ReportWire

Tag: Berlin Film Festival 2024

  • ‘Brief History of a Family’ Review: Subtle Psychological Thriller Puts a Contemporary Chinese Family Under the Microscope

    ‘Brief History of a Family’ Review: Subtle Psychological Thriller Puts a Contemporary Chinese Family Under the Microscope

    [ad_1]

    Identified only by their last name, Tu, the husband and wife in Brief History of a Family have built their comfortably middle-class life together in accordance with China’s one-child policy. Now, in less restrictive times, a chance to expand their nuclear unit arrives in the form of their teenage son’s mysterious new friend. From shifting perspectives, writer-director Lin Jianjie examines the contained volatility of this four-person configuration. His stylistic choices can be spot-on or self-conscious in their artifice, but his debut feature reveals a talent to watch. With its intriguing performances, narrative restraint and unanswered questions, the movie delivers a strong pull of yearning as well as tantalizing currents of suspicion and dread.

    The two boys are schoolmates who apparently have never interacted until the day Wei (Lin Muran) makes an overture of friendship that’s less innocent than it seems. The studious loner Shuo (Sun Xilun) becomes a regular guest at the Tus’ well-appointed high-rise apartment, igniting a simmering resentment in Wei and, in a low-key, nonsexual spin on Teorema, drawing out the parents’ unresolved emotions.

    Brief History of a Family

    The Bottom Line

    Strikingly enigmatic.

    Venue: Berlin Film Festival (Panorama)
    Cast: Zu Feng, Guo Keyu, Sun Xilun, Lin Muran
    Director-screenwriter: Lin Jianjie

    1 hour 40 minutes

    The father (Zu Feng) is a biologist, the mother (Guo Keyu) a former flight attendant, information we learn upon Shuo’s first visit: Taking in the view and the spaciousness and the elegant consumer trappings (fine work by production designer Xu Yao), he asks Wei, “What do your parents do?” In an incisive and humorous signal of the class divide between them, Shuo requests soy sauce at the dinner table and Wei’s mother, somewhat taken aback, offers him four types of the condiment. Having chosen, he douses his rice with it, his gastronomical gaucheness provoking a shocked silence.

    Another kind of silence greets Shuo’s disclosure that his mother died suddenly when he was 10. Bit by bit, bruise by bruise, he divulges that his father is a violent alcoholic. But Lin offers no glimpses of the boy’s home life, leaving us — and eventually one central character — to wonder if everything he says is true.

    The helmer keeps the story centered on the stylish space of the Tu apartment, which, after a crucial offscreen incident, becomes Shuo’s home too. But well before that turn of events, Shuo has insinuated himself into the family. Moving through their apartment’s hallway, past the feng shui fish tank, he’s no mere wanderer but, in his quiet way, purposeful. He hears Mrs. Tu’s meditation tapes in one room, Mr. Tu’s Bach in another, and Wei’s video games in the boy’s bedroom. The first time he spends the night, he has no qualms about asserting his preferences when Wei lends him clothes.

    In a late-night conversation with Wei’s mother, Shuo draws her out with an impressive off-the-cuff tenderness. Guo, who first made her mark onscreen as a teenager and for whom this film is a return to acting after a nearly 10-year break, offers a compelling portrait of gentleness, maternal warmth and regret. The heightened vision of her in the supermarket, not quite lost but incongruously fancied up, hints at some of the more surreal moments ahead from Lin and cinematographer Zhang Jiahao. Shooting in Chengdu, Hangzhou and Beijing, they create an unspecified city with an emphasis on its enormity, the edifices (and the produce displays) dwarfing the characters.

    Zu brings a colder form of constraint, with revealing cracks in the surface, to the role of Wei’s father, who’s impressed by Shuo’s focus and drive. The boy’s ambition is precisely what Mr. Tu longs for from his son, who’s ordinary in his insolent teenage laziness and more interested in fencing than the advanced English program his father insists he enroll in. Soon, Shuo is taking Wei’s place in the parents’ Ivy League dreams, and literally stands in for their son on a family weekend getaway.

    Bringing Shuo into their fold, the parents find themselves on newly unstable ground, unsettled but also renewed. For Mrs. Tu especially, Shuo represents a second shot at parenthood, a way of healing an emotional wound — a wound that can easily be torn open, as when another couple (Wang Shi and Zhu Zhu) announce that, in light of the reversal of longtime government policy, they’re expecting their second child.

    With minimal dialogue, the two young actors Sun and Lin evince a subtle reversal. Their unforced performances leave us to wonder, in Shuo’s watchful maneuvers and Wei’s increasingly stricken gaze, who’s helping whom, and who’s being honest — questions of identity mirrored in the reflective surfaces within the family home and their slightly confounding effect.

    The boys, in their adolescent confusion and awakening, waver between the impulse to save and the impulse to hurt. There’s an undertow of potential violence to the drama, percolating in its dark, propulsive score by Toke Brorson Odin (Winter Brothers), its suspenseful sound design by Margot Testemale and Jacques Pedersen, and the unrushed precision of Per K. Kirkegaard’s editing.

    There’s also a hallucinatory sensibility at times, and at others a scientific slant. Lin, who has a degree in bioinformatics, uses a circle motif that likens the four central characters to cells viewed on a microscope slide, and compares the coursing of blood through veins to people’s transit through city streets. Some of these visual gambits stop rather than deepen the story, but those pauses are momentary. If the biological metaphors don’t always click, the aching and perhaps dangerous dance among four wounded people never misses.

    [ad_2]

    Sheri Linden

    Source link

  • ‘The Devil’s Bath’ Review: A Disturbing Psychodrama About a Woman Driven to Extremes in 18th-Century Rural Austria

    ‘The Devil’s Bath’ Review: A Disturbing Psychodrama About a Woman Driven to Extremes in 18th-Century Rural Austria

    [ad_1]

    Austrian filmmaking duo Veronika Franz and Severin Fiala seemingly never met a remote woodland setting that didn’t feel like the right place to strand a traumatized woman. Following Goodnight Mommy (the chilling 2014 original, not the limp American remake) and their English language debut The Lodge, they inch away from horror without relinquishing the unsettling atmosphere or taste for the macabre in their intense character study, The Devil’s Bath (Des Teufels Bad). While it’s punishingly grim and has some pacing issues, this is a gripping psychological study by directors operating with formidable command.

    Early on, Franz and Fiala’s new film recalls Robert Eggers’ The Witch, despite being set more than a century later, in 1750. It has a comparable emphasis on ambience and authentic historical detail, which is possibly even more granular here. But vague suggestions of witchcraft quickly turn out to be misleading, with the story instead fueled by converging forces of religion, folklore and nature.

    The Devil’s Bath

    The Bottom Line

    Not horror but still plenty horrific.

    Venue: Berlin Film Festival (Competition)
    Cast: Anja Plaschg, Maria Hofstatter, David Scheid, Natalija Baranova, Camilla Schielin, Lorenz Trobinger, Claudia Martini, Agnes Lampl, Lukas Walcher, Reinhold Felsinger
    Director-screenwriters: Veronika Franz, Severin Fiala

    2 hours 1 minute

    Produced by Ulrich Seidl, the film was acquired ahead of its Berlin competition premiere by Shudder for North America and other key territories and is slated for a summer release.

    The devil’s bath — no, it’s not that tub Barry Keoghan slurped from right after Jacob Elordi stepped out in Saltburn — was 18th-century vernacular for melancholia. Franz and Fiala build their film around historical research on the period, when chronic depression drove hundreds of people across Europe — predominantly women — to escape the hell of their daily lives by committing murder. That allowed them to repent and seek absolution in confession before they were executed, rather than face eternal damnation for the unpardonable sin of suicide. The phenomenon is sometimes referred to as suicide by proxy.

    Victims for the most part were children, prompted by the profoundly messed-up Catholic reasoning that their souls were still pure, so their killers were almost doing them a favor by sending them to heaven before they could sin.

    The writer-directors remove any doubt about where their story is headed by plastering a quote up front: “As my troubles left me weary of this life, it came to me to commit a murder.” An unsettling prologue shows one woman taking that desperate course of action with a baby at a waterfall in the rocky forests of Upper Austria, before walking through dense mist to the local authorities to declare: “I’ve committed a crime.”

    The lingering after-effects of that infanticide remain in plain sight as a gruesome warning when the deeply religious young protagonist, Agnes (Anja Plaschg), marries and moves to an austere stone cottage in the area.

    Clearly someone with a strong connection to nature, Agnes takes pleasure twisting twigs and leaves and berries into a wedding garland. But already at the exuberant village celebration, there are indications that her new husband, Wolf (David Scheid), might prefer the company of his drinking buddies. His disinterest in sex on their wedding night and thereafter makes her feel alone in her new home, her prayers to be blessed with a child going unanswered.

    Agnes’ unhappiness isn’t helped by the constant presence of Wolf’s overbearing mother (Maria Hofstatter), who criticizes almost everything her daughter-in-law does from the outset. That goes for her efforts to pitch in with the fishing haul, her organization of the kitchen or her habit of wandering off into the woods for hours instead of being at home to look after the goats and chickens and cook her husband’s dinner.

    When the sour crone spots a vase of foliage Agnes has gathered, she tells her: “Throw this rubbish out.” She has no use for anything that’s not strictly utilitarian, making Agnes seem ethereal and out of place as she arranges her collection of dead insects or turns her face toward a patch of sunlight as a butterfly alights on her skin.

    While she’s out in the woods Agnes is startled to find a grisly tableau with the corpse of the murderer from the prologue, seated in a chair, with most of her fingers and toes hacked off and her severed head sitting on a table alongside her. An illustration tacked to a tree describes the events that put her there. But as Agnes keeps returning to the site, her morbid fascination shows pity and perhaps a kind of kinship.

    Franz and Fiala never overplay the hardships of Agnes’ situation in her new home. They make Wolf a decent enough man, not without compassion, though perhaps unsuited for marriage, while Agnes is too much of a dreamer to pass muster with his hard-bitten mother. The old woman blames her daughter-in-law for her failure to conceive a child.

    But Agnes’ mental state steadily deteriorates as she realizes she’s destined to remain childless and virtually alone. She’s badly shaken by a tragedy in the village, and an attempt to run away and return to her family ends with Wolf dragging her back, screaming and hysterical. She takes to her bed and begins ingesting small doses of rat poison, physically weakening her and sending her mind on hallucinatory detours.

    The movie can be slow going; the buildup to Agnes’ final spiral feels protracted given that we know from the start some version of what’s coming, making the story drag a little around the midpoint. But the filmmakers harness the pathos of ordinary women imprisoned in soul-crushing lives as a timeless sorrow, and Plaschg is harrowingly effective at showing how Agnes keeps retreating deeper inside herself, pushing her to violence. Even with a preordained outcome, the dire means of her release from suffering are both shocking and heart-wrenching.

    In addition to playing the demanding lead role, onscreen for pretty much the entire two-hour duration, Plaschg composed the mournful score (she records as Soap&Skin), dominated by pensive strings that take on darker, more disturbing tones as the story progresses to its inexorable conclusion, its horrific impact heightened by the decision to skip right over any trial proceedings. The fast-tempo festive tunes for the wedding celebration are echoed in sickly fashion with the even more ebullient revelry sparked by Agnes being brought to justice.

    The barbaric behavior of onlookers at an execution is quite literally blood-curdling, but Franz and Fiala refuse to play even the most graphic elements as horror. They stick to a rigorous naturalistic style, weaving a remarkably vivid tapestry of 18th-century life in a rural peasant community — villagers picking up stones from the field, or lining up for a small blackened loaf of bread after their day’s work. The fishing scenes in a large mudbound pond are especially fascinating; the labor involved makes your back ache just watching.

    Unlike his orderly compositions for Goodnight Mommy, cinematographer Martin Gschlacht here adopts a less formal style that veers almost toward documentary. He brings somber earth tones to the low-light environments and the wintry locations, capturing the harshness of the land but also an occasional image of painterly beauty. The contributions of production designers Andreas Donhauser and Renate Martin and costumer Tanja Hausner are essential to the enveloping effect of this bleak but riveting drama about a little-known piece of history.

    [ad_2]

    David Rooney

    Source link

  • Berlin: Why Streamers’ Belt Tightening Casts A Shadow Over Indies

    Berlin: Why Streamers’ Belt Tightening Casts A Shadow Over Indies

    [ad_1]

    The European Film Market is off to a strong start, buoyed by post-strike optimism and a truly impressive lineup of projects on offer in Berlin this year, including available indie movies with the A-list draws of stars such as Margot Robbie, Dave Bautista, Scarlett Johansson, and Will Smith. Coming off a solid Sundance and improving box office figures, both in the U.S. and Europe, hope appears to be slowly returning to an indie film industry that seemed near the brink just six months ago.

    But many EFM sellers still see a cloud over the horizon with the unresolved issue of the home entertainment market, particularly the all-important pay-one window. Ancillary revenues have always been the true driver of the indie market, but as streaming comes to dominate post-theatrical exploitation and the biggest platforms are pulling back on how much independent fare they buy, many are questioning how indie movies can make the numbers work.

    “We’ve all become more and more beholden to the streamers for ancillary revenue, and those license fees have been dramatically reduced,” says one veteran seller. “If you’re building a finance model for an independent film, these days, your return on that pay-one window is probably going to be a third of what you would have expected just a few years ago. There’s just not enough revenue from at-home markets to cover production costs for most films.”

    Headline-making deals, like Netflix’s $17 million acquisition of Greg Jardin’s horror thriller It’s What’s Inside, or Amazon’s $15 million buy of Megan Park’s comedy My Old Ass, both out of Sundance this year, are not, sellers say, making up for the broader loss of pay-one revenue as streamers overall buy fewer indie movies.

    ‘It’s What’s Inside’

    Courtesy of Sundance Institute

    It’s no surprise that most active independent buyers, the likes of A24 and Bleecker Street, have pay-one output deals in place (with Warner Bros. Discovery and Paramount Global’s Showtime Networks, respectively) that guarantee ancillary monies for their entire slate.

    “The future state of streaming platforms and their acquisition strategies are critical to the survival of independent film,” says J.J Caruth, president of domestic marketing and distribution at Highland Film Group’s U.S. distribution arm The Avenue. “Without having that pay-one window revenue, financing independent films becomes that much more challenging.”

    Caruth also sees a divide between streamer demand for mainstream genre films —she points to The Avenue’s action thriller Land of Bad starring Liam and Luke Hemsworth alongside Russell Crowe, as “exactly the type of content streamers are looking for” —with the more “unique edgy indie fare” —think Celine Song’s Past Lives, Justine Triet’s Anatomy of a Fall or Wim Wenders’ Perfect Days — that are pulling in audiences in theaters “but might not necessarily work as well for the platforms.”

    Genre films like The Avenue’s actioner ‘Land of Bad’ are still popular with streamers but harder to make work at the box office.

    The Avenue

    “Those kinds of generic action movies are great for Netflix and Amazon but they no longer have currency as a theatrical movie,” notes one European-based packager and seller, pointing to Liam Neeson’s Retribution, which earned just $7 million domestically for Roadside Attractions, or Millennium Media’s Expend4bles, which earned less than $17 million at the domestic box office for Lionsgate, the worst performance, by far, of the Expendables franchise.

    But Joe Lewis, CEO of Amplify Pictures, sees new opportunities in the streaming market as platforms shift away from their walled-garden approach of global all-rights deals and begin to “enter into an age of non-exclusively with is super-exciting…You can put your stuff out on multiple VOD platforms now and you see that the numbers aren’t cannibalizing each other, in fact, they can be additive.”

    Instead of a one-size-fits-all deal with a streamer, “essentially a cost plus deal, where you give up all global rights forever,” Lewis says indie producers can get creative with windowing rights, “putting together money from different sources” to allow “the value of a project to be better correlated with its success.”

    Caruth agrees, noting that the recent strategic shift by the streamers, “where they are beginning to license and window content” and be more flexible with rights deals makes her “cautiously optimistic again.”

    But, given the increasingly vital importance of streaming revenue to indie films, and the increasing dominance of a handful of vertically-integrated producer/distributor platforms, a long-term solution for the pay-one window problem is still out of sight.

    “I’m going to say something which will probably ensure that I never get hired by one of these streamers, but without some form of regulation, as they have in Europe to require platforms to buy a certain amount from the independents, it’s going to be very hard for independent producers and independent films to survive,” says Caruth. “But for the streamers, regulation is a four-letter word.”

    [ad_2]

    Scott Roxborough

    Source link

  • Berlin Hidden Gem: ’90s Nostalgia, Media and Horror Collide in ‘I Saw the TV Glow’

    Berlin Hidden Gem: ’90s Nostalgia, Media and Horror Collide in ‘I Saw the TV Glow’

    [ad_1]

    From beefcake Calvin Klein ads to Dungeons & Dragons, 1990s pop culture is hitting peak nostalgia. But in A24’s I Saw the TV Glow, writer-director Jane Schoenbrun examines the decade with a fresh eye, weaving a trans coming-of-age tale into a suburban horror story and a tribute to ’90s teen television. 

    Schoenbrun’s follow-up to 2021’s We’re All Going to the World’s Fair, the film follows Owen (Justice Smith and Ian Foreman play the character at different ages), a lonely teenager trying to find themselves in a body and world that both feel foreign. Owen’s life starts to change when they meet Maddy (Brigette Lundy-Paine), a slightly older queer teen who introduces them to a TV show called The Pink Opaque, about high schoolers battling supernatural forces. Owen and Maddy escape into the show’s fictional universe, which, while frightening in its own right, makes more sense than reality, and they bond deeply with the show’s characters.

    “It’s a very strange phenomenon that I don’t think people take seriously, but certainly as a dissociated queer kid in the suburbs, many of my closest emotional relationships were with characters on Buffy the Vampire Slayer,” Schoenbrun says, referencing one of the iconic ’90s shows that lend mythology and allegory to the film.

    TV Glow even features a cameo by Amber Benson, who played Tara Maclay, a beloved queer character on Buffy who some fans feel was ill-served by the show. “I was like, if I can put Amber Benson onscreen in my movie,” Schoenbrun says, “it’s almost this gift to myself and to others of righting a wrong.”

    Nineties kids will find the film rife with satisfying nods to the era, from allusions to Goosebumps and The Smashing Pumpkins to a supporting performance by Limp Bizkit frontman Fred Durst, who plays Owen’s terrifying, homophobic father.

    While Schoenbrun incorporated such allusions partly to pay tribute to things they found beautiful in ’90s pop culture, their choices speak to the ways in which culture shapes identity and helps us make sense of the world.

    “We are all ourselves, and we’re also conditioned by the invisible signals we’re receiving from all around us,” Schoenbrun observes. “At least for me, I think these glimpses of other worlds through a screen in childhood were often signals of some form of magic or otherness or possibility hidden in a way on the margins of the normative world that I was growing up in, that made some kind of promise to me. And I don’t think that this is an experience that only queer trans people go through.”

    But it’s not just identity that’s being illuminated by all those screens that surround us — Schoenbrun says media has the potential to shape our reality. “I think we look for ourselves all around us as a species, and we’re looking to our parents to tell us who we are. We’re looking to society, we’re looking at our peers. But I think, especially in our media-saturated environment, we’re looking to the glow of the screen and we’re looking to fiction to help define our understanding of reality.”

    [ad_2]

    Mia Galuppo

    Source link

  • Berlin: Cillian Murphy on How Christopher Nolan Influenced His Fest Opener ‘Small Things Like These’

    Berlin: Cillian Murphy on How Christopher Nolan Influenced His Fest Opener ‘Small Things Like These’

    [ad_1]

    It continues to be a busy winter for Cillian Murphy, having landed a best actor Oscar nomination for his $1 billion grosser Oppenheimer. Nonetheless, Murphy will be on hand at the Berlin Film Festival for the opening night premiere of his latest film, Small Things Like These.

    Directed by Tim Mielants, the period drama is adapted from the novel of the same name by Irish writer Claire Keegan — who also wrote the source material for Colm Bairéad’s Oscar-nominated drama The Quiet Girl — and plays out in a small Irish town in 1985 in the weeks before Christmas. Murphy plays Bill Furlong, a coal merchant and family man who becomes aware of abuse happening at the local convent, abuse that forces him to confront the trauma of his own childhood and make a moral choice. The backdrop is the real history of the Magdalene Laundries, asylums and workhouses run by the Catholic Church in Ireland purportedly for the purpose of employing and educating “fallen women.”

    Ahead of Berlin, Murphy talked to THR about producing Small Things Like These, shooting on location in many of the places portrayed in the novel, and an important lesson he learned from Christopher Nolan.

    How did you discover Claire Keegan’s book, Small Things Like These?

    Murphy I’m a fan of Claire Keegan as a writer, and I had read the book early. Then it stayed in my head for a long time, but then I thought I’d left it until too late and that the rights would be gone. I inquired about the rights and, miraculously, they were still available. I think there was a few people bidding, but, luckily, we got it. I immediately asked my friend and longtime collaborator [Irish playwright] Enda Walsh to write it. I know and trust him so well, and he knows that world and he loves Claire. Then a few things happened kind of coincidentally and very quickly. My producing partner, Alan Moloney, I brought it to him and he said, “OK, let’s do it.” Then I brought it to Matt Damon and he said, “Let’s do it.” At the time, they were just setting up their studio company [Artists Equity, the production shingle Damon formed with Ben Affleck]. It was serendipitous, in many ways.

    What about the story made you think it could be due for a film adaptation?

    On the page, it is a tiny, tiny story, but it’s grappling with these huge themes. I felt that we could make a beautiful, meditative film that was very atmospheric and emotional. It already had what most scripts really struggle with: a killer ending. That’s what I’m always looking for because scripts with a good third act are so hard to find. I also felt like the character was complex and difficult to play, because he said so little, but there was so much under the surface. I love that challenge. Also, for my country and where I’m from, we’re still dealing with the trauma of all of this. I always think that art can be more powerful than government papers, editorials or academic papers. Art can sometimes help with that healing in a more powerful way.

    Why was it important to film on location in New Ross, where the book is set?

    It felt to me that the town is like a character in the book. Once we got the rights and Enda was writing the script, we immediately went on a location scout in New Ross. It had never been used as a location before. It was just so beautiful, and so perfect. We could feel the energy of the novel as we walked in the streets. The second thing that I think is very important — and I’ve learned a lot from Chris Nolan about it — is the power of shooting and locations and not building sets. We didn’t build a single set on this film, every single location is real. We shot the exterior of the [Magdalene] Laundry that’s in the novel. That Furlong house is a tiny house we found on a terraced street. I feel like that changes the energy of the film, in terms of the aesthetic of it, but also for the actors and director. It’s not practical, because you’re trying to get a crew and cameras and lights into these tiny little spaces, but it does pay off, emotionally.

    We did an awful lot of scouting for a long time. None of our locations have been used before in films. In Ireland, in any town or city, there are locations that show up all the time. Our production designer managed to find new versions of these things [in New Ross] that had never been filmed before. It was eerie and quite difficult sometimes, like [shooting] in those actual laundries. You can feel the energy, and you know what went down there. We were all very aware of that.

    How was it filming in the community where the events of the book took place?

    It couldn’t have been more helpful. They were also delighted that we were there. We cast a lot of the kids locally, we cast a lot of the background artists locally. All the counselors and the local politicians and everybody couldn’t have been more helpful in giving us access to the streets. We couldn’t have shot it anywhere else, because of all those deep streets and that river that runs through the town, with the spires everywhere and the presence of the Catholic Church, it’s almost like a garrison town. It’s everywhere you look.

    The story reaches a fever pitch when Bill if forced to sit across from the head of the laundry, Sister Mary (played by Emily Watson), as she attempts to intimidate him into silence. How did you go about tackling that moment? 

    That was the centerpiece of the story, from Bill’s point of view. [Sister Mary] is this omnipresent character, but we don’t get to meet her until that point, and that was the biggest scene in the film. Most of the writing and the dialogue is so small and minimal, and we knew we had to have this big showdown in the middle. But, again, none of it is in the actual text, all the meaning is in the subtext and the silence. Emily Watson is one of my favorite actors in the world, and I thought, “Wouldn’t it just be a miracle if we could get her to play the part?” In that scene, she’s terrifying, and it follows the beats of a traditional Mafia intimidation scene, even the payoff at the end. But that was very true to the book. That’s how you intimidate a community.

    Cillian Murphy and Tim Mielant on the set of ‘Small Things Like These’

    Courtesy of FilmNation

    Did you have time to rehearse before filming?

    I’m not a big fan of rehearsals. It was quite nice being producer on this in that, in tandem with [director] Tim [Mielants], we could work out where we wanted to do this. Because we had a lot of kids in the movie and a lot of nonactors in the movie, it’s best to just save it for the set. Myself and Eileen Walsh, who plays my wife, we have been friends for 27 years. I did my first ever job with her. We didn’t really need to rehearse because Tim said when you put the camera on us, you could just feel the history between us because we’ve known each other that long. With our five daughters, we didn’t rehearse at all. We hung out with them and we made cakes together. But many times in their scenes, Tim just ran the camera, didn’t say “action.” They’re really just behaving naturally. I think that’s very important because for young actors, at times, it can be intimidating if you say “action” and “cut.” It really felt like a little family being in that tiny little kitchen and I’m really proud of how natural those things are. That’s because on the day, we didn’t overthink it.

    The story is a period drama, set in 1985. How did you and the filmmakers go about portraying that time in Ireland?

    When you read the book, you think this could be the ’50s. It only occasionally gives you some of this political kind of context of the time, so we never wanted to put up a title saying it’s 1985. You hear it sometimes in the soundtrack or you hear [Irish politician Ian] Paisley on the radio very, very subtly in the background. We did want to make it so that you were in this last moment [of a certain] time in Ireland. In between the ’50s and the ’80s, there wasn’t a huge amount of progression, socially. We wanted to keep it like that. Equally with the flashbacks, [Bill’s] memories, we never wanted to shoot them in a sepia tone, or say, “This is 1955.” We wanted to make it as much part of the fabric of the film and his character as possible. It means that the audience has to do a little bit of work to figure out what’s going on, but once the pattern is established, it’s very, very clear. I’ve always believed that the audiences are super smart. They like a little bit of work, and they like to be asked to keep up.

    This film is about a specific place and time in Ireland. What do you hope non-Irish audiences take from the story?

    There’s a wonderful universality in this story, mostly because of the specificity of it. We’ve shown this movie in Los Angeles, in the U.K., in Ireland, and our audiences have all responded to it on a very deep emotional level. That’s exactly what we wanted to achieve. 

    [ad_2]

    Mia Galuppo

    Source link

  • Berlin Fest Pulls Invites for Far-Right Politicians After Backlash

    Berlin Fest Pulls Invites for Far-Right Politicians After Backlash

    [ad_1]

    The Berlin Film Festival has pulled invites for members of the German far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) party for the opening ceremony of the 2024 Berlinale on Feb. 15 after a media backlash.

    “We have… today written to all previously invited AfD politicians and informed them that they are not welcome at the Berlinale,” Berlinale’s directors Mariëtte Rissenbeek and Carlo Chatrian said in a statement on Thursday.

    The invitations offered to AfD politicians Kristin Brinker and Ronald Gläser, both members of the Berlin State Parliament, led to a group of film professionals from Berlin and abroad signing an open letter to the festival protesting the decision. The letter stated the invitation to AfD politicians was “incompatible” with the Berlinale’s commitment “to being a place of ’empathy, awareness and understanding,’” the filmmakers wrote.

    Fest organizers in their announcement acknowledged “an intense discussion in the cultural sector, in the press and on social media as well as within the Berlinale team about the invitations of AfD politicians, a right-wing extremist party, to the opening of the Berlinale.”

    “Especially in light of the revelations that have been made in recent weeks about explicitly anti-democratic positions and individual politicians of the AfD, it is important for us — as the Berlinale and as a team — to take an unequivocal stand in favour of an open democracy,” Rissenbeek and Chatrian added in their statement.

    The Berlinale is largely state-funded, with the federal government providing around $14 million to the festival annually. The AfD is not currently part of the government federally or in any of the German states, but the party has been gaining support and is currently polling second nationwide at around 20 percent of the vote.

    “In times when right-wing extremists are moving into parliaments, the Berlinale wants to take a clear position by taking a clear stance with today’s disinvitation of the AfD. The discussion on how to deal with AfD politicians also affects many other organisations and festivals. This debate must be conducted across society as a whole and together with all democratic parties,” the festival added.

    The controversy over the AfD politician invites also follows in recent weeks hundreds of thousands of Germans taking to the streets to protest a report by the investigative group Correctiv that revealed details of a meeting between senior AfD members and wealthy German corporate figures where they discussed a plot to deport asylum seekers and German citizens of foreign origin en masse once they came to power.

    [ad_2]

    Etan Vlessing

    Source link