ReportWire

Tag: Artemis

  • NASA to roll back its Artemis II moon rocket for repairs

    [ad_1]

    KENNEDY SPACE CENTER — On Wednesday morning, NASA will begin its Artemis II moon rocket’s long march back to the Vehicle Assembly Building to begin repairs after a helium flow issue forced the cancellation of another launch attempt.


    What You Need To Know

    • NASA will use a crawler transporter to move the Space Launch System rocket and its Orion capsule back to the Vehicle Assembly Building
    • This can take up to 12 hours to move about four miles from the launch pad to the Vehicle Assembly Building
    • The reason behind the rollback is because a helium flow issue was discovered

    On Wednesday at around 9 a.m. ET, NASA will use a crawler transporter to move the 322-foot (98.27-meter) Space Launch System rocket and its Orion capsule companion back to the Vehicle Assembly Building, the U.S. space agency stated.

    This can take up to 12 hours as it will make its approximately 4-mile journey to the Vehicle Assembly Building, as the crawler transporter will burn rubber at about 1 mile per hour or less.

    The reason behind the trek is due to a helium flow issue that came up over the weekend.

    “Once back in the VAB, teams will immediately begin work to install platforms to access the area of the helium flow issue. Teams also will take advantage of the time in the VAB to replace batteries in the flight termination system and retest it, and replace additional batteries in the upper stage,” NASA shared.

    The Artemis II moon rocket will be rolled back to NASA’s Vehicle Assembly Building for repair work. (Spectrum News file photo/Anthony Leone)

    The Artemis II rocket has had some issues since it was first rolled to its temporary home at Launch Pad 39B at NASA’s Kennedy Space Center in January.

    During the first wet dress rehearsal — or a prelaunch test — NASA teams filled more than 700,000 gallons of cryogenic fuel into the rocket, but they discovered a liquid hydrogen leak, among other issues.

    The teams replaced the seals where the leak was discovered, near the rocket’s tail service mast umbilical interface.

    In the second wet dress rehearsal, the new seals worked fine and all looked good.

    However, over the weekend, NASA Administrator Jared Isaacman announced on X that a helium flow issue was discovered, and the massive moon rocket would need to be rolled back to the Vehicle Assembly Building for repairs.

    Hurricane Ian forced NASA to roll the rocket back into the Vehicle Assembly Building during the Artemis I mission in 2022.

    Originally, the Artemis II was going to be launched in February, until the leak pushed that back, and the next attempt was going to be in March.

    Now, the possible next launch attempt will be in April.

    When all is ready, NASA’s Cmdr. Gregory Reid Wiseman, pilot Victor Glover, mission specialist Christina Koch and Canadian Space Agency astronaut mission specialist Jeremy Hansen will be launched on a flyby mission to the moon.

    Artemis II possible launch dates

     

    [ad_2]

    Anthony Leone

    Source link

  • Tourists change plans in hopes of seeing Artemis II launch

    [ad_1]

    NASA is prepping to bring the Artemis II rocket back to the hangar for repairs due to a helium leak discovered after last week’s wet dress rehearsal.


    What You Need To Know

    • The new issue for Artemis has pushed the launch date to a possible April launch; Space Coast visitors are adjusting their plans accordingly

    Now, they are eyeing a new launch date as early as April.

    This means many people who are in town, or coming to town to watch the launch, are having to change plans.

    The Guinn Family hails from Arkansas and the members are visiting the Space Coast on a two-fer.

    One, to see Hutson Guinn play baseball at Eastern Florida State College, but also hoping to watch the historic moon launch, where four people will do a flyby mission of Earth’s lunar sister.

    Getting a place to stay was a challenge due to hotels being booked for others wanting to see it too.

    “Airbnb, VRBO, Booking.com, all the big ones, not a great selection,” said Kara Guinn.

    The launch delay prompted the rocket’s return to the Vehicle Assembly Building for repairs. NASA officials stated this weekend that a helium flow is the reason behind the recent problems. 

    Don Platt, the director of Spaceport Education Center at Florida Tech, agrees with NASA’s decision.

    “Try to get it back to the VAB, don’t try to do anything heroic with it at the launch pad. This way, hopefully they can get it back there out there and ready for the April launch window,” Platt said.

    Platt recalled his first shuttle launch as a child, visiting with his family in 1982 for STS 4.

    “That launch went on the first opportunity scheduled, like two months ahead of time, and that was only the fourth shuttle launch. I got so lucky,” he said.

    Not so lucky for the Guinn Family, but they’re not giving up.

    “We will be back in April!” Kara Guinn told Spectrum News.

    A Space Coast Office of Tourism official stated, “We encourage space fans to be aware that launches can be delayed or scrubbed at any time for many reasons, but the great news is the likelihood of seeing a launch on any Space Coast trip is relatively high due to the ever-increasing launch cadence”.

    NASA is set to begin bringing the rocket back Tuesday afternoon — it should take some 12 hours.

    Depending on the length and extent of repairs, an April launch window will be on the table.

    [ad_2]

    Greg Pallone

    Source link

  • NASA to rollback Artemis moon rocket due to helium flow issue

    [ad_1]

    KENNEDY SPACE CENTER — On Saturday, NASA Administrator Jared Isaacman posted on X that due to a helium flow issue, the Artemis II moon rocket will be rolled back to the Vehicle Assembly Building for repairs and the possible March launch attempt has been canceled.


    What You Need To Know

    • This new issue has pushed the launch date to a possible April launch
    • The new issue is a helium flow that could result in the rocket being sent to the Vehicle Assembly Building
    • The Artemis II rocket has seen some issues during the first wet dress rehearsal

    “After overnight data showed an interruption in helium flow in the SLS interim cryogenic propulsion stage, teams are troubleshooting and preparing for a likely rollback of Artemis II to the VAB at @NASAKennedy,” Isaacman stated, who added that this could impact the March launch window.

    The U.S. space agency followed up with a blog post, stating that during the overnight, the issue was detected.

    “NASA is taking steps to potentially roll back the Artemis II rocket and Orion spacecraft to the Vehicle Assembly Building (VAB) at the agency’s Kennedy Space Center in Florida after overnight Feb. 21 observing interrupted flow of helium in the SLS (Space Launch System) rocket’s interim cryogenic propulsion stage. Helium flow is required for launch,” NASA stated.

    In a follow-up post on X, Isaacman shared that engineers were unable to get the helium flow through the rocket during a routine procedure to repressurize the system.

    “Potential faults could include the final filter between the ground and flight vehicle, located on the umbilical, though this seems least likely based on the failure signature. It could also be a failed QD umbilical interface, where similar issues have been observed,” he stated.

    He said this issue was found on the Artemis I back in 2022 and stated that access and repairs to any of the issues can only be performed in the Vehicle Assembly Building.

    “As mentioned previously, we will begin preparations for rollback, and this will take the March launch window out of consideration,” he posted.

    NASA was eyeing as early as March 6, but now the next launch attempt should be in April.

    Both NASA and Isaacman stated that teams are reviewing the data and trying to determine the best course of action. Earlier on Saturday, the duo stated that a decision was being made to either make the repairs on the launch pad or roll it back to the Vehicle Assembly Building.

    NASA stated that high winds may make that decision for them.

    “In order to protect for troubleshooting options at both Pad B and the VAB, teams are making preparations to remove the pad access platforms installed (Friday), which have wind-driven constraints and cannot be removed during high winds, which are forecasted for (Sunday),” NASA stated in the blog post on Saturday morning. 

    The day before, NASA held a press conference about its second wet dress rehearsal, where the Space Launch System rocket was fueled with more than 700,000 gallons of cryogenic fuel and other tests, like a simulated countdown to launch, took place on Launch Complex 39B at the Kennedy Space Center.

    The first test earlier this month saw a liquid hydrogen leak, but new seals were replaced and worked well for the second test.

    NASA officials were eyeing March 6 as the earliest possible test launch, but with this new problem, the next attempt may not be until April.

    During the Artemis I mission in 2022, Hurricane Ian forced NASA to roll the rocket back to the Vehicle Assembly Building.

    Once the Artemis II is ready, it will send NASA’s Cmdr. Gregory Reid Wiseman, pilot Victor Glover, mission specialist Christina Koch and Canadian Space Agency astronaut mission specialist Jeremy Hansen to the moon in a flyby mission while they are in the Orion capsule.

    Artemis II launch attempt dates

    [ad_2]

    Anthony Leone

    Source link

  • NASA to rollback Artemis moon rocket due to helium flow issue

    [ad_1]

    KENNEDY SPACE CENTER — On Saturday, NASA Administrator Jared Isaacman posted on X that due to a helium flow issue, the Artemis II moon rocket will be rolled back to the Vehicle Assembly Building for repairs and the possible March launch attempt has been canceled.


    What You Need To Know

    • This new issue has pushed the launch date to April
    • The new issue is a helium flow that could result in the rocket being sent to the Vehicle Assembly Building
    • The Artemis II rocket has seen some issues during the first wet dress rehearsal

    “After overnight data showed an interruption in helium flow in the SLS interim cryogenic propulsion stage, teams are troubleshooting and preparing for a likely rollback of Artemis II to the VAB at @NASAKennedy,” Isaacman stated, who added that this could impact the March launch window.

    The U.S. space agency followed up with a blog post, stating that during the overnight, the issue was detected.

    “NASA is taking steps to potentially roll back the Artemis II rocket and Orion spacecraft to the Vehicle Assembly Building (VAB) at the agency’s Kennedy Space Center in Florida after overnight Feb. 21 observing interrupted flow of helium in the SLS (Space Launch System) rocket’s interim cryogenic propulsion stage. Helium flow is required for launch,” NASA stated.

    In a follow-up post on X, Isaacman shared that engineers were unable to get the helium flow through the rocket during a routine procedure to repressurize the system.

    “Potential faults could include the final filter between the ground and flight vehicle, located on the umbilical, though this seems least likely based on the failure signature. It could also be a failed QD umbilical interface, where similar issues have been observed,” he stated.

    He said this issue was found on the Artemis I back in 2022 and stated that access and repairs to any of the issues can only be performed in the Vehicle Assembly Building.

    “As mentioned previously, we will begin preparations for rollback, and this will take the March launch window out of consideration,” he posted.

    NASA was eyeing as early as March 6, but now the next launch attempt will be in April.

    Both NASA and Isaacman stated that teams are reviewing the data and trying to determine the best course of action. Earlier on Saturday, the duo stated that a decision was being made to either make the repairs on the launch pad or roll it back to the Vehicle Assembly Building.

    NASA stated that high winds may make that decision for them.

    “In order to protect for troubleshooting options at both Pad B and the VAB, teams are making preparations to remove the pad access platforms installed (Friday), which have wind-driven constraints and cannot be removed during high winds, which are forecasted for (Sunday),” NASA stated in the blog post on Saturday morning. 

    The day before, NASA held a press conference about its second wet dress rehearsal, where the Space Launch System rocket was fueled with more than 700,000 gallons of cryogenic fuel and other tests, like a simulated countdown to launch, took place on Launch Complex 39B at the Kennedy Space Center.

    The first test earlier this month saw a liquid hydrogen leak, but new seals were replaced and worked well for the second test.

    NASA officials were eyeing March 6 as the earliest possible test launch, but with this new problem, the next attempt may not be until April.

    During the Artemis I mission in 2022, Hurricane Ian forced NASA to roll the rocket back to the Vehicle Assembly Building.

    Once the Artemis II is ready, it will send NASA’s Cmdr. Gregory Reid Wiseman, pilot Victor Glover, mission specialist Christina Koch and Canadian Space Agency astronaut mission specialist Jeremy Hansen to the moon in a flyby mission while they are in the Orion capsule.

    Artemis II launch attempt dates

    [ad_2]

    Anthony Leone

    Source link

  • NASA Targets March For First Moon Mission By Artemis Astronauts After Fueling Test Success – KXL

    [ad_1]

    CAPE CANAVERAL, Fla. (AP) — NASA aims to send astronauts to the moon in March after acing the latest rocket fueling test.

    Administrator Jared Isaacman says launch teams made “major progress” between the first countdown rehearsal that was disrupted by hydrogen leaks earlier this month and the second test that was completed without significant seepage Thursday night.

    NASA could launch four astronauts on the Artemis II mission as soon as March 6.

    To keep their options open, the three Americans and one Canadian plan to go into a two-week health quarantine Friday night.

    More about:

    [ad_2]

    Grant McHill

    Source link

  • NASA conducts second Artemis II wet dress rehearsal

    [ad_1]

    KENNEDY SPACE CENTER —  NASA took another crack at fueling its giant moon rocket Thursday after leaks halted the initial dress rehearsal and delayed the first lunar trip by astronauts in more than half a century.

    For the second time this month, launch teams pumped more than 700,000 gallons (2.6 million liters) of supercold fuel into the rocket atop its launch pad. They counted all the way down to the half-minute mark as planned, then turned back the clocks to run through the final 10 minutes again.

    NASA completed the test late at night and said there was minimal hydrogen leakage, well within safety limits.

    It was the most critical and challenging part of the two-day practice countdown. Engineers were analyzing the data, with the outcome determining whether a March launch is possible for the Artemis II moon mission with four astronauts. 


    What You Need To Know

    • A ground issue delayed the filling of the liquid hydrogen fuel
    • However, that issue has been resolved
    • RELATED coverage:

    The nearly 50-hour test started on Tuesday as launch controllers arrived at their consoles at the Kennedy Space Center’s Launch Control Center.  

    But it is Thursday that many space fans are anxious about as more than 700,000 gallons of cryogenic fuel will be pumped into the Space Launch System rocket during the second test of it and its little companion, the Orion capsule, which will take four astronauts on a flyby mission to the moon.

    “Following successful chilldown of the liquid hydrogen and liquid oxygen lines, teams have started slowly filling the SLS rocket’s core stage with super-cold liquid hydrogen, chilled to minus 423 degrees Fahrenheit, then with liquid oxygen chilled to minus 297 degrees. This marks the official start of propellant loading for the Artemis II wet dress rehearsal,” NASA stated on Thursday morning in a live blog at around 10:30 a.m. ET.

    To fill the core stage can take several hours, but what has space fans anxious is whether any leaks will be detected. As of 1 p.m. ET, no new leaks have been discovered.

    In addition to fueling the rocket, the wet dress rehearsal also allows technicians and engineers to go over countdown procedures, system checks, and determine whether any leaks occur during the first test.

    During the first wet dress rehearsal on Monday, Feb. 2, teams uncovered a liquid hydrogen leak in an interface that is used to route the fuel into the SLS’s core stage.

    In fact, that was the same portion where a liquid hydrogen leak was found during the Artemis I mission back in 2022.

    NASA technicians replaced two seals in that area of the Artemis II rocket, which pushed the crewed launch from early February to early March.

    Between the first and second wet dress rehearsals, NASA conducted a different test last weekend, where another issue was detected.

    “Over the weekend, teams replaced a filter in ground support equipment that was suspected of reducing the flow of liquid hydrogen during a Feb. 12 partial fueling test. The test provided enough data to allow engineers to plan toward a second wet dress rehearsal this week. Engineers have reconnected the line with the new filter and are reestablishing proper environmental conditions,” NASA stated.

    During Thursday’s second test, NASA announced that there was a ground issue, which delayed the filling of the liquid hydrogen.

    But that issue was resolved.

    If all goes well with this test, NASA stated it is eyeing March 6 as the earliest opportunity to launch the historical moon mission.

    The expedition will see NASA’s Cmdr. Gregory Reid Wiseman, pilot Victor Glover, mission specialist Christina Koch and Canadian Space Agency astronaut mission specialist Jeremy Hansen go to the moon in a flyby mission.

    Artemis II launch attempt dates

    [ad_2] Anthony Leone
    Source link

  • NASA to conduct second wet dress rehearsal of Artemis II

    [ad_1]

    KENNEDY SPACE CENTER — After detecting a liquid hydrogen leak during its first wet dress rehearsal of the Artemis II moon rocket, NASA will attempt a second test of the launch vehicle that will take humans back to the moon.


    What You Need To Know

    • The U.S. space agency is eyeing Thursday for a second wet dress rehearsal
    • If all goes well, March 6 might be the earliest chance for Artemis II launch
    • The first wet dress rehearsal found leaks; NASA replaced seals
    • RELATED coverage:

    The U.S. space agency is eyeing Thursday for a second wet dress rehearsal, as it will put more than 700,000 gallons of cryogenic fuel into the Space Launch System rocket during a test of that and the Orion capsule. It will also simulate a launch countdown, the ability to recycle the countdown clock and drain the tanks to practice for possible scrubs.

    “Launch controllers will arrive to their consoles in the Launch Control Center at NASA’s Kennedy Space Center in Florida at 6:40 p.m. EST on Feb. 17 to begin the nearly 50-hour countdown. The simulated launch time is 8:30 p.m., Feb. 19, with a four-hour window for the test. While the Artemis II crew is not participating in the test, a team of personnel will go to the launch pad to practice Orion closeout operations, including closing the spacecraft’s hatches,” NASA explained on Monday.

    NASA provided a bit more detail on the test.

    During the rehearsal, the team will execute a detailed countdown sequence. Operators will conduct two runs of the last ten minutes of the countdown, known as terminal count. They will pause at T-1 minute and 30 seconds for up to three minutes, then resume until T-33 seconds before launch and pause again. After that, they will recycle the clock back to T-10 minutes and conduct a second terminal countdown to just inside of T-30 seconds before ending the sequence. This process simulates real-world conditions, including scenarios where a launch might be scrubbed due to technical or weather issues.

    During the first wet dress rehearsal on Monday, Feb. 02, NASA teams found a liquid hydrogen leak in an interface that is used to route the fuel into the SLS’s core stage, as well as other issues.

    In fact, that was the same section where a liquid hydrogen leak was found during the Artemis I mission.

    While technicians replaced two seals in that area since the Artemis II first pretest, this past weekend, NASA made additional fixes to issues that were discovered during a different test.

    “Over the weekend, teams replaced a filter in ground support equipment that was suspected of reducing the flow of liquid hydrogen during a Feb. 12 partial fueling test. The test provided enough data to allow engineers to plan toward a second wet dress rehearsal this week. Engineers have reconnected the line with the new filter and are reestablishing proper environmental conditions,” NASA stated in a blog post.

    Because the leak and other issues were discovered during the first wet dress rehearsal, NASA had to push the launch of the Artemis II to early March. It was supposed to launch early February.

    Officials stated that if all goes well, NASA will be eyeing March 6 as the earliest chance to launch the historical mission.

    But officials stressed that it all depends on how the second test goes and its findings.

    Once the Artemis II stacked rocket is ready for launch, it will send NASA’s Cmdr. Gregory Reid Wiseman, pilot Victor Glover, mission specialist Christina Koch and Canadian Space Agency astronaut mission specialist Jeremy Hansen to the moon in a flyby mission.

    Artemis II launch attempt dates

    [ad_2] Anthony Leone
    Source link

  • NASA says it detected leak on Artemis II moon rocket during testing

    [ad_1]

    KENNEDY SPACE CENTER — On Monday afternoon, NASA stated that its teams detected a leak on its Artemis II moon rocket during the wet dress rehearsal.

    In an update, NASA stated that its teams have been able to fill the Space Launch System rocket’s core stage.


    What You Need To Know

    • The leak exceeded allowable limits, NASA stated
    • The wet dress rehearsal of the Orion capsule and the SLS rocket has teams loading more than 700,000 gallons of cryogenic fuel into the rocket, conducting a launch countdown and practicing safely removing the fuel from the rocket

    “Teams have stopped the flow of liquid hydrogen through the tail service mast umbilical interface into the core stage after leak concentrations exceeded allowable limits,” the U.S. space agency stated.

    NASA stated that by stopping the flow of fuel, it lets engineers conduct troubleshooting processes that were first developed during Artemis I in 2022.

    During three separate occurrences, NASA detected liquid hydrogen leaks on the Space Launch System rocket during the Artemis I mission.

    “Liquid oxygen continues to flow into the core stage, and liquid hydrogen continues to flow into the upper stage,” NASA stated about the Artemis II wet dress rehearsal.

    In a new update, NASA stated that fixing the leak has “proved unsuccessful”.

    “After teams temporarily resumed fast fill of liquid hydrogen operations into the core stage, initial steps to correct the leak proved unsuccessful. The leak rate at the interface of the tail service mast umbilical continues to exceed the allowable limits. Liquid hydrogen filling operations on both the core stage and upper stage are paused as the team meets to determines next steps,” NASA explained.

    It was stated during the live feed that at 3:48 p.m. ET that the core stage liquid hydrogen fast fill has resumed.

    In a 4:41 p.m. ET update, NASA stated, “NASA teams have completed filling the core stage of the SLS (Space Launch System) rocket with liquid hydrogen and transitioned to topping mode. … Engineers continue to watch the leak at the interface of the tail service mast umbilical, but the liquid hydrogen concentration in the umbilical remains within acceptable limits.”

    During one of the launch attempts of Artemis I, that there was a leak at that same section. 

    In another update early in the evening, the U.S. space agency confirmed that the rocket has been filled with fuel, but the teams are keeping an eye on the leak.

    “Engineers continue to monitor liquid hydrogen concentration levels in the tail service mast umbilical, where a leak was previously detected. Levels are currently stable,” NASA stated.

    The wet dress rehearsal of the Orion capsule and the SLS rocket has teams loading more than 700,000 gallons of cryogenic fuel into the rocket, conducting a launch countdown and practicing safely removing the fuel from the rocket.

    Once the Artemis II stacked rocket is ready for launch, it will send NASA’s Cmdr. Gregory Reid Wiseman, pilot Victor Glover, mission specialist Christina Koch and Canadian Space Agency astronaut mission specialist Jeremy Hansen to the moon in a flyby mission.

    [ad_2]

    Anthony Leone

    Source link

  • Students studying about the next mission to the moon, history of flight

    [ad_1]

    BREVARD COUNTY, Fla. — All eyes are on the upcoming Artemis II mission to the moon because America hasn’t been to the moon in more than 50 years, and some Brevard County students are following along and learning about the history of flight.


    What You Need To Know

    • Some Viera Middle School students are learning about the history and future of flight
    • They are part of a program created through a partnership between FlightWorks Alabama and Airbus U.S. Space and Defense 
    • Some students are building model airplanes, and others are building their own space capsules
    • Teachers are helping the students understand the importance of developing a talent pipeline for future engineers and aviators

    The students learned Friday that NASA delayed a key test, the wet dress rehearsal, because of expected cold temperatures. The wet dress rehearsal, a simulated launch day for the team and the fueling of the rocket to check for issues before the real liftoff, is now scheduled for Monday, Feb. 2, with a potential launch on Sunday, Feb. 8.

    In one classroom at Viera Middle School, students are studying the dawn of aviation.

    It all began when the Wright brothers took flight in Kitty Hawk, N.C. in December 1903. Their Wright Flyer was the first to achieve sustained, powered and controlled flight.

    Those students are building their own model planes.

    Seventh-grader Olivia Toler and her peers are cutting, sticking and gluing their models as part of the We Build it Better program, which was created through a partnership involving Airbus U.S. Space and Defense.

    It has reached 600,000 students in classrooms across the United States, United Kingdom and France and was created to help students like Toler understand the importance of developing a talent pipeline for future engineers and aviators.

    “Something like in the field of aerospace and launching rockets,” Toler said about a potential career.

    Down the hall in Lynn Dotson’s class, her students are focused on the future of flight.

    Every Friday in her classroom, it’s Artemis “Fri-yay,” where students learn something new about the moon mission.

    This time, it’s all about the Orion capsule, which will take the four-person crew to the moon.

    Liam Stevens and his friends built their own capsules out of plastic and Styrofoam cups.

    They put chocolate on the inside and are applying gradual heat to test the strength of the mock heat shield.

    “Testing it, seeing what’s wrong and trying to fix it,” Stevens explained.

    Dotson took time away from teaching in schools to be an educator at NASA. Now she’s back in the classroom mentoring future engineers — maybe even preparing them for spaceflight.

    “What if they become astronauts?” Dotson said, smiling.

    She said she is excited her students are immersing themselves in studying Artemis.

    “How cool would that be? I could be the one that inspired them — and the other teachers here. That’s our job,” Dotson said. “We are inspiring the next generation.” 

    [ad_2]

    Greg Pallone

    Source link

  • NASA prepares for Artemis II wet dress rehearsal

    [ad_1]

    NASA is preparing to move forward with a key milestone as it readies the Space Launch System (SLS) rocket and Orion spacecraft for the Artemis II mission.

    A “wet dress rehearsal” allows launch teams to practice fueling and countdown procedures under conditions that closely mirror launch day, much like a full dress rehearsal before a Broadway opening.

    The process begins with the multi-hour task of fully fueling the rocket with its flight propellants. Teams load more than 700,000 gallons of super-cold liquid hydrogen and liquid oxygen into the SLS tanks while monitoring vehicle systems and validating ground procedures.

    Artemis I wet dress rehearsal

    Once fueling is complete, teams conduct a simulated countdown that runs to just short of liftoff. The rehearsal includes all planned holds, allowing controllers to practice stopping and restarting the countdown as they would on launch day. 

    NASA is eager to verify that issues encountered during similar tests in 2022 ahead of the Artemis I launch are fully resolved.

    The most visible members of the Artemis II team, however, will not take part in the wet dress rehearsal.

    NASA astronauts Reid Wiseman, Victor Glover, and Christina Koch, along with Canadian Space Agency astronaut Jeremy Hansen, are currently in a 14-day quarantine. The precaution helps ensure they do not contract an illness that could delay the mission.

    Kennedy Space Center Crew Quarters where astronauts spend 14-days ahead of launch in quarantine.

    During quarantine, the crew is staying in the spartan but functional Astronaut Crew Quarters inside the Neil Armstrong Operations and Checkout Building at Kennedy Space Center. Think of the cleanest one-star hotel you have ever stayed in.

    The facility, which dates back to the Apollo era, includes a kitchen, lounge, and bedrooms for the astronauts, as well as medical exam rooms and the suit room where crews don their pressure suits before heading to the launch pad.

    Results from the wet dress rehearsal will help mission managers assess overall system readiness and make final decisions about a specific launch date, which could be as early as February 6 at 9:41 p.m. EST.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • How the lessons learned from the Challenger disaster apply to Artemis rockets

    [ad_1]

    NATIONWIDE — As NASA prepares for the wet dress rehearsal of its Artemis II moon rocket and capsule, many are noticing similarities between the cold temperatures this week and how they played a part in the demise of the space shuttle Challenger and its crew 40 years ago.

    However, an expert at Florida Tech explains why the cold weather should not impact Artemis II.


    What You Need To Know

    • A lot of lessons were learned after the Challenger incident
    • Get more space coverage here  ▶
    • 🔻Scroll down to watch interviews with Don Platt, director of Florida Tech’s Spaceport Education Center🔻

    The Artemis II will see NASA’s Cmdr. Gregory Reid Wiseman, pilot Victor Glover, mission specialist Christina Koch and Canadian Space Agency astronaut mission specialist Jeremy Hansen do a flyby of the moon in the Orion spacecraft.

    However, the wet dress rehearsal of Orion and the Space Launch System (SLS) rocket that is currently set for Saturday will see cold temperatures of 40 degrees Fahrenheit (4.4 Celsius).

    Forty years ago on Jan. 28, the space shuttle Challenger blew up 73 seconds after launch, killing its crew. The explosion took the lives of Michael J. Smith, Francis R. “Dick” Scobee, Ronald E. McNair, Ellison S. Onizuka, S. Christa McAuliffe, Gregory B. Jarvis, and Judith A. Resnik.

    The explosion was caused when the O-rings failed at cold temperatures. The rings on the rocket create a seal to prevent exhaust gases from leaking.

    The O-rings were rated to be flown at 39 degrees Fahrenheit (3.9 Celsius) or higher. But when the launch happened at 11:38 a.m. ET, the temperature was at 36 degrees Fahrenheit (2.2 Celsius).

    With the chilly temperatures that are currently sweeping through the Sunshine State, many are worried about Artemis II’s wet dress rehearsal for Saturday and the earliest launch attempt on Friday, Feb. 06.

    However, Don Platt, director of Florida Tech’s Spaceport Education Center, shares how the lessons learned after the Challenger incident were already applied to other shuttle missions, which do impact Artemis II.

    “Well, even in the shuttle program itself, there was about a three-and-a-half-year delay or so, after the Challenger disaster, and so that time was spent reviewing the entire shuttle program, but specifically reviewing these these segment joints that I just talked about and redesigning how the O-rings, these rubber seal material segments fit into that joint. And they added additional redundancy, essentially another layer,” Platt said.

    He continued how these improvements are still being used.

    “Now, of course, you know, after these 40 years, NASA has spent a lot of time looking at ways to improve the joint and materials have, of course, come a long way since the 1980s as well. And so now the the feeling is that the SLS solid rocket booster joints are robust and will not be a major concern at temperatures even down into the 30s and 20s,” Platt shared.

    He explained that with crewed missions, where humans will be on board a spacecraft, extra caution takes place, especially during wet dress rehearsals.

    And this caution goes beyond the SLS rocket and the Orion capsule. It also includes other things.

    [embed]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W7XHOPa2x0U[/embed]

    “And all of the components that connect to the rocket to provide propellent into the rocket and to provide electrical power, to make sure that all the interfaces for when the astronauts take the elevator up into the top of the rocket, all of that stuff is working fine and everybody knows exactly what they’re doing,” he said, adding, “You don’t want to have some sort of thing pop up there when they’re actually ready to go and and ready to get into the vehicle and and fly to the moon.”

    In many ways, the uncrewed Artemis I mission in 2022 was a wet dress rehearsal for the Artemis II, Platt said. It was during this test flight of the Orion capsule that an issue with the heat shield was discovered.

    A material called Avcoat that was on the heat shield broke off in chunks during the re-entry phase of Artemis I.

    The Avcoat material is designed to protect a spacecraft from extreme temperatures by burning away as it heats up, instead of sending that heat to the capsule itself.

    However, during re-entry, it broke up into chunks instead of burning away. This issue pushed back the Artemis II and III missions, but NASA has stated it has resolved the problem.

    Platt shared how the Artemis missions will have a profound impact on people.

    [embed]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G9jmlwQzsK8[/embed]

    [ad_2] Anthony Leone
    Source link

  • NASA sets date for Artemis II fueling test

    [ad_1]

    KENNEDY SPACE CENTER — NASA has set the date when it will conduct a fueling test for its Artemis II Space Launch System (SLS) rocket and Orion spacecraft that will take four people to the moon.


    What You Need To Know

    • Artemis II will see four astronauts flyby the moon
    • A wet dress rehearsal simulates the launch of the Artemis II moon rocket
    • If an issue is discovered, it may push back the launch

    The U.S. space agency is considering Saturday, Jan. 31, as the earliest date for its wet dress rehearsal, which will simulate the launch of the Artemis II moon rocket.

    “The upcoming wet dress rehearsal is a prelaunch test to fuel the rocket. During the rehearsal, teams demonstrate the ability to load more than 700,000 gallons of cryogenic propellants into the rocket, conduct a launch countdown, and practice safely removing propellant from the rocket without astronauts inside the spacecraft,” stated NASA in a blog.

    There will be several test runs of this simulated launch that will test the Artemis II team’s ability to put a hold on the launch and resume it.

    “The rehearsal will count down to a simulated launch at 9 p.m. EST, but could run to approximately 1 a.m. if needed. The first run will begin approximately 49 hours before launch when launch teams are called to their stations, to 1 minute 30 seconds before launch, followed by a planned three-minute hold and then countdown resumption to 33 seconds before launch — the point at which the rocket’s automatic launch sequencer will control the final seconds of the countdown,” explained NASA.

    If the team detects any issues or anomalies with either the rocket or capsule, the two craft will be rolled from their home on Launch Pad 39B to the Vehicle Assembly Building for work. They were rolled to the launch pad on Saturday, Jan. 17.

    This would also push back the launch if they are rolled back. At the moment, NASA is aiming for a Friday, Feb. 06, launch.

     

    NASA also addressed the cold snap that has attacked the Sunshine State this week.

    “With cold weather sweeping the country and lower than normal temperatures expected in Florida Tuesday, Jan. 27, technicians are taking steps to ensure environmental control systems keeping Orion and SLS elements at the proper conditions are prepared for the cold,” the American space agency stated.

    NASA also revealed that the Artemis II emergency egress system (where baskets will take crew and launch pad personnel from the mobile launcher to the ground) did not work as expected, but has been resolved.

    “… the baskets used to transport the crew and other pad personnel from the mobile launcher in an emergency stopped short of the terminus area located inside the pad perimeter. Since then, the brakes of the system have been adjusted to ensure the baskets fully descend,” NASA commented.

    Artemis II will see four people — NASA’s Cmdr. Gregory Reid Wiseman, pilot Victor Glover, mission specialist Christina Koch and Canadian Space Agency astronaut mission specialist Jeremy Hansen — go to the moon for a flyby mission.

    The first Artemis I mission in 2022, where the uncrewed rocket and capsule were tested, saw a number of delays.

    It was originally expected to launch on Aug. 29, 2022, but a liquid hydrogen leak and temperature issues with the engine forced the first attempt to be scrubbed.

    A second attempt was scrubbed as a separate liquid hydrogen leak was discovered.

    After other issues and two hurricanes, NASA was not able to launch Artemis I until November of that year.

    It is not uncommon for rockets, even established ones like SpaceX’s Falcon 9, to be sent back for repairs or adjustments after testing has shown that issues were detected.

    [ad_2]

    Anthony Leone

    Source link

  • NASA rolls out SLS rocket for Artemis II moon mission

    [ad_1]

    KENNEDY SPACE CENTER —  More than 1,000 people came out to see NASA roll out its Artemis II Space Launch System (SLS) rocket as it made its slow march to the launch pad during the chilly early morning hours on Saturday.  


    What You Need To Know

    • The SLS is a super-heavy rocket that is 322 feet tall (98.27 meters)
    • The Artemis II mission will see four humans flying by the moon
    • It will begin its slow 4-mile ground journey from the Vehicle Assembly Building to Launch Pad 39B at NASA’s Kennedy Space Center

    The SLS is a super-heavy rocket that is 322 feet tall (98.27 meters), making it 17 feet (5.18 meters) taller than the Statue of Liberty, according to NASA.

    To put it into perspective for space lovers:

    At 7 a.m. ET., the SLS rocket and Orion capsule took a ride on a crawler transporter as it began its slow 4-mile ground journey from the Vehicle Assembly Building to Launch Pad 39B at NASA’s Kennedy Space Center.

    And yes, it was a slow trip, moving at 1 mile per hour or less. Between unscheduled stops and other factors, it could take between six and 12 hours before it arrives at the launch pad — its home until the planned February 2026 launch. 

    Once it arrives at its temporary home, it will have its wet dress rehearsal, which is scheduled to take place either at the end of January or the start of February.

    The purpose of the wet dress rehearsal is to test each phase of the launch countdown, from loading more than 700,000 gallons of super-cold fuel into the rocket to safely standing down from a liftoff attempt.  

    And that fuel isn’t something you can find at your local gas station.

    “The liquid oxygen tank and liquid hydrogen tank hold a combined 733,000 gallons of propellant super cooled to minus 423 degrees Fahrenheit to power the four RS-25 engines at the bottom of the rocket,” NASA explained.

    Sitting on top of the SLS rocket is the Orion capsule, which will carry its human crew to their 10-day mission to the moon.

    It will send NASA’s Cmdr. Gregory Reid Wiseman, pilot Victor Glover, mission specialist Christina Koch and Canadian Space Agency astronaut mission specialist Jeremy Hansen to the moon, the first time humans visited the rocky satellite since 1972.

    Glover will be the first Black man and Koch will be the first woman to fly to the moon. 

    During a press conference on Saturday morning, the four shared a stage with NASA Administrator Jared Isaacman.

    Isaacman said that the Artemis II mission will fulfill more than one promise.

    “Why are we doing this? We are doing this to fulfill a promise, promise to the American people that we will return to the moon, a promise to all of the pioneers, the engineers, the scientists, the astronauts, the researchers from the 1960s, which the laid the foundation that we are that we are standing upon right now. We’ll do it inevitably to figure out the orbital and lunar economy for all of the science and discovery possibilities that are out there to inspire my kids, your kids, kids all around the world to want to grow up and contribute to this unbelievable endeavor that we’re on right now,” he said.

    Koch also echoed some of what Isaacman said, as well as adding some of the things the mission will focus on.

    “One of the reasons that these missions are so important is the discovery and the knowledge that we bring back to Earth, and that is the entire point. We have both lunar geology science, and we have human research on this mission. Human research is that we’re participating in everything from how we can top perform behavioral health, immune response in space, which is a fascinating physiological response that humans have to microgravity,” she said.

    During the press conference, Hansen said that America’s exploration of space has paved the way for other countries, such as Canada, to develop their own skills.

    “I’ve really applauded the American space leadership because they carved out space for Canada to hone some of our skills, to develop workforce in specific areas, and to bring that knowledge. And the future for Canada kind of looks like where the international collaboration wants to go. We aren’t leading that collaboration. NASA is leading that collaboration, inviting our participation. We have skill sets, and I know Canada will rise to the challenge, just like they did in the Artemis. When we were asked to join Artemis, we started to lean into developing new robotic systems for deep space,” he said.

    While discussing how close they have become, Wiseman also shared that they will have the easiest job on launch day.

    “While we’re up there on launch day, we’ve got the easiest job. We really have the easiest job. We’ve trained for this. We know exactly what to do and it will be good. It’s our families that we think about the most on launch day,” he said.

    This will be a flyby mission, as seen in this NASA graphic for Artemis II.

    NASA is aiming for a Feb. 6 launch, but it can be pushed back to April. The U.S. space agency explained why.

    “While the Artemis II launch window opens as early as Friday, Feb. 6, the mission management team will assess flight readiness after the wet dress rehearsal across the spacecraft, launch infrastructure, and the crew and operations teams before selecting a launch date,” NASA stated.

    As John Honeycutt, NASA’s Artemis II mission management team chair, said during a Friday afternoon press conference, “We will fly when we are ready.”

    The U.S. space agency has named the mission to return to Earth’s lunar neighbor Artemis, as a homage to the Apollo moon landing. In Greek mythology, Artemis is the twin sister of Apollo and the goddess of the moon.

    NASA plans to send humans (including the first woman and person of color) back to the moon in 2027, more than 50 years after the last time humans stepped on the lunar surface.

    The Artemis I launch took place in 2022 to test out the new systems and how they would handle going to the moon and back.

    Learn about the crew

    [ad_2]

    Anthony Leone

    Source link

  • NASA to roll out SLS rocket Saturday for Artemis II moon mission

    [ad_1]

    KENNEDY SPACE CENTER — During the early morning hours of Saturday, NASA will begin the Artemis II’s Space Launch System (SLS) rocket’s slow roll to the launch pad.


    What You Need To Know

    • The SLS is a super-heavy rocket that is 322 feet tall (98.27 meters)
    • The Artemis II mission will see four humans flying by the moon
    • It will begin its slow 4-mile ground journey from the Vehicle Assembly Building to Launch Pad 39B at NASA’s Kennedy Space Center

    The SLS is a super-heavy rocket that is 322 feet tall (98.27 meters), making it 17 feet (5.18 meters) taller than the Statue of Liberty, according to NASA.

    To put it into perspective for space lovers:

    At 7 a.m. ET., the SLS rocket and Orion capsule will take a ride on a crawler transporter as it begins its slow 4-mile ground journey from the Vehicle Assembly Building to Launch Pad 39B at NASA’s Kennedy Space Center.

    And yes, it will be a slow trip, moving at 1 mile per hour or less. Between unscheduled stops and other factors, it could take between six and 12 hours before it arrives at the launch pad — its home until the planned February 2026 launch. 

    Once it arrives at its temporary home, it will have its wet dress rehearsal, which is scheduled to take place at the end of January.

    The purpose of the wet dress rehearsal is to test each phase of the launch countdown, from loading more than 700,000 gallons of super-cold fuel into the rocket to safely standing down from a liftoff attempt.  

    And that fuel isn’t something you can find at your local gas station.

    “The liquid oxygen tank and liquid hydrogen tank hold a combined 733,000 gallons of propellant super cooled to minus 423 degrees Fahrenheit to power the four RS-25 engines at the bottom of the rocket,” NASA explained.

    Sitting on top of the SLS rocket is the Orion capsule, which will carry its human crew to their 10-day mission to the moon.

    It will send NASA’s Cmdr. Gregory Reid Wiseman, pilot Victor Glover, mission specialist Christina Koch and Canadian Space Agency astronaut mission specialist Jeremy Hansen to the moon, the first time humans visited the rocky satellite since 1972.

    This will be a flyby mission, as seen in this NASA graphic for Artemis II.

     

    NASA is aiming for a Feb. 6 launch, but it can be pushed back to April. The U.S. space agency explained why.

    “While the Artemis II launch window opens as early as Friday, Feb. 6, the mission management team will assess flight readiness after the wet dress rehearsal across the spacecraft, launch infrastructure, and the crew and operations teams before selecting a launch date,” NASA stated.

    As John Honeycutt, NASA’s Artemis II mission management team chair, said during a Friday afternoon press conference, “We will fly when we are ready.”

    The U.S. space agency has named the mission to return to Earth’s lunar neighbor Artemis, as a homage to the Apollo moon landing. In Greek mythology, Artemis is the twin sister of Apollo and the goddess of the moon.

    NASA plans to send humans (including the first woman and person of color) back to the moon in 2027, more than 50 years after the last time humans stepped on the lunar surface.

    The Artemis I launch took place in 2022 to test out the new systems and how they would handle going to the moon and back.

    Learn about the crew

    [ad_2]

    Anthony Leone

    Source link

  • Questions surround NASA’s push for Starship alternatives

    [ad_1]

    CAPE CANAVERAL, Fla. — Earlier this week, NASA acting Administrator Sean Duffy said that the U.S. space agency is considering Blue Origin and other companies to handle the task of sending people to the moon for the Artemis III mission.


    What You Need To Know

    • NASA may consider Blue Origin and other companies for Artemis III over SpaceX, citing delays
    • Don Platt, Director of Florida Tech’s Spaceport Education Center, questions if other companies can speed up lunar mission timelines
    • Elon Musk criticized NASA’s decision, defending SpaceX’s progress
    • U.S. Rep. Mike Haridopolos supports increasing competition to accelerate the moon mission timeline

    The Trump administration’s goal is to reach the lunar surface before China and before the end of the president’s term in 2028.

    Duffy says that the U.S. cannot wait for SpaceX since it has seen delays with its Starship, which is a Human Launch System (HLS) vehicle.

    Companies like Blue Origin have developed a lunar lander, but Don Platt, Director of Florida Tech’s Spaceport Education Center, raises the question if other companies can produce results any quicker.

    “Competition is a good thing, the question is though will it be any faster with anybody else, especially anybody besides Blue Origin, which of course has already been developing a lunar lander,” said Platt. “If you go with another company it’s probably going to take at least as long as getting Starship up to speed with their test system and be ready for lunar related missions.”

    SpaceX CEO Elon Musk has not minced words about his feelings on the situation, taking shots on Wednesday at Duffy.

    “Having a NASA Administrator who knows literally ZERO about rockets & spacecraft undermines the American space program and endangers our astronauts,” Musk said in an X post.

    In a reply to Duffy’s announcement that NASA is considering other agencies on Monday, Musk also posted on X that “SpaceX is moving like lightning compared to the rest of the space industry.”

    “Starship will end up doing the whole moon mission, mark my words,” Musk continued in the post.

    In the last two test flights, SpaceX has been pleased with Starship’s results during those launches, with the latest one, test 11, happening last week.

    However, SpaceX has seen three failed test flights this year in test flights 0708, and 09.

    U.S. Rep. Mike Haridopolos, a Republican who represents Florida’s Space Coast, spoke to Duffy this week. Haridopolos said that it was important for NASA to land on the moon before China. The country plans to land its citizens on the moon in 2030.

    “We want to make sure we make it back to the moon and land on the moon before the Chinese,” Haridopolos said. “My conversation with the secretary — he said, ‘What better way to accelerate this quickly is to have more competition?’”

    Haridopolos says the moon missions are not just about exploration, they’re about national security.

    “The thing about the United States, is that despite our efforts going all the way back to 1969, we have always seen this as a humanitarian mission, we don’t have the same confidence with the Chinese, given their unique or nefarious actions up in space, we want to make sure the United States stays space dominant,” he said.

    Blue Origin’s Blue Moon is slated for the Artemis V mission, which originally was going to be the lunar lander’s first crewed flight, stated NASA.

    A Blue Origin spokesperson said earlier this week, “Blue Origin is ready to support.”

    [ad_2]

    Greg Pallone, Anthony Leone

    Source link

  • NASA’s Sean Duffy wants to open Artemis III to other companies

    [ad_1]

    NATIONWIDE — Citing that SpaceX is behind schedule with its Starship that will be used for the Artemis III mission, NASA acting Administrator Sean Duffy said on Monday that the U.S. space agency is considering Blue Origin and other companies to handle the task.


    What You Need To Know

    • Blue Origin may have a chance to send people to the moon during the Artemis III mission
    • The company is already scheduled for the Artemis V mission

    On his X account, Duffy posted what he wants and also included his interview on CNBC.

    “Now, SpaceX had the contract for Artemis III. By the way, I love SpaceX and it’s an amazing company, but the problem is, they are behind. They pushed their timelines out and we are in a race against China. The president and I want to get to the moon in this president’s term. So, I’m going to open up the contract and I’m going let other space companies compete with SpaceX, like Blue Origin. Whatever one gets us there first to the moon, we are going to take. If SpaceX is behind and Blue Origin can do it before them, good on Blue Origin,” he said.

    In his X post, U.S. Secretary of Transportation Duffy typed, “@NASA is opening up HLS production to Blue Origin and other great American companies.”

    He did not name those other companies.

    Lockheed Martin has the contract for NASA’s Orion spacecraft and Boeing holds the contract for the Space Launch System’s rocket core stages. Other U.S. companies have contracts for certain components of the SLS and Orion.

    Duffy’s words of beating China to the moon are echoes of what others in the administration have said.

    During a media tour of Blue Origin’s New Glenn rocket facility in Florida in September, U.S. Rep. Mike Haridopolos said that it was important for NASA to land on the moon before China. The communist country plans to land its citizens on the moon in 2030, while the Artemis III is set in 2027.

    At the end of the tour, Spectrum News asked Haridopolos, who is the chairman of the U.S. Space and Aeronautics Subcommittee, if NASA has any backup plans if Starship was behind schedule.

    He said the concern at that time is Artemis II, which will see four astronauts orbit around the moon in 2026 in NASA’s Space Launch System rocket and the Orion spacecraft.

    The Blue Moon is slated for the Artemis V mission, which originally was going to be the lunar lander’s first crewed flight, stated NASA.

    Spectrum News reached out to NASA, Blue Origin and SpaceX for comment and is waiting for a response.

    In the last two test flights, SpaceX has been pleased with Starship’s results during those launches, with the latest one, test 11, happening last week.

    However, SpaceX has seen three failed test flights this year in test flights 07, 08, and 09.

    [ad_2]

    Anthony Leone

    Source link

  • ‘We risk losing the moon to China’ NASA space race continues amid U.S. funding concerns

    [ad_1]

    NON-RENEWAL. WE ARE STILL WAITING TO HEAR BACK. WE’LL KEEP YOU POSTED. OUR LEADERSHIP IN SPACE IS UNDER THREAT. THAT IS THE WARNING TODAY FROM TOP NASA OFFICIALS AND A FORMER NASA ADMINISTRATOR. THAT’S RIGHT. WESH 2’S SPACE COAST REPORTER MEGHAN MORIARTY IS LIVE FOR US RIGHT NOW WITH THE CLEAR MESSAGE FROM THOSE LEADERS. CHINA IS SURGING. SUMMER AND NANCY. THE MESSAGE WAS CLEAR WITHOUT A SUCCESSFUL AND FULLY FUNDED ARTEMIS PROGRAM, WE RISK LOSING THE MOON TO CHINA. HOWEVER, THERE ARE STILL CONCERNS AROUND THE SETBACKS AND THE EXCESSIVE COST TIED TO SPACE EXPLORATION. IT’S GETTING DOWN TO THE WIRE IN THE COUNTRY THAT LANDS ON THE MOON. NEXT, COULD HOLD THE POWER SHAPING THE RULES OF SPACE FOR DECADES TO COME. THEIR INTENT IS CLEAR. THEIR PROGRESS IS REAL, AND TIME IS NOT ON OUR SIDE. THIS IS A RACE THAT THE UNITED STATES CANNOT AFFORD TO LOSE. DURING A SENATE COMMITTEE MEETING ON WEDNESDAY, KEY WITNESSES TESTIFIED BEFORE LAWMAKERS URGING THEM NOT TO CUT BACK FUNDING FOR SPACE EXPLORATION. THIS COMES AFTER CRITICISM OVER THE EXCESSIVE COST AND DELAYS IN COMPONENTS FOR NASA’S ARTEMIS PROGRAM. WE’RE TALKING ABOUT NOW AN AGENCY THAT HAS LESS THAN ONE THIRD OF 1% OF THE FEDERAL BUDGET. AND, BY THE WAY, IF YOU GO BACK TO APOLLO, IT WAS SOMEWHERE BETWEEN 4 AND 5%. SO WE ARE SIGNIFICANTLY SMALLER. MOST NOTABLY, WE HEARD FROM FORMER NASA ADMINISTRATOR JIM BRIDENSTINE, WHO ACKNOWLEDGED THE CONCERNS OVER MONEY BUT SAYS THE PROGRAM IS ESSENTIAL NOT JUST TO BEAT CHINA TO THE MOON, BUT FOR OVERALL SCIENTIFIC DEVELOPMENT. WE HAD A DRUG, A MERCK DRUG, KEYTRUDA, WHICH IS FOR LUNG CANCER, AND WE WERE ABLE TO TO MAKE THAT DRUG SO THAT INSTEAD OF INSTEAD OF TRYING TO FIND OUT IF WITHIN 2 OR 3 MONTHS, IF IT’S GOING TO BE EFFICACIOUS, YOU CAN FIND OUT WITHIN 2 TO 3 WEEKS WHETHER OR NOT IT’S GOING TO BE EFFICACIOUS. FORMER NASA ADMINISTRATOR NOMINEE JARED ISAACMAN ALSO WEIGHED IN ON X, SAYING IN PART, IT IS GOOD TO SEE NASA GETTING SOME WELL-DESERVED ATTENTION, BUT ADDING THAT WE SHOULD BE ASKING WHY TAXPAYERS HAVE SPENT 100 PLUS BILLION TRYING TO RETURN TO THE MOON, SAYING THE SLS IS EXTRAORDINARILY EXPENSIVE AND ORION HAS ISSUES. THE SUITS ARE NOT READY AND THE LANDERS ARE NOT READY. ISAACMAN ALSO HIGHLIGHTED THAT NASA CAN GET HELP FROM PRIVATE INDUSTRY. SO THIS WAY THE TAXPAYER ISN’T FRONTING MOST OF THE COST. NOW, WHILE THIS IS AN IMPORTANT DISCUSSION THAT WILL CONTINUE, IT SEEMS TO BE CLEAR THAT THERE ALSO NEEDS TO BE SOME BACKUP PLANS IN PLACE. ANOTHER COMMITTEE MEETING IS NOT ON THE SCHEDULE JUST YET.

    ‘We risk losing the moon to China’ NASA space race continues amid U.S. funding concerns

    Updated: 7:02 PM EDT Sep 3, 2025

    Editorial Standards

    As the race to land on the moon intensifies, key witnesses are urging U.S. lawmakers not to cut funding for NASA’s Artemis program, emphasizing the importance of beating China to the moon and advancing scientific development.Allen Cutler, president and CEO of the Coalition for Deep Space Exploration, stressed the urgency of the situation. “Their intent is clear. Their progress is real, and time is not on our side. This is a race that the United States cannot afford to lose,” Cutler said.During a Senate committee meeting on Wednesday, witnesses addressed concerns over the excessive costs and delays in components for NASA’s Artemis program. Former NASA Administrator Jim Bridenstine acknowledged these concerns but emphasized the program’s significance.”We’re talking about now an agency that has less than one-third of one percent of the federal budget. And by the way, if you go back to Apollo, it was somewhere between 4 and 5 percent, so we are significantly smaller,” Bridenstine said.Bridenstine also highlighted the scientific benefits of the Artemis program, citing advancements in medical research. “We had a drug merk drug Keytruda, which is for lung cancer and we were able to make that drug so that instead of trying to find out within two to three months if it’s going to be efficacious. You can find out within two to three weeks if it’s going to be efficacious,” he said.Former NASA administrator nominee Jared Isaacman shared his views on the social media platform X, expressing mixed feelings about NASA’s current situation.”It is good to see NASA getting some well-deserved attention,” Isaacman said, but he also questioned the financial investment. “We should be asking why taxpayers have spent $100+ billion trying to return to the Moon,” he said, pointing out issues with the Space Launch System, Orion, and other components.

    As the race to land on the moon intensifies, key witnesses are urging U.S. lawmakers not to cut funding for NASA’s Artemis program, emphasizing the importance of beating China to the moon and advancing scientific development.

    Allen Cutler, president and CEO of the Coalition for Deep Space Exploration, stressed the urgency of the situation. “Their intent is clear. Their progress is real, and time is not on our side. This is a race that the United States cannot afford to lose,” Cutler said.

    During a Senate committee meeting on Wednesday, witnesses addressed concerns over the excessive costs and delays in components for NASA’s Artemis program. Former NASA Administrator Jim Bridenstine acknowledged these concerns but emphasized the program’s significance.

    “We’re talking about now an agency that has less than one-third of one percent of the federal budget. And by the way, if you go back to Apollo, it was somewhere between 4 and 5 percent, so we are significantly smaller,” Bridenstine said.

    Bridenstine also highlighted the scientific benefits of the Artemis program, citing advancements in medical research. “We had a drug merk drug Keytruda, which is for lung cancer and we were able to make that drug so that instead of trying to find out within two to three months if it’s going to be efficacious. You can find out within two to three weeks if it’s going to be efficacious,” he said.

    Former NASA administrator nominee Jared Isaacman shared his views on the social media platform X, expressing mixed feelings about NASA’s current situation.

    “It is good to see NASA getting some well-deserved attention,” Isaacman said, but he also questioned the financial investment. “We should be asking why taxpayers have spent $100+ billion trying to return to the Moon,” he said, pointing out issues with the Space Launch System, Orion, and other components.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • NECC grad hopes to go from plumber to mentor

    NECC grad hopes to go from plumber to mentor

    [ad_1]

    HAVERHILL — Joshua Buffum began a career as a plumber. Then, the world was rocked by the COVID-19 pandemic and he lost his job.

    So he changed direction and turned his attention to a dream he had since he was a child struggling in school and receiving help from his teachers.

    “After graduating from the Hunking School, a cousin who is a plumber told me how good the work was and my plan was to work for him after I graduated from Whittier Tech in 2019,” he said.

    “I did work in plumbing, then COVID hit and there was no work. So in the spring of 2021, I decided to change careers and I enrolled at Northern Essex Community College, majoring in educational studies.”

    Buffum said that ever since he was a young boy struggling with academics, he admired the teachers who helped him succeed. He hoped to become a teacher someday and then his career path took another turn.

    “All my friends headed to the Tech and I followed along,” he said.

    It wasn’t until he lost his plumbing job during the pandemic that he realized it was no longer the career for him.

    So Buffum focused on his work with an after-school program at the Haverhill YMCA. It reinforced his dream of helping to support and mentor young people.

    “I worked part time and I loved it, so I decided to make my childhood dream of becoming a teacher a reality,” he said.

    “I always wanted to help kids who struggled in school as I did and needed extra help from teachers who made me feel like they were really there to help kids.”

    Buffum juggled working at the YMCA in the afternoon and evenings while taking morning classes at NECC. He admits struggling during his first semester, but gained support through NECC’s Pathways to Academic & Career Excellence program, or PACE – a TRIO Student Support Services program that helps first-generation, low-income and disabled students graduate and transfer to four-year colleges.

    “They helped me out a lot in the long run,” he said of his involvement in the PACE program as a first-generation college student.

    “Also, by attending NECC I saved a lot on tuition, fees and traveling.”

    Buffum not only found his groove in school, where he was on the dean’s list each year, but the guidance he received through the PACE program helped hone his focus on a career in education.

    “It helped me really understand a lot of what it is to be a teacher,” he said.

    “I think you really have to have the heart and soul of being one.”

    Buffum said his instructors at NECC were “amazing and helpful,” and points to Donna Tanner, coordinator of the Educational Studies Program, as well as his work at the YMCA with kids of all ages.

    Now, he’s applying all of those skills toward his goal of becoming a teacher – preferably 11th grade history so he can help students during their crucial junior year as they map out their futures – and eventually move into guidance.

    “This fall, I’ll be at Salem State (University) for the 4+1 master’s program in education,” he said.

    As he reflects on his time at NECC, Buffum said he will “miss the connections with the teachers I had.”

    Perhaps one day, his own students will say the same about him.

    [ad_2]

    By Mike LaBella | Staff Writer

    Source link

  • Report Finds NASA’s Orion Capsule Sustained Heat Shield Damage

    Report Finds NASA’s Orion Capsule Sustained Heat Shield Damage

    [ad_1]

    Although NASA’s unmanned test flight of the Orion spacecraft in December 2022 was hailed as a triumph, the federal space agency found it had less to celebrate when they started examining the capsule, according to a recently released Office of the Inspector General report.

    The report, an audit assessing NASA’s readiness to undertake Artemis II, noted the capsule hadn’t held up well upon re-entry during the unmanned test flight. That flight was part of Artemis I, the first mission in a series planned to put boots on the lunar surface for the first time since Apollo 17 in 1972.

    For Artemis I, the uncrewed spacecraft was launched on November 16, 2022. It spent just over 25 days in orbit and swung around the moon twice before reentering our atmosphere and splashing down in the Pacific Ocean on December 11. NASA officials seemed brimming with confidence when they assured the public that we’d be seeing Artemis II, the Orion’s first manned spaceflight, by 2024.

    However, in January, that brisk timeline was ultimately adjusted when NASA representatives announced that Artemis II, the first manned Orion flight, would not be launched until September 2025 “at the earliest”, noting that the safety of the astronauts who will one day be aboard the vehicle is paramount.

    The delays – which also bumped Artemis III to September 2026 at the earliest, while Artemis IV remains scheduled for 2028 – were allowing space agency teams time for “troubleshooting a battery issue and addressing challenges with a circuitry component responsible for air ventilation and temperature control,” according to the NASA release.

    But there was one other reason tucked in there, almost an afterthought: the fact that NASA employees needed time to further investigate the “unexpected loss of char layer pieces to the spacecraft’s heatshield,” although it was expected the investigation would be wrapped up this spring.

    Despite how casually NASA reported this issue in January, now the OIG report has made it clear that the Orion’s heat shield problems are more than just a minor nuisance to be sorted out. (Considering faulty heatshields caused the 2003 Columbia shuttle disaster, it’s understandable that NASA isn’t eager to make a big deal about this, even though they are certainly working furiously to solve it.)

    So even though the Orion’s 2022 test looked fantastic, the report clarifies, in reality the Avcoat material that the heat shield is made of was worn away in more than 100 places by the time it splashed down in the Pacific. On top of that, while the ablative heat shield (aka the char layer) was intended to sort of melt, it ultimately broke off in chunks leaving a debris trail in its wake, a malfunction NASA scientists are still working to understand, according to the report.

    “The unexpected behavior of the Avcoat creates a risk that the heat shield may not sufficiently protect the capsule’s systems and crew from the extreme heat of reentry on future missions.”

    tweet this

    “The unexpected behavior of the Avcoat creates a risk that the heat shield may not sufficiently protect the capsule’s systems and crew from the extreme heat of reentry on future missions,” the report states.

    In a statement accompanying the report, Catherine Koerner, NASA associate administrator of exploration systems development, tried to strike a positive tone, noting that NASA scientists “successfully recreated char loss,” meaning they are closer to understanding what is causing it.

    However, the OIG report also drilled down on this statement, explaining that NASA ultimately “could not reproduce the exact material response or flight environment experienced during Artemis I.”

    Considering that Orion will heat up to 5,000 degrees Fahrenheit during reentry, the report underscored that the fact that the heat shield is breaking off in chunks could translate to a crew that will be unprotected from that heat or by the damage the shield could do to the capsule’s parachutes as it crumbles away.

    There were other issues that the OIG report highlighted. The Orion’s bolts melted and eroded (an issue that can only be resolved if the heat shield is addressed, according to the report). The spacecraft’s electrical system had some power distribution problems that NASA is addressing via software adjustments. Plus, the mobile launcher NASA used caused $26 million in damage, well over the $5 million NASA had allocated for cleaning up after Artemis I.

    All in all, the report had a clear message: “The Artemis I test flight revealed critical issues that need to be addressed before placing crew on the Artemis II mission,” it concluded.

    Back in January when NASA announced the delayed schedule, officials insisted they wouldn’t rush Artemis II or take any shortcuts regarding astronaut safety. Considering what can happen when you strap humans to the top of enormous rockets, fire them into space and then bring them plummeting back to earth like comets streaking through the sky, let’s hope they meant that.

    [ad_2]

    Dianna Wray

    Source link

  • One of these concept lunar vehicles could join NASA’s Artemis V astronauts on the moon

    One of these concept lunar vehicles could join NASA’s Artemis V astronauts on the moon

    [ad_1]

    Three companies are vying for the opportunity to send their own lunar vehicle to the moon to support NASA’s upcoming Artemis missions. The this week that it’s chosen Intuitive Machines, Lunar Outpost and Venturi Astrolab to develop their lunar terrain vehicles (LTV) in a feasibility study over the next year. After that, only one is expected to be selected for a demonstration mission, in which the vehicle will be completed and sent to the moon for performance and safety tests. NASA is planning to use the LTV starting with the Artemis V crew that’s projected to launch in early 2030.

    The LTV that eventually heads to the moon’s south pole needs to function as both a crewed and uncrewed vehicle, serving sometimes as a mode of transportation for astronauts and other times as a remotely operated explorer. NASA says it’ll contract the chosen vehicle for lunar services through 2039, with all the task orders relating to the LTV amounting to a potential value of up to $4.6 billion. The selected company will also be able to use its LTV for commercial activities in its down time.

    Lunar Outpost's Lunar Dawn LTV concept is pictured in a rendering showing it driving on the moon

    Lunar Outpost

    Venturi Astrolab's concept lunar terrain vehicle, Flex pictured alongside renderings of a solar powered rover and lander on the moonVenturi Astrolab's concept lunar terrain vehicle, Flex pictured alongside renderings of a solar powered rover and lander on the moon

    Astrolab

    Intuitive Machines, which will be developing an LTV called the Moon Racer, has already bagged multiple contracts with NASA as part of the Commercial Lunar Payload Services (CLPS) program, and , Odysseus, to the moon to achieve . Venturi Astrolab will be developing a vehicle it’s dubbed Flex, while Lunar Outpost will be working on an LTV called Lunar Dawn. All must be able to support a crew of two astronauts and withstand the extreme conditions of the lunar south pole.

    “We will use the LTV to travel to locations we might not otherwise be able to reach on foot, increasing our ability to explore and make new scientific discoveries,” said Jacob Bleacher, a chief exploration scientist at NASA.

    [ad_2]

    Cheyenne MacDonald

    Source link