ReportWire

Tag: Bankruptcy

  • NC chipmaker Wolfspeed exits Chapter 11 bankruptcy as a restructured company

    [ad_1]

    Inside Wolfspeed’s corporate headquarters near Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.

    Inside Wolfspeed’s corporate headquarters near Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.

    bgordon@newsobserver.com

    Three months after filing for Chapter 11 protection, the North Carolina semiconductor supplier Wolfspeed is out of bankruptcy.

    “Wolfspeed has emerged from its expedited restructuring process, marking the beginning of a new era,” CEO Robert Feurle announced in a statement Monday. “Which we are entering with new energy and a renewed commitment to the growth mindset and entrepreneurial spirit that have powered Wolfspeed since its inception.”

    Through restructuring, the Durham chipmaker eliminated nearly 70% of its debt, representing billions of dollars, and pushed its earliest loan repayment date to 2030. Wolfspeed creditors, including the semiconductor manufacturer Renesas and the investment firm Apollo Global Management, had their debt holdings converted to equity, with previous shareholders receiving a fraction of the new company’s stock.

    On Monday, Wolfspeed canceled its old shares and issued new ones under the same stock ticker, WOLF, at an exchange ratio of 0.0084. Some online stock platforms showed Wolfspeed stock rising upwards of 1,700% before trading was temporarily halted midday due to volatility, though these websites appear not to have calculated that the restructured Wolfspeed (trading under the same ticker) had significantly reduced its number of shares, the financial advice outlet The Motley Fool reports.

    The company also reincorporated in Delaware on Monday, a move it says won’t impact its North Carolina operations.

    Wolfspeed bets on 200-millimeter

    Founded in 1987 under the name Cree, Wolfspeed manufactures a unique semiconductor material called silicon carbide, which is used in electric vehicles, fast-charging stations, and renewable energy storage units. The company also has a lineup of power devices. As Wolfspeed divested from its legacy lighting divisions, it took on large amounts of debt in recent years to fund two silicon carbide factories, including a massive materials plant near Siler City in western Chatham County where Wolfspeed promised to employ more than 1,800 workers.

    Yet production delays at its New York State factory, coupled with increased Chinese chip competition and flagging electric vehicle demand, caused Wolfspeed’s stock to spiral beginning last year. The company ended this past March with $1.3 billion in cash but also faced mounting debt obligations over the next several years, including a $575 million payment due date in 2026. Wolfspeed rejected offers this year to restructure part of its debt, opting instead for a broader solution.

    On June 30, the company filed under Chapter 11 in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas, one of the nation’s most used bankruptcy courts. At the time, Wolfspeed had approximately 3,400 total employees, down from more than 5,000 the previous year. Its “prepackaged” restructuring plan was supported by enough creditors to help it move through bankruptcy court within the anticipated three-month window.

    With Monday’s announcement, Wolfspeed struck an optimistic tone about its ability to supply silicon carbide both now and into the future. It completed its Siler City factory in June and earlier this month unveiled its commercial 200-millimeter silicon carbide products, which are 25% larger than the existing industry standard.

    This story was originally published September 29, 2025 at 6:00 PM.

    Related Stories from Raleigh News & Observer

    Brian Gordon

    The News & Observer

    Brian Gordon is the Business & Technology reporter for The News & Observer and The Herald-Sun. He writes about jobs, startups and big tech developments unique to the North Carolina Triangle. Brian previously worked as a senior statewide reporter for the USA Today Network. Please contact him via email, phone, or Signal at 919-861-1238.

    [ad_2]

    Brian Gordon

    Source link

  • Justice Department questions retired FBI agent’s role in $1.4 billion Sandy Hook lawsuit

    [ad_1]

    A senior U.S. Justice Department official sent a letter to a lawyer for relatives of victims killed in the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting, asking pointed questions about a retired FBI agent’s involvement in a defamation lawsuit that led to a $1.4 billion judgment against conspiracy theorist Alex Jones.Ed Martin Jr., who leads the Justice Department’s “weaponization working group,” asked in the letter whether retired agent William Aldenberg received any financial benefits from helping to organize the lawsuit, in which he was a plaintiff along with victims’ family members.Aldenberg, like the parents and other relatives of the 20 children and six educators killed in the 2012 school shooting in Newtown, Connecticut, has been the subject of false conspiracy theories spread by Jones on his “Infowars” broadcasts.Aldenberg was among the law enforcement officers who responded to the school and found the dead children. That then led to years of abuse from people who believed the shooting was a hoax, he has said. His share of the judgment totaled around $120 million.Martin sends lawyer letter asking about retired agentIn a Sept. 15 letter to Christopher Mattei, a lawyer who represents Sandy Hook families, Martin suggested he was scrutinizing Aldenberg’s role in the lawsuit.“As you may know, there are criminal laws protecting the citizens from actions by government employees who may be acting for personal benefit,” Martin wrote.Mattei responded to the letter in a text message to The Associated Press.“Thanks to the courage of the Sandy Hook families, Infowars will soon be finished,” he said, referring to the families’ efforts in court to liquidate Jones’ assets to help pay the judgment. “In his last gasps, Jones is once again harassing them, only now with the corrupt complicity of at least one DOJ official. It’s as disgusting as it is pathetic, and we will not stand for it.”The Justice Department said it had no immediate comment Tuesday.Martin, who has been examining President Donald Trump’s claims of anti-conservative bias inside the Justice Department, has sent letters to a host of targets in other, unrelated matters, seeking information or making appeals, but it’s unclear whether such requests have amounted to anything.Jones posted a copy of the letter on his X account Tuesday, saying “Breaking! The DOJ’s Task Force On Government Weaponization Against The American People Has Launched An Investigation Into The Democrat Party / FBI Directing Illegal Law-fare Against Alex Jones And Infowars.”Retired agent testified at the trialAldenberg joined the relatives of eight Sandy Hook victims in suing Jones, alleging defamation and infliction of emotional distress.Aldenberg was one of the first witnesses to testify at the trial in 2022. He broke down on the witness stand as he described entering the two classrooms where children and educators were shot.He also testified about how he and others in the community and law enforcement were targeted with threats and conspiracy theories, including one that claimed he was an actor who also pretended to be the father of a victim.Messages were left at a phone listing and email addresses listed for Aldenberg in public records.Relatives of the shooting victims testified that they were subjected to violent threats, in-person harassment and abusive comments on social media because of Jones.Martin has been serving as head of the Justice Department’s “weaponization working group” since his nomination for top federal prosecutor in Washington was pulled amid bipartisan concerns about his modest legal experience and his advocacy for Jan. 6 rioters.Attorney General Pam Bondi created the group to scrutinize matters in which conservatives have claimed they were unfairly targeted or treated.Martin was also recently named a special prosecutor to help conduct the separate mortgage fraud investigations into Democratic New York Attorney General Letitia James and U.S. Sen. Adam Schiff.In his letter to Mattei, he asked for several pieces of information and requested that the lawyer respond by Sept. 29.In the letter, Martin asks Mattei to keep the correspondence confidential because “I do not wish to litigate this in the media.” On Sept. 14, Jones posted a photo on his X account of him and Martin together, saying the two met in Washington, D.C.Jones recently asked the U.S. Supreme Court to hear his appeal of the $1.4 billion judgment. He also is appealing a $49 million judgment in a similar lawsuit in Texas filed by two other parents of children killed in Newtown. He has cited free speech rights, but he has acknowledged that the shooting was “100% real.”Jones claims Democrats have been targeting him for his speech.He filed for bankruptcy in late 2022. The Sandy Hook plaintiffs are now trying to liquidate Infowars’ assets in state court proceedings in Texas.

    A senior U.S. Justice Department official sent a letter to a lawyer for relatives of victims killed in the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting, asking pointed questions about a retired FBI agent’s involvement in a defamation lawsuit that led to a $1.4 billion judgment against conspiracy theorist Alex Jones.

    Ed Martin Jr., who leads the Justice Department’s “weaponization working group,” asked in the letter whether retired agent William Aldenberg received any financial benefits from helping to organize the lawsuit, in which he was a plaintiff along with victims’ family members.

    Aldenberg, like the parents and other relatives of the 20 children and six educators killed in the 2012 school shooting in Newtown, Connecticut, has been the subject of false conspiracy theories spread by Jones on his “Infowars” broadcasts.

    Aldenberg was among the law enforcement officers who responded to the school and found the dead children. That then led to years of abuse from people who believed the shooting was a hoax, he has said. His share of the judgment totaled around $120 million.

    Martin sends lawyer letter asking about retired agent

    In a Sept. 15 letter to Christopher Mattei, a lawyer who represents Sandy Hook families, Martin suggested he was scrutinizing Aldenberg’s role in the lawsuit.

    “As you may know, there are criminal laws protecting the citizens from actions by government employees who may be acting for personal benefit,” Martin wrote.

    Mattei responded to the letter in a text message to The Associated Press.

    “Thanks to the courage of the Sandy Hook families, Infowars will soon be finished,” he said, referring to the families’ efforts in court to liquidate Jones’ assets to help pay the judgment. “In his last gasps, Jones is once again harassing them, only now with the corrupt complicity of at least one DOJ official. It’s as disgusting as it is pathetic, and we will not stand for it.”

    The Justice Department said it had no immediate comment Tuesday.

    Martin, who has been examining President Donald Trump’s claims of anti-conservative bias inside the Justice Department, has sent letters to a host of targets in other, unrelated matters, seeking information or making appeals, but it’s unclear whether such requests have amounted to anything.

    Jones posted a copy of the letter on his X account Tuesday, saying “Breaking! The DOJ’s Task Force On Government Weaponization Against The American People Has Launched An Investigation Into The Democrat Party / FBI Directing Illegal Law-fare Against Alex Jones And Infowars.”

    Retired agent testified at the trial

    Aldenberg joined the relatives of eight Sandy Hook victims in suing Jones, alleging defamation and infliction of emotional distress.

    Aldenberg was one of the first witnesses to testify at the trial in 2022. He broke down on the witness stand as he described entering the two classrooms where children and educators were shot.

    He also testified about how he and others in the community and law enforcement were targeted with threats and conspiracy theories, including one that claimed he was an actor who also pretended to be the father of a victim.

    Messages were left at a phone listing and email addresses listed for Aldenberg in public records.

    Relatives of the shooting victims testified that they were subjected to violent threats, in-person harassment and abusive comments on social media because of Jones.

    Martin has been serving as head of the Justice Department’s “weaponization working group” since his nomination for top federal prosecutor in Washington was pulled amid bipartisan concerns about his modest legal experience and his advocacy for Jan. 6 rioters.

    Attorney General Pam Bondi created the group to scrutinize matters in which conservatives have claimed they were unfairly targeted or treated.

    Martin was also recently named a special prosecutor to help conduct the separate mortgage fraud investigations into Democratic New York Attorney General Letitia James and U.S. Sen. Adam Schiff.

    In his letter to Mattei, he asked for several pieces of information and requested that the lawyer respond by Sept. 29.

    In the letter, Martin asks Mattei to keep the correspondence confidential because “I do not wish to litigate this in the media.” On Sept. 14, Jones posted a photo on his X account of him and Martin together, saying the two met in Washington, D.C.

    Jones recently asked the U.S. Supreme Court to hear his appeal of the $1.4 billion judgment. He also is appealing a $49 million judgment in a similar lawsuit in Texas filed by two other parents of children killed in Newtown. He has cited free speech rights, but he has acknowledged that the shooting was “100% real.”

    Jones claims Democrats have been targeting him for his speech.

    He filed for bankruptcy in late 2022. The Sandy Hook plaintiffs are now trying to liquidate Infowars’ assets in state court proceedings in Texas.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • FTX Recovery Trust Announces Third $1.6B Creditor Distribution

    [ad_1]

    The FTX Recovery Trust, the organization tasked with repaying former customers and creditors of the defunct exchange, has announced a third distribution of nearly $1.6 billion.

    According to a press release on Friday, the distribution will begin on September 30. Funds will be transferred to creditors’ accounts via BitGo, Kraken, or Payoneer within three business days.

    Retail Customers First

    The repayment plan prioritizes two distinct groups of creditors. The first is the convenience class, which consists of smaller creditors and retail traders. This group makes up the majority of FTX’s customer base and, surprisingly, will recover approximately 120% of their claims, ultimately receiving more than they lost.

    In contrast, the non-convenience class, consisting of larger institutional players with more complex claims, will receive smaller payouts. This approach highlights a clear priority within the repayment plan, protecting retail customers first.

    The latest round of payouts will increase the total recovery for various creditor groups. U.S. customers will receive an additional 40% of their claims, bringing their total recovery to 95%. Similarly, Dotcom customers, who used the exchange’s international arm, are set to receive a further 6% payout, raising their total to 78%.

    Furthermore, general unsecured and digital asset loan claims will be compensated at a rate of 24%, increasing their overall recovery to 85%. Lastly, for the convenience class, which is composed primarily of small creditors and everyday traders, their claims will be paid out at 120% of face value, meaning they will recover more than their initial losses.

    Repayments History and Market Impact

    The FTX Recovery Trust has been steadily working to make things right, with over $6.2 billion already paid out to creditors this year alone, a $1.2 billion distribution in February followed by a massive $5 billion payout in May. With assets valued at a staggering $16.5 billion set aside, the trust is showing its commitment after court approval to reduce the disputed claims.

    Although there were concerns about the first two repayments causing short-term volatility, the actual impact was minimal. Many creditors, particularly the retail “convenience class,” received their payouts in fiat currency rather than crypto. This decision, while frustrating for those who missed out on the crypto market’s significant rebound since late 2022, largely prevented a sudden sell-off of major assets like Bitcoin or Ethereum.

    SPECIAL OFFER (Sponsored)

    Binance Free $600 (CryptoPotato Exclusive): Use this link to register a new account and receive $600 exclusive welcome offer on Binance (full details).

    LIMITED OFFER for CryptoPotato readers at Bybit: Use this link to register and open a $500 FREE position on any coin!

    [ad_2]

    Wayne Jones

    Source link

  • Amid bankruptcy, some Publishers Clearing House winners are facing the end of ‘forever’ prizes

    [ad_1]

    NEW YORK — For decades, Publishers Clearing House doled out hefty checks on the doorsteps of hopeful consumers across the U.S., including prizes that boasted lifetime payouts. But some of those winners are now facing an end to the “forever” money they were once promised.

    The turmoil arrives amid PCH’s ongoing bankruptcy process. The sweepstakes and marketing company filed for Chapter 11 in April, citing growing financial strain that spanned from rising operational costs and changes in consumer behavior.

    In July, gaming platform ARB Interactive purchased certain assets from PCH for $7.1 million and established “PCH Digital,” a new platform that hosts sweepstakes opportunities. But under the terms of that deal, ARB says it’s not responsible to pay out prizes issued by PCH prior to July 15 — meaning that the company will not pay people who won sweepstakes before that date, with an exception of two unawarded “SuperPrizes” still being promoted.

    In a statement sent to The Associated Press, ARB recognized the disappointment for past winners that it said was caused by the bankruptcy process — and noted that it was “committed to restoring and preserving the trust” of the PCH brand going forward.

    ARB added that it was “taking decisive steps to ensure that every future prize winner can participate with absolute confidence.” The company pointed to plans for a paying structure “that stands separate from ARB to ensure that all future PCH prizes are honored, regardless of ARB’s financial status.”

    PCH did not immediately respond to requests for comment on Tuesday.

    It wasn’t immediately clear how many past winners of PCH sweepstakes were no longer seeing “forever” checks. At the time of April’s Chapter 11 filing, PCH listed 10 unidentified prize winners among its creditors with the largest unsecured claims — totaling millions of dollars, court documents show.

    And for some, trouble bubbled up before the Chapter 11 filing. One man, who won a $5,000 a week “forever” award from PCH in 2012, told The New York Times and KGW that he didn’t receive his annual check from the company back in January — which has since caused him to scramble to pay his bills without the money he’s learned to rely on.

    PCH’s roots date back to 1953 — when Harold and LuEsther Mertz and their daughter, Joyce Mertz-Gilmore, formed a business out of their Long Island, New York home to send direct-to-consumer mailings that solicited subscribers for a number of magazines through one single offering.

    The company later grew with chances for consumers to win money — first launching a direct mail sweepstakes in 1967 — and expanded its offerings to a wide variety of merchandise, from collectible figurines to houseware and “As Seen on TV” accessories, in the years that followed. Its in-person “Prize Patrol” team was formed in 1989.

    PCH became known for surprising prize winners with oversized checks, which was often filmed and featured in TV commercials.

    But its operations didn’t come without financial strain, particularly in recent years. When filing for Chapter 11 in April, PCH said it was working to “finalize a shift away” from its legacy direct-mail business and instead transition to a “pure digital advertising” model — citing rising competition, expensive operating costs and changes in consumer behavior.

    Over the years, PCH also faced some scrutiny from regulators who previously raised concerns about consumers mistakenly believing that making purchases from the company would improve their chances at winning its sweepstakes. As a result, PCH has racked up several costly legal settlements.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Lawrence General, Holy Family hospitals rebrand with unified name

    [ad_1]

    METHUEN — Across the Merrimack Valley, signs for three longtime health care institutions are coming down.

    On Tuesday, mayors, state legislators, Lt. Gov. Kim Driscoll and other officials gathered outside Holy Family Hospital in Methuen to hear the new name for the medical facility and those for Holy Family Hospital in Haverhill and Lawrence General Hospital.


    This page requires Javascript.

    Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

    kAmp== E9C66 6DE23=:D9>6?ED H:== @A6C2E6 F?56C E96 ?2>6 |6CC:>24< w62=E9 H:E9 2 DF77:I :?5:42E:?8 :ED =@42E:@?i |6CC:>24< w62=E9 {2HC6?46 w@DA:E2=[ |6CC:>24< w62=E9 w2G6C9:== w@DA:E2= 2?5 |6CC:>24< w62=E9 |6E9F6? w@DA:E2=]k^Am

    kAms:2?2 #:492C5D@?[ :?E6C:> AC6D:56?E 2?5 rt~ @7 |6CC:>24< w62=E9[ D2:5 E96 ?6H ?2>6 😀 ?@E D:>A=J 2 492?86 😕 3C2?5:?8 3FE E96 C6?6H2= @7 2 4@>>:E>6?E 2?5 2 AC@>:D6 E@ D6CG6 2 C68:@? E92E 92D 366? 9:E 92C5 3J E96 7:?2?4:2= 4@==2AD6 2?5 >:D>2?286>6?E @7 $E6H2C5 w62=E9 r2C6[ 7@C>6C @H?6C @7 w@=J u2>:=J 9@DA:E2=D]k^Am

    kAmxE 92D 366? 2=>@DE 2 J62C D:?46 E96? – {2HC6?46 v6?6C2= 23D@C365 3@E9 w@=J u2>:=J 9@DA:E2=D] %96 AFC492D6 <6AE E96 9@DA:E2=D @A6C2E:@?2=[ AC6G6?E:?8 2 A@E6?E:2==J 56G2DE2E:?8 =@DD @7 D6CG:46D 😕 E96 C68:@?]k^Am

    kAm“%96C6 46CE2:?=J 92G6 366? D@>6 C@F89 H2E6CD 369:?5 FD[” #:492C5D@? D2:5] “w2G:?8 2? @AA@CEF?:EJ E@ DE2CE 7C6D9 2D 2 ?6H @C82?:K2E:@? 😀 2=D@ C62==J :>A@CE2?E]”k^Am

    kAm(9:=6 @77:4:2=D 5:5 ?@E @776C 2?J ?6H :?7@C>2E:@? @? 9@H D6CG:46D >2J 492?86 H:E9 E96 C63C2?5:?8[ #:492C5D@? 4@?7:C>65 E92E A=2?D 2C6 DE:== 😕 A=246 E@ 4=@D6 >65:42= 2?5 DFC8:42= 365D 2E |6CC:>24< w62=E9 w2G6C9:== 2?5 E@ EC2?D7@C> E96 9@DA:E2= :?E@ 2? @FEA2E:6?E D2E6==:E6 6>6C86?4J 724:=:EJ H:E9 D@>6 :?A2E:6?E D6CG:46D]k^Am

    kAm(9:=6 E96 9@DA:E2= 😀 =:46?D65 7@C dh >65:42=^DFC8:42= 365D[ 52E2 7C@> yF=J :?5:42E6D @?=J 6:89E 365D 2C6 DE27765 2?5 😕 FD6] %96 @E96C EH@ |6CC:>24< w62=E9 9@DA:E2=D 2C6 2E @C ?62C 42A24:EJ[ 244@C5:?8 E@ E96 52E2]k^Am

    kAm#:492C5D@? D2:5 E96 {2HC6?46 2?5 |6E9F6? =@42E:@?D H:== 36 23=6 E@ 23D@C3 A2E:6?ED 7C@> w2G6C9:==]k^Am

    kAm(:E9 DE277:?8 DE:== 2 4C:E:42= 3@EE=6?64< 😕 962=E9 42C6 😕 E96 |6CC:>24< ‘2==6J 2?5 36J@?5[ #:492C5D@? D2:5 D96 9@A6D E96 ?6H ?2>6D 7@C E96 E9C66 9@DA:E2=D H:== 96=A H:E9 C64CF:E:?8 6>A=@J66D]k^Am

    kAm|6CC:>24< w62=E9 AC6G:@FD=J 6I2>:?65[ 3FE 49@D6 ?@E E@[ EC2?D76C D@>6 @FEA2E:6?E D6CG:46D 7C@> E96 |6E9F6? 9@DA:E2=]k^Am

    kAm~? %F6D52J[ E96 @77:4:2=D 😕 |6E9F6? AF==65 2 E2CA E@ C6G62= E96 ?6H ?2>6]k^Am

    kAmx? E96 ?6H =@8@[ E96 “C’D” 😕 E96 H@C5 “|6CC:>24<” 2C6 D92A65 E@ C6AC6D6?E E96 |6CC:>24< #:G6C] %96 ?2>6 H2D 49@D6? 32D65 @? :?AFE 7C@> 6>A=@J66D 2?5 DE2<69@=56CD[ 244@C5:?8 E@ 2 9@DA:E2= AC6DD C6=62D6]k^Am

    kAm#:492C5D@?[ H9@ 92D 366? H:E9 |6CC:>24< w62=E9 7@C 7:G6 >@?E9D[ D2:5 E96 46C6>@?J 2?5 C6?2>:?8 H6C6 DJ>3@=:4 @7 2 56D:C6 E@ AFE E96 A2DE 369:?5 E96>] $96 D2:5 E96 C63C2?5:?8 H:== 36 2 D=@H C@==@FE[ 6I46AE 7@C E96 H63D:E6 E92E H6?E @?=:?6 %F6D52J] |@DE D:8?D 92G6 6:E96C 2=C625J 366? 492?865 @C H:== 36 D@@?]k^Am

    kAmq67@C6 ;@:?:?8 |6CC:>24< w62=E9[ #:492C5D@? D6CG65 2D AC6D:56?E @7 %F7ED |65:42= r6?E6C] $96 C6A=2465 7@C>6C rt~ sC] p392 p8C2H2=[ H9@ C6D:8?65 😕 u63CF2CJ 7@==@H:?8 2? :?E6C?2= :?G6DE:82E:@?]k^Am

    kAm#:492C5D@? D2:5 56DA:E6 E96 492==6?86D 72465 3J DE277 5FC:?8 $E6H2C5’D 7@CAC@7:E @H?6CD9:A @7 w@=J u2>:=J[ :?4=F5:?8 😕 E96 7:?2= 52JD 367@C6 E96 9@DA:E2=D H6C6 D@=5[ 6>A=@J66D’ 4@>>:E>6?E E@ E96 4@>>F?:EJ ?6G6C H2G6C65]k^Am

    kAm“%96J DE2J65 3642FD6 E96J 42C65[” D96 D2:5]k^Am

    kAm{2HC6?46 v6?6C2= w@DA:E2=’D ?2>6 H2D 😕 FD6 7@C >@C6 E92? 2 46?EFCJj E96 ?2>6 w@=J u2>:=J w@DA:E2= H2D FD65 7@C 2E =62DE f_ J62CD]k^Am

    kAmsC:D4@== C67=64E65 @? E96 H@C< E92E >256 E96 F?:7:42E:@? A@DD:3=6]k^Am

    kAm“%96D6 9@DA:E2=D 2?5 E96:C 565:42E65 962=E9 42C6 AC@76DD:@?2=D E:C6=6DD=J 2?5 25>:C23=J 42C65 7@C A2E:6?ED 56DA:E6 724:?8 D:8?:7:42?E 492==6?86D[” D96 D2:5] “}@H[ H6 46=63C2E6 F?:E:?8 E96D6 9@DA:E2=D 2D |6CC:>24< w62=E9[ E@86E96C 56=:G6C:?8 E96 42C6 E92E E96D6 4@>>F?:E:6D 56D6CG6 2?5 E92E >2<6D @FC DE2E6 AC@F5]”k^Am

    kAm%9@D6 H9@ 2EE6?565 E96 46C6>@?J :?4=F565 |6E9F6? |2J@C s]y] q62FC682C5[ w2G6C9:== |2J@C |6=:?52 q2CC6EE 2?5 {2HC6?46 |2J@C qC:2? s6!6?2]k^Am

    kAm“(6 2C6 566A=J AC@F5 @7 E9:D >@>6?E[” |6CC:>24< w62=E9 3@2C5 r92:C #@D6>2C:6 s2J D2:5] “~FC 4=:?:4:2?D 2?5 @E96C E62>D @7 42C6 AC@G:56CD[ @FC =6256CD9:A 2?5 @FC 3@2C5 C6>2:? 7F==J 4@>>:EE65 E@ 9@?@C:?8 @FC >:DD:@? 2?5 =6824J @7 42C:?8 7@C A2E:6?ED 😕 E96 4@>>F?:E:6D H96C6 D@ >2?J @7 FD =:G6 2?5 H@C<[ ?@H 2D |6CC:>24< w62=E9]”k^Am

    kAm#:492C5D@? D2:5 D96 5:5 ?@E 92G6 E96 4@DE 7@C E96 C63C2?5:?8]k^Am

    kAm%96 ?@?AC@7:EUCDBF@jD ?6H H63D:E6 😀 k2 9C67lQ9EEAi^^>6CC:>24<962=E9]@C8Qm>6CC:>24<962=E9]@C8k^2m]k^Am

    [ad_2]

    By Teddy Tauscher | ttauscher@eagletribune.com

    Source link

  • No-frills pioneer Spirit Airlines seeks second bankruptcy in months

    [ad_1]

      (CNN) — U.S. no-frills pioneer Spirit Airlines filed for fresh Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection on Friday, as dwindling cash and mounting losses derailed its turnaround efforts since emerging from a previous Chapter 11 reorganization in March.

    The carrier, recognizable by its bright yellow jets, has struggled to steady operations since emerging from its first bankruptcy in March.

    Flights, ticket sales, reservations and operations will continue, the airline said on Friday.

    Spirit had been attempting to rebrand as a more premium airline to keep pace with post-pandemic travel trends that have challenged the viability of the ultra-low-cost model.

    But Spirit’s recovery was further hit by uncertainty from President Donald Trump’s tariffs and budget cuts, which have cooled consumer spending and driven down domestic airfares.

    The airline was forced to raise going-concern doubts earlier this month.

    “Since emerging from our previous restructuring, which was targeted exclusively on reducing Spirit’s funded debt and raising equity capital, it has become clear that there is much more work to be done and many more tools are available to best position Spirit for the future,” said CEO Dave Davis.

    The Florida-based airline first sought bankruptcy protection last November after years of losses, failed merger bids and mounting debt, becoming the first major U.S. carrier to do so since 2011.

    It posted a $1.2 billion net loss last year, with its troubles compounded by the collapse of a $3.8 billion merger with JetBlue Airways and RTX’s Pratt & Whitney engine issues that forced it to ground many of its Airbus jets.

    Spirit began in 1964 as a long-haul trucking company before shifting to aviation in the 1980s, initially flying leisure packages under the name Charter One Airlines.

    It rebranded as Spirit in 1992 and built its reputation as a discount carrier for budget-conscious travelers willing to skip extras like checked bags and seat assignments.

    But the pandemic upended that model, as demand shifted toward more comfortable, experience-driven travel, leaving ultra-low-cost carriers struggling to adapt.

    [ad_2]

    Story by Reuters

    Source link

  • Spirit Airlines declares bankruptcy for second time in less than a year

    [ad_1]

    Budget carrier Spirit Airlines said Friday that it has filed for bankruptcy protection only months after emerging from a Chapter 11 reorganization.

    The no-frills airline said it intends to conduct business as normal during the restructuring process, meaning passengers can continue to book trips and use their tickets, credits and loyalty points. The company said its employees and contractors would still be paid.

    Spirit CEO Dave Davis said the airline’s previous Chapter 11 petition focused on reducing debt and raising capital, and since exiting that process in March “it has become clear that there is much more work to be done and many more tools are available to best position Spirit for the future.”

    In a quarterly report issued earlier this month, Spirit Aviation Holdings, the carrier’s parent company, said it had “substantial doubt” about its ability to continue as a going concern over the next year — which is accounting-speak for running out of money. Spirit cited “adverse market conditions” the company faced after its most recent restructuring and other efforts to revive its business.

    That included weak demand for domestic leisure travel, which Spirit said persisted in the second quarter of its fiscal year, and “uncertainties in its business operations” that the Florida company expects to continue “for at least the remainder of 2025.”

    Troubles since the pandemic

    Known for its no-frills, low-cost flights on a fleet of bright yellow planes, Spirit has struggled to recover and compete since the COVID-19 pandemic. Rising operation costs and mounting debt eventually led the company to seek bankruptcy protection in November. By the time of that Chapter 11 filing, the airline had lost more than $2.5 billion since the start of 2020.

    When Spirit emerged from bankruptcy protection in March, the company successfully restructured some of its debt obligations and secured new financing for future operations. Spirit has continued to make other cost-cutting efforts since — including plans to furlough about 270 pilots and downgrade some 140 captains to first officers in the coming months.

    The furloughs and downgrades announced last month go into effect Oct. 1 and Nov. 1 to align with Spirit’s “projected flight volume for 2026,” the company noted in its quarterly report. They also follow previous furloughs and job cuts before the company’s bankruptcy filing last year.

    Despite these and other cost-cutting efforts, Spirit has said it needs more cash. As a result, the company said it may also sell certain aircraft and real estate.

    And as discount carriers struggle to compete with bigger airlines — many of which have snagged budget-conscious customers through their own tiered offerings — Spirit is attempting to tap into the growing market for more upscale travel. It is now offering flight options with tiered prices, the higher-priced tickets coming with more amenities.

    Spirit’s aircraft fleet is relatively young, which has also made the airline an attractive takeover target. But such buyout attempts from budget rivals like JetBlue and Frontier were unsuccessful both before and during the bankruptcy process.

    Spirit operates 5,013 flights to 88 destinations in the U.S., the Caribbean, Mexico, Central America, Panama and Colombia, according to travel search engine Skyscanner.net

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Spirit Airlines Files For Bankruptcy Protection Again – KXL

    [ad_1]

    (Associated Press) – Spirit Airlines has filed for fresh bankruptcy protection months after emerging from a Chapter 11 reorganization.

    The budget carrier said on Friday that it would continue operating as normal during the voluntary restructuring, and customers still can book trips and use tickets.

    Spirit’s parent company recently expressed “substantial doubt” about its financial future, citing weak demand for domestic leisure travel and ongoing market challenges.

    Despite cost-cutting efforts, including pilot furloughs, Spirit says it needs more cash and may sell aircraft and real estate.

    The airline is also trying to attract upscale travelers with tiered pricing and additional amenities.

    More about:

    [ad_2]

    Grant McHill

    Source link

  • Bed Bath & Beyond executive says company won’t open any California stores

    [ad_1]

    Bed Bath & Beyond fans in California nostalgic for the in-store experience will have to make do with the company’s website after an executive said the retailer won’t open any stores in the Golden State.

    Marcus Lemonis, executive chairman of Bed Bath & Beyond, said in a statement on Wednesday that the business environment in California makes it difficult for retailers to operate. 

    “California has created one of the most overregulated, expensive and risky environments for businesses in America,” he said. “It’s a system that makes it harder to employ people, harder to keep doors open and harder to deliver value to customers.”

    This decision isn’t about politics — it’s about reality,” Lemonis added.

    The company’s announcement comes just weeks after the Brand House Collective, the specialty retailer that manages the Bed Bath & Beyond brand owned by Beyond Inc., opened its first in-person store in Nashville after Bed Bath & Beyond shuttered hundreds of locations in declaring bankruptcy in 2023. 

    In addition to giving the store a new name — Bed Bath & Beyond Home — Brand House said it would honor legacy coupons, the big white and blue paper slips that have become synonymous with the Bed Bath & Beyond brand.

    At the time of the new store’s launch, a spokesperson for the Brand House Collective said it was planning to open four additional Bed Bath and Beyond Home stores in the Nashville area.

    The company also has its sights set on expanding in other markets. Brand House Collective spokesperson Amy Sullivan told CBS MoneyWatch on Wednesday that the company plans to open additional physical stores in different cities in a “curated, smaller format.”

    “We intend to convert the vast majority of our existing Kirkland’s fleet into Bed Bath & Beyond stores while also pursuing new real estate opportunities,” she said. 

    Kirkland’s, which is based in Nashville, rebranded as the Brand House Collective in July.

    “We’d love to bring the brand back to every city, but it has to make sense for our customers and for the business,” she said. “Until conditions change, California won’t be on our Bed Bath & Beyond roadmap.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Who will buy Infowars? Both supporters and opponents of Alex Jones interested in bankruptcy auction

    [ad_1]

    Conspiracy theorist Alex Jones’ Infowars broadcasts could end next week as he faces a court-ordered auction of his company’s assets to help pay the more than $1 billion defamation judgment he owes families of victims of the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting.

    Or maybe not.

    Both opponents and supporters of the bombastic internet show and radio host have expressed interest in bidding on the Infowars properties he has built over the past 25 years. They include Roger Stone, an ally of Jones and Donald Trump, and anti-Jones progressive media groups. If Jones supporters buy the assets, he could end up staying on Infowars.

    Up for sale are everything from Jones’ studio desk to Infowars’ name, video archive, social media accounts and product trademarks. Buyers can even purchase an armored truck and video cameras. For now, Jones’ personal social media, including his account on X, formerly known as Twitter, with 3 million followers, are not up for sale, but court proceedings on whether they should be auctioned are pending.

    The auctions resulted from Jones’ personal bankruptcy case, which he filed in late 2022 after the Sandy Hook families were awarded nearly $1.5 billion in damages in lawsuits in Connecticut and Texas over his claims that the school shooting was a hoax. Many of Jones’ personal assets also are being liquidated to help pay the judgment.

    The deadline to submit bids and nondisclosure agreements on the Infowars assets is Friday afternoon. After the bids are reviewed, prospective buyers deemed qualified will be invited to a live auction that could see multiple bidding rounds next Wednesday. Any items not sold will be put up at another auction on Dec. 10.

    Jones has expressed confidence that supporters — whom he did not name — will buy the assets of Infowars and its parent company, Free Speech Systems, allowing him to continue using its platforms. He also appears to be preparing for losing the brand because he has set up new websites and social media accounts and has been directing his audience to them.

    “There’s a lot of buyers, people that are patriots that want it and will come in,” Jones said on his show in August. “If not … we’ll work with somebody else, fire something up. And it’ll be a little bit of a hiccup for the crew, and things. But that will just make us bigger.”

    Email messages to Infowars and Jones’ bankruptcy lawyer were not returned.

    It’s not clear how much money the auctions might bring in. In court documents, Free Speech Systems listed the total value of its properties and holdings at $18 million. Proceeds from the sales will go to creditors including the Sandy Hook families, who have not yet received any money from Jones and his company.

    Confidentiality agreements and sealed bids generally are used in auctions to maximize bid amounts while preventing bidders from talking to each other and driving down the offers. The trustee in Jones’ bankruptcy case said in court documents that the procedures for the Infowars auction were designed to attract the highest possible bids.

    Christopher Mattei, a Connecticut lawyer representing the Sandy Hook families, called the auctions an important milestone in their yearslong fight to hold Jones accountable. He also said the families will be seeking a portion of all Jones’ future income.

    “From the beginning, the Connecticut families have sought to hold Jones fully accountable for his lies and to protect other families from him,” Mattei said. “Stripping Jones of the corrupt business he used to attack the families while poisoning the minds of his listeners is an important measure of justice.”

    The families sued Jones and his company for defamation and emotional distress for repeatedly saying on his show that the 2012 shooting that killed 20 first graders and six educators in Newtown, Connecticut, was a hoax staged by crisis actors to spur more gun control.

    Parents and children of many of the victims testified that they were traumatized by Jones’ hoax conspiracies and threats by his followers.

    Jones, who has since acknowledged that the shooting did happen, is appealing the judgments.

    Jones has made millions of dollars from his internet and radio shows, primarily through sales of nutritional supplements, survival gear, clothing and other merchandise.

    Stone, the Jones and Trump ally and a conservative commentator, said on his X account and on Jones’ show that he would like to put together a group of investors to buy Infowars. He did not return email and social media messages on Thursday.

    “I understand the importance of Infowars as a beacon of the truth, as a beacon of truthful information. And therefore, I would like to do whatever I possibly can to ensure, if possible, that Infowars survives,” Stone said on Jones’ show in September.

    People on social media also have urged billionaire Elon Musk, owner of Tesla and X, to buy Infowars, an idea Jones has backed but Musk has not publicly responded to.

    On the other side, Jones’ detractors have shown interest in buying Infowars, kicking Jones out and turning it into something else, such as a news site that debunks conspiracy theories or even a parody site. They include officials at two progressive media sites, The Barbed Wire and Media Matters for America.

    An opinion piece by The Barbed Wire in September by publisher Jeff Rotkoff had a headline that read, “Let’s Buy Infowars. Alex Jones used these exact materials to exploit his viewers, peddle conspiracy theories, and damage the lives of grieving parents. We want revenge.”

    Rotkoff urged readers to donate money to help put in bids, but he said Thursday that The Barbed Wire, based in Jones’ home state of Texas, was now unlikely to make any offers.

    “But we have talked to a number of similarly ideologically aligned bidders and we are certain we will be outbid,” Rotkoff said in an email. “We’re thrilled that there appear to be multiple well-resourced bidders who share our interest in undoing much of the damage to our country done by Alex Jones. We’ll be rooting for those folks to be successful.”

    He declined to say who the other potential bidders were.

    Who exactly has submitted bids so far has not been disclosed. Jeff Tanenbaum, president of ThreeSixty Asset Advisors, which is helping to run the auction along with Tranzon Asset Advisors, would only say there have been a large number of inquiries.

    If detractors buy up Infowars’ properties and Jones gets the boot, he should be able to build new platforms fairly quickly, said Melissa Zimdars, an associate professor of communication and media at Merrimack College in Massachusetts.

    “As long as there is an audience hungry for his content — and there is — he’ll be able to utilize X and various fringe social media platforms,” she said in an email.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • TGI Fridays files for bankruptcy, as sit-down chain restaurants face broad challenges

    TGI Fridays files for bankruptcy, as sit-down chain restaurants face broad challenges

    [ad_1]

    TGI Fridays closing 36 “underperforming” restaurants across U.S.


    TGI Fridays closing 36 “underperforming” restaurants across U.S.

    00:24

    Restaurant chain TGI Fridays filed for bankruptcy protection Saturday, saying it is looking for ways to “ensure the long-term viability” of the casual dining brand after closing many of its branches this year.

    The Dallas-based company filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in a Texas federal court.

    TGI Fridays Executive Chairman Rohit Manocha in a statement said the “primary driver of our financial challenges resulted from COVID-19 and our capital structure.”

    Sit-down chain restaurants have more broadly faced challenges in recent years as diners choose to get food delivered or visit upscale fast food chains like Chipotle and Shake Shack.

    A U.S. bankruptcy judge in September approved a reorganization plan for seafood chain Red Lobster after years of mounting losses and dwindling customers.

    Founded in 1965, the popularity of TGI Fridays peaked in 2008 with 601 restaurants in the U.S. and a $2 billion business, according to Kevin Schimpf, director of industry research at Technomic. Its sales in the U.S. were $728 million in 2023, down 15% from the prior year, according to Technomic.

    It now counts 163 restaurants in the U.S., down from 269 last year. It closed 36 in January and dozens more in the past week.

    TGI Fridays Inc. said it only owns and operates 39 restaurants in the U.S., which is just a fraction of the 461 TGI Friday-branded restaurants around the world. A separate entity, TGI Fridays Franchisor, owns the intellectual property and has franchised the brand to 56 independent owners in 41 countries. Those remain open.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Court approves Tupperware’s sale to lenders, paving way for brand’s exit from bankruptcy

    Court approves Tupperware’s sale to lenders, paving way for brand’s exit from bankruptcy

    [ad_1]

    NEW YORK (AP) — A U.S. bankruptcy judge approved a sale of Tupperware Brands on Tuesday, paving the way for the iconic food storage company to soon exit Chapter 11 protection and continue offering its products while undergoing a hoped-for revitalization.

    The sale given the court’s green light in Delaware still is subject to closing conditions. Under terms of the deal, a group of lenders is buying Tupperware’s brand name and various operating assets for $23.5 million in cash and more than $63 million in debt relief.

    Tupperware agreed to the lender takeover last week, pivoting from a previously planned asset auction. The brand said it expects to operate as The New Tupperware Co. upon completion of the deal.

    Going forward, customers in “global core markets” will be able to purchase Tupperware products online and through the brand’s decades-old network of independent sales consultants, but the new company is set to be “rebuilt with a start-up mentality,” Tupperware said.

    The specifics of how that will look are unclear. Tupperware did not immediately respond to The Associated Press’ requests for further comment Tuesday.

    Tupperware once revolutionized food storage, with the brand’s roots dating back to a post-World War II mission of helping families save money on food waste with an airtight lid seal. The plastic kitchenware saw explosive growth in the mid-20th century, notably with the rise of direct sales through “Tupperware parties.”

    First held in 1948, the parties were promoted as a way for women in particular to earn supplemental income by selling the containers to friends and neighbors. The system worked so well that Tupperware eventually removed its products from stores.

    In the following decades, the Tupperware line expanded to include canisters, beakers, cake dishes and all manner of implements, and became a staple in kitchens across America and eventually abroad. But the brand struggled to keep up in more recent years.

    An outdated business model and rising competition contributed to some of the company’s challenges. When filing for bankruptcy last month, Florida-based Tupperware noted that consumers were shifting away from direct sales, which made up the vast majority of the brand’s sales, and increasingly favoring glass containers over plastic.

    While sales improved some during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, when consumers cooked and ate at home more, Tupperware saw an overall steady decline over the years. Rubbermaid, OXO and even recycled takeout food containers snagged customers — as well as home storage lines at major retailers like Target, Walmart and Amazon.

    Financial troubles piled up in the meantime. In September’s bankruptcy petition, Tupperware reported more than $1.2 billion in debts and $679.5 million in assets.

    “This is a situation that was in urgent need of a vast global resolution,” Spencer Winters, an attorney representing Tupperware, said during a U.S. Bankruptcy Court hearing Tuesday. Winters called the sale agreement a “great outcome” that he said preserves Tupperware’s business, customer relationships and jobs.

    The sale agreements calls for Tupperware to become a privately held company under supportive ownership of the purchasing lender group, which includes investment firms Stonehill Capital Management and Alden Global Capital.

    Last week, Tupperware said the new company’s “initial focus” would be in the U.S., Canada, Mexico, Brazil, China, South Korea, India and Malaysia, followed by European and additional Asian markets.

    Other closing conditions that must be met before the transaction is completed include an issue with a Swiss entity that still needs to be resolved, according to statements made in court Tuesday.

    _______

    AP Business Reporter Haleluya Hadero contributed to this report.

    ___

    This story was first published on Oct. 29, 2024. It was updated on Oct. 31, 2024 to correct that Stonehill Capital Management and Alden Global Capital are investment firms, not hedge fund managers.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Nurse’s union blasts changes by new hospital owners

    Nurse’s union blasts changes by new hospital owners

    [ad_1]

    Unionized nurses at Holy Family Hospital’s campuses in Haverhill and Methuen are accusing the new owners of violating the terms of their contracts by making “unilateral” changes to their health care coverage and other benefits.

    Lawrence General Hospital formally took over ownership of the hospitals last week as part of the sale of bankrupt Steward Health Care System’s Massachusetts hospitals in a $28 million deal signed off on by a federal judge in Texas.

    The sale was heralded by Gov. Maura Healey, health care leaders and local elected officials as a way to preserve jobs, improve working conditions and prevent the closure of the hospitals.

    But the Massachusetts Nurses Association alleges that Lawrence General is violating the terms of the court-approved sale and collective bargaining agreements for registered nurses who work at Holy Family’s two campuses.

    In an emergency motion, filed in U.S. Bankruptcy Court on Wednesday, the union alleges that LGH unilaterally imposed changes to the nurses’ health plans that will increase premiums, out-of-pocket costs and deductibles, and removed credits for uninsured members.

    The hospital also required nurses at Holy Family to switch to a different, more costly type of retirement plan, and reduced coverage through its life insurance plans, according to the union, which estimates the changes will cost nurses thousands of dollars in lost wages.

    “Unless immediately addressed, Lawrence’s improper actions will cause significant economic injury to MNA and its members by reducing benefits while imposing significantly higher costs, including increased deductibles and copays,” lawyers for the union wrote in the 91-page complaint.

    The complaint asks the bankruptcy judge to declare the hospital in violation of the terms of the sale and require it to honor existing collective bargaining agreements with unionized nurses.

    “We remain an active and engaged participant in discussions with the Massachusetts Nurses Association, just as we have from the outset,” a spokesperson from Lawrence General Hospital said in a statement. “The court filings will not impact or interrupt our ability to deliver high-quality, compassionate, and culturally competent care. We continue to work together with the MNA and all of our staff to meet the health care needs of our patients, their families, and the communities we serve.”

    In the court filing, the union said shortly after the sale of Holy Family hospitals was announced in September nurses entered into negotiations with Lawrence General for new employment terms.

    But the union said hospital officials rejected several offers and then “threatened” to impose the changes on nurses if they didn’t agree to the new terms. After the sale of the hospitals closed on Oct. 1, Lawrence General imposed the new employment terms by “fiat,” according to the complaint.

    “Lawrence’s actions cannot be excused as inadvertent mistakes or transitional hiccups,” the union’s lawyers wrote. “Rather, they are its most recent attempt to impose significant economic changes on MNA-represented nurses.”

    The Dallas-based Steward operated about 30 hospitals nationwide before it filed for bankruptcy protection earlier this year to pay down $9 billion in debt to its creditors.

    In September, a federal judge approved plans to transfer ownership of several of Steward’s Massachusetts hospitals, including Holy Family, Morton Hospital in Taunton and St. Anne’s Hospital in Fall River. Morton and St. Anne’s were purchased by Lifespan, a Rhode Island-based company, a deal valued at more than $175 million.

    The state took over a fifth Steward hospital — St. Elizabeth’s Hospital in Brighton — by eminent domain until Boston Medical Center takes it over as its new owner.

    Steward closed its hospitals in Dorchester and Ayer at the end of August after failing to reach adequate terms with prospective buyers.

    Christian M. Wade covers the Massachusetts Statehouse for North of Boston Media Group’s newspapers and websites. Email him at cwade@cnhinews.com.

    [ad_2]

    By Christian M. Wade | Statehouse Reporter

    Source link

  • Fisker faces more bad news as the SEC starts investigating its business practices

    Fisker faces more bad news as the SEC starts investigating its business practices

    [ad_1]

    The past week hasn’t been the kindest to the electric vehicle industry. Now, it’s capped off with news that the EV startup Fisker is the subject of an investigation from the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

    reported that SEC officials sent several subpoenas to Fisker. The filing doesn’t specifically say what the subpoenas are asking for or looking into but it’s clear that the SEC has launched an investigation into the floundering EV maker that .

    Fisker has been struggling to keep its head above water ever since last year’s disastrous rollout of its Ocean SUV that failed to score more than a few thousands sellers even though it produced well over 10,000 units. Following its Q4 earnings report last year that saw a gross margin loss of 35 percent, the car maker announced it would lay off 15 percent of its workforce the following March as it shifted to a direct-to-consumer sales strategy.

    A Fisker spokesperson declined to comment on the matter to TechCrunch saying they could not “comment on the existence or nonexistence of a possible investigation.”

    Fisker isn’t the only EV maker to suffer a noticeable setback. Tesla saw a major stumble with .

    [ad_2]

    Danny Gallagher

    Source link

  • Tupperware lifts the lid on its financial problems with bankruptcy filing

    Tupperware lifts the lid on its financial problems with bankruptcy filing

    [ad_1]

    NEW YORK (AP) — The company behind Tupperware, the plastic kitchenware that revolutionized food storage after World War II and became inextricably linked to the parties where women seeking a measure of financial independence and fun in midcentury America sold the colorful products, has filed for bankruptcy.

    Tupperware Brands, the Orlando, Florida-based consumer goods company that produces the iconic line of containers, said it was seeking Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection after struggling to revitalize its core business and failing to secure a tenable takeover offer.

    Despite enjoying the same cultural ubiquity as Kleenex, Teflon and other brands whose trademarked names are eponymous with entire product categories, Tupperware has suffered from waning sales, rising competition and the limitations of the direct-to-consumer marketing model that once defined its success.

    The company said Tuesday in its bankruptcy filing that consumers shifting away from direct sales, which make up the vast majority of its sales more than a quarter-century after the first Tupperware parties, has hit the storied business hard.

    The company also cited growing public health and environmental concerns about plastic, internal inefficiencies that made it challenging to operate globally, and the “challenging microeconomic environment” of the last several years for its financial straits.

    Tupperware said it planned to continue operating during the bankruptcy proceedings and would seek court approval for a sale “in order to protect” the brand.

    Tupperware’s roots date to 1946. As the company tells it, chemist Earl Tupper found inspiration while creating molds at a plastics factory. He set out on a mission to create an airtight lid seal — similar to the one on a paint can — for a plastic container to help families save money on food waste.

    The brand experienced explosive growth in the mid-20th century, particularly with the rise of direct sales through Tupperware parties. First held in 1948, the parties were promoted as a way for women to earn supplemental income by selling their friends and neighbors the lidded bowls for holding leftovers.

    The system worked so well that Tupperware eventually removed its products from stores. It also led Tupper to appoint Brownie Wise, who came up with the house party idea, as a company executive, a position that was rare for a woman at the time.

    In the decades that followed, the brand expanded to include canisters, beakers, cake dishes and all manner of implements, and became a staple in kitchens across America and eventually, abroad as well. A newspaper reporter who went undercover to work as a footman in Buckingham Palace captured pictures of the royal Tupperware on the breakfast table of Queen Elizabeth II.

    The story behind the company also showed up on TV screens and on stage, with depictions in PBS’ 2004 film “Tupperware!” and the play “Sealed for Freshness.”

    “For more than 70 years, Tupperware Brands has centered on a core purpose – to inspire women to cultivate the confidence they need to enrich their lives, nourish their families, and fuel communities around the world,” Tricia Stitzel, the company’s first female CEO, wrote as recently as 2018. “And we continue to make decisions, from our innovative products to our strategic growth strategy, which reflect this purpose.”

    In the 2000s, Tupperware also diversified beyond its containers by acquiring beauty and personal care companies, most of them direct-selling brands like Avroy Shlain, Fuller Cosmetics, NaturCare, Nutrimetics and Nuvo.

    Financial analysts, however, criticized Tupperware in recent years for sticking with the direct sales model and failing to evolve with the times, most notably the large number of women who work outside the home.

    “The reality is that the decline at Tupperware is not new,” Neil Saunders, managing director of GlobalData, said in Wednesday commentary. “It is very difficult to see how the brand can get back to its glory days.”

    The company’s sales improved some during the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic, when Americans were cooking and eating more at home. But overall sales have been in steady decline over the years due to rising competition from Rubbermaid, OXO and even takeout food containers that consumers recycle. Vintage Tupperware also remains in demand as a collectible.

    Overall, sales for food storage supplies are up 18% compared to before the pandemic, according to figures from market research firm Circana. But despite that growth – and the ongoing popularity of food storage videos on social media – the troubles for Tupperware remained.

    Saunders explained that many consumers have migrated to less expensive home storage brands they can find at Target and Walmart. Amazon, the king of online retailers, also has its own line.

    Historically, Tupperware marketed its products as higher-quality durable items. But consumers who are looking for durability are interested in more sustainable materials, such as glass and stainless steel, said Jennifer Christ, manager of consumer and commercial research for the Freedonia Group, a market research company.

    “There’s less brand loyalty than there used to be,” Christ said.

    In the past few years, Tupperware tried a few things to expand its reach and attract new customers. It started selling its products on Amazon as well as in stores at Target and Macy’s. In 2019, the brand also launched a line made with sustainable materials and expanded it two years later.

    But financial troubles continued to pile up.

    Last year, the company sought additional financing as it warned investors about its ability to stay in business and its risk of being delisted from the New York Stock Exchange.

    The company received an additional non-compliance notice from the NYSE for failing to file its annual results with the Securities and Exchange Commission earlier this year. Tupperware continued to warn about its ability to stay afloat in more recent months, with an August securities filing pointing to “significant liquidity challenges.”

    Shares for the company have fallen 75% this year.

    In Tuesday’s bankruptcy petition, Tupperware reported more than $1.2 billion in total debts and $679.5 million in total assets. It said Tupperware currently employs more than 5,450 employees across 41 countries and partners with over 465,000 consultants who sell products on a freelance basis in nearly 70 countries. Particularly in India, Tupperware was introduced as a way for women to own their own businesses.

    Many Tupperware sellers market the products online, but many also make their sales during Tupperware parties at their homes or neighborhood gatherings. In the announcement of the filing, the company maintained that there were no current changes to Tupperware’s independent sales consultant agreements.

    Tupperware also pointed to aims to “further advance Tupperware’s transformation into a digital-first, technology-led company,” possibly signaling a move toward increased reliance of sales on the brand’s website or perhaps more online-focused marketing, although the company did not provide exact specifics.

    In a statement, Tupperware President and CEO Laurie Ann Goldman acknowledged Tupperware’s recent financial struggles and said that the bankruptcy process is meant to provide “essential flexibility” as the company pursues this transformation. The brand, she maintains, isn’t going anywhere.

    “Whether you are a dedicated member of our Tupperware team, sell, cook with, or simply love our Tupperware products, you are a part of our Tupperware family,” Goldman said in a statement. “We plan to continue serving our valued customers with the high-quality products they love and trust throughout this process.”

    The company’s bankruptcy filing, though, faces opposition from Tupperware’s new lenders, who want the petition dismissed or converted it to a Chapter 7 case, which would liquidate the company. Alternatively, they’re asking the court for permission to take action against the company, which could allow them to collect debt they’re owed.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Iconic Tupperware Brands seeks Chapter 11 bankruptcy

    Iconic Tupperware Brands seeks Chapter 11 bankruptcy

    [ad_1]

    NEW YORK — Tupperware Brands, the company that revolutionized food storage decades ago, has filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection.

    Orlando, Florida-based Tupperware plans to continue operating during the bankruptcy proceedings and will seek court approval for a sale, “in order to protect its iconic brand,” the company said just before midnight on Tuesday.

    The company is seeking bankruptcy protection amid growing struggles to revitalize its business. Tupperware sales growth improved some during the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic, but overall sales have been in steady decline since 2018 due to rising competition. And financial troubles have continued to pile up for the company.

    Doubts around Tupperware’s future have floated around for some time. Last year, the company sought additional financing as it warned investors about its ability to stay in business and its risk of being delisted from the New York Stock Exchange.

    The company received an additional non-compliance notice from the NYSE for failing to file its annual results with the Securities and Exchange Commission earlier this year. And Tupperware had continued to warn about its ability to stay afloat in more recent months, with an August securities filing pointing to “significant liquidity challenges.”

    In Tuesday’s bankruptcy petition, Tupperware reported more than $1.2 billion in total debts and $679.5 million in total assets. Shares for the company have fallen 75% this year and closed Tuesday at about 50 cents apiece.

    “The reality is that the decline at Tupperware is not new,” Neil Saunders, managing director of GlobalData, said in Wednesday commentary. “It is very difficult to see how the brand can get back to its glory days.”

    Saunders explained that many consumers have been migrating to cheaper home storage brands — noting that competition has intensified over years, particularly with the rise of online platforms like Temu and retailers like Target also beefing up their own home storage and kichenware brands.

    Tupperware’s roots date back to 1946. According to the company’s website, shortly after the Great Depression, chemist Earl Tupper found inspiration while creating molds at a plastics factory — setting out on a mission to create an airtight seal for a plastic container, similar to that on a paint can, to help families save money on food waste.

    The brand experienced explosive growth in the mid 20th century — particularly with the rise of Tupperware parties, first held in 1948. Tupperware parties notably gave many women a chance to run their own businesses out of their homes, selling the products within social circles.

    The system worked so well that Tupperware eventually removed its products from stores. And in Tuesday’s bankruptcy announcement, the company maintained that there were no current changes to Tupperware’s independent sales consultant agreements.

    According to court documents published Tuesday, Tupperware currently employs more than 5,450 employees across 41 countries — and additionally partners with global sales force of over 465,000 consultants who sell products on a freelance basis in nearly 70 countries.

    Tuesday’s announcement also pointed to aims to “further advance Tupperware’s transformation into a digital-first, technology-led company,” possibly signaling a move toward increased reliance of sales on the brand’s website or perhaps more online-focused marketing, although the company did not provide exact specifics.

    In a statement, Tupperware President and CEO Laurie Ann Goldman acknowledged Tupperware’s recent financial struggles and said that the bankruptcy process is meant to provide “essential flexibility” as the company pursues this transformation. She also maintained that the brand wasn’t going anywhere.

    “Whether you are a dedicated member of our Tupperware team, sell, cook with, or simply love our Tupperware products, you are a part of our Tupperware family,” Goldman said in a statement. “We plan to continue serving our valued customers with the high-quality products they love and trust throughout this process.”

    Goldman, who previously served as CEO of Spanx, was appointed as Tupperware’s CEO in October 2023 — as part of larger leadership change ups. The company has appointed a new management team within the last year.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Objections filed as Steward pushes for sale of hospitals

    Objections filed as Steward pushes for sale of hospitals

    [ad_1]

    BOSTON — As Steward Health Care prepares to make the case in federal court Wednesday that the deals it reached to sell four Massachusetts hospital facilities should be quickly approved, a number of others would like to have a word — including key lenders for the bankrupt company, the Archdiocese of Boston, and the Internal Revenue Service.

    The blur of activity includes ongoing negotiations between Steward and Massachusetts state government over a second, and larger, infusion of public funding that the company says is required to keep its hospitals here open until the sales close, possibly on Sept. 30.

    Massachusetts aided Steward with $30 million to stay afloat in August and now is poised to provide the company another $42 million in payments and advances by the end of this week, according to a court filing late Monday.

    An array of objections have been lodged in U.S. Bankruptcy Court since Steward announced the hospital sales. A sale hearing is scheduled for 11 a.m. Wednesday, when Judge Christopher Lopez will weigh whether the deals are the best possible way for the company to wind down operations and maximize the value the assets return for its lenders and creditors. Steward says they are and should be approved.

    The court is likely to consider an objection filed by the “first in, last out” or FILO lenders that have pumped hundreds of millions of dollars into Steward as the company headed for bankruptcy. Those lenders said they “cannot possibly consent to the proposed sales of the Massachusetts Hospitals in their current form, and they do not.”

    “The Debtors’ sale process has resulted in bids for the Massachusetts Hospitals for an aggregate purchase price of $343 million, subject to certain adjustments … However, this figure is misleading as the entirety of the Purchase Price will be allocated towards the real property and therefore flow to benefit the purported landlord (MPT and Macquarie) and more specifically will flow to the purported landlord’s secured lender,” the FILO lenders wrote in the objection.

    The objection from the IRS relates to a section of each asset purchase agreement that says Steward has filed all of its tax returns. The federal government says that isn’t actually the case, echoing the way state government was repeatedly frustrated by Steward’s failure to file financial disclosures.

    “The United States states that either the terms of the respective Asset Purchase Agreements should be revised to correctly reflect that certain required federal tax returns for certain of the Seller Debtors have not been filed with the IRS and that the applicable Seller Debtor has a legal obligation to file such tax return,” or the court should require Steward to file the returns in question before the transactions close, the U.S. Department of Justice wrote on behalf of the IRS.

    The limited objection from the Archdiocese of Boston stems back to the history of many Steward hospitals as part of the Caritas Christi network. The church said its sale of the hospitals to Steward in 2010 was the best option “that would allow the Hospitals to continue to operate as Catholic health care facilities.”

    An agreement between the archdiocese and Steward requires the company to return any and all religious items and remove “all symbols of Catholic identity (e.g. interior signage, trade and service marks associated with Catholic identity in both paper and electronic form) and cease using a list of Catholic-related names.

    The church said it would object to the hospital sales “to the extent that the Debtors seek to transfer the Restricted Names or the Religious Items or authorize the buyers to continue to use symbols of Catholic identity,” but added that it appears no such transfer is contemplated. That suggests that there will be new names for St. Elizabeth’s Medical Center, the Holy Family hospitals, St. Anne’s Hospital and Good Samaritan Medical Center, since the church says Steward “acknowledged and agreed that the … names were ‘integrally related’ to the Hospitals’ Catholic identity.”

    [ad_2]

    By Colin A. Young | State House News Service

    Source link

  • Megabus routes through Philly affected by bankruptcy and new partnerships

    Megabus routes through Philly affected by bankruptcy and new partnerships

    [ad_1]

    Those planning to travel for the Labor Day weekend may find that Megabus is not as simple an option as they remember. With its parent company Coach USA declaring bankruptcy in June, its routes were taken over by other bus companies this month.

    Peter Pan Bus Lines is now serving routes that go between Philly, New York City, Baltimore and Washington D.C., while Fullington Trailways will allow travel between Philly, New York, State College and Pittsburgh.


    MORE: Donald Trump’s former national security advisor wrote a book about his time in the White House; here’s what he said


    Passengers who booked their trips on or before Aug. 15 were contacted to reschedule their trips. The Megabus website is still live and allows anyone to reserve trips, albeit for Peter Pan and Fullington travel services. Routes that served stops including Dallas, Atlanta, Richmond and several other cities in the southern United States were discontinued.

    Currently, the Megabus stops in Philly are at Schuylkill Avenue and Walnut Street, close to William H. Gray 30th Street Station, and in Northern Liberties at 520 North Christopher Columbus Blvd. Previously, the second Megabus stop in Philly was located on 6th and Market streets.

    Megabus parent company Coach USA commenced Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings in June, citing lower ridership and demand in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic.

    The shifting locations of inner city bus stops and the sudden changes in bus routes are part of accumulating issues for bus riders traveling to and from Philly. In June 2023, the city’s Greyhound station closed after 35 years. 

    Temporary bus stops on the curbsides of streets like Market Street have caused congestion, and passengers have lacked shelter or sitting areas while waiting. Philadelphia still lacks a proper bus terminal after the Greyhound station closed.

    [ad_2]

    Chris Compendio

    Source link

  • LL Flooring files for bankruptcy and will close 94 stores. Here’s where they are.

    LL Flooring files for bankruptcy and will close 94 stores. Here’s where they are.

    [ad_1]

    Kati Weis’s Colorado PFAS reporting gets lots of attention. Go “Behind the Story”


    Household items containing toxic “forever chemicals” will be banned under new Colorado law

    11:06

    LL Flooring, a specialty flooring company formerly known as Lumber Liquidators, is holding closing sales at 94 retail locations across the U.S. after it filed Sunday for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in Delaware.

    The company is currently in negotiations with multiple parties to sell its business, LL Flooring said in the statement. 

    While operating under the Lumber Liquidators brand name, the company was in the spotlight after a “60 Minutes” report found some its flooring contained dangerous levels of formaldehyde. In 2019, it agreed to pay $33 million in fines for misleading investors about levels of the chemical in its Chinese-made laminate flooring.

    In announcing the bankruptcy, LL Flooring blamed “several macroeconomic and operational challenges” for putting a strain on its business.

    “After comprehensive efforts to enhance our liquidity position in a challenging macro environment, a determination was made that initiating this Chapter 11 process is the best path forward for the company,” LL Flooring CEO Charles Tyson said in the statement. 

    The bankruptcy will also provide LL Flooring with the time and flexibility to close some of its stores while also pursuing the sale of the rest of the business, he added.

    The provider of hard and soft flooring alternatives said it is continuing to serve customers at more than 300 retail stores across the U.S. It also remains open for business online. 

    LL Flooring said it is shuttering 94 of store locations at which it is currently hosting “closing sales.” The company said its financial advisors helped determine which stores it made sense to close and which to keep open. The more than 90 locations that will close their doors are still open for business in the interim, though. 

    Here’s a list of LL Flooring stores that are closing by state:

    Alabama

    Arizona

    • Mesa, AZ
    • Phoenix, AZ
    • Prescott Valley, AZ

    California

    • Bakersfield, CA
    • Burlingame, CA
    • Elk Grove, CA
    • Fairfield, CA
    • Fresno, CA
    • Rancho Cucamonga, CA
    • Salinas, CA
    • S. San Diego, CA
    • Santee, CA
    • Torrance, CA
    • Visalia, CA

    Colorado

    • Longmont, CO
    • Loveland, CO
    • Thornton, CO

    Connecticut

    • Milford, CT
    • North Haven, CT
    • Norwalk, CT
    • Waterbury, CT

    Florida

    • Clearwater, FL
    • Florida City, FL
    • Gainsville, FL
    • St. Augustine, FL
    • Tampa, FL

    Georgia

    Illinois

    • Bloomington, IL
    • Champaign, IL
    • Crystal Lake, IL
    • E Peoria, IL
    • Geneva, IL
    • Mundelein, IL
    • South Elgin,  IL

    Indiana

    • Greenwood, IN
    • Lafayette, IN
    • Muncie, IN

    Iowa

    Louisiana

    • Broussard, LA
    • Lake Charles, LA

    Massachusetts

    • Framingham, MA
    • Leominster, MA

    Maryland

    • Edgewood, MD
    • Lutherville, MD

    Michigan

    • Battle Creek, MI
    • Kentwood, MI

    Minnesota

    • Chanhassen, MN
    • Rochester, MN
    • St. Cloud, MN

    Mississippi

    Missouri

    • Chesterfield, MO
    • Joplin, MO
    • N. Kansas City, MO

    Nevada

    New Jersey

    • Mount Holly, NJ
    • Woodbridge, NJ
    • Woodbury, NJ

    New York

    • Medford, NY
    • New Hartford, NY
    • Staten Island, NY
    • Westbury, NY

    North Carolina

    Ohio

    • SE Cincinnati, OH
    • W. Columbus, OH
    • Reynoldsburg, OH
    • Solon, OH

    Oregon

    Pennsylvania

    • Exton, PA
    • Fairless Hills, PA
    • Philadelphia, PA

    Tennessee

    • Clarksville, TN
    • Franklin, TN
    • Jackson, TN

    Texas

    • Abilene, TX
    • Arlington, TX
    • College Station, TX
    • Denton, TX
    • Fort Worth, TX
    • Houston Galleria, TX
    • Katy, TX
    • Killeen, TX
    • McAllen, TX
    • S. San Antonio, TX
    • Sherman, TX

    Utah

    Virginia

    Washinton

    • Bellingham, WA
    • Olympia, WA
    • Yakima, WA

    West Virginia

    • Beckley, WV
    • Parkersburg, WV

    Wisconsin

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Steward’s creditors accused of ‘brinkmanship’

    Steward’s creditors accused of ‘brinkmanship’

    [ad_1]

    BOSTON — The Healey administration is lashing out at Steward Health Care System’s creditors for seeking to block $30 million in state funding to help transition the bankrupt company’s hospitals to new owners.

    In a new filing in U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Assistant Attorney General Andrew Troop accuses a group representing creditors seeking to collect $9 billion in debt from Steward of engaging in “brinksmanship” in an effort “to wring out more value from qualified bidders or the commonwealth to salvage their own bad financial, investment or lending decisions.”

    “Many of these creditors seem to have lost sight of the importance of providing safe healthcare over the long term, and instead seem intent on saddling bidders with potentially critical levels of debt or obligations, which will only make this crisis a recurring one,” Troop wrote in the seven-page statement.

    While the state is “unable” to stop Steward from closing the two hospitals, Troop said it still has “significant police powers” to intervene in the federal bankruptcy process if it “does not result in a clear path to the sale of the hospitals.”

    The fiery statement comes as a federal judge in Texas weighs a request from a group representing Steward’s myriad creditors to reject Gov. Maura Healey’s plan to devote $30 million in repurposed Medicaid funding to help transition the sale of six of Steward’s hospitals as part of the company’s bankruptcy proceedings.

    Steward plans to put its 31 U.S. hospitals – including Holy Family’s locations in Methuen and Haverhill – up for sale to pay down $9 billion in outstanding liabilities owed to creditors. The company filed for federal bankruptcy protections in May.

    Steward said it was not able to find buyers for Carney Hospital in Dorchester and Nashoba Valley Medical Center in Ayer and announced plans to shut down the facilities in the next 30 days.

    U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Christopher Lopez, who is overseeing the case, approved the request to close the hospitals following a hearing Wednesday in a Texas courtroom.

    Bids on Steward’s Massachusetts hospitals and other states were due last week, but the company has not disclosed prospective buyers. A hearing on the sales was scheduled for Thursday, but the company asked the federal judge presiding over the case to postpone the proceedings until Aug. 13, without citing a reason.

    Last week, Healey officials announced plans to provide $30 million in Medicaid funding to help ensure a “smooth transition” to new ownership for the company’s six remaining hospitals. Healey told reporters earlier this week that “not a dime” of the money will go to Steward or its management team.

    But in a court filing this week, a committee representing Steward’s creditors asked Lopez to block the move, arguing that the transition funding would come “at the expense of the rest of debtors, their estates and their creditors.”

    On Wednesday, Lopez approved a request by Steward and others to reject a master lease for all the hospital properties, saying the move “is in the best interests of the Debtors, their respective estates, creditors, and all parties in interest.”

    The Attorney General’s Office sided with Steward on the lease issue and has accused the hospitals’ landlords – Medical Properties Trust and Macquarie Asset Management – of trying to block the move “to extract concessions from the Steward estate and their mortgagee.

    “These hospitals – while each in name a lessee – have been forced to pay the costs typically associated with property ownership, including real estate taxes, maintenance, and insurance,” Troop said in the latest court filing.

    Steward’s landlords objected to the request to reject the master lease, arguing in court filings that federal law prohibits the company from stopping rent payments “when their express intention is to continue conducting business in the landlords’ property pending a proposed sale.”

    “If a debtor were permitted to reject a lease and stop paying rent, while continuing to conduct business in the landlord’s property, every debtor would do that,” lawyers for the two property owners wrote in a legal filing. “But of course that is not allowed.”

    During the hearing Wednesday, Lopez also heard arguments for approving the Healey administration’s request to use the $30 million for transition costs, but it was not clear when he would issue his ruling on the funding.

    Christian M. Wade covers the Massachusetts Statehouse for North of Boston Media Group’s newspapers and websites. Email him at cwade@cnhinews.com.

    [ad_2]

    By Christian M. Wade | Statehouse Reporter

    Source link