ReportWire

Tag: arsenic

  • Chemical Safety, Cultivated Meat, and Our Health  | NutritionFacts.org

    More than 95 percent of human exposure to industrial pollutants like dioxins and PCBs comes from fish, other meat, and dairy.

    By cultivating muscle meat directly, without associated organs like intestines, the incidence of foodborne diseases “could be significantly reduced,” as could exposure to antibiotics, “pesticides, arsenic, dioxins, and hormones associated with conventional meat.” Currently, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration has approved seven hormone drugs to bulk up the production of milk and meat. “In the European Union, there exists a total ban on such use,” however. Even without injected hormones, though, animal products naturally have hormones because they come from animals. “Eggs, example given, contribute more to the dietary intake of estradiol [estrogens] than beef, whether the animal is legally treated with hormones or not.” After all, eggs come straight from a hen’s ovaries, so, of course, they’re swimming with hormones. But if you’re directly growing just muscle meat or egg white protein, you don’t need to include reproductive organs, adrenal glands, or any of the associated hormones.

    “Chemical safety is another concern for meat produced under current production systems.” There are chemical toxicants and industrial pollutants that build up in the food chain, such as pesticides, PCBs, heavy metals, and flame retardants, but there is no food chain with cultivated meat. We could produce all the tuna we wanted, with zero mercury.

    When the World Health Organization determined that processed meat was a known human carcinogen and unprocessed meat a probable human carcinogen, it wasn’t even talking about the carcinogenic environmental pollutants. When researchers tested retail meat for the presence of “33 chemicals with calculated carcinogenic potential,” like polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), organochlorine pesticides like DDT, and dioxin-like PCBs, they concluded that, in order to reduce the risk of cancer, we should limit beef, pork, or chicken consumption to a maximum of five servings a month.

    Why cultivate meat at all when you can just buy organic? Surprisingly, “consumption of organic meat does not diminish the carcinogenic potential associated with the intake of persistent organic pollutants (POPs).” A number of studies have recently compared the presence of environmental contaminants in organic meat versus conventional meat, and the researchers found, surprisingly, that organic meat was sometimes more contaminated. Not only organic beef either. Higher levels were also found in pork and poultry.

    If you look at the micropollutants and chemical residues in both organic and conventional meat, several environmental contaminants, including dioxins, PCBs, lead, and arsenic, were measured at significantly higher levels in the organic samples. As you can see below and at 2:56 in my video, The Human Health Effects of Cultivated Meat: Chemical Safety, the green is organic meat, and the blue is conventional. 

    Cooking helps to draw off some of the fat where the PCBs are concentrated, as shown here and at 3:01.

    Seafood seems to be an exception. Steaming, for example, generally increases contaminant levels, increasing contaminant exposure and concentrating mercury levels as much as 47 percent, as you can see here and at 3:15 in my video. Better not to have toxic buildup in the first place.

    More than 95 percent of human exposure to industrial pollutants like dioxins and PCBs comes from foods like meat, including fatty fish, and dairy, but the pollutants don’t appear magically. The only way the chicken, fish, and other meat lead to human exposure is because the animals themselves built up a lifetime of exposure in our polluted world, from incinerators, power plants, sewer sludge, and on and on, as you can see here and at 3:40 in my video.

    Unlike conventional meat production, a slaughter-free harvest would not only mean no more infected animals, but no more contaminated animals either. In terms of pollutants, it would be like taking a time machine back before the Industrial Revolution.

    Doctor’s Note:

    Cultivated meat means less contamination with fecal residues, toxic pollutants, antibiotics, and hormones; up to 99 percent less environmental impact; and zero pandemic risk. Cultivated meat allows people to have their meat and eat it, too, without affecting the rest of us.

    This is the final video in this cultivated meat series. If you missed the first two, check out the videos on Food Safety and Antibiotic Resistance.

    I previously did a video series on plant-based meats; see the related posts below.

    All videos in the plant-based meat series are also available in a digital download from a webinar I did. SeeThe Human Health Implications of Plant-Based and Cultivated Meat for Pandemic Prevention and Climate Mitigation.

    Michael Greger M.D. FACLM

    Source link

  • Detroit kept residents in the dark about hazardous contaminants at waterfront park

    Detroit kept residents in the dark about hazardous contaminants at waterfront park

    click to enlarge

    Steve Neavling

    A.B. Ford Park in Detroit has been closed off after contamination was found at the site.

    The city of Detroit knew about serious levels of contamination at a waterfront park on the east side but failed to alert residents or fence off the entire area until last month, Metro Times has learned.

    Soil testing at A.B. Ford Park in the Jefferson Chalmers neighborhood in 2022 and 2023 revealed excessive levels of arsenic, mercury, lead, barium, cadmium, copper, zinc, volatile organic compounds, and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, according to an environment assessment report made public on Tuesday, a month after the city received it.

    Contacting the soil is dangerous, according to the report.

    “This complete pathway is an unacceptable exposure and, therefore, response activities are required,” the report from Atlas Technical Consultants states.

    The city closed the park late last month to begin topping the contaminated ground with two feet of soil. The city also drew the ire of some residents with plans to remove more than 250 trees, some of which are more than 100 years old and are used by bald eagles.

    The testing was done ahead of planned park renovations that include walkways, a playground, basketball court, fitness and picnic areas, tennis and pickleball courts, a fishing node, beach, and waterfront plaza.

    click to enlarge A.B. Ford Park in the Jefferson Chalmers neighborhood is undergoing renovations. - Rendering via city of Detroit

    Rendering via city of Detroit

    A.B. Ford Park in the Jefferson Chalmers neighborhood is undergoing renovations.

    Now some residents are threatening to file a lawsuit against the city for allegedly exposing them to dangerous contaminants.

    Terry Swafford, who has taken his two children to the park almost every day before it closed last month, is calling on the city to offer free testing for residents who may have been exposed to contaminants.

    “We have all been exposed to toxins from the soil,” Swafford tells Metro Times. “It is unacceptable.”

    City officials are defending their handling of the contamination, saying the west side of the park was closed after toxins were found.

    “We followed the science every step of the way to make sure the public was protected at AB Ford Park,” Crystal Gilbert-Rogers, general manager for environmental affairs, told Metro Times in a statement. “The entire western half of the site has been fenced off to the public since February 2022 to allow for soil testing and demolition at the former Lenox center, as well as construction of the new community center.”

    Although the testing was confined to the western portion of the park, where the first renovations took place, environmental consultants emphasized in their report that the east side was likely just as contaminated.

    “It should be noted, based on soil-fill material grid sampling completed to date, the level, nature, and distribution of soil/fill material contamination within the eastern portion of the park are expected to be similar, if not identical, to the western portion of the park fully investigated in mid-2023,” consultants wrote in the Feb. 5 report.

    The eastern side of the park, which includes a soccer field, walking paths, and a fishing pier, stayed open for more than two more weeks after the report was received – and nearly two years after the first contamination was discovered on the western side of the park.

    Despite the contamination, an NFL Draft party was held next to the new recreation center in the park on Saturday, and food trucks, a bounce house, and games for children were set up in the parking lot. Although a chain-link fence was erected to keep people off the grass, clumps of dirt had breached the fence.

    Residents were informed in mid-February that contaminants were found, but the city declined to disclose any details until earlier this week.

    The level of contamination is serious enough to prompt the consultants to urge the city to notify workers of the contaminants and require them to wear gloves and clean any soil or dust from their boots and hands after leaving the park.

    “Construction workers may be exposed to hazardous substances found in soil and groundwater,” the consultants wrote.

    It’s unclear if workers were notified of the contamination when they demolished a building and constructed a solar-paneled recreation center last year.

    Residents are also worried about a large mound of dirt at the park’s entrance, which is across the street from homes, that was dumped there during previous renovations. Disrupted soil carries a significant risk of exposure.

    click to enlarge A large mound of dirt at the entrance of A.B. Ford Park. - Steve Neavling

    Steve Neavling

    A large mound of dirt at the entrance of A.B. Ford Park.

    The city defended the mound of dirt, saying it’s “entirely fenced off.”

    But Swafford counters that a chain-link fence cannot protect residents from airborne contamination. He’s not persuaded by the city’s insistence that residents were protected.

    “It’s complete bullshit,” Swafford says of the city’s explanation. “It’s insane. It’s truly Owellian. It’s divorced from reality altogether.”

    It’s unclear exactly what caused the contamination. The park used to be a Nike missile site in the 1950s. Those sites are notorious for leaving behind a toxic cocktail of contaminants, though it is not believed that any missiles were ever stored at the A.B. Ford Park site, which housed radar tracking towers and barracks for military personnel.

    The base of two radar towers are still jutting out of the ground at the park.

    click to enlarge The base of two radar towers from a former Nike site at A.B. Ford Park in Detroit. - Steve Neavling

    Steve Neavling

    The base of two radar towers from a former Nike site at A.B. Ford Park in Detroit.

    City officials believe at least some of the contamination is from soil that was dumped at the park decades ago.

    A Detroit City Council committee meets at 1 p.m. Thursday to consider approving the $9.6 million renovation plans. Some residents plan to speak out against the plans.

    The committee delayed action on the measure last week, saying it needed more time to hear from residents and gather more information.

    Steve Neavling

    Source link