BOSTON — The Healey administration is lashing out at Steward Health Care System’s creditors for seeking to block $30 million in state funding to help transition the bankrupt company’s hospitals to new owners.
In a new filing in U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Assistant Attorney General Andrew Troop accuses a group representing creditors seeking to collect $9 billion in debt from Steward of engaging in “brinksmanship” in an effort “to wring out more value from qualified bidders or the commonwealth to salvage their own bad financial, investment or lending decisions.”
“Many of these creditors seem to have lost sight of the importance of providing safe healthcare over the long term, and instead seem intent on saddling bidders with potentially critical levels of debt or obligations, which will only make this crisis a recurring one,” Troop wrote in the seven-page statement.
While the state is “unable” to stop Steward from closing the two hospitals, Troop said it still has “significant police powers” to intervene in the federal bankruptcy process if it “does not result in a clear path to the sale of the hospitals.”
The fiery statement comes as a federal judge in Texas weighs a request from a group representing Steward’s myriad creditors to reject Gov. Maura Healey’s plan to devote $30 million in repurposed Medicaid funds to help transition the sale of six of Steward’s hospitals as part of the company’s bankruptcy proceedings.
Steward plans to put its 31 U.S. hospitals — including Holy Family’s locations in Methuen and Haverhill — up for sale to pay down $9 billion in outstanding liabilities owed to creditors. The company filed for federal bankruptcy protections in May.
Steward said it wasn’t able to find buyers for Carney Hospital in Dorchester and Nashoba Valley Medical Center in Ayer and announced plans to shut down the facilities in the next 30 days.
U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Christopher Lopez, who is overseeing the case, approved the request to close the hospitals following a Wednesday hearing in a Texas courtroom.
Bids on Steward’s Massachusetts hospitals and other states were due last week, but the company hasn’t disclosed prospective buyers. A hearing on the sales was scheduled for Thursday, but the company asked the federal judge presiding over the case to postpone the proceedings until Aug. 13, without citing a reason.
Last week, Healey officials announced plans to provide $30 million in Medicaid funds to help ensure a “smooth transition” to new ownership for the company’s six remaining hospitals. Healey told reporters earlier this week that “not a dime” of the funds will go to Steward or its management team.
But in a court filing this week, a committee representing Steward’s creditors asked Lopez to block the move, arguing that the transition funding would come “at the expense of the rest of debtors, their estates and their creditors.”
On Wednesday, Lopez approved a request by Steward and others to reject a master lease for all the hospital properties, saying the move “is in the best interests of the Debtors, their respective estates, creditors, and all parties in interest.”
The Attorney General’s office sided with Steward on the lease issue and has accused the hospitals’ landlords — Medical Properties Trust and Macquarie Asset Management — of trying to block the move “to extract concessions from the Steward estate and their mortgagee.
“These hospitals – while each in name a lessee – have been forced to pay the costs typically associated with property ownership, including real estate taxes, maintenance, and insurance,” Troop said in the latest court filing.
Steward’s landlords objected to the request to reject the master lease, arguing in court filings that federal law prohibits the company from stopping rent payments “when their express intention is to continue conducting business in the landlords’ property pending a proposed sale.”
“If a debtor were permitted to reject a lease and stop paying rent, while continuing to conduct business in the landlord’s property, every debtor would do that,” lawyers for the two property owners wrote in a legal filing. “But of course that is not allowed.”
During Wednesday’s hearing, Lopez also heard arguments for approving the Healey administration’s request to use the $30 million for transition costs, but it wasn’t clear when he would issue his ruling on the funding.
Christian M. Wade covers the Massachusetts Statehouse for North of Boston Media Group’s newspapers and websites. Email him at cwade@cnhinews.com.
BOSTON — U.S. Rep. Lori Trahan is urging federal authorities to investigate Stewart Health Care System’s plans to sell its Massachusetts hospitals after the bankrupt company announced plans to close two of the facilities.
In a letter to the heads of U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Trade Commission and Department of Health and Human Services, Trahan said Steward’s decision to sell two hospitals — Carney Hospital in Dorchester and Nashoba Valley Medical Center in Ayer, will “have a long-lasting impact on accessible healthcare” in those communities.
The Westford Democrat, whose district includes Ayer, called on the agencies to probe the closures and “closely monitor” the sale of Steward’s six other hospitals in Massachusetts, including Holy Family’s locations in Methuen and Haverhill.
“It is crucial to ensure that healthcare services remain accessible and affordable for patients as these hospitals transition to new ownership,” Trahan wrote.
The Department of Justice and other agencies recently launched an investigation into the impact of “greed” at Steward and other health care systems. As part of the investigation, the agencies plan to review the impact of private equity firms on patient health, worker safety and the quality of care for patients.
The Texas-based company is also the target of an investigation by the U.S. Attorney’s office in Boston, which is probing allegations that include fraud and violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. The federal law prohibits U.S. companies or citizens from engaging in bribery and corruption overseas.
Trahan’s request would expand the scope of that investigation to include “domestic crimes” as well as “the consumer harms patients have faced because of the company’s actions.”
Trahan cited the role of the private equity firm Cerberus Capital Management in Steward’s finances in Massachusetts and other states. She said acquisitions and sale-leaseback deals enriched Cerberus and Steward’s executives, including CEO Ralph de la Torre.
Last week, the U.S. Senate’s Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions voted to initiate the investigation and issue a rare congressional subpoena for Steward’s CEO Ralph de la Torre to testify on Capitol Hill before the panel at a September hearing.
Steward plans to put its 31 U.S. hospitals up for sale to pay down $9 billion in outstanding liabilities owed to creditors as part of the company’s bankruptcy proceedings. The company filed for federal bankruptcy protections in May.
Bids on Steward’s Massachusetts hospitals and other states were due last week= but the company hasn’t disclosed prospective buyers. The company’s attorneys have asked a federal bankruptcy judge on Monday to postpone a court hearing on the hospital sales until Aug. 13 as it finalizes lease terms and other details.
Meanwhile, the Healey administration’s plans to provide about $30 million in repurposed state-Medicaid funding to keep the hospitals running as they transition to new ownership is facing opposition from a committee representing creditors during the company’s bankruptcy proceedings.
In a court filing late Monday, the committee said it has “significant concerns” that the $30 million pledged by the state may provide near-term (and important) assistance in transitioning the hospital to new owners, “it will do so at the expense of the rest of debtors, their estates and their creditors.”
Gov. Maura Healey has pledged that “not a dime” of the $30 million will go to Steward and will instead help ensure a smooth transition to new hospital ownership. But she noted that her administration has little or no authority to block the hospital closures.
“It’s Steward’s decision to close these hospitals, there’s nothing that the state can do, that I can do, that I have the power to do, to keep that from happening,” Healey told reporters on Monday. “We are in this situation … because of the greed of one individual, Ralph de la Torre, and the management team at Steward.”
Christian M. Wade covers the Massachusetts Statehouse for North of Boston Media Group’s newspapers and websites. Email him at cwade@cnhinews.com
BOSTON — U.S. Rep. Lori Trahan is urging federal authorities to investigate Stewart Health Care System’s plans to sell its Massachusetts hospitals after the bankrupt company announced plans to close two of the facilities.
In a letter to the heads of U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Trade Commission and Department of Health and Human Services, Trahan said Steward’s decision to sell two hospitals – Carney Hospital in Dorchester and Nashoba Valley Medical Center in Ayer – will “have a long-lasting impact on accessible health care” in those communities.
The Westford Democrat, whose district includes Ayer, called on the agencies to probe the closures and “closely monitor” the sale of Steward’s six other hospitals in Massachusetts, including Holy Family’s locations in Methuen and Haverhill.
“It is crucial to ensure that healthcare services remain accessible and affordable for patients as these hospitals transition to new ownership,” Trahan wrote.
The Department of Justice and other agencies recently launched an investigation into the impact of “greed” at Steward and other health care systems. As part of the investigation, the agencies plan to review the impact of private equity firms on patient health, worker safety and the quality of care for patients.
The Texas-based company is also the target of an investigation by the U.S. Attorney’s office in Boston, which is probing allegations that include fraud and violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. The federal law prohibits U.S. companies or citizens from engaging in bribery and corruption overseas.
Trahan’s request would expand the scope of that investigation to include “domestic crimes” as well as “the consumer harms patients have faced because of the company’s actions.”
Trahan cited the role of the private equity firm Cerberus Capital Management in Steward’s finances in Massachusetts and other states. She said acquisitions and sale-leaseback deals enriched Cerberus and Steward’s executives, including CEO Ralph de la Torre.
Last week, the U.S. Senate’s Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions voted to initiate the investigation and issue a rare congressional subpoena for Steward’s CEO Ralph de la Torre to testify on Capitol Hill before the panel at a September hearing.
Steward plans to put its 31 U.S. hospitals up for sale to pay down $9 billion in outstanding liabilities owed to creditors as part of the company’s bankruptcy proceedings. The company filed for federal bankruptcy protections in May.
Bids on Steward’s Massachusetts hospitals and other states were due last week= but the company hasn’t disclosed prospective buyers. The company’s attorneys have asked a federal bankruptcy judge on Monday to postpone a court hearing on the hospital sales until Aug. 13 as it finalizes lease terms and other details.
Meanwhile, the Healey administration’s plans to provide about $30 million in repurposed state Medicaid funding to keep the hospitals running as they transition to new ownership is facing opposition from a committee representing creditors during the company’s bankruptcy proceedings.
In a court filing late Monday, the committee said it has “significant concerns” that the $30 million pledged by the state may provide near-term (and important) assistance in transitioning the hospital to new owners, “it will do so at the expense of the rest of debtors, their estates and their creditors.”
Gov. Maura Healey has pledged that “not a dime” of the $30 million will go to Steward and will instead help ensure a smooth transition to new hospital ownership. But she noted that her administration has little or no authority to block the hospital closures.
“It’s Steward’s decision to close these hospitals, there’s nothing that the state can do, that I can do, that I have the power to do, to keep that from happening,” Healey told reporters on Monday. “We are in this situation … because of the greed of one individual, Ralph de la Torre, and the management team at Steward.”
Christian M. Wade covers the Massachusetts Statehouse for North of Boston Media Group’s newspapers and websites. Email him at cwade@cnhinews.com.
Spirit Airlines is moving farther away from its history as a fee-happy budget airline and will start selling tickets that include some of its most popular extras in bundles.
The Florida-based airline said Tuesday the top ticket will be a “Go Big” package that includes priority check-in, a roomier seat, snacks and drinks, a checked bag, a carry-on bag and free WiFi.
CEO Ted Christie said the changes are “taking low-fare travel to new heights.” They also indicate the deep trouble with Spirit’s longtime business model.
The airline with bright yellow planes hasn’t made a full-year profit since 2019 — it has lost nearly $2.4 billion since — leading industry analysts to mull whether a bankruptcy filing could be in Spirit’s future.
Full-service carriers Delta and United account for an outsized share of the U.S. airline industry’s profit, and they are doing it by focusing on premium flyers while also selling bare-bones “basic economy” fares that compete with Spirit, Frontier and Allegiant for travelers on tight budgets.
The budget carriers have suffered more than the giants from a glut of flights within the United States, which has led to price-cutting. Delta, United and American have a booming business right now in long-haul international flights that can offset weak pricing power at home. Spirit does not.
The budget carriers are trying to adapt. Frontier Airlines — which, like Spirit, has been losing money for more than four years — matched a pandemic-era move by the bigger airlines and dropped flight-change and cancellation fees for many customers this spring. Spirit quickly copied the move.
Spirit has other problems, including a looming debt payment of more than $1 billion and a shortage of planes because some of its jets are grounded for inspections and repairs of Pratt & Whitney engines. Spirit expects compensation of up to $200 million from the engine maker, but its condition is dire enough that Spirit announced in April it would furlough some pilots and delay delivery of new jets.
TD Cowen analysts downgraded Spirit shares to “Sell” this month and said if Spirit can’t renegotiate its debt or return leased planes to lessors, a pre-packaged bankruptcy filing is possible.
Spirit’s announcement Tuesday targets travelers who might not consider a budget airline.
It said customers will be able to book any of the four new ticket bundles starting Aug. 16. That means they won’t be available during the height of summer-vacation travel but will be in use over the busy Labor Day holiday.
“We listened to our guests and are excited to deliver what they want: choices for an elevated experience that are affordable and provide unparalleled value,” Christie said in a statement issued by Spirit.
Spirit shares gained 5% in afternoon trading but are down more than 80% this year.
BOSTON — Bankrupt Steward Health Care System is delaying hearings on the sale of its Massachusetts hospitals by another two weeks, as the company finalizes lease terms and state funding, according to a new court filing.
The delay, which pushes back the hearing date to Aug. 13, comes two days before the company was scheduled to appear before a federal bankruptcy judge in Texas to receive approval to sell its hospitals in Massachusetts, Arkansas, Louisiana, Ohio and Pennsylvania to pay off creditors.
The company didn’t cite a reason for the delay and it is not clear if U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Christopher Lopez will approve the request.
Steward, which filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in May, is putting its 31 U.S. hospitals up for sale beginning this month to pay down $9 billion in outstanding liabilities owed to creditors as part of the bankruptcy proceedings. The company has eight hospitals in Massachusetts, two of which are being closed.
Steward has received bids for the six hospitals, including Holy Family Hospital in Methuen and Haverhill, but has yet to identify bidders or disclose the sale prices. It plans to sell its hospitals in Dorchester and Ayer after failing to reach adequate terms with prospective buyers.
Meanwhile, the state’s taxpayers could be on the hook for $30 million to support Steward’s hospitals as they are shut down or transitioned to new owners.
A proposal filed by Steward on Friday as an emergency motion seeks approval of the payment and an expedited plan to close Carney Hospital in Dorchester and Nashoba Valley Medical Center in Ayer as part of the bankruptcy proceedings. It’s not clear if that request has been approved.
Karissa Hand, a spokeswoman for Gov. Maura Healey, said the $30 million, which does not require legislative approval, will “ensure that patients can continue to access care and workers can keep their jobs until Carney and Nashoba Valley close and the remaining hospitals are transitioned to new owners.”
“Because of Steward and Ralph de la Torre’s greed and mismanagement, these hospitals are in bankruptcy and starved of the resources needed to keep operating for another month,” she said in a statement.
The payments are “advances” on Medicaid funding that the state owes Steward, according to the Healey administration, and cannot be used for rent payments, debt service or management fees.
Healey has blasted the company’s decision to close the two hospitals and called on the company to disclose details of the sale of the other hospitals.
“It is time for Steward and their real estate partners to finally put the communities they serve over their own selfish greed,” she said in a statement Friday. “They need to finalize these deals that are in their best interest and the best interest of patients and workers.”
Christian M. Wade covers the Massachusetts Statehouse for North of Boston Media Group’s newspapers and websites. Email him at cwade@cnhinews.com.
COLOMBO, Sri Lanka — Sri Lanka will hold a presidential election on Sept. 21 that will likely be a test of confidence in President Ranil Wickremesinghe’s efforts to resolve the country’s worst economic crisis.
The date was announced by the independent elections commission Friday, which said nominations will be accepted on Aug. 15.
Wickremesinghe is expected to run while his main rivals will be opposition leader Sajith Premadasa and Anura Dissanayake, who is the leader of a leftist political party that has gained popularity after the economic debacle.
It will be the first election in the South Asian island nation after it declared bankruptcy in 2022 and suspended repayments on some $83 billion in domestic and foreign loans.
That followed a severe foreign exchange crisis that led to a severe shortage of essentials such as food, medicine, fuel and cooking gas, and extended power outages.
The election is largely seen as a crucial vote for the island nation’s efforts to conclude a critical debt restructuring program and as well as completing the financial reforms agreed under a bailout program by the International Monetary Fund.
The country’s economic upheaval led to a political crisis that forced then-President Gotabaya Rajapaksa to resign in 2022. Parliament then elected the then-Prime Minister Wickremesinghe as president.
Under Wickremesinghe, Sri Lanka has been negotiating with the international creditors to restructure the staggering debts and to put the economy back on the track. The IMF has also approved a four-year bailout program last March to help Sri Lanka.
Last month, Wickremesinghe announced that his government has struck a debt restructuring deal with countries including India, France, Japan and China — marking a key step in the country’s economic recovery after defaulting on debt repayment in 2022.
The economic situation has improved under Wickremesinghe and severe shortages of food, fuel and medicine have largely abated. But public dissatisfaction has grown over the government’s effort to increase revenue by raising electricity bills and imposing heavy new income taxes on professionals and businesses, as part of the government’s efforts to meet the IMF conditions.
Sri Lanka’s crisis was largely the result of staggering economic mismanagement combined with fallout from the COVID-19 pandemic, which along with 2019 terrorism attacks devastated its important tourism industry. The coronavirus crisis also disrupted the flow of remittances from Sri Lankans working abroad.
Additionally, the then-government slashed taxes in 2019, depleting the treasury just as the virus hit. Foreign exchange reserves plummeted, leaving Sri Lanka unable to pay for imports or defend its beleaguered currency, the rupee.
Under the agreements with its creditors, Sri Lanka will be able to defer all bilateral loan instalment payments until 2028. Furthermore, Sri Lanka will be able to repay all the loans on concessional terms, with an extended period until 2043. The agreements would cover $10 billion of debt.
By 2022, Sri Lanka had to repay about $6 billion in foreign debt every year, amounting to about 9.2% of gross domestic product. The agreement would enable Sri Lanka to maintain debt payments at less than 4.5% of GDP between 2027 and 2032.
A federal judge dismissed Rudy Giuliani’s bankruptcy protection case Friday, clearing the way for creditors to pursue foreclosures, repossessions and other efforts to collect debt from the former New York City mayor and Trump adviser.
Giuliani himself asked for the dismissal Wednesday, after more than half a year of missing court deadlines amid allegations by lawyers for his creditors that he was evading questions about his finances.
Giuliani filed for bankruptcy protection after a federal jury in December held him liable for defaming two Georgia election workers, and awarded them $148 million in damages.
Giuliani spread lies tying the election workers, Ruby Freeman and Shaye Moss, to a wider conspiracy he pushed — and continues to champion — claiming without evidence that former President Donald Trump lost the 2020 election due to fraud. The dismissal will allow Giulani to pursue an appeal of the defamation case. U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Sean Lane previously barred Giuliani from doing so while his Chapter 11 reorganization was ongoing.
Lane criticized Giuliani for a lack of transparency about his finances during the proceedings, writing Friday that he “has not even retained an accountant, which is the most rudimentary of steps. Such a failure is a clear red flag.”
“Giuliani has failed to provide an accurate and complete picture of his financial affairs in the six months that this case has been pending,” Lane wrote.
Giuliani is barred from again pursuing bankruptcy protection for one year, Lane wrote.
Giuliani’s creditors accused him during the bankruptcy case of hiding assets and using the bankruptcy process to slow down collection. They pointed on Monday to a “completely incongruous” series of recent filings by Giuliani.
He requested on June 17 an extension to file a reorganization plan, crucial to showing a judge the plan for repaying debts. Then Giuliani filed on July 1 a motion to liquidate his assets, giving control to an independent trustee. On Wednesday, he turned the case upside down when he announced he was seeking its dismissal.
Giuliani’s financial problems have peaked as his legal troubles have piled up. He’s entered not guilty pleas to charges in Georgia and Arizona stemming from his alleged efforts to undermine the 2020 presidential election results.
Giuliani, a former U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York, was disbarred from practicing law in the state on July 2. A board in Washington, D.C., recommended in May that he be disbarred there as well.
Graham Kates is an investigative reporter covering criminal justice, privacy issues and information security for CBS News Digital. Contact Graham at KatesG@cbsnews.com or grahamkates@protonmail.com
Fisker is just a few days into its Chapter 11 bankruptcy, and the fight over its assets is already charged, with one lawyer claiming the startup has been liquidating assets “outside the court’s supervision.”
At issue is the relationship between Fisker and its largest secured lender, Heights Capital Management, an affiliate of financial services company Susquehanna International Group. Heights loaned Fisker more than $500 million in 2023 (with the option to convert that debt to stock in the startup) at a time when the company’s financial distress was looming behind the scenes.
That funding was not originally secured by any assets. That changed after Fisker breached one of the covenants when it failed to file its third-quarter financial statements on time in late 2023. In exchange for waiving that breach, Fisker agreed to give Heights first-priority on all of its current and future assets, giving Heights considerable leverage. Heights not only gained pole position to determine what happens to the assets in the Chapter 11 proceedings, but also gave them the chance to tap a preferred restructuring officer to oversee the company’s slow descent into bankruptcy.
Alex Lees, a lawyer from the firm Milbank who represents a group of unsecured creditors owed more than $600 million, said in the proceeding’s first hearing on Friday in Delaware Bankruptcy Court that it took “too long” to get to this point. He said Fisker’s tardy regulatory filing was a “minor technical default” that somehow led to the startup “basically hand[ing] the whole business over to Heights.”
“We believe this was a terrible deal for [Fisker] and its creditors,” Lees said at the hearing. “The right thing to do would have been to file for bankruptcy months ago.” In the meantime, he said, Fisker has been “liquidating outside the court’s supervision” for the benefit of Heights in what he said amounts to “suspect activity.” Fisker has spent the run-up to the bankruptcy filing slashing prices and selling off vehicles.
Scott Greissman, a lawyer representing the investment arm of Heights, said Lees’ comments were “completely inappropriate, completely unsupported,” and derided them as “designed as sound bites” meant to be picked up by the media.
an”There may be a lot of disappointed creditors” in this case, Greissman said, “none more so than Heights.” He said Heights extended “an enormous amount of credit” to Fisker. He added later that even if Fisker is able to sell its entire remaining inventory — around 4,300 Ocean SUVs — such a sale “will maybe pay off a fraction of Heights’ secured debt,” which currently sits at more than $180 million.
Lawyers told the court Friday that they have an agreement in principle to sell those Ocean SUVs to an unnamed vehicle leasing company. But it’s not immediately clear what other assets Fisker could sell in order to provide returns for other creditors. The company has claimed to have between $500 million and $1 billion in assets, but the filings so far have only detailed manufacturing equipment, including 180 assembly robots, an entire underbody line, a paint shop and other specialized tools.
Lees was not alone in his concern over how Fisker wound up filing for bankruptcy. “I don’t know why it took this long,” Linda Richenderfer, a lawyer with the U.S. Trustee’s Office, said during the hearing. She also noted that she was still reviewing new filings late Thursday and in the hours before the hearing.
She also expressed “great concern” that the case could convert to a straight Chapter 7 liquidation following the sale of the Ocean inventory, leaving other creditors fighting for scraps.
Greissman said at one point that he agreed that Fisker “probably took more time” than needed to file for bankruptcy protection, and that some of these quarrels could have been “more easily resolved” if the case had started sooner. He even said he agrees with Richenderfer that “even with a fleet sale, Chapter 11 may not be sustainable.”
The parties will meet again at the next hearing on June 27.
Before he dismissed everyone, Judge Thomas Horan thanked all the parties involved for getting to the hearing “pretty cleanly” despite the rush of filings this week. He particularly called out the U.S. Trustee’s office for working under “really difficult circumstances” to “get their heads around” the case with “minimal controversy, in the scheme of things.”
“I imagine there are a few people who want to catch up on some sleep now,” he said with a smile, as he ended the hearing.
Two years ago, an employee at Fisker Inc. told me that the most pressing concern inside the EV startup was not whether its Ocean SUV would get built. Fisker was outsourcing the manufacturing of its first EV to highly respected automotive supplier Magna, after all. The startup’s November 2022 start-of-production target was aggressive, but not impossible for a company like Magna, which builds vehicles for the likes of BMW.
Instead, this person said, employees were increasingly worried that Fisker wouldn’t be ready to handle all the problems that come after a company puts a car on the road. They were worried the focus was all on building the car and not on the company.
The conversation stuck with me because Fisker founder and CEO Henrik Fisker had an automotive startup fail a decade ago for, arguably, this reason. That company, Fisker Automotive, got a hybrid sports car into the hands of a few thousand customers. But the company buckled soon after as it faced complaints about quality, the failure of its battery supplier, and a hurricane that literally sunk a ship full of vehicles.
The employee’s warning that the new Fisker was heading down a similar path was striking and ultimately prescient. Fisker filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection this week after spending only just one year shipping its SUV to customers around the world. In large part, its undoing is directly tied to its inability to address the worries that employee raised in 2022.
This person wasn’t alone. Dozens of others who worked at Fisker have echoed this sentiment to me in conversations since, nearly all of them on the condition of anonymity because they feared losing their jobs or retaliation from the company. Those conversations informed stories I reported on — the Ocean’s quality and service problems, Fisker’s internal chaos, and decisions from Henrik Fisker and his co-founder, wife, CFO and COO, Geeta Gupta-Fisker, that dragged the company down.
Most all of them told me about how the lack of preparedness ran deep and permeated almost every division of the company, as I’ve previously reported for TechCrunch and Bloomberg News.
The software powering the Ocean SUV was underbaked. It contributed to the delay of the launch of the SUV, and it even kneecapped the very first delivery in May 2023, which Fisker had to turn around and troubleshoot shortly after handing it over. A similar thing happened when the company made its first deliveries in the U.S. in June 2023, when one of its board members’ SUVs lost power shortly after taking delivery.
The company shipped far fewer Ocean SUVs than it originally projected. Even after it lowered its target for 2023 multiple times, it still struggled to hit its internal sales goals. Sales employees have recounted stories of calling potential customers repeatedly in hopes of selling vehicles because so few new leads were coming in. Others wound up pitching in to sell cars even if they worked in completely different departments.
Many customers who did take delivery of their Ocean ran into problems like sudden power loss, trouble with the braking system, glitchy key fobs, problematic door handles that could temporarily lock them in or out of the car, and buggy software. (The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has opened four investigations into the Ocean.)
Fisker struggled with the quality of some of its suppliers, and employees have said it did not build out a proper buffer of spare parts. This put extra pressure on the people in charge of trying to fix the cars as they ran into problems, and ultimately led to the company plucking parts from not only Magna’s production line in Austria, but also from Henrik Fisker’s own car. (Fisker has denied these claims.)
This whole time, lower- and midlevel employees went to great lengths to do what they could to help out the slow-growing customer base. One owner told me an employee took a phone call on their personal cell phone while at a funeral. Other employees relayed stories of workers doing company business while at the hospital. Many worked long days, nights and weekends — to the point where at least one hourly employee has filed a prospective class action over this very issue.
The company itself admitted on multiple occasions that it did not have enough staff to handle the influx of customer service requests. This was another place where workers from other departments pitched in. Some are even still fielding customer calls today, despite having left Fisker weeks or months ago.
Fisker struggled at the mundane-yet-serious work of being a public company, too. It lost track of around $16 million in customer payments at one point, thanks to messy internal accounting practices. It suffered multiple delays in its required reporting to the Securities and Exchange Commission. One of those delays allowed one of the company’s largest lenders to eventually take the reins in the final months.
Despite all this, Fisker is still touting its speed to market as an accomplishment as it begins the bankruptcy process. “Fisker has made incredible progress since our founding, bringing the Ocean SUV to market twice as fast as expected in the auto industry,” a nameless spokesperson said in a press release about the Chapter 11 filing.
This ephemeral corporate representative goes on to say that Fisker “faced various market and macroeconomic headwinds that have impacted our ability to operate efficiently.” While that is certainly true to an extent, there is otherwise no introspection about the myriad issues that got the company to this moment in time.
Perhaps that will surface in the Chapter 11 proceedings, where the company looks to settle its debts (of which it claims to owe between $100 million and $500 million) and offload or otherwise restructure its assets (totaling between $500 million and $1 billion).
What happens next will depend on how those proceedings go. Fisker always took an “asset-light” approach, likening itself to how Apple leveraged Foxconn to help build the iPhone into a global phenomenon. The problem with being asset-light is that it naturally means there is less to borrow against or sell when things break bad.
Magna has stopped production of the Ocean and expects a $400 million revenue loss this year as a result. It’s unclear how much progress Fisker made on its future products, the sub-$30,000 Pear EV and the Alaska pickup. The engineering firm that was co-developing these vehicles with Fisker recently sued the startup, calling the projects into question.
Fisker said in its press release that it will continue “reduced operations,” including “preserving customer programs, and compensating needed vendors on a go-forward basis.” In other words, it will continue to manage a bare-bones operation in case there is a willing buyer of the assets it’s putting up for sale in the Chapter 11 case.
A decade ago, the bankrupt Fisker Automotive did find a buyer. It ultimately morphed into a startup known as Karma Automotive, which is still nominally around today. There have been similar outcomes lately. Three other EV startups that recently filed for bankruptcy — Lordstown Motors, Arrival and Electric Last Mile Solutions — were able to sell off assets to peer companies in the space.
But the ultimate fate of this startup, and its assets, won’t change the fundamental problem: Fisker wasn’t ready to grapple with bringing a flawed car to market.
A U.S. bankruptcy judge has rejected a request from embattled Los Angeles developer Shangri-La Industries for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection for three motel properties in Redlands, Thousand Oaks and Salinas intended for homeless housing.
Shangri-La filed a petition in U.S. Bankruptcy Court in San Jose on April 29 in a move to block foreclosure of and/or financial restructuring on the former Good Nite Inn in Redlands, the former Quality Inn & Suites in Thousand Oaks and the former Sanborn Inn in Salinas.
The three projects, funded under California’s Homekey program launched in June 2020 to protect unhoused individuals from the threat of the coronavirus pandemic, entailed redeveloping the motels for homeless housing.
Shangri-La’s petition also sought bankruptcy protection for a fourth motel conversion project at a former Travelodge in San Ysidro funded under the state Community Care Expansion program.
Cody Holmes, former chief financial officer for Los Angeles developer Shangri-La Industries, and his alleged ex-girlfriend, Madeline Witt, have been sued by Shangri-La, which alleges Holmes embezzled millions of dollars from the company, some of which was earmarked for state-funded motel conversion projects to house the homeless, and used the money to finance a luxurious lifestyle for himself and Witt. (Courtesy photo)
Adolfo Gomringer, proprietor of Monrovia-based AG Flooring, Inc., poses in front of the Step Up San Bernardino building on Friday, Dec. 22, 2023. Gomringer and his team dedicated their efforts to the homeless housing project from March 2021 to Dec. 2022, yet they remain uncompensated, with Shangri-La Industries owing him $93,000. (Photo by Anjali Sharif-Paul, The Sun/SCNG)
Tod Lipka, president and CEO of Step Up, delivers a speech during the unveiling of Step Up San Bernardino at the former All Star Lodge in San Bernardino on Thursday, March 16, 2023. (Photo by Watchara Phomicinda, The Press-Enterprise/SCNG)
The Good Nite Inn in Redlands, seen here in 2021, was converted in 2022 to a 98-room homeless shelter with the help of $30 million in state Homekey funds. The location is now called Step Up in Redlands. (File photo by Jennifer Iyer, Redlands Daily Facts/SCNG)
The front exterior view of Step Up San Bernardino, a new permanent supportive housing for chronically unhoused seniors at the repurposed former All Star Lodge in San Bernardino on Thursday, March 16, 2023. (Photo by Watchara Phomicinda, The Press-Enterprise/SCNG)
Bad faith
In orders handed down on May 15 and June 5, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge M. Elaine Hammond concluded that Shangri-La acted in bad faith when it failed to get written authorization from its partner on the projects, Step Up on Second, to seek bankruptcy protection.
“I find that the totality of circumstances support a finding of bad faith that warrants dismissal of the bankruptcy case,” Hammond said in her May 15 orders regarding the Redlands and Salinas properties. Similar findings were determined in orders handed down on the Thousand Oaks and San Ysidro properties on June 5, court records show.
Step Up on Second is a Santa Monica-based nonprofit that provides support services for the homeless, and is also serving as the property manager at the former Good Nite Inn, now called Step Up in Redlands. Step Up also partnered with Shangri-La on six other Homekey-funded projects, including Step Up in San Bernardino, a former All Star Lodge that opened in March 2023 to provide housing for chronically homeless senior citizens.
Step Up in Redlands and Step Up in San Bernardino are the only two of the seven Homekey-funded projects now housing homeless residents that are fully operating. The fate of the project in Thousand Oaks, three projects in Salinas and one in King City remains uncertain.
Developer blames Step Up
Los Angeles attorney Brian A. Sun, who represents Shangri-La, blamed Step Up for blocking its efforts to restructure the financing of the three projects on which the developer was seeking bankruptcy protection.
“Step Up inexplicably withheld its consent, thereby thwarting our efforts to refinance and restructure the financing of the projects and their completion,” Sun said in a telephone interview on Friday, June 14. He said Shangri-La is still pushing to refinance or restructure the financing on all three projects so they can be completed as envisioned.
Profit interest sold
Shangri-La representatives argued in motions filed in bankruptcy court that the developer was authorized to file for bankruptcy because Step Up was no longer its partner in the Homekey projects.
Shangri-La maintains it executed a profit interest purchase agreement with Step Up in November 2022, and that Step Up subsequently sold its interest in the Homekey projects to Shangri-La for more than $2.7 million.
From November 2022 to January 2023, Shangri-La Industries and Step Up used loan proceeds intended for one of the Homekey-funded motel projects in Salinas, at the former Salinas Inn on Fairview Avenue, to fund two of three scheduled buyout payments to Step Up totaling $2,742,346, according to a motion filed by Jonathan Shenson, an attorney for Shangri-La.
Given that Step Up sold its future profit interests on the seven Homekey projects, the nonprofit was no longer a partner of Shangri-La, and therefore the developer was authorized to file its bankruptcy petition, Shenson said in his motion.
In her order granting dismissal, Hammond determined that Shangri-La’s argument was incomplete.
“Based on the limited information provided, the indications are that debtor’s filings are an unfair manipulation of the bankruptcy code,” Hammond said in her order.
Step Up responds
Tod Lipka, Step Up’s president and chief executive officer, said its reasons for selling its interests in future profits from the Homekey projects were essentially two-fold: it needed to cover operating expenses and provide services to the Redlands and San Bernardino Homekey-funded properties, and also needed money to fund numerous other projects in 2023.
“In 2022 we realized we were going to be doing significant things in 2023. We had numerous housing projects opening and were going to be housing numerous people like we never had before,” Lipka said.
Those projects, Lipka said, not only included ones across California, but at least one state-funded project in Fulton County, Georgia, to house homeless individuals in apartments.
Step Up continues to provide homeless services to residents at the Homekey-funded motels in Redlands and San Bernardino, and maintains an ownership stake in those projects, Lipka said.
“Just because we sold our (profit) interest doesn’t mean we sold out ownership in the project,” Lipka said. “We were essentially giving up that future revenue.”
He said the $2.7 million valuation was based on an “aggregate present value” of all seven Homekey projects.
Shangri-La, Lipka said, has not paid Step Up for providing its services in Redlands and San Bernardino since operations began at the motels in January and March 2023, respectively. The nonprofit provides and pays for case managers for tenants, security and staffing, he said.
“We had to cover the services of those projects that we are not getting reimbursed for by Shangri-La,” Lipka said. He said Shangri-La owes Step Up $1.5 million for services rendered to date, and he questions where all that money went.
“We’re only beginning to discover the extent of the alleged fraud and deception committed by Shangri-La,” Lipka said.
Unpaid contractors
Problems began surfacing for Shangri-La last year, when a Southern California News Group investigation revealed that contractors on the Redlands and San Bernardino Homekey projects filed more than $2 million in mechanics liens over unpaid work on those projects.
It was later revealed that dozens of liens totaling millions of dollars had also been filed at recorders’ offices in Ventura and Monterey counties by contractors and lenders that were not paid for Homekey-funded projects in those areas.
On April 16, the Redlands City Council terminated its Homekey agreement with Shangri-La amid allegations by the state Department of Housing and Community Development that the developer misappropriated $114 million in Homekey funds.
In February, Shangri-La sued its former chief financial officer, Cody Holmes, seeking $40 million in damages. The lawsuit alleges Holmes embezzled millions from the company, including funds intended for its Homekey projects, and engaged in bank fraud and check kiting in 2022 and 2023 with Shangri-La’s lenders, banks and brokers.
Holmes, according to the lawsuit, allegedly transferred vast sums of company cash and property to bank accounts and shell companies he controlled and to his former girlfriend, Madeline Witt, a defendant in the lawsuit.
Holmes, according to the lawsuit, used the money to host extravagant parties, travel on private jets, and lease exotic cars — including a 2021 Bentley Bentayga and a Ferrari Portofino. He also purchased high-dollar luxury items for himself and Witt, including two Birken handbags valued at nearly $128,000, Chanel and Louis Vuitton handbags valued at more than $14,000, a $127,000 Riviera diamond necklace, a $35,000 Audemars Piguet diamond watch, and 20 VIP passes for the 2023 Coachella Music and Arts Festival valued at more than $53,000.
More than a dozen lawsuits
From June 2023 to January 2024, a total of 15 lawsuits and other legal actions were filed against Shangri-La by lenders and contractors in Northern and Southern California, including the state’s lawsuit pending in Los Angeles County.
It prompted attorneys for Shangri-La to file a petition in March with the Judicial Council of California to coordinate all the cases so they are heard in Los Angeles. The next hearing on the state’s case, as well as on Shangri’s petition to coordinate all the cases, will be held on Monday, June 17, in Los Angeles Superior Court before Judge David S. Cunningham III.
Defaults and setbacks
A motion filed in bankruptcy court by Arixa Institutional Lending Partners LLC noted that the lender extended a $12 million loan, with a secured note, to Shangri-La in June 2022 for the acquisition and upgrade of the former Good Nite Inn in Redlands.
The maturity date of the note was Jan. 1, 2024. But as of April 18, Shangri-La still had not made good on its loan, owing Arixa no less than $13.8 million, including $1.7 million in interest fees and nearly $44,000 in foreclosure fees, according to the motion.
Redlands spokesman Carl Baker said the city continues to work with Arixa, which has agreed to work with the city on finding a buyer willing to continue providing housing to the homeless at the motel.
“Arixa and the city are working collaboratively on finding a new buyer for the property,” Baker said. “Our intention is to continue the operation of the property as it has been operating.”
In April, Step Up in Redlands was housing 132 formerly homeless residents, Assistant City Manager Chris Boatman said at the time.
Court battle
Shangri-La’s failed attempts at bankruptcy changes how the investigation into alleged wrongdoing by the developer is handled, said Adam Stein-Sapir, a bankruptcy expert at the New York City-based Pioneer Funding Group.
“In bankruptcy, it would be done by a court-appointed trustee and their counsel. Out of bankruptcy, it will be in state court through the litigation already started by the state … plus any additional cases likely to pop up,” Stein-Sapir said. “In short, in bankruptcy it’s a bit more organized and streamlined; out of court it’s more like an octopus of litigation with each arm being steered by a different captain.”
He said the state attorneys will definitely use the fact that the bankruptcy cases were dismissed to show that another court has seen it their way.
“Admittedly it wasn’t after a trial on the merits, it was just a judge looking at a contract and some preliminary documents, but it’s good enough to include in argument,” Stein-Sapir said.
364 Capital LLC, a Naples, Florida-based firm specializing in bankruptcy restructuring and DIP financing run by Renzo Renzi, has offered a $1.1 million loan to a Hadid-controlled entity called Tree Lane LLC to help address slope erosion issues and engage professionals to help Hadid through bankruptcy on his Beverly Hills property.
Hadid filed for bankruptcy in April on a lot located at 2451 Summitridge Drive, a four-acre vacant lot that needed “emergency” attention, due to erosion issues. The spec developer owed $54.6 million to creditors, according to the bankruptcy filing. The entity’s interest in the property is worth about $35 million, the filing said.
U.S. Bankruptcy Court Judge Sheri Bluebond approved the loan on May 29, which will serve as interim emergency financing, according to a court order. Renzi declined to comment, while Hadid could not be reached for comment.
The loan has a floating interest rate equal to secured overnight financing rate plus 9 percent. As of June 4, SOFR was at 5.3 percent, meaning the interest rate is currently at around 14 percent, according to a source familiar with the transaction.
The debtor-in-possession financing, which is a type of loan given to companies under Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection, will go towards paying for contractor and engineering services to address erosion at the site.
Hadid originally sought a total of $7.7 million in DIP financing, according to the court document.The court will consider approval of the remaining balance of the financing at a hearing on June 13.
Renzi’s 364 Capital has previously stepped in with similar financing for Hadid’s other properties.
In 2022, the firm provided a $6.5 million loan for a Hadid-associated entity called Treetop Development LLC, also to help fix erosion issues at another Beverly Hills property at 9650 Cedarbrook Drive in Beverly Hills.
Hadid has blamed the lender on the property for his financial difficulties, according to a recent interview with the New York Post.
“They gave us enough money to hang ourselves and then they stopped funding,” Hadid told the Post, referring to real estate developer Zach Vella and his firm Skylark Capital, which provided a $31 million loan to his Tree Lane LLC in 2018.
“I believe I was a victim and now I have to fight my fight,” he said.
NEW YORK — Dozens of Red Lobster locations across the U.S. are on the chopping block.
Restaurant liquidator TAGeX Brands announced this week that it would be auctioning off the equipment of over 50 Red Lobster locations that were recently closed as part of the seafood chain’s “footprint rationalization.” The locations span across more than 20 states — cutting back on Red Lobster’s presence in cities like Denver, San Antonio, Indianapolis and Sacramento.
It’s unclear if Red Lobster plans to shutter any additional restaurants in the near future. The Orlando, Florida-based company did not immediately respond to The Associated Press’ requests for comment.
On Red Lobster’s website, a handful of impacted locations were listed as “temporarily closed” or “unavailable” Tuesday morning.
Red Lobster has been struggling for some time. With lease and labor costs piling up in recent years, the chain is now reportedly considering filing for bankruptcy. A potential Chapter 11 filing could help Red Robster exit from some long-term contracts and renegotiate many of its leases, unnamed sources familiar with the matter told Bloomberg News last month.
Maintaing stable management has also proven difficult, with the company seeing multiple ownership changes over its 56-year history. Earlier this year, Red Lobster co-owner Thai Union Group, one of the world’s largest seafood suppliers, announced its intention to exit its minority investment in the dining chain.
Thai Union first invested in Red Lobster in 2016 and upped its stake in 2020. At the time of the January announcement on its plans to divest, CEO Thiraphong Chansiri said the COVID-19 pandemic, industry headwinds and rising operating costs had impacted Red Lobster and resulted in “prolonged negative financial contributions to Thai Union and its shareholders.”
For the first nine months of 2023, the Thailand company reported a $19 million share of loss from Red Lobster.
And then there’s been the problem of endless shrimp. Last year, Red Lobster significantly expanded its iconic all-you-can-eat shrimp deal. But customer demand overwhelmed what the chain could afford, which also reportedly contributed to the millions in losses.
TAGeX Brands’ auctions for the more than 50 closing Red Lobster locations it’s handling liquidation for began Monday and will run through Thursday. The sales are “winner takes all” — meaning that one winner will receive the entirety of contents for each location. Images on TAGeX Brands’ website show that that includes ovens, refrigerators, bar setups, dining furniture and more.
TAGeX Brands called the liquidation “the largest restaurant equipment auction event ever.” In a statement, founder and CEO Neal Sherman said that the goal of such online auctions was to “prevent high-quality items from being discarded in landfills” and instead promote sustainable reuse.
As of Tuesday morning, auctions for 48 locations were still live after another four sales closed Monday, TAGeX Brands told The Associated Press via email.
Red Lobster’s roots date back to 1968, when the first restaurant opened in Lakeland, Florida. In the decades following, the chain expanded rapidly. Red Lobster currently touts more than 700 locations worldwide.
Cannabis in Court: When Federal Courts Will Hear Commercial Disputes Related to the Cannabis Business – Cannabis Business Executive – Cannabis and Marijuana industry news
How much are three abandoned, partially built luxury towers in Downtown Los Angeles worth?
That’s the question raised by L.A. Downtown Investment, an EB-5 investment firm that sunk millions into the graffitied eyesore known as Oceanwide Plaza at Figueroa, Flower, 11th and 12th streets, Bisnow reported. It says the project is worth far less than its developer contends.
The firm representing the foreign investors in the EB-5 program say its developer, China-based Oceanwide Holdings, overestimates the value of the unfinished hotel and condo towers by relying on an outdated appraisal.
Its attorneys suggest a sale price should account for a property left to weather the elements for more than four years and would likely cost $1 billion to complete.
L.A. Downtown Investment, one among many investors involved in litigation over the unfinished hotel and condo project, has teamed up with one creditor to argue in court filings that the project estimate comes from a 2017 CBRE appraisal.
They say the seven-year-old appraisal doesn’t reflect the project’s nearly five-year construction halt, the time it has stood vacant or the cost of white-washing the graffiti, according to the filing.
“The debtor’s views on value are grossly overstated,” L.A. Downtown Investment said last week in a complaint filed in bankruptcy court.
In June, L.A. Downtown Investment filed a notice of default with L.A. County, stating the Beijing-based developer had defaulted on an EB-5 loan tied to the project. Oceanwide owed $157.4 million under the loan, according to the notice, which also stated a sale could be scheduled after Aug. 8.
Lendlease also wants the court to invalidate the EB-5 group’s loan altogether, claiming fraud and misrepresentation.
L.A. Downtown Investment was previously run by Edward Chen, who was charged by the U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission in 2017 for allegedly stealing $12.5 million from investors. A federal court ordered Chen to pay back $24 million.
Lendlease, the general contractor for the Oceanwide Plaza project, joined other creditors owed for their work to push the China-based developer of Oceanwide Plaza into bankruptcy last month.
Contractors and investors have also sued over money they say they’re owed on the project. The developer’s parent company, Beijing-based China Oceanwide Holdings Group, faces liquidation.
Oceanwide Holdings acknowledges it owes at least $370 million, including a $170 million loan from L.A. Downtown Investment, $185 million owed to Lendlease and $15 million owed to the L.A. County Tax Collector, according to court filings reviewed by Bisnow.
The CBRE appraisal, updated in 2021, estimated the “as-is” value of the project at $313 million — less than the amount owed on the project.
That same appraisal estimated that the value of the luxury project, once complete, would be $1.4 billion, and that the cost to complete the project could be $1.2 billion.
“A prospective buyer would be hard put to pay anything close to $200 million for the project in its ‘as is’ condition, let alone the $370 million that the debtor says presently encumbers the property,” the updated appraisal said.
Read more
The discussion of the project’s value came into play as Oceanwide argued that it needs debtor-in-possession financing, funding that is only available to bankrupt companies, according to Bisnow.
“The debtor is in desperate need of funds to pay for continued maintenance and preservation of the property, including funds to safeguard the property, insurance coverage for the property, and payroll for employees,” Oceanwide said, asking the court to approve such financing.
Those who are owed by Oceanwide, including the county and L.A. Downtown Investment, have expressed concerns about the financing and seek assurances that nothing will hold up a sale of the property, which could allow them to get paid.
Aya Pastry was a rare pandemic success story. While Chicagoans anxiously navigated the early days of COVID, the desire for comfort foods increased, and baker Aya Fukai — who rose through Chicago’s culinary ranks using her imagination and creativity as pastry chef at highly profitable Gold Coast hot spot Maple & Ash — was there with her baked goods: Fukai took inspiration from a variety of sources, including Girl Scout Cookies, which pushed her to create a supercharged doughnut, a decadent treat that looks like a Samoa cookie. Coffeehouses around town turned to Aya to supply pastries, and the bakery’s wholesale operation boomed, counting more than 50 clients including large grocery stores like Dom’s Kitchen & Market and independent coffee shops like Gaslight Coffee Roasters.
But behind the scenes, Fukai wasn’t exactly enjoying her tremendous success. She quietly left the bakery in October. Fukai’s exit came just 10 months after her backers at What If Syndicate dissolved the company. What If co-founder David Pisor brought Aya Pastry under his newly formed entity, Etta Collective.
Few knew about Fukai’s exit, as her name remained on the signs. She says that her deal to sell her 51 percent stake in the bakery for $700,000 closed on October 3. Meanwhile, Pisor told Eater on January 17 that she was still with the bakery.
Aya Pastry is just one of the dominoes to fall in Pisor’s restaurant empire, an empire that at one point consisted of five restaurants in three states. In the past month, Pisor closed the River North location of Etta and filed Chapter 11 bankruptcy papers for Etta Collective and Etta River North. On the same day, Thursday, February 1, his attorney made two more bankruptcy filings — one for Etta Bucktown and another for Aya Pastry. The Aya filing revealed Pisor owed $500,000 to Fukai (she received $200,000 upon closing, it went mostly to attorneys fees, she says). A fifth filing had been made on January 18 involving Etta in Scottsdale, Arizona. There are also reports of a $2.5 million loan defaulting and eviction orders, according to Crain’s. The Chapter 11 filings would allow the businesses to continue, and although messaging directed to customers indicate that things are business as usual, questions remain about Etta’s future. Also, plans for a suburban Etta location in Evanston are on hold, Pisor confirms.
Workers said they only received two hours’ notice before Etta River North closed.Barry Brecheisen/Eater Chicago
“Our aim is to best position the Etta brand for future success,” a statement provided to Eater from Pisor and his reps reads. “By filing for protection under Chapter 11, we will be able to restructure our financial position while continuing our daily operations and keeping our locations open. As has already happened in our Scottsdale location, we predict that we will emerge stronger both operationally and financially.”
Former workers have been calling out Etta Collective for months, alleging that the company left them without health care. Their final paychecks also arrived two days late. Fukai, along with 11 former Etta employees — servers, bartenders, and operations staff — from River North and Bucktown provide an inside look into the seeming slow-rolling collapse of a national restaurant group. Etta’s Chicago workers saw warning signs of the downfall in August when Etta Collective narrowly dodged eviction at its Culver City location and laid off 10 workers including a handful at the corporate level. The cost-cutting continued as nine Etta River North workers claimed that they saw lapses in their health care coverage despite having premiums deducted from their paychecks. They accuse Pisor and management of allegedly misleading customers about the distribution of a 3.5 percent staff benefits fee added to customer checks. Most have requested their names be kept out of the story for fear of being labeled as outspoken as they search for new hospitality jobs. Some say they are worried about becoming a target of what they describe as Pisor’s litigious temperament.
After the settlement, Pisor quickly touted the arrivals of three forthcoming restaurants in an afternoon interview with Eater on January 22 — Etta Evanston, Etta Dallas, and a yet-to-be-announced Downtown Chicago steakhouse. Yet the bankruptcy filings include a list of unpaid vendors across sectors — restaurant, health care, and construction — that may put the three projects in jeopardy. Familiar names like Slagel Family Farm, Sysco, Kilgus Farmstead, and Supreme Lobster are owed thousands of dollars, according to these filings.
“He’s got open tabs all around the city,” alleges a source who works in construction and design.
In a written response about money owed to vendors, Pisor writes that Etta filed for Chapter 11 in part to ensure day-to-day operations to restructure and “work to resolve those payments.”
Etta Collective’s decline comes in the aftermath of a split between Pisor and former business partner Jim Lasky following a legal battle that started in March 2022. The two opened Maple & Ash, in 2015 in Chicago’s Gold Coast. They went on to form What If Syndicate and opened a Maple & Ash in Scottsdale. However, along the way, Lasky and Pisor’s relationship became strained, according to court documents. In January 2023, the pair agreed to split What If into two companies. Pisor formed Etta Collective, taking Etta restaurants in River North and Bucktown, Aya Pastry, and Cafe Sophie in Gold Coast. Lasky formed Maple Hospitality Group, taking Maple & Ash, one of the highest-grossing restaurants in the country, according to Restaurant Business Online.
Pisor’s employees in this new company, Etta Collective, say the split was an unwelcome change. Fukai alleges it was made without her knowledge or input, despite her being the majority owner of Aya Pastry. Though she’s come to terms with leaving the business that bears her name, she is considering pursuing legal action against Pisor after seeing the bankruptcy filing.
Many other former employees believe they would still be employed under different leadership.
“Pisor was the only thing wrong with that company,” former Etta River North server Drew Riebhoff alleges of Etta Collective.
Pisor earned a reputation as a developer with big ideas. As a restaurateur, he relished creating lavish dining rooms. Before Maple & Ash, he served as the chief executive officer of Elysian Hotels and was a prolific real estate developer. In 2015, Lasky and Pisor founded Maple & Ash. Building on the success of that first steakhouse, the partners, along with executive chef and Elysian alum Danny Grant, opened a second location four years later in Scottsdale, Arizona.
Maple & Ash brought a brasher attitude compared to traditional steakhouses. It had to, as it takes guts to open a steakhouse on the perimeter of what Chicagoans have nicknamed “the Viagra Triangle,” with Morton’s and Gibsons already surrounding Mariano Park. Pisor and Lasky debuted a new brand centered on one of the trends of the moment: kitchens with wood-fired hearths.
An approach that mixed fine dining with approachable irreverence earned Maple & Ash national attention; then-Eater critic Bill Addison hailed the team for its embrace of “the steakhouse motif with unfettered playfulness.” Addison continued, “[Grant] oversees a 12-foot hearth that breathes fire over rows of steaks, as well as a coal-burning oven that produces the kitchen’s greatest stroke of genius: a seafood tower of roasted shrimp, oysters, lobster, Alaskan King Crab legs, and other oceanic treasures, kissing the shellfish with smoke and concentrating their flavors.”
When Etta Bucktown, a more casual restaurant than Maple & Ash, opened in 2018, customers soon made it one of the hottest tables in town, too. A prototypical neighborhood restaurant and easily scaled, a second Etta soon opened in River North with a third following in Culver City, California.
But the partnership reached a breaking point during the pandemic. Maple & Ash became caught up in a scandal over vaccinations earmarked for a safety net hospital on Chicago’s West Side. A Maple & Ash regular, the former chief operating officer of Loretto Hospital, broke protocol and secured a supply of COVID vaccines for the steakhouse’s staff. While all of this was going on, restaurants across the country fought for every dollar and applied for PPP funds, and staff donned masks to keep safe. Pisor and Lasky’s relationship continued to erode.
David Pisor came up with much of the design for Maple & Ash, the steakhouse he and Jim Lasky opened before the two split in January 2023.Barry Brecheisen/Eater Chicago
A lawsuit filed by Pisor in April 2022 alleged that Lasky and Grant were freezing him out of the company. A counter-lawsuit accused Pisor of allegedly showing up to a female employee’s house late at night unannounced. Rumors began to circulate on both sides, but before the powder keg could explode, Pisor and Lasky agreed to a settlement in January 2023, splitting the company and keeping any other stories away from the public eye.
Today, Pisor’s empire appears in shambles, and his former business partner at Maple & Ash, Lasky, is defending allegations of PPP fraud levied by restaurant investors. The claims of PPP abuse were used as punchlines during the 2024 Jean Banchet Awards, which recognizes local chefs and restaurants. On stage in January, host Michael Muser, a co-owner of two-Michelin-starred Ever, joked about the alleged purchase of a private jet using taxpayer funds that were supposed to benefit employees. But Maple & Ash’s reputation and brand, at least in the eyes of customers, remains strong. The steakhouse continues to attract crowds in Gold Coast and Scottsdale.
Maple & Ash’s owners declined to comment for this story.
Pisor had big plans in 2023 after breaking away from Lasky. In March, he hired a pair of big names with Michelin-star resumes. Alinea Group alum Dan Perretta served as a partner and executive chef. He brought over Micah Melton, the former beverage director of the Aviary — the upscale cocktail lounge operated by Alinea. Buoyed by a fresh start and new personnel, Pisor teased expansion through a series of media announcements in the spring and early summer. But by August, Melton was laid off and Perretta had quit, allegedly in protest of the layoffs.
For service staff, Etta looked like a great place to work from the outside. The company’s promise to pay 70 percent of medical expenses for employees was particularly attractive. But after those August layoffs — which included firing managers who handled payroll — Etta workers allege that they received mixed messages from management regarding their paychecks and benefits. One ex-employee claims he was told by a manager that Etta had underpaid him in August and that he would receive the missing amount in the next week’s paycheck. When the following payday arrived, he claims he was told he owed money to the restaurant because he was overpaid. Complicating matters, according to workers, was an alleged lapse in dental and vision coverage between July 31 and December 5. Eater reviewed emails from insurance provider Guardian and Etta that backed the claim.
“It was just becoming this big, big process of confusion and lies,” a former River North worker alleges.
In an interview from January and a written statement, Pisor denies any lapses, claiming Etta provided “same-day reimbursement checks” and payments before appointments.
Eater has reviewed worker pay stubs from January 2024 showing the deductions (around $15.56 bimonthly for dental and $67.14 for health insurance for employees without dependents). Another worker tells Eater that their dentist told them their “insurance was no longer active.” They claim management never bothered to tell workers.
“I got a call from my dentist for like $500 because they said that they canceled our insurance in August, but we had still been paying premiums since then,” that same worker says. “And that has been taken out of our checks.”
Similarly, Etta server Riebhoff received a letter dated December 12 from Guardian stating dental coverage had been terminated on July 31 before coverage was reinstated. Workers pushed back during a December pre-shift meeting and benefits were restored retroactively to August. Management allegedly told workers they would be reimbursed for any out-of-pocket health care expenses incurred during the lapse in coverage.
“All employees who attended their appointments and submitted a claim to us received a manual check reimbursement from us directly out of pocket, as we did not want any employee to have to fund their own vision and dental appointments while the billing dispute was still being resolved,” Pisor responded.
In January, Pisor told Eater that the health care concerns were not as widespread as alleged by employees, attributing the claim to just one outspoken worker complaining. However, Eater spoke with eight other employees who shared similar concerns about dental and vision coverage. Pisor added that Etta was in a dispute with Guardian, saying the insurance company overcharged Etta following its August layoffs.
Guardian does not appear on the restaurant’s bankruptcy filing as one of the vendors to whom Etta River North owes money. In a statement, Pisor writes that Etta and Guardian agreed to a payment plan in mid-December after receiving a notice on December 7 from Guardian, giving Etta its 30-day notice that it would discontinue coverage due to nonpayment. However, a $10,042.39 debt to United Healthcare appears on the Etta Collective filing.
Aya Fukai says she left Aya Pastry in October 2023.Aya Pastry
Workers want to know what their deductions were spent on. They also received notice of open enrollment going from December 20 to December 29, 2023. An email sent to workers dated December 29, 2023, announced that the dispute with Guardian had been settled. A representative from Etta’s dental and vision provider, Guardian, declined most questions but did say that Etta is no longer a client.
Etta also tacked on a 3.5 percent fee for customers, presenting it as a payment for “staff benefits.” Workers claim that’s not the case and allege the money goes toward credit card processing fees.
“We were required through management to tell people that that was to go toward our health care,” a former Etta worker alleges.
Pisor’s statement denies this claim, saying the charge is meant to cover health care: “We do not offer discounts for cash, nor do we communicate with customers in that manner.”
Multiple former workers, including Riebhoff, allege that they were told by managers that “if [customers are] paying with cash, we take that service charge off.”
Riebhoff continues, “Yep, I guess if you pay cash, you don’t have to help people with insurance.”
Former Etta workers claim pettiness played a role in the company’s fall, citing numerous instances of Pisor’s hubris. A former employee says they believe “it would be thriving” and alleges that Pisor “completely gutted the restaurant of all of its heart and soul.”
The menu changed so much that regular customers couldn’t recognize the restaurant they once enjoyed; management removed popular items like oysters, ricotta pillows, and fire pie. “They just didn’t want anything that Danny [Grant] created on our menu,” Riebhoff says.
A manager allegedly told Riebhoff that the decision to remove specific dishes was a reaction to the loss of chef Grant after What If’s split. Pisor dismissed that conclusion as untrue speculation, saying while dishes change due to seasonality, the classics remain. In addition, three workers and a source familiar with operations say that to underscore that feeling, someone had defaced a photo of Grant at Etta Bucktown, drawing a penis on the picture.
“That’s how petty that they were about the Danny Grant situation,” a former worker says. “And that’s up at the restaurant for employees to see and walk past every day.”
Cafe Sophie next found footing in Gold Coast.Barry Brecheisen/Eater Chicago
Pisor writes, “to the best of my knowledge, there’s no photo of Danny Grant in the restaurant with graffiti on it” and that “if I had been aware of any such photo, I would have had it removed and made sure we addressed that issue with staff immediately.”
Grant declined a request for comment.
A source familiar with Etta’s operations says they were stunned by how quickly the chain’s financials soured right after the split with Lasky in January 2023. That source claims Pisor didn’t realize that restaurants in Chicago slow down in the winter months and make the majority of money after March. Part of the reason, the source alleges, was that Pisor didn’t make any adjustments to his lifestyle, thinking he could live his life as if he was still a co-owner of Maple & Ash, which reported $32 million in sales in 2023. He wanted badly to see Etta succeed on the national level but Etta wasn’t ready to expand that quickly at that scale, the source says.
Pride also seems to have fueled Pisor’s desire to open another steakhouse — showing Grant and Lasky that he could exceed the success of Maple & Ash without them. Pisor had an opportunity to partner on a new restaurant at One Illinois Center. Maple & Ash’s reputation impressed the project’s owner who sought to replicate that success. But in the wake of the bankruptcy filings and eviction notes, the project owner confirms they have severed ties with Pisor. They declined further comment, stating they didn’t want their name in the story and didn’t want anything to do with Pisor. Two other sources allege that the owner was continually embarrassed by Pisor’s recent headlines.
Engineers, architects, and management companies haven’t been paid for a $5 million project that includes a new Etta in Evanston. Construction was supposed to start there in mid-February, but parties are pulling out of the project: “As far as right now, that project is dead,” a construction source says.
Pisor described Evanston as “on hold” and that Etta Collective’s focus is on restructuring.
Pisor’s attitude toward flipping the page in teasing new projects without facing accountability irked his former employees. The day he closed Etta River North, Pisor told Eater Chicago he had worked out a deal with his landlord to open a new restaurant in the space.
“When he said he was going to open a new restaurant in that space, that was a bit infuriating for me,” a former worker says. “Because if that is the case, why were we not informed about this and given the option to maybe pursue a future with the company?”
As the bankruptcies get sorted, there are parties interested in buying Etta from Pisor. Court documents identified John Leahy, who owns Lulu’s in Waikiki, Hawai’i, as a stalking horse investor. “He is a long-time colleague who is interested in helping us restructure and emerge stronger from this bankruptcy,” according to Pisor. “Each entity is being restructured so that we can emerge stronger from the filing. We’re excited to start growing again once we come out the other side of this.”
While Pisor talks expansion, grassroots campaigns from restaurant workers, including the activists at the CHAAD Project, have mounted with a goal of alerting members of the hospitality industry of Pisor and Etta Collective’s reputation.
Pisor writes that he’s unaware of such campaigns and feels Etta treats workers well: “We take very good care of them, and we have employees who have been with us for five years. We’re very proud of the team we’ve built.”
That’s contrary to Riebhoff’s frustrations which have built for months.
“In the court documents for the Scottsdale bankruptcy, there is a quote from him saying, ‘I want to keep this place open so I don’t negatively impact my employees there,’” Riebhoff says. “Meanwhile, he closes Etta River North two hours before our shift with no communication whatsoever. I fucking worked for Lettuce [Entertain You Enterprises] during COVID, and R.J. Melman called us to tell us about it — everyone. So for him to just like not acknowledge it at all, to have zero sympathy or empathy, is fucking disgusting.”
Etta River North remains closed even though lights are turned on and tables set as though the restaurant is ready to serve customers. On the morning of Wednesday, February 7, Rieboff was greeted by the sound of 30 or so text messages. He wasn’t surprised with what he read. He and his former coworkers were supposed to receive their last paycheck from Etta, but the payments didn’t come through. So he and four former workers gathered that afternoon outside Etta Bucktown with signs to protest.
“A lot of industry people live check by check, where’s their money?” they yelled. “They have new concepts even though they’re broke!”
Former Etta River North server Drew Riebhoff holds up a sign at a protest in front of Etta’s Bucktown location.Ashok Selvam/Eater Chicago
A former Etta worker holds up two signs outside the Bucktown location.Ashok Selvam/Eater Chicago
Eater reviewed a text from Rieboff to Etta Bucktown manager Max Ostrowski asking about the status of the paychecks. Ostrowski replied that payment should pop up in 24 to 48 hours, “but if Bucktown gets shut down [because] of protest, then the courts could shut us down and we can’t pay anyone and it would be tied up in courts for months.”
That night, Pisor sent out an email to those former workers, writing that “this payment delay was not expected, the court has approved payment, and we anticipate that the funding process will only take a few days.”
On the afternoon of Friday, February 9, Rieboff told Eater that he received his payment and that he was shocked that no insurance premiums were deducted from his paycheck.
As news spread about Aya Pastry’s bankruptcy on Tuesday, February 13, Pisor’s teams sent out an email newsletter to the bakery’s customers: “Aya continues to operate and add new clients to our roster. What does this mean for you, our valued patrons? Operations as usual. We remain dedicated to producing great breads, cakes and pastries that you’ve come to expect, and our day-to-day operations will continue without interruption.”
A similar email was also sent to Etta Bucktown’s customers, a message that addressed the protest earlier in the week, reassuring potential diners that payments were “sent less than 36 hours after they were due” and that management was “filled with optimism about the future.”
Neither message included any mention of Fukai’s departure. When reached, Fukai, who had already seen the Aya Pastry email, said she felt the message “seemed misleading.” Pisor, in a statement, writes that Etta Collective promoted a worker who had been with the bakery for four and a half years to lead Aya Pastry.
Fukai, who already received $200,000 of Aya’s $700,000 sale price from Pisor, wonders if she’ll see the remainder after five years of building the bakery. She empathizes with Rieboff and Etta’s other workers. Though she’s had since October to extricate herself from the bakery, she needs a reset.
“I’ve been working so hard, and I had so many responsibilities, so I’m taking a little break,” Fukai says.
Tattered Cover’s current CEO can be paid a salary of $120,000 this year, a U.S. Bankruptcy Court judge ruled Monday, despite the objections of its former CEO.
Kwame Spearman, who owns a minority stake in the company, led Tattered Cover between early 2021 and early 2023, when he stepped down following an aborted mayoral bid to focus on running for Denver school board, ultimately unsuccessfully.
His successor is Brad Dempsey, a bankruptcy attorney who took over soon before the company filed for Chapter 11 in October and has led it through the bankruptcy process. Tattered Cover’s board of directors wants him to stay on through 2024 in exchange for $120,000.
That salary had to be approved by a bankruptcy judge. Spearman objected to it.
“We have not seen any official plan for the reorganization of the business and there is concern that a compensation for Mr. Dempsey at $10,000 per month might be extraordinarily excessive,” Spearman told Bankruptcy Judge Michael Romero at a hearing Monday afternoon.
Tattered Cover was scheduled to submit its plan by Jan. 16 but asked for and received a one-month extension instead. Gabrielle Palmer, an attorney for the bookstore chain, said Monday that Tattered Cover will likely need another extension this week.
“If the plan shows merit that Mr. Dempsey should be making $120,000 annually, we’re all fine with this,” Spearman said, before again criticizing Dempsey for not crafting a plan.
“Moreover, I have not heard (about) the net income situation. I have heard that, allegedly, sales were slightly up from 2022, but as we’re all aware, sales are not the determinant, net income is the determinant. As a creditor, I think there is strong suspicion to believe that the business is actually in a worse financial situation under Mr. Dempsey’s leadership,” he added.
Palmer defended Dempsey’s tenure as CEO, noted that the company’s six-person board of directors wants him to stay on, and called his proposed salary “fair and reasonable.”
Tattered Cover is being propped up financially by a $1.3 million loan from Read Colorado LLC, a company formed by local philanthropists. That loan requires Dempsey to remain as CEO and states that Tattered Cover will be in default of the loan if he leaves the company.
“It doesn’t make sense to change from Brad Dempsey now or to not allow Brad Dempsey to be paid. We are at a critical time,” said Tim Swanson, a lawyer for Read Colorado.
“It can’t be lost that the lone objector to Mr. Dempsey’s continued employment is someone who is seeking to try to purchase the company,” Swanson said of Spearman.
Spearman countered that he hasn’t made a bid for the company but acknowledged he has requested Tattered Cover’s financial reports in order “to evaluate the terms of a potential offer” to buy it. At one point, he repeatedly used the word “we” to describe people who doubt “the viability of the (company’s) board of directors and Mr. Dempsey’s leadership.”
“Who’s ‘we?’” Romero asked. “You’re the only one who filed an objection, Mr. Spearman.”
“I have been in conversation with other individuals, including people who might want to be putting in bids to acquire the company,” Spearman told the judge.
“From the financial information that has been available, this is not a profitable business,” Spearman said of the internal reports that he has received, “and it is adding on increased debt (and) adding on another $10,000 a month for Mr. Dempsey when, quite frankly, we have no indication that net income from the business is going in the right direction.”
Romero took no position on whether Tattered Cover “is going forward or going south,” as he put it, but said he is “hesitant to interfere with the business judgment” of Tattered Cover’s board of directors. With that, he approved the $120,000 salary request for Dempsey.
“Let’s just see where this goes,” the judge said, and then adjourned the hearing.
After entertaining the possibility of restarting FTX following the bankruptcy process for a long time, lawyers for the defunct exchange have announced that that plan is now scrapped, and the company will simply dissolve once all debts are paid off.
Andrew Dietrich, one of the lawyers representing FTX in the court case, stated that although repayment of creditors in full is not yet guaranteed, it is an objective that is definitely attainable.
Creditors would only be receiving the dollar value of their crypto holdings. This may prove disappointing to investors, as the value of those assets has increased since the exchange went bust. However, it is precisely this development that allowed for full refunds in the first place. Additionally, the solution is legally sound and consistent with bankruptcy law.
Selling The Company Back to The Previous Owner
As company lawyers approach the home stretch in tallying up funds to be paid out, they’ve sealed yet another deal to sell off an FTX-owned entity.
In this case, Digital Custody Inc., a Delaware-based firm with a South Dakota license allowing for custody of digital assets, will be sold for a mere $500,000 to CoinList. The funds will be provided by CoinList’s CEO, a man named Terrence Culver.
However, there’s a catch: Terence Culver is also the man who originally sold Digital Custody to FTX for a total of $10 million.
FTX file motion to sell Digital Custody for $500k which FTX bought for $10m to Terrence Culver (person who sold DCI to FTX for $10m)
A&M (UCC/Ad hoc agrees) says this reflects a fair price for the valuable license from South Dakota that allows it to provide custody pic.twitter.com/QZ8XGVoHQ8
The sale was conducted via two separate transactions, each worth $5 million, one in December 2021 and one in August 2022.
Digital Assets Is “Of No Use to FTX US”
At the time, FTX US bought the company in order to facilitate custody of its own and client assets within the US.
However, asset custody is no longer a concern for FTX since it will be winding down its business as soon as possible once all debts have been paid off.
“DCI is also no longer useful to the Debtors’ business given the Debtors’ sale of LedgerX and that it is unlikely for the Debtors to sell or restart FTX US. As a result, selling or transferring the Interests pursuant to the proposed Sale Transaction in a private sale is the most efficient and cost-effective way of minimizing costs to the estates while maximizing the value for the benefit of the estates.”
The committees representing non-US creditors of FTX have also signed off on the sale. FTX can continue to look for better deals until shortly before the date of the sale.
If the buyer backs out of the deal, a reverse termination fee of $50k will be collected.
SPECIAL OFFER (Sponsored)
Binance Free $100 (Exclusive): Use this link to register and receive $100 free and 10% off fees on Binance Futures first month (terms).
COLOMBO, Sri Lanka — Thai Prime Minister Srettha Thavisin was the guest of honor at Sri Lanka’s 76th Independence Day celebrations on Sunday, as the island nation struggles to emerge from its worst economic crisis.
Srettha joined Sri Lankan President Ranil Wickremesinghe at a low-key ceremony near the country’s main seaside esplanade that included a military parade and parachute jumps. The holiday commemorates Sri Lanka’s independence from British rule in 1948.
Sri Lanka declared bankruptcy in April 2022 with more than $83 billion in debt, more than half of it to foreign creditors. The economic upheaval led to a political crisis that forced then-President Gotabaya Rajapaksa to resign in 2022. The parliament then elected Wickremesinghe as president.
Srettha arrived in Sri Lanka on Saturday and the two countries signed a free trade agreement aiming to boost trade and investment.
Wickremesinghe said on Saturday that Sri Lanka has made significant progress in economic stabilization and sought the help of Thailand in efforts to transform the battered economy and regain international confidence.
Sri Lanka suspended repayment of its debt in 2022 as it ran short of foreign currency needed to pay for imports of fuel and other essentials. Shortages led to street protests that changed the country’s leadership. The International Monetary Fund approved a four-year bailout program last March.
The economic situation has improved under Wickremesinghe, and severe shortages of food, fuel and medicine have largely abated. But public dissatisfaction has grown over the government’s effort to increase revenue by raising electricity bills and imposing heavy new income taxes on professionals and businesses, as part of the government’s efforts to meet the IMF conditions.
Sri Lanka is hoping to restructure $17 billion of its outstanding debt and has already reached agreements with some of its external creditors.
NEW YORK — On Friday, the National Press Club is offering solace — and a free meal — by giving recently laid-off journalists tacos in recognition of a brutal stretch that seems to offer bad news daily for an already struggling industry.
For anyone who works in the news media, the list is intimidating — and unremitting.
The news website The Messenger folded on Wednesday after being in operation since only last May, abruptly putting some 300 journalists out of work. The Los Angeles Times laid off more than 100 journalists in recent weeks, Business Insider and Time magazine announced staff cuts, Sports Illustrated is struggling to survive, the Washington Post is completing buyouts to more than 200 staffers. The Post reported Thursday that The Wall Street Journal was laying off roughly 20 people in its Washington bureau; there was no immediate comment from a Journal representative. Pitchfork announced it was no longer a freestanding music site, after digital publications BuzzFeed News and Jezebel disappeared last year.
And journalists at the Los Angeles Times, the Washington Post, New York Daily News and the Conde Nast magazine company have all conducted walkouts to protest how management was dealing with business problems.
Seeing all the damage is what led to the Washington-based National Press Club to open its weekly Taco Night to laid-off colleagues and offer a one-month free membership to people who need a networking opportunity.
“It’s very important when people have lost their jobs to know that they have some support behind them,” said Didier Saugy, the club’s executive director.
The news business has been in a free fall for the past two decades, starting when much of its advertising moved online to opportunistic tech companies. Advertising is still a huge part of the problem, although there are more complex reasons and circumstances unique to individual outlets that also play a part.
The situation is dire at larger, more national organizations and in smaller communities. A Northwestern University study released in November estimated the United States has lost one-third of its newspapers and two-thirds of its newspaper journalism jobs since 2005.
The nation loses 2.5 newspapers per week — a pace that is accelerating, the study found. Through the end of November, the employment firm Challenger, Gray and Christmas estimated 2,681 journalism jobs were lost in 2023, and that tally has increased by hundreds since.
One industry observer, Jeff Jarvis, wondered on his Buzzmachine website this week: “Is it time to give up on old news?”
“There’s an inevitability to what is happening,” Jarvis, author of “The Gutenberg Parenthesis: The Age of Print and its Lessons for the Age of the Internet,” said in an interview. “Publications have been trying to preserve their old ways and their old models, and it is time for them to realize that it’s not working and now it’s too late.”
While there have been some successes in news outlets shifting their business to paid digital subscriptions — most spectacularly at The New York Times — failures are much more numerous. Even The Washington Post, whose subscriptions boomed during the Trump administration, has seen a falloff, leading its management to acknowledge that it was too optimistic in expansion plans and needed to cut costs.
Optimism created by billionaire owners at the Post, with Jeff Bezos, and Los Angeles Times, with Patrick Soon-Shiong, has faded as it became apparent they didn’t have magic fixes. With COVID and the Hollywood strike constricting the advertising market, the Los Angeles Times estimated it was losing between $30 million and $40 million a year.
Philanthropy has offered a boost to some news organizations, including The Associated Press. The MacArthur Foundation and Knight Foundation last year pledged $500 million to seed solutions in the news industry, but such efforts can’t match the scale of the problem, Jarvis said.
“The industry,” he said, “leaps from false messiah to false messiah.”
Tech companies are also backing away from news, said Aileen Gallagher, a Syracuse University journalism professor. Through its AI-powered search generative experience, Google is much less frequently directing users to individual news sites, she said.
Publishers have also complained of losing significant business with Facebook much less frequently featuring news articles that bring people to news sites. Twitter, now X, was once like a second home to journalists, but that’s become much less the case since Elon Musk’s purchase of the site.
“What the news companies may have finally woken up to is that nothing good will come from accepting the scraps that social platforms and search platforms will give the news business,” Gallagher said.
The 2020 election proved a boon for many news outlets, but there are questions about whether the public will have as much interest in following political news this year.
Some of the troubled outlets also have unique issues that contributed to their problems. Sports Illustrated sent layoff notices to employees after the company that publishes its content lost its license to do so. The Messenger’s failure angered observers because its business plan — a centrist website that tried to appeal to many instead of a tightly-defined audience — was an uphill battle to start.
“It was business malpractice and human cruelty at an epic scale,” Jim VandeHei, co-founder of Axios and Politico, told the Puck newsletter. “Anyone who knew anything about the economics of media knew it would die quickly, spectacularly and sadly.”
That sadness is apparent in messages left on social media by laid-off journalists from The Messenger and elsewhere.
“I was laid off from my political writing job back in August and haven’t been able to find another one since,” wrote Tara Dublin, author of “The Sound of Settling: A Rock and Roll Love Story,” on X. “I am terrified about the future of journalism and how anyone is going to be able to trust any news source.”
Steve Reilly, an investigative reporter at The Messenger who saw his job disappear this week, wrote: “If you’ve been affected by recent journalism layoffs at the Messenger or elsewhere, please know that it is not your fault. It has nothing to do with you or your work.”
Jarvis, who also teaches journalism, said he doesn’t pretend to know the answers. He said there needs to be an attitude change from searching for a way to monetize content to seeing journalism as a service to the community.
“We need journalists in society, and we will find a way to fill that need,” he said. “I’m optimistic in the long run. But in the short run, it’s going to be ugly.”
___
David Bauder covers media for The Associated Press. Follow him at http://twitter.com/dbauder
Amidst legal turmoil and Terraform Labs’ collapse, Do Kwon’s Serbian venture Codokoj22 remains active.
Terraform Labs, the company behind the $60 billion collapse in the crypto market, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in the U.S. on January 21, nearly two years after its dramatic failure.
However, Codokoj22 d.o.o. Beograd, another venture by Terraform’s founder Do Kwon, remains active. Established in Serbia in 2022, while Kwon was evading an Interpol red notice, the company’s purpose remains unclear.
This Serbian enterprise called Codokoj22, co-founded with Han Chang Joon, is legally operational despite Kwon’s current legal predicaments. With a minimal investment of less than one dollar, the company is headquartered in Belgrade’s old town.
Screenshot of Do Kwon’s Serbian firm registration | Source: bisnode.rs
Interestingly, despite Kwon and Chang-Joon’s arrest and conviction for using false documents, Serbian law doesn’t mandate the dissolution of a business due to the legal status of its founders.
U.S. and South Korean authorities are seeking Kwon’s extradition from Montenegro to face fraud charges related to Terraform Labs‘ collapse. Despite this, Codokoj22 d.o.o. Beograd continues to function, owing to the absence of a voluntary liquidation process and the company’s compliance with Serbian business regulations.
The company’s survival hinges on its adherence to regulatory requirements, such as submitting financial statements. Missing two consecutive annual statements could trigger its deregistration, a situation yet to occur.
Kwon’s lawyer in Montenegro, Goran Rodic, stated he is unaware of Kwon’s intentions for the company. The future of Codokoj22 d.o.o. Beograd remains uncertain, as does the resolution of Kwon’s legal challenges across multiple jurisdictions.