ReportWire

Tag: Biodiversity Research Institute (BRI)

  • Science Is the Best (Local, Regional, National, Global) Policy

    Science Is the Best (Local, Regional, National, Global) Policy

    [ad_1]

    About a decade ago, BRI hosted a Bio Blitz at our River Point bird monitoring station in Falmouth, Maine.

    [ad_2]

    Biodiversity Research Institute (BRI)

    Source link

  • Something to (re)Think About

    Something to (re)Think About

    [ad_1]

    BYLINE: By Allison Foster, University of Maine graduate student

    Newswise — At Biodiversity Research Institute, our passion drives us to explore diverse projects across continents—from monitoring mercury levels to studying offshore wind development and tracking waterfowl movement. Yet, communicating our research extends beyond scientific journals, challenging us to make these insights not just accessible but also captivating to a wider audience.

    While peer-reviewed journals serve their purpose within the scientific community, they often miss engaging those outside our realm. This leads to a fundamental question: How do we bridge this gap? How can we ensure that our research resonates with people, sparks their curiosity, and motivates action?

    For us, science communication isn’t a mere process—it’s a commitment to engage nonscientists with our scientific endeavors. It’s about conveying complex concepts effectively, embracing objectivity, transparency, and empathy.

    At BRI our communication team possesses diverse skills, from writing and publishing to graphic design, all vital for effective science communication. Clear, accurate writing certainly remains a central facet, but visual mediums wield incredible power. Sharing images helps people feel more connected to what’s going on, gives a clearer vision of the work that’s being done, and enhances the relatability of the science to something that the audience cares about.

    Creativity and innovation are necessary to figure out the best practices to share this information. In the past 50 years, the landscape of communication has evolved tremendously. From traditional print media and radio to the dynamic realm of social media, podcasts, and interactive platforms, the ways we share information have expanded exponentially.

    When sharing science, we must put ourselves in our audiences’ shoes. Many people have never banded loons nor have any idea of what that process entails. Narratives hold immense power in science communication. Consider a story of scientists paddling through mist-covered waters, navigating toward a loon’s nest. The team, armed with equipment and a deep reverence for nature, silently move toward the loon’s nesting area. With steady hands, they extend a gentle gesture, coaxing the loon away from its nest just for a fleeting moment. With utmost care, they gently place a metal band around the loon’s leg, witnessing its quiet return to its haven, undisturbed by the process—a poignant snapshot of our dedication to research and respect for wildlife.

    Science communication also helps to inform decision making, which can have significant impacts to society. By providing policymakers with actionable information, we are able to better protect our environment. BRI’s continued contributions to the Minamata Convention on Mercury are clear examples of this. Recently, at the fifth meeting of the Conference of Parties to the Minamata Convention, BRI showcased key highlights of our work through a special issue about Mercury in the Global Environment. This special issue features a synthesis of studies about mercury monitoring, providing the information in a digestible format.

    Moving forward, Anne Roe’s quote resonates deeply: “Nothing in science has any value to society if it is not communicated.” We understand that the intrinsic value of our discoveries lies in their translation—bridging the gap between knowledge and action, insights, and impact.

    To see more BRI publications, visit: https://briwildlife.org/science-communications-library/

    More stories on https://briwildlife.org/bri-blog/.

    [ad_2]

    Biodiversity Research Institute (BRI)

    Source link

  • Science Outside the Box

    Science Outside the Box

    [ad_1]

    BYLINE: By Sarah Dodgin, Ecological Analyst, BRI

    Newswise — Neon green hoods, turquoise bellies, ornate crowns—Neotropical birds come in all shapes, sizes, and colors. Combined with unique patterns, textures, and song, they either blend in or stand out in thick jungles filled with hundreds of other species competing for the same or similar resources.

    When the first European explorers discovered Central and South America and the West Indies, they called this land the New World Tropics, a region known today as the Neotropics. Here in the dense rain forests of the Amazon, you would not suspect that many of the vibrant and charismatic birds that inhabit these remote areas are regularly exposed to sublethal amounts of mercury. In this seemingly pristine part of the world, how does mercury find its way into these birds?

    From affordable common goods to expensive investments, so many of our daily decisions seem inconsequential. But as our awareness grows, we are forced to think before we make a transaction and to ask ourselves a few questions: Where did this product come from? What industry is this tied to? And who, be it person or animal, is paying the price for my purchase?

    Many people have some understanding of the ethical dilemma associated with diamond mining. Conflict free, responsibly mined, and ethically sourced are all things we are urged to deliberate when making a selection of this precious gem. But what about gold? It turns out there are similar social and environmental considerations when picking out a pair of hoops. According to the World Gold Council and the World Bank, 15 to 20 million people make artisanal small-scale gold mining (ASGM) their primary source of income. Unlike large-scale gold mining, ASGM takes place outside of formal legal and economic structures, and although the operation itself is small in scale, its prevalence around the world looms large. In addition to labor rights and safety concerns for miners, another metal involved in the gold extraction process poses a threat to entire ecosystems.

    Mercury, a dense and silvery fluid, is the only metal in a liquid state at standard room temperature and pressure. Although mercury naturally occurs in small quantities in its elemental form and is usually contained deep in the Earth’s crust, the United Nations Environment Programme found that industrial activities such as ASGM, fossil fuel combustion, and waste incineration increase the amount of mercury released into the environment. Furthermore, mercury rapidly becomes a global issue because of its ability to mobilize far from the source of emission, contaminating soils, waterways, and the atmosphere. Particularly deleterious is the biomagnification (the ability for toxin levels to increase to successively higher concentrations in a food web) property of mercury when transformed to its organic form methylmercury. If exposed under the right conditions, mammals, birds, and fish suffer from behavioral, immunological, neurological, physiological, and reproductive impairment. Yet, there is a lack of Information on how mercury contamination occurs in the Neotropics, and the prevalence of mercury in birds across this region.

    To remedy this important knowledge gap, Chris Sayers, an associate research biologist at BRI and a Ph.D. student at UCLA, embarked on a mission to collaborate with more than 30 researchers from ten organizations throughout the Americas, including BRI. By examining 13 years of data comprising more than 2,000 samples from 322 neotropical bird species,

    documenting bird blood and feather samples from every site and habitat type surveyed in eight countries across Central America, South America, and the West Indies. “It wasn’t surprising to find these samples contained some amount of mercury because mercury is a naturally occurring, persistent, and globally distributed element,” says Sayers. “What is startling, however, is the elevated concentrations that we detected.”

    Beyond identifying mercury-emitting sources and mercury contamination hotspots through blood and feather sampling, determining the risk of mercury exposure in Neotropical birds was the study’s most notable outcome. Sayers found that risk was most strongly determined by four variables: diet, habitat, proximity to ASGM, and seasonal rainfall.

    Without the cooperation of dozens of researchers to create a database of thousands of mercury concentrations, these findings would not be possible. That’s why BRI’s Tropical Research for Avian Conservation and Ecotoxicology (TRACE) Initiative was created. TRACE serves as an inclusive and equitable data-sharing platform, documenting mercury exposure in birds. More broadly, TRACE gives scientists the ability to uncover the greater implications of mercury pollution to global biodiversity loss and human health. Through continued research and international collaboration, birds will remain as bioindicators of mercury pollution to create positive impacts for communities threatened by exposure globally.

    A small percentage of Neotropical birds are migratory. You might not realize it, but chances are you have seen, or know the names of some species. Common birds you may find in your backyard during the summer include warblers, swallows, vireos, and hummingbirds. This time of year, while we are watching the snow fall, they are keeping warm in countries such as Brazil and Costa Rica. But in order to keep them coming back year after year, regulators must curb mercury pollution in all industries, especially within artisanal small-scale gold mining.

    As consumers, it is our job to decide where our values lie this holiday season (and all year long). Will global biodiversity be one of them?

     

    More stories on https://briwildlife.org/bri-blog/.

    [ad_2]

    Biodiversity Research Institute (BRI)

    Source link

  • Science is the best (local, regional, national, global) policy

    Science is the best (local, regional, national, global) policy

    [ad_1]

    By Eleanor Eckel, BRI Communications Coordinator

    Newswise — A coyote’s lone cry punctuated the darkness as the two biologists hiked the wooded trail, parkas tightly zipped against the chill October night. They had been trekking this route every hour since dusk, winding their way to the mist nets they had set up earlier in the day. Once at a net, they slowly walked along its 36-foot length. When they discovered a northern saw-whet owl lying passively in one of the net pockets, they worked quickly, expertly untangling, banding, sampling, and measuring the tiny raptor in just minutes.

    Since 2009, BRI wildlife biologist Kate Williams and others have studied the migration and movement patterns of birds and bats over the Gulf of Maine and elsewhere on the Atlantic coast. BRI biologists documented that migratory owls fly over open water, taking advantage of islands as stopover sites, and that migratory falcons will fly hundreds of miles out over the Atlantic on their way south to the Caribbean and South America. This new information initiated important discussions about how migrating birds and bats might be affected by offshore structures, such as wind turbines.

    Careful siting of renewable energy development seems to play a key role in minimizing impacts to wildlife, but this requires detailed knowledge of where animals breed, winter, and migrate. To address this need, BRI established a wildlife and renewable energy program in 2009, which has evolved over the past 12 years into BRI’s Center for Research on Offshore Wind and the Environment (CROWE). Offshore wind energy is an essential component of plans to reduce reliance on fossil fuels and mitigate the effects of climate change on wildlife and ecosystems. According to the 2022 International Panel on Climate Change report, it is now “unequivocal” that human influence has warmed the atmosphere. Fossil fuel use has significantly contributed to the acceleration of climate change impacts, and now the “scale of recent changes across the climate system as a whole – and the present state of many aspects of the climate system – are unprecedented over many centuries to many thousands of years.” A path forward involves increased renewable energy technology to limit cumulative CO2 emissions.

    However, as with other energy sources, offshore wind can also present risks to wildlife and their environment. BRI biologists continue to work to understand wildlife distributions and movements and to identify ways to minimize risks from offshore wind energy development.

    CROWE director Kate Williams recognizes the need for rapid, renewable energy development as well as thorough wildlife risk assessments and monitoring. “We are trying to figure out how to mitigate sort of, local scale impacts to wildlife from these developments…but trying to figure out how to minimize that as much as possible for this sort of greater good of trying to figure out how to mitigate climate change to the point that we’re not going to see sort of large-scale extinctions, which is what they’re predicting right now.”

    Specific research conducted by BRI staff intended to determine potential risks to wildlife from offshore wind development include bird field studies and assessments for seabirds, waterfowl, shorebirds, songbirds, and raptors, acoustic studies, transmitter deployment and tracking, observational surveys (vessel- and plane-based), digital aerial surveys, stakeholder engagement and coordination, and development of siting strategies and monitoring and mitigation plans.

    As with all BRI research centers and programs, the offshore wind team utilizes innovative science and cutting-edge technology to provide accurate information. High-definition digital aerial surveys involve survey planes with an array of cameras that point down to the ocean’s surface which can identify species seen in the video. Aerial surveys allow researchers to determine which species are most at risk in areas designated for proposed wind arrays, and that information can be passed on to decision makers and developers. BRI also houses a Quantitative Wildlife Ecology Research Laboratory (QWERL) that provides large scale population and distribution models that help understand population dynamics in or near offshore wind arrays. Williams notes, “it’s a rare skillset to have that degree of mathematical expertise and also have the ecological expertise to understand how to apply it.” Cutting-edge science, combined with a wide range of ecological expertise, will continue to guide BRI’s wind energy research to provide accurate information to stakeholders and policy makers.

     

    More stories on https://briwildlife.org/bri-blog/.

    [ad_2]

    Biodiversity Research Institute (BRI)

    Source link

  • Something to (re)think about

    Something to (re)think about

    [ad_1]

    By Alyssa Soucy, Ph.D. Candidate, University of Maine

    Newswise — As the spotlight cuts across the lake, intersecting with the horizon beyond, I saw the trio of Common Loons as only white floating specks surrounded by darkness. Almost like a mirage, they appeared through the fog and the gnats swirling off the surface of the water. I fixed the beam of light on one of the chicks who looked serenely unaware of our approaching boat. My body and mind launched into the sole purpose of illuminating that chick as Carl Brown, BRI’s field biologist leading this loon translocation effort, swung a net over the side of the boat. Under the starry sky that evening, we successfully captured a Common Loon chick for safe relocation and release.

    Iain Stenhouse, field biologist and director of BRI’s Marine Bird Program, is accustomed to experiencing the profoundly mesmerizing, immersive feelings that arise when working closely with wildlife. Whether on a boat off the coast of Maine tracking families of Common Eiders, or surrounded by an Arctic Tern colony in Greenland, Stenhouse is at home in the wild working with the birds. In fact, as he recalls tracking these terns, a species that claim the longest migration distance on record, he becomes awakened by the connection he has with them. “There’s not much to an Arctic Tern, it’s almost all feathers. And, to know that this bird, under its own steam, has been to Antarctica and back again since you last saw it, and it doesn’t look any different is just breathtaking.” Stenhouse describes the feeling he has when holding birds as being unlike any other, “I’ve never known anything that had that same kind of rush of excitement and fascination and just awe.”

    BRI’s field biologists seek out opportunities that put them into close contact with the natural world. In fact, those encounters captivate, awaken, and spark their motivation and passion. Evan Adams, BRI’s director of the Quantitative Wildlife Ecology Research Lab, was drawn to this career after a trip to Costa Rica. Adams recounts, “There’s a hummingbird called the Violet Sabrewing. You could hear them as they flew by you because they sounded like a Harley Davidson, you didn’t even have to look. And I thought that that was super cool, and when returned home, I thought, ‘I want to study birds’—that was kind of it.”

    Helen Yurek, another BRI wildlife biologist, spends many days and nights in remote places. “You just see really cool things; you see animals doing things that you might not have otherwise.” Sarah Dodgin, an ecological analyst for BRI, recently spotted an elusive Upland Sandpiper during fieldwork. She exclaims, “They ran out right in front of the truck and I was like ‘Oh, my gosh, here you are!’ It was a cool feeling.” Similar to my experience working with the loons, and Stenhouse’s in Greenland with Arctic Terns diving overhead, each of us recognizes that sense of awe and wholeness we feel when we are connected with the world around us.

    Through our own experiences we are all describing a concept that psychologists have been studying for decades. The term connectedness to nature refers to the emotional and cognitive connections we have with the natural world. In recent years, interest in the relationship between nature and human well-being has exploded. A growing trend of “park prescriptions” involves doctors encouraging patients to spend time outdoors. Spending time in close contact with nature can lead to positive health outcomes, including lower rates of depression and anxiety, anger and fatigue, and cardiovascular and respiratory diseases. Experimental studies have shown that being outside can even improve working memory and task performance, as well as invoke feelings of restorativeness and increase happiness. As Rachel Carson wrote in Silent Spring, “There is something infinitely healing in the repeated refrains of nature—the assurance that dawn comes after night, and spring after winter.” It is in this personal relationship with nature that we can find solace.

    Questions remain as to why spending time in nature may lead to positive health outcomes. Some answers lie in the specific chemical and biological components contained within natural environments. While others turn to the field of psychology. For example, people experience a great sense of awe in response to nature. The awe and fascination that Stenhouse describes when working closely with birds conveys a sense of fulfillment, connection, and restorativeness. As he notes, “Modern living doesn’t provide many real moments anymore. That moment—feeling that little heartbeat against your fingertips and the warmth of another little creature in the world—is very cool.” The Biophilia Hypothesis further suggests that throughout much of our two-million-year evolutionary history, humans lived in hunter-gatherer societies, coexisting with the natural world. A connection with nature, or “biophilia,” developed and became integral to human survival. A connection to nature then may be rooted in our connection to our ancestral selves.

    Weeks later, when remembering the feel of the loon’s heartbeat and the sound of its haunting call, I am transported back to that night, back to that connection I felt with the loons and the lake, and the sense of purpose that enveloped me. As a social psychologist, I study people. Rarely do I have experiences that bring me in such close physical contact with wildlife; yet, it has taken only that one night to realize that there really is no other feeling like it.

    Social psychologists continue to document feelings of a connectedness to nature that have profound effects on behaviors, attitudes, and health. In doing so, they offer solutions that address both human and environmental well-being by recognizing the interconnections between the two. Whether you experience nature in a remote place while handling an Arctic Tern, out on a lake on a clear summer night surrounded by the calls of loons, or in the local community forest during your weekly walk, a connection and restoration is there waiting for you. As Robin Wall Kimmerer writes, “As we work to heal the earth, the earth heals us.”

     

    More stories on https://briwildlife.org/bri-blog/.

    [ad_2]

    Biodiversity Research Institute (BRI)

    Source link