ReportWire

Tag: Backlog

  • FEMA disaster application backlog grows under Trump

    [ad_1]

    A few days before a massive winter storm dumped snow and ice on a large swath of the country, disrupted travel and killed more than 30 people, a Florida congressman warned that the Federal Emergency Management Agency is letting disaster assistance requests pile up. 

    “As the only former Emergency Management Director in Congress, it is my responsibility to sound the alarm that FEMA is being dismantled by (Homeland Security) Secretary Kristi Noem,” U.S. Rep. Jared Moskowitz, D-Fla., wrote Jan. 22 on X. FEMA’s backlog of unanswered disaster assistance applications has exploded to the largest in its history.” Moskowitz was Florida’s Division of Emergency Management director from 2019 to 2021. 

    President Donald Trump has floated abolishing FEMA, citing the agency’s struggle to deliver timely disaster assistance, and in his second term he’s used executive actions to cut staff and freeze funds. A directive from Noem requiring her sign off for any expenditure over $100,000 has also delayed billions in grants and loans.

    But is Moskowitz correct that the agency has the largest backlog of pending disaster assistance applications in its 47-year history?  

    Taken together, the current list of pending disaster applications, independent analyses and information from disaster management experts show that the backlog is larger than is typical, with applications awaiting approval for longer periods of time compared with the last several decades. 

    FEMA declined to answer our questions. Moskowitz’ office also did not respond to our request for evidence supporting his statement.

    Disaster declaration applications face longer limbo under second Trump administration

    FEMA’s daily operations briefing provides an overview of potential weather threats and ongoing disasters. 

    Its Jan. 28 report shows 18 pending disaster declaration requests. Eleven are more than a month old. The requests are typically submitted through FEMA regional offices before being sent to the president for final approval.

    A September analysis by The Associated Press examined how the current backlog compares with the last 37 years — covering the majority of FEMA’s 47-year history. During the agency’s first decade, the disaster declaration approval process wasn’t fully implemented and large disasters were relatively few and far between.

    The AP’s analysis found that, on average, it took less than two weeks for a major disaster declaration to be granted by presidents throughout the 1990s and early 2000s. During the last decade, under presidents from both political parties, that rose to about three weeks. In Trump’s second term so far, approvals are taking more than a month, on average.

    White House spokesperson Abigail Jackson told the AP Trump was making sure federal dollars were “spent wisely to supplement state actions, not replace them,” during disasters. 

    “President Trump provides a more thorough review of disaster declaration requests than any Administration has before him. Gone are the days of rubber stamping FEMA recommendations — that’s not a bug, that’s a feature,” Jackson said. 

    Former FEMA officials, including people who helped process these types of declarations, told PolitiFact the backlog of pending applications is substantial, and was longer than average at different points in 2025.  

    The processing time is most important, said Elizabeth Zimmerman, a former FEMA administrator under President Barack Obama. “A reasonable amount of time for approval should really be no more than two weeks.” 

    Zimmerman said that could change with the type of request and how much money applicants are seeking, but even considering those factors, the current process is slower than normal.

    There may be contributing factors that are out of Trump’s control. The process for assessing natural disasters has become more complex over time and disasters have become more frequent and intense because of climate change.

    Still, these delays mean people have to wait to receive federal aid for temporary housing and home repairs. It can also impede recovery efforts as local governments don’t know when or whether they will receive federal reimbursements.

    Significant delays in disaster payouts 

    News reports throughout 2025 documented a slew of delays, denials and cancellations of federal disaster funds as states waited for information on new policy proposals from FEMA.

    “There’s a lot of anecdotal information that things are being held up, and it’s adversely affecting these communities,” said Michael Coen, a former FEMA chief of staff in the Obama and Biden administrations. “I have heard from multiple FEMA employees who are frustrated over a lot of projects that are being held up by the secretary’s office.” 

    The Wall Street Journal, citing internal government documents and conversations with FEMA employees, reported in September that many of FEMA’s core functions have ground to a halt under the Trump administration, and contracts and grants haven’t been approved because of new bureaucratic hurdles.

    “A wave of senior staff departed the agency when Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency offered buyouts, taking decades of experience with them,” the Journal reported. Another 400 FEMA employees were routed to work at Immigration and Customs Enforcement as the administration started dismantling FEMA’s disaster-response infrastructure.

    In a Sept. 15 report, FEMA said it withheld $10.9 billion in disaster payments to 45 states in the final months of fiscal year 2025, which ended Sept. 30. News outlets and local government groups said the money was to reimburse states for emergency costs related to the COVID-19 pandemic. 

    FEMA said it “shifted” the reimbursements to fiscal year 2026 but did not say when the money would be paid. In response to news stories about the funds, FEMA said in an Oct. 18 press release that disaster relief funds “do not expire” and that the outstanding payments “are actively being processed and are not canceled.” 

    The Hill reported in December that more than $900 million in FEMA grants and loans awaited Noem’s approval under her new policy to personally review certain expenditures. The New York Times recently reported an even larger number — $17 billion — in funds that have faced unusually long delays because of the requirement.

    The bottleneck, The New York Times found, “includes money that had already been approved by regional FEMA offices for things like debris removal, and repairs to roads, bridges and water and sewer systems.”

    Our ruling

    Moskowitz said FEMA’s backlog of unanswered disaster assistance applications “has exploded to the largest in its history.”

    We were unable to quantify whether the current backlog is the largest in agency history; publicly available data is limited, and no public database provides historical comparisons.

    But the available evidence shows Moskowitz is largely on target.

    As of Jan. 28, FEMA listed 18 pending disaster declarations awaiting Trump’s approval. Eleven are more than a month old and some date back to October. Disaster management experts said the backlog is particularly large compared with what’s typical and that requests are sitting longer than normal. 

    A September 2025 AP analysis found that over the last 37 years — which covers most of FEMA’s existence and the timeframe when it implemented its current assistance system — disaster declarations were typically approved in three weeks or less. Approvals are taking more than a month, on average, so far during Trump’s second term.  

    Moskowitz’s statement is accurate but needs additional information. We rate it Mostly True. 

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Justice on hold: India court crippled by a million-case backlog

    [ad_1]

    The Allahabad High Court – one of India’s oldest and most prestigious, once graced by figures like India’s first premier Jawaharlal Nehru and future Supreme Court judges – is back in the spotlight.

    This time, though, for very different reasons.

    With more than a million cases pending, it is among the most overburdened courts in the country. Matters ranging from criminal trials to property and family disputes have been pending here for decades, leaving thousands of people in India’s most populous state, Uttar Pradesh, trapped in legal limbo.

    Consider Babu Ram Rajput, 73, a retired government employee who has been battling a property dispute for over three decades.

    He bought land at an auction in 1992, but the previous owner challenged the sale – and the case remains unresolved to this day.

    “I just hope my case is decided while I’m still alive,” Mr Rajput says.

    The high court’s struggle mirrors a broader crisis in India’s judiciary, where too few judges and a constant flood of cases have caused crippling delays.

    With a sanctioned strength of 160 that experts say has never been completely filled, the court is severely understaffed. Delays in police investigations, frequent adjournments, and poor infrastructure further add to the backlog, leaving the system stretched beyond capacity.

    Each judge faces hundreds of cases a day – sometimes over 1,000. With just five working hours, that’s less than a minute per case. In practice, many aren’t heard at all.

    Over a million cases are pending at the Allahabad High Court [Umang Poddar/BBC]

    Lawyers say urgent matters – like bail pleas or eviction stays – are heard first, pushing older cases further down the list.

    Senior lawyer Syed Farman Naqvi says courts often issue interim or temporary orders in urgent cases – but once the immediate need is met, the matter lingers as new cases pile up.

    Retired judge Amar Saran says the mounting backlog has forced judges into a “cut-grass approach” – issuing quick, standard orders, from nudging the government to act to directing lower courts to handle the matter.

    In April, the court confronted the scale of its delays while ruling on a rape and murder case pending for over 40 years. By the verdict’s delivery, four of the five convicted men had died. Ordering the sole surviving convict to surrender, the court admitted it regretted not ruling sooner.

    The backlog has even prompted legal action. Earlier this year, a group of Allahabad High Court lawyers petitioned for more judicial appointments, calling the court “paralysed” by a shortage of judges that leaves cases lingering for years.

    The crisis has caught the attention of India’s top court. In January, the Supreme Court called it “worrisome” that case listings at the Allahabad High Court are unpredictable, saying the system had completely collapsed.

    Uncertain hearing dates hit people hard, especially in vast Uttar Pradesh. Many travel hundreds of kilometres to Prayagraj where the court is located on just a few days’ notice for their hearing.

    Mr Rajput is from Kanpur, 200km (125 miles) from Prayagraj. He spends around four hours travelling each time his case is listed – yet can never be sure it will actually be heard.

    “I’m over 70,” he says. “I often learn just days in advance that my case is listed, “making travel a hassle.” He adds that many times his case isn’t heard because other matters take up the whole day.

    A man binds case files outside the Allahabad high court

    A man preparing court files outside the Allahabad High Court [Umang Poddar/BBC]

    Lawyers have long urged the court to set up another bench – a branch of the high court in a different city to ease access and speed up hearings – in the western part of the state. Currently, an additional bench exists in the city of Lucknow. A similar recommendation was made in 1985 by a government commission, but it has yet to be implemented.

    Earlier this year, the state government reportedly urged the high court to set up another bench, but the letter was later withdrawn for unknown reasons. The push for more benches isn’t limited to Uttar Pradesh; a 2009 Law Commission report said all states would benefit from additional high court branches.

    While new benches could help long-term, experts say quicker fixes – like appointing more judges – are needed.

    But the process is slow and complex: senior high court judges first shortlist candidates, then the list is reviewed by the state and federal governments, and the Chief Justice of India. After this, senior Supreme Court judges forward the final list to the federal government for appointment.

    Experts say picking the right candidates is often challenging. Former Allahabad High Court Chief Justice Govind Mathur notes that chief justices, often appointed from outside the state, may not know local lawyers or judges, complicating recommendations. Names can be rejected at any stage and remain confidential until the Supreme Court forwards them to the government.

    Last year, the Supreme Court recommended just one appointment for the Allahabad High Court, despite nearly half the seats being vacant. Some progress came this year with 15 new judges, but almost half the posts remain empty after retirements and transfers. Earlier this month, 26 more names were sent to the government, raising hopes – but the impact on the backlog remains uncertain.

    Experts say the backlog is so huge that even at full strength, each judge would handle over 7,000 pending cases. Some progress came this year, after 40 new judges were added – 24 of whom were appointed last week – but the backlog persists.

    Mr Mathur says that deeper judicial reforms – like a “uniform policy for hearing and disposing of cases” – are essential, rather than leaving it to individual judges.

    Follow BBC News India on Instagram, YouTube, X and Facebook.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • How AI Can Revolutionize Our Broken Supply Chain | Entrepreneur

    How AI Can Revolutionize Our Broken Supply Chain | Entrepreneur

    [ad_1]

    Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.

    The Covid-19 pandemic sent shockwaves through the global supply chain, exposing vulnerabilities and inefficiencies that were previously hidden. From inventory mismanagement to port backlogs, the pandemic magnified a myriad of issues that challenged even the most robust supply chains. As businesses search for innovative solutions to address these problems, Artificial Intelligence (AI) stands out as a powerful ally. We explore how AI-driven predictive analytics can support and enhance experienced human decision-making in the face of evolving global supply chain dynamics.

    The power of AI in tackling supply chain challenges

    The pandemic brought to light several key challenges that businesses must address to ensure smooth operations in their supply chains. By leveraging AI, organizations can gain insights into crucial aspects such as inventory management, container allocation, demand fluctuations, freight pricing and port operations. Let’s examine how AI can help tackle some of these challenges.

    [ad_2]

    John Monarch

    Source link