ReportWire

Tag: Bill Skarsgard

  • Now That Pennywise Has Arrived on ‘It: Welcome to Derry,’ Bob Gray Is Close Behind

    [ad_1]

    At long last, this week’s episode of It: Welcome to Derry gave fans what they’d been waiting for: Pennywise the Dancing Clown in full circus regalia, complete with glowing eyes and way too many pointy teeth. The big moment was well worth it, and even if it felt like episode five was a long time to hold out on It‘s signature villain, the show’s creative team—which includes Barbara Muschietti, Andy Muschietti, Brad Caleb Kane, and Jason Fuchs—has often spoken about why they wanted to build that anticipation. But now that Pennywise is here, what’s next?

    For starters: more details about his past, beyond what we already know about the asteroid thanks to the It movies and Stephen King’s book, not to mention earlier episodes of Welcome to Derry. Speaking to TV Guide, Fuchs promised “a lot of Pennywise” moving forward, with Kane teasing, “He’s in! He’s another character,” meaning Welcome to Derry‘s already large ensemble is simply going to have to make room for more.

    If you watched the teaser for episode six, which arrives Sunday on HBO, you might have spotted a familiar face: Bill Skarsgård, not in his Pennywise greasepaint, but instead in the guise of Pennywise’s most notable human form: “Bob Gray.” He pops up in King’s book, but Welcome to Derry aims to dig even deeper into what he means to the story.

    “Certainly, when we talk about the mysteries we’re excited to discover, we’re excited to understand why the shapeshifter has chosen to return, time and again, to the form of Pennywise,” Fuchs told TV Guide. “And what was that first encounter with Bob Gray? What did that look like? Who is Bob Gray? We have a lot of whys we want answers to, and the story of Bob Gray and the story of Pennywise are certainly in that bucket. So without spoiling anything in those final episodes, you’re going to see that mystery looked into in a really serious way.”

    But what will Bob Gray’s chompers look like? Find out on It: Welcome to Derry, which drops new episodes Sundays on HBO and HBO Max.

    Want more io9 news? Check out when to expect the latest Marvel, Star Wars, and Star Trek releases, what’s next for the DC Universe on film and TV, and everything you need to know about the future of Doctor Who.

    [ad_2]

    Cheryl Eddy

    Source link

  • I’m Both Terrified and Impatient for Pennywise to Show Up on ‘Welcome to Derry’

    [ad_1]

    There have been two episodes of It: Welcome to Derry, and Pennywise is taking his sweet time to make his entrance as dramatic and traumatic as possible.

    Since the marketing has been all in on making sure you know Bill Skarsgård is back, we’ve been excited to see how film franchise director Andy Muschietti is planning to have his first small-screen appearance as Pennywise the Dancing Clown come into play.

    In io9’s recent chat with the minds behind the show, which expands the Stephen King It universe, Jason Fuchs (writer, producer, and co-showrunner) shared that they “wanted to understand why a shape-shifter who has a virtually infinite number of forms it could take continues to take the form of Pennywise the Dancing Clown.” He also said that fans can expect to get “really satisfying answers to some of those things in the context of the show. But the answers themselves suggest fresh mysteries and new questions.” Since they were given free rein by King himself to do whatever they want, we’re anxious to see how much new input they’re putting into the horror legend’s scariest creation.

    So far we have so many questions! The first couple episodes truly play with the expectations of how It is perceived, playing tricks on the audience’s minds as well as its young characters. It begins with that gnarly birthing scene where the fleshy demon bat baby comes out to feast on the children of Derry, starting with Matty Clements. This grotesque incarnation makes us wonder if it’s just It awakening from its cyclical slumber in the most dramatic way possible or if it’s reborn every time and quickly evolves into a bigger form the more kids it claims.

    By the end of the episode, it goes from the size of an eagle to a bigger creature when it takes out half the kids that were introduced. This isn’t Stranger Things; we at least get the sense that no one is safe. Everyone in Derry who has a fair share of darkness and trauma is game for It. And that point is made very clearly as we meet new characters.

    © HBO Max

    In episode two, the surviving girls, Lilly (Clara Stack) and Ronnie (Amanda Christine), are preyed on through It taking the forms of their dead parents. Not as a clown, but instead giving Ronnie the major retraumatization of being birthed by a demonic version of her mom, who passed away when she was born. Likewise, Lilly faces her father in the form of It, taking pieces of him in pickle jars to scare her. But again, it raises a lot of ideas of how It decides to masquerade. Was It really the demon mom or pickled, dead daddy? Or were these just projections it could manipulate? They both disappear instantly; we’re leaning toward more projections than a corporeal outfit that It chooses to take.

    Why the entity chooses to don its iconic clown garb has yet to be explored despite marketing bombarding us with Pennywise’s signature look. If we think back on It: Chapter Two, you might recall that there’s a scene where Beverly encounters Pennywise getting ready and looking most definitely like a man putting on clown makeup in a twisted “Get Ready With Me’ moment; we even see It use its fingernails to tear the red lines onto its face.

    Welcome To Derry Pennywise Makeup Hbo Max
    © Warner Bros. Pictures

    The trailers tease that the circus or carnival origin story is coming, with glimpses of Skarsgård in his creepy man form without makeup, as we’ve seen in the movies. Hopefully in this Sunday’s episode, we’ll get more lore about Its origin; the entity has been encountered by the Indigenous people around Derry in the past, who have had more knowledge of its presence as an ancient being or alien. Perhaps It body-snatched a carnie after its previous host was destroyed. Because otherwise, why does It go through the effort to put on the face? It can’t be just for funzies, right?  If he can just morph into anything, why go through the effort to put on his dancing clown face?  It feels like there is an element of having a main form as a corporeal host to unleash its horrors. We are itching to find out more and to see Skarsgård return.

    It: Welcome to Derry streams Sundays on HBO Max.

    Want more io9 news? Check out when to expect the latest Marvel, Star Wars, and Star Trek releases, what’s next for the DC Universe on film and TV, and everything you need to know about the future of Doctor Who.

    [ad_2]

    Sabina Graves

    Source link

  • ‘Welcome to Derry’ Will Make You Wait for Full Pennywise

    [ad_1]

    Bill Skarsgård is back as Pennywise for the It prequel Welcome to Derry, and like the movies, the show will use him when the scary situation truly calls for it.

    Talking to SFX Magazine, co-showrunner Andy Muschietti likened the clown’s appearances in the show to the shark in Jaws: “It’s very appropriate for a monster that is a shapeshifter to appear in several different shapes and manifestations before he shows up as a clown,” he said. “The idea is building tension around the apparition of a monster that we know already, and people are waiting – when is it going to appear?”

    A simple idea, sure, but one Muschietti and his co-showrunner (and sister) Barbara say more than works for Welcome to Derry. The latter called the new creations cooked up for the show “pretty damn incredible” and “so much more” than what’s been seen in the trailers. Since every episode was made to “pack a punch,” the team strived to make these “new incarnations and fears” stand on their own while living up to the level of what was achieved in the two films.

    “When [Pennywise] appears, it’s in a big way,” teased Andy Muschietti. He hopes the audience will find it “gratifying” when the cosmic entity does appear on screen, and we’ll see how that trick works when Welcome to Derry premieres October 26 on HBO.

    Want more io9 news? Check out when to expect the latest Marvel, Star Wars, and Star Trek releases, what’s next for the DC Universe on film and TV, and everything you need to know about the future of Doctor Who.

    [ad_2]

    Justin Carter

    Source link

  • Screening at Venice: Gus Van Sant’s ‘Dead Man’s Wire’

    [ad_1]

    A rushed follow-through leaves the film’s mere 105 minutes feeling somewhat purposeless in the grand scheme of things. Courtesy Venice Film Festival

    There’s something to be said about movies that are just good enough, especially those that refashion real events into cinematic junk food. It is, however, hard not to be disappointed when one such work comes from Gus Van Sant, which makes Dead Man’s Wire a frustrating experience despite its climactic vigor. The tale of a disgruntled Hoosier who takes a rich man hostage in 1977, the film re-creates the lengthy standoff in immense visual detail but rarely probes beneath the surface of its colorful characters and relegates any sense of tension or intrigue to its climactic scenes.

    Van Sant has made several biopics (or pseudo-biopics) involving American gun violence, from the Palme d’Or-winning school shooter drama Elephant (2003) to the Oscar-winning gay rights drama Milk (2008). After decades of doing so, any artist is likely to lose their fascination with the subject, given how it’s ground to a standstill politically. And yet, the director presses on despite this, crafting a film where the threat of pulling a trigger is rarely riveting and even verges on doltish at times, as troubled Indianapolis resident Tony Kiritsis (Bill Skarsgård) tethers a wire to himself, his shotgun, and his wealthy would-be victim Richard Hall (Dacre Montgomery), in a kind of janky proto-Saw trap set to go off if the police intervene. But while the drama seldom feels zealous or threatening, it’s underscored by disappointment and disillusionment, the kind that has driven the weary Kiritsis to hold Hall at gunpoint.


    DEAD MAN’S WIRE ★★1/2 (2.5/4 stars)
    Directed by: Gus Van Sant
    Written by:  Austin Kolodney
    Starring:
    Bill Skarsgård, Dacre Montgomery, Colman Domingo, Al Pacino, Cary Elwes, Myha’la
    Running time: 105 mins.


    Whatever Van Sant’s feelings about this kind of subject matter may have once been, he appears to now translate them through a lens of sheer exhaustion. “Here,” the movie gestures wearily. “Another one of these. Pew pew.” It is, on one hand, fascinating to watch a film whose director seems fed up with his own characters and with the very premise of being driven to gun violence while fashioning oneself into a martyr. And yet, Van Sant’s Taxi Driver-esque tale (by way of Fargo; his delusional anti-hero is surprisingly polite) lives in the body of a based-on-real-events saga without embodying the reality from which it draws.

    Kiritsis, like Van Sant, is methodical, and the character responds to each of his plans going awry with a scrappy backup ploy (and a backup to each backup). This results in him kidnapping Hall from the fancy offices of his family mortgage company instead of his elderly father (an underutilized Al Pacino), who happens to be on vacation, and taking Hall to his cramped apartment as a number of policemen—with whom he happens to be friends—roll their eyes while in pursuit. Kiritsis’ motives are gradually revealed, and his demands involve apologies and restitution. His public declarations over the TV and radio establish how heroically he sees himself, so it’s no surprise that he foolishly believes the world to be entirely on his side, to the point that he thinks he’s in no danger of being arrested once things are all said and done.

    It’s all very interesting on paper. The oddball case makes you wonder whether a crime so idiosyncratic really transpired, and the performances do a great job of selling the oddity of it all. Skarsgård, although he taps into Kiritsis’ wounded-animal nature and occasional snappiness, is a treat to watch in the moments he dials back and acts completely casually, as though trying to convince Hall he’s approachable despite holding a 12-gauge Winchester to his neck. Montgomery, meanwhile, eschews the usual charisma for which he’s cast and makes himself physically meek and small, embodying a sniveling desperation that, on occasion, makes Kiritsis’ grievances seem worth considering.

    However, Van Sant never pushes Dead Man’s Wire in either of these two directions and instead lets it wallow in a casual middle ground. The unfolding action is never farcical enough to make the film satirical or outright funny, but it’s also never imbued with enough historical gravity to truly matter. Snapshot re-creations of known photos and news footage, and the presence of locally popular field reporters and radio hosts (played by Myha’la and Colman Domingo, respectively) seek to clarify the film’s reality, but these characters end up bit players in its opaque dramatic fabric rather than becoming living, breathing people crossing paths with an extraordinary, potentially violent scenario. The bigger picture, the moving pieces, and the various plans and strategies to save Hall never fade into view.

    When it comes time for the standoff to end, the questions of how it’ll wrap up, who’ll survive, and which somewhat personable character will be forced to pull the trigger grant Dead Man’s Wire a temporary intensity. This last hurrah isn’t quite “too little too late,” but its rushed follow-through leaves the film’s mere 105 minutes feeling somewhat purposeless in the grand scheme of things. It’s a tale with no purpose beyond letting viewers know, with a bemused cadence, that something quirky once happened in Indianapolis and that it could’ve been much more destructive—and perhaps much more enrapturing—than it really was.

    More from Venice:

    Screening at Venice: Gus Van Sant’s ‘Dead Man’s Wire’

    [ad_2]

    Siddhant Adlakha

    Source link

  • Toronto Awards Analysis: Bill Skarsgard Could Be a Contender for Gus Van Sant’s Sales Title ‘Dead Man’s Wire’

    [ad_1]

    The season of Skarsgards continues with Dead Man’s Wire, a Gus Van Sant-directed dramedy based on a dark true story from 1977, which showcases a terrific performance by Bill Skarsgard (It) as a Luigi Mangione-like figure. The timely film had its North American premiere at the Toronto International Film Festival’s Princess of Wales Theatre on Sunday — having world premiered last week at the Venice Film Festival, where it received a rave from THR — and went over extremely well. It is still seeking U.S. distribution, but will surely soon find it, and when it does, assuming it is released this year, it could thrust Skarsgard into the thick of an Oscar race that already includes his father Stellan (for a supporting performance Neon’s Sentimental Value) and brother Alexander (for a supporting turn in A24’s Pillion).

    Dead Man’s Wire, the first produced feature scripted by Austin Kolodney, centers on Tony Kiritzis, an Indianapolis man who poured his life savings into a real estate investment, the sale of which, he felt, was then deliberately sabotaged by his mortgage broker, thrusting him into a rage. He showed up at the office of the mortgage company, seeking its CEO M.L. Hall (Al Pacino), but, upon learning that the man was on vacation, met up with the man’s son Richard Hall (Dacre Montgomery), the company’s president, and took him hostage. Kiritzis connected a sawed-off shotgun to a wire that he placed around Hall’s neck, and, in full view of the police and media, transported him back to his own apartment, from which negotiations commenced. As twisted as Kiritzis’ behavior was, he became something of a folk hero after sharing his motives via interviews with a popular local DJ (Colman Domingo).

    Watching the film, one cannot help but think of Sidney Lumet’s 1975 classic Dog Day Afternoon (underscored by the presence of Pacino in both films) and Mangione, the man who assassinated a health care executive in cold blood late last year but retained support from much of the public. Resentment of the rich by the poor dates back to the beginning of time, but it is clearly spiking at the moment, as evident in everything from the popularity of Donald Trump (ironically), Bernie Sanders and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez to another 2025 film about the abduction of a powerful corporate titan, Yorgos LanthimosBugonia.

    Dead Man’s Wire, which was shot in just 19 days, is clearly a low-budget film, so I imagine its asking price won’t be terribly high. A distributor who would like to have an instant best actor Oscar contender would be wise to snap it up. Van Sant, one of the great actors’ directors of his time, has directed several prior performances that went on to not only Oscar noms, but wins (Robin Williams in 1997’s Good Will Hunting and Sean Penn in 2008’s Milk), and he’s in fine form on this one.

    [ad_2]

    Scott Feinberg

    Source link

  • Hot vamp fans, are time is NOW with this ‘Nosferatu’ trailer! | The Mary Sue

    Hot vamp fans, are time is NOW with this ‘Nosferatu’ trailer! | The Mary Sue

    [ad_1]

    Vampire hive, are you excited? The highly anticipated adaptation of Nosferatu from Robert Eggers released its first trailer and yes, I am ready to make this my entire personality. Even if I have to wait until Christmas to see it. I can stay spooky that long.

    Look, it is spooky season. Do I wish Nosferatu was coming out in October? Yes. But as a Scorpio, I am ready and willing to keep the haunting vibes alive until Christmas to celebrate Eggers’ take on a vampire story. We’ve been waiting a while for the Eggers version of the iconic story. And what a perfect time to dive into the horrifying tale.

    Nosferatu is a story that many know well. A vampire stalks a young woman, terrifying many throughout the years. The cast includes Bill Skarsgård as Count Orlok and Lily-Rose Depp as the object of his desire, Ellen Hutter. The rest of the cast includes Nicholas Hoult, Aaron Taylor-Johnson, Emma Corrin, Ralph Ineson, Simon McBurney and Willem Dafoe.

    The original film is pretty classic. Thomas Hutter (Hoult) is summoned to Orlok’s castle and it is made clear that Orlok’s new obsession is Hutter’s wife. We don’t know exactly what changes Eggers made for his take on Nosferatu but it is a pretty perfect pairing. Eggers is known for his darker work and it has us excited.

    This new trailer though? Gone is the allure of being the subject of a vampire’s obsession because this is already terrifying.

    Part of what makes vampire stories appealing comes from the overtly sexual nature of their stories. Eggers’ trailer for Nosferatu is probably one of the first times where I’ve felt like being around a vampire is the last thing I’d ever want. And I’m here for it!

    Vampire girlies, it is our time

    I love being a vampire girl. Well, to be fair, I am both a vampire girl and a witchy woman. I’d call myself a Witch sun and a Vampire rising. The point is: Many of us love a great vampire story. And one of the best of all time was the original Nosferatu. Pulling heavily from the story of Dracula, it left audiences haunted by the idea of the creatures of the night.

    With the release of Salem’s Lot this October, we’re in it now with our vampire stories and that’s exciting. Who doesn’t stop and think about how our world would look if vampires were real? I can’t be the only one and Nosferatu brought that thought out in a lot of us!

    While some movies do not need remakes, I do think that a modernized take on Nosferatu has a place in this world. Which is why I am so excited about the Eggers version. This trailer really captures what makes Eggers’ vision so breathtaking and while I still don’t know what he’s changing from the original film, I am more than ready (and willing) to head to theaters to see his film.

    Can’t wait to force my entire family to go and see a vampire movie on Christmas.


    The Mary Sue is supported by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a small affiliate commission. Learn more about our Affiliate Policy

    [ad_2]

    Rachel Leishman

    Source link

  • The Crow 2024 Is More Caca Than Caw-Caw, But That’s to Be Expected When Compared to the Original

    The Crow 2024 Is More Caca Than Caw-Caw, But That’s to Be Expected When Compared to the Original

    [ad_1]

    In a perfect world, remakes and reboots wouldn’t need to exist at all. Or if they did, the final product would be the result of truly careful, measured storytelling methods that only served to elevate rather than insult the original. Alas, as most know, the world is far from perfect. In fact, it’s as much of a shitshow as the one portrayed in Rupert Sanders’ version of The Crow. And as Sanders’ third movie as director, it’s done little to boost his prospects for directing in the future. This further compounded by his previous credits being Snow White and the Huntsman (mired in scandal when Sanders, then married, was caught having an affair with the film’s star, Kristen Stewart) and Ghost in the Shell. The latter being yet another remake that was panned for more than just casting Scarlett Johansson in a Japanese woman’s role (though that didn’t cause nearly as much outrage as her brief bid to play a trans man). Still, the reviews for Ghost in the Shell seem utterly kind in comparison to what’s been lobbed at The Crow, and from no less than the film’s original director, Alex Proyas, calling it a “a cynical cash grab,” then adding, “Not much cash to grab it seems.”

    True indeed, for The Crow made just barely under five million dollars in its opening weekend. It had a fifty-million-dollar budget to recoup. Unfortunately for the studio (Lionsgate), it couldn’t even manage to beat out 2009’s Coraline, which placed at number seven in the United States’ top ten box office (to The Crow’s number eight) after being re-released in theaters in honor of its fifteenth anniversary. The likelihood of The Crow remaining in the top ten at all during its second week of release doesn’t seem promising. All of which is to say: what the hell what wrong? That question isn’t too hard to answer.

    For a start, with a movie like The Crow, which has such a strong and devoted following, the OG fans of the film were likely never going to get on board with an “updated” (read: far more “corporatized”) version. Especially one that so often feels as though it desperately wants to check off multiple boxes in different genres. For there’s the “romantic” aspect of it, which often mirrors what Joker and Harley Quinn seem to have going on in the upcoming Joker: Folie à Deux, complete with Eric (Bill Skarsgård) and Shelly (FKA Twigs) meeting at a rehab facility called Serenity, the supernatural aspect and the Tarantino-level revenge and violence aspect. Something that FKA Twigs herself called out in an interview promoting the film, foolishly thinking that it was a good thing that The Crow has such “hodgepodge energy” by saying, “I was amazed at the juxtaposition between the front half, the middle and the end of the movie. It’s almost like there’s three genres in one. At the beginning, you have this incredible coming-of-age love story about these two outsiders who are just desperate to feel at home… and then in the middle, it’s this psychological thriller, and then at the end, you know, it’s kind of pure gore and horror…”

    In short, it’s all “kind of” whatever, trying to be everything to everyone perhaps because the writers were aware that it was never going to measure up to the 1994 version, so why not just try to appeal to as many audience members as possible? A “strategy” that, in the end, serves to appeal to no one. Save for, at best, those who have no knowledge of The Crow’s previous iterations as a comic book or Proyas film.

    Funnily enough, one of the writers in question of The Crow 2024, Zach Baylin, was not so long ago nominated for an Academy Award for Best Original Screenplay for King Richard (which lost that year to Kenneth Branagh’s Belfast). So yes, it’s quite an about-face to go from Oscar-nominated to more than likely Razzie-nominated. As for his co-writer, William Schneider, The Crow inauspiciously marks his first writing credit on a full-length feature. It seems both writers ended up on autopilot after a certain point, mish-mashing the timeline of the narrative and eventually losing all sight of anything resembling “logical time” with an ending that not only reverts to a lazy “rewind” tactic, but totally excises the original killers in favor of having the two OD as a reason for their death (or, in Shelly’s case, near death). And, speaking of being junkies, Skarsgård and Twigs have way-too-perfect teeth to fit that casting bill.

    As for the Eric Draven (Brandon Lee) and Shelly Webster (Sofia Shinas) of 1994’s The Crow, let’s just say there was a lot more depth to their characters that didn’t rely on the sole “trait” of making them drug addicts. Indeed, Eric and Shelly aren’t junkies at all in the original, just two “ghouls” in love (with Eric also being a musician). As though to highlight how “emo” they are in their love for each other (Jack and Sally from The Nightmare Before Christmas-style) from the get-go, upon unearthing their bodies right after they’re murdered in their Detroit loft, Sergeant Albrecht (Ernie Hudson, of Ghostbusters fame) finds a wedding invitation for the following day, October 31st, prompting one of his fellow policemen to ask, “Who the fuck gets married on Halloween anyhow?” Albrecht replies, “Nobody.”

    That was the answer then. The answer now is: plenty of people. Some of whom were likely influenced by the “macabre” stylings of Eric and Shelly’s coupledom (later mirrored in such “unions” as the ones shown in Candy, Corpse Bride and even Only Lovers Left Alive). That sense of, “If you jump, I jump” (or, in The Notebook’s case, “If you’re a bird, I’m a bird”—an appropriate saying for The Crow). And yes, jumping off a bridge does come up in The Crow 2024, with Shelly asking Eric if he would, essentially, die for her. The answer is, needless to say, a resounding yes. But the “intensity” of their “love” for one another often feels forced rather than authentic—even though that’s clearly the aim of the actors involved. And yes, Skarsgård and Twigs seem to be doing the best they can with the material they’re given, with Twigs likely attracted to the project because it furnished her with her first opportunity to play a lead role. Though perhaps she might have been better off sticking to the periphery if this was going to be the result…

    As for the decision to add the demonic element into the mix (all in keeping with the trend of satanic panic this year) via Vincent Roeg (Danny Huston), it’s utterly underdeveloped—along with just about everything else in the movie. But this isn’t to say that The Crow 2024 lacks style where substance is totally missing. The soundtrack, visual effects and, yes, “aesthetic” are nothing to be balked at, even if they can never capture (or even dream of recreating) the genuine “lo-fi grit” of Proyas’ film. The effect, instead, is a prime example of what happens when a corporate entity tries to commodify something truly artistic: the authenticity is lost, blatantly so.

    In many ways, an “update” (or “reinvention,” as Stephen Norrington, at one point attached to write the script in the early period of its development hell) of The Crow was always going to be doomed. The film was already known for being “cursed” after Brandon Lee died on set after an improperly loaded prop gun killed him. What’s more, in trying to get a “reboot”/“remake” off the ground, a number of actors so ill-suited to the part (e.g., Bradley Cooper) became attached that any fan of the original couldn’t possibly have high hopes.

    A few years back, when the project seemed permanently foiled, Proyas hit the nail on the head in terms of addressing the core issue of trying to remake The Crow at all: “It’s not just a movie that can be remade. It’s one man’s legacy. And it should be treated with that level of respect.” Obviously, though, there wasn’t much respect for the original if they weren’t even going to include at least a nod to Sarah (Rochelle Davis), who served not only as a key thread of the film, but also its narrator, the one who tells the audience from the outset, “People once believed that when someone dies, a crow carries their soul to the land of the dead. But sometimes, something so bad happens, that a terrible sadness is carried with it and the soul can’t rest. Then sometimes, just sometimes, the crow can bring that soul back to put the wrong things right.”

    Alas, “the crow” can’t right this particular wrong: The Crow 2024. Another one of its fundamental problems being what The Crow comic book creator James O’Barr boiled it down to: “I think the reality is, no matter who you get to star in it, or if you get Ridley Scott to direct it and spend two hundred million dollars, you’re still not gonna top what Brandon Lee and Alex Proyas did in that first ten-million-dollar movie” (Side note: it was originally a fifteen-million-dollar budget, with an additional eight added to it when Proyas decided to complete the remaining scenes with Lee with CGI and a stand-in.)

    But, if nothing else comes out of The Crow 2024 (apart from disappointment and tarnished reputations), there is certainly the silver lining that filming in Prague, with all its underground raves and nightclubs, ended up inspiring the sound and tone of FKA Twigs’ upcoming album, Eusexua.

    [ad_2]

    Genna Rivieccio

    Source link

  • The Crow Is a Gothic Superhero Romance Destined for Cult Status

    The Crow Is a Gothic Superhero Romance Destined for Cult Status

    [ad_1]

    There are people reading this review who weren’t born when producers first tried to bring back The Crow. On this website, the first article about it was 2008 (which just so happened to be io9’s first year of existence), and since then, every few years, a new director and star attempted to adapt James O’Barr’s gothic comic series for a new generation. I mention this because that history—whether you know it or not—somehow hangs heavily on Rupert Sanders’ The Crow, a reimagining of the original source material starring Bill Skarsgård. Simply put, the mere idea of a new Crow movie carries with it an albatross of impossibility. For years, no one could make it happen. There has to be a reason. And that reason must mean whatever finally makes it to theaters won’t be good.

    Well, Sanders’ version did make it. It’s coming to theaters this weekend. And, I’m admittedly shocked to say, it’s actually pretty good. It’s not great. There are issues of course. But even the lauded 1994 Alex Proyas film with Brandon Lee had those. Much like that film though, this one feels like a fresh interpretation of the story that may not see immediate success but is destined to be discovered by would-be fans in the years to come.

    Eric and Shelly in The Crow. – Lionsgate

    The thing that immediately stands out about The Crow is just how obsessed it is with the relationship between the two main characters. There’s Shelly, played by FKA twigs, who finds herself on the run from a mysterious entity and ends up in a rehab facility. There she meets Eric (Skarsgård), an introvert with a troubled childhood who is hated by everyone in the facility. The two quickly bond, escape, and fall madly in love.

    The development of that relationship covers the majority of the film, endearing the characters to the audience. It probably goes on too long but the more we spend time with Eric and Shelly the more we care about them, and the more anxiety builds about what’s to come. Because, if you know anything about The Crow, eventually both Shelly and Eric are killed, Eric is given a mysterious set of powers, and he’s told he can bring Shelly back if he kills the people who killed her.

    Once Eric gets those powers, it still takes him a fair amount of time to figure them out. Therefore, it’s not until very, very late in the film that the full promise of The Crow is on display. Then, and only then, do we get any prolonged action set pieces or superhero-type moments. And, once that happens, it’s not just cathartic, it’s exhilarating. Sanders crafts an operatic symphony of violence as Eric disposes of the bad guys, with a level of gore sure to make some audience members’ stomachs turn. It’s truly brutal and feels like an almost completely different movie.

    The Crow Street
    Walking down the street in The Crow. – Lionsgate

    However, as good as that third act ends up being, it’s also the biggest problem with The Crow. Tonally, it’s three different movies. It’s a romantic love story. It’s the origin story murder mystery. Then it’s a big, exciting, violent action film. Each works on its own but also slightly against the rest of the film because the balance isn’t quite right.

    In spite of that, you’re always along for the ride thanks to the magnificent performances by Skarsgård and twigs. Each has such a unique look and presence that you can’t take your eyes away from them. You can tell the characters are broken, potentially scary people, but you can also see and feel an almost river of innocence flowing through them. Plus, their chemistry is just off the charts. It’s as if they’ve known each other forever. Sanders might not have the story quite right, but the characters and performances are spot on.

    Even so, there are other issues too. The mythology of Eric’s powers is a little random and confusing. A villain played by Danny Huston isn’t as exciting or captivating enough to pose a real threat. And the ending lacks a bit of the emotional impact you’d hope for after everything you’d just watched. Make no mistake, The Crow is a flawed movie. But the flaws are beautifully at odds with the positives, leading me to say this: if you have any interest in The Crow, and are willing to go in with an open mind, the film will surprise you. It’s much better than you’re expecting and, in moments, actually pretty damned good.

    The Crow opens August 23.

    Want more io9 news? Check out when to expect the latest Marvel, Star Wars, and Star Trek releases, what’s next for the DC Universe on film and TV, and everything you need to know about the future of Doctor Who.

    [ad_2]

    Germain Lussier

    Source link

  • ‘The Crow’ is a dark and fascinating adaptation

    ‘The Crow’ is a dark and fascinating adaptation

    [ad_1]

    I am someone who has never seen The Crow (1994), and now, thirty years later, a new take on the comic book story is coming to life from director Rupert Sanders. Bill Skarsgård stars as Eric (a.k.a. the Crow) and what we see in the film is an ill-fated love story come to life.

    Shelly (FKA Twigs) and Eric meet in a rehab facility and their whirlwind romance ends in tragedy when Shelly’s past catches up to her. The entire first act of the movie is setting up Eric’s love of Shelly. From what I know of the original movie, that was the part that they could not film after the tragedy with Brandon Lee happened on set. It felt, in a lot of ways, like this take on The Crow wanted to give audiences that time to really live with Eric and Shelly.

    The Crow is something that feels like your emo phase never left. You know, that time in your life when Hot Topic consumed your every waking moment. And while you might think that makes this movie just an aesthetic choice, what I will say is that the heart of the story and Skarsgård’s approach to Eric really is captivating to watch. So you get to live that emo fantasy that is synonymous with a property like The Crow while still enjoying what you’re watching.

    Spoilers ahead, if you don’t already know the story!

    A story worth telling

    On the one hand, I don’t love the concept of a woman being fridged for a man’s benefit. Without Shelly (and Eric’s) death, you don’t have the story of the Crow. But it is given to Eric. He’s the one who has the power and uses his love of Shelly to push himself forward in the world. He has to use his revenge to get Shelly back. That’s his entire motivation.

    It’s beautiful; I am not discounting that. But it is a classic case of fridging a woman. I do like what Sanders did with his take on The Crow because it allowed me to spend time with Shelly and understand her relationship to Eric. But still, I wish this wasn’t a necessary part of Eric’s origin as the Crow.

    But this story of love and the desperation one feels to get it back makes The Crow a worthwhile movie to see. I think Skarsgård taking people out wearing a black leather jacket is cool all on its own, but when he is doing it motivated by his own love? It makes those “cool” moments even better.

    There were so many moments later in this film that had me cheering. They still have those really iconic shots, the darkness that makes a story like The Crow interesting to an audience. That being said, it isn’t only those images without any substance. We get to see a real love story happening along with an aesthetic that people love.

    I don’t think this take on The Crow is going to make or break anyone’s opinion on the story. It did make me really interested in this viewing gap of mine, and I want to go and explore other stories in this universe, and I think that’s where this is going to really shine.

    It’s worth it to see in theaters, and honestly, Twigs and Skarsgård are so perfect.


    The Mary Sue is supported by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a small affiliate commission. Learn more about our Affiliate Policy

    [ad_2]

    Rachel Leishman

    Source link

  • Bill Skarsgård’s Pennywise Returns for It Prequel Series

    Bill Skarsgård’s Pennywise Returns for It Prequel Series

    [ad_1]

    Image: Warner Bros.

    It and It: Chapter Two star Bill Skarsgård (Nosferatu) has officially signed back on to reprise the role of sewer-dwelling, child-eating clown Pennywise for Max’s Welcome to Derry series. The returning Pennywise joins castmates Taylour Paige, Jovan Adepo, Chris Chalk, and James Remar.

    According to Deadline, Skarsgård will also executive produce the show along with his fellow It film franchise creative team at Warner Bros. The show was inspired by the Stephen King novel It and was developed by the franchise’s director Andy Muschietti with producer Barbara Muschietti. They’re also joined by Chapter Two co-producer Jason Fuchs with the films’ other producers, Roy Lee and Dan Lin. Now with Skarsgård in the mix, we’re excited for more horror in the prequel series. Muschietti is set to direct four episodes out of the nine in the series order.

    Recently, Bill Skarsgård starred in Boy Kills World and will be featured as Eric Draven in the upcoming The Crow reboot, while Andy Muschietti remained in the Warner Bros. family with The Flash. Needless to say, we are excited to see them team up again with more world-building and creepy killer clownery in the Stephen King universe. Their take on It has become the quintessential one garnering $1.17 billion worldwide. And in an age with ever-expanding mythologies, characters like Pennywise can keep floating on in horror infamy as long as he wants.

    Stay tuned at io9 for Welcome to Derry updates!


    Want more io9 news? Check out when to expect the latest Marvel and Star Wars releases, what’s next for the DC Universe on film and TV, and everything you need to know about House of the Dragon and Lord of the Rings: The Rings of Power.

    [ad_2]

    Sabina Graves

    Source link

  • The Crow Reboot ‘Is a Bit Like a Cure Song’

    The Crow Reboot ‘Is a Bit Like a Cure Song’

    [ad_1]

    The Crow.
    Photo: Larry Horricks/Lionsgate

    The reboot of The Crow has been gestating for more than 15 years, and now it’s finally ready to hatch. To be fair, there was some omens hovering over the project. Based on James O’Barr’s comic-book series of the same name, the latest film adaptation has seen a revolving door of writers, directors, producers, and stars, making the simple fact that it even has a release date no small feat. Not to mention the fact that the 1994 cult classic isn’t exactly known for its moderate box-office success. Brandon Lee, son of Bruce Lee, tragically died on the set of the first film after being shot by a prop gun.

    The new team got Ghost in the Shell and Snow White and the Huntsman director Rupert Sanders to guide The Crow to a landing. Bill Skarsgård and FKA Twigs snagged lead roles in the film about an undead man who vows to avenge his brutally murdered wife. Now that’s a casting decision that has fan-fiction writers racing to their keyboards at superhero speeds. So what else do we know about the comic-book movie in a time famously mediocre for comic-book movies?

    Had this film arrived a decade ago with these stars and this aesthetic, it would have sent the witchy Tumblr girl economy into overdrive. In one first-look image, Eric (Skarsgård) and Shelly (Twigs) do their best interpretation of René Magritte’s The Lovers, kissing despite being separated by a sheer white curtain. In another, the couple share a look beside a campfire with Eric’s evil-eye tattoo peeking out from his T-shirt and “Lullaby” inked above his eyebrow. While Lee’s Eric sports a bob and monochromatic clown makeup à la a Kiss bandmate, the 2024 version opts for heavy black rings around the eyes and a cartoonish smile line drawn in thick eyeliner.

    Rock bands Joy Division and the Cure were of no small influence to the director when he was working on the film. “Look, I grew up listening to Joy Division and the Cure, and this movie is a bit like a Cure song — the beauty of melancholy,” Sanders told Vanity Fair in an interview dated February 28. Okay. He decided the project was for him when he realized he could make a “dark romance, something that dealt with loss, grief, and the ethereal veil between life and death and reaching through that.” Sanders hasn’t given us any details on what we can expect plotwise, but he did tell Deadline he wanted to “reimagine The Crow as a foreboding voice of today.”

    The cast list has seen higher turnover rates than digital journalism gigs. But despite losing Bradley Cooper, Tom Hiddleston, Luke Evans, Jake Huston, and Jason Momoa, the show will go on. Isabella Wei stars alongside Skarsgård and Twigs as Zadie, while Danny Huston, Laura Birn, Sami Bouajila, and Jordan Bolger join The Crow in undisclosed roles.

    The Crow lands onscreen June 7.

    [ad_2]

    Zoe Guy

    Source link

  • John Wick: Chapter 4 Movie Review

    John Wick: Chapter 4 Movie Review

    [ad_1]


    critic’s rating: 



    4.0/5

    John Wick (Keanu Reeves) kills the Elder, the only individual above the High Table in Morocco. Because of this, New York Chad Stahelski Continental Hotel manager Winston Scott (Ian McShane) and his concierge, Charon (Lance Reddick), are summoned to the Marquis Vincent de Gramont (Bill Skarsgard), a senior member of the High Table. Vincent kills Charon as a warning and sets a high open bounty on John Wicks. While the world’s best assassins are lured by the lucre to kill him, the two deadliest seem to be his old friend Caine (Donnie Yen), and a new entity, Mr Nobody (Shamier Anderson), who travels with an attack dog. His only hope to get out of this mess is to formally challenge Vincent to a duel and kill him. To do so, he has to be part of the High Table once more. His adoptive sister Katia (Natalia Tena), agrees to take him back into the fold, only if he manages to kill Killa (Scott Adkins), a German High Table member who murdered her father. John Wick successfully does so, leading to a mammoth showdown involving Caine, Mr Nobody, hundreds of hitmen and ultimately, Vincent himself…

    The storyline doesn’t do justice to the parade of continuous action that you see for close to three hours. Director Chad Stahelski, who started out as a stuntman before moving up the ladder, pushes his actors and stunt doubles to the limits of human endurance. Never mind the fact that people aren’t actually being hit by speeding vehicles or falling off three floors on top of a car. It all looks so authentic that the audience gasps and groans, as if it’s physically feeling the pain. Some ideas are way out of this world. To see Scott Adkins kick some butt, delivering high kicks while wearing a prosthetic suit which bloats him out to Sumo proportions is deliciously wild. And what’s more audacious is having Donnie Yen play a blind assassin who is almost better than John Wick despite his handicap. It’s almost as if someone has given Ip Man Jedi powers. Donnie Yen dodging a hail of bullets playing a blind man asks for a complete suspension of disbelief but you can’t take your eyes off him while he’s doing that. There were rumours that we were going to see a crossover between the John Wick universe and Nobody universe. Well, that hasn’t actually happened, as Bob Odenkirk, who plays the titular character in the 2021 film, isn’t part of this movie. But we do have a Mr Nobody character, played by Shamier Anderson, who is something of a wildcard here. He and his canine companion bring their own dose of action and offer another layer to the proceedings.

    The film can be seen as a homage to Keanu Reeves. Whether it’s The Matrix (1999), 47 Ronin (2013), or his directorial venture, Man of Tai Chi (2013), we see echoes of the previous films in this. John Woo has been credited as being the father of Gun Fu, where gun battle is combined with martial arts elements. And so much of John Woo’s early work, from films like A Better Tomorrow (1986), Bullet in the Head and more is reflected here. Chad Stahelski must have idolised Woo growing up and the student, one can say, has surpassed the master here.

    Donnie Yen is 59 and Keanu Reeves is a year younger and yet both make action look so easy even at their age. They share a great camaraderie and it’s a treat to see two great action stars coming together and regaling the audience with their distinct fighting styles. While their individual scenes do make for a great watch, it’s their scenes together that truly elevates the film. Watching them together is like watching poetry in motion and kudos to the director and his team for bringing a lyrical quality to the action.

    All-in-all, watch the film for its never-seen-before action sequences, as also for the pleasure of watching two masters of action, Keanu Reeves and Donnie Yen, giving their best to the film.

    Trailer : John Wick

    Neil Soans, March 23, 2023, 3:30 AM IST


    critic’s rating: 



    4.5/5


    John Wick: Chapter 4 Story: With few friends left in this criminal underworld, John Wick (Keanu Reeves) brings high stakes to the High Table as he faces the consequences of his deeds.

    John Wick: Chapter 4 Review: The ‘John Wick’ series has been clear and precise in its offering, and Chapter 4, aka JW4, is no different in its premise. It builds on what the franchise has become synonymous with – high-octane, dazzling fight choreography and close-quarter combat featuring Keanu Reeves doing what he does best. But JW4 turns it all up a notch, expanding the mythos of the High Table with old players, featuring Laurence Fishburne, Ian McShane and the late Lance Reddick, but also introduces a mix of new characters who are all instantly memorable.
    Scott Adkins is virtually unrecognisable yet thoroughly enjoyable as Killa – a scenery-chewing villain plucked straight out of a James Bond movie. Donnie Yen often steals the show as Caine with his clean and crisp artistry, which warrants his own spin-off. Adding to the list of martial art legends are Hiroyuki Sanada and Marko Zaror, whose distinctive styles are hard to miss. Bill Skarsgård is menacingly measured as Marquis – a stylish baddie begging to be dispatched in the most brutal way. A wildcard thrown into the mix is Shamier Anderson’s mysterious Mr Nobody with his feisty canine companion. Rina Sawayama makes her film debut with some standout sequences of her own. However, the film rests on Keanu Reeves’ stoic shoulders, and his actions continue to speak louder than words with a relentless commitment to up the ante.

    This high-calibre roster allows elaborately choreographed fight sequences to be presented in wide frames without fast-paced cuts. The results are breathtaking, with scenes shot inventively to often make JW4 play out like a live-action video game, perfectly capturing this franchise’s tone and feel. Director Chad Stahelski and Keanu Reeves have been pushing for more acknowledgement of stunt work in film. JW4’s remarkable stunt performers pull off innumerable jaw-dropping moments, presenting a showcase of their invaluable contribution to the entertainment industry. If the first John Wick film raised the bar for the spectacle of fight-based storytelling while reinforcing Keanu Reeves as a bona fide action star, JW4 redefines the gold standard for the genre.

    [ad_2]

    Devesh Sharma

    Source link