ReportWire

Tag: Bankruptcy

  • Appeals court reverses judge's ruling, orders appointment of independent examiner in FTX bankruptcy

    Appeals court reverses judge's ruling, orders appointment of independent examiner in FTX bankruptcy

    [ad_1]

    DOVER, Del. — A federal appeals court has ordered the appointment of an independent examiner in the bankruptcy case of FTX amid concerns about widespread fraud preceding the collapse of the multibillion-dollar cryptocurrency exchange.

    A three-judge panel in Philadelphia issued the ruling Friday in an appeal filed by the U.S. bankruptcy trustee, who serves as a government watchdog in Chapter 11 reorganizations. Lawyers for the trustee had argued that FTX’s financial affairs and business operations, including allegations of unprecedented fraud leading to its collapse, should be reviewed by a disinterested person, not left to an internal investigation.

    U.S. Bankruptcy Judge John Dorsey denied the trustee’s request last February. He agreed with FTX and its official committee of unsecured creditors that an examiner’s work would be too costly and would duplicate investigations already under way by FTX’s new leadership, the creditors committee and several federal agencies. Dorsey also expressed confidence in John Ray III, who was appointed by FTX co-founder Sam Bankman-Fried as the company’s new CEO on the same day the company sought bankruptcy protection.

    Bankman-Fried is awaiting sentencing in March after being convicted in November on wire-fraud and conspiracy charges. Several other former FTX executives have pleaded guilty to similar charges. Prosecutors said Bankman-Fried siphoned billions of dollars from customer accounts at FTX into his cryptocurrency hedge fund, Alameda Research.

    The appeals court reversed Dorsey’s ruling, agreeing with the trustee that the bankruptcy code mandates the appointment of an examiner.

    “Sometimes highly complex cases give rise to straightforward issues on appeal,” Judge Luis Felipe Restrepo wrote for the panel. “Such is the case here.”

    Restrepo also noted that an examiner is required to make his or her findings public, whereas a debtor or creditors committee conducting an internal investigation has no such obligation.

    “The collapse of FTX caused catastrophic losses for its worldwide investors but also raised implications for the evolving and volatile cryptocurrency industry,” the judge wrote, noting that further scrutiny of FTX could alert potential investors to undisclosed credit risks in other cryptocurrency companies.

    “In addition to providing much-needed elucidation, the investigation and examiner’s report ensure that the bankruptcy court will have the opportunity to consider the greater public interest when approving the FTX Group’s reorganization plan,” he added.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Crypto firm Terraform Labs files for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection

    Crypto firm Terraform Labs files for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection

    [ad_1]

    NEW YORK — Terraform Labs has filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection, less than two years after a collapse of the company’s cryptocurrency devastated investors around the world.

    The Singapore crypto firm filed for protection in U.S. bankruptcy court in Delaware on Sunday, according to court documents. Terraform listed both its estimated assets and liabilities in the $100 million to $500 million range.

    Terraform said that the bankruptcy filing will allow the company to “execute on its business plan while navigating ongoing legal proceedings,” which includes litigation in Singapore as well as the U.S.

    Terraform added that it intends to fulfill all financial obligations to employees and vendors during this bankruptcy case, and does not require additional financing. The company also plans to continue the expansion of its Web3 offerings.

    “We have overcome significant challenges before and, against long odds, the ecosystem survived and even grew in new ways post-depeg; we look forward to the successful resolution of the outstanding legal proceedings,” Chris Amani, Terraform Labs CEO, said in a prepared statement.

    Terrform’s legal troubles boiled over following the May 2022 implosion of digital currencies TerraUSD and Luna.

    Terraform Labs founder Do Kwon was arrested in Montenegro last year and sentenced to four months in prison for using forged documents while attempting to fly to Dubai using fake Costa Rican passports.

    South Korea and the United States have requested Kwon’s extradition from Montenegro.

    TerraUSD was designed as a “stablecoin,” a currency that is pegged to stable assets like the U.S. dollar to prevent drastic fluctuations in prices. However, an estimated $40 billion in market value was erased for the holders of TerraUSD and its floating sister currency, Luna, after it plunged far below its $1 peg.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • IBM, Westpac-backed blockchain project Lygon to liquidate

    IBM, Westpac-backed blockchain project Lygon to liquidate

    [ad_1]

    Blockchain startup Lygon — backed by International Business Machines and other prominent supporters, including major financial institutions — has gone bankrupt.

    The Australia-based company’s debt hovers at around $14.3 million, according to news platform news.com.au.

    Per a statutory report filed with the corporate regulator in late 2023, Lygon entered liquidation just five years after launching.

    Lygon, headquartered in Sydney, has subsidiaries in New Zealand and Singapore. The firm also captured the attention of the banking community.

    Established as a joint venture by ANZ, CBA, Westpac, IBM, and Scentre Group, the company aimed to revolutionize the digitization of bank guarantees through blockchain technology.



    You might also like:

    Focused on streamlining the process, Lygon sought to eliminate the cumbersome practice of couriering paper documents for bank guarantees, ultimately saving time and money.

    The success story gained significant media coverage, including reports in The Australian Financial Review and various trade publications, highlighting its $12.75 million raised in a crowdfunding campaign.

    However, the narrative took a downturn just over a year later. In June 2023, Lygon appointed administrators, eventually liquidating a few months afterward.

    Amid this unfortunate turn of events, a staff member, who not only invested personally but also influenced their family to invest, expressed lamentation over the financial losses.

    Furthermore, Russell, an individual who spoke on the condition of anonymity to news.com.au, conveyed that staff are owed a significant amount of money. He described the situation as a sad state of affairs.

    Lygon’s intellectual property

    In October 2023, Lygon’s intellectual property (IP) was sold to a consortium involving an investment fund and former senior executives, as stated by the appointed liquidator, Trent Hancock of insolvency Hamilton Murphy. 

    Initially valued at $5.1 million, the firm’s technology was sold for a mere $500,000, representing one-tenth of its initial valuation, and was purchased by some of Lygon’s previous leadership team.

    As part of the sale, Lygon was required to change its business name to its Australian Business Number.

    Russell expressed disappointment with the sale, noting that it significantly diluted the investments of those involved. He also expressed surprise at the legal aspects of the situation, highlighting that the same leadership team repurchased the assets at a fraction of the original cost.

    Russell disclosed that members of his family invested nearly $500,000 in Lygon, though he acknowledged this amount as “a drop in the ocean” compared to the losses incurred by other shareholders.

    He asserted that Lygon had conducted a friend’s and family fundraiser, accumulating close to $5 million from staff and their associates, all of which have now been lost.

    Crypto chaos

    Blockchain liquidation and collapses have been recurring issues in the cryptocurrency industry, impacting investors, creditors, and the broader market.

    Last June, Celsius Network, a cryptocurrency lending platform, which also promoted itself as a safer alternative to banks faced several challenges, including a liquidity crisis and allegations of market manipulation against its co-founder, Alex Mashinsky.

    Mashinsky was arrested and charged with securities fraud, commodities fraud, and conspiracy to manipulate the price of the Celsius token; CEL.

    After a lengthy bankruptcy process, Celsius Network ended its bankruptcy case on Nov. 9, 2023, with a plan to create a new company, NewCo, which will repay customers and creditors.

    The plan, approved by a New York bankruptcy court, involved using a mining firm to pay back creditors.

    NewCo, the newly established company, was set to receive financial backing from two sources: $450 million in cryptocurrency held by Celsius and a $50 million investment from Fahrenheit, an investment group that acquired the rights to oversee NewCo’s mining and staking operations.


    Follow Us on Google News

    [ad_2]

    Ogwu Osaemezu Emmanuel

    Source link

  • Amazon will invest in Diamond Sports as part of bankruptcy restructuring agreement

    Amazon will invest in Diamond Sports as part of bankruptcy restructuring agreement

    [ad_1]

    Amazon will partner with Diamond Sports as part of a restructuring agreement as the largest owner of regional sports networks looks to emerge from bankruptcy.

    Diamond owns 18 networks under the Bally Sports banner. Those networks have the rights to 37 professional teams — 11 baseball, 15 NBA and 11 NHL.

    Diamond Sports has been in Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings in the Southern District of Texas since it filed for protection last March. The company said in a late 2021 financial filing that it had debt of $8.67 billion.

    The terms of the agreement were announced by Diamond Sports on Wednesday morning. Amazon had no comment. It remains subject to approval by the bankruptcy court.

    The agreement with Diamond Sports’ largest creditors allows it to emerge from bankruptcy, continue operations and prevents a total collapse of the regional sports network system where the NBA, NHL and MLB would have to step in to take over production and distribution of most of their teams.

    Last season, MLB had to take over production and distribution of the San Diego Padres and Arizona Diamondbacks after Diamond let rights payments to the Padres lapse and was unable to agree to an amended deal with the Diamondbacks.

    Under the terms of the restructuring agreement, Amazon will make a minority investment in Diamond and enter into a commercial arrangement to provide access to Diamond’s content via Prime Video.

    Customers will be able to access their local team’s content on Prime Video channels where Diamond has rights. Pricing and availability will be announced at a later date. Regional sports content will also remain available on cable and satellite providers.

    Amazon Prime already carries some New York Yankees and Brooklyn Nets games produced by the YES Network.

    Diamond also has an agreement in principle with Sinclair Broadcast Group, to settle pending litigation between the companies.

    Sinclair bought the regional sports networks from The Walt Disney Co. for nearly $10 billion in 2019. Disney was required by the Department of Justice to sell the networks for its acquisition of 21st Century Fox’s film and television assets to be approved.

    Even before Sinclair bought the regional networks, the business was in a downturn due to cord cutting and declines in advertising revenue after entering into exorbitant long-term deals with some teams.

    Under an agreement with creditors last year, Diamond Sports Group became a separate company from Sinclair.

    As part of the settlement, Sinclair will pay Diamond $495 million and provide ongoing services to support Diamond’s reorganization. The proceeds from the settlement will also pay off some creditors.

    “We are thrilled to have reached a comprehensive restructuring agreement that provides a detailed framework for a reorganization plan and substantial new financing that will enable Diamond to operate and thrive beyond 2024,” Diamond Sports CEO David Preschlack said in a statement. “We are grateful for the support from Amazon and a group of our largest creditors who clearly believe in the value-creating potential of this business. Diamond’s near-term focus will be on implementing the RSA and emerging from bankruptcy as a going concern for the benefit of our investors, our employees, our team, league and distribution partners, and the millions of fans who will continue to enjoy our broadcasts.”

    Diamond recently reached agreements with the NHL and NBA to keep local rights through the end of this season. It remains in discussions with Major League Baseball on reworked agreements for the upcoming season, with the next court hearing scheduled for Friday.

    ___

    AP sports: https://apnews.com/sports

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Amazon will invest in Diamond Sports as part of bankruptcy restructuring agreement

    Amazon will invest in Diamond Sports as part of bankruptcy restructuring agreement

    [ad_1]

    Amazon will partner with Diamond Sports as part of a restructuring agreement as the largest owner of regional sports networks looks to emerge from bankruptcy.

    Diamond owns 18 networks under the Bally Sports banner. Those networks have the rights to 37 professional teams — 11 baseball, 15 NBA and 11 NHL.

    Diamond Sports has been in Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings in the Southern District of Texas since it filed for protection last March. The company said in a late 2021 financial filing that it had debt of $8.67 billion.

    The terms of the agreement were announced by Diamond Sports on Wednesday morning. Amazon had no comment. It remains subject to approval by the bankruptcy court.

    The agreement with Diamond Sports’ largest creditors allows it to emerge from bankruptcy, continue operations and prevents a total collapse of the regional sports network system where the NBA, NHL and MLB would have to step in to take over production and distribution of most of their teams.

    Last season, MLB had to take over production and distribution of the San Diego Padres and Arizona Diamondbacks after Diamond let rights payments to the Padres lapse and was unable to agree to an amended deal with the Diamondbacks.

    Under the terms of the restructuring agreement, Amazon will make a minority investment in Diamond and enter into a commercial arrangement to provide access to Diamond’s content via Prime Video.

    Customers will be able to access their local team’s content on Prime Video channels where Diamond has rights. Pricing and availability will be announced at a later date. Regional sports content will also remain available on cable and satellite providers.

    Amazon Prime already carries some New York Yankees and Brooklyn Nets games produced by the YES Network.

    Diamond also has an agreement in principle with Sinclair, to settle the pending litigation between the companies and the other named defendants, which settlement is supported by Diamond’s creditors that are parties to the RSA.

    Sinclair Broadcast Group bought the regional sports networks from The Walt Disney Co. for nearly $10 billion in 2019. Disney was required by the Department of Justice to sell the networks for its acquisition of 21st Century Fox’s film and television assets to be approved.

    Even before Sinclair bought the regional networks, the business was in a downturn due to cord cutting and declines in advertising revenue after entering into exorbitant long-term deals with some teams.

    Under an agreement with creditors last year, Diamond Sports Group became a separate company from Sinclair.

    As part of the settlement, Sinclair will pay Diamond $495 million and provide ongoing services to support Diamond’s reorganization. The proceeds from the settlement will also pay off some creditors.

    “We are thrilled to have reached a comprehensive restructuring agreement that provides a detailed framework for a reorganization plan and substantial new financing that will enable Diamond to operate and thrive beyond 2024,” Diamond Sports CEO David Preschlack said in a statement. “We are grateful for the support from Amazon and a group of our largest creditors who clearly believe in the value-creating potential of this business. Diamond’s near-term focus will be on implementing the RSA and emerging from bankruptcy as a going concern for the benefit of our investors, our employees, our team, league and distribution partners, and the millions of fans who will continue to enjoy our broadcasts.”

    Diamond recently reached agreements with the NHL and NBA to keep local rights through the end of this season. It remains in discussions with Major League Baseball on reworked agreements for the upcoming season, with the next court hearing scheduled for Friday.

    ___

    AP sports: https://apnews.com/sports

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Celsius Threatens to Sue Creditors Who Withdrew Funds Before Collapse

    Celsius Threatens to Sue Creditors Who Withdrew Funds Before Collapse

    [ad_1]

    Celsius, the platform whose bankruptcy plan was finally approved late last year, has recently lashed out at former clients who cashed out before the company had the opportunity to freeze their funds.

    Bold Propositions

    The former crypto staking, lending, and exchange platform that has since shifted its focus to Bitcoin mining following the approval of the judge in its bankruptcy case was the first major player in crypto to bring up the “unsecured creditors” argument in court as a way to appropriate client funds.

    Therefore, it’s not surprising that another outrageous proposal regarding bankruptcy should also come from Celsius.

    According to a notice submitted by Kirkland & Ellis on behalf of their client, Celsius users who withdrew more than $100,000 from the platform in the 90 days prior to the former behemoth’s bankruptcy declaration must “resolve their outstanding liability” or face litigation.

    K&E lawyers have labeled the act of withdrawing funds prior to bankruptcy “avoidance actions,” which can be pursued in court. According to the document, these creditors must return 27.5% of what they withdrew by the 31st of January or face clawbacks.

    “If you are an Account Holder who did not accept the Custody Settlement or you do not have a Class 6A General Custody Claim, this is the amount you must pay to settle your total Withdrawal Preference Exposure. This amount is 27.5% of your total Withdrawal Preference Exposure. […] I intend to make the WPE Settlement Payment by the deadline of January 31, 2024. I understand that I must make the WPE Settlement in Cash by wire.”

    Payouts to Creditors Will Start Soon

    The notice published by Celsius’ legal team is part of the preparations to repay creditors in accordance with the terms laid out in the restructuring agreement. Ostensibly, these measures will allow those who withdrew a significant amount but still had some assets trapped on the platform to receive some of the funds due to be distributed.

    “After you submit the Election Form and make the WPE Settlement Payment, you will receive confirmation of the Debtors’ receipt of your WPE Settlement Payment, that you have completed all actions required under the Account Holder Avoidance Action Settlement, and that you will have been released from all the Avoidance Actions.”

    Although clawback attempts have been made with varying degrees of success by FTX and others, the initiative to recoup funds from private investors is unprecedented and may be hotly contested in court. It’s worth noting that the paragraph above is contingent on the recipient of the notice signing their agreement to the term, and the enforceability of the clawback may be impossible.

    However, if the move is successful, other bankrupt platforms will almost certainly take heed and file their own motions.

    SPECIAL OFFER (Sponsored)

    Binance Free $100 (Exclusive): Use this link to register and receive $100 free and 10% off fees on Binance Futures first month (terms).

    [ad_2]

    Cristian Lipciuc

    Source link

  • Exploring failed ventures: RootData publishes list of deceased crypto projects

    Exploring failed ventures: RootData publishes list of deceased crypto projects

    [ad_1]

    RootData, a provider of visual and structured data on companies in the digital finance industry, has published a list of deceased crypto projects that failed to make it through 2023.

    The biggest names to make the list were Prime Trust, Yield Protocol, Wyre, Multichain and Clockwork. In total, the RootData list included 116 crypto projects that announced their closure or bankruptcy in 2023 and had inactive Internet resources for a long time.

    RootData analysts note: in total, the funds previously allocated for creating and financing “dead projects of 2023” exceeded $940 million.

    The most difficult period and the peak of the most high-profile fiascoes was the second half of 2023. At the end of June, amid the consequences of the crypto winter and Bolt Financial’s refusal to purchase, the Wyre payment platform closed. In July, after the arrest of its founder and a series of hacks, Multichain went bankrupt.

    In August 2023, due to financial problems, the custodial service Crypto Custodian Prime Trust announced its bankruptcy. At the same time as Prime Trust, the Solana blockchain-based smart contract automation project Clockwork ceased to exist due to “limited commercial potential.”

    October saw the closure of DeFi crypto lender Yield Protocol, which announced that the cessation of operations was due to a “lack of regulatory safety and sustained demand for fixed-rate borrowing.”

    At the same time, 2023 was the year of recovery of the cryptocurrency market. Its capitalization has more than doubled in 12 months, rising from $830 billion to its current $1.66 trillion. Bitfinex analysts expect the cryptocurrency market capitalization to reach as much as $3.2 trillion in 2024.


    Follow Us on Google News

    [ad_2]

    Anna Kharton

    Source link

  • Alex Jones proposes $55 million legal debt settlement to Sandy Hook families

    Alex Jones proposes $55 million legal debt settlement to Sandy Hook families

    [ad_1]

    Conspiracy theorist Alex Jones’ latest bankruptcy plan would pay Sandy Hook families a minimum total of $55 million over 10 years, a fraction of the nearly $1.5 billion awarded to the relatives in lawsuits against Jones for calling the 2012 Newtown school shooting a hoax.

    The families, meanwhile, have filed their own proposal seeking to liquidate nearly all of Jones’ assets, including his media company Free Speech Systems, and give the proceeds to them and other creditors.

    The dueling plans, filed late Friday in U.S. Bankruptcy Court in Houston, will be debated and challenged over the next two months, with hearings scheduled for February that will result in a final order saying how much Jones will have to pay out.

    Jones and Free Speech Systems, based in Austin, Texas, both filed for bankruptcy last year as the families were awarded more than $1.4 billion in a Connecticut lawsuit and another $50 million in a Texas lawsuit. A third trial is pending in Texas in a similar lawsuit over Jones’ hoax conspiracy filed by the parents of another child killed in the school shooting.

    The new bankruptcy filings came a day after the 11th anniversary of a gunman’s killing of 20 first-graders and six educators at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut, on Dec. 14, 2012.

    Relatives of some of the victims sued Jones in Connecticut for defamation and infliction of emotional distress for claiming the school shooting never happened and was staged by “crisis actors” in a plot to increase gun control.

    Eight victims’ relatives and an FBI agent testified during a monthlong trial in late 2022 about being threatened and harassed for years by people who deny the shooting happened. Strangers showed up at some of their homes and confronted some of them in public. People hurled abusive comments at them on social media and in emails. Some received death and rape threats.

    Jones’ lawyers did not immediately respond to email messages Saturday.

    Christopher Mattei, a Connecticut attorney for the Sandy Hook families, said Jones’ proposal “falls woefully short” of providing everything the families are entitled to under bankruptcy laws.

    “The families’ plan is the only feasible path for ensuring that Jones’ assets are quickly distributed to those he has harassed for more than a decade,” Mattei said in a statement Saturday.

    Jones’ new proposal to settle with the families for at least $5.5 million a year for 10 years doesn’t appear to offer much more than what Free Speech Systems offered them in its bankruptcy case last month. He also would give them percentages of his income streams.

    Free Speech Systems, the parent company of Jones’ Infowars show, proposed to pay creditors about $4 million a year, down from an estimate earlier this year of $7 million to $10 million annually.

    The company said it expected to make about $19.2 million next year from selling the dietary supplements, clothing and other merchandise Jones promotes on his shows, while operating expenses including salaries would total about $14.3 million.

    Personally, Jones listed about $13 million in total assets in recent financial statements filed with the bankruptcy court, including about $856,000 in various bank accounts. A judge recently gave Jones approval to sell some of his assets, including guns, vehicles and jewelry to raise money for creditors.

    The families’ plan would set up a trust that would liquidate nearly all of Jones’ assets, except his primary home and other holdings considered exempt from sale under bankruptcy laws. The trust would have sweeping powers, including authority to recoup money that Jones has paid and given others if those transfers were not allowed by law.

    The families have been complaining about Jones’ personal spending, which topped $90,000 a month this year. They also have another pending lawsuit claiming Jones hid millions of dollars in an attempt to protect his wealth. One of Jones’ lawyers has called the allegations “ridiculous.”

    Jones is appealing the $1.5 billion in lawsuit awards to the families and has insisted his comments about the shooting were protected by free speech rights.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • SmileDirectClub winds down operations — but customers are told to keep paying

    SmileDirectClub winds down operations — but customers are told to keep paying

    [ad_1]

    SmileDirectClub Inc. said late Friday it was winding down operations, effective immediately, seeming to cast its millions of customers adrift — except when it comes to their bills.

    SmileDirectClub
    SDCCQ,
    -45.32%

    said in a statement that its aligner treatment is not available to new customers. For existing customers, the company said, “we apologize for the inconvenience, but customer care support is no longer available” through its telehealth program, including periodic check-ins.

    The company did not immediately return a request for comment.

    People on the company’s SmilePay plan will need to make all payments until paid in full, the company said. SmileDirect also ended its lifetime guarantee.

    For those seeking refunds, the company said that “there will be more information to come once the bankruptcy process determines next steps and additional measures customers can take.”

    The company in late September filed for bankruptcy protection, saying it was seeking to find investors for a “comprehensive recapitalization.” In January, it laid off workers and ended a few international operations in a bid to become profitable.

    The company has long attracted criticism for its teledentistry model, which it has said aims to disrupt the orthodontics industry. There were allegations a few years ago that it had harmed customers by breaking teeth and causing nerve damage, which the company denied.

    Setbacks also include a scathing report from a short seller; regulatory action in California, Alabama and Georgia; and opposition to the company’s business practices from medical organizations including the American Dental Association and the American Association of Orthodontists.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • OxyContin maker bankruptcy deal goes before the Supreme Court on Monday, with billions at stake

    OxyContin maker bankruptcy deal goes before the Supreme Court on Monday, with billions at stake

    [ad_1]

    WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court is hearing arguments over a nationwide settlement with OxyContin maker Purdue Pharma that would shield members of the Sackler family who own the company from civil lawsuits over the toll of opioids.

    The agreement hammered out with state and local governments and victims would provide billions of dollars to combat the opioid epidemic. The Sacklers would contribute up to $6 billion and give up ownership, and the company would emerge from bankruptcy as a different entity, with its profits used for treatment and prevention.

    But the justices put the settlement on hold during the summer, in response to objections from the Biden administration. Arguments take place Monday.

    The issue for the justices is whether the legal shield that bankruptcy provides can be extended to people such as the Sacklers, who have not declared bankruptcy themselves. Lower courts have issued conflicting decisions over that issue, which also has implications for other major product liability lawsuits settled through the bankruptcy system.

    The U.S. Bankruptcy Trustee, an arm of the Justice Department, contends that the bankruptcy law does not permit protecting the Sackler family from being sued by people who are not part of the settlement. During the Trump administration, the government supported the settlement.

    Proponents of the plan said third-party releases are sometimes necessary to forge an agreement, and federal law imposes no prohibition against them.

    Lawyers for more than 60,000 victims who support the settlement called it “a watershed moment in the opioid crisis,” while recognizing that “no amount of money could fully compensate” victims for the damage caused by the misleading marketing of OxyContin.

    A lawyer for a victim who opposes the settlement calls the provision dealing with the Sacklers “special protection for billionaires.”

    OxyContin first hit the market in 1996, and Purdue Pharma’s aggressive marketing of the powerful prescription painkiller is often cited as a catalyst of the nationwide opioid epidemic, persuading doctors to prescribe painkillers with less regard for addiction dangers.

    The drug and the Stamford, Connecticut-based company became synonymous with the crisis, even though the majority of pills being prescribed and used were generic drugs. Opioid-related overdose deaths have continued to climb, hitting 80,000 in recent years. Most of those are from fentanyl and other synthetic drugs.

    The Purdue Pharma settlement would be among the largest reached by drug companies, wholesalers and pharmacies to resolve epidemic-related lawsuits filed by state, local and Native American tribal governments and others. Those settlements have totaled more than $50 billion.

    But it would be one of only two so far that include direct payments to victims from a $750 million pool. Payouts are expected to range from about $3,500 to $48,000.

    Sackler family members no longer are on the company’s board and they have not received payouts from it since before Purdue Pharma entered bankruptcy. In the decade before that, though, they were paid more than $10 billion, about half of which family members said went to pay taxes.

    A decision in Harrington v. Purdue Pharma, 22-859, is expected by early summer.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Empty Accounts Discovered As Celsius Allows Crypto Withdrawals For Eligible Users

    Empty Accounts Discovered As Celsius Allows Crypto Withdrawals For Eligible Users

    [ad_1]

    In a recent announcement, bankrupt crypto lender Celsius has initiated additional withdrawals for certain eligible custody users. However, it’s important to note that only specific custody assets are currently available for withdrawal, while other cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin (BTC) remain inaccessible

    Starting November 29th, two groups, namely Class 6A General Custody Claims and Class 6B withdrawable custody claims, are eligible for withdrawals. Users within these groups have until February 28th to make their withdrawals. 

    Qualifying users can withdraw 72.5% of their crypto, minus transaction fees, provided they did not participate in a previous custody settlement. 

    Withdrawal Woes For Celsius Users

    In the November 29 announcement, Celsius urged users to withdraw these assets from the Celsius app immediately and to keep personal records of relevant information, as the app will only be accessible for a limited time. 

    However, despite the withdrawal option, some Celsius users have experienced difficulties, according to reports on the X platform. This development comes as some 58,300 users hold approximately $210 million worth of assets that have been deemed “custodial assets” by the court.

    According to user responses to the Celsius announcement, there have been reports of login failures on the platform. Users claim to be experiencing errors even after attempting to reinstall the Celsius app. 

    Additionally, some users have expressed concern that their Earn accounts are empty, further exacerbating the issues faced by former users of the crypto lending platform. One user specifically stated: 

    While my frozen portfolio balance is visible, my custody balance shows 0.

    Transition To ‘Creditor-Owned’ Bitcoin Mining Company

    As reported by our sister website, Bitcoinist Celsius recently obtained approval from the bankruptcy court for its proposal to transition into a creditor-owned Bitcoin mining company. 

    This plan involves repaying customers through a combination of crypto assets and stock in the newly established Bitcoin mining firm, which will be publicly listed.

    The distribution of assets is expected to commence in early 2024, pending endorsement from the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). However, Celsius acknowledges the possibility of liquidation if the crypto-mining proposal fails to materialize.

    Celsius and its founder and CEO, Alex Mashinsky, have faced legal action from various entities, including the SEC, Federal Trade Commission (FTC), and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), for alleged misleading practices. 

    Celsius promptly settled with the FTC, agreeing to pay $4.7 billion once the bankruptcy proceedings concluded. Mashinsky has been charged with fraud; his criminal trial is scheduled this year. 

    Overall, the resolution of the reported issues faced by Celsius users remains uncertain, including the login difficulties and accounts displaying zero balances. 

    It is yet to be determined whether these occurrences are temporary or persistent and how the platform intends to address them. The future actions and measures Celsius took to rectify these concerns are still to be clarified.

    The 1-day chart shows CEL’s price surge over the past 24 hours. Source: CELUSDT on TradingView.com

    The lender’s native token, CEL, is trading at $0.2533, up 5% in the past 24 hours. However, it is important to note that the token has yet to recover from its 2022 decline and remains down more than 50% year-to-date.

    Featured image from Shutterstock, chart from TradingView.com

    [ad_2]

    Ronaldo Marquez

    Source link

  • Sandy Hook families offer to settle Alex Jones’ $1.5 billion legal debt for at least $85 million

    Sandy Hook families offer to settle Alex Jones’ $1.5 billion legal debt for at least $85 million

    [ad_1]

    Sandy Hook families who won nearly $1.5 billion in legal judgments against conspiracy theorist Alex Jones for calling the 2012 Connecticut school shooting a hoax have offered to settle that debt for only pennies on the dollar — at least $85 million over 10 years.

    The offer was made in Jones’ personal bankruptcy case in Houston last week. In a legal filing, lawyers for the families said they believed the proposal was a viable way to help resolve the bankruptcy reorganization cases of both Jones and his company, Free Speech Systems.

    But in the sharply worded document, the attorneys continued to accuse the Infowars host of failing to curb his personal spending and “extravagant lifestyle,” failing to preserve the value of his holdings, refusing to sell assets and failing to produce certain financial documents.

    “Jones has failed in every way to serve as the fiduciary mandated by the Bankruptcy Code in exchange for the breathing spell he has enjoyed for almost a year. His time is up,” lawyers for the Sandy Hook families wrote.

    The families’ lawyers offered Jones two options: either liquidate his estate and give the proceeds to creditors, or pay them at least $8.5 million a year for 10 years — plus 50% of any income over $9 million per year.

    Alex Jones Speaks To The Media Outside The Sandy Hook Trial In Waterbury, Connecticut
    InfoWars founder Alex Jones speaks to the media outside Waterbury Superior Court during his trial on September 21, 2022 in Waterbury, Connecticut.

    Joe Buglewicz/Getty Images


    During a court hearing in Houston, Jones’ personal bankruptcy lawyer, Vickie Driver, suggested Monday that the $85 million, 10-year settlement offer was too high and unrealistic for Jones to pay.

    “There are no financials that will ever show that Mr. Jones ever made that … in 10 years,” she said.

    In a new bankruptcy plan filed on Nov. 18, Free Speech Systems said it could afford to pay creditors about $4 million a year, down from an estimate earlier this year of $7 million to $10 million annually. The company said it expected to make about $19.2 million next year from selling the dietary supplements, clothing and other merchandise Jones promotes on his shows, while operating expenses including salaries would total about $14.3 million.

    Personally, Jones listed about $13 million in total assets in his most recent financial statements filed with the bankruptcy court, including about $856,000 in various bank accounts.

    Under the bankruptcy case orders, Jones had been receiving a salary of $20,000 every two weeks, or $520,000 a year. But this month, a court-appointed restructuring officer upped Jones’ pay to about $57,700 biweekly, or $1.5 million a year, saying he has been “grossly” underpaid for how vital he is to the media company.

    Bankruptcy Judge Christopher Lopez on Monday rejected the $1.5 million salary, saying the pay raise didn’t appear to have been made properly under bankruptcy laws and a hearing needed to be held.

    If Jones doesn’t accept the families’ offer, Lopez would determine how much he would pay the families and other creditors.

    After 20 children and six educators were killed by a gunman at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut, in 2012, Jones repeatedly said on his show that the shooting never happened and was staged in an effort to tighten gun laws.

    Relatives, of many but not all, of the Sandy Hook victims sued Jones in Connecticut and Texas, winning nearly $1.5 billion in judgments against him. In October, Lopez ruled that Jones could not use bankruptcy protection to avoid paying more than $1.1 billon of that debt.

    Relatives of the school shooting victims testified at the trials about being harassed and threatened by Jones’ believers, who sent threats and even confronted the grieving families in person, accusing them of being “crisis actors” whose children never existed.

    Jones is appealing the judgments, saying he didn’t get fair trials and his speech was protected by the First Amendment.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Sandy Hook families offer to settle Alex Jones’ $1.5 billion legal debt for a minimum of $85 million

    Sandy Hook families offer to settle Alex Jones’ $1.5 billion legal debt for a minimum of $85 million

    [ad_1]

    Sandy Hook families who won nearly $1.5 billion in legal judgments against conspiracy theorist Alex Jones for calling the 2012 Connecticut school shooting a hoax have offered to settle that debt for only pennies on the dollar — at least $85 million over 10 years.

    The offer was made in Jones’ personal bankruptcy case in Houston last week. In a legal filing, lawyers for the families said they believed the proposal was a viable way to help resolve the bankruptcy reorganization cases of both Jones and his company, Free Speech Systems.

    But in the sharply worded document, the attorneys continued to accuse the Infowars host of failing to curb his personal spending and “extravagant lifestyle,” failing to preserve the value of his holdings, refusing to sell assets and failing to produce certain financial documents.

    “Jones has failed in every way to serve as the fiduciary mandated by the Bankruptcy Code in exchange for the breathing spell he has enjoyed for almost a year. His time is up,” lawyers for the Sandy Hook families wrote.

    The families’ lawyers offered Jones two options: either liquidate his estate and give the proceeds to creditors, or pay them at least $8.5 million a year for 10 years — plus 50% of any income over $9 million per year.

    During a court hearing in Houston, Jones’ personal bankruptcy lawyer, Vickie Driver, suggested Monday that the $85 million, 10-year settlement offer was too high and unrealistic for Jones to pay.

    “There are no financials that will ever show that Mr. Jones ever made that … in 10 years,” she said.

    In a new bankruptcy plan filed on Nov. 18, Free Speech Systems said it could afford to pay creditors about $4 million a year, down from an estimate earlier this year of $7 million to $10 million annually. The company said it expected to make about $19.2 million next year from selling the dietary supplements, clothing and other merchandise Jones promotes on his shows, while operating expenses including salaries would total about $14.3 million.

    Personally, Jones listed about $13 million in total assets in his most recent financial statements filed with the bankruptcy court, including about $856,000 in various bank accounts.

    Under the bankruptcy case orders, Jones had been receiving a salary of $20,000 every two weeks, or $520,000 a year. But this month, a court-appointed restructuring officer upped Jones’ pay to about $57,700 biweekly, or $1.5 million a year, saying he has been “grossly” underpaid for how vital he is to the media company.

    Bankruptcy Judge Christopher Lopez on Monday rejected the $1.5 million salary, saying the pay raise didn’t appear to have been made properly under bankruptcy laws and a hearing needed to be held.

    If Jones doesn’t accept the families’ offer, Lopez would determine how much he would pay the families and other creditors.

    After 20 children and six educators were killed by a gunman at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut, in 2012, Jones repeatedly said on his show that the shooting never happened and was staged in an effort to tighten gun laws.

    Relatives, of many but not all, of the Sandy Hook victims sued Jones in Connecticut and Texas, winning nearly $1.5 billion in judgments against him. In October, Lopez ruled that Jones could not use bankruptcy protection to avoid paying more than $1.1 billon of that debt.

    Relatives of the school shooting victims testified at the trials about being harassed and threatened by Jones’ believers, who sent threats and even confronted the grieving families in person, accusing them of being “crisis actors” whose children never existed.

    Jones is appealing the judgments, saying he didn’t get fair trials and his speech was protected by the First Amendment.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • WeWork’s stock has continued the strange trend of the bankruptcy bounce

    WeWork’s stock has continued the strange trend of the bankruptcy bounce

    [ad_1]

    In a strange flashback to the demise of Bed Bath & Beyond Inc., WeWork Inc.’s stock soared on its over-the-counter debut this week, just days after the office sharing company filed for chapter 11 bankruptcy protection. 

    WeWork
    WEWKQ,
    +23.02%

    filed for Chapter 11 in New Jersey on Monday and the beleaguered company’s stock was halted before the open that day. The New York Stock Exchange started the delisting process for WeWork that same day.

    Trading resumed over the counter on Wednesday, with WeWork shares ending their first session as an OTC stock up 91.5%.

    WeWork Chapter 11 a meme stock reality check: ‘No one should ever buy a stock that is rumored to be headed to bankruptcy

    A similar scenario happened when shares of Bed Bath & Beyond began trading over the counter in May after the Nasdaq started the delisting process for the bankrupt home-goods retailer and sometime meme-stock darling. Despite Bed Bath & Beyond’s well-documented woes, the stock ended its first session as an OTC stock up 30.4%. Bed Bath & Beyond’s shares were canceled in September.

    In June Overstock.com acquired Bed Bath & Beyond’s intellectual property, and began operating as Bed Bath & Beyond, before changing its corporate name to Beyond Inc.
    BYON,
    +2.06%
    .

    Like Bed Bath & Beyond, WeWork has continued to attract investor attention even as the company’s problems mounted. In mid-September WeWork’s stock saw a record run-up amid meme stock chatter, just weeks after WeWork warned that it may not be able to stay in business.

    Related: WeWork files for bankruptcy, capping a stunning downfall

    Users on social media noted the activity in WeWork’s share price this week, with Twitter user @asunapg warning Thursday that the OTC markets are “much more volatile and often a death trap for a lot of companies.”

    “Here we go again” tweeted @B2Investor Friday, with popcorn and clown emojis.

    WeWork’s stock ended Thursday’s session down 21.3% and the stock is down 12.7% Friday, compared with the S&P 500 index’s
    SPX
    gain of 1.3%.

    Related: Why investors gamble on shares of bankrupt companies — Bed Bath & Beyond, for example

    Tom Bruni, head of content at StockTwits, a social platform for investors and traders, told MarketWatch that, from what he is seeing, there doesn’t seem to be broad interest in the stock.

    “Unlike Bed Bath & Beyond and others where it seemed possible to restructure and continue operating, the current situation for WeWork is mainly a math equation,” he told MarketWatch. “It’s looking most likely that it’ll be bought out, the question is at what price and how much cash (if anything) does that leave for common shareholders to receive? The consensus right now is that all value from its 52 million shares of common stock will be wiped out.”

    Set against this backdrop, short covering could be driving the stock price up in the short term, according to Bruni. “Many market participants don’t want to risk being squeezed by unexpected good news, so they’d rather take their gains than ride it all the way down to zero,” he said. “Should that high short interest start to create sustainable upside momentum (more than a few days), then we’d likely see other traders get involved on the long side.”

    “But for now, with earnings season in full swing, there’s plenty of volatility and news elsewhere for investors/traders to focus on,” he added.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Groupon’s stock craters after earnings as CEO says business ‘continues to be challenged’

    Groupon’s stock craters after earnings as CEO says business ‘continues to be challenged’

    [ad_1]

    Groupon Inc. shares were tumbling more than 20% in Thursday’s extended session after the discounting marketplace announced a new rights offering and acknowledged “challenged” business conditions.

    The company said in a Thursday afternoon release that its board approved an $80 million fully backstopped rights offering to all holders of its common stock. The rights offering will occur through the distribution of nontransferable subscription rights to purchase common stock at a price of $11.30 a share.

    Groupon
    GRPN,
    -2.73%

    also posted third-quarter results, showing revenue down to $126.5 million from $144.4 million a year prior and slightly below the $129.7 million FactSet consensus, which is based on estimates from three analysts.

    The company logged a net loss of $41.4 million, or $1.31 a share, compared with a loss of $56.2 million, or $1.86 a share, in the year-earlier period.

    “We are turning our focus to delivering projects across product, engineering, sales, marketing and revenue management that we expect will reinvigorate our marketplace and position our business to return to growth,” interim CEO Dusan Senkypl said in a release.

    Added Senkypl: “While we did not make as much progress on key projects as I expected and our business continues to be challenged, I am pleased to see sequential improvement in our financial performance, Local Billings return to growth, and our plan to strengthen our liquidity position.”

    In addition, co-founder Eric Lefkofsky plans to leave Groupon’s board of directors, according to Thursday’s release. “With a new management team and the announcement of today’s financing strategy, I am confident that Groupon is on the right track to become the ultimate destination for experiences and services,” Lefkofsky said.

    Groupon’s stock is up 58% so far this year but off 97% from its 2011 all-time high.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Japan’s SoftBank hit with $6.2B quarterly loss as WeWork, other tech investments go sour

    Japan’s SoftBank hit with $6.2B quarterly loss as WeWork, other tech investments go sour

    [ad_1]

    TOKYO — Japanese technology company SoftBank Group Corp. racked up a huge loss in the July-September quarter as its technology investments, most notably office-sharing company WeWork, went sour.

    Tokyo-based SoftBank loss totaled 931 billion yen ($6.2 billion) in the last quarter, a reversal from the 3 trillion yen profit it posted in the same period a year earlier.

    SoftBank has a sprawling investment portfolio and tends to have erratic financial results that fluctuate with market trends.

    That has been highlighted by the troubles at WeWork, which filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection this week amid turmoil in the U.S. commercial real estate market after the pandemic sent vacancies soaring in major cities like New York and San Francisco.

    SoftBank holds a nearly 80% stake in WeWork.

    SoftBank’s chief financial officer, Yoshimitsu Goto, sought to allay investor’s worries, stressing in an online news conference that the company was still going strong overall, making cautious investment decisions and plans to keep growing.

    He said WeWork’s troubles were “regrettable.” SoftBank will study what went wrong and try to do better with its future Vision Fund investments, Goto said.

    SoftBank’s financial damage related to WeWork in the July-September quarter totaled 234 billion yen ($1.5 billion), according to the company, which was the first telecoms operator to bring the iPhone to Japan.

    Goto gave as an example of a hopeful development the recent IPO on Nasdaq of British semiconductor and software design company Arm, which SoftBank acquired in 2016.

    The listing did not directly affect SoftBank’s earnings results, but a gain of $47 billion was recorded as a capital surplus.

    SoftBank’s quarterly sales were little changed, edging up to 1.67 trillion yen ($11 billion) from 1.61 trillion yen. The company does not give full year forecasts.

    SoftBank used to own significant stakes in Amazon, Facebook and Alphabet but sold them a couple of years ago. SoftBank has also sold its stake in Uber to ride out hard times, and dramatically reduced its stake in Alibaba, the Chinese e-commerce and technology company.

    SoftBank Group Corp. shares rose 1.1% Thursday on the Tokyo Stock Exchange.

    ___

    Yuri Kageyama is on X, formerly Twitter https://twitter.com/yurikageyama

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • WeWork — once one of the world’s hottest startups — declares bankruptcy

    WeWork — once one of the world’s hottest startups — declares bankruptcy

    [ad_1]

    WeWork, the formerly high-flying shared office space company that was once among the world’s most valuable startups, filed for bankruptcy on Monday after years of deteriorating financial performance. 

    “To successfully achieve its goals, WeWork Inc. and certain of its entities filed for protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code, and intend to file recognition proceedings in Canada under Part IV of the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (the “CCAA Recognition Proceedings”),” the company said in a statement. “WeWork’s locations outside of the U.S. and Canada are not part of this process. WeWork’s franchisees around the world are similarly not affected by these proceedings.”

    WeWork’s collapse caps a startling decline for a company that was valued at $47 billion in early 2019 after a torrent of venture capital funding from Japan’s Softbank, Goldman Sachs, BlackRock and other blue-chip investors. Over time, its operating expenses soared and the company relied on repeated cash infusions from private investors.

    WeWork leases buildings and divides them into office spaces to sublet to its members, which include small businesses, startups and freelancers who want to avoid paying for permanent office space. The company began struggling right out the gate, however, because millions of Americans converted to remote work and no longer needed office space when mandatory COVID lockdowns were in place.

    WeWork said in its statement announcing the bankruptcy filing that its office spaces are still “open and operational.” The company said it is “requesting the ability to reject the leases of certain locations, which are largely non-operational, adding that “all affected members have received advanced notice.”

    In August, WeWork warned that it might not be able to survive over the next year because of factors such as financial losses and a need for cash. The company also said that it’s facing high turnover rates by members. 

    Former WeWork founder and CEO Adam Neumann launched the company in April 2011. He was ousted in September 2019. 

    “As the co-founder of WeWork who spent a decade building the business with an amazing team of mission-driven people, the company’s anticipated bankruptcy filing is disappointing,” Neumann said Monday in a statement. “It has been challenging for me to watch from the sidelines since 2019 as WeWork has failed to take advantage of a product that is more relevant today than ever before. I believe that, with the right strategy and team, a reorganization will enable WeWork to emerge successfully.”

    WeWork’s downturn began in late 2019 when the company planned to go public but backed out after the company revealed that its losses were much bigger than projected. The company laid off 2,400 employees, or nearly 20% of its workforce, in November 2019. WeWork eventually sold shares to the public in 2021.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • WeWork seeks bankruptcy protection, a stunning fall for a firm once valued at close to $50 billion

    WeWork seeks bankruptcy protection, a stunning fall for a firm once valued at close to $50 billion

    [ad_1]

    WeWork has filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection, a stunning fall for the office sharing company once seen as a Wall Street darling that promised to upend the way people went to work around the world

    ByThe Associated Press

    November 6, 2023, 10:55 PM

    FILE – A sign for WeWork is displayed at their office in the borough of Manhattan in New York, Aug. 9, 2023. Trading in shares of WeWork were halted Monday as rumors that the office sharing company will seek bankruptcy protection. (AP Photo/Ted Shaffrey, File)

    The Associated Press

    NEW YORK — NEW YORK (AP) — WeWork has filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection, a stunning fall for the office sharing company once seen as a Wall Street darling that promised to upend the way people went to work around the world.

    The company offered few specifics about the course of its restructuring, but noted in its filing that it was requesting the ability to cancel leases in particular locations that WeWork described as largely non-operational. All affected members have received advanced notice, the company said in a late Monday announcement.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Prosecutor takes aim at Sam Bankman-Fried’s credibility at trial of FTX founder

    Prosecutor takes aim at Sam Bankman-Fried’s credibility at trial of FTX founder

    [ad_1]

    NEW YORK — A prosecutor began cross-examining Sam Bankman-Fried at a New York City trial on Monday, attacking his credibility by highlighting public statements he made before and after the FTX cryptocurrency exchange he founded filed for bankruptcy late last year when it could no longer process billions of dollars in withdrawals.

    Assistant U.S. Attorney Danielle Sassoon confronted Bankman-Fried with instances in which he’d promised customers that their assets would be safe and that they could demand those assets to be returned at any time.

    Repeatedly, Bankman-Fried answered the series of questions with a rapid “Yep.”

    Bankman-Fried, 31, has been on trial for the past month on charges that he defrauded his customers and investors of billions of dollars. He has pleaded not guilty to charges that carry a potential penalty of decades in prison.

    The California man gained a level of fame from 2017 to 2022 as he created the Alameda Research hedge fund and FTX, building a cryptocurrency empire that became worth tens of billions of dollars. For a time, he seemed to be transforming the emerging industry by conforming to his publicly stated vision of a more regulated and safe environment for users.

    Through her line of questioning, Sassoon tried to show that Bankman-Fried’s public statements were false and that he promised customers that their accounts were safe while he looted them, spending lavishly on real estate, celebrity-laden promotions, investments and political contributions.

    In one instance, she asked him if he’d used profanity in speaking about regulators — even as he was trying to convince Congress to bring more legitimacy to the cryptocurrency industry by setting up a regulatory framework.

    “I said that once,” he answered when she offered a specific example.

    And when Sassoon asked if his pursuit of regulations was just an attempt at garnering positive public relations, he answered: “I said something related to that, yes.”

    Before cross-examination began on Monday, Bankman-Fried testified that he believed his companies could withstand the daily withdrawal of billions of dollars in assets until several days before they could not.

    Bankman-Fried was arrested last December on fraud charges. Initially freed on a $250 million personal recognizance bond to live with his parents in Palo Alto, California, he was jailed in August when Judge Lewis A. Kaplan became convinced that he had tried to tamper with potential trial witnesses.

    He began testifying on Thursday. Kaplan has told jurors that the trial might be completed as early as this week.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • BlockFi to start settling debts with creditors after successful exit from bankruptcy

    BlockFi to start settling debts with creditors after successful exit from bankruptcy

    [ad_1]

    BlockFi has announced its emergence from bankruptcy and is initiating plans to repay creditors, marking a significant turnaround after last year’s challenging halt of withdrawals following the FTX exchange collapse.

    The Oct. 24 announcement by BlockFi, a crypto lending firm, about its emergence from bankruptcy and the commencement of creditor repayments signifies a pivotal moment in the company’s history.

    Last year, the collapse of the FTX exchange compelled BlockFi to halt withdrawals, leading to a tumultuous period for the company and its stakeholders. In its blog post, the company’s management and advisors take pride in achieving this critical milestone swiftly and efficiently compared to other retail crypto companies.

    The company’s ability to navigate through bankruptcy and plan for a strategic wind-down does bring a sigh of relief to creditors and customers. Yet, the turbulent nature of the crypto industry, coupled with the aftermath of the FTX collapse, raises questions about the stability and long-term viability of BlockFi’s operations.

    The company assures users that digital assets will be distributed back to clients, with withdrawals available to nearly all wallet customers. Additionally, users with interest-yielding accounts are being prompted to withdraw available funds.

    This marks the commencement of what the company describes as the first wave of distributions, with subsequent distributions being subject to various factors, primarily BlockFi’s treatment in the FTX bankruptcy cases.

    The statement introduces an element of uncertainty, as the amount and frequency of subsequent distributions are not guaranteed. The dependency on the outcomes of the FTX bankruptcy cases further complicates the scenario, given the unpredictable nature of legal proceedings and the volatile crypto market.


    Follow Us on Google News

    [ad_2]

    Bralon Hill

    Source link