ReportWire

Tag: Bank of America Corp

  • The banking crisis is having a slow-burn impact on the economy

    The banking crisis is having a slow-burn impact on the economy

    [ad_1]

    People walk by the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) on February 14, 2023 in New York City.

    Spencer Platt | Getty Images

    A banking crisis that erupted less than two months ago now appears to be less a major broadside to the U.S. economy than a slow bleed that will seep its way through and act as a potential catalyst for a much-anticipated recession later this year.

    As banks report the impact that a run on deposits has had on their operations, the picture is a mixed one: Larger institutions like JPMorgan Chase and Bank of America sustained far less of a hit, while smaller counterparts such as First Republic face a much tougher slog and a fight for survival.

    That means the money pipeline to Wall Street remains mostly alive and well while the situation on Main Street is much more in flux.

    “The small banks are going to be lending less. That’s a credit hit on Middle America, on Main Street,” said Steven Blitz, chief U.S. economist at TS Lombard. “That’s negative for growth.”

    How negative will come to light both in the approaching days and months months as data flows through.

    First Republic, a regional lender seen as a bellwether for how hard the deposit crunch will hit the sector, posted earnings that beat expectations but reflected a struggling company otherwise.

    Bank earnings largely have been decent for the first quarter, but the sector’s future is uncertain. Stocks have been under pressure, with the SPDR S&P Bank ETF (KBE) off more than 3% in Tuesday afternoon trading.

    “Rather than bringing concerning new information, this week’s earnings are confirming that the banking stress stabilized by the end of March and was contained at a limit set of banks,” Citigroup global economist Robert Sockin said in a client note. “That’s about the best macro outcome that could have been hoped for when stresses emerged last month.”

    Watching growth ahead

    “Everything keeps telling me that. Can you have a recession that is not led by autos and housing? Yes, you can. It’s a recession created by a loss of assets, a loss of income and that eventually flows through to everything,” he said. “Again, it’s a mild recession. A 2008-2009 recession occurs every 40 years. It’s not a 10-year event.”

    In fact, the most recent recession was just two years ago in the early days of the Covid crisis. The downturn was historically steep and short, ended by an equally unprecedented fusillade of fiscal and monetary stimulus that continues to flow through the economy.

    Consumer spending has seemed to hold up fairly well in the face of the banking crisis, with Citigroup estimating excess savings of about $1 trillion still available. However, delinquency rates and balances are both rising: Moody’s reported Tuesday that credit card charge-offs were 2.6% in the first quarter, rising by 0.57% from the fourth quarter of 2022, while balances soared 20.1% on an annual basis.

    Personal savings rates also have tumbled, falling from 13.4% in 2021 to 4.6% in February.

    But the most comprehensive report released so far that takes into account the period when Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank were shuttered indicated that the damage has been confined. The Federal Reserve’s periodic “Beige Book” report released, April 19, indicated only that lending and demand for loans “generally declined” and standards tightened “amid increased uncertainty and concerns about liquidity.”

    “The fallout from the crisis seems less serious than I had expected just a few weeks ago,” said Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody’s Analytics. The Fed report “was a lot less hair-on-fire than I had expected. [The banking situation] is a headwind, but it’s not a gale-force headwind, it’s just kind of a nuisance.”

    It’s all about the consumer

    Where things go from here depends greatly on the consumers who account for more than two-thirds of all U.S. economic activity.

    While the demand for services is catching up to pre-pandemic levels, cracks are forming. Along with the rise in credit card balances and delinquencies is likely to come the further obstacle of tightening credit standards, both by necessity and through an increased likelihood of tougher regulation.

    Lower-income consumers have been facing pressure for years as the share of wealth held by the top 1% of earners has continued to climb, up from 29.7% when Covid hit to 31.9% as of mid-2022, according to the most recent Fed data available.

    “Before any of this really started unfolding in early March, you were already starting to see signs of contraction and reining in of credit,” said Jim Baird, chief investment officer at Plante Moran Financial Advisors. “You’re seeing reduced demand for credit as consumers and businesses start to pull in the deck chairs.”

    Baird, though, also sees chances slim for a steep recession.

    “When you look at how all the forward-looking data lines up, it’s hard to envision how we sidestep at least a minor recession,” he said. “The real question is how far can the strength of the labor economy and still-significant cash reserves that many households have propel consumers forward and keep the economy on track.”

    First Republic Bank reports Q1 results: Stock sink despite topping estimates

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Big bank earnings season is over. Here’s how our stocks stack up against peers

    Big bank earnings season is over. Here’s how our stocks stack up against peers

    [ad_1]

    Morgan Stanley Chairman and Chief Executive James Gorman speaks during the Institute of International Finance Annual Meeting in Washington, October 10, 2014.

    Joshua Roberts | Reuters

    Big bank earnings are behind us. After hearing from the nation’s biggest institutions over the past couple weeks, we can breath a sigh of relief: They were better than feared.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • The bad loan term that’s back for banks trying to spot a recession

    The bad loan term that’s back for banks trying to spot a recession

    [ad_1]

    Signs explaining Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) and other banking policies on the counter of a bank in Westminster, Colorado November 3, 2009. 

    Rick Wilking | Reuters

    If there wasn’t enough banking jargon to blind you, it’s time to learn a new piece of it: Welcome to the industry’s era of the “criticized loan.”

    It’s a loan that’s not gone bust, or even missed a payment. But in a time when Wall Street is vibrating to any sign of recession risk, especially from banks, it’s gaining new currency. Criticized loans are those that show preliminary signs of higher risk, such as a developer who’s making payments but is otherwise having financial trouble, or an office building that recently lost a big tenant and needs to replace it.

    And they’re rising, which sets off the kind of bells that have sent bank stocks down roughly 20% since early March, even as earnings from the sector are coming in healthier than expected. Wall Street is watching stats on commercial real estate loans almost as closely as for signs that depositors are fleeing for higher interest rates paid by money-market funds (the No. 1 question on recent earnings calls).

    Banks are being asked more about criticized loans partly because other credit quality metrics look so good, despite the failures of Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank last month, according to David George, a banking analyst with Robert W. Baird & Co. Watching these loans is a way to gain at least limited insight into a real estate downturn many analysts expect to get worse before it gets better, as a combination of recession fears and the slow return of workers to post-Covid offices drives expectations of rising office vacancy rates.

    “It’s more subjective, but there are regulators at every bank,” he said. “Criticized loans could be paying or performing but a loan could be singled out because of its collateral.” 

    Not all banks disclose criticized loan growth in earnings reports, and the definition of a criticized asset is more fluid than classifications of whether a loan has missed payments or is otherwise “non-performing,” meaning it has missed payments or violated some other term of the loan deal. A bank’s quarter-end list of criticized assets is developed by a bank itself, under the supervision of bank examiners, according to David Fanger, senior vice president at the bond-rating agency Moody’s Investor Service.

    The Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.’s guidelines for such loans say they should be singled out if “well-defined weaknesses are present which jeopardize the orderly liquidation of the debt, [including] a project’s lack of marketability, inadequate cash flow or … the project’s failure to fulfill economic expectations. They are characterized by the distinct possibility that the institution will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected.” 

    Bank earnings show modest growth in ‘criticized loans’

    So far, reports for the first quarter show only slight growth in criticized loans, even as they move into the spotlight at regional banks and national-level commercial banks like Bank of America and Wells Fargo.

    At Bank of America, criticized loans to office building projects rose to $3.7 billion out of $19 billion in office loans. But office buildings represent only a quarter of the bank’s commercial real estate loans, and all CRE is just 7% of the bank’s total loans and leases. So even that ominous-sounding number — 20% of office loans look at least potentially shaky — works out to less than 1% of the bank’s total loans and leases.  Bank of America set aside $900 million for potential loan losses in all categories, a truer indication of short-term vulnerability.

    “They’re over-reserved,” George said. “It’s almost impossible for us to see office [losses] more than 4 or 5 percent of office loans. They already have reserves for that.”

    Wells Fargo, the nation’s biggest commercial real estate lender, according to American Banker, did not disclose its level of criticized loans in its earnings report. A spokeswoman said in an e-mail that the number will be in the bank’s quarterly Securities and Exchange Commission filing. Wells Fargo previously said its criticized loan levels in commercial real estate fell during 2022, but ticked upward in the fourth quarter to $12.4 billion out of $155.8 billion in loans. 

    Among the most detailed disclosures are those from Huntington Bancshares, a Columbus, Ohio-based regional with $169 billion in assets. Its criticized loans, which include all commercial lending and not just real estate, rose 5% to $3.89 billion. That included upgrades of $323 million in loans to a higher risk rating, and paydowns of $483 million, offset by $893 million in loans newly placed in the “criticized” category. Criticized loans are only 3.5% of Huntington’s total loans and 13 times more than the total of commercial loans that are 30 days past due. 

    Of Huntington’s $16 billion-plus in commercial real estate loans, none are 90 days past due and only 0.25% of balances are 30 days past due or more. But the 30-days-late category is up from close to zero in late 2022. How big a problem is this? If all of the 30-days-late loans went unpaid and had to be written off, Huntington’s quarterly earnings of $602 million would have dropped by about 7%, or $41 million. The total of all criticized loans compares to 2022 net income of $2.13 billion.

    “Our credit quality remains top-tier,” Huntington CEO Stephen Steinour told analysts on its recent earnings call. “Huntington is built to thrive during times like this.”

    The story is similar among regional banks generally. PNC, the second-largest regional bank, said criticized real estate loans are now 20% of office loans, because multi-tenant buildings it has lent to are about 25% empty, and 60% of the loans are up for refinancing or repayment by the end of 2024. But only 0.2% of office loans are actually delinquent. “In the near term, this (multi-tenant office) is our primary concern area,” CFO Robert Reilly told analysts. PNC has loan loss reserves of 9.4% of total multi-tenant office loans.

    At Cincinnati-based Fifth Third Bancorp, 8.2% of office loans are now criticized, but that represents about 0.1% of the bank’s total loans. Cleveland-based Keycorp said its criticized loans were about 2.8% of its total, up from 2.5% late last year, but that only 0.2% of loans aren’t being paid on time.  

    “Credit quality remains strong,” Keycorp CEO Christopher Gorman said after its earnings, adding that the company has reduced risk for a decade, including by eliminating most construction loans to office building developers. “We have limited exposure to high-risk areas, such as office, lodging and retail,” he told analysts on the quarterly earnings call.

    There is an estimated $1.5 trillion in the commercial real estate refinancing pipeline over the next three years, but Moody’s research shows the portfolios to be well diversified across bank types, and according to a recent analysis from CNBC Pro using Deutsche Bank data, the concentration of CRE risk is smallest at the largest banks, where office loans make up less than 5% of total loans, and are less than 2% on average.

    For investors, the key is to look at all the metrics together to manage their own risk, Fanger said. Many, even most, criticized loans will never go bad, he said, since they can be restructured or refinanced, or the office building collateral can be sold to repay some loans. But the newly prominent metric, which he said has been around for years, is the place to look for one version of what could happen down the road.

    “There’s a qualitative aspect to any rating,” Fanger said. “We find it a useful measure for the likely direction of risk.” 

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Bank of America or Citi? Analysts say one stock is set to soar 50%

    Bank of America or Citi? Analysts say one stock is set to soar 50%

    [ad_1]

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Morgan Stanley tops analysts’ expectations on better-than-expected trading results

    Morgan Stanley tops analysts’ expectations on better-than-expected trading results

    [ad_1]

    Morgan Stanley CEO James Gorman participates in a conversation-style interview with Economic Club of Washington in Washington September 18, 2013.

    Yuri Gripas | Reuters

    Morgan Stanley on Wednesday topped estimates for first quarter profit and revenue on better-than-expected trading results.

    Here’s how the company did:

    • Earnings of $1.70 per share, vs. $1.62 Refinitiv estimate
    • Revenue of $14.52 billion, vs. $13.92 billion estimate.

    The New York-based bank said earnings fell 19% to $2.98 billion, or $1.70 a share, from a year earlier on declines in investment banking and trading. Companywide revenue slipped 2% to $14.52 billion.

    As revenues dipped, expenses at the bank climbed 4% to $10.52 billion, mostly fueled by higher-than-expected compensation costs. Expenses came in $430 million higher than the StreetAccount estimate.

    Higher costs helped hurt profit margins at the bank’s wealth division and investment bank, analyst Mike Mayo of Wells Fargo said in a research note. He also said that when excluding the benefit of a low tax rate, the bank would’ve earned $1.64 per share.

    Shares of the bank dropped 3.8% in premarket trading.

    Under CEO James Gorman, Morgan Stanley has become a wealth management giant thanks to a string of acquisitions. The bank gets most of its revenue from wealth and investment management, steadier businesses that help to offset volatile trading and banking results.

    “The investments we have made in our wealth management business continue to bear fruit as we added a robust $110 billion in net new assets this quarter,” Gorman said in the earnings release. “Equity and fixed Income revenues were strong, although investment banking activity continued to be constrained.”

    Wealth management revenue climbed 11% from the year-earlier period to $6.56 billion, matching the StreetAccount estimate. The increase was fueled by a rise in net interest income amid higher rates and loan growth, which offset lower asset management revenues as markets declined.

    First-quarter trading revenue dipped from a year ago as Wall Street comes down from a pandemic-era boom, but Morgan Stanley’s traders managed to top expectations by roughly $250 million.

    The bank’s fixed income traders produced $2.58 billion in revenue, exceeding the $2.33 billion StreetAccount estimate. Equities trading revenue of $2.73 billion edged out the $2.65 billion estimate.

    Investment banking revenue dropped 24% to $1.25 billion on fewer completed M&A deals and lower stock and debt issuance, edging out the $1.2 billion estimate.

    Finally, the bank’s smallest business, investment management, saw revenues drop 3% to $1.29 billion, just below the $1.34 billion estimate, as management fees decreased amid declining markets.

    At the start of a conference call with analysts, Gorman addressed the turmoil sparked by the March collapse of two American regional banks.

    “In my view, we are not in a banking crisis, but we have had and may still have a crisis among some banks,” Gorman said. “I consider the condition not remotely comparable to 2008.”

    He added that there was “no doubt” that Morgan Stanley would acquire more companies in wealth management, though nothing was imminent.

    Morgan Stanley shares have climbed 5.7% this year before Wednesday, outperforming the 16% decline of the KBW Bank Index.

    JPMorgan Chase, Citigroup, Wells Fargo and Bank of America each topped expectations as the firms reaped more interest income amid rising rates. Goldman Sachs missed on costs tied to unloading consumer loans amid its pivot away from retail banking.

    This story is developing. Please check back for updates.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • CNBC Daily Open: Goldman Sachs’ tough quarter

    CNBC Daily Open: Goldman Sachs’ tough quarter

    [ad_1]

    An employee exits Goldman Sachs headquarters in New York, US, on Tuesday, Jan. 17, 2023.

    Bing Guan | Bloomberg | Getty Images

    This report is from today’s CNBC Daily Open, our new, international markets newsletter. CNBC Daily Open brings investors up to speed on everything they need to know, no matter where they are. Like what you see? You can subscribe here.

    Markets were mostly flat on Tuesday despite a bevy of big companies reporting earnings. Investors were likely concerned about higher interest rates.

    What you need to know today

    • Goldman Sachs had a bad first quarter. The bank’s earnings fell 18% from a year earlier to $32.23 billion and its revenue dropped 5% to $12.22 billion. Revenue slid because the bank sold part of its Marcus loans portfolio at a $470 million loss.
    • Netflix’s earnings fell to $1.31 billion from $1.6 billion from a year earlier even though its revenue grew to $8.16 billion from $7.87 billion. This suggests its margins are narrowing. Separately, the company is delaying plans to stop users in the U.S. from sharing passwords after the scheme slowed subscriber growth in other countries.
    • Johnson & Johnson’s first-quarter sales grew 5.6% compared with the same period last year, though it reported a net loss of $68 million because of a lawsuit involving the company’s talcum powder. The consumer staples giant foresees headwinds for its pharmaceutical department, lowering its sales target for 2025 to $57 billion from $60 billion.
    • PRO Disney has a strong slate of films coming out — and its share could rally as much as 34.6% on the back of “tentpole titles” like “The Little Mermaid,” according to a Deutsche Bank analyst.

    The bottom line

    There are two types of banks, broadly speaking. First, commercial banks, which primarily serve consumers and businesses by accepting their deposits and extending loans to them. Second, investment banks, which help institutions and governments navigate complex financial transactions such as trading, mergers and acquisitions.

    Intuitively, the way they make money is different. Commercial banks reap profits from the difference in interest rates between the loans they make and the deposits they receive, while investment banks earn fees on their dealmaking activity.

    Bank of America belongs to the first category; Goldman the second. This explains why their earnings, fundamentally, diverged so much. In today’s high interest rate environment, commercial banks tend to earn more since they can charge higher rates for their loans while keeping deposit rates low, whereas investment banks typically see a fall in fees because of reduced financial activity.

    Goldman, of course, knows that — it’s been trying to diversify into commercial bank through Marcus, its retail-focused business. But that endeavor’s making losses rather than boosting profits and might face threats of “cannibalization” — as CEO David Solomon put it — from Apple’s new savings account, launched in partnership with Goldman itself.

    Investors punished Goldman for the bank’s lackluster quarterly results and apparently confusing strategy, sending its shares down 1.7% — and they dipped a further 0.18% in after-hours trading. Investors were also let down by Johnson & Johnson’s sales forecast. The company’s shares dropped 2.81%.

    Nevertheless, U.S. markets were mostly flat. Investors were probably more worried about interest rates, a problem of the future, than earnings reports, a snapshot of the past. And for good reason: Atlanta Federal Reserve President Raphael Bostic told CNBC he anticipates “one more move” on rate hikes, followed by a pause “for quite some time.”

    Higher interest rates for longer means tighter margins, lower profits for companies and a general slowdown in the economy. No wonder markets are still, despite the bevy of earnings reports from big companies.

    Subscribe here to get this report sent directly to your inbox each morning before markets open.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • S&P 500 ekes out gain, stocks drift as earnings pick up

    S&P 500 ekes out gain, stocks drift as earnings pick up

    [ad_1]

    U.S. stocks drifted, closing mostly lower on Tuesday, as investors waited for earnings season to gather more steam. The Dow Jones Industrial Average
    DJIA,
    -0.03%

    ended down 10 points, or less than 0.1%, near 33,976, while the S&P 500 index
    SPX,
    +0.09%

    gained 0.1%, according to preliminary figures from FactSet. The Nasdaq Composite Index
    COMP,
    -0.04%

    fell less than 0.1%. Bank of America
    BAC,
    +0.63%

    and Goldman Sachs
    GS,
    -1.70%

    were among the major banks to report quarterly results, while streaming giant Netflix Inc.
    NFLX,
    +0.29%

    was on deck after the bell. It is ending its red-envelope DVD rental service after 25 years. Investors also heard Tuesday from several more staffers at the Federal Reserve, with Atlanta Fed President Raphael Bostic telling Reuters that he expects one more rate hike, but for the Fed’s policy rate to stay higher for awhile. Continued gridlock in Washington on the debt-ceiling stalemate also has been coming into focus for markets. BlackRock also sold the first batch of seized assets from Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank, which fetched about 85 cents to 90 cents on the dollar.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Treasury yields little changed as focus remains on economic outlook, earnings

    Treasury yields little changed as focus remains on economic outlook, earnings

    [ad_1]

    John Zich | Bloomberg | Getty Images

    U.S. Treasury yields were little changed on Tuesday, as investors continued to assess the outlook for the U.S. economy and digested the latest round of corporate earnings.

    As of around 2:20 a.m. ET, the yield on the benchmark 10-year Treasury note was fractionally higher at 3.5946% while the yield on the 30-year Treasury bond also nudged marginally upwards to 3.8080%. Yields move inversely to prices.

    Corporate earnings season dominates this week’s agenda, with giants Johnson & JohnsonBank of America and Goldman Sachs all set to report before the opening bell on Wall Street on Tuesday.

    On the data front, traders will have an eye on the March housing starts and building permits figures due at 8:30 a.m. ET. Housing starts for the month are expected to have fallen by 3.4% to 1.40 million units, according to Dow Jones consensus estimates, while building permits are projected to drop by 4.9% to 1.45 million units.

    Markets are closely following economic data for a read on where the Federal Reserve might take interest rates at its next meeting in early May. More than 84% of traders are calling a 25 basis point hike at the next policy meeting, according to CME Group’s FedWatch tool.

    An auction will be held Tuesday for $34 billion of 52-week Treasury bills.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Should investors buy regional bank stocks? A bull and a bear weigh in — and share 3 top picks

    Should investors buy regional bank stocks? A bull and a bear weigh in — and share 3 top picks

    [ad_1]

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Three investors on how to protect your portfolio | CNN Business

    Three investors on how to protect your portfolio | CNN Business

    [ad_1]

    A version of this story first appeared in CNN Business’ Before the Bell newsletter. Not a subscriber? You can sign up right here. You can listen to an audio version of the newsletter by clicking the same link.


    New York
    CNN
     — 

    Wall Street has been hit with a barrage of complex signals about the economy’s health over the past month. From banking turmoil to weakening jobs data to slowing inflation, and now the start of earnings season, investors have remained largely resilient.

    But the Federal Reserve’s March meeting minutes revealed last week that officials believe the economy will enter a recession later this year. While that’s not new news to investors who have worried that a recession is on the horizon for the past year, it does mean that markets could take a turn for the worse.

    So, how should investors protect their portfolios? Investors say there isn’t one asset that Wall Street should pile all their bets on, but there are fundamentals that should underlie their investment strategies.

    Jimmy Chang, chief investment officer at Rockefeller Global Family Office, says he advises clients to be patient, defensive and selective when navigating the market.

    In other words, investors should make decisions based on logic, not a fear of missing out.

    “You chase these rallies and then it fizzles out — you’re left holding the bag,” he said.

    Chang also recommends that investors stay defensive by investing in high-quality blue chip stocks with solid balance sheets and keep dry powder.

    Doug Fincher, portfolio manager at Ionic Capital Management, says investors should brace their portfolios against inflation.

    The Personal Consumption Expenditures price index rose 5% for the 12 months ended in February, showing that inflation remains much higher than the Fed’s 2% target.

    Coupled with the fact that the central bank has signaled that it plans to pause interest rate hikes sometime this year, it’s possible inflation could prove stickier than Wall Street expects.

    “It is the boogeyman of traditional investments,” Fincher said.

    He manages the Ionic Inflation Protection exchange-traded fund, which seeks to specifically perform well during periods of high inflation. The portfolio’s core exposure is inflation swaps, which are transactions in which one investor agrees to swap fixed payments for floating payments tied to the inflation rate. The fund also invests in short-duration Treasury Inflation Protected Securities.

    Megan Horneman, chief investment officer at Verdence Capital Advisors, says that her firm has hedged its portfolio in cash. A well-known haven, cash is a better alternative to other perceived safe spots like gold, which tends to be volatile and run up too fast, she said.

    Investors have rushed into money market funds in recent weeks after the banking turmoil both shook their confidence in the banking system and sent ripples through the market.

    “Cash is actually earning you something at this point,” Horneman said. “You have to look long term.”

    Earnings season kicked off Friday with a bonanza of earnings from the nation’s largest banks.

    Perhaps most noteworthy out of the bunch was JPMorgan Chase, which reported record revenue and an earnings beat for its latest quarter.

    The bank has $3.67 trillion in assets, making it the largest bank in the country and a bellwether for the economy. Strong earnings reports from the New York-based bank and its peers including Wells Fargo, Citigroup and PNC Financial Services have shown a promising start to the earnings season.

    Charles Schwab, Goldman Sachs, Bank of America and Morgan Stanley report next week.

    Here are some key takeaways from JPMorgan Chase’s first-quarter earnings:

    • The company guided net interest income to be about $81 billion in 2023, up $7 billion from its previous estimate. That’s especially important because this earnings season is all about guidance, as investors try to gauge whether the economy is headed for a recession and which companies will be able to weather a potential downturn.
    • CEO Jamie Dimon said in the post-earnings conference call that while financial conditions are a bit tighter after the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank, he doesn’t see a credit crunch. But chances of a recession are now higher, he said.
    • The company said that its portfolio’s exposure to the office sector is less than 10%, addressing concerns that the $20 trillion commercial real estate industry could be the next space to see turmoil.

    Read more here.

    Monday: Empire State manufacturing index and homebuilder confidence index. Earnings report from Charles Schwab (SCHW).

    Tuesday: Earnings reports from Bank of America (BAC), Goldman Sachs (GS), Johnson & Johnson (JNJ), Netflix (NFLX), United Airlines (UAL) and Western Alliance Bancorp (WAL).

    Wednesday: Earnings reports from Citizens Financial Group (CFG), Morgan Stanley (MS), Tesla (TSLA) and International Business Machines (IBM). Speech from NY Federal Reserve President John Williams.

    Thursday: Philadelphia Fed manufacturing index, jobless claims, mortgage rates, US leading economic indicators and existing home sales. Earnings reports from AutoNation (AN) and American Express (AXP).

    Friday: Manufacturing PMI and services PMI. Earnings report from Procter & Gamble (PG).

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • JPMorgan Chase is set to report first-quarter earnings – here’s what the Street expects

    JPMorgan Chase is set to report first-quarter earnings – here’s what the Street expects

    [ad_1]

    Jamie Dimon, chairman and chief executive officer of JPMorgan Chase & Co., during a Bloomberg Television interview at the JPMorgan Global High Yield and Leveraged Finance Conference in Miami, Florida, US, on Monday, March 6, 2023.

    Marco Bello | Bloomberg | Getty Images

    JPMorgan Chase is scheduled to report first-quarter earnings before the opening bell Friday.

    Here’s what Wall Street expects:

    • Earnings: $3.41 per share, 29.7% higher than a year earlier, according to Refinitiv.
    • Revenue: $36.24 billion, 14.7% higher than a year earlier.
    • Deposits: $2.31 trillion, according to StreetAccount.
    • Provision for credit losses: $2.27 billion.
    • Trading Revenue: Fixed income $5.29 billion, Equities $2.86 billion.

    JPMorgan, the biggest U.S. bank by assets, will be watched closely for clues on how the industry fared after the collapse of two regional lenders last month.

    Analysts expect a mixed bag of conflicting trends. For instance, JPMorgan likely benefited from an influx of deposits after Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank experienced fatal bank runs.

    But the industry has been forced to pay up for deposits as customers shift holdings into higher-yielding instruments like money market funds. That will probably curb banks’ gains from rising interest rates amid the Federal Reserve’s efforts to tame inflation.

    The flow of deposits through American financial institutions is the top concern of analysts and investors this quarter. That’s because smaller banks faced pressure last month as customers sought the perceived safety of megabanks including JPMorgan and Bank of America. But the bigger picture may be that deposits are leaving the regulated banking system overall as customers realize they can earn higher yields outside checking and saving accounts.

    Another key question will be whether JPMorgan and others are tightening lending standards ahead of an expected U.S. recession, which could constrict economic growth this year by making it harder for consumers and businesses to borrow money.

    Banks have begun setting aside more loan loss provisions on expectations for a slowing economy later this year, and that could weigh on results. JPMorgan is expected to post a $2.27 billion provision for credit losses, according to the StreetAccount estimate.

    Wall Street may provide little help this quarter, with investment banking fees likely to remain subdued thanks to the still-shut IPO market. CFO Jeremy Barnum said in February that investment banking revenue was headed for a 20% decline from a year earlier, and that trading was trending “a little bit worse” as well.

    Finally, analysts will want to hear what JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon has to say about the economy and his expectations for how the regional banking crisis will develop. JPMorgan has played a central role in propping up a client bank, First Republic, which teetered last month, in part by leading efforts to inject it with $30 billion in deposits.

    Shares of JPMorgan are down about 4% this year, outperforming the 31% decline of the KBW Bank Index.

    Wells Fargo and Citigroup are scheduled to release results later Friday, while Goldman Sachs and Bank of America report Tuesday and Morgan Stanley discloses results Wednesday.

    This story is developing. Please check back for updates.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Warren Buffett on banking crisis fallout and why he sold most of his bank stocks except one

    Warren Buffett on banking crisis fallout and why he sold most of his bank stocks except one

    [ad_1]

    Share

    Warren Buffett, Berkshire Hathaway CEO, joins CNBC’s “Squawk Box” to discuss the fallout from the banking crisis and why he sold certain bank stocks.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Bank panic created this pocket of opportunity with yields nearing 8%, analysts say

    Bank panic created this pocket of opportunity with yields nearing 8%, analysts say

    [ad_1]

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • BofA reports inflows into global stocks are on a record-setting pace — and ETFs may be a way to play the hot trade

    BofA reports inflows into global stocks are on a record-setting pace — and ETFs may be a way to play the hot trade

    [ad_1]

    There’s a corner of the market gaining traction among ETF investors, according to The ETF Store’s Nate Geraci.

    The firm’s president finds international ETFs are experiencing stronger inflows.

    “There is a little bit of performance chasing going on here, because broad international stocks have fairly significantly outperformed U.S. stocks since about the beginning of the fourth quarter of last year,” he told CNBC’s “ETF Edge” this week. “Investors are looking at that performance and perhaps reallocating there.”

    BofA Global Research’s latest market data out late this week appears to support Geraci’s thesis. It shows emerging markets are seeing strong inflows so far this year.

    According to the firm, inflows into emerging-market equities are clipping along at $152.3 billion on an annualized basis. This would mark the group’s largest ever inflows if the pace continues.

    Geraci believes a weakening U.S. dollar due to a potential pivot away from interest rate hikes by the Federal Reserve is partially responsible for the shift. The U.S. Dollar Currency Index is down almost 1% year to date.

    Valuations of overseas companies may also be more attracting investors, he added.

    And, there may be even more growth ahead.

    D.J. Tierney of Schwab Asset Management contends retail investors don’t own enough global stocks. He suggests the upside will continue into the second quarter, which starts Monday.

    “Rebalancing [to international stocks] to get some more exposure could make sense for a lot of investors,” said the senior investment portfolio strategist.

    His firm’s Schwab International Equity ETF, which tracks large- and mid-cap companies in over 20 developed global markets, is up 8.1% so far this year.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • UBS sees a rally in these bank stocks ahead as bank crisis appears contained

    UBS sees a rally in these bank stocks ahead as bank crisis appears contained

    [ad_1]

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Bank of America’s Andy Sieg is joining Citi as head of global wealth

    Bank of America’s Andy Sieg is joining Citi as head of global wealth

    [ad_1]

    Andy Sieg, a veteran of Merrill Lynch, is parting ways with Bank of America to join Citigroup.

    He will be the new head of Citi Global Wealth, reporting to Jane Fraser, the bank’s CEO. Sieg will begin his new role in September, as he is required to take a six-month leave before starting the new position, according to an announcement from Fraser.

    “Growing Wealth is a core pillar of our strategy and will improve our business mix by adding more fee-based revenue and drive improved returns,” Fraser said in the announcement. “In my conversations with Andy, it is clear to him that our team is on a mission to transform Citi — and he is highly driven and motivated to play a central role in our firm’s leadership.”

    Previously, Sieg was president of Merrill Lynch Wealth Management, a post he’s held for six years. He was also a member of Bank of America’s executive management team. The bank acquired Merrill during the throes of the great financial crisis.

    Separately, Bank of America announced that Lindsay Hans and Eric Schimpf have been appointed presidents and co-heads of Merrill Wealth Management. They will report to Bank of America CEO Brian Moynihan.

    CNBC’s Hugh Son contributed reporting.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • U.S. stocks end mostly higher as banks helped buoy S&P 500 after First Citizens deal

    U.S. stocks end mostly higher as banks helped buoy S&P 500 after First Citizens deal

    [ad_1]

    U.S. stocks closed mostly higher Monday, as bank shares climbed after First Citizens BancShares Inc.
    FCNCA,
    +53.74%

    agreed to buy failed Silicon Valley Bank’s deposits and loans. The Dow Jones Industrial Average
    DJIA,
    +0.60%

    finished 0.6% higher, while the S&P 500
    SPX,
    +0.16%

    gained 0.2% and the technology-heavy Nasdaq Composite
    COMP,
    -0.47%

    slipped 0.5%, according to preliminary data from FactSet. Regional and big banks helped buoy the S&P 500, with First Republic Bank
    FRC,
    +11.81%

    among the index’s top-performing stocks, FactSet data show. Shares of major Wall Street banks such as Bank of America Corp.
    BAC,
    +4.97%
    ,
    Citigroup Inc.
    C,
    +3.87%
    ,
    Wells Fargo & Co.
    WFC,
    +3.42%

    and JPMorgan Chase & Co.
    JPM,
    +2.87%

    also saw sharp gains in Monday’s trading session.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Pro Picks: Watch all of Friday’s big stock calls on CNBC

    Pro Picks: Watch all of Friday’s big stock calls on CNBC

    [ad_1]

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Moody’s sees risk that U.S. banking ‘turmoil’ can’t be contained

    Moody’s sees risk that U.S. banking ‘turmoil’ can’t be contained

    [ad_1]

    Despite quick action by regulators and policy makers, there’s a rising risk that banking-system stress will spill over into other sectors and the U.S. economy, “unleashing greater financial and economic damage than we anticipated,” said Moody’s Investors Service, one of the Big Three credit-ratings firms.

    Simply put, the risk is that officials “will be unable to curtail the current turmoil without longer-lasting and potentially severe repercussions within and beyond the banking sector,” Atsi Sheth, Moody’s managing director of credit strategy, and others wrote in a note distributed on Thursday. Still, the agency’s baseline view is that U.S. officials will “broadly succeed.”

    Moody’s warning came as Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen indicated that the U.S. could take additional actions if needed to stabilize the banking system, and after Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell assured Americans on Wednesday that the central bank would use its tools to protect depositors.

    Read: Regional banks get the attention, but worries are more widespread, says ex-FDIC chief Bair and Debate over expanding deposit insurance weighs on bank stocks. Here’s what to know.

    Beneath the surface, though, is lingering worry. Hedge-fund manager Bill Ackman, for example, is warning of an acceleration of deposit outflows from banks and the latest global fund manager survey from Bank of America
    BAC,
    -2.42%

    found that 31% of 212 managers polled regard a systemic credit crunch as the biggest threat to markets.

    Of the three ways in which banking-system troubles could spill over more broadly, one of them is potentially the “most potent,” according to Moody’s: That is a general aversion to risk by financial-market players and a decision by banks to retrench from providing credit. Such a scenario could lead to the “crystallization of risk in multiple pockets simultaneously,” the ratings agency said.


    Source: Moody’s Investors Service

    “Over the course of 2023, as financial conditions remain tight and growth slows, a range of sectors and entities with existing credit challenges will face risks to their credit profiles,” the Moody’s team wrote. Banks are not the only type of players with exposure to interest-rate shocks, and “market scrutiny will focus on those entities that are exposed to similar risks as the troubled banks.”

    A second potential channel for spillover is through the direct and indirect exposure to troubled banks that private and public entities have — via deposits, loans, transactional facilities, essential services, or holdings in those banks’ bonds and stocks. And a third way in which banking problems could spread more broadly is through a misstep by policy makers, who have been focused on inflation and may not be able to respond effectively enough to evolving developments, Moody’s said.

    On Thursday, U.S. stocks
    DJIA,
    +0.23%

    SPX,
    +0.30%

    COMP,
    +1.01%

    finished higher as investors continued to weigh the risks to the banking sector. The policy-sensitive 2-year Treasury yield
    TMUBMUSD02Y,
    3.833%

    fell to its lowest level this year, while gold futures settled at a more than one-year high.

    Last week, Fitch Ratings said that nonbank financial institutions, insurers, and funds were experiencing a variety of “knock-on effects” as the result of the sudden deterioration of a few U.S. banks.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Sens. Booker, Warnock press big bank CEOs to pause overdraft fees after SVB failure

    Sens. Booker, Warnock press big bank CEOs to pause overdraft fees after SVB failure

    [ad_1]

    Sen. Cory Booker (D-NJ) speaks during Attorney General nominee Merrick Garland’s confirmation hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee, Washington, DC, February 22, 2021.

    Al Drago | Pool | Reuters

    WASHINGTON — Sens. Cory Booker and Raphael Warnock have urged the CEOs of 10 major banks to waive overdraft and nonsufficient fund fees that could cost some Americans more than $100 a day in the wake of the failures of Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank.

    In letters dated Tuesday, the New Jersey and Georgia Democrats asked banks to help customers whose payments were delayed or missing due to the collapse of SVB and Signature earlier this month. The letters went to the CEOs of Wells Fargo, U.S. Bank, Truist Financial Corporation, TD Bank, Regions Financial Corporation, PNC Bank, JP Morgan Chase, Huntington National Bank, Citizens Bank and Bank of America.

    “Disruptions across the banking industry this month rattled consumers and threw into jeopardy the paychecks of millions of American workers,” wrote Booker, who is a member of the Senate Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship, and Warnock.

    The fees, which can reach up to $111 a day for low account balances or up to $175 on low account fees, “compound the difficult financial situation customers find themselves in, particularly when their lack of funds is due to an unprecedented, unexpected delay,” the senators added.

    JPMorgan declined to comment. The other banks that received the letters did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

    The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation closed SVB on March 10 after the bank announced a nearly $2 billion loss in asset sales. The agency said SVB’s official checks would continue to clear and assets would be accessible the following day.

    Regulators shuttered New York-based Signature Bank days later in an effort to stall a potential banking crisis. Many of its assets have since been sold to Flagstar Bank, a subsidiary of New York Community Bankcorp.

    Booker and Warnock said banking customers whose paydays fell between March 10 and March 13 were unable to receive or deposit checks from payroll providers banking with SVB and Signature Bank. They also noted that online merchant Etsy notified customers of payment delays because it used SVB payment processing.

    The senators also cited an unrelated, nationwide technical glitch on the 10th that caused missing payments and incorrect balances for Wells Fargo customers.

    “These delays will disproportionately harm the impacted customers who are part of the sixty-four percent of Americans living paycheck-to-paycheck, who are often ‘minutes to hours away from having the money necessary to cover’ expenses that lead to overdraft nonsufficient fund fees,” Booker and Warnock wrote.

    They praised steps taken by the Treasury and the FDIC to stem a possible economic catastrophe by ensuring access to depositor funds over the $250,000 FDIC-guarantee threshold and creating a new, one-year loan to financial institutions to safeguard deposits in times of stress.

    Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen on Tuesday said the Treasury is prepared to guarantee all deposits for financial institutions beyond SVB and Signature Bank if the crisis worsens.

    “In line with quick, decisive government response to assist the businesses and individuals who were helped immediately in order to contain the broader fallout of these bank failures, we urge you to act with similar urgency to backstop American families from unexpected and undeserved charges,” the senators wrote.

    [ad_2]

    Source link