ReportWire

Tag: awards

  • ‘The Last of Us’: Inside That Tragic, Gorgeous, and Surprising Love Story Episode

    ‘The Last of Us’: Inside That Tragic, Gorgeous, and Surprising Love Story Episode

    [ad_1]

    Spoilers for The Last of Us episode three ahead

    Hitting many of the same narrative beats, recreating iconic shots, and expanding upon the original digital design with painstakingly hand-built sets, HBO’s The Last of Us had, through its first two episodes, deliberately and closely echoed the postapocalyptic game on which it’s based. From the beginning, the question of how the adaptation would eventually set itself apart was twofold, a matter of both when it’d shift directions and to exactly what degree. Enter Sunday’s third episode, “Long Long Time,” which is a decades-spanning and near-feature-length love story that “explodes expectations,” as one of its stars, Nick Offerman, puts it to Vanity Fair.

    In the game, Bill is a minor character whose survivalist bent comes in handy when it comes to helping protagonists Joel (Pedro Pascal) and Ellie (Bella Ramsey) on their perilous cross-country journey. He’s encountered briefly through Joel’s perspective, entering the enclosed mini safe town Bill has built for himself as he claims to contentedly live in isolation. “You come to realize that he’s actually lying,” says game creator Neil Druckmann, who developed the series with Emmy winner Craig Mazin. “There was something Bill cared about more than survival—there’s this other man named Frank.” Frank is not a speaking role in the game; the relationship between him and Bill is only subtly alluded to. But here Mazin saw his opportunity to put his stamp on the Last of Us show, to give viewers “a breath” after two intense and bloody opening episodes, and to buck expectations. We’ve been on the run with Joel and Ellie, and finally viewers get to sit down and stay awhile with Bill and Frank. 

    “I said, ‘Neil, I’ve got a crazy idea,’” Mazin recalls. “And he was like, ‘Do it. Let’s see how it goes.’ And off we went.”

    In “Long Long Time” we meet Offerman’s Bill in 2003, the show’s earliest ongoing timeline so far, as the episode begins. His survivalist paranoias improbably come true as the world starts melting down. Singularly equipped to, yes, survive in the world that nobody but him saw coming, he constructs a bunker and an entire electrical ecosystem around it to live comfortably for as long as he wants. As this origin story goes, he finds a stranger lurking outside his property, starving and dirty and (so he claims) not infected—Frank, played by Murray Bartlett. After confirming, Bill reluctantly lets the man in for a shower, a meal, and a glass of wine. They realize they’re attracted to each other—the blossoming of a romance that the episode, directed by Peter Hoar, charts with gorgeous and heartbreaking specificity through the end of both their lives. Not exactly typical video game stuff.

    “It was about showing both the passage of time and the creation of a functioning relationship that implied that two people could have success in this world,” Mazin says. “Regardless of the nature of their love, whether it’s romantic or platonic or parental, not everything has to end badly. And they really do have a happy ending as far as I’m concerned.”

    Veterans of TV known for their more offbeat characterizations, Bartlett (The White Lotus) and Offerman (Parks and Recreation) pull off something magical in just a single episode, believably developing a relationship that initially feels new and exciting and strange, then turns worn and a little cranky and genuinely profound. The chemistry is natural and quiet, the depth of the performances intricately woven between them. Bartlett secured the part in an audition, and Mazin was able to cast Offerman—an acquaintance—after another actor couldn’t commit due to scheduling. In fact, Offerman himself first had to say no due to timing, only for the role to work out when it came back around.

    “Craig told me that they took a good look at Murray and said, ‘Oh man, we’re going to need some counterpoint to this guy,’” Offerman says and then laughs. By this point, White Lotus had made Bartlett an Emmy-bound star. “Imagine seeing Indiana Jones and then your agent is like, ‘So they want you to be in a relationship with the guy with the hat and the whip,’” Offerman says. “How did I get here?”

    The coup of “Long Long Time” comes down, in many ways, to just how quickly it establishes deep intimacy between the men. Bartlett and Offerman say that Mazin’s script laid much of the groundwork for allowing them to jump in, find that particular romantic texture, and then pop out for the main story to continue progressing. (The episode ends when Joel and Ellie, planning to hand Ellie off to the couple’s capable care, arrive at the house and find them dead.) “We were set up for success,” Bartlett says. “Some of these scenes are very vulnerable and very delicate. We were lucky enough to have someone [in Hoar] who would just tread very carefully in maneuvering us in the right directions to tell the version of the story that we wanted to tell.”

    It’s all in the little details—flashes of a life partnership taking place years apart. After they meet, we see them make love. Mazin, who is not gay, says it’s “the first sex scene I’ve ever written in my career.” The creator leaned on queer collaborators on the episode like Bartlett, Hoar, and others to ensure it and similar moments felt authentic and specific to these characters: “I do believe when you’re writing outside of your familiarity, it’s important to do your homework and to also have people nearby who are being paid and working with you—not just your friends that you’re bothering—who can say, ‘Actually, this is better, this would be more true.’”

    Offerman and Bartlett fell into a dynamic easily and in good humor. “Murray liked me, I’ll go that far,” Offerman says dryly over Zoom, with Bartlett smirking beside him. (“I liked you enough, dude,” Bartlett replies.) They approached the naked scenes, both literally and figuratively, “meticulously,” Bartlett says, zeroing in on upending tropes of “these two rugged guys in a postapocalyptic world.” They both chuckle recalling one key moment that marks a time jump of several years, with the two characters bickering like an old married couple—a signal that their love has lasted. “When we burst out of the house screaming at each other into the street, to me, it’s such a triumphant memory,” Offerman says. In one of the final sequences, Bill walks in from his garden while Frank, who now uses a wheelchair and is ill with some unnamed malady, is painting. They take each other in. “There’s no words,” Bartlett remembers of shooting the scene. “It’s a beautiful moment.”  

    [ad_2]

    David Canfield

    Source link

  • A Messy Oscar Scandal From “a Little Movie With a Giant Heart”

    A Messy Oscar Scandal From “a Little Movie With a Giant Heart”

    [ad_1]

    On the morning of Oscar nominations, when Andrea Riseborough’s name was announced as a nominee for lead actress, a loud gasp went through the Samuel Goldwyn Theater. The nomination took many by surprise because her awards campaign for her performance in To Leslie had only begun about two weeks earlier. Many had not even heard of the small independent film, which centers on a woman with substance abuse issues who makes attempt after attempt to right her life, but a celebrity-driven grassroots campaign took the town by storm—and landed her an unexpected nomination. 

    Now, just a few days later, a new report from Puck indicates that there are questions being raised about whether Academy rules for campaigning have been broken. A source tells Vanity Fair that there has not been a formal complaint filed to the Academy yet, but the conversation around the topic has reached a fever pitch, with the Academy releasing this statement on Friday: “It is the Academy’s goal to ensure that the Awards competition is conducted in a fair and ethical manner, and we are committed to ensuring an inclusive awards process. We are conducting a review of the campaign procedures around this year’s nominees, to ensure that no guidelines were violated, and to inform us whether changes to the guidelines may be needed in a new era of social media and digital communication. We have confidence in the integrity of our nomination and voting procedures, and support genuine grassroots campaigns for outstanding performances.”

    While the statement from the Academy did not specifically name To Leslie, it’s clear that this review is targeted at the campaign, which has become the talk of the town. “Even if it’s not expressly written in the rules, it’s not really in the spirit of how this should be done,” one awards strategist tells VF. “There is something that just doesn’t sit right with this.” 

    In case you missed it, about a week before Oscar voting, several high-profile actors, including Edward Norton, Bradley Whitford, Jennifer Aniston, Melanie Lynskey, and Helen Hunt, began tweeting out effusive praise for the film and Riseborough’s performance.

    Gwyneth Paltrow hosted a screening while Amy Adams moderated a Q&A. And during a virtual Q&A, Kate Winslet called it “one of the greatest performances I have ever seen in my life.” And Cate Blanchett, now Riseborough’s competitor in the best-actress category, even mentioned her onstage when she accepted the Critics Choice Award. Things began to look dodgy when some eagle-eyed people noticed that many of the tweets of support, like this one from Mia Farrow, used the same phrase: “a small film with a giant heart.” Joe Mantegna, Dulé Hill, and Meredith Vieira also tweeted about the movie using similar language.

    What became obvious is that even though this is being labeled as a grassroots campaign without a lot of money behind it, it’s still a campaign, and a very well orchestrated one at that. Sources say Mary McCormack, the wife of the film’s director Michael Morris, was one of the biggest advocates for the film, reaching out to her wide network. (Vanity Fair has reached out to McCormack for comment.) McCormack is a veteran actor who starred in TV series like The West Wing and In Plain Sight. Riseborough’s PR team, agency, and manager also used their networks, and the awards PR firm Shelter was brought on to coordinate the campaign. 

    According to the report from Puck, an email being sent out to A-list talent (and voters) encouraged as much social media promotion as possible: “If you’re willing to post every day between now and Jan 17th, that would be amazing! But anything is helpful, so please do whatever makes you comfortable. And what’s more comfortable than posting about a movie every day!” 

    It was an almost unheard of way to campaign for a film—most studios launch awards campaigns that begin at the fall festivals and continue for months with screenings and events and lots of press—but they were successfully able to get many influential actors to endorse the movie, just as voting opened. “It’s always been about word of mouth, and how you get the movie on the radar, and while this seems unconventional, it’s really not—this just happened to garner more attention because it’s high-profile people,” says an awards strategist. In some cases, it’s easy to draw a bright line between Riseborough and her A-List supporters—for example, she stars opposite Winslet in the upcoming limited series The Palace—but in others, it appears to be a case of aggressive networking and Rolodex-sharing. 

    So now the question is, did they really break any rules? The Academy has a strict list of campaigning guidelines, put in place to protect the process from any abuse. “It is the Academy’s goal to ensure that the Awards competition is conducted in a fair and ethical manner,” the regulations state. “The Academy requires that voting members of the Academy make their choices based solely on the artistic and technical merits of the eligible films and achievements.”

    Some of the rules are quite specific. For example, only one mailing can be sent out to voters per week; a film’s synopsis has to be “300 characters or less including spaces.” Others leave a bit of room for interpretation. There are a couple of rules that could possibly be relevant vis-à-vis the To Leslie campaign. First of all, under “Lobbying,” one rule states, “Contacting Academy members directly and in a manner outside of the scope of these rules to promote a film or achievement for Academy Award consideration is expressly forbidden.” We know that many voters in the Academy branch were contacted and encouraged to watch the movie and use social media to support the film. 

    [ad_2]

    Rebecca Ford

    Source link

  • Great Movies That Got Zero Oscar Nominations

    Great Movies That Got Zero Oscar Nominations

    [ad_1]

    Every year we expend so much effort on the Oscars. Who will win? Who should win? Who got snubbed? Who gave the best speech? It’s pretty much five straight months of this, non-stop.

    But can you name last year’s Best Picture winner off the top of your head? Okay, you might remember Moonlight because of the crazy wrong envelope kerfuffle. What about the Best Picture in 2020? How about the year before that? (It was Coda and Nomadland. I looked it up, because I didn’t remember.)

    The Oscars are fun, and yes, they are important for a lot of reasons. But they do not guarantee cinematic immortality. Plenty of the most famous and most beloved movies of all time didn’t win a single Academy Award (including Dr. StrangeloveIt’s a Wonderful LifeTaxi DriverDo the Right ThingVertigo, and The Shawshank Redemption). And then there are the classics that didn’t even merit a single nomination. All 12 of the films below are classics of their respective genres. Some of them have been watched for almost a century. And none of them got even one (1) Oscar nomination. So don’t fret, fans of awesome films like Nope that are almost certainly going to be ignored by the Academy this year. Pundits may talk about the Oscars as a race. But in the macro view, they’re just the beginning of a much longer journey.

    Great Movies That Got Zero Oscar Nominations

    These all-time classics not only didn’t win any Oscars — they weren’t even nominated!

    The Worst Oscar Best Picture Winners

    These movies won the Academy Awards for Best Picture over better, more deserving films.

    [ad_2]

    Matt Singer

    Source link

  • The 10 Most Surprising Oscar Best Picture Winners

    The 10 Most Surprising Oscar Best Picture Winners

    [ad_1]

    Every year, film buffs and casual viewers alike get excited when the Academy releases their annual list of nominations — especially when it comes to the Best Picture category. You see, unlike every other category, the Best Picture trophy carries a bit more weight to it. There are less quantifiable elements to it than a more specific category, such as Sound Editing or Costume Design. In those categories, you can pinpoint certain merits based on technique or attention to craft. As a concept, “Best Picture” implies that a film manages to score highly in several departments — but even beyond that, it leaves the biggest impression on its audiences.

    The term “Oscar bait” refers to a movie (typically, a drama) that seems particularly geared toward a certain demographic — the industry professionals who get to decide the nominations each year. These films often feature A-list actors in challenging roles, heavy-hitting themes, and sweeping scores. They’re the clear front-runners, and no one is really surprised when they take home the big prize. But other times, a movie has an unexpected victory. Whether it falls into a genre that isn’t typically celebrated at the Academy Awards, or it snubs a more “Oscar-worthy” title, sometimes a film’s win comes as quite a shock to the audience. At the end of the day, though, the news shouldn’t come as a shock to the Academy — they’re the very ones who picked it, after all.

    Below, you’ll find 10 of the most shocking Best Picture winners in Oscar history.

    The 10 Most Shocking Best Picture Winners In Oscar History

    These movies shocked the film world on their way to winning Best Picture at the Academy Awards.

    The Worst Oscar Best Picture Winners

    These movies won the Academy Awards for Best Picture over better, more deserving films.

    [ad_2]

    Claire Epting

    Source link

  • The 2023 Oscar Nominations, by the Numbers

    The 2023 Oscar Nominations, by the Numbers

    [ad_1]

    Another Oscar nomination morning has passed, with Allison Williams and Riz Ahmed confidently guiding us through a very un-quiet Western Front, past The Banshees of Inisherin, to take in Everything Everywhere All at Once on the Oscar ballot in this, our Year of Dicks. Now that we’ve had a second to peruse the ballot and take it all in, it’s time to shout out those Oscar milestones that were achieved yesterday. 

    It was a landmark year for first-time nominees, all while masters of their craft like Steven Spielberg, Cate Blanchett, and John Williams etched their names in the Oscar record books. If you’re an Oscar nerd—or if you simply like to sit back and watch Oscar nerds spin out with facts and figures—here’s where the ballot really comes alive. 

    BEST PICTURE

    With 10 nominated films that were released in six different months across the calendar, the 2022 best-picture field is the most calendar-diverse since 2009. Everything Everywhere All at Once hit theaters in March, Top Gun: Maverick premiered in May, Elvis opened in June; Tár, All Quiet on the Western Front, The Banshees of Inisherin, and Triangle of Sadness all debuted in October, The Fabelmans in November, and finally Avatar: The Way of Water in December. This bucks a trend of recent best-picture lineups that have been heavily weighted toward November and December releases. Eight of the 10 best-picture nominees last year, for example, opened in the last two months of the year. 

    Meanwhile, The Fabelmans’ nomination in best picture means that Steven Spielberg has tied the great William Wyler for directing the most best-picture nominees at 13. 

    In less-great but still notable news, Women Talking’s two total nominations is the fewest by a best-picture nominee since 2017’s The Post. On the bright side for Sarah PolleyThe Post was directed by Steven Spielberg, so: good company.

    BEST DIRECTOR

    Spielberg’s best-director nomination for The Fabelmans ties him with Martin Scorsese for second-most of all time, at nine nominations. They both trail William Wyler and his 12 best-director nominations. 

    The shared nomination for the Daniels, Daniel Kwan and Daniel Scheinert, marks the fifth time that a best-director nomination is shared by codirectors. The two most recent instances of that were when Joel and Ethan Coen were nominated for 2010’s True Grit and 2007’s No Country for Old Men. Prior to that, it had only been Robert Wise and Jerome Robbins for West Side Story and Warren Beatty and Buck Henry for Heaven Can Wait.

    And with Elvis’s nomination in best picture—but not best director—Baz Luhrmann has now missed out on a best-director nod for a best-picture nominee twice. It happened before when Moulin Rouge! was nominated for best picture in 2002. Luhrmann joins the company of Joe Wright (Atonement and Darkest Hour), Frank Darabont (The Shawshank Redemption and The Green Mile), and Lawrence Kasdan (The Big Chill and The Accidental Tourist) for this frustrating achievement.

    GENERAL ACTING-CATEGORY MILESTONES

    One of the most striking things about the 2023 nominations is that there were 16 performers who received their first acting nominations. Only Cate Blanchett, Michelle Williams, Angela Bassett, and Judd Hirsch had ever been previously nominated. It’s been 56 years since that kind of wave for first-time nominees. The 1967 Oscars also featured 16 first-time nominees, including the first-ever acting nods for Michael Caine, Vanessa Redgrave, Steve McQueen, Alan Arkin, and Walter Matthau. 

    The five acting nominations for Irish performers this year also sets an all-time Oscar record. The four nominees from The Banshees of InisherinColin Farrell, Brendan Gleeson, Barry Keoghan, and Kerry Condon—are joined by Aftersun’s Paul Mescal, and together they’ve obliterated the previous record of three Irish acting nominees that was set in 1990 by My Left Foot stars Daniel Day-Lewis and Brenda Fricker along with Henry V’s Kenneth Branagh. 

    BEST ACTOR

    Just one year after best actor featured zero first-time acting nominees for the first time since 1981, all five best-actor nominees this year are first-timers. Austin Butler (Elvis), Colin Farrell (The Banshees of Inisherin), Brendan Fraser (The Whale), Paul Mescal (Aftersun), and Bill Nighy (Living) are all new to feeling Oscar’s warm embrace. The last time this happened was 1935—88 years ago!—when the Oscars had just three best-actor nominees, all first timers:  Clark Gable (It Happened One Night), Frank Morgan (The Affairs of Cellini), and William Powell (The Thin Man).

    BEST ACTRESS

    Michelle Yeoh’s nomination for her performance in Everything Everywhere All at Once marks the first time that an openly Asian woman has been nominated for best actress. If that sounds like a complicated record, it is—1936 best-actress Oscar nominee Merle Oberon hid her mother’s Sri Lankan ancestry. (More on Oberon’s fascinating story in this episode of You Must Remember This.) But Yeoh’s nomination is a landmark by any measure. The Malaysian-born star was joined on the ballot by her costars Stephanie Hsu and Ke Huy Quan, as well as The Whale’s Hong Chau, making for the largest lineup of Asian and Asian American acting nominees in Oscar history. 

    [ad_2]

    Joe Reid

    Source link

  • Jimmy Kimmel Reacts To Oscar Betting: ‘They’re Encouraging Someone With A Gambling Problem To Slap Me’

    Jimmy Kimmel Reacts To Oscar Betting: ‘They’re Encouraging Someone With A Gambling Problem To Slap Me’

    [ad_1]

    By Brent Furdyk.

    Jimmy Kimmel will be keeping a look out for potential slappers when he takes to the stage of the Dolby Theater in March to host the Oscars.

    Kimmel, who has hosted twice before, addressed the 2023 nominations during Tuesday night’s edition of “Jimmy Kimmel Live!”

    One thing that surprised him, he noted in his monologue, was that online gambling sites are now taking bets on which films and actors will be winning awards.


    READ MORE:
    Jimmy Kimmel To Return To Host The Oscars For A Third Time In 2023

    In addition, he pointed to one category referencing last year’s infamous Will Smith slap of Chris Rock: “Will any host or award presenter be slapped during the show?” reads the bet.

    “If you put $100 on yes, you win $1,200 — which, I have to say, seems like they’re encouraging someone with a gambling problem to slap me,” Kimmel quipped.

    Kimmel also pointed to the Best Oscar nominees, which included “Everything Everywhere All at Once”, “Top Gun: Maverick”, “Elvis”, “Avatar: The Way of Water” and, he joked, “six movies that no one has seen — including a movie called ‘Triangle of Sadness’, which I always thought was a slice of Papa John’s pizza.”


    READ MORE:
    Regina Hall On Jimmy Kimmel Hosting Oscars: ‘I Hope Nobody Comes Out Of The Audience This Time’ (Exclusive)

    Kimmel will be hosting the Oscars on Sunday, March 12.

    [ad_2]

    Brent Furdyk

    Source link

  • Razzies Apologize For Nominating a Child for Worst Actress

    Razzies Apologize For Nominating a Child for Worst Actress

    [ad_1]

    Critics were generally not kind to the recent remake of Stephen King’s FirestarterOn Rotten Tomatoes it got a 10 percent score, and it made my personal list of the worst films of 2022. But the Razzies, the annual awards dedicated to the worst in cinema, took things a step further by nominating Ryan Kiera Armstrong, the 12-year-old actress who plays the central role in the film as the pyrokinetic girl Charlie, for their Worst Actress of 2023.

    No one expects the Razzie Awards to be nice, but nominating a child for an award as one of the worst actors of the year was a very controversial decision, one that got a lot of negative attention on social media. In the wake of the outcry, the Razzies have now announced they have rescinded Armstrong’s nomination (although you can still see her listed on their official website as of this writing) and will institute a new rule for the future barring anyone under the age of 18 from being nominated for a prize.

    Razzies founder John Wilson gave this statement about the decision to

    Sometimes, you do things without thinking, Then you are called out for it. Then you get it. It’s why the Razzies were created in the first place. The recent valid criticism of the choice of 11 year old Armstrong as a nominee for one of our awards brought our attention to how insensitive we’ve been in this instance. As a result, we have removed Armstrong’s name from the Final Ballot that our members will cast next month. We also believe a public apology is owed Ms. Armstrong, and wish to say we regret any hurt she experienced as a result of our choices.

    “We have never intended to bury anyone’s career,” Wilson also said. “It is why our Redeemer Award was created. We all make mistakes, very much us included. Since our motto is ‘Own Your Bad,’ we realize that we ourselves must also live up to it.” Frankly, it’s a little depressing anyone needed to inform the Razzies it was needlessly cruel to nominate (and therefore mock) children before this, but at least the rule will prevent it from happening again.

    The other nominees for Worst Actress are Bryce Dallas Howard for Jurassic World: Dominion, Diane Keaton for Mack & Rita, Kaya Scodelario for The King’s Daughter, and Alicia Silverstone for The Requin. The “winners” of all of this year’s Razzies will be announced the day before the Academy Awards, on March 11. You can read all of these year’s Razzie nominees here.

    The Worst Razzie Nominees in History

    The Razzies honor the worst in movies. But sometimes, their picks are even worse.

    [ad_2]

    Matt Singer

    Source link

  • ‘My Year of Dicks’: It’s Real, It’s Oscar-Nominated, and You Can Watch It Now

    ‘My Year of Dicks’: It’s Real, It’s Oscar-Nominated, and You Can Watch It Now

    [ad_1]

    Each year one moment from the Oscar nominations announcement earns unintentional buzz, most notably seen in past pronunciation snafus. But when the 2023 Oscar nominations were read by Riz Ahmed and Allison Williams, people were talking about one nominee’s provocative title itself—not the delivery of it.

    My Year of Dicks,” Ahmed said while announcing the nominees for best animated short film. He then chuckled, his break eliciting laughter from attendees in the pressroom. Giggles continued when Ahmed read the next nominee, the eccentrically titled An Ostrich Told Me the World Is Fake and I Think I Believe It. After a brief pause, Williams capitalized on the moment, quipping, “No comment.”

    The 25-minute short with the attention-grabbing title made first-time Oscar nominees out of director Sara Gunnarsdóttir, who became the first female Icelandic filmmaker to get an Academy Award nomination, and writer Pamela Ribon, who hails from Disney Animation with credits on Moana and Ralph Breaks the Internet. Dicks (insert Ahmed’s laughter here) is adapted from Ribon’s memoir, Notes to Boys (And Other Things I Shouldn’t Share in Public), and inspired by her own experiences coming of age in the early ’90s.

    Told in five chapters, set in genres ranging from vampire tale to horror film, the story centers on a 15-year-old girl named Pam who is hell-bent on losing her virginity over the course of a particularly phallic 365 days in small-town Texas. Ribon, who has called this project a “homegrown experience,” quotes her real-life letters and uses video recordings of her teen self; she even cast some of her own family members in the short. 

    Amidst commentary around the nominations’ biggest snubs and surprises, the official My Year of Dicks Twitter account shared the following message: “We are so grateful for the nomination from our animation community, and for this chance to share such a personal story of awkward, teenage wonder with a worldwide audience. Thank you, thank you.” In a follow-up tweet, the account shared video of the nominations announcement, writing, “If just announcing our title can get that level of giggles (Thanks, Riz and Allison!), we can’t wait to see what’ll happen when you watch the film.”

    You can watch My Year of Dicks at this Vimeo link before the 2023 Oscars on Sunday, March 12. 

    [ad_2]

    Savannah Walsh

    Source link

  • The Oscars 2023 Nominations, Explained

    The Oscars 2023 Nominations, Explained

    [ad_1]

    Campaign logic was turned on its head in this year’s surprising, at times thrilling, slate of nominees. We break down how it happened, and what it means.

    [ad_2]

    David Canfield

    Source link

  • For the First Time, Two Sequels Were Nominated for Best Picture

    For the First Time, Two Sequels Were Nominated for Best Picture

    [ad_1]

    It’s not often that sequels really go up for serious Oscar consideration… and it’s never been the case that two are up for Best Picture at the same time. Both Top Gun: Maverick and Avatar: The Way Of Water have managed to get Oscar nominations, but they face some stiff competition.

    Other films nominated for Best Picture at the Oscars this year include Everything Everywhere All at Once, Elvis, Tár, The Banshees of Inisherin, The Fabelmans, All Quiet on the Western Front, Triangle of Sadness, and Women Talking. Of course, regardless of how this all goes for Joseph Kosinski or James Cameron, we can at least all agree that it’s been a great year for movies.

    Both films are up for a variety of other nominations. For Avatar: The Way Of Water, we have nominations for Best Sound, Best Visual Effects, and Best Production Design. On the other hand, Top Gun: Maverick is sitting pretty with a few more nominations and in some weightier categories. It’s in the running for Best Original Song, Best Sound, Best Visual Effects, Best Adapted Screenplay, and Best Film Editing.

    Both films made a ton of money at the box office, received rave reviews from critics, and were well-liked by the general public. Unfortunately, when you’re up against such great films, that’s not always a guaranteed win. Luckily, both of these films also arguably have a pretty huge cultural impact, and that can really give them a leg up. Top Gun: Maverick also has nominations in some pretty key categories like Best Film Editing. Even if it doesn’t win Best Picture (which is very unlikely), it could still take home some Oscars in other categories.

    Regardless of how this goes, everyone involved with both movies should be excited to know that they were part of breaking an Oscars record. People frequently push back against the sequel-wave that Hollywood has been riding, but these nominations show that sometimes, sequels really are good.

    The Best Oscar Best Picture Winners Ever

    More than 90 films have earned the title of Best Picture from the Academy Awards. These are the best of the best.

    [ad_2]

    Cody Mcintosh

    Source link

  • Razzies Announce Nominees For the Worst Movies of 2022

    Razzies Announce Nominees For the Worst Movies of 2022

    [ad_1]

    It was not a good year for Tom Hanks, at least according to the Razzie Awards, the most famous awards in the world dedicated to terrible movies. The Razzies just announced their nominees for the worst in cinema of 2022, and Hanks, one of America’s most beloved actors for decades, managed to snag three Razzie nominations in three different categories.

    Hanks was nominated for Worst Actor for his work in Pinocchio, the live-action remake of the Disney classic that also scored nominations for Worst Picture, Worst Supporting Actress (Lorraine Bracco), Worst Remake/Ripoff/Sequel, Worst Director (Robert Zemeckis), and Worst Screenplay. Hanks was also nominated twice for Elvis — both as Worst Supporting Actor and Worst Screen Couple, where he was nominated for his work alongside his “Latex-Laden Face (and Ludicrous Accent).”

    That’s pretty much the Razzies in a nutshell; a mix of deserving nominees (Hanks wasn’t particularly good in Pinocchio and he was definitely bad in Elvis) and cheap shots. They also tend to nominate movies they don’t like (or work from people they don’t like) even in categories where they make no sense. The Marilyn Monroe biopic Blonde, for example, is nominated for Worst Onscreen Couple for “Both Real Life Characters in the Fallacious White House Bedroom Scene.” Now Blonde was a terrible movie; it made my own list of the worst films of 2022. But that seems like … a stretch?

    Still, there are probably more worthy Razzie nominees this year than in others, including the schlock superhero film Morbius and Netflix’s brutal animated movie of Marmaduke. The “winners” of this year’s Razzies will be announced the day before the Academy Awards, on March 11.

    Worst Picture
    Blonde
    Disney’s Pinocchio
    Good Mourning
    The King’s Daughter
    Morbius

    Andrews McMeel Entertainment
    Andrews McMeel Entertainment

    Worst Actor
    Colson Baker, Good Mourning
    Pete Davidson, Marmaduke
    Tom Hanks, Disney’s Pinocchio
    Jared Leto, Morbius
    Sylvester Stallone, Samaritan

    Worst Actress
    Ryan Kiera Armstrong, Firestarter
    Bryce Dallas Howard, Jurassic Park: Dominion
    Diane Keaton, Mack & Rita
    Kaya Scodelario, The King’s Daughter
    Alicia Silverstone, The Requin

    Worst Remake/Rip-off/Sequel
    Blonde
    365 Days: This Day & The Next 365 Days
    Disney’s Pinocchio
    Firestarter
    Jurassic World: Dominion

    Worst Supporting Actress
    Adria Arjona, Morbius
    Lorraine Bracco, Disney’s Pinocchio
    Penelope Cruz, The 355
    Bingbing Fan, The 355 & The King’s Daughter
    Mira Sorvino, Lamborghini: The Man Behind the Legend

    Worst Supporting Actor
    Pete Davidson, Good Mourning
    Tom Hanks, Elvis
    Xavier Samuel, Blonde
    Mod Sun, Good Mourning
    Evan Williams, Blonde

    Blonde. Ana de Armas as Marilyn Monroe. Cr. Netflix © 2022
    Netflix

    Worst Screen Couple
    Colson Baker & Mod Sun, Good Mourning
    Both Real Life Characters in the Fallacious White House Bedroom Scene, Blonde
    Tom Hanks & His Latex-Laden Face (and Ludicrous Accent), Elvis
    Andrew Dominik & His Issues with Women, Blonde
    The Two 365 Days Sequels

    Worst Director
    Judd Apatow, The Bubble
    Colson Baker & Mod Sun, Good Mourning
    Andrew Dominik, Blonde
    Daniel Espinosa, Morbius
    Robert Zemeckis, Disney’s Pinocchio

    Worst Screenplay
    Blonde
    Disney’s Pinocchio
    Good Mourning
    Jurassic World: Dominion
    Morbius

    The Worst Razzie Nominees in History

    The Razzies honor the worst in movies. But sometimes, their picks are even worse.

    [ad_2]

    Matt Singer

    Source link

  • Jenny Slate on Her Critics Choice 2023 Look and ‘Marcel the Shell’ Poignant Makeup Moment

    Jenny Slate on Her Critics Choice 2023 Look and ‘Marcel the Shell’ Poignant Makeup Moment

    [ad_1]

    It’s Friday afternoon in Los Angeles, during the brief lull between the Golden Globes and the Critics Choice Awards, and Jenny Slate is detailing her red carpet preparations. “Right now, I’m eating an everything bagel in my car. Super glamorous!” the actor says by phone, as an electronic trill announces that she’s shifted into park. 

    A facial with Natura Bissé notwithstanding (“A gigantic luxury—I’m very happy about that”), this is not the moment for the laid-back pampering one might expect for a woman tied to two celebrated movies. Marcel the Shell With Shoes On, a Critics Choice nominee for best animated film, is the product of her decade-long collaboration with co-creator Dean Fleischer Camp, with Slate voicing the winsome one-inch-tall protagonist. She also turns up in awards-season darling Everything Everywhere All at Once, playing an athleisure-clad regular at the laundromat. Maybe, in an alternate reality, Slate is sipping kombucha after yoga and a lymphatic massage. “But right now, I am the mother of a two-year-old who has jet lag,” she says, recalling daughter Ida’s 4 a.m. request for yogurt following the Globes. “It feels like I’m just folding the awards into my life,” she says. A master of her multiverse: “It definitely does all fit.”  

    Skin prep comes first for makeup artist Kirin Bhatty, who used Violette’s Boum-Boum Milk with a gua sha tool before applying metallic rust tones on the eyes (Yeux Paint in Rose d’Aurore and Marron Glacé). Bisou Balm in Bêtise simulated a “just bitten” lip, Bhatty says.

    By Sami Drasin. 

    Hairstylist Nikki Providence relied on IGK’s Good Behavior balm and smoothing spray to finesse the side-swept waves. “Since it was a torrential downpour off and on all weekend, they were life savers,” says Providence.

    By Sami Drasin.

    Slate has a soft spot for the Critics Choice Awards. In 2015, she took home the event’s prize for best actress in a comedy, for her role in the oops-pregnancy movie Obvious Child; five years later, her debut comedy special, Stage Fright, earned a nomination as well. “It’s the actual critics who have watched everything, who write in depth about all of these projects, and it is immensely important to be honored by them,” says Slate, who earmarked a dress by Olivier Theyskens for this weekend’s ceremony. It’s one of the designer’s couture-level exercises in sustainability, composed entirely of fabric swatches—in this case, gold and metallic olive and snippets of magenta—that he has accumulated over the years. “I love a turtleneck, always have, and while it’s very tight on the body, it also still somehow shows restraint,” she says. “To me, it feels like maybe my most powerful look yet.” 

    The Olivier Theyskens dress, revealing its weightless quality.

    By Sami Drasin.

    A moment with stylist Monty Jackson.

    By Sami Drasin.

    The team getting Slate ready on Sunday evening serve as longtime confidants: makeup artist Kirin Bhatty and hairstylist Nikki Providence above the neck, stylist Monty Jackson below. “He’s seen me very naked one million times,” Slate says with a laugh. “He really works not just with my figure and what I think is stylish, but also with my emotions.” It’s a cherished quality, given that the stakes of the occasion are higher than another fancy night out. “When you’re [dressing for] your own birthday party, you don’t really think about whether the entire internet is going to tell you that you looked either very good or very bad or somewhere in between.”

    Backyard sunlight picks up the metallic glimmers in the dress and makeup.

    By Sami Drasin.

    [ad_2]

    Laura Regensdorf

    Source link

  • The Images of Tár: “I Felt Like I Had to Really Step Up and Deliver Here”

    The Images of Tár: “I Felt Like I Had to Really Step Up and Deliver Here”

    [ad_1]

    The availability of the Dresden Philharmonic, the group which stands in for Lydia’s fictional orchestra, was tight—so tight, in fact, that production had to begin with their scenes or they’d lose them altogether. This meant actors like Blanchett had to dive right into the conducting and musical work—and that the crew, too, had to kick things off with a bang.  

    Todd Field: We had to  marshal our energies and push them straight into this, full force. These were very, very short days because you only get an orchestra for, at most, 10 hours, and that doesn’t include their breaks and them eating. I think the first day we did something like 96 setups, and that was something that Florian and I planned for weeks and months, trying to figure out what those setups were. I don’t typically use storyboards unless that’s absolutely necessary, but in this case it was essential. 

    Florian Hoffmeister: When we started talking about the film, Todd was very adamant to emphasize that this is a working space. It’s not glorified, it’s hard work; they go in there, they rehearse all day. Authenticity was paramount. At first sight, you might think it limits the lighting, but I found it actually terribly liberating to approach the space with this theme. And Todd always said from the beginning, we should never move the camera—the golden rule. I still remember the first time that orchestra played, you just fly away. There’s this instant feeling the camera wants to move with the music.

    Field: When you look at rehearsals of orchestras, there’s some very rich footage of watching rehearsal processes. And once you go down that rabbit hole, you stay there—at least for me, watching people rehearse is infinitely more interesting than watching performance. There’s nothing fancy about the way that that is documented. It’s typically one or two cameras with a couple of boom mics and people getting what they can. Either the camera is inside the orchestra or adjacent to the orchestra. That was the approach for this. It was, by design, really banal. 

    Hoffmeister: Though if it were truthfully banal, it would be quite an appalling space. The tightrope on which you walk is how you can create an image that is arresting and inviting and allows the eye to wander, within these rules. How do you shape that? We were lucky in the sense that the German music industry is highly regulated, to the extent that the luminance on their note sheets has to have a certain brightness. So, by contract, the concert hall has to have a certain brightness so they can read their notes!

    Great Debate

    [ad_2]

    David Canfield

    Source link

  • Marcel the Shell With Shoes On: You Will Believe a Shell Can Skate

    Marcel the Shell With Shoes On: You Will Believe a Shell Can Skate

    [ad_1]

    Animation meets the real world at every moment in Marcel the Shell With Shoes On—but maybe less than you think. Set inside a house that happens to be occupied by a chatty shell (voiced by Jenny Slate) and his grandmother (voiced by Isabella Rossellini), the movie uses stop-motion animation to bring Marcel to life in ordinary settings, like a kitchen floor or a bathroom sink. It’s technically a hybrid of live action and animation, and in the two-decade history of the best animated feature category at the Oscars, no film like that has made the cut.

    But Marcel the Shell didn’t just make the Oscars shortlist, it’s been on an awards season streak, nabbing nominations from the Golden Globes and Critics’ Choice Awards in the best animated feature camp, along with winning the New York Film Critics Circle and the National Board of Review awards.

    Marcel’s director Dean Fleischer-Camp and animation director Kirsten Lepore are honored to be pioneering the bridge between the two worlds that have gone unrecognized for so long. “I know some people are salty about what constitutes an animated movie. And ‘is that an animated movie?’ because it consists of live-action elements,” Fleischer-Camp says about Marcel expanding the animation branch. “But I think the place I’ve come to is that overall it’s a great thing because it means that there’s so much animation now in even live-action films that we’re even having to have those conversations.” 

    Lepore adds, “It feels cool to be recognized for creating something unique, like something that is largely animation, but it’s something different. And I feel like that’s always exciting to celebrate in filmmaking.”

    For a scene that perfectly encapsulates that balance, look no further than a table, a shell, and one very uncontrollable squirrel. (You can see a glimpse of it at 1:57 in the trailer below). 

    The Scene

    Part of Marcel’s beauty is in the combination of real-life things—including animals and people— and the stop-motion shells, creating the vivid illusion that Marcel and his grandmother exist in our world. According to Fleischer-Camp and Lepore, no scene exemplifies this more than the scene in which Marcel skates across a dusty table with his grandmother, Nanna Connie, until a squirrel disrupts their fun. Even the music—Jock Jams classic “Pump Up the Jam” and Shakira’s “Whenever, Wherever”—is perfect. “Those are just the type of subtle things that add to what you’re talking about that makes it so realistic and feel so naturally captured. But actually, it’s very good editing and sound design that went into the movie,” Lepore says.

    When Shell Meets Squirrel

    The arrival of the squirrel was, according to Fleischer-Camp, one of the most difficult scenes in the movie. There is so much precision and preparation that is going into this,” Fleischer-Camp says. “But also, it involves a live squirrel and stuff like that. It doesn’t matter how much you prepare, the squirrel is still going to do whatever it wants.”

    Most of the production took place on a stop-motion stage, using motion-controlled rigs for the careful camera movements required for this animation technique. But, Lepore says, “when the squirrel comes in and everything becomes hectic, then the whole idea is like, ‘Oh, my God, handheld camera! The camera needs to be all over the place.’ Every shot required a lengthy conversation to maintain the stop-motion effect alongside the film’s documentary style. “We were just trying to be strategic and choosy with those scenes,” Lepore says. “It looked so off the cuff, but it’s actually very planned and controlled.”

    [ad_2]

    Rendy Jones

    Source link

  • Brendan Fraser & ‘Encino Man’ Co-Star Ke Huy Quan Share Emotional Reunion At Critics Choice Awards

    Brendan Fraser & ‘Encino Man’ Co-Star Ke Huy Quan Share Emotional Reunion At Critics Choice Awards

    [ad_1]

    By Brent Furdyk.

    The past year has seen big career resurgences for Brendan Fraser and Key Huy Quan, thanks to their respective performances in “The Whale” and “Everything Everywhere All At Once”.

    As longtime fans of both actors will recall, they once appeared together in one of Fraser’s first films, “Encino Man”, and the two former co-stars shared a heartwarming reunion while attending Sunday night’s Critics Choice Awards.

    Not only was it a big night for both actors — Quan won for Best Supporting Actor while Fraser won for Best Actor — they also got to reconnect, more than 30 years after making the 1992 comedy.


    READ MORE:
    Ke Huy Quan Details Adorable Reunion With Harrison Ford Nearly 40 Years After ‘Indiana Jones And The Temple Of Doom’

    “It was great to see him again. I love him in ‘The Whale’,” Quan told reporters of Fraser, as reported by People. “What a powerful performance.”

    According to Quan, Fraser “gave me a big hug and put his arm on my shoulder” when they “saw each other for the first time after 30 years” during the award show.

    “He put his hand on my shoulder and he said this, he was still here,” Quan added. “I will never forget those three words and it’s actually right.”


    READ MORE:
    Steven Spielberg And Ke Huy Quan Share Heartwarming Embrace On Red Carpet

    Quan expressed similar sentiments about himself. “For me, I cannot believe I’m still here,” he said. “It’s been a wild ride ever since that movie came out.”

    Click to View Gallery

    Critics Choice Awards 2023 Red Carpet Fashion: See The Best Looks




    [ad_2]

    Brent Furdyk

    Source link

  • Amanda Seyfried’s Critics Choice Awards Dress ‘Keeps Breaking’ On Her

    Amanda Seyfried’s Critics Choice Awards Dress ‘Keeps Breaking’ On Her

    [ad_1]

    By Anita Tai.

    Amanda Seyfried is experiencing a wardrobe malfunction.

    The actress arrived at the 2023 Critics Choice Awards in a beautiful gold dress from French fashion house, styled by Elizabeth Stewart, but it just didn’t want to stay on.

    Speaking with Access Hollywood, Seyfried revealed the gown kept “ripping and actually breaking.”


    READ MORE:
    Brendan Fraser Moved To Tears During Critics Choice Awards Win: ‘You Found Me’

    It was made of a single piece of twisted, fringed gold lamé chiffon and was from the label’s Spring-Summer 2020 collection.

    She may be the star of “The Dropout”, but Amanda Seyfried is top of the style class this evening. – Photo: Kevin Winter/Getty Images for Critics Choice Association
    — Photo: Kevin Winter/Getty Images for Critics Choice Association

    Despite the fashion hiccup, the actress was hopeful.

    “It’s a statue dress so if I don’t get one, at least I look like one,” she joked.


    READ MORE:
    Ke Huy Quan Delivers Emotional Acceptance Speech After Critics Choice Awards Win

    The dress ended up bringing her luck as “The Dropout” actress won the award for Best Actress in a Limited Series for her work in the show.

    People reports, however, that when walking up to the stage to receive the reward for Best Limited Series, she had a black jacket on and her hair down, perhaps hiding the broken dress.

    [ad_2]

    Anita Tai

    Source link

  • Gabriel LaBelle Wins Best Young Performer at Critics Choice Awards 2023

    Gabriel LaBelle Wins Best Young Performer at Critics Choice Awards 2023

    [ad_1]

    Gabriel LaBelle, who played an adolescent Steven Spielberg in his autobiographical film, The Fabelmans, won best young performer at the Critics Choice Awards 2023

    The 20-year-old, whose category was presented off-screen, bested fellow nominated actors including Frankie Corio for AftersunJalyn Hall for Till, Bella Ramsey for Catherine Called BirdyBanks Repeta for Armageddon Time, and Sadie Sink for The Whale. LaBelle’s award was announced offscreen, making him one of the winners whose acceptance remarks will likely be relegated to social media. 

    “Nobody knows how he behaved 60 years ago,” LaBelle told Vanity Fair about the pressures of playing an iconic Oscar-winning filmmaker. “But I could see through [some of the] 8mm footage that he took of his family and that he appeared in sometimes how he walked and moved around. I noticed that he smiles differently than I do. I kind of wanted to look like him [and] makeup and hair did so much. But it was about making sure that I could have [Sam] feel what [Steven] thought he was feeling in that time.”

    If there was one direction LaBelle received in emulating Spielberg, who won the best directing award at the Golden Globes 2023 just last week, it was too be less “whiny,” LaBelle told VF. . “He would say, ‘I despise self-pity and that’s not what I’m or have ever been about. And so I don’t think you’d be doing that.’ And that clued me into his whole life,” the actor remembered. “He has such a strong work ethic, he’s so successful, he works hard, and he’s so obsessed with this medium. So he doesn’t have time to feel bad for himself. He just gets things done. That was the one thing that gave me more insight into him. I can [now] understand why [Steven] wanted to make those movies. I’ll never fully understand him, but I definitely feel like I know him a little better than most people.”

    Critics Choice Awards’ young performer award dates back to 1996 with past winners including Jude Hill for BelfastAlan Kim for MinariHailee Steinfeld for True Grit, and Dev Patel for Slumdog Millionaire

    [ad_2]

    Savannah Walsh

    Source link

  • ‘Glass Onion’ Production Designer On How He Avoided Making the Movie “Fugly”

    ‘Glass Onion’ Production Designer On How He Avoided Making the Movie “Fugly”

    [ad_1]

    Rick Heinrichs loves to solve puzzles. He’s a big fan of the New York Times crossword, though not, he rushes to clarify, in the same way as Glass Onion: A Knives Out Mystery writer-director Rian Johnson.

    “I would never go head-to-head with him,” Heinrichs, the production designer for Glass Onion, tells Vanity Fair. “I have actually done one with him. We were waiting at an airport somewhere to go off to maybe Ireland or something like that, and he was doing the New York Times crossword, and also he does it even if he’s abroad. He gets it in print. And he uses a pen…. That’s just too much commitment for me. I can’t handle that.”

    However, as anyone who has seen the twisty-turny Glass Onion can attest, Heinrichs is not one to shy away from a challenge. “I don’t like to like start slow and work my way up to the hard stuff,” he says. “I like to start with the hard stuff.” And in this intricate movie, there was a lot of hard stuff.

    Start with, for example, the multilayered puzzle box that introduces the movie’s mystery. Or how about the art-stuffed atrium of billionaire Miles Bron’s (Edward Norton) house, or the glass onion itself, the massive refractory dome that houses Bron’s office, as well as the heart of the movie’s mystery.

    Heinrichs, who previously worked with Johnson on Star Wars: The Last Jedi, says that his inspiration for the futuristic, very man-made glass onion was in fact organic. It was…an actual onion. Though he researched architectural onion domes, he didn’t quite find what he was looking for there.

    “I just sort of went back to the drawing board, if you will, or the cutting board, and literally took an onion and sliced it up,” Heinrichs says. “Pull the skin off it, and a naked onion is a beautiful thing. It’s got that sort of see-through light quality to it.”

    It reflects the intrinsic intricacy of the film, which is, shall we say, multilayered. Like an onion.

    The puzzle box that serves as an invitation to Bron’s “disruptors” is also a veiled overview of the film’s plot: After solving a series of puzzles, the whole thing spins and resets, presenting the solver with a whole new set of problems, just when they thought they’d gotten to the center of it.

    “There is no box that can do this,” Heinrichs says. Instead, he had to devise different ways the puzzles—Magic Eye illusions, codes, and more—could lead to a box opening in some way, then meld practical builds with animated transitions to make the cipher look as realistic as possible. “Everything was bespoke.”

    He credits his prior experience working with Johnson, who tends to build teams of repeat collaborators, in helping him develop a shorthand, streamlining a process that was only made more complicated by shooting in the midst of COVID. That doesn’t mean things didn’t get a little fugly every now and then, though.

    “He’s one of the nicest people you could ever work with,” Heinrichs says of Johnson. “He would never make you ever feel belittled by anything. But on the other hand, you know, he will tell you if what you’re showing him is fugly or not. That was one of my favorite phrases. I got a ton of fugly designs. You have to get through all the fugly designs to get to the good stuff. He’s got really good taste in the people that he likes to work with. Obviously, apart from me.”

    Speaking of taste, the film makes a strong point that that’s one thing that money can’t buy, showcased most pointedly in the atrium set where much of the action takes place. Miles has jammed the expansive room with art, including the Mona Lisa, on loan from, as he pronounced it, the “Loov-ruh.”

    [ad_2]

    Kase Wickman

    Source link

  • Jamie Lee Curtis Forced to Sit Out Critics Choice Awards Due to COVID-19

    Jamie Lee Curtis Forced to Sit Out Critics Choice Awards Due to COVID-19

    [ad_1]

    Jamie Lee Curtis has to take some time off the awards circuit. On Friday, the Everything Everywhere All at Once star took to social media to announce that she has tested positive for COVID-19, and as such will not be able to attend the Critics Choice Awards this Sunday.

    Instagram content

    This content can also be viewed on the site it originates from.

    Curtis posted a photo on her Instagram account of three separate positive COVID tests. “Fuck COVID!” began her caption. “Sadly, this head cheerleader is not going to be at all the weekend festivities cheering on her friends and colleagues. I’m glad that there are all these home tests available so that I didn’t go to the @americanfilminstitute lunch and spread my germs.” Curtis will also have to sit out Saturday’s BAFTA Tea Party, another prime stop on the awards trail. “I was SO looking forward to going to the @bafta tea and the @criticschoice awards as a nominee and member of a motley crew!” she wrote. 

    Curtis is nominated at the Critics Choice Awards for best supporting actress for her performance in Everything Everywhere All at Once, along with her costar Stephanie Hsu, recent Golden Globe winner Angela Bassett, Women Talking’s Jessie Buckley, The Banshees of Inisherin’s Kerry Condon, and Glass Onion’s Janelle Monáe.  Earlier this week, Curtis appeared to be in good health while attending the Golden Globes as both a nominee and a presenter. As of yet, no one else who attended the Golden Globes has publicly tested positive for COVID-19. 

    Curtis has been gaining steam in the Oscar race for her fun turn as Deirdre Beaubeirdre, an irritable IRS inspector, in A24’s hit film Everything Everywhere All at Once. She’s taken home multiple critics’ prizes, and has thus far been nominated at the Golden Globes, Critics Choice Awards, and, most recently, the Screen Actors Guild Awards. Curtis ended her Instagram post with a message to her fans: “Stay safe out there people.”

    [ad_2]

    Chris Murphy

    Source link

  • What We Learned from the Golden Globes and the SAG Nominations

    What We Learned from the Golden Globes and the SAG Nominations

    [ad_1]

    Did you hear— the Golden Globes are actually back. Sure, TV ratings aren’t what they used to be, and some winners were “deep in the process of creating a new musical” instead of attending, but the awards show advertised as one big party actually recaptured that vibe on Tuesday night, particularly impressive given the two years of scandal and upheaval that came before it. 

    On this week’s Little Gold Men podcast, David Canfield shares his dispatch from inside the ballroom at the 2023 Golden Globes, where Rihanna turned heads, Jennifer Coolidge stole the show, and emotional speeches from Angela Bassett and Ke Huy Quan early in the evening set the ebullient tone that followed. He joins Rebecca Ford, Richard Lawson, and Katey Rich to talk about what the Globes might mean to the overall awards race, which got another jolt of energy when the SAG Awards nominations were announced just hours after the Globes ended. Should The Fabelmans, which won two major Golden Globe awards, be worried about Michelle Williams’s surprising SAG snub? Can both The Banshees of Inisherin and Everything Everywhere All at Once pull off a pair of nominees in a single category? And should we credit Adam Sandler’s excellent Little Gold Men interview with his awards season success? (It’s OK if you don’t agree on that last part.)

    Listen to the episode above, and subscribe to Little Gold Men on Apple Podcasts or anywhere else you get your podcasts. You can also e-mail us your own burning awards season questions at littlegoldmen@vf.com

    [ad_2]

    Vanity Fair

    Source link