ReportWire

Tag: bail

  • Family mourns father killed in Elk Grove hit-and-run

    THIS IS KCRA THREE NEWS LIVE AT 11 P.M. A GOOD HEART. AND HE ALWAYS MEANT WELL FOR PEOPLE. AND HE DEFINITELY DID NOT DESERVE TO BE KILLED. TONIGHT, AN EMOTIONAL MESSAGE FROM THE FAMILY OF A MAN KILLED IN A HIT AND RUN IN ELK GROVE. THANK YOU FOR JOINING US TONIGHT. I’M CECIL HANNIBAL. POLICE SAY THE 61 YEAR OLD VICTIM WAS FIXING A FLAT TIRE WHEN HE WAS HIT. NOW HIS FAMILY WANTS TO KNOW WHY THAT DRIVER WAS RELEASED FROM JAIL. KCRA 3’S ANAHITA JAFARY EXPLAINS WHY THE FAMILY SAYS JUSTICE HAS NOT BEEN SERVED. HE’S NOT GOING TO BE ABLE TO WATCH ME GRADUATE OR GROW UP. SO IT’S JUST SAD TO DEAL WITH IT. 61 YEAR OLD DANIEL SANCHEZ WAS SIMPLY CHANGING A TIRE WHEN HIS LIFE WAS CUT SHORT. KNOWING THAT IT WAS A HIT AND RUN MADE IT THAT MUCH HARDER. DANIEL’S WIFE WAS WITH HIM AT THE TIME AND CALLED THE MOTHER OF HIS CHILDREN TO TELL HER WHAT HAPPENED. SHE CALLED ME AND I ANSWERED, AND SHE WAS HYSTERICALLY CRYING, AND I JUST KNEW TELLING HER KIDS, SHE SAYS, WAS THE HARDEST PART. AS A MOM, WE TRY OUR HARDEST TO PROTECT OUR KIDS FROM ANYTHING THAT WOULD HURT THEM AND IT STILL HAPPENED. THEY STILL GOT HURT IN THAT MOMENT. IT WAS SURREAL IN A SENSE. THERE WAS. I ALMOST DIDN’T BELIEVE IT, BUT NOW, A FEW DAYS LATER, EVERYTHING IS STARTING TO SLOWLY SET IN. DANIEL’S SON, ANDRE SANCHEZ, IS A SENIOR IN HIGH SCHOOL. HE’S NOT GOING TO SEE THE MAN THAT I’M BECOMING IN THE FUTURE, AND THAT RESONATES WITH ME ON AN ENTIRELY DIFFERENT LEVEL. HE SAYS HIS UPCOMING GRADUATION IS ONE MILESTONE HE WISHES HIS FATHER COULD BE HERE FOR. I’LL BE ABLE TO SEE ALL MY PEERS, AND AT THE END OF THE DAY, WHETHER PEOPLE LIKE TO ADMIT IT OR NOT, THAT’S GOING TO BE SOMETHING THAT I ENVY BECAUSE EVERYBODY ELSE IS GOING TO GET TO HAVE THEIR MOMENT WITH THEIR FAMILY. AND I’M NOT. OFFICIALS SAY SCHMIDT SINGH WAS ARRESTED AFTER DETECTIVES SEARCHED HIS HOME AND FOUND THE DODGE TRUCK IN HIS GARAGE, WITH EVIDENCE OF IT BEING INVOLVED IN THE CRASH WHILE HE TOOK ANOTHER MAN’S LIFE. AND HE’S WITH HIS FAMILY HAPPY. AND ALL OF OUR FAMILY IS GRIEVING. SINGH HAS SINCE BEEN RELEASED ON BAIL, LEAVING THE FAMILY QUESTIONING THE SYSTEM. I CAN’T IMAGINE THE TYPE OF LOSS YOU GUYS ARE GOING THROUGH AND WHAT THIS HAS DONE TO YOU AND YOUR FAMILY. WHAT WOULD HELP THIS SITUATION FOR YOU ALL? I HOPE THAT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT AND THE D.A., AT THE VERY LEAST, PUTS HIM BACK IN JAIL, AND I HOPE THAT THEY FOLLOW THROUGH WITH PRESSING CHARGES. AND THEY GIVE MY BOY SOME TYPE OF CLOSURE AND SOME TYPE OF JUSTICE FOR WHAT HAPPENED TO THEIR DAD. NOW THEY SHARE PHOTOS. WE’RE SO HAPPY TO BE A DAD. THE REASON I PLAYED FOOTBALL. REASON I PLAYED BASEBALL FOR AS LONG AS I DID IN SACRAMENTO COUNTY. HE DEFINITELY DI

    Family mourns father killed in Elk Grove hit-and-run

    A family is grieving the loss of Daniel Sanchez, who was killed in a hit-and-run while changing a tire, as the suspect has been released on bail.

    Updated: 11:19 PM PST Feb 7, 2026

    Editorial Standards

    A family in Sacramento County is grieving and frustrated after Daniel Sanchez, 61, was killed in a hit-and-run while changing a tire, and the suspect has been released on bail.Daniel’s son, 11-year-old Anthony Sanchez, expressed his sorrow, saying, “He’s not gonna be able to watch me like graduate or grow up, so it’s just sad to deal with it.” Angela Holguin, the mother of Daniel’s children, shared the difficulty of the situation, stating, “Knowing that it was a hit and run made it that much harder.” She recounted the moment she learned of the tragedy, saying, “She called me and I answered, and she was hysterically crying, and I just knew. So we cried on the phone together for about 20 minutes, maybe a half hour, but I had to pull it together, my kids are going to be waking up for school.”Holguin described the challenge of telling her children about their father’s death, saying, “As moms, we try our hardest to protect our kids from anything that would hurt them and it still happened; they still got hurt.”Daniel’s son, Andres Sanchez, a senior in high school, reflected on the loss, saying, “It was surreal in a sense. I almost didn’t believe it, but now, a few days later, everything is starting to slowly set in.”Andres expressed his sadness about his father missing important milestones, saying, “He’s not going to see the man that I’m becoming in the future, and that resonates with me on an entirely different level.” He added, “I’ll be able to see all my peers and at the end of the day, whether people like to admit it or not, that’s going to be something that I envy, because everybody else is going to get to have their moment with their family and I’m not.”Authorities arrested Kushmit Singh after detectives found the Dodge truck involved in the crash in his garage. Anthony Sanchez shared, “My grandma said to me to pray for him to get caught. I did. Three hours later, he actually got caught.” Despite the arrest, Singh has been released on bail, prompting Anthony to say, “He took another man’s life and he’s with his family happy and all of our family is grieving.”Angela Holguin expressed her hopes for justice, saying, “I hope that the police department and the DA, at the very least, put him back in jail and I hope that they follow through with pressing charges, and they give my boys some type of closure and some type of justice for what happened to their dad.” She shared memories of Daniel, saying, “He was so excited to be a dad,” while Andres added, “He’s the reason I played football, the reason I played baseball for as long as I did.”Holguin emphasized, “He definitely did not deserve to be killed,” and described Daniel as someone with “a good heart” who “always meant well for people.” Singh had his first court appearance yesterday and will be seen again on February 26 for further arraignment.See more coverage of top California stories here | Download our app | Subscribe to our morning newsletter | Find us on YouTube here and subscribe to our channel

    A family in Sacramento County is grieving and frustrated after Daniel Sanchez, 61, was killed in a hit-and-run while changing a tire, and the suspect has been released on bail.

    Daniel’s son, 11-year-old Anthony Sanchez, expressed his sorrow, saying, “He’s not gonna be able to watch me like graduate or grow up, so it’s just sad to deal with it.” Angela Holguin, the mother of Daniel’s children, shared the difficulty of the situation, stating, “Knowing that it was a hit and run made it that much harder.”

    She recounted the moment she learned of the tragedy, saying, “She [Daniel’s wife] called me and I answered, and she was hysterically crying, and I just knew. So we cried on the phone together for about 20 minutes, maybe a half hour, but I had to pull it together, my kids are going to be waking up for school.”

    Holguin described the challenge of telling her children about their father’s death, saying, “As moms, we try our hardest to protect our kids from anything that would hurt them and it still happened; they still got hurt.”

    Daniel’s son, Andres Sanchez, a senior in high school, reflected on the loss, saying, “It was surreal in a sense. I almost didn’t believe it, but now, a few days later, everything is starting to slowly set in.”

    Andres expressed his sadness about his father missing important milestones, saying, “He’s not going to see the man that I’m becoming in the future, and that resonates with me on an entirely different level.”

    He added, “I’ll be able to see all my peers [at graduation] and at the end of the day, whether people like to admit it or not, that’s going to be something that I envy, because everybody else is going to get to have their moment with their family and I’m not.”

    Authorities arrested Kushmit Singh after detectives found the Dodge truck involved in the crash in his garage. Anthony Sanchez shared, “My grandma said to me to pray for him to get caught. I did. Three hours later, he actually got caught.” Despite the arrest, Singh has been released on bail, prompting Anthony to say, “He took another man’s life and he’s with his family happy and all of our family is grieving.”

    Angela Holguin expressed her hopes for justice, saying, “I hope that the police department and the DA, at the very least, put him back in jail and I hope that they follow through with pressing charges, and they give my boys some type of closure and some type of justice for what happened to their dad.”

    She shared memories of Daniel, saying, “He was so excited to be a dad,” while Andres added, “He’s the reason I played football, the reason I played baseball for as long as I did.”

    Holguin emphasized, “He definitely did not deserve to be killed,” and described Daniel as someone with “a good heart” who “always meant well for people.” Singh had his first court appearance yesterday and will be seen again on February 26 for further arraignment.

    See more coverage of top California stories here | Download our app | Subscribe to our morning newsletter | Find us on YouTube here and subscribe to our channel

    Source link

  • Murder suspect had firearm charges dropped in 2020

    METHUEN — Five years ago, Anthony Nunez-Romano faced five weapons charges in Lawrence District Court, four of which were felonies.

    But for the 26-year-old Methuen resident now charged with murdering his mother, all five counts were dismissed in 2020, roughly a year after they were filed, court records reveal.

    This page requires Javascript.

    Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

    kAm~? %F6D52J[ }F?6K#@>2?@ H2D 324< 😕 {2HC6?46 s:DEC:4E r@FCE[ E9:D E:>6 244FD65 @7 <:==:?8 s@>:?82 #@>2?@[ dd[ H:E9 2 7:C62C>]k^Am

    kAmp DA@<6DA6CD@? 7@C E96 tDD6I r@F?EJ s:DEC:4E pEE@C?6J’D ~77:46 C67FD65 E@ 4@>>6?E @? E96 @FE4@>6 @7 E96 62C=:6C 492C86D @C 6G6? E96:C 6I:DE6?46[ C62D@?:?8 E92E E96J :?G@=G6 2? :?5:G:5F2= 😕 2? @?8@:?8 42D6]k^Am

    kAm|62?H9:=6[ }F?6K#@>2?@ C6>2:?D ;2:=65 2E E96 tDD6I r@F?EJ w@FD6 @7 r@CC64E:@?D 😕 |:55=6E@?[ @C56C65 3J 2 ;F586 E@ 36 96=5 H:E9@FE 32:=] w6 😀 492C865 H:E9 9:D >@E96C’D >FC56C 2?5 EH@ C6=2E65 H62A@?D 492C86D]k^Am

    kAm#@>2?@[ H9@ H@C<65 2E {2HC6?46 !F3=:4 $49@@=D 7@C >@C6 E92? 2 564256 [ H2D 7@F?5 5625 😕 E96 9@>6 D96 D92C65 H:E9 }F?6K#@>2?@ @? |@?52J] !@=:46 H6C6 4@?E24E65 E@ 4@?5F4E 2 H6==36:?8 4964< 2E E96 =@42E:@? @? {J?52=6 pG6?F6 2?5 7@F?5 96C 5625 H:E9 2AA2C6?E 8F?D9@E H@F?5D[ 244@C5:?8 E@ 2 A@=:46 C6A@CE]k^Am

    kAm(9:=6 :E 😀 F?4=62C 6I24E=J H92E 92AA6?65 😕 E96 62C=:6C 7:C62C>D 42D6D[ :?4=F5:?8 H96E96C E96J H6C6 C67:=65 😕 2?@E96C G6?F6 @C 5C@AA65[ 4@FCE C64@C5D :?5:42E6 2 AC@323=6 42FD6 962C:?8 – 2 C@FE:?6 AC6=:>:?2CJ 962C:?8 – H2D 7:CDE D6E 7@C y2?] a`[ a_a_] xE H2D E96? C6D4965F=65 7:G6 E:>6D[ 😕 A2CE 5F6 E@ E96 @?8@:?8 r~’xs`h A2?56>:4]k^Am

    kAmp7E6C 9:D 2CC2:8?>6?E 😕 E96 H62A@?D 42D6[ }F?6K#@>2?@ H2D @C56C65 E@ E96 tDD6I r@F?EJ w@FD6 @7 r@CC64E:@? A6?5:?8 2 52?86C@FD?6DD 962C:?8[ H9:49 H2D 96=5 E9C66 52JD =2E6C] sFC:?8 E92E 962C:?8[ 2 ;F586 7@F?5 E92E 96 H2D ?@E 2 E9C62E E@ E96 AF3=:4 2?5 C6=62D65 9:> @? A6CD@?2= C64@8?:K2?46] w6 C6>2:?65 7C66 7@C E96 C6>2:?56C @7 E96 42D6[ C64@C5D :?5:42E6]k^Am

    kAm%96 =2DE 52E6 D6E 7@C E96 AC@323=6 42FD6 962C:?8 H2D ~4E] a`[ a_a_[ E96 52J E96 42D6 H2D 5C@AA65 2?5 E96 “5676?52?E 5:D492C865]”k^Am

    kAm%96 7:G6 G@:565 492C86D 282:?DE }F?6K#@>2?@ :?4=F56 7:C62C>D EC277:4<:?8[ 42CCJ:?8 2 8F? H:E9@FE 2 =:46?D6 2?5 A@DD6DD:@? @7 2 =2C86 42A24:EJ 7:C62C>] %96 42D6 DE6>>65 7C@> 2 4@?EC@==65 3FJ @7 2? pzcf C:7=6 😕 pAC:= a_`g]k^Am

    kAmp? uqx C6A@CE 2EE24965 E@ E96 42D6 7:=6 😕 4@FCE 5@4F>6?ED C64@F?ED E96 :?G6DE:82E:@?[ H9:49 2=D@ :?G@=G65 w@>6=2?5 $64FC:EJ[ |2DD249FD6EED $E2E6 !@=:46 2?5 4@?7:56?E:2= :?7@C>2?ED]k^Am

    kAmsFC:?8 2 DE:?8 @A6C2E:@?[ E96 uqx AC@G:565 4@?7:56?E:2= :?7@C>2?ED H:E9 E96 ?646DD2CJ 42D9 – Sb[`__ 7C@> “@77:4:2= 286?4J 7F?5D” – 2D H6== 2D EH@ 56G:46D 42A23=6 @7 E2<:?8 2F5:@ 2?5 G:56@[ 286?ED D2:5]k^Am

    kAm%96 EC2?D24E:@? E@@< A=246 2E @C ?62C 2 9@>6 @? !9:==:A pG6?F6 😕 |6E9F6?[ H9:49[ 244@C5:?8 E@ E96 C6A@CE[ H2D E96 C6D:56?46 @7 }F?6K#@>2?@ 2E E96 E:>6]k^Am

    kAmx? 86?6C2=[ E96 562= H6?E D>@@E9=J[ 244@C5:?8 E@ E96 C6A@CE 3J :?G6DE:82E:?8 286?ED]k^Am

    kAm%96J >6?E:@? E92E 5FC:?8 E96 EC2?D24E:@?[ D@>6@?6 A@=:46 36=:6G65 E@ 36 E96 D:DE6C @7 2 A6CD@? :?G@=G65 😕 E96 562= 3682? J6==:?8 2E 96C 3C@E96C 7@C 9:D :?G@=G6>6?E]k^Am

    kAm%96 AFC492D6 :?4=F565 EH@ 7F==J =@2565 >282K:?6D[ @?6 42A23=6 @7 42CCJ:?8 a_ C@F?5D 2?5 E96 @E96C `d]k^Am

    kAmp7E6C E96 :?G6DE:82E:@?[ A@=:46 D9@H65 E96:C :?7@C>2?E A:4EFC6D @7 A@E6?E:2= DFDA64ED 2?5 2D<65 E96 A6CD@? E@ A:4< @FE C64@8?:K23=6 7246D] p44@C5:?8 E@ E96 C6A@CE[ E96 :?7@C>2?E 72:=65 E@ A:4< @FE }F?6K#@>2?@] %96 C6A@CE 5@6D ?@E6 E92E 3@E9 2 DFDA64E 2?5 }F?6K#@>2?@ H@C6 8=2DD6D]k^Am

    kAm!@=:46 =2E6C :56?E:7:65 E96 D6==6C @7 E96 H62A@? 2D 2 >6>36C @7 E96 %C:?:E2C:@D v2?8[ :?G6DE:82E@CD D2:5] xE’D F?4=62C H92E C@=6 A@=:46 2==6865 }F?6K#@>2?@[ H9@ H2D `g 2E E96 E:>6[ A=2J65 😕 E96 EC2?D24E:@?k^Am

    kAm%96 492C86 @7 EC277:4<:?8 36EH66? @?6 2?5 EH@ 7:C62C>D 42CC:6D 2 >2I:>F> D6?E6?46 @7 `_ J62CD 😕 AC:D@?[ 2D H6== 2D 2 A@E6?E:2= 7:?6 @7 F?56C Sd_[___[ 244@C5:?8 E@ E96 42D6 7:=6] %96 492C86 @7 42CCJ:?8 2 7:C62C> H:E9@FE 2 =:46?D6 42CC:6D 2 >:?:>F> D6?E6?46 @7 b_ >@?E9D 😕 DE2E6 AC:D@? @C `g >@?E9D 😕 2 ;2:= @C 9@FD6 @7 4@CC64E:@?D]k^Am

    kAmx? 2 A@=:46 C6A@CE E:65 E@ E96 4FCC6?E >FC56C 42D6[ :?G6DE:82E@CD 4:E6 4@?G6CD2E:@?D H:E9 72>:=J >6>36CD @7 }F?6K#@>2?@[ H9@ C2:D6 4@?46C?D 23@FE 9:D >6?E2= 962=E9] t2C=:6C E9:D H66<[ 9:D D:DE6C E@=5 2FE9@C:E:6D 96C 3C@E96C H2D 5:28?@D65 H:E9 D49:K@A9C6?:2]k^Am

    By Teddy Tauscher | Staff Writer

    Source link

  • Prominent California farmer charged with killing estranged wife held on $5.5-million bail

    A prominent Imperial Valley farmer charged with killing his estranged wife was extradited to Arizona on Tuesday, where bail has been set at $5.5 million.

    Michael Abatti, 63, was arrested on Dec. 23 for allegedly killing Kerri Ann Abatti, 59. He pleaded not guilty to a charge of first-degree murder on Wednesday in Navajo County Superior Court.

    An Imperial County Sheriff’s Office booking mugshot of Michael Abatti.

    (Imperial County Sheriff’s Office)

    Once bail is posted, Abatti will be allowed to return to El Centro — where he lives and where he can receive ongoing medical treatments, according to his attorneys, Owen Roth and Danielle Iredale. He is required to surrender his passport, and will be allowed limited travel to Arizona and Wyoming, where the Abattis own property.

    Kerri Abatti was shot in her home in the Arizona town of Pinetop-Lakeside at around 9 p.m. on Nov. 20, authorities say. An autopsy report shows she was shot once in the head. The shot came from outside her house and went through a window.

    Her nephew found her after hearing a loud bang, and called 911, according to autopsy reports. She died while being taken to a hospital in Show Low, which is roughly 10 miles from Pinetop-Lakeside.

    According to the couple’s divorce filings, the Abattis had been embroiled in a bitter feud about the amount of financial spousal support Kerri Abatti was owed following the separation. Kerri Abatti left her husband and their El Centro home in August 2023 after 31 years of marriage.

    While he was on a fishing trip, she left for Pinetop-Lakeside, where the couple owned a 7,000 sq. ft. home on a 14-acre lot.

    Kerri Abatti grew up in Pinetop-Lakeside; it is where her parents, siblings and extended family reside.

    The couple have three adult children who live in California and Nevada.

    Photos of Michael Abatti taken Wednesday in Navajo County show him shirtless and wearing a suicide vest.

    His attorneys told The Times on Monday that he had surrendered to authorities in El Centro when he learned of the arrest warrant. He also waived his right to extradition.

    At a press conference on Monday, Navajo County Sheriff David Clouse told reporters his detectives “had strong reason to believe that Mr. Abatti had traveled from El Centro, Calif., on Nov. 20 to Pinetop, Ariz., committed the homicide and traveled back to California.”

    A pre-trial conference and release hearing is scheduled for March 17 in Navajo County.

    Susanne Rust, Alex Wigglesworth

    Source link

  • Police/Fire: Man charged in Rockport carjacking attempt

    ROCKPORT — A New Hampshire man is being held without bail, accused of attempting to trying to a Rockport resident’s vehicle by force.

    Todd Andrew Wilbur, 42, of Derry, N.H., was arrested at 6:46 a.m. Wednesday on Story Street on charges of carjacking and assault and battery, according to a police log entry.

    This page requires Javascript.

    Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

    kAm(:=3FC H2D 2CC2:8?65 😕 v=@F46DE6C s:DEC:4E r@FCE 27E6C 9:D 2CC6DE 2?5 A=62565 ?@E 8F:=EJ] ~? %9FCD52J[ 96 H2D 36:?8 96=5 H:E9@FE 32:= AC:@C E@ 2 52?86C@FD?6DD 962C:?8 D4965F=65 7@C }@G] ac]k^Am

    Source link

  • Cashless bail explained: What it is, how it works and why Trump is targeting it

    When President Donald Trump signed an executive order last month threatening to withhold federal funding from states and localities that have adopted “cashless bail” policies, he escalated a national fight over how courts decide who should remain behind bars before trial.

    The move has already rippled into state capitols. In North Carolina, Republican lawmakers are considering legislation this week that would tighten pretrial release rules after a high-profile fatal stabbing on a commuter train last month.


    SIGN UP HERE to get PhillyVoice’s free newsletters delivered to your inbox


    The bill, which was first introduced in March and altered earlier this week with the title “Iryna’s Law,” would require people to post money bail for certain offenses and would restrict judicial discretion for violent and repeat offenders. The bill also would add a new category of violent offenses that require specific pretrial conditions, such as electronic monitoring. It passed the state Senate on Monday.

    “When we were looking at drafting this bill, a lot of it was looking at the situation that happened in Charlotte,” said North Carolina state Sen. Danny Britt, a Republican and criminal defense attorney, to WRAL-TV.

    In New York, Republican lawmakers are pushing to advance legislation that would further limit pretrial release and allow judges to weigh a defendant’s “dangerousness” in setting conditions. New York ended bail for most misdemeanors and nonviolent felonies in 2019, but has since scaled back the law at least three times to allow judges more discretion.

    And in Texas — where legislators passed new bail restrictions earlier this summer — voters in November will consider a constitutional amendment banning bail altogether in certain cases for violent offenses such as murder, aggravated assault and indecency with a child.

    Trump signed the cashless bail order three days after Iryna Zarutska, a 23-year-old Ukrainian refugee, was killed in a seemingly random stabbing in Charlotte, North Carolina. The suspect, who has a lengthy criminal record, had been released without bond last winter after being charged with misusing the 911 system.

    Trump’s order directs U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi to identify which jurisdictions have “substantially eliminated cash bail,” though it does not define what that means — leaving its scope and enforcement unclear. Some legal experts say they expect challenges in court, as has happened with previous efforts to tie federal funding to state or local policies.

    Trump issued the directive alongside another order aimed at Washington, D.C., where he declared a “crime emergency” and sought to roll back the city’s decades-old bail law. The district did not fully eliminate cash bail when it passed its Bail Reform Act in 1992, but judges are required to consider nonfinancial conditions — such as electronic monitoring, curfews or check-ins — before setting a monetary bond.

    Trump’s orders are part of his broader crackdown on crime and public safety, which has also included deploying the National Guard to Memphis, Tennessee; Washington, D.C., and Los Angeles.

    Same charge, different outcomes

    Cash bail is a guarantee to show up to court: A defendant pays money and is allowed to go home. At the end of their case, they may get the money back. A judge or magistrate may set the amount based on the severity of the charge and whether the defendant is considered a flight or safety risk.

    But someone unable to pay the bail, even after being charged with a low-level misdemeanor, may remain in jail for days, weeks or months. Defendants by law are presumed innocent, but stuck behind bars, they can lose jobs or housing and be unable to care for their family.

    Dozens of jurisdictions, including some states, have taken steps to change their bail systems, but there is no single definition of what constitutes “bail reform” or how such changes are applied.

    Some states, counties and cities have moved toward fully or nearly eliminating, cash bail. Under these “cashless bail” systems, people may be released before trial without paying money unless a judge determines they pose a public safety risk or are unlikely to return to court. These decisions, experts say, are made intentionally, based on the facts of the case — including the charges involved — rather than on a defendant’s ability to pay.

    The policies can affect a large share of the people in the justice system. About 5 million felony cases and 13 million misdemeanor cases are resolved in state courts each year, according to the National Center for State Courts. Since misdemeanors make up the bulk of cases, state and local bail policies can shape outcomes for millions of people charged with lower-level offenses.

    Some opponents of cashless bail policies argue that lenient policies may result in the release of defendants who could reoffend or fail to appear. Supporters counter that keeping people in jail simply because they cannot afford bail is unfair and disproportionately affects Black, Latino and low-income defendants.

    The ongoing debate has fueled misconceptions, partly because some news coverage repeats unproven claims that cashless bail policies cause upticks in crime.

    Trump has frequently drawn that connection himself. In a July post on Truth Social, he wrote: “Crime in American Cities started to significantly rise when they went to CASHLESS BAIL. The WORST criminals are flooding our streets and endangering even our great law enforcement officers. It is a complete disaster, and must be ended, IMMEDIATELY!”

    Supporters of cash bail often raise concerns that released suspects might commit new, potentially more serious crimes. While that is possible in individual cases, some research suggests that eliminating cash bail does not lead to a widespread increase in crime. Some research also suggests that setting money bail isn’t effective in ensuring court appearances or improving public safety.

    How the bail system works

    Washington, D.C., the immediate target of Trump’s executive orders, largely eliminated the use of cash bail in 1992. Judges are required to first consider nonfinancial conditions, such as check-ins or curfews, though cash bail may still be used in serious cases.

    Several states also have adopted major changes. Alaska, California, Illinois, New Jersey and New York have passed laws scaling back or fully eliminating cash bail, though some of those laws have since been revised.

    In 2016, New Mexico voters overwhelmingly approved a constitutional amendment that limited the use of cash bail. Judges may impose a cash bond if they determine it is necessary either to ensure a defendant returns to court or because the person poses a public safety risk.

    In 2023, Illinois became the first state to fully abolish cash bail through the Pretrial Fairness Act, which also guarantees defendants legal representation at pretrial hearings.

    “Those early decisions about someone’s liberty are much more deliberative,” said Don Steman, a professor and co-director of the Center for Criminal Justice at Loyola University Chicago. The center’s team has been evaluating the implementation and impact of the Pretrial Fairness Act. “It’s about, ‘Is this person a threat to public safety or a threat to willful flight?’”

    In Houston, a 2019 settlement and consent decree resolved a lawsuit challenging Harris County’s misdemeanor bail practices as unconstitutional, requiring the county to release most people charged with misdemeanors on a personal promise to return to court.

    In the latest independent monitoring report, from 2024, observers wrote that the changes “have saved Harris County and residents many millions of dollars, improved the lives of tens of thousands of persons,” and resulted in “no increase in new offenses by persons arrested for misdemeanors.”

    In August, just a day after Trump issued his executive order, Texas Republican Attorney General Ken Paxton asked a federal court to vacate the consent decree.

    He argued that the order conflicts with a Texas law passed in 2021 and another state bail law that took effect this month. Those laws require people charged with violent crimes in Texas to post cash bail in order to be released from jail, and expand the list of offenses for which defendants must post a cash bond, respectively.


    This story was originally produced by Stateline, which is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network which includes Pennsylvania Capital-Star, and is supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity.

    Amanda Hernández, Pennsylvania Capital-Star

    Source link

  • Cash bail doesn’t reduce crime — or make us safer

    In most places in America, people have long had the right, if accused of a crime, to buy their freedom back from the government. Cash bail — the requirement that a person who has been arrested pay the court money in order to secure their own release while charges are pending — is a norm in the U.S., making us one of only two countries in the world with a for-profit bail industry.  

    Among a flurry of other potentially unenforceable or unconstitutional executive actions, President Donald Trump recently issued an executive order to undo state and local bail reforms. Specifically, he is pushing back on the move by some jurisdictions to end the antiquated practice of cash bail.  Trump has framed the policy as “tough on crime,” but the data reveals cash bail to actually be dumb on crime. Eliminating cash bail improves safety and stability for both people who are arrested and the community at large, while reinstating it deepens cycles of harm that extend beyond the jailed person and their families, impacting all of us.

    Of the more than five million people booked into local jails annually, 80% have not been convicted of any crime. Instead, they are being jailed  while legally innocent — accused, but unable to afford their freedom. This is because cash bail remains the dominant form of pretrial release. A judge orders a person to pay a certain amount of money, which they can have back if and when they successfully return to court. But all too often, that amount is out of reach for the people our system impacts, who are largely very poor. After all, the vast majority of people accused of crimes are so poor they are assigned public defenders for legal representation.

    For about a decade of my life, I was one of those public defenders. Standing up in front of judges, I asked them to consider the fallout that would result to the community I served if they were to set unpayable cash bail for my clients. A mom separated from her infant while still nursing. A man who would miss the first day of a new job he had been trying to get for over a year. A grandson who wouldn’t be able to take his grandmother to dialysis three times a week. A retiree who urgently needed daily medication, which the jail was unlikely to provide until it took its time to re-diagnose her and re-prescribe its own medication regimen, which then may or may not work. 

    Day in and day out, judges would ask “How much can she afford?” Implicit in this question was a requirement for me to put a price tag on each person I represented. One judge, upon hearing my argument that an unemployed man with severe cardiac issues should be released so he would not risk death in jail, replied, “Counselor, it’s only $300.” To my client, $300 might as well have been a million. 

    These days, as a person working to improve our court system and understand what really creates safety, the lunacy of cash bail is more than apparent. Jailing people before trial doesn’t actually improve public safety. One study showed that incarcerating someone for only two to three days before making bail and being released could result in their being 40% more likely to commit new crimes than similar people held for only 24 hours before they were bailed out. Another study revealed that people who were locked up for seven days or longer were 39% more likely to be arrested for new crimes and 31% more likely to be arrested for new violent offenses than someone locked up for only a day. Both studies carefully ensured they were comparing apples to apples — the only difference between the studied groups was the length of their exposure to a jail, causing researchers to conclude that jail itself is “criminogenic.”

    It makes sense. Jail causes people to lose their jobs, medicines and access to stabilizing influences like family and religious groups. It exposes people to violence almost daily, and it is inherently traumatizing. But proponents of cash bail argue that shooting ourselves in the foot on safety is necessary, because cash bail is the best way we have to ensure that people don’t evade answering accusations or flee the court’s jurisdiction. 

    Bail, though, didn’t originate as a smart incentive structure to ensure court appearances. It dates from Anglo-Saxon England, prior to the Norman invasion of 1066 — from a time when many punishments for crime were monetary. Paying bail enabled someone to receive their punishment up front rather than be detained to answer for it, and then, if they were found not guilty, they could have the money back. But after the Norman invasion, William the Conqueror brought with him harsh physical punishments for crime instead of monetary recompense, dramatically increasing the incentive to flee the courts, and resulting, by the 13th century, in a formalized bail structure in England.

    Want more sharp takes on politics? Sign up for our free newsletter, Standing Room Only, written by Amanda Marcotte, now also a weekly show on YouTube or wherever you get your podcasts.

    When societies use bail, they eventually realize a couple of things. First, high bail can — and will — be used to jail legally innocent people indefinitely. Second, tying liberty to wealth — and allowing other people to profit off the provision of liberty, thereby creating a cottage industry of freedom loans — is morally repugnant. The time scales for this recognition can be very different, though. England established that unpayable bail should not be utilized back in 1689 before finally banning a commercial bail industry in 1976.

    But here in the U.S., we wholeheartedly embraced liberty for sale, and these days, the very type of bail industry banned in England brings in $2 billion per year. By and large, this is money coming out of the pockets of poor families, and for little reason: Jurisdictions  that have banned cash bail have discovered that eliminating it does not increase crime at all. Judges are still deciding whether a person is safe to go home; the only difference is that now no one can pay their way out of that determination. What’s even better? Eliminating cash bail had other excellent downstream effects. It reduced racial disparities and allowed more people to be found not guilty of their charges, likely because they were not being ground down into false guilty pleas by endless pretrial detention. 

    And even without cash bail, people did a perfectly good job returning to court. Something as simple as a phone call reminder can increase court appearances by 42%, probably because more people forget their court dates than actively evade them — a figure borne out by local community bail funds, which have reported over 90% return-to-court rates with the people they bail out at no charge and support during their court case. While using reminders of this kind, these people are also able to experience the myriad other benefits of remaining at liberty — keeping their jobs, continuing to be productive members of the community, paying their rent so they don’t lose their housing and tucking their kids into bed at night. 

    This order from the president, like so many others, is a form of theater. Security theater, in this case, that prioritizes a retributive desire to see people jailed rather than a smart, data-oriented understanding that the justice system of Norman England left a lot to be desired, and that, these days, we can get better results with less carceral horror. 

    In other words, without cash bail, judges still have the freedom to detain people they deem dangerous. And for the rest of the millions of people cycling through American courts, eliminating cash bail means that no matter how rich or poor they are, people can make smarter, more tailored arrangements with the court system that enable them to live their lives, not be forced to plead guilty (a huge win for due process) and still meet any obligations the court places upon them. All this would mark a strong step towards a fairer and more just society. 

    The post Cash bail doesn’t reduce crime — or make us safer appeared first on Salon.com.

    Source link

  • 86-year-old man nearly loses $10k in bail scam; Police share what to look out for

    An 86-year-old man nearly lost $10,000 in a bail scam before police stepped in.

    [DOWNLOAD: Free WHIO-TV News app for alerts as news breaks]

    News Center 7’s Mason Fletcher talks to police about how they got the man’s money back LIVE on News Center 7 at 11:00.

    TRENDING STORIES:

    Police said the man got a phone call on Aug. 29 from an unknown person claiming to be his son, who said he had been arrested for a car accident involving a pregnant woman and needed $10,000 for bail.

    Englewood Police Detective Tim Corcoran said this is a common tactic.

    “They’ll call. They’ll talk real low. They’ll act like they’re crying and all in the hopes of pulling the emotions of the person they’re calling,” he said.

    A second caller, posing as a court employee, instructed the resident on how to pay the money. The victim handed an envelope full of $10,000 cash to a courier who later arrived at his home.

    “No court system will ever call you and ask you for money over the phone,” Corcoran said.

    The man believed the call, put the cash in an envelope, and gave it to a Lyft driver sent by the scammer.

    News Center 7 will continue to follow this story.

    [SIGN UP: WHIO-TV Daily Headlines Newsletter]

    Source link

  • Timeline of events in Fitzsimmons case

    A timeline for the case of North Andover police officer Kelsey Fitzsimmons, 28.

    Feb. 16: Fitzsimmons gives birth to her son with fiance Justin Aylaian, a North Andover firefighter, and takes maternity leave.


    This page requires Javascript.

    Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

    kAmkDEC@?8m|2C49 hik^DEC@?8m }@CE9 p?5@G6C A@=:46 C6DA@?5 E@ u:EKD:>>@?D’ 9@>6 2E `ad !9:==:AD qC@@2=6 92G:?8 2 >6?E2= 962=E9 6A:D@56]” $96 😀 7@F?5 😕 E96 9@FD6 2?5 H:==:?8 E@ 8@ E@ 2 9@DA:E2=] u:EKD:>>@?D H2D EC2?DA@CE65 E@ {2HC6?46 v6?6C2= w@DA:E2= H96C6 D96 H2D 96=5 @? 2 $64E:@? `a @C56C 7@C >6?E2= 962=E9 :DDF6D 2?5 5:28?@D65 H:E9 A@DEA2CEF> 56AC6DD:@?]k^Am

    kAmkDEC@?8m|2C49 `_ik^DEC@?8m u:EKD:>>@?D 😀 5:D492C865 7C@> E96 9@DA:E2= 2?5 G@=F?E2C:=J 4@?E24E65 E96 }@CE9 p?5@G6C !@=:46 s6A2CE>6?E E@ EFC? @G6C 96C A6CD@?2= 2?5 56A2CE>6?E:DDF65 7:C62C>D[ 244@C5:?8 E@ 4@FCE 5@4F>6?ED]k^Am

    kAmkDEC@?8m|2C49 `bik^DEC@?8m }@CE9 p?5@G6C !@=:46 s6A2CE>6?E DFDA6?5D 96C 8F? A6C>:E 27E6C E96 56A2CE>6?E 56E6C>:?65 D96 H2D F?DF:E23=6 E@ 42CCJ 2 H62A@?] p3@FE E9:D E:>6[ u:EKD:>>@?D 😀 A=2465 @? 25>:?:DEC2E:G6 =62G6]k^Am

    kAmkDEC@?8m|2J eik^DEC@?8m u:EKD:>>@?D 7:=65 2 A6E:E:@? 2AA62=:?8 }@CE9 p?5@G6C A@=:46 r9:67 r92C=6D vC2J’D 564:D:@? E@ DFDA6?5 96C 8F? A6C>:E] $96 2C8F6D :E H2D C6G@<65 5F6 E@ 2 `a9@FC >6?E2= 962=E9C6=2E65 9@DA:E2=:K2E:@?[ 244@C5:?8 E@ 4@FCE 5@4F>6?ED]k^Am

    kAmkDEC@?8myF?6 `gik^DEC@?8m }@CE9 p?5@G6C A@=:46 {E] |:4926= s2G:D D6?E 2 =6EE6C E@ {2HC6?46 s:DEC:4E r@FCE DE2E:?8 u:EKD:>>@?D H2D 4=62C65 3J 2 >65:42= AC@76DD:@?2= E@ C6EFC? E@ 5FEJ] w6 D2:5 96C =:46?D6 E@ 42CCJ 7:C62C>D H2D C6:?DE2E65 3J E96 56A2CE>6?E]k^Am

    kAmkDEC@?8myF?6 agahik^DEC@?8m p=J2:2?’D 277:52G:E 2==686D 96 H2D 😕 |2:?6 H:E9 u:EKD:>>@?D 7@C E96 H66<6?5] ~? yF?6 ag[ pJ=2:2? D2:5 u:EKD:>>@?D A9JD:42==J 23FD65 9:> 3J DEC:<:?8 9:> E9C66 E:>6D 😕 E96 7246 H:E9 2 4=@D65 7:DE]k^Am

    kAmw6 D2:5 E96 A9JD:42= 23FD6 E@H2C5 9:> =67E 9:> 😕 762C 7@C 9:D =:76 2?5 😕 762C @7 D6C:@FD A9JD:42= 92C> E@H2C5 9:> 2?5 9:D 323J E92E A@E6?E:2==J 4@F=5 36 :?7=:4E65 3J u:EKD:>>@?D] x? E96 4@>A=2:?E[ pJ=2:2? 4=2:>D 2 A2EE6C? @7 4@?46C?:?8 3692G:@C @? E96 A2CE @7 u:EKD:>>@?D 2?5 96 D66@?E9@=5 49:=5]k^Am

    kAmkDEC@?8myF?6 b_ik^DEC@?8m pJ=2:2? 7:=65 2? 23FD6 AC6G6?E:@? @C56C C6BF6DE 😕 tDD6I !C@32E6 2?5 u2>:=J r@FCE] pE cib` A]>][ E96 C6DEC2:?:?8 @C56C H2D :DDF65 E@ }@CE9 p?5@G6C A@=:46]k^Am

    kAmpJ=2:2? 2==6865=J >@G6D @FE[ 244@C5:?8 E@ 2 4@FCE 5@4F>6?E] $E2E6>6?ED 7C@> u:EKD:>>@?D 2?5 96C 2EE@C?6J[ %:>@E9J qC25=[ D2J D96 H2D :?G:E65 E@ 2 =@42= A2C< 3J pJ=2:2? 😕 E96 27E6C?@@? E@ H@C< @? E96:C AC@3=6>D] u:EKD:>>@?D 4=2:>65 D96 C6EFC?65 9@>6 27E6C pJ=2:2? 5:5 ?@E D9@H FA]k^Am

    kAmp3@FE e A]>][ E9C66 }@CE9 p?5@G6C A@=:46 @77:46CD 2CC:G65 2E 96C 9@>6 E@ D6CG6 96C 2 C6DEC2:?:?8 @C56C E92E :?4=F565 u:EKD:>>@?D EFC?:?8 @G6C 4FDE@5J @7 E96 49:=5]k^Am

    kAmp? 2C>65 4@?7C@?E2E:@? @44FCC65 H96? u:EKD:>>@?D H2D 36:?8 6D4@CE:?8 3J 2 C6DA@?5:?8 @77:46C 2?5 D96 H2D DECF4< 3J 2 8F?D9@E[ 2FE9@C:E:6D D2:5] u:EKD:>>@?D C646:G65 >65:42= 2DD:DE2?46 367@C6 D96 H2D 7=@H? E@ 2 q@DE@? 9@DA:E2=]k^Am

    kAmkDEC@?8myF=J `ik^DEC@?8m pJ=2:2? 7:=65 7@C D@=6 4FDE@5J @7 E96 49:=5 😕 tDD6I !C@32E6 2?5 u2>:=J r@FCE]k^Am

    kAmkDEC@?8myF=J `ik^DEC@?8m tDD6I r@F?EJ s:DEC:4E pEE@C?6J !2F= %F4<6C 2?5 }@CE9 p?5@G6C A@=:46 r9:67 r92C=6D vC2J 96=5 2 AC6DD 4@?76C6?46] %F4<6C D2:5 E9C66 @77:46CD[ :?4=F5:?8 2 DFA6CG:D@C[ 2?5 u:EKD:>>@?D H6C6 😕 E96 9@FD6] w6 D2:5 u:EKD:>>@?D H2D DE23=6 😕 2 q@DE@? 9@DA:E2= 2?5 DE2E6 A@=:46 56E64E:G6D 7C@> 9:D @77:46 H6C6 92?5=:?8 E96 :?G6DE:82E:@? 2?5 =@@<:?8 E@ D66 :7 G:56@ 7@@E286 6I:DE65] vC2J D2:5 9:D 56A2CE>6?E 5@6D ?@E H62C 3@5J 42>6C2D]k^Am

    kAmkDEC@?8myF=J bik^DEC@?8m ~77:46C !2EC:4< }@@?2?[ H9@ D9@E u:EKD:>>@?D[ H2D AFE @? 25>:?:DEC2E:G6 =62G6[ 244@C5:?8 E@ s2G:D]k^Am

    kAmkDEC@?8myF=J `_ik^DEC@?8m %96 s:DEC:4E pEE@C?6J’D ~77:46 4@?7:C>65 u:EKD:>>@?D H2D 492C865 H:E9 2C>65 2DD2F=E H:E9 :?E6?E E@ >FC56C 2?5 EH@ 4@F?ED @7 2DD2F=E H:E9 2 5625=J H62A@?]k^Am

    kAmkDEC@?8myF=J hik^DEC@?8m %:>@E9J qC25= 😀 9:C65 2D 5676?D6 2EE@C?6J 7@C u:EKD:>>@?D]k^Am

    kAmkDEC@?8myF=J `dik^DEC@?8m %96 |2DD249FD6EED !6246 ~77:46C $E2?52C5D 2?5 %C2:?:?8 r@>>:DD:@? @C56C65 u:EKD:>>@?D E@ DFCC6?56C 2?J H@C<:DDF65 862C 2?5 96C 8F?]k^Am

    kAmkDEC@?8myF=J `fk^DEC@?8mi u:EKD:>>@?D :DDF65 2 AF3=:4 DE2E6>6?E 7C@> 96C 9@DA:E2= 365[ 4=2:>:?8 D96 2EE6>AE65 E@ <:== 96CD6=7 2?5 ?6G6C A@:?E65 E96 8F? 2E 2? @77:46C]k^Am

    kAmkDEC@?8mpF8] fik^DEC@?8m u:EKD:>>@?D 😀 2CC2:8?65[ 7C@> E96 9@DA:E2=[ 😕 {2HC6?46 s:DEC:4E r@FCE @? E9C66 492C86Di 2C>65 2DD2F=E H:E9 :?E6?E E@ >FC56C 2?5 EH@ 4@F?ED @7 2DD2F=E H:E9 2 5625=J H62A@?] %96 ;F586 @C56C65 96C 4@>>:EE65 2?5 96=5 H:E9@FE 32:=]k^Am

    kAmp DE2E6 A@=:46 C6A@CE 😀 >256 AF3=:4 😕 {2HC6?46 s:DEC:4E r@FCE] %96 C6A@CE :?4=F56D :?E6CG:6HD 7C@> E96 E9C66 C6DA@?5:?8 @77:46CD 2?5 2==686 u:EKD:>>@?D A@:?E65 96C 8F? 2E ~77:46C !2EC:4< }@@?2?] %96 C6A@CE 2==686D EH@ @77:46CD H6?E FADE2:CD H:E9 u:EKD:>>@?D 2D D96 82E96C65 4=@E9:?8 7@C 96C 49:=5] (96? pJ=2:2? 2?5 u:EKD:>>@?D’ >@E96C D9@H65 FA[ 2? @77:46C H6?E 5@H?DE2:CD[ =62G:?8 96C 2=@?6 H:E9 }@@?2?] u:EKD:>>@?D 😀 D2:5 E@ 92G6 =F?865 369:?5 2 5@@C 2?5 2:>65 2 8F? 2E }@@?2?] (96? D96 H6?E E@ C6=@25 E96 8F?[ }@@?2? D2:5 96 D9@E 96C]k^Am

    kAm%96 C6A@CE 2=D@ 56E2:=D 9@H u:EKD:>>@?D C6A@CE65=J E@=5 E96 @77:46CD 2== 96C 7:C62C>D H6C6 D64FC65 😕 E96 32D6>6?E]k^Am

    kAmkDEC@?8mpF8] “ik^DEC@?8m u:EKD:>>@?D 2?5 qC25= 7:=65 2 32:= A6E:E:@? @7 E96 {2HC6?46 s:DEC:4E r@FCE ;F586’D 564:D:@?]k^Am

    kAmkDEC@?8mpF8] `cik^DEC@?8m p? tDD6I r@F?EJ $FA6C:@C r@FCE ;F586 96=5 2 52?86C@FD?6DD 962C:?8 E@ E2<6 96C 32:= A6E:E:@? F?56C 25G:D6>6?E] u:EKD:>>@?D 2AA62C65 7C@> 96C |2DD249FD6EED v6?6C2= w@DA:E2= 365]k^Am

    kAmkDEC@?8mpF8] `dik^DEC@?8m %96 tDD6I r@F?EJ $FA6C:@C r@FCE ;F586 56?:65 96C 32:= 2AA62=] u:EKD:>>@?D C6>2:?65 96=5 H:E9@FE 32:=]k^Am

    kAmkDEC@?8mpF8] `gik^DEC@?8m u:EKD:>>@?D 7:=65 2 D64@?5 32:= 2AA62=] $96 😀 5:D492C865 7C@> E96 9@DA:E2= >:5H66<[ 244@C5:?8 E@ qC25=[ 2?5 4@>>:EE65 E@ E96 (6DE6C? |2DD249FD6EED #68:@?2= (@>6?’D r@CC64E:@?2= r6?E6C 😕 r9:4@A66]k^Am

    kAmkDEC@?8mpF8] adik^DEC@?8m %96 D2>6 tDD6I r@F?EJ $FA6C:@C r@FCE ;F586 56?:65 E96 32:= C6BF6DE 282:?] p 8C2?5 ;FCJ :?5:4E65 u:EKD:>>@?D @? 2 4@F?E @7 2DD2F=E 3J >62?D @7 2 52?86C@FD H62A@?]k^Am

    kAmkDEC@?8mpF8] agik^DEC@?8m u:EKD:>>@?D 2AA62CD 😕 tDD6I r@F?EJ $FA6C:@C r@FCE 7@C 2CC2:8?>6?E] yF586 @C56C65 96C C6=62D6 E@ 96C A2C6?ED’ 4FDE@5J H:E9 v!$ >@?:E@C65[ ac^f 9@>6 4@?7:?6>6?E H:E9 ?@ 4@?E24E H:E9 96C 49:=5] %96 C6=62D6 :?4=F565 `_ 4@?5:E:@?D E@ 6?DFC6 E96 4@>>F?:EJ’D D276EJ[ A6?5:?8 2 9@>6 :?DA64E:@? 2?5 4C:>:?2= 324<8C@F?5 4964>@?D 😀 D6E E@ 36 C6=62D65 uC:52J]k^Am

    By Angelina Berube | aberube@eagletribune.com

    Source link

  • Trump’s Unconstitutional Plan to Penalize States that Allow Cashless Bail

    NA

    President Trump recently issued an executive order directing the Justice Department to penalize jurisdictions that allow cashless bail, by withholding federal funds from them:

    On Monday, President Donald Trump, who has called cashless bail a “government-backed crime spree,” signed an executive order to end the policy nationwide. The order restricts the allocation of “Federal policies and resources” to jurisdictions and states with cashless bail policies for “crimes that pose a clear threat to public safety and order.” It tasks Attorney General Pam Bondi with creating a list of such jurisdictions within 30 days, at which point the federal funds of these jurisdictions may be suspended or terminated.

    Like a number of other Trump policies, this is simultaneously an attack on federalism and an attempt to usurp Congress’ spending power. Supreme Court precedent – most of it authored by conservative justices – holds that only Congress can impose conditions on state and local governments receiving federal grants, and those conditions must be clearly stated in the statutes allocating the funds. There are a number of other constitutional constraints on grant conditions, as well.

    This issue has come up most often with Trump’s efforts to use grant conditions to coerce sanctuary cities, which limit state and local law enforcement assistance to federal immigration enforcement operations.  See my Texas Law Review article on the numerous defeats Trump suffered in his first term, on this issue. That has continued with several court decisions ruling against similar attempts to coerce sanctuary cities in his second term (see my analyses here, here, and here).

    As noted in my  November 2024 post on sanctuary cities and conditional grants,  longstanding Supreme Court precedent holds that conditions on federal grants must 1) be enacted and clearly indicated by Congress (the executive cannot impose its own grant conditions), 2) be related to the purposes of the grant in question, and 3) they must not be “coercive.”

    All of these constraints apply to Trump’s attack on cashless bail, as well. Few, if any, federal grants have congressionally enacted conditions restricting cashless bail. And if we are talking about grants that are not closely linked to law enforcement purposes, imposing such conditions would violate the relatedness requirement. And if Trump wants to pull all or most grants from such jurisdictions, that is likely to violate the admittedly vague “coercion” constraint.

    In addition, this is an attempt to insert the federal government in a core traditional area of state and local authority. Few powers are more central to state and local autonomy than control over state criminal law enforcement. I’m old enough to remember a time when conservatives cared about limiting federal intrusion on areas of state autonomy. This is a pretty blatant example.

    This order should also be seen in the context of Trump’s broader assault on Congress’s fiscal authority. The Constitution clearly gives Congress, not the executive, power over taxation and spending. Yet Trump has sought to impose unilateral executive conditions on grants, withheld funds allocated by Congress,  usurped authority over tariffs on a massive scale, and imposed unconstitutional export taxes. This bail measure is yet another usurpation.

    The Framers of the Constitution rightly wanted to avoid giving power or taxation and spending to any one man. They remembered the abuses of monarchs such as Charles I. We would do well to heed that wisdom, too.

    The courts have, in many cases, curbed Trump’s fiscal power grabs. But Congress should also act. Sadly, the GOP congressional leadership has largely either ignored Trump’s usurpation of legislative authority or actively applauded them.

    Unlike in the case of sanctuary cities, which I have long defended on a variety of grounds, I don’t have much in the way of strong views on bail policy, and am not an expert on the subject. But the issue of when to grant bail or deny it is one the Constitution leaves to the states, at least when it comes to state crimes.

    I will only add that there is a significant civil liberties angle here. In a free society, there should be a strong presumption against detaining or imprisoning people who have not been convicted of any crime. The presumption might be overcome in cases where a suspect poses some grave threat to public safety or cannot otherwise be prevented from fleeing the jurisdiction. But overcoming it should at least require a compelling showing that there is a grave threat or a flight risk. Requiring payment of bail is not as coercive as pretrial detention without bail. But there may be little difference between the two in  cases where the suspect is indigent or does not have ready access to cash.

    If the defendant is convicted, time spent in pretrial detention may count against his or her sentence. But that is little consolation if the suspect is acquitted or if they are sentenced to a fine or probation.

    In sum, I am not sure what the optimal bail policy is. But there is reason to be wary of sweeping rejection of cashless bail. There is even more reason to be wary of this administration’s ongoing assaults on federalism and attempts to usurp Congress’s fiscal authority.

    Ilya Somin

    Source link

  • Trump directs DOJ to penalize states and cities that use cashless bail

    On Monday, President Donald Trump, who has called cashless bail a “government-backed crime spree,” signed an executive order to end the policy nationwide. The order restricts the allocation of “Federal policies and resources” to jurisdictions and states with cashless bail policies for “crimes that pose a clear threat to public safety and order.” It tasks Attorney General Pam Bondi with creating a list of such jurisdictions within 30 days, at which point the federal funds of these jurisdictions may be suspended or terminated. 

    While the Eighth Amendment prevents excessive bail, defendants are not guaranteed an absolute right to bail. The Bail Reform Act of 1984 allows for the denial of bail for defendants who pose a flight risk, including those charged with violent crimes, offenses carrying life imprisonment or death, certain drug offenses, repeat felony offenders, and those posing a danger to society.

    When a defendant is arraigned, a judge may release them on their own recognizance (a promise to appear), detain them, or release them on bail. With bail, a cash guarantee is provided and returned upon the conclusion of the case. Bail is determined by the jurisdiction where the crime is prosecuted, meaning in some jurisdictions, bail isn’t required for lesser charges.

    With cashless bail, defendants who are not deemed a flight risk or threat to public safety are released on a promise to return, without monetary collateral. Proponents argue that cash bail disproportionately impacts black and Latino populations, and ending this practice would reduce recidivism rates, since data suggest that longer pretrial detention is linked to quicker new arrests.

    Multiple jurisdictions and states have experimented with cashless bail to varying degrees of success. In 2023, Illinois became the first state to abolish cash bail. Under the Pretrial Fairness Act, judges must instead hold detention hearings to determine whether a defendant is a flight risk or a public safety threat. “Not too different from how we release people now. It’s just that money will no longer be a condition of release,” NPR reported at the time. 

    It’s unclear if these reforms had any impact on crime, although a study by Loyola University Chicago’s Center for Criminal Justice notes that violent crimes and property crimes declined a year after cashless bail was enacted. That same report found that the percentage of people who missed a required court date declined from 25.1 percent to 22.8 percent.

    New York’s bail reform law, enacted in 2019 and amended in 2023, limits cash bail and pretrial detention primarily to violent felonies. Defendants are typically released on recognizance unless there’s a flight risk, and New York law narrows the parameters for bail consideration to “the kind and degree of control or restriction necessary to reasonably assure the principal’s return to court.”

    Following the passage of New York’s laws, a 2023 study by the John Jay College of Criminal Justice found that the state’s bail reforms neither increased nor decreased recidivism rates. 

    New Jersey’s risk-based bail system, which was finalized in 2017, offers more judicial discretion than New York’s, but still eschews cash bail for low-risk defendants in favor of a public safety assessment. In 2023, New Jersey’s Joint Committee on Criminal Justice Reform attributed the state’s rearrest rate of less than 1 percent to the 2017 bail reform, noting that over 80 percent of defendants who completed pretrial services were not rearrested. 

    The president also signed an executive order on Monday aimed at cashless bail policies in Washington, D.C., which have been in place since 1992. The order mandates that federal law enforcement in the city hold arrestees in federal custody and pursue federal charges and pretrial detention to ensure they aren’t released from custody before trial. 

    It also authorizes Bondi to review the Metropolitan Police Department’s retrial release policies and direct Democratic Mayor Muriel Bowser to align D.C. policies with the president’s methods for dealing with crime in the city. Under the order, federal agencies must also identify actions, including funding allocation and federal services, to coerce D.C. to abandon its cashless bail system.

    Last year, the city released 87 percent of the people arrested in D.C. without bail. Of those, 89 percent remained arrest-free, and 86 percent of released defendants made all scheduled court appearances, according to data from D.C.’s Pretrial Services Agency.

    Tosin Akintola

    Source link

  • Suspect in Market Basket fires pleads not guilty in Superior Court

    A former Market Basket employee who officials allege lit two fires in the back of the supermarket in March, pleaded “not guilty” during his arraignment in Salem Superior Court on Wednesday.

    Matthew R. Johnson, 35, who court records say is homeless, was indicted on felony charges of attempted burning of a building and burning a building, in relation to fires in two separate areas of the back of the store that filled the supermarket with smoke on March 14.


    This page requires Javascript.

    Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

    kAmv=@F46DE6C 2?5 2C62 7:C6 56A2CE>6?ED C6DA@?565 2E gia_ A]>] E92E ?:89E E@ AFE @FE E96 7:C6D[ @?6 E92E DE2CE65 😕 2 A2==6E[ 2?5 2?@E96C 😕 2 42C53@2C5 EC2D9 4@>A24E@C]k^Am

    Ethan Forman may be contacted at 978-675-2714, or at eforman@northofboston.com.

    By Ethan Forman | Staff Writer

    Source link

  • Killer in 1987 Salem murder granted parole

    Killer in 1987 Salem murder granted parole

    BEVERLY — A man who was serving a life sentence for a 1987 execution-style murder in Salem has been granted parole, despite the objections of the victim’s family and the Essex District Attorney’s office.

    Charles “Chucky” Doucette, who pleaded guilty to the second-degree murder of Raymond Bufalino, was granted parole by the state parole board on May 13.

    Doucette, who is now 64, shot Bufalino twice in the head as they were sitting in Bufalino’s car near Harmony Grove Cemetery on the Salem-Peabody line in 1987. He was also convicted of two violent home invasions while on bail awaiting trial, and was arrested when he was out on parole on two previous occasions.

    In its unanimous decision, the parole board said Doucette “has demonstrated a level of rehabilitation that would make his release compatible with the welfare of society.”

    In testimony before the parole board in March, Bufalino’s wife, Shauna O’Sullivan, pleaded with the board not to release Doucette.

    “With his tendency for violence I fear that he will reoffend,” she said in a video of the hearing. “I would hate to hear of another person having to live through the anguish and emotional turmoil that I went through. I believe he made his choice all those years ago and that he should be held accountable for his crimes.”

    O’Sullivan said her son was 9½ months old at the time his father was murdered.

    “I’m not angry or bitter,” she told the board. “I’m past that now, some 38 years later.

    “I feel I owe it to my husband’s memory to say something.”

    Bufalino’s sister and brother also spoke against giving Doucette parole. In a statement read by a victim service advocate at the parole hearing, Suzanne Maynard and Anthony Bufalino called Doucette a “menace to society and a true threat to society.

    “Look at what happened the first time he got paroled,” they said. “Nothing but trouble. So tell me, since being back in prison has he changed? I doubt it.”

    Essex County Assistant District Attorney Kayla Burns also spoke against parole, saying Doucette has continued to minimize his culpability and deflect blame.

    “He puts the blame on other people being in his life,” Burns said.

    During the hearing, Doucette, who has lived in Beverly and Peabody, said he has changed in his years in prison thanks to counseling and programs on subjects such as domestic violence and anger management.

    “I’ve always been bigger and stronger than most people. I always got my way through intimidation and being a total ass,” he told the parole board. “I’m not that person today. I have children. I have grandchildren. I have great-grandchildren. I don’t want them to make the mistakes I made. I want them to learn from the mistakes I made.”

    Doucette’s mother and sister spoke in favor of his release. His sister, Kim Malick, said Doucette has remained close to her children, who are now in their 20s.

    “He met my oldest daughter when she fit into the palm of his hand in prison,” Malik said. “I would love for him to have the opportunity to come home and see her.”

    Doucette had been granted parole twice previously and was arrested both times — once on a rape charge that was later dropped, and another on a domestic assault charge of which he was acquitted — and sent back to prison.

    In total, Doucette was serving seven life sentences for the murder, two counts of home invasion, two counts of armed robbery, and two counts of stealing by confining or putting a person in fear.

    He was denied parole in his last three attempts before the board granted parole in May.

    According to the board’s decision, Doucette has invested in his rehabilitation, including participating in domestic violence programs and counseling, and working and volunteering in the prison law library. “He has strong vocational skills and work ethic,” the board said.

    Doucette has maintained stable relationships with his family and has been sober since 1990, according to the board.

    He told the board he wanted to get his commercial driving license and move to Texas to be near his family.

    Bufalino, of Salem, worked for Doucette’s father at a Salem gas station and was considering a lawsuit after getting injured while working. Doucette was also angry that Bufalino owed him money, according to the parole board’s statement of the case.

    While seated together in Bufalino’s car, Doucette shot him once behind the right ear and once in the mouth. Bufalino’s body was found by his wife, who had gone to search for him. He was 30 years old.

    At the hearing, Doucette apologized to Bufalino’s family. At one point he broke down crying when he said that his own daughter no longer talks to him.

    “I know how bad it hurt me with my own daughter not being part of my life,” Doucette said. “I can’t put into words what I must have cost Ray’s family and his son especially.”

    After gaining parole, Doucette was scheduled to be released to a long-term residential program. Conditions included a 10 p.m. curfew, electronic monitoring at the parole officer’s discretion, a substance abuse treatment plan, domestic violence counseling, counseling for intimate partner/co-dependence relations, and no contact with the victim’s family.

    Staff Writer Paul Leighton can be reached at 978-338-2535, by email at pleighton@salemnews.com, or on Twitter at @heardinbeverly.

    By Paul Leighton | Staff Writer

    Source link

  • Florida Mother Arrested & Charged After Allegedly Trying To Sell Her 1-Year-Old Daughter For $500

    Florida Mother Arrested & Charged After Allegedly Trying To Sell Her 1-Year-Old Daughter For $500

    A Florida woman is now behind bars after allegedly attempting to sell her 18-month-old daughter.

    RELATED: Florida School Allegedly Threatens To Expel Student Over Mother’s OnlyFans Account

    Here’s What The Florida Mother Allegedly Did

    According to Fox 35 Orlando, on March 5, a 33-year-old woman named Jessica Woods was seen loitering “around an unnamed business.” Woods reportedly was accompanied by her daughter.

    The outlet reports that an anonymous citizen approached the mother. Additionally, they asked if she or her daughter needed any help.

    The citizen reportedly worked at the business Woods was seen standing outside of. The anonymous also noted that the mother had been spotted there for a few days.

    To note, the New York Post reports that the citizen was an employee at H&R Block.

    According to the anonymous citizen, Woods explained that she didn’t need any help.

    However, from there, the mother made a surprising offer to the citizen and tried to sell her daughter for $500.

    Here’s What Happened To The 1-Year-Old

    The anonymous citizen declined the mother’s proposal and instead offered to buy her and her daughter necessities. In response, Woods allegedly walked away and left her child.

    “Woods told the citizen she did not need anything but offered to sell the child to the citizen for $500,” a press release from the Palatka Police Department stated, per New York Post. “When the citizen refused to purchase the child, Woods walked away, leaving her daughter behind.”

    The citizen then took the child to the Palatka Police Department and informed authorities of the incident. According to the outlet, the department’s “victim advocate program” looked after the child until “the Department of Children and Families took custody.”

    According to Fox 35 Orlando, the 1-year-old has since been placed in foster care.

    Here’s What Happened To The Mother

    The outlet adds that on March 7, police located Woods. Authorities arrested the woman and transported her to Putnam County jail. The 33-year-old mother has reportedly been charged with “child neglect and abandonment.”

    Additionally, she is charged with “selling or surrendering minor for property or money, and three counts of child abuse.”

    On Thursday, March 14, Fox 35 Orlando reported that Woods remained in police custody and has had her bond set at $255,000.

    RELATED: Boyfriend Of Missing Florida Teen’s Mother Arrested After Police Uncovered His Inappropriate Child Content

    Jadriena Solomon

    Source link

  • Riverside church volunteer and his wife arrested on allegations of abusing children

    Riverside church volunteer and his wife arrested on allegations of abusing children

    A youth volunteer at a Riverside church and his wife have been arrested on allegations of sexually and physically abusing two children a decade ago, authorities announced Wednesday.

    Jose Cruz Martinez, 47, was arrested Friday on multiple counts of physical and sexual abuse of a minor; he is being held on $2-million bail, according to the Riverside Police Department.

    The abuse allegations predate Martinez’s time as a volunteer at a Riverside church, which was between 2016 and September 2023. Martinez has not been accused of abusing any children while he was a volunteer.

    Martinez’s wife, 48-year-old Dawn Renee Johnson, was arrested Jan. 10 on allegations of aiding and abetting the sexual and physical abuse of a minor, police said. She’s also being held on $2-million bail.

    The investigation began after Riverside detectives learned of allegations that a male and female minor were abused 10 years ago.

    Detectives say they think there could be more victims who haven’t come forward. Anyone with more information is encouraged to call 951-353-7133 or 951-353-7945.

    Summer Lin

    Source link

  • Street vendor activists kept in jail on charges tied to protests

    Street vendor activists kept in jail on charges tied to protests

    A Superior Court judge on Thursday denied bail again for a group of activists dubbed the “Justice 8” who have been in jail for two weeks facing charges stemming from protests in San Bernardino County and elsewhere.

    Prosecutors allege Edin Alex Enamorado and other street vendor advocates have carried out intimidation tactics, showing up at workplaces and homes of people targeted in his social media campaigns, which are intended to publicly shame customers who attack vendors or those who make racist comments.

    Enamorado, 36, and seven other activists were arrested Dec. 14 amid what authorities described as a months-long assault investigation after a Sept. 3 protest in L.A. County and another in Victorville on Sept. 24. The investigation grew to involve police from other cities in the Inland Empire, including Upland, Fontana and Pomona, who contended that the suspects were involved in other “violent acts during protests” in those cities.

    On his Instagram accounts, which have hundreds of thousands of followers, Enamorado has shared videos of street vendors being harassed, elected officials making racist comments and police making violent arrests.

    But San Bernardino County Sheriff Shannon Dicus said after their arrest that the group members had manipulated videos to make themselves look like crusaders. And in doing so, Dicus said, they harassed the subjects of their videos to gain attention, views and financial profit.

    “This group is not about substance for the human condition,” Dicus said during a news conference earlier this month, “but rather clickbait for cash.”

    Charges against the group include false imprisonment, kidnapping, assault, vandalism and unlawful use of tear gas , according to court documents.

    In addition to Enamorado, those arrested were his partner, Wendy Lujan, 40, of Upland; David Chavez, 28, of Riverside; Stephanie Amesquita, 33, of San Bernardino; Gullit Eder Acevedo, 30, of San Bernardino; Edwin Pena, 26, of Los Angeles; Fernando Lopez, 44, of Los Angeles; and Vanessa Carrasco, 40, of Ontario. All have been charged with carrying out violent attacks against three victims, according to court documents.

    Luhan was not in court Thursday; she is scheduled to appear next week.

    Prosecutors have repeatedly sought to keep the individuals behind bars, saying they pose a danger to the public. Last week, a judge ordered the group held without bail. At a hearing Thursday, the San Bernardino County district attorney’s office made the same argument.

    Judge Melissa Rodriguez granted bail to only one defendant: Acevedo. The schoolteacher was ordered to have no contact with anyone else involved the case, including any alleged victims. Acevedo will be required to wear an ankle monitor and stay off social media.

    “No contact means no contact,” Rodriguez said.

    The rest of the defendants were held without bail after being found to be a danger to the community as well to as the victims in the case. Prosecutors referenced one image of a piñata with a victim’s face superimposed on the object. Another victim fears that protesters will show up at their home and has gone into hiding, according to prosecutors. A new hearing was scheduled for Jan. 3.

    Enamorado’s attorney, Nicholas Rosenberg, said outside the courthouse Thursday he did not agree with the judge’s assessment of his client, calling Enamorado an important member of the community.

    “Look, the fight is not over,” Rosenberg said.

    Carasco’s attorney, Damon Alimouri, called the court’s no-bail decision “outrageous” and unconstitutional.

    Enamorado started out as a political organizer but is known for his activism around street vendors. In June, he posted a TikTok video that since has been removed showing the mess created after a pair of food carts were overturned outside a concert at SoFi Stadium.

    Enamorado told The Times he did not witness the incident but the vendors told him a stadium worker instructed them to step back off the street and then lost his temper when they ignored his directives. The worker, who SoFi Stadium officials said was employed by a third-party vendor, was later fired.

    In September, Enamorado organized a large protest on the steps of the Santa Barbara Police Department after a viral video showing a racist exchange between a white woman and a Latino man roiled the city.

    He and the others in the group face 17 charges in San Bernardino County — the majority of which are felonies — from two September incidents. On Sept. 3, prosecutors say several members chased a security guard into a supermarket and pepper-sprayed him while he was on the ground. They then beat the guard, authorities said. On Sept. 24, Enamorado and the others organized a protest after a viral video showed a San Bernardino County sheriff’s deputy slamming a girl to the ground during a brawl at a high school football game.

    Attorneys representing Enamorado and the other defendants say they were protesting police violence and the harassment of a street vendor at the time.

    Times staff writer Jeremy Childs contributed to this report.

    Nathan Solis

    Source link

  • UPDATE: Kodak Black Pleads Not Guilty After Being Hit With Multiple Charges Including Drug Possession

    UPDATE: Kodak Black Pleads Not Guilty After Being Hit With Multiple Charges Including Drug Possession

    Kodak Black has pleaded not guilty after being arrested in Florida. As The Shade Room previously reported, the 26-year-old rapper was arrested in Plantation, Florida, on Wednesday, December 6.

    RELATED: REPORT: Kodak Black Arrested On Drug Charge In Florida

    Why Was The Rapper Arrested?

    As The Shade Room previously reported, Plantation authorities allegedly found the rapper in his Bentley vehicle earlier this week. The rapper’s car blocked a road at the time, and his taillights were on.

    When the officer approached the vehicle, they reportedly observed the rapper asleep with the window halfway down. Additionally, they noticed the smell of “burnt weed” and a cup of alcohol, per XXL.

    While the officer reportedly ran the rapper’s driver’s license information, they observed white powder “falling from the rapper.” It was then determined that the substance was coming from Black’s mouth.

    The rapper was arrested and booked into the Broward County Sheriff’s Office. He was charged with possession of cocaine, tampering with evidence, and an “improper stop/stand/park/.”

    At the time, it was reported that the rapper’s bail would be revealed after a bond hearing.

    Additionally, it was reported that Black would appear in court on Thursday, December 7.

     

    More Details Regarding Kodak Black’s Case, Plea & Release

    According to case records via the Broward County Clerk of the Courts, Kodak Black’s Broward County case number is 23012882CF10A, and the case was officially filed on Friday, December 8, in the Central Courthouse.

    The rapper, whose real name is Bill Kapri, will have his case overseen by Judge Michael Lynch.

    Additionally, the case record states that Kodak Black’s bond amount for his possession of cocaine charge was set at $5,000 on Thursday, December 7.  The bail amounts for charges of tampering with evidence and improper stop/stand/park remain undisclosed.

    Furthermore, the record reveals that the rapper entered not-guilty pleas to all his charges on Friday, December 8, and was subsequently released with his bond being posted that same day.

    According to a Notice of Appearance filed in Kodak Black’s case, he reportedly requests a trial by jury.

    What The Court Expects Of Kodak Black Ahead Of His Trial

    A Pretrial Services Supervision Order states that “upon receipt of bond,” the rapper must remain in Broward County, as well as the state of Florida. Additionally, Kodak Black must not violate state or federal laws and attend all hearings before his trial.

    The 26-year-old will reportedly be on “standard pretrial supervision” and must report to his designated Pretrial Services Office twice a week via telephone.

    The rapper is also required to submit to a substance abuse evaluation ten days after his release and attend any “recommended follow-up treatment.” Black may not consume alcohol or illegal substances under his pretrial supervision and will also submit to random drug and alcohol tests.

    At this time, Kodak Black has not publicly addressed his recent arrest.

    RELATED: Woman Arrested After Attempting To Burn Down Martin Luther King Jr.’s Birth Home

    Jadriena Solomon

    Source link

  • NY judges will get more power in setting bail, governor says | Long Island Business News

    NY judges will get more power in setting bail, governor says | Long Island Business News

    Judges in New York will have more discretion to jail people awaiting trial for alleged crimes, Gov. Kathy Hochul announced Thursday night, a policy change fiercely resisted by some of her fellow Democrats.

    The governor held a state Capitol news conference to announce that a “conceptual agreement” had been reached on a $229 billion budget with the state Legislature, a deal that still needs to be approved by lawmakers. The budget includes policy proposals ranging from a minimum wage hike to allowing more charter schools in New York City.

    But negotiations between the governor and legislative leaders ran well past an April 1 deadline, in large part because Hochul insisted on changes to the state’s bail laws.

    The issue has been a flashpoint between liberal Democrats, who say requiring people to pay cash to get out of jail rigs the system against poor people, and elected officials who cast it as a public safety issue.

    New York approved sweeping changes in 2019 aimed at keeping defendants who can’t afford bail from being disproportionately jailed. But those changes have been tweaked twice before amid criticism that judges were being deprived of a tool they could use to hold people likely to commit new crimes.

    The new agreement would remove a requirement that judges choose the “least restrictive” means to ensure defendants return to court. Judges have complained the standard “tied their hands,” Hochul said.

    “It gives judges discretion they need to hold violent criminals accountable, while still upholding our commitment to a justice system that is fair and accessible to all and also ensuring that poverty is never treated as a crime,” she said.

    State Assembly Speaker Carl Heastie confirmed the conceptual agreement in a statement, saying it addresses many priorities advocated by Democrats. He added that some issues were still under discussion.

    Hochul’s latest push for bail changes came after her closer-than-expected election victory last November in the Democrat-dominated state. Republicans attacked their opponents as soft on crime, making particularly strong gains in New York City suburbs.

    Some lawmakers said Hochul’s proposed changes would undercut the bail reforms approved in 2019 and result in more New Yorkers in pretrial detention — especially people with low incomes and people of color.

    Assembly member Latrice Walker, a Brooklyn Democrat, accused Hochul of the “wholesale dismantling of bail reform.”

    Bail has become a point of contention between GOP and Democratic lawmakers in other states as well. Republican lawmakers in at least 14 states, including Georgia and Wisconsin, have pushed bills that would in part make it harder for defendants to get out of jail before trial.

    The bail deal struck between Hochul and the Assembly and Senate leaders is one of several political compromises in the budget package.

    The state would raise the minimum wage, but not to the $20 sought by liberal Democrats. Starting next year, the minimum wage will rise to $16 in New York City and some of its suburbs and $15 elsewhere in the state, with additional 50 cent increases in 2025 and 2026, Hochul said.

    The state would give an infusion of money to the authority that operates the subway, bus and commuter rail systems in the New York City metropolitan area, funded partly through a tax increase paid by larger businesses. However, those higher taxes would only be paid by businesses in New York City, not in the suburbs where Democrats are concerned about losing votes.

    Hochul also dropped, for now, a plan to try to spur construction of multifamily housing in suburban communities that have historically put up barriers to new development. That proposal had also run into loud opposition from suburban lawmakers.

    o

    Ted Baird

    Source link

  • Sam Bankman-Fried Will Be Released On $250 Million Bail

    Sam Bankman-Fried Will Be Released On $250 Million Bail

    FTX founder Sam Bankman-Fried is set to be released from federal custody after his attorneys struck a deal with prosecutors on a bail amount of $250 million, according to multiple reports.

    Source link

  • California Bail Agents Assoc. and Beth Chapman Victorious in Legal Battle Seeking to Remove Cash Bail

    California Bail Agents Assoc. and Beth Chapman Victorious in Legal Battle Seeking to Remove Cash Bail

    In an overwhelming ruling in favor of the bail industry, California Federal Judge Gonzalez Rogers struck down motions in a federal lawsuit seeking to eliminate cash bail in California yesterday at the Federal Court in Oakland. The ruling followed months of legal posturing by a non-profit group called Equal Justice Under the Law (EJUL) and Washington DC attorney Phil Telfeyan. The group claims that bail bonds unfairly target the poor because they cannot afford the bail to get out of jail. Beth Chapman, star of “Dog the Bounty Hunter” and “Dog and Beth: On the Hunt”, disagrees with that assertion.

    “Bail limits are determined by judges but state law gives the judges authority to make a bail bond commensurate to the violation,” said Chapman. “Just because someone can’t afford the amount authorized by law doesn’t mean their rights are being violated. That’s as ridiculous as suggesting that your rights are being violated if you can’t afford the cost of getting a driver’s license and therefor shouldn’t have to pay.”

    “Just because someone can’t afford the amount authorized by law doesn’t mean their rights are being violated. That’s as ridiculous as suggesting that your rights are being violated if you can’t afford the cost of getting a driver’s license and therefor shouldn’t have to pay.”

    Beth Chapman, Star of “Dog & Beth”

    Chapman teamed up with the California Bail Agents Association (CBAA) to get the bail industry listed as an intervener in the case along with the city of San Francisco. The unprecedented move by the industry and the T.V. star shows how disastrous a ruling in favor of EJUL would have been to the industry and the public safety needs of the average citizen.

    “Even though we were not named in the suit directly we felt it necessary to stand with the city to ensure that the people’s interest were represented,” stated Maggie Kriens, vice-president of the CBAA. “There is no doubt that our industry would be devastated by a ruling in favor of EJUL but also the safety of the public would be put at risk because of how easy it would be to get out of jail with no supervision or accountability to show up for a court date. We could not sit idly by and let the people of California be put at risk by this awful move.”

    The strategy of intervening with the industry was the brain child of Beth Chapman who is the wife of popular T.V. star Duane “Dog the Bounty Hunter” Chapman. Chapman has been in the bonding business for 30 years and she has spent much of the last decade advocating legislative changes across the country to protect the bail industry and ensure criminals have a reason to return to court to face their charges. She has also been tracking and challenging lawsuits like this and has vowed to take the fight to those seeking to make it easier to let the criminal out of jail.

    “Our industry typically has not gotten involved to this level and that is something that must change,” said Chapman. “We have been operating in successful partnership with the judicial system for over 200 years but we cannot take it for granted that it will always be that way. This is the sole reason Duane and I temporarily suspended our show while these incredibly important battles are taking place. Mr. Telfeyan has stated the he will be filing suits in other states across the country and I promise I will be there to fight this every time.”

    Mrs. Chapman is currently running as president of the Professional Bail Agents of the United States (PBUS), a national organization which represents over 15,000 bail agents across the country. Showing the importance of the fights ahead, the couple stunned the entertainment industry in early January by not renewing their contract with CMT for a fourth season of their popular show “Dog and Beth: On the Hunt”. They stated that their priority needed to be Beth’s campaign and their continued work in getting the industry involved in both legal and legislative advocacy.

    “This is what true leadership looks like, putting the needs of others ahead of yourself,” said Kriens. “I am thankful for the leadership Beth has taken in this case and in so many other situations like this across the country. If our industry is to survive it will take people like the Chapman’s to step up and fight for us. In the end, it’s not only good for the bail bond industry but also for the safety of the general public.”

    Judge Gonzalez Rogers did not go so far as to dismiss the case altogether but instead denied all of the motions filed by EJUL and gave them 30 days to “think of a legal venue” to accomplish their goal but even stated “I don’t know if it exists”. Assuming they are able to come before the court again there is little doubt that Beth Chapman and the CBAA will be there armed and ready with the facts and the proper arguments to ensure the bail industry remains a critical part of the criminal justice system.

    ##

    For more information please contact: mediarequests@dogthebountyhunter.com

    Related Media

    Source link