ReportWire

Tag: ballot

  • Trump, California and the multi-front war over the next election

    [ad_1]

    In recent weeks, Marin County Registrar Natalie Adona has been largely focused on the many mundane tasks of local elections administrators in the months before a midterm: finalizing voting locations, ordering supplies, facilitating candidate filings.

    But in the wake of unprecedented efforts by the Trump administration to intervene in state-run elections, Adona said she has also been preparing her staff for far less ordinary scenarios — such as federal officials showing up and demanding ballots, as they recently did in Georgia, or immigration agents staging around polling stations on election day, as some in President Trump’s orbit have suggested.

    “Part of my job is making sure that the plans are developed and then tested and then socialized with the staff so if those situations were to ever come up, we would not be figuring it out right then and there. We would know what to do,” Adona said. “Doing those sort of exercises and that level of planning in a way is kind of grounding, and makes things feel less chaotic.”

    Natalie Adona faced harassment from election deniers and COVID anti-maskers when she served as the registrar of voters in Nevada County. She now serves Marin County and is preparing her staff for potential scenarios this upcoming election, including what to do if immigration agents are present.

    (Jess Lynn Goss / For The Times)

    Across California, local elections administrators say they have been running similar exercises to prepare for once unthinkable threats — not from local rabble-rousers, remote cyberattackers or foreign adversaries, but their own federal government.

    State officials, too, are writing new contingency plans for unprecedented intrusions by Trump and other administration officials, who in recent days have repeated baseless 2020 election conspiracies, raided and taken ballots from a local election center in Fulton County, Ga., pushed both litigation and legislation that would radically alter local voting rules, and called for Republicans to seize control of elections nationwide.

    California’s local and state officials — many of whom are Democrats — are walking a fine line, telling their constituents that elections remain fair and safe, but also that Trump’s talk of federal intervention must be taken seriously.

    Their concerns are vastly different than the concerns voiced by Trump and other Republicans, who for years have alleged without evidence that U.S. elections are compromised by widespread fraud involving noncitizen voters, including in California.

    But they have nonetheless added to a long-simmering sense of fear and doubt among voters — who this year have the potential to radically alter the nation’s political trajectory by flipping control of Congress to Democrats.

    An election worker moves ballots to be sorted.

    An election worker moves ballots to be sorted at the Orange County Registrar of Voters in Santa Ana on Nov. 5, 2024.

    (Allen J. Schaben / Los Angeles Times)

    Trump has said he will accept Republican losses only if the elections are “honest.” A White House spokesperson said Trump is pushing for stricter rules for voting and voter registration because he “cares deeply about the safety and security of our elections.”

    Rick Hasen, an election law expert and director of the Safeguarding Democracy Project at UCLA Law, said some of what Trump says about elections “is nonsensical and some is bluster,” but recent actions — especially the election center raid in Georgia — have brought home the reality of his threats.

    “Some worry that this is a test run for trying to seize ballot boxes in 2026 and prevent a fair count of the votes, and given Trump’s track record, I don’t think that is something we can dismiss out of hand,” Hasen said. “States need to be making contingency plans to make sure that those kinds of things don’t happen.”

    The White House dismissed such concerns, pointing to isolated incidents of noncitizens being charged with illegally voting, and to examples of duplicate registrations, voters remaining on rolls after death and people stealing ballots to vote multiple times.

    “These so-called experts are ignoring the plentiful examples of noncitizens charged with voter fraud and of ineligible voters on voter rolls,” said Abigail Jackson, the White House spokesperson.

    Experts said fraudulent votes are rare, most registration and roll issues do not translate into fraudulent votes being cast, and there is no evidence such issues swing elections.

    A swirl of activity

    Early in his term, Trump issued an executive order calling for voters nationwide to be required to show proof of U.S. citizenship, and for states to be required to disregard mail ballots received after election day. California and other states sued, and courts have so far blocked the order.

    This past week, Trump said outright that Republicans should “take over” elections nationwide.

    The Justice Department has sued California Secretary of State Shirley Weber and her counterparts in other states for refusing to hand over state voter rolls — the lawsuit against Weber was tossed — and raided and seized ballots from the election office of Fulton County, long a target of right-wing conspiracy theories over Trump’s 2020 election loss.

    President Trump walks behind former chairperson of the Republican National Committee Michael Whatley.

    President Trump walks behind former chairperson of the Republican National Committee Michael Whatley as he prepares to speak during a political rally in Rocky Mount, N.C., on Dec. 19.

    (Andrew Caballero-Reynolds / AFP via Getty Images)

    Longtime Trump advisor and ally Stephen K. Bannon suggested U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents will be dispatched to polling locations in November, reprising old fears about voter intimidation. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said she couldn’t rule that out, despite it being illegal.

    Democrats have raised concerns about the U.S. Postal Service mishandling mail ballots in the upcoming elections, following rule changes for how such mail is processed. Republicans have continued pushing the SAVE America Act, which would create new proof of citizenship requirements for voters. The U.S. Supreme Court is considering multiple voting rights cases, including one out of Louisiana that challenges Voting Rights Act protections for Black representation.

    Charles H. Stewart, director of the MIT Election Data + Science Lab, said the series of events has created an “environment where chaos is being threatened,” and where “people who are concerned about the state of democracy are alarmed and very concerned,” and rightfully so.

    But he said there are also “a number of guardrails” in place — what he called “the kind of mundane mechanics that are involved in running elections” — that will help prevent harm.

    California prepares

    California leaders have been vociferous in their defense of state elections, and said they’re prepared to fight any attempted takeover.

    “The President regularly spews outright lies when it comes to elections in this country, particularly ones he and his party lose,” Gov. Gavin Newsom said in a statement. “We will continue to correct those lies, rebuild much-needed trust in our democratic institutions and civic duties, and defend the U.S. Constitution’s grant to the states authority over elections.”

    California Atty. Gen. Rob Bonta and Secretary of State Shirley Weber.

    California Atty. Gen. Rob Bonta and Secretary of State Shirley Weber take questions after announcing a lawsuit to protect voter rights in 2024.

    (Damian Dovarganes / Associated Press)

    California Atty. Gen. Rob Bonta said in an interview that his office “would go into court and we would get a restraining order within hours” if the Trump administration tries to intervene in California elections, “because the U.S. Constitution says that states predominantly determine the time, place and manner of elections, not the president.”

    Weber told The Times that the state has “a cadre of attorneys” standing by to defend its election system, but also “absolutely amazing” county elections officials who “take their job very seriously” and serve as the first line of defense against any disruptions, from the Trump administration or otherwise.

    Dean Logan, Los Angeles County’s chief elections official, said his office has been doing “contingency planning and tabletop exercises” for traditional disruptions, such as wildfires and earthquakes, and novel ones, such as federal immigration agents massing near voting locations and last-minute policy changes by the U.S. Postal Service or the courts.

    “Those are the things that keep us up at night,” he said.

    Los Angeles County Registrar-Recorder Dean Logan said the county no longer has ballots from the 2020 election.

    Los Angeles County Registrar-Recorder Dean Logan said the county no longer has ballots from the 2020 election.

    (Irfan Khan / Los Angeles Times)

    Logan said he is not currently concerned about the FBI raiding L.A. County elections offices because, while Fulton County still had its 2020 ballots on hand due to ongoing litigation, that is not the case for L.A. County, which is “beyond the retention period” for holding, and no longer has, its 2020 ballots.

    However, Logan said he does consider what happened in Georgia a warning that the Trump administration “will utilize the federal government to go in and be disruptive in an elections operation.”

    “What we don’t know is, would they do that during the conduct of an election, before an election is certified?” Logan said.

    Kristin Connelly, chief elections officer for Contra Costa County, said she’s been working hard to make sure voters have confidence in the election process, including by giving speeches to concerned voters, expanding the county’s certified election observer program, and, in the lead-up to the 2024 election, running a grant-funded awareness campaign around election security.

    Connelly — who joined local elections officials nationwide in challenging Trump’s executive order on elections in court — said she also has been running tabletop exercises and coordinating with local law enforcement, all with the goal of ensuring her constituents can vote.

    “How the federal government is behaving is different from how it used to behave, but at the end of the day, what we have to do is run a mistake-free, perfect election, and to open our offices and operation to everybody — especially the people who ask hard questions,” she said.

    Lessons from the past

    Several officials in California said that as they prepare, they have been buoyed by lessons from the past.

    Before being hired by the deep-blue county of Marin in May, Adona was the elected voting chief in rural Nevada County in the Sierra foothills.

    In 2022, Adona affirmed that Trump’s 2020 election loss to Democrat Joe Biden was legitimate and enforced a pandemic mask mandate in her office. That enraged a coalition of anti-mask, anti-vaccine, pro-Trump protesters, who pushed their way into the locked election office.

    Protesters confronted Adona and her staffers, with one worker getting pushed down. They stationed themselves in the hallway, leaving Adona’s staff too terrified to leave their office to use the hallway bathroom, as local, state and federal authorities declined to step in.

    “At this point, and for months afterwards, I felt isolated and depressed. I had panic attacks every few days. I felt that no one had our back. I focused all my attention on my staff’s safety, because they were clearly nervous about the unknown,” Adona said during subsequent testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee.

    In part because she knows what can go wrong, Adona said her focus now is on preparing her new staff for whatever may come, while following the news out of Georgia and trying to maintain a cool head.

    “I would rather have a plan and not use it than need a plan and not have one,” she said.

    Clint Curtis, the clerk and registrar of voters in Shasta County — which ditched its voting machines in 2023 amid unfounded fraud allegations by Trump — said his biggest task ahead of the midterms is to increase both ballot security and transparency.

    Since being appointed to lead the county office last spring, the conservative Republican from Florida has added more cameras and more space for election observers — which, during the recent special election on Proposition 50, California’s redistricting measure, included observers from Bonta’s and Weber’s offices.

    He has also reduced the number of ballot drop boxes in the vast county from more than a dozen to four. Curtis told The Times he did not trust the security of ballots in the hands of “these little old ladies running all over the county” to pick them up, and noted there are dozens of other county locations where they can be dropped off. He said he invited Justice Department officials to observe voting on Proposition 50, though they didn’t show, and welcomes them again for the midterms.

    “If they can make voting safer for everybody, I’m perfectly fine with that,” he said. “It always makes me nervous when people don’t want to cooperate. Whatcha hiding? It should be: ‘Come on in.’”

    Election workers inspect ballots after extracting them from envelopes.

    Election workers inspect ballots after extracting them from envelopes on election night at the Los Angeles County Ballot Processing Center on Nov. 5, 2024, in the City of Industry.

    (Gina Ferazzi / Los Angeles Times)

    Weber, 77 and the daughter of an Arkansas sharecropper whose family fled Southern racism and threats of violence to reach California, said that while many people in the U.S. are confronting intense fear and doubt about the election for the first time, and understandably so, that is simply not the case for her or many other Black people.

    “African Americans have always been under attack for voting, and not allowed to vote, and had new rules created for them about literacy and poll taxes and all those other kinds of things, and many folks lost their lives just trying to register to vote,” Weber said.

    Weber said she still recalls her mother, who had never voted in Arkansas, setting up a polling location in their home in South L.A. each election when Weber was young, and today draws courage from those memories.

    “I tell folks there’s no alternative to it. You have to fight for this right to vote. And you have to be aware of the fact that all these strategies that people are trying to use [to suppress voting] are not new strategies. They’re old strategies,” Weber said. “And we just have to be smarter and fight harder.”

    [ad_2]

    Kevin Rector, Hailey Branson-Potts, Ana Ceballos

    Source link

  • California leaders decry Trump call to ‘nationalize’ election, say they’re ready to resist

    [ad_1]

    President Trump’s repeated calls to “nationalize” elections drew swift resistance from California officials this week, who said they are ready to fight should the federal government attempt to assert control over the state’s voting system.

    “We would win that on Day One,” California Atty. Gen. Rob Bonta told The Times. “We would go into court and we would get a restraining order within hours, because the U.S. Constitution says that states predominantly determine the time, place and manner of elections, not the president.”

    “We’re prepared to do whatever we have to do in California,” said California Secretary of State Shirley Weber, whose office recently fought off a Justice Department lawsuit demanding California’s voter rolls and other sensitive voter information.

    Both Bonta and Weber said their offices are closely watching for any federal action that could affect voting in California, including efforts to seize election records, as the FBI recently did in Georgia, or target the counting of mailed ballots, which Trump has baselessly alleged are a major source of fraud.

    Weber said California plays an outsized role in the nation and is “the place that people want to beat,” including through illegitimate court challenges to undermine the state’s vote after elections, but California has fought off such challenges in the past and is ready to do it again.

    “There’s a cadre of attorneys that are already, that are always prepared during our elections to hit the courts to defend anything that we’re doing,” she said. “Our election teams, they do cross the T’s, dot the I’s. They are on it.”

    “We have attorneys ready to be deployed wherever there’s an issue,” Bonta said, noting that his office is in touch with local election officials to ensure a rapid response if necessary.

    The standoff reflects an extraordinary deterioration of trust and cooperation in elections that has existed between state and federal officials for generations — and follows a remarkable doubling down by Trump after his initial remarks about taking over the elections raised alarm.

    Trump has long alleged, without evidence and despite multiple independent reviews concluding the opposite, that the 2020 election was stolen from him. He has alleged, again without evidence, that millions of fraudulent votes were cast, including by non-citizen voters, and that blue states looked the other way to gain political advantage.

    Last week, the Justice Department acted on those claims by raiding the Fulton County, Ga., elections hub and seizing 2020 ballots. The department also has sued states, including California, for their voter rolls, and is defending a Trump executive order seeking to end mail voting and add new proof of citizenship requirements for registering to vote, which California and other states have sued to block.

    On Monday, Trump further escalated his pressure campaign by saying on former FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino’s podcast that Republicans should “take over the voting in at least 15 places,” alleging that voting irregularities in what he called “crooked states” are hurting his party. “The Republicans ought to nationalize the voting.”

    On Tuesday morning, Karoline Leavitt, the White House press secretary, appeared to try to walk back Trump’s comments, saying he had been referring to the Save Act, a measure being pushed by Republicans in Congress to codify Trump’s proof-of-citizenship requirements. However, Trump doubled down later that day, telling reporters that if states “can’t count the votes legally and honestly, then somebody else should take over.”

    Bonta said Trump’s comments were a serious escalation, not just bluster: “We always knew they were going to come after us on something, so this is just an affirmation of that — and maybe they are getting a step closer.”

    Bonta said he will especially be monitoring races in the state’s swing congressional districts, which could play a role in determining control of Congress and therefore be a target of legal challenges.

    “The strategy of going after California isn’t rational unless you’re going after a couple of congressional seats that you think will make a difference in the balance of power in the House,” Bonta said.

    California Democrats in Congress have stressed that the state’s elections are safe and reliable, but also started to express unease about upcoming election interference by the administration.

    Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Fremont) said on “Meet the Press” last week that he believes the administration will try to use “every tool in their toolbox to try and interfere,” but that the American people will “overcome it by having a battalion of lawyers at the polls.”

    California Sen. Adam Schiff this week said recent actions by the Trump administration — including the Fulton County raid, where Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard put Trump on the phone with agents — were “wrong” and set off “alarm bells about their willingness to interfere in the next election.”

    Democrats have called on their Republican colleagues to help push back against such interference.

    “When he says that we should nationalize the elections and Republicans should take over, and you don’t make a peep? What is going on here?” Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) said Tuesday. “This is the path that has ruined many a democracy, and our democracy is deep and strong, but it requires — and allows — resistance to these things. Verbal resistance, electoral resistance. Where are you?”

    Some Republicans have voiced their disagreement with Trump. Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) said Tuesday that he is “supportive of only citizens voting and showing ID at polling places,” but is “not in favor of federalizing elections,” which he called “a constitutional issue.”

    “I’m a big believer in decentralized and distributed power. And I think it’s harder to hack 50 election systems than it is to hack one,” he said.

    However, other Republican leaders have commiserated with Trump over his qualms with state-run elections. House Majority Leader Mike Johnson (R-La.), for example, took aim at California’s system for counting mail-in ballots in the days following elections, questioning why such counting led to Republican leads in House races being “magically whittled away until their leads were lost.”

    “It looks on its face to be fraudulent. Can I prove that? No, because it happened so far upstream,” Johnson said. “But we need more confidence in the American people in the election system.”

    Elections experts expressed dismay over Johnson’s comments, calling them baseless and illogical. The fact that candidates who are leading in votes can fall behind as more votes are counted is not magic but math, they said — with Democrats agreeing.

    “Speaker Johnson seems to be confused, so let me break it down. California’s elections are safe and secure. The point of an election is to make sure *every* eligible vote cast is counted, not to count fast,” Sen. Alex Padilla (D-Calif.) wrote on X. “We don’t just quit while we’re ahead. It’s called a democracy.”

    Democrats have also expressed concern that the administration could use the U.S. Postal Service to interfere with counting mail-in ballots. They have specifically raised questions about a rule issued by the postal service last December that deems mail postmarked on the day it is processed by USPS, rather than the day it is received — which would impact mail-in ballots in places such as California, where ballots must be postmarked by election day to be counted.

    “Election officials are already concerned and warning that this change could ultimately lead to higher mailed ballots being rejected,” Senate Democrats wrote to U.S. Postal Service Postmaster General David Steiner last month.

    Some experts and state officials said voters should make a plan to vote early, and consider dropping their ballots in state ballot drop boxes or delivering them directly to voting centers.

    [ad_2]

    Ana Ceballos, Kevin Rector

    Source link

  • Out-of-state group funding pot law repeal

    [ad_1]

    BOSTON — A Virginia-based group is leading an initiative to repeal Massachusetts’ 2016 recreational cannabis law, and putting hundreds of thousands of dollars behind the effort, according to newly released campaign finance data.

    The anti-legalization group Smart Approaches to Marijuana, has contributed more than $1.5 million to proposed referendum that would effectively halt recreational cannabis sales by forcing the state’s $1.7 billion industry to convert to medical pot shops. It would also ban non-medical home growing.

    This page requires Javascript.

    Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

    kAmu:=:?8D H:E9 E96 DE2E6 ~77:46 @7 r2>A2:8?D 2?5 !F3=:4 u:?2?46 D9@H E96 pC=:?8E@?[ ‘:C8:?:232D65 8C@FA 4@?EC:3FE65 S`]dd >:==:@? 😕 $6AE6>36C E@ E96 r@2=:E:@? 7@C 2 w62=E9J |2DD249FD6EED x?4][ 2 4@>>:EE66 E92E 9:C65 A2:5 D:8?2EFC6 82E96C6CD E@ 4=62C 2 7:CDE 9FC5=6 E@ E96 32==@E]k^Am

    kAm“(6 2C6 DFAA@CE:?8 E9:D 677@CE 3642FD6 >@>6?EF> 😀 C:D:?8 24C@DD E96 4@F?ECJ E@ C6;64E =682= >2C:;F2?2[” E96 8C@FA’D 4@7@F?56C 2?5 rt~[ z6G:? $236E[ D2:5 😕 2 AC6A2C65 DE2E6>6?E] “p?5 ?@ H@?56Ci p>6C:42?D 😕 6G6CJ DE2E6 2C6 H2<:?8 FA E@ E96 >2DD:G6 92C>D E9:D ?6H q:8 %@3244@ :?5FDECJ 5@6D E@ 6G6CJE9:?8 7C@> >6?E2= 2?5 A9JD:42= 962=E9 E@ D@4:2= 4@96D:@? 2?5 @C56C]”k^Am

    kAm%96 8C@FA[ 4@7@F?565 3J 7@C>6C #9@56 xD=2?5 4@?8C6DD>2? !2EC:4< z6??65J[ 😀 32?:=2C C6A62= :?:E:2E:G6D 😕 @E96C DE2E6D H96C6 A@E 😀 =682=]k^Am

    kAm$236E 2C8F6D E92E E96 25G6?E @7 C64C62E:@?2= A@E 😕 |2DD249FD6EED 92D 4@?EC:3FE65 E@ :?4C62D65 5CF8 255:4E:@? 2?5 >6?E2= 962=E9 :DDF6D 2>@?8 J@FE9 H9:=6 6?C:49:?8 E96 42??23:D :?5FDECJ]k^Am

    kAmw6 4:E65 DEF5:6D 7C@> 4@?D6CG2E:G6 8C@FAD 4=2:>:?8 “G:@=6?E 4C:>6” 92D DA:<65 😕 E96 DE2E6 D:?46 A@E H2D =682=:K65]k^Am

    kAm“{682= H665 92D 366? 2 325 562= 7@C 6G6CJ@?6 6I46AE E96 :?5FDECJ[” $236E D2:5]k^Am

    kAmqFE #J2? s@>:?8F6K[ 6I64FE:G6 5:C64E@C @7 E96 |2DD249FD6EED r2??23:D r@2=:E:@? 2?5 9625 @7 2 4@>>:EE66 @AA@D:?8 E96 C6A62= 677@CE[k^Am

    kAm“%9:D C62==J :D?’E 23@FE AF3=:4 962=E9 @C D276EJ[” 96 D2:5] “xE’D 2 ?2E:@?2= @C82?:K2E:@? ECJ:?8 E@ AFD9 :ED 286?52 @? E96 DE2E6[ 2?5 FD6 :ED @FE@7DE2E6 5@?@CD E@ DAC625 >:D:?7@C>2E:@? 😕 2? 677@CE E@ @G6CEFC? 2 56>@4C2E:4 @FE4@>6] %96 DE2E6’D G@E6CD >256 :E 4=62C 😕 a_`e E96J @G6CH96=>:?8=J DFAA@CE =682=:K2E:@?]”k^Am

    kAms@>:?8F6K D2:5 =682= H665 92D 366? 2 H:?572== 7@C E96 DE2E6 2?5 =@42= 8@G6C?>6?ED H9:49 92G6 4@==64E65 9F?5C65D @7 >:==:@?D @7 5@==2CD 😕 E2I6D D:?46 C64C62E:@?2= D2=6D H6C6 7:CDE 2FE9@C:K65] w6 5:DAFE65 4=2:>D 3J E96 8C@FA E92E E96 42??23:D :?5FDECJ 92D 4@?EC:3FE65 E@ 4C:>6]k^Am

    kAm$FAA@CE6CD @7 E96 C6A62= 677@CE 4=62C65 2 >2;@C 9FC5=6 E@ E96 32==@E 27E6C E96J DF3>:EE65 >@C6 E92? fg[___ G@E6C D:8?2EFC6D E@ E96 $64C6E2CJ @7 $E2E6 q:== v2=G:?’D @77:46 7@C 46CE:7:42E:@? @7 E96 x?:E:2E:G6 !6E:E:@? 7@C 2 {2H #6=2E:G6 E@ #68F=2E:?8 |2C:;F2?2] v2=G:? 46CE:7:65 E96 D:8?2EFC6D =2DE H66<]k^Am

    kAm{2DE H66<[ E96 DE2E6 q2==@E {2H r@>>:DD:@? C6;64E65 2 4@>A=2:?E 2==68:?8 DFAA@CE6CD @7 E96 677@CE “7C2F5F=6?E=J” 4@==64E65 D:8?2EFC6D 7C@> G@E6CD 3J 9:C:?8 2 E9:C5A2CEJ 8C@FA E92E >256 5646AE:G6 4=2:>D 23@FE H92E E96 AC@A@D65 32==@E BF6DE:@? H@F=5 5@ :7 2AAC@G65]k^Am

    kAmq@E9 E96 $64C6E2CJ @7 $E2E6’D ~77:46 2?5 E96 |2DD249FD6EED ~77:46 @7 E96 pEE@C?6J v6?6C2= H6C6 C6A@CE65=J 4@?E24E65 3J G@E6CD 4@?46C?65 23@FE E96 E24E:4D 36:?8 FD65 3J E96 2?E:42??23:D 42>A2:8? E@ 4@==64E D:8?2EFC6D] }6:E96C H2D H:==:?8 E@ 4@>>6?E 23@FE 2?J 24E:G6 :?G6DE:82E:@?D]k^Am

    kAm|2DD249FD6EED G@E6CD =682=:K65 C64C62E:@?2= 42??23:D E9C@F89 2 32==@E C676C6?5F> 😕 a_`e[ H9:49 A2DD65 H:E9 dbT @7 E96 G@E6]k^Am

    kAm#646?E A@==D 92G6 D9@H? DEC@?8 DFAA@CE 7@C C64C62E:@?2= A@E 😕 E96 DE2E6 2?5 ?2E:@?2==J]k^Am

    kAmrC:E:4D 2=D@ D2J 2==@H:?8 42??23:D E@ C6>2:? =682= H9:=6 DE@AA:?8 E96 C6E2:= >2C<6E H@F=5 7665 3=24<>2C<6E D2=6D @7 E96 5CF8[ 4C62E:?8 AF3=:4 D276EJ :DDF6D]k^Am

    kAm&?56C E96 DE2E6 4@?DE:EFE:@?[ E96 {68:D=2EFC6 😀 C6BF:C65 E@ 4@?D:56C E96 :?:E:2E:G6 A6E:E:@?D 367@C6 324<6CD @7 E96 C676C6?5F>D >FDE 4@?5F4E 2?@E96C C@F?5 @7 D:8?2EFC6 82E96C:?8] {2H>2<6CD 92G6 F?E:= |2J d E@ G@E6 @? E96 AC@A@D2=D]k^Am

    kAmx7 =2H>2<6CD 5@?’E E2<6 FA E96 4FCC6?E >62DFC6D[ 324<6CD @7 E96 C676C6?5F>D >FDE 82E96C 2?@E96C `a[cah D:8?2EFC6D E@ >2<6 E96 32==@E]k^Am

    kAmk6>mr9C:DE:2? |] (256 4@G6CD E96 |2DD249FD6EED $E2E69@FD6 7@C }@CE9 @7 q@DE@? |65:2 vC@FAUCDBF@jD ?6HDA2A6CD 2?5 H63D:E6D] t>2:= 9:> 2E k2 9C67lQ>2:=E@i4H256o4?9:?6HD]4@>Qm4H256o4?9:?6HD]4@>k^2m]k^6>mk^Am

    [ad_2]

    By Christian M. Wade | Statehouse Reporter

    Source link

  • Out-of-state group funds pot law repeal

    [ad_1]

    BOSTON — A Virginia-based group is leading an initiative to repeal Massachusetts’ 2016 recreational cannabis law and putting hundreds of thousands of dollars behind the effort, according to newly released campaign finance data.

    The anti-legalization group Smart Approaches to Marijuana has contributed more than $1.5 million to a proposed referendum that would effectively halt recreational cannabis sales by forcing the state’s $1.7 billion industry to convert to medical pot shops. It would also ban nonmedical home growing.

    This page requires Javascript.

    Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

    kAmu:=:?8D H:E9 E96 DE2E6 ~77:46 @7 r2>A2:8?D 2?5 !F3=:4 u:?2?46 D9@H E96 pC=:?8E@?[ ‘:C8:?:232D65 8C@FA 4@?EC:3FE65 S`]dd >:==:@? 😕 $6AE6>36C E@ E96 r@2=:E:@? 7@C 2 w62=E9J |2DD249FD6EED x?4][ 2 4@>>:EE66 E92E 9:C65 A2:5 D:8?2EFC6 82E96C6CD E@ 4=62C 2 7:CDE 9FC5=6 E@ E96 32==@E]k^Am

    kAm“(6 2C6 DFAA@CE:?8 E9:D 677@CE 3642FD6 >@>6?EF> 😀 C:D:?8 24C@DD E96 4@F?ECJ E@ C6;64E =682= >2C:;F2?2[” E96 8C@FA’D 4@7@F?56C 2?5 rt~[ z6G:? $236E[ D2:5 😕 2 AC6A2C65 DE2E6>6?E] “p?5 ?@ H@?56Ci p>6C:42?D 😕 6G6CJ DE2E6 2C6 H2<:?8 FA E@ E96 >2DD:G6 92C>D E9:D ?6H q:8 %@3244@ :?5FDECJ 5@6D E@ 6G6CJE9:?8 7C@> >6?E2= 2?5 A9JD:42= 962=E9 E@ D@4:2= 4@96D:@? 2?5 @C56C]”k^Am

    kAm%96 8C@FA[ 4@7@F?565 3J 7@C>6C #9@56 xD=2?5 r@?8C6DD>2? !2EC:4< z6??65J[ 😀 32?:=2C C6A62= :?:E:2E:G6D 😕 @E96C DE2E6D H96C6 A@E 😀 =682=]k^Am

    kAm$236E 2C8F6D E92E E96 25G6?E @7 C64C62E:@?2= A@E 😕 |2DD249FD6EED 92D 4@?EC:3FE65 E@ :?4C62D65 5CF8 255:4E:@? 2?5 >6?E2= 962=E9 :DDF6D 2>@?8 J@FE9D H9:=6 6?C:49:?8 E96 42??23:D :?5FDECJ]k^Am

    kAmw6 4:E65 DEF5:6D 7C@> 4@?D6CG2E:G6 8C@FAD 4=2:>:?8 “G:@=6?E 4C:>6” 92D DA:<65 😕 E96 DE2E6 D:?46 A@E H2D =682=:K65]k^Am

    kAm“{682= H665 92D 366? 2 325 562= 7@C 6G6CJ@?6 6I46AE E96 :?5FDECJ[” $236E D2:5]k^Am

    kAm#J2? s@>:?8F6K 😀 E96 6I64FE:G6 5:C64E@C @7 E96 |2DD249FD6EED r2??23:D r@2=:E:@? 2?5 9625 @7 2 4@>>:EE66 @AA@D:?8 E96 C6A62= 677@CE]k^Am

    kAm“%9:D C62==J :D?’E 23@FE AF3=:4 962=E9 @C D276EJ[” 96 D2:5] “xE’D 2 ?2E:@?2= @C82?:K2E:@? ECJ:?8 E@ AFD9 :ED 286?52 @? E96 DE2E6 2?5 FD6 :ED @FE@7DE2E6 5@?@CD E@ DAC625 >:D:?7@C>2E:@? 😕 2? 677@CE E@ @G6CEFC? 2 56>@4C2E:4 @FE4@>6] %96 DE2E6’D G@E6CD >256 :E 4=62C 😕 a_`e E96J @G6CH96=>:?8=J DFAA@CE =682=:K2E:@?]”k^Am

    kAms@>:?8F6K D2:5 =682= H665 92D 366? 2 H:?572== 7@C E96 DE2E6 2?5 =@42= 8@G6C?>6?ED[ H9:49 92G6 4@==64E65 9F?5C65D @7 >:==:@?D @7 5@==2CD 😕 E2I6D D:?46 C64C62E:@?2= D2=6D H6C6 7:CDE 2FE9@C:K65] w6 5:DAFE65 4=2:>D 3J E96 8C@FA E92E E96 42??23:D :?5FDECJ 92D 4@?EC:3FE65 E@ 4C:>6]k^Am

    kAm$FAA@CE6CD @7 E96 C6A62= 677@CE 4=62C65 2 >2;@C 9FC5=6 E@ E96 32==@E 27E6C E96J DF3>:EE65 >@C6 E92? fg[___ G@E6C D:8?2EFC6D E@ $64C6E2CJ @7 $E2E6 q:== v2=G:?’D @77:46 7@C 46CE:7:42E:@? @7 E96 x?:E:2E:G6 !6E:E:@? 7@C 2 {2H #6=2E:G6 E@ #68F=2E:?8 |2C:;F2?2] v2=G:? 46CE:7:65 E96 D:8?2EFC6D]k^Am

    kAm%96 DE2E6 q2==@E {2H r@>>:DD:@? C6;64E65 2 4@>A=2:?E 2==68:?8 DFAA@CE6CD @7 E96 677@CE “7C2F5F=6?E=J” 4@==64E65 D:8?2EFC6D 7C@> G@E6CD 3J 9:C:?8 2 E9:C5A2CEJ 8C@FA E92E >256 5646AE:G6 4=2:>D 23@FE H92E E96 AC@A@D65 32==@E BF6DE:@? H@F=5 5@ :7 2AAC@G65]k^Am

    kAmq@E9 E96 $64C6E2CJ @7 $E2E6’D ~77:46 2?5 E96 |2DD249FD6EED ~77:46 @7 E96 pEE@C?6J v6?6C2= H6C6 C6A@CE65=J 4@?E24E65 3J G@E6CD 4@?46C?65 23@FE E96 E24E:4D 36:?8 FD65 3J E96 2?E:42??23:D 42>A2:8? E@ 4@==64E D:8?2EFC6D] }6:E96C H2D H:==:?8 E@ 4@>>6?E 23@FE 2?J 24E:G6 :?G6DE:82E:@?D]k^Am

    kAm|2DD249FD6EED G@E6CD =682=:K65 C64C62E:@?2= 42??23:D E9C@F89 2 32==@E C676C6?5F> 😕 a_`e[ H9:49 A2DD65 H:E9 dbT @7 E96 G@E6]k^Am

    kAm#646?E A@==D 92G6 D9@H? DEC@?8 DFAA@CE 7@C C64C62E:@?2= A@E 😕 E96 DE2E6 2?5 ?2E:@?2==J]k^Am

    kAmrC:E:4D 2=D@ D2J 2==@H:?8 42??23:D E@ C6>2:? =682= H9:=6 DE@AA:?8 E96 C6E2:= >2C<6E H@F=5 7665 3=24< >2C<6E D2=6D @7 E96 5CF8[ 4C62E:?8 AF3=:4 D276EJ :DDF6D]k^Am

    kAm&?56C E96 DE2E6 4@?DE:EFE:@?[ E96 {68:D=2EFC6 😀 C6BF:C65 E@ 4@?D:56C E96 :?:E:2E:G6 A6E:E:@?D 367@C6 324<6CD @7 E96 C676C6?5F>D >FDE 4@?5F4E 2?@E96C C@F?5 @7 D:8?2EFC6 82E96C:?8] {2H>2<6CD 92G6 F?E:= |2J d E@ G@E6 @? E96 AC@A@D2=D]k^Am

    kAmx7 =2H>2<6CD 5@?’E E2<6 FA E96 4FCC6?E >62DFC6D[ 324<6CD @7 E96 C676C6?5F>D >FDE 82E96C `a[cah D:8?2EFC6D E@ >2<6 E96 32==@E]k^Am

    kAmr9C:DE:2? |] (256 4@G6CD E96 |2DD249FD6EED $E2E69@FD6 7@C }@CE9 @7 q@DE@? |65:2 vC@FAUCDBF@jD ?6HDA2A6CD 2?5 H63D:E6D] t>2:= 9:> 2E k2 9C67lQ>2:=E@i4H256o4?9:?6HD]4@>Qm4H256o4?9:?6HD]4@>k^2m]k^Am

    [ad_2]

    By Christian M. Wade | Statehouse Reporter

    Source link

  • Commentary: There’s one state in America with no voter registration. How does that work?

    [ad_1]

    When he’s not busy slathering the White House in gold or recklessly sundering foreign alliances, President Trump loves to talk about voter fraud.

    Although the incidence is rare — like, spotting-a-pangolin-in-the-wild rare — Trump persistently emits a gaseous cloud of false claims. About rigged voting machines, dead people casting ballots, mail-in votes being manipulated and other fevered figments of his overripe imagination.

    Voting is the most elemental of democratic exercises, a virtuous act residing right up there alongside motherhood and apple pie. But Trump has treated it as a cudgel, something dark and sinister, fueling a partisan divide that has increasingly undermined faith in the accuracy and integrity of our elections.

    One result is a batch of new laws making it harder to vote.

    Since the 2020 presidential election — the most secure in American history, per the Trump administration’s own watchdogs — at least 30 states have enacted more than 100 restrictive laws, according to New York University’s Brennan Center and the Democracy Policy Lab at UC Berkeley, which keep a running tally.

    Texas passed legislation allowing fewer polling places. Mississippi made it harder for people with disabilities to vote by mail. North Carolina shortened the window to return mail ballots.

    In California, state Sen. Carl DeMaio and allies are working to qualify a November ballot measure that would require a government-issued ID to vote, a solution in desperate search of a problem.

    “We have the lowest level of public trust and confidence in our elections that we have ever seen,” the San Diego Republican said in launching the effort, sounding the way someone would by lamenting the damage a fire has done while ignoring the arsonist spreading paint thinner all around.

    Amid all the manufactured hysteria, there is a place that is unique in America, with no voter registration requirement whatsoever.

    If you’re a U.S. citizen, 18 years or older and have lived in North Dakota for 30 days prior to election day, you’re eligible to vote. It’s been that way for more than 70 years, ever since voter registration was abolished in the state in 1951.

    How’s it working?

    Pretty darn well, according to those who’ve observed the system up close.

    “It works excellent,” said Sandy McMerty, North Dakota’s deputy secretary of state.

    “In general, I think most people are happy with this,” political scientist Mark Jendrysik agreed, “because it lowers the record-keeping burdens and saves money.”

    Jendrysik, who teaches at the University of North Dakota in Grand Forks, said voter registration was abandoned at a time when the state — now redder than the side of a barn — had vigorous two-party competition and, with it, a bipartisan spirit of prairie populism.

    “There was an idea we should make it easier to vote,” Jendrysik said. “We should open up things.”

    What a concept.

    Walk-up voting hasn’t made North Dakota a standout when it comes to casting ballots. In the last three elections, voter turnout has run close to the national average, which puts it in the middle of the pack among states.

    But there also hasn’t been a high incidence of fraud. In 2022, a study by the state auditor’s office found it “exceptionally” unlikely an election in North Dakota could be fraudulently influenced. (Again, like the country as a whole.)

    In fact, Jendrysik said he can’t recall a single case of election fraud being prosecuted in the 26 years he’s lived in North Dakota and followed its politics.

    It’s not as though just anyone can show up and cast a ballot.

    Voting in North Dakota requires a valid form of identification, such as a state-issued driver’s license, a tribal ID or a long-term care certificate. It must be presented each and every election.

    By contrast, a California voter is not required to show identification at a polling place before casting their ballot — though they may be asked to do so if they are voting for the first time after registering to vote by mail and their application failed to include certain information. That includes a driver’s license number or the last four digits of their Social Security number.

    Could North Dakota’s non-registration system be replicated elsewhere?

    Jendrysik is dubious, especially in today’s political environment.

    North Dakota is a sparsely populated state with hundreds of small communities where, seemingly, everyone knows everyone else. There are about 600,000 eligible voters, which is a lot more manageable number than, say, California’s 30 million adult-age residents. (California has more than a dozen counties with north of half a million registered voters.)

    “It’s unique to this state,” Jendrysik said, “and I think if they hadn’t done it decades ago, it would have never happened.”

    (Fun fact: North Dakota also has no parking meters on its public streets, owing to a state law passed in 1948, according to Jendrysik, who has published two academic papers on the subject.)

    McMerty, of the secretary of state’s office, believes others could emulate North Dakota’s example.

    It would require, she suggested, rigorous data-sharing and close coordination among various state agencies. “We’re updating our voter rolls daily — who’s obtained a driver’s license, births, deaths. That kind of thing,” McMerty said.

    Again, that’s a much easier task in a state with the population the size of North Dakota’s. (About 800,000 at last count.)

    And there’s no particular impetus for others to end their systems of voter registration — unless it could be proved to significantly boost turnout.

    We should be doing all we can to get people to vote and invest in our beleaguered political system. Rather than wasting time chasing shadows and phantoms or indulging the delusions of a sore-loser president.

    [ad_2]

    Mark Z. Barabak

    Source link

  • Explaining California’s billionaire tax: The proposals, the backlash and the exodus

    [ad_1]

    The battle over a new tax on California’s billionaires is set to heat up in the coming months as citizens spar over whether the state should squeeze its ultra-rich to better serve its ordinary residents.

    The proposed billionaire tax that triggered the tempest is still far from being approved by voters or even making the ballot, but the idea has already sparked backlash from vocal tech moguls — some of whom have already shifted their bases outside the state.

    Under the Billionaire Tax Act, Californians worth more than $1 billion would pay a one-time 5% tax on their total wealth. The Service Employees International Union-United Healthcare Workers West, the union behind the act, said the measure would raise much-needed money for healthcare, education and food assistance programs.

    Other unions have piled on billionaires, targeting the rich in Los Angeles.

    A group of Los Angeles labor unions said Wednesday that it is proposing a ballot measure to raise taxes on companies whose chief executive officers earn 50 times more than their median-paid employees.

    Here is how this fight could continue to play out in the Golden State:

    Who would be affected?

    The California billionaire tax would apply to about 200 California billionaires who reside in the state as of Jan. 1. Roughly 90% of funds would go to healthcare and the rest to public K-14 education and state food assistance.

    The tax, due in 2027, would exclude real estate, pensions and retirement accounts, according to an analysis from the Legislative Analyst’s Office, a nonpartisan government agency. Billionaires could spread out the tax payment over five years, but would have to pay more.

    Which billionaires are already distancing themselves from California?

    Google co-founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin

    Google is still headquartered in California, but December filings to the California Secretary of State show other companies tied to Page and Brin recently converted out of the state.

    One filing, for example, shows that one of the companies they managed, now named T-Rex Holdings, moved from Palo Alto to Reno last month.

    Business Insider and the New York Times earlier reported on these filings. Google didn’t respond to a request for comment.

    Palantir co-founder Peter Thiel

    Thiel Capital, based in Los Angeles, announced in December it opened an office in Miami. The firm didn’t respond to a request for comment. Thiel recently contributed $3 million to the political action committee of the California Business Roundtable, which is opposing the ballot measure, records provided to the Secretary of State’s Office show.

    Oracle co-founder and Chief Technology Officer Larry Ellison

    Years before the wealth tax proposal, Ellison began pulling back from California, but he’s continued to distance himself farther from the state since the proposal emerged.

    Last year, Ellison sold his San Francisco mansion for $45 million. The home on 2850 Broadway was sold off-market in mid-December, according to Redfin.

    Oracle declined to comment.

    DoorDash co-founder and Chief Technology Officer Andy Fang

    Fang, who was born and raised in California, said on X that he loves the state but is thinking about moving.

    “Stupid wealth tax proposals like this make it irresponsible for me not to plan leaving the state,” he said.

    DoorDash didn’t respond to a request for comment.

    What would it still take to become law?

    To qualify for the ballot, proponents of the proposal, led by the healthcare union, must gather nearly 875,000 registered voter signatures and submit them to county elections officials by June 24.

    If it makes it on the November ballot, the proposal would be the focus of intense scrutiny and debate as both sides have already lined up big war chests to bombard voters with their positions. A majority of voters would need to approve the ballot measure.

    Lawyers for billionaires have also signaled the battle won’t be over even if the ballot measure passes.

    “Our clients are prepared to mount a vigorous constitutional challenge if this measure advances,” wrote Alex Spiro, an attorney who has represented billionaires such as Elon Musk in a December letter to California Gov. Gavin Newsom.

    What are the initiative’s chances?

    It’s unclear if the ballot measure has a good chance of passing in November. Newsom opposes the tax, and his support has proved important for ballot measures.

    In 2022, he opposed a ballot measure that would have subsidized the electric vehicle market by raising taxes on Californians who earn more than $2 million annually. The measure failed. The following year, he opposed legislation to tax assets exceeding $50 million. The bill was shelved before the Legislature could vote on it. A bill that would impose an annual tax on California residents whose net worth surpassed $30 million also failed in 2020.

    However, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Fremont) have backed the wealth tax proposal, and Californians have passed temporary tax measures before. In 2012, they approved Proposition 30 to increase sales tax and personal income tax for residents with an annual income of more than $250,000.

    Could it solve California’s problems?

    The Legislative Analyst’s Office said in a December letter that the state would probably collect tens of billions of dollars from the wealth tax, but it could also lose other tax revenue.

    “The exact amount the state would collect is very hard to predict for many reasons. For example, it is hard to know what actions billionaires would take to reduce the amount of tax they pay. Also, much of the wealth is based on stock prices, which are always changing,” the letter said.

    California economist Kevin Klowden said the tax could create future budget problems for the state. “The catch is that this is a one-off fix for what is a systemic problem,” he said.

    Supporters of the proposal said the measure would raise about $100 billion and pushed back against the idea that billionaires would flee.

    “We see a lot of cheap talk from billionaires,” said UC Berkeley law professor Brian Galle, who helped write the proposal. “Some people do actually leave and change their behavior, but the vast bulk of wealthy people don’t, because it doesn’t make sense.”

    Still, the pushback has been escalating.

    Palo Alto-based venture capitalist Chamath Palihapitiya estimates that the lost revenues from the billionaires who have already left the state would lead to more losses in tax revenues than gained by the new tax.

    “By starting this ill-conceived attempt at an asset tax, the California budget deficit will explode,” he posted on X. “And we still don’t know if the tax will even make the ballot.”

    The union backing the initiative says “the billionaire exodus narrative” is “wildly overstated.”

    “Right now, it appears the overwhelming majority of billionaires have chosen to stay in California past the Jan. 1 deadline,” said Suzanne Jimenez, chief of staff at SEIU-United Healthcare Workers West. “Only a very small percentage left before the deadline, despite weeks of Chicken Little talking points claiming a modest tax would trigger a mass departure.”

    Times staff writer Seema Mehta contributed to this report.

    [ad_2]

    Queenie Wong

    Source link

  • Battle Ground Public Schools Goes for Another Levy – KXL

    [ad_1]

    Battle Ground, Wash. — After two recent failed bond levy’s, Battle Ground Public Schools will ask voters again to say yes to a bond levy.  February 10th, the nearly $190 million dollar replacement Educational Programs & Operations Levy will be on the ballot.  It is designed to replace one that expired in 2021.

    Voters said no to a school bond levy in February and April of 2025.

    More about:

    [ad_2]

    Brett Reckamp

    Source link

  • OK registration trend continues shift from Dem to GOP, independent

    [ad_1]

    An area trend in party affiliation over the past 14 years shows a dramatic shift in registered voters, including an increase in folks voting independent.

    Cherokee County Election Board Secretary Tiffany Rozell shared the data with Tahlequah Daily Press, which shows that over this time span, the number of Republicans increased from 5,833 in 2011 to 12,924 by October 2025. Registered Democrats in 2011 numbered 14,768, and by 2025, the number registered in that party has decreased to 9,313.

    This page requires Javascript.

    Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

    kAmr96C@<66 r@F?EJ H2D @?46 @4C2E:4 DEC@?89@=5] x? `hgd[ 244@C5:?8 E@ %s! C6A@CED 2E E92E E:>6[ >@C6 E92? g_T @7 E96 4@F?EJ H2D C68:DE6C65 s6>@4C2E:4]k^Am

    kAmw@H6G6C[ G@E6CD H9@ 92G6 AF==65 2H2J 7C@> C68:DE6C:?8 H:E9 6:E96C @7 E96 EH@ >2:? A2CE:6D 2?5 C68:DE6C:?8 :?56A6?56?E ?F>36C65 a[bbg 😕 a_“[ H:E9 2? :?4C62D6 E@ d[fb_ 😕 a_ad] s2E2 @? C68:DE6C65 G@E6CD 😕 E96 {:36CE2C:2? !2CEJ 3682? 36:?8 4@==64E65 😕 a_`e[ H:E9 ch ?@E65[ 2?5 😕 a_ad[ E96 ?F>36C 92D :?4C62D65 E@ ae`]k^Am

    kAm$6G6C2= :?5:G:5F2=D H6C6 4@?E24E65 7@C :?AFE @? E9:D E@A:4[ :?4=F5:?8 E96 DE2E6 2?5 ?2E:@?2= 5:C64E@CD @7 E96 #6AF3=:42? !2CEJ[ 2?5 E96 ?2E:@?2= 5:C64E@C @7 E96 s6>@4C2E:4 !2CEJ] %H@ C6DA@?565i E96 DE2E6 5:C64E@C @7 E96 s6>@4C2E:4 !2CEJ[ 2?5 E96 r96C@<66 r@F?EJ #6AF3=:42? !2CEJ 492:C]k^Am

    kAm{2FC6? rC2:8[ 6I64FE:G6 5:C64E@C @7 E96 s6>@4C2E:4 !2CEJ[ D2:5 E96 5@H?H2C5 EC6?5 😕 C68:DE6C65 s6>@4C2ED DE2CE65 😕 a_`c[ H96? E9@D6 49@@D:?8 E@ G@E6 :?56A6?56?E 6IA6C:6?465 2 5C2>2E:4 C:D6]k^Am

    kAmx? ~<=29@>2[ :?56A6?56?E G@E6CD 42? @?=J AF== 2 s6>@4C2E:4 32==@E 7@C 2 AC:>2CJ] %96 ~<=29@>2 $64C6E2CJ @7 $E2E6’D @77:46 @77:4:2==J D6E E96 52E6 E@ 368:? 4@==64E:?8 D:8?2EFC6D @? $E2E6 “F6DE:@? gbe 7@C ~4E] ah[ 2?5 E92E AC@46DD >FDE 36 4@>A=6E65 😕 h_ 52JD]k^Am

    kAmx7 A2DD65[ $E2E6 “F6DE:@? gbe H@F=5 6?5 ~<=29@>2UCDBF@jD 4=@D65[ A2CE:D2? AC:>2C:6D 2?5 C6A=246 E96> H:E9 @A6? AC:>2C:6D] x? E96 @A6? AC:>2CJ DJDE6> AC@A@D65 3J $” gbe[ 2== G@E6CD U?52D9j C682C5=6DD @7 A2CEJ U?52D9j H@F=5 36 23=6 E@ 42DE 32==@ED 😕 2 D:?8=6 AC:>2CJ 6=64E:@?[ 😕 H9:49 2== 42?5:52E6D 2AA62C @? @?6 32==@E 2=@?8 H:E9 E96:C A2CEJ C68:DEC2E:@?] %96 E@A EH@ G@E686EE6CD H@F=5 >@G6 @?E@ 2 86?6C2= 6=64E:@?] %9:D :?7@C>2E:@? H2D E2<6? 7C@> E96 H63D:E6 k2 9C67lQ9EEAi^^G@E6J6Dgbe]4@>QmG@E6J6Dgbe]4@>k^2m]k^Am

    kAm“x 5@?’E 36=:6G6 E96 >2;@C:EJ @7 @FC G@E6CD 2C6 8@:?8 #6AF3=:42?[ 3FE E@ :?56A6?56?E[ H9:49 😀 2 ?2E:@?2= EC6?5[” rC2:8 D2:5]k^Am

    kAm$96 D2:5 E96 EFC?@FE C2E6 7@C s6>@4C2ED 😀 72C =6DD E92? E9@D6 C68:DE6C65[ 2?5 s6>@4C2ED 92G6 2 9:896C A6C46?E286 @7 7@=A2C65 E@ #6AF3=:42?D]k^Am

    kAm“%96 3:886DE C62D@? H9J G@E6CD 5@?’E EFC? @FE 😀 =24< @7 C6AC6D6?E2E:@? 😕 E96 A2CEJ[” rC2:8 D2:5] “$@ >2?J 8@ 4@>A=6E6=J F?492==6?865 2?5 AC:>2C:6D >2J ?@E 6G6? 92G6 42?5:52E6D]”k^Am

    kAm~?6 @7 E96 3:886C >@E:G2E:@?D 😕 ~<=29@>2 😀 E@ G@E6 😀 7@C =@42= C246D[ rC2:8 D2:5]k^Am

    kAm“%96 E@A 😀 8@G6C?@C 2?5 AC6D:56?E[ 3FE DEF5:6D D9@H G@E6CD 2C6 >@C6 =:<6=J E@ D9@H FA 7@C 2 4@>>F?:EJ A@D:E:@?[” rC2:8 D2:5]k^Am

    kAm$:?8=6:DDF6 32==@ED 2C6 2 AC@3=6>[ =:<6 AFEE:?8 6=64E:@?D 😕 E96 >:55=6 @7 E96 42=6?52C[ rC2:8 D2:5]k^Am

    kAm“|@DE 2DD@4:2E6 6=64E:@?D H:E9 E96 v6?6C2= q2==@E[” rC2:8 D2:5] “(96? H6 AFE E9:?8D @? 2 =@42= 32==@E – 2?5 :E 4@DED 2 =@E @7 >@?6J E@ AFE @? E96D6 6=64E:@?D – E96? A6@A=6 5@?’E D9@H FA] %96 4@DE 😀 E96 D2>6[ 3FE E96 C6EFC? @? 2? 6=64E:@? 😀 ?@E E96C6]”k^Am

    kAm%96 D:?8=6:DDF6 D2=6D E2I 6=64E:@? 7@C E96 $EC66ED 2?5 $:56H2= @? $6AE] h[ @?=J `[_fd G@E65 @FE @7 “[ffa C68:DE6C65 E@ G@E6 😕 E96 5:DEC:4E]k^Am

    kAmw2G:?8 2 3@?5 G@E65 @? @FED:56 @7 2 3:886C 6=64E:@? 42?[ 9@H6G6C[ 36 36?67:4:2=[ rC2:8 D2:5] xE AC6G6?ED D@>6 @7 E96 C96E@C:4 2?5 >@?6J :DDF6D 4@?7FD:?8 E96 G@E6CD]k^Am

    kAm“(6 D9@F=5 36 DE2?52C5:K:?8 2?5 D:>A=:7J:?8 @FC 6=64E:@?D[” rC2:8 D2:5] “p?5 :7 2 A6CD@? >@G6D 4:EJE@4:EJ[ E96J 92G6 E@ =62C? :E 2== @G6C 282:? 😕 6249 ?6H E@H?]”k^Am

    kAmr2C@= $?665y2=36CE[ 492:C @7 E96 r96C@<66 r@F?EJ #6AF3=:42? !2CEJ[ D2:5 E96 4@F?EJ 92D 567:?:E6=J D66? 2 D9:7E]k^Am

    kAm“*6D[ 96C6 😕 r96C@<66 r@F?EJ[ H6 92G6 D66? 2 D9:7E 😕 A6@A=6 DH:E49:?8 7C@> @?6 A2CEJ E@ 2?@E96C[” $?665y2=36CE D2:5] “%96 52E2 D9@HD A6@A=6 96C6 2C6 C68:DE6C:?8 >2:?=J 2D #6AF3=:42?D]”k^Am

    [ad_2]

    By Lee Guthrie | lguthrie@tahlequahdailypress.com

    Source link

  • OK registration trend continues shift from Dem to GOP, independent

    [ad_1]

    An area trend in party affiliation over the past 14 years shows a dramatic shift in registered voters, including an increase in folks voting independent.

    Cherokee County Election Board Secretary Tiffany Rozell shared the data with Tahlequah Daily Press, which shows that over this time span, the number of Republicans increased from 5,833 in 2011 to 12,924 by October 2025. Registered Democrats in 2011 numbered 14,768, and by 2025, the number registered in that party has decreased to 9,313.

    This page requires Javascript.

    Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

    kAmr96C@<66 r@F?EJ H2D @?46 @4C2E:4 DEC@?89@=5] x? `hgd[ 244@C5:?8 E@ %s! C6A@CED 2E E92E E:>6[ >@C6 E92? g_T @7 E96 4@F?EJ H2D C68:DE6C65 s6>@4C2E:4]k^Am

    kAmw@H6G6C[ G@E6CD H9@ 92G6 AF==65 2H2J 7C@> C68:DE6C:?8 H:E9 6:E96C @7 E96 EH@ >2:? A2CE:6D 2?5 C68:DE6C:?8 :?56A6?56?E ?F>36C65 a[bbg 😕 a_“[ H:E9 2? :?4C62D6 E@ d[fb_ 😕 a_ad] s2E2 @? C68:DE6C65 G@E6CD 😕 E96 {:36CE2C:2? !2CEJ 3682? 36:?8 4@==64E65 😕 a_`e[ H:E9 ch ?@E65[ 2?5 😕 a_ad[ E96 ?F>36C 92D :?4C62D65 E@ ae`]k^Am

    kAm$6G6C2= :?5:G:5F2=D H6C6 4@?E24E65 7@C :?AFE @? E9:D E@A:4[ :?4=F5:?8 E96 DE2E6 2?5 ?2E:@?2= 5:C64E@CD @7 E96 #6AF3=:42? !2CEJ[ 2?5 E96 ?2E:@?2= 5:C64E@C @7 E96 s6>@4C2E:4 !2CEJ] %H@ C6DA@?565i E96 DE2E6 5:C64E@C @7 E96 s6>@4C2E:4 !2CEJ[ 2?5 E96 r96C@<66 r@F?EJ #6AF3=:42? !2CEJ 492:C]k^Am

    kAm{2FC6? rC2:8[ 6I64FE:G6 5:C64E@C @7 E96 s6>@4C2E:4 !2CEJ[ D2:5 E96 5@H?H2C5 EC6?5 😕 C68:DE6C65 s6>@4C2ED DE2CE65 😕 a_`c[ H96? E9@D6 49@@D:?8 E@ G@E6 :?56A6?56?E 6IA6C:6?465 2 5C2>2E:4 C:D6]k^Am

    kAmx? ~<=29@>2[ :?56A6?56?E G@E6CD 42? @?=J AF== 2 s6>@4C2E:4 32==@E 7@C 2 AC:>2CJ] %96 ~<=29@>2 $64C6E2CJ @7 $E2E6’D @77:46 @77:4:2==J D6E E96 52E6 E@ 368:? 4@==64E:?8 D:8?2EFC6D @? $E2E6 “F6DE:@? gbe 7@C ~4E] ah[ 2?5 E92E AC@46DD >FDE 36 4@>A=6E65 😕 h_ 52JD]k^Am

    kAmx7 A2DD65[ $E2E6 “F6DE:@? gbe H@F=5 6?5 ~<=29@>2UCDBF@jD 4=@D65[ A2CE:D2? AC:>2C:6D 2?5 C6A=246 E96> H:E9 @A6? AC:>2C:6D] x? E96 @A6? AC:>2CJ DJDE6> AC@A@D65 3J $” gbe[ 2== G@E6CD U?52D9j C682C5=6DD @7 A2CEJ U?52D9j H@F=5 36 23=6 E@ 42DE 32==@ED 😕 2 D:?8=6 AC:>2CJ 6=64E:@?[ 😕 H9:49 2== 42?5:52E6D 2AA62C @? @?6 32==@E 2=@?8 H:E9 E96:C A2CEJ C68:DEC2E:@?] %96 E@A EH@ G@E686EE6CD H@F=5 >@G6 @?E@ 2 86?6C2= 6=64E:@?] %9:D :?7@C>2E:@? H2D E2<6? 7C@> E96 H63D:E6 k2 9C67lQ9EEAi^^G@E6J6Dgbe]4@>QmG@E6J6Dgbe]4@>k^2m]k^Am

    kAm“x 5@?’E 36=:6G6 E96 >2;@C:EJ @7 @FC G@E6CD 2C6 8@:?8 #6AF3=:42?[ 3FE E@ :?56A6?56?E[ H9:49 😀 2 ?2E:@?2= EC6?5[” rC2:8 D2:5]k^Am

    kAm$96 D2:5 E96 EFC?@FE C2E6 7@C s6>@4C2ED 😀 72C =6DD E92? E9@D6 C68:DE6C65[ 2?5 s6>@4C2ED 92G6 2 9:896C A6C46?E286 @7 7@=A2C65 E@ #6AF3=:42?D]k^Am

    kAm“%96 3:886DE C62D@? H9J G@E6CD 5@?’E EFC? @FE 😀 =24< @7 C6AC6D6?E2E:@? 😕 E96 A2CEJ[” rC2:8 D2:5] “$@ >2?J 8@ 4@>A=6E6=J F?492==6?865 2?5 AC:>2C:6D >2J ?@E 6G6? 92G6 42?5:52E6D]”k^Am

    kAm~?6 @7 E96 3:886C >@E:G2E:@?D 😕 ~<=29@>2 😀 E@ G@E6 😀 7@C =@42= C246D[ rC2:8 D2:5]k^Am

    kAm“%96 E@A 😀 8@G6C?@C 2?5 AC6D:56?E[ 3FE DEF5:6D D9@H G@E6CD 2C6 >@C6 =:<6=J E@ D9@H FA 7@C 2 4@>>F?:EJ A@D:E:@?[” rC2:8 D2:5]k^Am

    kAm$:?8=6:DDF6 32==@ED 2C6 2 AC@3=6>[ =:<6 AFEE:?8 6=64E:@?D 😕 E96 >:55=6 @7 E96 42=6?52C[ rC2:8 D2:5]k^Am

    kAm“|@DE 2DD@4:2E6 6=64E:@?D H:E9 E96 v6?6C2= q2==@E[” rC2:8 D2:5] “(96? H6 AFE E9:?8D @? 2 =@42= 32==@E – 2?5 :E 4@DED 2 =@E @7 >@?6J E@ AFE @? E96D6 6=64E:@?D – E96? A6@A=6 5@?’E D9@H FA] %96 4@DE 😀 E96 D2>6[ 3FE E96 C6EFC? @? 2? 6=64E:@? 😀 ?@E E96C6]”k^Am

    kAm%96 D:?8=6:DDF6 D2=6D E2I 6=64E:@? 7@C E96 $EC66ED 2?5 $:56H2= @? $6AE] h[ @?=J `[_fd G@E65 @FE @7 “[ffa C68:DE6C65 E@ G@E6 😕 E96 5:DEC:4E]k^Am

    kAmw2G:?8 2 3@?5 G@E65 @? @FED:56 @7 2 3:886C 6=64E:@? 42?[ 9@H6G6C[ 36 36?67:4:2=[ rC2:8 D2:5] xE AC6G6?ED D@>6 @7 E96 C96E@C:4 2?5 >@?6J :DDF6D 4@?7FD:?8 E96 G@E6CD]k^Am

    kAm“(6 D9@F=5 36 DE2?52C5:K:?8 2?5 D:>A=:7J:?8 @FC 6=64E:@?D[” rC2:8 D2:5] “p?5 :7 2 A6CD@? >@G6D 4:EJE@4:EJ[ E96J 92G6 E@ =62C? :E 2== @G6C 282:? 😕 6249 ?6H E@H?]”k^Am

    kAmr2C@= $?665y2=36CE[ 492:C @7 E96 r96C@<66 r@F?EJ #6AF3=:42? !2CEJ[ D2:5 E96 4@F?EJ 92D 567:?:E6=J D66? 2 D9:7E]k^Am

    kAm“*6D[ 96C6 😕 r96C@<66 r@F?EJ[ H6 92G6 D66? 2 D9:7E 😕 A6@A=6 DH:E49:?8 7C@> @?6 A2CEJ E@ 2?@E96C[” $?665y2=36CE D2:5] “%96 52E2 D9@HD A6@A=6 96C6 2C6 C68:DE6C:?8 >2:?=J 2D #6AF3=:42?D]”k^Am

    [ad_2]

    By Lee Guthrie | lguthrie@tahlequahdailypress.com

    Source link

  • OK registration trend continues shift from Dem to GOP, independent

    [ad_1]

    An area trend in party affiliation over the past 14 years shows a dramatic shift in registered voters, including an increase in folks voting independent.

    Cherokee County Election Board Secretary Tiffany Rozell shared the data with Tahlequah Daily Press, which shows that over this time span, the number of Republicans increased from 5,833 in 2011 to 12,924 by October 2025. Registered Democrats in 2011 numbered 14,768, and by 2025, the number registered in that party has decreased to 9,313.

    This page requires Javascript.

    Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

    kAmr96C@<66 r@F?EJ H2D @?46 @4C2E:4 DEC@?89@=5] x? `hgd[ 244@C5:?8 E@ %s! C6A@CED 2E E92E E:>6[ >@C6 E92? g_T @7 E96 4@F?EJ H2D C68:DE6C65 s6>@4C2E:4]k^Am

    kAmw@H6G6C[ G@E6CD H9@ 92G6 AF==65 2H2J 7C@> C68:DE6C:?8 H:E9 6:E96C @7 E96 EH@ >2:? A2CE:6D 2?5 C68:DE6C:?8 :?56A6?56?E ?F>36C65 a[bbg 😕 a_“[ H:E9 2? :?4C62D6 E@ d[fb_ 😕 a_ad] s2E2 @? C68:DE6C65 G@E6CD 😕 E96 {:36CE2C:2? !2CEJ 3682? 36:?8 4@==64E65 😕 a_`e[ H:E9 ch ?@E65[ 2?5 😕 a_ad[ E96 ?F>36C 92D :?4C62D65 E@ ae`]k^Am

    kAm$6G6C2= :?5:G:5F2=D H6C6 4@?E24E65 7@C :?AFE @? E9:D E@A:4[ :?4=F5:?8 E96 DE2E6 2?5 ?2E:@?2= 5:C64E@CD @7 E96 #6AF3=:42? !2CEJ[ 2?5 E96 ?2E:@?2= 5:C64E@C @7 E96 s6>@4C2E:4 !2CEJ] %H@ C6DA@?565i E96 DE2E6 5:C64E@C @7 E96 s6>@4C2E:4 !2CEJ[ 2?5 E96 r96C@<66 r@F?EJ #6AF3=:42? !2CEJ 492:C]k^Am

    kAm{2FC6? rC2:8[ 6I64FE:G6 5:C64E@C @7 E96 s6>@4C2E:4 !2CEJ[ D2:5 E96 5@H?H2C5 EC6?5 😕 C68:DE6C65 s6>@4C2ED DE2CE65 😕 a_`c[ H96? E9@D6 49@@D:?8 E@ G@E6 :?56A6?56?E 6IA6C:6?465 2 5C2>2E:4 C:D6]k^Am

    kAmx? ~<=29@>2[ :?56A6?56?E G@E6CD 42? @?=J AF== 2 s6>@4C2E:4 32==@E 7@C 2 AC:>2CJ] %96 ~<=29@>2 $64C6E2CJ @7 $E2E6’D @77:46 @77:4:2==J D6E E96 52E6 E@ 368:? 4@==64E:?8 D:8?2EFC6D @? $E2E6 “F6DE:@? gbe 7@C ~4E] ah[ 2?5 E92E AC@46DD >FDE 36 4@>A=6E65 😕 h_ 52JD]k^Am

    kAmx7 A2DD65[ $E2E6 “F6DE:@? gbe H@F=5 6?5 ~<=29@>2UCDBF@jD 4=@D65[ A2CE:D2? AC:>2C:6D 2?5 C6A=246 E96> H:E9 @A6? AC:>2C:6D] x? E96 @A6? AC:>2CJ DJDE6> AC@A@D65 3J $” gbe[ 2== G@E6CD U?52D9j C682C5=6DD @7 A2CEJ U?52D9j H@F=5 36 23=6 E@ 42DE 32==@ED 😕 2 D:?8=6 AC:>2CJ 6=64E:@?[ 😕 H9:49 2== 42?5:52E6D 2AA62C @? @?6 32==@E 2=@?8 H:E9 E96:C A2CEJ C68:DEC2E:@?] %96 E@A EH@ G@E686EE6CD H@F=5 >@G6 @?E@ 2 86?6C2= 6=64E:@?] %9:D :?7@C>2E:@? H2D E2<6? 7C@> E96 H63D:E6 k2 9C67lQ9EEAi^^G@E6J6Dgbe]4@>QmG@E6J6Dgbe]4@>k^2m]k^Am

    kAm“x 5@?’E 36=:6G6 E96 >2;@C:EJ @7 @FC G@E6CD 2C6 8@:?8 #6AF3=:42?[ 3FE E@ :?56A6?56?E[ H9:49 😀 2 ?2E:@?2= EC6?5[” rC2:8 D2:5]k^Am

    kAm$96 D2:5 E96 EFC?@FE C2E6 7@C s6>@4C2ED 😀 72C =6DD E92? E9@D6 C68:DE6C65[ 2?5 s6>@4C2ED 92G6 2 9:896C A6C46?E286 @7 7@=A2C65 E@ #6AF3=:42?D]k^Am

    kAm“%96 3:886DE C62D@? H9J G@E6CD 5@?’E EFC? @FE 😀 =24< @7 C6AC6D6?E2E:@? 😕 E96 A2CEJ[” rC2:8 D2:5] “$@ >2?J 8@ 4@>A=6E6=J F?492==6?865 2?5 AC:>2C:6D >2J ?@E 6G6? 92G6 42?5:52E6D]”k^Am

    kAm~?6 @7 E96 3:886C >@E:G2E:@?D 😕 ~<=29@>2 😀 E@ G@E6 😀 7@C =@42= C246D[ rC2:8 D2:5]k^Am

    kAm“%96 E@A 😀 8@G6C?@C 2?5 AC6D:56?E[ 3FE DEF5:6D D9@H G@E6CD 2C6 >@C6 =:<6=J E@ D9@H FA 7@C 2 4@>>F?:EJ A@D:E:@?[” rC2:8 D2:5]k^Am

    kAm$:?8=6:DDF6 32==@ED 2C6 2 AC@3=6>[ =:<6 AFEE:?8 6=64E:@?D 😕 E96 >:55=6 @7 E96 42=6?52C[ rC2:8 D2:5]k^Am

    kAm“|@DE 2DD@4:2E6 6=64E:@?D H:E9 E96 v6?6C2= q2==@E[” rC2:8 D2:5] “(96? H6 AFE E9:?8D @? 2 =@42= 32==@E – 2?5 :E 4@DED 2 =@E @7 >@?6J E@ AFE @? E96D6 6=64E:@?D – E96? A6@A=6 5@?’E D9@H FA] %96 4@DE 😀 E96 D2>6[ 3FE E96 C6EFC? @? 2? 6=64E:@? 😀 ?@E E96C6]”k^Am

    kAm%96 D:?8=6:DDF6 D2=6D E2I 6=64E:@? 7@C E96 $EC66ED 2?5 $:56H2= @? $6AE] h[ @?=J `[_fd G@E65 @FE @7 “[ffa C68:DE6C65 E@ G@E6 😕 E96 5:DEC:4E]k^Am

    kAmw2G:?8 2 3@?5 G@E65 @? @FED:56 @7 2 3:886C 6=64E:@? 42?[ 9@H6G6C[ 36 36?67:4:2=[ rC2:8 D2:5] xE AC6G6?ED D@>6 @7 E96 C96E@C:4 2?5 >@?6J :DDF6D 4@?7FD:?8 E96 G@E6CD]k^Am

    kAm“(6 D9@F=5 36 DE2?52C5:K:?8 2?5 D:>A=:7J:?8 @FC 6=64E:@?D[” rC2:8 D2:5] “p?5 :7 2 A6CD@? >@G6D 4:EJE@4:EJ[ E96J 92G6 E@ =62C? :E 2== @G6C 282:? 😕 6249 ?6H E@H?]”k^Am

    kAmr2C@= $?665y2=36CE[ 492:C @7 E96 r96C@<66 r@F?EJ #6AF3=:42? !2CEJ[ D2:5 E96 4@F?EJ 92D 567:?:E6=J D66? 2 D9:7E]k^Am

    kAm“*6D[ 96C6 😕 r96C@<66 r@F?EJ[ H6 92G6 D66? 2 D9:7E 😕 A6@A=6 DH:E49:?8 7C@> @?6 A2CEJ E@ 2?@E96C[” $?665y2=36CE D2:5] “%96 52E2 D9@HD A6@A=6 96C6 2C6 C68:DE6C:?8 >2:?=J 2D #6AF3=:42?D]”k^Am

    [ad_2]

    By Lee Guthrie | lguthrie@tahlequahdailypress.com

    Source link

  • It’s not a ‘scam’ that NYC mayor candidates are listed twice

    [ad_1]

    Elon Musk, the owner of social media platform X, criticized the legitimacy of New York City’s election system as voters prepared to head to the polls.

    Musk shared a photograph of New York City’s ballot on Nov. 4, Election Day. “The New York City ballot form is a scam! No ID is required. Other mayoral candidates appear twice. (Andrew) Cuomo’s name is last in bottom right,” wrote Musk, who supports Cuomo over Democratic frontrunner Zohran Mamdani and Republican candidate Curtis Sliwa. Other X users made similar points in other posts.

    New York doesn’t require voters to present IDs at their polling place on Election Day, beyond first-time voters who did not present ID at the time they registered. For all other voters, poll workers confirm identity by matching their signature to official records. People are required to present ID when they register to vote.

    As for Cuomo’s ballot placement, the former New York governor lost the Democratic primary and created his own independent party to allow him to run in the general election. According to election rules, that meant the placement for Cuomo and his new party was further down the ballot than longer-established parties. 

    What about candidates appearing twice? There’s nothing fishy about that: It’s part of New York’s long tradition of fusion voting, in which multiple parties can nominate the same candidate. 

    Having a candidate appear on the ballot twice is “not a scam at all,” said Jerry H. Goldfeder, senior counsel at the law firm Cozen O’Connor. “New York has had fusion voting for many, many years.”

    How does fusion voting work?

    If a candidate receives more than one party nomination, voters must choose not only the candidate they prefer but also the party they want those votes to count for.

    In the 2025 mayoral election, both Mamdani and one of his opponents, Sliwa, secured nominations of two parties, so they are listed twice on the ballot. 

    Mamdani won nominations from the Democratic Party and the left-wing Working Families Party. (On Election Day, Mamdani said he voted for himself on the Working Families Party line.)

    Sliwa won the nomination of the Republican Party and a party he created called the Protect Animals Party. (Sliwa has attracted notice for having 16 cats in his 320-square-foot studio apartment, and he’s made animal welfare a key campaign issue.)

    Any votes for a candidate, regardless of the party line the vote is cast under, counts toward that candidate’s total. “Although candidates may appear on more than one party’s line, voters can only vote for them once,” said Julia Sass Rubin, a Rutgers University public policy professor.

    So why would voters support a prominent candidate on a minor-party line?

    They might want to send a message about the importance of that party’s positions. They also might want to ensure that the smaller party continues to win enough votes to secure a ballot spot in future elections.

    By allowing cross-party alliances, a fusion system allows smaller parties to be more than just a “wasted vote” or a self-defeating “spoiler,” said Dan Cantor, who co-founded the Working Families Party and now heads the Center for Ballot Freedom, which supports fusion voting. 

    “It allows voters the ability to vote their values and send a message to the candidate that he or she should be attentive to the minor party’s concerns,” Cantor said.

    Fusion voting’s long history 

    Fusion voting dates to the 19th century, but only New York and Connecticut allow the practice today. 

    Historically, cross-nominations were used to elevate issues including the abolition of slavery and enhanced political representation into the mainstream, wrote three legal experts for the American Bar Association in 2024. 

    In the close 1960 presidential election, New York’s 45 electoral votes were crucial. While Richard Nixon received more Republican votes than John F. Kennedy received Democratic votes, “Kennedy’s 6% support on the Liberal Party line delivered him the state and the White House,” the authors wrote. Franklin D. Roosevelt and Ronald Reagan also won New York by fusing with minor parties.

    Tabatha Abu El-Haj, one of the authors of the American Bar Association paper, said there’s an irony in Musk’s criticism: “Back when Elon Musk threw out the notion of forming a third-party, many commentators noted the only way that party could actually influence the direction of the Republican Party would be if it operated as a fusion party.”

    Our ruling

    Musk wrote, “The New York City ballot form is a scam” because “mayoral candidates appear twice.”

    Mamdani and Sliwa are on the mayoral ballot twice because two separate parties made them their nominees. This is how fusion voting works, and how it has operated in New York since the nineteenth century.

    We rate the statement False.

    PolitiFact New York Writer Jill Terreri Ramos contributed to this report.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • California officials push back on Trump claim that Prop. 50 vote is a ‘GIANT SCAM’

    [ad_1]

    As California voters went to the polls Tuesday to cast their ballot on a measure that could block President Trump’s national agenda, state officials ridiculed his unsubstantiated claims that voting in the largely Democratic state is “rigged.”

    “The Unconstitutional Redistricting Vote in California is a GIANT SCAM in that the entire process, in particular the Voting itself, is RIGGED,” Trump said on Truth Social just minutes after polling stations opened Tuesday across California.

    The president provided no evidence for his allegations.

    “All ‘Mail-In’ Ballots, where the Republicans in that State are ‘Shut Out,’ is under very serious legal and criminal review,” the GOP president wrote. “STAY TUNED!”

    Gov. Gavin Newsom dismissed the president’s claims on X as “the ramblings of an old man that knows he’s about to LOSE.”

    His press office chimed in, too, calling Trump “a totally unserious person spreading false information in a desperate attempt to cope with his failures.”

    National tension is high as voters across California cast ballots on Proposition 50, a Democratic plan championed by Newsom to redraw the state’s congressional districts ahead of the 2026 election to favor the Democratic Party. The measure is intended to offset GOP gerrymandering in red states after Trump pressed Texas to rejigger maps to shore up the GOP’s narrow House majority.

    California’s top elections official, Secretary of State Shirley N. Weber, called Trump’s allegation “another baseless claim.”

    “The bottom line is California elections have been validated by the courts,” Weber said in a statement. “California voters will not be deceived by someone who consistently makes desperate, unsubstantiated attempts to dissuade Americans from participating in our democracy.”

    Weber noted that more than 7 million Californians have already voted and encouraged those who had yet to cast ballots to go to the polls.

    “California voters will not be sidelined from exercising their constitutional right to vote and should not let anyone deter them from exercising that right,” Weber said.

    Of the 7 million Californians who have voted, more than 4.6 million have done so by mail, according to the secretary of state’s office. Los Angeles residents alone have cast more than 788,000 mail-in ballots.

    Trump has long criticized mail-in voting. As more Democrats opted to vote by mail in 2020 during the COVID-19 pandemic, the president repeatedly made unproven claims linking mail in voting with voter fraud. When Trump ultimately lost that election, he blamed expanded mail-in voting.

    Over the last month, the stakes in the California special election have ratcheted up as polls indicate Proposition 50 could pass. More than half of likely California voters said they planned to support the measure, which could allow Democrats to gain up to five House seats.

    Last month, the Justice Department appeared to single out California for particular national scrutiny: It announced it would send federal monitors to polling locations in counties in California as well as New Jersey, another traditionally Democratic state that is conducting nationally significant off-year elections.

    The monitors are set to go to five California counties: Los Angeles, Kern, Riverside, Fresno and Orange.

    This story will be updated.

    [ad_2]

    Jenny Jarvie

    Source link

  • Trump pushes hard against Mamdani as New Yorkers select a mayor

    [ad_1]

    Voters were casting ballots in high-stakes elections on both coasts Tuesday, including for mayor of New York, new congressional maps in California and governor in both New Jersey and Virginia, states whose shifting electorates could signal the direction of the nation’s political winds.

    For voters and political watchers alike, the races have taken on huge importance at a time of tense political division, when Democrats and Republicans are sharply divided over the direction of the nation. Despite President Trump not appearing on any ballots, some viewed Tuesday’s races as a referendum on him and his volatile second term in the White House.

    In New York, self-described democratic socialist Zohran Mamdani, 34, was favored to win the mayoral race after winning the Democratic ranked-choice mayoral primary in June. Such a result would shake up the Democratic establishment and rile Republicans in near equal measure, serving as a rejection of both former Gov. Andrew Cuomo, a more establishment Democrat and Mamdani’s leading opponent, and Trump, who has warned that a Mamdani win would destroy the city.

    On election eve, Trump warned that a Mamdani win would disrupt the flow of federal dollars to the city and took the dramatic step of endorsing Cuomo over Curtis Sliwa, the Republican in the race.

    “If Communist Candidate Zohran Mamdani wins the Election for Mayor of New York City, it is highly unlikely that I will be contributing Federal Funds, other than the very minimum as required, to my beloved first home, because of the fact that, as a Communist, this once great City has ZERO chance of success, or even survival!” Trump wrote Monday on his social media platform.

    A vote for Sliwa “is a vote for Mamdani,” the president added. “Whether you personally like Andrew Cuomo or not, you really have no choice. You must vote for him, and hope he does a fantastic job. He is capable of it, Mamdani is not!”

    Mamdani, a Ugandan-born naturalized U.S. citizen and New York state assemblyman who defeated Cuomo in the primary, has promised a brighter day for New Yorkers with better public transportation, more affordable housing and high-quality child care if he wins. He has slammed billionaires and some of the city’s monied interests, which have lined up against him, and rejected the “grave political darkness” that he said is threatening the country under Trump.

    He also mocked Trump’s endorsement of Cuomo — calling the former governor Trump’s “puppet” and “parrot.”

    Samantha Marrero, a 35-year-old lifelong New Yorker, lined up with more than a dozen people Tuesday morning at her polling site in Brooklyn’s Greenpoint neighborhood to cast her vote for Mamdani, whom she praised for embracing people of color, queer people and other communities marginalized by mainstream politicians.

    Marrero said that she cares deeply about housing insecurity and affordability in the city, but that it was also “really meaningful to have someone who is brown and who looks like us and who eats like us and who lives more like us than anyone we’ve ever seen before” on the ballot. “That representation is really important.”

    New York mayoral candidate Andrew Cuomo speaks to reporters as he marks his ballot in New York on Nov. 4, 2025.

    (Richard Drew / Associated Press)

    And she said that’s a big part of why people across the country are watching the New York race.

    “We’re definitely a beacon in this kind of fascist takeover that is very clearly happening across the country,” she said. “People in other states and other cities and other countries have their eyes on what’s happening here. Obviously Mamdani is doing something right. And together we can do something right. But it has to be together.”

    Elsewhere on the East Coast, voters were electing governors in Virginia and New Jersey, races that have also drawn the president’s attention.

    In the New Jersey race, Trump has backed the Republican candidate, former state Rep. Jack Ciattarelli, over the Democratic candidate, Rep. Mikie Sherrill, whom former President Obama recently stumped for. Long a blue state, New Jersey has been shifting to the right, and polls have shown a tight race.

    In the Virginia race, former Rep. Abigail Spanberger, a 46-year-old former CIA officer, defeated Republican Lt. Gov. Winsome Earle-Sears, according to an Associated Press projection.

    Trump had not endorsed Earle-Sears by name, but called on Virginians to “vote Republican” and to reject Democratic candidate Spanberger, whom Obama has also supported.

    “Why would anyone vote for New Jersey and Virginia Gubernatorial Candidates, Mikie Sherrill and Abigail Spanberger, when they want transgender for everybody, men playing in women’s sports, High Crime, and the most expensive Energy prices almost anywhere in the World?” Trump recently wrote on his social media site, repeating some of his favorite partisan attacks on Democrats from the presidential campaign trail last year.

    At a rally for Spanberger in Norfolk, Va., over the weekend, Obama put the race in equally stark terms: as part of a battle for American democracy.

    “We don’t need to speculate about the dangers to our democracy. We don’t need to wonder about whether vulnerable people are going to be hurt, or ask ourselves how much more coarse and mean our culture can become. We’ve witnessed it. Elections do matter,” Obama said. “We all have more power than we think. We just have to use it.”

    Voting was underway in the states, but with some disruptions. Bomb threats disrupted voting in parts of New Jersey early Tuesday, temporarily shutting down a string of polling locations across the state before law enforcement determined they were hoaxes.

    In California, voters were being asked to change the state Constitution to allow Democrats to redraw congressional maps in their favor through 2030, in order to counter similar moves by Republicans in red states such as Texas.

    Leading Democrats, including Obama and Gov. Gavin Newsom, have described the measure as an effort to safeguard American democracy against a power grab by Trump, who had encouraged the red states to act, while opponents of the measure have derided it as an antidemocratic power grab by state Democrats.

    Trump has urged California voters against casting ballots by mail or voting early, arguing such practices are somehow “dishonest,” and on Tuesday morning suggested on his social media site that Proposition 50 was unconstitutional.

    “The Unconstitutional Redistricting Vote in California is a GIANT SCAM in that the entire process, in particular the Voting itself, is RIGGED,” Trump wrote, without providing evidence of problems. “All ‘Mail-In’ Ballots, where the Republicans in that State are ‘Shut Out,’ is under very serious legal and criminal review. STAY TUNED!”

    Both individually and collectively, the races are being closely watched as potential indicators of political sentiment and enthusiasm going into next year’s midterm elections, and of Democrats’ ability to get voters back to the polls after Trump’s decisive win over former Vice President Kamala Harris last year.

    Voters too saw the races as having particularly large stakes at a pivotal moment for the country.

    Michelle Kim, 32, who has lived in the Greenpoint neighborhood for three years, stood in line at a polling site early Tuesday morning, waiting to cast her vote for Mamdani.

    Kim said she cares about transportation, land use and the rising cost of living in New York and appreciated Mamdani’s broader message that solutions are possible, even if not guaranteed.

    “My hope is not, like, ‘Oh, he’s gonna solve, like, all of our issues,’” she said. “But I think for him to be able to represent people and give hope, that’s also part of it.”

    Lin reported from New York and Rector from San Francisco. Times staff writer Jenny Jarvie in Atlanta contributed to this report.

    [ad_2]

    Kevin Rector, Summer Lin

    Source link

  • Election Day in Northern California: The latest on voting for Prop 50 redistricting measure

    [ad_1]

    California voters have one big ballot measure to consider this year. Here’s what you need to know about Proposition 50 and how it would impact the state. What is Proposition 50? If passed, it would change California’s congressional district map. Normally the map is drawn by an independent commission, but state Democrats drew *** new map to try and get more members of their party elected to Congress. It’s *** direct response to Texas changing their congressional maps in favor of electing more Republicans. *** yes vote would support changing the maps. The congressional districts will get redrawn in *** way that spreads out likely Democratic voters into areas that are normally solved Republican spots. *** no vote would keep the current maps in place. What are people saying about Prop 50? Well, supporters say it is *** crucial step in keeping President Trump’s power in check and counter his push to get other states to redraw their maps. Governor Gavin Newsom is behind this move. Because Republicans hold the majority in both the Senate and House of Representatives, supporters of this measure say it would limit President Trump and his ability to pass items on his agenda. Opponents who are mostly members of the Republican Party say this is just *** power grab by the Democratic Party that would undermine *** fair election. 5 districts are likely to change from red to blue if Proposition 50 passes. District 1, currently represented by Doug LaMalfa. District 3 is represented by Kevin Kiley. District 22 is represented by David Valadaa. District 41 is currently held by Ken Calver. Lastly, District 48, which is held by Darrell Issa. Election day is November 4th, and ballots have already been mailed out. They must be returned or mailed in by that date for your vote to count.

    Special Election Day in Northern California: The latest on voting for Prop 50 redistricting measure

    See updates on Election Day.

    Updated: 12:01 AM PST Nov 4, 2025

    Editorial Standards

    Election Day has arrived for the special election. On Tuesday, Californians will decide whether to temporarily adopt new congressional district maps statewide, as Democratic leaders push to send more Democrats to the U.S. House of Representatives.Proposition 50, or Prop 50 for short, is part of a larger national fight in which Republicans and Democrats are trying to gerrymander their congressional districts to determine which party controls Congress halfway through President Trump’s term. The proposed maps target five California Republicans in an attempt to offset the five Republicans Texas is aiming to add.(Video Above: What to know about California’s Prop 50)Some communities in Northern California also have other measures or local races to weigh in on, including some measures in El Dorado County and the town of Truckee and races in Plumas County.All polling locations will open at 7 a.m. and close at 8 p.m. If you’re still in line when polls close, you should be able to cast your ballot. We’ll continue to update this page with updates from Election Day. Make sure to download our app for the latest breaking news updates with election results. What to know before polls open at 7 a.m.While voters can cast their ballot in person on Election Day, millions of California voters have already mailed in or dropped off their ballot. Here’s how to track your ballot. Here’s a look at early voter turnout across the state.Before heading out the door to vote, check if you are heading to the correct or closest voting location.Find out how to check here.Still need to learn more about Prop 50? Here’s everything to know.For those eager to head to the polls, make sure you know what you can and can’t do when it comes to voting in California. For example, you cannot wear pins, hats, shirts or other visible items that display a candidate’s name, image, logo or information about supporting or opposing a ballot measure. Here are more Election Day dos and don’ts.See more coverage of top California stories here | Download our app | Subscribe to our morning newsletter | Find us on YouTube here and subscribe to our channel

    Election Day has arrived for the special election.

    On Tuesday, Californians will decide whether to temporarily adopt new congressional district maps statewide, as Democratic leaders push to send more Democrats to the U.S. House of Representatives.

    Proposition 50, or Prop 50 for short, is part of a larger national fight in which Republicans and Democrats are trying to gerrymander their congressional districts to determine which party controls Congress halfway through President Trump’s term. The proposed maps target five California Republicans in an attempt to offset the five Republicans Texas is aiming to add.

    (Video Above: What to know about California’s Prop 50)

    Some communities in Northern California also have other measures or local races to weigh in on, including some measures in El Dorado County and the town of Truckee and races in Plumas County.

    All polling locations will open at 7 a.m. and close at 8 p.m. If you’re still in line when polls close, you should be able to cast your ballot.

    We’ll continue to update this page with updates from Election Day. Make sure to download our app for the latest breaking news updates with election results.

    What to know before polls open at 7 a.m.

    While voters can cast their ballot in person on Election Day, millions of California voters have already mailed in or dropped off their ballot.

    Before heading out the door to vote, check if you are heading to the correct or closest voting location.

    Still need to learn more about Prop 50?

    For those eager to head to the polls, make sure you know what you can and can’t do when it comes to voting in California.

    For example, you cannot wear pins, hats, shirts or other visible items that display a candidate’s name, image, logo or information about supporting or opposing a ballot measure. Here are more Election Day dos and don’ts.

    See more coverage of top California stories here | Download our app | Subscribe to our morning newsletter | Find us on YouTube here and subscribe to our channel

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • What’s on the ballot in the first general election since Donald Trump became president

    [ad_1]

    One year after Donald Trump retook the White House and set into motion a dramatic expansion of executive power, the Republican president figures prominently in state and local elections being held Tuesday. Video above: House Speaker Mike Johnson talks about potential impact of Tuesday’s elections on the government shutdownThe results of those contests — the first general election of Trump’s second term — will be heralded by the victors as either a major repudiation or resounding stamp of approval of his second-term agenda. That’s especially true in high-profile races for Virginia and New Jersey governor, New York City mayor, and a California proposition to redraw its congressional district boundaries. More than half of the states will hold contests on Tuesday. Here’s a look at some of the major statewide and local races on the ballot: In New Jersey, Democrat Mikie Sherrill and Republican Jack Ciattarelli are the nominees to succeed term-limited Democratic Gov. Phil Murphy. Sherrill is a four-term U.S. representative and former Navy helicopter pilot. Ciattarelli is a former state Assemblyman backed by Trump. In 2021, Ciattarelli came within about 3 percentage points of toppling Murphy.In Virginia, Republican Lt. Gov. Winsome Earle-Sears and Democratic former U.S. Rep. Abigail Spanberger look to replace term-limited Republican Gov. Glenn Youngkin. While Spanberger has made some efforts to focus on topics other than Trump in stump speeches, the president remained a major topic of conversation throughout the campaign, from comments Earle-Sears made about him in 2022 to some of his more polarizing policies, such as the so-called One Big Beautiful Bill tax and spending cut measure and the widespread dismissal of federal workers, many of whom live in northern Virginia.Trump was scheduled to participate in telephone rallies for the candidates on Monday night. As the only gubernatorial races held in the year following a presidential election, the contests have long served as the first major test of voter sentiment toward the party holding the White House. In every race for governor since 1973, one or both states have elected a governor from a party different than that of the sitting president. The race to lead the nation’s largest city features Democratic state legislator Zohran Mamdani, independent candidate and former Democratic Gov. Andrew Cuomo and Republican Curtis Sliwa.Mamdani’s comfortable victory over Cuomo in the June primary generated excitement from the party’s more progressive wing and apprehension among the party establishment. Party leaders like Gov. Kathy Hochul and U.S. House Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries eventually endorsed the self-described democratic socialist months after he won the nomination.The winner will replace outgoing Mayor Eric Adams, who initially sought renomination as a Democrat. After losing the primary, Adams opted to run as an independent, but dropped out of the race in September and eventually endorsed Cuomo. In February, the Trump Justice Department asked a court to drop corruption charges against Adams because the case impeded Trump’s “immigration objectives.” Trump later said he’d like to see both Adams and Sliwa drop out of the race in an effort to defeat Mamdani. California voters will decide a statewide ballot measure that would enact a new congressional map that could flip as many as five Republican-held U.S. House seats to Democratic control. Proposition 50, championed by Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom, is in response to a new Texas map that state Republicans enacted in August as part of Trump’s efforts to keep the U.S. House under Republican control in the 2026 midterms. The Texas plan, which could help Republicans flip five Democratic-held U.S. House seats, has sparked an escalating gerrymandering arms race among states to pass new maps outside of the regular once-a-decade schedule. Control of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court will be at stake when voters cast Yes or No votes on whether to retain three justices from the high court’s 5-2 Democratic majority. Partisan control of the court could have major implications for the 2028 presidential race, since justices might be asked to rule on election disputes, as they did in 2020. Spending on Tuesday’s contests is on track to exceed $15 million as Republicans have campaigned to end the majority and Democrats have responded. If all three justices are ousted, a deadlock in the confirmation process to replace them could result in a court tied at 2-2. An election to fill any vacant seats for full 10-year terms would be held in 2027. Virginia attorney generalRepublican incumbent Jason Miyares seeks a second term against Democrat Jay Jones. Much of the fall campaign has focused on text messages suggesting violence against political rivals that Jones sent in 2022.Texas-18 Sixteen candidates hope to fill a vacant congressional seat previously held by the late Democratic U.S. Rep. Sylvester Turner.State legislaturesControl of the Minnesota Senate and Virginia House of Delegates is at stake, while New Jersey Democrats defend their 52-28 General Assembly majority.Ballot measuresMaine voters will decide statewide questions on voting and a “red flag” law aimed at preventing gun violence. Texas’ 17 ballot measures include constitutional amendments on parental rights and limiting voting to U.S. citizens. Colorado and Washington also have statewide measures on the ballot.Mayors Detroit, Pittsburgh, Jersey City and Buffalo will elect new mayors, while incumbents in Atlanta, Minneapolis and Cincinnati seek another term.

    One year after Donald Trump retook the White House and set into motion a dramatic expansion of executive power, the Republican president figures prominently in state and local elections being held Tuesday.

    Video above: House Speaker Mike Johnson talks about potential impact of Tuesday’s elections on the government shutdown

    The results of those contests — the first general election of Trump’s second term — will be heralded by the victors as either a major repudiation or resounding stamp of approval of his second-term agenda. That’s especially true in high-profile races for Virginia and New Jersey governor, New York City mayor, and a California proposition to redraw its congressional district boundaries.

    More than half of the states will hold contests on Tuesday. Here’s a look at some of the major statewide and local races on the ballot:

    In New Jersey, Democrat Mikie Sherrill and Republican Jack Ciattarelli are the nominees to succeed term-limited Democratic Gov. Phil Murphy. Sherrill is a four-term U.S. representative and former Navy helicopter pilot. Ciattarelli is a former state Assemblyman backed by Trump. In 2021, Ciattarelli came within about 3 percentage points of toppling Murphy.

    In Virginia, Republican Lt. Gov. Winsome Earle-Sears and Democratic former U.S. Rep. Abigail Spanberger look to replace term-limited Republican Gov. Glenn Youngkin. While Spanberger has made some efforts to focus on topics other than Trump in stump speeches, the president remained a major topic of conversation throughout the campaign, from comments Earle-Sears made about him in 2022 to some of his more polarizing policies, such as the so-called One Big Beautiful Bill tax and spending cut measure and the widespread dismissal of federal workers, many of whom live in northern Virginia.

    Trump was scheduled to participate in telephone rallies for the candidates on Monday night.

    As the only gubernatorial races held in the year following a presidential election, the contests have long served as the first major test of voter sentiment toward the party holding the White House. In every race for governor since 1973, one or both states have elected a governor from a party different than that of the sitting president.

    The race to lead the nation’s largest city features Democratic state legislator Zohran Mamdani, independent candidate and former Democratic Gov. Andrew Cuomo and Republican Curtis Sliwa.

    Mamdani’s comfortable victory over Cuomo in the June primary generated excitement from the party’s more progressive wing and apprehension among the party establishment. Party leaders like Gov. Kathy Hochul and U.S. House Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries eventually endorsed the self-described democratic socialist months after he won the nomination.

    The winner will replace outgoing Mayor Eric Adams, who initially sought renomination as a Democrat. After losing the primary, Adams opted to run as an independent, but dropped out of the race in September and eventually endorsed Cuomo. In February, the Trump Justice Department asked a court to drop corruption charges against Adams because the case impeded Trump’s “immigration objectives.” Trump later said he’d like to see both Adams and Sliwa drop out of the race in an effort to defeat Mamdani.

    California voters will decide a statewide ballot measure that would enact a new congressional map that could flip as many as five Republican-held U.S. House seats to Democratic control.

    Proposition 50, championed by Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom, is in response to a new Texas map that state Republicans enacted in August as part of Trump’s efforts to keep the U.S. House under Republican control in the 2026 midterms. The Texas plan, which could help Republicans flip five Democratic-held U.S. House seats, has sparked an escalating gerrymandering arms race among states to pass new maps outside of the regular once-a-decade schedule.

    Control of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court will be at stake when voters cast Yes or No votes on whether to retain three justices from the high court’s 5-2 Democratic majority.

    Partisan control of the court could have major implications for the 2028 presidential race, since justices might be asked to rule on election disputes, as they did in 2020. Spending on Tuesday’s contests is on track to exceed $15 million as Republicans have campaigned to end the majority and Democrats have responded.

    If all three justices are ousted, a deadlock in the confirmation process to replace them could result in a court tied at 2-2. An election to fill any vacant seats for full 10-year terms would be held in 2027.

    Virginia attorney general

    Republican incumbent Jason Miyares seeks a second term against Democrat Jay Jones. Much of the fall campaign has focused on text messages suggesting violence against political rivals that Jones sent in 2022.

    Texas-18

    Sixteen candidates hope to fill a vacant congressional seat previously held by the late Democratic U.S. Rep. Sylvester Turner.

    State legislatures

    Control of the Minnesota Senate and Virginia House of Delegates is at stake, while New Jersey Democrats defend their 52-28 General Assembly majority.

    Ballot measures

    Maine voters will decide statewide questions on voting and a “red flag” law aimed at preventing gun violence. Texas’ 17 ballot measures include constitutional amendments on parental rights and limiting voting to U.S. citizens. Colorado and Washington also have statewide measures on the ballot.

    Mayors

    Detroit, Pittsburgh, Jersey City and Buffalo will elect new mayors, while incumbents in Atlanta, Minneapolis and Cincinnati seek another term.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Is that election text legit? Where to find info you can trust

    [ad_1]

    This week voters across California received a suspicious text message saying they’d failed to turn in their ballots for the Nov. 4 statewide special election on redistricting.

    The message may appear official. It includes the voter’s name and address and links to an official website providing information on early voting and vote-by-mall ballot drop-off locations.

    But it’s not from the state, and officials urge caution.

    The office of the California secretary of state received numerous reports from voters of “inaccurate text messages from Ballot Now,” according to a news release.

    “This has caused voters to believe their returned ballots have not been received or processed by county elections officials,” Shirley Weber, secretary of state, stated in the release. “Let me be clear: Ballot Now is not in any way affiliated with the California Office of the Secretary of State.”

    Weber’s office told The Times it doesn’t know the intent behind the Ballot Now text messages, and “we are trying to get to the bottom of it.”

    Ballot Now did not respond to The Times’ request for comment.

    Where voters can get trustworthy answers to their elections questions

    Voters can find accurate information on elections and voting at the state secretary’s website or at their county election office. The secretary’s website includes the complete list of county election offices.

    Questions that the secretary of state’s website can assist with include:

    How do I check my voter status? By entering some personal information, you can see if you are registered to vote, where you’re registered, and check that your political party and language preference are correct at the website’s voter status page.

    How do I track my ballot? You can sign up to track your ballot through the state’s online site Ballottrax.

    • By signing up on Ballottrax, voters receive automatic updates when their county elections office: mails their ballot to them, receives their ballot, counts their ballot, or when the office has any issues with the ballot.
    • Updates are available in 10 languages — including Spanish, Japanese and Tagalog — and you can choose to be texted, emailed or called with voice alert updates.

    Where can I return my ballot? Los Angeles County residents can look for official vote-by-mail ballot drop-box locations or voter centers on the Los Angeles County registrar-recorder/county clerk website.

    How to report something fishy

    If you believe you’re the victim of election fraud or have witnessed a violation of the California Elections Code, you can submit a complaint form or call the secretary of state’s office.

    Fill out an online form, download a PDF version of the form and mail it, or call the office — English speakers can call (916) 657-2166 or (800) 345-8683; Spanish speakers can call (800) 232-8682.

    The physical form can be mailed to the California Secretary of State Elections Division at 1500 11th St., 5th Floor, Sacramento, CA 95814 or faxed to (916) 653-3214.

    Los Angeles County residents are encouraged to call the Los Angeles County registrar-recorder/county clerk’s call center with any questions or concerns they have, said Mike Sanchez, spokesperson for the office.

    The registrar of voters can be reached at (800) 815-2666, and the number for voter center information is (800) 815-2666; choose option No. 1.

    [ad_2]

    Karen Garcia

    Source link

  • Trump, contradicting the California GOP, opposes early and mail-in voting in Prop. 50 election

    [ad_1]

    President Trump urged California voters on Sunday not to cast mail-in ballots or vote early in the California election about redistricting — the direct opposite of the message from state GOP leaders.

    Repeating his false claim that former President Biden beat him in 2020 because the election was rigged, Trump argued that the November special election about redistricting in California would be rigged, as would the 2026 midterm election to determine control of Congress.

    “No mail-in or ‘Early’ Voting, Yes to Voter ID! Watch how totally dishonest the California Prop Vote is! Millions of Ballots being ‘shipped,’” Trump wrote on Truth Social. “GET SMART REPUBLICANS, BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE!!!”

    Proposition 50, a ballot measure proposed by Gov. Gavin Newsom and other California Democrats to redraw the state’s congressional districts to boost their party’s ranks in the U.S. House of Representatives, is on the Nov. 4 ballot.

    The rare mid-decade redistricting effort was in response to Trump urging GOP-led states, initially Texas, to increase the number of Republicans in the House in the 2026 midterm election to allow him to continue implementing his agenda in his final two years in the White House.

    Newsom responded to Trump on X: “Ramblings of an old man that knows he’s going to LOSE.”

    Trump has not weighed in on the merits of Proposition 50, while prominent Democrats who support it have, including former President Obama.

    More than 4 million mail-in ballots — 18% of the ballots sent to California’s 23 million voters — had been returned as of Friday, according to a vote tracker run by Democratic redistricting expert Paul Mitchell, who drew the proposed maps on the ballot. Democrats continue to outpace Republicans in returning ballots, 51% to 28%. Voters registered without a party preference or with other political parties have returned 21% of the ballots.

    Early-voting centers also opened in 29 counties on Saturday.

    Turnout figures were alarming Republicans leaders before Trump’s message.

    “It’s simple. Republicans need to stop complaining and vote. We ask and ask and ask and yet turnout still lags,” the San Diego GOP posted on X. “To win this one GOP turnout needs to be materially better than average. It’s very doable but won’t just happen. Work it.”

    Republicans historically voted early while Democrats were more likely to cast ballots on election day. Trump upended this dynamic, creating dissonance with GOP leaders across the nation who recognized the value of banking early votes. And it completely contradicts the messaging by the opponents of Proposition 50.

    Jessica Millan Patterson, a former chair of the state GOP and leader of the “No on Prop. 50 — Stop Sacramento’s Power Grab” committee, has been a longtime proponent of urging Republican voters to cast ballots as early and conveniently as possible.

    “Sacramento politicians rushed this costly election for partisan gain, and mistakes have been made,” she said Sunday evening. “If Californians want change from our state’s failed one-party rule, it starts by turning out to vote no on Proposition 50.”

    [ad_2]

    Seema Mehta

    Source link

  • Voter turnout exceeds expectations in California’s Prop. 50 special election

    [ad_1]

    Early voter turnout is exceeding expectations in California’s Nov. 4 special election over redrawing the state’s congressional districts, a Democratic-led effort to counter Republican attempts to keep Congress under GOP control.

    “We’re seeing some pretty extraordinary numbers of early votes that have already been cast, people sending back in their ballots,” Gov. Gavin Newsom said in a livestream with former President Obama on Wednesday.

    More than 3.4 million mail ballots have been returned as of Wednesday, with votes from Democrats outpacing ballots from Republicans and Californians registered as not having a party preference, according to a ballot tracker run by Democratic strategist Paul Mitchell. Mitchell is deeply involved in the Democratic effort, and drafted the proposed congressional districts on the Nov. 4 special election ballot.

    That’s roughly the same number of ballots returned by this time in the White House contest between then-Vice President Kamala Harris and then-former President Trump in 2024, notable because turnout during presidential elections is higher than in other years.

    About a million more ballots had been turned in by this point in the unsuccessful 2021 attempt to recall Newsom, but that was during the COVID pandemic.

    This year’s turnout is also especially significant because Proposition 50 is about the esoteric topic of redistricting. Redrawing congressional districts is usually a once-a-decade process that takes place after the U.S. census to account for population shifts.

    California’s 52 congressional districts currently are crafted by a voter-approved independent commission, but Newsom and other California Democrats decided to ask voters to allow a rare mid-decade partisan gerrymandering to blunt Trump’s efforts in GOP-led states to boost his party’s numbers in the House.

    Obama, who has endorsed Proposition 50 and stars in a television ad supporting the effort, on Wednesday said the ballot measure will affect the entire country.

    “There’s a broader principle at stake that has to do with whether or not our democracy can be manipulated by those who are already in power to entrench themselves further,” Obama said. “Or, whether we’re going to have a system that allows the people to decide who’s going to represent them.”

    About 51% of the ballots that have been returned to date are from registered Democrats, while 28% are from registered Republicans and 21% are from voters who do not express a party preference.

    It’s unknown how these voters cast their ballots, but the Democratic advantage appears to give an edge to supporters of Proposition 50, which needs to be passed by a simple majority to be enacted. About 19.6 million ballots — roughly 85% of those mailed to California voters — are outstanding, though not all are expected to be returned.

    The current trend of returned ballots at this point shows Democrats having a small edge over Republicans compared with their share of the California electorate. According to the latest state voter registration report, Democrats account for 45% of California’s registered voters, while Republicans total 25% and “no party preference” voters make up 23%. Californians belonging to other parties make up the remainder.

    Mitchell added that another interesting data point is that the mail ballots continue to flow in.

    “Usually you see a lull after the first wave — if you don’t mail in your ballot in the first week, it’s going to be sitting on the counter for a while,” Mitchell said. But ballots continue to arrive, possibly encouraged by the “No Kings” protests on Saturday, he said.

    A spokesperson for the pro-Proposition 50 campaign said they are taking nothing for granted.

    “With millions of ballots still to be cast, we will keep pushing to make sure every Californian understands what’s at stake and turns out to vote yes on Nov. 4th to stop Trump’s power grab,” said spokesperson Hannah Milgrom.

    Some Republican leaders have expressed concerns that the GOP early vote may be suppressed by Trump’s past criticism about mail balloting, inaccuracies in the voter guide sent to the state’s 23 million voters and conspiracy theories about the ballot envelope design.

    “While ballot initiatives are nonpartisan, many Republicans tend to hold on to their ballots until in-person voting begins,” said Ellie Hockenbury, an advisor to the “No on Prop 50 — Stop Sacramento’s Power Grab” campaign committee. “As this next phase starts — and with nearly two weeks until Election Day — we expect already high turnout to continue rising to defeat Proposition 50 and stop Gavin Newsom’s partisan power grab.”

    Amy Thoma, a spokesperson for the other major group opposing the proposition, said the data show that the voters who have returned ballots so far are not representative of the California electorate.

    “Special elections tend to be more partisan, older and whiter than general elections, which is one of the reasons we’ve been concerned about the speed with which the politicians pushed this through,” she said.

    [ad_2]

    Seema Mehta, Dakota Smith

    Source link

  • More than 1 million ballots turned in for California special election on Prop 50, data firm says

    [ad_1]

    More than 1 million ballots turned in for California special election on Prop 50, data firm says

    NEXT MONTH’S SPECIAL ELECTION. IF APPROVED, PROP 50 WILL GIVE CALIFORNIA LAWMAKERS THE POWER TO REDRAW CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS, CREATING FIVE HOUSE SEATS FOR DEMOCRATS. KCRA 3’S CECIL HANNIBAL JOINS US LIVE IN DOWNTOWN SACRAMENTO. SO, CECIL, WHAT ARE VOTERS SAYING ABOUT THE PROCESS SO FAR? WE SPOKE TO SEVERAL VOTERS TODAY WHO SAY THAT IT’S BEEN A SMOOTH AND EASY PROCESS SO FAR. ONE, BECAUSE THEY CAN SIMPLY WALK UP OR DRIVE UP TO A BALLOT BOX AND PUT THEIR VOTE RIGHT IN THERE. OR ALSO BECAUSE THEY SAY WHAT’S ON THE BALLOT IS SIMPLE. IT’S 70 WORDS. ONE QUESTION WITH TWO OPTIONS YES OR NO FOR PROP 50. NOW, ELECTION OFFICIALS TODAY SAY THEY WANT THIS TO BE A SIMPLE AND SMOOTH PROCESS FOR VOTERS. PROBABLY WONDERING WHY WE’RE HERE IN DOCO. WELL, THAT’S BECAUSE THIS IS ONE LOCATION WHERE VOTERS IN SACRAMENTO COUNTY CAN COME DROP OFF THEIR BALLOT INSIDE OF THE KINGS TEAM STORE. ACTUALLY, AN EMPLOYEE JUST TOLD ME THEY’VE HAD THREE PEOPLE SHOW UP TODAY, TWO YESTERDAY. SO PEOPLE ARE GETTING OUT AND CASTING THEIR VOTES NOW. SACRAMENTO, EL DORADO AND SAN JOAQUIN COUNTIES ALL SAY THAT BALLOTS HAVE BEEN MAILED OUT, AND IF YOU HAVEN’T RECEIVED IT ALREADY, YOU SHOULD VERY SOON. WELL, YOU KNOW, VOTING LASTS UNTIL NOVEMBER 4TH. ANOTHER REMINDER FOR YOU WHEN YOU’RE DROPPING OFF YOUR BALLOT, MAKE SURE YOU SIGN THE PINK ENVELOPE. THAT’S VERY, VERY IMPORTANT. SO ELECTION OFFICIALS CAN VERIFY THAT IT IS YOU AND NOT VOTER FRAUD. YOU CAN ALSO MAIL IT IN FOR FREE THROUGH USPS. NOW WE TALKED ABOUT PROP 50, BUT IT’S NOW TIME FOR VOTERS TO DECIDE WITHOUT DISCUSSING PARTY AFFILIATION. WE TALKED TO VOTERS IN SACRAMENTO COUNTY TODAY ABOUT THE MEASURE. WELL, IT’S REALLY ONE SINGLE QUESTION. AND THAT QUESTION IS CLEAR TO ME. I THINK THAT IT’S THE RIGHT THING TO DO AT THIS MOMENT IN TIME. I THINK IT’S REALLY UNFORTUNATE THAT WE HAVE TO DO THIS, BUT I FEEL LIKE WE’VE BEEN FORCED BY THE REPUBLICAN PARTY. ONLY ONE VOTE. YOU KNOW, GOT TO DO WHAT I THINK IS RIGHT. YEAH. BACK OUT HERE LIVE AGAIN. THIS IS ONE LOCATION WHERE VOTERS CAN DROP OFF THEIR BALLOTS. IF YOU’RE HEADING TO A KINGS PRESEASON GAME THIS WEEK, RIGHT ON YOUR WAY TO THE ARENA OR SOMEWHERE TO WATCH THE GAME, YOU CAN JUST COME DROP OFF YOUR BALLOT. NOW WE’RE TALKING ABOUT DROP OFF YOUR BALLOT. IF YOU HAVE ANY CONCERNS ABOUT SECURITY. TODAY, WE TALKED TO ELECTION OFFICIALS FROM SACRAMENTO, EL DORADO AND SAN JOAQUIN COUNTIES ABOUT JUST THAT SECURITY AND STAFFING FOR THIS SPECIAL ELECTION. WE’LL HAVE MORE ON THOSE DISCUSSIONS COMING UP TONIGHT AT SIX. LIVE IN DOCO. CECIL HANNIBAL KCRA THREE NEWS, OKC. SO THANK YOU. AND THE SECRETARY OF STATE’S OFFICE OFFERS A WAY FOR VOTERS TO TRACK THEIR BALLOTS. IT’S CALLED WHERE’S MY BALLOT? VOTERS COULD SIGN UP WITH THEIR NAME, THEIR BIRTH DATE, AND ZIP CODE. ONCE LOGGED IN, YOU CAN TRACK WHERE THE BALLOT IS FROM WHEN IT’S MAILED TO YOU, SENT BACK TO COUNTY ELECTIONS OFFICE, AND RECEIVED AND THEN COUNTED. JUST A REMINDER, THE LAST DAY TO REGISTER IS OCTOBER 20TH AND TODAY IS THE SEVENTH. SO AS OF LAST MONTH, NEARLY HALF OF ALL VOTERS ARE REGISTERED. DEMOCRATS, 25% A

    More than 1 million ballots turned in for California special election on Prop 50, data firm says

    Updated: 4:30 PM PDT Oct 17, 2025

    Editorial Standards

    More than 1 million ballots have been returned so far in California’s special election to decide Proposition 50, according to a data firm used by political campaigns.Political Data Inc. said on X Wednesday that 4.49% of ballots sent out to California voters have already been returned. The firm cited a rate that was “close to recall election numbers,” in a reference to the 2021 vote over whether to recall Gov. Gavin Newsom. According to the early mail-in vote, 5% of Democrats and 5% of Republicans have turned in their ballots. That equates to more than 530,000 votes from Democrats and more than 293,000 from Republicans. About 76% of ballots returned were from people ages 50 or older. White voters have been overrepresented with 72% of the vote so far. California voters on Nov. 4 will decide if the state should temporarily toss its current congressional district map drawn by the state’s independent commission and replace it with a new one that was quickly drawn by Democrats. It’s part of a larger national fight in which Republicans and Democrats are trying to gerrymander their congressional districts to determine which party controls the U.S. House of Representatives halfway through President Donald Trump’s term.The proposed maps target five California Republicans in an attempt to offset the five Republicans Texas is aiming to add.If approved, the maps would be in place for the 2026, 2028 and 2030 elections. State leaders have said the power to draw maps would return to the independent redistricting commission in 2031.One of the people who works at Political Data Inc., Paul Mitchell, is the owner of a consulting firm that helped to create the congressional redistricting maps for Democrats. He said he is not campaigning for the measure. The last day to register to vote is Oct. 20, though people can also vote on Nov. 3 with Conditional Voter Registration. | RELATED | Everything you need to know about California’s Proposition 50See more coverage of top California stories here | Download our app | Subscribe to our morning newsletter | Find us on YouTube here and subscribe to our channelPHNjcmlwdCB0eXBlPSJ0ZXh0L2phdmFzY3JpcHQiPiFmdW5jdGlvbigpeyJ1c2Ugc3RyaWN0Ijt3aW5kb3cuYWRkRXZlbnRMaXN0ZW5lcigibWVzc2FnZSIsKGZ1bmN0aW9uKGUpe2lmKHZvaWQgMCE9PWUuZGF0YVsiZGF0YXdyYXBwZXItaGVpZ2h0Il0pe3ZhciB0PWRvY3VtZW50LnF1ZXJ5U2VsZWN0b3JBbGwoImlmcmFtZSIpO2Zvcih2YXIgYSBpbiBlLmRhdGFbImRhdGF3cmFwcGVyLWhlaWdodCJdKWZvcih2YXIgcj0wO3I8dC5sZW5ndGg7cisrKXtpZih0W3JdLmNvbnRlbnRXaW5kb3c9PT1lLnNvdXJjZSl0W3JdLnN0eWxlLmhlaWdodD1lLmRhdGFbImRhdGF3cmFwcGVyLWhlaWdodCJdW2FdKyJweCJ9fX0pKX0oKTs8L3NjcmlwdD4=

    More than 1 million ballots have been returned so far in California’s special election to decide Proposition 50, according to a data firm used by political campaigns.

    Political Data Inc. said on X Wednesday that 4.49% of ballots sent out to California voters have already been returned.

    The firm cited a rate that was “close to recall election numbers,” in a reference to the 2021 vote over whether to recall Gov. Gavin Newsom.

    This content is imported from Twitter.
    You may be able to find the same content in another format, or you may be able to find more information, at their web site.

    According to the early mail-in vote, 5% of Democrats and 5% of Republicans have turned in their ballots. That equates to more than 530,000 votes from Democrats and more than 293,000 from Republicans.

    About 76% of ballots returned were from people ages 50 or older. White voters have been overrepresented with 72% of the vote so far.

    California voters on Nov. 4 will decide if the state should temporarily toss its current congressional district map drawn by the state’s independent commission and replace it with a new one that was quickly drawn by Democrats. It’s part of a larger national fight in which Republicans and Democrats are trying to gerrymander their congressional districts to determine which party controls the U.S. House of Representatives halfway through President Donald Trump’s term.

    The proposed maps target five California Republicans in an attempt to offset the five Republicans Texas is aiming to add.

    If approved, the maps would be in place for the 2026, 2028 and 2030 elections. State leaders have said the power to draw maps would return to the independent redistricting commission in 2031.

    One of the people who works at Political Data Inc., Paul Mitchell, is the owner of a consulting firm that helped to create the congressional redistricting maps for Democrats. He said he is not campaigning for the measure.

    The last day to register to vote is Oct. 20, though people can also vote on Nov. 3 with Conditional Voter Registration.

    | RELATED | Everything you need to know about California’s Proposition 50

    See more coverage of top California stories here | Download our app | Subscribe to our morning newsletter | Find us on YouTube here and subscribe to our channel

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • 99 stolen special election ballots found in Sacramento County homeless encampment, officials say

    [ad_1]

    Dozens of stolen, unvoted ballots for the special election on Proposition 50 were found in a Sacramento County homeless encampment on Wednesday, according to the sheriff’s office. Sgt. Amar Gandhi, a spokesperson for the Sacramento County Sheriff’s Office, said deputies were in the area of Elder Creek and Mayhew roads to clean up a camp in the area when they found 99 ballots and other election-related materials among a large amount of other mail.”Obviously saw the urgency, grabbed all those items first, got the ballots and stuff returned to the voter registration,” Gandhi said.He said deputies secured the ballots and election mail and returned them to the Sacramento County Department of Voter Registration and Elections. He confirmed to KCRA 3 that the ballots were voided.”They won’t count for anything,” Gandhi said.The county’s Department of Voter Registration and Elections stated that new ballots will be sent to affected voters on Thursday.The sheriff’s office said the camp was vacant when deputies arrived, and no arrests have been made in connection with the stolen ballots. Investigators are now working to identify those responsible for the theft.”It’s a big deal and it’s an undertaking. So, this is something that will work in conjunction with the post office as well,” Gandhi said. “It’s going to take a lot of backtracking.”Any California voter who has not received their ballot is urged to contact their county elections office to have their ballot reissued.Gandhi said the goal is to protect the integrity of every vote.”Whether it’s mail-in or some other method, make sure you’re taking the steps to track it and making sure your vote counts,” he said.See more coverage of top California stories here | Download our app | Subscribe to our morning newsletter | Find us on YouTube here and subscribe to our channel

    Dozens of stolen, unvoted ballots for the special election on Proposition 50 were found in a Sacramento County homeless encampment on Wednesday, according to the sheriff’s office.

    Sgt. Amar Gandhi, a spokesperson for the Sacramento County Sheriff’s Office, said deputies were in the area of Elder Creek and Mayhew roads to clean up a camp in the area when they found 99 ballots and other election-related materials among a large amount of other mail.

    “Obviously saw the urgency, grabbed all those items first, got the ballots and stuff returned to the voter registration,” Gandhi said.

    He said deputies secured the ballots and election mail and returned them to the Sacramento County Department of Voter Registration and Elections.

    He confirmed to KCRA 3 that the ballots were voided.

    “They won’t count for anything,” Gandhi said.

    The county’s Department of Voter Registration and Elections stated that new ballots will be sent to affected voters on Thursday.

    The sheriff’s office said the camp was vacant when deputies arrived, and no arrests have been made in connection with the stolen ballots. Investigators are now working to identify those responsible for the theft.

    “It’s a big deal and it’s an undertaking. So, this is something that will work in conjunction with the post office as well,” Gandhi said. “It’s going to take a lot of backtracking.”

    Any California voter who has not received their ballot is urged to contact their county elections office to have their ballot reissued.

    Gandhi said the goal is to protect the integrity of every vote.

    “Whether it’s mail-in or some other method, make sure you’re taking the steps to track it and making sure your vote counts,” he said.

    See more coverage of top California stories here | Download our app | Subscribe to our morning newsletter | Find us on YouTube here and subscribe to our channel

    [ad_2]

    Source link