ReportWire

Tag: bbc

  • Everything we know about Call the Midwife’s Christmas special for 2025

    [ad_1]

    Call the Midwife is ringing in the festive season in style this year, returning with not one but two Christmas specials for 2025. And, true to form, Poplar is set for plenty of joy, heartache and classic midwifery drama.

    While series 15 lands on BBC One in January 2026, fans have a double helping of festive storytelling to enjoy first – always the sparkling gems of the BBC’s Christmas lineup.

    In a treat for long-time viewers, this year’s specials will take part of the action overseas. Senior members of Nonnatus House will travel to Hong Kong on a mercy mission, while the younger midwives remain in Poplar to hold the fort – and inevitably face chaos of their own.

    Here’s everything you need to know about the Call the Midwife Christmas special 2025…

    Christmas has arrived at Nonnatus House (Credit: BBC/Neal Street Productions/Nicky Johnston)

    Is there a Call the Midwife Christmas special 2025?

    Yes, there are actually two festive episodes this year, just like we had in 2024.

    Last year, the series changed from the traditional 90-minute Christmas episode to two one-hour offerings. This year will be the same, with the series picking up shortly after where series 14 ended.

    The last series saw romance blossom between Cyril and Rosalind as they spent more time together. Will they get to enjoy their first Christmas as a couple without any drama?

    Series 14 also saw Nancy and Roger get married on the same day as welcoming a daughter into the world. It has been revealed that Nancy has left Poplar to live with Roger, along with their new baby girl and Nancy’s eldest daughter, Colette. Could someone new be heading to Nonnatus House to replace her?

    Trixie dressed as an angel for Call the Midwife Christmas special 2025
    Trixie gets into the festive spirit this Christmas (Credit: BBC/Neal Street Productions/Olly Courtney)

    What is the plot for the festive special?

    With the senior staff on a mercy mission in Hong Kong, there will be a different feel to this year’s yuletide offering.

    As Fred and Violet head to Hong Kong to visit her son, Derek, they soon find that death and destruction have hit after a devastating building collapse at the Mother House. Soon, Doctor Turner, Shelagh, Sister Julienne, Sister Veronica and Nurse Crane head to Hong Kong to join them on a mercy mission.

    Once there, the team discover nuns and orphans are among the injured. But it’s not just finding medical supplies and abandoned babies that the team faces – there is also an outbreak of tuberculosis and terrifying triads to contend with.

    Meanwhile, Doctor Turner and Shelagh try to track down May’s birth mother, Esther, in the Walled City, but soon unearth an underground crime network that leaves them with an impossible decision to make.

    Speaking of filming in the usually sun-drenched Far East, show creator Heidi Thomas said: “We were hit with a typhoon while filming, but the cast and crew were back on set the following day. The water was up to their knees, and some of the scenes were filmed in wellies!”

    Fred and Violet arrive in Hong Kong
    Fred and Violet arrive in Hong Kong for the Call the Midwife Christmas special 2025 (Credit: BBC/Neal Street Productions/Charmaine Man)

    What is happening in Poplar?

    We will also still be getting a traditional Call the Midwife Christmas we all know and love, as the younger staff from Nonnatus House stay at home to spend the festive period in snowy Poplar.

    Back in London, Trixie and Geoffrey find an elderly man, Mr Fischer, lying in the snow. They walk him home and discover he has a terminal blood disorder. As his health declines, Sister Monica Joan visits, as she remembered delivering his sibling in the same flat. But will she be able to bring him comfort in his final hours?

    Also in Poplar, Rosalind and Joyce host a Christmas gathering with their friends and colleagues. One treat you must watch out for is seeing Timothy, Geoffrey and Harry as we have never seen them before!

    Shelagh helping a patient in Hong Kong
    Shelagh is on hand to help in Hong Kong (Credit: BBC/Neal Street Productions/Charmaine Man(

    Who is in the cast for the Call the Midwife Christmas specials 2025?

    All the familiar faces fans adore will be back for this year’s Call the Midwife Christmas specials.

    Helen George returns as Trixie Franklin for both the festive episodes and season 15, joined once again by Jenny Agutter as Sister Julienne and Linda Bassett as the ever-dependable Nurse Phyllis Crane.

    Rebecca Gethings is back as Sister Veronica, Georgie Glen reprises her role as Miss Higgins, and Judy Parfitt returns as the cherished Sister Monica Joan. Sister Hilda, played by Fenella Woolgar, will also be part of the new instalments.

    The younger midwives are back too, with Renee Bailey as Joyce Highland and Natalie Quarry as Rosalind Clifford. Over at the Turner household, Stephen McGann returns as Doctor Turner, along with Laura Main as Shelagh and Max Macmillan as Timothy. Alice Brown, April Rae Hoang and Edward Shaw also return as Angela, May and little Teddy.

    Poplar favourites Cliff Parisi and Annabelle Apsion are back as Fred and Violet Buckle, while Daniel Laurie returns as Reggie Jackson and Zephryn Taitte as Cyril Robinson.

    Series 14’s newest addition, Molly Vevers, reprises her role as Sister Catherine – the thoughtful Scottish postulant who took her vows in last year’s finale and is continuing her midwifery training.

    And bringing some much-needed levity, Trixie’s lovable brother Geoffrey, played by Christopher Harper, is also back. Eisa Latif returns too as Harry, Miss Higgins’ grandson, ready to add a little extra festive sparkle.

    Nurse Crane helping a patient in Hong Kong for the Call the Midwife Christmas special 2025
    Nurse Crane is in her element helping others after the building collapse (Credit: BBC/Neal Street Productions/Charmaine Man)

    When is the Call the Midwife Christmas special?

    The BBC hasn’t confirmed the exact broadcast dates or times just yet, but Call the Midwife’s Christmas specials almost always land on Christmas Day and Boxing Day.

    All signs point to the 2025 episodes following that familiar festive tradition once again.

    Read more: Call the Midwife fans thrilled as BBC announces new series, prequel series and a film

    Leave us a comment on our Facebook page @EntertainmentDailyFix and let us know if you’ll be watching Call the Midwife’s Christmas special?

    [ad_2]

    Claire Crick

    Source link

  • BBC’s ‘brilliantly addictive’ 6-part drama is trending now

    [ad_1]

    The BBC‘s latest scandal-filled drama has arrived on TV screens, and it’s currently climbing BBC iPlayer’s ‘Most Popular’ chart. The six-part series, Wild Cherry, is created and penned by Nicôle Lecky, known for her BAFTA-winning drama Mood, and follows ultra-rich families living in the gated community of Richford Lake. Eve Best (House of the Dragon) and Carmen Ejogo (True Detective) star as two mothers whose friendship is tested when their daughters become wrapped up in a shocking scandal. 

    With plenty of glamour, high-stakes tension and teen drama, it’s no wonder that the series is being compared to shows like Gossip Girl and Desperate Housewives. Keep reading for all you need to know about the new series, including what viewers have said about the show. 

    © BBC/Firebird/Natalie Seery

    The series is set in the gated community of Richford Lake

    What is Wild Cherry about?

    Set in the gated community of Richford Lake, the series follows the seemingly perfect lives of super-mum Juliet (Eve Best) and business mogul Lorna (Carmen Ejogo). But when their teenage daughters, Grace (Imogen Faires) and Allegra (Amelia May), are accused of a shocking scandal at their exclusive private school, toxic secrets and lies ripple throughout the community. 

    The synopsis continues: “Wild Cherry is a coming-of-age drama for both mothers and daughters as they navigate privilege, power and social media. ‘Like mother like daughter’ rings loudly in a complex world, where danger and betrayal is never far from the surface – even in a perfect town.”

    WATCH: The trailer for Wild Cherry

    Grace Gibbons (IMOGEN FAIRES)© BBC/Firebird Pictures/Natalie Seery

    The series has been met with mixed reviews from viewers

    What are viewers saying about Wild Cherry?

    The series has been met with mixed reviews from viewers, with some left disappointed with the slow pacing while others hailed the first episode as “brilliantly addictive”. One person wrote on X: “If you haven’t started Wild Cherry, released today on BBC iplayer then you absolutely need to. It’s like nothing I’ve ever watched before. Imagine if desperate housewives was in the UK in 2025, but meets the show Clique with a sprinkle of Skins,” while another penned: “Binge watched over the weekend kept me guessing with all the twists and turns. BBC is on [fire] at the moment.”

    A third viewer praised the performances from the cast, highlighting Louis Ashbourne Serkis, who is the son of actors Andy Serkis and Lorraine Ashbourne, writing: “Just binge watched #WildCherry and it was brilliantly addictive with plenty of valid points about the risks of #SocialMedia and #Influencers. Superb performances from everyone and particularly @LouisSerkis who is definitely becoming a versatile talent to watch,” while another added: “Wild Cherry last night was Fantastic, and #EveBest looked phenomenal.”

    Juliet (EVE BEST), Allegra (AMELIA MAY), Lorna (CARMEN EJOGO) and Grace (IMOGEN FAIRES)© BBC Studios/Lesley Edith

    Eve Best and Carmen Ejogo star in the series

    What have TV critics said about Wild Cherry?

    The series received positive reviews from critics, with The Telegraph describing the show as a thriller that “tackles uncomfortable truths about parenting and teenage girls” in its four-star review, while The Guardian called the series a “fun, trashy thriller” in its three-star review. 

     Lorna Gibbons (CARMEN EJOGO) & Juliet Lonsdale (EVE BEST)© BBC/Firebird Pictures/Natalie Seery

    All six episodes are available to stream on BBC iPlayer

    How to watch Wild Cherry

    All six episodes of Wild Cherry are available to stream on BBC iPlayer now. The first two episodes aired on Saturday 15 November. 

    [ad_2]

    Nicky Morris

    Source link

  • That was fast: Man who accosted Ariana Grande last week is serving time already in Singapore

    [ad_1]

    The law works quickly in Singapore, where last week an Australian man with a habit of disrupting events charged at Ariana Grande after jumping a barrier at the Asian premiere of “Wicked: For Good.”

    This week, he’s already serving his sentence for the offense.

    Johnson Wen, 26, was convicted Monday of being a public nuisance and sentenced to nine days in jail, the BBC reported. Videos from the Thursday incident show Wen jumping a barricade at Universal Studios Singapore and running at Grande, then putting his arms around her neck and shoulders while jumping up and down and flashing a big smile to the cameras. He was separated from his shocked target by her co-star Cynthia Erivo and escorted off by security.

    But that wasn’t all — Wen tried a second time to jump the barricades that lined the event’s yellow carpet but was pinned down by security, the BBC said. He was arrested Friday.

    The Australian was in Singapore on a 90-day tourist visa and has been in custody since his arrest. He was sentenced Monday after the prosecution requested a week behind bars on a charge that carries up to a three-month sentence, according to Singapore’s the Straits Times.

    “Dude this is is not okay,” one commenter had written Thursday on Wen’s Instagram post showing him charging onto the carpet and grabbing Grande. “Look how badly you scared her! You put hands on her. I sincerely hope you [are] charged with something and banned from events.”

    The judge in Singapore apparently thought something similar when speaking with Wen at the trial.

    Wen has disrupted several celebrity and sporting events by running onto stages and into the middle of sporting events, including at the 2024 Olympics in Paris. “I won’t do it again, your honor,” he told the judge when asked if there was anything to mitigate his behavior, per the Straits Times.

    “Are you paying lip service or is this your intention?” the judge asked. Wen replied in the affirmative, saying he was “going to stop.”

    The judge referenced Wen’s earlier intrusions and noted that he hadn’t faced consequences previously, the Straits Times reported.

    “Perhaps you thought the same would occur here, but Mr. Wen, you are wrong,” the judge said, adding that there are always consequences to actions.

    The judge said Wen seemed “to be attention-seeking, thinking only of yourself, and not the safety of others, when committing these acts.” He said the act was premeditated and added two days to the requested sentence. It’s unclear whether Wen was also fined.

    Prosecutors had labeled him a “serial intruder” who was aiming for clout online, the BBC reported.

    Wen, who goes by “Pyjama Man” online, wrote on Instagram as he posted video of himself during the Thursday incident, “Dear Ariana Grande Thank You for letting me Jump on the Yellow Carpet with You.” Commenters did not support his enthusiasm.

    After doing promotion for “Wicked: For Good” with a number of her castmates in cities around the world, Grande did not mention what happened in Singapore when she appeared at a Q&A about the film on Saturday in Century City. On Sunday, she attended the motion picture academy’s 16th Governors Awards at the Ray Dolby Ballroom in Hollywood, where Tom Cruise was given an honorary Oscar, along with Debbie Allen, Dolly Parton and production designer Wynn Thomas.

    The U.S. premiere of “Wicked: For Good” — which also stars Jeff Goldblum as the Wizard — is planned for Monday in New York, with the movie opening domestically in wide release Thursday.

    [ad_2]

    Christie D’Zurilla

    Source link

  • Why is Trump threatening to sue the BBC?

    [ad_1]



    Why is Trump threatening to sue the BBC? – CBS News










































    Watch CBS News



    President Trump has threatened legal action against the British broadcaster BBC. Haley Ott has the details.

    [ad_2]
    Source link

  • Meet the Wild Cherry cast fronting the BBC’s answer to Big Little Lies

    [ad_1]

    Lovers of Gossip Girl and Big Little Lies, have we got a TV recommendation for you.

    BBC TV series Wild Cherry stars the multi-hyphenate and multi-talented Nicôle Lecky who not only wrote, created, produced, starred in, sung on and won two BAFTAs for her first TV show Mood, has now written, created, produced, co-stars and sings the theme tune for this incredibly good new BBC1 drama. (She was also, incidentally, one of our 6 Women of the Year Spotlight stars last week and also co-stars – as if she has the time – alongside George Clooney and Laura Dern in the new Noah Baumbach film, Jay Kelly.)

    The show follows the lives of two mothers and two daughters in the wake of private school scandal that will shake the entire community. And we’re pleased to report that the Wild Cherry cast is looking pretty major.

    Glamour has had a sneak preview, and we can also reveal that the show is extremely addictive, touching on the toxicity of social media and how it affects the body image and sexuality of young women, as well as navigating the murky waters of microaggressions and privilege.

    Nicôle will star alongside Eve Best and Carmen Ejogo as mothers Juliet and Lorna, as well as younger talent Imogen Faires and Amelia May as daughters and schoolgirls Grave and Allegra.

    Also comprising the Wild Cherry cast are Peep Show’s Sophie Winkleman, The Crown’s James Murray, Nathaniel Martello-White, Jason York, Isabelle Allen, Catriona Chandler and Tara Webb.

    Speaking to Glamour in an interview as part of our Women of the Year Spotlight series, Lecky opened up about her research process for Wild Cherry, which included speaking to private school teens about the pressured they face in an increasingly online world. “The influence of diet culture affects girls proportionately more than boys, across social media,” she said of her findings. “It’s incessant.”

    Glamour has rounded up the key Wild Cherry cast members, who they play in the TV series and where you might have seen them before onscreen.

    Nicôle Lecky

    PHOTOGRAPHER:,Natalie Seery

    Nicóle’s incredible one-woman show Super Hoe was adapted for TV and became Mood. In Wild Cherry, she plays life coach Gigi, who is trying to find her place in the very exclusive Richford Lake community where the story is set.

    Carmen Ejogo

    Meet the Wild Cherry cast fronting the BBC's answer to Big Little Lies

    PHOTOGRAPHER:,Natalie Seery

    [ad_2]

    Charley Ross

    Source link

  • BBC apologizes to Trump over editing of his Jan. 6 speech in documentary

    [ad_1]

    The BBC has issued an apology to President Trump over editing of a speech he gave on Jan. 6, 2021, that aired in its documentary “Trump: A Second Chance.” Mr. Trump had threatened to sue the British broadcaster for $1 billion over the program about the Capitol riot, and the BBC noted in a statement Thursday that it “strongly disagree[s]” that there’s a basis for a defamation claim. 

    BBC lawyers wrote to Mr. Trump’s legal team in response to a letter they received Sunday, the BBC Press Office said. In that letter, lawyers working for Mr. Trump alleged that the Oct. 28, 2024, episode of the network’s “Panorama” documentary program, which was produced by an external production company, sought to mislead viewers by editing together three separate sections of the speech made by Mr. Trump.

    “BBC Chair Samir Shah has separately sent a personal letter to the White House making clear to President Trump that he and the Corporation are sorry for the edit of the President’s speech on 6 January 2021, which featured in the programme,” the BBC Press Office said in its statement Thursday. “The BBC has no plans to rebroadcast the documentary ‘Trump: A Second Chance?’ on any BBC platforms.”

    “While the BBC sincerely regrets the manner in which the video clip was edited, we strongly disagree there is a basis for a defamation claim,” the press office added.

    The White House did not immediately comment on the BBC’s apology. Speaking to reporters aboard Air Force One Friday night, Mr. Trump said, “We’ll sue them for anywhere between a billion and $5 billion, probably sometime next week.”

    The BBC’s response to Mr. Trump’s legal team laid out five main arguments why the organization believes there is no legitimate case against it, BBC News reported. CBS News has not seen the letter sent by the BBC in reply to Mr. Trump’s legal team.

    According to BBC News’ report, those arguments include that the episode in question did not air in the U.S.; that it did not cause Mr. Trump harm, as he won the election a week later; and that the edits made were intended to shorten a long speech rather than to mislead. It also said that the clip was not meant to be taken in isolation, and that matters of public concern and political speech are protected under U.S. law.

    An expert on international media law told CBS News that the BBC’s response appears to be “careful and considered.”

    “President Trump was clearly owed a fulsome apology and he’s had that,” U.K.-based attorney Mark Stephens told CBS News. “I don’t think he was entitled to damages, and so as a consequence, they’ve rightly hung tough on that particular issue. But, of course, this has been a massive PR victory for the president. He can now call the BBC ‘fake news’ … pointing to some credible background for that.”

    The letter over the weekend from Mr. Trump’s lawyers claimed that the program “has caused President Trump to suffer overwhelming financial and reputational harm,” and that it was defamatory under Florida law. It outlined demands by Mr. Trump that the BBC retract the documentary, issue an apology and “appropriately compensate President Trump for the harm caused.”

    The letter did not clarify what would be considered appropriate compensation, but it warned that if the BBC failed to comply with Mr. Trump’s demands by Friday at 5 p.m. ET, Mr. Trump would file “legal action for no less than $1,000,000,000 (One Billion Dollars) in damages.”

    Stephens told CBS News that while it would be possible for Mr. Trump to pursue a lawsuit against the BBC in the U.S., “it’s got a number of legal impediments and tripwires.”

    First, Stephens said, was that the program which included the clip was not shown in the U.S. 

    “You can’t be lowered in the estimation of right-thinking people by a program that wasn’t seen by an American audience. So you can’t sue, there’s no jurisdiction to sue, in America,” he said.

    He also said that because Mr. Trump is “the president, the ultimate public figure,” criticism of him would likely be protected under the First Amendment.

    Even if the case got past those hurdles, which he doubted, Stephens said, “lawyers would be looking at whether or not the sting of this was true. And they can point to all sorts of previous judicial findings which have said that there was some measure of incitement in which the president was involved.”

    The head of the BBC and its CEO of news resigned in the wake of the criticism of the broadcaster’s editing of the speech. The BBC said Director-General Tim Davie and head of news Deborah Turness both announced their resignations on Sunday.

    In a letter to staff, Davie said quitting the job after five years “is entirely my decision.” 

    “Overall, the BBC is delivering well, but there have been some mistakes made and as director-general I have to take ultimate responsibility,” Davie said, adding that he was “working through exact timings with the Board to allow for an orderly transition to a successor over the coming months.”

    Turness said that the controversy about the Trump documentary “has reached a stage where it is causing damage to the BBC — an institution that I love. As the CEO of BBC News and Current Affairs, the buck stops with me.”

    “While mistakes have been made, I want to be absolutely clear recent allegations that BBC News is institutionally biased are wrong,” she added.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Disney and the BBC’s Disintegrated ‘Doctor Who’ Deal Is Leaving Its Spinoff in Limbo

    [ad_1]

    We already could tell just from the way things went from the last few months that Disney and the BBC’s two-year partnership for Doctor Who‘s latest era wasn’t going great—and that was before we really started getting a picture of just how messy things were behind the scenes. But now we’ve just got our latest example of just how bad things seemingly broke between the two studios: the last few episodes of Doctor Who material commissioned as part of Disney’s era will actually air on the BBC well before they hit Disney+.

    Although the BBC’s initial statement on the conclusion of its deal with Disney already noted that The War Between the Land and the Sea would release on BBC broadcast channels and the iPlayer streaming service this December, today the corporation confirmed that the series will officially launch December 7 with a two-part premiere in the UK, before rolling out the remaining episodes weekly throughout the remainder of the month. It also further reiterated that War Between will not see a simultaneous broadcast outside of the UK on Disney+, with the series still set to release on the streamer at a currently undisclosed point in 2026.

    io9 has reached out to Disney for clarification on War Between‘s international release, with a spokesperson for the streamer only reaffirming that the series will broadcast on Disney+ in 2026.

    Regardless of whether international audiences are left waiting weeks or months for the miniseries—which follows UNIT dealing with the return of the Sea Devils, a race of ancient precursor beings who have lived in Earth’s oceans since before the dawn of humanity—the current exclusive release of War Between in the UK strikes a broad contrast with how the past few years of Doctor Who have been broadcast both there and abroad on Disney+.

    Controversially for UK fans, Doctor Who‘s broadcast times for the past two seasons were switched to favor streaming-first releases to accommodate better premiere times for US audiences watching on Disney+—a decision that likely contributed to the past two seasons’ diminished audience figures, which was repeatedly noted by Disney as a crucial factor in its consideration over whether or not to renew its partnership with the BBC.

    Now the BBC is taking its proverbial TARDIS-shaped ball and going home, and while every Doctor Who fan now has eyes on Christmas 2026 to see just what the future of the main show looks like, international audiences will be left waiting a little longer for any slice of the Whoniverse they can get.

    Want more io9 news? Check out when to expect the latest Marvel, Star Wars, and Star Trek releases, what’s next for the DC Universe on film and TV, and everything you need to know about the future of Doctor Who.

    [ad_2]

    James Whitbrook

    Source link

  • The Mess at the BBC Will Never End

    [ad_1]

    But if you can’t stand the BBC, or want to see it dramatically weakened, then you don’t have to waste time thinking carefully about these questions. The day after the Telegraph published Prescott’s memo, Boris Johnson, the former Prime Minister, who is now a columnist for the Daily Mail, declared that he wouldn’t be paying his license fee—the £174.50 annual levy, per household, that funds the BBC—until the broadcaster either came clean about how it “doctored” Trump’s speech, or its director general, Tim Davie, resigned. The same day, Karoline Leavitt, the White House press secretary, described the broadcaster “as total, 100 percent fake news” and “a Leftist propaganda machine.”

    Over the weekend, Auntie—as the BBC used to be known, for its prudish, familiar, and slightly condescending ways—imploded. Both the chief executive of BBC News, Deborah Turness, and Davie, its over-all leader, announced that they would resign. Trump celebrated the news on Truth Social. “These are very dishonest people who tried to step on the scales of a Presidential Election,” he wrote. “On top of everything else, they are from a Foreign Country, one that many consider our Number One Ally. What a terrible thing for Democracy!” On Monday, he threatened to sue the BBC for a billion dollars.

    The BBC has bust-ups in its makeup. It has a deep and complex relationship with both the state and the people that it serves. (The BBC World Service broadcasts in forty-two languages, and the BBC, as a whole, claims to reach some four hundred and fifty million people every week.) Three of the past five directors general have resigned after one controversy or another. But, this century at least, the crises have tended to follow either an egregious editorial mistake or a conflict with outside forces, as in 2004, when the BBC clashed with the government over the case for the war in Iraq. What is unusual about the current crisis is that it was instigated, at least partly, from within. According to reporting in the Guardian and the Observer, Prescott was hired as an adviser to the BBC on the advice of Robbie Gibb, a former Conservative press secretary, who is one of five political appointees on the board of the broadcaster. Before Gibb joined the BBC, under Johnson’s government, back in 2021, he helped to set up GB News, a right-wing cable-news channel. For years, he has been on a mission to undo the BBC’s perceived liberal bias, challenging appointments and questioning its coverage. “Gibb’s supporters say he is trying to save the BBC from itself,” the Observer reported. “He was also heard last year to say that if he didn’t get his way, he would ‘blow the place up.’ ”

    On Monday, I spoke to David Hendy, the author of “The BBC: A Century on Air,” which chronicles the first century of the corporation. Hendy, who is devoted to the BBC, likes to compare the organization to a Saturn V rocket. It has “a million moving parts, roughly one per cent of which will fail,” he told me. “And that one per cent means actually quite a lot of failures.” Like others, Hendy recognized that the systems that the BBC has designed to make itself accountable—its boards and committees, its standards and guidelines—make it more vulnerable and ponderous when it comes under determined attack.

    It is also much weaker than it used to be. The BBC suffered a thirty-per-cent cut, in real terms, to its budget between 2010 and 2024, under the Conservative government, and it is frequently undermined by politicians of all sides. On Sunday, when the broadcaster was being assailed by both the White House and the right-wing press in the U.K., Lisa Nandy, the Labour minister who currently oversees the funding of the BBC, was hardly reassuring. Nandy said that the editing of Trump’s speech was “very serious,” and she aired her own concerns about the BBC operating in an environment “where news and fact is often blurred with polemic and opinion, and I think that is creating a very, very dangerous environment in this country where people can’t trust what they see.”

    In such a climate, Hendy said, it wasn’t a surprise that the BBC has become overly defensive. “It is afraid to own up to its mistakes,” he told me. “It’s one of these organizations that is damned if it owns up and damned if it doesn’t.” But Hendy also drew a distinction between a good-faith critique of the national broadcaster and a bad-faith one. He said, of Prescott’s leaked letter, “It seems to me that it’s not trying to make the BBC good or honest by pointing out some of these mistakes or failures. It feels as if it’s a criticism which is designed to undermine the BBC as a whole.”

    [ad_2]

    Sam Knight

    Source link

  • BBC leaders resign after the broadcaster’s editing of a Trump speech is called misleading

    [ad_1]

    BBC Director-General Tim Davie and BBC News Chief Executive Deborah Turness announced Sunday they are resigning from their positions.

    The departures come as the British public broadcaster has faced criticism for its editing of President Trump’s Jan. 6, 2021, speech before the Capitol riot and insurrection.

    The BBC investigative series “Panorama,” in a broadcast a week ahead of the U.S. presidential election last year, featured an edited video of Trump’s speech.

    Critics said that the way the speech was edited was misleading in that it cut out a section in which Trump said that he expected his supporters would demonstrate peacefully.

    “I know that everyone here will soon be marching over to the Capitol building to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard,” Trump said in the speech, during which he also urged his supporters to “fight like hell.”

    In a statement, Turness acknowledged the controversy around the “Panorama” broadcast, noting, “In public life leaders need to be fully accountable, and that is why I am stepping down. While mistakes have been made, I want to be absolutely clear recent allegations that BBC News is institutionally biased are wrong.”

    In a separate news release, Davie said, “In these increasingly polarized times, the BBC is of unique value and speaks to the very best of us. It helps make the UK a special place; overwhelmingly kind, tolerant and curious. Like all public organizations, the BBC is not perfect, and we must always be open, transparent and accountable.

    “While not being the only reason, the current debate around BBC News has understandably contributed to my decision. Overall the BBC is delivering well, but there have been some mistakes made and as Director-General I have to take ultimate responsibility.”

    Trump posted a link to a Daily Telegraph story about the speech-editing on his Truth Social network, thanking the newspaper “for exposing these Corrupt ‘Journalists.’ These are very dishonest people who tried to step on the scales of a Presidential Election.” He called that “a terrible thing for Democracy!”

    White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt reacted on X, posting a screen grab of an article headlined “Trump goes to war with ‘fake news’ BBC” beside another about Davie’s resignation, with the words “shot” and “chaser.”

    Trump was impeached and criminally indicted over his role in the Jan. 6, 2021, riot and insurrection. The felony charges were dropped after he won the 2024 election, as U.S. Justice Department policy holds that a sitting president may not be criminally prosecuted.

    Pressure on the broadcaster’s top executives has been growing since the Daily Telegraph newspaper published parts of a dossier complied by Michael Prescott, who had been hired to advise the BBC on standards and guidelines.

    As well as the Trump edit, it criticized the BBC’s coverage of transgender issues and raised concerns of anti-Israel bias in the BBC’s Arabic service.

    The 103-year-old BBC faces greater scrutiny than other broadcasters — and criticism from its commercial rivals — because of its status as a national institution funded through an annual license fee of $230 paid by all households with a television.

    The BBC airs vast reams of entertainment and sports programming across multiple television and radio stations and online platforms — but it’s the BBC’s news output that is most often under scrutiny.

    The broadcaster is bound by the terms of its charter to be impartial in its output, and critics are quick to point out when they think it has failed. It’s frequently a political football, with conservatives seeing a leftist slant in its news output and some liberals accusing it of having a conservative bias.

    It has also been criticized from all angles over its coverage of the Israel-Hamas war in Gaza. In February, the BBC removed a documentary about Gaza from its streaming service after it emerged that the child narrator was the son of an official in the Hamas-led government.

    The BBC shakeup comes as Trump has been extremely aggressive in pursuing lawsuits against U.S. media companies. Paramount Global forked over $16 million this summer after Trump complained about the editing of a Kamala Harris interview on CBS’ “60 minutes.” Last year, ABC News paid $16 million to settle Trump’s defamation lawsuit against anchor George Stephanopoulos.

    The Associated Press contributed to this report.

    [ad_2]

    Mark Olsen

    Source link

  • Who won Celebrity Traitors? Winner revealed in unexpected final twist

    [ad_1]

    Who would have thought that sending 19 beloved British personalities to a gothic castle in Scotland would be so damn fun? And so very watchable? The first season of Celebrity Traitors was nothing short of an absolute treat. From Alan Carr’s profuse sweating to tittering over Celia Imrie’s utterly iconic fart (there are some words I never thought I’d type), it’s been a riot. But who won Celebrity Traitors?

    In addition to all of the memeable moments through the series, there has been plenty of gripping gameplay, too. Let’s remind ourselves of the roller coaster ride: the 19 celebs rocked up to the castle in cars only to be swiftly driven to a makeshift graveyard where they dug their own graves searching for the first six shields. Later, Jonathan Ross, Cat Burns and Alan Carr were selected as the three Traitors.

    In an unusual twist, it took the Faithful celebs a very, very long time to hunt one of them down. In the meantime, countless Faithful were murdered or banished. Annoyingly, everyone was kind of onto Jonathan Ross thanks to the popular Big Dog theory — but he wasn’t banished until last week.

    After Alan murdered Celia Imrie in plain sight by quoting a few lines of Shakespeare at her (again, something never thought I’d type), the remaining group banished Kate Garraway. This left us with our five finalists: Traitors Alan Carr and Cat Burns, and Faithfuls David Olusoga, Joe Marler and Nick Mohammed.

    In the final, players did not reveal their true identities when leaving the game, meaning the five remaining contestants were forced to make their final call on pure instinct.

    So what happened in the final and who won Celebrity Traitors?

    What happened in the Celebrity Traitors final?

    In the penultimate episode, Joe Marler came up with yet another theory. But this time, he was right: he was convinced that Alan and Cat were the two Traitors in their midst and he sought out Nick and David to get them on side. (It didn’t help when Alan burst out laughing while saying “I’m a Faithful” — let’s face it, he was doomed.)

    In the tense Celebrity Traitors finale, the group completed their sufficiently stressful escape room-esque train task before running through a lush green field to Claudia.

    The tone quickly turned though, after the celebrities had to carry out their final banishments.

    Nick and David made an alliance, agreeing to vote for Cat in an attempt to seal her fate. Meanwhile, though, Joe did an amazing job of flying undercover with the traitors by forming his own alliance with Cat and Alan and agreeing to vote for David.

    Ultimately, however, when it came time to vote, while Cat and Alan voted for David as planned, Joe successfully pulled the rug out from under the traitors, with Joe voting for Cat too. Bravo on your poker face, sir. Immaculately executed on your part. But did Alan make it out alive and win it for the traitors?

    At the end of the finale, the group gathered around the fire pit to cast their final judgement, with each of them voting to banish again in the belief that there were remaining traitors in their midst.

    So who won Celebrity Traitors? Did Joe Marler’s hunch pay off?

    Who won Celebrity Traitors?

    First up, meet our runners-up…

    The runners-up

    Cat Burns: banished at the round table

    PHOTOGRAPHER:,Paul Chappells

    [ad_2]

    Meg Walters

    Source link

  • Hero Rail Worker Stops London Train Stabbing Spree

    [ad_1]

    Eleven people were stabbed in a London train horror, and a rail worker praised as “nothing short of heroic” remains in life threatening condition after trying to stop the attack

    In a shocking attack on a London-bound train, a rail worker’s quick thinking helped divert a suspected stabbing spree, leaving ten or more people injured and prompting two arrests as investigators probe a motive. Investigators later determined that the second arrest had no involvement and was subsequently released.

    Passengers on a London-bound train faced terrifying chaos Saturday when a stabbing spree left ten people hospitalized and two men previously arrested (ages 32 and 25 – the 25-year-old was eventually released and not charged) in what authorities describe as a “serious incident” that was thought to have a possible terror link, which has now been debunked. The suspect allegedly attacked passengers inside the carriage before being overpowered by a rail worker, hailed as a hero by police, who intervened and helped restrain him until officers arrived; the rail worker remains in critical condition. The incident occurred around 1:30 p.m. local time on a Thameslink service en route to London from Doncaster. 

    London’s Metropolitan Police said the motive remains unclear, though one man was initially arrested on suspicion of attempted murder. Images from the scene showed the carriage in disarray and at least one covered body on the floor as paramedics worked. Authorities immediately launched an investigation and stated that there was a possibility this was a terrorism related attack, but later confirmed there was not. An explosives team also searched the train and the nearby station. A suspect was named early Monday morning, with specific charges listed; Anthony Williams, 32, from the city of Peterborough, faces 10 counts of attempted murder, one count of actual bodily harm, and one count of possessing a bladed article in connection with the train attack. Additionally, Williams has also been charged with an additional count of attempted murder and possession of a bladed article in a separate incident that occurred on November 1st.

    Some passengers described a scene of panic as those nearby screamed and ducked for cover when the stabbings began. “He just made a lunge and started stabbing — someone shouted, ‘duck’, and I hit the floor,” one witness told the BBC News.

    In a joint statement, Thameslink and British Transport Police thanked the rail worker for “playing an essential role in preventing further injury.” The train was taken out of service, and investigators are considering CCTV footage, passenger mobile recordings, and forensic evidence from the knives recovered. 

    The ten wounded, aged between their 20s and 60s, include three with life-threatening injuries. All are listed in stable condition. The two suspects remain in custody. With public transport still regarded as a key target for extremist acts, the British government has urged travelers to remain vigilant and report suspicious activity. “Let us be clear: attacks of this nature are entirely unacceptable and will be met with our full force,” Home Secretary M. Sunak said. As the investigation continues, questions remain over what triggered the attack, how the perpetrators boarded with weapons, and whether they are part of a wider network or lone attackers. This is a developing story and details are subject to change.

    [ad_2]

    Lauren Conlin

    Source link

  • Nightmare-inducing British children’s characters you probably forgot about

    [ad_1]

    Halloween is the spookiest night of the year, and while many will be more than happy to curl up in front of the sofa with the lights dimmed streaming every horror movie, there’s others who might opt to avoid the frights. Normally, children’s television is a safe bet, with the episodes aimed at a younger audience generally guaranteed not to have anything that’ll make you afraid to sleep with the lights off. But these characters ended up giving not only children, but plenty of adults nightmares, even from shows that are normally tame. Scroll down to see the most frightening children’s TV characters, if you dare…

    © BBC

    I still can’t sleep well after these two…

    The Bear and the Lion – Teletubbies

    It was meant to be one of the seven ‘Magical Events’, and yet this episode ended up traumatising a generation of Teletubbies viewers, including this writer. The Scary Lion with Big Scary Teeth and The Bear with Brown Fuzzy Hair were seen chasing around the titular characters with a strange and eerie music playing in the background.

    Viewers were more scared by the Bear’s sharp claws and eyes rolling around its head as it chanted: “I’m the Bear, I’m the Bear, and I’m coming,” over and over again. The episode is still discussed online, with one commentator saying: “The lion and bear episode of the Teletubbies is the scariest thing to have ever aired in television history and if you disagree, you’re wrong.” A second added: “The lion and the bear in the Teletubbies were HORRIFYING. I used to run up the stairs in pure panic every time they came on-screen.”

    Complaints started flooding in to the BBC when the episode first aired back in 1997, and the corporation ended up taking action. Repeats of the episode starting from 2001 changed the Bear’s voice and swapped the music to something more light-hearted. But the damage had already been done, with some countries removing the whole episode from their rotations, and I still get the shivers whenever I think about the episode.

    A still from The Moomins with the Groke© BBC

    Eerie silence speaks volumes

    The Groke – The Moomins

    Tove Jansson’s iconic Moomin series might seem like light-hearted fun for all ages, but one particular episode of the 1990 cartoon ended up unnerving several viewers. In episodes 6-8 of the series, the Moomins first encounter the monstrous Groke, searching for a shell. My sister regularly recounts how terrifying the original episode was simply due to the creature’s imposing figure and lack of dialogue. It was the emptiness and solitary stare, in which she never blinked, that ended up unnerving viewers.

    One social media commentator noted: “This one was particularly scary, the Hufsa, or the Groke. It made everything cold and it growled. Traumatizing.” While a second added: “‘This Groke character is rather scary looking. Maybe we should try to make her harder to see for our network, so the kids don’t get scared’. Welp, mission failed. I remember The Groke being [the] scariest [expletive] thing ever, when I was a child.

    Mr Noseybonk in an episode of Jigsaw© BBC

    The mask of Mr Noseybonk was horrifying!

    Mr. Noseybonk – Jigsaw

    Broadcast between 1979 and 1984, Jigsaw was a show aimed at children aged between four and seven, however, it ended up having one of the most terrifying things to have ever been put on screen, Mr. Noseybonk. The character was known for his largely extended nose and toothy grin and despite being intended to entertain, he instead terrified.

    Taking to social media, one said: “From 1980 to 1984, lighthearted Children’s BBC puzzle series/sketch show Jigsaw was haunted by NOSEYBONK. Intended to be a whimsical childlike innocent, he ended up terrifying kids, like Mr Bean directed by David Lynch,” and a second posted: “He has given me a LIFELONG fear of long noses. I’d managed to avoid seeing him for over 40 years and then last year there was a picture of him posted up on some reddit forum and that night I woke screaming. And twice more that week.”

    Speaking to SyFy magazine in 2018, X Files writer Benjamin Van Allen revealed that the character was the inspiration for his Mr. Chuckleteeth character in the horror series. “Mr. Chuckleteeth was actually inspired by an old British kids TV show called Jigsaw,” he explained. “There’s a character in Jigsaw called Mr. Noseybonk. He kind of looks like Mr. Chuckleteeth a little bit, so that was the inspiration for me when I was writing the character. It was the starting point for the design, but we really made it our own thing. My inkling is that it might also have been the inspiration behind Jigsaw, the character in the Saw films.”

    A split image of both versions of Worzel Gummidge© Shutterstock / BBC

    The scarecrow scared in both incarnations

    Worzel Gummidge

    Even though he’s one of the heroes of his series, plenty of children have found talking scarecrow Worzel Gummidge absolutely terrifying. Whether it’s the nature of a scarecrow coming to life or his ability to remove his own head and keep speaking, many still shudder when they hear the theme. It’s not just the original that terrified viewers, as the reboot has attracted plenty of attention with some suggesting the character resembled classic horror villain Freddy Kreuger.

    Reflecting on the series, one said: “I also used to find Aunt Sally scary as hell too – the whole thing just seemed to have an odd atmosphere to it. Wurzel was just weird, Aunt Sally seemed to hate him and that seemed to create a weird air of conflict,” while a second shared: “Scarier than 1970’s Dr Who. And that is saying something,” and a third penned: “The original was terrifying. Aunt Sally gave me nightmares for weeks and I refused to watch it after her introduction.

    A still image of Hartley Hare on Pipkins© TV Times/Future Publishing via G

    Hartley’s unkempt appearance was too much for some

    Hartley Hare – Pipkins

    Puppets raised a generation from the Muppets to Sooty, we all have fond memories of these entertainers, but one ended up scaring instead of thrilling. While Pipkins had plenty of puppets, from Topov the Cockney monkey to Octavia the Ostrich and Mrs Penguin, it was Hartley Hare that unnerved many. Several complained about his mangy appearance, with some comparing the children’s character to a reanimated zombie.

    Noting his scariness, one person on X wrote: “Another favourite on our (very unscientific) poll of scariest childhood horrors was Hartley Hare. If there was ever a sinister hybrid of abused oven glove and reanimated roadkill then Pipkins’ own Hartley Hare was it. Voiced by Nigel Plaskitt he terrified a generation,” while a second said: “As children’s television icons go, the myxomatosis-riddled fleabag that was Pipkins’ HARTLEY HARE was pretty unique. Terrifying to behold and camp as Christmas, I adored him, then and now.”

    Noel Edmonds being embraced by Mr Blobby on Good Morning Britain© Ken McKay/ITV/Shutterstock

    Mr Blobby was a British icon

    Mr Blobby – Noel’s House Party

    Mr Blobby was meant to entertain children with his clumsy antics, but his electronically distorted voice, that only ever repeated variations of the word ‘blobby’, and his crazy green eyes, had children heading behind the sofa instead of laughing along with him.

    One of those who found the character frightening is comedian Jack Whitehall, with the star attempting to hide away under his desk when the character made a cameo on The Big Fat Quiz. When Blobby was compared to the Teletubbies, Jack replied: “Teletubbies? They’re joyous, Blobby was evil.” When the character appeared on the show, Jack exclaimed: “How the [expletive] were you allowed near kids?

    [ad_2]

    Matthew Moore

    Source link

  • 9 People Billie Piper Could Play in ‘Doctor Who’ Now That ‘Doctor Who’ Probably Needs to Figure That Out

    [ad_1]

    Good news: Doctor Who is alive. Bad news: Doctor Who is now alive and probably has to deal with one of the most bizarre cliffhangers in over 60 years of cliffhanging history.

    With yesterday’s news that the BBC would be continuing Doctor Who‘s future after the termination of its partnership with Disney starting with a new Christmas special in 2026, the series now has an equally as important task to deal with beyond its continued survival: just who the hell is Billie Piper meant to have been playing in those closing moments of “The Reality War”, anyway?

    Even before the future of the series was stuck in limbo for months, creatives involved in the series, from Piper herself to showrunner Russell T Davies, wanted to suggest that the returning actress was not necessarily playing the 16th incarnation of the Doctor, despite her regenerating out of departing star Ncuti Gatwa. Piper was not credited in “Reality War” as appearing as the Doctor, as has traditionally been the case for new Doctors, and there was enough going on with Gatwa’s regeneration and the reasoning process for it to suggest that not everything was as it seemed. And since then, any willing commentary that has been made about the decision is purely speculative, other than to indicate that there was not a clear plan in place as to how the outcome would play out, with no guaranteed future for the series.

    But now that future is at least guaranteed. So while we now have a long wait until Christmas 2026 to actually see who Piper is playing, we have some suggestions… admittedly only mostly silly ones.

    9) Rose Tyler, Again

    © BBC

    The climax of “The Reality War” was meant to be about the use of regeneration energy to shunt reality itself… but what if it didn’t just affect Doctor Who‘s prime reality and translocated noted reality hopper Rose Tyler into the Doctor’s place, and now she has to figure out how to get whoever they’ve become back?

    8) The Master

    Doctor Who Power Of The Doctor Master
    © BBC

    The last time we saw the Master, we did see him attempt to violently take over the Doctor’s body during the regeneration process. What better way to mess with the mind of your oldest frenemy than by forcing them to have the face of one of their closest former companions while also being you?

    7) The Bad Wolf, Again

    Doctor Who The Parting Of The Ways Bad Wolf Rose Tyler
    © BBC

    The 15th Doctor’s regeneration centered the TARDIS in such a way that it feels like it’s going to play an important factor in just whoever Piper is meant to be (if not the Doctor, that is). The Doctor blasted the console with all that energy, we cut to that ominous shot of it darkened and lit only by the regeneration process itself… and we know the ship’s heart is already familiar with using Rose Tyler’s face as an agent of its will. What if the TARDIS feels that’s necessary once more?

    6) Susan Foreman

    Doctor Who The Interstellar Song Contest Susan
    © BBC

    It’s probably too late for the show to use whatever plans it had for Carole Ann Ford at this point after whatever was cut from “The Reality War”—and we don’t know yet if Russell T Davies is going to carry on writing Doctor Who after this 2026 special. Given that Susan was brought up multiple times during the 15th Doctor’s era even before she made those mental appearances (depicted in the TARDIS console room; for some reason, again, the TARDIS is key!), what if whatever she was trying to warn the Doctor about was so dire that this shifting of reality allowed her to somehow transpose herself onto the Doctor’s being, and we tie it all up here?

    And now she looks like Billie Piper because she regenerated. For some reason. Time Lord stuff!

    5) The Moment, Again

    Doctor Who Day Of The Doctor The Moment
    © BBC

    It was never actually used to destroy Gallifrey, after all. If the veil between the nature of reality itself was so thin after whatever the Doctor did to change it, did something activate the Moment, a weapon capable of consuming galaxies in its devastation?

    Plus, a familiar interface would just be a logical solution for a massive temporal weapon that now has a lot of history with the Doctor to take.

    4) The Actress, Billie Piper

    Billie Piper Wednesday
    © Netflix

    In the 2025 season’s “Lux,” one of the many bizarre things that happen to the 15th Doctor and Belinda while battling the reality-warping Mr. Ring-A-Ding is that they briefly get pulled through a television into a reality where the Doctor’s adventures with their many companions are the subject of a long-running hit TV show named Doctor Who.  See where I’m going with this? Don’t have to think about who Billie is; she simply is Billie! Who doesn’t love an existential crisis at the holidays?

    3) The Heart of the TARDIS (Again)

    Doctor Who The Doctor's Wife Idris
    © BBC

    We’ve already had one instance of the TARDIS itself embodying a physical form. Given how intrinsic it was to the 15th Doctor’s process of “death,” maybe the TARDIS is trying to save her pilot by taking over their body for a bit, to sustain it until an actual regeneration can occur?

    And then you can blame the Rose Tyler of it all on the Bad Wolf stuff again, or something. Hey, I’m not the one making the show.

    2) The Valeyard

    Doctor Who Trial Of A Time Lord Valeyard
    © BBC

    This is just because everyone always says whenever there’s some mysterious regeneration stuff happening, it simply must be the Valeyard, a strangely sinister emanation of the Doctor introduced in “The Trial of a Time Lord” meant to reflect a future, malicious incarnation that could only be postponed and never truly avoided. Choosing the moment the Doctor’s just sacrificed themselves to move all of reality enough to let baby Poppy exist in some form or another seems like a suitably sinister thing for the Valeyard to do.

    1) Okay Maybe She’s Just the 16th Doctor

    Doctor Who Reality War Billie Piper
    © BBC/Disney

    Or maybe we just skip all this nonsense, and Billie Piper is a one-off Doctor like David Tennant was for the 60th anniversary specials? This era of the show has been very much about trying to repeat the old hits—maybe 2023 will be old enough by Christmas 2026 to be considered for dipping back into the same bag of tricks.

    Want more io9 news? Check out when to expect the latest Marvel, Star Wars, and Star Trek releases, what’s next for the DC Universe on film and TV, and everything you need to know about the future of Doctor Who.

    [ad_2]

    James Whitbrook

    Source link

  • Carole Ann Ford Reveals What Could’ve Been the Purpose of Her ‘Doctor Who’ Return

    [ad_1]

    It’s no secret at this point that the latest season of Doctor Who ended with an almighty mess—leaving the series in a state of limbo that has only continued to get messier as time has gone on. One of the first initial signs of that messiness, beyond the content of “The Reality War” itself, was when Disney+ promoted the episode with a promotional image of a scene that was not actually in the final episode, leading fans to wonder if Ncuti Gatwa’s shock exit from the show was not originally intended to be.

    Now, a surprising source has seemingly confirmed that that was the case: the Doctor’s granddaughter Susan, aka actress Carole Ann Ford. Speaking recently in conversation with fellow Doctor Who companion Katy Manning at Club Parramatta in Sydney, Australia (via Cultbox), Ford revealed new details about the scene glimpsed in that promotional image of the still-alive 15th Doctor dancing in a club with his seemingly still-current companion, Belinda Chandra.

    “You didn’t see the episode, which was to sort of introduce my coming back, where I was holding hands with a little—beautiful little tiny Black child, three years old. And we were watching through the window somewhere where the audience wasn’t supposed to know where we were supposed to be,” Ford explained “And we were watching my newly embodied grandfather, who was now Ncuti [Gatwa], and watching him have a wonderful time singing and dancing in a party in a shop opposite where we were. And obviously I, my character Susan, was longing to just go there and fling her arms around her grandfather and say, ‘Grandfather, how lovely to see you after all this time and how did you survive your floating about in space… and why have you changed?’”

    The child in question appears to be Sienna-Robyn Mavanga-Phipps, the actress who played Poppy—initially introduced as a standalone character in Gatwa’s first season in the episode “Space Babies,” Poppy became a central figure in the 2025 season’s two-part finale “Wish World” and “The Reality War,” where she was wished into being by an alternate reality earth as the Human-Time Lord child of a married Doctor and Belinda.

    In the version of “The Reality War” that was broadcast, Susan didn’t appear at all, and Poppy, who was in danger of being erased entirely with the reset of reality, was saved by the 15th Doctor’s sacrifice, kickstarting his regeneration process to change reality enough to allow Poppy to continue to exist as Belinda’s completely human daughter and retroactively establish Belinda’s arc across the prior season as really being about needing to get home to a child that she previously did not have.

    Where the arc would’ve gone now seems to be thrown into doubt, given not just that Doctor Who has still yet to be announced as getting a new season any time soon, but also due to the significant changes made to this storyline as eventually broadcast. As to how things would’ve played out, Ford declined to say.

    “Anyway, that was unfortunately not to be—for reasons I know and will not disclose,” the actress concluded. Ford’s sole appearance in the season—the first time she had appeared on-screen in Doctor Who since the 1993 charity special Dimensions In Time—would remain as a nebulous vision seen by the 15th Doctor during the events of “The Interstellar Song Contest.

    While whatever Doctor Who had planned for either Susan or Poppy remains unclear, the only thing with any clarity that has emerged from this season is that things did not go as they were originally planned.

    Want more io9 news? Check out when to expect the latest Marvel, Star Wars, and Star Trek releases, what’s next for the DC Universe on film and TV, and everything you need to know about the future of Doctor Who.

    [ad_2]

    James Whitbrook

    Source link

  • The BBC’s ‘Doctor Who’ Secrecy Stopped It From Defending Millie Gibson From Tabloid Reports

    [ad_1]

    Millie Gibson has spoken out about being unable to respond to a series of reports made by British tabloids about her time on Doctor Who—out of concerns from the BBC that doing so could potentially jeopardize revealing then-upcoming storylines from the show.

    Speaking to the I Paper, Gibson touched on a series of reports from British newspapers in 2023 that claimed that she had been dismissed from the series before she had even debuted as the Doctor’s then-latest companion, Ruby Sunday, alleging that the then-19-year-old star behaved like a “diva” on set.

    Gibson’s first full season of Doctor Who wouldn’t premiere until spring 2024, at the climax of which Ruby chose to leave the TARDIS behind to spend time with her family, but she would continue to be a part of the Doctor’s life back on Earth by joining up with UNIT. By that point, however, set pictures and early reporting had confirmed that Andor star Varada Sethu had joined the series as its next companion, Belinda Chandra, and it wouldn’t be officially revealed by the BBC until April 2024, a month before Gibson’s debut season began, that she would continue to appear in the following season in 2025, in an irregular capacity alongside Ncuti Gatwa and Sethu.

    All that time, however, the BBC never formally acknowledged or denied the reports, leaving fans confused and Gibson at the mercy of public opinion even before she’d yet to really step foot out of the TARDIS. “I couldn’t be like, ‘It’s a lie!’ [because] they’d be like, ‘Well, that’s spoilers,’” Gibson told the I Paper. “It was quite hard to stand up for myself without ruining the show. I was like, ‘Oh, this is horrific because it just looks like it’s true.’”

    “Oh, it was awful. What was frustrating was the amount of people that were like, ‘Oh, sorry, this has happened mate,’” Gibson continued, “and I was like, ‘Yeah, it’s not [happened], but thank you.’”

    Without the BBC publicly defending her, Gibson turned to her co-star in Gatwa for advice on how to deal with the scrutiny. “He’s had his time with that,” Gibson added, “and it’s just about just being able to try and shut it out.”

    Is a Doctor Who spoiler worth keeping if it means an actress as young as Gibson is left defenseless from incorrect reporting? Perhaps the formal announcement of her part in season two, alongside Sethu’s arrival, was seen by the BBC as a response to the allegations. But it’s not like the BBC doesn’t respond to reports it considers factually incorrect, and all this still created more confusion that could have possibly been worth it without some kind of pushback to the rumors, which could’ve easily been done while still preserving Ruby’s wider arc on the show.

    But then again, the BBC does seem to love creating confusion over Doctor Who for little reason as of late.

    Want more io9 news? Check out when to expect the latest Marvel, Star Wars, and Star Trek releases, what’s next for the DC Universe on film and TV, and everything you need to know about the future of Doctor Who.

    [ad_2]

    James Whitbrook

    Source link

  • ‘Doctor Who’ Producer Jane Tranter Hits Back At “Rude” Writer Who Said Sci-Fi Series Is As “Dead As We’ve Ever Known It”

    [ad_1]

    Jane Tranter, the executive producer of Doctor Who, has bristled at the suggestion that the iconic sci-fi series is “as dead as we’ve ever known it.”

    The claim was made by Robert Shearman, who wrote Christopher Eccleston episode Dalek in 2005 and has penned several Doctor Who novels. Commenting in Doctor Who Magazine, he argued that Season 15’s ambiguous ending, when Ncuti Gatwa regenerated into Billie Piper’s Rose Tyler, had “put a full stop on things” in a way previous season finales have avoided.

    The remarks also captured a mood of uncertainty around Doctor Who, with many unanswered questions over whether Disney will continue to co-produce the series, and if Russell T Davies and Tranter’s Bad Wolf will remain involved in the BBC Studios-owned show.

    Tranter mounted a spirited defense of the Time Lord when confronted with Shearman’s quote. “‘As dead as we’ve ever known.’ That’s really rude, actually. And really untrue,” Tranter said during an interview with BBC Radio Wales on Friday.

    “The plans for Doctor Who are really simply this: the BBC and BBC Studios had a partnership with Disney+ for 26 episodes. We are currently 21 episodes down into that 26-episode run. We have got another five episodes of [spin-off series] The War Between The Land And The Sea to come. At some point after that, decisions will be made together with all of us about what the future of Doctor Who entails,” Tranter said in the interview, marking the 10th anniversary of Bad Wolf.

    “It’s a 60-year-old franchise. It’s been going for 20 years nonstop since we brought it back in 2005 [when I worked at the BBC]. You would expect it to change, wouldn’t you? Nothing continues the same always, or it shouldn’t continue the same always. So it will change in some form or another. But the one thing we can all be really clear of is that the Doctor will be back and everyone, including me, including all of us, just has to wait patiently to see when — and who.”

    Tranter’s comments echo those of BBC content chief Kate Phillips, who told the Edinburgh TV Festival in August: “Rest assured, Doctor Who is going nowhere. Disney has been a great partnership — and it continues with The War Between The Land And The Sea next year — but going forward, with or without Disney, Doctor Who will still be on the BBC … The Tardis is going nowhere.”

    Despite the confidence in Doctor Who’s future, Season 15’s seven-day ratings did suffer. The season averaged 3.2M viewers over its eight episodes, which was half a million viewers down from Gatwa’s first season, and 1.7M below Jodie Whittaker’s final outing as the Time Lord.

    [ad_2]

    Jake Kanter

    Source link

  • Where are the stars of Strictly Come Dancing season one now? From tragic death to rare cancer diagnosis

    [ad_1]

    Strictly Come Dancing season one first aired in 2004, and since then, it has become something of a ritual. Every year, as the sky grows darker and the air feels colder, it can only mean one thing: a new gang of celebrities are taking to the dancefloor for the chance to win the coveted Glitterball.

    As the weeks go by, we’ll be able to see this year’s Strictly line-up learn and grow as they blossom into formidable dancers. And let’s face it: at least one contestant will split from their partner and succumb to the Strictly curse.

    Now that the 21st season of Strictly Come Dancing has begun, it’s time for us to take a look at where our inaugural celeb contestants are now…

    Christopher played Spencer Moon in EastEnders for three years (Credit: BBC)

    Christopher Parker

    EastEnders fans might know Christopher Parker better as Spencer Moon, a character he portrayed in the soap between 2002 and 2005. Impressively, he juggled his prime-time soap role along with Strictly. He was paired with pro Hanna Karttunen on the show.

    The duo got all the way to the final, but sadly, just months later, Christopher tried to take his own life. According to The Sun, this was due to a woman claiming that he had lied about their relationship to hide his sexuality.

    After his hospitalisation, he left EastEnders, fame and fortune behind. He retrained as a media lawyer. Chris continues to practice to this day.

    Strictly Come Dancing season one cast – Jason Wood

    Before joining Strictly, Jason Wood was a successful comedian who frequented the Edinburgh Fringe Festival and headlined comedy clubs. He was best known for his impressions of musicians.

    He was partnered up with Kylie Jones on the show. And, in an unlucky turn of events, the pair ended up being the first couple eliminated from the show. This was despite not having the lowest votes, and Wood being described as changing from “a caterpillar to a butterfly in one week”

    Sadly, at the age of 38, Jason died in his sleep in 2010, just hours after performing what ended up being his final gig.

    Lesley Garrett on Loose Women
    Lesley made the Strictly semi-final with Anton Du Beke (Credit: ITV)

    Lesley Garrett

    Opera singer and broadcaster Lesley Garrett went all the way to the semi-final with then-dancer Anton Du Beke. Since Strictly, Lesley has been awarded a CBE and she continues to perform.

    However, earlier this year she opened up about a cancer diagnosis so rare that it affects less than 400 people in the UK each year. The 70-year-old singer revealed doctors found a thymoma – a tumour on the thymus gland – a tiny organ that sits below the breastbone, just above the heart and between the lungs.

    She told the Mail: “Knowing there was a risk to my voice, that I could lose it and my career, was so terrifying – so unthinkable – that I had no choice but to lock my fears away. If I’d lost the ability to sing, it would have been the end of my life, really – I’d have lost an essential part of myself. Singing isn’t just what I do, it’s who I am. I’d have lost myself, and I can’t imagine what I would have done. It would have been a kind of death.

    “But thanks to my wonderful NHS team and the cleverness of the technology I have made a full recovery and there has been no lasting effect on my voice. I’m so relieved and grateful, and hope that by shining a light on a rare cancer we can raise awareness and understanding of it.”

    Natasha Kaplinsky
    Natasha Kaplinsky was the first-ever Strictly curse victim, it was reported at the time (Credit: YouTube)

    Natasha Kaplinsky

    Newsreader Natasha Kaplinsky didn’t just win the first season of Strictly. She and her partner Brendan Cole were also rumoured to have been the first victims of the Strictly curse!

    Both split with their long-term partners during the show, and allegedly got together once the show had ended. The pair have since married different people.

    Since the show, Natasha endured a number of heartbreaking miscarriages before having her two children. She remains in broadcasting, and spends a lot of her time doing charity work.

    Martin Offiah at BBC Sports Personality of the Year 2024
    Martin has since retired from rugby (Credit: Cover Images)

    Martin Offiah

    Professional rugby player Martin Offiah made it to the semi-finals with Erin Boag. After scoring ore than 500 tries in his illustrious sporting career, Martin was inducted into the Rugby Hall of Fame back in 2013.

    Since then, he’s retired from playing. But he is still involved in the sport as the official Ambassador of Wigan Warriors.

    David Dickinson on This Morning
    David now hosts Dickinson’s Real Deal (Credit: YouTube)

    Strictly series one cast now – David Dickinson

    Before going on the show, David Dickinson was already a TV mainstay as host of Bargain Hunt and This Morning’s occasional antiques expert. He reached seventh place with pro Camilla Dallerup, and in a 2018 interview, he reflected on just how much Strictly has changed since he appeared on it.

    “It seemed like a bit of fun when I did it. Not quite as competitive, not quite so serious,” he said. “We did two or three hours [of rehearsing a day] instead of eight to 10 now.”

    These days, he presents the show Dickinson’s Real Deal.

    Claire Sweeney on Lorraine
    Claire is now in Corrie (Credit: ITV)

    Claire Sweeney

    At the time, Claire Sweeney was best known for her role as Lindsey Corkhill in Brookside. She and pro partner John Byrnes were eliminated in week 5. But Claire’s career hasn’t slowed down since.

    She’s acted in a slew of West End shows, presented shows such as 60 Minute Makeover, I’m Famous and Frightened and Here Comes The Sun. Most recently, she’s been seen terrorising pensioners as Cassie Plummer in Coronation Street.

    Verona Joseph

    Verona Joseph is best known for her role as Jess Griffin in medical drama Holby City. She and pro partner Paul Killick came sixth. As well as continuing with Holby City, she also appeared in Casualty and Dr Who.

    Read More: Doctor warns pregnant Dianne Buswell ‘will need careful monitoring’ as she prepares to make Strictly history

    Head to our Facebook page @EntertainmentDailyFix and let us know what you thought of this story. We want to hear your thoughts!

    [ad_2]

    Charlotte Colombo

    Source link

  • Who is Celebrity Traitors’ Ruth Codd? Meet the contestant and Netflix actor

    [ad_1]

    Speaking on the experience in an interview, Ruth said, “My injury is the greatest challenge I’ve faced in my life so far. I injured it playing soccer at the age of 15. It never healed correctly, so until I was 23, I was on and off crutches, getting loads of operations. Because of nerve damage and chronic pain, I chose to get it amputated. It took eight years of my life, constantly going in and out of hospital.”

    She explained, “My whole life revolved around trying to heal my leg. For years, I didn’t see it getting any better. I was stuck in a really bad mindset, and I was pissed off at life. When I made the decision to amputate it, things finally started to turn around. It was a relief. I could get on my life.”

    Ruth on joining Celebrity Traitors

    On her decision to join Celebrity Traitors, Ruth said, “I’m questioning everything now! I’ve never done anything like this before. I watched the show, and I just thought it’d be really good fun.”

    She added, “I think because of the way I dress, everyone thinks that I’m dark and spooky all the time. And because of the parts I play. I’m not really like my roles at all. Well, I’d like to think so, because I normally end up playing really mean people! So, I’d like to think there’s no similarity.”

    Does Ruth want to be a Faithful or Traitor?

    So what team will Ruth end up on? For now she remains as Faithful, though as we know all too well there’s still everything to play for, with the actor saying “I’d be happy with either. I’m kind of 50/50. I’m a very indecisive person. I flip flop back and forth.”

    Iiiinteresting. Let’s watch this space!

    [ad_2]

    Lian Brooks

    Source link

  • Prince William Walking Around the TARDIS Set Is a Nice Reminder That ‘Doctor Who’ Is Not Dead Yet

    [ad_1]

    Doctor Who‘s peculiar limbo is going to stick around for a good while yet, it seems, as no one is too keen to definitively put a point to the show’s future beyond a general, hopeful desire that one day it will return. That’s meant that ever since the show’s bizarro mess of a season finale earlier this year, Doctor Who fans have been left clinging to scraps to indicate that the show is not staring down the Dalek raygun barrel of total extermination. The latest scrap? His Royal Highness, the Prince of Wales.

    Well, mostly the set he’s standing on. But Prince William was at least the avenue to remind us that that set—a very important one indeed at that, the latest TARDIS console room—is still ready and available for filming.

    Radio Times reports that Prince William recently visited Bad Wolf Studios in Cardiff, where Doctor Who has been filmed in recent years, in his capacity as the president of the British Academy of Television and Film Arts, a position the Prince of Wales has held since 2010. Pictures of the royal visit were released today, along with the news that Prince William recorded a message at the studio that was released during tonight’s BAFTA Cymru Awards ceremony (where Who showrunner Russell T Davies accepted an award for Outstanding Contribution to Television), promoting the local film and television industry in Wales… which of course included British royalty stepping inside the TARDIS.

    Putting aside Doctor Who‘s own storied history with the royal family—including that time the show nearly dropped a Titanic-shaped starship on top of Buckingham Palace (and then actually did, in an alternate timeline)—the news here is mostly heartening to fans still waiting to hear more definitive news about the show’s future, with the BBC and Disney alike remaining vaguely noncommittal but hopeful about an eventual return to adventures in time and space. And that news is that simply the TARDIS set itself, one of the most important standing sets of the series, is, well, still standing.

    There had been some errant rumors that the set could be potentially broken down—i.e., dismantling the set entirely to open up the occupied studio space for other sets—if Doctor Who wasn’t planning a return any time soon (or at all). But the fact that the set has at least been maintained, even if only for the occasional visit, does at least indicate Doctor Who‘s on-screen future isn’t totally done and dusted. It leaves fans in pretty much the same place they’ve been since the broadcast of “The Reality War”—eying a 2027 return at the earliest, decreasing in likeliness the longer it goes without the BBC making any announcement—but a glimmer of hope is better than no hope at all.

    Want more io9 news? Check out when to expect the latest Marvel, Star Wars, and Star Trek releases, what’s next for the DC Universe on film and TV, and everything you need to know about the future of Doctor Who.

    [ad_2]

    James Whitbrook

    Source link

  • Thomas Skinner breaks silence after Strictly elimination

    [ad_1]

    Thomas Skinner has broken his social media silence after becoming the first celebrity contestant to be eliminated from this year’s series of Strictly Come Dancing. The businessman and social media personality went up against Chris Robshaw and Nadiya Bychkova in the dance-off during the first Results Show of the season. While Thomas and his dance partner, Amy Dowden, gave it their all with their Salsa performance, Chris and Nadiya’s Viennese Waltz ultimately won over the judges, with all four deciding to save the latter couple.

    © BBC/Guy Levy
    Thomas Skinner and Amy Dowden became the first couple to leave the show

    Taking to social media after the result, Thomas praised his dance partner and said he was “gutted” for her. He penned (via The Mirror): “Amy Dowden is one of the most amazing persons I’ve ever met. I loved every single second dancing with her. She is an absolutely wonderful person inside and out. She didn’t deserve to be out first, I’m so gutted for her that we went so early in the competition. I know dancing means the absolute world to her. Keep on shinning, Amy. Sorry our Strictly journey was so short. But you keep on shinning girl. You deserve the world. Bosh.”

    On Monday morning, Thomas shared his appreciation for the support he’d received from fans online. “Back in the van for me this morning, it’s another busy one. Hope you all had a wonderful weekend,” he penned. “I’m catching up on my messages & emails this morning, so will be getting back to everyone who needs a new mattress. Also want to say a massive thank you to all the lovely messages of support I’ve had.”

    The former Apprentice star continued: “It means the world! I know I was rubbish at dancing, but it was so much fun. But back to reality. You are ten times stronger than you can ever imagine… so don’t give up!! Keep on moving forward! Let’s go smash it today. New week, new day, new start. Don’t go home until you’re proud. Bosh.”

    WATCH: Strictly Come Dancing’s most amazing perfect 40 dances

    Thomas’ Strictly exit 

    During Sunday’s results show, judges Shirley Ballas, Anton Du Beke and Craig Revel Horwood all chose to save Chris and Nadiya, meaning that Thomas and Amy won the majority vote and would be leaving the competition. Meanwhile, Motsi Mabuse, who was the judge with the deciding vote, said that she would also have chosen to save Chris and Nadiya. 

    Thomas Skinner & Amy Dowden, Chris Robshaw & Nadiya Bychkova© BBC/Guy Levy
    Thomas and Amy went up against Chris Robshaw & Nadiya Bychkova in the dance-off

    When ask by host Tess Daly about his experience on the show, Thomas said he “loved it”. “I’ve never danced before and my stay was short, but Amy’s amazing,” he said. “It’s been great fun and I’ve enjoyed it. I can’t really dance that well but I’ve had fun! Thank you, Amy – sorry that we haven’t done too good, ’cause you’re a different class.”

    Thomas Skinner and Amy Dowden on Strictly Come Dancing© CREDIT LINE:BBC/Ray Burmiston
    Thomas praised Amy as “amazing”

    Meanwhile, Amy said she’d “made a new friend for life” in Thomas, who she described as “adorable”. “There is a Ballroom boy in there, so I’m a bit gutted he didn’t get to do the Ballroom, but the last three years as you know have been quite difficult for me,” she said. “I lost all confidence as a dancer – but walking into the room with you with a massive smile and a laugh, you brought me back and, honestly, thank you.”

    [ad_2]

    Nicky Morris

    Source link