said they wanted him locked up until his trial, and they filed a new motion for it to happen. They also upped his charge to attempted first-degree murder.

    After being released on bond, prosecutors said Tillman posted a TikTok and made comments directed at the witness and used a text message that the witness had sent him in the past.

    The state argues that this violated the judge’s no-contact order with the victim and witnesses, which is a condition for his release.

    The judge agreed that Tillman violated court orders.

    At that time, he was charged with attempted sexual battery. In a new court filing, prosecutors said they want Tillman to be sentenced as a “habitual violent felony offender.”

    Tillman’s criminal record includes convictions for aggravated battery and misdemeanor battery in Orange County.

    His girlfriend at the time also reported abusive behavior, including an incident where he choked her until she lost consciousness, according to the OCSO.

    Related content

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Motion filed to revoke bond of man arrested for attempted rape on running trail in Orange County

    [ad_1]

    >> Video above: Previous coverageA man who was arrested for allegedly attempting to rape a woman on a running trail in Orange County could have his bond revoked.According to court records on the Orange County Clerk’s website, a motion has been filed to revoke 23-year-old Jacoby Vontell Tillman’s bond.The Orange County Sheriff’s Office spent months searching for Tillman, following a report that he assaulted a woman while she was jogging on the Little Econ Greenway Trail in July.OCSO said Tillman attacked a woman from behind and attempted to rape her. The woman said he grabbed her and wrapped both arms around her neck, choking her, causing her to see stars and eventually blacking out.Once she woke up, the woman said she was still face down and realized her shorts and underwear were gone, according to the OCSO. Tillman was arrested on Oct. 10 and charged with attempted sexual battery, battery by strangulation and false imprisonment. However, he was released from jail on Sunday on a total bond of $9,500, according to the Orange County Corrections Department.Tillman’s bond release sparked outrage from Orange County Sheriff John Mina.”This is atrocious! He should have never been released,” Mina said on Facebook.The attempted rape victim has also shared concerns about Tillman’s release. “I think he is a danger. Not just to women, but to kids,” she said.Tillman’s criminal record includes convictions for aggravated battery and misdemeanor battery in Orange County.His girlfriend at the time also reported abusive behavior, including an incident where he choked her until she lost consciousness, according to the OCSO. This is a developing news story and will be updated as more information is released.

    >> Video above: Previous coverage

    A man who was arrested for allegedly attempting to rape a woman on a running trail in Orange County could have his bond revoked.

    According to court records on the Orange County Clerk’s website, a motion has been filed to revoke 23-year-old Jacoby Vontell Tillman’s bond.

    The Orange County Sheriff’s Office spent months searching for Tillman, following a report that he assaulted a woman while she was jogging on the Little Econ Greenway Trail in July.

    OCSO said Tillman attacked a woman from behind and attempted to rape her.

    The woman said he grabbed her and wrapped both arms around her neck, choking her, causing her to see stars and eventually blacking out.

    Once she woke up, the woman said she was still face down and realized her shorts and underwear were gone, according to the OCSO.

    Tillman was arrested on Oct. 10 and charged with attempted sexual battery, battery by strangulation and false imprisonment.

    However, he was released from jail on Sunday on a total bond of $9,500, according to the Orange County Corrections Department.

    Tillman’s bond release sparked outrage from Orange County Sheriff John Mina.

    “This is atrocious! He should have never been released,” Mina said on Facebook.

    The attempted rape victim has also shared concerns about Tillman’s release.

    “I think he is a danger. Not just to women, but to kids,” she said.

    Tillman’s criminal record includes convictions for aggravated battery and misdemeanor battery in Orange County.

    His girlfriend at the time also reported abusive behavior, including an incident where he choked her until she lost consciousness, according to the OCSO.

    This is a developing news story and will be updated as more information is released.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Arrest made after 15-year-old killed in Cocoa ambush shooting

    [ad_1]

    DAUGHTER’S. WESH TWO NEWS STARTS NOW WITH BREAKING NEWS. WE’RE FOLLOWING SEVERAL BREAKING NEWS STORIES FIRST IN BREVARD COUNTY, WHERE THE SHERIFF SAYS THEY’VE MADE AN ARREST IN THE MURDER OF A 15 YEAR OLD GIRL. BUT THE SEARCH FOR ANOTHER SUSPECT CONTINUES IN JUST THE LAST HOUR, SHERIFF WAYNE IVEY ANNOUNCED THIS MAN, 20 YEAR OLD JOHN TARIK SMITH, WAS ARRESTED FOLLOWING A TRAFFIC STOP IN VOLUSIA COUNTY. HE’S NOW FACING SEVERAL CHARGES, INCLUDING FIRST DEGREE MURDER. THE SHERIFF’S OFFICE JUST POSTED VIDEO OF DETECTIVES WALKING SMITH INTO THE BREVARD COUNTY JAIL. INVESTIGATORS BELIEVE HE HELPED AMBUSH A CAR OUTSIDE A RESTAURANT IN UNINCORPORATED COCOA LAST WEEK. SHOOTING AND KILLING CORREIA DUNNELLON AND WOUNDING TWO YOUNG MEN. NOW, DEPUTIES ARE LOOKING FOR A SECOND SUSPECT RIGHT NOW. AND THIS IS HIS PHOTO HERE. HIS NAME IS XAVIER BUTLER. IF YOU KNOW WHERE HE IS OR YOU HAVE ANY INFORMATION, YOU’RE URGED TO CALL THE SHERIFF’S OFFICE OR THE CRI

    Arrest made after 15-year-old killed in Cocoa ambush shooting

    Updated: 6:36 PM EDT Oct 13, 2025

    Editorial Standards

    An arrest has been made after a 15-year-old girl was killed in an ambush shooting in Cocoa last week, the Brevard County Sheriff’s Office announced Monday.Jonterich Smith, 20, is charged with first-degree premeditated murder and two counts of aggravated battery with a firearm. He is being held without bond.The BCSO is still looking for the second suspect, Xazavier Butler. If found, he will be faced with the same charges as Smith, and held without bond. Ka’Ryah Duncan was one of three people shot while sitting in a parked car outside a restaurant on Clearlake Road. Another car pulled up behind them and fired dozens of shots, leaving all three people wounded, BCSO said. Duncan later died from her injuries. Video shared by the Brevard County Sheriff’s Office to Facebook

    An arrest has been made after a 15-year-old girl was killed in an ambush shooting in Cocoa last week, the Brevard County Sheriff’s Office announced Monday.

    Jonterich Smith, 20, is charged with first-degree premeditated murder and two counts of aggravated battery with a firearm. He is being held without bond.

    The BCSO is still looking for the second suspect, Xazavier Butler. If found, he will be faced with the same charges as Smith, and held without bond.

    Ka’Ryah Duncan was one of three people shot while sitting in a parked car outside a restaurant on Clearlake Road.

    Another car pulled up behind them and fired dozens of shots, leaving all three people wounded, BCSO said.

    Duncan later died from her injuries.

    Video shared by the Brevard County Sheriff’s Office to Facebook

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • ACLU seeks release of Michigan immigrant held in custody despite life-threatening leukemia

    [ad_1]

    Federal authorities refuse to release a Michigan man in a pending deportation case, despite his life-threatening leukemia and the inconsistent health care he’s received while in custody since August, his lawyer said Thursday.Related video above: Massachusetts city council passes resolution barring police from assisting ICEThe American Civil Liberties Union of Michigan is seeking a bond hearing for Jose Contreras-Cervantes, which could allow him to return to his Detroit-area family and doctors while his case winds through immigration court. He’s currently being held at a detention center about three hours away.Contreras-Cervantes, a 33-year-old married father of three who has been living in the U.S. for about 20 years, but not legally, was arrested at an Aug. 5 traffic stop in Macomb County, near Detroit. He had no criminal record beyond minor traffic offenses, said ACLU lawyer Miriam Aukerman.Contreras-Cervantes was diagnosed last year with chronic myeloid leukemia, a life-threatening cancer of the bone marrow, said his wife, Lupita Contreras.”The doctor said he has four to six years to live,” she said.His detention is a consequence of the Trump administration’s policy of refusing to agree to bond hearings for immigrants if they entered the U.S. illegally, even if they lack a criminal record. The policy is a reversal of past practices and it has been successfully challenged, including this week in Washington state.”We don’t just lock people up and throw away the key,” Aukerman said. “Judges decide who should be behind bars. That is true for citizens and noncitizens. … Immigration cases can take months or even years.”U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement had no immediate comment on the case.Contreras-Cervantes was shuttled from Michigan to Ohio and then back to Michigan and didn’t receive medication for 22 days, his wife said.He is now getting a substitute medication at North Lake Processing Center, a privately operated detention center in Baldwin, Michigan, not the specific medication recommended by his doctors, Aukerman said.The ACLU filed a petition Monday in U.S. District Court in Detroit, asking a judge to order bond hearings for Contreras-Cervantes and seven other people who are in custody.”What the (Trump) administration is doing is trying to crush people’s spirits, make them give up,” and agree to deportation, Aukerman said. “We’re saying no. They’re entitled to due process.”

    Federal authorities refuse to release a Michigan man in a pending deportation case, despite his life-threatening leukemia and the inconsistent health care he’s received while in custody since August, his lawyer said Thursday.

    Related video above: Massachusetts city council passes resolution barring police from assisting ICE

    The American Civil Liberties Union of Michigan is seeking a bond hearing for Jose Contreras-Cervantes, which could allow him to return to his Detroit-area family and doctors while his case winds through immigration court. He’s currently being held at a detention center about three hours away.

    Contreras-Cervantes, a 33-year-old married father of three who has been living in the U.S. for about 20 years, but not legally, was arrested at an Aug. 5 traffic stop in Macomb County, near Detroit. He had no criminal record beyond minor traffic offenses, said ACLU lawyer Miriam Aukerman.

    Contreras-Cervantes was diagnosed last year with chronic myeloid leukemia, a life-threatening cancer of the bone marrow, said his wife, Lupita Contreras.

    “The doctor said he has four to six years to live,” she said.

    His detention is a consequence of the Trump administration’s policy of refusing to agree to bond hearings for immigrants if they entered the U.S. illegally, even if they lack a criminal record. The policy is a reversal of past practices and it has been successfully challenged, including this week in Washington state.

    “We don’t just lock people up and throw away the key,” Aukerman said. “Judges decide who should be behind bars. That is true for citizens and noncitizens. … Immigration cases can take months or even years.”

    U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement had no immediate comment on the case.

    Contreras-Cervantes was shuttled from Michigan to Ohio and then back to Michigan and didn’t receive medication for 22 days, his wife said.

    He is now getting a substitute medication at North Lake Processing Center, a privately operated detention center in Baldwin, Michigan, not the specific medication recommended by his doctors, Aukerman said.

    The ACLU filed a petition Monday in U.S. District Court in Detroit, asking a judge to order bond hearings for Contreras-Cervantes and seven other people who are in custody.

    “What the (Trump) administration is doing is trying to crush people’s spirits, make them give up,” and agree to deportation, Aukerman said. “We’re saying no. They’re entitled to due process.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • A strawberry delivery driver arrested by Border Patrol tries to make his way home

    [ad_1]

    The lights never dimmed and Angel Minguela Palacios couldn’t sleep. He pulled what felt like a large sheet of aluminum foil over his head, but couldn’t adjust to lying on a concrete floor and using his tennis shoes as a pillow.

    He could smell unwashed bodies in the cramped room he shared with 40 detainees. He listened as men, many of them arrested at car washes or outside Home Depots, cried in the night for their loved ones.

    Minguela, 48, lay in the chilly downtown Los Angeles ICE facility known as B 18 and thought about his partner of eight years and their three children. In his 10 years in the United States, he had built a secure life he had only dreamed of in Mexico, ensconced in their humble one-bedroom rented home, framed photos of the family at Christmas, his “#1 Dad” figurine. Now it was all falling apart.

    The morning of Aug. 14, Minguela had been on his last delivery of the day, dropping off strawberries to a tearoom in Little Tokyo. He didn’t know that Gov. Gavin Newsom was holding a news conference there to inveigh against President Trump’s efforts to maintain control of the U.S. House of Representatives through redistricting in Texas. U.S. Border Patrol agents were massing nearby, creating a show of force outside the event.

    As they moved in, one agent narrowed in on Minguela’s delivery van. Soon, he was in handcuffs, arrested for overstaying a tourist visa. As his lawyer put it, Minguela became “political, collateral damage.”

    Over the six days he spent in B 18, a temporary immigration processing center, Minguela watched as several detainees chose to self-deport rather than remain in detention.

    A building marking is painted on a wall at an Immigration and Customs Enforcement facility known as “B 18.”

    (Carlin Stiehl / Los Angeles Times)

    No aguanto aqui,” the men would say. “I can’t take it here.”

    The harsh conditions, Minguela said, felt intentional. He knew he needed to stay for his family. But he wondered if he’d make it.

    ::

    Minguela fled Mexico in 2015, driven in part by violence he faced there.

    In his time servicing ATMs in Ciudad Juárez, he said he was kidnapped twice and at one point stabbed by people intent on stealing the cash. After his employers cut staff, he lost his job, helping drive his decision to leave.

    Minguela came to Texas on a tourist visa and left the same day to L.A. drawn by the job opportunities and its many Spanish speakers. He had little money, rented a room as he searched for employment and soon found a job at the downtown produce market.

    He met the woman he calls his esposa, who asked not to be named for fear of retaliation, at the second job he worked in the Piñata District. They are not married but Minguela helped raise her two children and later their son, who is autistic. The children — 15, 12 and 6 — all call him Dad.

    With Minguela there, his esposa said she never felt alone. He helped with the laundry and cleaning. He played Roblox with his middle son and helped his 15-year-old daughter with her homework, especially math.

    “He would always make sure that we would stay on track,” his daughter said. “He would always want the best for us.”

    Photos captured the life they had built in L.A. The family in San Pedro for a boat ride. Celebrating Father’s Day and birthdays with cake and balloons. At a Day of the Dead celebration on Olvera Street downtown.

    Angel Minguela Palacios with his partner of eight years and their 6-year-old son.

    Angel Minguela Palacios with his partner of eight years and their 6-year-old son.

    (Carlin Stiehl/Los Angeles Times)

    When immigration raids began in June, their lives suddenly narrowed. Minguela rarely went out, leaving the house only for work and errands. His daughter would warn him if she heard rumors of immigration officers near her high school, so he wouldn’t risk picking her up.

    Minguela planned ahead, made copies of his keys and left money for his family in case he was grabbed by immigration agents. But he never expected it would happen to him.

    On Aug. 14, his alarm went off at 1:15 a.m., as it did almost every day. He drank the coffee his wife had brought him as he headed to the produce market, where he’d worked for the same company for eight years.

    Minguela helped take orders of strawberries, raspberries and blueberries, before heading out to make deliveries around 8 a.m. He had around half a dozen places to hit before he would call it a day.

    His partner called to warn him that she’d seen on social media that ICE officers were near one of his delivery spots. He had just been there and luckily missed them, he said.

    He was relieved that the Little Tokyo tearoom was his last stop. It didn’t open until 11 a.m. He arrived 10 minutes after. He found a parking spot out front and began unloading the boxes of strawberries and one box of apples.

    Minguela was adjusting wooden pallets in the van when he heard a knock. He turned to see a Border Patrol agent, who began asking him about his legal status. Rather than answer, Minguela said he pulled a red “know your rights” card out of his wallet and handed it to the agent.

    Image of a federal agent looking at identification outside of the Japanese American National Museum on Aug. 14.

    Angel Minguela Palacios took this image of a federal agent looking at his identification outside of the Japanese American National Museum on Aug. 14.

    (Angel Rodrigo Minguela Palacios)

    The agent told him it was “of no use” and handed it back. As he held his wallet, Minguela said the agent demanded his license. After running his information, Minguela said, the agent placed him in handcuffs.

    ::

    Inside B 18, the lights never turned off. No matter the hour, officers would call detainees out of the room for interviews, making it difficult to get uninterrupted sleep, Minguela recounted. The temperature was so cold, family members dropped off sweaters and jackets for loved ones.

    The detainees were given thin, shiny emergency blankets to sleep with. He described them as “aluminum sheets.” As the days passed, he said, even those ran out for new detainees. The bathrooms were open-air, providing no privacy. Detainees went days without showering.

    The conditions, he said, felt intentional. A form of “pressure to get people to sign to leave.”

    Department of Homeland Security officials have previously told The Times that “any claim that there are subprime conditions at ICE detention centers are false.”

    When Minguela closed his eyes, he saw the faces of his family. He wondered how his esposa would keep them afloat all alone. He wanted to believe this was just a nightmare from which he would soon awaken.

    He replayed the morning events over and over in his head. What if he had gotten to Little Tokyo five minutes earlier? Five minutes later?

    “Those days were the hardest,” Minguela said. “My first day there on the floor, I cried. It doesn’t matter that you’re men, it doesn’t matter your age. There, men cried.”

    The men talked among themselves, most worrying about their wives and children. They shared where they’d been taken from. Minguela estimated that around 80% of people he was held with had been detained at car washes and Home Depot. Others had been arrested while leaving court hearings.

    Minguela said he’d only been asked once, on his second day, if he wanted to self-deport. He said no. But he watched as several others gave up and signed to leave. Minguela hoped he’d be sent to Adelanto, a nearby detention center. He’d heard it might be harder to get bond in Texas or Arizona.

    On the sixth day, around 4 a.m., Minguela and more than 20 others had been pulled out of the room and shackled. He only learned he was going to Arizona after overhearing a conversation between two guards.

    It felt, Minguela said, “like the world came crashing down on me.”

    The 25 detainees were loaded onto a white bus and spent around 10 hours on the road, before arriving at a detention center near Casa Grande. When Minguela saw it for the first time, in the desert where the temperature was hitting 110 degrees, he felt afraid. It looked like a prison.

    Ay caray, adonde nos trajeron,” he thought. Wow, where did they bring us?

    ::

    There were around 50 people in Minguela’s wing. His cell mate, an African immigrant, had been fighting his asylum case for five months, hoping to get to his family in Seattle.

    For the first time since his youth, Minguela had time to read books, including Gabriel Garcia Marquez’s “No One Writes to the Colonel.” He read the Bible, taking comfort in Psalm 91, a prayer of trust and protection. He took online courses on CPR, computer skills and how to process his emotions.

    But all the distractions, he said, didn’t change the fact that detainees were imprisoned.

    Lo que mata es el encierro,” Minguela said. “What kills you is the confinement.”

    Angel Rodrigo Minguela Palacios' son walks through Union Station after being received by his family

    Angel Minguela Palacios spent more than a month in immigration detention.

    (Carlin Stiehl / Los Angeles Times)

    Almost everyone there, Minguela said, had arrived with the intention of fighting their case. There were detainees who had been there for a year fighting to get asylum, others for eight months. Some had been arrested despite having work permits. Others had been scammed out of thousands of dollars by immigration lawyers who never showed up for their court hearings. Many decided to self-deport.

    If he wasn’t granted bond, Minguela told his partner he feared he might do that in a moment of desperation.

    Minguela lay in his darkened cell, reflecting on moments when he had arrived home, tired from work and traffic, and scolded his children about minor messes. About times he’d argued with his wife and given her the silent treatment. He made promises to God to be an even better husband and father. He asked that God help his lawyer on his case and to give him a fair judge.

    Minguela had his bond hearing Sept 9. He was aided by the fact that he had entered the country lawfully, providing the judge the ability to either grant or deny him bond.

    Alex Galvez, Minguela’s lawyer, told the judge about his client’s children. He pointed out that Minguela didn’t have a criminal record and was gainfully employed, the primary breadwinner for his family. Galvez submitted 16 letters of recommendation for his client.

    Angel Rodrigo Minguela Palacios greets his son and wife after arriving at Union Station in a Greyhound bus from Phoenix

    Angel Minguela Palacios beams at his 6-year-old son.

    (Carlin Stiehl / Los Angeles Times)

    When the government lawyer referred to Minguela as a flight risk, Galvez said, the judge appeared skeptical, pointing out that he’d been paying tens of thousands of dollars in taxes for the last 10 years.

    The judge granted a $1,500 bond. Minguela’s employers at the produce company paid it. When Minguela was pulled out of his cell on the night of Sept. 17, the other detainees applauded.

    “Bravo,” they shouted. “Echale ganas.” Give it your all.

    ::

    A crowd of people waited to greet Minguela as soon as he stepped off a Greyhound bus at Union Station in downtown L.A. on Thursday night. His partner and their three children all wore black shirts that read “Welcome Home.”

    Minguela’s employer, Martha Franco, her son, Carlos Franco, and her nephew held “Welcome Back” balloons and flowers.

    “He’s coming,” the children cried, when the bus groaned to a halt at 9:35 p.m. When Minguela spotted the waiting crowd, he beamed. His youngest son jumped up and down with anticipation as he stepped off the bus.

    Estas contento,” Minguela asked the boy. “Are you happy?”

    • Share via

    He held his esposa tight, kissing her on the cheeks, the forehead and the lips.

    Minguela knows his release is just a step in the journey. His lawyer plans to file for cancellation of his removal and hopes to secure him a work permit. Minguela said he wants other immigrants to know that “there’s hope and not to despair.”

    “Have faith,” Minguela said.

    When Minguela arrived home after 10 p.m., he clasped his face in surprise as he was greeted by more than a hundred red, gold and black balloons. Signs strung up around the living room read “God loves you” and “Welcome home we missed you so much.”

    His partner had decorated and bought everything to make ceviche and albondigas to celebrate his return. But she hadn’t had time that day to cook. Instead, she bought him one of his favorites in his adopted home.

    An In-N-Out Double-Double burger and fries.

    [ad_2]

    Brittny Mejia

    Source link

  • ‘It’s too close for comfort’: Texts show Marcos Lopez’s alleged role in gambling operation

    [ad_1]

    Arrest documents for former Osceola County Sheriff Marcos Lopez were released Friday and detail his alleged role in a gambling operation.Lopez was arrested on June 5 and faces charges of one count of racketeering and one count of conspiracy to commit racketeering. The affidavit includes a screen grab of a text message Lopez sent to co-defendant Ying “Kate” Zhang in September 2019. Investigators describe Zhang, a Chinese-born realtor, as “an investor and co-business owner” in the illegal enterprise.Lopez wrote in a text message, “Kate, nothing to worry. No matter what the outcome is, when I win, we start the first internet amusement cafe in Osceola County. You will be safe and not have to worry about anything because I will be your sheriff.”According to the affidavit, Lopez introduced Zhang to Krishna Deokaran in August 2019 at the Player’s Club in Leesburg. Investigators describe Deokaran as being at the helm of the operation, owning casinos in Lake County and the Eclipse Social Club. Zhang has not been arrested, and a source told WESH 2 Investigates she is believed to have fled the country.When Deokaran suggested opening a gambling business near the Osceola Sheriff’s Office on State Road 192, investigators say Lopez replied, “No, that can’t work because it’s too close for comfort.” Eventually, investigators say Lopez connected Deokaran with what would become the Eclipse site, later texting, “We did a raid. I shut the place down. It’s ours.”After the casino opened at this location in Kissimmee, an anonymous tip led investigators to discover the TikTok page openly advertising slot machines and fish tables.In proffer interviews with investigators, Deokaran admitted paying Lopez cash each time they met — anywhere from $10,000 to $35,000 — totaling between $600,000 and $700,000. The payments, prosecutors allege, were for securing the site, alerting the operation of possible task force investigations and keeping deputies away.Deokaran has forfeited nearly $1 million in Osceola and Orange counties after raids shut down his illegal casinos, but he has not been arrested.Court records show Deokaran’s admissions came as part of a proffer agreement, in which defendants may receive reduced charges or a plea deal in exchange for cooperation. Jose Rivas, a defense attorney not representing anyone in this case, said, “Well, it’s the big fish when it comes because he’s running the organization. But at the same time, what the government is really after is the public official which is Marcos Lopez.”The affidavit reveals Deokaran cooperated with investigators during proffer interviews. Rivas explained, “A proffer is what we call a snitch session. You know, pretty much in more formal terms. It’s when someone provides what we call substantial assistance.”The affidavit calls the former sheriff a “protector and beneficiary of the illicit operation,” and says he: played a multifaceted role in the expansion and protection of the enterprisejoined for political campaign contributions and personal payment pledged to use his anticipated elected sheriff’s title to shield the enterprise from law enforcement scrutiny recruited new members, secured leases for new locationsOfficials were tipped off in September of 2022 that the Eclipse Social Club in Kissimmee was operating as a casino with Las Vegas-style machines, the affidavit says. In July 2023, an agent went undercover into the establishment where people had to ring a bell and get through security and a locked door to enter. Lopez’s defense team of attorneys, Mary Ibrahim and Migdalia Perez, sent WESH 2 Investigates the following statement:”In light of the release of the Arrest Affidavit, the Lopez Defense team wishes to remind the public and press the importance of the legal principle of the presumption of innocence.It is the cornerstone of our justice system. These are unchallenged accusations, not a conviction. We urge the public and the press to respect the legal process and allow it to proceed without prejudice. It is vital that we uphold the rights of all involved and refrain from speculation that could jeopardize a fair outcome. We ask for patience while the legal process runs its course.”See the full documents below. Background Lopez was accused of engaging in the gambling operation for campaign contributions and personal payments. In total, investigators said the organization generated over $21.6 million in illicit proceeds.Gov. Ron DeSantis suspended Lopez from his position as sheriff and appointed an interim sheriff, Christopher Blackmon.His bond was set at $1 million, and he pleaded not guilty to the charges.One week after Lopez was booked into the Lake County Jail, WESH 2 Investigates learned a multi-agency raid in 2024 shut down the casino at the center of the state’s racketeering case.On June 23, Robin Severance Lopez, the suspended sheriff’s estranged wife, was arrested. She is charged with conspiracy to use investment proceeds from racketeering. Marcos Lopez bonded out of jail on June 26. He has pleaded not guilty.Lopez’s defense team of attorneys Mary Ibrahim and Migdalia Perez sent WESH 2 Investigates the following statement:”In light of the release of the Arrest Affidavit, the Lopez Defense team wishes to remind the public and press the importance of the legal principle of the presumption of innocence.It is the cornerstone of our justice system. These are unchallenged accusations, not a conviction. We urge the public and the press to respect the legal process and allow it to proceed without prejudice. It is vital that we uphold the rights of all involved and refrain from speculation that could jeopardize a fair outcome. We ask for patience while the legal process runs its course.”Arrest docsTimeline

    Arrest documents for former Osceola County Sheriff Marcos Lopez were released Friday and detail his alleged role in a gambling operation.

    Lopez was arrested on June 5 and faces charges of one count of racketeering and one count of conspiracy to commit racketeering.

    The affidavit includes a screen grab of a text message Lopez sent to co-defendant Ying “Kate” Zhang in September 2019. Investigators describe Zhang, a Chinese-born realtor, as “an investor and co-business owner” in the illegal enterprise.

    Lopez wrote in a text message, “Kate, nothing to worry. No matter what the outcome is, when I win, we start the first internet amusement cafe in Osceola County. You will be safe and not have to worry about anything because I will be your sheriff.”

    According to the affidavit, Lopez introduced Zhang to Krishna Deokaran in August 2019 at the Player’s Club in Leesburg. Investigators describe Deokaran as being at the helm of the operation, owning casinos in Lake County and the Eclipse Social Club. Zhang has not been arrested, and a source told WESH 2 Investigates she is believed to have fled the country.

    When Deokaran suggested opening a gambling business near the Osceola Sheriff’s Office on State Road 192, investigators say Lopez replied, “No, that can’t work because it’s too close for comfort.”

    Eventually, investigators say Lopez connected Deokaran with what would become the Eclipse site, later texting, “We did a raid. I shut the place down. It’s ours.”

    After the casino opened at this location in Kissimmee, an anonymous tip led investigators to discover the TikTok page openly advertising slot machines and fish tables.

    In proffer interviews with investigators, Deokaran admitted paying Lopez cash each time they met — anywhere from $10,000 to $35,000 — totaling between $600,000 and $700,000.

    The payments, prosecutors allege, were for securing the site, alerting the operation of possible task force investigations and keeping deputies away.

    Deokaran has forfeited nearly $1 million in Osceola and Orange counties after raids shut down his illegal casinos, but he has not been arrested.

    Court records show Deokaran’s admissions came as part of a proffer agreement, in which defendants may receive reduced charges or a plea deal in exchange for cooperation.

    Jose Rivas, a defense attorney not representing anyone in this case, said, “Well, it’s the big fish when it comes because he’s running the organization. But at the same time, what the government is really after is the public official which is Marcos Lopez.”

    The affidavit reveals Deokaran cooperated with investigators during proffer interviews. Rivas explained, “A proffer is what we call a snitch session. You know, pretty much in more formal terms. It’s when someone provides what we call substantial assistance.”

    The affidavit calls the former sheriff a “protector and beneficiary of the illicit operation,” and says he:

    • played a multifaceted role in the expansion and protection of the enterprise
    • joined for political campaign contributions and personal payment
    • pledged to use his anticipated elected sheriff’s title to shield the enterprise from law enforcement scrutiny
    • recruited new members, secured leases for new locations

    WESH 2 News

    Arrest docs detail former Osceola Sheriff Marcos Lopez’s alleged role in gambling operation

    Officials were tipped off in September of 2022 that the Eclipse Social Club in Kissimmee was operating as a casino with Las Vegas-style machines, the affidavit says.

    In July 2023, an agent went undercover into the establishment where people had to ring a bell and get through security and a locked door to enter.

    Lopez’s defense team of attorneys, Mary Ibrahim and Migdalia Perez, sent WESH 2 Investigates the following statement:

    “In light of the release of the Arrest Affidavit, the Lopez Defense team wishes to remind the public and press the importance of the legal principle of the presumption of innocence.

    It is the cornerstone of our justice system. These are unchallenged accusations, not a conviction. We urge the public and the press to respect the legal process and allow it to proceed without prejudice. It is vital that we uphold the rights of all involved and refrain from speculation that could jeopardize a fair outcome. We ask for patience while the legal process runs its course.”

    See the full documents below.

    Background

    Lopez was accused of engaging in the gambling operation for campaign contributions and personal payments.

    In total, investigators said the organization generated over $21.6 million in illicit proceeds.

    Gov. Ron DeSantis suspended Lopez from his position as sheriff and appointed an interim sheriff, Christopher Blackmon.

    His bond was set at $1 million, and he pleaded not guilty to the charges.

    One week after Lopez was booked into the Lake County Jail, WESH 2 Investigates learned a multi-agency raid in 2024 shut down the casino at the center of the state’s racketeering case.

    On June 23, Robin Severance Lopez, the suspended sheriff’s estranged wife, was arrested.

    She is charged with conspiracy to use investment proceeds from racketeering.

    Marcos Lopez bonded out of jail on June 26. He has pleaded not guilty.

    Lopez’s defense team of attorneys Mary Ibrahim and Migdalia Perez sent WESH 2 Investigates the following statement:

    “In light of the release of the Arrest Affidavit, the Lopez Defense team wishes to remind the public and press the importance of the legal principle of the presumption of innocence.

    It is the cornerstone of our justice system. These are unchallenged accusations, not a conviction. We urge the public and the press to respect the legal process and allow it to proceed without prejudice. It is vital that we uphold the rights of all involved and refrain from speculation that could jeopardize a fair outcome. We ask for patience while the legal process runs its course.”

    Arrest docs

    Timeline

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Top immigration court rules judges can deny bond to millions of migrants

    [ad_1]

    A Trump administration policy to deny bond hearings to immigrants who entered the country without authorization was upheld by an immigration appellate board Friday, expanding mandatory detention to thousands of people already behind bars and potentially millions more nationwide.

    Although the policy is being challenged in federal court, the ruling by the Board of Immigration Appeals is likely to send an immediate chill through immigration courts where judges for decades have released individuals on bond whom they did not deem a flight risk or danger.

    Those judges are now bound by the board’s decision. Immigration courts are not part of the judicial branch but fall under the Department of Justice.

    Immigrant rights attorneys say holding immigrants throughout their cases — a process that can sometimes take years — is intended to break the spirit of many and force them to sign their own deportation orders.

    “This is an effort to increase the number of people in detention significantly,” said Niels W. Frenzen, director of the USC Gould School of Law Immigration Clinic, who is part of a team of attorneys who have filed habeas petitions for dozens of immigrants picked up during the summer raids in Los Angeles.

    “Literally millions of people are now subject to being held without bond,” he said.

    One of those is Ana Franco Galdamez, a mother of two U.S. citizens who has been in the country for two decades. She was getting treatment for breast cancer when she was arrested in a June 19 raid in Los Angeles County, where nearly 1 million undocumented immigrants reside, according to estimates.

    She was denied bond and missed treatment, but she was eventually released after a lawyer filed a habeas case.

    “Detention conditions are horrific, and they’ve gotten even worse,” Frenzen said. “The goal of the administration is to make it difficult for people to fight their cases and to give up.”

    Federal judges have ruled in several cases that denying bond violated federal statues and constitutionally protected due process. The group is now seeking to block the no-bond policy in a class-action lawsuit filed in U.S. District Court for the Central District of California. Other lawsuits are also pending.

    The Trump administration introduced the no-bond policy nationally in a memo in July — paving the way for the mandatory detention of immigrants.

    The move came after Congress authorized expanding immigration detention and enforcement amid a crackdown inside courtrooms and at immigration check-ins.

    Immigrants, most of whom had been following the rules to adjust, maintain or gain legal status, were arrested and detained.

    For months now, those inside the immigration courts system have been pressed to implement Trump Administration policies. Judges have been fired, and the Pentagon has said it is identifying military lawyers and judges to temporarily sit on the bench.

    The Department of Homeland Security did not respond to a request for comment. The Executive Office for Immigration Review, which oversees the immigration courts, did not answer specific questions from The Times — but pointed out that the ruling was a precedent.

    “It strips judicial discretion in many cases,” said Claire Trickler-McNulty, a former senior official with Immigration and Customs Enforcement. “It basically says, if you entered illegally, only ICE can decide if you get out of detention.”

    The Board of Immigration Appeals’ decision stems from the case of a Venezuelan immigrant who crossed the border in November 2022 near El Paso, Texas, and was later granted temporary protected status. That status expired on April 2 after the Trump administration terminated the program, a decision that is also tied up in litigation.

    The board determined that immigration judges had no authority to issue bonds because immigrants “who are present in the United States without admission … must be detained for the duration of their removal proceedings.”

    In other words, the board’s decision treats people who have been in the U.S. for years the same as newly arriving immigrants at the border, who can be quickly deported without bond.

    “We’ve had clients that are pregnant, we’ve had clients that are breastfeeding. We’ve had clients who have never been arrested, let alone commit, convicted of any crime ever, who’ve never missed an ICE check in — they’re all being told, ‘You’re subject to mandatory detention because of this new interpretation by the Trump administration,’” said Jordan Wells, an attorney with the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights of the San Francisco Bay Area. “This now solidifies that as the law of the land, unless and until [the] federal circuit court rules otherwise.”

    [ad_2]

    Rachel Uranga

    Source link

  • Detroit father of 5 released from ICE detention after federal court order

    [ad_1]

    Steve Neavling

    The Patrick V. McNamara Federal Building in downtown Detroit, where immigration hearings take place.

    A longtime Detroit resident and father of five U.S. citizen children was released from immigration detention on Wednesday after a federal judge ruled that the Trump administration unlawfully denied him due process.

    Juan Manuel Lopez-Campos, who has lived in the U.S. for 26 years and has no criminal record, was arrested during a traffic stop in June and held for more than two months without a chance to seek bond.

    The ACLU of Michigan took up his case and sued on his behalf. In response to the suit, U.S. District Judge Brandy R. McMillion ruled that the Trump administration’s new directive to deny bond hearings is “not only wrong but also fundamentally unfair.”

    Lopez-Campos walked free Wednesday.

    “I am happy to finally be with my family with the help of my legal team,” Lopez-Campos said in a statement. “I hope to continue to fight my case.”

    The Trump administration’s directive in July attempted to reverse decades of policy by eliminating access to bond hearings for immigrants facing civil detention. If left in place, the directive would have subjected immigrants to mandatory detention without judicial review, a process that can take months or even years, legal experts said.

    “There are hundreds, if not thousands, of others still being wrongly denied what Juan just experienced: the opportunity to fight your immigration case from home,” Ramis J. Wadood, staff attorney for the ACLU of Michigan, said. “Because of that, we will not rest until every affected individual is allowed to exercise the same right to due process and has a chance to come home to their families.”

    Lopez-Campos’s attorney, Shahad Atiya, who worked with the ACLU on the case, said the government had “no legitimate reason” to keep him locked up.”

    “The cruelty was the point, but we’re glad that justice prevailed,” Atiya said.

    Lopez-Campos was one of more than 1,400 immigrants who were arrested by federal agents since President Donald Trump took office in January. Most of them had no criminal convictions.

    [ad_2]

    Steve Neavling

    Source link

  • $975 million bond for DPS schools is headed to Denver voters

    $975 million bond for DPS schools is headed to Denver voters

    [ad_1]

    The most expensive element in the bond package — $300 million — is for critical maintenance at 154 DPS buildings.

    Denver Public Schools buses parked in a lot off Federal Boulevard. July 17, 2024.

    Kevin J. Beaty/Denverite

    Denver voters will decide on the largest bond in Denver Public Schools’ history this November.

    The board of education unanimously approved Thursday sending the $975 million measure to the ballot.

    The bond measure is a one-time investment in capital projects that was approved by a group of 72 community members after an exhaustive review.

    It wouldn’t raise taxes and would pay for air conditioning, safety upgrades, upgrades and several middle and high schools, including athletic facility upgrades, career and technical education, new school buses, and critical maintenance.

    The most expensive element in the package — $300 million — is for maintenance at 154 buildings. On average, DPS facilities are 55 years old.

    That’s followed by $240 million for air conditioning for the 21,000 students in 29 buildings without air conditioning. It also means that 20 more buildings will be upgraded to get climate-conscious heat humps — a top priority for student advocates.

    Third, $124 million would be for new school construction, including a new elementary school in far northeast Denver and expanding a campus near the airport.

    The bond also includes:

    • $100 million for school upgrades that would include upgrading outdoor classrooms, cafeterias, restroom and one new health clinic.
    • $55 million is allocated for technology, including classroom sets of Chromebooks for grades K-5, replacing student and teacher devices and hotspots that allow students access to the internet at home.
    • $51 million for specialized career and technical education programs like aerospace engineering and other fields. It includes money for performance arts hubs and theater and auditorium upgrades in South and Manual High Schools.
    • $28 million for security upgrades so schools can have secure entryways that screen visitors before entry, including for several major high schools. It also includes weapons detection and crisis communication systems.
    • $33 million for athletic field upgrades at 10 schools.

    The city’s voters have approved bonds in the last four presidential election years.

    Several local civic organizations have endorsed the bond measure. Denver Families for Public Schools, a nonprofit that carries out community organizing campaigns and whose board is composed of charter school leaders, is backing the measure.

    The nonprofit released a poll in July showing the majority of sampled Denver voters would support the bond measure.

    [ad_2]

    Jenny Brundin

    Source link

  • Denver voters favor a potential $975 million DPS bond, polls finds

    Denver voters favor a potential $975 million DPS bond, polls finds

    [ad_1]

    Denver Public Schools buses at their home off Federal Boulevard, Dec. 14, 2019.

    Kevin J. Beaty/Denverite

    A majority of sampled Denver voters would support a ballot initiative that would issue a $975 million bond to Denver Public Schools, according to a new poll from civic engagement nonprofit Denver Families for Public Schools and Keating Research, Inc.

    The Denver Public Schools Board of Education is weighing a proposal from the district’s Community Planning and Advisory Committee to put the nearly $1 billion bond on the November ballot for Denver voters. 

    The board is due to vote on sending it to the voters in August. 

    The bond would be used for maintenance projects, a new school and safety and technology improvements.

    The recommendation comes after five months of discussions with the committee of parents, educators and students on how a bond would be most beneficial.

    Diving into the poll findings

    The survey polled 500 likely Denver voters on a wide range of issues, including the potential bond. Keating Research noted that that support was consistent across political beliefs. 

    “Support for the Denver Public Schools bond measure is widespread, extending across party lines as Democrats (78% vote yes), Unaffiliated voters (62% vote yes), and a plurality of Republicans (43% vote yes) support the bond measure,” a report on the survey said. 

    Major projects the bond would pay for include:

    • $240 million to install air conditioning in 29 DPS buildings without A/C, install more efficient A/C units at more locations, and conduct a geothermal study on school use of A/C.
    • $301 million for “critical maintenance,” which includes mechanical, electrical, plumbing and sustainability upgrades.
    • $100 million for “quality learning environments”, which would pay for a health clinic at the Paul Sandoval Campus, all-gender restrooms and building outdoor classrooms. 
    • $11 million to implement and improve district-wide safety systems, including weapons detection, security cameras and crisis communication.

    The poll also surveyed voters on what they think of DPS leaders

    While surveyed voters expressed support for the potential bond, Denver residents appear to be dissatisfied with the current leadership.

    Forty-seven percent of respondents held an unfavorable view of the current Denver School Board. Fifty-one percent of respondents said they were unfamiliar with Superintendent Alex Marrero, with 33 percent holding an unfavorable view. 

    Denver Families for Public Schools paid for the study as part of its goal to understand how voters feel about the potential bond. The nonprofit plans to decide whether it will endorse the bond in the coming weeks. 

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • $10-billion climate bond will go before voters in November

    $10-billion climate bond will go before voters in November

    [ad_1]

    California voters will get to decide in November if they want the state to borrow $10 billion to pay for climate and environmental projects — including some that were axed from the budget because of an unprecedented deficit.

    The 28-page bill to put the Safe Drinking Water, Wildfire Prevention, Drought Preparedness, and Clean Air Bond Act of 2024on the ballot was approved by both the Senate and Assembly late Wednesday.

    This was the last day lawmakers had to approve the climate bond proposal to get the measure on the Nov. 5 ballot.

    Senate President Pro Tem Mike McGuire (D-Healdsburg) was acting as governor Wednesday because Gov. Gavin Newsom was in Washington. McGuire is a supporter of the proposed climate bond and was expected to sign the legislation Wednesday night.

    “Ensuring that our communities have the resources to protect themselves from wildfires, drought and floods is critical to the long-term success of the Golden State,” McGuire said in a press release Monday.

    The language of the bill had been negotiated in secret over the last several months but did not become public until 9:57 p.m. Saturday.

    California taxpayers would pay the bond back with interest. An analyst for the Assembly estimated that the $10 billion bond would cost the state $650 million a year for the next 30 years or more than $19 billion.

    Scott Kaufman, legislative director at the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Assn., said the cost could be much higher if the interest rate on the bonds turns out to be higher than the 5% rate the analyst used.

    “These bonds will be paid by people decades from now that didn’t even get to vote for their authorization,” Kaufman wrote to the bill’s author in a letter opposing the measure.

    Earlier this year, Sacramento legislators had proposals to place tens of billions of dollars of bonds on the November ballot for efforts as varied as stopping fentanyl overdoses and building affordable housing.

    But those plans were deflated in March when a $6.4-billion bond measure promoted by Newsom to help homeless and mentally ill people got 50.18% of the vote, barely enough to win approval.

    In a recent survey by the Public Policy Institute of California, 64% of likely voters said it was a “bad time” for the state to issue bonds to pay for state projects and programs.

    Dozens of environmental groups, renewable energy companies, labor unions, water agencies and social justice advocates have been lobbying state lawmakers to place the climate bond on the ballot.

    The lobbying intensified after Newsom proposed spending $54 billion on climate efforts in 2022 but then cut that funding to close recent massive budget deficits.

    According to the bill, $3.8 billion would be allocated to water projects, including those that provide safe drinking water, recycle wastewater, store groundwater and control floods.

    An additional $1.5 billion would be spent on wildfire protection, while $1.2 billion would go toward protecting the coast from sea level rise.

    Other money would be used to create parks, protect wildlife and habitats and address extreme heat events.

    The language requires that at least 40% of the money go to projects that provide benefits to disadvantaged communities, defined as populations where the median household income is less than 80% of the area average or less than 80% of the statewide median.

    Some legislators pulled their support of the bond, saying this provision had recently been weakened so that more money would go to people who were not financially disadvantaged.

    Jasmeet Bains (D-Delano) said before the Assembly vote that the definition of vulnerable populations had been diluted. “It’s fundamentally unjust,” she said.

    Hundreds of millions of dollars from the bond would benefit private industry. For example, it would provide $850 million to clean energy projects, including the proposed offshore wind farms. Those planned wind projects are already benefiting from subsidies in President Biden’s Inflation Reduction Act.

    Governments often take out long-term debt to pay for infrastructure projects that are expensive to build but will last for decades. Yet some of the planned climate bond spending would go to operate programs that could long be over by the time the bonds are paid off. For instance, a portion will go to “workforce development” or the training of workers.

    And up to 7% of the money or $700 million can go to administration costs.

    “We are already seeing the devastating effects of climate change — more extreme heat waves, catastrophic fires and floods, coastal erosion, and severe droughts,” Sen. Ben Allen (D-Santa Monica) said in a press release. “Every part of our state is affected, and unless we take action now, the cost to address these impacts will become increasingly overwhelming.”

    [ad_2]

    Melody Petersen

    Source link

  • Virginia man charged in bomb threat at Prince William County courthouse complex – WTOP News

    Virginia man charged in bomb threat at Prince William County courthouse complex – WTOP News

    [ad_1]

    Police have charged a Haymarket, Virginia, man with making threats to bomb the Prince William County courthouse and jail.

    This article was republished with permission from WTOP’s news partner InsideNoVa.com. Sign up for InsideNoVa.com’s free email subscription today.

    Police have charged a Haymarket, Virginia, man with making threats to bomb the Prince William County courthouse and jail.

    At 1:53 p.m. Thursday, the suspect entered the lobby with a bag he immediately brought to a restroom, Prince William County police Master Officer Renee Carr said in a release.

    He then called emergency services and falsely reported a bomb threat to the complex, which includes the Prince William-Manassas regional jail and adjoining courthouse, Carr said.

    Jail staff made contact with the man in the lobby, where responding officers determined he was intoxicated and took him into custody, she said.

    The courthouse and the jail adjusted operation status as a precaution while a police K-9 and members of the Virginia State Police Explosive Ordnance Disposal Unit responded and determined the bag was not a bomb, Carr said.

    Police charged Ray Darnell Smith, 30, of Youngs Drive in Haymarket with threats to bomb, obstruction of justice and intoxicated in public, she said. He was held without bond at the Prince William-Manassas regional jail.

    [ad_2]

    Valerie Bonk

    Source link

  • Donald Trump’s Nine Lives

    Donald Trump’s Nine Lives

    [ad_1]

    Listen to this article

    Produced by ElevenLabs and News Over Audio (NOA) using AI narration.

    Donald Trump loves the musical Cats, and like the titular creatures, the former president seems to have nine lives. Today, in the face of yet another near-death financial experience, Trump got his latest reprieve. An appeals-court panel in New York State reduced the bond he must post in a civil fraud case from more than $464 million to just $175 million.

    Given that the past few months have seen Trump repeatedly use legal procedures to his advantage, drawing out the cases against him in the hope of eventually escaping them, this decision may look like yet another infuriating case of Trump extracting injustice from the justice system. But in fact it is not such an instance, and the reduction is actually quite appropriate.

    Recall the timeline. In mid-February, Justice Arthur Engoron ruled that Trump must pay more than $350 million, plus interest, after he, his sons, and the Trump Organization engaged, according to the judge’s findings, in a years-long pattern of fraud, inflating and deflating the reported value of his assets in order to profit long-term. Trump promptly appealed the ruling, but as a defendant, he must post the value of his judgment while appealing.

    The problem for Trump is that $350 million (which interest soon brought to nearly half a billion dollars) is a huge amount, even for him. He claims to have a net worth in the billions, but that number includes a great deal of assets that aren’t really available. Part of it is nebulous brand value, but a lot is in real estate—value that can’t be quickly accessed. Trump claimed in a deposition in the case that he had more than $400 million in cash and growing. That’s questionable and, even if true, wouldn’t leave him enough to cover the bond.

    Instead, he sought to obtain a bond from a company that specializes in such products. Bonding companies promise courts to cover the cost of a judgment. In return, they usually demand collateral from a client such as Trump—or maybe particularly from Trump, given his long history of not paying his debts. One of them this month posted a bond in the much smaller judgment against Trump for defaming the writer E. Jean Carroll. But Trump was unable to obtain a bond large enough to cover the fraud judgment, even after approaching 30 companies. His lawyers said it was a “practical impossibility” in a filing. (Trump, ever helpful to his own defense, claimed on social media that he actually has more than $500 million in cash.)

    The bond was due today, and Trump got his good news from the court just in time. It is a stay, or pause, not a permanent reduction. For now, the original judgment amount will still be due if Trump doesn’t win on appeal. Today’s outcome is neither a shock nor a travesty.

    Offering temporary relief on the bond makes some sense. Imagine that the panel had not reduced the bond amount. Attorney General Letitia James could have started seizing his accounts or his properties, or else he would have been forced to start selling them. But this is a terrible moment to be selling commercial real estate, because the office market has not recovered from COVID. Beyond that, any buyers would know Trump was in a pinch and be happy to profiteer off him.

    But then imagine that a few weeks from now, Trump won his appeal, convincing the court that Engoron’s finding was incorrect, or that the calculated amount of the penalty was unfair. Trump would have no way to recover the assets he’d been forced to unload at fire-sale prices. It doesn’t take any affection for Trump to see why a court would want to avoid such an outcome, and why—even if Trump would still be filthy rich—this would be unjust punishment.

    The problem for Trump remains winning on appeal. He railed against Engoron in a statement and claimed that the judge was wrong on law, but legal experts told me that they thought Trump would struggle to win his appeal. Engoron’s decision was written in clear detail, as was his calculation of Trump’s penalty, which is based on how much ill-gotten gain Trump extracted from his fraud. “The judge here did a very good job,” Jim Wheaton, a law professor at William & Mary, told me. “Whether you agree or not, the judge very carefully made factual conclusions based on testimony in front of the judge. The judge made credibility decisions based on testimony of witnesses before him.”

    Trump’s instinct for stalling the legal cases against him is pernicious. U.S. courts must find a way to balance the need for procedural protection with the principle that justice delayed is justice denied, and so far they have shown themselves ill-equipped; consider that the U.S. Supreme Court won’t even hear arguments about Trump’s immunity from criminal prosecution until a month from today. But forcing Trump to put a FOR SALE BY OWNER sign out in front of Trump Tower today wouldn’t serve justice, and might actually undermine it. As for Trump, he may just be delaying that outcome—but that’s another problem for him to try to wriggle, cat-like, out of on another day.

    [ad_2]

    David A. Graham

    Source link

  • Florida Mother Arrested & Charged After Allegedly Trying To Sell Her 1-Year-Old Daughter For $500

    Florida Mother Arrested & Charged After Allegedly Trying To Sell Her 1-Year-Old Daughter For $500

    [ad_1]

    A Florida woman is now behind bars after allegedly attempting to sell her 18-month-old daughter.

    RELATED: Florida School Allegedly Threatens To Expel Student Over Mother’s OnlyFans Account

    Here’s What The Florida Mother Allegedly Did

    According to Fox 35 Orlando, on March 5, a 33-year-old woman named Jessica Woods was seen loitering “around an unnamed business.” Woods reportedly was accompanied by her daughter.

    The outlet reports that an anonymous citizen approached the mother. Additionally, they asked if she or her daughter needed any help.

    The citizen reportedly worked at the business Woods was seen standing outside of. The anonymous also noted that the mother had been spotted there for a few days.

    To note, the New York Post reports that the citizen was an employee at H&R Block.

    According to the anonymous citizen, Woods explained that she didn’t need any help.

    However, from there, the mother made a surprising offer to the citizen and tried to sell her daughter for $500.

    Here’s What Happened To The 1-Year-Old

    The anonymous citizen declined the mother’s proposal and instead offered to buy her and her daughter necessities. In response, Woods allegedly walked away and left her child.

    “Woods told the citizen she did not need anything but offered to sell the child to the citizen for $500,” a press release from the Palatka Police Department stated, per New York Post. “When the citizen refused to purchase the child, Woods walked away, leaving her daughter behind.”

    The citizen then took the child to the Palatka Police Department and informed authorities of the incident. According to the outlet, the department’s “victim advocate program” looked after the child until “the Department of Children and Families took custody.”

    According to Fox 35 Orlando, the 1-year-old has since been placed in foster care.

    Here’s What Happened To The Mother

    The outlet adds that on March 7, police located Woods. Authorities arrested the woman and transported her to Putnam County jail. The 33-year-old mother has reportedly been charged with “child neglect and abandonment.”

    Additionally, she is charged with “selling or surrendering minor for property or money, and three counts of child abuse.”

    On Thursday, March 14, Fox 35 Orlando reported that Woods remained in police custody and has had her bond set at $255,000.

    RELATED: Boyfriend Of Missing Florida Teen’s Mother Arrested After Police Uncovered His Inappropriate Child Content

    [ad_2]

    Jadriena Solomon

    Source link

  • He died during a card game. His widow then challenged his alleged killer’s low bond.

    He died during a card game. His widow then challenged his alleged killer’s low bond.

    [ad_1]

    A judge raised Ronald Joseph’s bond after a Mecklenburg County jury indicted him for the first degree murder of a Charlotte man during an auto-shop card game on Feb. 4, 2024.

    A judge raised Ronald Joseph’s bond after a Mecklenburg County jury indicted him for the first degree murder of a Charlotte man during an auto-shop card game on Feb. 4, 2024.

    Getty Images/istockphoto

    He’d been to her house. He sat at her dinner table. And during a Sunday night card game, he killed her husband, police say.

    Ronald Joseph, 45, of Huntersville, stood with bloodied clothing and hands when police lights illuminated a northwest Charlotte auto shop off Brookshire Boulevard on Feb. 4. A witness grasped him close, waiting for officers to handcuff him, police reports say.

    Rudolph Acolaste was dead in the corner. A game of Spades sat unfinished.

    Joseph had robbed Melissa Bethea and her two kids, 13 and 19, of a husband and father, , the now widow said through weeps inside the Mecklenburg County Courthouse Friday, her eyes bloodshot from tears.

    She and a district attorney also challenged Joseph’s low, $100,000 bond.

    “This man doesn’t need no bond, sir,” Bethea said in front of Superior Court Judge Robert Bell Friday.

    His bond needed to be retracted or raised to something “remotely close to reasonable,” Bill Bunting, the Homicide Unit Chief at Mecklenburg County’s District Attorney’s Office, said in court Friday.

    A jury Monday said the case presented enough evidence to indict Joseph on first-degree murder.

    Joseph was originally booked in jail without bond, but District Court Judge Fritz Mercer, Jr. set a $100,000 bond on Feb. 5.

    An unprovoked argument and a gun

    Witnesses say Joseph shot Acolaste, but they don’t know why.

    Joseph came into the room, unprovoked, started an argument, unprovoked, and brandished a silver Taurus revolver. Then, Acolaste collapsed, two bullets in his chest and shoulder, Bunting said.

    “There was no reason for the argument… (he) was not even part of the game,” a witness told officers, according to Charlotte-Mecklenburg Police Department records.

    Judge increases bond

    Joseph’s attorney, Anthony Monaghan, defended the $100,000 bond, saying Mercer, the district court judge, had heard all relevant information before setting it.

    Joseph lived at the auto shop, which had been partially converted with two bedrooms and a kitchen, where the argument with Acolaste started, Monaghan said. It was an interpersonal conflict, he said. He would not be a risk to the public.

    Bell, the superior court judge, raised Joseph’s bond to $250,000 before he was sent back to Mecklenburg County Detention Center. His next court date has not yet been set.

    Related stories from Charlotte Observer

    Julia Coin covers local and statewide topics — including destructive fires, illegal gambling and the pervasiveness of drugs in schools — as The Charlotte Observer’s breaking news and courts reporter. Michigan-born and Florida-raised, she studied journalism at the University of Florida, where she covered statewide legislation, sexual assault on campus and Hurricane Ian’s destruction.
    Support my work with a digital subscription

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • 14 Powerful Genre-Bending Films That Explore Love in Unconventional Ways

    14 Powerful Genre-Bending Films That Explore Love in Unconventional Ways

    [ad_1]

    Explore the world of love through a variety of lenses. Here’s a collection of powerful films that each portray love and romance in a unique way, spanning multiple genres including drama, comedy, fantasy, animation, and sci-fi.


    “Cinema is a mirror by which we often see ourselves.”

    Alejandro Gonzalez Inarritu


    Movies give us the opportunity to explore major themes in life in a meaningful and profound way.

    A powerful film can lead to a better understanding of your own experiences. It can communicate thoughts and emotions that may have been challenging to express; and, at times, completely reshape our perspective on life.

    For better or worse, movies play a pivotal role in shaping our beliefs and map of reality. We pick up ideas through films, sometimes absorbed at a very young age, and those ideas find their way into our daily lives influencing our choices and perspectives.

    Filmmakers understand the transformative power of cinema, purposely using it to shake up people’s consciousness. The goal of a solid film is to create an experience that leaves you a different person by the end of it.

    As viewers, it’s essential to be aware of a film’s effects both emotionally and intellectually. Often, the movies that linger in our thoughts long after watching are the most impactful and life-changing.

    Here’s a collection of classic films about love and romance. Each movie has had a lasting influence on audiences in one way or another. It’s an eclectic list that spans multiple genres, including drama, comedy, animation, fantasy, mystery, and sci-fi.

    Titanic (1997)

    James Cameron’s epic tale blends love and tragedy against the historical backdrop of the Titanic’s sinking in 1912. The film weaves a captivating narrative of a forbidden romance blossoming amidst a natural disaster.

    Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind (2004)

    In this mind-bending story, a man attempts to erase the memories of a lost love using cutting-edge technology, only to find fate conspiring to bring the couple back together repeatedly. The film explores the complexities of memory, love, and destiny.

    Beauty and the Beast (1991)

    Disney’s classic adaptation of the French fairy tale is celebrated for its beautiful animation and memorable songs. The film goes beyond appearances, illustrating the transformative power of true love.

    Her (2013)

    Set in a near-future world, “Her” tells the unconventional love story of a lonely man who forms a deep connection with his computer’s operating system. The film delves into themes of technology, loneliness, and the nature of human connection.

    Before Sunrise (1995)

    Richard Linklater’s film follows two young tourists who meet on a train in Europe and share an unforgettable night in Vienna. The movie explores the transient nature of connections and the profound impact of brief encounters.

    Lost in Translation (2003)

    Sofia Coppola’s film features a washed-up American celebrity and a young woman forging an unexpected bond in Tokyo. “Lost in Translation” navigates themes of loneliness, connection, and self-discovery.

    Cinema Paradiso (1988)

    An Italian filmmaker reflects on his past and learns how to channel his love in a different and creative way through his art and craftsmanship.

    Past Lives (2023)

    Two childhood friends reconnect after years apart, seeking to unravel the meaning behind their enduring connection. The film explores the complexities of friendship, time, and shared history.

    Check out: In-Yeon: Exploring “Past Lives” and Eternal Connections

    The Lobster (2015)

    Set in a dystopian future, “The Lobster” challenges societal norms by presenting a world where individuals must choose a romantic partner within 45 days or face transformation into an animal. The film satirizes the pressure to conform in matters of love.

    Annie Hall (1977)

    Woody Allen’s classic romantic comedy is a hilarious and heartfelt movie that explores neurotic love and the psychological obstacles we commonly face in marriage and long-term relationships.

    Your Name. (2016)

    A masterful anime that combines elements of science fiction, fantasy, and romance. It centers on a mysterious connection between a boy and girl who swap bodies, learn about each other’s lives, and search to find each other in real life.

    A Woman Under the Influence (1974)

    John Cassavetes’ uncomfortably raw and dramatic portrayal of the profound impact of mental illness on marriage and family, navigating the complexities with unflinching honesty.

    The Fountain (2006)

    Darren Aronofsky’s “The Fountain” explores love and mortality through three interconnected storylines spanning different time periods. The film delves into themes of eternal love and the quest for immortality, providing a visually stunning and emotionally resonant experience.

    Scenes From a Marriage (1974)

    Legendary director Ingmar Bergman’s deeply incisive and detailed chronicle of a rocky marriage’s final days.

    Choose one movie and analyze it

    Each of these films offers a different perspective on love while also pushing the boundaries of cinema and story-telling.

    It’s fun to compare each story: How did the couples meet? What defined “love” for them? What obstacles did they face? Did the relationship work out in the end or not? Why?

    Exercise: Choose one movie from the list that you haven’t seen before and do the Movie Analysis Worksheet (PDF).

    While films are often seen as just a source of entertainment or healthy escapism, they can also be an avenue for self-improvement and growth.

    The “Movie Analysis Worksheet” is designed to make you think about the deeper themes behind a film and extract some lessons from it that you can apply to your life.

    Watch with a friend and discuss

    If you don’t want to do the worksheet, just watch one of the movies with a friend (or loved one) – then discuss it after.

    Watching a film together is an opportunity to share a new experience. It can also spark up interesting conversations. This is one reason why bonding through movies is one of the most common ways we connect with people in today’s world.

    Which film will you check out?


    Enter your email to stay updated on new content on self improvement:

    [ad_2]

    Steven Handel

    Source link

  • ‘My heart is broken’: Prince George’s Co. attorney wants justice for toddler killed – WTOP News

    ‘My heart is broken’: Prince George’s Co. attorney wants justice for toddler killed – WTOP News

    [ad_1]

    The two men charged with murder in the fatal shooting of a 2-year-old boy in Langley Park, Maryland, last week will be held without bond.

    The two men charged with murder in the fatal shooting of a 2-year-old boy in Langley Park, Maryland, last week will be held without bond.

    On Monday, suspects Johnny Alejandro Turcios, 28, and Israel Fuentes Jr., 33, of Lewisdale, were charged with first- and second-degree murder in the death of 2-year-old Jeremy Poou-Caceres. A Prince George’s County judge ordered the two to be held without bond before their next scheduled court appearances next month.

    “We are going to pursue this case. Like we do every other case. But this is a very sad case — it just is. A 2-year-old, an innocent child is dead, gone. [He] didn’t have a chance to really fully live a life, to pursue their dreams, to grow up,” State’s Attorney Aisha Braveboy said at a press conference after the hearing.

    Braveboy vowed to get justice.

    “My heart is broken. Our community is grieving, the family of the baby is grieving,” said Braveboy.

    The 17-year-old mother of the child, who was also shot during the exchange, spoke to Telemundo44 saying, “When I heard the first gunshot, I knew I had to run because I knew I had to protect my son.”

    According to charging documents, Turcios and Fuentes were in an argument with a group of other men over drug distribution territory before they opened fire on the group and got into a carjacked gold Ford Explorer.

    Attorney Giovanna Miller said, “We believe that they were caught in [the] crossfire, based on accounts given by the witnesses.”

    The carjacked Ford connected to the incident was found with an AK-47 style gun inside — which matched the shell casings near the scene.

    It was later discovered that Turcios was on probation following a robbery conviction but still had a gun at the time of the murder.

    Authorities also said about 90 minutes after the shooting, Fuentes called police and said he was robbed of his phone and money in the same area. Fuentes blocked the number he was calling from, something detectives say he did to attempt to explain why his phone history would put him near the murder scene.

    WTOP reported that neither of men’s public defenders argued that they should be released on bond.

    Police are still searching for two other suspects in this case, as the investigation is ongoing.

    A GoFundMe has been set up for Poou-Caceres’s funeral expenses. It has raised more than $5,000 so far.

    WTOP’s William Vitka contributed to this report.

    Get breaking news and daily headlines delivered to your email inbox by signing up here.

    © 2024 WTOP. All Rights Reserved. This website is not intended for users located within the European Economic Area.

    [ad_2]

    Ciara Wells

    Source link

  • Say What?! 49-Year-Old Man Arrested After Driving In Ocean At Florida Beach (Video)

    Say What?! 49-Year-Old Man Arrested After Driving In Ocean At Florida Beach (Video)

    [ad_1]

    A 49-year-old man was arrested after driving his vehicle in Florida ocean waters.

    RELATED: Florida Man Files Lawsuit Against Dunkin’ Donuts Alleging A Toilet Explosion Left Him Injured

    More Details Regarding The Incident

    According to Fox 35 Orlando, 49-year-old Jason Brzuszkiewicz bypassed closed beach gates at Smyrna Beach in Florida on the morning of Tuesday, February 6.

    Brzuszkiewicz was captured on video driving his Dodge Ram pickup truck onto the shore and into high-tide waters. According to the outlet, the man did so for over a minute.

    Additionally, the footage reportedly captured him attempting to do a donut in the water.

    The clip then ends with multiple medical response vehicles entering the scene.

     

    More Information Regarding The 49-Year-Old’s Arrest & Charges

    According to Fox 35 Orlando, The Volusia Sheriff’s Office arrest affidavit notes that Brzuszkiewicz did not pay the toll fee to enter the location. Additionally, the affidavit alleges that the man informed authorities he “wanted to drive on the beach.”

    The outlet reports that Brzuszkiewicz has been arrested and charged with failure to pay an access fee.

    The 49-year-old was reportedly taken to the Volusia Branch Jail and detained on a $200 bond. Furthermore, his white pickup truck has been towed.

    According to the Volusia County Recently Booked Facebook page, this is not the first time Brzuszkiewicz has been detained this week. Recently Booked reports that the man was also taken into custody on Sunday, February 4.

    At the time, the 49-year-old was arrested for allegedly defrauding an innkeeper for less than $1,000.

    Another Recent Incident In Florida

    Earlier this month, another Florida man was put behind bars, as previously reported by The Shade Room. Michael Banks allegedly shot his mother and her friend after he revealed his desire to have an incestuous relationship with his 17-year-old daughter.

    According to the Tampa Bay Times, Banks overheard his mother and friend discussing leaving their residence with the teen. It was later revealed that the mother was talking about kicking her son out when he turned violent.

    The man killed his mother’s friend before injuring his mother and daughter with gunfire.

    RELATED: Florida Man Shoots His Mom & Daughter After Allegedly Revealing Desire To Date His Teen

    [ad_2]

    Jadriena Solomon

    Source link