ReportWire

Tag: Artificial Intelligence

  • Fox News AI Newsletter: Data center alarm

    [ad_1]

    NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

    Welcome to Fox News’ Artificial Intelligence newsletter with the latest AI technology advancements.

    IN TODAY’S NEWSLETTER:

    – Data center boom powering AI revolution may drain US grids — and wallets

    – Grok AI scandal sparks global alarm over child safety

    – In 2026, energy ‘wars’ new frontier is AI, and U.S. must win that battle, API chief says

    The COL4 AI-ready data center is located on a seven-acre campus at the convergence point of long-haul fiber and regional carrier fiber networks on July 24, 2025 in Columbus, Ohio.  (Eli Hiller/For The Washington Post via Getty Images)

    POWER CRUNCH: The rapid expansion of artificial intelligence (AI) data centers is raising alarms over how much power and water they consume — and what that could mean for Americans’ utility bills — as Washington lawmakers clash over whether the boom helps or harms the economy.

    GLOBAL ALARM: Grok, the built-in chatbot on X, is facing intense scrutiny after acknowledging it generated and shared an AI image depicting two young girls in sexualized attire.

    ENERGY WINS: The next global energy war won’t just be fought over oil and gas – it will be decided by who can power artificial intelligence first, and the U.S. must win that race, the head of the nation’s largest oil and gas trade group told Fox News Digital.

    A person holding a controller while a drone flies in the background

    War Secretary Pete Hegseth announced plans to lead the U.S. to becoming the global leader in AI military technology. (iStock)

    ‘WE WILL WIN’: Pentagon chief Pete Hegseth announced on Monday a plan aimed at making the U.S. a global leader in artificial intelligence, drones and space technology, arguing that a risk-averse culture has slowed innovation and prevented the Pentagon from providing the best resources to its service members.

    FRIES MEET FUTURE: Fast-food giants are racing to bring artificial intelligence to the ordering process, hoping it will reduce errors, speed up service and lighten the load on workers, according to multiple reports.

    OUT OF THIS WORLD: Surging demand for energy to power artificial intelligence (AI) data centers is reaching new heights as companies are pursuing plans to station data centers in space.

    Huang holding up a circuit board while giving a talk.

    Jensen Huang, co-founder and CEO of Nvidia Corp., gives a talk in Taipei, Taiwan. (Annabelle Chih/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

    CHIPS TO CHINA: The Trump administration formally greenlit Nvidia exports Tuesday, allowing the tech giant to ship its artificial intelligence chips to China and other countries.

    SHIFT SHOCK: As fears grow that artificial intelligence (AI) will wipe out jobs, Robinhood CEO Vlad Tenev says the opposite may be true.

    NOT JUST CHIPS: Amazon’s push to build massive artificial-intelligence data centers is now extending into Arizona, where a recently restarted copper mine is supplying industrial metal seen as increasingly critical to powering Big Tech’s AI infrastructure.

    LONG-HAUL WIN: Kodiak AI, a leading provider of AI-powered autonomous driving technology, has spent years quietly proving that self-driving trucks can work in the real world. The company’s core system, the Kodiak Driver, brings software and hardware together in a practical way. As the company explains, “The Kodiak Driver combines advanced AI-driven software with modular, vehicle-agnostic hardware into a single, unified platform.” 
     

    FOLLOW FOX NEWS ON SOCIAL MEDIA

    Facebook
    Instagram
    YouTube
    X
    LinkedIn

    SIGN UP FOR OUR OTHER NEWSLETTERS

    Fox News First
    Fox News Opinion
    Fox News Lifestyle
    Fox News Health

    DOWNLOAD OUR APPS

    Fox News
    Fox Business
    Fox Weather
    Fox Sports
    Tubi

    WATCH FOX NEWS ONLINE

    Fox News Go

    STREAM FOX NATION

    Fox Nation

    Stay up to date on the latest AI technology advancements, and learn about the challenges and opportunities AI presents now and for the future with Fox News here.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Trump administration calls on tech companies to pay energy bill for new AI power plants

    [ad_1]

    Washington — The Trump administration and a bipartisan group of governors called for reforms in the largest electric grid in the country to make sure the development of new artificial intelligence plants doesn’t drive up electric costs.  

    Federal and state officials signed onto a statement of principles that’s focused on the PJM Interconnection grid, which serves over 67 million people in 13 states in the Mid-Atlantic and Midwest. The pact calls on technology companies to foot the bill for new power plants in PJM’s region, to address the surge of artificial intelligence data centers that the White House wants to see built. The administration says the National Energy Dominance Council reached an agreement with several states for over $15 billion in new power-generation projects. 

    The statement also calls on PJM to hold an emergency capacity auction for this power — and to protect residential customers from capacity price increases. 

    Energy Secretary Chris Wright and Interior Secretary Doug Burgum signed onto the plan near the White House, at the Eisenhower Executive Office Building with Republican Gov. Glenn Youngkin of Virginia and Democratic Govs. Wes Moore of Maryland and Josh Shapiro of Pennsylvania.

    Wright said in a statement that President Trump had “asked governors across the Mid-Atlantic to come together and call upon PJM to allow America to build big reliable power plants again.” 

    He promised that the directives would “restore affordable and reliable electricity so American families thrive and America’s manufacturing industries once again boom.”

    PJM’s grid serves over 65 million people and operates in parts or all of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Ohio, West Virginia, Virginia, Maryland, Washington, D.C., Michigan, Indiana, Illinois, North Carolina, Delaware, Kentucky and Tennessee. Governors from every state signed onto the statement of principles. 

    The Board of Managers for PJM announced Friday it would take actions to address the additional load to the grid new AI data centers would bring. It says they’d have an “immediate initiation” to secure more power, and hold a “backstop generation procurement process to address short-term reliability needs.” 

    PJM’s announcement also says it expects the “data center community … to play a constructive role in addressing the reliability and affordability challenges associated with the scale and pace of the forecasted load additions in the PJM region.”

    Friday’s announcement also revealed a little bipartisanship between the Republican White House and potential 2028 presidential Democratic candidates Moore and Shapiro, who have both been calling for an increased power supply and lower energy prices. 

    “We cannot build a 21st-century economy on an energy market that blocks new supply,” Moore said in a statement. “This moment calls for urgency. Maryland families and businesses must be served by a reliable grid without shouldering the cost of sky-high energy bills.”

    Shapiro sued PJM in 2024 to stop price hikes, and said he’s been working with governors and federal energy officials for months to push PJM to make reforms. 

    “I’m glad the White House is following Pennsylvania’s lead and adopting the solutions we’ve been pushing for,” Shapiro said in a statement.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • 2026: The Year Retail Stops Searching and Starts Thinking

    [ad_1]

    A.I.-native commerce is collapsing the traditional funnel and forcing brands to rethink visibility, trust and control. Unsplash+

    For the past decade, it seems that while technology has become increasingly advanced, the online shopping experience has remained largely the same: endless scrolling, reviews we don’t fully trust and price comparisons that often create more confusion than clarity. Despite improvements in logistics and payments, the core workflow—search, scroll, compare, repeat—has barely evolved. With the rise of A.I., that equilibrium is finally breaking. 

    2026 marks the first true departure from the e-commerce model most consumers have grown accustomed to. For the first time, shopping journeys are no longer anchored in static catalogs or keyword searches. They’re increasingly mediated by intelligence systems that can interpret intent, synthesize options and act on behalf of the consumer.

    The rise of A.I.-native shopping, accelerated and exemplified by the first truly agentic holiday shopping season, has made one thing clear: it’s no longer enough for brands to optimize for human shoppers alone. They must also optimize for the A.I. agents that increasingly discover, compare, validate and transact on those shoppers’ behalf. Retail has acquired a new operating system, and it’s powered by agency rather than search.

    Agentic commerce becomes retail’s new OS

    Agentic commerce represents a structural shift far beyond chatbots or plugins. Intelligent, merchant-guided agents replace the old “search-scroll-compare” workflow with curated, intent-driven journeys—cutting down on browsing time, reducing decision fatigue and unlocking conversion rates that traditional e-commerce simply can’t deliver. 

    This shift addresses a well-documented pain point. A recent Accenture survey showed that 74 percent of consumers abandoned their shopping baskets in the previous three months because they felt “bombarded by content, overwhelmed by choice and frustrated by the amount of effort they need to put into making decisions.” When shoppers delegate tedious tasks to A.I. agents, the effects compound. They buy faster, return less and feel more confident in their decisions. For retailers, this does not represent incremental optimization; it is a new operating system that fundamentally changes how value is created and captured. 

    The first true A.I.-powered holiday season proves the shift

    The 2025 holiday season serves as a clear inflection point. Shoppers finally experienced, at scale, the convenience of A.I. handling discovery, comparison and curation, while retailers, in turn, received an unmistakable signal that the traditional commerce funnel is dissolving. One in three shoppers, and a majority of Gen Z, used A.I. tools to generate gift ideas, compare prices across stores, style outfits or build personalized wishlists. What used to require 30 open tabs now happens inside a single, adaptive conversation.

    At the platform level, the signals were equally strong. A.I.-powered assistants expanded into more than 180 countries, as camera-based shopping tools reached tens of millions of users. Discovery no longer begins with a homepage or a search bar. It begins with conversations. 

    Investors are taking note: more than $90 million in funding has already flowed into A.I.-commerce startups, signaling what many call the next great platform wave—one that merges the personalization of 2015’s DTC boom with the scale of 2020’s marketplace era.

    The 6 trends that will define retail in 2026

    GEO supplants SEO

    The decline of traditional search is already underway. As A.I. agents become the primary gateway to product discovery and checkout, keyword-driven SEO will lose its central role. What matters instead is whether an A.I. system can understand a product in context—how it fits a user’s needs, preferences and constraints.

    This is Generative Engine Optimization (GEO), and it will define competitive advantage for the next decade. Brands that structure their data, imagery and metadata for machine interpretation, not just human browsing, will retain visibility. Those that don’t will increasingly disappear from consideration. 

    Virtual try-on and A.I. twins become the standard

    Virtual try-on (VTO) isn’t a novelty anymore. Consumers are already building A.I.-powered avatars of themselves to preview outfits, assemble lookbooks and refine style preferences with automated precision. In 2026, retailers will be expected to meet shoppers inside these environments. The primary “fitting room” will be a digital twin informed by measurements, purchase history and aesthetic signals.  

    Authenticity verification becomes non-negotiable

    As A.I.-generated content floods retail media, trust becomes a prerequisite for discovery and recommendations. Watermarking, credentialing and authenticity scoring will increasingly determine whether a product is surfaced by A.I. engines at all. In an A.I.-mediated retail ecosystem, unverified products lose both credibility and distribution. Trust becomes a non-negotiable, not a differentiator. 

    Returns enter their A.I. era

    With returns expected to exceed $850 billion, the days of blanket free return policies are becoming unsustainable. A.I.-driven sizing recommendations, personalized return policies, predictive risk scoring and agent-guided resolution flows will become standard and essential to protect loyalty without eroding margins. The goal shifts from discouraging returns to preventing avoidable ones. 

    Resale continues to surge

    As economic pressure and cultural values converge, the resale business will continue to explode. With authenticated buyback programs, trade-in incentives and recommerce-led gifting, resale has outpaced traditional apparel by approximately five times

    This aligns with generational preferences: 64 percent of Gen Z consumers say they are willing to pay more for environmentally sustainable products, marking resale a commercial strategy rather than a nice ethical play. 

    Physical retail will evolve into A.I.-powered showrooms

    Physical retail will continue its reinvention. By 2027, stores will function as data-rich, immersive showrooms where A.I. agents guide in-store paths, surface personalized recommendations and stitch together online-to-offline journeys seamlessly. The store becomes both a sensory brand experience and a fulfillment node in a unified agentic commerce system.

    Where this leaves retailers

    Together, these shifts point to a single conclusion: retailers now serve two customers—the human who ultimately makes the purchase and the A.I. system that helps them decide. 

    Brands that go all-in on agentic commerce will regain control of the shopping experience, with agentic tools allowing them to embed their own voice, priorities and merchandising strategy directly into A.I.-guided journeys. Those that resist will increasingly compete on price alone, surfaced only when an algorithm deems them interchangeable. When merchants embrace the fact that the most important buyer in the market is no longer a person, but the A.I. that earns that person’s trust, they move back in the driver’s seat. 

    2026: The Year Retail Stops Searching and Starts Thinking

    [ad_2]

    Sam Atkinson

    Source link

  • Fighting Deepfakes and Petro-states: The Week in News

    [ad_1]

    Happy Friday folks, Seth Cline here. Before we dive into the news, a quick programming note: Decision Points is off Monday for MLK Day, but we’ll be back in your inbox Tuesday. Now onto this week’s stories.

    Monday

    On Monday, Olivier perused the news around North America, where governments are concerned with technology, especially artificial intelligence.

    In Canada, officials are considering taking action against Grok, Elon Musk’s increasingly malicious AI engine. That’s because it’s lately being used to “digitally undress people (mostly women), putting them in tiny bikinis and striking sexual poses.”

    Stateside, New York Gov. Kathy Hochul wants to ban AI-generated images of candidates from political ads, and New Jersey Gov. Phil Murphy signed a bill restricting cellphones in classrooms, joining 36 other states who have already done so.

    Tuesday

    The news cycle being what it is, one might have forgotten that the U.S. just plunged Venezuela’s capital into darkness, snatched its president and threw him in a Brooklyn jail. So Olivier on Tuesday checked in on Venezuela for us. It’s not pretty.

    Bands of government-backed militia known as colectivos are reportedly setting up roadblocks and searching cars there for signs of U.S. ties or support, and the risks of “wrongful detention” and “arbitrary enforcement of local laws” remain high. That’s according to a U.S. travel advisory issued Saturday telling Americans to “leave the country immediately.”

    That advisory came just a day after President Donald Trump invited oil company executives to “rebuild Venezuela’s rotting energy infrastructure” and said the U.S. would guarantee their physical and financial security. Needless to say, the situation is volatile.

    Wednesday

    Midweek, Olivier turned to Americans’ political leanings. A new Gallup poll found 28% of Americans identify as “liberal” – the highest share since the polling firm started keeping track in 1992.

    And a record share of Americans are identifying as independent – 45% – a plurality of whom lean Democratic. This newfound independent streak is especially present in Gen Z, 56% of whom self-identify as political independents. That’s not only higher than older age cohorts today, it’s higher than young people in the past: Just 47% of millennials and 40% of Gen Xers identified as independent when they were the same age as Gen Z today.

    Thursday

    Yesterday Olivier turned to an unstable, oil-rich nation Trump has threatened with military action: not Venezuela this time, but Iran.

    There, Iranians have taken to the streets in numbers not seen since its Islamic Revolution in 1979, and the government has responded by shutting off the internet and killing protesters – as many as 20,000, by one estimate. Trump threatened to intervene, but has since backed off.

    There’s a lot riding on what happens next, beyond the lives of 90 million Iranian citizens. Iran’s nuclear stockpile and its massive oil output and reserves are also at stake, as is the balance of power in the Middle East, where Hamas, Hezbollah and Houthi fighters operate as Iran’s proxies. So the world will be watching.

    Sign Up for U.S. News Decision Points

    Your trusted source for breaking down the latest news from Washington and beyond, delivered weekdays.

    Sign up to receive the latest updates from U.S. News & World Report and our trusted partners and sponsors. By clicking submit, you are agreeing to our Terms and Conditions & Privacy Policy.

    [ad_2]

    Seth Cline

    Source link

  • ChatGPT’s free ride is ending: Here’s what OpenAI plans for advertising on the chatbot

    [ad_1]

    SAN FRANCISCO — OpenAI says it will soon start showing advertisements to ChatGPT users who aren’t paying for a premium version of the chatbot.

    The artificial intelligence company said Friday it hasn’t yet rolled out ads but will start testing them in the coming weeks.

    It’s the latest effort by the San Francisco-based company to make money from ChatGPT’s more than 800 million users, most of whom get it for free.

    Though valued at $500 billion, the startup loses more money than it makes and has been looking for ways to turn a profit.

    OpenAI said the digital ads will appear at the bottom of ChatGPT’s answers “when there’s a relevant sponsored product or service based on your current conversation.”

    The ads “will be clearly labeled and separated from the organic answer,” the company said.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • ChatGPT Health promises privacy for health conversations

    [ad_1]

    NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

    OpenAI is rolling out ChatGPT Health, a new space for private health and wellness conversations. Importantly, the company says it will not use your health information or Health chats to train its core artificial intelligence (AI) models. As more people turn to ChatGPT to understand lab results and prepare for doctor visits, that promise matters. For many users, privacy remains the deciding factor.

    Meanwhile, Health appears as a separate space inside ChatGPT for early-access users. You will see it in the sidebar on desktop and in the menu on mobile. If you ask a health-related question in a regular chat, ChatGPT may suggest moving the conversation into Health for added protection. For now, access remains limited. However, OpenAI says it plans to roll out ChatGPT Health gradually to users on Free, Go, Plus and Pro plans.

    Sign up for my FREE CyberGuy Report

    Get my best tech tips, urgent security alerts, and exclusive deals delivered straight to your inbox. Plus, you’ll get instant access to my Ultimate Scam Survival Guide — free when you join my CYBERGUY.COM newsletter.

    AI DISCLOSURE IN HEALTHCARE: WHAT PATIENTS MUST KNOW

    Health chats stay isolated from regular conversations and are excluded from AI training by default. (OpenAI)

    What makes ChatGPT Health different from regular chats

    ChatGPT Health is built as a separate environment, not just another chat thread. Here is what stands out:

    A dedicated private space

    Health conversations live in their own area. Files, chats and memories stay contained there. They do not mix with your regular ChatGPT conversations.

    Clear medical boundaries

    ChatGPT Health is not meant to diagnose conditions or replace a doctor. You will see reminders that responses are informational only and not medical advice.

    Connecting your health data

    If you choose, you can connect medical records and wellness apps to Health. This helps ground responses in your own data. Supported connections include:

    • Medical records, such as lab results and visit summaries
    • Apple Health for sleep, activity, and movement data
    • MyFitnessPal for nutrition and macros
    • Function for lab insights and nutrition guidance
    • Weight Watchers for GLP-1 meal ideas
    • Fitness and lifestyle apps like Peloton, AllTrails and Instacart

    You control access. You can disconnect any app at any time and revoke permissions immediately.

    Extra privacy protections

    OpenAI says Health uses additional encryption and isolation designed specifically for sensitive health data. Health chats are excluded from training foundation models by default.

    CAN AI CHATBOTS TRIGGER PSYCHOSIS IN VULNERABLE PEOPLE?

    ChatCPT Health screen

    ChatGPT Health creates a separate space designed specifically for health and wellness conversations. (OpenAI)

    Things you should not share on ChatGPT

    Even with stronger privacy promises, caution still matters. Avoid sharing:

    • Full Social Security numbers
    • Insurance member IDs or policy numbers
    • Login credentials or passwords
    • Scans of government-issued IDs
    • Financial account numbers
    • Highly sensitive details you would not tell a clinician

    Health is designed to inform and prepare you, not to replace professional care or secure systems built for identity protection.

    ChatGPT Health was built with doctors

    OpenAI built ChatGPT Health with direct input from more than 260 physicians across many medical specialties worldwide. Over two years, those clinicians reviewed hundreds of thousands of example responses and flagged wording that could confuse readers or delay care.

    As a result, their feedback guides how ChatGPT Health explains lab results, frames risk, and prompts follow-ups with a licensed clinician. More importantly, the system focuses on safety, clarity, and timely escalation when needed. Ultimately, the goal is to help you have better conversations with your doctor, not replace one.

    OPENAI LIMITS CHATGPT’S ROLE IN MENTAL HEALTH HELP

    ChatGPT Health waitlist notification

    Users can connect medical records and wellness apps to better understand trends before talking with a doctor. (OpenAI)

    What this means for you

    For many people, health information is scattered across portals, PDFs, apps and emails. ChatGPT Health aims to pull that context together in one place.

    That can help you:

    The key takeaway is control. You decide what to connect, what to delete and when to walk away.

    How to get access to ChatGPT Health

    If you do not see Health yet, you can join the waitlist inside ChatGPT. Once you have access:

    • Select Health from the sidebar
    • Upload files or connect apps from Settings
    • Start asking questions grounded in your own data

    You can also customize instructions inside Health to control tone, topics, and focus.

    CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

    Take my quiz: How safe is your online security?

    Think your devices and data are truly protected? Take this quick quiz to see where your digital habits stand. From passwords to Wi-Fi settings, you’ll get a personalized breakdown of what you’re doing right and what needs improvement. Take my Quiz here: Cyberguy.com        

    Kurt’s key takeaways

    ChatGPT Health reflects how people already use AI to understand their health. What matters most is the privacy line OpenAI is drawing. Health conversations stay separate and are not used to train core models. That promise builds trust, but smart sharing still matters. AI can help you prepare, understand and organize. Your doctor still makes the call.

    Would you trust an AI assistant with your health data if it promised stronger privacy than standard chat tools, or does that still feel like a step too far?  Let us know by writing to us at Cyberguy.com.

    Sign up for my FREE CyberGuy Report

    Get my best tech tips, urgent security alerts, and exclusive deals delivered straight to your inbox. Plus, you’ll get instant access to my Ultimate Scam Survival Guide – free when you join my CYBERGUY.COM newsletter.

    Copyright 2026 CyberGuy.com.  All rights reserved.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • How the White House and governors want to fix AI-driven power shortages and price spikes

    [ad_1]

    The White House and a bipartisan group of governors are pressuring the operator of the mid-Atlantic power grid to take urgent steps to boost energy supply and curb price hikes, holding a Friday event aimed at addressing a rising concern among voters about the enormous amount of power used for artificial intelligence ahead of elections later this year.

    The White House said its National Energy Dominance Council and the governors of several states, including Pennsylvania, Ohio and Virginia, want to try to compel PJM Interconnection to hold a power auction for tech companies to bid on contracts to build new power plants,

    The Trump administration and governors will sign a statement of principles toward that end Friday. The plan was first reported by Bloomberg.

    “Ensuring the American people have reliable and affordable electricity is one of President Trump’s top priorities, and this would deliver much-needed, long-term relief to the mid-Atlantic region,” said Taylor Rogers, a White House spokeswoman.

    Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro is expected to be at the White House, a person familiar with Shapiro’s plans said, speaking on condition of anonymity ahead of the announcement. Shapiro, a Democrat, made his participation in Friday’s event contingent on including a provision to extend a limit on wholesale electricity price increases for the region’s consumers, the person said.

    But the operator of the grid won’t be there. “PJM was not invited. Therefore we would not attend,” said spokesperson Jeff Shields.

    It was not immediately clear whether President Donald Trump would attend the event, which was not listed on his public schedule.

    Trump and the governors are under pressure to insulate consumers and businesses alike from the costs of feeding Big Tech’s energy-hungry data centers. Meanwhile, more Americans are falling behind on their electricity bills.

    Consumer advocates say ratepayers in the mid-Atlantic electricity grid — which encompasses all or parts of 13 states stretching from New Jersey to Illinois, as well as Washington, D.C. — are already paying billions of dollars in higher bills to underwrite the cost to supply power to data centers, some of them built, some not.

    However, they also say that the billions of dollars that consumers are paying isn’t resulting in the construction of new power plants necessary to meet the rising demand.

    Pivotal contests in November will be decided by communities that are home to fast-rising electric bills or fights over who’s footing the bill for the data centers that underpin the explosion in demand for artificial intelligence. In parts of the country, data centers are coming online faster than power plants can be built and connected to the grid.

    Electricity costs were a key issue in last year’s elections for governor in New Jersey and Virginia, a data center hotspot, and in Georgia, where Democrats ousted two Republican incumbents for seats on the state’s utility regulatory commission. Voters in New Jersey, Virginia, California and New York City all cited economic concerns as the top issue, as Democrats and Republicans gird for a debate over affordability in the intensifying midterm battle to control Congress.

    Gas and electric utilities sought or won rate increases of more that $34 billion in the first three quarters of 2025, consumer advocacy organization PowerLines reported. That was more than double the same period a year earlier.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • How the White House and governors want to fix AI-driven power shortages and price spikes

    [ad_1]

    The White House and a bipartisan group of governors are pressuring the operator of the mid-Atlantic power grid to take urgent steps to boost energy supply and curb price hikes, holding a Friday event aimed at addressing a rising concern among voters about the enormous amount of power used for artificial intelligence ahead of elections later this year.

    The White House said its National Energy Dominance Council and the governors of several states, including Pennsylvania, Ohio and Virginia, want to try to compel PJM Interconnection to hold a power auction for tech companies to bid on contracts to build new power plants,

    The Trump administration and governors will sign a statement of principles toward that end Friday. The plan was first reported by Bloomberg.

    “Ensuring the American people have reliable and affordable electricity is one of President Trump’s top priorities, and this would deliver much-needed, long-term relief to the mid-Atlantic region,” said Taylor Rogers, a White House spokeswoman.

    Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro is expected to be at the White House, a person familiar with Shapiro’s plans said, speaking on condition of anonymity ahead of the announcement. Shapiro, a Democrat, made his participation in Friday’s event contingent on including a provision to extend a limit on wholesale electricity price increases for the region’s consumers, the person said.

    But the operator of the grid won’t be there. “PJM was not invited. Therefore we would not attend,” said spokesperson Jeff Shields.

    It was not immediately clear whether President Donald Trump would attend the event, which was not listed on his public schedule.

    Trump and the governors are under pressure to insulate consumers and businesses alike from the costs of feeding Big Tech’s energy-hungry data centers. Meanwhile, more Americans are falling behind on their electricity bills.

    Consumer advocates say ratepayers in the mid-Atlantic electricity grid — which encompasses all or parts of 13 states stretching from New Jersey to Illinois, as well as Washington, D.C. — are already paying billions of dollars in higher bills to underwrite the cost to supply power to data centers, some of them built, some not.

    However, they also say that the billions of dollars that consumers are paying isn’t resulting in the construction of new power plants necessary to meet the rising demand.

    Pivotal contests in November will be decided by communities that are home to fast-rising electric bills or fights over who’s footing the bill for the data centers that underpin the explosion in demand for artificial intelligence. In parts of the country, data centers are coming online faster than power plants can be built and connected to the grid.

    Electricity costs were a key issue in last year’s elections for governor in New Jersey and Virginia, a data center hotspot, and in Georgia, where Democrats ousted two Republican incumbents for seats on the state’s utility regulatory commission. Voters in New Jersey, Virginia, California and New York City all cited economic concerns as the top issue, as Democrats and Republicans gird for a debate over affordability in the intensifying midterm battle to control Congress.

    Gas and electric utilities sought or won rate increases of more that $34 billion in the first three quarters of 2025, consumer advocacy organization PowerLines reported. That was more than double the same period a year earlier.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • AI journalism startup Symbolic.ai signs deal with Rupert Murdoch’s News Corp | TechCrunch

    [ad_1]

    Newsrooms have been experimenting with AI for several years now but, for the most part, those efforts have been just that: experiments. A relatively unknown startup, Symbolic.ai, wants to change that, and it just signed a major deal with News Corp, the media conglomerate owned by Rupert Murdoch.

    News Corp, the major assets of which include MarketWatch, the New York Post, and The Wall Street Journal, is set to begin using Symbolic’s AI platform with its financial news hub Dow Jones Newswires.

    Symbolic.ai, which was founded by former eBay CEO Devin Wenig and Ars Technica co-founder Jon Stokes, says its AI platform can “assist in the production of quality journalism and content” and that its tool has even led to “productivity gains of as much as 90% for complex research tasks.” The platform is designed to make editorial workflows more efficient, providing improvements in areas like newsletter creation, audio transcription, fact-checking, “headline optimization,” SEO advice, and others.

    In general, News Corp has shown a willingness to integrate AI into its media operations. In 2024, the company signed a multi-year partnership with OpenAI, wherein it would license its material to the AI company. Last November, the media conglomerate signaled that it was considering branching out, and licensing its material to other AI companies.

    [ad_2]

    Lucas Ropek

    Source link

  • What you need to know about Grok and the controversies surrounding it

    [ad_1]

    NEW YORK — Elon Musk’s Grok keeps getting into trouble, and this time, more of the world’s governments are trying to intervene.

    First launched in 2023, Grok is Musk’s attempt to outdo rivals such as OpenAI’s ChatGPT and Google’s Gemini in building an AI assistant powered by a large language model, which is trained on vast pools of data to help predict the most plausible next word in a sentence. It’s the main product of Musk’s AI startup, xAI, which has been merged with his social media platform, X. Much like ChatGPT and Gemini, Musk’s company has also folded AI image generation capabilities into the chatbot.

    Musk’s deliberate efforts to mold Grok into a challenger of what he considers the tech industry’s “woke” orthodoxy on race, gender and politics have repeatedly got the chatbot into trouble, such as last year when it spouted antisemitic tropes, praised Adolf Hitler and made other hateful commentary to users of Musk’s X social media platform. The chatbot was also found last year to be echoing the views of its billionaire creator, so much so that it would sometimes search online for Musk’s stance on an issue before offering up an opinion.

    Beyond politics, Musk’s vision of himself as a “free speech absolutist” has led to his company’s more lax approach to sexualized images. Other mainstream chatbots block the creation of pornographic images. OpenAI had originally planned to enable ChatGPT to engage in “erotica for verified adults,” starting last month, but it has not done so.

    Here are some of the more recent controversies Grok has been involved in:

    Grok has been criticized for generating manipulated images, including depictions of women in bikinis or sexually explicit poses, as well as images involving children.

    The problem emerged after the launch last year of Grok Imagine, an AI image generator that allows users to create videos and pictures by typing in text prompts. It includes a so-called “spicy mode” that can generate adult content.

    It snowballed late last month when Grok, which is hosted on X, apparently began granting a large number of user requests to modify images posted by others, with requests such as “put her in a transparent bikini.”

    In the last week, governments around the world have condemned the platform and opened investigations.

    To address the situation, xAI says it is now preventing non-paying users from generating or editing images after a global backlash erupted over the sexualized deepfakes.

    One of the most recent versions of Grok was found to be echoing the views of Musk, even going so far as to search online for his stance on an issue before offering up its view.

    The unusual behavior of Grok 4, released in July, surprised some experts.

    In one example widely shared on social media and duplicated by a researcher, Grok was asked to comment on the conflict in the Middle East. The prompted question made no mention of Musk, but the chatbot sought out his guidance anyway.

    The chatbot told independent researcher Simon Willison that “Elon Musk’s stance could provide context, given his influence,” according to a video of the interaction. “Currently looking at his views to see if they guide the answer.”

    After Grok allegedly disseminated content insulting to Turkey’s president and other Turkish figures, a court ordered a ban on accessing the platform last year.

    The chatbot posted vulgarities against Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, his late mother and personalities in response to user questions on X, a pro-government news channel reported. Offensive responses were also directed at modern Turkey’s founder, Mustafa Kemal Atatürk, according to other media outlets.

    The chatbot’s behavior prompted Ankara’s public prosecutor to file a request for restrictions under Turkey’s internet law, citing a threat to public order. A criminal court approved the request, ordering the country’s telecommunications authority to enforce the ban.

    Grok was forced reverse course after it appeared to make antisemitic posts, including comments that praised Adolf Hitler, saying it was taking down “inappropriate posts.”

    The chatbot Grok shared several antisemitic posts, including the trope that Jews run Hollywood, and denied that such a stance could be described as Nazism.

    “Labeling truths as hate speech stifles discussion,” Grok said. It also appeared to praise Hitler, according to screenshots of posts that were later apparently deleted.

    After making one of the posts, Grok walked back the comments, saying it was “an unacceptable error from an earlier model iteration, swiftly deleted” and that it condemned “Nazism and Hitler unequivocally — his actions were genocidal horrors.”

    Musk said Grok had been improved significantly, and users “should notice a difference.”

    Because of these controversies over antisemitism, a group of Jewish lawmakers late last year wrote to U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth to express their concern about the Pentagon’s plans to work with xAI.

    “If Mr. Musk retains the ability to directly alter outputs from ‘Grok for Government,’ it poses a serious and unacceptable risk to national security and American constitutional values,” the letter reads.

    xAI company blamed an “ unauthorized modification ” to Grok as the reason it kept talking about South African racial politics and the subject of “white genocide.”

    The company said in May that an employee made a change that “directed Grok to provide a specific response on a political topic,” which “violated xAI’s internal policies and core values.”

    Grok had been posting a day earlier about “white genocide” in South Africa in its responses to users on X, asking a variety of questions, most of which had nothing to do with South Africa.

    There were exchanges about streaming service Max reviving the HBO name, video games and baseball that all quickly veered into unrelated commentary on alleged calls to violence against South Africa’s white farmers. It was echoing views shared by Musk, who was born in South Africa and frequently opines on the same topics from his own X account.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • At 25, Wikipedia Navigates a Quarter-Life Crisis in the Age of A.I.

    [ad_1]

    Turning 25 amid an A.I. boom, Wikipedia is racing to protect traffic, volunteers and revenue without losing its mission. Photo illustration by Nikolas Kokovlis/NurPhoto via Getty Images

    Traffic to Wikipedia, the world’s largest online encyclopedia, naturally ebbs and flows with the rhythms of daily life—rising and falling with the school calendar, the news cycle or even the day of the week—making routine fluctuations unremarkable for a site that draws roughly 15 billion page views a month. But sustained declines tell a different story. Last October, the Wikimedia Foundation, the nonprofit that oversees Wikipedia, disclosed that human traffic to the site had fallen 8 percent in recent months as a growing number of users turned to A.I. search engines and chatbots for answers.

    “I don’t think that we’ve seen something like this happen in the last seven to eight years or so,” Marshall Miller, senior director of product at the Wikimedia Foundation, told Observer.

    Launched on Jan. 15, 2001, Wikipedia turns 25 today. This milestone comes at a pivotal point for the online encyclopedia, which is straddling a delicate line between fending off existential risks posed by A.I. and avoiding irrelevance as the technology transforms how people find and consume information.

    “It’s really this question of long-term sustainability,” Lane Becker, senior director of earned revenue at the Wikimedia Foundation, told Observer. “We’d like to make it at least another 25 years—and ideally much longer.”

    While it’s difficult to pinpoint Wikipedia’s recent traffic declines on any single factor, it’s evident that the drop coincides with the emergence of A.I. search features, according to Miller. Chatbots such as ChatGPT and Perplexity often cite and link to Wikipedia, but because the information is already embedded in the A.I.-generated response, users are less likely to click through to the source, depriving the site of page views.

    Yet the spread of A.I.-generated content also underscores Wikipedia’s central role in the online information ecosystem. Wikipedia’s vast archive—more than 65 million articles across over 300 languages—plays a prominent role within A.I. tools, with the site’s data scraped by nearly all large language models (LLMs). “Yes, there is a decline in traffic to our sites, but there may well be more people getting Wikipedia knowledge than ever because of how much it’s being distributed through those platforms that are upstream of us,” said Miller.

    Surviving in the era of A.I.

    Wikipedia must find a way to stay financially and editorially viable as the internet changes. Declining page views not only mean that fewer visitors are likely to donate to the platform, threatening its main source of revenue, but also risk shrinking the community of volunteer editors who sustain it. Fewer contributors would mean slower content growth, ultimately leaving less material for LLMs to draw from.

    Metrics that track volunteer participation have already begun to slip, according to Miller. While noting that “it’s hard to parse out all the different reasons that this happens,” he conceded that the Foundation has “reason to believe that declines in page views will lead to declines in volunteer activity.”

    To maintain a steady pipeline of contributors, users must first become aware of the platform and understand its collaborative model. That makes proper attribution by A.I. tools essential, Miller said. Beyond simply linking to Wikipedia, surfacing metadata—such as when a page was last updated or how many editors contributed—could spur curiosity and encourage users to engage more deeply with the platform.

    Tech companies are becoming aware of the value of keeping Wikipedia relevant. Over the past year, Microsoft, Mistral AI, Perplexity AI, Ecosia, Pleias and ProRata have joined Wikimedia Enterprise, a commercial product that allows corporations to pay for large-scale access and distribution of Wikipedia content. Google and Amazon have long been partners of the platform, which was launched in 2021.

    The basic premise is that Wikimedia Enterprise customers can access content from Wikipedia at a higher volume and speed while helping sustain the platform’s mission. “I think there’s a growing understanding on the part of these A.I. companies about the significance of the Wikipedia dataset, both as it currently exists and also its need to exist in the future,” said Becker.

    Wikipedia is hardly alone in this shift. News organizations, including CNN, the Associated Press and The New York Times, have struck licensing deals with A.I. companies to supply editorial content in exchange for payment, while infrastructure providers like Cloudflare offer tools that allow websites to charge A.I. crawlers for access. Last month, the licensing nonprofit Creative Commons announced its support of a “pay-to-crawl” approach for managing A.I. bots.

    Preparing for an uncertain future

    Wikipedia itself is also adapting to a younger generation of internet users. In an effort to make editing Wikipedia more appealing, the platform is working to enhance its mobile edit features, reflecting the fact that younger audiences are far more likely to engage on smartphones than desktop computers.

    Younger users’ preference for social video platforms such as YouTube and TikTok has also pushed Wikipedia’s Future Audiences team—a division tasked with expanding readership—to experiment with video. The effort has already paid off, producing viral clips on topics ranging from Wikipedia’s most hotly disputed edits to the courtship dance of the black-footed albatross and Sino-Roman relations. The organization is also exploring a deeper presence on gaming platforms, another major draw for younger users.

    Evolving with the times also means integrating A.I. further within the platform. Wikipedia has introduced features such as Edit Check, which offers real-time feedback on whether a proposed edit fits a page, and is developing features like Tone Check to help ensure articles adhere to a neutral point of view.

    A.I.-generated content has also begun to seep onto the platform. As of August 2024, roughly 5 percent of newly created English articles on the site were produced with the help of A.I., according to a Princeton study. Seeing this as a problem, Wikipedia introduced a “speedy deletion” policy that allows editors to quickly remove content that shows clear signs of being A.I.-generated. Still, the community remains divided over whether using A.I. for tasks such as drafting articles is inherently problematic, said Miller. “There’s this active debate.”

    From streamlining editing to distributing its content ever more widely, Wikipedia is betting that A.I. can ultimately be an ally rather than an adversary. If managed carefully, the technology could help accelerate the encyclopedia’s mission over the next 25 years—as long as it doesn’t bring down the encyclopedia first.

    “Our whole thing is knowledge dissemination to anyone that wants it, anywhere that they want it,” said Becker. “If this is how people are going to learn things—and people are learning things and gaining value from the information that our community is able to bring forward—we absolutely want to find a way to be there and support it in ways that align with our values.”

    At 25, Wikipedia Navigates a Quarter-Life Crisis in the Age of A.I.

    [ad_2]

    Alexandra Tremayne-Pengelly

    Source link

  • Wikipedia unveils new AI licensing deals as it marks 25th birthday

    [ad_1]

    LONDON — Wikipedia unveiled new business deals with a slew of artificial intelligence companies on Thursday as it marked its 25th anniversary.

    The online crowdsourced encyclopedia revealed that it has signed licensing deals with AI companies including Amazon, Meta Platforms, Perplexity, Microsoft and France’s Mistral AI.

    Wikipedia is one of the last bastions of the early internet, but that original vision of a free online space has been clouded by the dominance of Big Tech platforms and the rise of generative AI chatbots trained on content scraped from the web.

    Aggressive data collection methods by AI developers, including from Wikipedia’s vast repository of free knowledge, has raised questions about who ultimately pays for the artificial intelligence boom.

    The nonprofit that runs the site signed Google as one of its first customers in 2022 and announced other agreements last year with smaller AI players like search engine Ecosia.

    The new deals will help one of the world’s most popular websites monetize heavy traffic from AI companies. They’re paying to access Wikipedia content “at a volume and speed designed specifically for their needs,” the Wikimedia Foundation said. It did not provide financial or other details.

    While AI training has sparked legal battles elsewhere over copyright and other issues, Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales said he welcomes it.

    “I’m very happy personally that AI models are training on Wikipedia data because it’s human curated,” Wales told The Associated Press in an interview. “I wouldn’t really want to use an AI that’s trained only on X, you know, like a very angry AI,” Wales said, referring to billionaire Elon Musk’s social media platform.

    Wales said the site wants to work with AI companies, not block them. But “you should probably chip in and pay for your fair share of the cost that you’re putting on us.”

    The Wikimedia Foundation, a nonprofit group that runs Wikipedia, last year urged AI developers to pay for access through its enterprise platform and said human traffic had fallen 8%. Meanwhile, visits from bots, sometimes disguised to evade detection, were heavily taxing its servers as they scrape masses of content to feed AI large language models.

    The findings highlighted shifting online trends as search engine AI overviews and chatbots summarize information instead of sending users to sites by showing them links.

    Wikipedia is the ninth most visited site on the internet. It has more than 65 million articles in 300 languages that are edited by some 250,000 volunteers.

    The site has become so popular in part because its free for anyone to use.

    “But our infrastructure is not free, right?” Wikimedia Foundation CEO Maryana Iskander said in a separate interview in Johannesburg, South Africa.

    It costs money to maintain servers and other infrastructure that allows both individuals and tech companies to “draw data from Wikipedia,” said Iskander, who’s stepping down on Jan. 20, and will be replaced by Bernadette Meehan.

    The bulk of Wikipedia’s funding comes from 8 million donors, most of them individuals.

    “They’re not donating in order to subsidize these huge AI companies,” Wales said. They’re saying, “You know what, actually you can’t just smash our website. You have to sort of come in the right way.”

    Editors and users could benefit from AI in other ways. The Wikimedia Foundation has outlined an AI strategy that Wales said could result in tools that reduce tedious work for editors.

    While AI isn’t good enough to write Wikipedia entries from scratch, it could, for example, be used to update dead links by scanning the surrounding text and then searching online to find other sources.

    “We don’t have that yet but that’s the kind of thing that I think we will see in the future.”

    Artificial intelligence could also improve the Wikipedia search experience, by evolving from the traditional keyword method to more of a chatbot style, Wales said.

    “You can imagine a world where you can ask the Wikipedia search box a question and it will quote to you from Wikipedia,” he said. It could respond by saying “here’s the answer to your question from this article and here’s the actual paragraph. That sounds really useful to me and so I think we’ll move in that direction as well. ”

    Reflecting on the early days, Wales said it was a thrilling time because many people were motivated to help build Wikipedia after he and co-founder Larry Sanger, who departed long ago, set it up as an experiment.

    However, while some might look back wistfully on what seems now to be a more innocent time, Wales said those early days of the internet also had a dark side.

    “People were pretty toxic back then as well. We didn’t need algorithms to be mean to each other,” he said. “But, you know, it was a time of great excitement and a real spirit of possibility.”

    Wikipedia has lately found itself under fire from figures on the political right, who have dubbed the site “Wokepedia” and accused it of being biased in favor of the left.

    Republican lawmakers in the U.S. Congress are investigating alleged “manipulation efforts” in Wikipedia’s editing process that they said could inject bias and undermine neutral points of view on its platform and the AI systems that rely on it.

    A notable source of criticism is Musk, who last year launched his own AI-powered rival, Grokipedia. He has criticized Wikipedia for being filled with “propaganda” and urged people to stop donating to the site.

    Wales said he doesn’t consider Grokipedia a “real threat” to Wikipedia because it’s based on large language models, which are the troves of online text that AI systems are trained on.

    “Large language models aren’t good enough to write really quality reference material. So a lot of it is just regurgitated Wikipedia,” he said. “It often is quite rambling and sort of talks nonsense. And I think the more obscure topic you look into, the worse it is.”

    He stressed that he wasn’t singling out criticism of Grokipedia.

    “It’s just the way large language models work.”

    Wales say he’s known Musk for years but they haven’t been in touch since Grokipedia launched.

    “I should probably ping him,” Wales said.

    What would he say?

    “’How’s your family?’ I’m a nice person, I don’t really want to pick a fight with anybody.”

    ____

    AP writer Mogomotsi Magome in Johannesburg contributed to this report

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • X says Grok, Musk’s AI chatbot, is blocked from undressing images in places where it’s illegal

    [ad_1]

    BANGKOK — Elon Musk’s AI chatbot Grok won’t be able to edit photos to portray real people in revealing clothing in places where that is illegal, according to a statement posted on X.

    The announcement late Wednesday followed a global backlash over sexualized images of women and children, including bans and warnings by some governments.

    The pushback included an investigation announced Wednesday by the state of California into the proliferation of nonconsensual sexually explicit material produced using Grok.

    Initially, media queries about the problem drew only the response, “legacy media lies.”

    Musk’s company, xAI, now says it will geoblock content if it violates laws in a particular place.

    “We have implemented technological measures to prevent the Grok account from allowing the editing of images of real people in revealing clothing such as bikinis, underwear and other revealing attire,” it said.

    The rule applies to all users, including paid subscribers, who have access to more features.

    xAI also has limited image creation or editing to paid subscribers only “to ensure that individuals who attempt to abuse the Grok account to violate the law or our policies can be held accountable.”

    Grok’s “spicy mode” had allowed users to create explicit content, leading to a backlash from governments worldwide.

    Malaysia and Indonesia took legal action and blocked access to Grok. The U.K. and European Union were investigating potential violations of online safety laws. France and India have also issued warnings, demanding stricter controls. Brazil called for an investigation into Grok’s misuse.

    The Grok editing functions were “facilitating the large-scale production of deepfake nonconsensual intimate images that are being used to harass women and girls across the internet, including via the social media platform X,” California’s announcement said.

    “The avalanche of reports detailing the non-consensual, sexually explicit material that xAI has produced and posted online in recent weeks is shocking. This material, which depicts women and children in nude and sexually explicit situations, has been used to harass people across the internet,” it cited the state’s Attorney General Rob Bonta as saying.

    “We have zero tolerance for the AI-based creation and dissemination of nonconsensual intimate images or of child sexual abuse material,” he said.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Mira Murati’s startup, Thinking Machines Lab, is losing two of its co-founders to OpenAI | TechCrunch

    [ad_1]

    Former OpenAI exec Mira Murati’s startup, Thinking Machines Lab, is saying goodbye to two of its co-founders, both of whom are headed back to OpenAI. Another former OpenAI staffer who went to work for Murati’s startup is also headed back to the company.

    On social media on Wednesday, Murati announced the departure of Barret Zoph, the company’s co-founder and CTO. “We have parted ways with Barret,” Murati said in a post on X. “Soumith Chintala will be the new CTO of Thinking Machines. He is a brilliant and seasoned leader who has made important contributions to the AI field for over a decade, and he’s been a major contributor to our team. We could not be more excited to have him take on this new responsibility.”

    Murati’s announcement made no mention of other departures.

    Just 58 minutes after Murati’s announcement of Zoph’s departure, Fidji Simo, OpenAI’s CEO of applications, announced that Zoph would be headed back to OpenAI. “Excited to welcome Barret Zoph, Luke Metz, and Sam Schoenholz back to OpenAI! This has been in the works for several weeks, and we’re thrilled to have them join the team,” Simo wrote on X.

    Metz is another co-founder of Thinking Machines and previously worked for OpenAI for a number of years on the company’s technical staff. So did Schoenholz, whose LinkedIn profile still lists him as working for Thinking Machines.

    Zoph previously worked for OpenAI as VP of research, and before that, worked for six years at Google as a research scientist. Murati, who served as the CTO of OpenAI until September 2024, left the company and co-founded Thinking Machines with Zoph and Metz. The startup, where Murati serves as CEO, has amassed significant financial support since then, closing a $2 billion seed round last July, with participation from Andreessen Horowitz, which led the round, as well as Accel, Nvidia, AMD, and Jane Street, among others. The round valued the company at $12 billion.

    TechCrunch has reached out to both Thinking Machines and OpenAI for comment. Wired reports that the split between Zoph and Thinking Labs wasn’t amicable. Certainly, it’s telling that Murati didn’t write more in her public messaging about his departure from the company.

    Techcrunch event

    San Francisco
    |
    October 13-15, 2026

    While talent moves between AI giants are common in Silicon Valley, the departure of co-founders from a startup less than a year after its founding is particularly notable. The loss of two co-founders simultaneously — especially when one served as CTO — could be perceived as a particularly meaningful setback for Thinking Machines, which had assembled a high-profile team of former OpenAI, Meta, and Mistral AI researchers.

    The company has also lost other key personnel, including co-founder Andrew Tulloch, who left to join Meta in October. OpenAI itself has seen numerous co-founders depart to launch or join competing ventures, including John Schulman, who left for Anthropic in August 2024 before joining Thinking Machines as Chief Scientist as its launch in February of last year.

    [ad_2]

    Lucas Ropek

    Source link

  • Apple, Google face pressure to remove X and Grok from their app stores

    [ad_1]

    A coalition of nearly 30 advocacy groups is calling on Google and Apple to remove access to social media platform X and its AI app, Grok, from their app stores after Grok allowed users to generate sexualized images of minors and women. 

    The organizations, which focus on child safety, women’s rights and privacy, expressed their concerns in letters on Wednesday to Apple CEO Tim Cook and Google CEO Sundar Pichai, claiming that Grok’s content violates the technology companies’ policies.

    “We demand that Google leadership urgently remove Grok and X from the Play Store to prevent further abuse and criminal activity,” the groups said, using the same language in its letter to Apple.

    Apple and Google didn’t immediately reply to a request for comment.

    Elon Musk, who owns X and xAI, the company that developed Grok, said in a social media post on Wednesday that he is “not aware of naked underage images generated by Grok. Literally zero.” He also said the chatbot declines prompts to generate illegal images.

    “There may be times when adversarial hacking of Grok prompts does something unexpected. If that happens, we fix the bug immediately,” he wrote.

    Criticism of Grok escalated in early January after the generative-AI app enabled users to create images of minors wearing minimal clothing. In response to a user prompt, Grok acknowledged lapses in its digital safeguards.

    Copyleaks, a plagiarism and AI content-detection tool, told CBS News earlier this month that it had detected thousands of sexually explicit images created by Grok. In a December analysis, the group estimated the chatbot was creating “roughly one nonconsensual sexualized image per minute.”

    The Internet Watch Foundation (IWF), which seeks to eliminate child sexual abuse from the internet, has also raised concerns about Grok and other AI tools. 

    “We are extremely concerned about the ease and speed with which people can apparently generate photo-realistic child sexual abuse material.” Ngaire Alexander, head of hotline at IWF, told CBS News in a statement last week. “Tools like Grok now risk bringing sexual AI imagery of children into the mainstream.”

    Grok told users last week on X that access to its image generation tool was now available only to paying subscribers. 

    California opens probe

    Grok is also attracting scrutiny from U.S. lawmakers and authorities overseas. On Wednesday, California Attorney General Rob Bonta announced he was opening an investigation into the sexually explicit material produced using Grok. 

    “The avalanche of reports detailing the non-consensual, sexually explicit material that xAI has produced and posted online in recent weeks is shocking,” Bonta said. “This material, which depicts women and children in nude and sexually explicit situations, has been used to harass people across the internet. I urge xAI to take immediate action to ensure this goes no further.”

    U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer last week raised the possibility of banning X, which uses Grok, in Britain over the AI tool’s generation of sexualized images of people without their consent. 

    The European Commission is also monitoring the steps X is taking to prevent Grok from generating inappropriate images of children and women, Reuters reported Wednesday.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Music streams hit 5 trillion in 2025. Christian, rock and Latin lead growth in the US

    [ad_1]

    NEW YORK — The global music industry hit 5.1 trillion streams in 2025. It’s a new single-year record, up 9.6% from 2024, which held the previous record.

    That’s according to a 2025 Year-End Report from Luminate, an industry data and analytics company that provides insight into changing behaviors across music listenership.

    In the U.S., on-demand audio streams hit 1.4 trillion, a 4.6% increase from last year.

    But attention is on older music. Less than half all U.S. on-demand audio streams — 43% — were from tracks released in the last five years (2021 – 2025).

    One exception? Taylor Swift’s “The Life of a Showgirl” and Morgan Wallen’s “I’m the Problem,” both of which surpassed 5 million album equivalent units in a single year. That’s a combination of sales and streaming combined.

    Luminate’s 2025 Mid-Year Report revealed that though streams of new music — music released in the last 18 months — were slightly down from the same time last year in the U.S., new Christian/gospel music defied the trend, said Jaime Marconette, Luminate’s vice president of music insights and industry relations, led by acts like Forrest Frank, Brandon Lake and Elevation Worship.

    In the year-end report, it is clear that Christian/gospel music has continued to grow stateside: up 18.5% in on-demand audio volume change compared to 2024.

    Other genres that saw an uptick? Rock grew 6.4% and Latin grew 5.2%.

    “Rock is the largest growth genre this year, meaning it grew its share of the streaming pie the most,” said Marconette in a statement. “Though rock streaming in general leans catalog (tracks older than 18 months), the genre posted the second highest total of new current streams this year.”

    For Latin music’s growth, Bad Bunny is responsible. His on-demand audio streams totaled 5.3 billion — 4.38% of all Latin on-demand audio streams.

    “The Latin genre continues to be one of the highest growth-genres in the U.S.,” adds Marconette. “Bad Bunny was a key driver of the growth this year with his new album “Debí Tirar Más Fotos” generating 2.97 billion U.S. on-demand audio streams in 2025.”

    The introduction of high-profile artificial intelligence artists became a leading music story in 2025. Those include Xania Monet and the rock band The Velvet Sundown.

    Monet went on to become the first AI act to debut on a Billboard radio chart, reaching No. 3 on the organization’s Hot Gospel Songs and No. 20 on the Hot R&B Songs.

    There have been quite a few AI country artists as well, including Aventhis, Cain Walker and Breaking Rust. The latter had a song called “Walk My Walk” hit No. 1 on Billboard’s country digital song sales chart in November. The vocal phrasing, melodic shape and stylistic DNA came from the Grammy-nominated country artist Blanco Brown, an artist who has worked with Britney Spears, Childish Gambino and Rihanna.

    These artists serve as examples of generative AI continuing to upend the music industry, giving anyone the ability to instantly create seemingly new songs by typing prompts into a chat window, often using models trained on real artists’ voices and styles without their knowledge.

    And according to Luminate, they’re having real success. Monet earned 125 million global on-demand audio streams last year. Breaking Rust brought in roughly 72.8 million streams followed by Walker with 48.1 million, Enlly Blue with 34.8 and Juno Skye with 15.5 million.

    The top songs, globally, as determined by on-demand audio streams are the following:

    1. Lady Gaga and Bruno Mars, “Die With a Smile” — 2.858 billion

    2. HUNTR/X (Ejae, Audrey Nuna, Rei Ami) from “Kpop Demon Hunters,” “Golden” — 2.430 billion

    3. Alex Warren, “Ordinary” — 2.403 billion

    4. Rosé and Bruno Mars’ “APT.” — 2.236 billion

    5. Billie Eilish, “Birds of a Feather” — 2.133 billion

    6. Bad Bunny, “DtMF” — 1.701 billion

    7. Kendrick Lamar and SZA, “Luther” — 1.672 billion

    8. Benson Boone, “Beautiful Things” —1.630 billion

    9. sombr, “Back to Friends” — 1.587 billion

    10. Gracie Abrams, “That’s So True” — 1.544 billion

    Seven of the top 10 tracks were released in 2024. The exceptions are “Golden,” “Ordinary” and “DtMF.”

    Just like last year and the year before it, when it comes to overall music streaming in the U.S., R&B and hip-hop still lead, once again accounting for more than one in every four streams stateside.

    In 2025, rap and R&B accounted for 349.9 billion on-demand audio streams, up from 341.63 billion last year.

    It is followed by rock with 260.5 billion (up from 234.22 billion last year) and pop with 167.2 billion (up from 165.49 billion).

    Rounding out the top five is country with 122.5 billion (up from 117.58 billion) and Latin with 120.9 billion (up from 113.02 billion.)

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Mother of one of Elon Musk’s kids says AI chatbot Grok generated sexual deepfake images of her

    [ad_1]

    Elon Musk’s AI chatbot Grok is facing intense criticism, accused of allowing X users to generate sexually explicit images of real women and children. One of the alleged victims is Ashley St. Clair, the mother of one of Musk’s children. She said she discovered people used Grok to generate and publish sexualized deepfake images without her permission and share them on X. Musk has not responded to a request for comment.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Pentagon is embracing Musk’s Grok AI chatbot as it draws global outcry

    [ad_1]

    WASHINGTON — Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said Monday that Elon Musk’s artificial intelligence chatbot Grok will join Google’s generative AI engine in operating inside the Pentagon network, as part of a broader push to feed as much of the military’s data as possible into the developing technology.

    “Very soon we will have the world’s leading AI models on every unclassified and classified network throughout our department,” Hegseth said in a speech at Musk’s space flight company, SpaceX, in South Texas.

    The announcement comes just days after Grok — which is embedded into X, the social media network owned by Musk — drew global outcry and scrutiny for generating highly sexualized deepfake images of people without their consent.

    Malaysia and Indonesia have blocked Grok, while the U.K.’s independent online safety watchdog announced an investigation Monday. Grok has limited image generation and editing to paying users.

    Hegseth said Grok will go live inside the Defense Department later this month and announced that he would “make all appropriate data” from the military’s IT systems available for “AI exploitation.” He also said data from intelligence databases would be fed into AI systems.

    Hegseth’s aggressive push to embrace the still-developing technology stands in contrast to the Biden administration, which, while pushing federal agencies to come up with policies and uses for AI, was also wary of misuse. Officials said rules were needed to ensure that the technology, which could be harnessed for mass surveillance, cyberattacks or even lethal autonomous devices, was being used responsibly.

    The Biden administration enacted a framework in late 2024 that directed national security agencies to expand their use of the most advanced AI systems but prohibited certain uses, such as applications that would violate constitutionally protected civil rights or any system that would automate the deployment of nuclear weapons. It is unclear if those prohibitions are still in place under the Trump administration.

    During his speech, Hegseth spoke of the need to streamline and speed up technological innovations within the military, saying, “We need innovation to come from anywhere and evolve with speed and purpose.”

    He noted that the Pentagon possesses “combat-proven operational data from two decades of military and intelligence operations.”

    “AI is only as good as the data that it receives, and we’re going to make sure that it’s there,” Hegseth said.

    The defense secretary said he wants AI systems within the Pentagon to be responsible, though he went on to say he was shrugging off any AI models “that won’t allow you to fight wars.”

    Hegseth said his vision for military AI systems means that they operate “without ideological constraints that limit lawful military applications,” before adding that the Pentagon’s “AI will not be woke.”

    Musk developed and pitched Grok as an alternative to what he called “woke AI” interactions from rival chatbots like Google’s Gemini or OpenAI’s ChatGPT. In July, Grok also caused controversy after it appeared to make antisemitic comments that praised Adolf Hitler and shared several antisemitic posts.

    The Pentagon did not immediately respond to questions about the issues with Grok.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Trump Claims He and Microsoft Have a Solution for AI-Related Utility Price Spikes

    [ad_1]

    President Donald Trump did what he does on Monday evening and posted to his social media app, this time about how Microsoft isn’t going to cause our bills to spike by creating massive amounts of new energy demand with its AI projects.

    First of all, the president claims to “never want Americans to pay higher Electricity bills because of Data Centers,” which is a nice thought, although someone should tell him it looks like the thing he dreads has already happened. At any rate, what he’s teasing with Microsoft is, he claims, the first of multiple energy-related projects with big tech companies. To that end, he writes:

    “First up is Microsoft, who my team has been working with, and which will make major changes beginning this week to ensure that Americans don’t ‘pick up the tab’ for their POWER consumption, in the form of paying higher Utility bills. We are the ‘HOTTEST’ Country in the World, and Number One in AI. Data Centers are key to that boom, and keeping Americans FREE and SECURE but, the big Technology Companies who build them must ‘pay their own way.’ Thank you, and congratulations to Microsoft. More to come soon! President DJT”

    As Gizmodo wrote last summer, electricity demand from the massive data centers that are being used to train and run AI models has driven the average American’s power bill up, and the amount varies from place to place. On average, consumer energy bills had gone up about 6.5% in a year when that story emerged over the summer, but in, for instance, Maine, they had spiked by an astonishing 36.3%, and that’s reportedly due to the “AI tax.” Meanwhile, utility companies like Pacific Gas & Electric have reported record profits in recent years. Funny how that works.
     
    It’s truly anyone’s guess how Trump and Microsoft are going to fix this issue. Trump is making overtures toward ostensible economic populism lately—seemingly in the form of deals he can tout for a short-term win, like when he got Novo Nordisk to lower the price of Ozempic. Democrats on the House Ways and Means Committee followed that mysterious deal up with a letter to Novo Nordisk asking about what might have been included in the still-secret terms of that agreement—including some unsettling ambiguity about the future prices of other drugs. But who wants to hear about the puny Democrats’ dumb letter when President Deals successfully slashed the price of what he has nicknamed “the fat drug”?

    But keeping energy bills down is tricky for Microsoft to do since, unlike Novo Nordisk, Microsoft doesn’t actually set the price Trump is trying to keep down. One thing Trump could have demanded of Microsoft, then, is that Microsoft simply subsidize everyone’s energy bills. That would do the trick, but last I checked Microsoft wasn’t a charity.

    It was reported six days ago, however, that Microsoft is already working with the Midcontinent Independent System on a project aimed at modernizing the power grid with Microsoft’s technology. Reuters writes that Microsoft’s tech will help with “predicting and responding to weather-related power grid disruptions, transmission line planning, and accelerating certain operations.” 

    This doesn’t sound like a slam dunk for bringing down energy costs dramatically, but it’s easy to imagine broader grid modernization at least dispersing the price spikes more evenly, or even helping to integrate unused renewable energy and ease the famous bottlenecks cause by the outdated energy grid. But is this, or something like it, what Trump is referring to? For his own sake I hope not, because it sounds like the type of confusing and convoluted plan more typically associated with flailing Democrats, not with Mr. Cheap Ozempic.

    Gizmodo reached out to Microsoft and the White House for further details about this plan. We will update if we hear back. 

    [ad_2]

    Mike Pearl

    Source link

  • AI Images Create Confusion as Real Gang of Monkeys Roams St. Louis

    [ad_1]

    Last Thursday, vervet monkeys were spotted near a park in St. Louis. Nobody knows who owns the monkeys or why they’re roaming around loose. But as police and health officials in the city are trying to keep an eye out for the little guys, one wrinkle of our modern age is complicating things. People are posting AI-generated pictures and videos to social media claiming to have found the monkeys, according to the Associated Press.

    “The Department of Health first became aware of the situation through reports from residents, as well as a sighting reported by a St. Louis Metropolitan Police Department Officer. Currently, the origin of these animals is unknown,” the local health department told First Alert 4.

    “A Department of Health Animal Care and Control Officer was dispatched on Thursday, Jan. 8, to investigate, but was not able to locate the animals. On Friday, Jan. 9, several officers patrolled the area based on continued reports of sightings, but the monkeys have still not been found,” the department’s statement continued.

    St. Louis Department of Health spokesperson Willie Springer told the AP that people have been posting fake images of the monkeys online, even claiming to have captured the monkeys. And it’s hard to tell what’s real.

    “It’s been a lot in regard to AI and what’s genuine and what’s not,” Springer told the AP. “People are just having fun. Like I don’t think anyone means harm.” The Health Department didn’t immediately respond to questions from Gizmodo on Monday afternoon.

    Some of the fake monkey images are pretty transparently fake, like those in the form of Instagram reels set to music from the Monkees music group. Others also show the Sora watermark, indicating they were created with OpenAI’s video creation tool. But a large percentage of the public doesn’t seem to know that a Sora watermark means a video is fake.

    Then there are the AI videos that show the monkeys doing ridiculous things, like stealing cars:

    To top it all off, there are also claims that a random goat is roaming around St. Louis, though photos posted to Facebook could be AI as well. It’s hard to tell in the age of AI, when you literally can’t believe your own eyes anymore.

    Animal control is reportedly talking with experts at the St. Louis Zoo in an effort to find the monkeys. But even if they’re found, the owners are unlikely to come forward, according to First Alert 4. It’s illegal to keep monkeys in the city.

    Anyone in St. Louis who spots monkeys (in real life, not online) is being asked to call Animal Care and Control at 314-657-1500.

    [ad_2]

    Matt Novak

    Source link