[ad_1]
Watch CBS News
Be the first to know
Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.
[ad_2]

[ad_1]
Watch CBS News
Be the first to know
Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.
[ad_2]

[ad_1]
Watch CBS News
Be the first to know
Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.
[ad_2]

[ad_1]
Watch CBS News
Be the first to know
Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.
[ad_2]

[ad_1]
The Biden administration has raised allegations with top officials in New Delhi that India was involved in a thwarted plot to assassinate a Sikh separatist living in America, adding a new source of friction in ties between the two nations.
The issue is being treated “with utmost seriousness,” Adrienne Watson, a spokeswoman for the White House National Security Council said in a statement Wednesday. “It has been raised by the U.S. government with the Indian government, including at the senior-most levels,” she said.
The U.S. allegations come just two months after Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau accused the Indian government of involvement in the murder of a Sikh separatist leader on Canadian soil. It also puts the U.S. in an awkward spot as the Biden administration sees India as an increasingly important strategic partner in the region as it works to counter China’s influence.
Watson said Indian officials “expressed surprise and concern” about the U.S.’s allegations and are investigating the issue. “We have conveyed our expectation that anyone deemed responsible should be held accountable,” she said.
India’s foreign ministry said in a statement the U.S. side had “shared some inputs” about terrorists and organized criminals that were a “cause of concern for both countries and they decided to take necessary follow-up action.” Indian officials have repeatedly accused Sikh separatist organizers abroad of being terrorists or part of organized criminal gangs.
The White House statement comes after the Financial Times reported that the U.S. stopped a plot to assassinate a Sikh separatist living in America and warned the Indian government it was concerned about its involvement in the planned killing, citing people familiar with the matter it didn’t identify.
The latest developments places renewed focus on India’s alleged involvement in targeted overseas killings. In June, Canadian Sikh separatist Hardeep Singh Nijjar — who was designated a terrorist by India’s government — was shot an killed in Vancouver. Trudeau said there were “credible allegations” of Indian government involvement in the murder of Nijjar, accusations that New Delhi called “absurd.”
After a diplomatic firestorm that saw Canada forced to cut the number of its officials in the country, tensions appear to be gradually easing. India said on Wednesday it would resume online visa services for Canadian citizens, while Trudeau participated in a virtual Group of 20 leaders meeting hosted by Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi.
Gurpatwant Singh Pannun, an American and Canadian citizen, was the target of the latest conspiracy, the FT reported. Pannun is general counsel of Sikhs for Justice, an organization that advocates for an independent Sikh state known as “Khalistan” to be carved out of India.
Pannun is a key organizer of nonbinding referendums calling for a separate Sikh state that have been held in countries with large Indian diasporas, including Canada, the UK and Australia. An American phase of the voting will begin Jan. 28 in San Francisco, he said in an email to Bloomberg.
“India wants to kill me for running the referendum campaign,” he said. “India’s transnational terrorism has become a direct challenge to the sovereignty of the United States.”
U.S. federal prosecutors have filed a sealed indictment against at least one alleged participant in the assassination plot in New York district court, and prosecutors were debating whether to unseal the indictment, according to the FT.
The U.S. Justice Department didn’t respond to a request for comment. Pannun said in his statement that Nijjar’s murder and the reported threat to his life represent challenges to the self-determination of Canada and the U.S. “I trust that the Biden administration is more than capable to handle any such challenge,” he said.
[ad_2]
Iain Marlow, Laura Dhillon Kane / AP
Source link

[ad_1]
A proposed rule from the Federal Communications Commission would bar pay-TV companies from charging customers early termination fees when they sever their service contract before it expires.
The proposal, which the commission will vote on next month, would also force cable companies and satellite TV services to give customers a rebate if a subscriber leaves before a billing cycle ends. FCC officials said eliminating early termination fees would benefit the video-streaming business.
“When companies charge customers early termination fees, it limits their freedom to choose the service they want,” FCC Chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel said in a statement Tuesday. “In an increasingly competitive media market, we should make it easier for Americans to use their purchasing power to promote innovation and expand competition within the industry.”
In an effort to attract customers, cable companies and satellite providers often offer a promotional price that locks new subscribers in a contract for at least one year. Such contracts typically contain fine print stating that the customer agrees to pay an extra charge if they end their contract before the agreed upon date.
The price of early termination fees vary, but is usually based on a specific amount, say $40, multiplied by the number of months a subscriber has left in the contract at the time of cancellation. While there are many reasons why a consumer might wish to terminate service, including financial hardship or dissatisfaction, such fees make it costly to do so during the contract term, according to FCC officials.
“Because these fees may have the effect of limiting consumer choice after a contract is enacted, it may negatively impact competition for services in the marketplace,” the FCC said.
The early termination proposal is part of the Biden administration’s effort to axe so-called junk fees. President Biden has already taken aim at stamping out bank fees, extra charges from food delivery services and surcharges on hotel stays. Junk fees hurt the economy and siphon billions of dollars from U.S. households every year, federal officials have said.
“Companies shouldn’t lock you into services you don’t want with large fees,” Mr. Biden said Wednesday on social media. “It’s unfair, raises costs, and stifles competition. We’re doing something about it.”
If passed, the FCC proposal would erod a long-standing stream of revenue for TV operators many of which are already losing millions of paid subscribers to streaming services. Cable and satellite television companies lost 1.8 million subscribers in the second quarter of this year, which added to the 1.9 million lost during the same period last year, analysts at MoffettNathanson said in a September report.
[ad_2]

[ad_1]
Watch CBS News
Be the first to know
Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.
[ad_2]

[ad_1]
Watch CBS News
Be the first to know
Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.
[ad_2]

[ad_1]
Watch CBS News
Be the first to know
Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.
[ad_2]

[ad_1]
Xi comes to America: This week, at an estate outside of San Francisco, President Joe Biden met with Chinese President Xi Jinping as part of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) summit. They talked about stemming fentanyl production, keeping lines of communication open between the two countries’ militaries, and Taiwan’s future, among other things. But little was agreed to.
“There was a time when summits with Chinese leaders resulted in agreements on containing North Korea and keeping Iran from getting a nuclear weapon, on climate goals and economic coordination to avoid financial crises and joint efforts in counterterrorism. Those days are over,” wrote Katie Rogers and David E. Sanger for The New York Times. Now, “there is little to no prospect of changed behavior.”
Afterward, Biden called Xi a dictator again, a move that has earned the Chinese Communist Party leader’s chagrin in the past. “He’s a dictator in the sense that he’s a guy who runs a country that is a communist country,” said Biden.
The whole thing seemed pretty photo-oppy and of limited use, though the two leaders “agreed to steps that could help curb the flow of Chinese chemicals used in the U.S. production of fentanyl,” per Politico.
China-watchers criticized the talks for ignoring the giant nuclear elephant in the room. “When it comes to the U.S. nuclear posture in East Asia—deploying and expanding America’s nuclear arsenal as a deterrent to Chinese hostilities—Biden is not only following Trump’s lead but in some ways taking an even more aggressive stance than his predecessor did,” wrote Michael Hirsh for Politico. “Many experts fear Washington and Beijing are headed into a tit-for-tat spiral of nuclear confrontation that could come to resemble the brinkmanship of the Cold War.”
And yet, the San Francisco talks had pretty much nothing on that, as far as we know. There was some talk of reining in the use of artificial intelligence in nuke deployment, but little beyond that; it was essentially one big “we’ll circle back on that later” meeting.
Potemkin San Francisco: Meanwhile, the long-failing city of San Francisco was seemingly cleaned up overnight—or at least parts of it were—seemingly to prepare for Xi’s arrival.
This became heavily memed:
San Francisco if Xi stayed longer than three days. pic.twitter.com/a3VAj5R6Y5
— Autism Capital ???? (@AutismCapital) November 13, 2023
Dad just said Uncle Xi is coming over. pic.twitter.com/VOnC0jVx9h
— Autism Capital ???? (@AutismCapital) November 14, 2023
California Gov. Gavin Newsom claimed that, well actually, this cleanup process had long been underway, but also that of course the city would clean up in advance of world leaders coming over for dinner. “Obviously, any time you put on an event, by definition…you know, you have people over to your house, you’re going to clean up the house,” said Newsom. “You’re going to make sure the kids make their beds, you know. Take the socks, you know, put them in the drawer, in the hamper.”
What Newsom misses is that taxpayers deserve for their dollars to be put to good use all the time, not just when foreign leaders visit.
Besides, it’s also worth noting that “the city hardly ‘fixed’ its second homelessness problem. It just shifted encampments and vagrant behavior away from the downtown,” wrote Reason‘s Christian Britschgi. There’s a difference between legitimately solving a problem and simply hiding it out of sight; Newsom seems to have mostly chosen the latter.
Don’t all MRI rooms house AK-47s? Few details have been released about the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) raid of Al Shifa hospital in Gaza, which is believed to be above a Hamas command center. “In a video taken at the hospital, a military spokesman, Lt. Col. Jonathan Conricus, displayed caches of guns, ammunition, protective vests and Hamas military uniforms, some of which, he said, had been hidden behind M.R.I. machines and others in nearby storage units,” reported The New York Times.
Indeed, IDF video provided to the press shows grab bags with AK-47s, ammo, and grenades hidden behind an MRI machine at Al Shifa, per Conricus. But many observers have said that Israeli claims that Al Shifa was housing large Hamas operations have not materialized. “Really what we haven’t seen at this point is anything like the claims from the Israeli military that this is used as a sort of sophisticated command and control center by Hamas,” reported BBC correspondent Yolande Knell.
It’s a little too early to tell. More will likely emerge in the coming days.
Scenes from New York: Earlier this week, hundreds of kids and their parents marched to Democratic Sen. Chuck Schumer’s house demanding that he take action to prevent Israel from continuing to attack Gaza. I am not a huge fan of kid political activism, generally speaking, especially varieties that seem to emanate from parental preference and not the interest of the child, though this is perhaps something even worse: Ever-younger kids becoming obnoxious, shouty activists. (They are all well within their rights to do so, of course.)
Sonic Youth will always be Youth Against Fascism. This Goo/Pettibon mashup is a joke about right wing Milei’s hair. Essentially its about voting for Massa to remain & stopping the pro-police state Milei from taking power. Vote for humanitarianism ✌️❤️All love to Argentina pic.twitter.com/YgADfcYPdo
— Thurston Moore (@nowjazznow) November 16, 2023
Another baseless claim from Jacobin—in fact, working hours have been declining in capitalist countries https://t.co/TvYIgS73cN pic.twitter.com/jUVpq90R53
— Chris Freiman (@cafreiman) November 15, 2023
I don’t like filming people tearing down posters of the abducted, ID’ing them and then getting them fired. Or killing their job prospects. I find the act of destroying the posters offensive and often despicable especially when done with delight. But there may be non-despicable 1/
— Russ Roberts (@EconTalker) November 15, 2023
[ad_2]
Liz Wolfe
Source link

[ad_1]
Washington — A bipartisan group of senators is working through the weekend to forge a deal on asylum policy changes designed to reduce migrant crossings along the southern border, hoping to make a rare breakthrough on one of Congress’ most intractable issues, three congressional officials told CBS News.
Sens. Michael Bennet of Colorado, James Lankford of Oklahoma, Chris Murphy of Connecticut, Kyrsten Sinema of Arizona and Thom Tillis of North Carolina are negotiating a compromise to overhaul how migrants are processed along the U.S.-Mexico border, where illegal crossings have soared to all-time highs over the past two years. The compromise they’re envisioning would be part of a broader national security funding package requested by President Biden that includes aid to Israel, Ukraine and border security money, which Senate Republicans have conditioned on significant restrictions on asylum.
Bennet and Murphy are Democrats, and Lankford and Tillis are Republicans. Sinema is a former Democrat who became an independent late last year.
The bipartisan group spoke on Wednesday night to hash out a framework for the potential deal, and will continue their talks through the weekend alongside their staff, the congressional officials said. If a breakthrough materializes in the Senate, it’s unclear if the Republican-led House would take up and pass a bipartisan border proposal that is not as strict as a measure it passed earlier this year.
In an interview with CBS News, Sinema said the Senate negotiators believe there’s an urgent need to address what she called a “porous border” and “loopholes” in U.S. immigration law being exploited by those smuggling migrants into the country.
“There’s growing concern, from folks on both sides of the aisle, that we have to act now, as a national security measure, to protect our border and ensure the safe passage of migrants into our country for those who do qualify for asylum,” Sinema said.
In fiscal year 2023, Border Patrol processed more than two million migrants who crossed into the U.S. unlawfully, only the second time that threshold has been surpassed in the agency’s history, federal statistics show. The unprecedented migration flows have strained federal and local resources, in border and interior cities alike, and created a political headache for Mr. Biden as he seeks a second term.
Getty Images
Partisan gridlock has doomed numerous other attempts to pass a bipartisan reform of the U.S. immigration system, which has not been updated in any significant way since 1996. The ongoing talks in the Senate could meet the same fate, but several factors have opened a rare, though limited, window for lawmakers to reach a compromise on some immigration issues.
The Biden administration, congressional Democrats and many Republicans want Congress to approve more military assistance to Ukraine to help its war effort against Russia. However, Republican leadership in the Senate has linked passing additional aid to Ukraine, which some Republicans oppose, to changes to U.S. border policy. The Biden administration has also implored Congress to allocate billions of dollars in funding to hire additional immigration officers and judges and bolster border security, but Republicans have rejected approving those funds without a policy shift.
Moreover, the White House is under growing political pressure to reduce the flow of migrants into the U.S., including from Democratic mayors and governors in cities like New York and states like Illinois that are struggling to shelter the new arrivals. Internally, some administration officials also believe the spike in border crossings won’t drop to manageable levels unless the asylum system is reformed.
Earlier this week, a Republican Senate working group led by Lankford released its border policy demands, asking for drastic limits on asylum eligibility, long-term detention centers to hold migrant families with children and the reinstatement of Trump-era policies like the so-called “Remain in Mexico” program.
While Democrats are unlikely to support family detention and the more sweeping restrictions on asylum, they could be open to some limits and faster deportations. During a Senate hearing this week, Murphy, the Connecticut Democrat, said a discussion about “adjustments to the asylum standard” was a “legitimate conversation,” though he noted it would need to be accompanied by a surge in resources.
Sinema said that while the ultimate eligibility criteria for asylum — centered on showing well-founded fear of being persecuted — does not need to change, the steps before migrants see a judge do need to be altered.
“Right now, that system is broken,” she told CBS News. “And the cartels are exploiting the loopholes in the system. And it’s created a situation that is inefficient, inhumane, and it’s dangerous for both our communities and for migrants.”
The purpose of the talks, Sinema added, is to find a “middle ground.”
Getty Images
The White House, which congressional and administration officials have said is not involved in the Senate talks, said earlier this week it disagreed with “many” of the GOP working group’s proposals, but left the door open to having a “serious conversation about reforms that will improve our immigration system” with Republicans.
In their list of demands, Republican senators also included dramatic restrictions on the use of humanitarian parole, a law the Biden administration has invoked to welcome hundreds of thousands of migrants and refugees from Afghanistan, Latin America and Ukraine.
Any border security deal by the bipartisan Senate group would almost certainly face criticism from the left and right.
Immigration hardliners, who have advocated for mass deportations and the gutting of U.S. asylum law, would likely view it as insufficiently restrictive. Even if the Senate strikes a deal, it’s unclear if the Republican-led House and Speaker Mike Johnson would support a bill backed by Democrats.
On the other hand, restrictions on asylum and efforts to speed up deportations would likely garner criticism from progressives and immigrant rights advocates, most of whom do not support changes to asylum law. A deal that does not include the legalization of undocumented immigrants, such as so-called “Dreamers,” would also create rifts among Democrats and their allies, who have pushed for a path to citizenship for decades.
“Essentially the Republicans are saying, ‘We will get everything we want and you don’t get anything,’ and that’s not really a negotiation position,” said Aaron Reichlin-Melnick, policy director at the American Immigration Council, which advocates for progressive migration policies.
Reichlin-Melnick said advocates would not back any of the Republicans’ proposals, which he said would amount to the “mass detention of families and children in prison camps” and “the elimination of asylum.”
But Theresa Cardinal Brown, an immigration expert at the Bipartisan Policy Center, said the record levels of migrant apprehensions along the southern border over the past years have shown that the current asylum process is “unworkable” and needs to be reformed.
“It has overwhelmed our ability to process people,” said Cardinal Brown, a former federal immigration official under Presidents Barack Obama and George W. Bush. “As a practical matter, we’re not processing people for asylum. We’re adding them to an interminable queue.”
[ad_2]

[ad_1]
Watch CBS News
Be the first to know
Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.
[ad_2]
[ad_1]
(Bloomberg) — Li-Cycle Holdings Corp., which is set to receive significant backing from the Biden administration, saw its share price slashed nearly in half after announcing it would pause construction on a first-of-its-kind lithium-ion-battery recycling plant.
Most Read from Bloomberg
The Toronto company said it would halt work on its Rochester Hub pending completion of a strategic review, including scope and budget. Li-Cycle said it is facing escalating construction costs that exceed prior guidance and is working closely with the US Energy Department concerning its offer of a $375 million loan commitment.
Li-Cycle is one of the many companies vying to help the US meet surging demand for battery materials needed in the transition from gas-powered cars. The government is pouring billions of dollars in subsidies and tax incentives to build up a domestic supply chain, intended to help the US compete with China’s dominant industry position. The setback shows the challenges the US and the West face trying to essentially kick-start an industry from scratch.
Li-Cycle shares fell as much as 49% in New York. The stock closed at $1.23, down 46% for the day, its largest drop on record.
“The board of directors has decided to pause construction work on the Rochester Hub, pending a review of the project, including an evaluation of the go-forward phasing of its scope and budget, including construction strategy,” according to the statement. “As previously disclosed, engineering and procurement for the project are largely complete, with the current focus being on construction activities on site.”
Shares jumped 6% in February after the Biden administration announced the company’s US subsidiary would receive the loan to help finance expansion of a facility to recycle lithium-ion batteries into chemicals that can be used for the batteries of more than 200,000 electric vehicles a year. The funding is from the department’s Advanced Technology Vehicles Manufacturing Loan Program amid a broader White House goal of having half of all car sales in 2030 be zero-emissions.
The unexpected announcement comes as congressional Republicans have vowed to find the next Solyndra LLC in their criticism of the hundreds of billions of dollars in new loan authority given to the Energy Department in President Joe Biden’s signature climate law. Solyndra, a California solar manufacturer that flopped soon after receiving a $535 million loan guarantee during the Obama administration, resulted in a years-long pause in loan activity amid intense congressional scrutiny.
The Energy Department said the Li-Cycle loan is still in the conditional phase and no money has yet been distributed.
(Updates with shares in fourth graph, expanded company comment in fifth graph.)
Most Read from Bloomberg Businessweek
©2023 Bloomberg L.P.
[ad_2]

[ad_1]
Watch CBS News
Be the first to know
Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.
[ad_2]

[ad_1]
Watch CBS News
Be the first to know
Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.
[ad_2]
[ad_1]
Joe Biden had an immediate objective in his primetime foreign policy address Thursday evening: to build support for aiding Israel and Ukraine. But the president was also making a broader case to the public about the role the United States should play in world conflicts he sees as battles for democracy: “American leadership is what holds the world together,” Biden said from the Oval Office. “American alliances are what keep us, America, safe. American values are what make us a partner that other nations want to work with.”
“We are the essential nation,” Biden added, alluding to the Madeleine Albright line, the applicability of which has increasingly come into question as chaos consumes the American political system. “We have to remember who we are.”
It was an ambitious address—an appeal for the country to “get past” its divisions and to fulfill its “responsibilities as a great nation.” But it was also tinged with uncertainty. It’s hardly clear whether the US can actually maintain the international order it established in the middle of the last century, especially with Donald Trump still a major fixture in American politics. After all, the aid package Biden touted in his Thursday evening address is arriving on a Capitol Hill that’s still without a House speaker following the ouster of Kevin McCarthy and bitter feuding among the Republican majority—which has increasingly come to oppose additional Ukraine funding, anyway. There’s been more bipartisan support for Israel, following the devastating sneak attack by Hamas earlier this month. But the public has mixed views about the extent to which the US should be involved in the conflict, and Biden has faced mounting pressure—in Washington and beyond—to rein in Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s retaliatory siege on Gaza.
Biden—who has pushed the Israeli government to allow aid to Gaza and warned against a ground incursion, even as he publicly supports the ally—did speak more directly Thursday about the plight of Palestinians and Muslim Americans than he had previously: He emphasized the “critical need for Israel to operate by the laws of war” and condemned the rise in Islamophobia, including the brutal killing last week of a six-year-old Palestinian American boy near Chicago in what authorities describe as a hate crime, motivated by the Israel-Hamas conflict. “We can’t stand by and stand silent when this happens,” Biden said.
But critics, including some in his own administration, say he has not spoken loudly enough about the humanitarian crisis in Gaza, and have called on him to de-escalate the situation. “The United States must help achieve an immediate ceasefire, or at minimum, a temporary cessation of all hostilities that stops the threats to civilians in Israel and Gaza,” Pramila Jayapal and a group of House progressives said in a statement as Biden visited Israel earlier this week. Biden, for his part, has declined to do so, instead calling Thursday for Americans to serve as the “arsenal for democracy.”
“We cannot and will not let terrorists like Hamas and tyrants like [Vladimir Putin] win,” Biden said.
The speech was a clear reflection of Biden’s somewhat hawkish approach to Israel policy. But more than that, it underscored his enduring belief in a kind of American exceptionalism: “America,” he said Thursday, is a beacon to the world—still.” He repeated that last word for emphasis—aware, it seems, that his audience may need more convincing.
[ad_2]
Eric Lutz
Source link

[ad_1]
WASHINGTON — Declaring that U.S. leadership “holds the world together,” President Joe Biden told Americans on Thursday night the country must deepen its support of Ukraine and Israel in the middle of two vastly different, unpredictable and bloody wars.
Acknowledging that “these conflicts can seem far away,” Biden insisted in a rare Oval Office address that they remain “vital for America’s national security” as he prepared to ask Congress for billions of dollars in military assistance for both countries.
“History has taught us when terrorists don’t pay a price for their terror, when dictators don’t pay a price for their aggression, they cause more chaos and death and more destruction,” Biden said. “They keep going. And the cost and the threat to America and the world keep rising.”
Read More: As U.S. Downs Israel-Bound Missiles From Yemen, Biden Faces Risk of Escalation
Biden’s speech reflected an expansive view of U.S. obligations overseas at a time when he faces political resistance at home to additional funding. He’s expected to ask for $105 billion on Friday, including $60 billion for Ukraine, much of which would replenish U.S. weapons stockpiles provided earlier.
There’s also $14 billion for Israel, $10 billion for unspecified humanitarian efforts, $14 billion for managing the U.S.-Mexico border and fighting fentanyl trafficking, and $7 billion for the Indo-Pacific region, which includes Taiwan. The proposal was described by three people familiar with the details who insisted on anonymity before the official announcement.
“It’s a smart investment that’s going to pay dividends for American security for generations,” Biden said.
Read More: U.S. General’s Prediction of War With China ‘in 2025’ Risks Turning Worst Fears Into Reality
He hopes that combining all of these issues into one piece of legislation will create the necessary coalition for congressional approval. His speech came the day after his high-stakes trip to Israel, where he showed solidarity with the country after the Oct. 7 attack by Hamas and pushed for more humanitarian assistance to Palestinians.
With Israel continuing to bombard the Gaza Strip and preparing a ground invasion, Biden placed an increased emphasis on the deadly toll that the conflict has had on civilians there, saying he’s “heartbroken by the tragic loss of Palestinian life.”
“Israel and Palestinians equally deserve to live in safety, dignity and peace,” Biden said. He also warned about a rising tide of antisemitism and Islamophobia in the U.S., noting the killing of Wadea Alfayoumi, a 6-year-old Palestinian-American boy.
“To all you hurting, I want you to know I see you. You belong,” Biden said. “And I want to say this to you. You’re all Americans.”
Read More: The Israel-Hamas War Is Leading to an Uptick in Hate Crimes
The White House said that after his speech, the President and First Lady Jill Biden spoke over the phone with Wadea’s father and uncle to express their “deepest condolences” and share their prayers for the recovery of the boy’s mother, who was also stabbed.
Biden included in his remarks a warning to Iran’s leaders, who have supported Hamas in Gaza and Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, and said the U.S. “will continue to hold them accountable.”
As Biden seeks a second term in a campaign that will likely hinge on voters’ feeling about the economy, he was careful to emphasize that the spending will create jobs for U.S. workers, referencing the construction of missiles in Arizona and artillery shells in Pennsylvania, Ohio, and Texas.
And he worked in a nod to one of his political heroes, Franklin Delano Roosevelt, by saying that “just as in World War II,” the country is “building the arsenal of democracy and serving the cause of freedom.”
Biden faces an array of steep challenges as he tries to secure the money. The House remains in chaos because the Republican majority has been unable to select a speaker to replace Rep. Kevin McCarthy, who was ousted more than two weeks ago.
Read More: Jim Jordan’s Dilemma Is What Happens When Bullying Backfires
In addition, conservative Republicans oppose money for sending more weapons to Ukraine as its battle against the Russian invasion approaches the two-year mark. Biden’s previous request for funding, which included $24 billion to help with the next few months of fighting, was stripped out of budget legislation last month despite a personal plea from Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.
There will be resistance from some on the other side of the political spectrum when it comes to military assistance for Israel, which has been bombarding the Gaza Strip in response to the Hamas attack on Oct. 7.
Critics have accused Israel of indiscriminately killing civilians and committing war crimes by cutting off essential supplies including food, water and fuel.
Read More: For Gazans, There Are No Safe Havens
Bipartisan support for Israel has already eroded in recent years as progressive Democrats have become more outspoken in their opposition to the country’s decades-long occupation of Palestinian territory, which is widely viewed as illegal by the international community.
There are rumbles of disagreement within Biden’s administration as well. Josh Paul, a State Department official who oversaw the congressional liaison office dealing with foreign arms sales, resigned over U.S. policy on weapons transfers to Israel.
“I cannot work in support of a set of major policy decisions, including rushing more arms to one side of the conflict, that I believe to be short-sighted, destructive, unjust and contradictory to the very values that we publicly espouse,” he wrote in a statement posted to his LinkedIn account.
A speech from the Oval Office is one of the most prestigious platforms that a President can command, an opportunity to try to seize the country’s attention at a moment of crisis. The major television networks broke into regular programming to carry the address live.
Biden has delivered only one other such speech during his presidency, after Congress passed bipartisan budget legislation to avert a default on the country’s debt.
The White House and other senior administration officials, including Office of Management and Budget Director Shalanda Young, have quietly briefed key lawmakers in recent days about the contours of the planned supplemental funding request.
The Democratic Senate plans to move quickly on Biden’s proposal, hoping that it creates pressure on the Republican-controlled House to resolve its leadership drama and return to legislating.
Read More: House Republicans Show Where Israel Ranks (Right Behind Their Infighting)
However, there are disagreements within the Senate, too, on how to move forward. Eight Republicans, led by Kansas Sen. Roger Marshall, said they did not want to combine assistance for Ukraine and Israel in the same legislation.
“These are two separate and unrelated conflicts and it would be wrong to leverage support of aid to Israel in an attempt to get additional aid for Ukraine across the finish line,” they wrote in a letter.
North Dakota Sen. Kevin Cramer said he was fine with the proposal as long as there was also a fresh effort to address border issues. But he said “it’s got to be designed to secure the border, not to facilitate travel through the border.”
Although there was a lull in migrant arrivals to the U.S. after the start of new asylum restrictions in May, illegal crossings topped a daily average of more than 8,000 last month.
Sen. Chris Murphy, a Connecticut Democrat who leads a Senate panel that oversees funding for the Department of Homeland Security, was wary of any effort to overhaul border policy during a debate over spending.
“How are we going to settle our differences over immigration in the next two weeks?” Murphy said. “This is a supplemental funding bill. The minute you start loading it up with policies, that sounds like a plan to fail.”
Biden’s decision to include funding for the Indo-Pacific in his proposal is a nod toward the potential for another international conflict. China wants to reunify the self-governing island of Taiwan with its mainland, a goal that could be carried out through force.
Although wars in Europe and the Middle East have been the most immediate concerns for U.S. foreign policy, Biden views Asia as the key arena in the struggle for global influence.
The administration’s national security strategy, released last year, describes China as “America’s most consequential geopolitical challenge.”
—Associated Press writers Matthew Lee, Mary Clare Jalonick, Kevin Freking and Darlene Superville and AP media writer David Bauder contributed to this report.
[ad_2]
Chris Megerian and Seung Min Kim / AP
Source link

[ad_1]
People are consuming more marijuana than ever, but the industry is still suffering significant growing pains. As the industry expands, bad players are being weeded out but New York and California have truly botched the legal system. The marijuana industry is primarily filled with small businesses like dispensaries, craft product makers, farmers and more. On the key issues preventing them from moving to profitability is banking and taxes. After a 3 year downturn (despite increased sales), the cannabis industry saw a ray of hpe in the SAFER Banking bill….but then the US House of Representatives devolved into one of the hottest messes in its storied history. So did Matt Gaetz (R-FL) put a knife in the cannabis industry?
RELATED: Unlicensed Shops in NYC Are Doing Better Than The Naked Cowboy
The Biden administration has been extremely slow in delivering on his campaign promise of increased federal legalization and an easier way to do business. The House passed SAFE Banking 7 times in bipartisan fashion, all failing in the Senate. This year, the Senate, with key sponsors of Senators Chuck Schumer (D-NY) and Patty Murray (D-WA) wrote the bill SAFER Banking and managed to get it out of committee.
WIth some bipartisan support, including Senator Tommy Tuberville (R-AL), the bill looked like it will pass the Senate and head to the House before going to the White House with hopes of Biden’s signature. The industry crossed fingers with hope and cannabis stocks inched upwards.
Then Representative Matt Gaetz ousted Rep. Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) as speaker and shut down Congress. For the last two weeks, GOP Representatives have been caught up in a vortex of a floor fight which shows little hope of abating soon. After twice losing, Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) announced he is pushing for a third floor vote for speaker. Until a speaker is elected, House bills remain stalled.
Senator David Daines (R-MT) is saying the the Senate will hold off on floor action until there’s a sense the House can pass a bill. But if they year ends, everything starts back at the beginning, and adds months of waiting to the beleaguered cannabis industry.
RELATED: Why Gen Z Is Putting Down Beer And Picking Up Marijuana
One issue around the lack of a SAFER Banking act is it makes it harder on the regular workers of businesses to get car, house and other traditional loans. Without SAFER Banking, this is seen as a negative and count against a regular worker who is holding onto a steady job. Even with a well paying job, banks are more likely to look at through a “no” lens.
So in a way, Matt Gaetz is also harming the working man and small business owner.
[ad_2]
Terry Hacienda
Source link

[ad_1]
Watch CBS News
Be the first to know
Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.
[ad_2]

[ad_1]
If there’s one thing that unifies Americans, it’s their hatred of so-called junk fees, or charges that are often hidden until payment is due and that can inflate the ultimate price of everything from food delivery to hotels and bank accounts. Now, the Biden administration says it’s taking aim at the practice by proposing a rule that would ban businesses from the practice.
The move comes days after California Gov. Gavin Newsom signed a new law that bans junk fees effective starting July 1, 2024, and as the Biden administration had earlier called for a crackdown on the practice.
The Federal Trade Commission’s proposed rule banning junk fees comes after it received 12,000 comments from consumers and businesses on how such fees impact them, FTC Chair Lina Khan said on a conference call with reporters to discuss the rule.
Junk fees not only cost Americans billions annually in unnecessary charges, but also hurt the economy by suppressing competition among businesses, officials said on the call. The proposed rule would require businesses that rely on junk fees to provide refunds to consumers, and those companies could face monetary penalties.
“Junk fees have been creeping across the economy, and Americans are tired and fed up,” Rohit Chopra, director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, said on the call.
Businesses would face a penalty if $50,000 per violation under the proposed FTC rule, officials said.
The CFPB is also taking aim at a practice employed by some big banks in which customers are charged to gain basic information about their accounts, such as their balance, Chopra said.
“We are issuing a new policy to ensure the largest banks in the country play it straight with consumers,” he said. “Today’s guidance outlines a pretty basic concept: When people request basic information about their account, banks can’t change them big fees.”
The FTC said that banning junk fees will also free up about 50 million hours of consumers’ time, as they won’t have to search for the total price for purchases like hotels or tickets.
“These junk fees make it harder for people to choose the best product or service,” Khan said on the call.
The FTC will next publish the proposed rule in the Federal Register, and consumers can submit comments online for 60 days after that.
[ad_2]