ReportWire

Tag: ayanna pressley

  • Poll: Markey primary challengers face tough fight

    [ad_1]

    BOSTON — Democratic Sen. Ed Markey holds a “significant” lead over his primary rivals, according to a new poll, which suggests challengers will face a difficult fight to unseat the three-term incumbent.

    The University of Massachusetts at Amherst/WCVB TV poll, released Sunday, showed Markey with a 20-point lead over Congressman Seth Moulton and former teacher Alex Rikleen in a Democratic primary match-up. The poll of 800 likely voters found 51% supported Markey, compared to 28% for Moulton and 6% for Rikleen. About 13% said they were undecided.


    This page requires Javascript.

    Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

    kAmqFE |2C<6J’D 25G2?E286 ?2CC@HD :7 #6A] pJ2??2 !C6DD=6J[ 2 q@DE@? s6>@4C2E[ 564:56D E@ ;F>A :?E@ E96 C246 367@C6 ?6IE J62C’D AC:>2CJ[ A@==DE6CD 7@F?5]k^Am

    kAm|2C<6J[ fh[ 😀 D66<:?8 2?@E96C D:IJ62C E6C> 2>:5 BF6DE:@?D @7 86?6C2E:@?2= A@H6C 😕 &]$] A@=:E:4D[ H9:49 4@?E:?F6 E@ =@@> @G6C E96 s6>@4C2E:4 A2CEJ 27E6C 7@C>6C !C6D:56?E y@6 q:56?’D 6>32CC2DD:?8 6I:E 7C@> E96 a_ac AC6D:56?E:2= C246] w:D J@F?86C s6>@4C2E:4 C:G2=D 2C6 862C:?8 FA E@ >2<6 9:D 286 2 <6J 724E@C 😕 E96:C AC:>2CJ 492==6?86D]k^Am

    kAm“|2C<6J =625D 4FCC6?E 2?5 A@E6?E:2= 492==6?86CD 7@C E96 s6>@4C2E:4 !2CEJ ?@>:?2E:@?[ 3FE E96C6 2C6 C62D@?D 7@C 4@?46C? 2>@?8 9:D E62>[” p=6I2?56C %96@5@C:5:D[ 2DD@4:2E6 AC@76DD@C @7 A@=:E:42= D4:6?46 2E &|2DD p>96CDE 2?5 4@5:C64E@C @7 E96 A@==[ D2:5 😕 2 DE2E6>6?E]k^Am

    kAm“%96 s6>@4C2E:4 AC:>2CJ 😀 2? 6E6C?:EJ 2H2J 😕 A@=:E:42= E:>6 2?5 #6AD] |@F=E@? 2?5 pJ2??2 !C6DD=6J[ ?6:E96C @7 H9@> 92D CF? DE2E6H:56[ D66> E@ 5C2H ?@?EC:G:2= 49F?@4C2E:4 G@E6[” 96 D2:5] “p?5 >62?:?87F= ?F>36CD @7 s6>@4C2ED C6>2:? F?564:565]”k^Am

    kAm!@==DE6CD D2:5 2>@?8 E9@D6 H9@ C6DA@?565 E@ E96 DFCG6J E96 >@DE 7C6BF6?E=J H6C6 FD65 H@C5 E@ 56D4C:36 |2C<6J H2D “@=5” C67=64E:?8[ 86?6C2E:@?2= :DDF6D 7@C E96 :?4F>36?E H9@ H@F=5 36 g_ FA@? 9:D C66=64E:@?]k^Am

    kAm%2E:D96 }E6E2[ AC@G@DE AC@76DD@C @7 A@=:E:42= D4:6?46 2E &|2DD p>96CDE 2?5 5:C64E@C @7 E96 A@== D2:5 H:E9 |2C<6J’D 286 “2E E96 962CE” |@F=E@?’D 2?5 #:<=66?’D 42>A2:8?D[ E96 :?4F>36?E D6?2E@C “H:== ?665 E@ 255C6DD E96 6=6A92?E 😕 E96 C@@>[ 2?5 4@?G:?46 G@E6CD E92E[ 😕 9:D 42D6[ 286 😀 3FE 2 ?F>36C]”k^Am

    kAm“p4C@DD E96 4@F?ECJ[ 2 ?F>36C @7 J@F?8 s6>@4C2ED 2C6 FC8:?8 =@?8D6CG:?8 s6>@4C2E:4 :?4F>36?ED E@ ‘A2DD E96 E@C49’ E@ 2 ?6H 86?6C2E:@? @7 =6256CD[” }E6E2 D2:]” $@ 72C[ @FC A@==:?8 DF886DED E92E s6>@4C2E:4 G@E6CD 4@?E:?F6 E@ DFAA@CE |2C<6J[ H9@ =625D ?@E @?=J 9:D 4FCC6?E 492==6?86CD[ 3FE 2=D@ 6>6C86D 2D E96 7C@?ECF??6C 😕 2 9JA@E96E:42= >2E49FA :?G@=G:?8 !C6DD=6J]”k^Am

    kAm“u@C ?@H[ |2C<6J C6>2:?D 2 7@C>:523=6 @AA@?6?E H9@D6 EC24< C64@C5 DF886DED E92E 96 H:== ?@E 8@ BF:6E=J :?E@ E96 ?:89E[” }E6E2 25565]k^Am

    kAm|2C<6J[ 2 7@C>6C w@FD6 =2H>2<6C H9@ H2D 7:CDE 6=64E65 E@ E96 $6?2E6 😕 a_`b[ 567=64E65 2 $6?2E6 s6>@4C2E:4 AC:>2CJ 492==6?86 😕 E96 a_a_ 6=64E:@?D H:E9 2 `_A@:?E G:4E@CJ @G6C #6A] y@6 z6??65J xxx[ 364@>:?8 E96 7:CDE E@ 56762E E@ 2 >6>36C @7 E96 DE2E6’D DE@C:65 A@=:E:42= 72>:=J 😕 2 DE2E6H:56 42>A2:8?]k^Am

    kAmy6DD6 #9@56D[ 2 A@=:E:42= D4:6?46 AC@76DD@C 2E &|2DD p>96CDE 2?5 4@5:C64E@C @7 E96 A@==[ D2:5 DFCG6J’D 7:?5:?8D 2=D@ DF886DE E96 :DDF6 @7 286 😀 =6DD :>A@CE2?E E@ G@E6CD E92? >2?J @E96CD 724:?8 E96 DE2E6 2?5 E96 ?2E:@?[ 2?5 5:D2AA@:?E>6?E H:E9 E96 s6>@4C2E:4 !2CEJ 😀 ?@E :>A24E:?8 G@E6CD’ G:6HD @7 E96 >:5E6C> 6=64E:@?]k^Am

    kAm“p=E9@F89 E96C6 92D 366? 2 =@E @7 4C:E:4:D> @7 E96 s6>@4C2E:4 !2CEJ’D =6256CD9:A 😕 E96 286 @7 %CF>A[ 2EE:EF56D E@H2C5 A@=:E:42= =6256CD – H96E96C A@D:E:G6 @C ?682E:G6 – 5@ ?@E D66> E@ 36 A=2J:?8 2 3:8 C@=6 😕 D92A:?8 |2DD249FD6EED G@E6CD’ AC:@C:E:6D[” #9@56D D2:5] “r=62C=J[ >2?J |2DD249FD6EED s6>@4C2ED H2?E E@ 7@4FD @? 7:89E:?8 E96 4FCC6?E #6AF3=:42? AC6D:56?E[ C2E96C E92? H@CCJ 23@FE E96 7FEFC6 @7 E96 s6>@4C2E:4 !2CEJ]”k^Am

    kAmk6>mr9C:DE:2? |] (256 4@G6CD E96 |2DD249FD6EED $E2E69@FD6 7@C }@CE9 @7 q@DE@? |65:2 vC@FAUCDBF@jD ?6HDA2A6CD 2?5 H63D:E6D] t>2:= 9:> 2E k2 9C67lQ>2:=E@i4H256o4?9:?6HD]4@>Qm4H256o4?9:?6HD]4@>k^2m]k^6>mk^Am

    [ad_2]

    By Christian M. Wade | Statehouse Reporter

    Source link

  • Democratic lawmakers unveil bill to give people in US prisons right to vote

    Democratic lawmakers unveil bill to give people in US prisons right to vote

    [ad_1]

    WASHINGTON (Reuters) – Democratic U.S. Representative Ayanna Pressley and U.S. Senator Peter Welch on Wednesday unveiled a bill that if passed would grant the right to vote nationwide to people who had been in prison or were currently in prison.

    “The right to vote is sacred in America and it’s essential to citizenship, and all citizens deserve a voice in our democracy,” Pressley told reporters.

    The bill is unlikely to advance in the divided Congress, where Republicans narrowly control the House of Representatives and Democrats control the Senate. The lawmakers acknowledged the headwinds to the legislation.

    “There is resistance. We know that,” Welch said.

    Pressley referred to her family’s history with the criminal justice system, mentioning that while she was growing up, her father had addiction issues and had been incarcerated before going on to become an author and professor.

    Welch noted that his state of Vermont was one of the few places in the country where people do not lose the right to vote, even when they are incarcerated, along with Maine and Washington, D.C.

    The laws surrounding voting and incarceration are a patchwork across the U.S., though in recent years, some states have moved to loosen prohibitions on voting for people who have been incarcerated or who are currently serving a prison sentence.

    States may bar voting for people who are currently in prison, for a period after release, for certain crimes, or require an additional waiting period, a governor’s pardon, or additional actions such as the payment of a fine, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures.

    Nearly 5 million people in the U.S. are directly affected by these policies, Pressley said, adding that Black Americans were disproportionately affected.

    The United States is the country with the highest number and the second-highest rate of people in prison in the world, according to the National Institute of Corrections. Black Americans are imprisoned at five times the rate of white Americans, according to the Sentencing Project, an advocacy group.

    (Reporting by Makini Brice; Editing by Bill Berkrot)

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Vivek Ramaswamy Gets A Searing Fact Check After KKK Comments

    Vivek Ramaswamy Gets A Searing Fact Check After KKK Comments

    [ad_1]

    Dana Bash took GOP presidential hopeful Vivek Ramaswamy to task for comparing Rep. Ayanna Pressley (D-Mass.) to one of the “modern grand wizards of the modern KKK” during an Iowa campaign event on Friday.

    Bash provided a stern fact check for Ramaswamy on Sunday morning’s “State of the Union,” when she tried to get the political newcomer to defend his comments about the lawmaker, who became the first black woman to represent her state in Congress when she was elected in 2018.

    “You know, I’m sure, the KKK was responsible for more than a century’s worth of horrific lynchings, rapes, murders of Black people,” she said. “How, in any way, are the views you’re talking about comparable to the views and atrocities committed by the KKK?”

    On Friday, Ramaswamy lashed out at Pressley over 2019 remarks in which she said the Democratic Party doesn’t “need any more brown faces that don’t want to be a brown voice.”

    Republican presidential hopeful Vivek Ramaswamy, a businessman, speaks at an event in St. Clair Shores, Michigan, earlier this month. On Friday, he compared Democratic Rep. Ayanna Pressley to one of the “modern grand wizards of the modern KKK.”

    Paul Sancya via Associated Press

    Ramaswamy tried to rewrite his comments, telling Bash he only said Ku Klux Klan leaders would be “proud” of Pressley.

    After Bash reminded Ramaswamy he was misquoting himself, the former biotech businessman tried to link Pressley’s words to the “spirit” of the white supremacist terrorist organization.

    “I think it is the same spirit to say that I can look at you and based on just your skin color, that I know something about the content of your character, that I know something about the content of the viewpoints you’re allowed to express,” he said.

    “For Ayanna Pressley to tell me that because of my skin color I can’t express my views, that is wrong. It is divisive. It is driving hate in this country. This is dividing our country to the breaking point,” he added.

    While he eventually agreed that the KKK’s reign of terror was “obviously wrong,” Ramaswamy called for an “open and honest discussion” of race, claiming there is “a gap between what people will say in private today and what they will say in public.”

    “I think we need to have real, open, honest, raw conversation as Americans,” he said. “That is our path to national unity. And there are many Americans today who are deeply frustrated by the new culture of anti-racism, that’s really racism in new clothing, and we need to have that debate in the open.”

    Pressley’s team responded to Ramaswamy in a fundraising email on Saturday, writing, “We typically don’t engage in these bad-faith attacks but yesterday a line was crossed.”

    “A GOP candidate referred to Ayanna as ‘a modern grand wizard of the KKK’ because she speaks out against racial injustice,” it went on. “This is backwards and harmful, but that is the point.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Vivek Ramaswamy Calls Rep. Ayanna Pressley And Ibram X. Kendi Part Of ‘Modern KKK’

    Vivek Ramaswamy Calls Rep. Ayanna Pressley And Ibram X. Kendi Part Of ‘Modern KKK’

    [ad_1]

    PELLA, Iowa ― Vivek Ramaswamy, the multi-millionaire biotech investor seeking the Republican presidential nomination, characterized Rep. Ayanna Pressley (D-Mass.), prominent author Ibram X. Kendi, and other progressive anti-racists as akin to “grand wizards of the modern KKK.”

    The remarks came up on Friday afternoon in response to an Iowa resident asking Ramaswamy at a campaign event whether he is likely to be accused by liberals of being a “white supremacist” or some kind of “white adjacent” race traitor.

    Ramaswamy responded with a long riff on how he considers those contemporary progressives, who insist that he should have liberal views based on his non-white identity, to be the biggest sources of racial discrimination in contemporary American culture.

    He cited as examples two statements made by Pressley and Kendi, who are both Black.

    “We don’t need any more brown faces that don’t want to be a brown voice,” Pressley said at the liberal Netroots Nation conference in 2019. “We don’t need Black faces that don’t want to be a Black voice.”

    Ramaswamy also noted that Kendi wrote the following in his bestselling book, “How To Be An Anti-Racist”: “The only remedy to past discrimination is present discrimination. The only remedy to present discrimination is future discrimination.” (Ramaswamy did not cite the sentence preceding those two, “The only remedy to racist discrimination is antiracist discrimination.”)

    Pressley’s comments, in particular, deprive non-white people of their agency as individuals, treating them as a monolith based on their identity in a similar way to what the Ku Klux Klan used to do, Ramaswamy argued.

    “The greatest racism I’ve experienced ― and I have experienced racism ― comes from the modern left at a scale unimaginable,” said the GOP candidate, who is the son of Indian immigrants. “Because I think they feel a sense of betrayal, saying that, ‘You’re not speaking in the tone that you’re supposed to.’”

    “So the other side will gaslight you when you’re saying this stuff, ‘Oh, you’re just making that stuff up,’” added Ramaswamy, emphasizing that he was citing specific quotations. “These are the words of the modern Grand Wizards of the modern KKK.”

    Pressed by reporters after the event, Ramaswamy stood by the essence of his remarks but tweaked them to avoid comparing contemporary progressives to KKK leaders in themselves. Instead, he said, Pressley, Kendi and the “whole movement” with which they are associated would make the KKK “proud.”

    “The fact that we’re taught to see one another on the basis of our genetic attributes is something that would make the old wizards of the grand KKK proud,” Ramaswamy said. “I think here is no better way to disempower someone in this country, as a kid, than to say that you can’t get ahead because of the genetics that you’re born with.”

    “I would say in recent years, probably the last decade, it’s come from the left. And I think it says a lot about the decay in our culture,” he added. “From the likes of the modern evangelists of this modern religion would certainly make, in some ways, the old generation of KKK grand wizards very proud, in a certain sense of that word.”

    HuffPost reached out to representatives of Pressley and Kendi for comment but did not receive an immediate response.

    Ramaswamy has opposed racial preference programs designed to correct past racism, such as affirmative action, a core focus of his campaign. To that end, the list of ten “truths” he recites at every campaign stop includes the idea that “reverse racism is racism.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • “They Don’t See Us”: Ayanna Pressley Won’t Let Women Be Ignored by the Republican Majority

    “They Don’t See Us”: Ayanna Pressley Won’t Let Women Be Ignored by the Republican Majority

    [ad_1]

    With the GOP gearing up to retake the House majority, the Massechussetts Democrat is angling to protect women’s rights by running for chair of the Democratic Women’s Caucus. “This is not a social club,” Pressley told Vanity Fair. “We are all formidable in our own right.”

    When Ayanna Pressley made her debut on the Beltway, Democrats held a double-digit majority in the House of Representatives. Donald Trump was a perfect foil for Pressley and her progressive compatriots. Their influence only expanded with more insurgent progressive wins in 2020. Plus, Democrats won back the Senate and sent Joe Biden to the White House. But now in the twilight of the 117th Congress, “the Squad”—Pressley, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Rashida Tlaib, Ilhan Omar, alongside newer recruits like Jamaal Bowman and Cori Bush—will soon find themselves in unfamiliar territory: the House minority. This is not lost on Pressley, nor are the stakes. In her words, the House Democratic caucus is at a “critical inflection point” ahead of this shift to come on January 3. Pressley is plotting her next move. 

    After a midterm cycle that showed the power of galvanizing voters who care about women’s reproductive rights, this is where Pressley sees a path forward for progressives. That, and turning attention to the White House. “There’s an opportunity certainly in the next two years to make sure we’re offering a clear affirmation of who Democrats are and part of that is working closely with the White House,” she says in an interview with Vanity Fair. To steward this, Pressley is running to be the chair of the Democratic Women’s Caucus, with the intent to make it as relevant a voting bloc as groups like the Congressional Progressive Caucus and the Congressional Black Caucus—both of which she’s also a member of. And she’s preparing to push back against a Republican House that appears more interested in scoring political points than pushing any kind of policy agenda. “It couldn’t be more clear. The Republican Party of [Kevin] McCarthy and Trump, they don’t have a policy vision—certainly not one that centers women’s families and the most marginalized,” she says. “They don’t see us. They don’t see women,” she continued later in the conversation.

    Pressley pitched herself in a letter to her colleagues at the end of last month. If elected to the chair position, she wrote that she would, “defend women’s issues from the ongoing attacks from those across the aisle,” in the face of the “extremists pose serious threats to the rights of every woman that calls this country home.” She wants the caucus to “be seen as the go-to for women across the board” and to serve as a bulwark against a backlash to women she is bracing for after a historic number were elected to Congress. “It’s always that strange dichotomy,” Pressley said. “[It’s] When we see this wave of women—and none of us are there by magic; we’re there by hard work…. When we see the most coordinated and underlining policy attacks against us.” 

    But Pressley’s bid is part and parcel of progressives, and more broadly, the Democratic Party’s reliance on and recognition of the critical role women—and particularly women of color—play in securing victories up and down the ballot. Her party, Pressley stressed, has to keep serving the interests of this critical voting bloc. “The reason why I’m running is to ensure that our collective voices remain front and center at the policy-making table,” she said. Pressley noted Raphael Warnock’s victory over Herschel Walker in the runoff election for the Georgia Senate seat as evidence of this. “We know the outsized role that Black women continue to play, both as strategy partners and building these coalitions and putting together these winning strategies,” she said the day after Warnock’s victory. “But also in the electorate at the ballot box.”

    “The Squad” moniker can be traced back to a somewhat spontaneous photo taken during new member orientation. The snap of Pressley, Ocasio-Cortez, Tlaib, and Omar tied their political fates together. The group’s outspokenness and the fact that both Pressley and Ocasio-Cortez bested Democratic incumbents in the primaries, put their party’s Old Guard on notice. Their profiles and platforms quickly eclipsed those of the traditional arbiters of political influence in Washington. But the quartet represented something of a sea change within the Democratic Party; they redefined what it meant to be a “progressive” and the résumé required to run for Congress. With their historic victories, the members of “the Squad” paved the way for a new generation of progressives, which only grew this past midterm cycle with the additions of Summer Lee and Maxwell Frost, among others. They shifted the Overton window. In some ways, Pressley was always a bit of an outlier in the group. She largely avoided the type of skirmishes with leadership and rank-and-file members the other three, at various times, found themselves embroiled in. 

    While “the Squad” branding has faded—largely relegated to the right-wing and conservative press—when asked to reflect on those early days of her congressional tenure, in which the group as a collective, became a bigger target of criticism than even Hillary Clinton or Nancy Pelosi, Pressley responded: “My priorities haven’t changed. My convictions and my resolve have only been further emboldened and the issues I’ve led on my entire life are the issues that I’ve continued to work on.” Policy is her “love language” and she has “always just followed the work.” But as she positions herself for life in the minority, where chances at policy will be few and far between, Pressley acknowledged that her outsized platform could aid her effort to thrust the caucus into greater relevance. “I do think that the platform that I have  earned and built up over time, would [serve]  in such a way to increase the reach and the impact and the influence of this caucus,” she said. 

    Pressley isn’t the only “Squad” member to set her sights on a leadership post. Last week, Omar was elected deputy chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus. Speaking on Monday night, Omar reflected on the approaching shift to the minority. “It is going to be an effort to try to block as much progress as Republicans want to make in the house, even in their messaging bills,” the Minnesota congresswoman said. “I know that with a slim majority, it was challenging—even for Speaker Pelosi.” But this time around, every Squad member, including Pressley, is bringing a lot more legislative expertise to the table. “It was clear from pretty early on when she came to Congress that she had a really deep passion for reproductive rights issues, issues facing women—economic issues and care issues,” a former Capitol Hill staffer said of the Massachusetts Democrat. “And I think the idea of having the Democratic Women’s [Caucus] as more of an organized bloc would be a good one.” 

    Pressley was the first woman of color to serve on the Boston City Council, a perch from which she launched the Healthy Women’s Families and Communities Committee. With her election to Congress, she claimed another first as the first woman of color elected to represent Massachusetts. And in her time on Capitol Hill, protecting and promoting women has been a throughline: she is colead of the Women’s Health Protection Act; she serves on the Pro-Choice Caucus; she has been a leader in the fight for paid leave and maternal health justice; and she is the lead co-sponsor in the fight to abolish the Hyde Amendment, to name a few. “The issues of consequence in this moment are issues that I’ve led on,” she pitched. 

    [ad_2]

    Abigail Tracy

    Source link