ReportWire

Tag: bankfailures

  • ‘This is a risk confronting all banks,’ ex-FDIC chief Sheila Bair tells MarketWatch

    ‘This is a risk confronting all banks,’ ex-FDIC chief Sheila Bair tells MarketWatch

    [ad_1]

    Regional banks shouldn’t be the only source of worry for potential fallout from the Federal Reserve’s rapid pace of interest-rate hikes in the past year, said a former top banking regulator.

    “I don’t see regional banks as having any particular problem,” said Sheila Bair, who ran the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. from 2006 to 2011, in an interview with MarketWatch on Thursday. “We need to be mindful of all unmarked securities at banks — small, medium and large.”

    Bair called the hyperfocus on regional banks and interest-rate risks “counter productive” in the wake of the collapse earlier in March of Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank
    SBNY,
    -22.87%

    of New York.

    “This is a risk confronting all banks,” she said. “All examiners need to be on alert for how interest-rate risk is being managed. If there is a run, they will need to sell these securities. Those are the kinds of things all-size banks, and all examiners should be worried about.”

    A run on deposits at Silicon Valley Bank snowballed after it disclosed a $1.8 billion loss on a sudden sale of $21 billion worth of high-quality, rate-sensitive mortgage and Treasury securities. It was the biggest U.S. bank failure since Washington Mutual’s collapse in 2008.

    The FDIC estimated that U.S. banks had some $620 billion of unrealized losses from securities on their books as of the end of 2022, including longer-duration Treasurys and mortgage securities that have become worth less than their face value.

    “Unrealized losses on securities have meaningfully reduced the reported equity capital of the banking industry,” FDIC Chairman Martin Gruenberg said on March 6, in a speech at the Institute of International Bankers.

    Days after that gathering, Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank both collapsed, prompting regulators to roll out a new emergency bank funding program to help head off any liquidity strains at other U.S. lenders. Regulators also backstopped all deposits at the two failed lenders.

    Bair earlier this month argued that if U.S. banking authorities see systemic risks they should go to Congress and ask for a backstop against uninsured deposits, beyond the standard $250,000 cap per depositor, at a single bank. Specifically, she wants zero-interest accounts, or those used for payroll and other operational expenses, to be fully covered, as was the case for a few years in the wake of the global financial crisis to stop runs on community banks.

    Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen said Wednesday that blanket deposit insurance protection isn’t something her department is considering, but added that the appropriate level of protection could be debated in the future.

    Fed Chairman Jerome Powell on Wednesday said the U.S. banking system “is sound and resilient, with strong capital and liquidity,” after hiking rates by another 25 basis points to a range of 4.75% to 5%, up from almost zero a year ago.

    See: Fed hikes interest rates again, pencils in just one more rate rise this year

    Bair has been calling for a pause on Fed rate hikes since December. She said that instead of raising rates by another 25 basis points on Wednesday, Fed Chair Powell should have hit pause and said the central bank needs time to assess.

    “If we have a financial crisis, we won’t have a soft landing,” Bair said. “We have to avoid that at all costs.”

    Read: Bank failures like SVB are a reminder that ‘risk-free’ assets can still wreck portfolios

    Stocks closed modestly higher Thursday in choppy trade, with the Dow Jones Industrial Average
    DJIA,
    +0.23%

    up 0.2% and S&P 500 index
    SPX,
    +0.30%

    advancing 0.3%, while the Nasdaq Composite Index
    COMP,
    +1.01%

    gained 1%.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • The Fed will either pause or hike interest rates by 25 basis points. What are the pros and cons of each approach?

    The Fed will either pause or hike interest rates by 25 basis points. What are the pros and cons of each approach?

    [ad_1]

    The Federal Reserve will meet on Wednesday and, for once, the outcome is unclear.

    This is the most uncertain Fed meeting since 2008, said Jim Bianco, president of Bianco Research.

    Fed officials, starting with former chair Ben Bernanke, have perfected the art of having the market price in what the central bank will do — at least regarding interest rates — at each upcoming meeting. That has happened 100% of the time, Bianco said on Twitter.

    The Fed’s meeting this week is different because it follows the sudden collapse of confidence in the U.S. banking system following the government takeover of Silicon Valley Bank as well as the tremors around the world that have led to the shotgun wedding of Swiss banking giant Credit Suisse and its longtime rival, UBS.

    At the moment, the market probabilities are 73% for a quarter-percentage-point move and 27% for no move, according to the CME FedWatch tool. The market seems to be growing in confidence of a hike, analysts said, based on movements on the front end of the curve.

    The Fed’s decision will come on Wednesday at 2 p.m. Eastern and will be followed by a press conference from Fed Chair Jerome Powell.

    “Depending on your perspective, the Fed’s decision will be seen as either capitulation to the markets or ivory-tower isolation from the markets,” said Ian Katz, a financial sector analyst with Capital Alpha Partners.

    Here are the pros and cons for both a pause and a 25-basis-point hike.

    The case for and against a pause

    The main rationale for a pause is that the banking system is under stress.

    “While policymakers have responded aggressively to shore up the financial system, markets appear to be less than fully convinced that efforts to support small and midsize banks will prove sufficient. We think Fed officials will therefore share our view that stress in the banking system remains the most immediate concern for now,” said Jan Hatzius, chief economist at Goldman Sachs, in a note to clients Monday morning.

    Former New York Fed President William Dudley said he would recommend a pause. “The case for zero is ‘do no harm,’” he said.

    The case against a pause is that it could spark more worries about the banking system.

    “I think if they pause, they are going to have to explain exactly what they are seeing, what is giving them more concern. I am not sure a pause is comforting,” said former Fed Vice Chair Roger Ferguson in a television interview on Monday

    The case for and against a 25-basis-point hike

    The main reason for a quarter-percentage-point rate increase, to a range of 4.75%-5%, is that it could project confidence.

    “What you need from policymakers is steady hands, steady ship,” said Max Kettner, chief multi-asset strategist at HSBC. “You don’t need overaction … flip-flopping around in projections or opinions.”

    The Fed should say that it has managed to contain confidence so far and that “we can press ahead with the inflation fight,” he added.

    Oren Klachkin, lead U.S. economist at Oxford Economics, said he didn’t think “the recent bank failures pose systemic risks to the broad financial system and economy.”

    He noted that “inflation is still running hot” and the Fed has better ways to alleviate banking-sector stress than interest rates.

    The case against hiking is that doing so could further exacerbate concerns about the stability of the banking sector.

    “A rate hike now might have to be quickly reversed to deal with a deeper, less contained recession and disinflation. Why would the Fed raise rates when it may be forced to cut rates so much sooner than previously hoped?” asked Diane Swonk, chief economist at KPMG.

    Gregory Daco, chief economist at EY, said he thinks economic activity is slowing, which gives the Fed time.

    “There is no rush to hike. We are not going to see hyperinflation as a result,” he said.

    Stocks
    DJIA,
    +1.20%

    SPX,
    +0.89%

    rose Monday. The yield on the 10-year Treasury note
    TMUBMUSD10Y,
    3.485%

    inched up to 3.46%, still well below the 4% level seen prior to the banking crisis.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • First Republic gets $30 billion in deposits from 11 major U.S. banks, but stock resumes slide as it suspends dividend

    First Republic gets $30 billion in deposits from 11 major U.S. banks, but stock resumes slide as it suspends dividend

    [ad_1]

    Bank of America BAC, Citigroup C, JPMorgan Chase JPM and Wells Fargo WFC said Thursday that they are each making $5 billion in uninsured deposits into First Republic Bank FRC as part of a $30 billion backstop by 11 banks against the ravaged banking landscape of the past week.

    However, First Republic stock fell 14.7% in after-hours trading after the bank said it would suspend its dividend to conserve cash. The bank last paid a quarterly dividend of 27 cents a share on Feb. 9 to shareholders of record as of Jan. 26.

    It…

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • First Republic and Western Alliance pace big rebound in regional-bank stocks after huge losses

    First Republic and Western Alliance pace big rebound in regional-bank stocks after huge losses

    [ad_1]

    Shares of regional banks posted big gains on Tuesday as they regained their footing after huge losses in the previous session, but volatility continued in the sector following the demise of Silicon Valley Bank, Signature Bank and Silvergate Capital in the past week.

    While the rise in some cases is eye-popping, most stocks have yet to recover fully from losses in the past few days. Most stocks are trading well below their levels from a week ago, even with Tuesday’s gains.

    Among…

    [ad_2]

    Source link